John,

 

I do not see any problems with that language.

 

Thanks,

Clay Barnett, P.E.

Town Engineer

Town of Addison

16801 Westgrove Drive

Addison, TX 75001-2818

Office: (972) 450-2857

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ext_mail John Hill 
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 12:34 PM
To: Clay Barnett
Cc: Nancy Cline
Subject: AT&T Easement

 

*****************************************************************************

IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message contains information

from the law firm of Cowles & Thompson, P.C. which may be

privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable

law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the

employee, or agent responsible  for delivering the message to the

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us

immediately at our telephone number

                             (214) 672-2000

******************************************************************************

 

 

Clay, in connection with the proposed AT&T easement for the Vitruvian site, AT&T has requested that the easement include language that will allow AT&T the “right to drain or sheet flow
storm water runoff from the Easement onto the Property and/or into existing and future storm water collection and drainage facilities located within the Property.”  The “Property” is
defined a only the 5 foot subsurface easement and the 10’ X 20’ above ground easement (see attached diagram).

 

Is that language acceptable?  If so, it seems that it should state something to the effect that “as long as such drainage or sheet flow is in compliance with all laws, ordinances, codes,
rules and regulations of the Town of Addison, Texas and any other governmental entity, agency or authority having jurisdiction, with such use and compliance to be the sole responsibility
of Grantee and at Grantee’s sole cost and expense.”

 

Thanks.

 

John