..r AIt r\l\ j!' I"! ...!i' Be .4 iU 1:.1+ creE 10):: \J 􀁦􀁾􀁔􀁒􀁅􀁬􀀴􀁬􀁍􀀠􀁾􀁉􀁴􀀾􀁾􀀠& Sf ;.2.ltJ6-V4"'L.£. '( 􀁊􀁾 (f" \ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 4&).2871 Post Office Box 9010 Addison. TUM 75001..9010 16801 􀁗􀁾􀁴􀁧􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁥􀀠June 14,2000 Mr. Charles R. Tucker, P.E. Director ofTransportation Planning And Development Texas Department ofTransportation P.O. Box 3067 Dallas, TX 75221-3067 Re: BRfNSAP and House Bill 1681 Dear Mr. Tucker: As a result of your letter of September 17, 1999, and a subsequent conversation with Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E., regarding BRfNSAP, and, based on the twenty foot opening criteria, available infunnation on the location and the design of the following culvert is enclosed: Lake Forest Drive at a tributary of White Rock Creek Please call me at 972-450-2879 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Town of Addison cl 􀀣􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠. J s C. Pierce, Jr., P .E .. sistant City Engineer cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P.E., Acting Director of Public Works Enclosures 17-4 BRIDGE ENGINEERING Eorthquak. for c •• EQ. Earth E, water and iee pressure ](JEJ strea.m flow SF, a.nd uplift B acting on the substructure. .Forces resulting from elastic deiormations, including rib shortening R. For... reoulting from thermal deformation. T, including .hrinkage 8. Highway Bridge 􀁌􀁯􀁡􀁤􀁳􀁾􀀠Vehicular lute load of highway bridges is expressed in ,I 14' H20-44 Il,OOO LB H15-44 6.000lB H1O-44 4,oooLB I ,􀁾􀀠52.0ooLB 24,000 LB 16.000LB ·1.. W" TOTAL WEIGHT OF TRUCK ANO LOAON a O,IW I, WIDTH OF EACH REAR TIRE EQUALS 1 IN. PER TON OFTOTAL wEIGHT OF LOADEO TRUCK -j o,jw I0' CL EARANCE a LOAD LANE WIDTH , I 0 0011JlI "-' 1 6' 2' 􀁾􀀡URB 2' (.) STANDARD H TRUCKS FIG. 11-3. Standard truck loading. In deaign of stul grid and timber 800m for H20 or H20-S1S loading, one axle load of 24 kips or two axle loads of 16 ldps each, spe.eed 4 it apart. may be used, whiehever produces the greater stre5$. instead of the 32--kip axle shown. DESIGN LOADS 17-5 terms of design lanes and lane loa.dings, The number of design lanes depends on the width of the roadway.Ea.ch lane load is represented either by a standard truck with trailer (Fig. 􀀱􀀷􀁾􀀳􀀩􀀠or, alternatively, as 8. 100ft-wide uniform load in combination ",ith a concentrated load (Fig. 17-4). In proportioning any member, all lane loads should be asaumed to occupy, within their respective lanes, the positions that produce muUnum stress in that member. Table 17-1 gives maximum moments, shears, and reactions for one loaded lane. Effects resulting from the simultaneous loading of more than two lanes may be reduced bya loading factor, which is 0.90 for three lanes and 0.75 for fOUI lanes. \'---'=---fO 32.00QLB24;DOOLB Q HS20-44 B,ooo LB H S 15-44 6,000 LB ;l2.000 LB 24;000 LB 14' V 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠d 􀁾􀀠O.lW Q,4W L..----i WIDTH OF TIRES SHALL BE THE SAME AS O,4W '" TH STANOARO H TRUQ{S O.JW w' COMBINED wEIGHT ON THE FIRST TWO AXLES ITHE SAME AS FOR THE CORRESPONDING H TRUCK)V' VARIABLE SPACING-14 TO 30 FT INCLUSIVE. SPACING TO BE USED IS THAT WHICH PRODUCES MAXIMUM STRESSES 10' CLEARANCE AND LOAD LAN WIDTH t '211" 12K 4' i.o URe ALItRNATIVE LOAOJNG (hI STANDARD "-S TRUCKS For slab design, the eenw line of the wheel should be assumed to be 1 ft from the face of the curb. There are five clnsses of loading: H2O. HIS. HIO. 􀁈􀀮􀀲􀀰􀁾􀁓􀀱􀀶􀀬􀀠and Hl5-S12. Subsequent 44 indicates adoption of loading iltandard in 1944. SfJJ 􀁾01-eft?I VOU#5 .. --fJf...c>..'11,1􀁓􀀴􀁾􀀠=""< 􀀴􀀴􀁾􀁌􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀠7877Cj-OG:J/􀁫􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠􀁴􀀰􀁩􀁾􀂷􀀯􀀻􀁾􀀠 IJ-MJ'-/6/!)CJO J2) 0(00 􀁾􀀦􀀶􀁕. ro 􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀠.._____ .__ .􀁟􀂷􀁾􀁊􀁌􀁩􀁒____ .. .._ 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁧􀁺􀀻􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁱􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀡􀁌􀀭􀁾􀁦􀁩􀁩􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀠.-----.------.--liil1M-til!i101􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀭---..􀁾􀀠-..􀀽􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭.. .... --.-... 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁊􀀿􀁥􀁾􀀠#5 􀀯􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠.......... . Ie 􀁾􀀠..-.---. ! I I I ill ! I llf m (1m ( . -. , 1'1 11 􀁾􀀠i itt I,-l3 -U1W ..M I PUBIlC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 4Si}.2871 Post Office Box 9010 Addison, Texu 15001·9010 16801 WeatgrovcApri15,2000 Mr. Charles R. Tucker, P.E. Director of Transportation Planning And Development Texas Department ofTransportation P.O. Box 3067 Dallas, TX 75221-3067 Re: BRINSAP and House Bill 1681 \ Dear Mr. Tucker: As a result ofyour letter of September 17, 1999, and a subsequent conversation with Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E., the following BRINSAP information is submitted: TxDot's Off-System Bridge List for Addison needs to be revised as per the attached. Based on the twenty foot opening criteria, available information on the location and the design of the following culverts is enclosed: Winnwood Road at a tributary ofWhite Rock Creek Midway Road and Spring Valley Road at Fanners Branch Creek Belt Line Road, and Marsh Lane at Rawhide Creek Structural details for the Midway RoadIFanners Branch Creek culvert may be available from the Farmers Branch Engineering Department. Please call me at 972-450-2879 ifyou have any any questions. Very truly yours, Town ofAddison/? • 􀀵􀁴􀁵􀁮􀁵􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁳C. 􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁥􀀬􀀠Jr" P,E, Assistant City Engineer ec: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P .E., Acting Director of Public Works Enclosures TEXAS DEFAR'l'bU... • ...l' UY TtuU':::I i:'Vl'.:,.:a".,L-""\"",,,.tlU#on .......... "" ... -..-... 􀁾􀀬􀀠-. 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠<:> OFF-SYSTEK BRIDGES 􀁾􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁅􀁄􀀠BY CITY'" iSil'" 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭COUNTY=OS' OHNER=AODIBON -----------------------------..----------------------OBS OOlJ1!ITY CN'l'I..)!EC S'l'ILNO FCLTY_OV LOCATION CITY 334 057 1'00100 003 1 MIDWAY ROl\J) 0.2 MI N KELLER SP. a 0020 335 057 POG200 001 1 Fl\I\l!BROOK DRIV E· 0.1 III S OF BROOKRAVE 0020 336 057 1>00220 001 1 OAKS NORTH 0.1 !II S OF BELT LINE 0020 􀀱􀁲􀀬􀀶􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁊􀀠f,,-. t..Jt.If.t £0"" Cree/.:.. .... '" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 , i i ,j I' I II 1 I I! I I i I iI I . I I ! 1 , :' 'l' ,., vJ l Y\'!\ \JJ 􀁾􀀠􀁩􀁦􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠0 l{p --1 :! "Ttl 􀁢􀁶􀁾􀁲􀁪􀀠􀁾􀀠uJWz-jG?uct<-􀁾􀀠,.. /f.€ 􀁾􀀾􀀼􀀭upj 01-Hv.-􀁾tio-w I 􀁾􀀠􀀦􀁬􀁾􀁣􀁳􀀠( 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠, 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠/rbl?J I( '2 tt 13 II 3 cg 13 Ll Lf "6 13 i( S of--13 l\ 􀁾􀂣􀀯􀀿􀀠II '1 􀁾􀀠13 11 to '& 13 􀁾􀀠12'6 /3 Ij, 􀁾􀀩􀁊􀁾􀁾􀀠f3 /if-7 :; Ct!Uf. 􀁾􀁾􀁻􀀨􀀲􀁊􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁶􀀧􀁤􀀧􀀷􀀠􀁲􀁨􀀭􀀦􀁉􀁉􀀭􀁾􀀠__ . 􀁾􀀮§hJ-j77Y 􀁾􀁓􀀠/.' 1..J;hds , 'I: I: Iti il I, Ii it j , I ", ... " ---.,. 􀁧􀁾􀁦􀁩􀁴􀁊􀁾􀀠;2( 13 /7-;2 􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁾Ir-AI 􀁄􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁤􀀠J1cfo 􀁾􀀡􀁖􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀠tD ver 5 he,erdkr 􀁾􀀻􀁬􀀬􀀷􀀠.' 33 " 􀀳􀁾􀀠It1􀁾􀁴􀁩􀀭􀁂􀀠 􀁾􀁾Cr.o-ek ... ;, .i., 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀁮􀁔􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁾􀀭􀀽􀁩􀀾􀁾􀁪􀁾􀁌􀁍􀁨􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭...􀁟􀀮􀀭􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭__ .􀁾􀁗􀁌􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀳􀁨􀁵􀀺􀀮􀁳􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀿􀀮􀀲􀁾__ _ 􀁾____...... 􀁒􀁾. . ..____ -..-.... ...._ ....... -------...... ....􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁾...􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭..-.....--.. 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭...... - , PI-------H::+-:.-----------------II! w,., September 28, 1999 Mr. Charles R. Tucker, P.E. Director ofTransportation Planning And Development Texas Department of Transportation P.O. Box 3067 Dallas, TX 75221-3067 Re: BRINSAP and House Bill 1681 Dear Mr. Tucker: This is to respond to your letter of September 17, 1999 to John Baumgartner, P.E., Director ofPublic Works, regarding BRINSAP and House bill 1681. To the best of our knowledge, we do not have any bridge structures with total openings of more than twenty feet on any of our public streets. However, we do know oftwo bridge structures on private property, within apartment developments, that do have total openings ofmore than twenty feet. We assume these structures do not come under the program. We do have plans to construct a bridge in the future that would qualifY. We will send you structural details upon completion of construction of the bridge. Please call me at 972-450-2879 ifyou have any questions. Very truly yours, Town ofAddison James C. Pierce, Jf., P.E. Assistant City Engineer cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager John Baumgartner, P.E., Director ofPublic Works DEC'D S£p 21 1999 Texas Department of Transportation P.O. BOX 3067. DALlAS. TEXAS 75221-3067. (214) 320-6100 \ • .). Septerriber 17, 1999 􀀱􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁴􀀮􀁉􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀠Mr. John Baumgartner 􀁾􀁖􀀭\J rr.vr.C>.K \-􀁾􀁦􀁊􀀢􀀢􀀠􀁜􀁱􀁾􀁴Director of Public Works City of Addison 􀁾􀁩􀀾􀀠;'L􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁎􀁜􀁾􀀠\ 􀀨􀁾􀀠5300 Beltline Rd. 􀁜􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁜􀁊􀁴􀀠P.O. Box 9010 Addison, Tx. 75001-9010 Subject: BRINSAP and House Bill 1681 Dear Mr. 􀁂􀁡􀁾􀁧􀁡􀁲􀁴􀁮􀁥􀁲􀀺􀀠The Texas Legislature passed House Bill 1681 this session that requires local governments to submit bridge design plans, when available, to Texas Department of Transportation (see attached). The law became effective Septerriber 1, 1999. It has been determined that the counties should submit the plans directly to the district due to the permanent bridge inspection records being located at the district. Each district is also responsible for inventory and updating those records. This law does not require counties to produce plans for bridge work, but requires submission only if plans exist. A requirement to submit plans after the project is complete was added to assure counties that TxDOT was not reviewing plans for content. Plan submission is to be used to aid in the accurate inventory, inspection and load capacity assessment of the structures. Plans for new bridges will also enable district BRINSAP forces to idel).tify when new structures are added to the off system inventory. Plans submitted should be for structures that have total openings of more'tlian twenty 'feet, and'should include structural de-tans';' layouts;'etc:: The law benefits not only TxDOT but the counties and cities as well. Asbuilt plans allow structures to be more accurately evaluated for load capacity while minimizing conservative assumptions that reduce calculated capacities. This helps everyone achieve the goal of BRINSAP which is safety. By knowing as much as we can about the structures thac are out there, they can be posted when necessary and effective maintenance, repair and replacement can better keep keep the structures safe and as useable as possible. Your continued support of helping TxDOT achieve this goal is appreciated. D " . If you have any"questions please contaot Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E. at {21,,!;&' 320-4423 or faX '(214) 319-6439 P"YI