John,

 

Thank you.  I discussed the insurance with Randy and he thinks the items referenced are appropriate and we do not need to be additional insured with workers comp.

 

Thank you,

Nancy

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ext_mail John Hill 
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:37 PM
To: Nancy Cline
Cc: Lea Dunn; Clay Barnett
Subject: Halff Associates

 

***************************************************************************** 
IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message contains information 
from the law firm of Cowles & Thompson, P.C. which may be 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the 
employee, or agent responsible  for delivering the message to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately at our telephone number 
                             (214) 672-2000 
****************************************************************************** 

 

Nancy, based on our discussion this afternoon, attached please find a revised red-lined copy of the proposed agreement with Halff Associates, Inc.  The “base” version of this document
is a clean copy of the document that you forwarded to me from Halff.

 

One of the items we discussed was the ownership of the plans the Halff prepares (Article V).  The attorney for Halff, Dan Tanksley, had revised the document to provide that the Town
would receive a license for the plans, would have the right to use them, but would not own them.  In a telephone conversation this afternoon, I mentioned to Dan that the Town wants ownership
of the plans, and the language has been revised as had been originally proposed.

 

Regarding the indemnity provision, I have asked David Metzler with our office to review the indemnity clause changes, and am waiting for his comments, which I hope to have asap (so there
may be other changes to that provision).

 

As I mentioned earlier, the insurance provisions need to be reviewed by Randy Moravec’s office.  For example, there is a provision that the Town be named as an additional insured with
respect to general liability and automobile liability; but could the Town also be named as an additional insured on the employers liability insurance?

 

Please review the description of the services being provided (Article II) to determine if they are sufficient.

 

Thanks.

 

John