I would prefer the P209. The chip seal has not worked well for us. We can maintain the 209 with equipment we have. Dave Foster Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from AT&T ________________________________ From: McAnally, Mitchell, R Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 6:53 PM To: 'david.freeman@faa.gov' ; Dave Cc: McIllwain, Frank O. ; joe.mcanally@addisonairport.net ; joel.jenkinson@addisonairport.net ; Clay Barnett ; Farmer, Eric, C ; LeMay, Matthew, C Subject: ADS Runway Improvements MALSR Access Road David Freeman / Dave Foster: Part of the elevated MALSR change order is to install an access road that leads up to the station 10+00 light bars and to the new MALSR shelter location. I have attached an exhibit of the proposed changes. The typical section from the FAA standard detail shows an 8 inch P-209 on top of a compacted subgrade for a maintenance area access road. During the RSA grading project a chip seal was placed on the MALSR / Localizer access road. Do either one of you prefer the 8 inch P-209 or a typical section that matches the existing access road? Let me know as soon as possible to help process Change Order #3. If you have any questions just let me know. Thanks, Mitchell McAnally Project Engineer Office: 972-377-7480 Direct: 972-377-7480 E-mail: MRMcAnally@GarverUSA.com ________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies.