( 1-' , z p 􀁾􀀠..... ,(0) -
. .... . .......... ,. . ,'. '. . 􀁾􀀠-,.':.. . . J -.;' -. 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁌􀀮􀀠 􀁾􀁾"ra--'I r 􀁾􀀠l.»J\\,-:;...D&t 6FF SYsTf!.tvl 􀀸􀀨􀁺􀀧􀁉􀁄􀁾􀂣􀀢􀀠---r7 '/..j..:nt/fElVTb'l'-y . -:-.........-:-.
-. -'.' ._ ... . . .. . . '. "' 􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀠-' .' ." . -.;" :.'. .. -....: .'., . ;..: 
I REPORT ON: ) FY 2003 OFF-SYSTEM BRIDGE INVENTORY, INSPECTION AND APPRAISAL PROGRAM DALLAS DISTRICT CITY OF ADDISON PRESENTED TO: CITY OF ADDISON PREPARED FOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DALLAS DISTRICT OCTOBER 2003 
2003 OFF-SYSTEM BRIDGE INVENTORY, INSPECTION AND APPRAISAL PROGRAM TxDOT DALLAS DISTRICT CITY OF ADDISON CONTENTS: I. State Notice Concerning Load Posting ofWeak Bridges II. Map ofInspection
Area Included in This Report III. Bridge Condition List for Structures Inc!uded in This Report IV. Structures Included In This Report: I. POO 1-00-003 Midway Road over Hutton Branch
2. POOI-45-001 Lake Forest Drive over Tributary of White Rock Creek 3. P002-00-001 Farmbrook Drive over Farmers Branch 4. POOZ-ZO·OO 1 Oaks North Drive over White Rock Creek Tributary

The following report has been prepared for your convenience in administering bridge management in your county. It includes Bridge inspection records, Bridge summary sheets and Bridge
photos. The scope of this investigation included a detailed field inspection of each bridge. Since plans were available for only the newest structures, measurements were made in the
field of those members deemed necessary to perform a structural analysis of the bridge. Utilizing the data obtained by inspection, a structural review was made of each bridge, and its
load carrying capacity was estimated in terms of an Inventory Rating Load (Heaviest load that can safely use the bridge for an indefinite period of time without causing permanent damage)
and an Operating Rating Load (Maximum permissible load that can safely use the bridge on an occasional basis). It should be noted that these ratings represent the best estimate possible
with a thorough visual field inspection of an existing structure, upholding a reasonable standard of of care by use of routine inspection tools as afforded by routine means of access.
A Bridge Inspection Record was completed for each structure, a condition rating was determined for each of seven (7) elements of the structure. These include deck, superstructure, substructure,
channel, culverts, approaches, and miscellaneous items. A Bridge Summary Sheet containing recommended weight limits for those structures that require a posted weight limit, component
ratings and recommended repairs. These are repairs that should be made to lengthen the useful life of the structure. Those structures included in the list should be repaired as soon
as maintenance funds are available within the County's normal maintenance program. State law (Sec. 9 ofHouse Bill 1547) requires that all structures which have been structurally analyzed
and rated in this report be posted or closed in accordance with the recommendations herein. 
􀁾􀁏􀁎􀁔􀀠CLAIRE ' ( >"', •• -.', """ SOJOURN i NORTHWOOD COUNTRY CLUB 
I Texas Department of Transportation P.O, BOX 133067' DALLAS, TEXAS 75313·3067' (214) 320·6100 December 10, 2003 Mr. Michael Murphy Director of Public works City of Addison P.O. Box
9010 Addison, TX. 75001-9010 RE: Off-System BRINSAP Summary Package Dear Mr. Murphy: An inspection and analysis of Off-System public bridges, consistent with Federal Regulations and
the National Bridge Inspection Standards, was recently completed by this department. The bridge inspection was conducted and the recommendations were prepared by private consultants.
Since some bridges are within your j sdiction and subj ect to your control, supervision and maintenance, we are forwarding Summary Packages containing the following for each structure.
This information can be used in carrying out your responsibilities for the bridge maintenance, repair, closures, and weight limit posting. 1. Bridge Summary Sheet 2. Bridge Inspection
Record 3. Color Photos 4. Bridge location map please notify us of any other ne\'l or old structures within within your jurisdiction that need to be added to or deleted from our database.
If you have any questions, comments, suggestions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E. in the Dallas District Bridge Section, at tel. (214) 320-4423 or
fax (214) 319-6439. Sincerely, Anthony Okafor, P.E. IAM/dla District Bridge Engineer Attachments An Equal Opportunity Employer 
Off-System Structures in the City of Addison 12110/2003 2Di 3C 84C( 85 86 5 4 Place 61 Feat Xed 7 Fac Carried 9 Location 126 Dist u! 18 057 POOl 00 003 1 00200 HUTTON BRANCH MIDWAY ROAD
0.2 MI N KELLER SP. RD. 03 18 057 POOl 45 001 1 00200 WHITE ROCK CREEK TRIB LAKE FOREST DRIVE 0.1 MI SO OF BELT LINE RD 03 18 057 P002 00 001 1 00200 FARMERS BRANCH FARM BROOK DRIVE
0.1 MI S OF BROOKHAVEN CR 03 18 057 P002 20 001 1 00200 WHITE ROCK CREEK TRIB OAKS NORTH DRIVE 0.1 MI S OF BELT LINE RD 103 Page 1 
2003 OFF-SYSTEM MAINTENANCE REPAIR FORM (City ofAddison) IS-057·POOI-45·001 Lake rores.t Drive Tributary ofWbile Rock Creek 9/1612003 18"{)S7-POOZ·OO.oOI Farmbrook Drive Ft.trmt:rs Brandl
5 IPump concrete in hole under 6/1112003 􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭.... 􀀯􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠.._
DALLAS DISTRICT CITY OF ADDISON OFF-SYSTEM BRIDGES BRIDGES WITHOUT PLANS IN THE BRINSAP FILE (Culverts Excluded & Railroad Overoasses) ... :.;;',BriageJ.D .: -.-.--":. <,c;.· .; FaCilily.Carrled
.; ..'. .. .' FeaturedCrossEfd·. ','.; POO2-00·001 Farmbrook Drive Farmers Branch NO OTHER CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE MAINTENANCE AT THIS TIME 10/2012003 Page 1 of 1 Barnhart Engineering

Bridge Inspection Record District: 18 County: 057 Cont-POOI-OO Structure: 003 Route: 􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀬􀁍􀀻􀀭􀀬􀁩􀁤􀀢􀁷􀀢􀀬􀁡􀀢􀀬􀁹􀀬􀀭􀀬􀁒􀀢􀀬􀁯􀁾􀁡􀀢􀀬􀁤􀁣􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮____ Description: 3 Barre19.0'
X 6.0' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert With Cast In Place WingwaHs -Skew Varies Feature Crossed' Hutton Branch Inspector's Signature: William E. Dupal, Jr., P.E. Date: June 16.2003 Como,""
Name: BARNHART ENGINEERING City Of Addi, N-Not applicable Jl \" • . 1\.1'.... 0 () 1'/'''''''''--_ 9-Excellent Condition 􀁷􀁾􀁌􀁟􀀧􀁔􀀢􀀧􀀭r' 􀁉􀁦􀁻􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁴􀀮•••• 􀀹􀀮􀁾...:;:-.....
8-Very good condition -no problem noted IS 􀀢􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁎􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠1,1q,4...:::. *_ ..􀁾􀁾􀀠7-Good condition 􀁾􀀠some minor problems I' t( .4 '. .}r'J'r' 6-Satisfactory eondition
nunor deterioratIon of sfructum! clements (limIted) , '4' • '. """\ 5-Fair condition -minor detenorntton ofstructural clements (extensive) 􀁾............ 'U"U ..........:', '\ 4-Poor
condition _ dctcnomtion slgmfieantly affects structural capacity S WllLlAM E. DUPAl, 􀁊􀁈􀀯􀁾􀀠3-Senous condition 􀁾􀀠deterioration seriously affects structural capacity \ 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀢􀀠'B92BO"'"
',.:""􀀲􀁾􀀠Cntica! condItion 􀁾􀀠bndgeshould be closed until repaired ....1b.... u( ... 􀁾􀀠J. Failing condition -bridge closed but repaIrable 􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀨􀀧􀀾􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀮􀀡􀀹􀁅􀁎􀁓􀀧􀁴􀁾...
􀁾􀁾􀀩􀀱􀀠0-Failed condition -bndge closed and beyond repair "';.,.••:[§tONA·--'" 􀀢􀁌􀀢􀁾􀀱􀀻􀀬􀀴􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀠,.,.///Enter a rating for each element ofeach component The rotmg should equal
or exceed the minimum ratmg listed to the letrOt eacb element. Component Ratings should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component Fully supportive comments are to be made
hereon or on attachments for all ratings of? or below, Min. I Deck (Item 58) I Rating Min. I Superstructnre (Item 59) I Rating 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 Deck-Rating Wearing Surface Concrete
I) Joints, Expansion, Open Joints, Expansion, Sealed Joints, Other Drainage System Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets Median Barrier Railings Pedestrian Rails 2) Railing Protective Coating
Delineation (curve markers) Other N 7 N N N 8 8 N 7 8 N N Main Members· Steel Main members -Concrete Main Members· Timber Main Members Connections Floor System Members Floor System Connections
Secondary Members Seeondary Member Conneetions Expansion Bearings Fixed Bearings Steel Protective Coating Other N N N N N N N N N N N N Component Rating ----0 Comments: Comments: I)
Minor longitudinal and transverse cracks in the concrete wearing surface, 2) Minor to moderate impact damage to the west end of the north rail. 
I Texas Department of TransportatiOn BRIDGE SUMMARY SHEET Bridge LD.: 18-057-POOI-OO-003 -....... --=:---;------Facility: Midway Road Feature X'ed: Hutton Branch Bridge Owner: City Of
Addison Company Name: BARNHART ENGINEERING Signalure: Dale: 2. Selected Component Description and Rating: Inspection Rating Inventory Rating Operating Rating Inspection Date: _J_u.,-ne-,;:16:-,_2_00=
3-:-_:-;;-;-:::-; 1085 H HS H HS Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (H S 15 Assumed) 150 20,0 Load Rating 15.0 20.0 Comments and/or Upgrade Recommendations (if applicable): Maintenance
Not Required At This Time Load Posting Limits for Present Condition (if applicable): Inventory Operating 'NEIGH!" LIMIT : fI ""'ElGhT, UMT : 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Axle Ibs Axle
or Tandem Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Axle lbs Axle or Dr WEIGHr 1 UMIT I tAXLE:T"""'" l ' 'hEIGHT LMT T"""" AXLE 􀁾􀀧􀀠GROSS I las.1 􀁾􀀠LIlS I """'" ' 􀁨􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠'':JI,....... las .. 􀁾􀀠LOO<>
( ZCf.,ED ) 􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁯􀁯􀀺􀀯􀀠"J Sign Code Sign Code '" OrnER I Rll.1Th 2 R!2.2Tt 3 RI24Tb 4 􀁒􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁉􀁔􀁴􀀠5 WI2·5 6 Posting Recommendation: Load Posting Not Required At This Time
Previous Load Posting Recommendations: Observed Load Posting at Bridge: R12-2Tb None R12·2Tb X None _____ lb. Gross RI2-4Tb Ihs Tandem Axle R12-4Tb _____ Ibs Tandem Axle RI2-4Tc Ibs
Axle or RI2-4Tc _____ Ibs Axle or Tandem Other R12-2Tc Ibs Gross R12-2Tc Material Needed -R12-2Tb -R12-2Tc It It -R12-4Tb e -R12-4Tc Advance Warning Bridge Bridge Advance Warning -W12·5
Sian Code Condition Code Maintenance (optional) (op!ional) 􀁾􀀠Posts 􀁾􀀠Hardware Sets § §-Decals A. Visible & Legible D. Improper Position G, Sign Missing K Clean Sign N. None B. Obscured
by Vegelation E. Damaged Beyond H. Sign & Post Missing L. Reposition Sign P. Replace Sign C. Sign Needs Cleaning F. Sign Down J. Clear Vegetation M. RepOSition Sign & Post S. Replace
Sign & Post 
Bridge Inspection Record * Modified (12-5-2000) District: 􀁾􀀬􀁾County: 􀁾Cont-Sec: POOl 45 Structure: 001 Route: --c-__􀁾􀀢􀁌􀁡􀁫􀁥􀀠Forest Drive Description: _ 5 Barrels 8.01 X 4,0'
􀁒􀁥􀁦􀁾􀁥􀁤Concrete Box Culvert With Masonry Headwalls ----Feature Crossed: I!ibutary of White Roek Creek Inspector's Signature: William E. Dupal Jr"",-P",.E",''__ Date: SeDtember 16,
2003 Fompany Name BARNHART ENGINEERING Maintenanee Section: City 􀁯􀁦􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠:-N::-NOl 􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁬􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁢􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀠,,,,,,,,#_I 􀀹􀁾􀀠Excellent
condition 1 I'll • '\ fly IIt. OF ;:-1 8· Very good condition -no problems noted \" 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾LU"v..t , I""'';' ........ 􀁾􀁾􀀠 i 7-Good condition -some minorprob!ems . 'f........
*'...􀁾... I 6-Satisractory condition -minor deterioration ofstructural elements (limited) 1..'1 ¥ ;I.e<'; " .,􀁾􀀯􀀠••••\11.." \ ... ' " .:\I 􀀵􀁾􀀠fair condition minor deterioration
orstructural elements (extensive) 􀁾••• 􀁾􀀮􀀠w.., ........ 􀁾.. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁟􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠.. 􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠n. " " , 4· Poor condition 􀁾􀀠deterioration significantly affeets structural capacity
􀁾WILLIAM E. DUPAL, JR. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠3-Serious condition 􀁾􀀠deterioration seriously affects structural capacity ", ... , ............" ...." "", \ : 2-Critical condition -bridge should be
closed until repaired \1,'" B9260 ,,:,,\' 􀁬􀁾􀀠Failing condition 􀁾􀀠bridge closed but repairable 􀁾􀁯􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀠(/.... '\:. 􀁾􀀺􀁯􀀧􀀩􀁏􀁾􀀠Failed condition -bridge closed and beyond
repair .... 􀁾􀁜􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁐􂂬􀁎􀁓􀀧􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀠. -. _:tfI 􀁾􀀤􀁓􀀧􀀬􀀠'''"''<.. '-,,; -,Olll!' , IJ' Enler a rating for each element of each component. The raling should equal or
exceed the minimum rating listed to the left of each 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠element Component Ratings should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully
supportive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for all ratings of7 or below Min. 􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠Deck (Hem 58) I Rating Min. Rating t 􀁄􀁥􀁣􀁫􀁾􀁒􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁧􀀠N 7'I 6 Joints. Expansion,
Open I 6 Wearing Surrace _.__􀁾􀁾Direct !rofficCulvert I), N----,( 6 Joints. Expansion, Sealed N 􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀠I 6 Joints, Other N I 6 Drainage System r--}jCurbs. Sidewalks
& Parapets 􀁾( 6 6 Mediun Barrier N! 8 __ , 6 Railings Pedestrian Rails 7 Railing Protective Coaling 8 7 Delineation (curve markers) NI --. Other N I Comments: I) Minor surface spali
and hairline map craeks in the surface of the : direct traffic culvert. I I,, I o Main Members· Sleel o Main Mcmbers -Concrete o Main Members -Timber o Main Member Connections Floor
System Members I Floor System Conneetions 5 Secondary Members 5 Seeondary Members Connoctions 6 Expansion Bearings 6 Fixed Bearings 6 Steel Proleetive Coating N N N N 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭e-N
N N Other Component Rating Comments: I; r ! II I 􀀭􀁾􀀠Bndge Inspection Recon:I (page 1 of 2) 
I ,. $ommary,d61 Texas Depattmeflt of Transportation BRIDGE SUMMARY SHEET Bridge I.D,: J8-057-POOl-4S-00 1 Facility: Lake Forest Drive Feature X'ad: Tributary of White Rock Creek Bridge
Owner: City OfAddison Company Name: BARNHART ENGINEERING Dale: Selected Component Description and Rating: Operating Rating Inspection Date: September 16, 2003 __􀁾􀁈􀁾____􀁾􀁈􀁾􀁓􀁾􀀠H
HS Reinforced Concrete Box CulveJt (H S 15 Assumed) 20,0 Channel Load Rating 15,0 20,0 Comments andlor Upgrade Recommendations (if applicable): Moderate To Severe Erosion Of The Downstream
Channel Has Undermined The Channel Apron 4 Feel. Causing It To Settle 2"And Crack In Two, Recommendation: Construct Gabions, Similar To Those Along The Banks. Along The End Of The Downstream
Apron. Load Posting Limits for Present Condition (if applicable): Inventory Operating lbs Gross los Gross Ibs Tandem Axle los Tandem Axle Ibs Axle or Tandem Ibs Axle or Sign Code Sign
Cooe ----.. 2 􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁉􀁾i AXLE 1 LSS R12.2Tc 3 I1NElGHTI 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠I LIlS. [ AXlEOOTmJEM LBS Rll-l1b 4 Posting Recommendation: Load Posting Not Required At This Time 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭I 􀁜􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀬􀁾􀀠I
Gf<OSS LIlS. Lom! ''''''0"""'" /R!l-4T", \\'12-5 5 6 Previous Load Posting Recommendations: Observed Load Posting at Bridge: R12-2Tb ____-'-X'-___ None R12·2Tb ___􀁾X____ None R12-2Tc
_________ Ibs Gross R12-2Tc _________ Ibs Gross R12-4Tb _________ Ibs Tandem A>cle R12-4Tb _________ Ibs Tandem Axle R12-4Tc _________ lb. A>cle or R12-4Tc _________ Ibs Axle or Tandem
Olher 􀁾􀀠Material Needed /'-' //' -I 1"--/' • R12-2Tb 􀁖􀁃􀁏􀁍􀁐􀁁􀁓􀁾􀀠􀀩􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁦􀁴􀀨􀀠· R12-2Tc -R12-4Tb 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀯􀀠It -R12-4Tc Advance Warning Bridge Bridge Advance Warning (oplional)-W12-5
(optional) -Posts • Hardware Sets -Decals Slcn Gooe Condition Code Maintenance A Visible & Legible O. Improper Position G, Sign Missing K, Clean Sign N.None R Obscured by Vegetation
E, Damaged Beyond H. Sign 8. Posl Missing L. Reposition Sign P. Replace Sign C. Sign Need's Cleaning F. Sign Down J. Clear Vegelatfoo M. Reposition Sign & Post S. Replace Sign 8. Post

--Bridge Inspection Record District: 18 County: 057 Cont-POO 1-00 Structure: 􀁾􀁾Route: -"M!-'i,.dw"oa"-y'-R"':'oa"'d'-:-_____􀁾􀀠 Description: 3 B=019.0' X 6.0' Reinforced Concrete
BOX Culvert With Cast In Place Wingwalls -Skew.,V",art"",'e"s':-:c'7='-__ Feature Crossed: Hutton Branch Inspector's Signature: William E. Dupal, Jr., P,E. Date: 􀁊􀁵􀁮􀁥􀀮􀁊􀁊􀁬􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀰􀁾􀀰􀀢􀀬􀀳􀁾�
�􀀮􀀭􀁟􀀠Com an Name: BARNHART ENGINEERlNG City OfAddison N-Not applicable 􀁾􀀠¥ () ,,......__ 9-ExcelientCondilion 􀀱􀁊􀁾􀁌􀀠l" ,I'i. OF -;-8-Very good condition -no problem noted 􀀱􀀱􀁁􀀮􀀮􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷
􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁾􀀠7-Good condition -some minor problems ti '1V'1'(. 􀀮􀁾􀀠f' 􀁾../􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀠•... tfl' 6-Satisfactory condition minor deterioration ofstructuraJ elements (limited)
1" -it* OW 􀁾􀀠...1.'\ 5-Fair eondition 􀁾􀀠minor deterioration of structural elements (extensive) 􀁦􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠...............􀁾........ -'S. 4-Poor condition· deterioration significantly
affects structural capacity 􀁾􀀠WI LUAM E DUPAL J"'1 :\ 3-Serious condition -deterioration seriously affects structural capacity 􀁾􀁩􀀧􀀺􀀢·..··89260.. ..···:.:􀀻􀁾'I.. 2-Critical condition
-bridge should be closed untl! repaired \.0'., ( 􀁾􀀠.?,iJ-.j1-Fai1ing condition bridge closed but repairable 􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀼􀀬􀂷􀂷􀀮􀁾􀁃􀁅􀁎􀁓􀁙􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀩􀁉w 􀁾􀁑􀁉􀀠.......... r,:,'-/0-Failed
condition -bridge closed and beyond repair -_atONAL ""'I'--..., 􀀧􀁙􀁥􀁾􀀯Enter a rating fOf eaeh element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum raring listed
to the 􀁉􀁾􀀠each element Component Ratings should equal the lowest r.1ting ofany element of the component. Fully suppa rtive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for all
ratin s of7 or below, Min. 􀀭􀁾􀁲􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵re (Item 􀀵􀀹􀀩􀁾􀁊RatingMin. Rating Deek-Rating ----􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭Wearing Surface Concrete I Joints, Expansion, Open Joints, Expansion, Sealed
---Joints, Other Drainage System N 7 N N N 8 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets 8 Median Barrier Railings Pedestrian Rails 2 Railing Protective Coating Delineation Delineation (eurve markers)
Other N 7 8 􀁾􀀠N Main Members -Steel Main members -Concrete -Main Members -Timber 6 6 Main Members Connections 6 Floor System Members 6 Floor System Conneetions 6 Secondary Members
-Secondary Member Connections6 -Expansion Bearings 6 Fixed Bearings 7 6 Steel Protective Coating 7 Other N N N N N N N N N N N N Component Rating -0 Comments; Comments: I) Minor longitudinal
and transverse cracks in the concrete wearing surface. 2) Minor to moderate impact damage to the west end ofthe north rail. ! i k-____________.____ ________L______________􀁾􀀠.. 2 
cl l District 18 County 057 Cont-Sec POO1-00 Structure 003 Route Midway Rood . J ,'1 MiD. Culverts {Item 62) RatingMin. Substructure {Item 60} RatingI I I I 0 Top Slabs 􀁪􀀩􀁾􀀠 0 Above
Ground 0 Abutment Caps N 0 Bottom Slab or Footings : 8 0 Below Ground or Foundation N 0 Abutments & Intermediate Supports 21N 6 5 Headwalls & Wingwalls 3)5 Backwalls & Wingwalls 6 0
Intermediate Supports N Other N Caps -Concrete 'N' Component Rating Caps -Timber Caps -Steel N N 0 Comments: CONTINUED UNDER ITEM 60Above Ground -Concrete N Above Ground -Steel 1) Minor
spalls with exposed rebar in the top slab of theN : Above Ground Timber N west barrel about drainage inlet. Minor longitudinal cracks Above Ground -Masonry N with efflorescence and stalactites
in the top slabs. Below Ground or FOWldation N 2) Minor spalls with exposed rcbar about drill holes in the 5 Collision Protection System N west abutment wall. Minor vertical with efflorescence
in the 6 Steel Protective Coating N barrel walls. Minor spalls in upstream end of Ihe interior 0 and abutment walls. Component Rating Comments: CONTrNUED FROM ITEM 62 Min. IApproaches
(Item 65) RatingI 3) Minor to moderate spall with exposed rebar at the end of the northwest wingwall. Minor vertical cracks at the north 0 Embankments 􀁝􀀩􀁾􀀠 wingwall connections and
in the headwalls .. 4 Embankment Retaining Walls N 5 Slope Protection 1) 7 5 Roadway Concrete 2) 7 6 Relief Joints N 6 Drainage )) 7 6 Guardfence mOOO) N 7 Delineation N : 7 Sight Distance
8 Others N Component Rating [2J Comments:Min. I Channel {Item 61) RatingI I) Minor embankment erosion along the southeast and cg0 Channel Banks southwest wingwalls. 0 Channel Bed 1)
7 2) Minor longitudinal and transverse cracks in the approach 5 Rip Rap, Toe Walls & Aprons 8 : pavement. S Dikes N 5 Jellies N Other N Component Rating Min. Miscellaneous RatingI I
7 Signs 􀁾􀀠 I) Up to 15" of erosion along the upstream side ofthe Comments: 7 lllumination N culvert. See view through photo. Minor rock and sediment 7 Warning Devices N accumulation
accumulation in the barrels. 7 Utility Lines N Other N Comments: ! I 6ndge 11'l5pechon Record (Page 2 o(2) J r] o ; ; , : -.-.
_____ _____ I . A Summary,d67 Texas Deparlmenlof Transportation BRIDGE SUMMARY SHEET Bridge LD.: JS-057-POOI-OO-003 .' Facility: Midway Road 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭Feature Xed:
Hutton Branch Bridge Owner: City Of Addison Company Name: BARNHART ENGINEERING Signature: Date: .2. Selected Component Description and Rating: " .Inspection Rating nventory Rating Operating
Rating Inspection Date: _J_u.,.ne-;:16,-._2_00:;::3-,-_:-;;-;-;::-:; 1085 H HS H Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (H S 15 Assumed) 15.0 20.0 Load Rating 15.0 20.0 Comments and/or Upgrade
Recommendations (if applicable): Maintenance Not R(:>mIIrpr! At This Time Load Posting Limits for Present Condition (if applicable): Inventory Operating Ibs Gross _____ lbs Gross _____
100 Tandem Axle _____ Ibs Tandem Axle _____ Ibs Axle Of Tandem _____ Ibs Axle or Sign Code _____ Sign Code OTHER I LlMiT L".ti GeOSS ""'G>rr I ! 􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀠I ! GRC$S i LBS_I 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁪􀀠:
AXLE ' "'U:T"""""'" J 􀁉􀁔􀁾􀁉􀀠Las 􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀠RJ2.2Tb !{t2-Hb 􀁒􀁊􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁔􀁣􀀠2 J 4 ; 6 Posting Recommendation: Load Posting Not Required At This Time Previous Load Posting Recommendations:
Observed Load Posting at Bridge: R12·2Tb R12·2Tc R12-4Tb R12-4Tc X None Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Axle Ibs A.xle or R12-2Tb R12-2Tc R12-4Tb _____ R12-4Tc Other X None Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem
Axle IbsAxle or Tandem Material Needed • R12·2Tb -R12-2Tc • R12-4Tb 8-R12-4Tc Advance Warning Bridge Bridge Advance Warning -W12·5 (optional) (optional) -Posts Sian Code -Hardware Sets
Condition Code §§-Decals Maintenance A. Visible & Legible 0. Improper Position G. Sign Missing K. Clean Sign N, None S. Obscured by Vegetation E. Damaged Beyond H. Sign & Post Missing
L. Reposition Sign P. Replace Sign C. Sign Needs Cleaning F. Sign Down J. Clear Vegetation M. Reposition 8[gn & Post S. Replace Sign & Post 
ROADWAY VIEW -LOOKING NORTH NEG. 495 NEG. 493 Barnhart Engineering SIDE ELEVATION -LOOKING SOUTHWEST DATE: 􀀶􀀯􀀱􀀶􀀱􀀲􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀠COUNT 057 .BRIDGE NuMBER: 
J J * Bridge Inspection Record 􀁍􀁯􀁯􀁩􀁲􀁾􀀠t12·5·20(0) District: 􀁟􀁾County: 057 Cont-Sec: POOl 45 Structure: 001 Route: Lake Forest Drive Description: 5 Barrels 8,0' X 4.0t Reinforced
COncrete Box Culvert 􀁗􀁩􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀠Masonry Headwalls f-eature Crossed: Tributa.ry of White Rock Creek [nspector's Signature: 􀁗􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁡􀁭􀀠􀁅􀁾Dupal Jr., P.E. Company Name .BARNHART
ENGINEERING ..􀁟􀁍􀁟􀁡􀁩􀁟􀁮􀁴􀁟􀁥􀁮􀁟􀀮􀁟􀁮􀁣􀁟􀁣􀁟􀁓􀁥􀁟􀁃􀁬􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀺􀀠City ofAddiso="=========== N-Not applicable ."",,--.-.9-Excellent eondition 1 ! 'II . "..., I' OFlj9 --1 8-Very
good condition 􀁾􀀠no problems nOled ''" 􀁾􀁾LL.J iW , I,f􀁾􀀢􀁜􀀬􀀧􀀦􀀬•••••".JIb,.,", 1 􀀷􀁾􀀠Good condition 􀁾􀀠some minor problems t. 'i "u 01-).cCl " ,,-,;••0""* ...􀁾􀀬􀀻I 6-Salisfactory
eondilion -minor deterioration ofstructural elements (Iimiled) 􀀭􀁬􀁾􀀢􀀠, *.-􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀬I it· ....I 5-Fair condilion 􀁾􀀠minor deterioration ofslruetural elements (extensive) ........
􀀢􀁾􀀠." 􀁾.. " 􀁾􀀠•• 0 " .... ....􀁾􀀠•• 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀴􀁾􀀠Poor condition -deterioration significantly aITccts struetural capacity 􀁾􀀠WILLIAM E, DUPAl., Jfi 3-Serious condition 􀁾􀀠deterioration
seriously affects struetural capacity ".." .................. ' .. ! 􀀲􀁾􀀠Critical condition -bridge should be closed Unli! repaired I,1-\1>0\ 69260 /!Failing conditioll-bridge closed
but repairable 'A" (/.... 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁾􀀠Failed condition 􀁾􀀠bridge closed and beyond repair ..... 􀁾··,.PE'H5>:-,.' '<t'·"":....Ss ',"-.,' ',,; -:..,.fO['lI.: f" Enler a rating ror
cach element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum rating listed lo the len of each --...,,.:,.:;"'-element. Component Ratings should equal the lowest rating
or any element of thc component. Fully supportive comments arc to be madeIhereon or on 8 N 8 attachments for all ratings of7 or below . 􀁍􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀽􀀠Deck (Item 58) Rating
Min. LSuperstru<!u':;' 􀀨􀁉􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀧􀀹􀀽􀀺􀀭􀀧􀀩-r---"'R:C-.J Deck-Rating ______ I I o Main Members -Steel • i N o Main Members -Concre\e 6 Direct Trame Culvert 􀁬􀀩􀁾􀁾􀀠7 1 o Main Members
􀁾􀀠TimberWearing Surface-__ 􀁾___􀁾__ 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠o Main Member Connections 6 Joints. Expansion, Scaled 6 Joints, Expansion, Open N N Floor System Members o. Floor System Connections
6 Drainage System __􀁾____ 6 Joints, Other 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠N 5 Secondary Members8----. 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets 5 Secondary Members Cooncetia os 6 Median Barrier J6 Expansion Bearings
. 6 Railings 􀁾__.____ Pedestrian Rails J6 fixed Bearings.---. J 7 Delineation (curve markers) i N 7 Railing Protective Coating 6 Sleel Protective Coating 8 1Olher 􀀮􀁾Other N Component
Rating ', Comments: II) Minor surface span and hairline m ap eracks in the surface of the Commcnts: , direct traffrc culvert. " I i 1'1 111 I i i ! ! 1 I . L . Bridge Inspection Record
(page 1 c 
l)istrict: 18 County: 057 Cont-Sec: POOl 45 Structure: 001 Route: __-'L"ak=e"-F"'or"'e"'st"'D:::;r:.:.iv;.:e'-_____ Min. I Substructure (Item (0) I Rating Min. I Culverts atom (2) I
Rating 0 Abutment Caps N 0 Top Slab 1) 7 0 Above Ground N 0 Bottom Slab or Footings 8 0 Below Ground or Foundation N 0 Abutments & Intermediate Supports 2) 7 5 Backwalls &. WingwaUs
N 5 Headwalls &. Wingwalls 3) 7 0 Intermediate Supports Other . N Caps 􀁾􀀠Concrete N: Caps -Steel N Component Rating I 7 ICaps -Timber N Above Ground -Concrete N Comments: Above Ground
-Steel N I) Numerous patches in the top slabs. Hairline lIansverse crack with Above Ground -Timber N stalactites at the east end of the center barrel. Above Ground -Masonry N 2) Minor
vertical cracks in the harrel walls. Below Ground or Foundation N 3) Minor spalls along the top of the northwest wingwalL Minor 5 CoHision Protection System N vertical crack in the southeast
wingwall oonnection. Minor cracking 6 Steel Protecetive Coating N : in the northeast wingwaU connection. Component Rating I N I! Comments: Min. I Approaches (Item 65) I Rating 0 Embankments
I) 7 4 Embankment Retaining Walls N 5 Slope Protection 8 5 ROlldway Concrete & Asphalt I) 7 6 Relief Joints N 6 Drainage 8 6 Guardfence N 7 Delineation N 7 Sight Distance 2) 7 Other
N Component Rating I 7 I Min. I Channel (Item 61) I Rating Comments: I) Minor to moderate cracks in the approach slabs. Minor settlement 0 Channel Banks I) 6 oftb. south approach slab.
Minor to moderate spalls in the north 0 Channel Bed 2) 5 approach slab. Widespread alligator cracking and rutting in the south 5 Rip Rap, Toe Walls & Aprons 2) 3) 6 approach pavement.
There is a I' drop off along the west side of the 5 Dikes N south approach pavement. 5 Jetties N 2) Horizontal curves at both ends ofthe culvert limits sight distance. Other Weir 3)
8 Nn <nP.M reduction reauired. Min. I Misc.llaneoos I Rating Component Rating I 5 I 7 Signs f<DuekXing" 8 I Comments:: 1 IUumination 8 I 1) Minor to moderate erosion of the downstream
channel banks. 7 Warning Devices N: Gabions have been placed .Iongthe bottom ofthe banks and have 7 Utility Lines 1) 8 I helped stabilized the banks. Other NI 2) Moderate to severe erosion
ofthe downstream cbannel has undermined the channel apron 4 feet, causing it to settle 2" and crack Comments: in two. See view through photo. 1) There is an electrical oonduit along
the south abutment. 3} Minor crack and spall in the northwest riprap. ! : : Bridge Inspection Record (page 2 of 2) '1 .J 
Summary.d67I ---* Texas Department of Transportation BRIDGE SUMMARY SHEET Bridge LD.: 18-057-POOI-45-001 Facility: Lake Forest Drive Feature X'ed: Tributary of White Rock Creek Bridge
Owner: City Of Addison <-•.. , Company Name: BARNHART ENGINEERING Dale:c-.-'-Selected Component Description and Rating: Inspection Rating Inventory Rating Operating Rating Inspection
Date: September 16, 2003 1085 H HS H HS Reinforced Concrete Box Culv8.rtJ!j§1!S./ls.""su"'m=ed""J'--__ 15 ° 20,0 Load Rating 15.0 20.0 Comments andlor Upgrade Recommendations (if applicable):
Moderate To Severe Erosion Of The Downslream Channel Has Undermined The Channel Apron 4 Feet, Causing II To Seffle 2" And Crac",k-'.'n",-,-Tc.;w",o",.__________________________ Recommendation:
Construct Gabions, Similar To Those Along The Banks, Along The End Of The Downstream Apron. Load Posting Limits for Present Condition (if applicable): I LIMiT GROSS LBS.' A>QECR 1N<lEM
lBS WEIGHTInventory Operating n i".,,'"' ! 􀁲􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀡Ibs Gross Ibs Gross '''-'0----'''''' . , 'ct.EDAXlEcrt i _____ Ibs Tandem Axle Ibs Tandem Axle ""00£ . : TN«M : 􀁉􀁔􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀠_____
Ibs Axle or Tandem Ibs Axle or 􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁊􀀠Omf.R 􀁬􀁩􀀬􀁬􀁾􀂷􀁲􀁲􀁢􀀠RI1_H. Rn.".'fb R12-lTt W12.5 _____ Sign Code Sign Code --Jio-I 2 3 4 5 6 Posting Recommendation: Load Posting Not
Required AI This Time Previous Load Posting Recommendations: Observed Load Posting at Bridge: R12·2Tb X None R12·2Tb X None R12-2Tc R12-4Tb R12-4Tc Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Axle Ibs Axle
or R12-2Tc R12-4Tb R12-4Tc Ibs Gross Ibs TandemAxle Ibs Axle or Tandem Other Material Needed -R12-2Tb R12-2Tc -R12·4Tb -R12-4Tc -W12-5 -Posts -Hardware Sets -Decals 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠r-COMPASS---􀁾􀁊􀀧􀀻􀀠'" Advance Warning (optionalj 􀀻􀁾􀀨􀀠eJ
10 Bridge Bridge § § Advance Warning (optional) A. Visible & legible D. Improper Position G. Sign Missing K. Clean Sign N.None B. Obscured by Vegetation E. Damaged Beyond H. Sign & Post
Missing L. Reposition Sign p" Replace Sign C, Sign Needs Cleaning F. Sign Down J Clear Vegetation M. Reposition Sign & Post S. Replace Sign & Post 
NEG. 170 ROADWAY VIEW -LOOKING NORTII Note: Speed Bump In Center Of Bridge Bridge Is Inside Apartment Complex NEG. 174 Barnhart Engineering SIDE ELEVATION -LOOKING NORTHEAST COUN'IX:
57 
NEG. 173 Barnhart Engineering SOUTH APPROACH SLAB -LOOKING NORTHEAST Note: Moderate Settlement Of South Approach Slab Moderate Transverse Cracks Through Slab, Curb, And Sidewalk ,-.--.
-:DATE: 6/11/2003 COUNTY: 57 BRIDGE NUl\mER: POO2-00-001 -,-' --.--.-----._,_. --_. ---_.-...-..'---..􀁾􀀠-._ ... 
Bridge Inspection Record MoO!fied(12·5.2000) District: 18 County: 057 Cont-Sec: P002-20 Structure: 00 I Route: Oaks North Drive Description: -"4,-"B",ar"r"el",s_-,S",.0",'_",X,-_4",.,,,O_'_-"R"e",in"
,"-"o"rce=d..::C"o",n",cr"c",le=-B",ox Culvert With Cast In Place Conerele Win"'gw=al"'ls'-_______ Feature Crossed: While Rock Creek Tributary Inspector's Signature: Joseph 􀁇􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀺􀀿􀀢􀀧􀁲􀀬􀀧􀀭􀁐
􀀧􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀧􀁅􀀢􀀮____ Date: __-,J"u",IY,-7"",..:2",OO-,,3,-__ Company Name BARNHART ENGINEERING Maintenance Section: City of Addison N· Not applicable 9-Excellent condition 8-Very good
condition 􀁾􀀠no problems noted 1-Good condition -some minor problems 6-Sutislaclory condition minor deterioration orstmctural elements (limited) 5-Fair condition» mtllOr deterioration
ofstructural clements (exlensive) 4-Poor condition -deterioration signfficanlly affects structural capacity 3-Serious condition -deterioration seriously afleclS structural capacity 2-Critical
condition -bridge shoUld be closed until repaired 1-Faiiing conJition -bridge closed bur repairable 􀁯􀁾􀀠Failed condition * bridge closed and beyond repair Min. I Deck (Item 58) I Rating
Deck-Rating 6 Wearing Surface 6 6 6 Joints. Other 6 Drainage System 6 6 Median Barrier 6 Railings 7 7 Other Comments: I} Minor diagonal cracks in concrete pavement. 2) 􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁡􀁲􀁤􀀠rails
consist of brick walls topped with steel bars. N Concrete I 7 Joints. Expansion, Open N Joints, Expansion, Sealed N N 8 Curbs. Sidewalks & Parapets 8 N Non-standard 2 8 Railing Protective
Coaling 8 Delineation (eurve markers) 8 8 Min. ISuperstructure (item 59) I Rating 0 Main Members· Steel N N0 Main Members -Concrete N0 Main MemberS -Timber N0 Main Member Connections
NFloor System Members I Floor System Connections N 5 Secondary Members N 5 Secondary Members Connections N 6 Expansion Bearings N N6 Fixed Bearings N6 Steel Protective Coating NOther
Component Rating N Comments: 
District; _1_8_ County: 057 Cant-Sec: __􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁐􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀲􀀺􀀻􀀰􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁟􀁓􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀺􀀠_-,0",0,,-1_ Route: __􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁏􀀢􀀧􀁡􀁫􀁳􀀽􀁎􀀽􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀽􀁾􀁄􀀺􀀡􀀺􀁲􀁩􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁶􀁥􀁾__
, . , , Min. I Subst ..... t."" (Item 60) I Rating 0 Abutment Caps N 0 Above Ground N 0 Below Ground or Foundation N 5 BackwaHs & Wingv.'3US N 0 Intermediate Supports Caps -Conerete
N Caps -Steel N Caps -Timber N Above Ground 􀁾􀀠Concrete N Above Ground -Sleel N Above Ground -Timber N Above Ground -Masonry N Below Ground or Foundation N 5 Collision Proteetion System
N 6 Steel Protecetive Coating N Component Rating I IN Comments: Min. I Culverts (Item 62) I Rating 0 Top Slab I 7 0 Bottom Slab or Footings 8 0 Abutments & Intennediate Supports 2 7
5 Headwalls & Wingwalls 3 7 Other N Component Rating I 7 I Comments: 1) Minor spaii with exposed rebar in top slab ofsouth interior barrel at easl end. 2) Minor spalls in south abutment
wall about stonn sewer outlets. 3) Minor vertical cracks in western wingwalls. Minor spalls in western headwall. Min. I Approaches (Item 65) I Rating 0 Emhankments 8 4 Embankment Retaining
Walls N 5 Slope Protection 8 5 Roadway Concrete I) 7 6 Relief Joints N 6 Drainage 8 6 Guardfence N 7 Delineation N 1 Sight Dislancc 8 Olher N Component Rating I 7 I Comments: -I) Minor
diagonal cracks in concrete pavement. Min. I Channel (Item bl) I Rating 0 Channel Banks I) 7 0 ChonnelBed 7 5 Rjp Rap, Toe Walls & Aprons N 5 Dikes N 5 Jetties N Olher N Component Rating
I I7 Comments: I) Approximately 2' of erosion along downstream loe of culvert. Minor drift caught at upstream race of culvert. See side elevation and view through photos. Min. I Miscellaneous
I Ratmg 7 Signs ,j :1 7 Hlumirtation 7 Warning Devices 7 Utility Lines 8 Other Comments: 1) 12" pipeline runs through north barrel. Two I" conduits run through south barrel. , c , c
: . , 􀁾􀀠-, ,, {;. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠, ,. , , , '. c. 
----I Summary.d67 Texas Department of Transpor{ation Bridge J.D.: Facility: Oaks North Drive Feature X'ed: White Rock Creek Tributary Bridge 􀁏􀁷􀁾􀁥􀁲􀀺􀀠City Of Addison Company Name:
BARNHART ENGINEERING Selected Component Description and Rating: Inspection Date: _J_""-IY_7,,,'2_00_3--=--,-----.,.-,,-,--,:0: Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (No Plans; H S 15 Assumed)
Inspection Rating 1085 Inventory RatIng Operating Rating H HS H HS 200 Load Rating 15.0 20.0 Comments and/or Upgrade Recommendations (if applicable): Maintenance Not Required At This
Time Load Posting Limits for Present Condition (if applicable): Inventory Operating Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Axle Ibs Axle or Tandem Sign Code Ibs Gross Ibs Tandem Me Ibs Axie or Sign Code
---t;o. 􀁾, I WEICHT L1mT MlE(;f'! i rI¢C<M' WEJGHT ......􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠CROSS lBS. r""""AXLE '''' ," 􀁾􀀠LOAD ( zot£D ,! 􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁯􀁯􀁥􀀬􀀮􀀧􀀠"".//0l1lER JUHlh )tll-flh RIl...He \VIM
I 2 l 4 5 6 Posting Recommendation: Load Posting Not Required At This Time Previous Load Posting Recommendations: Observed Load Posting at Bridge: R12-2Th X None R12-2Tb X None _____
R12-2Tc IbsGros. R12-2Tc _____ lb. Gross _____ R12-4Th Ibs Tandem Axle R12-4Tb _____ Ibs Tandem Axle _____ R12-4Tc IbsAxleOT R12-4Tc _____ lb. Axle or Tandem Other MateriaI Needed -R12-21b
-R12-2Tc -R12-4Tb e R12-4Tc Advance Warning Bridge Bridge Advance Warning -W1Z-5 (optional) Sian Code Condition Code Maintenance (optIDnal) -Post. -Hardware SelS ___ -Decals A. Visible
& Legible D. Improper Position G. Sign Missing K. Clean Sign N. None B. Obscured by Vegetation E. Damaged Beyond H. Sign & Post Missing L. Reposition Sign P. Replace Sign C. Sign Needs
Cleaning F. Sign Down J, Clear Vegetation M. Reposition Sign & Post S. Replace Sign & Post 
Texas Department of Transportation p,O, BOX 3067. Q<lLLAS, TEXAS 75221-3067· (214) 320·6100 􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁒􀁾􀁅􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁃􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁅􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁉􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁖􀁾􀁅􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭October 28, 1996
OCT 3 1199) Mr. Ron Whitehead City Manager CITY MANAGER City of Addison 5300 Belt Line Road P.O. Box 144 Addison, Tx. 75001-0144 RE: FAD and Off-System BRINSAP Inspection Folders Dear
Whitehead: An inspection and analysis of FAD and Off-System public bridges, consistent with Federal Regulations and the National Bridge Inspection Standards, was recently completed by
this department. The bridge inspection was conducted and the recommendations were prepared by private consultants. Since these bridges are within your jurisdiction and are subject to
your control, supervision and maintenance, we are forwarding these folders containing the pertinent findings. This information can be used in carrying out your responsibilities for bridge
maintenance, repair, closures, and weight limit posting. A map showing the location of the bridges bridges along with the following lists (if applicable) are also enclosed. List 1. Structures
showing the condition rating for Deck, Superstructure, Substructure, Channel, Approach and Culverts. List 2. Recommended for load posting. List 3. Bridges with condition rating of 4
or less. List 4. Bridges with HS10 rating or less. List 5. Bridges with H10 rating or less with Recommendations. Structures with a condition rating of 4 or lower or with an operating
rating of HS10 (or H10) or lower need prompt attention. If you have such structures in your jurisdiction, you should take necessary steps to improve the condition rating of the structure.
An Equal Opportunity Employer 
Page 2 Mr. Whitehead City of Addison Under federal law, if a closure is recommended, the bridge must be strengthened or closed with a positive barrier at each end of the structure, also,
all bridges incapable of safely carrying the state legal load must be posted by erecting the appropriate signs. To enforce this requirement, as per the Code of Federal Regulations, The
Federal Highway Administration can withhold federal highway funds from those jurisdictions that do not comply with these regulations. The FHWA is stressing monitor bridges with request
a record of the importance of critical findings. corrective actions follow-up In order taken, if procedures to to comply, we any, on each bridge. New signs, posts and hardware for those
bridges that now require posting, as well as those that now require a change in existing load posting signs to the new requirements, will be sent to the TxDOT Maintenance yard in your
County. They will contact you when this sign material is ready for you to pick up. We have spent considerable time and effort in sorting the folders and compiling the list. However,
we may have included folders outside your jurisdiction by mistake. Please cross check the list of bridges within your jurisdiction with the folders forwarded to you to ensure you received
all the bridge folders. If you received folders outside your jurisdiction, please return them to us. Please bring to our attention any inconsistencies between the information provided
in the inspection folders and the lists of bridges. If you have any questions, comments, suggestions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E. in the District
Bridge Section, at (214)320-4423. Sincerely, Charles R. Tucker, P.E. Director of Transportation Planning and Development Attachments 
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 16:02 MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1996 14 BRINSAP OFF-SYSTEM BRIDGES BY CITIES -----------------------------------------------------COUNTY=057 OWNER=ADDISON
----------------------------------------------------C S F L R N T I C 0 S S C W C C T S R N L C U U H D U 0 L T T T A P B A Y L U R F R Y T D N V 0 N S U S I E S S N A E B T E iii N
C 0 0 C T T E P R S Y C 0 C T V N K R R L P T 227 057 P00200 001 1 FARMERS BRANCH CREEK FARMBROOK DRIVE 0.1 MI S OF BROOKHAVEN CR 7 6 8 S 5 N 228 OS7 P00220 001 1 FARMERS BRANCH CREEK
OAKS NORTH 0.1 MI S OF BELT LINE RD N N N 7 8 7 \ 
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14:16 MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1996 6 BRINSAP FAU BRIDGES ------------------------------------<----------------COUNTY=057 CITY=ADDISON ----------------------------------
-------------------C F L R N I C 0 S S C II C C T S N L C U U H D U 0 L T T T A P B A Y L U C R R Y T D N V 0 N I S S I E S S N A E B T T E N C 0 0 C T T E P R S Y Y C 0 T V N K R R
L P T 75 057 ADDISON 8041.16 all RAWHIDE CREEK MARSH LANE 0.1 MI S OF BELT LINE RD N N N 8 8 7 76 057 ADDISON 804218 003 HUTON BRANCH MIDWAY ROAD 0.2 MI N KELLER SP. RD. N N N 5 6 6
77 057 ADDISON 805018 026 WHITE ROCK CREEK BELTLINE ROAD 0.25 MI W OF SH 289 7 6 7 7 7 N 􀁾􀀠