SEE MY COMMENTS

 

From: Victor Lissiak III [mailto:vl3@vtinc.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Eric T. Little; rdj@kevinsloanstudio.com
Cc: Joel Massey; Nick Jacob; wgeistweidt@kleinfelder.com; Jennifer Haynes; Clay Barnett; chad@ntexcon.com
Subject: RE: Vit Park Issues

 

Team,

See our comments below.  

 

Victor Lissiak III, M.S.C.E., E.I.T.

Viewtech Inc

ph: 972-661-8187

fax: 972-661-8172

cell: 972-740-7002

vl3@vtinc.net

 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This communication may contain
protected or privileged material and should only be viewed by the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient(s), be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. 

 

From: Eric T. Little [mailto:ELittle@udr.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:33 AM
To: rdj@kevinsloanstudio.com; Victor Lissiak III
Cc: Joel Massey; Nick Jacob; 'wgeistweidt@kleinfelder.com'; Jennifer Haynes; Clay Barnett; 'chad@ntexcon.com'
Subject: Vit Park Issues

 

We have a few issues we need to discuss at tomorrow’s meeting. I need both VIII and Robyn to attend if possible.

 

1.       Steps Under Ponte – The structural drawings do not match the landscape plans. SP303 shows the steps to be 2-7X1-0 and the L4-34 shows them at 3-0X1-0. The concrete was poured
per SP303, but the stone was ordered per L4-34. We need to discuss a new pattern for the stone here that works with the SP303 drawings. -We cannot determine how the discrepancy occurred.
 We will provide any input necessary to resolve the issue.  I BELIEVE EVERYONE IS GOOD TO GO WITH THIS AS IS.

2.       Wildlife Observation Decking – L5-01 indicates that the decking pattern is not to be installed in line with the steel framing below. To be honest, I am unsure of what the pattern
for the decking is supposed to be. I believe that it would be better if it lined up with the steel framing that it sets on. We need to review and discuss. -The decking should span perpendicular
to the C4x5.4 joists. ROTATING THE PATTERN 90DEG WAS APPROVED.

3.       The railing mock up welding has been redone and needs to be reviewed tomorrow for approval. DID NOT GET A YEAH OR NEAH FROM KSS ON THIS.

4.       RFI 64 – We need an answer on this ASAP. DONE

5.        We started drilling the piers for the switch back ramp on the north bank on Ponte and it appears that some of the piers are right in the middle of the duct bank feeding Savoye
2 (see SP315 attached). PENDING VIEWTECH – WE ARE HITTING SAVOYE 2 FOUNDATION, DUCT BANK AND THE SANITARY INSTALLED DURING 1A ON THE UPPER 3 ROWS OF PIERS…..

6.       Olden has stated that the soil on the north bank at Ponte is unsuitable for soil nail walls. We dug a test pit and Kleinfelder has observed and indicated that they agree. We
are waiting on the report for this now. That being said, we might need to change this section of wall to cast-in-place, either matching the walls under the bridge (spread footer) or
the walls south of the bridge (pier supported). See SP204 attached. -We will provide the required wall details WE NEED TO CHANGE THIS WALL TO MATCH THE WALLS UNDER THE BRIDGE (SEE DRAWING
FOR LOCATION)

 

Thanks,

 

Eric