Jules, I spoke with Clay concerning his two plan comments (below) on the Vitruvian Park Monument Sign project. We agreed to the following: 1. A RPZ and enclosure is required for the fountain make-up water. Since there are no fountain drawings showing this, Civil will reference the requirement and the fountain plans for the RPZ installation. Clay will direct Lynn to condition the permit on the installation of the RPZ. Make sure that submittals for the RPZ and RPZ enclosure are provided to Civil and Landscape for approval. Make sure that Landscape approves the proposed RPZ location prior to installation. 2. We discussed the need for inlet protection for the existing curb inlets in Marsh Lane and Vitruvian Way and agreed that if the on-site erosion control and grading are handled correctly, the need for inlet protection for the street curb inlets should not be needed. Installation of silt fence and inlet protection around the existing drop inlet, as shown on the erosion control plan, and the relocation of the existing drainage swale behind the monument sign, will directing surface water to the existing drop inlet and prevent the majority of surface runoff from impacting the perimeter silt fence and entering the street. However, if these measures are not handled correctly or if any sediment leaves the construction site, curb inlet protection will be required. The revised civil utility plan (C501) is attached and will be uploaded to Projectmates shortly. This should address all of Clay’s comments for this project. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Joel From: dalegregory@sprint.blackberry.net [mailto:dalegregory@sprint.blackberry.net] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 1:46 PM To: Joel Massey; Jules Roberts Cc: Kevin Nowell; Dale Gregory; Carlos Trevino; mbush@greenscapepump.com Subject: Re: VP Monument Sign Fees Correct..... Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect ________________________________ From: "Joel Massey" Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:36:50 -0500 To: Jules Roberts Cc: Kevin Nowell; Dale Gregory; Carlos Trevino Subject: RE: VP Monument Sign Fees Jules, It was our plan that the RPZ and enclosure be shown on the fountain plans because that is why it is required. This RPZ is in addition to backflow prevention for the irrigation system. Is this the understanding of Metheny? Please confirm. I will follow up with Clay this afternoon and he will probably insist that I reference the fountain RPZ on the civil utility plan. I will let you know. Joel A. Massey Project Manager icon Consulting Engineers, Inc. Bicentennial Financial Center 250 W. Southlake Blvd., Suite 117 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 552-6210 Fax: (817) 552-3126 Mobile: (817) 229-7944 jmassey@icon-engineers.com From: Jules Roberts [mailto:JDRoberts@udr.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:36 AM To: Joel Massey; Kevin Nowell; Dale Gregory; Carlos Trevino Subject: Fwd: VP Monument Sign Fees Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Lynn Chandler Date: October 8, 2010 9:54:07 AM CDT To: "'JDRoberts@udr.com'" Subject: FW: VP Monument Sign Fees Jules, Clay Barnett’s comments are listed below. He would like for these issues to be resolved with him before I issue the permit. You can contact him at 972-450-2857. Lynn From: Clay Barnett Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 9:46 AM To: Lynn Chandler Cc: Carmen Moran; Deiadra Burns; 'Jules Roberts'; Tom Lamberth Subject: RE: VP Monument Sign Fees Lynn, I have reviewed the fountain drawings and have two comments: 1. An RPZ is required on the water service for the fountain 2. Add inlet protection to the inlet on Marsh and the inlet on Vitruvian Way. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Clay Barnett, P.E. Town Engineer Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001-2818 Office: (972) 450-2857