I I 
Page 1 of!Project Inventory for SIP Commitments ) • Mike Murphy From: Angela Carson [acarson@nctcog.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 20034:55 PM To: Aaron Russell; Abel Saldana; Alan Hendrix,
P.E.; Arturo Serna; Bernard J. Vokoun, P.E.; Beth Ramirez, P.E.; Billy Hardie; Brian Barth, P.E.; Brian K. Shewski; Bruce Russell; Carla Forman; Cecil Hollingsworth; Cesar Molina, Jr.,
P.E.; Charles Conrad; Charles F. Dibrell, III, P.E.; Charles Tucker, P.E.; Chris Burkett, P.E.; Christa Sharpe; Cinde Weatherby-Billiand; Cissy Bylo; Curt Caldwell, P.E.; Dana Burghdoff;
David Davis, P.E.; David Gallis; Edith Ngwa, Ph.D.; Frank Davis; Ghareb M. Sunna; Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize; Ivan Nicodemus; Jack Wierzenski; Jeff Chambers; Jim Cline; Jim Driscoll; Jim
Sparks; Jim Stone; Joe Temus; John Blain; John Polster; Jon Fortune; Judy Johnson; Keith Manoy; Keith Mellon, P.E.; Ken Griffin; Ken Melston, P.E.; Kent Colling, P .E.; Lloyd Denman;
Lloyd Neal; Margie McAllister; Marl< A. Young, P.E.; Marl< Bouma; Mayela Sosa; Michael Copeland; Michael Curtis; Michael McAnelly; Michelle Saye; Mike Murphy; Mike Nicely; Nancy Amos;
Patrick Baugh; Paul Luedtke, P.E.; Pete Breitenbach; Ramana Chinnakotla; Randy Skinner; Renee Lamb; Rick Berry; Robert Green, P.E.; Robert Wunderlich, P.E.; Roland Castaneda; Ronald
Young, P.E.; Rondell Fagan; Ronnie Bell; Ruben Delgado, P.E.; Sam Wilson; Senator Jane Nelson; Steve Terrell; Terry Sams, P.E.; Tim Juarez; Tom Johnson; Tom Shelton; Tom Simerly; Tom
Wallon; Trip Brizell; Wallace Ewell, P.E.; Waller Ragsdale, P.E.; Wes McClure, P .E.; Wilma Smith Cc: Dan Rocha; Dawn Wills; Chris Klaus; Christie JesUs Subject: Project Inventory for
SIP Commitments Importance: High As discussed at the July 25, 2003 meeting ofthe Surface Transportation Technical Co:mmlittee, conducting an inventory of all 100% locally-funded Transportation
Control Measures that have 􀀱􀁾􀀢􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀵􀀭􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠 since 1999. Projects that will be completed between now and December 2007 should also be , locally-funded projects will help the region
meet our commitments in the State Implementation Plan for air quality, and will free up future STP-MM and CMAQ funds for other needed improvements. Please see attached letter and respond
by August 7, 2003 ... DanR «TCM letter 7-3O-n3.pdf» Dan 􀁒􀁯􀁣􀁨􀀼􀁴􀁾􀀠Princ:ipcd Transpol"f<ltlon Planner Nor1'h Centrol Texos Council of Governmerrts: P.O. Box 5888. Arling1On, TX
76005-8888 817-695-9265 phone 817-&4().3028 fax droclU1@nC't<09.org bttp:llwww.nctcog.oJ:9l 8/20/2003 􀁾􀀠:'7-n:t/l:-zc, C/u 41 ?-'/0/e-. 'fJU)) e:c:r'i: 
North Central Texas Council Of Govemments TO: The Surface Transportation T echniool Committee DATE: July 30, 2003 and Other Interested Parties FROM: Dan Rocha Principal Transportation
Planner SUBJECT: Inventory of Looolly·Funded Transportation Control Measures As discussed at the July 25,2003 meeting 01 the Surface Transportation Techniool Committee, NCTCOG is conducting
an Inventory 01 all 100% locally·funded Transportation Control Measures that have been completed since 1999. Projects that will be completed between now and December 2007 should also
be listed. These looolly·funded projects will help the region meet our commttments in the Stete Implementation Plan for air qualtty, and will free up future Surface Transportation Program
-Metropolitan Mobiltty (STP·MM) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Oualtty (CMAO) funds for other needed improvements. Your help is needed in this effort Please list all projects your
organization has completed, or will complete between January 1999 and December 2007, that a.....1QQf4,1'IlI:1IIIy Ilind JIIiP " &MAQ,.S+R,.MM'or..transit.forrnula·funds). We are interested
in the following project types: • Alternative Fuel Vehicle Conversions • Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities • Grade Separations • I ntersection Improvements • Park·N·Ride Lots • Traffic Signal
Improvements (Interested in projects in 2002·2007 that prOVide mobilily improvements. ) For each specific project, the following Information is needed in order for the project to be
identified as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) commitment Project Type (from list above) Project Location (Including From & To, or A StreetIB Street) Brief DeSCription (e.g., added
duallelt turns on north and south approaches. signal optimization) • Date project was implemented or will be implemented 616 SIX Flags Ortve. CerlIetpoln.lWo. p. O. Box 5888. AningIoo.
Texas 76005-5888 (8171640-3300 FAX: .81NI41)-7806 *!ecydod_ hIIp:l__'D.C(llT1 • 
Page Two July 30, 2003 Please fax your Information to me at 817-640-3028, or send It via e-mail to drooha@nctcog.org. The information needs to be sent by August 7, 2003. For e-mail submittals,
any format (Excel, Word, etc.) will be aooepted. Thank you for helpi us with this important inventory. If you have questions, please call Christie Jestis or me at 􀀸􀀱􀀷􀁾􀀠-9240. DR:ac
00: 2002-2003 UPWP Element 3m Project File -,-, r-• " ., ¢"" •. 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit P,O, Box 660163 Dallas. Texas 75266-0163 214/749-3278 March 25, 2003 Mr, James Pierce, P. E. Assistant City Engineer Department of Public Works Town of Addison
p, O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 Re: LAP/CMS FY 2003 Second Quarter Report Dear Mr, Pierce: Attached is the FY 2003 Second Quarter Report for the Town of Addison LAP/CMS programs.
If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 214/749-2764 or Julie Rodriguez at 214/749-283 L Sincerely, 􀁾􀀠. 􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀱􀀮􀀠Trip Brizell Senior Manager Capital Planning & Development
TB:jr Attachments 
.-. ............ /􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠ADOISO CAPITAL ASS1 TANCe PROGRAM ...,'" ; ruu>amnuR115 􀁾􀁯􀁲􀁲􀁕􀁒􀁅􀀤􀀠EXPENOITlJnES url!.l'lDm.lnu iW"&lommllS IlJ(PtNDITURElii 1!.l:HJ(000000nfi$
UJ'!!l(0ITU1I1!8 􀁾􀁒􀁦􀁇􀀠TOTAL 􀁐􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁅􀁴.,,' ""'-TOIiE -,. DURlNQ DUllING tlUl'IINO bUllriNG 􀁏􀁏􀁉􀁬􀁬􀁊􀁾􀁑􀀠DUfllltlG. tlt,ltIINO ""'". DORING 00111"0 ..... otItf'U·IIIo.!'1.mDSlfOfYE
" • • '" m fY!!£ ",." aIlS • 􀁉􀀧􀁬􀁪􀀻􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠P<lrlIatoIrdlo..",lIf;()On;,a. !l(Wdll9i><O'1'1d 􀁾􀁁􀁾..__t!J""'III'rIdFll1m l'hI,I,!llCtllIII1!tllmdet'rnm CU:IIlofumll AMalI_InCAl".
""'... -... -. Md!IIJ1'l AoeNexc:ol Yhy (JtdnmoeliOl'l ( D􀁬􀁾􀁲􀁏􀁖􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁬􀁳􀀩􀀠pet RQiWluilrm llOO1/M 1<,,,,,/111) $348,0\l0.00 P.,,..,.,. "'''''., $$9,200,00 􀁆􀀧􀁴􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁓􀁾􀀱􀁦􀀠􀁾􀁔􀀬!ntns
ftlf$>lO,OOOtl) lurid II now Up/eMS f$ject "N'" 􀁗􀁾􀁶􀁷􀀧􀁓􀁯􀀩􀁯􀁵􀁭In!et&octlofi '""''''' 􀁬􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁯􀁮􀁬􀁳􀀠""'''''' 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀺SUflTOTM. T'UfS NlOfECT 􀁾􀀬􀀶􀀰􀀰􀀧􀀨􀀬􀁬􀀡􀀠􀁐􀁁􀁾􀀧THOROUGH.FARE
P 􀀤􀀱􀁡􀀮􀁭􀁾􀀮􀀴􀀰􀀠$24,sn.OO STAFF I 12'1Q(1)9 $$,869.130 Proloet latOO 􀁾􀀠nils PROfliCT liWllOO n • .,... $24,$12.00 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁈􀁅􀀻􀁌􀁛􀁾􀁙􀁆􀁏􀁮􀁃􀁉􀁔􀁙elGINEE 1<'."'" $4,&7l!.ill
$4,872-'13 $1.fj12J)3 .... PlOtoct etlild 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠, 8&1, U1'l9' OUOlUm'Mkfwayln\cfllOOOOM PASS PROJECT ,.."., 􀁂􀁥􀀱􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁾􀁕􀁑􀁉􀀧􀁉􀁊􀁭􀀠1<,""'" $ira::::m .."" $1t11.000« 8oltUnelMII:Iway
""$Oro 􀁾􀁾􀁾i 􀁒􀁬􀁧􀁉􀁬􀁾􀂷􀁗􀁡􀁹􀁫􀁱􀁵􀁢􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠tWl1/Q5 $500;000,00 """"', """"OTA<. Tn'" ,.om", "".., $4S2.056.17 􀁾􀀬􀁏􀀺􀁓􀁕􀀮􀁬􀀢􀀠-'. 􀁾􀀱􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁔􀁦􀁬􀁎􀁔􀀢􀁾􀁲􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀠'll
l:ll:ltW 􀁇􀁬􀁾''''"",1m S12.l!iOMDP,-" nlDliIn $151,277.36 p"","" "'",., :111"0.(10 Project 􀁃􀁯􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁥􀁤Utldet Boog'3l $161AI4G.3$ so 00, I'd 􀁨􀀮􀁮􀁤􀁾􀀠iraJl!!f""t9d to !h& KalM(
􀁰􀁾􀀮oeUe9Toilway Prnjocl ""'1IlI5 lS3t,l147.Ei4 AOcIiIiomI furdOlg per T(mn 01 Jldi:lIs0fts 1'.Illijrifll!Gd02/(J7flll 211Mn 􀀤􀀳􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠'''''''"'' ""'''''' $3,1901\.00 SUBTOTAL
TIllS l'ROJECT "" 􀁍􀁏􀁏􀁔􀁆􀁏􀁒􀁲􀁲􀁥􀁅􀁌􀁾LINE lNiERSEet ...􀁾􀀠$12@1.lo,OO· -,.,"""" $"19,92$.00 "''''''''' 1l2JIM14 􀁾􀁾p,-, 1<,,,'"""""" ,./H'" $3.6.1)'75 􀁾􀁃􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁏􀁏􀁕􀁮􀁤􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁡�
�􀁉􀁤􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀺􀁡􀁊􀁬􀁳􀁦􀁑􀁬􀁦􀁂􀁤􀀠10 􀀡􀁬􀀻􀁑􀁋􀁥􀁬􀁉􀁩􀀡􀁦􀁓􀁰􀁴􀀨􀁾􀀠Ollila. TQI'wayProject """'" ($37_" 181.141.83 SO.OO TcWJI of Ad:Jtson reflnlOO 1..Af'1CMS In 1M -.mI: of 5122.522.
Oul 01 lilts atrnUtlt.$l8,5:lO. i!Jarehmdfunhls pll)j. ""*"􀀱􀁉􀀧􀁉􀁉􀁭􀀮􀁾be rotlrog<Utmled II> f\roI;f u1her pro}ect3 pm 􀁬􀀡􀀬􀁉􀀷􀁁􀀩􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀠02112101 $1M10.00 􀁾􀁭􀀤􀀱􀁡􀀮􀀶􀁭to
flGlphll'ld01h6fflIlI'2i1rol TownolArlrlison (Sle,tUO,OO'􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁯􀁲􀁁􀁴􀀮nns PRotECT "",,"" 􀀤􀀸􀀷􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧IGrw:;iMfflovatENIS jurzw!l 12Ir.400,OO $20/100.00 ".00,...... $2O,4ooJX) 􀁰􀁾CilmpIaled
f1114194 """'"" -------m:vMtM!IOS IJ!3'\1CH PADS iitM9t $4l,OOG,OO WIM:30PmjoI:.1 􀁃􀁯􀁾uroer B\dgel 04I11i9S $:ffi,1!14.JO $000 􀁕􀀱􀀱􀁬􀀱􀁴􀁜􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁾􀀱􀁭􀁜􀁦􀁥􀁤􀀠money===􀀽􀀱􀁉􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀱􀁍
􀁊th$ A13p.ahG Rood RaalgMlllllI)mj9d.. ($J.21Ui:?m}IIct ID nwniIlr) dlMcd. ,...", 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁦􀁵􀁮􀁤􀁬􀁮􀁩􀁊􀁐􀂥􀁔􀁏􀁖􀀼􀁬􀁉􀀨􀁬􀁲􀁍􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀡􀁉¢l1ad O2i01rol """'" .$1,026.00 """"'" 􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁣􀁲􀀠"""
n ""..." .$i,(l26,OO 􀁾.. .. 􀁐􀀧􀁡􀀢􀀬􀁟􀁾􀁒􀁬􀀬􀁗􀁅􀁔􀀠O3Il1im $8.500.00 i􀁾􀁵􀁬􀀠04111/95 $85,05.5.18$14.16).23P1\1'1'f101'l1 ""'4I1l6 I$11 1,SP2.3S1PayrtWillll $rocI pmJIICII oomptoold.
$f,QT:U5 ....,AopO'QIjIIIl"" bnlaoo,," pat!l!2?l'06 lotter '''''''' 
--------. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁎􀀠CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM .r--' -. 􀁧􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀢􀀠􀀢􀀡􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁁􀁾􀀠i_;:II!turu:i-=<. l'IIOJIler_11 􀁕􀁓􀁬􀁴􀁬􀁨􀁯􀁾􀁯􀁤􀀼􀀧􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀱􀁏􀀧􀀱􀀠 􀁾􀁲􀀮􀁡􀁭􀀡􀁬􀁮􀁯􀀠10
Rru;okrtloo .9n1172par ,Tam Ryt!on; 􀁾􀁭􀀤􀀱􀀳􀀮􀀼􀀱􀀰􀀱􀀬􀀶􀀱􀀱􀀱􀀰􀀱􀁯􀀠 !!hJt Aropahtl Fload Realignment pmje<;l Prolccttoroll'Gln'*"<l, .,,,'" (15'3.407,$4 _ __ __ _ S!!:II,(Ol'AkUUs..PROlIcr
MlDWAY}[lIiitfa/fR/Ji INTeRSEOT. 􀁐􀁡􀁖􀁉􀀧􀁏􀁏􀀢􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠Par l'la'lOlUtion .910112, apply the 􀁲􀁥􀁭􀁡􀁬􀁾􀁮􀁧􀀠turds til hlllpp/1)\lmmpmJt;et I\r.lpafIQ Ad. Realignment: Ext Remalndor
of lhill P"!'>J&i:1 􀀨􀁍􀁫􀁩􀁷􀁡􀁹􀀡􀁌􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁷􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁨􀁬􀁬􀁤􀀡􀁸􀁬􀁾􀀠 OaliasCoorny. Cb,,, 􀁾􀁰••Jm 00I00m ,...... SU,.,OTAL TIllS pru:m:cr 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠'Payment W17193 PSI' 􀁒􀁾Wl'Ol12.1!fQt{
Ibo _Iring f\.fnd, 10 flGlp progmm projoCl,: 􀁾Rd. ReIIQrlIllQllIExt Rilmalodtwol pnljoetwll'l be!ul'lded by Daib3 Ctlunly. CIa!)(l 􀁰􀁭􀁪􀁏􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁲􀁊􀀡􀁭􀀠 􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀨􀀤􀀴􀀲􀀬􀁏􀁾􀀮􀁾..5JlIFlQIAL
nns tBQJ.1lCl 􀁬􀁩􀀮􀀧􀁩􀀲􀁓􀀺􀁾􀀠, ..."" 􀀮􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠Payrnont 00I11t93 Por RBsoru!k>tl '910112, "/lilly \hQ remallllng rums 10 tlerp Illogrom ".t: ArapahO. Rd. RMIIQfltOOI'It Elot.
Remainder 01 pto)ocl: will 1m fund«1 by Oallas CoullI'{. elDse projed per Jim 􀁐􀁦􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁡􀀠,ca 􀁻􀀤􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻-, '--n;. 􀀧􀀢􀁾􀀠􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁩􀀱􀁫􀀾􀁉􀁬􀁡􀁉􀁆􀁵􀁲􀁯􀀼􀁨􀀠􀁵􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀽􀀠$2SO:00
).oo'''''''''' ""-' ,.....""-' ""'''''' O4ItVS5 f>nymoolMd 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀀡􀁯􀁥􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀠""'Reprogr.Im mmaltll/lg ballttlc$ "G! !iV19SlGtt&r iI.''''' 􀁾􀁾IhEH!ij)It>9rnrnrrnad 1'0000)' 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁧b
R9so11J101'1 '0711112 por Tom Ryden: ReprogmmS41.3SS.ee mID 1hEI Mp¥to Rl;lad Realljjnml1l'll pro/(!et PlUjeet !(I cemaln clJsed. ($41,359.00 Town of Addison refLnl'!!d LAP/CMS In """'"
tl'lo flmount of $122.52l!. Out (If!hls 􀁮􀁭􀁯􀁵􀁮􀁾􀀠$212. .... 8;leIlJ(l(1i1;), lhilpruj. whlch than should baNlJ)l'll1lramtl\l)!j b::I turd 0100, pA)je<:13 j)6I' miOl 􀁣􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀠00112M
$212.00 R9prog13m $21.2. Ie help hlrwj clhll<' 􀁥􀀺􀀽􀁾􀁯􀁲􀁗􀁋􀁮ialWlol' Adi:IIli.on OV1Mil􀀢􀀻􀀨􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀠."""" "".., 􀁅􀁎􀁇􀁾􀁅􀁒􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁭􀁏􀁎􀀠"".., $8,701.00 􀁾􀀮􀀠'"""""p-I
HIt: I"'U\N 􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀧􀁗􀀬􀁾􀁯􀁴􀀯􀁾􀁾11101fO:J l\dditlo>naI 􀁲􀁬􀀮􀁮􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁾􀀠por TO",,11 of Adc:Il$Iln,* o.t/12lO1 $l,eilfl.oo -[Qltt/r d'Msd IIM}7fOr F'&:;fr'eltl "''''''" $J9AS.Ii·1lIl
DELT UNEIDAlLAS NOATH TOLLwAY INTERSECTION $28:1,000.00 p,,,,,,", HlIIll93P"""",, """" ""'...PIlYlllI!If't 1)4111m OStl4fOO Payfl'nmt an(l 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁾􀁴CQmplel8d j)eI "'_t ,.....,9/'Vi9&lQtblt
Add11fcM{lII\!fk'\gj)«Townol 􀁾􀀦􀀠 I&tI!lrdatedO'lJtl:7tGs """,,, "".ro 0IV19fI)f 􀁾􀀠MOO""-'''''W7AL KELLER SFRINGSIOAU.AS NOfmi TOlLWAY INTERSECTION $225,15!l.oo """'" v:nHDmll!.eSI
E'U'£I«:iI'lV1II1:5 Ur&lCIfT\lFI'f$ 􀁅􀁩􀁉􀁐􀁅􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀩􀁉􀁔􀀱􀁊􀁦􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀠El!Pl!IIDlTVI'IEQ 1llo:HNDm,/lillS 􀁅􀁬􀀨􀁐􀁾􀁁􀀡􀁳􀀠EXPVltl<1\ll'll!.!l tlIPeHDI'n;nll1l 􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁥􀁳􀀠D.nI'lOnlJIIE9
TOTAL 􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁏􀁍􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁏􀀠txllllfilG 001'1111110 !ll)mHQ !lURING I'JURlHG (lLIAlNG DUAII!IG ClUIl:IIlC\ DURlIfG "'... """. ,􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠" . $10,831100 􀀤􀀲􀀬􀀹􀀲􀁓􀀬􀁾􀀠$4.:mo.OO 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠$19,590,
00 􀁾􀀮􀀵􀀤􀀮􀁡􀁯􀀠$5.525,00 $85,6<15.27 SI1,1,5j.1I7 $8,701.00 $33.750.00 $:1,7511.00 SU!J35.00 ----... ...... . . 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠S13,no.OO $3,810.00 $12\'.1.00 􀁾􀀱􀀷􀀮􀀱􀀲􀀠..."" "<>00
􀁁􀁾􀁏􀁬􀁊􀁎􀁔􀁐􀁁􀁉􀁄􀀠􀁆􀁬􀁉􀁎􀁴􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁧􀁔􀀠ycrP JEC'! $10.830.00 $0.00 ..... $2,925.00 $000' ",-00 S". S150.6'lIl.14 ".00 $6.701.00 ".00 􀀤􀁬􀁬􀀹􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁇􀀿􀀠".00 $2&2,&41.00 $Om i

ADDISON CAPITAL ASSISTANCE,PROGRAM ",YOUNT EXPENDITURES EXPEND!l1JR!;:S EXPENDITURES ElG'ENDmlRES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITUIlES I!XPEHDITUR£S ElCPENDlnJRES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES
TOTAL PROOAAY"ED DATE APPROVED m .. DUlliNG DURINO DURiNO WRiNO DUIliNO WRiNO DUIllNO DURING DURING DORING DURINO RlNOS NOT YET PROJECTNAYE APPROVllD EPIIOO _m •.PROJECT' 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁷􀀠􀁾
􀁯􀁯􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠,=.• 􀁾􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀠"Piiymont 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠Mdliooal rums IriInsfemed from BI!!t LloolMontlort ond Belt Unel 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁾􀁮􀀠Ad. ProJeel3 04111/95 $69.205.47 $232,043.44""".'"
"".....􀁐􀁡􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁴and Project Complolod ",,"" $.21.497.03 $2115.630.47 $0.00 􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀺􀀽􀁬􀁧􀀺􀀠02112101 $275.00 Paymont $275.00 TO" 09I19/0t 􀁾􀁱􀀡􀁩􀀮􀁉􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁕􀁉􀀮􀀴􀀷􀀠I
􀁵􀁲􀀼􀀺􀁾􀁷􀀠􀁾􀁓􀁓􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠 TOLLWAY TO MARSH LtJ'er.::!ASE I Pnymont 02I1G'94 $255.000.00 S450.105.oo SO.OO Addilloml funding per Town of Addison's leHar dated 02101101 $1115.105.00
""m, $1115,105.00Paymant SUBTOTAL lHlS PROTECT 09119/01 $450.105.00 -----------............. , " ii175,OOO.OO .,Paymenl ""''". '""-􀁾􀀠$15,570.00 -.-. , Payment 04111195 $93.958,00 -.
---" $18,492.71PaymenL 03114/96 􀁾􀁾􀀠Paymont and proJoct complolod. Aapn;lgram balarr;o per 9/27/96 101lor. ",,"" $3,123.22 ( $129,143_99 ./$0.00 Uso tho ropn;lglllmmod mDnoy C ., "\
7 , -according ID ReselL/lion 􀁾􀀹􀀷􀀰􀀱􀀷􀀲􀀠per Tom AytI"on; ReprogramS45,656.011n1O tho Ampaho Road Realignment pn;lJeeL Project 10 rermln closed. 090'09/91 ($45.859_00 -􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠<
􀀭􀀽􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀺􀁩􀁎􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀯􀀽􀀱􀁅􀁎􀁾􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀠􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁾􀁖􀁲􀁴􀀠$1.200,000.00 Addllional FI.nCls 111'01194 $900,000.00 Paymenl 04111105 $184.715.00 Payment 􀀰􀀳􀁉􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀹􀀶􀀠
$9.500.00 Addliional Funds ICVOII95 $620.559.00 Patmen! $5.53.492.70 AddItional Fund.': per Resolution ""'''''' .970112 $283,138.22 Transferred $139,170 from the MfdwaVlUndbarg proJeel
to flJ'Klthls (Arapaho) project por Resolution n10172 ,."'., $139.170.00 Transferred $42,015 from the MidwayIBoILw<1V proJecl to fund this (Arapaho) project per Resolufion 1970172 $42,075.00
Translorred $70,120 from tho """'" MId'III\IYlGreenhili project 10 fund this (Arapaho) project per Rosolulion .970172 $70.720.00 (;(>nUnlJlId on LAP/CMS ",lIh IJ """''' programmed IImounl
0($844.592 $1,014.825.00 Transferfrom Belt UnelMarsh Ln. project POt Rosol 1910172 $41,359.86 Paymont 09/12191 """''' ,...., TllInsfor fn;lm Weslgrova/Sojoum projec! per Rosol .•970172
$4S,e.51i1.01 Transfer from Sldowalk 81J:!1 Bench Pads """'" pn;l)ecl per Rasel. 11)70172 $3.211.10 Transfor from ActdlsonM'estgrove """'" $4,162,491.43 SO.OOpro/ecl por Resol. '970172
09I00I9' $13,407.64 $2,399,004_73 SUBTOTAL nilS PROJECT $4162491.43 Payment 02118198 􀁾􀀡􀀱􀀢􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁡􀁫􀁴􀁌􀁊􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀺􀁩􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁡􀀠lfi::r:: $50.000.00 $225,000.00 Poymont (end
Pn;lJec:1 Complala) """" Payment "y...... $331,763.00$.25.000.00 SO.OO 􀀽􀁩􀀺􀁮􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀰􀀱􀁉􀁧􀀺􀀠0217/01 $81,763.00 $81,763.00 Payment SUBTOTAL nIls PROTECT In'lo;OI ;):)58,341.837.433.
741-98􀁾􀀴􀀮􀁳􀀷􀀲􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠$4,672.93 $1,547,252.54 S435,8!lO.93 $1,150,755.13 $I,064,584.SS 􀁾􀀬􀀴􀀶􀀹􀀬􀀱􀀶􀀴􀀮􀀷􀀳􀀠"'.00 ",.00 iiT.l6.84Rl1 SO.OOTuTAL :u,992,089.82 w.OO 57433741.98TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS AU YEARS 􀁐􀁴􀁱􀁯􀀺􀁉􀀨􀁉􀀱􀁃􀁭􀁬􀁾􀀠SUMMARY STATUS REPORT, 313l1D3 (CAP ASSISTANCE FUNDS· DNL Y) FUNDS PROGRAMMED $1,992,089.82 Funds Allocated thru FY 96 $6,10a,392.oo

I 􀁾􀀠eo 􀁾􀁉i 􀁾􀀠􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾.0 a' 􀁉􀁾􀀠
----, Itro;lUl (f I I own Wfll9 􀁾􀁑􀁉􀁓upgraoo ---, IR9CM$!lUCUon, SUBroTAL mIS PR.0JECT -, IH$$OIf,mon #010146 ,.. SUproTAL THIS 􀁾􀁒􀀮􀁏􀁉􀁅􀁃􀁔􀀠_0<C:iI IAddfsAm Roefi¥e&1 Way _...􀁾􀀠OIQlIQ1lJOf
ITmn&POrtatlofl satanos funding sunronu:. 􀁾􀁳PROJECT lTecMlC<lI A$$l$lanco rorogram (TAP) -,-lAo:Kllton Roatf Wldtlnma SUBTO:ML nus PROJECT new project. IH990142 $0.00 $983.250,0011112A)2
SO..,.50 $S83.260.00,""'"", 􀀤􀀹􀀸􀀳􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀠$1SS,043.00 I $0.00111"\2102 $155,04') $155,0;43.00 """"'"" I $0.00 O:lIZ""" $5S,QS3..50 $59",053.50 $59,053.50"'''0'''' $59.0S3,St) I I$695,000.00
101HIID1 $695,000.00 $!J95.qtidOO I $76,500-00$76,500,000813010' 􀀤􀁾􀀬􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠.-$0.00 $4'....... $41,530.00 $82.860.00I09119101 '""""" 10117102 $41,3:JO.OO $41,SS!).OO 􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁯􀀠SO.OO
O&flt1OO $37,750.0Il $37,7M.OO $37.750.00I07107100 􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀠Q&(12roO $1,229,7S/:l!__ 1 $245,95$.00 I $29&,9n,0007107100 02112101 $53,D21.00 $53,021,0009119101 1<>'16101 $571,354.00
􀀤􀀱􀁾􀀬􀀱􀀶􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠$40,000,00 I $0.00$40,000»0 I $40.000.0004117100 """""'" 􀀤􀀴􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁉􀁬􀀮􀀱􀀿􀁏􀀠I $35,993.00 I "'DO0$110199 $35,993.00 09107199 m,993.oo $3s..993.00 04114198 􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁗􀁾􀀠
" -,-CfIlil_ TechrncalAssfsta/'lOO' per Amottor'! .."",.iPa)mant SUBTOTAl THIS PROJECT IKeller 􀁾􀁲􀁬􀁮􀁧􀁳􀁉􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁏􀁬􀀧􀁬􀀠􀁾􀁣􀁡􀁾􀀠In'ltilUCtlonlmprovernanlS per IRasoluOon 11980076
Payment Addllronallundlng per Reso1ulkm It9!10142 Paymenl SUBTOTAL nils PROJECT 􀁉􀁾􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀢􀁉􀀠Arapaho Real1gnmen\lEJ(tenslon Per <:.lP_l.n.ol Resolution 11970172. Payment Payment
Additional rundlng per Resolution 11980076 Payment Payment IAddlthxlBJ lunding per Resolution 11990142 Payment IAddUron!ll func!fng per Ras.oIullon 􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀰􀁑􀀹􀀹􀀠Payment SUBTOTAL THIS
PH.Olter :eit lb'Ie: OUOllJITI'& Midway intersections Per Rasolutfon--111970172, Int 'oJ 􀀬􀀵􀁕􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁲􀁁􀁌􀀠􀁾􀁉􀁓􀀠PROJEf7 Ilway (Single ?do! Urban--IInterchange} Per RcsoluliOn 11970172
􀁾􀁵􀁲􀁮􀀺􀁯􀁴􀀠1XOO19JOGt SUBTOTAL 􀁾􀁓PROTECT 􀁪􀁬􀀹􀁤􀁬􀁾􀁉􀁃􀁬􀁩􀀮􀁉􀁉􀀠􀁁􀁳􀁓􀁉􀀤􀁾􀁃􀀡􀁬􀀠􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁲􀁾􀁭􀀠Ptlr 􀁒􀁾􀁬􀀮􀁫􀁭􀀱􀁊􀀹􀀷􀀰􀀱􀀷􀀲􀀠Payment . SUBTOTAL mrs PROTECT KellorSprlng&fOtlorum
InlorsocUon If'(jr Rusolullon #970t12 Payment mmu···· A : .. lJN 􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁏􀁇􀀺􀁁􀁌􀁁􀁓􀁓􀀬􀀮􀁳􀁊􀂷􀁁􀁎􀁃􀁅􀁐􀁒􀁄􀁇􀁒􀁁􀁍􀁬􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁬􀀤􀁮􀁏􀁎􀀠MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LAPI UNPflOORAMMEI BAlAN
exPfNDWF/fS EXPENontJRES EXPENDr1VRES EXP#!NDmlRES ElXPEJJDmJRES SXPENOtnJRES I TOTAL PAlO 1Q8YPfIOJEC1􀁟􀀧􀁟􀀮􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀁾"''''''''''''''''' I $34,000.0004/'''' $34,000.00 I
$34,000..0006I17r'98 ,.o.􀁑􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀮􀁬􀁉􀀹􀀠04!141'i1S 􀁾􀀲􀁓􀀰􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀬􀁏􀁏􀀠 ...00 $250,00.0.00 I _,000,0006ft7r'96 06fl0199 $100,000.00 $100,000.0009/07/99 􀀤􀀳􀀵􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀁡􀀮􀁾􀀠O9I09m7
$844,592,00 10121/97 $16$.91$,40 SO.OO$675,613.6002/1&'98 I 04I14f9S $S4UeO.57, $110,256.00 I $2,<l91,61n.s106f1719S s.i35,024.67.71,.". OSfl0/99 $1,.056.738.00 oM>7199 I $1,C56,73S.00
$.!iO,OOOOO061'_ $50,000.00O71tJ7iOO I 􀁾􀀹􀀴􀀶􀁦􀁾􀀠....,"" _,OOM· $170.000.00 i $314,<M4.(lO I $$35,956.00􀀱􀁃􀁖􀁚􀁖􀁾􀀷.,...... I 3144.044.00 􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀠...._000"'"''''10f21197 I $50:,000.00
-.000.0004/'_ $102.8(lO.00 I $0.00$52,$00.0006117196 1 .2112101 $102.800.00 02/12101 {smz.aoo..ol 02112/01 ($216,200.00: $102.6Olloo 09109197 $34,000.00 I $34,000.00 I $0,00$34,000.0010/21197
$3iftooo,OO 0910",7 􀁾􀁓􀁏􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠I 10/21/97 $250,000,00 
􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁪􀀧􀀠PROJECT tt.a!ai Rasctulion fl9IID255, transfsr amlng (Iell ave!,) ItIt'Itfs lrom 2 P/CMS projects as shown beloW. aV$', I1)sre wiP 00 no physical 􀀻􀁦􀀤􀁦􀁯􀁴􀁦􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁏􀁦􀀧􀁜􀀦􀁹􀁾􀁬�
�􀁦􀁔􀁏􀁍􀀱􀀠,dd1son and DART. The Tmm of AddiSon wi! '-Pthe !1lOMY In Ihelr NOrE-r"""'"Nm allroad 􀁃􀁲􀁯􀁳􀁳􀁾􀁥􀁹􀁯􀁲􀀮􀀠􀀤􀁾􀀶􀀬􀀳􀀶􀀰􀀠􀁾􀀠MidwnyJUOOluylntm,IlC;[kln: 􀁾􀀠$&,sG4.94
AclU8l1otef pmgmmmed fer lhlti 􀁐􀁴􀁯􀁦􀁴􀀡􀁣􀁴􀁾􀀠$315,8:24.94 CfQilloosl fUliding per RQsr.:tI,lIiC('! /1000142 Payrneot SUBTOTA.L '!IJIS PRO]r.CT Midway Road t Dooley Intersection
Improvuments par Resolutlorl 3 #970046 Payment Aclua/cosl of this pra),cl W8$ $126,035. The mms/n/ng $8,965 will be tippled to the Keller SprlngsHJuQrum pm/tlCr par Resolution fl911rJ2.58.
The Town of IAdd/son ha$ the scrusl remafnfng Imt:moy. I Town 01 Addison I'Ufunded LAPiCMS Inlhoamounlol$122,li22". (Mol !h/S$JI'l0l.n'lt.$900.ls31",lundtorlhi.'.l proJ. I'Ihieh then
stlOUld Ix; reprogrammed to lund other projecl.$ per .217/{)1 COmlSptlI'lOl)I'lC6 Reprogram $lWO. 10 help lul'ld oll1or projO(:IS per2fl'!01 TOWI'I of M:l'isQrI ;O«espoodalloo SUBTOTAL
􀁾􀁳PROJECT • 􀁒􀁡􀁾􀁴􀁏􀁡􀁤􀀠C!'O.UlI'Ig RepiaOl)lll8ni 0<'1 􀁉􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁲􀁁􀁤􀀮􀀠At:lv81 cosfol thlspJTJjtlt;t Min $43,149. 11Nt MtMinfllg$56,860 WlfJ b!sppIf4d to file Kelle1 SprlngslOl.IOf"lIIm
pt.r.1/f!Cf ptlY .R'MoIutfon 􀁾The Town cI Addison hIlS' thq sdual mcney. Payment SUBTOTAL 11IIS f'RO]£CT "echnical MmlAilOO Program 􀁔􀁟􀁾􀀢􀀠.... 􀁁􀁾􀁾􀁕􀁬􀁃􀀴􀁌􀀱􀁲􀁁􀁎􀁃􀁅􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁏􀁾􀁑􀁗􀁅􀁓􀁩􀀱�
�􀁎􀁾􀁎􀁁􀁇􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀠sysTEM 􀁻􀁌􀁁􀁐􀁉􀁃􀁍􀁾􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁈􀁾􀁷􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀱􀁦􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁆􀁙􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀧􀀡􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀡􀀮􀁓􀀮􀀠-,􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭11110196 1111D19a 11I10r'98
08110199 09107/W Oat2S197 0412$ Oo?J12101 02112J01 1""""", 02112101 OIl1I!l1Oi 10123196 Paymonl 11lt9/SS SUBTOTAL TH1S PRO},£CT $34,000.00 TOTAL $81'101,005.13 $0.00 $269,000.00 $2,231,672.57
T(!f., O/JI/lu",me/lllI A" Yeanf: $44.175.06 [ $44,175.06 $294, 175.06 $135,000.00 I $135,000.00I (.., .... ooi (S8,9flS.OO) -,,", (_.00: 􀀤􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠$100,_001 1 $100.000.00 $lI1<lOO I
$910,OQ 􀀤􀀱􀁾􀁦􀁯􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠134,000.00 I .$34,000.00 $1,236,906.06 $373,108.00 $86,496.00 $59,05a,50 $5,580,50'.13 􀁲􀁾􀀠PROl'iIJAM'MED"􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠; 􀁲􀁯􀁲􀁁􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁲􀁯􀀠!FfINOSNOTYET
$294,175.061 $0.00 $126,035.00 1 $0.00 -$100.910.001 $0.00 SO.OO $34,000,00 $1,32:3,657.00 $5,"",,501. "I $2,862,634.00 " ..= ......􀁾􀀠
i f Ii 􀁾􀀠: 􀀴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀠􀁾􀀠I! II !Ii 􀁾􀁩􀀠II 􀁾􀀻􀀠>" § II 􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁩􀀠II 􀁾􀀠Ii :d Ii 􀁾􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀠Iii 􀁾􀁩􀁬􀁴􀀠 I ; ! : .-I 
RD EXCEL WAY 1 􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁧􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁦􀀺􀀻􀂧􀁾􀁴􀁃􀀮􀀧􀀭􀁦􀀺􀀵􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀭􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁧􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀺􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁕􀀮􀁏􀁌􀁉􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠.... 􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀬... 􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀭? ? ? ... l'·?-:1C ?;;'o ? ITV'P<=OF ? "'I H(lS{C'fj()N
....>IOt,v,NC ? j,Ql"/h;;tr. . 􀀮􀀱􀀧􀁜􀀴􀀮􀀮􀂧􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀨􀁬􀁾􀁥􀁩􀀧􀁬􀀧􀁩􀀬􀁊􀁲􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀧􀀠c:..Eii;,,;,Q£ ?'i? 􀀬􀀬􀀮􀁊􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁁􀁓􀀧􀁊􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁴􀁃􀀡􀁎􀀠􀁶􀁊􀁬􀀨􀀩􀀧􀁎􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀿SIGN
AL''''..,_''''' SP SPRINGS ? 
RD THIS THE OR INTERSECTION INTERSECTION SIGNAL ? ?..•........•. ., ? ? ·:1:·· ? ? ? .. <.---.......:: .•..• ? ? ?.+......... :.......__ ... ..... _........ .? ? ? '7 ? ? ... -;i 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects (widening) to the Belt Line simultaneous operation of left Road bridge over the Tollway turn lanes for eastlwest traffic allow the
interchange to act and for north/south traffic, a single intersection instead Efficiency ofthe intersection two, will be improved by 15 to 20% :):5 􀁾􀁾􀀱tt-􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁣􀀯􀁬􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾Yf.5-􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁪􀁤􀁲􀁾�
�􀁾􀀠􀁰􀁴􀁾􀁲􀁰􀀠5Jk-􀁴􀁇􀀮􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀱􀀻􀁾Page 1 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects I(widening) to the Belt Line simultaneous operation of left bridge over the Tollway tum lanes for eastlwesttrafflc allow the interchange
to act and for north/south traffic. a single intersection instead Efficiency of the intersection two. will be improved by 15 to 20% Page 1 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Page 2 of 4 IParkway Single Urban Point Location Projects 􀁾􀀠
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects I 􀁾􀀠;;l..5 '/.10t.t('6UVlk...t <A..p {u-Page 3 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects Interchange IParkway Single Urban Page 4 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual POint Locations lconstruction of a single point interchange (SPUI) consists of the removal existing pavement, medians bridge parapet walls, installation
of concrete drill and cantilever bridge bents, reconstruction of existing retaining walls, construction of additional bridge deck and parapet walls, construction of right-tum lanes,
construction of dual left-tum and installation of new signals, TraffiC signals be timed with other signals on Belt Line Road which are covered by another project. IAssociated work includes
control during Imarkings and signing. Ivehlcles per Page 1 of 1 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ISouthbound to U-turn Arapaho Road a new southbound to The widening and realignment northbound u-turn lane at the of Arapaho Road(under
iArapaho Road Bridge over the construction) required the North Dallas Tollway. elimination of the southbound northbound u-turn lane to laccommodate 6 through lanes 2 left tum lanes across
the Ibridge. The SB to NB u-turn must be re-established SS to NS turning Imovements reach 90 per hour. Page 1 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ISouthbound to Northbound U-turn Arapaho Road 'It'T5D 000 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀨􀁶􀀭I􀀸􀁁􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁌􀁲􀁲􀁊􀀭􀁬􀁾􀀠Iv-Page 2 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ISouthbound to Northbound U-turn Arapaho Road funding. iOalias County, Funding. of Dallas, funding. tentative Page 3 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ISouthbound to Northbound U-tum Arapaho Road n.tx.us Page 4 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point Locations ISouthbound Northbound U-tum Arapaho Road consists ofthe removal a portion of existing Iconcrete mono curb along inside curb
lines of southbound northbound Dallas ParKway. removal of a portion of the east and west retaining installation of concrete shaftsand concrete labutments on the east and sides of Dallas
North lToiIwaY• installation of MSHTO Type IV beams to Dallas North Tollway. construction of reinforced bridge deckand parapet walls associated retaining wall Iconstruction. Associated
work include traffic control construction. pavement markings and Signing. Ivehicles per Page 1 of 1 
Dana. Traffic Management Team Meeting MEETING NOTES: June 3, 1999 @DARTHumanResources Conference Room ITEM INFOITEMBY ! WHOM 􀁁􀁔􀁔􀁅􀁎􀁄􀁁􀁎􀁃􀁅􀀺􀀲􀀱􀁁􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁳􀀠OPENING REMARKS:
Rick Cortez called the 􀁭􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧to order, asked fur corrections to Rick Cortez, the minutes, Mahesh Kuimil questioned the statement «DART MAP will no longer be TXDOT bandling tbe
crasbes in the HOV lane", This statement should be changed to "Accident Investigations sban be performed by DPD in tbe HOV lane." Minutes were approved, introductions were then made,
AGENDA ITEMS: Melanie Young, Joint Project Submittals TXDOT Four projects submitted 00 May 14. I) Control Center Project -TXDOT and two other agencies, 2) Reference Marker Project -TxDOT
to design and contract installation based on survey ofpractice performed by TTl 3) Extensioo of Intercity Communications Project -Includcs eight additional agencies 4) Produce Speed
Maps for MPO -Includes highways and tollways RegionallTS Integration Deployment Submittal Koorosh Olyai, Olyai, -Proposal has been submitted to Federal Highway Administration DART -Does
not anticipate to hear from Washington until late Summer or Fall -Proposals will be ranked, prioritized, and theo submitted through the legislative process -Handout of submittal provided
Alternate Route Workshop -Gave background ofproject including maps containing primary altemate routes Beth Ramirez, · Next step is to determine device types to usc to "get the message
out" ; ie, Dynamic City orDaUas Message Signs, cameras, etc. • Also need 10 determine the higher frequency areas -Beth asked for input on existing devices in inventory in the area and
the need to find funding sources for the new devices, _ -Was decided to have a site on one alternate route and involve One police agency to test the alternate route project -coordinated
through Steve Poole, Advanced Traveler Information System ISP Workshop Andy Oberlander, -provided vidco "AzTech -Moving Forward Together". one offour showcase projects TXDOT in the country
involving ITS -Andy gave background on seminar in Arizona discussing how the privale companies are getring involved in disseminating the traffic information through pagers, kiosks, etc,
· Discussion of putting information into vehicles was not feasible al this time because ofno real demand, but maybe four or five years down the road, -Discussed how Arizona only allowed
four contractual ISPs 10 receive information from the 􀁭􀁡􀁮􀁡􀁧􀁥􀁭􀁾􀁴centers and then the ISPs could disseminatc or sell infonnation to other ISPs as required andlor desired. -Seattle
allowed for contracts with anyone who was interested as an lSP -It was suggesled that Dallas use the Seattle method · Arizona and other three projects are to be used as ajumpstart fur
the rest ofthe country 
Dallas Traffic Management Team Meeting -Concept of selling advertising to utilize free information to public was discussed -Also concept of"bundliug" traffic information with information
that people will pay for ie, weather. sports. etc, -to be able to get the traffie information out CaD for Projects Retrasp«t -deadline was May 14 -72 applications submitted by 62 agencies
-$300M allocated for programs; $2,7Bin requested projeets -875 total projects requested ofwbicb 400 are Linear Projects (widenings. new facilities) and 475 are Point Location Projects (several intersections. several signalizations.
or even Dan Roeha, NCTCOG hundreds ofsignalization projects) -eight to oine weeks before sending out the ranked and scored projects list TraffIC Operations and Safety lfut .pots -Riek
Cortez discussed the form attached to the TMI' minutes for Traffic Study locations to be revit:alized and to identiJY any locations that may need observation, -Terry Sams presented a
location -Jupiter at George Bush Frontage Road, Road, need for dual lefts -Carol Walters had arequest for Tom Corbett of Shadow Traffic to utilize his personnel to locate hot spots from
the air, Just need a brief loeation, -Gerry Barker of The Dallas Moroing News suggested using their website (www,dallasnews,com) to provide a point for the public to emaillocalions of
traffic hot spots -will work with TTl to set up, Other Business -Rick Cortez is making a new email list of eertain persons to disseminate TMC lane closure information and is working
on a way to setup selective lists for distribution of information that pertains to a specific part ofthe area only or that pertains to major incidents only. -Tom Corbett still wants
all information types in order to elarify to the public the exact information to report -Melanie Young mentioned that a change order has been placed fur the Loop 12 al I-30 construction
projeel -TXDOT has hired two additional operators for the TMC and thanks were extended to TTl for providing support in the TMC when it was needed, -Wrecker project staging is completed
with. meeting scheduled for June 24, --Dan Rocha discussed a project to be perfonned this fall "Remote-Sensing, such as low level aerial photography" to gel vehiele density to determine
levels of service on the I ectirc freeway system in the area and to help identifY some unknown bottlenecks -24 sample photos Over eourse of4 separate days in moroing and afternoon peak
hours • 4 samples over 6 different time slots -looking for vehicle types and lane distribution . still need to determine exaet times to take photographs -Incident Management Conference.
September IS -17 at Holiday Inn Select near 1635 and 135E interchange NEXT MEETING: 0 1:30 P.M. on July 1,1999 at DART -Human Resoun:es Conference Room 0 Agenda items and other business:
conlllct Jim CarveU (972-994-0433). Riek Cortez (972-320-4495). or Tanuny Herring (972·320-4496). 
25/99 13:27 tt9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀲􀀯􀀰􀀰􀀶􀀠Right-of.Way Exhibit· S.W. Comer Belt LinelMidway Labor $2,219.40 ODe __􀀤􀀲􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀡􀁌􀀠$2,499.68 TEA -21 Application Labor
$707.12 ODC _$71.39 $778.51 QuorumIL8lIdmark DeseriptioBs Labor $635.54 ODe $92.74 $728.28 Trame Counts on Midway Road Subconsultant $421.76 
1 􀁾􀁮􀀮􀀵􀁐􀁴􀁊􀁲􀁬􀀭􀁣􀁶􀀭􀁦􀁖􀁲􀁴􀀠􀂣􀀺􀀯􀁾􀀯􀁲􀁹􀀠/f-c.-f-􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁾􀀠REFERENCE ITEM B.2 2-1 􀁾􀀠􀁃􀁐􀁙􀀷􀀭􀁦􀀭􀀮􀁱􀁾􀀠54'& PLtsseJ In Iqqg-􀁾Q)vevS' cc (P 􀁾􀁢􀀮􀁶􀀠􀁦􀀭􀁥􀁲􀀻􀁾􀀠TEA-21
CALL FOR PROJECTS ' OWV'fiQv1 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁮􀁤􀁻􀀧􀀠􀀱􀁓􀁙􀁬􀁖􀁬􀁾􀀨􀁲􀁜􀀢􀀱􀁉􀁴􀀭􀀴􀀠fu.1lic-Wc9rk5 UOIYli1lC#-ee.... -rmri-t'YIlf(lk9-􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁔􀁖􀀢􀀧􀁃􀁉􀁙􀀱􀀧􀀳􀁲􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀫Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Surface Transportation ProgramMetropolitan Mobility p(bJ cPJ/#;zPrbj 􀁾􀀣􀀺􀀱􀀮􀀠$110 M t '65" yY1 4-q M150 M %'Lb 0 􀁾􀀠North Central
Texas Council of Governments 
TEA-21 􀁾􀁁􀁌􀁌􀀠FOR PR('lJECTS Proposed Project Eligibility1 Regional Travel Demand Management Program Employer-Based Trip Reduction Vanpools and Carpools Park-n-Ride Facilities Transportation
Management Associations Similar Projects Which Reduce Drive-Alone or Peak-Period Travel Advanced Transportation Management System Advanced Traveler Information Systems Advanced Traffic
Management Systems Advanced Public Transportation Systems Similar Intelligent Transportation System Projects System Capacity & Management Projects Freeway, Tollway, Arterial and Collector
Capacity Fixed Guideway and Other Transit Systems High Occupancy Vehicle Systems Intersection Improvements Signalization Improvements Grade Separations Freeway Bottleneck Removal Bicycle
& Pedestrian Facilities Special Events Management Alternative Fuel Conversion Similar Capacity and System Management Projects 1 The Regional Transportation Council has a regional alternative
fuels program under consideration, 1 
TEA-21 CALL FOR PROJECTS Schedule February 1·8, 1999 Solicit Public Comments (Five Meetings) RTC Approval, Issue Call for Projects February 11·12, 1999 "Candidate Projects Due to NCTCOG
(5:00 p.m.) May 14, 1999 Evaluate Candidate Projects June -August 1999 '" Report on Project Rankings, Initial Project Selection August -September 1999 Solicit Public Comments October
1999 Report on Public Meeting Comments & Air November -December 1999 Quality Conformity Analysis;1 Request Final Action on Selected Projects 
TEA-21 CALL FOR PRJJECTS Proposed Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Purpose of the Program Provides funds in nonattainment areas designated by the Clean Air Act.
Projects must contribute positive air quality benefits. Funds cannot be used to add transportation capacity for single-occupancy vehicles. Eligible Applicants Local Governments Public
Sector Transportation 􀁾􀁧􀁥􀁮􀁣􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠Private Sector Submitters Must Secure Public Sector Sponsor in Order for Projects to be Considered Scope of Program Project Call #1 (1999), $110
Million Project Call #2 􀀨􀁾􀀠2001), Approximately $35 Million Eligible Geographic Area EPA-Designated Nonattainment Area: Collin, Dallas, Denton and Tarrant Counties Subregion Allocation
of Funds1 Eastern Subregion (Collin, Dallas and Denton Counties) =68% Western Subregion (Tarrant County) = 32% 1 Based on estimates of weekday Hydrocarbon and Nitrogen Oxide emissions.
3 
I TEA-21 􀁾􀁃􀁁􀁌􀁌􀀠FOR PROJECTS PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA: CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) Congestion Management System Strategyl 20 Current Cost-Effectiveness
Rating Benefit/Cost Ratio ... Score , 0.00-0.49 0i , 0.50 -0.99 3 1.00-1.49 5 1.50-1.99 8 200 -2.99 10 ! 3.00-4.99 15t==.. >4.99 20 I , ! ! Air Quality/Energy Conservation Rating Dollars
Per Pound of Volatile Organic 1Compound Emission Reductions Score >99.99 0 I 50.0-99.99 5 i 10.0-49.99 10 5.0-9.99 15 <5.0 20 4 
TEA-21'.tALL FOR PRl..jECTS PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA: CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, CONTINUED Local Cost Participation Rating Percent Commitment Score
0-20 0 21-25 3 26-30 7 31-35 10 36-40 13 41 -45 17 >45 20 Intermodal/MultimodallSocial Mobility Rating Mode Occupancy Score Automobile (Occupancy -1) 0 Goods Movement Pedestrian Bicycle
TOM Bus Transit Ught Rail Commuter Rail HOV Elderly & Disabled Intermodal 20 -Congestion Management System Strategyl Transportation Control Measure Rating Criteria Score Is proposed
project in the Congestion Management System or State Implementation Plan? No 0 Yes 20 5 
TEA-2". )CALL FOR PRuJECTS Proposed Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan Mobility Purpose of the Program Funds projects on roadways classified greater than a local road or rural
minor collector, and can be used to add system capacity for single-occupancy vehicles. Eligible Applicants Local Governments Public Sector Transportation Agencies Private Sector Submitters
Must Secure Public Sector Sponsor in Order for Projects to be Considered Scope of Program Project Call #1 (1999): $150 Million Project Call #2 􀀨􀁾􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀩􀀺􀀠$49 Million + Eligible
Geographic Area Project Call #1: Current Urbanized Area Boundary (Based on 1990 Census) Project Call #2, New Urbanized Area Boundary (Based on 2000 Census) Subregion Allocation of Funds2
Eastern Subregion = 69% Western Subregion = 31% 2 Based on population, employment and vehicle miles of travel estimates. 6 
TEA-2'.CALL FOR PF\.,JJECTS PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA: SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMMETROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) AND URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM (UAFP) Current Cost-Effectiveness
Rating Benefit/Cost Ratio Score 0.00-0.49 0 0.50-0.99 3 1.00-1.49 6 1.50-1.99 9 2.00-2.99 12 : 3.00-4.99 18 >4.99 24 Future Cost-Effectiveness Rating Benefit/Cost Ratio Score i 0.00
-0.49 0 ! 0.50-0.99 3 1.00 -1.49 6 ! 1.50-1.99 9 2.00-2.99 12 3.00-4.99 18 >4.99 24 7 
TEA-2T1CALL FOR PK0JECTS PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA: SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMMETROPOLITAN MOBILITY AND URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM, CONTINUED Air Quality/Energy Conservation
Rating Dollar Per Pound of Volatile Organic Compound Emission Reductions Score >99.99 0 50.0-99.99 5 10.0-49.99 9 i 5.0-9.99 14 L <5.0 18 Local Cost Participation Rating Percent Commitment
Score L 0-20 0 21 -25 4 26-30 8 31-35 12 36-40 16 41-45 20 ! >45 24 IntermodallMultimodallSocial Mobility Rating Mode Occu""lp"".an'-'-'c"'--y--:-:-___--+__-=S::.:c'70:..=rec-_-, Automobile
(OcCu=Jp:.;;;;;ian:..:.;c,,--Y=-c1L--___+-___) O'---__-i Goods Movement Bicycle & Pedestrian Travel Demand Management Bus Transit Light Rail, Commuter Rail 16 High Occupancy Vehicle
Facilities Elderly & Disabled Intermodal 8 
􀁔􀁅􀁁􀀭􀀲􀀱􀂷􀁾􀁁􀁌􀁌􀀠FOR PR\.w.JECTS Pending Decisions for the Regional Transportation Council Decision 1: Reserve Funds for Future Cost Overruns Reserve Approximately 5% of Total
Available Funds for New Projects (Project Costs Adjusted to Year 2003 Dollars) Reserve Approximately 10% of Current Out-Year Programming for Existing Projects Total Reserve for Project
Cost Overruns 􀁾􀀠$50 Million Decision 2: Reserve Funds for Future Partnerships • Reserve $100 Million for RTC Partnerships (Texas Transportation Commission, NAFT A) Decision 3: Issue
Call for Projects Total Available Funds (Includes TEA-21 Funds + 3 Years of Next Transportation 8i113) 􀁾􀀠$344 Million Eligible Projects: Travel Demand Management, Advanced Transportation
Management, and System Capacity & Management Projects Evaluate Candidate Projects Using Previous Criteria 3 Future funding is contingent upon the provisions of the next transportation
bill, expected to be passed in 2003. 9 
TEA-2'.CALL FOR PR0JECTS Pending Decisions for the Regional Transportation Council, Continued Decision 4: Subregion Allocation of Funds CMAQ Eastern Subregion = 68% CMAQ Western Subregion
= 32% STP-MM Eastern Subregion = 69% STP-MM Western Subregion = 31% UAFP Eastern Subregion =74% UAFP Western Subregion =26% Decision 5: Geographic Area for-STP-MM Funds Project Call
#1: Current Urbanized Area Boundary (Based on 1990 Census) Project Call #2: New Urbanized Area Boundary (Based on 2000 Census) Note: Information Contained in Decisions 1:5 Are Recommendations
of Surface Transportation Technical Committee 10 
--_. ----.---------_.. · r SURFACE TRANSPORATION FUNDING PROGRAMS LEGEND _ Metropolitan Mobility Urban Mobility o Rural Mobility LOCATION MAP 􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀠N" ,4'􀀬􀁾..\ Ot2345 No"h Calltral
TeUI COIIl'lcll 01 Oove.nmll\bI Trarwportatlon 􀁾􀀮􀀠
P.02 ofay-1.2-99 1.1:01A DALLAS COUNTY PU8UGWORKS May 12, 1999 MEMORANDUM ViaFAK To: Transportation Infrastructure Partners From: Donald R. Holzwarth, P. E. Director of Public Works
Subject: Dallas County Participation In Candidate TEA-21 Projects On Tuesday, May 11, 1999, the Dallas Counly Commissioners Court approved Court Order No. 99-922 (copy attached) which
authorizes County funding participation in the listed projects. This County funding is in addition to the local match funding to be provided by your jurisdiction/agency and provides
for local overmatching on the listed projects The Dallas County funding will be limited to the listed 'County Share-percentage of the actual project cost, not to exceed the amount shown
as 'County Maximum Cost' for each project. County funding authorized for projects which are not sefeeted for TEAw21 funding through the MPQ selection process will be de-obligated and
remain available for reprogramming by Dallas Counly in the future. Your agency/jurisdiction is responsible for insuring thai the necessary project submittal infOlTllation is provided
to the North Central Texas Council of Governments prior to the deadline of 5:00 pm, Friday, May 14, 1999, except that Dallas County will submit Project No. 28, Miller Road Bridge. Included
in the authorized funding listed in the attachments is complete programming of the remaining Dallas County 1991 Bond Funds for Incident Detectionand Response. We appreciate your cooperation
end support in preparing the project requests and in developing this funding pal1lcipation program. We join you in anticipating the selection of these needed projects for TEA-21 funding
and look forward to working with you, our partners, in seeing these projects completed. Donald R. Holzwarth, P. E. Director of Public Works Attachment 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas,
To;!l(BS 75202 (214)653-7151 
May-12-99 11,OlA 1'>.03 COURT ORDER ORDER NO. 99 922 30 DATE: HAY 111999 STATE OF TEXAS , COUNTY OF DALLAS , BE IT REMEMBERED, at a regular meeting of the Commissioners Court 􀁯􀁦􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁾􀀠County
, Texas, hc.ld on thc ____l._l._th___ day of ______ .-".Ma=.'.l_____, 1999,00 motion made by MiIro Cantrell, Q:mnissioner o1:...JD"'.t"'s"'tr..,icI::=...JliI:l""".--4l,2_________, and
seconded by Jim Jackson, o:nmissioner of Di1ilttict N:J. 1 , the following order was adopll::d: WHEREAS, the matter set foIlh below was disc.ussed in briefing on May 7, 1999 and on May
II. 1999; and WHEREAS, the federal Tl1IIIsportation Equity Act for the Twenty-First Centul:)' O'EA-21) autho.r:i= new federal transportation funding for the Surface Transportation Program
-Metropolitan Mobility (STp·MM) and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) which are programmed through the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MFO); and WHEREAS, the
North Central Texas council of Governments (NCTCOO), as the MPO for the Dallas-Fort WoIIh Metropolitan Area, has issued a Call for Projects to be comndered fur STp·MM and CMAQ funding
under TEA·21, with candidate projeclll to be submitted 10 NCTCOO by 5:00 pm, May 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, the CommiSSioners Court of Dallas County desires to participate with Dallas County
cities and other agencies in avennatehing the required local participation for these programs to improve the overall mnking ofprQjects IocaIed in Dallas County in the project evaluation
and selection prooe.ss to be utilized by NCTCOO; and WHEREAS, .the Commissioners CQurt bas requested and received candidate projects for CQunty participation from the cities and other
agencies and the Public Works Department bas reviewed and evaluated the projccts submitted; and WHEREAS, the Dirccror of Publlc Works recommends that Dallas County participate in the
projects shOwn on the attached listing, subject ro eacll bci:ng selected forl'EA-21 funding by the MPO and subject to the additional local matching fimds listed being provided by the
cities or other agencies, IT IS THEREFOR.E ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DF£RmID by the Dallas County CommissiollC1's Court that Dallas County Major Capital Development Funds shall be made available
for participation with the cities and other agencies in providing !he local matching funds for !he projects included in the attached listing, subject to each project's selection for
TE.A-21 funding by the MPO and subje(;( to the additional local match being provided by the ciUes or other agencies. 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Dallas Ccuruy COIlllTlissioners Court that Dallas County funding amounts shown in the attached listing are maxiOl1l1ll amounts and
that Dallas Couoty participation in \he listed p«!j1lCts shall not exceed the lesser of the amouot Iisced or the proportional share of the actual project cost attributable 10 Dallas
County based on the original funding proportions from all funding SOl.u:ces, and Dallas County reserves the right to notify cities and other agencies of reductions in funding in the
event economic emergencies cause the Dallas County Commissioners Court to de-obligate funds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUnGED AND DECREl;>J) by the Dallas County Commissioners Court that
it is the intention of tbe Commissioners Court 10 provide an equal allocation of transportation funds to each oonunissioners disbict and thus anocations of future County funding for
transportation improvements 10 the four commissioners dilib.icts may be adjusted at the time said future 􀁦􀁵􀁵􀁮􀁤􀁾􀀠are programmed in order to eliminate any inequities which result
from the fmal :;ekction of 'J'EA-21 projects and the actual implementation of said projects. OPEN COURT, thl! the __..::1:.:..1th=-___ day of ___·___􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁍􀁡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁌􀀭􀁟􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠
1999 􀁾􀁾.. .. Mike Cantrell 􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁐􀀺􀁩􀁬􀀬P.E. Director of Public Works 
C 􀁾􀀠i<, ... N 􀀢􀁩􀁊􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁉􀁉􀀪􀀡􀁴􀁦􀁊􀁾􀁟􀀧􀁭􀁕􀀮􀁜􀁨􀀴􀁊􀂢􀀠dt'fl'UI18J!11IUBtflll!lll!aIR!l!fJII!11 􀀡􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁈􀁕􀁕􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀢􀁕􀀱􀁴􀁒􀁍􀀱􀁩􀁾􀁡􀀸􀁩􀁴􀀡􀁬􀀱􀁉􀀢􀁗􀁪􀀡􀁩􀀢􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁡􀀡􀀡􀁵􀀮􀁉
􀁕􀁉􀀠rtr'Qi,SI 􀁮􀀪􀀬􀁈􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁟􀁈􀁴􀁩􀀦􀁬􀁂􀁴􀁭􀁾􀁊􀀧􀁒􀁭􀀧__• ,DALLAS COUNTY PARTICIPA TlON . 􀁾􀀠...TEA-21 CALL FOR PROJECTS .....MAY 14,1999 􀁾􀀠APPROVED BY COMMISSIONERS COURT ORDER
NO. MAY11,1999 --􀁕􀀺􀁮􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁦􀀪􀀧􀁍􀁦􀁴􀁦􀀻􀁴􀁴􀂣..􀁲􀀮􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀧􀁭􀁳􀀮􀁴􀀧􀁮􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁓􀀮􀀭􀁟􀀬􀀮􀀧􀁋􀀮􀁴􀁾..􀀡􀁬􀀧􀀳􀀧􀀺􀂧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁊􀂣􀁬􀁮􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁬􀀱􀀡􀀡􀀱􀀱􀀡􀀧􀁕􀀢􀀤a
􀁡􀀦􀁪􀁬􀁬􀁕􀁦􀁴􀁭􀁍􀁦􀀬􀁾􀁴􀁟􀀧􀁉􀁴􀀺􀁦􀁴􀁗􀁦􀀭ji! District # 1 Project From TD O!lier County Total Pro!ed Maximum eost Jurlsdlction(s) ProjeatlYl'e Agenq tounly Cas! 􀁓􀁨􀁾􀁲􀁥􀀠Sbam!!l
11$ 􀁔􀀼􀁩􀁬􀁷􀁡􀁹􀁓􀀮􀁾􀁨􀀢􀀧􀁵􀁲􀁤-. No"""'urod l).hJm" Aropahn Rd 5135.000 􀁾􀁓􀀬􀁉􀁉􀁏􀁏􀀠New Fa:ifily :ill'" 20lt ,.. Bel Lin. Rd.-. T.'1Mil' SinglO PtliIiliJlbon !nletel<enge SGI,IIOO
52.470,000 NewF..llv llOli 20lt f64 Dailas.An!a IncdiJl!Ce:teoslonaooRespol'llileRwle CiIywlde 5132,000 1S6II,OOIl Canu\[fcm IDRJlTS lIllI :lOI! 141 V."-1 PI<><y. Hullan R!1 (_I Flllu,.
1""'111 5901,000 􀁾􀀮􀀵􀁬􀁏􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀨􀁉􀀠Ci>,lOiIon Widen!:!! l!I!I 2!1110 ., YVa/S.rq. LoI<.llood Oen!<l1 rap Road SH121 $1,300,000 $.801),000 􀁃􀁾􀀬􀀠Wldell'llg :i!l1O lll!I 31/I,wood
Rd. Un.....iIy:Jr. SYJ,OOO mo,ooo llaIW 􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁴􀁓􀁥􀁣􀀻􀁦􀁬􀁄􀁉􀀢􀁬􀁉􀀺􀀱􀁴􀁰􀁲􀁷􀁅􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁣􀁮􀁴􀀠llOlI 2!1110 If'f Im\(:cd ReI . L ...... Ln. S)O,OOO $350,000 . 0.1.. IntnecIlcn 􀁾􀁴􀁭􀁬􀀠20%
lll!I 318 t\G$conS!. 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁏􀁥􀁫􀁓􀁉􀀮􀀠$15,000 S7;,000 Da!u lnieMlClion In'tlratlll'teJ'rt llOlI ;m. 3)4 AocnoallAI<I! OIIklaw, iI1,OCO 815.000 DoJI.. 􀁾􀁣􀁮In1'»cYl!lItenf 2:1% ;m.
􀀱􀁾􀀠D..P......y t>o'" 􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁹􀀠􀁬􀁩􀁭􀁩􀁾􀀠Weslgr:nte 􀁓􀁬􀀬􀀨􀁉􀀶􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁏􀁏􀀠$6,214,000 C.IIa. '/IIde'Iir.g 20'11 2Cl\ 193 8eIt 􀁌􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁤􀀮􀀠􀁓􀀮􀁈􀁾􀀱􀁬􀀼􀀧􀀠􀁏􀁏􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀠$461I,OCO
$U1O,000 Call.. '/IIde'I11!jj 20'% 2Il\\ 2)1 LUlIIIRosd 􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁬􀀯􀁉􀀮􀀠S!:oI 􀁾JN.W. H<wy. 11..00,00] fI/HJ.OOO 􀁏􀁾􀁉.. \'(odoII"i llO% :il:i% 11$ I_IOeIedfi>n am 􀁾􀀠Variolll kalOls
11lIQIXQ S550,OCIl _ ... B<ol1ch IIlI'lIIlS 26'11 lll!I􀁾􀀷􀀠I11III",1>1"" In. Nichol,,,, Rd Iii 1ii!5 lmJO,IXQ 112.500,OCIl Fatnlef9 􀁡􀁾􀁣􀁢􀀠2810 :1(1%-'I!jj 􀁾􀀠S/11191J 1:10:03
PM £>ago 1 "fir IJ1 0 
District # 1 l1li <39 ':1\ " 141 Project Jurlsdlctlonts) """"Iln. llIinq Vido:>l_nIOeledbr.R<_R_ Carn;>bell Roo::l 􀁾􀀯􀁉􀁉􀁴􀁉􀁉􀁣􀁉􀁉􀀠r_lSoor 1lI!IIo...... 1...1dEo1 Oel.o:lllIl..,d
IleJpo",. RleI,,<""'" From IHti:l5 CllyOido .lJy ElIRd. CiI)'wide 􀁰􀁬􀀱􀀩􀁾TlIPs Widening DJRJlTS t\ew Flu::ili!, IORmS District # To "'-df'kwy U.s' IS 1 Olhlll' County Agenoy County
Maximum Share Shan! '4 COlt $1&\JlOO :;,;% m 26% 􀁾􀀠$132,400 $:l,051,m 31'11 15% $7O,(I(X) 26% 2(11\ TOTALS $111,477,533 Tolar Project Cost $2,200,000 16S2.000 519,9OIl,000 $:jOO.(I(X)
$57,031,0(10 District # 2 Project Jurisdlction(s) 1iII Mm'l Rood I!ri;ge 0.1l1l\I -1II Milor RDfid Clallam! 19 tl_1HilhWO) Ilarlllld :Ii DallaS AltlO·1'/1Jo lOR 11_ Ilarllnd 22 '.omS'
􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀬􀀠lBJ F......... (l.l!!\SlIlaI'end 141 'l,neal1d. MesqJi!. '49 'lorltl....,Il!.MeoqJr.. II 􀁜􀁉􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁲􀁒􀁯􀁡􀁤􀀠􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁉􀁴􀀠" 􀁓􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁍􀁤􀀠Sac/t•• From Cily ,,1l3arl,nd
􀀭􀁾􀀠GO'..niryClub_ C_IIIRDad .......-. 􀁋􀁾􀁟􀀠drulonRd la,..mOr. w...Crfy !.'mit MuddyC,eek Pl'Qject Typ. -log W""'!!i W""'ing :ORJITli NowF.c!\r Wl<I!nlng WidePltrg W!derlflg Widen,g
District # To OIher County 􀁍􀁬􀁬􀁘􀁩􀁭􀁾􀁭Agency 􀁃􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁜􀁙􀀠CostShire Ibamll Cily of Rvoiot1 &2,7I11,!J2 011 m lBI«I Rat HLIXl.nI $:jOO.(I(X) 25% 6'11 u. PIlId! DM $4IO,6li1 25'1<
2IllI $I50.@20,., 20,.. 1.0 ""'" Ell"" _COO 25'1\ m <IeIt Una R.I. $1,2JO,COO 2\1.,. 20'7. LH. ;JQ Sl,66il.1X»26'4 lCl'o i\INdG!t Road $1,412,784 25'J1, 213\1. 􀁾􀁉􀁥􀁳􀁒􀁯􀁡􀁤􀀠􀁓􀁬􀀮􀁡􀁉􀁂􀀮􀁧􀀬􀁾�
�20'1\ m. 2 TOTALS $fO,751,m Tolal Project Cost 􀁓􀀱􀀳􀀬􀁩􀁾􀀬􀀱􀀶􀁩􀀩􀀠f,5,008,331 $2.353,338 $153,1l11O $4,4OO,IlIIO 􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁊􀁏􀁏􀀠$6,300,000 !7.113.8t':l $9.0!I1.5QS $58,067,223 '0
fJl111991:10,04 PM Page 2018 Q III 
􀁾􀀠'< I III'"' Dlstriet# 3 1 Ie IeProject From To Otlw CoIIlI\Y 􀁔􀁯􀁬􀁡􀁬􀁐􀁾􀀠 Agency County Maximum CQst Jlll'illdiction(s) Project Type Share Share % Cost '"' ..'"' District# 3
o 􀁾􀀠Project From To OIlIer ' County Total PIOJRt ColiAgency County Maximum JurisdictionlS) Project Type Shlle Share % Cost ill lo6:lSSouilblunci Solve, R<:od Elom Road lako Juno Road
􀁾􀀬􀁚􀁬􀀶􀀠􀁓􀀳􀀬􀁊􀀴􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀠IloIth I'piJl!II N",Faei'ly 21'11 2l% 􀁾􀀠e,GnmdAoon. l.H.an 11IiI>,«X) 􀁾􀀬􀁀􀀠􀁉􀁍􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁮iIl1prMlnent :!\l% 'lOll H""rvSL Good LaI'"", Sl6.ooo 􀁓􀁪􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏241
Dallas !men:ecticl'! "p'CWlment z)'JI 'M ru.1<>lI AYe. S1aIoSl $2t,OIIO 5120,000'm Colla. InlmediOll 􀁾􀁭􀀢􀀢􀀠20'1> 2l% l<3 BIleMBIId. Scye",Rd, $4<),000 $ll)O,«X) Doll.. Inl..-'"P'_to!
20'11 :!)'!, 1.ect>oI... 01, V_Or, 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁉􀁬􀀠5100,000211-1 Olll.at 􀁉􀁭􀁴􀁮􀁥􀁤􀁢􀁲􀁬􀁬􀀬􀀢􀁰􀁵􀁬􀁶􀁾􀁭􀁥􀁬􀁜􀀱􀀠;1)'11 :!\lIi 241 tH, 35i:0010, Klost Bill!. $4C.ooo $ll)O,O::O 􀀱􀁟􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁭􀁾􀀠::!l
l' m Fordham Rd. Su"'vvoItRd $4C,000 $200,0::0 2'i Dala. 1,,..,_lmJll!l'lO'llllM 2'.)% 2i1II I.H 3!f L"""""Or. $1(;,il:(I $3SIJ.@Ill) 0..., 11I1ers &:iiol'llmprtlYement ::!l'JI 2lI'£
Hic'll!YSl 􀁓􀁣􀁵􀁾􀀠CentmtE:.pr. m,ooo $100,00023£ 0III.at 1,I.....,ion \!I1lm"manl 23'11 20% 􀁉􀁬􀁥􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁯􀀠Rd. Ille!leriAd $)C.il:(I $150,00Il300 Da'J1U 􀀱􀁾􀁬􀁥􀀢􀁥􀁣􀁩􀁩􀁄􀁮􀀠􀀱􀁭􀁾􀁮􀁬􀀠2'J'
JI 2i1II I.H :nR;. Tho'.n 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁖􀀠􀀱􀁩􀁨􀁲􀀮􀀡􀁆􀀱􀁬􀀡􀀼􀁾􀀠C.,..Uk<. S333iOO SI,6ll6,1llO 221 OI!sS 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁩􀁬􀀧􀀻􀀠20'1. 2il'1o '96 S!", 482 .,I-US Doll" Cily 􀁌􀀻􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀠m,lal
􀁾􀀸􀀱􀀱􀀷􀀬􀀰􀀰􀁉􀁬􀀠Dala. ......ni'I! 􀀲􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀠211% "" SpJ 4IflI 51""" lJ\. 􀀢􀁾.. loop 121 N,l1/twesl I'!ty, tH, 3& Wdmi"S m,w; 20'11 20% stm4,000 11!2 L<Xl' 35<1Hany 􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀢􀀠'-51
o.kl.." 􀁾􀁶􀁥􀀬􀀠S)'1,ro:: $355,000 !)all.. 􀀱􀁮􀀱􀀡􀀡􀀢􀂫􀁦􀁩􀁯􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁶􀁲􀁦􀁣􀁎􀁥􀁾􀀠2C" 20\', 2.. 0<er10. Rd. 􀁓􀀢􀁮􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁓􀁬􀀠SIlO,OC<: 􀁾􀀬􀁣􀀺􀁯􀁯􀀠01111, 1ol8"!!dian ImP_I
:if)'II 2Cl\ '"' lM1'oodRtI!IQ ',.emMonA"IQ u.., 􀁾IHal')' H"'" e;..d. $1,115,000 55.815,000 0.1.. 􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠21)" 2(1% 'lI oSll1!991:1():()$ PM Page 3 ofB ''I 
􀁾􀀠'< •... 1\1 District. (I. 3 ' III Project From To Other County Total PlOject III AgI!llC)' Cognly Mulmum Cost ... Jurisdictlon!s, Project TYI''' Share !JIlin'!!. CHI ;;' l5'l '.Ii
.t!i S"""OII Sll1111lld. S31),0IXl S1;!iO.OIXl 0 D.lb. Intlnl!Cllon '''P''''''''''''! l!l % 3J% IIJ 2IXJ Unle!d RIlIId SJ{ 310 I SM. W<ighl 1110015....... 3261,800 􀀤􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀨􀀩􀁬􀁑􀀠:l>
DaIIl> WIIlel'!iI'!I:IOII 3J% 2J!l HasIWlIMI Ddphln 􀀱􀁉􀁤􀀮􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁡􀁾􀁨􀁏􀁬􀀠Sf C_ElqMy. $545,200 12.726,0IXl D,llas n""""""'M 2C % ;!)II, 1ll Becllay m. Joffo<llon eM! $30,\'00 $1511,0IXl
!lalla! Inl"l<Ch..III1I'f"'O••nl 1Il'l, 3J% 211 '>!i1ila'Yi'tow "'-Ave. F"""Y Rri S3i1UIlO S1.!i24,OO> Dol'" 􀁗􀁾􀁮􀁧􀀠1Il% 2ffi' ll! Joffe...., 􀁂􀁾􀁤􀀮􀀠Mam,fi. Av.. ii30.000 S'.50,OIXl
001101 l_ecIio. 'mpr""",,,,t 20 % 3J% ll! Ik!oi<rey hie. W Co,...."" 5t. $2IJ.OOO 1100,000o..lfa. 1""".o1len 1_..1 20 'II 􀁾􀀠221 Col""", 􀁂􀁾􀁤􀀠.10,.""" BMI. $40,000 $200,000 􀁄􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁉􀁮􀁾􀁯􀁮
"'""",men! :10" m ZIt 􀁅􀁩􀁧􀁾􀀱􀁨􀁓􀁬􀀠Jo_IlIvd. S31),\'OO l15O,000 oar.. irI!emClicn ,,_men! 2Ilfj, :!O'l. 231 Ik!oi<rey ".e CoI".il> Biro. t16.0IXl l17S,tllODar.. 􀁓􀁧􀁮􀁾ftJ>Ir",,,,,
20" m 10l lOOi>l2fBlJd<ne.6I\'d. "'koJulltlld. US. '7Slo.F.HaYm t167.@$1,935,0000.'.. Widerilll1 10" m :19'! Fcrn'l'RoiId JimM&'Rrl $3OOIXl Sl!>l.OOO Da:'85 􀀱􀀱􀀱􀀧􀀱􀁴􀁉􀁴􀁀􀁬􀀺􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀠􀁬􀁾􀁬􀀠􀀲􀁬
􀁾􀀠m :0, Co.... 0"" w..rm",I.ndRd. $lIl.OIXl 11liO.0IXl Da'la. SQlf.1 PlO<if<.ton ::0'1> m m Ban,.. v..... Road II 􀁾􀀠211 SJl.OOl 6185,000 DoiIa. '''''''l!OIien 1_" 20" m "" Keisl
􀁡􀁾􀀠Sur_I. S31),@SlliO,OIXl [),,,,, 􀁉􀁮􀁬􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁢􀀬􀁮􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀻􀁏􀀧􀁬􀀮􀀠m 􀁾􀀠Rid1r!10nd 􀁓􀁫􀁾􀁍􀀧􀁮􀀠S2Il.OOl 51OO.0IXl 􀁯􀀮􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀠InlOl'_' """.,,'''''''' 20" m , H!!!In.li'Bu.""
Maple $00.IX'il S250.ooI)IS 0,-.. Int.,,,,,,,, 1m"''''.......' lIl'l. m 1m Comp W..."m _ HO'"I,n SchOol Road $3Il.1X'il Sl!o.OIXl Ill"" ,.terood<ln 1In"",,,,,"., 20'" m 29Ii l<iighlillldtJ....
SiqIo"" Iiluon Rd. S2C.00l Sl(l).OIXl 􀁏􀁡􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀠IMfI's«tl!l'llfnprwoment m,. m m Forney Rood L... """" iIOO.OOIl $300' iIOO 􀁄􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀠'mer,.,"'" Im",_' Im",_' 2<)" m il . o 5111199
1:10:116 PM Pag<: 4 of B OJ 
:il '< 􀁾􀀠I ... II) District # 3 I III IIIProject From To OIlIer County Tolat I'roject Agen<:y County Mulmum Coli ... Jurisdietlon(s} 􀁐􀁬􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁔􀁾􀀠Share Share % COsl ..... 2111
H!lMom' Rood Sitko" Stool s:l2.11X1 S1!I,tm 0 1lsU.. 1,_,-,1 2Q% m w l>251 51", ild, Sucknll!f 51SOJlX) SOCJ),I!XI 0.110. InlloSeefion 1_l1l1I 20% 21111 ;111 !It Pual Colla. VlOO<iII
fIooe1s lr'dar'SGl:6on /rnpJoInIllant 21)'1/, 20\1 s:!(I,OOO $100,tXXl 2'2 Gat""''''''.1:l<Is. Goo:r loti""" I!>1""",!\:in Impr_t 21)% m S3IIIl,OOI $1,fIlO,COO iI!!!I lIIIolsrIload u-a,Rd.
$2!I,OCO $lM,OOO 0iI1'o, InlerA«:lion I_eat 2Il1'. 21)1', m Conlinelolo' A..,O.,e SIeNn.... F"I, 11.H.:J6J _onrn_nI 20 .. 2tll1 $150,000 Si'SQ,ax1 2IlIl '1lI1t1!i1O' l'oIIorlW 0.'100
PoIl<SI fntm:eclion fr'rc*Nament :!l% m 140,001 $aIl.OOO ZI1 2!l 􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁮􀁾􀁥􀁹􀀠DallsJ Bi.""" OaIIM 􀁃􀁾􀁟􀀠w.._"", 􀁉􀁮􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁡􀁮􀀠blpJwement 1"'."..U.. 􀁾􀁴􀀠:!:I'll :!:Ill 20\1
m S1J,ooo Slii,COO 5151),00:> 􀁓􀀱􀁾􀀬􀀨􀁋􀁬􀀩􀀠iii Iiu1ler Dallas tlanyH.... 􀁉􀁮􀀡􀁥􀁬􀀳􀁥􀁤􀁩􀀨􀀨􀁊􀀱􀁬􀁭􀁾􀁴􀀠:!l!ll 2!l\\ 5151),000 Sl5Il,:m 2IlIl Ook '-"'"AIls. D.11os 'H 35 (Slem,,""1
1_",I'!i!!""'m",r 21)11 m S58.21l1l S2l1,DOO l!1 􀁅􀁲􀁲􀁾􀁃􀁟􀀱􀀠Doll.. I H 35 (SIom"<ml Inlo.tIClan Impr_"" 2011 2'!. 511,000 5<&1,000 2!l 􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀠Hln.. 1!1Od 0.. O'kLow'A.... Widenlrig
2:)% 20\1 $15.1,000 S/!ii),OOO 2IlIl 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠t:lltg Jr. eM:! DaUs: t. e Clillum 􀁬􀁮􀁾􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁥􀁥􀁴􀁩􀁲􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁡􀁶􀀮􀁭􀁦􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁾􀀠<OlI 2IlII m,ooo S1!lIl,OO:> 2$1 I H 3Il 0'""'
Jim Miller lr'ltflrleetOl'! mprMmet\! 2:)lI 2ClI SIIl,ooo mo,coo 313 􀁾􀁬􀁊􀁍􀁣􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀠0i!II>s 􀁾􀀢􀀱􀀱􀀸􀀼􀁹􀀠P''''I', ftltersecICIt 1mf!QWt11e1! 20')', 2ClI m,ooo S'al,C<C n5 􀁐􀁃􀁬􀁬􀁲􀁬􀁓􀁾􀀮􀀠0.
11.. WlIOdaIIR<>s<" 􀁉􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁏􀀧􀁬􀁬􀀱􀁴􀁦􀀩􀁬􀀧􀁃􀁜􀁉􀀧􀁥􀀨􀁉􀀱􀁾􀁬􀁩􀀱􀀱􀀠20'1\ m SOO,OOO mo,COO 2Ili AnnAIixwA,", 0."'" $JM'""" Sl 1"1._impr""",o,l 2iJ'JI. m Sl5.1lOO f/5,OOC
2SII Jm Miler Rd, 0.... i.oq> 12 􀁉􀁾􀁥􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀮􀁤􀀠2lI'fo m S24,l1OO 􀁓􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀠25' 1le'1 L"" 'Id, e F, Haw.F"'I' S\\l,1XI) $!OO,C<C 0.11>$ 􀁬􀁴􀀱􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀱􀀠20"10
l!OII> , " 1iiI1119!1 1:111:05 PM Page SoH Ul 0 
N '"' Il. District # 3 ProjeCI Jurlsdictlon(s) From Proj!<:tTYfl& To OIlIer Agerrq county Shlle §h31lt1 Coullty Maxllll1lm Cost Tot.ll Project Cos! 􀁾􀀠GF HaWII""'Y. lBI<e J""" RI1 S4OO,OOII
52,00II,000 Dall.. I",,,,,,,,,,,,, 11119,,,,,,,,","1 21)5 m !OO Sl1gt!!lOn 3M! Ddt.. Wam","",nd Rd, l_nlm9'_"'.1 :1)% 2IlI! $190,000 $Il5O,OOO 􀁾􀀠Ilucl<nsr BW C,F. HlIII'n F..,. 1180,Il00
S4OO,IX!) 0,11.. 􀁉􀁬􀀱􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁥􀁴􀁾􀁅􀁬􀁮􀀠􀁾􀁮􀀱􀀠􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀠m III <)'.Il0l1 0Il1.. I'I?Bk 'dlVSecion lmprwenl'lmt 􀀲􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀠2IlI! $:12,000 􀁓􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠iIIl o..I!,>F"'l'Rd 1),11..
T..gerdoo Rtl Irll""",",n Imp,,,,,,,,,nI :lO5 lilli $20,(100 SI00,OOO 3J8 ill""51. 001.. l'Ioods1l 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠Intersecl:on 􀀡􀁭􀁰􀁴􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠20% 21lli $I.Il.1IOO $2OO,OCIi -311) GaI1<ln
Avo, W.'!\ing1aO A"" s:>l,1IOIl S2!()J):jj 􀁏􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀠􀀱􀁮􀁴􀁾􀁲􀀦􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁃􀁮􀀠Impf'tMlell"llUlI 􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀠m c.dIr Spring< $SIl,1IOO &250,000!50 0.111. Imecseelm Improyer"mt 201\ 20\1, m
_S".., wrcrtf I'No 115,000 Slii,OOO Dalss 􀁉􀁭􀁥􀁮􀀦􀀻􀀡􀁩􀀺􀀻􀁲􀁉􀁬􀁬􀁦􀀧􀁬􀁥􀁾􀀢􀀹􀁲􀁴􀁴􀀠􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀠211% 3!4 Mr!QIeAW8,D."", 0.\ laIdI A"". In:crsec;tion 􀀱􀁾􀀡􀁬􀀧􀀱􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠2011 m;
Slil,IIOIl $15tl,@3>19 Hook,11 A.B. 0.1lio L."""nAve. In!eJsaefmlmprnvetllant 20\\ m SlO,IX!) t!OO,@3>17 Ge...,/W<Dora. I.f<JnQer"yo, 􀀡􀁮􀁭􀁬􀀧􀁓􀁾􀁬􀁲􀁸􀀧􀁬􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠20% m $lli00il
􀀡􀁉􀁚􀁬􀁾􀀮􀁯􀁲􀁯􀀠". 315 3lQ OIIIItoI EIP"YDoto. Ga."" Ave DIIllis Hal"'" Delli. GaoI'nIPaO.c HailS!. _10;;;;J, In:er.u:,ctoo implMlrlfnf Inw••:li:o 􀀱􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁬􀁉􀁗􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁬􀀠􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁥􀀱􀁓􀁬􀁉􀁃􀀺􀁭
􀀠Irnpre\I'HI!m :lO'II 2O'!. 20'1\ m m :!O!\ ;40,00II 1:/8,000 165,000 $2!lI),tlIII 􀁓􀁉􀁾􀀬􀀱􀁘􀀡􀀩􀀠5325.000 District # 3 TOTALS '8,581,636 $43,243,1B4 􀁾􀀠<t 0.. District # 4 '"'
'"' tn tn I Project Jurisdlctlonls) From ProjectType To Olher Auency Courri¥ 􀁓􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁥􀀠!3lar&% County Maximum Coal loU! Proltei Cost N '"' I "2 􀁷􀁡􀁬􀀧􀁑􀀱􀁬􀁥􀁾􀀠RlOOd Co<iIrHilI W..'C'lyl''''' -'Il Llot. V""Or :25'110 20% $',0111,321
SS,I't62j >, 1\1 $1111991;10:05 PM 􀁾􀀦􀀶􀀢􀀧􀀸􀀠:E 
􀁾􀀠'<I ... DiSlrlct# 4 N I Project Jurisdlctlon{s) 121) u.s. 61 Cedar Hill US157 11$ Cedo,HII :m 􀁾􀁟􀁉􀁈􀁬􀁡Reed 1lGI4. From _1Run Rd. (1<9) FM.I382 DIN. lid. To ProJeotType 􀁦􀁮􀀱􀀮􀁾􀁯􀁯􀀡􀁉􀁏􀀼�
�􀀠",,-men. llIferSedioo ImpriMlmBlI1 0_11 Hill City Llmib Widening Ofher Ageney County Shalf SIwe:!2 2n m. 26% m. 3)'1\ m . County Mulrnum Cos! l12iO,Im 112:iIl.\'Ol $251,4'00 Tatal
ProJect Cast. ;IZ1:).OOO $1,250,00II $1,&,00;) ID III ... ..... 0 W ):> m O.... SL Oollos brgBMl. 11l1eraRlilln Il1IPWament :10" :.m. tlIl,OOO $IOOIXll m V._Sl0."" laniIBM1. ln1o,,,,,1bI
bnp<_ 20'1. 20!1. $4$Pl) SZlS,!lJII l!II Ctmbt c...k Kelt $36,(111) $liil.OOll 0.1.. 111......I0Il 1m"""""",,, :ll'IG :!1llI l't1 c...pWI...... llrl. 0aIaa I'I>lkSi. In1et'!1tc11on 􀁬􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁦
􀁬􀁴􀀠201 20!1. $25.000 Sl2S,OOl ... PclkSt Rod Bi,d Ln. $3l,CIIl 􀁓􀁬􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁉􀁉􀀠Dolo hl1elSetlion ImpfO'temeni 2IJr. m :!IS H,mplcnRd. 1loIa Roll Bi,d 1.0. 1nto"",,1ilr\ 􀁉􀁭􀁰􀀬􀁾􀀠lIJ%
2!J% $24.000 S121l.00II 215 t.!oLlll8in CnJok Pkwy. llatos /(J!ill1811ni RC!3ns!rJJC:liM f. H. 2Il 34% 121'. SI94,2f1 􀁾􀁬􀁉􀀰􀀱􀀬􀁗􀁉􀀠lEI! 􀁗􀁩􀁮􀁾Roo:! De$OIt! Cod<III Hill!!d. Wideni.g
\'Iesl CIIy iJmill 26% I"'" saS.lllO $3,«1,000 115 Winle!gllll!ll Roo:! DoSoIo HempIM Roo:! Widening O!>cIn!UHlllRd lIi'll 17l!. $2.1HO.2!» $11.617,000 111 Oladrt_OI"",,,m. OodalHil
. Ooniotill. Roc:d IlaIiI!I Wile<I!ne C,,,.:h Sf/eel 24'11 :.m. SIl2JI.600 $4,1+1,000 212 Wi"""""" Roo:1 􀁴􀁬􀁴􀀮􀁯􀁣􀁡􀁮􀁷􀁩􀁉􀁾􀀠F·67 Wido>i.g E.llmcarMil. Oily lilnis 2611> m SI,OOO,37&
S5.(ll.&OO 13 􀁾,,,,lde.1 De!«:""'PJ<rgr1/t!I 􀁇􀁲􀁡􀁊􀁙􀀺􀁬􀁉􀀧􀀡􀁾􀁊􀁩􀀡􀀠T.... OOT varimJ!llo<oliona IDRJITS 31" 15% 􀁦􀁬􀀳􀁾􀀠$2'l5JlOO 12 lo'Io SIa, Rate T""k sane! Pmllie I.H30
ICRJlTS !leUI,.., Rd. 29% :!1llI 5150.000 SISO.OOI iO Belt IJJIe Rd. Chrd Prai,ie TexaoOOT 1H,30 Widet1ir:g Rock liland Rd. 331 13'lIi $1,312,000 114.400,«0 • 1 IRlIOF""._ GImIPrai'i,
T.... OOT IWrr:Allhur mm. N... 􀁆􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁬􀀡􀀠TRA Raitoarl Spur 3310 13% $4Q.I,OOO $3JOO.OOI Hu",", F<noIl Rood 􀁾􀁵􀁲􀁥􀁎􀁤􀀮􀀠NlmtyRd. 􀀤􀀱􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁬􀁉􀀩􀀠S6.lIiS.200IJ4 IrvlIg 􀁗􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁴􀀱􀁬􀁾􀀠26'
:!1llI '03 􀁶􀀮􀁾VIowln N!rIIv>le Dr. W,lnol fIIIln. 􀀤􀀤􀀸􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1JYt!9 211' :.m.-!!!! '0 , 5111/$93;45:38 PM Paae 70(11 ,.. 0 
Distrlcf# 4 Project From To other COllftly Tala! Project AgencyCoIIIIIy MulllUlm Cost Jurisdlctlon(8) ProjectType 􀁧􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁥􀀠Sbilllt!! Cost 4G l!eIll;"" Rood 0.1Ias AYenue 91,'9'''''
Rood SI.11l4.400 $5.172.000 l..."sIor Wide"1Il 2)'11 2Il'IIo 117 1.fI.20 Coolooll 􀁾􀁩􀁬􀁬􀀠ad. S1B5.711:l SS26.81» T_OCT o.",1IIlIi11o 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁉􀀡􀁓􀀧􀀡􀁤􀀡􀁬􀁮􀀠Imp",,._ 33')', 1!1'1
District # 4 TOTALS $11.',838,328 $75,102,B15 District # Multiple Project Jurisdicfionjs} From Project T:iPe To other A!lency County Share Shore % County MaxImum Cost filial PlOleGt
cost 3Il V"'"" o.I«:lla1Camel>.lOrlDR 065 CilrHide !DRIllS 20% m Sl40.ZO 51,701,000 JI2 CIl'J1!jeable 􀁾SIS'" Fm IIlR Roulins 􀁾􀀮􀀱􀁉􀁬􀁲􀁳􀀠ID/lnTS 2011 2Il!I $i112,&'lQ , S4.I!S4.OOO
lDI liTl'lOOd RoocI DaI!I. Utlw...iIy BI'/d, le"""" Alia"'_IonImpmy.....1 􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀠20!1 $11O.1IlO li553,@ZII L11, il5E F.....go Rood o.na. Spur 􀁊􀁾/N,W, HMy, _F..􀁉􀁾􀀠No!IhdSlOlII'flSpor
l!2 211 !I 20!1 $323,11:0 $I,540.0c0 IDI m 361 􀁏􀁾􀁉..ArOlIOR IMIg IT S<lenbalCclrIlDICen1or T_OOT T.....II "'IJ>cnIy IlrellWfdo ITS 1I\Ieg""'" ""ieC1 T_DOT DART Cl!jwldo Doflol c"'"iy
NC1I::OO !DRIITS IOIOITS IIlRIITS District # Multiple 20'11 lIZ'" 47S. TOTALS lOll 13" 3% 58OO.0c0 $1.625,000 􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀺􀀰􀀠$«211,6/lO S4.0c0.OCO $13.000.000 510.000,000 $35,758,000 DALLAS
COUNTY TOTALS 147,1111,874 $26',802,222 5I111!l9 3:46:38 PM Page8of8 '" '" 11 
􀁾􀀭.AJ)6ISDN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 45(l.2871 *H "® Post Office Box 9010 Addison. Texas 75001-9010 16801 WestgroV6 May 12,1999 Mr. Dan Rocha, Principal Transportation Planner
North Central Texas Council ofOovernments Centerpoint Two, 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 200 Arlington, TX 76001 Re: 1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Dear Mr. Rocha: In response to your call,
this is to transmit our applications for the following projects: • Belt LinelDallas Parkway Single Point Urban Interchange • Dallas Parkway Southbound to Northbound U-turn at Arapaho
Road • Belt Line Road Signal Timing and Hardware Upgrade • Midway Road Signal Timing and Hardware Upgrade The application consists ofa paper copy and an electronic file for each application.
Appropriate enclosures have been included as requested. Please give me a call at 972450-2879 ifany additional information is needed. Very truly yours, Town ofAddison 8:::1!::?::.DFE
Assistant City Engineer cc: John Baumgartner, Director of Public Works Enclosures 
--i LETTER 0F TRANSMITTAL PAR SON S T RAN S PO R TAT 10 N G R 0 U P BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 5485 Belt Line Road, Suite 199 􀁄􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀺􀂧􀀡􀀱􀀱􀀱􀀹􀀹􀀡􀁾􀁏􀁂􀀠NO..---........_1
Dallas, Texas 75240-7655 iATTENTION: Mr, JimPier"e, P,ll. Telephone #: (972) 991-1900 Fax #: (972) 490-9261 RE: : ........ __ .. Metro #: 263-9138 ..... Traffic Signal Timing and Hardware
TO: Town of Addison i Belt Line .Road . 16801 Westgrove.::..::..:.:D:.:J:I=·v'-e=-______ 􀁾__--",M.:.:i.::.dw,,-a::.yRoad ..__􀁾􀀠Addison, Texas (214) 450-2879 WE ARE SENDING YOU: i!lAttached
DUnder separate cover: []Shop drawings DPrints DPlans ,JSamples 􀁾􀁓􀁰􀁥􀁣􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁬􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀠D Copy of letter :::::!Change order [JEA Reports and Schematics DOther i ITEM COPIES DATE
DESCRIPTION I I 05/J 1/99 Diskette with Applications for COG f--I.....=2'---+.......;...... _____....._t---=Lo"'ca"-'Cti-=on"-'CM.:.:a=ps"'-(MJdway and Belt Line) 1_-i3 4 5 6 THESE ARE
TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: [JFor approval []Approved as submitted DResubmil copies for approval I!lFor your use DApproved as noted IJSubmit copies for distribution .:!iAs requested
DRetumed for corrections DRetum corrected prints ""'Review/Comment DFOR SUBMITTAL TO TXDOT DFOR BIDS DUE 19__ D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: COPY: SIGNED: If enclosures
are not as noted, kindly notify us at one 
JIM JACKSON COMMISSIONER, PRECINCf NUMBER 1 To: City Managers and Public Works Directors Town ofAddison Cities ofCarrollton, Coppell, Dallas, Farmers Branch, Irving & Richardson From:
Commissioner Jim Jackson Date: May 7, 1999 FYI -Following is a list ofprojects in Commissioner's District 1 chosen from your cities' T21 project submission that the Dallas County Public
Works Department recommends the county commit to 20% additional funding. Also presented is a list ofprojects chosen that are multi district or more central or general in nature. They
are submitted under the heading District 7. Ratification will be on the Commissioners Court agenda next Tuesday, May 11. Because ofthe short time frame, any comments or input will best
be received by return fax to 972/406-0615. Irving and Dallas will also have projects submitted from other Commissioners' Districts. JJ:cm Enclosure SERVICE CENTER -2311 JOE FIELD RD.
-DALLAS, TEXAS 75229 -PHONE 972-247-1735 • FAX 972-406·0615 COUNTY ADMTNISTRAnON BUILDING· 411 ELM STREET· DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 . 214-653-7361 
􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁧􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀱􀁈􀀺􀀺􀀱􀀺􀀿􀁲􀀴􀀺􀁬􀁦􀁴􀀠Ii e:;:;:;w: 􀁴􀀤􀀧􀀪􀁓􀁩􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁾􀀠i:,t«;:ii;fil\i';i$i 􀁩􀀻􀀡􀀡􀀻􀁬􀁴􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁀􀀠it'" & 􀁾􀀠Recommended projects ranked by total point
by district, with county funding requested and total project cost for each district and countywide District # 1 Multi· Local Regional Local Tolal Cost to Tolal ProjectID Jurisdiction
Project Project Type Juris Pis MatchPIs ThorPls PriorPls Pis Danas Co. Cost 144 Mison BeUUneRd. New Facilily 15 20 :lO :lO 95 $494,(0) $2,410,(0) 145 Addison ToIt.vay Southbound New
Facilily 15 20 :lO 29 94 $135,(0) $675,(0) 194 Dalla. Cal1as Parkway Wodening 15 20 :lO 27 92 $1,004,800 $5,214,(0) 128 Richatdson Can¢eII Road New Facilily 20 15 20 :lO 85 tl,OOI,333
$19,800,(0) 193 Dallas BellUM Rd. Widening 15 20 20 28 ,83 $408,(0) $2,340,(0) 142 Carroilion Vatwood Pkwy Widening 20 20 10 :lO '80 iIiOO4,(0) $4,520,(0) 201 Dallas luna Road Widening
15 20 20 21 7B $1,490,(0) $7,41>1,(0) 41 Coppell West Sandy lake Road Widening 15 20 10 :lO 75 $1,300,(1,300,(0) $6,800,(0) 187 Farmers Branch Valley VI<!W In. Wodening 10 26 10 29 76
$500,(0) $2,!iOO,OO) 139 Richardson Video Incedenl Deleot"n Response IORIITS 10 26 10 28 74 $132,400 $662,(0) 189 Farmers Branch Inc>:feol Oelec1ion end Response IORIITS 10 26 10 27
73 $110,(0) $55(),OO) 141 Richardson Oallas "'.. Incidenl DeI",1ion and Response IORIITS 10 26 10 28 72 $70,(0) $300,(0) 184 Ger'"II", Dallas AI.. lncidenl OeIeolion and Response 10000TS
10 20 10 18 58 $132,(0) $660,(0) 96 Irving Ratal Ln Widening 10 20 10 13 63 SSn,980 $2,8S9,9:Xl 334 Dollas _Ave In''''''eolion lmprovem. 10 20 10 41 $3,(0) $15,(0) 342 Dallas InwoodRd.
Inlellieclion Improveme 10 20 10 41 $30,(0) $150,(0) 341 Dallas InwoodRd. Inlerseclion Improveme 10 20 10 41 $70,(0) $300,(0) 338 Dallas IleaconSL lntersection Improveme 10 20 10 41
S15,OO) $75,(0) sn199 9:12:27 AM Page 1 0'6 
District # 7 Multi-Local Regional Local Total Cost 10 Total ProjectJD Jurisdiction 􀁐􀁾􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀀠Project Type Juris Pis MatchPts TborPls PriorPts Pis Dallas Co. Cost-361 T....ooT At_ITS
Inlegl1l1ion Projecl IDRilTS 145 47 30 30 %62 $250,00) $10,00),00) 265 Texas oar ITS Cenlnil Cc<IIrnI Cenl.. !DRIlTS 8S 32 20 30 Ul $1,625,00) $13,IXXI,1XXI 362 Ow. Changoable M",_􀁓􀁾..For
lOR 􀁒􀁾􀀠IORllTS 55 20 20 29 124 1972,Il00 S4,864.1XX1 363 Ow. Video Deleclion C."""", f<l<IDR IDRilTS 55 20 20 28 123 $340,200 SI,701.1XX1 205 Ol!ilas I. H. 35E Frooiago _ New F8Cl'1y
10 20 30 17 11 $328.00) $I,64O,1XXI . 204 Dallas Inlorsection Im",__ IS 20 10 18 63 $110,Il00 $553,1XXI·1_District # 7 TOTALS $3,626,600 $31,758,000 DALLAS COUNTY TOTALS $44,046,811
$245,888,465 517/99 9:12:211 AM Page 6 0'6 .!i 􀀢􀀧􀀨􀁙􀀬􀁾---------..--. 
05/06/99 08:02 '6'9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR 1i!J001l017 FAX TRANSMISSIUN NO. OF PAGES UNCLUDING THIS PAGEl /1 DATE May 6,1999 TIME To NAME JIM PIERCE. P.E. F R o MNAME Brian A. Moen,
Associate FIRM TOWN OF ADDISON PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. 5485 Belt Line Road, Suite 199 Dall6s. Texas 75240-7607 Phone (972) 991·1900 Fax (9721 490·9261 r--------------1 PROJECT
NUMBER ADDRESSf------------I f----------------j PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER 972-450-2834 RE: TOWN EAST BLVD CLOSED LOOP SIGNAL SYSTEM Jim, Att<Jched are copies of the TEA21 applications
for Midway and Belt Line Road. Please call me after you have a "hanGe to review them. If you like, we Gan meet to discuss any questions you may have. ThankS, Brian Moen 
North Central Texas Council Of Governments sf:{b1TO: Honorable Mayors and County Judges DATE: April 30, 1999 City Managers and County Administrators Texas Department of Transportation
Officials 􀁄􀁾􀀠Transportation Authority Officials North Texas Tollway Authority Officials 􀁾􀁰Other Interested Parties FROM: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation SUB.IECT:
1999 North Central Texas Council of Govemments Call for Projects Reminder Notice The deadline for the North Central Texas Council of Govemments (NCTCOG) Call for Projects for the Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) funds is approaching. Pursuant to the Regional Transportation
Council's procedures fOr Calls for Projects,this serves as a reminder notice for all parties submitting projects. . The application, which is in Excel '97, is available by accessing
the web Site at: http://www.dfwinfo.comltransltip/calLfor...projects.htm The application is also also available on computer diskette. You may obtain a copy of the application diskette
by contacting Nathaniel Bamett at (817) 608-2337. Computers are also available at the NCTCOG offices for persons without access to Excel '97. To reserve time on the computer to enter
your project infonnation, please contact Nathaniel Bamett. VVhensubmitting your projects, please remember the following: • The:aeadline for receipt of appliCiations at NCTCOG offices
is Friday, May 14, 1999 at 5:oop:m. • Projects MUST BE submitted both on the diskette and a paper copy • No late or incomplete applications will be accepted • Applications cannot exceed
the available funds for each respective subarea: $202.780,000 in the Eastem Subregion (TxDOT Dallas District -Dallas, Denton, and Collin 􀁃􀁯􀁵􀀧􀁮􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁳􀀬􀀠and portions of Rockwall,
Kaufman. and Ellis Counties) and , , . $93,2,20,000 in the Western Subregion (TxDOT Fort Worth District -Tarrant County and , , • a portion o(PCjrker C()unt}t) " . 6i6 Six Flags Drive,
Centerpoint Two P. O. Box 5888, Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 (817) 640·3300 FAX: 817·640·7806 ®recycled paper 
PageT-we . April 30, 1999 􀁄􀁥􀀨􀁩􀁜􀀯􀁥􀁲􀁹􀁏􀁦􀁾􀁵􀁢􀁮􀁩􀁩􀁴􀁴􀁱􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀢􀁃􀁡􀁩􀀬􀀠bel1)ade 􀁾􀁴􀀠the IliCTCOGo.fl:icesat CenterPoint Twe,616 Six Fiags Drive; Suite 200, Ariington,Texas.760.11.
The mailing address for submittal ofthe diskette and 􀁰􀁡􀁰􀁾􀁲􀀠copy is: .. . . . . ... Dan Rocha Principal T rcmsportation Planner· North Central Texas Council of Governments P.O.
Box 58a8 Arlington, 'TeXl!s 76005-5888 . If yOu have any questions regarding this process (jr need aSSistance in the development of . candidate projects, please call Dan Rocha at.(817)
695,-9265. Thank you in advance for your consideration ofthe 1999 NCTCOOCali for ProjectS. NB:lr· ec:Michael Eastl.and; Executive Director, NCTCOO. Jack Miller, ChailTrian, RegionalTransporlation
Council Ron Harmon, President; NCTCOO Exi;ICUtiveBoard . 1998-99 UPWP Element 3.01 Project File .:' , 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ,,' ),,1 2 􀁐􀁜􀀨􀁪􀁪􀁾􀁴􀁬􀀧􀁾􀁭􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀿􀁱􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁏􀁾􀀺􀀠""" " . ,-->".,::>-:..-. -"'\:"':-l:' 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁱􀁴􀀬􀁔􀁹􀁰􀁥􀀨􀁣􀁨􀁃􀁬􀁏􀁳􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀠fron
i 􀀧􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁴􀀩􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀿􀀢􀀬􀀺􀀠",:\,:\ 􀀧􀀬􀀯􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀻􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀢􀀼􀀻􀀨􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠;", .;Llt<:..,/i'..􀀢􀀧􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭. ' 􀁨􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀁥􀁩􀀻􀀯􀀵􀁾􀁓􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁴􀁕􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀼􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀦􀁾􀀠
Midway Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing and Improvement Hardware Upgrade 􀁾􀀠',"""",,'j'+"t ,"""', ",," ;--:'c,<. " ,'",; ,,{+J: ,:/"11''i":" ' ''C',',.,,:';., ,,;3 '", ' , ' 4 ' ",5
􀁦􀀺􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀩􀀱􀁴􀀧􀀬􀀠p(ojeCtDescrlptlon,", Project Comment'\"," ' 􀁾􀀧􀀶􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁦􀁧􀁨􀁬􀁩􀀯􀀬􀀧􀂷􀀠;" -... ,"... ". ' ",: 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠".. , . }fL' ",'1/'/i,:t i , ,,' \ ...􀁫􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁻􀀧􀀢�
�,""ii,",',",r::",,:,,;;.;"'g,,'􀁾􀁜􀁤􀀪􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀬􀀺􀁭􀀬􀀮􀀠"', 'i,,,,,, ;', 6 Provide signal timing and This project will provide coordination between signals enhanced traffic
progression along Midway Road. Upgrade along Midway Road which will signal hardware at the project reduce travel times and idling intersections at intersections :',"'" I "ii",', " ,,",il
,/;",/"",'"'''' >,' " , ,C 􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀠,",',,,, ", "'... ' 13 14 Estimated Estimated Construction Time to start Date' " Complete tMMYvj') '. (months) ,,' Jan 2001 0006 y):/:} <".; 1,. X';.
""C" "",,> ">' ,;;,"', : i>",",' ,'\'\'" Page 1 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects POint Location Projects .'.. J;".,;.•,;+ h .... . · .• ·1.5 .. ' ......i!..􀀡􀁾.. 􀁾􀁊􀀡􀁾􀀧􀀻􀁾􀁴􀀧􀁾􀀱li,i 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁙􀁩􀀬􀁗􀀮􀁳􀀮􀁾􀁱􀁾􀀻􀁩􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀠prevlousFl/OdIng·
􀁓􀀺􀁲􀁐􀁾􀁍􀁍'I)f·USe:,i' 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁬􀁾􀁨􀁜􀁬􀁾I' ..... :i ?;/.i .,<11\: 􀁦􀁕􀁲􀁲􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁫􀁫􀁩􀁆􀀼􀁾􀁴􀀼􀀠􀀥􀀢􀀢􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠􀀮􀀬􀁾􀁧􀀼􀁾􀁻􀀻􀁨􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀴􀀧􀁾􀁦􀁾􀁬􀀠V'!'c":::1mib 􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀷􀀻􀁬􀁩􀀧􀁾
􀀢􀁴􀁹􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀁊􀀺􀀻􀀧􀁴􀁯':, Midway Road No N/A Signal Timing and Hardware Upgrade L. ;". 􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀠•.i, '!',.';: ... ;:+ ... ;:,..'., 􀁩􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀡􀀮􀁜􀁩􀀮􀂷􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠". '. '.'.. ,i',,'
.' l&Wlfi'i.dN··;.·.:,·i"· . 􀀮􀁾􀀠'./' . 17.. .. '. :1.9 , .20 . 􀁃􀁯􀁲􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁬􀀩􀁤􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁧􀀮􀀠Oq.fOff· ..., 􀁾􀀨􀁬􀁯􀁲􀀠Mlnut.", . 􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀡􀁏􀁲􀁤􀁥􀁾NUmber"
􀁾􀁛􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁻􀀻􀀿􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾.􀀧􀁾􀀼􀁊􀀻􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀱􀀬􀁾􀁟􀁴􀁾􀁓􀀺􀀠".".0';' i.i....· N/A Off NIA ,,',,(; ••fi.. ,j':./" 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀠,<,----. .... 21 Mapsco • "i ........,...
14K·4X i'.'. ,i;', .,.:•..•. '!:. i1t f.·'. ,<,' 22 23 Total Preliminary Total 􀁒􀁉􀁧􀁨􀁜􀁾􀁦􀀮􀀠Englneetlng.... ' . 􀁷􀁡􀁹􀁃􀁯􀁳􀁾􀀠. 􀁣􀁾􀀮􀁴􀀮􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀻􀀩􀀻􀀯􀀠..' ::'Vi:,';"::􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀠􀀺
􀀺􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀠. $52,000 $0 1.:1.'/,.. ;;; I,'!,,'>'" '•. Page 2 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects POint Location Projects . 1, .... , .. ,. ;,·,,;t..; 􀀮􀁾􀀴􀀻....·,/. 26 27 29 .;;.;; 􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀠• 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀂷􀁆􀁵􀁨􀁤􀁩􀁬􀁪􀁧􀀠Local.Fundlng L"""I'FundlUg..
Local! !lIi'ofPraUmlriary 􀀥􀁯􀁬􀁾􀀡􀁧􀁨􀁴􀁩􀁒􀀬􀁲􀀭􀀮􀀠,'l6AI.·.......... . ![" 􀁾􀁽􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁘􀁾􀀢􀀠,:.#J 􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀻􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁧􀁾􀀩􀀺􀀿􀁾􀀮􀁻􀀠Way . , ..􀀬􀁾􀀢􀀬􀁪􀀺􀁌􀁲􀁾􀀧􀀠􀂷􀁾􀁴􀀱􀀠􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁃􀁴
􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀻􀁩􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀠􀁩􀁩􀀺􀀧􀁍􀀺􀁩􀀧􀁩􀁤􀁩􀀧􀀢􀁷􀀭􀁡􀀢􀀧􀁙􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁯􀀭􀁡􀁤􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀫􀀭􀁾􀀤􀀳􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀴􀀫􀀧􀀰􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀮􀁏􀀽􀀺􀁏􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁏􀁲􀀠31% N/A 31% Addison ISignal Timing and
Hardware Upgrade 1$;:' 􀀺􀀧􀁦􀀮􀁾􀀠$01 $0 $0 $( ${ $01 $0 30 ILocaI PartIcipants Role. .,>'",: ":"',< 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠. Lead ."_.._,, Funding '·1 <' ytid$O f:. . '; ..•.•,:.. <,ee:·,·
$0,0 50 ;"",." Page 3 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects Page 4 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point Locations Iretiming the existing coordinated signal system Midway Road from ISPring Valley Road to Dooley Road. Timing plans for the PM,
Off.Peak, and Friday Peak periods will beIprepared for each intersection. signal hardware at each intersection will be upgraded include video detection, TS·2 cabinets, and T5-2 controllers.
Additional phone drops will be installed to provide a communications link to the traffic service center. Existing hardwire interconnect cables be used to maintain Icommunicatlon between
the controllers. Associated will include installation of new conduit and wiring at each The existingIpower source for each location be used. Page 1 of 2 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point Locations Scope of Work Page 2 of 2 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects 1 •. 2 3 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁾􀁴􀀻􀀻􀁴􀀬􀂷􀀬􀀻􀁜􀁩􀀳􀁾􀀺􀀱􀀧􀀺􀁉􀀼􀀺􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁔􀁹􀁰􀁥􀀠(choose Number of (rom list)': ',I.. .
: •. , Locations' 􀁴􀀻􀀵􀁩􀀻􀁩􀁣􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀧􀁩􀀢􀀺􀀿􀀼􀀺􀁜􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀠􀀧􀁉􀁪􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀯􀀺􀀧􀁉􀀧􀀠Belt Line Road Traffic Signal 9 Signal Timing and Improvement Hardware Upgrade .,1••.•.•. 'F}
I ',}I.,5II· ,.: '" 4 . 5 Project Descnptlon Project Comment . 13 Estimated .ii,.· ..:f.Ji.:!.', .iL', .,':; 􀀱􀂷􀀻􀀩􀀬􀂷􀁹􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀬􀁓􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀻􀀺􀀧􀀠.'.•....;,: •.•. Construction .' .
Start 􀁄􀁡􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠(MMYY) I. Provide signal timing and This project will provide Jun 2000 coordination between signals enhanced traffic progression along Belt Line Road. along Belt Line
Road which will Upgrade Signal hardware at reduce travel times and idling the project intersections at intersections II,' I',« .•,'i,L.;;: • .;... \:...... , '.""1" ..• ,1.·'1 .. ···'
." ' ,,',i ,·;Cf'·,·.:."'" • il.,;)'\ ..... •., .... 􀁾􀀧',. "'11'" ."-, h.,/: ,.db· .. ':'" .........y 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀠<".," ):h:( 􀁾􀀠14 Estimated Time to complete (months), 0009
. ...... j•••••••... Page 1 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects 1 .15, 1" ::h :16 IProJect '-:;-, 􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁍􀁾􀀧􀀿􀁑􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁲􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁪􀁩􀀻􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀻􀁬􀀱􀀺􀀻􀁩􀁾􀀺•• 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁬􀁩􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁨􀀧􀁬􀀰􀁊􀀧􀀨􀀧
S;'};o/' , 􀀺􀁬􀁲􀁲􀀧􀁍􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢􀁜􀀢􀀠􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁌􀁾􀀺􀀱􀀺􀀱􀁬􀁩􀁲􀀬􀀷􀀯􀀻􀁲􀀯􀀺􀀠Belt Line Road No NlA Signal Timing and Hardware Upgrade I:!:i'" 􀁾􀀱􀀲􀀧􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀠' :, ,;11i':",:J:,:', :el','
I.sJJl8i', , liij\ ,"<:i::' :: ";gil, is,'·, 17 19 20 Corresponding On'/Off, ' Prjor Minute :: pnear: 􀁐􀁲􀁑􀁊􀁾􀁴􀀠System ' ", Order:Number bel' "sub'rt\it\ed " ' )}\.,.: , :',.'ij);􀁾􀁻􀀻􀁾􀁪􀁾􀁊􀀻
􀀺􀀻􀁩􀀬􀁩􀁩􀁌􀀺􀀾􀁤􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀼􀀠􀀻􀀬􀁜􀁾􀀺􀀩􀀠NfA Off NfA 􀁜􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀧􀀺􀀠',':1:1 : ,:.:i:,":","':::': 􀀺􀁉􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀾􀀧􀀾􀀧􀀠Ixk0.AC'. 􀁾􀀧􀀠Jf', '.:;"5: ,':'il! 21 22 23 Me""""
Total Prellmlnaty Total Rlght..,f, LOcation ' , Engineering , Way COst };':Y">CUi:;!' Cost ' ' ,::,,'::, :: 13D-14D $90,000 $0 !", ,e:, . ", , .,,<. ,i' ,',..' ,,<.;, il3/', . :': :,<"
,/.. ,' . Page 2 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ",1 ,24, 25", 26 2"(.28, 29 30 T0lal. Lpl FlJndiii!l' blCalFUlldlhg,' LooaJ.fUndlng , Local Participants' .' ,Local Participants
Roles <:l'6h'S l'U<iilon; " %of,P'" Irlillna %of gihtJ!,f'"' %'oL';.. .' ,􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀱􀀡􀂣􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁾􀀰􀁾􀁾􀁙􀀧􀁘􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀠",'e 􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀱􀀧􀁩􀁪􀀠i, )' • Belt Line Road 31%
N/A 31% Addison Addison -Lead Signal Timing and Agency & Funding Hardware Upgrade $0 .v 􀁾􀁮􀀠IV"-:/", ". >':v : 􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠I "wI I I I I􀁾􀀺􀀾􀀠/tt:)( -:i:,r: 􀁲􀁾􀀠... 􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀠.'0,
\i+Y, 􀀱􀁫􀁦􀀱􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁁􀀢􀀤􀁏􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠:; , "'i;F' 􀀻􀁻􀁫􀁾􀀺􀀩􀀢􀀧􀀻􀀠-;" ; ,k";:':' 􀁲􀁻􀁾􀂣􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀬􀁾􀀼􀀧􀀠.:" ..; , . ',,' J/;> :.i•.
:,':(;,:<. 􀀧􀁾􀀠Page 3 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects Page 4 of 4 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point Locations provides for ISignal Timing and I retlming the existing Hardware coordinated signal system Upgrade IBelt Line Road from IMarSh
Lane to Quorum Drive. plans for the AM, PM, Off-peak, and Friday PM Peak periods will be prepared for intersection. The signal Ihardware at each intersection be upgraded to include detection,
T5-2 cabinets,I TS-2 controllers. IAdditional phone drops will be installed to provide a communications link to the traffic service center. existing hardwire interconnect cables be used
to maintain Icommunication between the controllers. Associated will include installation of new conduit and wiring at each Intersection. The existing Ipower source for each location
be used. Page 1 of 2 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point Locations Page 2of2 
􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁬􀁌􀁬􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁒􀁏􀁾􀀠 _., . _ ... _ ". _ ... _ ... _ ... 􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁙􀀠􀁾􀀠_ 1A1L1.l> . -----􀁾􀀠i􀁾􀀠... 􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁏􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀬􀁎􀀢􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁔􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀠... _ ... _ ... _'" _ ... _
CITY LIMITS, 􀁾􀀠DALLAS COUNTY i 􀀡􀁤􀁊􀀭􀁾􀀠_. 􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀀠! ;>:I ..." i 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Q 􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁬􀁌􀁬􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁬􀁌􀁬􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠=r..e 15 􀀡􀁉􀁾i 5 􀂩􀁾􀁛􀁧􀁩􀁾􀀨􀁑􀀩􀁬􀁌􀁬􀁌lI'(Q)lM 􀁾􀀠Q2
z " ! .II II. I BEl.lWAY OR CITY LIMITS I 'b i 􀁛􀁆􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠i 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁍􀂩􀁛􀁝􀀽􀁻􀁝􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠... f! 􀁾􀀠i 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠..-.;:-------.... 􀁾􀀠LEGEND ADDIsoN 􀁾􀀠SIGNAL TIMING AND \.J
HARDWARE UPGRADE LOCATION BELT LINE ROAD SIGNAL TIMING AND HARDWARE UPGRADE 
:c! COLLIN COUNTY ,.1_ ••• __ ,0_",_.,,_.,1_"'_"'_ CITY LIMITS 2 DALLAS COUNTY ;-f-. -;rUUUUI--.H 􀁾􀀠=􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁦􀀡􀀠I 5 ©􀁾lPd lPd (Q)[L[Lu(Q)[M ROAD 􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀠􀁾􀀠! 􀁾􀀠;rr e .6 LEGEND
IfC"1 SIGNAL TIMING AND 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠:= ...\ "---(r -• I i: CITY LIMITS 't 􀁛􀁆􀁾􀁬􀁐􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁐􀁤􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁛􀁍􀂩􀁛􀁬􀀺􀁻􀁝􀀠a: i .., 􀁾􀀠>J... 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁛􀀩􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁌􀁛􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁬􀁉􀀩􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁌􀁛􀁌􀁾
􀁾􀀠\J HARDWARE UPGRADE LOCATION 􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁌􀁛􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠R1NITY _"'_"'_'11_1 •• _'11 MIDWA Y ROAD SIGNAL TIMING AND HARDWARE UPGRADE 
􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠-... -... -... -... -'" _.. 􀀧􀁆􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁖􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀠--"J􀁾􀀠... 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _A....... .......... 0 PALLAS COUHTY i!l i ..
i FREEWAY PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL COlLECTOR!i § lOLL lUNNEL:i! i >-RESlDENllAL COLLECTOR::i 􀁾􀁴􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠I LOCAL􀁾􀀠" >􀁾􀀠::I 0 f-f'"IE 0 Z 􀁾􀀠a 􀁛􀁑􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁛􀀩
􀀩􀁾􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁛􀁨􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠=, J5C 􀂩􀁾􀁛􀁒􀁩􀁛􀁒􀁩􀂩􀁬􀁌􀁬􀁌􀁵􀂩􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠i 5 :IE Q \ \ \\ h Ii -iCI i z 􀁾􀀠CI :. l I.;: CITY LIMITS !i g 􀁾􀀠i IF 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾-r,9 >-􀁾􀀠i :E 􀀡􀁂􀀵􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂩􀀡􀁬􀀽􀁬􀁬􀀠
i THOROUGHFARE PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 1997 
Town ofAddison NCTCOG Call For Projects May 16, 1999 
Town ofAddison NCTCOG Call For Projects May 16,1999 
I ' \ I \, \ " II NO ADDiTlONAL R.O.W. NEEDED I 􀁾􀀠I" -, QG<J o 􀁾􀀠􀀬􀁾􀀠Z ° :;0 :t 􀁾􀀠\0 􀁜􀁾􀀠\» \-< 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀽􀁜􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀯􀁊􀀠1\ bj 􀁾􀀠) PROPOSED ARAPAHO U-'TURN ! LPREV10US
U-TURN CLOSED DUE TO ARAPAHO ROAD II1DENING ::3 f\, \ 􀁾􀀠I NO ADDI110NAL R.O.W. NEEDED a:: o z\ \ \ \ \ OD D i I SCALE: ," = 40' ARAPAHO ROAD U-TURN BRIDGE SOUTHBOUND TO NORTHBOUND
DALlAS PARKWAY AT ARAPAHO ROAD ADDISON, TEXAS PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC,BART(Ji-ASOiIol.ut • Dd..EUW, CA'IliER • smNWAN 􀁾􀀴􀀡􀀡􀀾􀀠BELT LJHE ROAD. SUIt[ ISIS! • DAUJ.S. TEXAS
7!>240 (972) 991-1900 • "AX: (972) 490-92111 =􀁾.. l'OIPUI,"'o.,.I[rI'lIICL "='􀁾􀀮􀁾Designed: . . SI.I[ 􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀭􀀽􀀠-,_ •____________􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀫􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀁫􀁾􀀮􀁤􀁾􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭) Drown:
􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠BY DAlE Checked: I I I 
\\ OF AMERICA _mONA!. R.O.W. 17.4 "2 (187 S.F.) SPECTRUM CENTER ElOST. R,O.W. SAKOWITZ VILL.LiGE PRoP. R.O. W. EJ<lST. R.O.W.-\ METRIC SCAlE: 1: 1000 MOBIL MART 􀁾􀀠SINGLE POINT URBAN
INTERCHANGE \ BELT UNE ROAD AT DAU.AS PARKWAY t,PEDESlRlAN COUNTS 8 \(lHUR5. OCT. 2. 1997) 5/28/3 \ \ \ ! I 1 ADO THRU PC 1L,i;L, P1<WY) B'I' OATE 
TOWN OF ADDIsoN To: ])6Y\ CY'QVt-k rd. p.r..,I Company: j),.J /4S Co. P""h (Jk.s FAX #: /]..( 􀁴􀁦􀁾􀀠􀁾:;3 -I:> 4-1 , Date: f -;)..7-9 '7 # ofpages (including cover): I PUBLIC WORKS
From: James C. Pierce,Jr.,P.E.,DEE Assistant City Engineer Phone: 972/450-2879 FAX: 972/450-2834 16801 Westgrove P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 o Original in mail 􀁾your request
0 FYI 0 Call me Comments: Th.: 􀀯􀁤􀁲􀀯􀁾􀁲􀀯􀀭􀁌􀀠t:rf OUr-j?ctu'-eds IS:I Lf 10 , 􀁉􀁉􀁂􀁥􀁬􀁦􀁌􀁩􀁦􀁬􀁥􀁚􀁔􀁯􀁉􀀯􀁷􀁾􀀠Sn,/e /3//}:ftlrbtm :t:nj.-prciurt'f-f. 2. 7O//w'1 􀁾􀁦􀀴􀁫􀁴􀁴􀀦􀁦􀀠Ia-likrf
'tbdUnef 􀁦􀀩􀀭􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁲􀁽􀀱􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁬􀁫􀁥􀁴􀀠3, 􀁓􀁴􀁪􀁬􀁩􀀮􀀩􀀭􀁲􀀬􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁲􀁾􀀯􀁊􀁴􀁦􀀡􀁲􀁊􀁾􀀠Df Si,W./Epv1"! &111-1'''if til,Ito_ tJ!J.-dG 
OFFICIAL ACTIONS OF THE ADDISON CITY COUNCIL April 27, 1999 7:30 p.m. -Council Chambers 5300 Belt Line Road Present: Mayor Beckert, Councilmembers Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth
Absent: Councilmember Watson Item #R1 -Consideration of Old Business. The following employees were introduced to the Council: Tony Shanley (Police), Wes Ashcraft (Utilities), and Michele
Covino (City Manager's Office). Items 2b and 2c were removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Item #R2 -Consent Agenda. #2a -Approval of the Minutes for the April 13,
1999, Council Meeting, (Approved) #2d -Award a bid in the amount of $23,067.20 to Palm, Inc. for miscellaneous landscape renovations. (Approved) #2e -Approval of purchase in the amount
of $62,943.76 to HGAC for a 1999 truck mounted sewer cleaner. (Approved) #2f -Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit applications to the North Central Texas
Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for funding for the Belt LinefToliway Single Point Urban InterGhange and Tollway Southbound to Northbound U-turn at Arapaho Road projects. (R99-038) #29
-Award a bid in the amount of $21,995 to Doric Building Corporation for remodeling of restrooms at Central Fire Station and Fire Station #2. (Approved) Councilmember Halpern moved to
approve the above listed items. Councilmember Dolan seconded. The motion carried. Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson 4-27-99OFFICE
OF THE CITY SECRETARY 
􀁾.. Consideration of a Resolution to amend the Code of Ordinances giving the City Manager or a designated r.epresentative the authority to approve service of alcoholic beverages in
parks. Council member Sudduth moved to approve Resolution No. R99-036 giving the City Manager or a designated representative the authority to approve service of alcoholic beverages in
parks within established guidelines. Councilmember Halpern seconded. The motion carried. Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson
#2c -Consideration of a Resolution approving a reservation policy for the Les Lacs park pavilion. Councilmember Klein moved to approve Resolution No. R99-037 approving a reservation
policy for the Les Lacs park pavilion, subject to changing the provision that portable toilets be removed within 48 hours of an event. Councilmember Halpern seconded. The motion carried.
Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson Item #R3 -Consideration of a Resolution approving the Technically Preferred Alignment for
Arapaho Road Phase 111111. The Mayor asked for comments from the floor. Gary Crouch and Joe Dingman spoke in opposition to the Technically Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase
11/111. Councilmember Halpern moved to approve Resolution No. R99-039 approving the Technically Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 111111. Councilmember Klein seconded. The motion
carried. Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson Item #R4 -PUBLIC HEARING and consideration of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No.
099-006 approving the development plans for 315 multi-family units, located on 3.92 acres in the Addison Circle development,on the north side of Morris Avenue, between Quorum Drive and Addison Road, on application from Post Properties. 4-27-99OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY 
Mayor Beckert opened the meeting as a public hearing. There were no questions or comments. Mayor Beckert closed the meeting as a public hearing. Councilmember Klein moved to approve
Ordinance No. 099-015 amending Ordinance No. 099-006 approving the development plans for 315 multi-family units, located on 3.92 acres in the Addison Circle development, on the north
side of Morris Avenue, between Quorum Drive and Addison Road, on applicetion from Post Properties, subject to the following condition: • The metal facade treatment on the southwest corner
of Building B shall be replaced with a stucco and brick treatment. Councilmember Sudduth seconded. The motion carried. Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern. Klein. Mallory. Sudduth Voting
Nay: None Absent: Watson Item #R5 -Consideration of an Ordinance providing for the issuance of Town of Addison, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, in the
aggregate principal amount of $1,81 0,000; pledging to the payment thereof certain receipts of the the Hotel Occupancy Tax as herein defined; calling certain bonds for redemption; enacting
other provisions relating to the subject; and declaring an emergency. Councilmember Halpern moved to approve Ordinance No. 099-016 providing for the issuance of Town of Addison, Texas,
Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds. Series 1999, in the aggregate principal amount of $1 ,81 0,000; pledging to the payment thereof certain receipts of the Hotel Occupancy Tax
as herein defined; calling certain bonds for redemption; enacting other provisions relating to the subject; and declaring an emergency. Councilmember Klein seconded. The motion carried.
Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory. Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson Item #R6 -Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement
with the North Texas Tollway Authority to provide for fire protection equipment in the Addison Airport Toll Tunnel. Councilmember Sudduth moved to approve Resolution No. R99-040 authorizing
the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the North Texas Tollway Authority to provide for fire protection equipment in the Addison Airport Toll Tunnel, subject to final approval.
Councilmember Halpern seconded. The motion carried. 4-27-99OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY 
Voting Aye: Beckert, Dolan, Halpern, Klein, Mallory, Sudduth Voting Nay: None Absent: Watson There being no further business before the Council, the meeting was adjourned. 􀁾􀀠 Mayor
........ Attest: City cretary 4-27-99OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY 
Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 11 :29 AM To: Jim Pierce Subject: RE: TEA 21 Projects Yes, I concur with your prioritization. -----Original Message----􀁩􀁩􀁴􀀹􀀺􀁲􀁯􀀻􀁩􀁭􀁩􀁩􀁛􀁬􀁲􀁩􀁦􀁛􀁴􀁬􀀡􀀱􀀱􀀱􀁾�
�􀁭􀀡􀀡􀁦􀁩􀁩􀂢􀀺􀁩􀀺􀁭􀁛􀁭􀀡􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀡􀀡􀀻􀁩􀁴􀀻􀀻􀁩􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁉􀀺􀁩􀁭􀀻􀁬􀁛􀁬􀁩􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁩􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁭􀁭􀁦􀀡􀁾􀁬􀀻􀁪􀁦􀁦􀀡􀀡􀀻􀁗􀀡􀁾􀀩􀀻􀁛􀀡􀁪􀀺􀁭􀀡􀁦􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁻􀁗􀁾􀁮􀁩􀀡􀀡􀁾􀁭􀁭􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀡
􀀡􀀻􀀻􀁬􀁭􀀻􀀡􀁩􀀥􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀡􀀻􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁭􀁭􀁭􀁭􀁩􀀻􀀠􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁦􀁾􀀻􀁛􀁬􀀻􀁭􀀱􀁾􀀠mmm 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁭􀁭􀁭􀁛􀁬􀀠Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 11 :08 AM To: John Baumgartner Subject: TEA 21 Projects
Don Cranford will need a priority ranking of our projects. How about this: 1. SPUI 2. Parkway U-tum 3. Signal Timing Jim. 
'&9724909261 ) It DATE 8.1 ........... NAME b/' 1/NAME U/,. :f-x 1£/"(" ' 1'?7 FIRM M.-or/􀁾􀁓􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠PAJ4S:'::/1 􀀬􀁲􀁏􀁾􀁾T ADDRESS F BartOl'l-Aschman􀁾􀁐􀁕􀁒i ATIEJN GRDUP--:...:---------548
5 Selt Line 􀁾􀁥􀀠I.edUWs' 􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀮􀀠Steinman INC.0 II oa, !.lIte 199J R a as, Texas 75240-7607r Pnone (972) 991-1900 O r-;;;;;:;;::::::-------.J 0 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁐􀁾􀁈􀀺􀀻􀁏􀀭􀀻􀁎􀁅􀀻􀀭􀀻􀁎􀀺􀁕􀀺􀁍􀀺�
�􀁾􀁅􀁒􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁊􀀠M Fax (972) 490-9261 FAX NUMBER (97Z.)q.50-Z9'V'" 􀁲􀀭􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾>"r I PROJECT NUMBER 􀁾􀀱􀀷􀀹􀁍􀀴􀀯􀀡􀀮􀁉􀁬􀀢􀀧􀀷􀀠􀀯􀀬􀀴􀁾􀀱􀁉􀀯􀀠p,L.
􀁾􀁚􀁾􀀭􀀻􀀠􀁾*I-i,r/«#/'<-/fo:>;;;&/'", 'It 9'&&, tJr::; e; f k.,. 􀁾􀁾//:C/7' -,,/Ac;d' It.-t/-Tu,..... ..J ;>ft S'Pd[ Z ",-,,/􀁾􀀠IL I /<1 JY{/417
1999 NCTCOG Call for ProJects Point Location Projects 1 2 :3 , 4 Ii ' 13" 14 rOlecll'lamell<ication;,, , PIc)",t TYpii ,.,,, •• ,,, ff!lli!Ustj , " " '.>' Nllmberol\ CQ<\ItiOf,..: ""
, Prqj.clD",CfIpI"m , : f.ille<:li;lpinroent , i '. ' estlm""", COJWfrlJCll"" ' $\IIrt D.t.l (MMYVlc " ' EstlMlI!ed TlmetcCflrnpl.,e (mClnlh.) rV). ".,! /1.. Southbound 10 :? Northbound
U-turn at Arapaho Road Intersection Improvement, OI1e Construct a new southbOund to northbOund u-turn lane al the Arapaho Road Bridge over the North Dallas Tollway, The widening and
realignment of Arapano Road(under constructton} required the efimination of the southbound to northbound u-turn lane to accommodate 6 through lanes and 2 left tum lanes across Ihe bridge.
The S8 to NB lI·tum lane must be re-establlShed when SB to N8 turning movements reach 90 per hour, Dec, 2003 0012 ,AlcidillGii at IRtefelLltI,,1 i i"'" ,,," ".. ..,'" .,"... ... '" '"
II.. " ...'" .,..'" co ....'" 􀁾􀁾􀁊􀀠'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀠'" 􀁾􀁾􀁻 􀀱􀀢􀁜􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀀬􀁎􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁤􀁾􀁟􀁟􀁾􀀠I§J ..,'" '" "Page 1 of 4 ...'" '" 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Location Projects ';' <:>... " ".15 t61 Ptojeel Narnl>tI.o<;.lli>n Provf.... CMAO,. PllMo". Flllliling • 􀁓􀁔􀁐􀀬􀁉􀁜􀁉􀁍􀀬􀁾􀁕􀁓􀁐􀀧􀀠. PIl)j!'ll.Ct>de•.
NOdS. .' ..' . ) .􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀧􀀠. . : No NA Southbound 10 􀁾􀀠Northbound U-turn at Arapaho Road l'ellway O'l-tMo) 􀁰􀁾􀀠\-. 􀁾: )􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠It􀁾􀀢􀀠'>\ 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠,􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁜􀀠
􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠f 􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁾􀀠'I 􀁾􀀠j 􀀦􀀩􀁖􀁜􀁾􀀠17 20.19 OMO!I. PlforMin\lleC9'tllSpondfn9 syo{ertt .Ordei"Nu""",,,􀁌􀁩􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁑􀁲􀀠􀁐􀁲􀁾􀀠. I>eltitlS.bmll!od , .:' , .:: , ' ;.. 22 23.' 21
􀁍􀁉􀁐􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠. f!o!:Iol PflOJilnInary 􀁔􀁾􀁒􀁩􀁩􀁊􀁬􀁩􀁬􀀢􀀧􀁦􀀮􀀠LoceIkln . Etitl1neefinlj . WayCtIOIl • :: '. Cjltl ..' '. I.,.,",' .'.," , 􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀠"-s r' "" 􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠ZeroN.A. N.A.
Dallas 4Z /f9S}&iIJilJ0" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠 '"'-' " '" '" . I -"" -'" g... ..... '" <> '" '" '"-􀁾􀀠fA I 􀁾􀀠Vl J!jjl <> o '-' o " '" 􀁾􀀠Page 2 014 
----c 1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects 􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀬􀀢Cool .' " 􀀧􀁾􀀠" 􀁾􀀬􀀠:, '. Tollway JIi 5'-fO,1HiD Soutl1bound to Northbound U·turn at Arapaho Road ";\ 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I) 􀁾􀀧􀀠0\ Point location
ProjeclS 􀁾􀁩􀀴􀀠'. 28,1 .27 29 PrOle<! N.I1io!LOi>1oI!oo . Ir41lll .' '., 211 !.o<:oI 􀁆􀁵􀁾􀀠. local Fuildlng LoCiI f.ndOlg lOcI!! Pi!l\iCipanl•.J'1IIlCqst '10., .'ll.q'Pr.l1nWlary
%0' Rliltit.o,•..', " ",., Englileerlr,g . Co.,Qucll••Way.. ' , , N.A. Addison Addison, Dallas 􀁾􀀢􀀷􀁓􀀰􀀢􀀧􀁦􀁦􀀠Addison I eO%, Dallas 20%, Dallas County, City of County:/.O% County
Dallas, DART 20% $0 $0 $9 v 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀠J~ ....\9\.If} 􀀰􀁾􀀠,.. 30. ..,'" "too.! Plrticlpanbl Rol•• .,"., .... Adtiison·Funding, '" .... Lead Agency, '" Project Management. All 􀁾􀀠others,
funding. ... No...., ...'" '" .... '" 􀁾􀀠til 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 I§l '" ...'" "Page 3 014 .... '" '" 
1999 NCTCOG Gall lor ProJects Point Location Projects 1 31 32 33 34 IPfoje<;INBm.lli)OaU"", ,if'Ioj.et Cont.c1 I';' ,􀁾􀀠,:. I'rcjeot"C:oMtact Ph<""N!J""!."': Ii' ", IProj"'" C..I""I
FAX, Nt!!nber , , ',; 􀁉􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁬Conmet li-Mall 􀁾􀀬􀁥􀁳􀁳􀀠';" '.U Tollway Southbound to Northbound U-turn at Arapaho Road Jim PIerce, P.E. 1972-450-2819 972-450·2834 jpiErce@ci,addlso
n.tx.us ...o ...'" ".,"'" ... '" ... <0 9 ..... .,'" .,'" '" ...'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠'" 􀁾􀀠1 s \ 􀁾􀀠 [§I <> '" '""Page 4 of 4 ...'" '" 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Pmjects Individual Point Locallons 37 383S" 36" .' ,Oms Sbeei B Cr.... SI!!!eI A ' , Deqile!l 􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁰􀀬or WOrle: : Poin. 􀁐􀁩􀁾􀁬􀁥􀀮􀀻􀁬􀁬􀁤􀀮􀁮􀁕􀁬􀁩􀀮􀁲􀀠, ",'
. ''': '. ". " ,' . ',.: ",,<:.' 􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀠">'. "faIlWllY· 􀁾VL, North OaUas Tollway Arapaho Road Soulhbound 10 d Northbound U-turn ar Arapaho Road -'\J lYl 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀁊􀀠􀁾􀀠J
II Del.elMo" " ...... Traffic ,lli!Un1 ' f ....'" 12 "<.>V.I...rMoSt I '" .,"Rtcant T.alIic ' : ., CWIII' . " " I .... '" .... '" 􀁾􀀠..'" ... ..., <> '" t .... '" 􀁾􀀠0,..'" '" 􀁾􀀠'"
􀁾􀀠I§I o <> Page I or 1 '""<>... '" 
.04/23/99 15:20 '6'9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR III0071015 Arapaho Road U-tum Detailed Scope ofWork Tbis project provides for construction ofa U-tum lane which consists ofthe removal
ofa portion ofexisting concrete mono curb along the inside curb lines ofsouthbound and northbound Dallas Parkway, removal of a portion ofthe east and west retaining walls, installation
of concrete drill shafls and concrete abutments on the east and west sides ofDallas North Tollway, installation of AASHTO Type IV beams to span Dallas North Tollway, construction ofreinforced
concrete bridge deck and parapet walls with associated retaining wall reconstruction. Associated items of work include traffic control during construction, pavement markings and signing.
Dallas ParkwayiBelt Line Road Single Point Urban Interchange Detailed Scope ofWork This project provides for the construction ofa single point urban interchange (SPUI) which consists
ofthe removal ofexisting pavement, medians and bridge parapet walls, installation of concrete concrete drill shafls and cantilever bridge bents, reconstruction ofexisting retaining walls,
construction ofadditional bridge deck and parapet walls, construction ofright-tum lanes, construction ofdual left -tum lanes and installation ofnew traffic signals. Associated work includes
traffic control during construction, pavement madcings and signing. 
1m19 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point Lccalion Projects 􀂷􀁾􀁁􀀩􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀢􀁩􀀡􀁾􀀭􀁾7:,:. 'ii"< 􀀱􀀢􀁉􀀼􀀱􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀡􀁦􀀧􀁬􀀡􀀢􀁾􀀧\,,,,, " ,<I.'!: .;.: 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀧􀁜􀀬􀀮􀀠􀀼􀁜􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀬�
�14 }. '. ' ;:•. ,,":, 􀁾􀀧􀁻􀁾􀀱􀁬􀁴􀀮􀀷􀀭􀀧􀀢􀀠Belt lInefTollway Single Point Urban Interchange 3 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁏􀁣􀁪􀀱􀁜􀀧􀁩􀁩􀁰􀁾􀀠", . , NUi!\IJOrOl fI<N!I!Ill!) •.: 'i\v"" 1..oIoatioI>.
'"1. '\,.! 􀁾􀀠H 􀀧􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠;.:" \, '<';., \, t;' E '. Interchenge, One Intersection hnprcvernent, Traffic SIgnal Improvement, Addition 01 Lanes. 􀀬􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁩􀀺􀀺􀁾..> .,', ,.
Construct modifications The project will allow !he (widening) to the Belt Une slmulteneous operation of left Road bridge over the Tollway turn lanes for easl/'west traffic to a.ow the
Interchange to act aru:l for nortlllsoulh traffic. as a single intersection instead Efficiency of Ihe IntersecUon Qf two. will be improved by 15 to 20% ..􀁾... Q """N... .,"., .... '"
N '" CI., .... N .. ... '".,'" '" .... 􀁊􀁾􀀠'i 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀿􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀀠¢ 􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾\Ii A 􀁾􀀠<II o 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 I§l ..'" '" "Page 1 of4 .... '" '" 
04/23/99 15:21 􀁾􀀹􀀷􀀲􀀴􀀹􀀰􀀹􀀲􀀶􀀱􀀠PARSONS TRANSPOR 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀹􀀯􀀰􀀱􀀵􀀠􀁾􀀠... " '" 􀁾􀀠n. 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Point LocatlOO Projects . }C; 􀁾􀀠Cl V> 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠V>t, 􀁾􀀠\!) IV'! 􀁾􀀠J .. 􀁾􀀠G" 􀁾􀀧􀀠...'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾\\} • 􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀱':.:\ .,..... , 􀁾...􀁾􀀠􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀺􀀲􀁾􀀠!',:
,;.''" 􀀲􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠'" : ,26 21'" \. 􀀺􀁜􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀢􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠":c.., ,2li '.', ; 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠􀀢􀀬􀀳􀁻􀀱􀁾􀀬􀁜􀁜􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀡􀀧􀀢􀀠:.,,1!ill" ':,=:." "\ \. .. :;" "" 􀁾􀀠11: 􀀮􀁾l\',A ,( "f !k • \.:.
".I '''',\ 􀀢􀀢􀁜􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀧􀂷􀂷􀀺􀀠!1\101'i, ' ;. 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀠. .,':' 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁜􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁜􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁜􀀠􀀼􀁾􀀠': " ' 􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀧􀁾-L.....!uodlllli , 􀀧􀁬􀁉􀁯􀁯􀁦􀁬􀀧􀁭􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀠ElIiio-ln
g , ' 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁌Wrq'(·, ,"", \:>l;'I l\r" 􀁾􀀧􀁆􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠',>. ' ',>: 􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁜􀁾􀀠'. 􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀠It:. 􀁾􀀠;', .", ""\ ',i' ,',',.., -'J" . ' 􀁾􀁴􀀧􀀱􀀱􀀧􀁜􀀧􀁾􀂷􀀧
􀁾􀁒􀀹􀀱􀀧􀀢􀀠􀀧􀁜􀁟􀀺􀀢􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠"" 􀁜􀁽􀀺􀀬􀀬􀁾;-f. "'\ •. , 􀁾􀀢􀁯􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁜􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠'.' BeH UI]IIITollway z.,olP,􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁰􀀠Addison 80%, Dallas Addison 20%, Dallas Addison 20%,
Dallas AdlIison. Oal(as Counly, City of Addison-Funding, Lead Agency,Singl rru.... y"••n Inte hange Coullly20% County 20% County Dallas, DART Project 20% Managemanl. All others, funding,
$0 $0 -$0 , ..., "''" .. '"' "'" ... '" ... '" 􀁾􀀠... ..'" '" '" '" ... <> .... I!!il, ",'... '""Page 3 014 ...'" '" 
1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects Individual Point LO(lalions ...'" ',: . 􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀮" , . Be ' oolWIII1< 􀁾􀀠, .. h' , \\.. 􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀠; ..􀁾􀀮􀀠'!.l. ' ' l\ 􀁾􀁜􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀠. '',.. "'" '""..
"" ... '" '" N C8.. .. ..'"... .. <>.. to 1 1 ... ) i c..; 􀁾􀀠l!l::s <II X 􀁾􀁜􀀠'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠iJ @<>...... Page 1 of 1 ...'" "'" 
U4/2J/99 15:23 '6'9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR 􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀲􀀯􀀰􀀱􀀵􀀠COST ESTIMATE ADDISON -SPUI :BELTLINE ROAD AND DALLAS NORTII TOLLWAY April 14.1999 ITEM·NBR DESCR.lPTION UNITS UNIT COST
QUANTITY COST 1--._-+1_" . 􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀬􀀵􀀰􀁯􀀮􀀺􀀰􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀲􀀭􀁴􀁩P:..;RE=P R.O.W. KM : $50.0.::,;00::;.00,-,,--+-__.:..1--t'_:::$5",0",.0""00,,,.00""--1 104·5001 REMOV CONC (l'...:,A:.:V)-,-_
---1-M2 i lO20.00 1500 $30,000.00 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀰􀁾􀁓􀀭􀁦􀁒􀁾􀁅􀀽􀁍􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁖􀁾􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁎􀁊􀁌___􀁾􀁾􀁍􀀲􀀽􀀭􀁾􀁩􀁟􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀮􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀭􀀫__􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀶􀀰􀁯􀀮􀀺􀀰􀁾􀀭􀀫􀁾􀀤􀁾􀁩􀀽􀀲􀁾􀀮
􀀰􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀻􀁏􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁏􀁾􀁏____ 104-5009 REMOV CONe (SDWLK) M2 I $12.00 : 200 􀀤􀀲􀀮􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠104-5011 _ REMOV CONC 􀁾􀁂􀁗􀁁􀁙􀀩􀀠--f--!.M2='-;'_,$_l1_.00'---+r.--'3:;:0.:,0._-t-_$::;:3"'.3;,;
:0.::,;0."'00'----I c-J'14-S013 􀁾􀁍􀁏􀁖CONe (CURB&GU'ITER) .-t---,M,,--+_-=.$4,;.:.72.:.:::..._.t-.---,1",5,::;00,--+_",-$7:1.0",8:;:0,:,::°=°'_-1 f--260-5010 LIMB TREATSI.JBGR (DC)(200
MM) 'M2 􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀽􀀬􀀶􀀰􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀲􀁓􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀰􀀰􀁾..+----,,,$6""S:'::00::':"Oo=0_-I 􀁾􀀵􀀰􀀱􀀱􀀠CONC CURB (TY m(MONO) M $10.00 .t--..:i.::,:so",O_+---=.;Sl:,::S,;:;.O'::;OO:::'O'';:O_-I
360·5017 CONCPAV(CPC",D)Ll(",200=MM::;I",--)__+_,M2::=+_.$4=1.0",O,--+._2S=OO,,--+_-"$",,10,,,,2,,::.50::,:0::::.0=0_ 416'{}506 (roLL SHAFT (36",lN",l,--___-i-_=:LF'--t-..;:$:.:::83"".O==O'---t-_,ll:
.:;0,,-O_+---:;S4",,9:J.,8::.:0:.::,O.:.::oo=420-05;1 CL C CONC (PARAPET 􀁗􀁁􀁾􀁌􀀩􀀠CY $&&2.86 125 $110,357.50 420·5014 CL C CONe BENT __􀀭􀁩􀀭􀀢􀁍􀀳􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀫􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀤􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁓􀀮􀀺􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁏􀁾􀀰�
�􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀲􀀲􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀵􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀁟􀀬􀀤􀀬􀀬􀁉􀁾􀁜􀁬􀀸􀁾􀀮􀀰􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀰􀀮􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀬􀁟􀀠 􀀴􀀲􀀲􀀭􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀱􀀠. IRaINi'CONC SLAB M2 $95.00"'--1-_.:;;12=0""0_+-...:$:.:1",14""000=,,,.0,,,,0_;
423-5007 IRET WALL 􀀭􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁍􀀲􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀬􀀤􀀳􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀷􀀵􀁯􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀬􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀰􀁾􀁟􀀫􀀭􀁟􀀳􀀺􀀺􀀡􀁏􀀽􀁏􀁟􀀧􀀭􀁩􀁉􀁟􀀤􀁾􀀱􀁣􀀺􀀻􀀱􀀲􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀵􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀰􀁾􀁏􀀧􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀠
i450·%95 ,RAil: (TY C411) -r--=.:M::.....j.,􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀰􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀹􀀮􀀹􀀢􀀬􀀸􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀤􀀴􀁣􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀱􀀬􀀭􀀢􀀮􀀹􀀹􀀽􀀶..::::00'--_1
464-:;005 i RC PIPE (CL fiT) (600MM) M $124.32 60 $7,459.20 I . 46S'{}741 IINLET (COMPL) (TY 1I){10') i ..:EA::.::..-+i.....:;$2:.,.4""O""0.""OO'--!------.:4__"i􀁟􀀭􀀽􀀤􀁾􀀹􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀶􀀰􀀢􀀬􀀰􀁾􀀮
􀁏􀀢􀀽􀀭􀁏􀁟􀀭􀁉􀀠 4%'{}502 IREMOV lNLET ----f.=E:"A-+I...:s""1.",.2;:::00",.0,,,O-+___3"--_II__:.:53"',6:;:00"'.0:.:0'----1 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀴􀂷􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀠􀁾SED FNC . _I M i 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀤􀀢􀀧􀀶􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁏􀁾􀁏􀁟􀀫􀀭�
�􀀴􀀰􀀢􀀧􀀰􀁾􀀰__􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀤􀀲􀁾􀀴􀀺􀁡􀀺􀀬􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁏􀁾􀁏􀀮􀀢􀀢􀁏􀁏􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀠 5004-5003 iTEMP SED me (REMOV) .' M ; S5.00 4000 􀁾􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏 􀁾􀀧􀀠 500-5001 iMOBlLlZATION
LS . $..15;:.:0",.0""00",.0,,,0,-+._--,-1__:!.􀀭􀀢􀁓􀀺􀀡􀀮􀁉􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁓􀁏􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀬􀁏􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁉 ---' S02-5001BARRleADE. SIGNS, TRAFF " MO I .::::$5"".000=..::;00:_'----=.:12:_-4-1_;:::$6
0=,0"'00"'.0"'0_-1 530-5001 DRVWY'S (CQllc)(15Omm) .-I--M2 I $36.00 i 200=__-+----'$;,;.7,200.00 M2 ....2!1-5002 CONCRET.fi SIDEW􀁾􀁋􀀠---1.-l!=--;-.--=$2:=.8::.:;.0:.::0'---+1_.::.300""'-_1-_5::;:8"
",4"'00::.0:.::°'----1 531-S004SIDEWAL,K RAMP (TV 4) EA I $46.􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀳􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁏􀁾􀀰􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀱􀀶􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀁟􀀭􀀽􀀤􀁾􀀷􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀴􀀰􀀸􀀽􀀮􀁏􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀰􀁟􀀭􀁉􀀠_536-5002 CONe
MEDMN M2 ! $40,00 1000 $40,000.00 _ 610 RDWY ILL ASSEM ___-f-""E",A"---f-$2,120.00 6 $12,720.00 __ _ 649-5003 􀀧􀀭􀁉􀀡􀀭􀁆􀁎􀁄􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁌􀁇􀀽􀁒􀁄􀁓􀁄􀀽􀀢􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁓􀀮􀀢􀀬􀁉􀁇􀀢􀀬􀁎􀀬􀀭􀀬􀁓􀁾􀁕􀁐􀀺�
�􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮:..PO::.:R""T'--__􀀫􀀭􀀬􀁅􀁁􀁾􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀬􀀤􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀳􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀵􀀰􀁯􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀮􀁟􀀫􀀭􀁩_""20"---+_-=$""7,,,,,00,,,,0,,,,.0,,,,0__-1 ,-_6",50,,---+OVERHEAD SIGN SUPPORT
EA $30,200.00 1 $30,200.00 􀁾􀀵􀀴􀀲􀀠!WZPM (CLB) . _____-+_EA"'-'.-L_S4='OO"'-_:i_-'S::=O""o_.+---,s",,2:.:.0:::.00"""'00'--_1 􀁾􀀧􀁻􀁽􀁓􀀴􀀳􀀠IWZPM (CLB) I EA I $4.00 . 200 I $800.00
􀁾􀀭􀀰􀀵􀀸􀀱􀀠WZPM (TAB:e,)'--_.. _____1-..:EA=--ii_ $6.83 I 1500 SIO.245.00 ,-662-0532 jWZPM (TAB) i BA $1.00 750 $750.00 666-0S 17 REFL ___.________ EA 􀀡􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀤􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀱􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁬􀁓􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁏􀀺�
�􀀮􀀺􀁏􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀲􀀺􀀴􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁟􀀮􀀽􀀤􀀢􀀢􀀲􀀮􀀬􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀷􀀶􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀰􀁣􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁏􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁏􀁟􀀭􀀾􀀠
04/23/99 15:23 '6'9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR 􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀳􀀯􀁑􀀱􀀵􀀠I lTEM-NER DESCRIPTION UNIll UNIT.COST QUANIITY COST . 666-0549 IREFL EA $40.00 I 24 '1 $960.00 666-50I2 jru;FL .. M $17.00
.' 15 $1,2.15.00_ 666-5013 RIm.. I RA $150.00 Z4 $3,600.00 .'􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀠r M $1.24 ISO S186.00 c-666-5041 REF!. ! M S6.00 I 250 I $1,500.00 .. 􀁾􀀶􀀭􀀵􀀰􀀴􀀴􀀠ru;FL M S10.00 75 S?SO.OO 666-5045
iREFL EA $60.00 I 24 I Sl,440.oo 666-5201 Iru;FL . M $1.50 ISO S225.00 666-5209. ru;FL '1 M $7.16 250 :&1,940.00. _672..0504 RPM (CLI:\>. i SA $8.60 160 $1,376.00 612-0507 RPM (CLB)
EA $4.00 360 , $1,440.00 ._ , EAi672-5016 ,RPMBTN $3.20 370 i $1,184.00 67&-5001 PAY SUt!.V &; pru;p I M $1.00 ISO $150.00 61$-5004 PAY SURV &; pru;l' , M $2.72 250 I $680.00 618-5006
,PAY 􀁾􀁕􀁒􀁖􀀠&; PREP M SS.73 75 $429.75 I .. 618-5001 PAY SURV &; PREP EA $31.70 24 $760.30 678·5008 PAV SURV &; PREP EA $40.00 I 24 $960.00 .. 686 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS S11S,OOO.00 I $175,000.00
􀁾􀀮􀀠i $75,000.00 IiLANDSCAPE LS t $75,000.00 .-rvru.RELOC I 1.8 $250,000.00 1 i SI75,000.00 " SUBTOTAL SI,703,432.25 CONTINGENCY $356,,698.71 ENGINEBRINGISURVEYIGBOTECH $240,OOO.01l
RIGHT-OF-WAY $135,000.00 TOTAL 52 435,130.96 
04/23/99 15:24 '6'9724909261 PARSONS TRANSI'OR @014/015 COST ESTIMATE ADDISON -ARAPAHO ROAD U-TURN Aprill4.lm ITEM·NBR DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT COST 0UANTITY COST , I !I I 200 200 440
82 3501----1200 2S 300 I ll5 1----+ ---------SO.OOI' I 􀁾􀀮􀀭__.___.___ -__• __-l--. . 􀁾􀀭____________􀁾􀁉􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀭__􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀡􀁟􀁾􀀤􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀮􀁏􀁾􀁏__I _􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁌i $0.00 !------.-----+----+I-
---1..____ 􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀤􀁏􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁯􀁯􀀽􀀭􀁟􀁾11 __ i _.________Li􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁉􀁾􀀠___--jl·____􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀡􀁓􀁏􀁾􀀮􀁏􀁾􀁏􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁉' I SO_I 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁔􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭iii SO.OO I' I'1---____LI __________ I􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀺-----+----+--==----lI $0.00 1-___ iSUBT,9TAL _ _____ +__4i.____---'-I____􀀭􀁦􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁳􀀺􀀡􀀽􀀸􀀸􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀷􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺�
�􀀮􀀺􀀽􀀰􀀬􀀰􀁾􀁟􀁉􀀠1--. I1-.l.-.ICON11NGENClES I ENGINEERlNGISURVEYIGEOTECH 1 RIGHT-Of-WAY I 􀁾􀁌􀀠i ! $201,796.40 $85,000.00 $0.00 $674,866.40 
04/23/99 15:24 'ft9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR 􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀵􀀯􀀰􀀱􀀵􀀠
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2811 ->=""7=:':"-""';;;"';;"";'® Post ome. Bo. 9010 Addi"•• T.... 75001·9010 Mr. Donald L. Cranford, P.E. Assistant Director, Transportation Division
Dallas County De.fartment ofPublic Works 411 Elm Street, 4 Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Re: Addison TEA-21 Projects Dear Mr. Cranford: The Town ofAddison requests Dallas County Commissioners
Court support for an additional project we intend to submit to the North Ceutral Texas Council ofGovemments (NCTCOG) in response to their call for projects. A description ofthe project
follows: Signal Timing and Upgrade of Signal Equipment. Belt Line and Midway Roads This project consists ofsignal timing for 9 intersections on Belt Line Road and 7 intersections on
Midway Road. Signal control equipment will be upgraded at 15 ofthe 16 intersections to facilitate the timing, and to switch to video detection. (One intersection has already been upgraded).
This project will improve traffic flow on both major arterials. This project will serve mUltiple mUltiple jurisdictions within the Cotinty. Preliminary estimated cost is $ 1,020,000.
Addison's funding commitment will be 20%. Belt Line Road carries over 60,000 vehicles per day, and Midway Road carries over 50,000 vehicles per day. We respectfully request the Court
to fund this project at the full 20% level. We· thank you for your interest and generous p3rticipation in this program. Please call me at 972450-2871 uyou have any questions about our
projects. Very truly yotU'S, ""7'-Ov-.-; d obn 􀁂􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁧􀁾􀁾􀀮Director of 􀁐􀁵􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁓􀀠cc: Ron Whitehead, Cil;y Manager James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E., DEE, Assistant Cil;y Engineer

----14:21 P.W.&T.-INTERAGENCY 􀁾􀀠972 450 2837 NO.286 &101 facsimileT RAN S MIT T A L _______________ To: John Baumgartner Of: Town ofAddison Fax: 972-4S0.2837 Pages; 1, including this
cover sheet. Date: April 21, 1999 Per your conversation last week,with lllOk Antebi. I am furwarding a list ofprojects whim the City ofDallu will be submitting to NCTCOG for con6ideration
ofTEA·21 funding. The only Projects I am ROding are the ones which are 011 the border ofDallas and Addison. Please let me know ifyou concur with theBe projects and project deBcriptions.
Also, please let me know if Addison would consider joint submis6ion and/or joint funding participation on these projects. !fYOIl have questions or need additional information. pl_give
me a call. F""" lI>e <INk of... Ai3n D, HendrlJc. P,E. """'rGrn MImeger, In"rGgency CoordlnallOn 1600 MiIJ1l1a. L1811 DalIIM. Te>.as 15201 (214)670-4262 Fax: {2141870.H00 
6 Polatttlal Candidate Projects for TEA4!1 STPMM. New TItOlOl.lglllares and Thoroughfare Widening 1_ § 􀁾􀀠_ ..."" c..... CoiJft. -till .roj...I1....!1} ,-ro P"JocI-jIIIon P,*,,-'" ''''''IColt
tt) _ DtJt. flMlliJll .... . 􀁾􀀠WIIfon-.ge __",""'y..8 ...,dhI. EB ....􀁾􀀧􀁌􀀠IIoIIl.JII6 P_WII __..,P t, ,"a _"",octlOill1-.'___ TAO '" 􀁾􀀠CUotoIdII' .....''"'..􀁾..r_􀁏􀁁􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁾11iI_
􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁤􀁮􀀹􀁾__1Ii_..􀁴􀁟􀀡􀁬􀁟􀁉􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁤__IIooIoUS1l511!t!13S ,.: :u1n-1'l:r;d1Res&m 1-􀁬􀀢􀁉􀁈􀁉􀁉􀁕􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁉􀁄􀁾􀀢􀁉__"._ I"I&""'IQI':': "..' '.. ,' .. :' 1$599_ ':111 ·1II·'I ..
".f ::!" !c:-...._..:IoII....􀁾􀀻􀁲􀁩􀁈􀀻..._ 'L: ." . . . 'I . .' I ''''::1>:'"""' ....MY 15"_..___(_4' .' .". '.' .' .. ,.:"",.:":,"" :-f!RlJVOI', . H-I-J·...ROW.-". '. . ...leiid-iWl..............
..· Sl;!l11:1.lltIO i:."·,·'.·:· I· .' ,"'--r .. ". .......-,. -... ._.,1.1" .13 .,_ 􀁾􀀠(.,,,<; \L􀁄􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀁸􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀠'< 􀁉􀁍􀀮􀁾􀀠􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀼􀀻􀀺􀀺�
�􀀻􀁨􀁗􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀧􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀻􀁮􀀻􀁩􀁦􀁴􀀩􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁩􀂷􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁟􀁟􀀺􀀮􀁩􀂻􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀠G1 􀁤􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁏􀀧􀁟􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁯􀁵􀁬􀁬􀁟􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀬􀁟􀀢􀁾􀁉􀀱􀀧􀀠􀁾_tfiwV _ .....IuI_.IldI... tum!lOCi<ltU.......
IP!I>Ioctwill_Clljlll<llvond __-';tIoI._ 􀁾􀀠_ I"!..__..... n..... _ISH __ 1_.$1UIIO,1IOII 11 13 2.11 .. Wlillmuidng __..4 ___y. ..... btWJgIt eMIl' tiS 1$; antllClbtli 10 NIl us 7t
SIItYiI::I!I 􀀱􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁖􀁬􀁥􀁹􀀠us 7S ICoI_ ......􀁾􀀧􀀪􀀢􀁟􀁔􀁘􀁉􀁬􀁏􀁔􀀺􀁟􀁲􀁸􀁯􀁯􀁲􀁟􀁲􀀠1_1_ 11 10 1." '" ___,' ..􀁲􀀻􀁾􀁬􀀮􀁏􀀢􀀢􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁉􀀢􀁉􀁍􀀮􀁊􀀺􀁉.. ,9IM -'; -􀀬􀁟􀁃􀁉􀁉􀁯􀁲􀁏􀁙􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀤􀀲􀀰�
�􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁮... ':.:1,,· IlIGT/Goooge . __misslng3W11_Io""""'''' """_ 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀬􀁄􀁡􀁉􀀻􀁉􀁳􀁉􀁬􀁯􀁲􀀡􀀢􀀺􀁐􀀬􀀢􀁏􀀡􀀾􀁩􀁴􀁴􀁬􀀱􀁬􀁴􀁮􀁯􀁏􀁡􀁮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁦􀁍􀁬􀁮􀁹􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁉􀀤􀁉􀁟􀀠􀂷􀁬􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀧􀁉􀀢􀀠""::'j';:
1OJII1BusbT....p>oo 1_ 􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁗􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀮􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀠. . /... .􀀱􀀭􀁥􀁯􀁉􀁩􀁉􀁉􀁩􀁡􀀴􀀱􀁲􀁯􀁥􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁴􀁮􀁙􀁢􀁹􀁾.... . _(IIoiIuoBqsllT""pII<aJ;....-lortll2l,Q11O ...
/. .' ,,:. ·,c__ ,____B!8tldWB.• ""Ir.i..rtlft. . 􀀺􀀢􀀢􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀹􀁏􀀢􀁾􀁟􀀱􀀧􀁉􀁵􀁧􀁯􀁩􀁉􀁲􀁮􀀠',' ' ... , $919_ 􀀺􀀭􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁬􀀫􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁻􀀻􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁩􀁾..',..·..􀁾􀀼􀁉􀁍􀁩􀁉􀁉􀁍􀁉􀁖􀀠.
. ...I . . I'':,':' I" .__"Jilr..i._-"YIo&IiM•.1!8 . ,. : ...• ·i.:.: .. .. , "; SH:!J181 DIIotPl1"""" j",,,,,,,,,,,,,WII __IoPt__ 􀁊􀁯􀁫􀁩􀁴􀁾􀁷􀁴􀁉􀁩􀀱􀁟􀀢􀀢__""""'" ,P.34DPXI 12 11
T."BoIlh! -l=eodoIos2 ___􀁢􀁹􀁾􀁟􀁦􀀢􀀠___NB1S8 /Add """""'10 _ ....obov ""_HOlt!T<>IIny._ ...._!w.mg...... 1$I,214,ilOO 1 '2􀁾-* 􀁰􀀭􀁾􀁐􀁡􀀭􀀧􀀠l:=ar Joint projoc:l_ Cem:I!lon: _eo"....,
__l=:oxI"",,,'II"__􀀢􀁾􀀠ponollon_dlyllmill....... f1a2t,nnn I. i_ 1-.. _112_WandWSIOI/lO _'" 12 --'-.g41ano __10 ••noo __tn ... WSDalluBlnlP_rorI:IIOTI Ge<rQe .., .1IIID14'__I011 .....
_·..IRdWUI62llSe IMiIMrt _TOIftt!I/ItIO _"""_lIoMId'ny I 12.􀁾􀀠.. l;!I '" 􀁾􀀠(1)Loca1lons and _IS aredllplicated fcrproJectB In mlipleiCUllllO:ll dlstriclls Costs _ counted OI1e lime
only pageD 
PotAIntlal Candidate Projects fOr TEA·21 CMAQ • Intersection !mprovemenl$ & Miscellaneous Improvements . Pn'j.cU.....U_.!I! ProJttt 􀁏􀁟􀁾􀁂􀀧􀀢􀀠, ...)meo..mln1S __Ian .... 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁏􀁉􀀧􀁦􀀧􀁏􀀧􀁉􀁤.
..."_ 􀀸􀁵􀁳􀀮􀁉􀀧􀁬􀁉􀀺􀁴􀁩􀁃􀁋􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁡􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀧􀁩􀁗􀁏􀁉􀁩􀁡􀀧􀁬􀁅􀁉􀁮􀁴􀀱􀀻􀀬WI__11oIIJU gtame* 􀁩􀁉􀁮􀁾to the SmIic:!I RoW. A*D.&ndWIIIlo__.... __od_..,HEConIdorMIS i-msat -e_Du.lI.''''''''
add ..'Ill WB Ian. lor "gill 􀁏􀁾􀀸􀀩􀀧􀁟􀀢􀀮<:II/IOd1Y......,.__ed """ ...-,.,.,HEearndclr MIS IwIllP_a..rdI _.NI!IS8_... HIII5aleft __ 􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁉􀀼􀁑􀁲􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀭enet.
EB _ tfgMtLlmlline 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬"" HE _MIS CMlJilIII F...... _lIftIfd..u· tum lanes DSlay 􀁾Nt ItUII'Itr impn.:lYremlra 􀁾􀀭..-.. SB1N8 '*'" IefltulU. and'"riCh! UoIm Ian.on all O...,
___􀁾􀀢􀁴􀁲􀀮__a4 .JIIII'ICMi ""-''Y""liECanldllf MIS 􀁒􀀢􀀢􀁡􀀮􀁴􀁓􀁾􀁟􀀠"lIIsa ...1iJIM .....lNI.....__'eI! Un S_..... -. ...""'815_ £BfMlIIII..m_b 5.J1IIIy.., 􀁤􀁴􀁉􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁉􀁲􀁦􀁕􀀩􀁬􀁤􀁩􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁬�
�􀁉􀀠CtudlatWMteRodc T_I ellfMllrI\""" ......... 􀁟􀁭􀀡􀁐􀁭􀁟􀁟􀁾...tI, ..loy_ F_IlI_ N9 (l'qusanldOill '""111m podia! CopaDiy __Pod......MdM ."....... ill'lkc:,.8I111bfU 􀁾􀀠.,fl<>td
_NW_ra<l, e.._,_ .......uoHT"'LBJ 􀂷􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁬􀁁􀁬􀁴C!OflhI signals S"I11'1..,.____ RetrII!JtR ....n on tldrSgelO PfI7Mttegl'lll:iittn!$; e..􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀧􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁾__AudeIiaiL8I _ 1I11I_IO,,",S__._II.
IIIICGIIII"!'I!aded PJIINbIdt QllfNE 􀁃􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁉􀁓....,""'_....-fl._If& ...... e., Consiutt8,....".,...__"Ilo<!tlObaCI(' left _"'dolay ...."""I.IIIan;MD'....udod..-..-r...NE nutHl\ 􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁡􀁹􀀮􀀠ClrmI
<IcI1 MIS o(t---jf /1"'1 .......0l0I..p_ -'''''''''glOpoI11l-􀁓􀁡􀁦􀁉􀁍􀁹􀀧􀁩􀁟􀁕􀁥􀁣􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁴􀀺􀁳􀀬􀁃􀁈􀁧􀁾􀁥􀁉􀁩􀁬􀁹􀀤􀁬􀀱􀁉􀁤􀀠􀁲􀀮􀁴􀀧􀁾􀀠18us....-cIpl!fdant .;ptlNftelU _..---_.........-D
olay -.-.􀁪􀁜􀁊􀀬􀁱􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀠-at""'"' _9"""1oft..... _ SaWt ....CopociIy.........'..'1I _........... IW8 """0gIIt ..... lane CepIdtf IIllPIatoWllll'l'tSp...a0l __' NB ""'..."'"lane
I 􀁂􀁵􀁬􀁬􀁱􀁊􀁥􀀱􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁬..􀁯􀁾􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁭􀁰􀁵􀀧..I!I!.lll-_..-tMiftiectkln iI,"'(MlfM1'Ib Cep:l!tlll.l!ely............"'"1sImI-___ at DIR. P;rlWay 19""",,_ _ I 􀁾􀀯􀀴􀁩􀁲􀁾􀀠Im_
UIJ ..1liIo1 1'W.... 􀁾􀁡􀀮􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁟􀀠􀁾IIMI deray '*ItUCIbn tJI/plcwemtnts ea.IIMd:a_ HS_left......... CapocIy 10""".........IIo/ay _.forNII_ 1_.'TmllyMiio 􀁓􀁓􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀢􀁍􀀠Gdolr
__.......,.S_ IReIlIga "'lUm..,..,meIIIl", I1IIIAitItD s........ 1aiJ....UIF..-_"lhI_..... 1iIOd4ua1 ..ft __... all lIeJIP'.'M:lm--.. --_to. s_ c_ Coon!. T ..... COOIIII -ClrtrId _111-SI.IIClOJl<IO
HE 10 " _.000 Me. 10 _.000 HE 10 .. c -"-" I. 11 $1150.110' HE !.-..... HE I. ...,...... NO I·e "411.... HE 10 I125D.COO !IE II 1 ....""" ..... I ,. .,....... NO ,,, SI.COOJl<lO lIE
I. I. J750.ooo IfE 11 13 n.500Jl<IO ......-He 11 ""w. 􀁦􀁬􀁾􀀠"" 1, 'u Ne 11 ,. "" \I ,. $100.000 Me 11 ".000.000 He 11 ·12 P. "•• w ..... ".. f1 SUiO.OOO Me 12 ,.>l".'''' "" 􀁾􀀠IIIIlII,COO
ftC 12 Ran" lo\AW 􀁉􀁾􀁢􀀠I I.O!I 1.sa 1.31• I.QCt .......... :IJ!D 􀀲􀀮􀁾􀀠..72 l1oOO UO 7.15 07 ...... .... 􀁾􀀮􀀲􀀴􀀠UII Q", G.'" I.GII .... ..... 3M! 􀁾􀀠... m ...... tv .... :0
f' 􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀀠'" ill i\l 􀁾􀀠§ is III Ul(II -."""_...􀁤􀁾􀀮􀀢􀁦􀁉􀁔􀁏􀁬􀁟􀁉􀁉􀁜􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀪􀀧􀁟􀀧dI_C-..._ ..._ ...... Nt. 5 􀁾􀀠
The following describes what TxDOT is doing regarding a project they will submit under NCTCOG's call for projects. If we want to be a part of this, and receive infonnation in our traffic
control center, TxDOT is asking for a letter from us committing $21,000 to the cause. I know we are probably not interested, but wanted to pass this on since I had the infonnation. Jim.
-----Original Message----􀁬􀀡􀁔􀁨􀁲􀀬􀁩􀀿􀀺􀁭􀁒􀁬􀁩􀀡􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁭􀁭􀁭􀁩􀀡􀀪􀀡􀁒􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁻􀀡􀀺􀁴􀀡􀀡􀁴􀀡􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀡􀁩􀁬􀁦􀀤􀁍􀁭􀀺􀁒􀁾􀁑􀁒􀁔􀁅􀁩􀁴􀁀􀁭􀁡􀁬􀁦􀁧􀁷􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁯􀁬􀁕􀁳􀁴􀁡􀁬􀁥􀁴􀀧􀁴􀁘􀀻􀁵􀁳􀁬􀀡􀁭􀀡􀀡
􀁩􀀡􀀡􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁭􀀮􀀠:!iiiim 􀀢􀁾􀁭􀁩􀁬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀠i'!tm!:: m::::mmISent: Monday, April 19, 19994:48 PM To: jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Subject: Inter-City Communications Exchange Inter-City
Communications Project -The project will consist of procuring and installing equipment necessary for exchange of video and data between the TxDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Control Center and any participating city. This will give the cities access to TxDOT owned and operated cameras, changeable message signs, highway speed data, and to the TxDOT incident
logging software (gives electronic updates on incidents along the freeway system). At the present time TxDOT has forty-two cameras spaced a one mile intervals along the highways, sixteen
changeable message signs and two miles of loop detection. It is up to each individual city to use the infonnation in a way that best suits their cities needs. Some cities use the infonnation
to infonn motorist of impending traffic conditionsthey may encounter before leaving home or work. Others use the infonnation to verify a major accident so signal timing can be changed. P .S. the infonnation as well as camera snapshots
will soon be available on the Internet. 
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY ACQUISITION GUIDELINES Dallas District Right of Way determination made Mapping contracted Public involvement satisfied (Limited
Public Meeting, Opportunity for Public Hearing, or Public Hearing) depending on type of project and environmental clearance Mapping completed. 8 months Environmental clearance approved
(potential contaminated sites identified)** Field check project and determine relocation needs, if any 1month Ifthere are displacements, prepare estimate to request funds Release requested
from Division Office and relocation funds set up, Ifthere are displacements 2 months Maps furnished and Local Public Agency released to begin acquisition 1week Right of way mapping may
be prepared concurrently with the environmental and public involvement processes. Itis the Local Public Agency's function to: Request and receive title information (depending on size
of project) and availability of title companies) 2 to 6 months Send informational notices to owners 1week Donations may be requested Field check project for appraisal assignments and
identify potential contaminated sites** 1month Assign and appraise parcels 2 months Review, correct and approve appraisals 1 to 2 months Map revisions requested, if necessary 2 V2 months
Make offers to owners (copies to TxDOT) 1month LPA sends 90 day relocation letters 1week LPA makes preliminary contact with displacees, if any,locates comparables and compute housing
or rental supplements and moving expenses 3 months Cure title problems The curing of title problems is ongoing during the negotiation process and must be completed in order to close
a parcel and obtain clear title. This also applies when a parcel is being condemned. Title must cured in order to name the proper parties to the law suit. 
ACQUIsmONBY DONATION' DEED Prepare Donation Deed and Waiver (Full or Partial Donation) 1 week Execute and record Donation Deed 1month Furnish recorded Deed (or copy) and Waiver to TxDOT
1 week The owner must be advised of his right to an appraisal and his right to receive jus compensation for the property being taken. He/she may wish to donate all or only part of the
land being taken. The Donation Waiver must be signed by the owner. Title tothe property must be cleared the same as on any other acquisition. If the property is donated (or acquired
in part with local money) on FM or On-System projects, conveyances should be made to the Local public Agency then deeded to the State. Partial donations must be supported by Appraisals
if reimbursement is requested. . ACQUISITION BY DEED Offer accepted Deed prepared and signed, title cured, parcel processed for payment for payment 2 to 3 months Close with owner (notify
TxDOT of closing date) 1week LPA sends 30 day relocation letters notifying owner and tenants, if any, 1week to vacate the taking by a specific date (notify TxDOT) Transmit recorded deed
to TxDOT (See below) lweek LPA relocates any displacees 2 months For FM and On-System projects, the original recorded deed must be in the name of the State of Texas and be sent to TxDOT.
For Off-System projects where title is secured in the name of the LPA, a copy of the recorded deed must be sent to TxDOT. ACQUISmON BY EMINENT DOMAIN Offer refused . . Initiate eminent
domain proceeding (obtain Commissioners' Court or City Council Authority to.condemn) 3 weeks File necessary 'court papers 1 month Update appraisal report 1 month Set and hold commissioners'
hearing 2 to 3 months File Awatd of Commissioners at)d obtain certified copy 1 week Process for payment 4 to 6 weeks 20 day appeal period for both sides of Award of Commissioners' (Runs
concurrently with payment process) Deposit amount of Award in the Registry of the Court (notify TxDOT of date of deposit) GIVES RIGHT OF POSSESSION 1 week 2 
ACQUISITON BY EMINENT DOMAIN Cont'd. Transmit copy of Award to TxDOT I week TxDOT sends 30 day relocation letters notifying the owners and tenants, if any, to vacate the taking by a
specific date 1 week File and record Judgment if no objections are filed I month Provide recorded Judgment to TxDOT 1 month LPA relocates any displacees 2 months Ifappealed, obtain Judgment
by agreement, mediation or jury trial File, record and provide recorded Judgment to TxDOT Depositing the amount of theAward ofCommissioners' into the Registry of the Court give the right
to take Possession of the property. Funds may be withdrawn from the Registry of the Court and used by the landowner even though the case may have been appealed ad jury trial is pending.
UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS Designer determines preliminary conflicts and where possible, tries to work around them Designer should have the following meetings with the utility companies as
appropriate: Preliminary design meeting . 30% plan completion meeting 65% plan completion meeting 90% plan completion meeting Final design and initial construction meeting Pre-letting
meeting Preliminary designs are furnished to LPA Designer needs to phase the project to allow time for the utility adjustments LPA should work with the utility companies to determine
ifadjustment is reimbursable Ifreimbursable, enter into an agreement with the utility company Work with the various utility companies is a simultaneous function with right of way acquisition.
Contact should be made with the utility companies as early as possible once the preliminary design is established. Plans need to be sent to the utility companies for the various meetings.
The 60% plan completion meeting should be held at least 7 months prior to the letting in order for them to have time to do the engineering for their adjustments. Usually, if the utility
is located in its own easement that is being extingnished by the right of way acquisition, the adjustment is reimbursable by thee LPA. The right of way must be acquired and cleared in
order for the utilities to be adjusted. TxDOT personnel are available to advise the LPA in the handling of these adjustment. 3 
CLEAR RIGHT OF WAY The Local Public Agency notifies TxDOT when improvements are vacated 1 week Any.retained improvements should be removed by owner 1 to 2 months Test all buildings and
slabs, not retained, for asbestos containing materials (ACM) 1 month Ifasbestos tests prove that friable ACM are present, abatement must be completed prior to removal 1 to 2 weeks Sell
improvements by sealed bid or public auction to clear right of way 2 to 6 months Clearing right of way includes the removal of all physical improvements within the taking. Timely clearing
of the right of way allows the utility companies to the begin their adjustments prior to the letting. HAZARD01)S MATERIAL AND PETROLEUM STORAGE TANK CLEANUP** Inspect property for possible
environmental concerns ** (This can be accomplished at the time appraisal assignments are made) Ifsuspicious sites are found, perform Phase I site assessment 1 month Hazardous material
or petroleum storage tanks on sit, perform Phase II site assessment (detennines extend of contamination) 3 months . Obtain voluntary cleanup by owner where possible Prepare and execute
removal agreement with owner 1 month File necessary documentation and closure plan Perform cleanup (T.N.R.C.C. regulations) 6 months to 2 years (Depends on the extent of contamination)
Obtain clean closure letter **Hazardous materials are those regulated by the Texas Department of Health, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission and the Environmental protection
Agency. The identification of hazardous materials, petroleum storage tanks, etc., in the taking, should be simultaneous process, beginning when the field check is made to assigu appraisals.
After historical data is gathered in the Phase I site assessment and potential problems are identified, a right of entry should be negotiated with the owner to do a Phase II assessment
to detennine the extent of the contamination. Any necessary cleanup should be taken care of as soon as possible in order that the contractor is not delayed. Cleanup must to be accomplished
in accordance with the appropriate regulatory agency guidelines. Construction will not be allowed to proceed on contaminated sits for obvious safety reasons. Voluntary cleanup by the
landowner should be obtained where possible. Neither the Local Public Agency nor the State wants to become the generator of hazardous material. 4 
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATIONS Provide detailed information regarding the status of outstanding right of way parcels, utility conflicts, outstanding remediation problems and uncleared parcels
to TxDOT. This detailed narrative status is necessary 4 months prior to the scheduled letting date in order that TxDOT can prepare the right ofway certifications to be submitted with
the PS&E package. These certifications provide information that determines whether a letter of authority is issued, allowing the project to be advertised for bids. This is in addition
to the documentation provided to satisfy Federal and State requirements for acquisition. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO COMPLETION OT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS'" If a Local Public
Agency chooses to purchase property with its own funds prior to completion of the environmental process, it may do so and not jeopardize Federal aid participation in future project costs
if certain requirements .are met. These include: 1. The acquire property must not influence the need for or location of the project. 2. The acquisition must comply with the· Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. 3. The acquisition must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. The acquisition
must not include lands protected by Section 4(F) of the DOT Act. (park land) 5. The final project must meet all requirements for a normal Federal-aid project such as compliance with
NEPA, Historical Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, Wetland Executive Order etc. 6. Advance acquisitions must not be used to circumvent Federal laws or regulations. Since acquiring
large quantities of right of way in advance of the Federal location approval could likely influence project location or need, the local governments should be made aware that any full
scale acquisition would be done totally at their risk. "'While this is an option allowed by the Federal Highway Administration, it is not recommended as a normal method of operation.
If not carefully administered, it could jeopardize Federal-aid participation. It also causes considerable problems when displacements are involved were State relocation assistance funding
is requested (State relocation assistance cannot be set up prior to completion of public involvement and final environmental clearance.) If relocation assistance is required in these
circumstances, accomplishment must be at other than State or Federal expense. 5 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 4S0-2S71 Post Office Box 9010 Addison. Texas 􀀷􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱􀁾􀀹􀀰􀀱􀁏􀀠16801 Westgrove April 15, 1999 Mr. Donald L. Cranford, PE Assistant Director, Transportation
Division Dallas County De,fartment ofPublic Works 411 Elm Street, 4 Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Re: Addison TEA-21 Projects Dear Mr. Cranford: The Town ofAddison requests Dallas County Commissioners
Court support for two projects we intend to submit to the North Central Texas Council ofGovernments (NCTCOG) in response to their call for projects. A description ofthe projects follow:
Belt LineITollway Single Point Urban Interchange This project consists ofconstruction ofmodifications to the Belt Line Road Bridge over the Tollway to allow the interchange to act as
a single intersection, instead oftwo. The project will allow the simultaneous operation ofleft tum lanes for east/west traffic and for north/south traffic. Efficiency ofthe intersection
should be improved by 15 to 20%. This project will serve multiple jurisdictions within the County. Preliminary estimated total cost ofthe project is $2,470,000. Addison's funding commitment
will be 20%. Tollway Southbound to Northbound U-turn at Arapaho Road This project will construct a new southbound to northbound U-turn lane at the Arapaho Road Bridge over the North
Dallas Tollway. The widening and realignment of ArapahoRoad (presently under construction) required the elimination ofthe southbound to northbound U-turn lane to accommodate 6 through
lanes and 2 left tum lanes across the bridge. The southbound to northbound U-turn lane must be re-established when southbound to northbound turning movements reach 90 per hour. This
project will serve multiple jurisdictions within the County. Preliminary estimated total cost ofthe project is $675,000. Addison's funding commitment will be 20%. 
Both ofthese intersections are on major arterials, and, both intersections are in the City of Dallas adjacent to the Addison City Limit Line. Belt Line Road carries over 60,000 vehicles
per day, and Arapaho Road carries over 11,000 vehicles per day. We expect the Arapaho counts to go up when the improvements presently under construction are completed. We respectfully
request the Court to fund these projects at the full 20% level. We thank you for your interest and generous participation in this program. Please call me at 972-450-2871 ifyou have any
questions about our projects. Very truly yours, ddison 􀁕􀀢􀀢􀁏􀁨􀁮􀀨􀁔􀁉􀀭􀁂􀀭􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁾􀁺􀀻􀀮􀀬􀁴􀀺􀀡Director of Public Works cc: Ron Whitehead, City Manager Jack Antebi, P.E., Program
Manager, Dallas Public Works and Transportation Department James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E., DEE, Assistant City Engineer 
TOWN OF ADDIsoN PUBLIC WORKS To: ThY) CrqYl+Vr-&,eE, From: James C. Pierce,Jr.,P.E.,DEE I Assistant City Engineer Company: Ua,.I/ct5 Lv. Pu1, tJkS Phone: 972/450-2879 FAX: 972/450-2834
FAX#: ;}.14--053-btfl6, 16801 Westgrove Date:,__􀀺􀁬􀀺􀀢􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀡􀀭􀀭􀀯􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀵􀁟􀀭􀀮􀀮􀁌􀁌􀀭􀁉􀀮􀀱􀁾__ P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 # of pages (including cover): 3 
*************** -CDMM.JOURNRL-􀁾􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀪􀀠DATE 04-15-1999 ****** T[ME 03:02PM ** P.1 MODE TRANSM[SSION START=04-15 03:00PM END=04-15 03:01PM NO. COM SPEED NO STATION NAME....
PAGES TELEPHONE NO. OK Ii; 92146535416 003 -Addison Sue Ctr -Upstairs____*************"'*"'*****c FAX-200 V2.17)*-9724502834-**'1'**__ 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2811 Post Office Box 9010 Addi30n. Texas 75001-9010 16801 WC3tgrove April 15, 1999 Mr. Donald L. Cranford, P.E. Assistant Director, Transportation Division
Dallas County DeEartment ofPublic Works 411 Elm Street, 4 Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Re: Addison TEA-21 Projects Dear Mr. Cranford: The Town of Addison requests Dallas County Commissioners
Court support for two projects we intend to submit to the North Central Texas Council ofGovernments (NCTCOG) in response to their call for projects. A description of the projects follow:
Belt Lineffollway Single Point Urban Interchange This project consists ofconstruction ofmodifications to the Belt Line Road Bridge over the Tollway to allow the interchange to act as
a single intersection, instead of two. The project will allow the simultaneous operation ofleft tum lanes for east/west traffic and for north/south traffic. Efficiency ofthe intersection
should be improved by 15 to 20%. This project will serve multiple jurisdictions within the the County. Preliminary estimated total cost ofthe project is $2,470,000. Addison's funding
commitment will be 20%. Tollway Southbound to Northbound U-turn at Arapaho Road This project will construct a new southbound to northbound U-turn lane at the Arapaho Road Bridge over
the North Dallas Tollway. The widening and realignment of ArapahoRoad (presently under construction) required the elimination ofthe southbound to northbound U-turn lane to accommodate
6 through lanes and 2 left tum lanes across the bridge. The southbound to northbound U-turn lane must be re-established when southbound to northbound turning movements reach 90 per hour.
This project will serve multiple jurisdictions within the County. Preliminary estimated total cost ofthe project is $675,000. Addison's funding commitment will be 20%. 
Both ofthese intersections are on major arterials, and, both intersections are in the City of Dallas adjacent to the Addison City Limit Line. Belt Line Road carries over 60,000 vehicles
per day, and Arapaho Road carries over 11,000 vehicles per day. We expect the Arapaho counts to go up when the improvements presently under construction are completed. We respectfully
request the Court to fund these projects at the full 20% level. We thank you for your interest and generous participation in this program. Please call me at 972-450-2871 ifyou have any
questions about our projects. Very truly yours, ddison 􀁕􀀰􀁨􀁮􀀨􀀩􀀢􀁬􀀭􀁂􀀭􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁾􀁉􀀺􀀡Director of Public Woiks cc: Ron Whitehead, City Manager Jack Antebi, P.E., Program Manager,
Dallas Public Works and Transportation Department James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E., DEE, Assistant City Engineer 
COST ESTlMATE , ADDISON -SPUI :BELT LINE ROAD AND DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY April 14,1999 ITEM-NBR DESCRlPTION UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY COST􀁟􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁣􀀢􀀧􀀽􀀢􀀢􀁯􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀢􀁾
􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀲􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁉􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁉􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀭􀁾􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁐􀁒􀀭􀁅􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀁏􀀭􀀮􀀢􀁗􀀭..-----------;--KM I $50,000.00 􀀱􀀱􀀭􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀠�
�􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠$30,000.00􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀰􀀴􀀭􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀠"_REr-12'1CONC(PAV) : M2 \' ,,,.00 I '''''' 104-5005.:.REMOV CONC (MEDIAN) M2 • $20.00 ! 600 $12,000.00I 104-5009
:REMOV CONC (SDWLK) i M2 I $12.00 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠200 --:.-'􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀤􀀲􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀬􀀴􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀰􀀢􀀬􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀰􀀢􀀬􀀰􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁪􀀠􀁟􀀱􀀰􀀴􀁾􀀵􀁑􀁉􀁉􀀠REMOV CONC(DRlVEWAY) M2 +_ $11.00 , 300,----;---"=$3""3,,,0,,
,0:.::::.00::.---; 􀁟􀀢􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀴􀀭􀁾􀀵􀀰􀀱􀀳􀀠􀁒􀁅􀁍􀁏􀁖􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁃􀀨􀁃􀁕􀁒􀁂􀀦􀁇􀁕􀁔􀁔􀁅􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀮􀁒􀀺􀁌􀀩􀁟􀁾􀀠M I $4.72 -+i_=150:;,;:0_-,,_ $7,080.00 260-5010 , LIME TREAT SUBGR (DC)
(200 MM) M2 $2"60 2500 􀀢􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁣􀀤􀀶􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀵􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀰􀀢􀀬􀀰􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁣􀁏􀁏􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠! I _360-501 I :CONC CURB(TY II) (M()N:.:O:::c)<--__+_1......:.:.M=--+_'--,,$:..:.10::,:.0::.:0,-􀁟􀀬􀀢􀁟􀁾􀀱�
�􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀰􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀱􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀤􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀱􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀵􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀰􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀰􀁟􀀭􀁉􀀠360-5017 :CONC PAY (CPCD)(200MM) M2 I $41.00 I 2500 I $102,500.00 ! i 1
_ 416-0506. DRlLL=-=SH=A-"F'-'T,"(,"-36=-IN:::.:L)_____􀁾􀁌􀀽􀁆􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀤􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀸􀀳􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀰􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀰􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀧_6",0:.::0__,=__-=$",4",-,9,-=.80:.,:0:;.:.0:.::0_-1
; ! 420-0551 CL C CONC (PARAPET \:.II,:.cA::;:L""L)L-_--;--'C-cY $8",8=2.:::::86=-,,'__.:.:12:::5__-;-,--"$:..:.1-,-,10""3:.::5,,,7.,,,50"------1 420-5014 CL C CONC BENT M3 ! $880.00
225! SI98,000.00􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀫􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁣􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀳􀀺􀁾􀀵􀀰􀁟􀀰􀁟􀀱􀁾􀁒􀁅􀁟􀁾􀁆􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁃􀀠􀁓􀁌􀁁􀁾􀁂􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁟􀀢􀀢􀀠_ "_""""""_--,-M2:.=---:.-i--,-$:;:9.::.;5.:.::00,,--"_: 1200
"""""_;. .!I14,000.OO _ _ 􀀴􀁟􀀲􀀳􀁾􀀭􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀷􀀠'RET WALL M2 : $375.00 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀳􀀰􀀰􀀠! $112,500:..:..0",,0'---1 __450.:()6,,9:.::5_.:.:RA=-=IL::..;{Tc:..cl.􀁉􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁬􀁟􀁾___" _-=2:.;:.00"---'i--=$c.Y
.:;C::..:4c___-=M'-=--i-_=$=.20::..:9::;c.9.::.;8 --+i 41",,9:.;:9-=-6.:.::00"-_1,__􀀴􀀶􀁾􀀴􀁾􀀭􀀵􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁌􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁒􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁃􀀭􀀽􀁐􀀮􀀬􀁉􀁐􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁅􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀨􀀻􀀺􀁃􀀺􀀺􀁌􀀮􀁟􀀺􀁉􀀺􀁉􀁉􀀺􀁌􀀩􀀨􀀢􀀬�
�􀀺􀁣􀁏􀁏􀀢􀀬􀁍􀁣􀀺􀁍􀀺􀀽􀀩___"__􀁾􀁣􀀺􀀢􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀤􀁾􀀺􀀱􀀽􀀲􀀴􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀳􀀲􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀱􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀶􀀺􀀮􀀰M i ___c-----=$:.:.7!..:,4;c59:..:.2=:0'--_1 _465:0741. INLET(COMPL2
(TY 11) (I,,,,O'L)􀁾􀁾__",EAce. I $2,400.00 I _..:4_ -+1􀁟􀀮􀁯􀀤􀁣􀀹􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀶􀀰􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀰􀁾􀀮􀀰􀀮􀁣􀀮􀀰􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀠, I496-0502 REMOV INLET ...􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁉􀁬􀁁􀀠1 $1,200.00,-_+!_..:3:. "___
$3,600.00 . 􀀵􀀰􀀨􀁽􀁬􀁾􀀭􀀵􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁬􀀮􀁟􀀮􀁔􀁟􀁅􀁍􀁟􀁐􀁾􀁅􀁄􀁟􀁆􀁟􀁎􀁾􀁃􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠___ M '_$6=.00",--+1_4:cOO,-"0__,'_"",$2=-c4"",OQO::..:..O,,,,0_-I 􀁾􀁟􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀴􀀭􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀳􀀠TEMP
SED FNC (REMOV) 􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁍􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀠--=-$;;..;5•.:.00'--__--'4000 I 320,000..:.00'--_1 1500-5001 􀁍􀁏􀁂􀁉􀁌􀁛􀁾􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀀠__...:...__􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁣􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁌􀀽􀁓􀀠i
3150,000.00 􀁟􀁾􀀱􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀬􀁟􀀭􀀽􀀤􀀽􀀱􀀵􀀰􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠502-5001 BARRICADE, SIGNS, TRAFF 􀁟􀀫􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁍􀀢􀀬􀁏􀀢􀀭􀁦􀀭􀀧􀀤􀀽􀀵􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀰􀀺􀁣􀁏􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁉􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀱􀀲􀀢􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁩􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀤􀀽􀀶􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀰􀀬􀁣􀀺􀁣􀁏􀁏􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁏􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀰􀁟􀀭􀁉r 􀀭􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀭-, ! I 530-5001 IDRVWY'S (Conc)(I50mm) ,M2 $36.00 1 200 $7,200.00
I !􀀮􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀭􀁾􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀠CONCRETE SIDEWALK __􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁍􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀲􀀭􀀫􀁟􀀮􀀳􀀲􀀸􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠300 _+!_"$8,400.00 531-5004 SIDEWALK RAMP(TY 4) EA 1 􀀤􀀴􀀶􀀳􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀰􀁾􀀰􀀺􀀮􀁟􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀱􀁟􀀭􀀬􀀭�
�􀀱􀀶􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠1 $7,408.00 􀁾􀀢􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀮􀁣􀀲􀀭􀀢􀀽􀀭􀁣􀀭􀀧􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠536-5002 CONe MEDIAN M2 $40.00 1000 I $40,000.00 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀢􀁟􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀢􀁉􀀭􀀧􀀽􀀽􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀽�
�􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀢........, -="-f-----' 1-----,-6101"-􀁟􀁾􀁒􀁄􀁗􀁙ILL ASSEM ___"__􀁾I EA 1...:$=2<:,1;:::20::..0,,-,0,--.,.'__6"--_-+' ...:$:::1",21.:.,7=.20::.:.",00'----1 􀁟􀁾􀀦􀁾􀀹􀀭􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀳􀀠FND
LG RDSD SIGN SUPPORT ,EA i 3350.00 20: $7,000.00 . 650 ... OVERHEAD SIGN SUPPORT , EA i $30,200.00 I 1 _-+!_-=$:::30,200.00 662-0542 WZPM (CLB) EA! $4.00 ! 500 .. 1 $2,000.00 '"-·662_0543
WZPM (CLB) EA·· i $4.00 ! 200 ; 3800.00 􀀮􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭..􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾...􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾...-----..􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀬---==::::':::'--1 . 􀁟􀀶􀀶􀀲􀀭􀀰􀁾􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁚􀁐􀁍􀀠(fABl
___.. EA $6.83 i 1500 .Jf--.::S",I",0,::.24.:;::5.:.;:.O:;::O__1 I662:0582WZPM(TAB) , EA SI.OO 'I 750 ! S750.00 􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀮􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀰􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀶􀁾􀀶􀁾􀀶􀀭􀁑􀁾􀀷􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁒􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁟􀁆􀁌___..._"_ "_..._ "_L:..:E::;.A.li.-Li-=.$1:.;;1.:.5.,,-00,,-_,.."_24_ "-,-I_..::$=.2,"'7.::.;60:.;..0:c0'----' 
--------􀁉􀁔􀁂􀁍􀀭􀀱􀀺􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁒􀀠DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY COST , 666-0549 iREFL I EA $40.00 I 24 $960.00 ....666-5012 REFL M $17.00 75 $1,275.00.. ------.. .. .-_.__.....
! . ..._-I,I 􀁾􀁾􀀭666-5013 REFL 􀁾􀁾􀀠! RA $150.00 24 $3,600.00______________M ___;...____---'__••• I-.. ...􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾' I, I______________M.666-5036 iREFL ; M , $1.24 " i 150 I $186.00r-·····
I. I666-5041 REFL i M . $6.00 250 i $1,500.00 i I i666-5044 'REFL M $10.00 75 $750.00_. i I I, ,666-5045 iREFL EA , $60.00 I 24 I $1,440.00 i I! M....§66-5201 􀁾􀀠,REFL -L__ I $1.50
$225.00 , 150.--j.. 666-5209 REFL M $7.76 250 I $1,940.00 TI .672-0504 RPM (CLA) , EA $8.60 160 i $1,376.00 I 672-0507 RPM (CLB) I EA $4.00 i 360 ! $1,440.00 672-5016 ;RPMBTN EA i $3.20
370 i $1,184.00 , 678-5001 .PAV SURV & PREP M $1.00 i 150 $150.00 ...I '--'--""678-5004 PAV SURV & PREP M $2.72 250 ! $680.00 ---_... I, 678-5006 PAY SURV &. PREP M $5.73 75 I $429.75._--_...__.....-
....__. I I I ,, 678-5007 PAVSURV&.PREP EA $31.70 24 I $760.80 -----_.... .i 678-678-5008 PA V SURV &. PREP I EA $40.00 , 24 , $960.00 􀀭􀁾􀀭, ! 686 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS $175,000.00 I !
$175,000.00--.. J LANDSCAPE LS $75,000.00 , I • $75,000.00c-.-.----... ..._-----_..., UTILRELOC i LS $250,000.00 I ..... ___$175,200.00 . SUBTOTAL $1,703,432.25 CONTINGENCY AND ENGINEERING
$596,201.29 RIGHT-Of-WAY $135,000.00 TOTAL $2 434 633.54 -
-------------COST ESTIMATE ADDISON -ARAPAHO ROAD U-TURN April 14,1999 ITEM-NBR DESCRlPTlON .. UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY COST ..􀁾􀀠.....􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭--.....􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠..􀁾.
..-.-... PAVEMENT REM.lPREP LS $50,000.00 I $50,000.00f.....-..--.--.. 􀀭􀁾........ I . MOBILlZA TlON I LS S50,000.00 I 1 $50,000.00, ,BARRICADE, SIGN, TRAFFIC CONT , LS I S50,OOO.00
I I I SSO,OOO.OO ,CONC PAV (CPCD) SY $35.00 I 200 $7,000.001---ic:ONC CURB (TY 1I)(MON02 LF $2.00 200 $400.00 TY IV CONC BEAM LF $65.00 440 $28,600.00.. _..... 􀁾􀀭􀁾.. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮......
..... RAIL LF $40.00 $12,000.00....._ ..--􀁾􀁽􀁏􀁏􀀠 RESTRlPING LS $30,000.00 I I 1 $30,000.00 --------.... 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠----....􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭-------.. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭CONC SLAB (eL
S) CY 5300.00 115 $34,500.00 t .CONCABUT CY $460.00 82 $37,720.00 , . DRlLL SHAFT (30") LF ,I S81.00 350 I $28,350.00 ;RET WALL SF I $40.00 1200 S48,000.00 !CONC (PARAPET) CY 8460.00
, 25 $11,500.00_ I-i i 1l-I -__M SUBTOTAL I ------. --..􀁾..... .......-..... 􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀿􀀮􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁮􀁧􀁥􀁮􀁣􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠& 􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁥􀁥􀀺􀁾􀁧 '-Right-of-Way , .... ._.. 􀁾􀁾􀀠TOTAL i 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭.....
------_. $0.00 • $0.00 $0.00 ; $0.00 $0.00 SO.OO $0.00 $0.00 , $0.00 : I I ! sO.oo SO.OO $0.00 : I , $0.00 $0.00 I i $0.00 , ; $0.00 $0.00 , .. 􀀤􀀳􀀸􀀸􀀬􀀰􀀷􀀰􀀮􀀰􀁑􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀲􀀸􀀶􀀬􀀸􀀶􀀱􀀮􀀳􀀴􀀠$0.00
I i $674,931.34 
Wednesday. March jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Ismith; nbamett Re: Call For Projects jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us wrote: About when will we know if a project application has been approved? Jim.
You will know that your application has been received and the candidate projects have been pulled into the evaluation process by the end of May. We will evaluate candidate projects throughout
the months of June, July and August. The STTC and the RTC will see the inHial rankings in August and September, public meetings in October, and final review and selection of projects
will occur in the NovemberlDecember time frame, following the air quality conformity test. You will know for sure which projects get selected in NovemberIDecember ...Dan Rocha 
SIGN IN SHEET . .' ,,"."..-.--􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁜􀀮􀀠.L,Cci) 􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀢􀀠.IL,l,:_..:l/, . CCI ... Black, John 97: 􀁾􀁊􀁡􀁭􀁥􀁳􀀠m 972-919·2611Davis, David r anners 􀁊􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀠,Mark Grand Prairie
􀀧􀀯􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀠·d131 (" 1.'-I l!. .􀁾􀀠'"L""IIIt...-la<•...,• (':lIesar !J12· YL" 􀁾'7 S'Jil1;o.)" ...... , 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀠....Irving 972·741·2646 It... u.S 21 .. , Olyai, DART I r..;.;;,;;;
/'L v. -h.1J.S97Pierce, Jim 􀁬􀁬􀀧􀀱􀁾􀁑􀀭􀀩􀀮􀀮􀁧􀀱􀀫􀀠( ., L972·919·2611PiirtlY.Ray '1'1 J, -'il bJ 'A "::&',, 􀁦􀁙􀁾􀀮􀀢􀁀􀀨􀁬􀀠d.Walter 71 'f1-z. 'L'l' 􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀮􀁯•.􀀻􀁾Dallas 21
..·o,u·jLt" Tom Plano T"""" u)hJ(;"..J.JUJA J, fl'-tJl 0 ' (io/.􀁾􀀠'>......9(.􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀂷􀁾􀀴􀀱􀂷􀀱􀁬􀀵􀀱􀀠Robert Young. F? 􀀬􀁾􀀠/1.1, .7""", PI, JJN ID,,;....􀁾􀀠\ "'. ..... !'I?-􀁾􀀠'R....
vWoll'<". 􀁁􀀮􀁜􀁾􀀠R."'.blu 71, TxDOT 21 19n -2=' 'l.<lg,/􀀮􀁾1NO-7 1"11-7ev'll'5i1 1..:)"./_ l,Iv "" j "., '9/7 _ AAl.., 􀀧􀀺􀁕􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀱􀁉􀁪􀁾􀀮􀀷􀁊􀁬􀁄􀀠... U') ...-h$:Li' f$'7Z.?
."1%2$ )S;.Qj .Au co .... 17«0 -75(, , &1 S'tl 13" 181, .a:-....J, &. "" A. -OJ, C<>_ dG;<.J• .31.0. 4'f" t. T. 􀁾􀁾􀁎􀀧􀁕􀁓􀀠, 􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁱􀁾􀀬􀀠c·,.....,17";". '7.5(; d.2., '7 r1:1.1'1_
7'1"1. 􀀱􀀧􀁍􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀁣􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠: • or"::!. , 
North Central Texas Council Of Governments February 24. 1999 Mr. John Baumgartner Director of Public Works Town of Addison P.O. Box 9010 Addison. Texas 75001 Dear Mr. Baumgartner: We
are in receipt of your request for the 1999 North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Call for Projects Application diskette which you will find enclosed. There are two folders/directories
on the diskette. The first folder contains three files which are described as follows: • "cfplnst.doc" contains the instructions for completing the Call for Projects application. This
file is in the Microsoft Word '97 formal • "instprnt.txt" contains the instructions for completing the Call for Projects application. This is a plain text file that is formatted for
printing. This file can be accessed and printed from any word processor. • "instread.txt" contains the instructions for completing the Call for Projects application. This is a plain
text file that is formatted for viewing on the computer monitor. The second folder contains one file. This file. "cfpfonns.xls", is the application for the Call for Projects. Please
enter your proposed projects directly into this file. This is a Microsoft Excel '97 format file. If I may assist you in any way with the preparation and submission of your application
please contact me at (817) 608-2317 or you may e-mail meatrmetscher@nctcog.dst.tx.us. Sincerely. 􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁤􀀠Randy 􀁾􀁴􀁳􀁣􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀠Transportation Planner I RM:lr Enclosure cc: 1998-99
UPWP Element 3.01 Project File 616 Six Flags Drive, Centerpoint Two P. O. BOx 5888. Arlington. Texas 76005·5888 (817) 640·3300 FAX: 817·640·7806 ®recycle" paper 
Pi-; , .\.., -􀁾􀀠DALLAS COUNTY : WI,R 221999PUBLIC WORKS March 16, 1999 Ii crT)" )._.-.----... .. 􀁾􀀠--: 􀀮􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭...-'􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Mr. Ron Whitehead, City Manager Town of Addison
5300 Belt Line Rd. P.O. Box 144 Addison, Tx 75001-0144 Re: Dallas County Support For TEA-21 Projects Dear Mr. Ron Whi tehead: The Commissioners Court is offering its support for important
transportation projects you may submit to the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for TEA -21 funding. The Court will considerfunding up to 20% of the cost of TEA-21 projects provided your City funds a minimum of 20% and the project meets the attached minimum criteria. The Regional Transportation Council's
adopted project evaluation criteria includes up to 24 points for exceeding the required 20% minimum local funding. Together we can exceed, even double, the required local match and thereby
significantly improve the evaluation scoring for needed Dallas County improvements. The attached eligibility requirements are the minimum conditions for County participation in your
projects. The County staff will evaluate projects submitted to the County and the Court will select projects not later than Tuesday, May 11, 1999. This will permit the commitment of
County participation prior to the May 14th deadline date for project submittals to NCTCOG. To be eligible for County funding participation your projects must be submitted to the Dallas
County Public Works Department by close Of business (4:30 pm), Friday. April 16, 1999. It is not necassary that you submit the completed NCTCOG project forms to Dallas County, however,
we must receive the project name, location, limits, brief project scope, estimated total cost of the project and the amount of the City's commitment. Please contact your County Commissioner
or the County Public Works Department for 􀀮􀁤􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁯􀁮􀁡􀁬􀀠;nfonna(;oo and 􀁡􀀬􀀬􀀻􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁡􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Mike Cantrell nneth A. Mayfield Commissioner, District 4 Dallas, Texas
75202 (214) 653-7151 
Project Eligibility Requirements Dallas County Funding Participation 1999 TEA-21 Call for Projects 1. County participation will not exceed 20% of the estimated total project cost. County
maximum participation will be fixed at project submittal. City participation must be 20% or more. 2. Thoroughfare improvements are eligible on routes functionally classified as minor
arterials and higher in the Regional Thoroughfare Plan as published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments. 3. Freeway service road and freeway interchange improvements are
eligible. 4. The project must be for permanent improvements. 5. County participation will be limited to functional and safety items. The County will not participate in the cost of aesthetic
items. 6. Signal System Improvements that are a part of a coordinated or centrally controlled system are eligible. 7. Incident Detection and Response (lOR) projects and Intelligent Transportation
System (ITS) projects which are consistent with the Area-Wide Plan and compatible with TxDOT's proposed freeway systems are eligible. 8. County participation amounts will include County
administrative charges. 9. County participation will be subject to execution of necessary Interlocal Agreements prior to project implementation. 10. The County anticipates providing
up to $20 million in total TEA-21 participation over 4 years and up to $40 million over eight years. TEA-21 provides six (6) years of federal funding authority with an additional three
(3) years for obligation of the funds for a total time frame of nine (9) years. 11. Priority for the County participation may be given to projects serving multiple jurisdictions within
the County and projects having a regional transportation impact. The County may also select projects for County participation funding to assure that benefits are reasonably distributed
throughout the County. 
Ap-:-12-99 03:26P P.02 􀁾..: DALLAS COUNTY PUBLICWORKS March 16, 1999 Re: 0.al'88 Counly Support For TEA-21 Projects Dear ,or' Ihe Commisslonsrs Court 's.offerlnglls support for Important
transportation projects you may submit to the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for TEA -21 funding. The Court will consider funding up to 20% of 􀁾􀁨􀁥􀀠cost ofTEA-21·projecls
provided your City funds a minimum of 20% and the project meels the aUached minimum criteria. The Regional Transportation Counoil's adopted project evaluation criteria includes up in
24 points for exceeding the required 20% minimum local funding. Together we can exceed, even double, the required local match and thereby significantly improve·the evaluation $COring
for needed Dallas County improvements. The attached eligibility requirements are the minimum conditions for County participation in your projects. The County staff will evaluate projects
submitted to the County and the Court will sel&,,\ projects not later than Tuesday, May ii, 1999. This will permit the commitment of County participation prior to the May 14th deadline
date for project submittals to NCTCOG. To be eligible for County funding participalion your projects mu:;1 be submitted to the Dallas County Public Works Department by close of business
(4:30 pm), Friday. April 16, 1999. It is not necessary that YOu submit the completed NCTCOG projectforms to Dallas County, however, we must receive the project name, location, limits(
bi'lef project scopej -estimated total OO5t ofoftle project and the amount ofthe City's commitmeAl , . . Please contact your County Commissioner or the County Public Works Department
for 􀀮􀁤􀁾􀁉􀀭􀀧􀀮􀁭􀁉􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀺􀀭... 􀁾􀁡􀀠Mike Cantrell Commissioner, District:2 Dallas, Texas 75202 .(214) 653-7151 
P.03 Apr-12-99 03:26P Project Eligibility Requirements Dallas County Funding Participation 1999 TEA-21 Call for Projects 1. County participation will not exceed 20% of the estimated
total project cost. Counly maximum participation will be fixed at project submittal. City participation must be 20% or more. 2. Thoroughfare improvements are eligible cn routes functionally
classified as minor arterials and higher in the Regional Thoroughfare Plan as published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments. ." 3. Freeway service road and freeway Interchange
improvements are eligible. 4. The project must be for permanent improvements. 5. County partiCipation will be limited to functional and safety items. The County will not participate
in the ClOst of aeslhetic items. 6. Signal System Improvements that are a part of a coordinated or cantrelly controlled system are eligible. 7. Incident Detection and Response (lOR)
projects and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) projects which are consistent with the Area-Area-Wide Plan and compatible with TxDOTs proposed freeway systems are eligible. 8. County
participation amounts will include County administrative charges. 9. County participation will be subject to execution of necessary Interlocal Agreements prior to project implementation.
10. The COUllIy aTltiCipetes providing up to $20 million in total TEA-21 partiCipation over 4 . years and up to $40 million over eight years. TEA-21 provides six (6) years offederal
funding authority with an additional three (3) year'S for obligation of the funds for a total time frame of nine (9) years. 11. Priority for the County participation may be g1ven to
projects serviJ'lg multiple jurisdIctions wJth11'l the County and projoots having a regIonal transportation impact. The County may also select projects for County participation funding
to assure thai benefits are reasonably distributed throughout the County. 
0 04/14/99 15:14 tt9724909261 PARSONS TRANSPOR Ii!iOO1l001 FAX TRANSMISSION NO. OF PAGES {INCLUDING THIS PAGEl /DATE 􀀴􀁐􀀿􀁾􀀠 NAME )If/'. Jr"YI Mer-ce.. NAME £0"'7 ybtJ.;.h"'l 􀁐􀁁􀁒􀁓􀁾.,RANliiPDA
TATIDN CRDLIP INc..F'IRM h7a'r1 e>f2PAsl7Y1 Sarto)')-Ascllman • De Leuw. ClOth.... Steinman 5485 Belt Una Road, Suite 199 F ADDRESS R Dallas, Texas 75240-7607 Phone (9721 991-1900 T
􀁾0 Fax 1972) 490-9261 PHONE NUMBER (97Z)t;/9 􀁾u7f' M PROJI!CT NUMBI!R FAX NUMBER (97Z)'f,SZ) -211371􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠A/,/7T7 £sr rfor 􀁾􀁮􀁖􀁾􀀠,;??e,dN7 1)0,.-, Cr-dn/J..-/a/b//AJ' Gep?:}.
,4 j (J t/-;;;;r-n -'!Weo -Spvr ttl G7S:-d􀁃􀁮􀀯􀀻􀁡􀁊􀁾􀀠􀁾C, .$¢.. ,c»·eJ 􀁾􀀠 eO (J:... c/6:",.-.) -l> 135; 000 Ro, ttJ, -J( (p 7s::. "J';' 0 Jh C. 'f-B5; orS '" '3 C;, (J2lU 􀀨􀀩􀁾􀀠'2.
f7 0 Dc)O 􀁾􀀠I ) -
· S-pLlr 'i20G) uYsf Est: (LAwDJ SE CDr Yl<>r -IJ-€dI cevf-4!.) IV c LDfV1T'r lf 7 Ft1.. X "3£) "'}J LJ CDf l1<er 4-􀁾􀀠S"D ff--K 30-::. 5u U:n"Y1ey--􀁾􀁙􀀧􀁖􀁾5 m-t. -ks .i 􀁾􀁶􀁙􀀱􀁤􀁳􀀠􀀨􀀡􀀿􀁾􀀢�
�􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀠P\Alai Lc ±V\voIV f? 111,z nt--/d-tJO PhAse. i fVl IJIl'"VV\ ttssess-yY1;?n(-/)(r,!/""MVV\; VI i 􀁓􀁾􀁉􀀭􀁉􀁕e L[l)orJ-. w ,'K Tl< DOT) 􀁾􀀫􀁉􀁌􀀠􀁾􀀼􀁻􀁾􀁦􀀠􀁾􀀨􀁙􀁜􀁲􀁮􀀯􀁴􀁴􀁦􀀯􀀱􀀮􀁴􀀧􀁲
􀁶􀀱􀀭fDII" (UzJ"-<-, :'(R)1) 􀁁􀁲􀁦􀁾􀁉􀁓􀁱􀁪s 􀀡􀀵􀀧􀁙􀁉􀀡􀀩􀀬􀁾􀀩􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁦􀁫􀁲􀁌􀁉􀁾􀁤􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀭􀁗􀀠_, /PZJ 􀁾􀀠)..m.rD r;:Wl.1 (If'ni l:Jo(i'l<;ttYl Pr2>ce.ed IYltf-sw ,K Je,ooo
􀀨􀁪􀁾􀀬􀁬􀁬􀂷􀁴􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀠􀁦􀀿􀁥􀁬􀁯􀁾􀀧􀀵􀀠􀁦􀁌􀀬􀀮􀀻􀁴􀀭􀀦􀀮􀀮􀁖􀀧􀁾􀀠iYt J-eollcdd {prlD0 􀁾􀁓􀀭􀁬􀀾􀀠Vhenfs. 
" 􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀭I R' 􀁌􀀧􀁩􀀧􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠.. , __ 􀁲􀀺􀀺􀁶􀁣􀁾􀀠i_U rlT·-r-\..􀀺􀁊􀀡􀀻􀁾􀂣􀀠I ; 􀁆􀁅􀁾􀀧􀀵􀀱􀁾􀀹􀀧􀀠􀁾􀁾T,_ 􀁃􀁯􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁏􀀧􀁇􀁾􀁭􀁭􀀮􀀢􀀠i cTTY i,', '.',l ......-=--:____...!.:."
􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀬__'_"__,􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠"'___" 􀁾􀀱􀁯􀀭􀁾􀀵􀁙􀁓􀀿􀀠􀀨􀀼􀁦􀀧􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀠8ft, Ifl) TO: Honorable Mayors and County Judges DATE: February 12. 1999 City Managers and County Administrators
Texas Department of Transportation Officials 'BJ.;t-L,rt (.. S PU::r:. Transportation Authority Officials II .•. i4-Q Ld 􀁴􀀧􀁲􀁴􀁲􀁪􀁤􀁬􀁾􀀠I -)North Texas Tollway Authority Officials
1lV'l.j?« f.r-}'< CUI",') FROM: M'ch 1M' P E 􀁁􀀧􀁦􀀧􀁬􀁰􀁾􀀠􀁐􀁮􀀮􀁾􀀠Jr/rrr:::􀁄􀁬􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀠􀁯􀁦􀂰􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁳􀁐􀁯􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀠4otollStM. (4).. 􀁩􀀮􀁕􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀯􀀧􀁾􀁶􀁬􀀯􀀰􀀧􀁲􀀠J ee.4M'!.>f-,
f:,.e.lley..$p"tI'l4(5 j2t>"#.pl, SUBJECT: 1999 North Central Texas Council of Govemments Call for Projects ,JJ 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠{12 /I 􀁦􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁪􀀭􀀮􀁪􀀮􀁙􀁙􀁨􀁊􀁴􀀮􀁬􀀯􀀧􀀱􀁾􀀧􀂷􀀱􀀠(4,l
􀁔􀁾F-U-:t. 3r1 A,,-6-1 -f..<-e-The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Dallas-Fort Worth, Denton. and
Lewisville Urbanized Areas. is required to develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in cooperation with local governments. the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). and
local transportation authorities. The Regional Transportation Council (RTC). as the transportation policy board for the MPO, is responsible for selecting projects in several funding
categories. Attachment 1 is a roster of RTC membership. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) directs funds toward transportation projects in nonattainment
areas as designated by the federal Clean Air Act. These projects must contribute to the attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan
Mobility (STP-MM) funds can be used on any roadway with a functional classification greater than a local road or rural minor collector. Projects funded under the CMAQ and STP-MM categories
are the programming responsibility of the MPO in consultation with TxDOT. With this notice, NCTCOG will begin taking requests for funding under the CMAQ and STP-MM Programs. Eligible
applicants include local governments and public sector transportation agencies locatad within the urbanized area boundary (identified as the STP-MM funding area in Attachment 2), or
within the designated nonattainment area of Collin. Dallas. Denton and Tarrant Counties. Private sector individuals and organizations within these areas can also submit projects for
funding. provided they secure public sector sponsorship of candidate projects prior to submittal. Project sponsorship must include a commitment to provide at least 20 percent of the
total project cost, in order to qualify for the federal CMAQ and STP-MM funding. In the event the project is on the State system. the Texas Department of Transportation will provide
the 20 percent match. Attachment 3 includes a general listing of eligible projects. These include projects to support the Regional Travel Demand Management Program that reduce drive-alone
travel and peakperiod vehicle travel. The Advanced Transportation Management System refers to projects which increase the effectiveness of the surface transportation system, and are
based on advanced computer and telecommunications technologies. System Capacity and Management projects are eligible for funding and listed in Attachment 3. The project selection criteria,
616 Six Flags Drive, Centerpoint Two f' O. Box 5888. Arrington. Te,.,. 76005·5888 (817) 640·3300 FAX, 817·640·7806 ®<ecycled pap€' 
Page Two February 12, 1999 procedures, and program requirements were presented at public meetings held eanier this month, and were approved by the RTC on February 11, 1999. The general
requirements and procedures of the Call for Projects are outlined in Attachment 4. Consistent with RTC Bylaws regarding Calls for Projects, entities wishing to submit under this call
may return the attached "Intent to Submit" card. NCTCOG will send out reminder notices two weeks prior to the deadline to the entities that mail or fax an "Intent to Submit" card. Please
be aware that RTC Bylaws state that late or incomplete applications will not be accepted and no supplemental information will be accepted after the deadline. Attachment 5 is a section
of the RTC Bylaws governing the Call for Projects. Applicants are encouraged to submit their application far enough in advance of the submission deadline to allow NCTCOG to review the
material for completeness. Projects submitted for funding under the 1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects must be received in the NCTCOG offices by 5 p.m., Friday, May 14, 1999. No projects
will be accepted after that time. In order to expedite the transfer of data to NCTCOG's project evaluators, and to reduce the chance for error in data entry, NCTCOG is requiring all
project submittals to be made on diskette, along with a paper copy, using an electronic Excel '97 worksheet developed especially for this Call. Please indicate on the Intent to Submit
card if your agency would like to have a 3.5" diskette mailed to you. You may also reserve time on computers at NCTCOG offices to enter project information. To do so, please contact
Randy Metscher at (817) 608-2317. Or, you may access the application files, along with accompanying instructions, at: http://www.dfwinfo.com/lransitip/caILforJlrojects.htm In order to
assist project submitters in the development and submission of applications, the following workshops have been scheduled (all workshops will be held in NCTCOG offices, 616 Six Flags
Drive in Anington): • Development of Advanced Transportation Management Projects: March 10, 1:30-3:30 p.m.; March 12, 9:00-11:00 a.m. • Development of Travel Demand Management Projects:
March 17, 1 :30-3:30 p.m. • Review of Application Software: March 18, 1:30-3:00 p.m.; March 23,1;30-3:00 p.m. • Administrative and Geometric Requirements (including cost estimate ranges):
March 29, 1 :00-4:30 p.m.; April 1, 8:30-12:00 p.m. If you have any questions regarding this process or need assistance in the development of candidate projects, please call Dan Rocha
at (817) 695-9265. Delivery of submittals can be made to NCTCOG offices at Centerpoint Two, 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 200. Anington, Texas 76011. The mailing address for submittal of
the diskette and paper copy (both required) is: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments P.O. Box 5888 Ariington, Texas 76005-5888 
Page Three February 12,1999 Thank you in advance for your consideration of the 1999 NCTCOG Call for Projects. DR:lr Attachments cc: Michael Eastland, Executive Director, NCTCOG Jack
Miller, Chairman, Regional Transportation Council Ron Harmon, NCTCOG Executive Board 1998-99 UPWP Element 3.01 Project File 
--ATTACHMENT 1 Regional Transportation Council JacI< Miller. Chairman Mayor City of Den!cn Ron Harmon. VIce Chairman commissioner Johnson County John Murphy. Secre!aJy Mayer Pm Tom City
of Rk;hardson DIck Bode Cooncllmember City of Plano Ron Brown commissioner EINsCounly Jerry Dunn Mayer City or Benbrook Charles England Mayor City 0' Grand Prairie LoIo Finkehan Cooncllmember
􀁃􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁉􀁳􀁳􀀠Sandy Greyson COUIIiljImember Cltyof'Pailas Unda Harper-Srown Mayor Pro Tem City at Irving Beck)l HaaIdn Cooncllmember City at Fort Worth JeckHamhall eomm_ c.4Iln
County. 􀁊􀁯􀁨􀁾􀁟􀀬􀁊􀁲􀀮􀀠0ep\IIy Mayor Pro Tem Cily r'MeoquIl8 􀁾􀁈􀁟􀀠􀁾􀁄􀁬􀁲􀁥􀁣􀁜􀁯􀁲􀀠North Texas Tollway Autho<iIy AlIce Holland Boor\! Member Fort Worth TranspOl1atlon Autho<iIy!
􀁾􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀠Cily 􀁾Gartand 􀁾􀁾􀀠ca..... ounty \ Sandy .lacoIIs eomm","",Den!cn cOunty DollIe Lynn Mayor Pro Tem City or Arlington Barbara Mallory caraway CoonciImember City of Dallas
Kenneth MayIIekI Commissioner Dallas Coonly BobbleMHcheli 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁔􀁸􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁏􀁉􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁬􀁣􀁴􀀠 _Phelps Mayor . City of Falm-BI1II1Cb DonPhIfar Mayor Pro Tem City of North Richland Hills
RoboI'IPope callas Araa Rapid Tnmsl MaryPou Mayor Pro Tom City of DaIIss ChucIt SIlcox Mayor Pro Tom CIty of Fort Worth SleYe SlImIons OIstrlctEngineer TxOOT, Fort Worth District 􀁇􀁲􀁡􀁤􀁾􀀠Smithey
CllIJr1cIlmember City .It Duncanvtlle stave TIII'I1III Mayor CitY at Allen \ MIlllfV...Ravenswaay 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠M8JlVie!lI 􀁃􀁾RepnosenIaIIve Cily "1 Dallas , B. G/i!tI WhIIIey CommIooIMer
Tarm)! Coonly_WIlson CounCItmember Cily of HunIt ! JeMliWoods citIzefl RepnosenIaIIve CIty of'Fort Worth -Cities of Dallas. UnIversIly Park, and Highland Parl< \, 
• • 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾..--------SURFACE TRANSPORATION LEGEND _ Metropolitan Mobdlty FUNDING PROGRAMS D Urban Mobility InH70N //,1;lOWH D Rural Mobility LOCATION MAP "" ) » SCa!& IFl Miles -i -iIiii[llii!!IlI
»01234$ o :I: s: m, ---Hont! Cefttni TflXH , ==-{lou<ldl of Oo'oUlmmllAIS Z -i􀀽􀁾􀁲􀀷􀀭naMytortatl/ll'l N -._-_. -_... ----------------􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭L 
ATTACHMENT 3 1999 NCTCOG CALL FOR PROJECTS Eligible Project Types Regional Travel Demand Management Program Employer-Based Trip Reduction Vanpools and Carpools Park-n-Ride Facilities
Special Events Management Transportation Management Associations Similar Projects Which Reduce Drive-Alone or Peak-Period Travel Advanced Transportation Management System! Advanced Traveler
Information Systems Advanced Traffic Management Systems Advanced Public Transportation Systems Similar Intelligent Transportation System Projects System Capacity & Management Projects
Freeway, Tollway, Arterial and Collector Capacitj Fixed Guideway and Other Transit Systems High Occupancy Vehicle Systems Intersection Improvements Signalization Improvements3 Grade
Separations Freeway Bottleneck Removal Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Special Events Management Alternative Fuel Conversion4 Similar Capacity and System Management Projects 1 Capital
projects must have a commitment from the sponsors to future operations. Consistency with national national architecture is an eligibility criteria, not a ranking criteria. 2 Candidate
projects must be dassified higher than a local road or rural minor collector. 3 Eligible projects include signal optimization (can be isolated projects), equipment upgrades (must be
part of an interconnected system) and new signals as a part of a new roadway or roadway widening project (must be part of an interconnected system). 4 In addition, The Regional Transportation
Council has a regional altemative fuels program under consideration. 
ATTACHMENT 4 1999 NCTCOG CALL FOR PROJECTS Procedures and General Requirements 1. Candidate project submittals should be surface transportation projects to be implemented in fiscal years
2000 through 2006. 2. Each local government may submit candidate projects with a total dollar amount not exceeding the available funds for the applicable subarea. Entities in the Eastern
Subregion (TxDOT Dallas District-Dallas, Denton, and Collin Couties, and portions of Rockwall, Kaufman, and Ellis Counties) may submit projects totaling no more than $202,780,000. Entities
in the Western Subregion (TxDOT Fort Worth District-Tarrant County and a portion of Parker County) may submit projects totaling no more than $93,220,000. Entities whose boundaries are
included in both TxDOT Districts may submit projects totaling no more than the Eastern Subregion funding allocation of $202,780,000. 3. STP-MM funds will be committed to selected projects
located in the urbanized area boundary (identified as the STP-MM funding area in Attachment 2). CMAQ funds will be committed to selected projects located in the deSignated nonattainment
area of Collin, Dallas, Denton and Tarrant Counties. Those local governments and transportation agencies whose boundaries lie partially within these areas should submit candidate projects
only within these areas. Candidate projects which are not within at least one of these areas will not be eligible for funding. 4. Private sector submitters must secure a public sector
sponsor for their candidate project(s) to be considered for evaluation and selection, with the request submitted through the public sector sponsor. 5. Eligible candidate projects are
listed in Attachment 3. Eligible ancillary costs include engineering, right-of-way, grading, base, pavement, cross drainage, pavement markings, safety features (e.g., guard fence, safety
lighting), environmental mitigation (e.g., sound walls), sidewalks, storm sewer, curb & gutter, driveways, ancl..lJtility adjustments. Ineligible ancillary costs include aesthetic lighting
new sidewalks (installation of sidewalks on street/roadway lane additions does not qualify, but stand-alone sidewalk projects do.) 6. Transportation System Capacity and Management projects
will be required to be grouped (minimum of $200,000 total cost) in order to minimize administration costs. Labor force accounts on signal optimization projects are exempt from this provision.
7, Environmental Impact Study commitments will be funded automatically, and NCTCOG will work to secure sponsors for these projects. 8. Transportation System Management and Travel Demand
Management recommendations from a completed Major Investment Study (MIS) will automatically be included in Call for Projects, and project sponsors will be requested. An inventory of
these projects is being forwarded to the public sector agencies involved in each study. Projects will be evaluated if submitted. 
1999 NCTCOG CALL FOR PROJECTS Project Evaluation Criteria: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Project Evaluation Criteria: Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan
Mobility (STP-MM) CRITERIA POINTS I Current Cost-Effectiveness (1995) 24 Future Cost-Effectiveness (2020 -18 Air Quality/Energy Conservation 1995) 18 Local Cost Participation' 24 IntermodallMultimoda
l/Social Mobility< 16 TOTAL 100 1 To score the maximum points requires a local commitment of greater than 45%. 2 A project will get points in the multimodallintermociallsocial mobility
category if the project's primary purpose is to move people or goods using modes other than slngle-ocoupant vehicles. 
ATTACHMENT 5 b. RTC Procedures for Calls for Projects (1) NCTCOG wishes to assist its member govemments to the best extent possible assuring fair and equitable treatment for all. NCTCOG
has historically provided technical assistance and will continue to do so under this policy. No supplemental information can be submitted or will be accepted after the application deadline.
Applicants will be encouraged to submit their applications far enough in advance of the submission deadline to allow NCTCOG to review the material for completeness. Applications submitted
just prior to the deadline may not receive any advance revieW. NCTCOG staff will be able to provide more assistance to the applicant when the Regional Transportation Council's role is
to simply nominate a project. NCTCOG staff must remain neutral when the Regional Transportation Council selects transportation projects. (2) When the Regional Transportation Council
sends out a Call for Projects, the applicant will have an option to retum an "Intent to Submit" response card to NCTCOG. This response can:! will entiUe each applicant that returns this
can:! to receive a reminder notice approximately two weekS in advance of the deadline. This reminder will include a summary of this policy statement reminding applicants that late or
incomplete applications will not be accepted. (3) The Regional Transportation Council will communicate these policies when a Call for Projects is initiated. (4) The Regional Transportation
Council will not accept any late applications. (5) The Regional Transportation Council will not as.:cept any incomplete applications. (6) Consistent deadlines will be established with
the standan:! deadline being" on Friday at 5 p.m. NCTCOG must have the submitted application "in hand" at the NCTCOG offices. Postmarked by the published deadline does not constitute
an on-tlme application. Deadlines other then the standen:! will be communicated in advance to the Regional Transportation Council. (7) Questions on project scores are required previous
to Regional Transportation Council selection. No appeals on late or incomplete applications will be accepted. 
REFERENCE ITEM 8 , \ ( North Central Texas Council 01 Govemments NCTCOG Legislative Update STTC. Number 19 June 18, 1998 TEA-21 SIGNED INTO LAW On Tuesday, June 9, 1996, President Clinton
signed the Transportation Equity Act for the 21'" Century (TEA-21) into law, ushering in the post-ISTEA era of developing and maintaining the nation's transportation infrastructure.
The signing of the bill allows new transportation funds to be used on state highway projects, which was a prinCiple concem for northem states with seasonal limitations on construction.
TEA-21 will provide the nation $204 billion in contract authority over six years ($166 billion for highways, $36 billion for transit). These figures represent a 32 percent increase over
ISTEA totals. For the Texas Highway Program, this translates into a $713 million average per year increase over the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). The signing
of TEA-21 represents a victory for those who fought to increase and equitably allocate the nation's investment in transportation spending: individuals such as House Transportation and
Infrastructure Chairman Bud Shuster (author of the House's BESTEA and chief proponent of increased national spending for transportation), Texas Senator Phil Gramm (co-author of the Byrd-Gramm
amendment that boosted federal funding levels in the Senate's ISTEA II legislation, and proponent of trade conidor development funding), and Texas Congressman,!Qm Delay (author of the
"donor states' STEP-21 funding equity proposal, which was incorporated into both the House and Senate versions of reauthorization legislation). President Clinton initially criticized
TEA-21 for devoting too much money to transportation and argued that this would both crowd out other spending and undermine fiscal discipline. The final legislation spends $10 Billion
to $13 billion less than earlier versions passed by the House and Senate, and the President said he was satisfied with the result. "I am proud to sign this bill," President Clinton said
at the June 9 signing. "It meets the challenge of building the pathways of the future, while maintaining fiscal discipline." The law is not subject to the President's line-item veto,
which gives President Clinton the power to cut spending that he considers wasteful from legislation. However, when Congress writes the a ro riation legislation needed to actu e d the
money, it is possible that parts of it may fall under the resident's line-item veto authonty. President Clinton did voice his disappointment with a portion of TEA-21 in that it does
not require states to lower the blood alcohol limit to 0.06 percent from the more common 0.10 percent for drunk driving. TEA-21 Provisions The program structure of TEA-21 is similar
to that of ISTEA, in which the public partiCipation elements remain, along with a streamlining of some program areas. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ),
the Surface Transportation Program (STP), and the Transportation Enhancements Program remain intact, with the National Highway System (NHS) and Interstate Maintenance (11M) Programs
being combined. 616 Six Rags Drive. Centerpoint Two P. o. Box 6BBB, AI1ingtOn, Texas 76006·588B (817) 640·3300 FAX: 817·64O·7B06 e.."""". paper 
TEA-21 highlights are as fallaws: • TEA-21 daes nat farmally 1ake the Highway Trust Fund aff the federal budget but daes include language that says that new revenue flawing into the
fund fram gasoline taxes will be spent an transpartatian. • Expanded flexibility in TEA-21 allaws states a greater chaice in deciding haw highway funds are to. be spent • TEA-21 denies
Amtrak highway funds far its rail aperations. Hawever, Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) passenger rail develapment is earmarked far funding. • Nearly 2,000 miles af newly designated intermadal
connectar routes will be added to. the Natianal Highway System. •TEA-21 includes new programs such as Barder Infrastructure, Transpartatian Infrastructure Finance and Innavatian, and Access to. Jobs. • The Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE)
pragram is extended, providing a flexible natianal10 percent goal far the participatian of disadvantaged business enterprises. • TEA-21 places emphasis an deplayment of Intelligent.
Transpartatian Systems (ITS) technalagies and establishment af natianal standards. High-Priority Projects TEA-21 provides spending autharity far high priority ar "demanstration" projects.
These projects were included in the legislative language af TEA-21 by individual legislators. The fallawing is a list af prajects in TEA-21 listed far the Narth Central Texas regian
(in millians): • • Upgrade 1. H: 30 between Dallas and F art Warth ($21.75) • Recanstruct in!en:nadal con nectars an S.H. 78 and F.M. 544 in Wylie ($5.5) • Canstruct S.H. 121 from tH.
30 to. U.S. 67 in Clebume ($25) • Imprave tH. 35 West from Spur 280 to. tH. 820 in Fart Warth ($3J • Widen U.S. 287 from Creek Bend Drive to. Waxahachie Bypass ($5.125) • Canstruct Hauston
Street Viaduct Praject, Dallas ($5.125) • Widen Meacham Boulevard from I.H. 35W to. F.M. 146 and extend Meacham Baulevard from west of F.M. 156 to. Narth Main Street ($2) Transit TEA-21
autharizes $41.3 billian far transit in FY 1998-2003, with $36.2 billian guaranteed to. be funded. Amang the new fIXed guideway systems and extensians to existing systems projects listed
in Sectian 3030 af TEA-21 , subsectian (a) autharizes the fallowing far final design and constructian far fiscal years 1998 thraugh 2003: • Dallas/Narth Central Extensian • Dallas/Fart
Worth RAIL TRAN (Phase II) 
Subsection (b) of the same section authorizes the following projects for alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering for fiscal years 1998 through 2003: • Dallas/DART LRT Extensions
• Dallas/Las Colinas Corridor Subsection (b) of the same section earmarks for the following projects authorized funds available under 49 USC Section 5309(m)(1)(8) for new fixed guideway
systems and extensions to existing fixed guideway systems: • DallaS/North Central Extension $188,000,000 • Dallas/Southeast Corridor $ 20,000,000 • DallaS/Northwest Corridor $ 12,000,000
The following tables compare the newly authorized TEA-21 with ISTEA (expired). The following figures are estimates for comparison purposes only: PROGRAM ELEMENTS NHS, STP, CMAQ, Interstate
Maintenance, Transit, Highway Safety NHSIIM, STP, Transit, Safety. Bridge, Ree. Trails, Highwiay Safety, Access to Jobs, on (hold hannless, 90 percent of payments 91 percent of guarantee
.", ' FUNDING ELEMENTS 
DAUAS.f'ORTWORTH METROPOUTAN AREA SUBALLOCATION OF MPO FUNDS Source: Transportation Department. NCTCOG ! i