>> Leave comment << Response to RFI No. 3 As of 3-May-2011 1:54 PM CT Vitruvian Infrastructure Phase 2A - Bella Lane 3900 Vitruvian Way Addison, Texas 75001 Project Number: 1308 - 2A Status: Outstanding Overdue Subject Existing Grade Conditions Reason Code None Question From CPS Civil (accidently loaded as a submittal): "See attached existing conditions survey and cut and fill comparison. I am sending this for information only. Although the total excavation required esceeds the plan quantity in the bid the net non fluff export is rteduced so as far as CPS Civil goes there is no cost ramification due to the variance in grade from the plans and the existing conditions. Please confirm" Proposed Solution Attached Files cut_fill_takeoff_actual_existing_conditions.xls existing_conditions_per_survey.pdf Section: 2 - Sitework Int. Tracking #: Days Elapsed: 13 From: Eric Little Originated: 20-Apr-2011 8:07 AM CT To: Eric Little (First Recipient) Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT (Original 27-Apr-2011 8:05 AM CT) Copy to: Lauren Williams Nick Jacob Robert Farrow Additional Info Proposed Solution Impact Critical Path? N/A Cost Change: None Time Change: None Discipline Code: N/A Drawing Numbers: Needs Drawing Change? No History (Chronological Order) Type Routed Billable n/a Memo Please review. Attached Files (none) From: Eric Little Sent: 20-Apr-2011 8:08 AM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 8:05 AM CT Copy to: Lauren Williams Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo The elevations indicated on the "existing conditions per survey.pdf" exhibit provided are an average of 0.30' LOWER than the elevations that we surveyed on 4/12/11. Please have the contractor send us the Bench Mark information that was used for this Hudson Site Control survey exhibit. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 21-Apr-2011 9:34 AM CT To: Eric Little Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Lauren Williams Joel Massey Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Routed Billable n/a Memo Please provide the information requested. Attached Files (none) From: Eric Little Sent: 26-Apr-2011 8:56 AM CT To: Lauren Williams Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo The elevations are based on the BMs called on sheet 2 of the phase 2 plans- which are the same BMs for phase 1. Hudson Site came from BM1 and checked into BM2. The elevations on the "existing conditions survey"pdf are from the ROW stakes that Hudson Site Survey set at 100' intervals, roughly. They are not for the boc, so they are not sure what the grades are being compared to. Attached Files (none) From: Lauren Williams Sent: 27-Apr-2011 9:36 AM CT To: Eric Little Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Scott Hale Robert Farrow Type Response Billable n/a Memo Since there are discrepancies, we need to confirm the survey datum. Please send us a CAD file of the Hudson survey information. We will forward a CAD file of our survey work back to you for comparison. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 27-Apr-2011 9:48 AM CT To: Lauren Williams Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Lauren Williams Joel Massey Eric Little Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo The CAD files used by Hudson Site Survey were the origional CAD files from the engineer, since they had to sign a waiver for them to be released. The grades that were written on the ROW stakes were to the existing grade and not any proposed grades. See attached CAD files used for comparison. Attached Files VP_PH2_CAD.zip From: Lauren Williams Sent: 27-Apr-2011 10:29 AM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Scott Hale Robert Farrow Type Response Billable n/a Memo The files that you sent are the exact files that we provided you. I do not need those, I have them. The bench mark data shown on the plans is over on Marsh Lane (2500 feet away). A bench loop should have been run from them to the site. I am asking for the descriptions and elevations of the local bench marks the surveyor is using for construction staking. We must be on the same page for the survey work or everything you install may affect the adjacent future development. I need a file from your surveyor that contains x,y,z (or n,e,el) coordinates and the local bench mark data they used to put the stake in the ground and determine the elevation. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 27-Apr-2011 10:46 AM CT To: Lauren Williams Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo Lauren, Here is our ROW layout (not sure why you would need it, as there are no elevations on it - proposed or otherwise). As for the previous statement of running a level loop to the site : a level loop was run from the called BM to the site (Vitruvian Park) and then back to the BM for a check. The crew checked in .01'. From that loop elevation was established on control points and from those control points we took an elevation with our GPS unit. Our elevations are based from the called BMs (we checked into both during our level loop). There are 3 control points near the Bella Lane site: #9000 - PK nail N: 9241.96 E: 12072.14 ELV: 569.73 #9001 - Hub/Tack N: 9047.72 E: 12135.91 ELV: 570.18 #9002 - Hub/Tack N: 9026.87 E: 12255.88 ELV: 569.15 Let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Thanks, John Attached Files (none) From: Lauren Williams Sent: 27-Apr-2011 2:16 PM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Scott Hale Robert Farrow Type Response Billable n/a Memo see attachment: ROW layout from Hudson Site Control Attached Files 04 14 11 Vitruvian Park PH 2 Control & ROW Holly.dwg From: Lauren Williams Sent: 27-Apr-2011 2:18 PM CT To: Lauren Williams Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Scott Hale Robert Farrow Type Response Billable n/a Memo We have completed the field verification of the project bench mark data and the Hudson bench mark data. The project bench mark data has been verified as correct and the three Hudson points that you provided are incorrect (see below). Please make the necessary survey control adjustments. #9000 - PK nail N: 9241.96 E: 12072.14 ELV: 569.73 Actual Elev: 569.96 #9001 - Hub/Tack N: 9047.72 E: 12135.91 ELV: 570.18 Actual Elev: 570.47 #9002 - Hub/Tack N: 9026.87 E: 12255.88 ELV: 569.15 Actual Elev: 569.43 Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 2-May-2011 8:53 AM CT To: Lauren Williams Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Joel Massey Eric Little Nick Jacob Scott Hale Robert Farrow Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Type Response Billable n/a Memo We have revised our cut fill calculations based on the corrected bench marks. The total amount of dirt moved was reduced slightly to 2604 cy but the excess materials generated increased to 2084 cy. As stated previously if materials is going to be placed on site we are in agreement to make this a no cost change. If we are to haul off site then we need to revise our pricing to reflect the increased quantity. Please let me know. Attached Files hudson ex conditions 2.pdf cut fill takeoff actual existing conditions 2.xls From: Robert Farrow Sent: 3-May-2011 1:37 PM CT To: Joel Massey Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Lauren Williams Joel Massey Eric Little Scott Hale Type Response Billable n/a Memo These revised cut and excess material numbers are close to our previous calculations. I believe our plan will be to provided you with a placement grading plan for the excess material. Eric Little will provide the direction. Attached Files (none) From: Joel Massey Sent: 3-May-2011 1:54 PM CT To: Robert Farrow Requested By: 27-Apr-2011 12:00 AM CT Copy to: Lauren Williams Joel Massey Eric Little Nick Jacob Scott Hale Bruce Dunne Clay Barnett Final Response (Closing) This item is still open. No final response to display. .................................................................................. Copyright (c) 1999-2011, Systemates, Inc. View the User Agreement for legal restrictions and terms of use applicable to this site. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use specified in the User Agreement. Projectmates - The Capital Project Management Software 瑁끘ォ雭₰¸ば퉳띏꾟﹏퀯꺪墟孶뺀�壹ᾰ近澿翀麦᳍㔷攥邪聣獀灳鱐灀ꧻ㵀珀⿎濠鿋뿒쿓퓝㋒⛕迦鿗鴨꬀ﺠ󚐿�쉜쎏쒟얯뾿쿆�웢⁦醩鵮ｐ₸ꃣ郈�￥信쿍뭯밟ﴯ�／༃�㿢俣⫯갯姗ȁ烑אּ熷ࠐ﨡鵢搐'偰僼ₖ₸沾녯ꂑ✑낲鹤В嬉놲뉤肠聀հﮐဆ띳Րি뽟켕焋巺�ꥷ罠㼺鼙俐忑࿪뿧返墳酆涀ꂗἢ￪꿘뿙⇿Ưɟ⩯᭏۟烟ﱐ罀℈꼝뼞弚缢輣೩鉊롯†ࡍ敱㍹﾿輪鼫꼬뼭＄꼼⼝ㇿ὿⁏㹟㓏㔟퐯䟌＠ꊜ㽅�Ｇ༩콄輺 鼻䷿⹯䁟䄏借䕏䛯著ⴲ怷⵹〲肧₠㨸㌵큥驍ﻀ啔䨏䴏亯便像㻟Ｏ⿯�俱⼖㼗优㽞ἳ凿刟匯朿䉯䏟淯啟὇㗕潔�꽚ｊཌ濿梿岯嵟硯椿⿯く㽟彬罼輳⽱ｖ䓕慌痶ꂙ邔靗ꭰ鞀홐ｿ齹꽺뽻콼འﾋ佫聿涏湯譿螏葿퐿劽斸畱傟邩ზ鹂￡龔㾈�￿供徜澝盿瞯䶼誟譏豟絯统￯ᾐ⾑㪒澰뾓ྙ�⾅㉀ⴷ灁塲ㆴ㋼်奰饟骏ꆟ걥ﾏ뾣쾤쾷�罠轡齢揿撯斿꫏묯舏ꞟ輯罪꯵뾩侒㾭ᆸ냔⁹⃶딺ꅯ쫏鹯ｿ辟翐近鿒羸边龺꾻볿躿쟏ࣿ⑀ᆐထའ￈࿊鿙�䵉⁇栬�㶰牳 挆ꀈ냚灴⼺逯摵⹲Ⴒ橯醖洒䇷⹳Þ⽭�蘯獠虯ᅐ誀朰燦楰끸　朮晩臵눑㵥奯ཀ쿺괹暁˜ݦ䂘䡻偙쁅䱒义⁋࿤ῥ∿絽燪ɲ尠晣就꽵䀷郰￟䖏휱扁⫃峲킆敮쿙迏뷿뻟࿯ራᅽၯ࿉ᇿ缄漓缔￴观䘈䃝郭ﹲ蚁飐ीŏ꡿꥟㵣䂘ཹჰ닄炰幸л՟㝤긟㗖㋀｡⾉俗忘�＇༉⌏䖀楲⁣楌惬ᇿரటയ฿刺뼏￟༂ἃ⼄／༑ἒട亚〔੫澐ᑢￏ�７�Ａ༣ᘩ另Þ惬䠠䃝뼔㼦⟿⡏ᡟ᫿ᬏᰟᴯḿ�Ｈ༪Ἣ⼬ู╒ﴐ瀮㍆眐�Ｐ㈿㤏㫯㳿 㴏䌟䉖쉲⁀畄㾢ﾟ꽀뽁콂㼳伴張漶缷㢿䎏䑯䕿䚏原䎋倀췽䊰⁎ꃴ惬⽉㽊佋䳿呟輿囄坟嵯풟픏缟｛ཝ轍齎꽏➏Ｐf닺㿏齤ㆯ솏ͦ샿檯漿殟氏洟港＿齰꽱뽲콳�绲䅸곳秿돏憘꿠随떿ꌾＡ屐란꾴꾄侁侃羆薿硯秏﫟ﵨ冻咥닺䋮ᏽ䟻Ｕ缯羍齐䗝ꁟ剦�儭﾿콒ﾔ⿡꽔엽悩ﾛ쬟궏뎏蝯芯累祔烾ᵉ⾴㾵ᾣ彥潦ꮟ�鴏嗟㞖꾛徠ᾤ⾥ﲈ炠૿든ꣿ깯鷿걟귏柟ￏ�꾕뾖쾗㯝龳꾴믿닏鼟윿ꄏꉟ챯딿龥ꖦ楂⃻닺⿏꧿ꩿ캏벿뻿휏꽿�蜏翉޳ 隙浥桰쀊骿쮰�쿯탟觯湇큚풿����뽯？⿀㿁係心濄뾘쾙�좏�쪯쳟춯﮿휏濢翣랂�激῾忦헿혯﴿گ࠿﾿濸뿞쿟迺忿࿤⳱烱뀃轗ຠ皠ꂏ爨癥ჵ便漰腑⹵晰釒삑烴䀖틣°猲戠⃴툕ₔ啿运⺠㽀0ᔑ㻑滀挐⁨殐⹳׿绘ཟᐇ턔⼏섋ᡔ왁ఐᚐš䢐⻠潰​䂒ǟᖐ縷ᔠ摱酈ヹ猶燲쀊奬옠‐稶揱⁙ᙢᡑ꘲澠ꁈヴ愙釴ᝰ枀᧟鄠六鈰捐耕댗▍〲텢뀥‮ᝁ简灟쌧ᕰᚂ␀妠椠௯☠✐潠冒∥쀾⫿툀⒰ᡢก辐辰ﾠ郭ꂏᆔ胰耕 瀎’Ħ┫᥀歰ᄢ⭨憑縠╮ᡀ彰酰ເ銠敠⧽䥐​甭ㄥꀎဗ௿ⴠᠣ鐱ⴠ䥱⠀ᖄ뎄ဪ捩耕彦 ⌘ᠨ畱䀰　聟᥿ᯇᲟᶯế῏⃟僯徻ហ₱ꁟ愣ꂏ⽫ﺠ㙷㞟㢯㦿㫏㯟䇯＿㗷頊뿭ὂﾊ�䯱佄䗿扟揟姯矏ਟଯﾛݓ翭ｇ鿯꿰뿱쿲テ䓿倿౿勵岟ﯟﲿ㿏ར㼑⹉낔￿ꖦ瑁忟ᦀᕀϑ笰獰佊Ͽӟ擯ޏࠏ渟勏熟｟佟漍缎潡㽲뽭�ｕ蹿醯惌釀仃Ⲡ纠拆釿繣迳胋鉈鏏磟奿￪״齷뾄併㎐�ͣ⼝梀넴恳灴䀺⼯摵⹲ဪṯ桪☑᧒ᢰ浰倯赍⿹퀒뀭嘯蕷ɪ瀠䄿♣Ɓኧ伽䕐♎⭆ 傀뀬❄漡☱摺耾鉮繐銐め汀㶀䔷䔹㌰䐂䌵䕄䈱䌈䄷傔䘳䕁㘀ㅁ㜲ㅂ⡆㍅鈷喐낸䥲鎹㐠ᄷ酀櫀丑逢鄇鑠鎑䛰㌱㜸䐀㠷䔸䄲݆聗ꂗ㡃㘱萶ㄹ傳䌷㔶䁎㉈㌸悔䔳䥄瀥あ큯ㅃꂕꨶ鐱ㅠ낓鐴䑰나阑㢑㈲ゕ㤲罂㲊耖劈퀴녾⃵ѻ奈邑䱒义﹋贠踯輿遏酟鉯鍿ﾏ龔꾕뾖쾗�ﾚজ紖䅋ᆞ⑲璠捜晘就鄱ࢋ齨现ᢷᢠ湡〣䐗鼲뻠啤窠ᩯ滸汏懋嵬濿烟ᯯ簏坟蕏號詯￯辈龉྾뾋쾌ﾠྡྷꏿꐟꔯ꘿ꝏꡟꥯꩿຎꭃ徐귀㠀䍁荁醪㌵䈴괲䬀탐끟鬶㦳걁䐠㢬터ꮀむ烊츶쨵 튠쭐㦠け邭㔦ガ䙂჋㐵䇺L팷톀고◰쾀鸞ꃐ䉄탔烎꾜뾝쾞쓿얟욯잿죏짟쫯쳿／῍⿎㿏俐忑濒翓返헿꺛꿏ᛚ뽇⾠㄀Ⳃ纠㙴ᘠᎰ⬑뇢砻⟿덀덿쉏딟뙯띿뢏ﾟ꾹뾺脥ᇵ꽭濲旿徱凑勵塏벏娟宯陶 ♮ˡ⤰솠／濼佞羿潠꼅뽍콎꼊ද禿珏ࣟ生矿／㼊⼑㽺佻࿸汽ﾀ薀翿繎艍药᝿ğᘭ㾯ἣ卆༘缤阈焾慲䓿☯拯擿樏晿朩槿�涰⼺歟江浯ｿ鼎꼏輷Ἡἔ釀选ᕿ⩱⳿✏⾯ハ棟㊓梱勶扯肀䃭ﶠ냙䅷㐏㜿㣟㧯㯿／伒Ὂ缪켾鼬꼭㽌潁䋧桿咜源㍴䘏㔯Ｏ㼶 ὒ�뽚輻彍潎崏原吿䍏㎹䴭ࡡ⵹갲㇀ㄠ脺郡倠⁍呃罢埿孿尟崯帿䭏ᯏＯ鿾缣輤鼥꽫潀轞齟惿璯僟兏穟描呏㊏ﱕ潔佖Ὠ潘罙⽽ὶ槿櫏藟瞯㱟㶟禯觏俯�齾潤搲潊傽祥侐澂ᾇ⾈觿訿浏馏砿軏稏篯࿿徛꾐뾑敒畱��࠰䋰腹锿荏｝＋།㾨侩循�䂛雿靿颏馟讯豟鵯鹟ｯ禟탮냙ï㾠⾸徢澣䌳ⴰ�暠㈥鷺쀝䄠�뎮뾹藿끟뇯쓿髿洏滯烿／ά⽲㽳德㿈ྐ徴檵ɿ뛻퇯鼟멿앯ㅁ烐秾ꃭ₁鿂ﾮ鿗꾫뾬���엏욯잿죏짟￯ﾛ⿕⇯愂냺⿖㿗�䤏䝍栠譥䀂 昽獠捲瀂瓠㩰⼯摵犤뼮潀ꍪ淁鄄獄洰倯৲눯ꕲ潠榡惲朢ꇳ楰쉸⸐豧晩턂ȟ㵥ᴳ�槜놺쉦昲⃂"쌁箰奈䕐䱒䧰䭎顯索슡爠쵳쀐捜ㅦ畜킓샽딯ㅅ燤큢屚쀄滼０�쮿찏？笜촟뼞ᤞ伝吞뼠켡ʟ켯ᖹ햖婢狀﩮羱郕냃鼖꼎辵鎶냃轹ဝ샪ᐞ硰ᄻᦏ鐒慌僼ၖ圠ꅩ慩獭糀촵﹢陡ᎏᐏᔟᘯ＿錜꾓９༛ᬜ伅弆췿༯ၟᅯ᱿ᵿẏᾟꆯ鬬牅捩耗數ﾐꀯ㼢伣弤漥伭弮漯゛㙿厖ル郹䠠胕㋿㎯㒿㗏⛟❯⡿㞏︺�㻡ߐ�㙯볏㡡！팾�གྷ潈�ｅ 䟿䤏䩯䭿䲏䶟ﾯ冮１�酒！죀胠뾼滂냿遑夾솥巟婿搟峭缟佟㽞齑꽒頇딪�ੂृࠔ㕷伌弍壟星⥏햯㦅晐巪⫿⯏淟㝟੯뛵玐羿콴뿘뾺鿀罠ｚﹹ㱰셍쉟�笟㻯㼯鼿澄弃㿨꽶ᚶ㔷쯶秿簯緯鋿ꗌ绐⋀＀쾍㾁쾇⽶龅꾆齀꽁僿溿潿炏豫赯鑿ﾟླྀ�⽺㽻ྥ龎潾뻽䊕ᄘﾧ뾒侂徃ꟿ閏雏냟衏늯ꋟ譏晲浥桰聳�뗯ꢿꦯ邿溗瀽辺돿뒏몟넟눯霿飯髿／ᾛ⾜㾝轱齲꽳忂㾡뛿ꍿ칟ꖯꙿ펏믟밿坿롍澐⾿ﾭྯ훿썿쑯�쇿톏뜿�龸忓뿚⿘�≠⨀ﰠ瘐 㡥捀㥵湡䀸燼⁳盛㊢촐⁀置戠恪와ࡠ民黁⃠ﲽ⁁ヺǭ䃼䃮쵣｀热쁬˙㻔腣迣釤䧾 쇍íဈ䏰쁬㣿ॠ拓㤐㣀繀ﱹੀ㣑쮐ढ洰ᝳ㯐柰ࡲࢀ昤૿㇯ｴ㗶ᏹꀈ郰峺忛濜핑☁扮瀉圻✙懾ね꿨뿟쿠ﯣ엿웏쟟죯쫿쬏찟￟＆俐俥濒缑返鿕꼖�꫏䇥瀲郷ꃬ䀸û㧀獐鼙开꿜뿝⼙ӿׯ⋿ࡏ␟Ꮯｏ༖뼥깣輚㿫形鼞ꌟ⣤᭮旐∩⎏쒟￯༊Ἃ⼌㼍伎式忌濍⯿Ɀ㪏ᒯᕟ䁯ȏ̏？漢꼴輤轀꼦꽊罂�⫿䷯䬏↏䲎㝖板桿ﺌ橢伳䌰檠醓殐 Ｃ镘굃潬罭�刹傿减揟䆎乏㌪睠⃸烾｠꼗뼘漱Ἧ䛲䃶㩭彩㼲＠棿䣯䦟熯掏丟䌟䍑羐煏､ས꽡콩�䲐鉊湯⃀㵍旡筹／㽮�ｳཱུ佌ﾃ罤磿曏枟蚯笟籯᱿踜ｰ཭ྀ⽯㽰ﾋ뾁쾂铿疟螏蠿靏赿踟〯҉ⴳ끾⵹〲‱‱㨱尵傠䌠鱔酟鑟雿霏？⾘羅缶⽕鼸罝轞齟ꗿ窏顯饯驿꺏調謯꾴⾝澎⛬遯ꄯ鋿ｏ従ྷﾯ꾣뾤辿㾱齶睿뎯쎯竏룟鹿汏剤澶⇯郭ꥆ着⿊볿쁏싿쌏쐟ꜯ퍯눿羯쾴�忕迊鿋ᰜ㡒煥㺰乐䋀ｹΆ俏企὆⽇忢濣翤뷿뻟铮퇯퉿펏얟옯＿俗忘櫙䃶 惸㿚⿲��は㊉ⴷ﵁짠֠㨲쁗䄠쾠�뾿퓿／쾧�ﾪྫྷᾭ忱㼂짿㱪௯�ꍯ䇿䀰祰㴠㩰鿼ᇿឿ᢯ᦿￏﾯ뼀켁�ￕ⼏뀽奿㰁坡Ⴐᄯ‿ዏ䤏䵠⁇敨䀼ㄽ䂠牳佣ℰ瓠聰⼺甯牤冷鑀橯쇝㹭玑┮䠰⽭ⱐ⼉�潠畖+ꄭⱩ杠ꄭ葰硩ჼ朮晩턼奱攂㌽㭗椖뇴㭦˼㈣ﱦ尠㸀篠H偙剅䥌䭎„㼫伬弭漮索፽ꄱ⃼獲ဇ捜硦就繵㞐⟀ㅅẕ扱娊㵜渐⍥０Ἱ＠뼖༅ἆ策쵙뽘壿圙塏婔宿㳏य侹耏쀴湲넴耤烟齐䣯�祰ၗ遊ᑘ櫓烠㭸轋鑌慌㘣轐⃰楗 慩淔侀㕼戇큡ṟｿ輟ཌྷ὎⽏㽐鍖潾叿嗿嘏㼛䁏ݟ䤯䩟㽯罋罖轗齘꽙魦牅槴兣榀逳ꁩ㽜佝广彟杯桏楟橯灿亖泽欠灛쀯郍뽬콭�濿惯慿抏掟撯斿烏澏齱꽲뽳鶀╓㌰ₐ䣾耏꽬彷潸罹征澂荇葿誏䊗畲ぃ畄㭮蛒蟯觿訏？뽺콻�ｾྀ뾊쾋買跟髯䏛聇镂ｰ퀻逳羐辑龒꾓辛钜鷿麯꒿ᯯ᰿ꕏꌿꑏ�ﾖ궑䅐￢漖懶醜厭�辱뛿닯덟둯땿랏룯뫿／Ά⾼긹醿�ᇁ［죺꧿�ﳯ靑좬﬇￟ￋ鿈᷸鿊쿍뿌῀⿁䇿䒘䓯䍵䈾䘽䝟왯ﾯ�缉ᾨῄ蒜뿟쿠擳◿顱⫦䉠Ꞁ ꝰ퍔낙끛㑒烐烉\㼕﵏■쉱⁣ꀨ潀珺녂갩괯긿꽏끟㽯羿꿝뿞࿦翣皜杢◷䐱饀⍀恅勷쵄攪퟿⫭⒁ↁム？⿭㿮俯忰濱എ忲￁�̏츿콯㍹귉ﯲ؟呂ჺ⁳恬�൭ඐꚀ勀‑큑⺞뻣ǒ�艵쀱㙲ᓣ⃱瀲肪冠໿�Ѡ펑^་ﻷ엮ﮯ༆眀୐టﲟ�ﳐ異悆킦逎ŝ恄溾偒Ƨ遑삦㙒ᝀ膙焯悙ꝵ㐁㌳㛾뼼쬽뿺＜༞ᬟ䕮耮䀎⹪宀䃲泻줠⵰큑䀯퀻炧₿↿⋏⏟⓯῿个῿寧⦉⩏⭟ᕨᘿｏ琄䑦浀⼅뼫伇죄䋼앒㊏᫿㣯餯‷䂆쿥꘾䈮䏏䓟￯ｅ�ᴺ 凼泅劐輾ㅳ큼瀰汹揰ㆀ䴹ⴠ〲ჅⲺႆꙹව駀珁ꁍ䥀据‮퍖矀ሧ㾀㰟虁剰م污灰⼺眯凁⹠牰橯㇉ፎ⤷ᨂ儰⾹バ퀑唯山爀杁퀑쀍ီ橴�⺰鲀牀架킠䂙џ歰屁ᅷ퍰暂탛삦{奈䕐䱒义䭼倠凯叿吏⬟屐渼᩽坡⢁à屰灣ㅦ畜倰䡊鉛�흛輷㧾༸诨㭁ᅐ〷꘠柰ꐑ勉෯鱰駐涁耍툹濊瀐ት愱�沠＠쏖愒₝ꄍ끎ｈ䨿嬌ຑၰ桰桧枡噩෱禀速瀹㕔棿伤ㅍ旖杤ꨕ즀洰｢킜퇛ﱞｨཪ㸿懶郸퀑偦姟喪嘟㼯㽗佘轸�穚ⴠ෻ቁ䍀聧ꀍ臧畚 愰馗禰滠卣ၧ睴ဵ旾ὡｵ㺢�弫㞟詿規ጆ掰遤烎嘭肙샐瘯炪ΐハᏞ菢ꃐ䳐杯ꛐ⁀⦀촇ᾈ軿陿ꅏ빺西㌆㒟㖯羿뼀伹＄ྍ侟⫳ｰ弻྅弾龩꾪꼖龥꟟黯ꔅꉁꏯ㗿㊾擜酹낮뵯㟢懼銉꼗舘뎡絓肶