Response to RFI No. 13 As of 26-Jun-2009 3:53 PM CT Vitruvian Infrastructure Phase 1B 4010 Marsh Lane Addison, Texas 75001 Project Number: 1308B Status: Outstanding Overdue Subject Asphalt Connector road (permanent) Reason Code None Question The permanent asphalt connector road as shown on sheet 7 of the phasing plan and sheet 24 of the paving plan shows to have 6" of lime stabilized under 4" of flexible base. With this being such a small area (298 SY), could we use flexible base in lou of lime stabilized if proctors and densities are taken? Please advise if this would be acceptable for this particular asphalt connector road. Proposed Solution NTC proposed to use flexible base in lou of lime stabilized for the asphalt connector road by the Garden Oak Apartments. Attached Files (none) Section: 2 - Sitework Int. Tracking #: Days Elapsed: 4 From: Andrew Rolph Originated: 22-Jun-2009 4:52 PM CT To: Jennifer Haynes, PE (First Recipient) Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT (Original 25-Jun-2009 4:43 PM CT) Copy to: Andy Nord Joel Massey Nick Jacob Jennifer Haynes, PE Wade Geistweidt Bruce Dunne Craig Benkdorfen Clay Barnett Additional Info Proposed Solution Impact Critical Path? No Cost Change: None Time Change: None Discipline Code: Civil Drawing Numbers: 24 Needs Drawing Change? No History (Chronological Order) Type Routed Billable n/a Memo Attached Files (none) From: Jennifer Haynes, PE Sent: 23-Jun-2009 8:22 AM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 4:43 PM CT Copy to: Andrew Rolph Andy Nord Nick Jacob Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo We have no problem with the substitution of a minimum additional 4" of Flexible Base for the 6" lime stabilized subgrade designated for the 298 SY connector road south of Ponte Ave Station 18+50. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 25-Jun-2009 4:02 PM CT To: Jennifer Haynes, PE Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Andrew Rolph Andy Nord Nick Jacob Jennifer Haynes, PE Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo I think just omitting the lime stabilization is this area is sufficient. We do need to include reducing the quantity of lime stabilization in the change order by this area (298 sy). Attached Files (none) From: Clay Barnett Sent: 26-Jun-2009 2:07 PM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Andrew Rolph Andy Nord Joel Massey Nick Jacob Jennifer Haynes, PE Wade Geistweidt Bruce Dunne Type Response Billable n/a Memo I disagree. That small connector road in on private property and may be there for some time. We do not want to reduce the quality of the section just for convenience. The cost of substituting 4" of flexible base for the lime stabilization is very small and is more convenient. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 26-Jun-2009 2:30 PM CT To: Clay Barnett Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Andrew Rolph Andy Nord Joel Massey Nick Jacob Jennifer Haynes, PE Wade Geistweidt Bruce Dunne Type Response Billable n/a Memo Please get it in the change order. Attached Files (none) From: Clay Barnett Sent: 26-Jun-2009 3:48 PM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Type Response Billable n/a Memo What do you want in the change order? Remove the lime and add the additional flex base or just remove the lime? Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 26-Jun-2009 3:53 PM CT To: Clay Barnett Requested By: 25-Jun-2009 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Final Response (Closing) This item is still open. No final response to display. .................................................................................. Copyright (c) 1999-2009, Systemates, Inc. View the User Agreement for legal restrictions and terms of use applicable to this site. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use specified in the User Agreement. Projectmates - Blueprint for e-Management