REGION C WATER PLANNING GROUP OPEN MEETING MONDAY, APRlL25, 2005,AT 1;00 P.M. THE MEETING WILL BE HELD AT TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY CENTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT' 6500 W. SINGLETON
BOULEVARD GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS AGENDA 1. ROLLCALL II. APPROV AI. OF MINUTES -March 15, 2005 III. ACTION ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Additional Wholesale Water Providers B. Action on Unique
Stream Segments C. Action on Policy Topics D. Proposed Strategies to Meet Water Needs IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Presentation by Environmental Group B. Infrastructure Financing Survey C.
Communications D. Overall Status and Next Steps V. OTHER DISCUSSION A. Updates from the Chair B. Report from Regional Liaisons C. Report from TV,'DB D. Conf'um Date and Location ofNext
Meeting E. Other Discussion F. Acknowledgement ofGuests/Comments VI. ADJOURNMENT Persons with disabilities who plan to attend the Region C Water Planning Group meeting and who may need
auxiliary aids or services snch as mobility assistance, interpreters for persons who are deaf or or heating impaired, re.ders, large print, or Braille are requested to contact Lee Shaffer
in the Central Regional Wastewater System Administrative Offices at (972) 263-2251 at least five work days prior to the meetiog so that appropriate arrangements can be made. : ..' I

REGION C WATER PLANNING GROUP OPEN MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 15,2005, AT I :00 P.M. THE MEETING WILL BE HELD AT TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY CENTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 W. SINGLETON
BOULEVARD GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS AGENDA 1. ROLLCALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -January 13, 2005 ill, ACTION ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Available Supplies to WWPslWUGs B. Additional Potentially
Feasible Water Management Strategy C. Additional Wholesale Water Providers D. lufrastructure Financing Survey lV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Water Conservation B. Summary of Water Needs C.
Feasible Water Management Strategies 1. Regional Supplies 2. County-by-County Suggested Water Management Strategies 3. Strategies for Wholesale Water Providers D. Report from Unique
Stream Segment Committee E. Report from Poliey Topics Committee F. Communications G. Overall Status and Next Steps V. OTHER DISCUSSION A. Updates from the Chair B. Report from Regional
Liaisons C. Report from TWDB D, Confinn Date and Location ofNex! Meeting E. Other Discussion F. Acknowledgement of GuestsfComments VI, ADJOURNMENT 
Tlinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Office December 28, 2004 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE -Wednesday, January 5,2005 at 11:00 a.m.
MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has been scheduled for 11 :00 a.m., Wednesday, January
5, 2005 at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. A catered lunch will immediately follow the meeting.
The primary topic for this meeting will be TRA's reuse permit application and its conflict with the City of Irving's application for amending their water rights permit for reuse. An
agenda, minutes from the September 14, 2004 meeting, and other information are enclosed for your review prior to the meeting. The information covered in this meeting is very important
to each Contracting Party of the System and you are encouraged to send a representative. If you have questions prior to this meeting, please contact this office at 817-493-5100. 􀁌􀁬􀀭􀁜􀁾􀁌􀁜􀁟􀀠'LL
,;....: l/). btU l'( i IeLO;". WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNBfcea c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill L. Tatum,
Manager, CRWS PO. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 Recycled Paper (817) 493-5100 o 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., DALLAS,
TEXAS WEDNESDA Y, JANUARY 5, 2005, 11 :00 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville
Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield North Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENTATIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor
Bob Cluck Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Ron Young Council member Paul
Walden Mr. Frank Crumb Council member Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mayor ProTem James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Tracy Doyle Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak
Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Director Sylvia Greene Mr. Danny F. Vance III. Introduction of Guests. Consultants. and Authority Staff 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 14. 2004 Meeting V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Planning, Design, Construction VI. Action: Advisorv Committee action
regarding Trinity River Authoritv's reuse permit application andits conflict with the Citv ofIrving's application for amending their water rights permit for reuse. VII. Other Business
VIII. Adlourn to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., DALLAS,
TEXAS TUESDA Y, SEPTEMBER 14, 2004, 11:00 A.M. I. Callto Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 11:10 a.m. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENTA TIVE PRESENT/ABSENT Addison
Mr. Steve Chutchian f!Mr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Ms. Fiona Allen f/Mayor Bob Cluck Present Bedford Mr. Jim Arrington f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Present Carrollton Mr. Milburn
Gravley Present Cedar Hill Mr. Greg Porter Absent Colleyville Mr. Ken Tywater f!Mr. Bill Lindley Present Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Mike Mikeska f!Mr. Bob Johnson Present
D/FW Airport Mr. Rick Reeter f/Mr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Dennis Schwartz f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Mr. Chris Barker f!Mr. Ron Young Present Farmers Branch Mr. Roy
Smallwood f/Councilmember Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Frank Crumb Absent Grand Prairie Mr. Ron McCuller f!Councilmember Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Bob Price f!Mr. Jerry
Hodge Present Hurst Mr. Ron Haynes Absent Irving Mr. David Ryburn f/Mayor ProTem James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Rick Anderson f!Mr. Ed IIschner Present Mansfield Mr. Bud Ervin f!Counalmember
Tracy Doyle Present North Richland Hills Mr. David Smyth f!Mr. Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Absent Trinity River Authority Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Absent
Director Sylvia Greene Absent Mr. Danny F. Vance Absent III. Introduction ofGuests. ConSUltants. and Authority Staff TRA Staff present were: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith,
Randy Brooks, John Nelson, Cheryl Abbott, Bill Tatum, Bill Cyrus, Shelley Fialho, Billy Hill and Debbie Bronson. 1 
Others: Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins Euless -Paul Wryesinski Farmers Branch -Mark Velton Grapevine -Stan Laster Midlothian -Judy Ford Venus -Jerry Reed Alan Plummer Associates -Betty
Jordan Black & Veatch -Layne Parsons Freese & Nichols -Ray Longoria IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 10, 2004 Meeting Chairman Gravley asked if there were any revisions to be made
to the minutes of the August 10,2004 meeting. There being none, Ron McCuller made a motion to accept as presented, Bob Price seconded the motion, and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status
Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum presented current information on the daily average flows and effluent quality since the August 10th meeting. Mr. Tatum stated that June, July, and August
had been the wettest months in the Central System's history. B. Financial-Patricia Cleveland gave a brief summary of the System's year to date FY 2004 budget. C. Regulatory -Patricia
Cleveland talked about the two day CMOM meeting and workshop that had been held in Austin on August August 30 -31. She said that EPA would be in partnership with utility providers to
develop the CMOM program. D. Planning, Design, Construction -Randy Brooks said that in the August meeting he had presented an in depth report on deSign, planning, and construction. Mr.
Brooks gave a brief summary of projected population growths, System historical data, and the process used to combine that information to determine System planning and expansion. VI.
Presentation ofMaster Plan Update Ray Longoria with Freese & Nichols presented the planning objectives and the results of the comprehensive Phase IV Master Plan that addressed the major
issues faCing the long-term operation of the CRWS System. VII. Action: Proposed FY2005 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy, Strategies, Objectives, and Contents
B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2005 Budget C. Detailed Budget Review Warren Brewer noted that the detailed FY 2005 Budget had been presented in the August 101h meeting. that a budget
workshop had been held with nine people attending, and that it was thought that all questions had been answered. There being no other questions, Fiona Allen made a motion to recommend
the FY 2005 Operating and Maintenance Budget to the Authority's Board of Directors for their approval in the October 27 meeting. Ron McCuller seconded the motion and a unanimous vote
followed. VIII. Other Business There was no other business to be discussed. IX. Adiourn to Lunch 2 
Chairman Gravley adjourned the meeting at noon and invited attendees to remain for a catered lunch. 3 
Trii"Iity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Office September 3, 2004 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE -Tuesday, September 14,2004 at 11 a.m.
MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 6500 West Singleton Blvd, Dallas, Texas A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has been scheduled
for 11 a.m., Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Dallas. Lunch will be served immediately following the meeting.
Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott before noon on Monday, September 13, 2004, at 817· 493·5100 or abbottc@trinityra.org. We encourage each party served by the System to send a representative
to this meeting, since Authority staff will be requesting the Committee's endorsement and approval of the proposed FY 2005 System Operations and Maintenance Budget. The proposed budget
was presented in the August 101h Advisory Committee and a Budget Workshop was held on Wednesday, September 1, 2004. We believe all questions about the budget have been answered. Enclosed
for your review are an agenda and minutes of the August 10, 2004 meeting. If you should have any questions, please contact this office at 817-493·5100. LJa.A./tJ.m.; fL 􀀮􀀶􀁾􀀯􀁃􀁓􀀺􀀾􀁊􀀠
WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region Icea c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS P.O. Box 240 Arlington,
Texas 76004-0240 o Recycled Paper (817) 493-5100 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., DALLAS,
TEXAS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2004, 11:00 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville
Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield North Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor
Bob Cluck Council member Jim Griffin Mr. Milbum Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Ron Young Mayor ProTem Paul
Walden Mr. Frank Crumb Council member Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mayor ProTem James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Tracy Doyle Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak
Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Director Sylvia Greene Mr. Danny F. Vance III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants. and Authority Staff 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 10, 2004 Meeting V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Planning, Design, Construction VI. Presentation ofMaster Plan Update
VII. Action: Proposed FY 2005 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy, Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2005 Budget C.
Detailed Budget Review VIII. Other Business IX. Adjourn to Lunch , ( . 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Minutes CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., DALLAS,
TEXAS TUESDA Y, AUGUST 10, 2004, 10:00 A.M. I. Call to Order-Chainnan Gravley called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENTATIVE
PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr. Jim Pierce f/Mr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Ms. Fiona Allen f/Mayor Bob Cluck Present Bedford Mr. Jerry Shennan f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Present Carrollton
Mr. Milburn Gravley Present Cedar Hill Ms. Ruth Antebi f/Mr. Greg Porter Present Colleyville Ms. Terry Leake f/Mr. Bill Lindley Present Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Chris
Kaakatyf/Mr. Bob Johnson Present D/FW Airport Mr. Rick Reeter fIMr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Dennis Schwartz f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Mr. Ron Young Present Fanners Branch
Mayor ProTem Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Ms. MaeBell Brown f/Mr. Frank Crumb Present Grand Prairie Council member Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Matt Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge
Present Hurst Mr. Chuck Kendrick f/Mr. Ron Haynes Present Irving Mr. Todd Reck f/Mayor ProTem James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Rick Anderson f/Mr. Ed IIschner Present Mansfield Councilmember
Tracy Doyle Present North Richland Hills Mr. David Smyth f/Mr. Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Absent Trinity River Authority Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Hector
Escamilla, Jr. Absent Director Sylvia Greene Present III. Introduction ofGuests, Consultants and Authority Staff Authority Staff Present: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith,
Randy Brooks, John Owens, John Nelson, Cheryl Abbott, Rosanne Robertson, Bill Decker, Alison Mackey, John Jadrosich, Bill Tatum, Mike Young, Bill Cyrus, and Shelley Fialho. 1 
Guests: Bedford -Jim Arrington Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins Colleyville -Ken Tywater Dallas -Mike Mikeska Euless -Chris Barker and Paul Wrzensinski Farmers Branch -Mark Velten and David
Ferguson Grand Prairie -Ron McCuller Grapevine -Bob Price Mansfield -Bud Ervin Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. -Alan Plummer and Betty Jordan Black & Veatch Corporation -Layne Parsons
and Amanda Zarazua First Southwest Company -Boyd London and Mary Williams McCall, Parkhurst & Horton -Chuck Kobdish Sowell Company -John Kubala IV. Approval afMinutes afthe September
16, 2003 Meeting Chairman Gravley asked if there were any revisions to the minutes of the September 16, 2003 meeting. There being done, a motion was made by Fiona Allen to approve the
minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Richard Fregoe, and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum reviewed the monthly flows and effluent quality
for FY 2003 and FY 2004 to date. Mr. Tatum gave a detailed explanation on the 102" sluice gate failure that occurred in March, as well as other emergencies that had occurred in FY 2004.
, Warren Brewer said that the sluice gate failure had resulted in a lot of interest from parties like AWWA and the result may include recommended changes to design standards. B. Financial-Patricia
Cleveland said that the FY 2003 settleup letters with the inflow and infiltration adjustment had been mailed to customers in June; the FY 2004 10M request had been mailed in July; and
that the midyear FY 2004 reallocations reflecting the current trending flows had also been mailed. She continued that the year to date FY 2004 Budget flows were lower than projected;
that the new power contract that became effective on June 1sI had resulted in increased savings; and even with the increased cost of System emergency repairs, the System could possibly
end the year below projected operations and maintenance cost. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland said that the discharge permit application and renewal had been sent to TCEQ and that
there had been many changes to our application for biosolids monitoring, including wet weather, blending, and CMOM. D. Planning, Design, Construction -Randy Brooks detailed the CRWS
capital improvement programs in progress. He said the AuthOrity was continuing to take steps to issue Series 2004 Bonds later this year, most likely through the Texas Water Development
Board's State Revolving Fund program. He presented tables listing the various projects funded by prior bond sales. VI. Dlscussian: Presentatlan ofPraposed FY2005 Operating and Maintenance
Budaet A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review 2 
x Patricia Cleveland gave a presentation of the proposed FY 2005 Central Operations and Maintenance Budget, detailing system cost and revenue. A discussion followed with specific questions
relating to some of the line items. Warren Brewer told members that each year the Authority presented the proposed budget; held a Budget Workshop, scheduled for September 151; and encouraged
our customer cities to call with any questions the members might have regarding the proposed budget. VII. Discussion: Odor Control Master Plan Warren Brewer said that urban development
was increasing quickly around the Central Treatment Plant, increasing the need for odor control, both at the plant and in the communities with lift stations. He continued that management
was pleased with the progress made and was now poised for the next round of improvements. Betty Jordan with Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. gave a detailed history of odor control at the
Central System stating that the Authority had an aggressive phased approach to odor control and was now using the most advanced treatments. She said that to date the System had spent
$15.6 million and was currently in the planning phase for the next phased improvements. VIII. Action: Series 2004 Bonds for Capita/Improvements Randy Brooks stated that a System Capital
Improvements Program had been identified that included improvements for the 162 mgd plant and for the interceptor pipeline system to maintain capacity. Warren Brewer explained that after
extensive discussions, it was recommended that Texas Water Development Board's State Revolving Funds be used for System improvements in the amount of $106.475 million; and that a public
sale for $9.525 million be issued to cover the purchase of land rights that were not allowed in the SRF funds. After a discussion, Mayor ProTem Paul Walden motioned to approve the Authority
Staff's recommendations. Fiona Allen seconded the motion and a unanimous vote followed. IX. Status Report on Retail Electric Power Supply Contract John Owens briefly told members that
a letter had been included in their packet outlining the Authority's actions in providing the Central System with the most economical power supply possible, and presented a summary of
past power supply contracts. Other Business Warren Brewer presented Bill Tatum and his staff with the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Platinum Award. Mr. Brewer explained
that this award was given to plants that operated for a five-year period with no pennit violations and that this was the second AMSA Platinum Award received for the Central System. Mr.
Brewer also said that AMSA had developed a new Excellence in Management recognition program for the successful implementation of programs that address the management challenges facing
public wastewater utilities and that TRA was one of only three who received the award in the state of Texas. Mr. Brewer said that included in the meeting packet, for member'S review
and later discussion, was infonnation relating to the competing reuse water pennit between TRA TRA and Irving. Mr. Brewer continued that TRA and Irving had met to discuss resolving the
dispute, but in July had learned that a resolution had not been accomplished. Mr. Vance said that the t. matter had now been referred from TCEQ to an Administrative Law Judge and a hearing
to establish parties with an interest in this matter would be scheduled soon in Austin. XI. Adjourn to Lunch There being no other business, Chairman Gravley adjourned the meeting at
12:20 p.m., and invited Members to remain for the catered lunch. 3 
TrinityRiverAuthority of Texas Northern Office July 28, 2004 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY MEETING
REMINDER NOTICE -Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 10;00 a.m. MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas This is a reminder that
the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 at 10:00 a.m., at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at
6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. You are invited to remain after the meeting for a catered lunch. Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott at 817-493-5100 or abbottc@trinitvra.org
prior to Friday, August 6, 2004. For your review, we have enclosed an agenda, minutes of the September 16, 2003 meeting and information pertaining to the Series 2004 Bonds. As you will
see from the agenda, there are several significant items that will be discussed at this meeting. including the proposed FY 2005 Operations and Maintenance Budget for the Central System.
Please contact this office at 817-493-5100, if you should have questions prior to this meeting. 􀁾n 􀀮􀁾􀁗􀁖􀁶􀀯􀀨􀀡􀀦WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNB/cea c: Danny
F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill L. Tatum, Manager, CRWS P.O. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004·0240 o Re.cycled Paper(817) 493-5100 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., DALLAS, TEXAS
TUESDA Y, AUGUST 10, 2004, 10:00 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless
Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield North Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TlVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Bob Cluck
Council member Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Robert Barker Mayor ProTem Paul Walden
Mr. Frank Crumb Councilmember Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mayor ProTem James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Tracy Doyle Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr.
Danny F. Vance Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Director Sylvia Greene III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants andAuthority Staff 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
IV. Approval ofMinutes of the September 16. 2003 Meeting V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Planning, Design, Construction VI. Discussion: Presentation ofProposed
FY 2005 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review VII. Discussion: Odor Control
Master Plan VIII. Action: Series 2004 Bonds for Capital Improvements IX. Status Report on Retail Electric Power Supplv Contract X. Other Business XI. Ad/ourn to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDA Y, SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 at 11 A.M. I. Ca/Ho Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 11 :10 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENTA
TlVE PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr. Jim Pierce/f Mr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Mr. Rick McCleery f/Mayor Bob Cluck Present Bedford Mr. Jim Arrington f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Present
Carrollton Mr. Milburn Gravley Present Cedar Hill Mr. Greg Porter Absent Colleyville Mr. Bill Lindley Absent Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Mike Mikeska f/Mr. Bob Johnson
Present D/FW Airport Mr. Dan Bergman f/Mr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Bill Willborn f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Mr. Ron Young Present Farmers Branch Mr. Mark Velten f/Mayor
ProTem Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Frank Crumb f/Mr. Dale Fisseler Present Grand Grand Prairie Councilmember Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Matt Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge
Present Hurst Mr. Larry Martin f/Mr. Ron Haynes Present Irving Mayor ProTem James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Ricky Anderson f/Mr. Ed IIschner Present Mansfield Councilmember Tracy Doyle
Present N. Richland Hills Mr. David Smyth for/Mr. Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Absent Trinity River Authority Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Hector Escamilla,
Jr. Absent Director Sylvia Green Absent III. Introduction ofGuests, ConSUltants andAuthoritv Staff TRA Staff present were Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith, John Nelson,
Cheryl Abbott, Alison Mackey, Bill Tatum, Mike Young, and Shelly Fialho. Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins Euless -Chris Barker Grand Prairie -Ron McCuller Irving -Jim Moffatt Mansfield -Chris
Burkett and Bud Ervin 1 
Midlothian -Robyn Forsyth and Judy Ford Venus -Mayor Carolyn Welcher, Jerry Reed, and Linda Taylor First Southwest Company -Boyd London Black & Veatch -Layne Parsons IV. Approval ofMinutes
ofthe August 12.2003 Meeting Chairman Gravely asked if there were any revisions to the minutes of the August 12, 2003 meeting. There being none, Ron Young made a motion that the minutes
be approved as presented, Council member Fregoe seconded the motion, and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum summarized flows for the month of August,
stating that it had been an unusually wet month and that there had been one System outflow. B. Financial -Patricia Cleveland reported that the System was 75% into the FY 2003 budget,
and that city flows were trending approximately 4 to 4.5 mgd less than projected. She continued that 10M infonnation requests had been mailed to the customer cities and that the infonnation
was now being received. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland stated that the TPDES permit renewal had been submitted to the State, but a response had not been received. She indicated that
the System would continue to operate under the current permit until the new pennit had been received. D. Capital Improvement Planning -Bill Smith said that Randy Brooks had provided
a handout at the August meeting and had summarized the 2004 capital improvement bond sale. Mr. Smith stated that staff was continuing to review needed System improvements and available
funding options. VI. Action: Proposed FY2004 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy, Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY
2004 Budget Warren Brewer reminded Members that at the August 12 meeting, a detailed presentation of the proposed FY 2004 Operating and Maintenance Budget was discussed. He continued
that a Budget workshop had also been conducted and that he felt all questions about the proposed budget had been addressed. Patricia Cleveland gave a budget overview. There was a brief
question and answer series covering emergency reserve funds and debt service coverage. At the end of the discussion, Chainnan Gravley asked if there were any other questions and there
were none. Jim Pierce made a motion to recommend that the proposed FY 2004 Central Regional Wastewater System Budget be approved by the Authority's Board of Directors. Ron Young seconded
the motion, and a unanimous vote followed. VII. Other Business There was no other business to be discussed. VIII. Adjourn to Lunch Chairman Gravley adjourned the meeting at 11 :40 a.m.,
and invited Members to remain for a catered lunch. 2 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2003 PERMITS NO: 10303-001 (TX0022802) FLOW ANNLAVG FLOW DLYAVG. FLOW ClY.MAX. FLOW 2.HR PK FLOW 2-HR PK RAINFALL TOTAL" eBOC DLYAVG. CBOO ClY.MAX.
CBOO DLYAVG. TSS DLYAVG. TSS DlY.MAX; T55 DLY.AVG. NH3 DLYAVG. NHl ClY.MAX.NH3 m.Y.AvG. DO MIN. pH MAlt pH MIN. CL2 MIN. CL2 OUTFALL COLl.ECT. SYSTTM PERMIT LIMIT: 162 MGo REPORT MGD REPORT MGD 281250 GPM MGD INCHES 7 MGlL 17 MG/l "50 LBS/DAY 15 MGIL 40 MGlL
20266 LBSfDAY V, MGIL 7 MGlL 2702/5404 LBS/DAY , MGIL 9 S.U. , S.U. 1 MGIL .099 MGlL NO. OF OUTFlOWS DEC JAN 137.503 137.433 134.853 128.809 181.590 140.780 136912 108468 197.153 156.194
4.13 0.22 1.0 1.1 2.0 2.0 1158.2 1175.8 1.1 1.1 2.0 2.0 1278.3 1181.5 0.065 0.133 0.169 1.053 72.7 142.8 8.' 8.9 7.' 7A 7.0 6.9 1.10 1.01 0.00 0.00 0 0 FEB 137.315 139.059 203.770 144353
207.868 5.07 􀀱􀁾􀀠2.0 1389.5 1.3 3.0 1511.4 0.194 1.378 216.5 8.6 7.' 6.9 1.02 0.00 0 MAR 136.090 134.567 155.270 12"" 180.660 0.85 12 2.0 1345.3 12 2.0 1305.5 0.641 3.639 720.3 B.'
7.' 6.8 1.12 0.00 0 APR MAY 133.470 132.530 126.720 132.691 141.580 174.560 108124 137735 155.699 198.338 1.90 2.53 1.0 1.1 1.0 2.0 1056.8 1176.6 1.0 1.' 2.0 2.0 1090.9 1380.6 0.310
0.078 ,..... 0.171 320.3 86.3 8.1 7.5 7A 7.' 6.8 6.' 1.04 1.06 0.00 0.00 0 0 JUN 133.139 139.079 198.840 151308 217.884 5.17 1.0 1.0 1159.9 1.0 1.0 1159.9 0.074 0.119 86.1 7.5 7.4 6.'
1.05 0.00 1 JUL AUG 132.390 131.987 126.118 127.320 136.740 166.500 106013 130287 152.659 187.613 0.08 1.85 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1051.8 1061.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1051.8 1061.9 0.070 0.102 0.200
0.287 72.8 108.1 7A 7A 7.' 􀀷􀁾􀀠6.' 7.0 1.08 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 1 SEP OCT 132.579 131.124 135.193 124.230 204.000 141.720 164791 105833 237.299 152.400 3.99 0.78 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1127.5
1036.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1127.5 1036.1 0.172 0.200 0.495 0.595 193.5 212.5 7.' 7.7 􀀷􀁾􀀠7> '.8 7.0 1.02 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 NOV 131.255 127.278 155.100 117680 169.459 3.15 1.0 1.0 1061.5
1.0 1.0 1061.5 0.134 0.378 142.3 7.' 􀀷􀁾􀀠6.' 1.06 0.00 0 AVG MAX 133.901 137.503 131.326 139.079 166.704 204.000 128080 164791 184.435 237.299 2.48 5.17 1.0 12 1.4 2.0 1150.1 1389.5
1.1 1.' 1.6 '.0 1187.2 1511.4 0.181 0.641 1.002 3.639 197.9 720.3 8.0 8.' 7.' 7.' 6.' 7.0 1.05 1.12 0.00 0.00 TOTAl2 MIN TOTAL 131.124 1606.815 124.230 1515.917 136.740 105833 152.400
0.08 29.72 1.0 1.0 1036.1 13800.9 1.0 1.0 1036.1 14246.9 0.065 0.119 72.7 2374.2 7A 􀀷􀁾􀀠'.8 1.00 0.00 90% FLOW", 145.800 MGD • EXCURSIONS: 0 TCEQ 75% FLOW =121.500 MGD OEPA -Rainfall
totals are measured at DFW AIrport FY 2003 EFFLUENT QUALITY/FLOW 190 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀱􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀠180 170 160 􀁾􀀠I 10.0 150 130 120 110 100 140 􀀱􀀡􀀽􀁳􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁔􀁈􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀾􀀼􀁴􀁳􀀧􀀼􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁫􀁾􀁓􀁾··15.0 0.0 DEC JAN FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV I _CBOD _TSS _NH3 ""2003 Dally Avg. Flow -+-2002 Dally Avg. Flow I B 11'1•III. B -... 1ft I: < • 􀁾􀀠
FY 2004 􀁐􀁾􀁒􀁍􀁉􀁔􀁓􀀠NO: 10303.001 (TX0022802) FLOW Fl.OW fLOW Fl."" FLOW ....,AU. CBOD eBOD CBOD TSS TSS TOS '"" "H'ANNLAVG DlY,AVa, Of-Y.MAX. ...."" 2-HR PI( TOTAl-Ol.Y.AVG . D1XMAlC..
ot."I'.AVG, OlY./f.YO. 􀁄􀁬􀁙􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀨􀁟􀀠CLY.AVG. [}Ly V\1. OlV,MAX. PERMtT 􀁌􀁬􀁍􀀡􀁴􀁾􀀮􀀠DEC JAIl "'0 MAR APR MAY JUN Ul AlJG SEP OCT NOV iA.VG MAX MIN TOTA.L '" REPORT 000 MOO 130.218
122.641 13\).342 130.166 130.689 143.128 130.88B 136.929 131.353 132.393 131.648 136,111 134.035 1Be.814 135.872 147..211 131.887 139.G94 135.872 168.814 130.213 122.1)41 1055.694 117.553
REPORT ;;:81250 MGD GPM 144.026 106829 217.830 173207 206.630 ,..... 180.850 133159 187.S00 150430 173.150' 1389&4 261.330 207454 250.320 􀀲􀁾􀀰􀀶􀀸􀀬􀀰􀀠203.5 158149A 267.3 2074S4.C
144.0 106329.0 MGO '53""249A18 224.473 191.749 216,619 200.108298._ 293.&5& 22..... 298.734 153-834 1 INCHES "G>l 0,,. 1,' 3.04 ',0 ",4 ".1.11 1.' 2.96 1.1 4.13 1.0 10.49 1.' 4.10 1.'
"00 1.' 10A9 1,' 0," 1.' .. EXCURSIONS: 0 TceQ UPA 11 "" " ... """MGIL lil:S,'DAY MGlL MOIL !.SSItlAY 􀀬􀁾􀀠1053.1 􀀬􀁾􀀠... 1022.8 􀀱􀁾􀀠1066.4 ... ',0 ,..... M 1191.7 1.0 1.' 11'S1.7
1.' 11")1.0 1A ... ,...., 3,0 1112.7 1.' 1.0 1104.2 1,' 1135.7 1,0 2.' 1169.3 2,' 145'1.1 U 2,0 ,..... 3. 1322.5 U 1.0 1227.7 1,' 1194.7 1.1 1A 1243.2 ,.. 1451.1 1A 2.0 1596,0 1,' 1053,1
1.' ,.0 1022.S ."', 9945.2 '" MGIL 0.205 0.138 (l.130 0.161 0.10$ 0.112 0.163 0.204 0.153 UC5 0.108 1 "GiL .......... .".. 0.474 0.365 0.503 •.341 0_ ...11 0.822 0.324 .... DO pH pH
Cl.2 eL2 COLLECT. DLY.AVG, MIN. "... M"" Mil" otm'All SYmM,,,,"'.... • • • 1 "". "" OFiUInAY MOIL S.U. S,U. -MG>!. oumows 214.9 .3 1,' ',8 1.13 O,OS • 149.0 SA 1,' 6,8 ,.... 0... •,,6.>
'.8 7.4 ••• U, OJlO ° 183.9 􀀮􀁾􀀠1.2 ••• 12' 0,04 1 '24.1 • .2 U 1,' 1.06 0.01 ° 13U 7.9 􀀱􀁾􀀠7.1 "1.11 0.0'0 • 232.3 7.S 􀀷􀁾􀀠7,' 1.03 0.00 • 257.B 􀀷􀁾􀀠􀀱􀁾􀀠6.7 ,., 11.00 3 TOTAL:
1B1.1 •• 1 1.2 '.0 1.11 0.01 7 251.8 ••• 7.. 1.1 1.24 0.05 '24.1 1.' 7,1 6,7 ,.0, 0.0'0 '''', 90% FLOW"" 14$,$00 MOO 75% FLOW::: 121.500 MOO -Rainfall totals are measured at OFW AIrport
AIrport FY 2004 EFFLUENT QUALITY/FLOW 􀀱􀁂􀁏􀀧􀁲􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠170 I,".' ".' 1GO t;0f:M 􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠150 􀁴􀁾􀁈􀀻􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁨􀁬􀀠140
􀀦􀀧􀁣􀀭􀀢􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀷􀀮􀁩􀀠􀀱􀀳􀀰􀂥􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀱􀀲􀀰􀂮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠110 I": ....... 100 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG ! _CBOO _TSS _NH3 .....2004 OallyAvg.l'low --2003 􀁏􀀮􀁕􀁹􀁁􀁖􀁬􀀡􀀮􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁗􀁬􀀠1
5.0 10.0 5.0 􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁦􀁵􀁾􀁾􀁀􀀲􀀮􀀱􀀮􀀺􀀴􀀠0.0 SEP OCT NOV 
;., .. ,. C>.. . . 􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠..... 􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀠.... ' 
AGENDA ITEM V-B CRWS -FY 2004 MID YEAR REALLOCATION 7/8/2004 PARTY BUDGET BUDGET REVISED REVISED % SHARE MGD 􀁾􀀬􀀪􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀠
􀂷􀁾􀀠CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2003 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTED FOR INTERCEPTOR In (METHOO 2) FY 2003 DISTRIBUTION ADJUSTED ADJUSTED CONTRIBUTION BASED
ON OFFY2003 TRA FY2003 DISTRIBUTION FY2003 ACTUAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL INTERCEPTOR CONTRIBUTION OFFY2OO3 ACTUAL ANNUAL CONTRACTING TOTAL FLOW REQUIREMENT BASED 1/1 TOTAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL
REQUIREMENT PARTY {MGI PERCENT ON ACTUAL FLOWS (MG) (MGl PERCENT REQUIREMENT ADJUSTMENT ADDISON 769.880 1.506% $BOl.Q12 769.B60 1.516% $B06,331 $5.319 ARLINGTON 15,073.996 29.490% $15,685,160
0._ 15,073.9OB 29.684% 815,788,345 $103,185 BEDFORD 1,697,029 3.320% $1,765,844 1,697'/)29 3.342% $1,777,545 $11,701 CARROllTON 5,005.909 9.793% $5,208,707 5,005.909 9.858% $5.243,279
$34,572 CEDAR Hill 120.319 0.235% $124,992 120.319 0.237% $126,056 $1,_ COLLEYVILLE 908.941 1.778% 8945,684 6.585 902.356 1.777% $945,152 ($532) B COPPEll 1,440.094 2.817% $1,498,308
1,440.094 2.838% $1.500,413 $10,106 III Z DALLAS 3,565,194 6.975% 83.709,867 43.042 3,522.152 6.938% $3,689.124 ($20,743) DIF'N AIRPORT 886.852 1.344% $714,848 686.852 1.352% $719,103
$4,255 i DUNCANVILLE 66.447 0.130% 886,144 66.447 0.131% 886,678 $532 -... EULESS 1,203.925 2.355% $1,252,579 68.136 1,135.789 2.237% $1,189,817 ($82,762) IIIa:FARMERS BRANCH 2,237.118
4.377% $2,328,042 0.203 2,236:915 4.405% $2,342,934 $14,893 FORT WORTH 394.166 0.771% $410,080 19.181 374.987 0.738% 8392,526 ($17.552) <•Il.GRAND PRAIRIE 5,081.346 9.941% $5,267,425
164.924 4,916.422 9.881% $5,149,138 ($138,269) GRAPEVINE 560.952 1.079% $573,367 6.604 544.148 1.072% $570,176 ($S.191) HURST 70.990 0.139% $73,931 70.990 0.140% $74A63 $532 IRVING 9.103.610
17.810% $9,472.794 9,103.610 17.927% $9,535,024 $82,230 KELLER 822.009 1.610% $556.326 3.464 819.425 1.614% $558,455 $2.126 MANSFIELD 1,311.763 2.665% $1,364,806 1.311.783 2.583% $1.373,848
$9.042 N RICHLAND HILLS 255.781 O.SOO% $265,940 11.547 244.234 0.461% $255,835 ($10,108) SOUTHLAKE 746.936 1.465% $779.205 10.964 737.962 1.453% $772,923 {$6.383) 51,118.136 100.000%
100.000% $53,188,063 334.958 SO,781.180 100.000% $53,188,063 $0 -AdLan03final,lods 
-' CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREAM CITY (METHOO 2) 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁻􀁾􀁽􀀠 􀁵􀁰􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁭􀀡􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁥􀁰􀁴􀀨􀀩􀁲􀀠Meter ID I City Meter 10 Node Latoral interoeptor
$t;), No. Olameter Siopo Capaclty (ets) Olllmeter SJope capaclty (cfs) C''Y 3.0E AddisOfl 13.1E 1930E EF012 EF2R 537.43 30 0.00270 21.310 30 0,00220 19.240 I I Grand Prab1& .ow IFarmers
Branch Addison 13,2E 19306 EF012 EF2R 537.43 18 0,01050 10.760 15 0.00500 4.570 Addison 13.35 19305 EF012 EF2R 537.43 City 18 0.00720 8,,910 1"·8a 11,ga 34608 aC019 BBCXU 7310,00 48
0.00070 37.m 4& 0.00080 40.738 DFW 11.78 29008 BC017 88C 9384.00 12 Q.OO4()O 2.250 12 0.00400 2.250 11.98 13.58 38108 8= 88CXIII 19240.00 36 0.00220 31.369 3B 0.00240 32.753 12.18 35008
8C019 88CXII 450.00 18 0.00120 3.649 18 0.00120 3.649 12,38 4120B SCOt 6 eBCXlI1 85.00 City 15 0.00150 2.509 ·J.:od 12,78 40908 eC020.4 aBCX!I1 325.00 City 15 0.00460 13.58 IKeller 12,88
40609 BC01e BBCXI 25985.00 36 0.00112 27.712 36 2i Ke!ler 12.88 I North RIchland Hills 13.38 13.38 6280B 0001$):.3 eBCXl1 3126,06 12 0.00200 1.598 12 0.00200 ISot.Jthlake 13.6B 4920B
BCQ18.1 BBCXI 90.00 18 0.01700 13.700 21 0.00100 o.vlOI Euless 12.0B In vine 12.68 1lO908 8C013 GV7A 5325.00 12 0.00202 1.606 12 0.00880 3.3511 ... 􀀡􀁬􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀬􀁬􀁲􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁍􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁧􀀬􀀧􀀿􀁾􀁟􀁌􀀠􀁾􀁐�
�􀁾􀀹􀀠_ C017 ____ 􀁾􀂧􀁾􀁅􀀺􀁉􀀧􀁉􀁾􀁑􀁴􀁾􀁉􀀱􀁾􀁟􀀠 _ 12 0.00241 4 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀴􀁉􀀠Colleyville 13.08 1580B ae007 LaCI 9600.00 42 0,00228 4$.170 42 0.00240 49,"1"" Bedford 13.18 24608 BC012
913 2266.00 􀁾􀀠12 0,00200 1.596 INorth RIchland Hilts 114.OB Keller 14.713 MS14.7B aCOOS,1 LBCII 35540.00 citY.. 12 0.00580 2.721 KeUer 15.09 22108 Bea08 LBCII 3S04O,00 21 0.00200 7.105
21 0.00339 9.250 Keller 15.0B North Richland H!!!s 16.0B MS16.0S BCOoa.2 LBCII 38837.00 OJ 8 0.00400 0.766 Gi:aildPrairie "''''M "...,.........-"" OW 1470W WF003 WFXJ8 13100.00 27 0.00710
27.249 27 0.00770 27,249 )W 1780W WFOO4 WFXJC 15746J;l2 42 0.00148 38.810 42 0.00200 45.115 Arlington Is.ow .:JW MS9.5W WF01S.1 WFCEO 2441.32 Q!!l.ltv Q-------0.503V.VUOVV VUOVV W MS9.7W
WF0152 WFCEO 2441.32 City 6 0.00480 V."):;I1.l l.8W MS9.8W WF015.4 WFOEO 2441.32 CI 8 O.ooaoo 1.084 10.0W Euless 11.6W MS11.6W WFD11.t aBP 6768.00 CI 10 0.Q0340 1.281 Euless 11.8W 2460W
WF011 SSP 12767.50 24 0.00408 14.4139 24 0.00410 14,524Euless----11.SW Fort Worth 10.5W 2470W WF"011 SSP 13121,76 euv 12 0.08160 10,180 Bedford 11.9W 2860W WF013.1 BBRI 20.00 EndofUtie
12 0.01450 4,302 Euless 1S.OW Bedford 1S.OW 3720W WFO't7 TJO 2156.00 City 12 0.00339 2.080 Bedford 15,5W MS15.5W WF018.1 HOT 1142.32 CI 12 0.00300 1.957 Bodford lS.0W 3760W WF016 HOT
2821.85 CI1'; 18 0.00340 SEuless 1B.5W Bedford 17.0W 33:lOW WRll6 BOT 8783.00 10 0.00850 2.025 10 0.00400 1'.-Euless 1B.OW Bedford lB.1W 3539W WF014B EOS 650.00 12 0.00317 2.011 12 0.32000
20.209 Hurst 18.6VV MS18.6W WF014A.3 EOSB 3525.65 City 10 0.02000 3.101 Bedford 19.0W 3850W WF019 SST 1560.00 18 0.01980 14.821 is 0.00340 6.142 Bodford 19.1W 3400W WF014A EO$B 2747.16
sa 0.00440 44.352 27 0.00440 20.599 '5.OJ NIInmon 7.OJ 1810J JT008 CWRA 20372.81 City 30 0.00550 30.501 􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠Min on 8.OJ MS8.0J JIOO1 cwes 113$0.00 21 0.00100 6.024 21 0.00802 14.228
IDalias [3.OM'-' Duncanville 4.5M MS4.5M MCD02.1 MC2 148.00 CI1Y 15 0.Q1350 7.526 Grand Pralne 5,1M 380M MCD06 FCCP 18.00 60 0.00150 101.140 60 0.00150 101.140 Grand Pmlrie 5.3M 2120M
MC004 EMCR 109.20 30 0.00100 13.006 27 O.Q0266 16.016 -H 2290M MC012 NEL 29700.00 FM 24 0.02401 35.148 15.1M .OM 1060M MCD07 NFFC 16340.00 27 0.00280 15.834 27 0.00280 15.834 9.oM B030M
MC005 SFFeR 953.50 30 O.OO4()O 26.011 30 0.00400 26.011 Arlington B.8M 1950M Moo10 80WeR 4558.00 sa 0.00219 31.297 31! 0.00220 31.369 L...-__-'--_-=M...."'.JI",lri 1o.QM lS40M MCtlO9
WeT 17987.61 27 0.00075 8.504 27 0.00075 8.504I5/41'2004 DI1tntlll3.x1s 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHOD 2 The following is a description of Method 2 for prorating CRWS interceptor infiltration/inflow (III) to the contracting
party flows. 1. Determine the annual volume of III for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -ADDF =III (annually). The use of delta meter subsystem values assumes that
the annual average 1/1 per idm for the CRWS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
of non-delta meters are considered to be lines required to serve the metered city, regardless of ownership. The evaluation of III annually will provide a trending to account for almual
rainfall, III reduction in the CRWS and the city collection systems, and any other changes in the condition of the systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diarneter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually, or assumed assumed to remain the same for a period of three to five years. 3. Determine the CRWS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. ) 4. Determine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No.1 divided by the sum of No.2 and No.3). 5. Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The
adjusted interceptor idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope of the existing CRWS interceptor
segments from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor size in excess of the size required for the upstream city is considered to be required to serve the delta
metered city, regardless of ownership. 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied by No.5). 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution
Based on Actual Flow for each of the contracting parties. 8. Adjust the Distribution of Fiscal Year Actual Aunual Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each of the contracting parties.

., ..... ) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the
total number of days in the year. . The average daily dry weather flow (ADDF) is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow recorded during the year. The following criteria are
established for the analysis of the flows used to determine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptor III proration. 1. The beginning of the fiscal year for flow recordings may result in
partial inclusion of the first seven day average meter recording. Partial seven day average meter recordings consisting of less than four (4) days will not be considered for use as theADDF.
2. During the year, there may be a need to adjust the recorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include, but not be limited to line blockage or year-to-date (YTD) adjustments.
Adjusted flows will not be considered for use as ADDF. 
􀁾􀁇􀁅􀁎􀁄􀁁􀀠ITEM V·D July 12, 2004 (Previous report August 6, 2003) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT * & .. PLANNING and
OTHER ACTIVITIES Name: Status: Name: Type: Status: Name: Type: Status: Name: Type: Status: Name: Type: Status: Name: Type: Status: 2004 Series Bond Sale Completed 2001 Five Year Plan
Update in January 2001 Submitted 2004 IUP to TWDB in March 2063 Approved by TWDB to submit loan application in October 2003 Authorized APAI to prepare Engineering report in April 2004
Work approx. 75% complete Authorized to prepare POS for bond sale in April 2004 Authorized to submit TWDB loan application by August 31, 2004 Anticipated Bond Sale in 2004 I and I Management
Plan -Phase IV Flow and Rainfall Data Collection and Evaluation Contract awarded in December 2001 Final report in progress Work is approximately 96% complete Wet Weather Flow EvalUation
Evaluation of Technologies and Alternatives Contract awarded in 2001 Work is approximately 95% complete Oxygen Feed Pilot Study Qxygen Pilot Study, Odor Survey and MonitOring . Contract
awarded in 2002 Odor surveys and data collection complete Work is approximately 99% complete Phase IV Master Plan Project Master Plan Report Contract awarded in 2002 Work is approximately
96% complete GIS Implementation Plan Software Purchase, Development, and Installation Contract awarded in 2003 Installed GIS SoftwarelTraining in early 2004 Developing Software linkages
in progress Work is approximately 68% complete 1 
-\ Location: Type: Status: Cities of Farmers Branch and Dallas North of Spur 348 to 1-635 72" parallel relief of 12,900 ft. 72" diameter pipeline Design initiated in August 1998 Design
65% complete Easement acquisition to begin in 2002 AntiCipated construction award by 2005 MOUNTAIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status:
Name: Location: Type: Status: Kirby Creek Outfafllnterceptor City of Grand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest Parkway Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment
of 20,500 ft. of 12" to 24" line Preliminary DeSign Contract awarded in August 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed August 1999 Environmental Assessment completed by March 2001
Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work is 94% complete Final Design initiated in late 2002 Final Design is 73% complete Easement acquisition in progress Anticipated construction
award in 2004 MCKC II Rehabilitation City of Grand Prairie Upstream of LS 4 along Mountain Creek Lake Rehab 4,650 ft. of 30" diameter pipeline Design work initiated in 2001 ESA approved
in 2004 Design 100% complete Easement acquisition completed in 2004 Anticipated construction award by August 2004 Jefferson Avenue Pipeline City of Grand Prairie From Mountain Creek
near Loop 12 to SE 14th Street Preliminary Engineering Study ofapproximately 20,000 ft. of 30· diameter line Preliminary Design Contract awarded in 2003 Study <10% complete Anticipated
construction award in 2005 .. 3 
Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment completed March 2000 Engineering evaluations & negotiation of pipeline relocation, November 1999 to December 2001 Revised draft environmental
assessment completed in April 2001 Revised pipeline alignment in summer 2001 Additional Archeological Investigations completed in June 2003 Design 81% complete Easement acquisition begun
in late 2001 Anticipated construction award in late 2004 PLANT AND OTHER SYSTEM PROJECTS Name: Pump Stations 6, 7, and 13 Evaluatlon(thls is finished) Type: Planning, Design, and Testing
Status: Contract awarded in eariy 2003 Work is approximately 98% complete Name: Class A Bio-Solids Stabilization Type: Design Report and Construction Services Status: Contract awarded
in early 2003 Work is approximately 89% complete Name: FY2004 Interceptor III Proration Type: 10M and III Flow Adjustment Status: Contract awarded in 2003 Work is approximately <5% complete
5 
Name: Location: Type: Status: ) Construction 80% complete Construction to be completed by September 2004 West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF-C. N. B. P. & M City of Arlington From West
of Hwy. 360 to west of Collins Street 72" parallel relief of existing 54" & 60" lines Design initiated in 1996 Design completed in December 1998 EA completed by December 1998 Construction
contract awarded in December 1998 Construction 97% complete Construction to be completed by end of 2004 PLANT PROJETS Name: Location: Type: Status: Bar Screening Improvements. Phase
I and II PS 6/6A Plant Design of Phase I is 100% complete Design of Phase II is 100% complete Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction 86% complete Construction to be
completed by August 2004 List of Construction Project Improvements Completed since August 2003 Report Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Little Bear Creek
CO-1/GV-4 City of Hurst East of Precinct Road, north of SP RRlWest of Hwy 121 & north of Glade Rehabilitation of 1500 ft. of 12" diameter line/200 ft. line repair Project added to BC
Rehab. in 1998 . Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement arid permit acquisition completed in July 2001 Construction awarded in October 2001 Construction completed in 2004 West
Fork Interceptor. Johnson Branch Relocation City of Grand Prairie Design and Construction Phase Engineering Design awarded in early 2003 Draft Environmental Assessment completed Design
is 100% complete Elm Fork Interceptor. MS 15.0E 7 
'Based on April 04 ESA Report "Based on May 04 Construction Report 9 
,1___,_____ Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas AGENDA ITEM VI ffi DATE: August 10,2004 FILE: 3110.102/3110.800 TO; MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITIEE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM RE: Central
Regional Wastewater System Proposed FY 2005 Budget Authority management annually prepares a proposed budget of anticipated expenses and required revenues for the Central Regional Wastewater
System in accordance with the fiscal provisions of our Wastewater Services Contract for the ensuing fiscal year. We are pleased to present to you the proposed FY 2005 Budget for the
annual operating funds of the Central System. This budget is relevant to the time period for December 1, 2004 through November 30, 2005. This budget reflects the proposed financial activities
of operating and debt service funds, provides for our continuing ability to deliver high quality, efficient wastewater service to our Contracting Parties, and will continue to position
the Central System for increased growth, regulatory changes and maximized internal operational productivity measures to result in cost efficient wastewater treatment. The Authority will
continue the efforts established in 2002 to ensure the security and integrity of our Central System and the reliability of our services. Therefore, the budget reflects the Authority's
continued commitment to protect capital investments, keep operational expenses to a minimum and to maximize the process of increasing operational efficiency throughout the Authority.
A brief overview of Central's financial picture for FY 2005 will reveal a slight increase in overall System expenditures, with only those increases in operating accounts required to
meet contractual obligations for our treatment of wastewater, as compared to FY 2004 projected requirements. The operation and maintenance expenditures were developed based on transporting
and treating an average daily flow of 151.247 MGD. The scheduled debt service requirements are slightly higher than the current budget, which reflects savings due to the issuance of
the Series 1993 Refunding Bonds, and are based on prinCipal and interest payments due on outstanding Central Regional Wastewater System Revenue Bonds. The anticipated expenditures in
FY 2005 total $58,421,590, an approximate 1.0% increase above the $57,839,230 predicted for the current fiscal year. The projected costs for salaries and related benefits, dues, maintenance
and operating supplies, laboratory supplies, process chemicals, fuel, audit, Expenses 􀁾􀀠.' Authority's computer network, process SCADA and maintenance 1154.17% Debt S$f'Iica and M&eellal'lOOUs
02311% Other Services and Charges .15..59% Petson.aJ Services management support services, professional services, postage, Project .5.6T%Supplies • t,-lO% Gapltal Outlaysinsurance payments,
utilities, collection system, equipment, plant/building and electrical maintenance, off-site 
August 10, 2004 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER. ADVISORY COMMITIEE Page 2 biosolids disposal, administrative overhead and capital outlay expenses essential to delivering services during the
year have increased $1.264.110, along with an increase of $52.200 over the current fiscal year in programmed debt services. The increases in the proposed FY 2005 Budget for operating
accounts is partly offset by a $733,950 reduction in service cost for power usage expenses due to a new energy contract which provides the Authority a lower price per kWh, as well as
in other operating category accounts due to program modifications and, as in previous year's efforts, by holding the line on controllable costs. During this ongoing weak economic climate,
Authority management continues our commitment of aggressive decisions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our business services and move toward deeper cost reductions, as
close scrutiny was given to all antiCipated and discretionary expenditures, resulting in an overall projected increase of $582,360 for FY 2005 expenditures above the FY 2004 Budget.
As is shown in the following table. the predicted gross and net unit costs/1,000 gallons are slightly higher than last year's projections for the coming FY 2005. Anticipated FY 2005
revenues from the System's Contracting Parties, totaling $55.735,040, reflects less than a one percent increase above the FY 2004 Revenueprojected revenue requirement of $55,193,770.
System revenue requirements are allocated to the cities 1194,93% Contract Reventle 01,59% Operating Overhead & IOfer·Fund Sefi'ieeson the basiS of city predicted flow .1,39% Miscellaneous
Income .0,98% Interest Incomecontribution. The predicted FY 2005 110.94% Profess!onal Fees 110.17% Operating TrallSfer$flow contribution of 151.247 is 2.761 MGD. or 1.79%, less than
we forecast for FY 2005 one year ago. The resulting predicted gross and net unit costs of service for wastewater transportation and treatment throughout FY 2005 are both 1.3% over the
respective predicted FY 2004 budgeted unit costs as reflected in the following table: it ,-. 
August 10, 2004 3110.102/3110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 3 The following exhibits are presented to provide flow allocations, a summary of budget objectives and detailed information
about the five major budget categories, as well as additional quantitative and statistical information for your review: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit
G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Flow Allocations Budget Objectives Budget at a Glance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous
Historical System Data Projected Future Costs of Service The proposed FY 2005 Budget (Exhibit K) is presented for your review and consideration and will be discussed in the August 10,
2004 Advisory Committee meeting. Additionally, a Budget Workshop will be held in the upstairs conference room of the Administrative Building at the Central Regional Wastewater System
on Wednesday, September 1, 2004, beginning at 10:00 a.m. for those representatives and city staff members who do not attend the Advisory Committee meeting or desire to discuss the proposed
budget in more detail. A later Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 14th, at which time the committee will be requested to recommend the proposed FY 2005 Budget
for adoption by the Authority's Board of Directors. If there are any questions concerning the proposed budget or the workshop, please contact the 6It":off;U PATRICIA M. CLEVELAND Manager,
Operations Northern Region PMC/rrr Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager, Northern Region Bill Tatum, Project Manager, Central Regional Wastewater
System 
EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2005 FLOW ALLOCA nONS GIIY fY 2004 I-Y 2004 I t-Y 2000 II FY 200b I % mON IFLOWIMGD1,11% ,TION 2.280 1.00tl% 2.280 1I\OROk. nVlV 46.370
42.636 28.190% 4.900 3.241% 4.900 3.240% .TQN 13.700 14.100 : HILL 0.324 0.214% 0.360 n 7::18% ,YVILLE 2.550 1.686% 2.570 1 i99% 􀀧􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀠I 4.200 2.778% 4.250 􀁾􀀠8.250 1 R?ROfn 9.000
5.151% ... 1 2.310 2.310 1.527% )UN( F 0.200 0.132% 0.200 0.132% lEULESS 􀁾􀀠4.2 5 2. 827'lA 4.271 􀀲􀀮􀀸􀀲􀀵􀁾􀀠6.7 J 4.431 "A 6.70( 􀀡􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁲􀀠1.5 J 1 041\°' 1.501 􀀰􀀮􀀹􀀹􀀲􀁾􀀠15.512
, ?fiQ°;' 17.600 11.637% 1.811 1.198% 1.621 1.072 HIIR5i '.2107 1.137' 1.215 0.142 6.5 00 .7ge 10 1 .78E % ,KFII FR .654 .755' .715 1.795% IN 􀁒􀁉􀁃􀁈􀁾􀁈􀁲􀁌􀁌􀁓􀀠4.125 2.728% 4.275
􀁾􀁾0.660 0.437% 0.680 SOUTHIAKF 1.700 1.124% 2.160 1.42 % lV''',151.208 100000% 1{ BUDGETED FY 2005 FLOWS 􀀴􀀵􀀥􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬
􀀠40%+--zn----........􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻f:: 􀀳􀀵􀀥􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀥􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠..J 􀀳􀀰􀀥􀀫􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁟􀀬􀁷􀁲􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠25% -20% -o f..J o 15% -Cl 􀁾􀀠z gj t§10% 􀁾􀀠'?Q C5 5% %-+ 0% 􀁾􀀠LL 􀁾􀀠z :> en CUSTOMER CITY 
EXHIBIT B CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2005 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Trinity River Authority's Central Regional Wastewater System is a large regional wastewater system
located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River and is currently serving approximately 1.3 million customers in Dallas, Tarrant, Ellis, Johnson and Denton counties
of north central Texas. The service area encompasses all or portions of 20 cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The Central
Regional Wastewater System treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons per day (MGD). This System consists of an extensive regional
network of interceptors, pipelines, lift stations,meter stations, and facilities for the delivery of treated effluent for golf course irrigation and lake level management under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2005 The Authority's objectives objectives are reflected in the recommended Annual Operating Budget for Central Regional Wastewater System FY 2005. The major goals
and objectives are: • Operate and adequately protect the Central System's capital investments by proper maintenance, which includes a 162 MGD treatment plant, over 200 miles of interceptors,
four lift stations, 138 metering stations, an analytical laboratory, and the DCURD water reuse project. • Provide wastewater transportation and treatment services for a projected flow
contribution of 151.247 MGD. • Continue operating at efficient levels and minimize unit costs while enhancing treatment capacity and meeting all regulatory requirements. • Continue Authority
efforts to reduce overall wet-weather flow impacts to the System by installing new pipelines for capacity, rehabilitating existing collection system infrastructure and plant facilities
as identified in the first and second phases of the 1998 Five Year Plan; funded by the Series 1998A Revenue Bonds, the third phase funded by the Series 2001 Bonds and the 2003 Refunding
Bonds. • Operate and maintain odor control facilities consistent with the Odor Control Abatement Master Plan and implement additional odor improvements in the primary treatment areas
to reduce risk of adjacent area odors. • Provide Contracting Parties laboratory testing and pretreatment program capabilities and services on a revenue-supported basis. • Continue 100%
land application of System biosolids under a five-year agreement. • Respond in a timely fashion to Customer Cities' requests for assistance. 
EXHIBITC FISCAL YEAR 2005 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $58,713,230 Expenses $58,421,590 Variance (Retained
for FY 2006 Debt Requirements) $291,640 Revenue .94.93% Contract Revenue 01.59% Operating Overhead & Inter,Fund Services .1,39% Miscellaneous Income .0.98% Interest Income .0.94% Professional
Fees .0.17% Operating Transfers Expenses .54.17% Debt Service and Miscellaneous 023.17% other Services and Charges .15.59% Persona! Services .5.67% Supplies .1.40% Capital Outlays FISCAL
YEAR 2005 FUND SUMMARY Revenue Summary Contract Revenue $55,735,040 Operating Overhead and Inter-Fund Services $934,150 Professional Fees $550,000 Interest Income $573,850 Operating
Transfers $102,000 Miscellaneous Income $818,190 Total Sources of Funds $58,713,230 Expenditure Summary Personal Services $9,104,600 Supplies $3,312,970 Other Services and Charges $13,538,260
Capital Outlays $817,200 Debt Service and Miscellaneous $31,646,560 Total Application of Funds $58,421,590 
EXHIBIT D CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PERSONAL SERVICES FY 2005 Cl Proposed FY 2005 of $9,104,600 vs Current FY 2004 of $8,791 ,200 = Variance (+) $313,400 or (+) 3.6%. Cl The
budget category of Personal Services includes seven line item accounts. As compared with present 􀁢􀁵􀁤􀁧􀁥􀁾􀀠one line item account remained unchanged (Unemployment Compensation), one
decreased (-) $2,060 (Education), and five increased (+) $315,460 (Salaries, FICA, Health/Life Insurance, PenSion, and Employee Service Recognition). o The anticipated increase in salaries
and related benefit costs is partly due to usual provisions for forecast salary adjustments based on merit, varying with each individual employee. Also, provisions are included for cost
increases in the Authority's Health Insurance expenses due to claims experience that has resulted in premium increases. Cl Authority management believes that the Central facility can
be operated efficiently and maintain adequate margins of safety with one Project Manager, an Operations/Maintenance staff of 97, plus 53 Technical Services/Pretreatment staff, Administrative
staff of 9, and 7 PurchasinglWarehouse staff. Personal Services 15.59% t Personal Services expenditures include those costs associated with the staffing required to operate, maintain,
and administer the treatment plant, biosolids program, laboratory, pretreatment program, collection system, and meter stations. Significant line item accounts in this category of expenditures
include salaries, payroll taxes, health insurance, and pension. 
EXHIBITE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM SUPPLIES FY2005 Q Proposed FY 2005 of$ 3,312,970 VS Current FY 2004 of $3,173,040 = Variance (+) $139,930 or (+) 4.4%. Q The budget category
of Supplies includes eight line items accounts. As compared with the present 􀁢􀁵􀁤􀁧􀁥􀁾􀀠three decreased (-) $6,260 (Office Supplies, TCEQ Certification Fees, and Computer Software
Licenses) and the remaining five line items increased (+) $146,190. Q Over 67% of the expenditures for Supplies is for the purchase of process chemicals, The increase of $75,930 in anticipated
process chemical expenditures is mainly associated with a modification in process use of iron salts, which is necessary for for odor and corrosion control. Q Included in the Computer
Software, Licenses and Instrument Supplies account is the Project's third year share of an Authoritywide Enterprise Resource Planning software which merged finanCial, payroll, human
resources, budget reporting, asset management, and purchasing into one integrated system, The cost to purchase and implement began in FY 2003 budgeting process for phaSing over a three-year
period (2003-2005). Expenses 5,67% Approximately 67% of the expenditures in this category are for the purchase of process chemicals necessary for sludge thickening, dewatering and stabilization,
odor control, effluent disinfection and dechlorialion, and other treatment processes. 
EXHIBIT F CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES FY 2005 <l Proposed FY 2005 of $13,538,260 vs Current FY 2004 of $13,535,730 = Variance (+) $2,530 or + 0.02%.
Other Services and Charges <l The budget category of Other Services and Charges includes 22 line item accounts. As compared with the present budget, two remained unchanged, (Legal and
Training), eight line item accounts decreased (-) $725,630 and twelve increased (+) $728,160. <l The decreases in this category are due to reductions in engineering services, telephone,
printing, employee travel, laundry and uniforms, power usage, repair and maintenance of vehicles, and equipment rental. Approximately 37% or $4,953,740 of the expenditures in this category
is for power usage. This has decreased 12.2% or (-) $686,220 due to lower price per kWh of a new Authority-wide energy contract for the time period of June 1,2004 through May 30, 2006.
This category of expenditures relates to the indirect costs associated with the collection and treatment system, vehicles, and off-site biosolids disposal. <l This category of expenditures
includes increases in auditing, the Authority's computer network and computer, process SCADA, maintenance management system and Lawson support services, professional services, postage,
Project insurance payments, water usage, repair and maintenance of the collection system, equipment, plant and buildings, and electrical systems. off-site biosolids land application,
and administrative overhead. 
EXHIBITG CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL OUTLAYS FY2005 􀁾􀀠 Proposed FY 2005 of $817,200 vs. Current FY 2004 of $742,900" Capital Outlays Variance (+) $ 74,300 or (+) 10.00%.
􀁾􀀠 The Capital Outlays category can vary significantly from year to year as major equipment is only purchased on an annual as needed basis. 􀁾􀀠 This category consists of 94% or $768,150
of capital expenditures for replacement items and 6% or $49,050 of new capital equipment items proposed for purchase in FY 2005. 􀁾􀀠 Approximately 84% or $642,050 of the proposed Capital
Outlay items for replacement are for a grease hauling tractor, vactor truck, four utility carts, a collection system Non utility truck and one Pretreatment truck with camper, which all
have excessive mileage and wear due to age, the The category of Capital Outlays consists of the replacement of corroded water chillers for the Solids Control and purchase of machinery
and equipment to achieve Administrative/Lab buildings, and twelve flow meters. a new purpose or replace existing equipment. 􀁾􀀠 Under the category of new proposed items, approximately
91% or $44,450 is for the procurement of several items related to the maintenance of the Collection System. 􀁾􀀠 A list of all the prOjected capital expenditures is on pages 28 and 29
of the attached proposed FY 2005 Budget. 
EXHIBIT H CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS FY 2005 Q Proposed FY 2005 of $31,648,560 vs. Current FY 2004 of $31,596,360 = Variance (+) $52,200 or (+)
0.17%. Q The amount budgeted for Debt Service reflects the fixed and established schedules based on outstanding debt of the Central System. Q In June 1995, the Authority issued $43,515,000
in System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various system improvements identified in the 5 Year Plan. Q In July 1998, the Authority issued $50,845,000 in System
Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects. These bonds were improvement projects. These bonds were purchased by
the Texas Water Development Board. Q In September 1998, the Authority issued $66,950,000 in System Improvement and Refunding Bonds, with $61,375,000 being refunded, producing a savings
of $2.7 million through the life of the bond. Q In July 2001, the Authority issued $88,225,000 in System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation
and plant improvement projecta. These bonds were purchased by the Texas Water Development Board. Q In January 2003, the Authority issued $135,885,000 in Revenue Refunding Bonds to retire
the Series 1993 Bonds, producing a sevings of $ 11,731,109 through the life of the bonds. Debt Services and Miscellaneous t 54.17% Debt Services and Miscellaneous includes the annual
principal and interest payments due on the System bonds and the associated paying agent fees. Typically, annual prinCipal and interest payments are structured to provide relatively level
debt service requirements from year to year until such time as additional bonds are issued. 
EXHIBIT J CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJECTED FUTURE COST OF SERVICE 151 1 143 162.41 165.21 .279 2005 2007 2009 .010 '--" T,,086 II .215 .284 NOTES: (1) NET COST IS PROJECTED
TO BE 95% OF GROSS COST BASED UPON HISTORICAL TRENDS FOR FY 2006 THROUGH FY 2010. (2) UNIT COST CALCULATION FOR FY 2006 THROUGH FY 2010 INCLUDES PROJECTED ADDITIONAL DEBT TO FINANCE
PLANT AND COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. (3) FLOW PROJECTIONS FOR FY 2005 ARE BASED ON CUSTOMER CITY PROJECTIONS. FLOW PROJECTIONS FOR FY 2006 THROUGH FY 2010 ARE BASED ON THE PHASE
IV III ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY BLACK AND VEATCH. 
) EXHIBIT K TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET. FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Description of the Project The Central Regional
Wastewater System (CRWS) consists of a treatment plant and appurtenances rated at 162 Million Gallons Per Day (MGD), Interceptor pipelines, lift staUons, meter stations, and facilities
for the delivery of treated effluent for Irrigation and level control under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. CRWS provides wastewater transportation and treatment for the
ClUes of Irving, Grand Prairie, Farmers Branch, Dallas, Carrollton. Coppell. Ceder Hili. Euless, Bedford, Fort Worth, Arlington, Colleyville, Dallas/Fort Worth IntemaUonal Airport, Grapevine,
Mansfield, Hurst, North Richland Hills, Duncanville, Southlake, Keller, and Addison. The eslfmated average daiiyvolume of wastewater predlcted'to be received from the contributing clUes
in Fiscal Year 2005 Is 151.247 Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD). 2005 2004 Percent Amount Percent Amount 􀁾􀀠Conlributlon Ml2.Q Contribution MGD Addison 1.508% 2.280 1.508% 2.280 Arlington
28.190% 42.636 30.666% 46.370 Bedford 3.240% 4.900 3.241% 4.900 Carrollton 9.322% 14.100 9.060% 13.700 Cedar HIli 0.238% 0.380 0.214% 0.324 Colleyville 1.699% 2.570 1.686% 2.550 Coppell
2.810% 4.250 2.778% 4.200 D/FW Airport 1.527% 2.310 1.528% 2.310 Dallas 5.951% 9.000 5.456% 8.250 Duncanville 0.132% 0.200 0.132% 0.200 Euless 2.826% 4.275 2.B27% 4.275 Farmers Branch
4.430% 6.700 4.431% 6.700 Fort Worth 0.992% 1.500 1.045% 1.580 Grand Prairie 11.637% 17.600 10.259% 15.512 Grapevine 1.072% 1.621 1.198% 1.B11 Hurst 0.142% 0.215 0.137% 0.207 Irving
17.785% 26.900 17.790% 26.900 Keller 1.795% 2.715 1.755% 2.654 Mansfield 2.826% 4.275 2.728% 4.125 North Richland Hills 0.450% 0.680 0.437% 0.680 Soullliake 1.428% ;u§Q 1.124% 1.700
Tolals 100 000% 151.247 100,000% 151.208 Located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River. the CRWS Facility Initiated operation in December 1959, Initially serving
four cities. The original plant consisted of a trickling filter process with a capacity of 30 MGD. The capacity was Increased 10 80 MGD In 1976 by the addition of mechanical dewatering
equipment and an actlvated sludge process. In 19BO, a two phase expansion program was completed that increased the capacity to 100 MGD and provided tertiary treatment. Growth In the
service area resulted In the expansion of the CRWS facility to a capacity of 135 MGD, with construction initiated In 19S8 and completed In early 1994. Effluent discharged from CRWS consistently
meets or exceeds the requirements specified In the TPDES permit Issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). TCEQ approved an upratlng of the discharge permit 10 an
effluantlevel of 162 MGD with the complelion ofthe solids dewatering project on April 1,2001. Page 1 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET. FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Work Program To maintain and operate the Central Plant on a
24-hour a day, 7-day a week basis requires a staff of three (3) department managers reporting to the Project Manager. In addition to the management staff (4), including purchasing and
the inventory department, staffing is as follows: System Operalion and Maintenance 96 Administration Services 8 Technical Services 44 Northern Region Purchasing 7 Pretreatment 11 163
The responsibility for selecting process parameters, actual treatment of wastewater, process and non-process equipment maintenance, maintenance, repair of electrical and electronic equipment,
lift station maintenance sludge disposal and computer monitoring of plant processes lies with the Manager, System Operations, and the Operation and Maintenance Department. The Manager,
Administrative Services and staff provide support at Ihe Cenlral System in the areas of human resource administration, benefits, training, clerical, accounts payable, payroll, and capital
asset control and data processing. The Manager, Technical Services and slaff provide analytical data for process control, influent monitoring and effluent quality reports. The laboratory
and Pretreatment Programs provide analytical and technical assistance to cities, state, and/or federal agencies and other TRA Projects on a contract basis. Engineering Services provide
inspection and surveillance of the collection system and monitoring of flows from the Cities into the Central System. Page 2 
-, TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM TOTAL FUND SUMMARY FUNDS 􀁁􀁖􀁁􀁬􀁾􀁂􀁌􀁅􀀠Projected December 1, 2004 $ 17,336,160
ESTIMATED SOURCES Of fUNDS Contract Revenue $ 55,735,040 Inter-Fund Services & Charges 530,790 Operating Overhead 403,360 Professional Fees 550,000 Interest Income 573,850 Operating
Transfers 102,000 Miscellaneous Income ____􀁊􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀱􀀹􀀰􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀷􀁊􀀳􀀬􀀲􀀳􀀰􀀠TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 76,049,390 .!'STlMATIi:!;! APPLI!08 TION QF FU!::lDS Appropriation Expenditures:
Personal Services $ 9,104,600 Supplies 3',312,970 Other Services and Charges 13,538,260 Capital Outlays 817,200 Debt Service and Miscellaneous 􀁟􀁾􀀱􀀬􀀶􀀴􀀸􀀬􀂧􀀶􀀰􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀬􀀵􀀹􀀰􀀠.
TOTAL FUNDS APPLIED $ 58,421,590 fUNDS AVAILABLE Projected November 30, 20G5 $ 17,627,800 Page 3 
'! TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGer -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT PESCRIPTION OF REVENUE 2005 BUDGET 20Q4BUDGET
!<QtlTRA!d A/'lQ geliiB&I!I:l!l 0lllilBtlEAD B§!El:lYfl (301) Contract Revenue -Addison $ 840,480 $ 832,320 (301) Contract Revenue· Allington 15,711,720 16,925,720 (301) Contract Revenue·
Bedford 1,805,820 1,788,830 (301) Contract Revenue· Carrollton 5,195,620 5,000,560 (301) Contract Revenue -Cedar HIli 132,650 118,110 (301) Contract Revenue· Colleyvtlle 946,940 930,570
(301) Contract Revenue -Coppell 1,566,160 1,533,280 (301) Coritract Revenue -DIFW Airport 851,070 843.360 (301) Contract Revenue -Dallas 3,316,790 3.011,370 (301) Contract Revenue· Duncanville
73,570 72,860 (301) Contract Revenue· Euless 1,575,070 1,550,330 (301) Contract Revenue -Farmers Branch 2,469,060 2.445,640 (301) Contract Revenue -Fort Worth 552,890 576,770 (301) Contract
Revenue· Grand Prairie 6,485.890 5.662,330 (301) Contract Revenue -Grap,}IIlne 597,480 861.220 (301) Contract Revenue -Hurst 79,140 76,610 (301) Contract Revenue -Irving 9,912,480 9,818,970
(301) Contract Revenue· Keller 1,000,440 968,650 (301) Contract Revenue -Mansfield. 1,575,070 1,505,690 (301) Contract Revenue -North Richland Hills 250,B10 241,200 (301) Contract Revenue
-Southlake ·795,900 620.360 (338) Inter-Fund Services & Charges 530,790 514.340 (339) Operallll9 Ovemead • Other Projects 403,360 435,550 TOTAL CONTRACT AND OPERATING OVERHEAD REVENUE
56,669,200 56,143,660 eROFESSIONAL FEES (398) ProfeSlllonal Fees 550,000 500.000 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES 550.000 500,000 . II:lTEREST II:lCOME (380)lntel'est Income Interest & SlnIdng
Fund 131.800 114,800 (380) Intemet Income· Reserve Fund 377,500 439.600 (380) lotemst Income· Revenue Fund 53,$50 44,300 (360) Interest Income • 􀁅􀁭􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁣􀁹􀀠11,000 11,000 TOTAL
INTEREST INCOME 573,850 609,700􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠2003 ACTUAL $ 821,969 15,783,236 1,776,970 5.241,583 126,054 944,846 1.507,926 718,870 3,687,930 69,675 1.355,077 2.342,176 392.401 5,147,470 569.992
74.439 9,531,939 859,189 1,373.403 255,752 772.812 253.293 486,624 . 54,093,625. 546,570 546,570 263.551 464,637 107,102 18,754 854,044􀁾􀀠Pege4 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE PROPOSED 20D5BUDGET CURRENT 20AABUDGET
2003 ACTUAL QPSRATIf:jG TRAf:l§FIlBS (372) Operating Transfers -Risk Retention 102,000 118,000 258.440 TOTAL OPERAnNG TRANSFERS 102,000 118,000 258,440 MISCgbl;AtllllOUS 􀁉􀁴􀁬􀁾􀁑􀁍􀁧􀀠(340)
Overstrenglh Surcharge (343) Pretreatment Revenue (344) Commodity Charge (348) Quantity Surcharge (399) Miscellaneous Income $ 700,000 25,000 53,770 29,420 10,000 $ 650,000 25,000 48,800
29,100 10,000 $ 680,882 43,374 95,671 15,649 47,283 TOTAl. MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 818.100 762.000 882.859 GRAND TOTAL $ 58,713,240 58,134,260 56,635,538! 1 Paga5 
􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁾TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT PESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE
2005 BUDGET 2004 BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES (400) Salaries -Regular $ 6,739,040 $ 6,645,060 (402) Payroll Taxes -Fica 515,540 508,350 (403) Emp. Ben -Health/life Ins. 1,025,480 831,930
(404) Employee Benefit -Pension 781,000 761,650 (406) Unemployment Compensation 20,000 20,000 (407) Emp. Recognition Program 20,000 18,610 (408) Employee Benefit -Education 3,540 • ____
􀁾􀀶􀀰􀀰􀀠TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 9,104,600 8,791i200 SUPPLIES (410) Office Supplies 43,630 45,900 (411) Dues and Subscriptions 61,340 54,810 (412) Fees OlherThan Dues and Subscriptions
79,710 79,810 (413) Maintenance and Operating Supplies 189,800 162,750 (414) Lab Supplies 308,600 297,950 (415) Process Chemicals and Supplies 2,220,800 2,144,870 (416) Fuel, Oil, &
Lubricants 120,350 94,320 (417) Computer Software, Lic. & Inslr. Supplies 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀸􀀸􀀬􀀷􀀴􀀰􀀠􀀠292,630 TOTAL SUPPLIES __.3..c31 2,970 3,.173,040 OIl:!sB SERYICjiS AND CHARGjiS . (420)
Auditing 41,000 37,500 (421) Engineering 248,010 259,500 (422) legal 20,000 20,000 (423) Outside Services 683,090 577,630 (424) Other Professional Services 164,130 148,600 (430) Telephone
and Telemelering 90,530 98,760 (431) Postage 9,720 8,520 (4.32) PrinUng and Binding 6,000 7,300 (433) Insurance Payments 320,460 299,960 (436) Travel 18,500 19,300 (437) Laundry, Uniform,
& Ind. Equip 47,910 49,070 (438) Training 55,700 55,700 (440) Utilities 120,000 110,000 (442) Power 4,953,740 5,639,960 (443) R & M -Collection System 654,200 388,240 (444) R 8o.M -Equipment
179,96P 168,790 (445) R & M -Plant & Buildings 792,220 691,520 (446) R & M -Vehicles 39,400 40,860 (448) R & M -Electrical 561,000 514,000 (449) Off-site Blosolld Land Application 2,585,540
2,563,870 (451) Rent -Machinery & EqUip. 69,130 84,100 (466) Administrative Overhead 1,878,020 ___1,752,550 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES __ 13,538,260 13,535,730 2003A<;:IUAl $ 6,743,147
496,687 585,003 645,846 7,366 16,921 􀁟􀁾􀁾__ill 8,495,712 46,700 81,618 12,025 188,797 305,492 2,049,523 113,581 .._._..􀁾􀀶􀀱􀀠3,089,197 37,500 358,420 640. 486,564 222,458 86,088
9,710 3,528 271,187 17,212 39,844 33,163 119,556 4,274,870 630,122 221,339 758,586 36,246 666,987 2,385,768 47,5c77. 1,754,570 12,461,935 Page 6 
( ) TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2005 BUDGET
20{)4 BUDGET CAPITAL OUTLAYS (474) Improvements OIT Buildings $ $ (476) Machinery & Equipment 817,200 742,900 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 817,200 742,900 2003 ACTUAL $ 3,025 899,343 902,368
DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLAt:!EOUS (480) Bond Principal Payments (481) Interest on long·Term Debt (483) Paying Agent Fees (486) SEC Disclosure Fees TOTAL DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS'
GRAND TOTAL 18,180,000 13,453,060 5,000 10,500 31,648,560 $ 58,421,590 17,295,000 14,285,860 5,000 10,500 31,596,360 $ 57,839,230 18,275,000 12,874,002 1,662 31,150,664 $ 56,099,876
Page 7 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE WORKSHEET ( PROPOSED CONTRACT REVENUE 2005 BUDGET Operation & Maintenance
Total Expenditures $ 26,788,530.00 Less Other Revenue Sources: Inter-Fund Services & Charges (530,790.00) Operating Overhead (403,360.00) Professional Fees (550,000.00) Pretreatment
Revenue (25,000.00) Commodity Charge (53,770.00) Operating Transfers & Misc. (112,000.00) Overstrength Surcharge (700,000.00) Zone B & Quantity Surcharge 􀁾􀀲􀀹􀀬􀀴􀀲􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀩􀀠Total
Other Revenue Sources (2,404,340.00) Net Operatlon and Maintenance to be to Billed Monthly 24,384,190,00 Debt Service Principal on Bonds: Due 810112005: 18,180,000,00 x 8112 12,120,000.00
Due 810112006: 19,055,000.00 x 4112 6,351,666.67 Interest on Bonds: Due 210112005: 6,868,538,13 x 216 2,289,512.71 Due 810112005: 6,868,538.13 x 616 6,868,538.13 Due 210112006: 6,442,513.13
x 416 4,295,008.75 Less: Interest Income (573,850,00) Net Debt Service to Billed Monthly TOTAL CONTRACT REVENUE $ 55,735,070.00 Page 8 
1 '; 􀁾􀁪􀀠" TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
DETAIL PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET 1301QHIl 􀁃􀁏􀁕􀁬􀁂􀁁􀁾􀁔􀀠REVENUE· AJ;!DI!!iQN (1106.301010) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 1.508% (1107.301010) Debl Service
$31,350,880 x 1.508% $ 367,713.59 472,771.27 Total Annual Requirement $ 840,480 $ 832,320 !3gjQ201 CQI'oITRA!:lI REVEN!.!Ii· ARLlN!;ZTQU (1106.301020) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190
x 28.190% (1107.301020) Dabt Service $31,350,880 x 28.190% 6,873,903.16 8,837,813.07 Total Annual Requirement 15,711,720 16,925,720 (' 􀀨􀀳􀀰􀀱􀀰􀁾􀀱􀀠COt!lIBAI<! BEVEN!.!E· BEDFORD
(1106.301040) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 3.240% (1107.301040) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 3.240% Total Annual Requirement 790,047.76 1,015,768.51 1,805,820 1,788,830 {301110}
COt!lTRACT REVENUE. !:lABBOLLTOt!l (1106.301110) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 9.322% (1107.301110) DabtSarvlce $31,350,880 x 9.322% 2,273,094.19 2,922,529.03 Total Annual Requirement
5,195,620 5,000,560 13011201 CONTBACT BEVE!!!!.!Ii· C!i;tlAR !:l11.1. (1106.301120) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 0.238% (1107.301120) DebtServlca $31,350,880 x 0.238% 58,034.37
74,615.09 Total Annual Requirement 132,650 118,110 Paga 9 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION /3011501 CONTRACT REVENUE·
COLLEYVILLE (1106.301150) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 1.699% $ (1107.301150) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 1.699% Total Annual RequIrement (391170) CONTRACT REVENUE· COPPELL (1106.301170)
OperaUon & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 2.810% (1107.301170) Debt Service $31,350,860 X 2.810% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (301200) CONmACT REVENUE· DIFW AIRPORT (1106.301200) Operation
& Maintenance $24,384,190 X 1.527% (1107.301200) Debt Service $31,350,860 x 1.527% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (301210) CONTRACT REVENUE· DALLAS (1106.301210) Operation & Maintenance
$24,384,190 x 5.951% (1107.301210) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 5.951% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (301260) CONTRACT REVENUE· DUNCANVILLE (1106.301260) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190
x 0.132"04 (1107.301260) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 0.132% Rounding Total Annual Requirement PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT DETAIL 2005 BUDGET 2004 BUpGET 414,287.39 532,651.45 $ 946,940
$ 930,570 685,195.74 880,959.73 1,566,160 1,533,280 372,346.58 478,727.94 851,070 843,360 1,451.103.15 1,865,690.87 3,316,790 3,011,370 32,187.13 41,383.16 73,570 72,860 :: " Page 10

//" TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPDON PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET (301290) CQNlBACI B!iiV!iit:lIJ!ii ·!iiIJ!.!iiSS (1106.301290) OperaUon & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 2.826% (1107.301290) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 2.826%
$ 689,097.21 885,975.87 Total Annual Requirement $ 1,575,070 $ 1,560,330 (S013QO) CONTRACI 􀁒􀁅􀁖􀁅􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀡􀁅􀂷􀀠E8BMERS BRANCH (1106.301300) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 4.430%
1,080,219.62 (1107.301300) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 4.430% 1,388,843.98 Total Annual Requirement 2.469,060 2,445,640 (301330) CONTRACI REVENIJE. FQRTWQRTH (1106.301330) Operation &
Maintenance $24,384,190 x 0.992% (1107.301330) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 0.992% 241,891.16 311,000.73 Total Annual Requirement 552,890 576.770 (301390) 􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁁􀁃􀁔REVENUE· GRANt:!
􀁾􀁒􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁒􀁉􀁅􀀠(1106.301390) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 11.637% 2,837,588.19 (1107.301390) Debt Service $31,350,860 x 11.637% 3.846.301.91 Total Annual Requirement 6,435,890
5,662,330 􀀨􀀳􀀰􀀱􀁾􀁏􀀩􀀠􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁔􀁒􀁁􀁾REVENUE· GRAPEVINE (1106.301400) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 1.072% (1107.301400) Debt Servfce $31,350 ,880 x 1.072% 261,398.52 336,081.43
Total Annual Requirement 597,480 661,220 Page 11 
----\ ! TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PETAIL
PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUpGEI 􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀴􀁾􀁏􀁉􀀠COHlRACT B(;;VEHI.!§ -I:IYBSI (1106.30145ll) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 0.142% (1107.301450) Debl Service $31,350,880
x 0.142% $ 34,625.55 44,518.25 Total Annual Requirement $ 79,140 $ 75,610 130H6!!1 CONTRACI BIi\IENUE -IBVltU2 (1106.301460) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 17.785% (1107.301460)
Debt Service $31,350,880 x 17.785% 4,336,728.19 .2,1;1§,Z§!Q1 Total Annual Requirement 9,912,480 9,818,970 􀀱􀀳􀀰􀀱􀁾􀀸􀀰􀀱􀀠CONTRACI BEVIiiHI./E -Kliibl.EB (1106.301480) Operation &
Maintenance $24,384,190 x 1.795% (1107.301480) Debt Service $31,350,880 J( 1.795% 437,696.21 562,745.30 Total Annual Requirement 1,000,440 968,650 (301ji201 CQt:lTRACT BiillENYIii· f/lANliEliiLD
(1106.301520) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 J( 2.826% (110.301520) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 2.826% 689,097.21 885,975.87 Total Annual RequIrement 1,575,070 1,505,690 􀁻􀀳􀀰􀀱􀂧􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀱􀀠CONIB
8CT REVENUE· t:lORTH BI{!HLAHP I:IILL§ (1106.301590) Operation& Maintenance $24,384,190 x 00450% $ 109,728.86 (1107.301590) Debt Service $31,350,880 x 0.450% 141,078.96 Total Annual Requirement 250,810 241,200 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2005 BUDGET 2004 BUDGET {3016801 CONTRACT 􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁎􀁕􀀡􀀺-l!OUIl:lbAlQii (1106.301680) Operation & Maintenance $24,384,190 x 1.428% $ 348,206.23 (1107.301680) Debt Service $31,350,880
x 1.428% 447,690.57 Total Annual Requirement $ 795,900 $ 620,380 􀁻􀀱􀀱􀀰􀀶􀀮􀀳􀁾􀀸􀀱􀁉􀁎􀁉􀁅􀁂􀂷􀁆􀁕􀁎􀁄􀀠I!ERVICES, !<H8RGsl! Clean Rivers Program (TCEQ) 60,000.00 Ten Mile Creek 273,200.00
Denton Creek 53,580.00 Red Oak Creek 20,820.00 Tarrant County 20,000.00 Walker-Calloway Branches 18,250.00 Mountain Creek 44,840.00 Northeast Lakeview 5,100.00 Joe Pool lake 35,000.00
Total Annual Requirement 530,790 514,340 {1106.331l1 OP!:B8T1NG OVERHEAD· QTHSB PROJECTS , DCURD#1 335,360.00 Ten Mile Creek 27,870.00 Denton Creek 10,770.00 Red 'Oak Creek 4,280.00
Mountain Creek 2,190.00 Tarrant County 22,890.00 Total Annual Requirement 403,360 435,550 (1106.3981 PROFessiONAL FEES 550,000 500,000 /1108.3801INIEREST INCOME ·1 & S 131,800 114,800
(1108.38Q1INTEREST INCOME· RESERVE FUND 377,500 439,600 1110.8.380: INI!:BEST INCOME -BEVENUE FUND 53,550 44,300 /1108.3BOllNI!:BEST INCQME. EMEBGENCY fUND 11,000 11,000 /110ft,MOI OVERSIRENGTH
SURCHARGE 700,000 650,000 /1106.3431 PRETREATMENT REVENUE 25,000 25,000 /11 Q6.344) COMMODITY CI:IARGE 53,770 48,800 11106.348} QUANIIIX SUR!<I:IABGE Town of Addison 29,420 29,100 Page
13 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/PESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
􀀮􀀲􀁾􀀰􀀵􀀠BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET (1106.373: OPERATING TRANSFERS· RISK RETENTION $ 102,000 $ 118,000 {1106.399] MISCELlANEOUS INCOME 10,000 10,000 Page 14 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT Salaries
Under the Salary Administration Plan for Ihe Following: Manager. Central Regional Wastewater System 1 Mainlenance Engineer 1 Sub·Total 2 Manager, System Operation 1 Operations Division
Chief 2 Chief Operator 8 Senior Operalor 8 Operator II 17 Operator I 6 1 . Mainlenance Division Chief Chief Maintenance Mechanic 6 Senior Mainlenance Mechanic 14 Maintenance Mechanic
II 14 Main1enance Mechanic' 5 E/E Division Chief 1 Chief Eleclrician 1 Chief Electronic Technician 1 Senior Electrician 2 Senior Electronic Technician 4 Electronic Technicialll Electrician
II 2 Senior HVAC Technician Process Systems Automation Engineer 1 Sub-Total 95 System Operations· Part·Time Employees Senior Maintenance Mechanic Sub-Total 1 l=.􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽
􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁰􀁡􀀽􀁧􀀽􀁥􀀱􀀽􀀵􀁤􀀠
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF gMl'loQYEES BUDGET AMOUNT Manager, Technical
Services Laboratory Division Chief Laboratory Supervisor Quaility Assurance Coordinator Senior Biologist Senior Chemist Biologist Chemist Laboratory Technician II Laboratory Technician
I Technical Services Engineer Environmental Services Coordinator Interceptor System Specialist Maintenance Division Chief Chief Maintenance Mechanic Senior Maintenance Mechanic Maintenance
Mechanic II Maintenance Mechanic I Chief Electronic Technician (Instrument TechniCian) Senior Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) Electronic Technician II (Instrument Technician)
Electronic Technician I (Instrument Technician) Senior Secretary Field Technician II SUb-Total 1 1 3 1 2 6 8 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 45 Manager, Administrative Services Office
Coordinator Senior Secretary Accounting Clerk Training Coordinator Sub-Total 1 1 5 1 1 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭9 PurchasinglWarehouse PurchaselWarehouse Supervisor Buyer Assistant Buyer Senior Storekeeper
Senior Secretary Sub-Total 1 2 1 2 7 Total Project Positions W 10 Pretreatment 159 Page 16 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT Total
Project Base Salaries w/Shift Diff $ 6,181,535 Total Project Holiday and Overtime Pay 223,170 Rounding 5 Total Project Salaries $ 6,404,710 Pretreatment Pretreatment Coordinator 1 Senior
Secretary 1 Environmental Inspector 3 Senior Field Technician 2 Field Technician II Total Pretreatment Positions 8 Total Pretreatment Base Salaries w/Shift Diff 326,811 Total Pretreatment
Holiday and Overtime Pay 7,514 Rounding § Total Pretreatment Salaries 334,330 Total Positions -Regular Employees 166 Total Positions -Part-Time Employees 1 Total All Positions 167 Total
Salaries $ 6,739,040 Page 17 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERJDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2Jl04 BUDGET (1106.400) SALARIES -REGULAR (001,01) PROJECT 157 Employees $ 6,404.710.00 (001 ,02) PRETREATMENT 8 Employees Total Salaries -Regular 334,330.00 $ 6,739,040
$ 6,645,060 (1106.402) PAYROLL TAXES -FICA (001.01) PROJECT $ 6,404,710.00 x 7.65% 489,960.00 (00 1.02) PRETREATMENT $ 334,330.00 x Rounding Total Payroll Taxes -Fica 7.65% 25,580.00
515,540 508,350 !1106.403) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE PROJECT (001.01) Health $ 349.53 X 115 X 12 $ 550.97 X 13 X 12 $ 478.17 X 11 X 12 $ 623.73 X 14 X 12 Provision for
Increase 25% 482,351,14 85,951.32 63,118.44 104,786.64 164,051.89 (002.01) Ufe InsurancelAD&D: Provision for increase 25% (003.01) Long Term Disability: Provision for increase 25% (004.01)
Employee Assistance Program: 28,821.00 7,205.25 16,358.02 4,089.51 4,770.00 PRETREATMENT ((001.02) Health $ 349.53 X $ 550.97 X $ 478.17 X $ 623.73 X ProvIsion for increase 6 X OX OX
1 X 12 12 12 12 25% 25,166.16 7,484.76 8,162.73 (002.02) Life Insurance: Provision for increase 25% (003.02) Long Term Disability: Provision for increase 25% (004.02) Employee Assistance
Program: 1,504.00 376.00 835.82 208.96 240.00 Total Emp. Ben. -Health/Life Insurance 1,025,480 831,930 Page 18 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&MBUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION (1106.404) EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT· PENSION (001.01)PROJECT (001.02) PRETREATMENT TOlal Emp. Ben. -Pension PROPOSED DETAIL 741,780.00 39.220.00 (1106.406) UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (001.01) PROJECT (001.02) PRETREATMENT
Total Unemployment Compensation 19,300.00 700.00 (110M07) EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM (001.01) PROJECT Service Awards $ 20.000.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT Total Emptoyee Recognition Program
(1106.408) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -EDUCATION (001.01) PROJECT 3,600.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT 500.00 Total Employee Benefil Education T olal Personal Services (1106.410) OFFICE SUPPLIES PROJECT
(001.01) Consumables 16,200.00 (002.01) Non-Consumables 7.880.00 (003.01) Computer/Copier Supplies 9,750.00 (005.01) Vending and Lunchroom Supplies 7,850.00 PRETREATMENT (001.02) Consumables
300.00 (002.02) Non-Consumables 500.00 (003.02) Computer/Copier Supplies 1,000.00 (005.02) Vending and Lunchroom Supplies 150.00 Total Office Supplies (1106.411) DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PROJECT (001.01) ProfessionallTechnical Memberships AMSA 17.960.00 Tx Prof Engineer 460.00 ASTD/ISA 300.00 American Society for Human Resources 160.00 Notary 213.00 Chlorine Institute
710.00 Nail Assoc of Purchasing Managers 500.00 Nat Safety CouncillTX Safety Association 460.00 TX Water Utilities Association 642.00 WEFIWEAT 1,400.00 WERF 35,315.00 (002.01) PeriodicalsiMagazlneslN
ewspapers 600.00 (003.01) Reference Books 1,600.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2005 BUDGET 2004 BUDGET 781,000 $ 761,650 20,000 20.000 20,000 18,610 3,540 5,600 9,104,600 8,791.200 43,630 45,900
Page 19 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED 08.M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION DETAIL (1106.411)
DUES 8. SUBSCRIPTIONS (Continued) PRETREATMENT (001.02) ProfessionallT echnical Memberships TWUA $ 220.00 (003.02) Reference Books 800.00 Total Dues and SubsCriptions (1106.412) FEES
OTHER THAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT: (001.01) Certification Fees 3,050.00 (002.01) TCEQ WW Inspect & WQA Fees 75,000.00 (005.01) TCEQ Sludge Fee 250.00 (006.01) Tier Two Fees 10.00
(008.01) City/County Fees 1,000.00 PRETREATMENT (001.01) Certification Fees 400.00 Total Fees Other Than Dues & Subscriptions /1106.4131 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING SUPPLIES PROJECT (001.01)
RepairiReplacement of Hand Tools 25,320.00 (002.01) Operational Supplies 11,000.00 (003.01) Maintenance Supplies 46,000.00 (004.01) Ground Care Supplies 9,000.00 (005.01) Janitorial
and Cleaning Supplies 15,000.00 (006.01) Electrical Supplies 12,000.00 (007.01) Facilities Supplies 12,000.00 (008.01) Protective/Safely Equipment 58,750.00 PRETREATMENT (001.02) Repair/Replacement
of Hand Tools 280.00 (005.02) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies 200.00 (008.02) Protective/Safely Equipment 250.00 Total Maintenance and Operating Supplies /1106.414) LAB SUPPLIES PROJECT
(001) Gases 8,000.00 (002) Water System 4,000.00 (003) BacH·Filters, Media and Supplies 78,000.00 (004)AA, ICP, and IR Supplies 12,000.00 (005) Gas Chromatog Supplies 10,000.00 (006)
TOC and MCTS-10 Supplies 3,000.00 (007) Lab Apparatus 30,500.00 (008) Chemical Reagents 63,500.00 (009) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables 60,000.00 (010) Filters, Glass Fiber, Prefilters
and Meml>ral 15,500.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2005 BUDGET 2004 BUDGET $ 61.340 $ 54,810 79,710 79,810 189,800 162,750 Page 20 
".' ..., TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
DETAIL PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET (1106.414] LAB SUPPLIES {Continued} (all) Field Sampling Supplies (012) Operational Supplies (013) Nuclear Sources -Wipe Test & Reloil
(014) Other -Freight and Shipping 1,000.00 6,000.00 300.00 1,150.00 PRETREATMENT (007) Lab Apparatus (008) Chemical Reagents and Standards (009) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables
(all) Field Sampling Supplies (014) Other -Freight and Shipping Total Lab Supplies 850.00 500.00 3,000.00 11,000.00 300.00 $ 30B,600 $ 297,950 (1106.4151 PROCESS CHEMICALS AND SUPPLIES
PROJECT (001) Lime (002) Ferric Chloride (003) Chlorine (004) Polymer (005) Hydrochloric Acid (006) Sodium Hydroxide (007) Citric Acid (008) Filter Cloths (009) Tie Wraps, Bags, Sludge
Judges, Etc. (010) Taste/Odor Control (all) Boiler Chemicals (012) Sulfur Dioxide 950,600.00 206,850.00 293,700.00 258,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 500.00 85,000.00 7,000.00 250,000.00
2,000.00 152,150.00 Total Process Chemicals and Supplies 2,220,800 2,144,870 (1106.41!!1 FUEL, OIL, AND LUBRICANTS PROJECT (001) Gasoline (002) Diesel Fuel (003) Solvents/Cleaners (004)
Anti-F rooze (005) Grease (006) Lubricants (007) Propane 44,730.00 37,640.00 10,000.00 500.00 5,000.00 18,000.00 800.00 PRETREATMENT (001) Gasoline (004) Anti-Freeze (005) Grease (006)
Lubricants rounding Total Fuel. Oil, and Lubricants 3,390.00 40.00 50.00 200.00 120,350 94,320 Page 21 \ 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.41T COMPUTER
S91'TWARE, LICENSES & INSTRUMENT SUPPI.,IES PROJECT (001) Metering Supplies (002) Instrument Repair (003) Drafting/Engineering Supplies (004) Line Surveillance (005) FM Telemetry (006)
Metering Electrical Repairs (007) Lawson GIL. HR & PR Software PRETREATMENT (001) Metering Supplies (002) Instrument Repair round Total Computer and Instrument Supplies Totat Supplies
t1J06,42Q) AUDITING (001) Audit . (1106.421) ENGINEERING (001) Engineering Studies (002) lit Prorations (003) Triennial ReportiAnnual Update (004) Pipeline Repairs/Erosion Control Total
Engineering (1106.422) LEGAL (001) Legal (1106.423) OUTSIPE SERVICES PROJECT (001) Advertising (002) Graphics, Displays, Etc. (003) Construction Services Charges (004) Security Monitoring/Support
(005) Solid Waste Disposal (Odor Control) (006) Contract Labor (007) PC/Networ1<lSCADA Support (012) Janitorial PRETREATMENT (001) AdvertiSing (002) Graphics, Displays, Etc. (006) Contract
Labor Total Outside Services $ PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT DETAIL 20jl5 Bl.IQGET .2004 BUDGET 10,000.00 14,000.00 2,500.00 6,000.00 1.000.00 8,000.00 246.785.00 150.00 300.00 5.00 $ 288,740
$ 3.312,970 41,000 112,000.00 100,000.00 16,010.00 20,000.00 248,010 20,000 24,500.00 1,000.00 50,000.00 13,180.00 48,740.00 21,000.00 474.770.00 48,000.00 500.00 200.00 1,200.00 683.090
• 292,630 3.173,040 37,500 259,500 20,000 577,630 Page 22 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET 11106.4241 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT (001,01) Drug Testing (002,01) U,S,G,S,Payments (003,01) Motor Vehicle Reports (004,01) Outside Testing
-Laboralory (006,01) NEXRAIN Studies $ 8,280,00 26,500,00 350,00 105,000,00 20,000,00 PRETREATMENT (004.02) Outside Testing -laboratory 4,000,00 Total Other Professional Services $ 164,130
$ 148,600 11106.430} TELEPHONE & TELEMETERING PROJECT (001,01) TelephoneiTelemeteMng (002,Ol),Pagers (003,01) Mobile Telephones (004,01) Internet Access 34,400,00 5,670,00 40,920,00
4,640,00 ( PRETREATMENT (001,02) TelephoneiTelemeteJing (002,02) Pagers (003.02) Mobile Telephones 1,000,00 180,00 3,720,00 Total Telephone & Telemetering 90,530 98,760 (1106.431) POSTAGE
PROJECT (001) Postage Meier (002) Stamps/Shipping 2,750,00 6,250,00 PRETREATMENT (001) Postage Meter (002) Stamps/Shipping 500,00 220,00 Total Postage 9,720 8,520 (1106.432' PRINTING
AND BINDING PROJECT (001) Special Forms (002) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary (003) Manuals, Handbooks, Etc, 2,000,00 1,500,00 1,500,00 PRETREATMENT (001) Special Forms (002) Letterhead,
Envelopes, and Stationary 750,00 250,00 Total Printing and Binding 6,000 7,300 Page 23 
· . TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERI!l.ESCRIPTION (1106.433) INSURANCE
PAYMENTS PROJECT (001) Workers' Compensation (002) Property/Casualty . (003) General Liability (004) Public Official liability (005) Automobile (006) Equipment Floater (007) Blanket
Bond round Total Insurance Payments (1106.436) TRAVEL PROJECT (001) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (002) Olhers on Authority Business PRETREATMENT (001) CRWS Employees on Authority
Business Total Travel (1106.4371 LAUNDRY, UNIFORM & IND. EQUIp. PROJECT (001) Uniform Rental (003) Patches/Hats (004) Towels, Mops, Mats PRETREATMENT (001) Uniform Renlal Total Laundry,
Uniform, & Ind. Equip. (1106.4381 TRAINING PROJECT (001) Training Wastewater Certiflcation Training Safety Training Technical Training Enhanced SkillslSupervisory Training Training ManualsIVideos
Purchasing Certification Classes PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED ;lOOS BUpGET CURRENT 2004 BUpGET $ 169,423.00 90,330.20 7,101.09 13,761.62 27,151.00 11,924.35 771.70 __---"(,2.96) $ 320.460
$ 299,960 14,760.00 500.00 3,240.00 18,500 19,300 36,190.00 1,500.00 9,400.00 820.00 47,910 49.070 10,000.00 10,000.00 23,000.00 4,500.00 4,100.00 1,500.00 Page 24 􀁢􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽�
�􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀬􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁟􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁬􀀠
( r ) TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBEBlI2ESCRIPTION j1106.438)
TRAINING {Continued} PRETREATMENT (001) Training Wastewater Certificafion Training Safely Training Technical Training Training ManualsNideos Total Training PROPOSED DETAIL $ 600.00 600.00
1,180.00 220.00 PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET $ 55,700 CURRENT 2004 BUDGET $ 55,700 (1106.440) UTILITIES PROJECT (001) Natural Gas (002) Waler 45,000.00 75,000.00 Total Utilities 120,000 110,000
11106.4421 POWER (001) Power 4,953,740 5,639,960 {1106.443} R & M -COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT (001) Meter Station Structure Rehabilitation (002) Manhole/Junction Box Rehabilitation (003)
System RepairslLine CleaningITV (004) lift Station/ROW Maintenance (005) Signs, Fencing, Docks Total R & M • CoJlection System 21,000.00 15,000.00 595,000.00 23,000.00 200.00 654,200
388,240 {1106.4441 R & M -EQUIPMENT PROJECT (001) Shop Equipment (002) Dumpsters (003) Compressors and Generators (004) Fuel Powered and Electrical Equipment (005) Office and Video Equipment
(006) Anatytical Equip Repair -Non Contract (OOl) Service Contracts-Analytical Equipment (008) Perkins-Elmer Equipment (009) MowerslTractors (010) Tracked Vehicles & Heavy Equipment
(011) Carts (012) Heavy Trucks (013) Trailers (014) Locomotive (015) Tire Repair (016) High Pressure Units (017) Foli<liIts 12,000.00 1,000.00 15,000.00 9,000.00 8,000.00 15,000.00 18,000.00
12,000.00 9,000.00 37,000.00 1,500.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 4,000.00 960.00 6,000.00 Total R & M -Equipment 179,960 168,790 Page 25 
􀁾􀀮􀀠. \, ACCOUNT NUMBERIPESCRIPTION (1106.4451 R & M -PLANT AND BUILDINGS PROJECT (001) Packing and Seals (002) Road Repair Materials (003) Machine Shop Slock (004) Mechanical Plating
and Coating (005) Clarifiers, Aeration, Equalization Basins (006) Specialized Balancing and Machining (007) Valves, Valve Operators, Pipe, Etc. (008) Posilive Displacement Pumps/Repairs
(009) Filler Press Paris (010) Pump Repair, Pump Parts, Machining (011) Conveyer System Parts (012) Industnal Air/Oil Fillers (013) Power Transmission Parts/Repairs (014) Building/Structural
Repair (015) Chlorination/Dechlorination (OlS) Railroad Repairs (017) Stormwater Regulations· Street Cleaning (01B) Blower Parts/Repairs (019) Crane Inspection & Servicing (020) Anaerobic
Digester Clean/Rehab Total R & M -Plant and Buildings (1106.446) R & M·VEHICLES PROJECT (001) Automobiles (002) Pickup Trucks (003) Tire Repair (004) Other-Battenes, Wiper Blades, etc.
PRETREATMENT (002) Pickup Trucks (003) Tire Repair Total R & M -Vehicles TRINITY RIVER RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM
DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED DETAIL 2005 BUDGET $ 30,600.00 30,000.00 11,000.00 25,000.00 130,000.00 5,000.00 85,000.00 112,200.00 22,800.00 105,000.00 23,000.00
3,000.00 30.000.00 41,100.00 20,000.00 21,000.00 11,520.00 60,000.00 6,000.00 __􀁾􀁏􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠$ 792,220 7,000.00 22,800.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 600.00 39,400 .. CURRENT 2004
BUJl..GET $ 691,520 40,860 Page 26 
(; ,-r' \ TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
DETAIL PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET (1106.448) R & M -ELECTRICAL PROJECT (001) Components (002) Signal Cable and Wire (003) Electronic Equipment Repair (004) Repairs of Pneumatic
Systems (005) FM Telemetry (006) PLClSCADA Parts and Repair (007) Vendor Service and Repair (008) Calibration (009) Electrical Parts and Materials (010) Motor Overhaul (011) HVAC Parts
and Repair (012) Elevator Repair and Service (013) Cathodic Test $ 60,000.00 6,000.00 65,000.00 1.000.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 45,000.00 5,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6,000.00
1,000.00 T olal R & M -Electrical $ 561,000 $ 514,000 ill06.449j OFF-SITE BIOSOLID LAND APPLICATION (002) Beneficial Reuse . 2,585,540 2.563.870 {1106.:l511 RENI· MACHIt:/ERY & EQUIPMEt:!I
PROJECT (001) Cranes and Other Heavy Equipment (002) Compresscrs and Special Equipment (003) Postage Meter (004) Tool Rental (005) Copier Renlal (007) Cylinder Rental (008) Other Rental
20.000.00 3,750.00 2.000.00 1,000.00 29,830.00 6,300.00 6.250.00 Total Rent -Machinery & Equipment 69,130 84,100 {1106.466j ADMINISlRATIVE OVERHEAD PROJECT (001) Related Cost Method
Allocation 1,878,020 1,752,550 Tolal Other Services and Charges 13,538,260 13,535,730 Page 27 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O8oM BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.476) MACHINERY
& EqUIPMENT (001.01 JPROJECT·Replacemenl: (4) Self ·Contained Breathing Apparatus (3) Chlorine Analyzers (1) Dissolved·Oxygen Meter (1 J Grease Hauling Tractor (1) VacCon Truck wNacuum
Unit (4) Off·Road Utility Carts (1) 180 Ton Chiller for Admin/lab Building (1) Solids Control ChilierlWater Tower (1) UV Visible Ught Spectrophotometer (1) Oil & Grease Extraction Unit
(1) Melals Digestion Unit (1) laboratory Glassware Washer (1) 12" Concrete Saw (1) lS" Concrete Saw (1) 2·Ton Utility Truck wi Utility Bed (2) 3" Non·Clog Centrifugal Pumps (1) Portable
Ultra Sonic Depth Flow Meier (8) Ultra Sonic Depth Flow Meters (2) Doppler Flow Meters (1) DepthNelocily Flow Meter (13)T810g Data Recorders PRETREATMENT· Replacement (1) 3/4 Ton 4X4
Truck (1) Camper (1 ) Aulo Sampler PROPOSED DETAIL $ 3,200.00 15,000.00 1,800.00 9,500.00 205,000.00 51,600.00 125.000.00 100,000.00 23,000.00 29,000.00 21,000.00 5,000.00 1.200.00 1,400.00
90.000.00 2.800.00 . 4,850.00 13,600.00 B.OOO.OO 7,500.00 18,200.00 25,000.00 2.000.00 __-'4....5"'00.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2lJ05 BUDGET 2004 BUDGET 736.650 $ 677,300 31.500 25.000 Page
28 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET" FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL f1106.4761
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (Contlnuedl (002.01) PROJECT-New: (1) Laptop Computer (1) 36' Trencher Attachment (2) Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (1) Small Pipeline Inspection Camera (2)
PC WOil<stallons (1) Concrete Core Drill (1) Pipe Fusion Machine $ 2,000.00 .3,650.00 3,600.00 8,000.00 2,600.00 2,500:00 26,700.00 PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET CURRENT 2004 BUDGET $ 49,050
$ 39,000 (002.02) PRETREATMENT-New 1,600 Total Machinery and Equipment 817,200 742,900 Page 29 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2005 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PI;TAIL PROPOSED 6!I.11!1J!UDGET CURRENT
􀁾􀀮􀁏􀀡􀁬􀀴􀀠BUDGET {1107.480) BOND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS Due 810112005: Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003 $ 2,040,000.00 2,370,000.00 2,335,000.00 170,000.00
11,265,000,00 Total Bond Principal Payments $ 18,180,000 $ 17,295,000 tt107.4811 INTEREST ON LONG TERM-DEBT Due 210112005: Series 1995 Series 199M Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003
Due 810112005: Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003 Adjuslment for Accrual round Tolal Bond Inlerest Payments 167,951.25 758,006.25 1,300,403.75 1.424,217.50
3,217 ,959.38 167,951.25 758,006.25 1,300,403.75 1,424,217.50 3,217,959.38 (284,016.26) 13,453,060 14,285,860 1l106,483) PAYING AGENT FEES 5,000 5,000 (1106.486) SEC DISCLOSURE FEES
10,500 10,500 Total Debt Service 31,648,560 31,596,360 Page 30 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Region Offlce AGENDA ITEM VIII DATE: July 30,2004 FILE: 3110.702 TO: MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System RE: Central
Regional Wastewater System Capital Improvements Planning Update for the Issuance of Series 2004 Bonds The Authority plans, operates, and maintains the Central Regional Wastewater System
(CRWS) in accordance with state and federal regulations. The Authority routinely reviews and updates capital improvement plans (CIP) for system-wide (plant and pipeline) facilities in
order to provide wastewater services for the 21 Contracting members. The Authority has adopted a flexible five-year planning window to organize and to manage these activities. As needed,
the Authority will issue revenue bonds to fund the facility improvements. The last bonds were issued in February 2001. Between January and February 2001, the members of CRWS Customer
Advisory Committee were advised of the Authority's plans for the next two-phased capital improvement program. These plans were reported in the 2001 Five-Year Plan Update and Summary
of Capital Improvements document prepared by Alan Plummer Associates,lnc. (APAI). During the January 24, 2001 CRWS Advisory Committee meeting, AuthOrity management advised members of
the various funding options and requested the endorsement of management's recommendation to apply for the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan for the
upcoming Phase I capital improvements. The Advisory Committee unanimously endorsed this recommendation. In February 2001, after further evaluation of the costs of issuing public sale
revenue bonds, or issuing bonds via the TWDB SRF, Authority management recommended to the Authority's Board of Directors the approval of selecting the lower interest rate TWDB SRF loan
option for funding the 2001 report's Phase 1 (2001-2003) improvements. TWOB SRF funds may be used for all project costs, except land rights acquisition. Today, all of the projects to
be funded by Phase I funding (Series 2001 Bonds) have been initiated and a majority of these projects have been completed. In March 2003, While management was again reviewing its plans
for Phase II projects, the staff submitted anticipated cost information to the TWOB in order to be included in TWOB's 2004 Intended Use Plan. This is the first step in TWOB's loan qualification
process in becoming eligible to receive a SRF loan. Based on an updated list of priority projects, the 
MEMBERS, ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 30,2004 3110.702 Page 2 Authority submitted an estimated cost of $106,475,000 to the TWOB. This estimate included engineering planning, design, construction,
construction inspection, loan closing, bond issuance, and CIP program administration costs. Since that time, the Authority has continued to evaluate CRWS system-Wide needs, individual
project engineering and construction timing, and to prioritize a final listing of the next set of capital improvement projects. In August 2003, management reported to the CRWS Advisory
Committee regarding the next CIP program. In February 2004, the Authority's Board of Directors approved an Engineering Services Agreement between the Authority and the engineering firm
of APAI for the purpose of preparing an engineering report to accompany financing documents for a next set of CIP's. This report is required to accompany either a Preliminary Official
Statement (POS) or a TWDB loan application. This report is expected to be finalized by early August 2004. The report will present an updated list of capital improvements projects based
on the previously listed Phase II projects contained in the 2001 Five-Year Plan Update and Summary of Capital Improvements report and additional projects that have been identified since
that report was issued. In addition, APAI will incorporate other planning efforts, including the CRWS Phase IV Master Plan (2004) for plant improvements, prepared by Freese and Nichols,
Inc., and the Phase IV Infiltrationilnflow Assessment (2004) for pipeline improvements, prepared by Black and Veatch Corporation. The estimated cost of these improvements, including
additional costs associated with issuing bonds and managing the CIP programs, but excluding land rights, is currently estimated to be $106 million. At this time, approximately $10 million
additional is also anticipated, for land rights acquiSition costs, which are ineligible SRF fund expenses. In June 2004, the TWDB advised the TRA that an SRF bond amount of $106,475,000
in Tier II funds would be available for TRA's use. The 2004 Five-Year Plan Update report will include a forecast offuture bond sales beyond 2004. As much as $300 million in additional
project needs have been identified and some or all ofthe needs will need to be funded before 2010. The improvements outlined in this report are necessary to continue to keep pace with
the increasing population growth and wastewater flows that are expected to occur in the CRWS service area over the next 20 years. Population growth within the CRWS service area, as well
as the inevitable need to rehabilitate older parts of the existing pipeline system and treatment plant facilities, requires that pipeline system and plant improvement projects be constructed
at periodic intervals. Funding ofthe next set of priority capital improvement projects for CRWS may be accomplished through a public,competitively bid bond sale, or by a bond sale using the TWDB's SRF. In order to maintain the option to sell bonds in the open market, First Southwest Company (FSW) is preparing a POS,
and this information can also be used to satisfY TWOB loan application requirements for the SRF process. The Authority has evaluated the various options available to fund the next generation
of capital improvements. The AuthOrity has concluded that the TWOB SRF loan requirements require more program costs, administrative effort, and construction cost thus producing higher
projects' cost than a public, open market, bond issue, but the SRF loan option actually costs less over the long term because of the lower TWOB SRF interest rate. With the assistance
of the 
MEMBERS, AOVISORY COMMITrEE July 30, 2004 3110.702 Page 3 Authority's financial advisor, FSW, financial evaluations ofthe funding scenarios have been analyzed. On a $106 million dollar
bond issue, the Authority has estimated that even with the additional administrative, technical, and program cost included, the lower interest rate TWOB loan still produces a total term
savings in excess of $15 million, and should be utilized. With the endorsement of the CRWS Advisory Committee, management of the Authority will recommend to the Authority's Board of
Directors that an application be submitted for a TWDB SRF loan before the August 31, 2004 deadline, in order to fund the next set of CRWS systemwide capital improvements, and issue bonds,
when approved. In addition, management will recommend that the Authority prepare $10 million of additional bonds to be sold on the open market as a public sale, for other costs which
are not eligible, under TWOB rules. Subject to the approval of the SRF loan by the TWOB, the Authority will authorize the issuance of the bonds to the TWOB, with a smaller bond sale
for land rights costs. If the TWOB loan is not approved, however, Authority management will subsequenlly recommend that the Board issue bonds in the open market as a public sale, for
the entire CIP program amount. Authority management seeks the approval of the Advisory Committee to proceed with the bond sales oullined herein. 􀁾􀁾􀀠B. RANOY BROOKS, P.E. 􀁾Manager.
Wastewater Services Planning Northern Region BRB/vaw 
Trini1y River Authority of Texas Northern Region OffIce AGENDA ITEM IX DATE: July 28, 2004 FILE: 0202.800.100 TO: MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System RE: Central
Regional Wastewater System Electric Power Status Report In Fiscal Year 2001, the Authority initiated procurement activities considering aggregation as well as direct procurement approaches
with Retail Electric Providers (REP), in preparation for the State of Texas electric utility deregulation legislation, Senate Bill 7. Senate Bill 7 went into effect January 1, 2002.
The result of these activities was the Authority entering into a Master Retail Power Sales Agreement with Dynegy Energy Marketing LP. The terms of the agreement was a flat rate price
of $41.45 per megawatt hour (MWh) and was effective January 1, 2002 through May 2003. The 17 -month term included 10-months in Fiscal Year 2002 and seven months in Fiscal Year 2003.
In late March 2003, with the Board of Directors approval, Management solicited proposals from several REP's for power. The Market was not as favorable in 2003 as had been experienced
in 2001. After considerable effort, Coral Power was selected because of the lowest price offered. The negotiated price of $51.40 per MWh was 24% higher than the existing power contract,
and understandably, was limited to only a 12-month contract time period. The new Master Energy Sales Agreement with Coral Power became effective June 1, 2003, and extended through May
31,2004, with six months (June 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀁵􀁧􀁨􀀠November 2003), of the agreement being in Fiscal Year 2003 and the remaining six nionth (December 2003 through May 2004) in Fiscal year 2004.
In the August 2003 Board of Directors meeting, the Authority's Board authorized the General Manager to solicit proposals and execute a contract for an additional term to follow the Coral
term, when more favorable conditions in the natural gas and electric markets warranted. The AuthOrity went back to the market in late September of 2003, soliCiting proposals from qualified
REP's which resulted in the Authority entering into a 24-month Master Sales Agreement with the lowest offer of $44.50 per MWh with Tractebel Energy Services Inc. This Agreement began
June 1, 2004 and will end May 31 , 2006. In the fall of 2001 ,the 77ti1 Legislature enacted Senate Bill 5 (SB5) to assist the state in complying with the Federal Clean Air Act which
contains energy efficiency measures that are designed to decrease energy consumption. The SB5 energy efficiency measures apply to local governments located in Clean Air Act non-attainment
counties in Texas. Dallas, Tarrant, Denton, and Ellis Counties, all of which have areas served by the Authority, are impacted by S85. Under S85, local governments, which include any
political subdivision other than school districts, which have electric accounts in any of the 38 designated counties, are required to report energy usage and energy conservation efforts
to the State Energy Conservation Office 
MEMBERS, ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 28, 2004 0202.800.100 Page 2 (SECO). The initial reporting began in March of 2002. At this time it is not mandatory, but the goal of SB5 is to reduce
consumption by 5% each year for 5 years. Authority Management has always been pro-active in identifying cost saving measures at each respective project, including energy conservation
and cost efficiencies. There are several programs planned for future implementation that will directiy or indirectiy result in significant energy conservation and cost reduction. In
mid 2004, SECO offered, and the Authority has agreed, to a Preliminary Energy Assessment conducted by a SECO-contracted engineering firm (in our case, Carter and Burgess) at no cost
to the AuthOrity. It is managemenfs understanding that Carter and Burgess will conduct the energy assessments for each individual Northem Region water and wastewater system, along with
other selected indiVidual Authority facilities that are located in non-attainment areas. The product of the the survey will be a report which will identify projects that will pay for
themselves from energy conservation in ten years or less. SECO also offers a program involving low interest rate funds for conversion of energy centers to more efficient power utilization.
Management will assess the viability of such funds, and discuss their use, along with any planned facility modifications, in future Advisory Committee mee ings . .􀀱􀁌􀀴􀀡􀁾􀀠JOHN S.
OWENS Manager, Support Resources Northem Region JSO/vaw 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas AGENDA .ITEM XGeneral Office 3000.100.001 August 9, 2004 Mr. Stephen W. McCullough, City Manager City of Irving 825 W.lrving Boulevard Irving, Texas 75060
RE: Docket No. 2003-1530-WR; City of Irving Application to Amend CA No. 03-4799 Dear Steve: I have reviewed Warren Brewer's letter to Dave Rybum dated July 2, 2004, and Dave's reply
to Warren dated July 12,2004. After Warren and I met with you and your senior staff at city hall, I was of the impression that Irving would contact TRA to discuss the potantial of Irving
purchasing treated wastewater from the Central Plant. Warren advised me after his meeting with Dave and Don Rauschuber thai we apparently had a miscommunication conceming the nature
of the meeting. Warren and I understood the meeting would concern where Irving wanted to pick up TRA Central's treated effluent and a pricing structure. Instead, Don Rauschuber had a
specific and completely new draft proposal for settlement dated June 25, 2004. Warren was not authorized to explore Mr. Rauschuber's proposals, and he so advised Dave. Dave's July 12,
2004, letter to Warren rejects Warren's July 2 letter and proposes a condensad version of Mr. Rauschuber's proposal. Since the settlement proposals are more legal than technical, I have
concluded that it is appropriate that I reply to you. Item 2 of Dave's letter indicates that Irving proposes to divert 22.9 MGD of return flow discharged at TRA Central and states that
this amount is 60% of the 32.8 MGD amount sought in I rving's pending application. My questions to you are: A. Does Irving agree by this proposal thai it intends to recognize TRA's ownership
of wastewater in its Central system prior to discharge into a watercourse? B. Does Irving agree by this proposai that TRA can make direct reuse of the 22.9 MGD prior to its discharge
into a watercourse? The first paragraph on page 2 of Dave's letter makes reference to return flows from TRA's Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System which also are a part of TRA's pending
reuse P.O. Box eo Arlington, Texas 76004 Matro (8i7) 467-4343 TaiaFax (817) 465·0970 
Letter to Mr. Steve McCullough 3000.100.001 August 9, 2004 Page 2 application. Dave's letter indicates that the return flow point into Grapevine Lake would be economically convenient
to Irving's reuse of retum flows. Dallas County Park Cities MUD is protesting TRA's reuse application and apparently will contend that it is entitled to divert and use this return flow
under the district's existing water right. By agreement, the Park Cities district has sustained. this position with Dallas, Grapevine and TRWD. I note that the Park Cities District and
Irving are represented by the same attorneys. This paragraph of Dave's letter suggests some sort of 'wheeling" concept like that used in the electric power business. What assurance,
if any, do you have that Irving can remove the Park Cities District's apparent claim on TRA's Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System's return flows? Your answers to my questions are
essential to TRA's consideration of the remaining items set forth in Dave's letter. I hope that we can continue to negotiate this matter to an early resolution. In the meantime, TRA
will continue its protest to Irving's application to protect the interests of all of TRA's customers in the Central Regional Wastewater System. DFV/cac 
Letter to Mr. Steve McCullough 3000.100.001 August 9, 2004 Page 2 application. Dave's letter indicates that the return flow point into Grapevine Lake would be . economically convenient
to Irving's reuse of return flows. Dallas County Park Cities MUD is protesting TRA's reuse application and apparently will contend that it is entilled to divert and use this return flow
under the districfs existing water right. By agreement, the Park Cities district has sustained.this position with Dallas, Grapevine and TRWD. I note that the Park Cities District and
Irving are represented by the same attorneys. This paragraph of Dave's letter suggests some sort of 'wheeling" concept like that used in the electric power business. What assurance,
if any, do you have that Irving can remove the Park Cities Districfs apparent claim on TRA's Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System's return flows? Your answers to my questions are
essential to TRA's consideration of the remaining items set forth in Dave's letter. I hope that we can continue to negotiate this matter to an early resolution. In the meantime, TRA
will continue its protest to Irving's application to protect the interests of all of TRA's customers in the Central Regional Wastewater System. DFV/cac 
RECEIVED JUl 1 2 2004 I -® Tl?A/Offlce of 􀁦􀁢􀁾IRVING Northe", Region • July 12, 2004 . Mr. Warren N. Brewer Regional Manager Northern Region Trinity River Authority ofTexas 5300 South
Collins P.O.Box240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 RE: City ofIrving Re-Use Dear Wmen: First I want to thank you for meeting with Don Rauschuber and me on JWle 28, to discuss options for
resolving the re-use issue. Due to the holiday, I did not receive your letter Wltil July 6. I have reviewed your proposal as outlined in your July 2 letter, and as the Director of Water
Utilities for Irving, I cannot accept the proposal as presented and would not recommend it to management. It appears that both Irving and TRA are interested in trying to move forward
to an acceptable resolution; therefore, I would like to keep before you the proposal offered by Irving. That being: . 1. Irving will continue to seek from TCEQ authorization to re-use
up to 60 percent of the amoWlt ofwater Irving imports from Lake Chapman on a one (1) time recycle basis (Le., 0.60 X 38.2 mgd = 22.9 mgd as may be adjusted to reflect Irving's total
quantity ofLake Chapman imported water over an accoWlting period and as may be adjusted for any future water authorized by TCEQ and for conveyance losses). 2. Upon discharge ofIrving's
treated effluent from TRA's Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, Irving will have the right to reuse water within the terms and provisions for its TCEQ permit. 3. TRA can seek TCEQ authorization
for reuse ofthe second or supplemental reuse cycles ofwater derived from Irving's importation ofLake Chapman Water. 4. Irving, as part ofthe TRA customer group, would not receive compensation
from TRA for any revenues received from the sale ofwater derived from second or supplemental reuse cycles. 5. Irving will prepare and maintain an accOWlting program that docoments importation
ofLake Chapman water to the Trinity River Basin and Irving's one (1) reuse ofthis water. Water Utilities Department P.O. Box 152288 • Irving. Texas 75015-2288 • 972.721.2281 • 972.721.2280
fax. www.ci.irving.tx.us 
Mr. Warren N. Brewer July 12, 2004 Regional Manager Northern Region Page 2 Trinity River Authority ofTexas In addition to the above, Irving would be interested in pursuing the release
ofreturn flows from your northem plant on Denton Creek. The receipt ofwater at this location would then make it possible to establish a valve for the water that could offset or defer
future cost by Irving to have the water treated and placed into our water system for use by Irving citizens. I would hope that we can continue to negotiate this matter to a resolution;
however, Irving does not want to slow the reuse pennit process down. Please contact me so we can continue toward a resolution on this matter. Sincerely, 􀁉􀁩􀁊􀁁􀁐􀁾􀀠W. David Rybum
Water Utilities Director WDRlbc PC: Steve McCullough, City Manager Sandy Cash, Deputy City Manager CliffMiller, Assistant City Manager File 
Mr. Warren N. BreWer. July 12, 2004 RJ:gional Manager Northern RJ:gion Page 2 Trinity River Authority ofTexas In addition .to the above, Irving would be interested in pursuing the release
ofreturn flows from your northem plant on Denton Creek. The receipt ofwater at this location would then make it possible to establish a valve for the water that could offset or defer
future cost by Irving to have the water treated and placed into our water system for use by Irving citizens. I would hope that we can continue to negotiate this matter to a resolution;
however, Irving does not want to slow the reuse pennit process down. Please contact me so we can continue toward a resolution on this matter. Sincerely, 􀁉􀁩􀁊􀁁􀁐􀁾􀀠W. David Ryburn
Water Utilities Director WDRlbc pc: Steve McCullough, City Manager Sandy Cash, Deputy City Manager Cliff Miller, Assistant City Manager File 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Office 3110.650 July 2, 2004 Mr. David Ryburn Director, Water Utilities City of Irving P.O. Box 152288 Irving, Taxas 75015-2288 Re: Trinity
River Authority Central Regional Wastewater System City of Irving Re-Use Dear Dave: Following my meeting with you and Don Rauschuber on June 28, we have given consideration to options
for resolvlng the re-use issues. It is our suggestion that we jointly pursue an arrangement in which fRA contractually reserves a quantity of the water discharged from the Central plant
for Irving's use exclusively, but not limit it, nor tie it to, the amount which you plan to import from Lake Chapman. Under that arrangement, Irving could take as much water as needed
and would pay an .amount for that contractual right, which would become a benefit for the members of the Central Regional Wastewater System. Under our existing contract terms, Irving
would also be a benefactor, as a system member, of almost 20% ofthe revenue derived, as well as future revenues from other re-use sales. We have considered various pricing methodologies
and potential conbepts for establishing a cost for the contractual right to take water, or a rate for water actually reserved or delivered for Irving's benefit. I believe that we can
come to an agreement on a rate to Irving, which is related to your avoided Cost based on all alternatives available to you. In all likelihood, the short term, least-cost option available
to you is the price of raw water as established under wholesale water contracts which Irving and many other cities have with the City of Dallas. Ifwe collidagree on a method of calculating
a raw water commodity charge which is tied to the City of Dallas' annually determined and announced raw water component for their wholesale water rates for customer cities, we could
then select a percentage of that raw water cost component to be used to determine the commodity charge. I believe this methodology would guarantee that your raw water price would be
below any alternative, and assure Irving that use of CRWS re-use water would be your least cost option for raw water. We can work on details and terms if you wish to pursue a contractual
arrangement which fits within the general parameters I have outlined. Recall that TRA's interests are tied to the interests of all 21 Contracting Parties, all of which have shared in
past system revenues as a credit against the gross cost of wastewater treatment for over thirty years. Irving has shared in these type revenues, along with either parties of the system,
and Irving's share of the DCURD re-use payments alone has exceeded two million dollars. P.O. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 (817) 493·5100 
• MR. DAVID RYBURN July 2,2004 3110.650 Page 2 Please contact me and let's try to move this process toward a resolution. WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNB/vaw c:
Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations 
MR. DAVID RYBURN July 2, 2004 3110.650 Page 2 Please contact me and let's try to move this process toward a resolution. Sincerely, ARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNBlvaw
c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager . Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Office September 9, 2003 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE Tuesday, September 16, 2003 at 11 a.m.
MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 6500 West Singleton Blvd, Grand Prairie, Texas A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has been
scheduled for 11 a.m., Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd. Lunch will be served immediately
following the meeting. Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott before noon on Monday, September 15, 2003, at 817-493-5100 or abbottc@trinityra.org. We encourage each party served by the System
to send a representative to this meeting, sinee Authority staff will be requesting the Committee's endorsement and approval of the proposed FY 2004 System Operations and Maintenance
Budget. The proposed budget was presented in the August 12'" Advisory Committee and a Budget Workshop was held on Thursday, August 28, 2003. We believe all questions about the budget
have been answered. Enclosed for your review are an agenda and minutes of the August 12, 2003 meeting. If you should have any questions, please contact this office at 817-493-5100. tJt:t./IAJV;v
Yl. .(b1!.JU..Velt Ie&.WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region leea c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS
P.O. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 (617) 493·5100 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITIEE MEETING MEETING SUMMARY CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD.,
GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS TUESDA Y, AUGUST 12, 2003, 10:00 A.Af. I. Call to Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 10:10 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll and introduce
Guest and Authority Staff. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENT A TIVE. PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr. Jim Pierce ffMr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Ms. Fiona Allen flMayor Bob Cluck Present
Bedford Mr. Jerry Shennan flCouncilmember Jim Griffin Present Carrollton Mr. Milbum Gravley Present Cedar Hill Ms. Ruth Antebi flMr. Greg Porter Present Colleyville Mr. Bill Lindley
Absent Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Present Dallas Mr. Mike Mikeska fl Mr. Bob Johnson Present D1FW Airport Mr. Jerry Dennis ffMr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Dennis Schwartz flMr.
Kent Cagle Present Euless Mr. Ron Young Present Fanners Branch Mayor ProTem Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Robert McMillion flMs. MaeBell Brown Present Grand Prairie Councilmember
Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Mall Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge Present Hurst Mr. Ron Haynes Present Irving Mayor ProTem James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Rick Anderson f/Mr. Ed
IIschner Present Mansfield Mr. Chris Burikell f/Councilmember Tracy Doyle Present North Richland Hills Mr. David Smyth f/Mr. Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Present
Trinity River AuthOrity Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Present Director Sylvia Greene Present III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants andAuthority Staff TRA
Staff present were Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith, Randy Brooks, Cheryl Abbott, John Nelson, Bill Decker, John Owens, Sam Scoll, John Jadrosich, Alison Mackey, Bill Tatum,
Bill Cyrus, and Shelley Fialho. 1 
Guest and Consultants: Bedford -Tom Ross and Jim Arrington Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins DFW Intemational Airport-Dan Bergman and Rick Reeter Euless -Chris Barker Farmers Branch -Mark
Velten and Mark Pavageaux Grand Prairie -Ron McCuller Irving -Jim Moffatt Mansfield -Bud Ervin Southlake -Mike Patterson Black and Veatch -Layne Parsons First Southwest Company -Boyd
London IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 10. 2002 Meeting Chairman Gravley asked if anyone had any changes or revisions to the minutes of the September 10, 2002 meeting, there being
none, Matt Singleton made a motion to approve as presented, Richard Fregoe seconded the motion, and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum summarized
the FY 2002 year-end system parameters, and presented information for FY 2003 (December 2002 to July 2003) daily average flows, effluent quality. and odor control additions and improvements.
He stated that the System had experienced two major events in the collection system that necessitated emergency expenditures. B Financial Patricia Cleveland reported that each Contracting
Party had received either a check or an invoice for the FY 2002 actual flows; that 11 of the Customer Cities had been mailed a request for information on the FY 2003 inch diameter per
mile (IDM); and that the FY 2003 year to date reallocation distribution had been mailed. She stated that the System was 66% into the FY 2003 Budget Year and was trending within the budget
of the routine predicted O&M expenditures. Warren Brewer and Danny Vance discussed the process used by the Authority in the selection ofthe energy provider, Coral Power and the projected
cost. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland said that the Central System had received a draft discharge permit and staff are in the review process. She briefly informed Members on Capacity
Assurance, Management, Operation and Maintenance Requirements (CMOM), National Blending Policy, Sanitary Sewer Overflow Regulations, and the Wastewater Security Act. D. Capital Improvement
Improvement Planning (1) Planning, Design, Construction (2) Series 2004 SRF Bonds Randy Brooks gave a presentation showing population comparisons between the 1992 Phase II and 2000 Phase
IV studies, as well as future population projections, and explained the evaluation and planning process for the Central System improvements. Mr. Brooks then summarized the current design
projects and the active construction projects, and provided handout material. 2 
VI. Discussion: Presentation ofProposed FY 2004 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget Objectives D. Detailed
Budget Review Warren Brewer said that each year the Central System Budget was developed and presented to the Contracting Parties in an August meeting, that a Budget Workshop was conducted
to provide greater detail on the budget. and then Members were asked to adopt the budget at the upcoming September 16, 2003 meeting. Patricia Cleveland then outlined TRA's philosophy,
strategies, and projected flows for the FY 2004 CRWS Operating and Maintenance Budget that would be effective from December 1, 2003 until November 30, 2004. There was a discussion conceming
projected employee salaries and other employee benefits. Mr. Brewer explained that the Authority's Salary Plan ranges of pay were established based on comparisons with Customer Cities
and by design, were set to fall in the mid range of salaries paid by TRA Customers. VII. Other Other Business Patricia Cleveland presented Bill Tatum and the Central System Employees
with the American Metropolitan Sewerage Agency GOLD award for the fourth year and noted that if the System maintained its current perfomnance level for the current year, they would receive
the Platinum Award for 2003. Warren Brewer said that a status report on the issue of reuse water within the state of Texas had been included in the packet. VII. Adjourn to Lunch There
being no further business, Chaimnan Gravley adjourned the meeting and invited attendees to remain for a catered lunch. 3 
-------------------CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2003 PERMITS NO: 10303-001 (TXOO22802) PERMIT LIMIT: DeC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Jue AUG•••OCT NOV vo MAl< FLOW MlNLAVG 16> MOD
137.503 137.433 137.318 13S.0eo 133,4TO 132.630 133.139 132.390 131.981 134,661 131.603 FLOW D!.:r'.AVG. REPORT MGD 1J4.863 121!l.809 139.069 134.667 13,720 132.591 138..(179 126.118
121.320 132.136 139.(119 FlOW OlY.MAX. REPORT .GD 181.690 140.780 2Q3.170 1155.270 141.680 114,&60 1$U4G 136.7400 1H,600 168,626 203,170 FLOW 2.HRPK 2812,M!.P. 136912 10$463 '''''&3".....103124
137135 161308 106013 130281 127629 16130& FLOW ,-HI! PI( MOD 197.183 168.184 201.883 180.660 155.699 19U38 217.884 151669 181.613 183,786 217.984 RAINFALL TOTAl.INCHES 4.13 0.226.07
.... 1." 2.53 6.17 00.008 1.86 2.42 6." eeoD OLY.AVG. 7 MOl\. 1.• 1.1 1.2 1.' ,.. 1.1 1,. 1.' 􀀢􀁾􀁡􀀠1,1 U eBOO DLY.MAX. 17 􀀢􀀢􀁾2.. 2.0 •••,.. 1.' ... 1,. ,.. 􀀱􀁾􀀠1.' 2.' ceoc DLYAVG.
"'" l6SJDAY 1168.2 1176.8 1389.6 134U 1066..8 1176.6 1169,9 1061.8 1061.9 1176.1 1389,S '" T,'OlY,AVO. Ol.Y.MAX. " .. MOJ\. 􀀮􀁇􀁾􀀠1.1 ,.. 1.1 2.• 1.3 3.• 1.2 ".1.0 2,. 1,' 2 •• 1 .•
1.' 1.• 1.• 1.• 1.' 1,1 1,a 1,3 3.' m DLY.AVG, 􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀶􀀠LSSiOAY 1278.3 1181.5 1611.4 13135.5 1090.9 1a80,$ 1169.9 1061.8 1061.9 1224,$ 1&11.4 MH' 01..YAVG. 􀁾􀀮􀀠MGI' 0.066 0.133 O.1!M
0.$41 Q.:J1O 0.0'18 0,074 0;070 0,102 0.165 1:1.641 NH3 OLY.MAX. 7 MM 9.169: 1.'" 1.378 3.639 3.540 0.171 0,119 0.200 0.287 1.173 Ujg ..., OLYAVG. Z101lu0.4 I"e,S/tlAY 12.7 142,a. 21(;,1>
720.3 320.3 .... 86.1 72.8 108.1 202,$ 720.3 DO M!N., MGiL ... ••••••••• '.1 7,' 7.' 1A 1.4 ••• .,. ,H ... MAX. MIN.• • • U. S,U• n 1.' M ••• 1.:! ••• 1,' •••7.' ... 1.' ••• 7,' ...
7,3 .., 7.3 􀀷􀁾􀀠1.:! a" 7A 1.0 Cl.' MIN. 1 MOl\. 1,10 HI1 1.02 1.12 1.04 1.06 1.06 1." 1,00 1.06 1.12 Cl2 OUTFALL .099 MGIL 0.00"".MO 0.00 0.00 ••CO MO O,()O 0.00 .... O.'IlO Co\'LECT
• SYS'1'EM NO. OF OUTfLOWS ••••• 0 1 0 1 TOTA' 2 90% F1.QW"14$,aoo MGD • EXCURSIONS: 0 TCEQ 76% FLOW-12.1..soo MGD OEI'A "Rainfall totals ant measured at DFW Airport FY 2003 EFFLUENT
QUALITY/FLOW 190 ""'... ............. ..... 􀁾􀀠...... -.. 15.0 180 170 160 10.0 150 140 130 5.0 120 110 100 0.0 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV C_CflOD _TSS _ NH3 __2003
Dally A.g. Flow 􀁾􀀭􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀲Daily A.g. Flow 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BL VD., GRAND
PRAIRIE, TEXAS TUESDA Y, SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 at 11 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville
Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth GrandPrairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N. Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENTATIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Bob Cluck Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milbum
Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Ron Young Mayor ProTem Paul Walden Mr. Dale Fisseler Councilmember Richard
Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mayor ProTem James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Tracy Doyle Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Hector Escamilla.
Jr. Director Sylvia Green III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants and Authority Staff IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 12. 2003 Meeting 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning VI. Action: Proposed FY 2004 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy,
Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2004 Budget VII. Other Business VIII. Adjourn to Lunch 2 
EXHIBIT C FISCAL YEAR 2004 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $58,134,240 Expenses $57,839,230 Variance (Retained
for FY 2005 Debt Requirements) $295,010 Revenue .94.94% Contract Revenue [J 1 .64% Operafing Overhead & Inler-Fund SeNices .1.31% Miscellaneous Income .1.05% Interest Income .0,86% Professional
Fees IIO.21l"A. Operating Trans!e1S Expenses .54.63% Debt SeNice and Miscell.neous [J 23.40% Other SeNices and Charges .15,20% Personal Services .5.49% Supplies .1.28% Capital Outlays
FISCAL YEAR 2004 FUND SUMMARY Revenue Summary Contract Revenue $55,193,770 Operating Overhead and Inter-Fund Services $949,890 Professional Fees $500,000 Interest Income $609,600 Operating
Transfers $118,000 Miscellaneous Income $762,980 Total Sources of Funds $58,134,240 Expenditure Summary Personal Services $8,791,200 Supplies $3,173,040 Other Services and Charges $13,535,730
Capital Outlays $742,900 Debt Service and Miscellaneous $31,596,360 Total A lieation of Funds $57,839,230 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Region Office July 29, 2003 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE -Tuesday, August 12, 2003, 10:00
a.m. MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie The Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has scheduled a meeting
for 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, August 12, 2003 at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. A catered lunch will
immediately follow the meeting. There are several Significant agenda items, including the presentation and explanation of the proposed FY 2004 Operations and Maintenance Budget for the
Central System. An agenda, minutes from the September 10, 2002 meeting, and other information will be mailed to you prior to the August 12th meeting. Each party served by the System
is encouraged to send a representative to this meeting. If you have questions prior to this meeting, please contact this office at 817-493-5100. U/IA#/I /j, 􀀰􀁾􀀯􀂣􀂥WARREN N. BREWER
Regional Manager Northern Region WNB/cea c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill L. Tatum, Manager, CRWS RO. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240
(817) 493-5100 ft "., Recycled Paper 
, I 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVO., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESOA Y, AUGUST 12,2003, 10:00 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless
Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield North Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TlVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Bob Cluck
Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milbum Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Ron Young Mayor ProTem Paul Walden Ms.
MaeBell Brown Councilmember Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mayor ProTem James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Tracy Doyle Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr.
Danny F. Vance Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Director Sylvia Greene III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants and Authority Staff 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 10. 2002 Meeting V. Status Reports A. Operations B Financial C. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning (1) Planning, Design, Construction (2)
Series 􀁾SRF Bonds ;l.oc4 VI. Discussion: Presentation ofProposed FY 2004 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget
Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review VII. Other Business VIII. Adjourn to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10,2002 at 11 A.M. I. Call to Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 11:10 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENTATIVE
PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr. Jim Pierce f/Mr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Mr. Charles Anderson f/Mayor Elzie Odom Present Bedford Council member Jim Griffin Absent Carrollton Mr.
Milburn Gravley Present Cedar Hill Mr. Jim Sparks flMr. Greg Porter Present Colleyville Mr. Bill Lindley Absent Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Terrace Stewart Absent D/FW
Airport Mr. Rusty Hodapp f/Mr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Bill Willborn f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Councilmember Glenn Porterfield Present Farmers Branch Mr. Mark Velton
f/Councilmember Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Frank Crumb flMr. Dale Fisseler Present Grand Prairie Councilmember Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Matt Singleton flMr. Jerry
Hodge Present Hurst Mr. Ron Haynes Present Irving Mr. Jim Sidall f/Councilmember James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Ed IIschner Absent Mansfield Mr. Bud Ervin f/Councilmember Blake Evans
Present N. Richland Hills Mr. David Smith flMr. Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Absent Trinity River Authority Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Hector Escamilla,
Jr. Present III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants and Authority Staff TRA staff present: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith, Randy Brooks, John Nelson, Cheryl Abbott, John
Jadrosich, Bill Tatum. Bill Cyrus, Mike Young. and Shelley Fialho. Also present: Arlington -Fiona Allen Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins Euless -Ron Young and Chris Barker Farmers Branch
-Mark Pavageaux Grand Prairie -Ron McCUller Midlothian -Robyn Forsyth and Judy Ford Alan Plummer Associates -Alan Plummer Black & Veatch -Layne Parsons First Southwest -Mary Williams
1 
IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 13. 2002 Meeting Chainnan Gravley asked if there were any changes to be made to the minutes of the August 13, 2002 meeting. None being requested,
Matt Singleton made a motion to accept the minutes of the August 13. 2002 meeting as presented. Councilmember Porterfield seconded the motion and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status
Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum gave updated System flows since the August meeting and steted that the May, June. July, and August flows for 2001 and 2002 were very similar. Mr. Tatum
then presented a slide presentation outlining the effluent process parameters for December 2001 through August 2002. He asked if anyone had questions and there wera none. B. Financial
-Patricia Cleveland told Members that through August, the System was 75% through the current budget year and had realized savings in power, but had encounterad some additional expenditures
in other areas. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland stated that the TPDES pennit renewal application application had been submitted to TCEQ for review and that staff was prepared to respond
to any questions posed by the State. Ms. Cleveland said that the current pennit had been filed for 162 MGD, and with future improvements and expansions the pennit would be increased
to 189 MGD. There was a brief discussion concerning CMOM's status and potential effects on the System and its Customer Cities. D. Capital Improvement Planning -Randy Brooks reviewed
current engineering and construction projects. He reported that staff was obtaining populations projections and traffic zone areas within the Central region and would use that infonnation
in updating the 2002 CIP program. VI. Action: Proposed FY2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy, Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action
on Proposed FY 2003 Budget Warren Brewer told members that staff had presented the FY 2003 Budget in the August meeting, and had also held a budget workshop that was attended by representatives
from nine cities. Upon completion of Patricia Cleveland's brief overview of the FY 2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget, Charles Anderson made a motion to recommend that the Authority's
Board of Director's adopt the Budget as presented. Bud Ervin seconded the motion and a unanimous vote followed. VII. Other Business Warren Brewer reintroduced Judy Ford and Robyn Forsyth
with the City Midlothian. He detailed a slide presentation of the Mountain Creek Regional Wastewater Service area and explained how the service area and pipelines related to the Central
System. Mr. Brewer told Members that since Irving's presentation in the August meeting, that TRA had not received any further requests, but that in a recent conversation with Steve McCullough,
he indicated it would be discussed at a later date. Patricia Cleveland presented Bill Tatum with the AMSA Gold award for the Central System. She stated that the Central System had received
Gold Awards for the prior eight years for not exceeding pennits parameters and that a Platinum Award was achieved with five consecutive Gold Awards. VIII. Ad/oum to Lunch Chainnan Gravley
adjourned the meeting at 11 :55 a.m. and invited attendees to remain for a catered lunch. 2 
􀁾􀀠("f')􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠0 􀁾􀀠0 C"l 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Ci 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠I C"lffi 0 0 􀁾􀀠C"l 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠(!) 􀁾􀁳􀀠 r/) (!) 􀁾􀁾􀀠 u . ll:ll.!l. '. . "-'-.' ." 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY20D3 PERMITS NO: 10303-4101 (lXO022802) """ .........VG FLOW DLY,AVG., FLOW DLY,MAX,. FLOW 2<HRPK FLOW "".PI< RAlNFAl.L TOTAL" CBOO Ot.YAVG. caoo
cooo DlYJ.'IAX.. PI.Y..AVG. TS$ Ol.YA'VG. TSS OLYMAX. TSS D.I.:V"AVG. ""'DLY..i\VG. ""' OLY.MAX. NH3 OlY.AVG. 00.... pH MAX. pH MIN• CU.... OWl 0IlTl'AU. C!lU.£CT. SYSTEM PERMrr UMrT:
DEC AN is" .GO 137..5D3 137.433 137.315 RISPORT MG. 134.e53 128.809 1,39.0" REPORT .GO 181.590 140.780 203.nO 􀀲􀁡􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠CP. 136912 ,..... 144353 M.' 197.153 156.194 201.868 '''''''..
4.13,.22 5.07U. 7 MGII. 1.' 1.1 '" 17 ....-LBSfDAY 􀀮􀁾􀀠1158.2 2.' 1175.8 2.' ""... " "GIL 1.1 1.1 􀀱􀁾􀀠.. MGIL2. 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠"""LSSlIlAY 127B.3 1iB1.5 1511.4 􀁾􀀴􀀠"GIL 0))65 0.133
0.194 T MGd. 0.169 1.053 1.378 270215404 UISlOAV 72.7 14:U..,.. •.GIL ... ... .., •S.U. 7.> 7.4 7-3 • S.U. u 􀀬􀁾􀀠... , MGIl. 1.10 1.01 1.02 .099-•••........ 110.01' OUTFLOWS•••MAR
APR MAY JUN UL 136.080 133A10 132.530 133.139 132..39 134.567 126.720 132.691 139.079 126.118 155.210 141.580 114.500 198.840 136.746 125458 108124 137735 151308 106013 ,...... ,......
"8.338 217.834'....... 1." • .53 5.11 .... 1.1 1.' 1.1 1.' 1.' 2.' 1345.3 1 .• 1056.8 ... 1176.6 ,.0 1159.9 ,.0 1051.8 '"1.' 1.3 ,.0 '" ,.. 2.0 2.0 1.0 1,0 1305,5 11lll0.a 1UU 1159.9
1051.8 0.£41 0.310 0.018 0.074 0.010 3.639 "... 0.171 0.11' OolDO m.:! 32 • .3 􀀸􀁇􀁾􀀠66.1 72.8 ... 8.1 7.' 7.. 7.4 7-3 7.4 U 7A 7.3 • .9 .. ••• G.' G.' 1,12 ,... M. U. 1.08 .0.00 0.00....
􀀮􀁾􀀮,.llO ••• 1•IAUG.E. OCT NOV VG 134.984 132.737 166.&41 121296 183.307 'A' 1.1 U 1189.2 1.1 1.' ''''''.0 0.196 1284 214.7 .., 􀀷􀁾􀀠••• 1.06 .... TOTAL: _ 1 u ..v .............
.. .. ""...... ..".......... .."...."''' .,........􀁾􀀠... .. ." ....a"., ., .. .. ........ ""'H 􀁾􀀠􀀢􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀠-, Art .. .. ... .90% FLOW*" 145.800 MGD "EXCURSIONS: 0 TCEQ 75%FLOW= 121.500MGD
.FA *"Rainfall totJt, are measured at OFW AIrport FY 2003 EFFLUENT QUALiTY/FLOW 190 L .1 15.0 180 17D 160 150 140 13D 5.0 12D 110 iii1,. -:;:" ,,:'::':1;'" 􀀼􀀺􀁩􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀠:.;:;.: :r"
􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠,"::::;1: 􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁩􀁦􀀬􀀮􀀧􀀠--'0 --;:;:;;::: ji;i! 0.0100 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV _ceOD _TSS _NH3 _2003 DallyAvg. Flow -2002D.llyAvg.Flow 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2002 PERMITS NO: 10303.001 (TX0022802) FLOW IANNlAVG Fl.OW OlY.AVG. Fl.OW tH..V.MAX.. FLOW 2-HR PK FLOW 2-11RPK RAlllFAU. TOTAl." COOD OL'tAVG, c.on
Ol'i',MAX,. c,oo Ol..Y.AVG. TS. t».:i'.AVG. T55 OLY.MAX, TSS tlL'i'.AVG. MH' elY.•WO. HH' DI.Y.MJ,X. HH' DLYAVG. DO .... '" """ "" MIN. CL2 MIN. CI..'! OUTFALl. C!lU.£(;T. SYSmM PERMIT
ut.IfT: DEC '.. MGIl 140,159 RePORT-130.540 REPORT MGO 20&.090 21M'".'" ,..... .GO 238.369 INCHES " .. 7 Mil!\. 1.1 11 .GIl. 2.' ""LBSlOA,Y 1181.4 Mon. 􀀱􀁾􀀠.. MM ... .. ''''' LOSJDAV
1470.1 MOIl. •.227 .. , MGil. 1231 270216404 lJ!$II>AY m.2 , MGIl ... • '.U . 7.' •S.u. ... ,...􀁾􀀠'... .099 MGIl.... Ito. OF oumows 2 􀁾􀀠FEB 138.8:51 137.479 129.630 140.6D1 21$,630
206.390 175093 1""'" 252.134 241.238 ..... 0." ,.3 1.' 2.0 2.0 1415.5 1363.0 2.' 1.' a. 3.0 2145.3 1901.5 0.161 0.186 0.555 􀁏􀁾... 175.8 m .• •••... T'" 7.5 ... ••• 1.07 1.02 1),00....
0 3 MAR 135.083 148.995 265.920 2Hi513 310,.339 Us 13 ... 1791.7 1.5 􀀮􀁾􀀠2150.6 0.184 .... US" 75 7.' ... 1." 0.00 • '"'"MAY UN 136.312 136..526 136.688 ,. 1H,$95 14a.reo 131.660 ""..,.205.510
141.250,.._ 197566 """"113607 ....... 241.534 163.594 .68 SA. 3.10 '"1.1 1.1 3.' 3.0 .'" 1eo4J' 1364.8 '248A 1.6 1.' 1.' 10.0 􀀱􀁾􀀠M 2567,9 1199,1) 1098.1 0.156 ..... 0.064 0.462 ..".
0.163 214.1 71.$ 7{l.$ '.3 1.1> 􀀷􀁾􀀠􀀷􀁾􀀠7A 7.3 7A 7.' 1A 1.02 1.04 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 1•Jue AUG ...,. 136.893 ''''''' 132.062 145.240 "....128083 172.784 184_ 􀀧􀁾􀀷􀀠1.47 M 􀀱􀁾􀀠2.0
1.' 1160.7 1101.4 1.' 1Jl 1.0 􀀬􀁾􀀠1125.4 """ 0.066 O.U1 0:.215 ..... 76" 140 75 ... 7,8 7A ••• 􀀮􀁾􀀠1.08 1.13 .... 0." • 1 SSP ,..... 121.992144.150 116614 167.924 U. M 1.1 1070.4
1.' 1.' 1061.5 0.082 0.170 67.9 '" 7.5 􀁾􀀮􀀠1.06 0.00 1 OCT NOV 137.045 137.137 141.370 125.680 242.840 141.420 16""" 111472 262.68& 160.520 6A< 0... 1.' 1.0 1.0 􀀱􀁾􀀠1179.0 10482
1.1 1Jl '''' 1.' 1281A 1048.2 0.156 0.102 1.221 0.599 2'''' 106.$ ,.0 82 7A 7.3 •••... '''' 1." OJlO 0.80 12 AVG MAX 137.095 140.159 131.106 ,...... 195.011 26S.9afJ 155112 215513 223.361
3'10.339 3.63 7.3, 1.1 1.3 2.' •• 0 1.2a9.o 1191.7 1.3 2.' • .1> 10.0 151t!.!i 2Si7.9 0.131 •.227 O.llZ' 1.231 159.1 2lI1I'" 7.. ... 7A 7.5 6., 7.' 1A' 1.1$ 0.00 .... TOTAL: 20 "'N 136.083
'125.680 '14'1.250 111412 1&0.520 .... ... 1Jl 1048.2 1.' 1.' 1048.2 0.056 0.163 70.6 ••• 7.2 ... '1.02 0.00 OTA!. 1645.135 1645.276 43.53 t$468,$ 1&1$7,4 191U BO% FLOW '" 145.800 MGD
• EXCURSIONS: 0TCSa. 75% FLOW"" 121.50(1 MGD oEPA ""'Rainfall totola are maasur&d at DFW AIrport FY 2002 EFFLUENT QUALITY/FLOW 190 􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁔􀀧􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀠180 170 160 I'" 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠.. 1'"140 130 120 110 100 150 􀀧􀀭􀀴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀧􀀫􀁟􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮�
�􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀂷􀀺􀀱􀀠'i; 􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀧... 􀀢􀁾􀁆􀂣􀀰􀀿􀁾􀀮􀀾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠..•...... 􀀮􀀬􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠0.0 OEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV ---------------------·-·-Wl_ceOD
_TSS _NH3 _20020.lIyAvg.FIQW -2001D.llyAvg.Flow ,.z Z g C ... • III 1ft Z i -... 1ft I: ,.<• 
FY 2003 PERMITS NO: 10303.001 (TX00m02) .....ffu_ DEC AN 􀁾􀀮􀀠MAR R MAY UN UL A\JG SEP C1 NOV VG U"" Fl.,", ANNL.AVGtI,. MGO 137..503 137.433 137.315 136.090 133A70 132.530 133.139
132.39 134.984 􀁾􀀢􀁉􀀢􀀠􀀢􀁨􀁾􀀠FLOW DLY"AVO. REl'Q1lT MOO 134.853 123.809 139.059 '34.... 126,720 132.691 139.079 126.118 132.731 4""""'" FLOW DlY.MAX.. REPORT "GIl 141.590 140.180
203.776 155.270 141.560 174.560 19..... 13&.740 166.641 "'.... _,., Fl."" 20HRPKZ.,,'"GPM 136912 108468 ,...., ,..... 11)8124 urns 1513011 ,'106013 127296 ... "....".. FLOW 2·HRPK ••G
197.153 156,194 207.868 . 180.$60 155.13$9 ,..217.&84 152.659 163.307 -"".." ....FAlJ. 'TOTAl" INCHes 4.13' • .22 ....,..., '''' U3 5.17 .... .... ... CBOD DlY.AVG. 7 MGIL 􀀱􀁾􀀠1.1
,. 􀀱􀁾􀀠1.' 1.' 1•• ••• 1.1 ., <BOO ll<.yJdAlt 17 􀁍􀁏􀁾􀀠2.' 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀬􀁾,.6 ,.. 2.' 1.' 1.' 1 •• ,. ClIO. OLY..AVG, "" LaSIDA.Y 11582 1175.a 1389.5 '34$.3 1056.8 1176.& 1159.9 1051.$
1189.2 ......,,'" rss OLY,A'IG... 􀁍􀁇􀁾􀀠1.1 1.1 1.3 12 1 .• 1.3 ,.. 1.' 1.1 .. 'so DlY.MAX. '" "GIL 2.' 2.' 3.' ,.. z.• 􀁾􀀠1.' ,.. 1.' .. TS. DLYAVG. 20266 !..BSl'DAY 1278.3 1181.5
1$11-4 1305.5 1090.9 13110.61159,9 1051.8 1245.9 ..r.... A NH' OLY.AVG. U4 "GIl. 0.D65 0.133 0.194 0.841 0.310 0.078 0.074 00.070 0.196 ""'.... "IU tlLY,MA,X. 7 MGlL 0.189 '.053 1.318
3.639 3.... G..171 0.119 01.284 ...,.. ft NH' DLY.AVG. '"'''''''' LS!!ilIlAY 72.1 142.8 21U 720.3 320.3.., IIG.1 12.& 214.7 _.. GO MIN, e MM IIJS ••• e .. ••• '.1 7.5 7.5 1.4 8.1 ..
􀁾􀀠pH MIN.• •S,U, S.U. 73 ,. 7.4 ••• 7.3 ... 7.3 ... 7.4 ... 􀀷􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠7.4 ••• 7.3 􀀮􀁾􀀠1.' 6,' .. ". C"'.,11. 1 􀀮􀁾􀀠1.10 ,.<11 1.02 1.12 1.04 ,.. 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠UB 1,(IG ... OWl otm'AlJ.
..... 0,00M......... .... 0.00 0.00 􀀮􀁾􀁯􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠oM COli..ECT. SYSTEM NO. OF ourFLOWS••••••,• TOTAL:,. 1 SO% FLOW 11:1".800 "'GD • exCURSIONS: 0TCEQ 75% FLOW _121.1500 "'GD oEPA ....Rainfall
totals are mflfl!U.lf$d at DFW A1rpcrt FY 2003 EFFLUENT QUALITY/FLOW 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 OEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL 􀀧􀀬􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀠'.:t,] I _ceoc _TSS _NH3
_2003 Dally Avg. Flow -2002 Dally Avg. Flow 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 AUG SEP OCT NOV 
'-.-.-''-' CENTRAl REGIONACw,(STEWATER SYSTEM FY 2002 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTED FOR INTERCEPTOR UI (METHOD 2) FY2002 DISTRIBUTION ADJUSTED ADJUSTED CONTRIBUTION
BASeD ON OF FY 2002 TRA FY2002 DISTRIBUTION FY 2002 ACTUAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL INTERCEPTOR CONTRIBUTION OF FY2002 ACTUAL ANNUAL CONTRACTING TOTAL FLOW REQUIREMENT BASED III TOTAL FLOW
ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT PARTY (MG) PERCENT ON ACTUAL FLOWS {MGl (MGl . PERCENT REQUIREMENT ADJUSTMENT ADDISON B09.557 1.525% $765.333 809.557 1.538% $n1.65B $5.524 ARLINGTON 16.020.557
30.187% $15.149.565 0.106 16.020.581 30.433% $15.273.043 $123,457 BEDFORD 1.788.659 3.370% $1.691.261 1.788.659 3.398% $1.705.313 $14.052 CARROLLTON 5.010.553 9.441% $4.738.041 5.010.553
9.518% $4,776.684 $38.643 CEDAR HILL llB.162 0.223% $111.914 118.152 0.224% $112.416 $502 COLLEYVILLE 836.125 1.575"'" $790,426 13.269 822.858 1.563% $784.404 ($6.022) COPPELL 1,424.204
2.684% $1.346.987 1.424.204 2.706% $1.357.526 $lo.s39 Z DAt.LAS 3.Q15.124 5.551% 52.851.055 99.361 2.915.763 5.539% $2.779.791 ($71.2B4) I:-DlFW AIRPORT 714.221 1.346% $575.501 714.221
1.357% $581.021 $5.520 .,Z DUNCANVILLE 68.124 0.128% $54.238 68.124 0.130% $65.242 $1.004 0 EULESS 1.468.245 2.799% $1.404,700 63.979 M21.266 2.700% $1.355.016 ($49.684) C FARMERS BRANCH
2.381.031 4.468% $2.251.335 0.278 2.380.753 4.523% $2.269.904 $18.569 ... FORT WORTH 695.098 1.310% $657.434 54.241 840.857 1.217% $510.761 ($46,673) ,BGRAND PRAIRIE 5.042.132 9.501%
$4.768,152 175.816 4.565.316 9,244% $4,639,175 ($128.977) GRAPEVINE 605.365 1.143% $573.624 15.921 590.444 1.122% $552.066 ($10.539) z-HURST 66.664 0.126% $63.234 66.664 0.127% $63,736
$502 BIRVING 10.000.476 18.944% $9.457,011 10.000.476 18.997% $9.533.795 $76.784 ... KELLER 681.713 1.661% $833,586 1.423 860.290 1.672% $639.106 $5.520 In MANSFIELD 1,222.305 2.303%
$1.165.779 1.222.305 2.322% $1.165,314 $9.535 I: N RICHLAND HILLS 223.372 0,421% $211,282 3.011 220.361 0.419% $210.278 ($1.004) < SOUTHLAKE 661.296 1.246% $625.315 2.132 639.164 1.252%
$628,326 􀁾􀀳􀀬􀁏􀀱􀀱􀀠•at$50.185.795 429.537 52.641.565 100.000% $60.185.795 $0 Copy of AdLan026!11112J<1s 4116/2.003 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREAM CITY (METHOD 2) ree tOf City. Meter 10 City Mater 10 Node laleral iFarme"sraneh 1ME Ad 180n 3,1 􀀱􀀹􀀳􀀰􀁾􀀠EF012 Sta. No. ""SlOpO
--o.om Slope Capacity (e s 0, 220 19,24( Addtson 13:""" 􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀴,2 lS 􀁾􀀠10,760 15 0.00500 4.57( I'\Uf,lI::SUIl EF012 18 0,00720 IGrapevine 11.8B Coli file BC019 B9CXU DFW 0,00070
37,998 48 0,00080 i84,uu 1< 0,00400 2,250 12 0,00400 l'.SEl' J.OO 38 0.00220 31.369 36 0,00240 .", 1& 􀁉􀁾􀁯􀀮􀁵􀀢􀀠􀁉􀁢􀁾􀁵􀀬􀀢􀀠""exjl 450,00 16 0,00120 3,649 18 0,00120 31 -" ..BC016
8BCXIII 85,00 City 15 0,00150 2,509 IC020.4 8eCXIII 325.00 CI(y 16 0,00460 4,7->1 13,58 <eller 112.88 14060B BC01S SBCXI 25985.00 36 0.00172 27,712 36 0.00172 V @OB BC019,3 BBCXII 3128.06
12 0.00200 1,598 12 0.00200 l ..􀁾􀁤􀀠,oulhlake 13,68 49208 BOO18,' BacXI 90,00 18 0,01700 13,700 21 0,00100 5.010 -';rapevlne 12.68 60908 BC013 GV1R 6325.00 12 0.00202 1.606 12 0.00880
3.351 Colleyville 12,9B 23958 BC010 CD17 5436.46 􀁾􀁤ofline 12 0,00241 1,754 􀁾􀁮􀀮􀁲􀀠112,88 Euless 12.08 Collovville 13.0B1560B BOO07 LBCI 9600.00 42 0.00228 48,170 42 0,00240 49.421
Bedford 13.1B 24808 BC012 B13 2266.00 Cllv 12 0,00200 1.598 North Riehland Hills 14,08 Keller 14.7B M514.7B BC008.1 LBCIi 35540,00 Cit 12 0,00580 2,721 Keller 15.0B 2210B BC008 LBCII
38040.00 21 0,00200 7,105 21 0,00339 9,250 Keller 15,OB North Richland Hills 16.08 MS18,OB BCOOB.2 LSCI! 38837,00 Clly a 0.00400 0,766 G,and Prelri. 5.0W Arlington 6,OW 1470W WF003 WFXJB
13100,00 27 0,00770 27.249 27 0,00170 27.249 Grand Pralrla 7,OW Arllng(on a.ow 1780W WF004 WFXJC 15746.82 42 0,00148 38,810 42 0.00200 4 Minglon 9,OW Grand P",lrio 9,5W MS9,5W WF015,1
WFCeO 2441,32 Clly 6 0.00800 u,ou, Grand Prairie 9,m MS9,7W WF015.2 WFCEO 2441,32 Ci 6 0,00480 0,300 Grand Pralrlo 9,8W MS9.8W WF015.4 WFCEO 2441,32 ell 8 0.00000 1,064 I Fort Wonh 10,OW
Eule.. 11,6W MS11.6W WF011.1 BSP 6766.00 CI(y 10 0.00340 1.281 Euless 11,8W 2460W WF011 SSP 12767,50 24 0.00408 14.489 24 0,00410 14,524 Eule.. 11,8W Fori Worth 10,SW 2470W WF011 BBP
13121.76 City 12 0.08160 10,180 Bedford ' 11,9W 2860W WF013,1 B9RI 20,00 End of Line 12 0,01450 4.302 Euless 13.0W Bedfe,d 15,OW S720W WF017 TJO 2156,00 CII 12 0,00339 2,060 Bodford
15,5W MS15.5W WF01S,1 HeT 1142,32 Cily 12 0.00300 1.957 Bodford lS,OW 3760W WF018 HCT 2821.65 City 16 0,00340 6", Eul... 16,5W e.dfo,d 17,OW 33,OW WF016 BOT 8783,00 10 0.00650 2,025
10 0,00400 . Euless 18,OW eedford 18,lW 3539W WF014B EOS 650,00 12 0,00317 2.011 12 0,32000 20,cU9 'iurat 16,6W MS18,6W WF014A,3 ease 3525.65 Cllv 10 0,02000 3,107' I 3660W WF018 SBT
7560,00 18 0.01980 14,821 16 0,00340 6,142 ledford 19,1W 3480W WF014A EOSB 2747,16 36 0,00440 44,362 27 0.00440 20,599 Grind Prairie _. a,OJ ArlinQIon 7.0J 1810J JT006 CWRR 20372,81
Cilv 30 0.00550 30,501 Arllnolon 8.OJ MS5,OJ JIOOl cwcs 11390,00 21 0.00100 5,024 21 Q,00802 14,228 0011.. 3,OM Ouooonvilio 4.5M MS4,5M Me002.1 Me2 148,00 CUy 15 0.01350 7,526 Grand
Pmin. 5.1M 360M MC006 FCCP 16,00 60 0.00150 101,140 60 0,00150 ---'oJ _. 101.1," Grand Prairie 5.3M 2120M MC004 EMCR 109,20 30 0,00100 13.006 27 0.00266 Ceda' Hili CH 2290M MC012 NEL
29700,00 FM 24 0.02401 Gr.>nd Ptairie 5,lM A,lingkln. 7,OM 10BOM MCll07 NFFC 16340,00 27 0,00260 15.534 27 0,00260 AMlnglon 8.0M 8030M MC005 SFFCR 953,50 30 0,00400 26,011 30 0.004001
Arlington 9,6M 1950M MC010 BOWaR 4558.00 36 0,00219 31.297 36 0.00220 Mansfield 10.0M 1840M MCOO9 WeT 179B7.61 27 0,00075 8,504 27 0,00075 21612003 j;'>lt(nl!02.xrs 􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀬􀁊􀀠-.
\,-' J'-' CENTRAL ReGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2002 INTERcePTOR 1/1 Customer TRA rnA Adjusted City for TRA Interceptor Interceptor TRA tntercaptot Interceptor Receiving Recelvlng AOF
ADDF !II Interoeptor CIIy Total !II In Interceptor In In 12.08 12.ea, 13.06.12.118.13.16 0;681 0.467 0.180 1&2,54 255.00 437.5' 0.0004119 0.075 27,443 150.88 0.052 13.0W 15.0W, 15.5W.
18.OW . 0.833 0.315 0.518 63.90 215.80 299.70 0,0011210 0.145 52.888 53.36 0.092 16.5W 17.0W 0.1l63 0.052 0,011 8.08 122.00 130.08 0.00008II2 0.001 0.2;;0 6.36 0.001 5.0W 6.0W 5.11.4
. 7.01.4.9.01.4,6.61.4. 10.0M 2117f<003 Adfldm2002,xls 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREAM CITY (METHOD 2) r',SB !C<>IlaYV;llell,9B 13.58 reller 12,9B Euless 12.08 North Richland Hllfs 􀀺􀁥􀁬􀁪􀁥􀁾􀀠..... 5.0W 7.OW•.
"".vu Coli. "10DFW Sou!hlake ".11.'(0 13.58 L;l:1VVD 38108 P\..oVH 8C020 jEF2R 􀁾􀁾􀁒􀀠-.-XII 9 19 !gty ''0 0.00220 31,,?,M 0.00400 􀁏􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀲􀁾􀀠Southlake 􀁾􀁵􀁴􀁨􀁬􀁡􀁫􀁥􀀠Southlake
12.1B ..j') >:10 35900 Dt"I'HD (;iii'.. 18 0.00120 ill 'i'i:Oili5O Q.Oli46o Kalla, Norlh Richland Rills Soulhlak. Grapevine C<>II. III. ! :! ! j 􀁾􀀠. 6280B 4920B 6090B 23958 H::Ct'lO
j24BO 514.1B eC01S BC019,3 eC016.1 BC013 BC010 0C007 􀁾􀁏􀁬􀁌􀀠_ BBel BBC B AI GV7R C017 lBCI B1L, ell _ _ 259 ;;ru,\ 5325.( 5436,' 9600.( .226§,l 􀁊􀀮􀁗􀁉􀀨􀁾l1i02Oor i:liiToO 􀁾􀀠1.598\
3,100 1.60S 0.00172 0.00200 ..Q£Q!ll!l 􀁾􀀠-0.00241 0,00240 0.00200 0.00580 '.v_V I • MOil --􀀴􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁦􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀠1.598 2.721 > 16.0B-B.OW 1.2 03 LBCrl WFXJB 3B837.00 Cily 13100.00 211-0.002001
27 0.00770 7.1Q5! 27.249 -21!8 27 0.00339 '00O.OQ'!cv 0.00770 _ _ 􀀹􀀮􀀲􀁾􀀰􀀠v"_v 27,249 S.OW 04 WFXJC 15746,S2 42 0.00148 39.810 42 0.00200 45.115 "'Ill Fort Worth 19.OW 10.0W :irand
Prairie 􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀡􀁬􀁱􀁐􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁦􀁪􀀢􀀬􀁟􀀠:uless !Eule.s 5W fW IMS9:7W m",u"''',8W :;?W '5.1 ;.2 5.4 1.1 WFCEO WFCEO WFCEO SBP 88P 2441.32 City 2441.32 Cily 2441,32 City 6788.00 City 12767.50
24 0.0040B 14.489 6 a 8 10 24 0.00800 0.00480 O.OOBoo 0.00340 0.00410 0.5031 O. 1. 1.« l' --Euless iEule•• l'.SW 13.0W !o,d t,S.OW J3720W 1.1 IWF017 "i'lP BBRtR TJO 13121.76 Cll\'. 20.00
End 01 Line 2156.00 City 12 12 12 0,08160 0,01450 0.00339 l' 􀀴􀀺􀀳􀀰􀁾􀀠2.080a 10rO ...j.'5,5W +.MS15.5W +.WF01B.l Vf018 HeT HCT 1142.32 City 2821.65 City 12 18 0.00300 0.00340 1.9Sll
6 ,. '''I 􀁩􀁉􀁅􀁾􀁬􀁥•• WEula.. !lMW. 1a.OW ledfo,d ledlom 111.0W 13830W _j.18.1W +.3539W IWF016 -+.WF014B Yf014A.3 BOT EOS EOS8 8783.00 10 650.00 3525.65 City 12 0.00550 0.00317 2,025
2,011 . 10 12 10 0.00400 0.32000 0.02000 " 20.«J9 3,107 !om 19.0W 3960W WF019 SST 7560.00 18 0,01960 14,821 16 0,00340 6.142 go.ford 19,1W 3480W WF014A EOSe 2747,16 36 0,00440 44,362
44,362 27 0.00440 20.599 Grand Prairie 5,OJ Mlnalon 7.0J 1810J JT008 CWRR 20372.81 Cili' 30 0,00580 30.501 Ani ton 8.OJ MSB,OJ JtOOl ewes 11390.00 21 0,00100 5,024 21 0.00802 14,228
Dallas 3,OM Duncanvlll. 4,5M MS4.5M MC002.1 MC2 148,00 City 15 0,01350 7.526 Grand Prairie 5,1M 380M MC006 FCCP 16.00 60 0.00150 101.140 60 0.00150 101.140 , Grand Prairie Cedar Hill
5.3M CH 2120M 2290M MC004 MC012 EMCR NEL 109.20 29700,00 FM 30 0.00100 13.006 27 '1.1 0.00266 1\ MMH 116.016, '1<: Uo!I, IG,and P,alrie IS.1M ___ -NFFC 16340.00 27 0,00260 ArlIn lon
SFFCR 953.50 30 0,00400 ArU(I tOil ;:r.QM It1; lM IMCOH) BOWeR 4558.00 36 0.00219 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀼􀀾􀁌􀁌􀀠-.All V.VVL"'Qi vl.>XIm M$nsfield 10.0M 18, I MCOO9 weT 17987.61 27 0.00075 6,5<l4
27 0.00075 8.504i 21612003 '. .QIt.f,Olr02.x!s 􀁾􀀬􀀠"--.> 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHOD 2 ) The following is a description ofMethod 2 for prorating CRWS interceptor infiltration/inflow (Ill) to the contractiJ:).g
party flows. I. Detennine the annual volume ofIII for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -AbDF = III (annuallYl The use ofdelta meter subsystem values assumes that
the arumal average III per idm for the CRwS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
ofnon-delta meters are considered to be lines required to serve the metered city, regardless ofownership. The evaluation ofIII annually will provide a trending to aCCO\ll1t for annual
rainfall, III reduction in the CRWS and the city collection systems, and any other changes in the condition ofthe systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diameter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually, or assumed to remain the same for a period ofthree to five years. 3. Detennine the CRWS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. ) 4. Detennine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No. I divided by the sum ofNo. 2 and No.3). 5. Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The
adjusted interceptor idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope ofthe existing CRWS interceptor
segments from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor size in excess ofthe size required for the upstream city is considered to be . required to serve the delta
metered city, regardless ofownership. 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied byNo.5). 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution
Based on Actual Flow for each ofthe contracting parties. 8. Adjust the Distribution ofFiscal Year Actual Annual Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each ofthe contracting parties.

CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ) INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHODOLOGY Method 2 Method 2 utilizes the CRWS and city inch-diameter-mile (idm) calcUlations, and the metered flows from
each delta meter to prorate interceptor III on a subsystem basis. The interceptor III is developed by applying the III per idm for the delta meter subsystem to an adjusted interceptor
idm. The adjusted interceptor idm is based on the line size required to transport the existing flow. capacity provided fur the upstream city. The interceptor III flows are deducted from
the Fiscal Year Contribution and the Annual Requirement is revised based on adjusted contribution percentages. \ ; 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHOD 2 ) The following is a description ofMethod 2 for prorating CRWS interceptor infiltration/inflow (III) to the contracting
party flows. 1. Determine the annual volume ofIII for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -ADDF = III (annually). The use of delta meter subsystem values assumes that
the arulUal average III per idm for the CRWS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
ofnon-delta meters are considered to be lines required to serve the metered city, regardless of ownership. The evaluation ofIII annually will provide a trending to account for annual
rainfall, III reduction in the CRWS and the city collection systems, and any other changes in the condition ofthe systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diameter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually, or assumed to remain the same for a period ofthree to five years. 3. Determine the CR WS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. ) 4. Determine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No.1 divided by the sum ofNo. 2 and No. 3). 5. Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The
adjusted interceph>r idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope ofthe existing CRWS interceptor
segments from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor siie in excess ofthe size required for the upstream city is considered to be . required to serve the delta
metered city, regardless ofownership. 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied by No.5). 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution
Based on Actual Flow for each ofthe contracting parties. 8. Adjust the Distribution ofFiscal Year Actual AnilUal Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each of the contracting parties.

BLACK & VEATCH MEMORANDUM Trinity River Authority ofTexas B&V Project 66779.110 Interceptor III Proration B&V FileB Negative Flow Adjustment July 26, 200 I To: Patricia Cleveland From:
Layne Parsons, P.E. The following methodology is proposed for adjusting negative average daily flow (ADF) and infiltration/inflow (III) flows used in the interceptor III proration calculation.
ADF Adjustment If a negative ADF value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, negative ADF should not be adjusted for the interceptor III proration. ADF and III will be zero (0)
at delta meter locations with negative ADF. IflAdjustment If a negative III value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, use the following steps to detennine an adjusted III value:
1. Using the estimated developed acres and the current annual III, determine the average gallons-per-acre-day (gpad) for the meters upstream ofthe receiving (delta) meter. 2. Apply the
calculated average gpad III flow value to the cumulative developed acres for the receiving (delta) meter to determine a revised annual III for the receiving (delta) meter. 3. Using the
revised annual cumulative III for the receiving (delta) meter, calculate the delta 111. 
) CENTRAL REGIONALWASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the total number
ofdays in the year. The average daily dry weather flow (ADDF) is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow reeorded during the year. The following criteria are established for
the analysis ofthe flows' used to detem:rine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptor III proration. I. The beginning ofthe fiscal year for flow recordings may result in partial inclusion
ofthe first seven day average meter recording. Partial seven day average meter recordings consisting ofless than four (4) days will not be considered for use as theADDF. 2. During the
year, there may be a need to adjust the reeorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include, but not be limited to line. blockage or year-Io-date (YTD) adjustments. Adjusted
flows will not be considered for use as ADDF. ') /
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM )INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION ./FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the total
number ofdays in the year. The ·average daily dry weather flow (ADDF) is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow recorded during the year. The following criteria are established
for the analysis ofthe flows' used to determine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptorl/I proration. I. The beginning ofthe fiscal year for flow recordings may result in partial inclusion
ofthe first sevc:n day average meter recording. Partial seven day average meter recordings consisting oflessthan four (4) days will not be considered for use as theADDF. 2. During the
year, there may be a need to adjust the recorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include, but .not be limited to line blockage or year-to-date (YTD) adjustments. Adjusted
flows will not be considered for use as ADDF. 
HAN'lOUT AGENDA ITEM 'I·B ." 􀁃􀁒􀁗􀁾􀀠-'2003 MID YEAR REALLOCAfiON 03myadjPROJ CONTRACTING PARTY 2003 BUDGET MGD 2003 BUDGET % SHARE 2003 REVISED MGD 2003 REVISED % SHARE IADDISON II
2.280 I 1.518% I 2.097 I 1.466%1 IARLINGTON II 45.460 I 30.276% I 41.719 I 29.165%1 IBEDFORD II 4.700 I 3.130% I 4.767 I 3.333%1 CARROLLTON 12.000 7.992% 13.707 9.582% CEDAR HILL 0.300
0.200% 0.329 0.230% COLLEYVILLE 2.527 1.683% 2.421 1.693% COPPELL 3.900 2.597% 3.993 2.791% DALLAS 8.500 5.661% 10.301 7.202% IDFW AIRPORT 2.310 1.539% 1.769 1.237%1 IDUNCANVILLE 0.200
0.133% 0.204 0.143%1 IEULESS 4.275 2.847% 3.191 2.231%1 IFARMERS BRANCH 6.700 4.462% 6.809 4.760%1 IFORTWORTH 1.368 0.911% 1.091 0.763%1 IGRAND PRAIRIE 16.690 11.116% 13.567 9.484%1
GRAPEVINE 1.920 1.279% 1.664 1.163% HURST 0.202 0.135% 0.182 0.127% IRVING 28.750 19.148% 26.628 18.614% KELLER 2.415 1.608% 2.138 1.495% MANSFIELD 3.250 2.165% 3.541 2.475% N RICHLAND
HILLS 0.703 0.468% 0.748 0.523% SOUTHLAKE 1.700 1.132% 2.179 1.523% TOTAL 150.1500 100.000% 143.045 100.000% Minor vanatlons may occur due to rounding CRWS 
" HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM V·DAugust 6, 2003 (Previous report August 7,2002) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT PLANNING and OTHER
ACTIVITIES Name: 2004 Series Bond Sale Status: Completed 2001 Five Year Plan Upd,.te in January 2001 Submitted 2004 IUP to TWDB in March 2003 Received notification of public hearing
on TWDB SRF 2004 IUP Anticipated Bond Sale in 2004 Name: I and I Management Plan -Phase IV Type: Flow and Rainfall Data Collection and Evaluation Status: Contract awarded in December
2001 Work is approximately 84% complete Name: Wet Weather Flow Evaluation Type: Evaluation Technologies and Altematives Status: Contract awarded in 2001 . Work Is approximateiy 94% complete
Name: Oxygen Feed Pilot Study Type: Owen Pilot St! rd¥, 0dQr Survey and Monitoring Status: Contract awarded in 2002 Work is approximately 51% complete Name: Phase IV Master Plan Project
Type: Master Plan Report Status: Contract awarded in 2002 Work is approximately 55% complete Name: Name: GIS implementation Plan Type: Software Purchase and Development and Installation
Status: Contract awarded In 2003 Work Is approximately <5% complete ACTIVE PIPEUNE pESIGN PROJECTS ELM FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor. EF-G Location: Cities
of Coppell and Carrollton Adjacentto Belt Line Road, from Luna Road to Fairway Type/Size: 48-lnch parallel relief of6,900-feet of 33-lnch diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated November
1994 Design Revisions begun May 1997 Final Design revisions completed June 2000 Design is 99% complete Easement/permit acquisition 95% complete Condemnation proceedings in progress Intensive
landowner negotiations in progressing Anticipated construction award by December 2003 1 
Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type; Status: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor. EF-1 City of Irving North of CRWS Treatment Plant, from West Fork
of Trinity River to SH 183 102-inch parallel relief of 25,300-feetof 72-and 96-inch diameter pipelines Design begun in 1996 Design 95% complete Plats and Legals complete Easement acquisition
begun December 2000 Anticipated construction award in 2005 Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-2 Cities of Irving and Dallas North of SH 183 to Spur 348 96-inch parallel relief of 20,600-feet
of 96-inch diameter pipeline Design Initiated in 1995 Revisions to Final Design made in December 1997 Design 76% complete Easement acquisition to begin by January 2002 Anticipated construction
award in 2005 Elm Fork Relief Interceotor, EF-§ Cities of Fanners Branch and Dallas North ofSpur 348 to 1-635 72-inch parallel relief of 12,900-feet 72-inch diameter pipeline Design
initiated in August 1998 Design 46% complete Easement acquisition to begin in 2002 Anticipated construction award by 2005 MOUNTAIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Location: Type: Status:
Name: Location: Type: Status: Kirby Creek Oulfafllnterceptor 􀁾􀀠i City of Grand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest Parkway Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment
of 2O.500-feetof 12inch to 24-inch line Preliminary Design Contract awarded in August 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed August 1999 Environmental Assessment completed by March
2001 Preiiminary Engineering and Environmental Work is 94% complete Final Design initiated in late 2002 Final Design is 10% complete 1 Easement acquisition to begin by fall of 2003 ,i
Anticipated construction award in 2004 j ! Mountain Creek Kirbv Creek II Rehabilitation City of Grand Prairie Upstream of LS4 along Mountain Creek Lake Rehab 4.650-feet of 3O-inch diameter
pipeline Design initiated in 2001 Design 100% complete Easement acquisition in progress Anticipated construction award by December 2003 2 
,.". '".. . '. 􀁔􀁹􀁰􀁾􀀺􀀠$tat!Jl>;, . . MOUNTAIN 􀁃􀁒􀁅􀁅􀁾INTERC.::PTOR'SYSTEM Name; Kirby Creek Outfall Interceptor Lo<;?tion: Gityof «::>rand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest
Parkway Type: Preliminary Engineering study and Environmental Assessment of;W.500"feet of 12inch to 24-inchlirje . .'. . . .. . . . . Status: Preliminary Oesign Contract awa!J:Iedin
􀁁􀁮􀀬􀁴􀁩􀁣􀁾􀁰􀁡􀁴􀀡􀁥􀁤􀀧􀀬􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁬􀁳􀁴􀁮􀁊􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁬􀀱􀀠AW<l,rtft\v 􀁄􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁢􀁥􀁲2003 2 
WEST FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM 1 I 1 1 Name: West Fork Interceptor. WF-1 l. Location: City of Grand Prairie From the Plant to Bear Creek System junction fType/Size: 84-inch parallel relief
of 17,800-feet of 84-inch pipeline Status: Design Contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed 2001 Environmental Assessment completed 1 Evaluation of TXDOT
conflicts and pipeline reroutes completed by February 2001 Final Design Is 63% complete Easement acquisition started December 2001 Anticipated construction award in 2004 . Name: West
Fork Interceptor. WF-3 Location: City of Grand Prairie Johnson Creek from junction with West Fork to Hwy. 360 Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation of 24-inch parallel relief of 11 ,050-feet
of 30-inch line Status: Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 1998 Environmental Assessment completed by December 2001 Final Design Contract awarded in June 2003 iFinal Design
is <5% complete Anticipated in July 2004 I I Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-11A Location: City of Grand Prairie From Johnson Creek to Roy Orr Blvd. Type: Preliminary Engineering Study,
Environmental Assessment, and Final Design of 72inch diameter parallel relief 6,900-feet of 6o-inch diameter line Status: Design awarded in August 1998 Draft Environmental Assessment
completed March 2000 Work is 31% complete Easement acquisition begun in 2000 Anticipated construction award in 2004 Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF-11 B Location: Cities of Arlington
and Grand Prairie From Roy Orr Boulevard to west of West Fork of Trinity River Type: Preliminary Engineering Study, Environmental Assessment, and Final Design of 84inch diameter parallel
relief of 16,000-feet of 66-inch to 84-inch diameter line Status: Design contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment completed March 2000 Engineering
evaluations & negotiation of pipeline relocation, November 1999 to December 2001 Revised draft environmental assessment completed in April 2001 Revised pipeline alignment in summer 2001
Additional Archeological Investigations completed in June 2003 DeSign 76% complete Easement acquisition begun in late 2001 Anticipated construction award in 2004 3 j 
Name: West Fork Interceptor, Johnson Branch Trunk Reloc81,on @Hwy 30 location: City of Grand Prairie Type: Design and Construction Phase Engineering Status: Design awarded in ear1y 2003
Draft Environmental Assessment completed Design is <5% complete Anticipated construction by December 2003 PLANT AND OTHER SYSTEM PROJECTS Name: Type: Status: Name: Type: Status: Name:
Type: Status: Pump Stations 6,7, and 13 Evaluation .' -' Planning, Design, and Testing Contract awarded in early 2003 Work is approximately 47% complete Class A Bio-$olids Stabilization
Design Report and Construction Services Contract awarded in ear1y 2003 Work is approximately 9% complete FY2003 Interceptor III Proration IDM and III Row Adjustment Contract awarded
in 2003 Work is approximately <5% complete ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PRQJECTS-(as of July 2003) PIPELINE PROJECTS Name: Location: Type: . Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Little Bear
Creek CO-1/GV-4 City of Hurst , ,i·East of Precinct Road, north of SP RRIWest of Hwy 121 &north of Glade Rehabilitation of 15OO-feet of 12-inch diameter line/200-foot line repair Project
added to BC Rehab. in 1998 Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition completed In July 2001 Construction awarded In October 2001 Construction is approximately
99% complete Bear Creek Rehab .• Section II & III Cities of Irving and Ft. Worth South of DFW Intemational Airport Rehabilitation of 9,Ooo-feet of 39-lnch diameter line . Preliminary
Design Study initiated in February 1996 Engineering Evaluation completed in January 1997 Design initiated May 1997 Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition
completed in July 2001 Construction awarded in October 2001 Construction is approximately 99% complete 4 
'.'.'/·.ACTIVECONSTRUCII0Nf>ROJEC:fS-fas.ofJtiIY2003t;;' 'OJ,..,: " .," ">-' 􀀺􀀬􀁽􀁏􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀠􀀢􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀧􀀠riU:iei.JNE 􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁊􀁅􀁃􀁾􀁓􀀠...' ,/{ :,•• _0,,; . Nall\e: 􀁌􀁩􀁴􀁴􀁬􀁥􀁂􀁥􀁡􀁲
􀂷􀁃􀁾􀁊􀀨􀁃􀁯􀀮􀀺􀀱􀀯􀁇􀁖􀀴􀀠": 􀁾􀀬􀀠 ',. . LoCation: City of HurSt . '. . . .... East of Precinct Road, nor\l:l of $PRRJ\.veSt OfHWy 121& north Of Glade Type: Rehabilitation of 1500-feet
of 12.inch diameter finef200.foot iine repair Status: Project added to BC Rehab. in :1J398' . '. . . . . . Final Designcornpleted in julie 2001 Easement and PElrmit acquisiliop ·CCil}1pleted
in July.20Q1 Construction awarded in Octo6ei";!O(J1 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠.... . Construction is approximately 99% colllpleje 4 
Name: Location: TypelSize: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Elm Fork Interceptor. MS 15.0E City of Carrollton South of
1-635 and north of Luna Road Re-build meter station. Design completed April 2002 Construction begun in May 2063 Construction 95% complete Mountain Creek Interceptor, MC-4A Cities of
Grand Prairie and Arlington Bowman Branch, South Fork Fish Creek to Loyd Park Construct new lift station, 1 O,OOO-foot of twin 24-inch diameter force main to replace existing 18-inch
force main, and build 7,500-feet of 54-inch diameter pipeline to replace existing 24-inch diameter gravity pipeline Environmental Assessment completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded
in August 1999 Evaluate possible reroute options in South Grand Prairie due to land development Modify design for two 24-inch diameter force main and 54-inch gravity pipeline in July
2001 Easement acquisition begun in October 2000 USACE environmental data and reports to be completed by September 2001 Easement acquisition to be completed by October 2002 Construction
contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <91 % complete Construction to be completed by December 2003 Mountain Creek Interceptor. MC-4B Cities of Grand Prairie, Arlington, and Mansfield
Loyd Park to Holland Road 16,OOO-feet of 48-inch relief pipeline replacement of 24-inch gravity pipeline Environmental Assessment completed in April 1999 . Design Contract awarded in
August 1999 Final design to be9in in September 2000 Easement acquisition to begin March 2001 USACE environmental data and reports to be completed by September 2001 Easement acquisition
completed by August 2002 Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <99% complete Construction to be completed by July 2003 West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF-G. Phase I City
of Grand Prairie From 3,900-feet west of Bear Creek System junction to Belt Line Road 84-inch parallel relief of 2,200-feet of 45-inch & 66:.jnch lines Design initiated in 1996 Revisions
to design made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 Design 100% complete in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition begun in 1999
Construction split into two phases in October 2000 Construction contract awarded in April 2001 Construction is approximately 99% complete Construction to be completed by September 2002
5 
􀁾􀀭􀁩􀀠 ..􀀪􀁻􀁾􀀧􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀠'Ii! ' Name: West Fork. Relief Interceptor, WF-G Phase II and 􀁉􀀭􀁁􀁾􀀱􀀠!:rosign , .'lJJ1\1 Location: City of Grand Prairie 􀁩􀁾􀁬􀀠From Bear Creek System
Junction approximately 3,900-feet upstream toward Belt Line Road Type: 84-lnch parallel relief of 3.900-feet of 45-inch & 66-inch lines ,:[, Status: Design initiated in 1996 ;vi'1Revisions
to'design made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 􀁾􀁜􀀮 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀁪,rDesign completed in April 1999 􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀠IAdditional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement
acquisition begun in 1999 􀁾􀁾􀁾..}i'l.g.(:,.Construction split into two phases in October 2000 􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀠.Design is 100% complete ,;[1,: 'tConstruction contract awarded in March 2003
􀁾􀀻􀀫􀁾Construction 52% complete -}i-.-'ij·f}'jName: West Fgr!< Relief Interceptor. WF-C. Nt B. p, & M ·rn",;'!Location: City of Arlington 􀀬􀁾􀀱􀀠􀁾􀀠From West of Hwy. 360 to west
of Collins Street i<:,} io' ;Type: 72-inch parallel relief of existing 54-inch & 60-lnch lines Status: Design initiated in 1996 . 􀁾􀀺􀁽􀀠 Design completed in December 1998 EA completed
by Decef(lber 1998 ,;c-Construction contract awarded in December 1998 Construction 97% complete 􀁾􀀾􀁬􀀠Construction to be completed by August 2003 􀁾􀀭􀀧􀁩􀀠JI1\PLANT PROJECTS Name:
Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: .t1 Stage V Odor Improvements -;ilPlant Weir Cover. Collection Piping. and Bic-Filter -':'-,ojContract
approved in December 2001 Construction to be completed by August 2003 \\ 􀀮􀁾􀀠;Bar Screening Improvements. Phases I and II PS6f6A 'I.:Plant , DeSign of Phase I is 100% complete " II
Design of Phase II is 100% complete 􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁲􀀠Construction contract awarded in June 2002 )1Construction <68% complete "\ Construction to be completed by February 2004 􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀠i I Clarifier
Piping Improvements t Plant r Evaluation and Piping Rehabilitation r :1Contract to be approved in August 2002 I I Construction to be completed by August 2003 I, 6 
􀁎􀁾􀁭􀁴􀀻􀁬􀀺􀀠. Stage V.Odor 􀁉􀁭􀀡􀁩􀁦􀀶􀁖􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠." ". .7.:.' Location: Plant '. /"': > .i--Type: Weir COver, COlieCtlonPiping, 􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁂􀁩􀁏􀀭􀁆􀁩􀁬􀁴􀁾􀁲􀂷􀀠 Status: Contract
approved in D!3ce!Dber 2001. .. . Constructio.n to be·compll'lteq .bY August 2()03 , . '., . . J •. Name:. .LOdation: 􀁔􀁙􀁾􀀺􀀠. Stabls:. 6 
List of Construction Proiect Improvements Completed since August 2002 Report 1. Bear Creek Interceptor Evaluation, BC-4 2. Harwood Road 88 Maintenance 3. Gravity Sand Filter Improvements
7 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Region Office HANDOUTAGENOAIITEM DATE: August 12, 2003 FILE: 3110.102/3110.800 TO: MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM
RE: Central Regional Wastewater System Proposed FY 2004 Budget Authority management annually prepares a proposed budget of anticipated revenues and expenditures of the Central Regional
Wastewater System in accordance with the fiscal provisions of our Wastewater Services Contract for the ensuing fiscal year. We are pleased to present to you the proposed FY 2004 Budget
for the annual operating funds of the Central System. This budget is relevant to the time period for December 1, 2003 through November 30, 2004. This budget reflects the proposed financial
activities of operating and debt service funds, provides for our continuing ability to deliver high quality, efficient wastewater service to our Contracting Parties, and will continue
to pOSition the Central System for increased growth, regulatory changes and maximized internal operational productivity measures to result in cost effiCient wastewater treatment. The
Authority will continue the efforts established in 2002 to ensure the security and integrity of our Central System and the reliability of our services. Therefore, the budget reflects
the Authority's continued commitment to protect capital investments, keep operational expenses to a minimum and to maximize the process of increasing operational efficiency throughout
the Authority. A brief overview of Central's financial picture for FY 2004 will reveal a slight decrease in overall System expenditures, with only those increases in operating accounts
required to meet contractual obligations for our treatment of wastewater, as compared to FY 2003 projected requirements. The operation and maintenance expenditures were developed based
on transporting and treating an average daily flow of 151.208 MGD. The scheduled debt service requirements are slightly lower than the current budget, primarily due to the refunding
of the Series 1993 Bonds in early 2003, and are based on principal and interest payments due on outstanding Central Regional Wastewater System Revenue Bonds. The antiCipated expenditures
in FY 2004 total $57,839,230, an approximate 0.4% decrease below the $58,077,710 predicted for the current fiscal year. The projected costs for salaries and related benefits, laboratory
supplies, engineering services, telephone, Expenses Project insurance payments, power usage, collection system maintenance .54,63% Debt Service and MiscellaneOUSrepairs, and equipment
rental essential 023.40% Other' Services and Charges .15.20% Personal Services .5.49% Suppliesfor delivering services during the year have increased $1,576,670 above the • 1.28% Capital
OuUays predicted FY 2003 Budget. The increase in the proposed FY 2004 Budget for operating accounts is 
• 
August 12, 2003 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 2 partly offset by a $1,184,390 reduction in service cost for process chemicals and capital outlays, as well as in other
operating category accounts due to process modifications and, as in previous year's efforts, by holding the line on controllable costs. During this weak economic climate, Authority management
continues our commitment of aggressive decisions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our business services and move toward deeper cost reductions, as close scrutiny was given
to all anticipated and discretionary expenditures. Along with decreases in some predicted operating accounts, there is a decrease in programmed debt payments of $630,760, resulting in
an overall projected decrease of $238,480 for FY 2004 expenditures below the FY 2003 Budget. As is shown in the follOWing table, and despite additional power costs not foreseen one year
ago, the predicted gross and net unit costsf1000 gallons are slightly less than last year's projections for the coming FY 2004. Anticipated FY 2004 revenues from the System's Contracting
Parties. Revenuetotaling $55,193,770, reflects a 1.06% increase above the FY 2003 projected revenue requirement of $54,613,900. The resulting predicted _94,94% ConltBct Revanua 01.64%
Operating Owmead & Intar-Fund SeNoes gross and net unit costs of service for _1.31 %Miscellaneous Incorne wastewater transportation and • 1.05% 􀁉􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁪􀀠Income .0.86% Professional
Fees treatment throughout FY 2004 are .0.20% Oper<ltlng 'transfers 1.3% below and 0.1 % over the respective predicted FY 2003 budgeted unit costs as reflected in the following table:
The following exhibits are presented to provide flow allocations, a summary of budget objectives and detailed information about the five major budget categories, as well as additional
quantitative and statistical information for your review: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 0 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Flow Allocations Budget Objectives
Budget at a Glance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous Historical System Data 
August 12, 2003 3110.102/3110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 3 The proposed FY 2004 Budget (Exhibit K) is p[ sented for your review and consideration and will be discussed in the
August 12. 2003 Adviso Committee meeting. Additionally. a Budget Workshop will be held in the upstairs confer om of the Administrative Building at the Central Regional Wastewater System
0 esda)! Au us! 28. 2003 beginning at 10:00 a.m. for those representatives and city staff member do no a en the Advisory Committee meeting or desire to discuss the proposed budget in
more detail. A later AdviSOry Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 16th. at which time the committee will be requested to recommend the proposed FY 2004 Budget for adoption
by the Authority's Board of Directors. If there are any questions conceming the proposed budget or the workshop, please contact the 􀁾􀁾􀀼􀁮􀀻􀀺􀁍􀁌􀁴􀀠PATRICIA M. CLEVELAND Manager.
Operations Northern Region .PMC/rrc Attachments c: Danny F. Vance. General Manager Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager. Northern Region Bill Tatum, Project Manager. Central Regional Wastewater
System 
EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2004 FLOW ALLOCATIONS BUDGETED FY 2004 FLOWS 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% z z 0 (!) 􀁾􀀠a: « !!! () « z g IZ a: :> 0:--' 0 00 UJ
to Z0J: a: 0: UJ « (/) UJ (!) l::: UJ UJ0.. I--'(/) --' (!) :::> J: --' :c --' 0 ::.::!!! z '" J:Z J: I« () :::> z (/) 0% CUSTOMER CITY 
EXHIBITB CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2004 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Trinity River Authority's Central Regional Wastewater System is a large regional wastewater system located
on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River and is currently serving approximately one million customers in Dallas, Tarrant, Ellis, Johnson and Denton counties of north
central Texas. The service area encompasses all or portions of 20 cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The Central Regional
Wastewater System treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons per day (MGD). This System consists of an extensive regional network
of interceptors, pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the delivery of treated effluent for golf course irrigation and lake level management under the first major
urban reuse program in Texas. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2004 The Authority's objectives are reflected in the recommended Annual Operating Budget for Central Regional Wastewater System
FY 2004. The major goals and objectives are: • Operate and adequately protect the Central System's capital investmentsby proper maintenance, which includes a 162 MGD treatment plant, over 200 miles of interceptors, four lift stations, 138 metering stations, an analytical laboratory, and the DCURD water
reuse project. • Provide wastewater transportation and treatment services for a projected flow contribution of 151.208 MGD. • Continue operating at efficient levels and minimize unit
costs while enhancing treatment capaCity and meeting all regulatory requirements. • Continue Authority efforts to reduce overall wet-weather flow impacts to the System by installing
new pipelines for capacity, rehabilitating existing collection system infrastructure and plant facilities as identified in the first and second phases of the 1998 Five Year Plan; funded
by the Series 1998A and 2000 Revenue Bonds, and the third phase funded by the Series 2001 Bonds. • Operate and maintain odor control facilities consistent with the Odor Control Abatement
Master Plan and implement additional odor improvements in the primary treatment areas to reduce risk of adjacent area odors. • Provide Contracting Parties laboratory testing and pretreatment
program capabilities and services on a revenue-supported basis. • Continue 100% land application of System biosolids under a five-year agreement. • Respond in a timely fashion to Customer
Cities' requests for assistance. 
EXHIBIT C FISCAL YEAR 2004 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $58,134,240 Expenses $57,839,230 Variance (Retained
for FY 2005 Debt Requirements) $295,010 Revenue .94.94% Contract Revenue []1 .64% Operating Overhead & 􀁉􀁮􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁆􀁵􀁮􀁤􀀠Services .1,31% Miscellaneous Income .1.05% Interest Income
.0.86% Professional Fees .0.20% Operating Transfers Expenses .54.63% Debt Service and Miscellaneous 023.40% Other Services and Charges .15.20% Personal Services .5.49% Supplies .1 28%
Capital Outlays FISCAL YEAR 2004 FUND SUMMARY Revenue Summary Contract Revenue Operating Overhead and Inler-Fund Services Professional Fees Inleresllncome Operating Transfers Miscellaneous
Income Total Sources of Funds Expenditure Summary Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous $55,193,770 $949,890 $500,000 $609,600
$118,000 $762,980 $58,134,240 $8,791,200 $3,173,040 $13,535,730 $742,900 
EXHIBIT D CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PERSONAL SERVICES FY2004 <l Proposed FY 2004 of $8,791,200 vs Current FY 2003 of $8,399,720 = Variance (+) $391,480 or + 4.7%. <l The budget
category of Personal Services includes seven line item accounts. As compared with present 􀁢􀁵􀁤􀁧􀁥􀁾􀀠one line item aocount remained unchanged (Unemployment Compensation), one decreased
(-) $1,400 (Education), and six increased (+) $392,880 (Salaries, FICA, Health/Life Insurance, Pension, and Employee Service Recognition). Q The anticipated increase in salaries and
related benefit costs is partly due to usual provisions for forecast salary adjustments based on merit, varying with each individual employee. Also, provisions are included for cost
increases in the Authority's Health Insurance expenses due to claims experience that has resulted in premium increases. <l Authority management believes that the Central facility can
be operated efficiently and maintain adequate margins of sefety with one Project Manager, an Operations/Maintenance staff of 97, plus 53 Technical Services/Pretreatment staff, Administrative
staff of 9, and 7 PurchasinglWarehouse staff. Personal Services 15.20% t Personal Services expenditures include those costs associated with the staffing required to operate, maintain,
and administer the treatment plant, biosolids program, laboratory, pretreatment program, collection system, and meter stations. Significant line item accounts in this category of expenditures
include selaries, payroll taxes, health insurance, and pension. 
EXHIBIT E CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM SUPPLIES FY 2004 <l Proposed FY 2004 of $ 3,173,040 vs Current FY 2003 of $3,556,400 = Variance H $383,360 or (-) 10.8%. <l The budget category
of Supplies includes eight line items accounts. As compared with the present budget, seven decreased (-) $400,960 (Office Supplies, Dues and Subscriptions, Certification Fees, Maintenance
and Operating Supplies, Process Chemicals, Fuel and Computer Software, licenses and Instrument Supplies), and the remaining line item account increased (+) $17,600 (Lab Supplies). <lOver
67% of the expendttures for Supplies is for the purchase of process chemicals. The decrease of $379,130 in anticipated process chemical expenditures is mainly associated with a modification
in process use of lime and polymer necessary for solids thickening and dewatering. <l Included in the Computer Software, licenses and Instrument Supplies account is the Project's second
year share of an Authoritywide 􀀮􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁰􀁲􀁩􀁳􀁥􀀠Resource Planning software which integrated financial, payroll, human resources, budget reporting, asset management, and purchasing
into one integrated system. The cost to purchase and implement began in FY 2003 budgeting process for phasing over a three-year period (2003-2005). Supplies 5.49% Approximately 67% of
the expenditures in this category are for the purchase of process chemicals necessary for sludge thickening, dewatering and stabilization, odor control, effluent disinfection and dechloriation,
and other treatment processes. 
EXHIBIT F CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES FY2004 Q Proposed FY 2004 of $13,535,730 vs Current FY 2003 of $12,785,680 = Variance (+) $750,050 or + 5.9%.
Q The budget category of Other Services and Charges includes 22 line item accounts. As compared with the present budget, five remained unchanged, (Audit, Legal, Postage, Travel, and
Laundry and Uniforms), eleven line item accounts decreased (-) $416,140, and six increased (+) $1,166,190. Q The decreases in this category are due to reductions in the Authority's computer
network, process SCADA, maintenance management system and Lawson support services, professional services, printing and binding, employee training, water usage, repair and maintenance
of equipment, plant and buildings, vehicles and electrical systems, off-site biosolids land application and administrative overhead costs. Q This category of expenditures includes increases
in engineering services, telephone, Project insurance payments, power usage, repair and maintenance of collection system, and equipment rental. Approximately 42% or $5,639,960 of the
expenditures in this category is for power usage. This has increased 23.9% or (+) $1,086,480 due to higher estimated flows, as well as increased costs of a new Authority-wide energy
contract for the time period of June 1, 2003 through May 31, 2004. Other Services and Charges '-_/23.40% This category of expenditures relates to the indirect costs associated with the
collection and treatment system, vehicles, and off-site biosolids disposal. 
EXHIBITG CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL OUTLAYS FY 2004 c:. Proposed FY 2004 of $742,900 vs. Current FY 2003 of $1,108,790" Variance H $ 365,890 or (-) 33.00%. c:. The Capital
Outlays category can vary significantly from year to year as major equipment is only purchased on an annual as needed basis. c:. This category consists of 94.5% or $702,300 of capital
expenditures for replacement itams and 5.5% or $40,600 of new capital equipment items proposed for purchase in FY 2004. c:. Approximately 90% or $629,000 of the proposed Capital Outlay
items for replacement are for two trucks, the heavy equipment items of a tractor hauling truck, track loader and pipeline television inspection unit with trailer, which all have excessive
mileage and wear due to age, and the replacement of an analytical laboratory gas chromatograph/mass spectrophotometer (GC/MS) for identifying organic compounds. The primary expenses
under the category of new items are for maintaining sludge dewatering equipment, a hydraulic dump truck bed for collection system maintenance program and one new utility camper cover
for the pretreatment truck. c:. A list of all the projected capital expenditures is on pages 28 and 29 of the attached proposed FY 2004 Budget Capital Outlays "--... 􀁾􀀠1.28% The category
of Capital Outlays consists of the purchase of machinery and equipmenllo achieve a new purpose or replace existing equipment. 
EXHIBIT H CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS FY2004 GI Proposed FY 2004 of $31,596,360 vs. Current FY 2003 of $32,227,120 = Variance (-) $630,760 or (-)
2.0%. GI The amount budgeted for Debt Service reflects the fixed and established schedules based on outstanding debt of the Central System. GI In June 1995, the Authority issued $43,515,000
in System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various system improvements identified in the 5 Year Plan. GI In July 1998, the Authority issued $50,845,000 in
System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects. These bonds were improvement projects. These bonds were purchased
by the Texas Water Development Board. GI In September 1998, the Authority issued $66,950,000 in System Improvement and Refunding Bonds, with $61,375,000 being refunded, prodUCing a savings
of $2.7 million through the life of the bond. GI In July 2001, The Authority issued $88,225,000 in System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation
and plant improvement projects. These bonds were purchased by the Texas Water Development Board. Glln January 2003, the Authority issued $135,885,000 in Revenue Refunding Bonds to retire
the Series 1993 Bonds, producing a savings of $ 11,731,109 through the life of the bonds. GI The decrease in debt expenditures over the present FY 2003 Budget is due to the overall decrease
in scheduled debt service payments in FY 2004. Deb! Services and Miscellaneous ? 54.63% Debt Services and Miscellaneous includes the annual principal and interest payments due on the
System 􀁢􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁾􀀠and the associated paying agent fees. Typically, annual prinCipal and interest payments are structured to provide relatively level debt service requirements from year
to year until such time as additional bonds are issued. 
EXHIBIT I CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND FLOW DATA FISCAL YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 --------BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED
ACTUAL PROJECTED ACTUAL PROJECTED NET ACTUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES REVENUE REVENUE FLOW FLOW COST/1,OOO GAL. COST/1,OOO GAL. $47,693,245 $46,327,057 $44,889,460 $42,064,179 114.14MGD
110.08 MGD $1.0745 $1.0440 $48,358,525 $47,401,825 $45,233,590 $42,891,464 116.00 MGD 118.01 MGD $1.0683 $0.9958 $47,014,070 $46,752,148 $43,601,935 $43,673,073 118.28 MGD 118.04MGD
$1.0099 $1.0136 $50,390,530 $50,691,945 $45,859,710 $45,808,213 12331 MGD 120.64 MGD $1.0189 $1.0403 $51,066,490 $51,361,749 $47,812,790 $48,442,041 127.41 MGD 123.47 MGD $1.0253 $1.0720
$54,509,150 $56,087,461 $49,187,660 $51,953,155 143.13 MGD 146.49 MGD $0.9415 $0.9716 $54,352,130 $53,339,201 $50,421,660 $50,188,032 145.52 MGD 144.22 MGD $0.9493 $0.9533 $58,077,710
• $54,613,900 • 150.15 MGD • $0.9965 • $57,839,230 • $55,193,770 • 151.21 MGD • $0.9973 • Central Regional Wastewater System Flow & Net Castl1 ,000 Gal. 160 • •􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽�
�􀁾􀁪1.5140 t----:;;> A • 120 100 l; c (!) BO 􀁾􀀠II! 60 􀁾􀀠() 40 20 a 0.5 2001 2002 2003 2004 1996 1997 199B 1999 2000 Fiscal Year 􀁛􀁆􀁙􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀳􀀦􀁾􀁾are projected􀁟􀁁􀁃􀁔􀁕􀁁􀁾NET
COSTI1OO0 __􀁁􀁃􀁔􀁕􀁁􀁾MGD 
-------------------------------------------EXHIBIT J CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJECTED FUTURE COST OF SERVICE 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠FISCAL YR. ENDING NOV. 30 2004 2005 2006
PROJECTED GROSS FLOW COST PER (MGD) 1,000 GAL. 151.208 $1.045 ..... $0.9.!lZ ---------2007 159.608 -------$1.147 NET COST PER 1,000 GAL. 154.008 $0.998$.1:051 156.808 $1.146 􀀮􀀤􀀱􀀮􀀰􀁪􀁬􀁾􀀠$1.090
162.4082008 $1.163. Ji1:225 $1.235165.208 $1.1732009 (1) NET COST IS PROJECTED TO BE 95% OF GROSS COST BASED UPON HISTORICAL TRENDS FOR FY 2005 THROUGH FY2009. (2) UNIT COST CALCULATION
FOR FY 2005 THROUGH FY 2009 INCLUDES PROJECTED ADDITIONAL DEBT TO FINANCE PLANT AND COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. 
EXHIBIT K TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Description of the Project The Central Regional Wastewater
System (CRWS) consists of a treatment plant and appurtenances rated at 162 Million Gallons Per Day (MGD), interceptor pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the
delivery of treated effluent for irrigation and level control under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. CRWS provides wastewater transportation and treatment for the Cities
of Irving, Grand Prairie, Farmers Branch, Dallas, Carrollton, Coppell, Cedar Hill, Euless, Bedford, Fort Worth, Arlington, Colleyville, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Grapevine,
Mansfield, Hurst, North Richland Hills, Duncanville, Southlake, Keller, and Addison. The estimated average daily volume of wastewater predicted to be received from the contributing cities
in Fiscal Year 2002 is 151.208 Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD). 2004 2003 Percent Amount Percent Amount 9.!i! Contribution MGD Contribution MGD Addison 1.508% 2.280 1.518% 2.280 Arlington
30.666% 46.370 30.276% 45.460 Bedford 3.241% 4.900 3.130% 4.700 Carrollton 9.060% 13.700 7.992% 12.000 Cedar Hill 0.214% 0.324 0.200% 0.300 Colleyville 1.686% 2.550 1.683% 2.527 Coppell
2.778% 4.200 2.597% 3.900 D/FW Airport 1.528% 2.310 1.539% 2.310 Dallas 5.456% 8.250 5.661% 8.500 Duncanville 0.132% 0.200 0.133% 0.200 Euless 2.827% 4.275 2.847% 4.275 Farmers Branch
4.431% 6.700 4.462% 6.700 Fort Worth 1.045% 1.580 0.911% 1.368 Grand Prairie 10.259% 15.512 11.116% 16.690 Grapevine 1.198% 1.811 1.279% 1.920 Hurst 0.137% 0.207 0.135% 0.202 Irving
17.790% 26.900 19.148% 28.750 Keller 1.755% 2.654 1.608% 2.415 Mansfield 2.728% 4.125 2.165% 3.250 North Richland Hills 0.437% 0.660 0.468% 0.703 Southlake 1.124% 1.700 1.132% 1.700
Totals 109 000% 151.208 10n 000% 150.150 Located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River, the CRWS Facility initiated operation in December 1959, initially serving
four four cities. The original plant consisted of a trickling filter process with a capacity of 30 MGD. The capacity was increased to 60 MGD in 1976 by the addition of mechanical dewatering
equipment and an activated sludge process. In 1980, a two phase expansion program was completed that increased the capacity to 100 MGD and provided tertiary treatment. Growth in the
service area resulted in the expansion of the CRWS facility to a capacity of 135 MGD, with construction initiated in 1988 and completed in early 1994. Effluent discharged from CRWS consistently
meets or exceeds the requirements specified in the TPDES permit issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). TCEQ approved an uprating of the discharge permit to an
effluent level of 162 MGD with the completion of the solids dewatering project on April 1, 2001. Page 1 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Work Program To maintain and operate the Central Plant on a
24-hour a day, 7-day a week basis requires a staff of three (3) department managers reporting to the Project Manager. In addition to the management staff, Including purchasing and the
inventory department, staffing is as follows: System Operation and Maintenance 96 Administration Services 8 Technical Services 44 Northern Region Purchasing 7 Pretreatment !l. 163 The
responsibility for selecting process parameters, actual treatment of wastewater, process and non-process eqUipment maintenance, maintenance, repair of electrical and electronic equipment,
lift station maintenance sludge disposal and computer monitOring of plant processes lies with the Manager, System Operations, and the Operation and Maintenance Department. The Manager,
Administrative Services and steff provide support at the Central System in the areas of human resource administration, benefits, training, clencal, accounts payable, payroll, and capital
asset control and data processing. The Manager, Technical Services and staff provide analytical data for process control, Influent monitoring and effluent quality reports. The laboratory
and Pretreatment Programs provide analytical and technical assistance to cities, state, andlor federal agencies and other TRA Projects on a contract basis. Engineering Services provide
inspection and surveillance of the collection system and monitOring of flows from the Cities into the Central System. Page 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM TOTAL FUND SUMMARY FUf:lIl!ii AVAILABLE Projected December 1, 2003 $ 17,184,010
E!iiTiMATED !iiOURCE!ii OF FUNDS Contract Revenue $ 55,197,760 Inter-Fund Services & Charges 514,340 Operating Overhead 435,550 Professional Fees 500,000 Interest Income 609,600 Operating
Transfers 118,000 Miscellaneous Income 762,980 58,138,230 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 75,322,240 E!iiTiMATED AffLiCATIOtj QF FU!:lD!ii Appropriation Expenditures: Personal Services $ 8,791,200
Supplies 3,173,040 Other Services and Charges 13,539,730 Capital Outlays 742,900 Debt Service and Miscellaneous 31.596.360 57.843.230 TOTAL FUNDS APPLIED $ 57,843,230 FUNDS AVAILABLE
Projected November 30, 2004 $ ..17.479,010 Page 3 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 20M CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT PESCRIPTION OF REVENUE 2004 BUDGET 2003 BUDGET
CONTRA!:;T 􀁾􀁎􀁑􀀠OegRA!ING OVIilRHI;;AD BEVEN!,!E (301) Contract Revenue -Addison $ 832,380 $ 829,040 (301) Contract Revenue· Arlington 16,926,950 16,534,910 (301) Contract Revenue
-Bedford 1,788,960 1,709,420 (301) Contract Revenue -Carrollton 5,000,920 4,364,740 (301) Contract Revenue· Cedar Hill 118,120 109,230 (301) Contract Revenue -Colleyville 930,640 919,150
(301) Contract Revenue -Coppell 1,533,400 1,418,320 (301) Contract Revenue -D/FW Airport 843,420 840,510 (301) Contract Revenue -Dallas 3,011,590 3,091,690 (301) Contract Revenue -Duncanville
72,860 72,640 (301) Contract Revenue -Euless 1,560,440 1,554,860 (301) Contract Revenue -Farmers Branch 2,445,810 2,436,870 (301) Contract Revenue -Fort Worth 576,820 497,530 (301) Contract
Revenue -Grand Prairie 5,662,740 6,070,880 (301) Contract Revenue -Grapevine 661,270 698,510 (301) Contract Revenue -Hurst 75,620 73,730 (301) Contract Revenue -Irving 9,819,680 10,457,470
(301) Contract Revenue -Keller 968,720 878,190 (301) Contract Revenue -Mansfield 1,505,790 1,182,390 (301) Contract Revenue -North Richland Hills 241,210 255,590 (301) Contract Revenue
-Southlake 620,420 618,230 (338) Inter-Fund Services & Charges 514,340 414,340 (339) Operating Ovemead -Other Projects 435,550 417,170 TOTAL CONTRACT AND OPERATING OVERHEAD REVENUE 56,147,650
55,445,410 PRQEEl!SIOtMIL EIilES (398) Professional Fees 500,000 450,000 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES 500,000 450,000 INTEREST INCQME (380) Interest Income Interest & Sinking Fund (380) Interest
Income -Reserve Fund (380) Interest Income -Revenue Fund (360) Interest Income -Emergency 114,800 439,500 44,300 11 ,000 229,600 1,147,800 123,500 44,000 TOTAL INTEREST INCOME $ 609,600
$ 1,544,900 2002 ACTUAL $ 771,892 15,273,724 1,705,389 4,776,897 112,421 764,439 1,357,586 681,052 2,779,915 65,244 1,355,077 2,270,005 610,788 4,639,362 563,110 63,739 9,534,220 839,144
1,165,368 210,288 628,354 340,232 362,312 50,890,576 835,387 835,387 355,533 618,127 141,759 91,343 1,206,762􀁾􀀠Page 4 
TRINITY RNER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET
􀁏􀁐􀁅􀁒􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁒􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁆􀁅􀁒􀁓􀀠(372) Operating Transfers· Risk Retention 118,000 258,440 TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS 118,000 258,440 􀁍􀁉􀁓􀁃􀁅􀁌􀁢􀁁􀁾􀁅􀁏􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁓􀀠􀁉􀁾􀁃􀁏􀁍􀁅􀀠(340)
Overstrength Surcharge (341) Northeast Lakeview Lift Station (343) Pretreatment Revenue (344) Commodity Charge (348) Quantity Surcharge (399) Miscellaneous Income $ 650,000 25,000 48,880
29,100 10,000 $ 600,000 22,000 51,810 36,800 10,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 762,980 720,610 GRAND TOTAL $ 58,138,230 􀁾􀀠58,419,360 2002 ACTUAL $ 911,534 20,840 38,799 132,527 24,232
1,150,148 $ 54,082,873 Page 5 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -RSCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE PERSONAL SERVICES (400) Salaries
-Regular (402) Payroll Taxes -Fica (403) Emp. Ben -HealthlLife Ins. (404) Employee Benefit· Pension (406) Unemployment Compensation (407) Emp. Recognition Program (408) Employee Benefit·
Education PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET $ 6,645,060 508,350 831,930 761,650 20,000 18,610 5,600 CURRENT 2003 BUDGET $ 6,465,890 494,640 655,250 740,660 20,000 16,280 7,000 2002ACIUAL $ 6,520,636
487,326 411,933 641,752 1,864 19,646 2.385 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES (410) Office Supplies (411) Dues and Subscriptions (412) Fees Other Than Dues and SubscripUons (413) Maintenance
and Operating Supplies (414) Lab Supplies (415) Process Chemicals and Supplies (416) Fuel, Oil, & Lubricants (417) Computer Software, Llc. & Inslr. Supplies 8,791,200 45,900 54,810 79,810
162,750 297,950 2,144,870 94,320 292,630 8,399,720 50,200 55,850 60,910 166,930 280,350 280,350 2,524,000 103,630 294,530 8.085,542 41,118 69,515 153,050 196,146 298,733 1,881,756 91,781
44,148 TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SflRVI\<E!j AN(2 CHABGflS (420) Auditing (421) Engineering (422) Legal (423) Outside Se/Vlces (424) Other Professional Services (430) Telephone and Telemetering
(431) Postage (432) Printing and Binding (433) Insurance Payments (436) Travel (437) Laundry, Uniform, & Ind. Equip (438) Training (440) Utilities (442) Power (443) R & M • Collection
System (4#) R & M -Equipment (445) R & M • Plant & Buildings (446) R & M -Vehicles (448) R & M· Electrical (449) Off-site Biosolid Land Application (451) Rent -Machinery & Equip. (466)
Administrative Overhead 3,173,040 37,500 259,500 20,000 577,630 148,600 98,760 8,520 7,300 299,960 19,300 49,070 55,700 110,000 5,639.960 388,240 168,790 691,520 40,860 514,000 2,563,870
84,100 1,7,56,550 􀁟􀀭􀀮􀁍􀁾􀀶􀀮􀀴􀀰􀀰􀀠37,500 223,090 20,000 644,590 197,700 91,060 8,520 11,010 287,430 19,300 49,070 70,600 120,000 4,553,480 369,750 223,200 729,600 43,500 587,000
2,665,190 79,520 1,754,570 2,776,247 36,000 282,517 374 404,151 186,586 82,240 7,788 4,268 173,153 22,679 52,343 39,285 73,832 3,930,637 862,727 144,855 880,312 40,380 440,695 2,279,298
86,192 1,545,960 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES 13,539,730 12.785,680 11,576,072 Page 6 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET CURRENT
2003 BUDGET 2002 ACTUAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS (476) Machinery & Equipment $ 742,900 $ 1,108,790 $ 645,437 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 742,900 1,108,790 645,437 DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS(480)
Bond Principal Payments (481) Inleraslon Long-Term Debt (483) Paying Agent Fees (486) SEC Disclosure Fees 17,295,000 14,285,860 5,000 10,500 16,430,000 15,785,120 12,000 15,580,000 14,674,200
1,703 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS 31,596,360 32,227,120 30,255,903 GRAND TOTAL $ 57,843,230 $ 58,077,710 $ 53,339,201 Page 7 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· RSCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED CONTRACT REVENUE 2004 BUpGET Operation & Maintenance
T olal Expenditures $ 26,262,370.00 Less Other Revenue Sources: Inter-Fund Services & Charges (514,340.00) Operating Overhead (435,550.00) Professional Fees (500,000.00) Pretreatment
Revenue (25,000.00) Commodity Charge (48,880.00) Operating Transfers & Misc. (128,000.00) Overstrength Surcharge (650,OOO.OO) Zone B & Quantity Surcharge 􀁾􀀹􀀬􀀱􀀰􀀰􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀩􀀠Total
Other Revenue Sources Net Operation and Maintenance to be to Billed Monthly 23,931,500.00 Debt Service Principal on Bonds: Due 8/0112004: 17,295,000.00 x 8112 11,530,000.00 Due 8101/2005:
18,180,000.00 x 4112 6,060,000.00 Interest on Bonds: Due 210112004: 7,280,128.13 x 216 2,426,709.38 Due 8101/2004: 7,280,128.13 x 6/6 7,280,128.13 Due 2101/2005: 6,868,538.13 x 4/6 4,579,025.42
Rounding (2.93) Less: Inlerest Income (609,600.00) Net Debt Service to Billed Monthly 31,266,260.00 TOTAL CONTRACT REVENUE $ 55,197,760.00 Page 8 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET {3!!10101 CQt!IRACT REVENUE -􀁁􀀡􀀺􀀡􀁄􀁉􀁾􀁎􀀠(1106.301010) Operation & Maintenance $23.931,500 x 1.508% (1107.301010) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 1.508%
Rounding Total Annual Requirement $ 360,887.02 471,495.20 (2.22) $ 832,380 $ 829,040 {301020} CONTRACT BEVENUE -ARUNGTON (1106.301020) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 30.666% (1107.301020)
Debt Service $31,266,260 x 30.666% Rounding 7.338,833.79 9,588,111.29 4.92 Total Annual Requirement 16,926,950 16,534,910 (3!!1!!4!!] CQNTRACT REVENUE -BEDFORD (1106.301040) Operation
& Maintenance $23,931,500 x 3.241% (1107.301040) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 3.241% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 775,619.92 1,013,339.49 0.60 1,788.960 1,709,420 {301110] CQNTRACT
REV!!lt!!JE -CARROLLTON (1106.301110) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 9.060% (1107.301110) Debt Service $31 ,266,260 x 9.060% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 2,168,193.90 2,832,723.16
2.94 5,000,920 4,364,740 {301120] CQHTRACT REVENUE -CEDAR HILL (1106.301120) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 0.214% (1107.301120) Debt Service '$31,266,260 x 0.214% Rounding Total
Annual Requirement 51,213.41 66,909.80 {3.21) 118,120 109,230 Page 9 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERJDesCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET (3011!lgl CONTRA!<T REVEtjUE. !<QI.,LEYVILLE (1106.301150) Operation & Maintenance $23.931,500 x 1.686% $ 403,485.09 (1107.301150) Debt SeNlee $31.266.260
x 1.686% 527.149.14 Rounding 5.77 Total Annual Requirement $ 930,640 $ 919.150 (3011 ZQI CONIRACT REl!ENYE • !<OeeELL (1106.301170) Operation & Maintenance $23.931.500 x 2.778% (1107.301170)
Dabt SaNice $31.266,250 x 2.778% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 664,817.07 868,576.70 6.23 1,533,400 1,418.320 (301200) CONTRACI BEVEtj!.!E • DIEJtl AIBPORI (1106.301200) Operation
& Maintenance $23,931,500 x 1.528% (1107.301200) Debt SeNice $31.266,260 x 1.528% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 365,673.32 477,748.45 (1.77) 643,420 640,510 (3012101 CONTRACT BEVEtlUE.
DALLA§ (1106.301210) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 5.456% (1107.301210) Debt SeNiee $31,266,260 x 5.456% Rounding 1,305,702.64 1,705,887.15 0.21 Total Annual Requirement 3,011,590
3,091,690 (301;l!!QI CONTRACT REVEtjUIi • DUtj!<ANVILLE (1106.301260) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 0.132% (1107.301260) Debt SeNiee $31,268,260 x 0.132% Rounding Total Annual
RequIrement 31,589.58 41,271.46 (1.04) 72.860 72,640 Page 10 
) -" TRINITY RiVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET {301290} CQNTRACI BEVEN!JE • E!.!b5SS (1106.301290) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 2.827% (1107.301290) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 2.827% Rounding
$ 676,543.51 883,897.17 (0.68) Total Annual Requirement $ 1,560,440 $ 1,554,860 (301300] CONTRACT REVEI!I!JE. FARMERS BRANCH (1106.301300) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 4.431%
1,060,404.77 (1107.301300) Debt Service $31,266,260 )( 4.431% 1,385,407.98 Rounding (2.75) Total Annual Requirement 2,445,810 2,436,870 (301330} CONTRACT REVENUE· FQBI WQRII:! (1106.301330)
Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 1.045% (1107.301330) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 1.045% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 250,084.18 326,732.42 576,820 497,530 {301390} CQI!ITRACT
REVENUE· GRANIl eRAlRIE (1106.301390) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 10.259% 2.455,132.59 (1107.301390) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 10.259% 3,207,605.61 Rounding 1.80 Total Annual
Requirement 5,662,740 6,070,880 {llOji!jO} CQNTRACI REVENUE· GRAPEVINE (1106.301400) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,600 x 1.198% (1107.301400)Debt Service $31,266,260 x 1.198% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 286,699.37 374,569.79 0.84 661,270 698,510 Page 11 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET {3014501 CONTRA!;;I REVENUE -HURST (1106.301450) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 0.137% (1107.301450) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 0.137% Rounding
Total Annual Requirement 32,786.16 42,834.78 (0.93) $ 75,620 $ 73,730 {301!1§01 CONIBACI 􀁂􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁾􀁙􀁉􀁩􀁩􀀠􀀭􀁉􀁒􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀡􀁡􀀠(1106.301460) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 17.790%
(1107.301460) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 17.790% Rounding $ 4,257,413.85 5,562,267.65 (1.50) Total Annual Requirement 9,819,680 10,457,470 (301!1§!l1 CONTRA!;;T BEV!lNU!l-ISIilLL!lB
(1106.301480) Operation &Maintenance $23,931,500 x 1.755% (1107.301480) Debl Service $31,266,260 x 1.755% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 419,997.83 548,722.86 (0.69) 968,720 878,190
{30152!11 CONTRACI R!lllENYIii -􀁍􀁁􀁾􀀱􀀲􀁆􀁉􀁅􀁌􀁄􀀠(1106.301520) Operation &Maintenance $23,931,500 x 2.728% (110.301520) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 2.728% Rounding Total Annual Requirement
652.851.32 852.943.57 (4.89) 1,505,790 1,182,390 {3015901 CONTBACT REVENYIii -NOBIH RICHLANI2 HILLS (1106.301590) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 0.437% $ 104,580.66 (1107.301590)
Debt Service $31,266,260 x 0.437% 136,633.56 Rounding 14.21 ) Total Annual Requirement 241,210 255,590 Page 12 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED OaM BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL
2Q04BUDGET !3Q168QI CONTRACT REVENUIl-SOUTHLAKE (1106.301680) Operation & Maintenance $23,931,500 x 1.124% (1107.301680) Debt Service $31,266,260 x 1.124% Rounding Total Annual Requirement
$ 268,990.06 351,432.76 (2.82) $ 620,420 {1108.33SIINTER-FUND 􀁓􀁅􀁾􀁉􀁃􀁅􀂧a CHARGES Clean Rivers Program (TNRCC) Ten Mile Creek Denton Creek Red Oak Creek Tarrant County Walker-Calloway
Branches Mounlain Creek Northeast lakeview Joe Pool lake Total Annual Requirement 70,000.00 269,200.00 49,200.00 13,670.00 25,000.00 14,500.00 37,670.00 5,100.00 30,000.00 514,340 1110B.339}
OPERATING OVERHEAD -OTHER PROJECTS DCURD #1 359,340.00 Ten Mile Creek 26,540.00 Denton Creek 13,520.00 Red Oak Creek 3,920.00 Mountain Creek 4,150.00 Tarrant County 28,080.00 Total Annual
Requirement 435,550 {1106.39S1 PROFESSIONAL FEE§ 500,000 (1108.3801 INTERE§T INCOME -I & S 114,800 (110S.380) INTEREST INCOME -RE§ERVE FUND 439,500 1110.S.l801 INTEREST INCOME -REVENUE
FUND 44,300 (1108.3801 INTEREST INCOME -EMERGENCY FUND 11,000 (1106.340) OVER§TRENGTH §URCHARGE 650,000 11106.3431 PRETREATMENT REVENUE 25,000 (1106.3441 COMMODITY CHARGIll 48,680 (1106.348)
QUANTITY §URCHARGE Town of Addison 29,100 CURRENT 2003 BUDGET $ 618,230 414,340 417,170 450,000 229,600 1,147,800 123,500 44,000 600,000 22,000 51,810 36,800 Page 13 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPDON DETAIL (11DS.3n)
OPERATING TRANSFERS· RISK RETENTION (110S.3S9) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET $ 116,000 10,000 CURRENT 2003 BUPGET $ 258,440 10,000 Page 14 : .. 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES PESCRIPTION NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BUDGET AMOUNT Salaries
Under the Salary Administration Plan for the Following: Manager, Central Regional Wastewater System Maintenance Engineer Sub-Total 2 Manager, System Operation Operations Division Chief
Chief Operator Senior Operator Operator II Operator I Maintenance Division Chief Chief Maintenance Mechanic Senior Maintenance Mechanic Maintenance Mechanic " Maintenance Mechanic I
ElE Division Chief Chief Electrician Chief Electronic T echnidan Senior Electrician Senior Electronic Technician Electronic T echnldalll Electrician" Senior HVAC Technician Process Systems
Automation Engineer Sub·Total 1 2 8 8 17 6 1 6 14 14 4 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 95 System Operations -Part-TIme Employees Senior Maintenance Mechanic Sub-Total 1 Page 15 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT Manager,
Technical Services 1 Laboratory Division Chief 1 Laboratory Supervisor 3 Quaility Assurance Coordinator 1 Senior Biologist 1 Senior Chemist 2 Biologist 6 Chemist 7 Laboratory Technician
II 3 Laboratory Technician I Technical Services Engineer 1 Environmental Services Coordinator 1 Interceptor System Specialist 2 Maintenance Division Chief 1 Chief Maintenance Mechanic
1 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 3 Maintenance Mechanic II 4 Chief Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) 1 Senior Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) 1 Electronic Technician
II (Instrument Technician) 3 Senior Secretary 1 Field Technician II 1 Sub-Total 45 Manager, Administrative Services 1 Office Coordinator 1 Senior Secretary 5 Accounting Clerk 1 Training
Coordinator 1 Sub-Total 9 PurchasinglW arehouse PurchaselWarehouse Supervisor 1 Buyer 2 Assistant Buyer 1 Senior Storekeeper 2 Senior Secretary 1 Sub-Total 7 Total Project Positions
W /0 Pretreatment 159 Page 16 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET. FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BUDGET AMOUNT Total
Project Base Salaries w/Shlfi Dlff Total Project Holiday and Overtime Pay Rounding Tolal Project Salaries $ 6,033,720 288,640 6,322,360 Pretreatment Pretreatment Coordinator Senior Secretary
Environmentallnspeclor Senior Field Technician Field Technician II 1 1 3 2 1 Total Pretreatment Positions 8 Total Pretreatment Base Salaries w/Shlfi Diff Total Pretreatment Holiday and
Overtime Pay Rounding Total Pretreatment Salaries 313,300 9,400 322,700 Total Positions -Regular Employees Total PosHions -Part-Time Employees Totel All Positions 166 167 Total Salaries
$ 6,645,060 Page 17 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED o&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPIION PROPOSED PETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET (1106.49Q) SALARIES -REGULAR (001.01) PROJECT 157 Employees $ 6,322,360.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT 8 Employees Total Salaries -Regular 322,700.00 $ 6,645,060
$ 6,465,890 (1106.402) PAYROLL TAXES -FICA (001.01) PROJECT $ 6,322,360.00 x 7.65% 483,660.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT $ 322,700.00 x Rounding T olal Payroll Taxes -Fica 7.65% 24,690.00
608,350 494,640 (1106.403) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -HEALTH/UFE INSURANCE PROJECT (001.01) Health $ 279.62 X $ 440.77 X $ 382.53 X $ 498.98 X Provision for increase 115 X 12 X 10 X 16 X 12 12
12 12 25% 385,875.60 63,470.88 45,903.60 95,804.16 147,763.56 (002.01) Life Insurance/AD&D: 35,389.00 (003.01) Long Term Disability: 17,066.00 (004.01) Employee Asslstance Program: 4,770.00
PRETREATMENT (001.02) Health $ 279.62 X $ 440.77 X $ 382.53 X $ 498.98 X Provision for Increase 6 X OX OX 1 X 12 12 1'2 12 25% 20,132.64 5,987.76 6,530.01 (002.02) Life Insurance: 1,801.00
(003.02) Long Term Disability: 1,194.00 (004,02) Employee Assistance Program: rounding Total Emp. Ben. -HealthlLife Insurance 240,00 1.79 831,930 655,250 Page 18 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/PESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2004 BUDGET 2003 BUDGET (1106.4041 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -PENSION (001.01 )PROJECT $ 724,050.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT 37,600.00 Total Emp. Ben. -Pension $ 761,650 $ 740,660 11106.406)
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (001.01) PROJECT 19,300.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT 700.00 Total Unemployment Compensation 20,000 20,000 11106.407) EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION pROGRAM (001.01) PROJECT
Service Awards $ 18,610.00 (001 .02) PRETREATMENT Total Employee Recognition Program 18,610 16,260 11106.408) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -EDUCATION (001.01) PROJECT 5,100.00 (001.02) PRETREATMENT
500.00 Total Employee Benefit -Education 5,600 7,000 Total Personal Services 8,791,200 8,399,720 11106.410) OFFICE SUPPUES PROJECT (001.01) Consumables 16,200.00 (002.01) Non-Consumables
7,650.00 (003.01) Computar/Copier Supplies 12,300.00 (005.01) Vending and Lunchroom Supplies 7,600.00 PRETREATMENT (001.02) Consumables 300.00 (002.02) Non-Consumables 500.00 (003.02)
Computer/Copier Supplies 1,000.00 (005.02) Vending and lunchroom Supplies 150.00 Total Office Supplies 45,900 SO,200 11106.4111 PUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT (001.01) Professionalff echnical
Memberships AMSAlAWWA 12,000.00 Tx Prof Engineer 460.00 ASTDIISA 110.00 American Society for Human Resources 390.00 American Water Resource Association 120.00 Chlorine Institute 700.00
Natl Assoc of Purchasing Managers 500.00 Nat Safety Councilrrx Safety Association 210.00 TX Water Utilities Association 700.00 WEFNVEAT 1,400.00 WERF 34,000.00 (002.01) Periodicals/MagazinesiNewspape
rs 1,810.00 (003.01) Reference Books 1,400.00 Page 19 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIPESCRIPTION (1106.4111 DUES &
SUBSCRIPTIONS (Continued) PRETREATMENT (001.02) Professionalffechnical Memberships TWUA $ (003.02) Reference Books PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT DETAIL 2004 BUpGET 2003 BUDGET 210.00 800.00
Total Dues and SubsCriptions 54,810 $ 55,850 (1106.4121 FEES OTHER THAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT: (001.01) Certification Fees 4,300.00 (002.01) TCEQ WW Inspect & WQA Fees 75,000.00
(005.01) TCEQ Sludge Fee (006.01) TIer Two Fees 100.00 10.00 PRETREATMENT (001.02) Certification Fees 400.00 Total Fees Other Than Dues & Subscriptions 79,810 80,910 /1106.413) MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATING SUPPLIES PROJECT (001.01) Repair/Replacement of Hand Tools (002.01) Operational Supplies (003.01) Maintenance Supplies (004.01) Ground Care Supplies (005.01) Janitonal
and Cleaning Supplies (006.01) Electrical Supplies (007.01) Facilities Supplies (008.01) ProtectiVe/Safety Equipment PRETREATMENT (001.02) Repair/Replacement of Hand Tools (005.02) Janitorial
and Cleaning Supplies (008.02) Protective/Safety Equipment Total Maintenance and Operating Supplies (1106.414) LAB SUPPLIES PROJECT (001) Gases (002) Water System (003) Bacti-Fllters,
Media and Supplies (004) AA, ICP, and IR Supplies (005) Gas Chromatog Supplies (006) TOC and MCTS·10 Supplies (007) Lab Apparatus (008) Chemical Reagents (009) Glassware, Plastics, and
Disposables (010) Filters, Glass Fiber, Prefilters and Membra. 25,320.00 17,150.00 30,000.00 6,000.00 11,800.00 12,000.00 15,000.00 44,750.00 280.00 200.00 250.00 162,750 166,930 8,000.00
6,000.00 68,000.00 8,000.00 12,000.00 3,000.00 29,150,00 69,500.00 60,000.00 11,000.00 Page 20 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PETAIL PROPOSED
2Q04BUpGET CURRENT 2Q03BUDGET {110!!.4141 LaB SUPPLIESJ!<QIl!inuedl (011) Field Sampling Supplies (012) Operational Supplies (013) Nuclear Sources -Wipe Test & Refoil (014) Other-Freight
and Shipping 1.000.00 5.000.00 300.00 1,350.00 PRETREATMENT (007) Lab Apparatus (008) Chemical Reagents and Standards (009) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables (011) Field Sampling
Supplies (014) Other -Freight and Shipping Total Lab Supplies 850.00 500.00 3,000.00 11,000.00 300.00 $ 297,950 $ 280,350 {1101l.415) PBQ!<ESS !<tlEMICAL§ AND SUPPLIES PROJECT (001)
Ume (002) Ferric Chloride (003) Chlorine (004) Polymer (005) Hydrochloric Acid (006) Sodium Hydroxide (007) Citric Acid (008) Filter Cloths (009) 11e Wraps. Bags, Sludge Judges, Etc.
(010) Taste/Odor Control (011) Boiler Chemicals (012) Sulfur Dioxide 910,000.00 259,350.00 279,720.00 293,400.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 500.00 83.000.00 7,000.00 150,000.00 2,000.00 144,900.00
Total Process Chemicals and Supplies 2,144,870 2,524.000 {1101l.416j FUEL, OIL, AND LUBRICANTS PROJECT (001) Gasoline (002) Diesel Fuei (003) Solvents/Cleaners (004) Anti-Freeze (005)
Grease (006) Lubricants (007) Propane 36,600.00 25,200.00 10.200.00 1,760.00 2,470.00 16,000.00 600.00 PRETREATMENT (001) Gasoline (004) Anti-Freeze (005) Grease (006) Lubricants 1,200.00
40.00 50.00 200.00 Tolal Fuel, 011, and Lubricants 94,320 103,630 Page 21 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED OaM BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/OESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET (1106.417J COMPUTER SOFTWARE, LICENSES & INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PROJECT (001) Metering Supplies (002) Instrument Repair (003) Drafting/Engineering Supplies
(004) Une Surveillance (005) FM Telemetry (006) Metering Electrical Repairs (007) Lawson GIL, HR & PR Software $ 13,000.00 12,000.00 4,000.00 3,100.00 1,000.00 9,000.00 250,080.00 PRETREATMENT
(001) Metering Supplies (002) Instrument Repair Total Computer and Instrument Supplies 150,00 300.00 $ 292,630 $ 294,530 Total Supplies 3,173,040 3,556,400 (1106.429) AUDITING (001)
Audit 37,500 37,500 11106.421) ENGINEERING (001) Engineering Studies (002) III Prorations (003) Triennial ReportiAnnual Update (004) Pipeline Repairs/Erosion Control 90,000.00 90,000.00
59.500.00 20,000,00 T alai Engineering 259.500 223,090 (1106.422) LEGAL (001) Legal 20,000 20,000 (1106.423) OUTSIDE SERVICES PROJECT (001) Advertising (002) Graphics, Displays, Etc.
(003) Construction Services Charges (004) Security MonltoringlSupport (005) Solid Waste Disposal (Odor Control) (006) Contract Labor (007) PCINetworkiSCADA Support (008) Lawson Support
(012) Janitorial 32,500.00 7,000.00 50,000.00 8,400.00 28,000.00 21,000.00 291,390.00 58,030.00 48,400.00 PRETREATMENT (001) Advertising (002) Graphics, Displays, Etc. (006) Contract
Labor 500.00 200.00 __...􀁬􀀬􀁏􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠Talal Outside Services 546,420 644,590 Page 22 
) -' TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/PESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2004 BUDGET 2003 BUDGET {1106.4241 OTHER egOFESl!IONAL SERl£IC(g2 PROJECT (001.01) Drug Testing $ 15,750.00 (002.01) U.S.G.S.Payments 26,500.00 (003.01) Motor VehiCle Reports
350.00 (004.01) Outside Testing -Laboratory 82,000.00 (006.01) NEXRAIN Studies 20,000.00 PRETREATMENT (004.02) Outside Testing -Laboratory 4,000.00 Total Other Professional Services
$ 148,600 $ 197,700 11106.430l nlLEPHONE & TELEMETERING PROJECT (001.01) Telephoneffelemeteling 37,660.00 (002.01) Pagers 5,400.00 (003.01) Mobile Telephones (62) 41,760.00 (004.01)
Internet Access 8,860.00 PRETREATMENT (001.02) Telephoneffelerneteling 1,000.00 (002.02) Pagers 360.00 (003.02) Mobile Telephones (7) 3,720.00 Total Telephone & Telemetering 98,760 91,060
{110S.431l eOSTAGE PROJECT (001) Postage Meter 3,300.00 (002) Stamps/Shipping 4,500.00 PRETREATMENT (001) Postage Meter 500.00 (002) Stamps/Shipping 220.00 Total Postage 8,520 8,520
U 1 QS.432l ffilNTlNG AND BINDING PROJECT (001) Special Fonns 3,000.00 (002) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary 1,800.00 (003) Manuals, Handbooks, Etc. 1,500.00 PRETREATMENT (001)
Special Forms 750.00 (002) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary 250.00 7,300 11,010j 􀁔􀁾􀀢􀁲􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀠Page 23 
TRINITY RNERAUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAl YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDlnJRE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2004 BUpGET CURRENT 2003 BUpGET (1106.4331 INSURANCE PAYMENTS PROJECT (001) Workers' Compensation (002) Property/Casualty (003) General Liability (004) Public Official Liability (005)
Automobile (006) Equipment Floater (007) Blanket Bond round $ 145,245.00 88,021.00 9,297.29 14,694.03 28,550.95 11,933.55 2,215.48 2.70 Total Insurance Payments $ 299,960 $ 287,430 (1106.4361
TRAVEL PROJECT (001) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (002) Others on AuthOrity Business 15,550.00 750.00 PRETREATMENT (001) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (002) Others on
Authority Business 3,000.00 Total Travel 19,300 19,300 (11Q6.43D LAUNDRY, UNIFORM & IND. EQUIP. PROJECT (001) UnIform Rental (003) Patches/Hats (004) Towels, Mops, Mats 38,770.00 650.00
9,000.00 PRETREATMENT (001) Uniform Rental 650.00 Total Laundry, Uniform, & Ind. EQUip. 49,070 49,070 (1106.4381 TRAINING PROJECT (001) Training Wastewater Certification Training Safety
Training Technical Training Enhanced SkillS/Supervisory Training Training ManualslVideos Purchasing Certification Classes 10,000.00 10,000.00 21,100.00 4,500.00 6,000.00 1,500.00 Page
24 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERitlESCRIPTION 11106.438) TRAINING
(Continued) PRETREATMENT (001) Training Wastewater Certification Training Safety Training Technical Training Training ManualsNideos Total Training (1106.440) UTILITIES PROJECT (001)
Natural Gas (002) Water Total Utilities (1106.442) POWER (001) Power 11106.443) R & M· COllECTION SYSTEM PROJECT (001) Meter Station Structure Rehabilitation (002) Manhole/Junction Box
Rehabilitation (003) System RepairslLine Cleaningnv (004) Lift StationlROW Maintenance Total R & M -Collection System (1106.444) R & M· EQUIPMENT PROJECT (001) Shop Equipment (002) Dumpsters
(003) Compressors and Generators (004) Fuel Powered and Electrical Equipment (005) Office and Video Equipment (006) Analytical Equip Repair. Non Contract (007) Service Contracts-Analytical
Equipment (008) Perkins-Elmer Equipment (009) MowerslTractors (010) Tracked Vehicles & Heavy Equipment (011) Carts (012) Heavy Trucks (013) Trailers (014) Locomotive (015) Tire Repair
(016) High Pressure Units (017) Forklifts Total R & M -Equipment PROPOSED PETAIL PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 600.00 600.00 1,180.00 220.00 55,700 if; 70,600 80,000.00 30,000.00
110,000 120,000 5,639,960 4,553,480 21,000.00 21,000.00 333,640.00 ___..E.,600.00 388,240 369,750 6,500.00 1,400.00 11,500.00 12,000.00 11,100.00 20,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 8,500.00
31,000.00 2,650.00 20,000.00 15,000.00 480.00 2,100.00 960.00 1,600.00 168,790 223,200 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBEBIDESCRIPIION (1106,445) R & M·
PLANT AND BUILDINGS PROJECT (001) Packing and Seals (002) Road Repair Materials (003) Machine Shop Stock (004) Mechanical Pla6ng and Coallng (005) Clarifiers, Aerallon, Equalization
Basins (006) Specialized Balancing and Machining (007) Valves, Valve Operators, Pipe, Etc. (008) Posillve Displacement PumpslRepairs (009) Filter Press Parts (010) Pump Repair, Pump
Parts, Machining (011) Conveyer System Parts (012) Indusmal Air/Oil Filters (013) Power Transmission PartsiRepairs (014) Building/Structural Repair (015) Chlorination/DechlOlinalion
(016) Railroad Repairs (017) Stormwater Regulations -Street Cleaning (016) Blower PartS/Repairs (019) Crane Inspection & Servicing (020) Anaerobic Digester CleanlRehab Total R & M -Plant
and Buildings (1106.4461 R & M -YEHICLES PROJECT (001) Automobiles (002) Pickup Trucks (003) TIre Repair (004) Other-Batteries, Wiper Blades, etc. PRETREATMENT (002) Pickup Trucks (003)
TIre Repair Total R & M -Vehicles PROPOSED DETAIL $ 30,600.00 30,000.00 11,000.00 25,000.00 30,000.00 5,000.00 78,000.00 112,200.00 22,800.00 105,100.00 23,500.00 3,000.00 30,000.00
41,100.00 16,200.00 21,000.00 11,520.00 66,000.00 9,500.00 _-=2",,0,.000.00 7,800.00 22,600.00 5,400.00 1,860.00 2,400.00 600.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2004 BUDGET 2003 BUDGET $ 691,520 $
729,600 40,860 43,500 Page 26 
) TRINITY RNER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2004 BUDGET (1106.4481 R & M -ELECTRICAL PROJECT (0.01) Components $ 46,000.00 (00.2) Signal Cable and Wire 6,000.00. (003) Electronic Equipment Repair 65,000.00 (004) Repairs
of Pneumatic Systems 1,000.00 (0.0.5) FM Telemetry 2,00.0..0.0. (0.0.6) PLC/SCADA Parts and Repair 22,50.0..00 (0.07) Vendor Service and Repair 44,20.0..0.0. (0.08) Calibration 5,000..00
(009) Electrical Parts and Materials 150,000.0.0 (010) Motor Overhaul 75,000.0.0 (0.11) HVAC Parts and Repair 90,000.00 (0.12) Elevator Repair and Service 6,300.00 (0.13) Cathodic Test
1,000.00 Total R & M -Electrical $ 514,000. (1106.4491 OFF-SITE BIOSOLID LAND APPLICATION (0.0.2) BenefiCial Reuse 2,563,870. (1106.451) RENT -MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT PROJECT (0.01) Cranes
and Other Heavy Equipment 40.,50.0..0.0 (0.02) Compressors and Special Equipment 2,600..0.0. (003) Postage Meter 1,700..0.0. (004) Tool Rental 1,0.0.0..0.0. (0.05) Copier Rental 26,610..0.0.
(007) Cylinder Rental 7,00.0..0.0. (008) Other Rental 4,690..0.0. Total Rent· Machinery & Equipment 84,10.0. 11106.4661 ADMINISTRATIVE OYERHEAD PROJECT (001) Related Cost Method Allocation
1,756,550 Total Other Services and Charges 13,539,730. CURRENT 2003 BUDGET $ 587,0.0.0. 2,665,190 79,520 1,754,570. 12,785,680 Page 27 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.476) MACHINERY
& EQUIPMENT (001.01 )PROJECT ·Replacement: (1) Full Size Truck (1) Spray WashlPositiva Displacement Pump (2) Solids Flow Meters (1) GClMS Spectrophotometer (1) Track Loader (1) Tractor
Hauling Truck (1) Television Inspection Unit wi Trailer (6) Ultrasonic Depth Flow Meters (6) Telog Data Recorder (1) Portabla Ultrasonic Depth FlowMeter (1) Doppler Closed Pipe Flow
Meter PRETREATMENT· Replacement: (1) 314 Ton 4X4 Truck PROPOSED DETAIL $ 16,000.00 40,000.00 6,850.00 130,000.00 225,000.00 98,000.00 135,000.00 9,600.00 8,100.00 4,750.00 4,000.00 􀁟􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀵􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀰
􀀮􀀰􀀰􀀠PROPOSED CURRENT 2004 BUDGET 2003 BUDGET $ 677,300 $ 657,500 25,000 2,290 Page 28 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL (1106.476)
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (Continued) (002.01) PROJECT-New: (1) Centrifuge $ (1) Belt Filter Press Autolube System (1) Gravity Table Belt Autolube System (1) Dump Truck Bed wi Hydraulics
3,000.00 10,000.00 6,000.00 20,000.00 PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET $ 39,000 $ 424,400 (002.02) PRETREATMENT-New (1) Camper for 3/4 Ton 4X4 Truck 1,600.00 1,600 24,600 Total
Machinery and Equipment 742,900 1,108,790 Page 29 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2004 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERJDESCRIPTION (1107.480) BOND PRINCIPAL
PAYMENTS Due 8/0112004: Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003 Total Bond Principal Payments (1107.481lINTEREST ON LONG TERM·pEBT Due 2/0112004: Series 1995 Series
1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003 Due 8/0112004: Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Series 2003 Adjustment for Accrual round Total Bond Interest Payments (1106.483)
PAYING AGENT FEES (1106.486) SEC DISCLOSURE FEES Total Debt Service PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED 2004 BUDGET CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 1,945,000.00 2,290,000.00 2,215,000.00 170,000.00 10,675,000.00
$ 17,295,000 $ 16,430.000 216,576.25 796,936.25 1,355,778.75 1,426,002.50 3,484,834.38 216,576.25 796,936.25 1,355,778.75 1,426,002.50 3,484,834.38 (274,394.16) (2.00) 14,285,860 15,785,120
5,000 12,000 10,500 31,596,360 32,227,120 Page 30 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Office AGENDA ITEM VII August5,2003 3110.102 MEMBERS. Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System RE: ReUse Status Report F or more
than 15 years, TRA management has sought to market and deliver treated wastewater effluent to users who can utilize the reclaimed water, and thereby generate revenue which will offset
the cost of wastewater treatment for TRA's customers. The sale of water to DCURD at Las Colinas is a good example. With TRA's high quality discharge removing 99% of traditional pollutants
and water supplies becoming more critical, the value of effluent gets more valuable. In the Region C Water Planning process, reuse is an essential strategy in the long-term supply alternatives
for cities, . agencies, and water supply districts in the Upper Trinity River Basin. Most of the public water supply agencies in the Dallas-Fort Worth area have filed applications with
the Texas Environmental Quality Commission (TCEQ) for effluent reuse. Some of these permits 􀁾􀁰􀁰􀁬􀁹for the same effluent. Efforts to resolve the conflicts and differences between
competing applications have been ongoing for some time. Compounding the problem is the uncertainty how TCEQ will resolve several major policy issues surrounding the reuse of effluent.
The Commission has not formulated a clear policy. Because of early conflicts among a group of entities in the upper Trinity River, there has been an effort to resolve differences mutually.
The parties involved are: TRA, Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD), North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD), City of Dallas, and City of Houston. These parties have been conducting
hydrological studies for almost two years and are trying to develop an agreement or mutual understanding of how reuse permits can be issued without negatively impacting anyone party's
water rights interests. One unresolved issue relates to the permit applications filed by TRWD and TRA for effluent reuse. TRWD's permit application proposes to withdraw water from the
the Trinity River near Corsicana, achieve some level of treatment through a constructed wetlands area, and then pump the water into Richland Chambers Lake, and eventually Cedar Creek
Lake, to increase the raw water supply for their Tarrant County raw water customers. The permit application relies upon effluent from TRA wastewater plants, as well as effluent discharged
from Fort Worth's Village Creek Wastewater Treatment plant. For various reasons, TRWD's permit develops a relationship between water that originates from their lakes but is treated and
discharged as effluent by other entities. p.o. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 (B17) 493-5100 
, MEMBERS, Advisory Committee August 5, 2003 3110.102 Page 2 The City of Fort Worth, TRA, and the TRWD have discussed an arrangement whereby TRWD would enter into a contract with TRA
and Fort Worth to purchase the effluent from each wastewater treatment agency to insure available water for withdrawal from the Trinity River. The pricing and terms of the contracts
have not been determined, pending a study being conducted by a consultant to TRWD. The consultant's charge is to make an economic analysis of the value of the effluent. In addition,
ongoing discussions with TCEQ about reuse also involve the issue of effluent ownership. Any contracts between TRA, Fort Worth, and TRWD must also address the larger issue of reuse by
other entities as well as satisfying Houston's downstream water interests. When all of these issues are settled, then the existing permit applications should be able to procaed without
protest. The City of Irving filed a protest to some of the permits, including TRA's application; and other cities and agencies in Texas are involved. All water rights interests must
be considered by the TCEQ in any final decisions. TRA management wanted to keep you advised as issues surrounding reuse continue to develop. WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern
Region WNBfcea 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Office August 30, 2002 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE -Tuesday, September 10,2002 at 11 a.m.
MEETING PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System AdviSOry Committee has been scheduled for 11 a.m., Tuesday, September 10,
2002, at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd. Lunch will be selVed immediately following the meeting. Please RSVP to Cheryl
Abbott before Friday, September 6, 2002, at 817-493-5100 or abbottc@trinityra.org. The purpose of this meeting will be the recommendation of the proposed FY 2003 System Operations and
Maintenance Budget for approval by the Authority's Board of Directors at their October meeting. The proposed budget was presented in the August 13'" Advisory Committee and a Budget Workshop
was heldon Monday, August 26, 2002. We believe all questions about the budget have been answered. We have enclosed an agenda and minutes of the August 13, 2002 meeting for your review prior
to the September 10'" meeting. We encourage each party selVed by the System to send a representative to this meeting. 􀁾􀁴􀁖􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁴􀁴􀀯􀁾􀀠WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern
Region WNBfcea c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS P.O. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004-0240 Recycled Paper (817) 493-5100
o 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITIEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10,2002 at 11 A.M. I. CalIto Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless
Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N. Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENTA TIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Elzie Odom
Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Council member Glenn Porterfield Council
member Paul Walden Mr. Dale Fisseler Council member Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Councilmember James Dickens Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Blake Evans Mr. Mike Curtis
Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. III. Introduction ofGuests, Consultants and Authority Staff IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 13. 2002 Meeting
1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
-------V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning VI. Action: Proposed FY 2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy.
Strategies. Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2003 Budget VII. Other Business VIII. Adjourn to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTes CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDA Y, AUGUST 13,2002, 10:30 A.M. I. Call to Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 10:40 a.m. II. Roll Call ENTITY REPRESENT A TlVE PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr.
Jim Pierce flMr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Mr. Charles Anderson flMayor Elzie Odom Present Bedford Ms. Mirenda McQuagge f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Present Carrollton Mr. Milburn
Gravley Present Cedar Hill Mr. Jim Sparks flMr. Greg Porter Present Colleyville Mr. Bill Lindley Absent Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Mike Mikeska f/Mr. Terrace Stewart Present
D/FW Airport Mr. Rusty Hodapp f/Mr. Jim Crites Present Duncanville Mr. Dennis Swartz f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Councilmember Glenn Porterfield Present Farmers Branch Councilmember
Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Dale Fisseler Absent Grand Prairie Councilmember Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine Mr. Matt Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge Present Hurst Mr. Ron Haynes
Present Irving Councilmember James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Ed IIschner Absent Mansfield Mr. Bud Ervin f/Councilmember Blake Evans Present North Richland Hills Mr. David Smyth f/Mr.
Mike Curtis Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak Present Trinity River Authority Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Present III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants
andAuthority Staff TRA staff present were: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, John Owens, John Nelson, Randy Brooks, Cheryl Abbott, Sam Scott, John Jadrosich, Alison Mackey, Bill Tatum,
Bill Cyrus, and Shelley Fialho. 1 
Also Present: Arlington -Fiona Allen Carrollton -Stephen Jenkins Duncanville -Bill Willbom Euless -Ron Young and Loretta Getchell Farmers Branch -Mark Velton and Roy Smallwood Grand
Prairie -Ron McCuller Irving -Steve McCullough, Sandy Cash, David Ryburn, Cliff Miller, and Doug Caroom, Southlake -Mike Patterson First Southwest Company -Boyd London Black & Veatch
-Kelly Loyd Alan Plummer -Alan Plummer Freese & Nichols -Ray Longoria IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 11, 20011V1eeting Chairman Gravley asked if there were any changes to the
minutes of the September 11, 2001 meeting. There being none, Charles Anderson motioned to accept the minutes as presented, Bud Ervin seconded the motion, and a unanimous vote followed.
V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum reviewed the System flows, effluent quality, and System activities for the time frame of September 11, 2001 to present. He noted that year
to date rainfall has been 31 inches. B. Financial -Patricia Cleveland reported that adjustments for the FY FY 2001 actual expenditures were mailed to parties in late May, with either
an invoice or a check, and that this was the 4th year that the VI adjustment method had been used. She noted that the FY 2002 mid-year reallocation notices had recently been mailed.
Ms. Cleveland stated that we were about 66% into the FY 2002 budget year and if there are no other emergency expenditures, the System should end the year within the budget. C. Regulatory
-Patricia Cleveland noted that the discharge permit expires this fall and an amendment application is presently being prepared; that the TNRCC had audited the System's industrial pretreatment
program and based on verbal feedback. overall. TNRCC had been pleased; and that the TNRCC staff was still holding our modified pretreatment program. including the city ordinances and
enforcement response plans. D. Capital Improvement Planning (1) Planning. Design, Construction (2) Series 2001 and upcoming Series 2003 SRF Bonds Randy Brooks presented images showing
System projects being designed and under construction, and discussed the handout material furnished to each attendee. Mr. Brooks said that we had been using the 1995 III report as a
guide for prioritizing projects and bond sales, but that we were anticipating a new report by the end of this year. He continued that with the currently planned master plan study for
the plant and with the new III report. staff will report again in 2003 about a possible bond sale. There was a brief discussion on plant capacity. current bond issues. and refundings,
in addition to future bond issues. VI. Discussion: Presentation ofProposed FY2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations
C. Budget Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review 2 
Mr. Brewer described the budget process and stated that the budget would be presented at this meeting, a budget workshop was scheduled for August 26th for any parties that wanted to
attend, and that another Advisory Committee meeting was scheduled for September 10th, when staff would ask for the Committee's approval of the proposed budget. Patricia Cleveland gave
a power point presentation detailing the proposed FY 2003 Central Regional Wastewater System's FY 2003 Operational and Maintenance BUdget. There were discussions on insurance cost, odor
control, and electrical power contract cost. VII. Discussion: City ofIrving's Request for a Contract Modification Related to Water Reuse Rights Mr. Brewer advised members that the City
of Irving had requested an opportunity to present a request to the Advisory Committee to seek the Committee's support in amending their Central System Contract with TRA so as to allow
the City to re use the water, after treatment and after being released from the treatment plant into the Trinity River, which the City discharges into the System, and which originates
from the City's water rights in Lake Chapman in Northeast Texas. He noted that all 21 parties of the Central System have contractual provisions which pledge title and ownership of wastewater
discharged into the system to TRA, consistent with a 1957 Texas statutory provision which grants TRA the ownership of all wastewater received for treatment in all wastewater treatment
systems. He noted that Irving and TRA management had discussed the City's request for the past two years, but that TRA management had not agreed to support the request unless the Advisory
Committee agreed. He then noted that TRA management had offered the City an opportunity to seek the Advisory Committee's support, as a necessary prerequisite to amending the contract,
and if the Committee agreed to support Irving's request, TRA would pursue dOing so. Irving Councilman James Dickens described the City's desire to acquire the right to re use the water
which they discharge into the CRWS as an additional source of water for the future. City Manager Steve McCullough then gave details about the Cilys' water rights in Lake Chapman, the
partnership arrangements made to move that water into Lake Lewisville and on into Dallas' Elm Fork Water Treatment plant, and the high cost of moving that water into a position which
would allow its use by Irving. He noted that the City would have their future water supply needs completely covered if they could also acquire the rights to use the portion of the Central
System's effluent which the City of Irving contributes. He then asked their Austin based water rights attorney, Doug Caroom, to add comments from a legal perspective. Mr. Caroom then
provided a written proposal to Members and TRA staff which proposed an arrangement in which TRA-CRWS would pay a discounted rate to Irving for Irving's Lake Chapman water, as a means
of preserving a first option for TRA's use, and which provided that Irving could call an option for the water, when they needed it. Mr, Caroom asked the Committee's endorsement of the
request, noting that the water to be imported from Lake Chapman fits the State's definition of being a "Developed" water source, by being imported from another river basin, and under
SB1 laws passed in 1997, could be made available for a party's use by a permit granted by the TNRCC. He noted that Irving had filed a water rights permit application with the TNRCC for
this water, adding that it would compete with the permit application previously filed by TRA in 1999 for all wastewater discharged from TRA plants. He noted that the statutory provision
enacted in 1957 granting TRA the ownership of all wastewater would not be a conflict if the 1973 TRA-Irving contract could be amended so as to allow the City to utilize this water, and
if the Committee agreed to this request and TRA agreed to amend the contract, the conflicting parts of the two permit applications would be resolved peacefully. 3 
Mr. Vance then described the City of lIVing's efforts during the 2001 Texas legislative session in filing a bill. sponsored by Rep. Will Hartnett. amending TRA's enabling legislation
to remove TRA's ownership of the water which lIVing wishes to use. He noted that after the bill had been filed, that he and Mr. McCullough had come to an agreement that if the bill was
removed from further consideration, lIVing would be given an opportunity to present the request to the Advisory Committee and pursue the issue in a non-legislation format. He noted that
the Advisory Committee would have to approve the request before TRA would be agreeable to amend the contract, since the City of lIVing was requesting something which the other 20 parties
of the CRWS (as well as the other four regional wastewater systems owned and operated by TRA) do not have. He also described the reuse permit application filed by TRA in 1999, noting
that many other parties around the state have also filed for reuse permits and that the TNRCC has not yet resolved how to address them all. Following a discussion, the Advisory Committee
members generally agreed that more information was needed before there was comfort in considering the request, and suggested that TRA management and lIVing management continue with more
discussions, and that TRA management report back to the Committee with results at a later date. Councilman Paul Walden of Farmers Branch made a motion that TRA management continue with
discussions with lIVing representatives about equity consideration for this water right, and Jim Pierce of Addison seconded the motion. After a discussion clarified that the motion was
intended to apply to continuing discussions only, and would not result in an agreement until the proposal was brought back to the Advisory Committee, the motion passed with one opposing
vote by Southlake representative Pedram Farahnak. TRA management agreed to continued discussions with lIVing, but noted that it might take a while to resolve and likely would not be
ready for consideration by the upcoming scheduled September 10th meeting. VIII. Other Business None IX. Adjourn to Lunch There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:40
p.m. and attendees were invited to remain for lunch. 4 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2002 PERMITS NO: 10303-001 (TXOOU8021 PERMIT I UMIT: DEC AN FEB M.R !APR IMA' JUN 􀁾􀁕􀁌􀀠UG .EP Iocr NOV VG MAX 'MIN OTAL I'l.OW I'l.OW 􀁎􀁎􀁌􀀮􀁁􀁙􀁾􀀠DLY,AVa,
,.. REPORT MGD 􀁾􀁾􀀠140.159 130.640 138.861 129.&30 131.479 1<110.601 1::15.Q83 148.996 136.312 156.6"' 136.52$ 143.760 136.683 131.660 136.932 134.391 136.8&3 132.0&2 131.214 138.915
140.169 168.695 135.083 129.630 1234.923 1250.234 FtOW FLOW FLaw 􀁭􀀮􀁙􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁋􀀠,"""PK REPORT :lUH2S0 MGD GPM 􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁾􀁾208.090 166534 23&..369 216.830 176093 _134 20&.390 187U1
241.288 266.920 215513 310.339 261.930 1&7686 .....24 205.510 161732 241.534 􀀱􀀴􀀱􀀬􀁾􀁏􀀠113607 1:63..594 160.880 119989 172.184 146... 123083 184.440 201.316 161189 232.112 265.920
215513 310.339 141.250 1136'" 183.&94 RAINFALl. CBOO eeoo 􀁔􀁏􀁔􀁁􀁬􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁖􀀹􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁙􀀮􀁍􀁁􀁘􀀢, _)NCHES "GIL 3.420 1.1 4.320 1.3 2.l!7 1,1 8.66 1,' 7.19 1.' 7." 1,1 12.00 '.1 ..51
1.0 .,84 1,' U1 1.1 12.00 1,' • .27 1.0 SUS " "GIL U> ••• 􀁾􀁄􀀠... U ,,0 4.0 2,' 1.' 2,' .., 1.' eeoo DLY.AVG:.... _l.£lSIOAY 1181.4 141U 13&3.0 1791.7,-, 131)4,8 ,..... 1160.7 1101.4
1352.3 1711.7 1101.4 12170.9 -TS. TSS TSS DLY.AVG. m.V.MAX. OLY.AVa. is .. ",..MGII. "GIL l.B$JDAY 1.' 2.0 1470.1 2.0 3,0 214'U 1,' 3.0 1901.6 1.' U 2150.6 1•• 10.0 2567.9 ',0 1.0 119&.0
1.' 1,0 ,....' 1.0 1.0 1125A 1•• 2.' 1138A 1.3 ,.. 1644.5 2,' ,.., 2567.9 1.' 1,0 '...., 14a06.3 NH' NH' -'-;3"􀁲􀀭􀁯􀁯􀁾􀁲􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁐􀁈􀂷􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁐􀁈􀂷􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀭... CL2 CL. OLV.AVG. bLY.MAX.
DLYAV(t M"'. MAll 􀁍􀁾􀁎􀀮􀀠.,.. OUTFALL V4 , 2702/5404 • • 6 1 .099 "GIl. "Gn. LeSlDAY "Gn. s.u, $."MGIL MGJI. D.22' 1.231 "".2 U ,., 6,' 1.04 0,00 0.16.1 0.555 176.8 S,' '.2 ... 1.07
.... 0.18& 1).890 n1.S ... 7 •• s.• 1.02 0.00 0.184 ..... 246,3 7,' 7.' G,G 1.OS ',00 0.15$ 0.482 214.1 8,' 7'> 7" 1.112 0,00 0,066 0.318 71.6 7 •• 7.4 7.' 1." .... 0.... 0.163 TO.8
7.' 7,' 7.' 1.15 ',00 0.0&6 0.215 7&.5 1,' 7.' U 1,08 0.00 0,131 0,$60 144.3 ••• ,.. ••• 1.13 0," 0.131 0.614 168,7 7.• 7.' ••• 1.07 .... 0.227 1.231 289.2 6,8 7.' 7,0 1.15 0.00 0.00
D.... 0.163 70,$ U 1.2 .,' ,... 0,00 1518.3 I COl.l..eCT. SYSTEM NO. Of 􀁏􀁕􀀱􀁆􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀹􀁾􀁟• ° J G , 1 D• 1 TOTAt.: 1G 90% FLOW "" 145.600 MGD • EXCURSIONS: 0 TNRCC 75% FLOW =121.000
MGD ,EP' FY 2002 EFFLUENT QUALITY/FLOW 190 􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀱􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀠180 170 160 Q 􀁾􀀠150 􀁾􀀠140 it 130 a􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁬􀁬􀀰􀀮􀀰;, 􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀁾'7 '" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁳􀀮􀀰􀀸1=:
::::;;;2"""""--: 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠__ _ 􀁾􀀠120 110 100 -lu DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV _CBOD _NH3 -20020aUyAvg.Flow --2001 DallyAvg, Flow_TSS ','..,.',. 
{)f-. {J, Q,n!6'Oy L{, q% TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM AGENDA FY 2003 BUDGET WORKSHOP CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON
BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS MONDA Y, AUGUST 26, 2002, 10 A.M. I. Introduction of Attendees II. Central Regional Wastewater System Background A. Historical Development of System B. Service
Contract Highlights C. Facilities DeSCription III. System Development Planning. Design, and Construction A. 1998 Five-Year Plan and 2000 Update B. Series 1998A, 1998B, and Series 2001
Revenue Bonds C. Current Design and Construction IV. Investment Officer's Report V. TRA Overall Budget Development VI. FY 2002 Current Year Budget A. Flow Projection and Analysis B.
Aclual Monthly Flow Distribution C. Mid-Year Assessment/Reallocation D. End-of-Year Settle-up VII. FY 2003 Budget A. System Flows and Allocation B. Budget Objectives C. Overview of Revenues
and Expenditures VIII. Question and Answer Session IX. Adjourn to Lunch FOLLOWING LUNCH, THERE WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR DISCUSSING ANY SPECIFIC AREA OF THE BUDGET OF CONCERN, EITHER
INDIVIDUALLY, OR AS A GROUP, FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO DO SO. 
􀁁􀀨􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁎􀁄􀁁􀀠ITEM III· A CHAPTER III Interceptor Relief Improvements Introduction The Authority currently owns and operates approximately 200 miles ofinterceptors within the Central
Regional Wastewater System. A comprehensive infiltration and inflow (1&1) assessment was completed by the Authority and its consultant (Black and Veatch, Corporation) in 1996. This comprehensive
planning effort identified and prioritized interceptor relief improvements needed system-wide. The investigation mrmed the basis for proceeding with detailed design and easement acquisition
for a number high priority projects, and continues to form the basis for proceeding with a number ofmajor relief improvements. Interceptor Relief Improvements The following table provides
an opinion ofprobable cost for each ofthe proposed interceptor relief projects for both the current (Series 2001) bond program and for the proposed future (Series 2003) bond programs.
---<._. --< ----􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭--􀀮􀁾􀀠..􀀭􀁾􀀭--..Interceptor Relief Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series g>"" 􀁾􀀠<: g>g> 􀁾􀀠􀁾.9 c: <: 􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠0
0if "6 is TOTAL for aI·s;. 􀁾􀀠'gSegment 2 2-l!: '" 1ll 􀁾􀀠20011lond 􀀮􀁳􀁾􀀠'" u; f;} 􀁾􀁣􀁮􀀠<: <= 0>::> c: 5􀁾􀀠<> .E .n'" 􀁾􀀠.Eu u 8MA $ 42.000 $ 56,000 BC-3 $ 57.300 $ 76400 8G-4
$ 8700 $ 8700 $ 17400 $ 34800 1$ 174000 $ 6960 Ef.1 951lond '95 $ 14000000 $600000 Ef.2 951lond '95 $ 20500,000 $ 84()000 􀁾􀁦􀀮􀀶􀀠981lond '9S $ 5000,000 $ 250000 MC-3 $205650 S 205,650
$ 274200 1$ 1371000 $54340 MG-4A 98A1lond '9S8 510000000 $ 500000 $10500000 MG-48 98A Ilond '9S8 $9000,000 $ 360000 $ 9380,000 WF-t 981lond '98 $19600,000 $ 980,000 $20,580,000 WF-3
981lond '98 $ 11 000,000 $ 550,000 WF-5 $ 24.800 $ 24,800 $ 98,000 $ 111,220 $ 716000 $ 30,000 WF-6B $ 36.250 $ 36,250 $ 72,500 $ 145,000 $ 725,000 $ 29000 WF-G 951lond '95 $ 2,200,000
$ 2200000 WF-tO $ 36,000 $ 36.000 $ 51000 $ 255000 $ 10200 WF-itA 98A Ilond '988 $2.500000 $ 100000 $2,600000 􀁗􀁦􀀮􀀱􀀱􀀸􀁾􀀱􀁬􀁯􀁮􀁤􀀠'9S8 1$2,000000 $ 60,000 $ 2000,000 'rotals $313,400
$ -$42,000,000 $1,340,000 $45,053,400 $287,200 $3,248.620 $ 53,841,000 $4,971,000 TOTAlror 2003 Bond $ 98,000 S 133.700 $ 233160 $ 14,600000 $ 21,340000 $ 5250000 $ l,100040 $ 11,550,000
$ 655,220 $ 971,500 $ 316200 $ 5.200000 $ 62,347.B20 
CHAPTER IV Rehabilitation Improvements The recommended rehabilitation improvements consist ofboth interceptor and manhole rehabilitation as well as rehabilitation of the Kirby Creek
Outfall. The purpose of the rehabilitation improvements is to reduce IJI flow and to accomplish major structural repairs needed to restore structural integrity of the pipeline. The need
for these improvements is based on the findings of field inspections. The table below presents engineering and surveying costs, land rights, construction costs, and inspection costs
currently projected for the rehabilitation improvements. All ofthe rehabilitation projects are recommended for the Series 200 I bond. Two ofthese projects are also recommended for further
funding under the next bond issue. -------􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠--􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀭􀀮􀀠----􀁾􀀭􀀭-􀁾􀀠---"--.Rehabilitation Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series C) '" c'!i';:'
􀁾􀀠'" c 􀁾􀀠6E 0 c C:J 􀁾􀀠i􀁾􀀠0 al '8 0"" fl 􀁾􀀠TOTAl for i TOTAl forSegment :i!' .§' a: 2 "C 1;\ g. 2001 Bond 􀁾􀀠1;\ 2003 Bond"C 􀁾􀀠c: c:'" 8 E 􀁾􀀠8 E'" ;t '", .ii Kilby Creel;
0uJfaJI(27,()(1) nt '98A 􀁾􀀠'98Bbond $1800 000 $ 72,000 $1872000 nlen:ejtOrRehabJJIIs1ioo $ 90,000 $ 450,000 $ 540,000 $1,718,000 $1,718,000 MCKC Rellab mw 10 12711J $ 30,000 $ 200,000
$ 230,000 MC June. S"" It OOM to roM $ 30 000 $ 200000 $ 230000 Be II &11/f1eIIaI>{;O.l &GV<4" 􀁾􀀠$1500000 $150000 $1650000 A... (15,()(1)h) $100000 $ 200000 $ 300,000 $ 711000 $28000
$ 739000 Totals $250,000 $ . $4,350,000 $222,000 $4,822,000 $2,429,000 $28,000 $2,457,000 "Funding to supplement 1998 bond proceeds. 
CHAPTER IV Rehabilitation Improvements The recommended rehabilitation improvements consist ofboth interceptor and manhole rehabilitation as well as rehabilitation ofthe Kirby Creek Outfall.
The purpose ofthe rehabilitation improvements is to reduce III flow and to accomplish major structural repairs needed to restore structural integrity ofthe pipeline. The need for these
improvements is based on the findings of field inspections. The table below presents engineering and surveying costs, land rights, construction costs, and inspection costs currently
projected for the rehabilitation improvements. All ofthe rehabilitation projects are recommended for the Series 2001 bond. Two of these projects are also recommended for further funding
under the next bond issue. ". -􀁾􀀠--_􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭------._-.􀀭􀁾􀀭-. " .---Rehabilitation Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series '" '" c: c:'s:.
';;' 􀁾􀀠'" "'. 5c: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠c: :::> :E '" -􀁾􀀠0 u 0 en 0> U TOTAL for en {l U TOTAL lorSegment '" Cf 2 co 2 􀁾􀀠.,c: 3 1); 2001 Bond c: 3 1); i CL 2003 Bond-c: c: ·c c '" '" 8 .5 $
8 .5'" c ! c 􀀮􀁾􀀠'0. . w i .n IarPy Cmek Out/aJI (21,000 ff)' '9aA Ixlnd '008 bond 1$1800 000 $ 12000 $1872000 !nt_pta,ReilabilitBrion $ 90,000 $ 450,000 $ 540,000 $1,718,000 $1,718,000
MCKCIlehab l1£!QJw 127IJJ $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 Me June. /lax /J. roM '0 7(lM $ 30000 $200000 $ 230000 BOil &11/Re/J9lYCO.l &GV-4' '98A bcm $1,500,000 $150000 $1650000 i!lferscnA....
(15,000 hi $100 000 $ 200 000 $ 300,000 $ 711 000 $28000 $739000 . [Olals $280,000 $ . $4,350,000 $222.000 $4,822,000 $2.429,000 $28,000 $2,457,000 'Funding \0 supplement 1998 bond proceeds.

----------CHAPTER V Erosion Control Improvements The Central Regional Wastewater System (CRWS) includes a wastewater collection network ofapproximately 200 miles of pipelines ranging
in size from 12 inches in diameter to 102 inches in diameter. In order to provide economical, gravity-flow service to the system's customer cities, many ofthese pipelines have been located
adjacent to natural streams, rivers, and drainage ditches. Erosive forces due to development, flooding, unstable soils, and other factors regularly alter the configuration ofstrearnbanks
throughout the North Texas region. When erosion causes the streambanks to advance toward a buried pipeline, the pipelines can wi structurally ifcorrective actions are not taken in a
timely manner. . For each ofthe sites for which action is proposed under the current bond series, a brief description ofthe erosion problems at the site are presented in the table below.
The table also presents the proposed funding amounts for each site. A number ofadditional sites are slated for continued monitoring or for repair by TRA crews using operation and maintenance
funding. -􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀠. 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠Erosion Control Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series g> g>'s;:. 's;:. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠c: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠c: :::J .2 􀁾􀀠:::J 􀁾􀀠.§'" .2> U TOTAL
for '" 􀁾􀀠TOTAl lor Project Description 0> a: 2 2 U., g> .,c: 1!! 'Iii g. 2001 Bond 􀁾􀀠2003 Bond'C '0 DO> 8 .'" 􀁾􀀠'".. .s :Il <3 .sl!! -' <.:> .5 􀁾􀀠0> '" w 108 NFFC/Sta 78+251shaJ1ow
cover $ 7,500 $10000 $ 50000 $2000 S 69500 121 WFXJC $/a. 92+00 $ 7500 $10,000 $ 50000 $2000 S 69500 111 WFXIAI $/a 73fOO ill 62+7254+06 '98 bond '98 bond $100 000 $ 4000 $ 104,000 124
DCURD exposed ipe, replacement in . Iorooress* '92 bond $500000 $20000 $ 520000 137BClIIA Sta 40+00 '98 bond '98 bond $100,000 $ 4,000 $ 104,000 "OTAl $15,000 $20,000 $300,000 $12,000
$ 347,000 $500,000 $20,000 $ 520,000 *To be constructed with EF-2 Interceptor Capacity Relief Projecl TRACRWS 2001 Five-Year Plan Update and SummBlY ofProposed CiiP/iai Improvements
VV·1 
-----CHAPTER VI III Management and Maintenance Activities The comprehensive InflowlInfiltration (Ill) Assessment completed by the Authority in 1996 recommended a continuing program of
inspection and III management activities as well as a number of interceptor "maintenance" activities. The table below lists the engineering and surveying costs, land rights costs, construction
costs, and inspections costs currently projected for the rehabilitation improvements. These costs are outlined in further detail in the 1996 report entitled Infiltrationiinflow Assessment
-Phase II -Infiltrationiinflow Management Plan . 􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭, ! 1&1 Management and Maintenance Activities 2001
Bond Series 2003 Bond Series ""0> 􀁾􀀠IS '" C> '" c: E 0 IS0 'E g>-E c:: u uIf 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠TOTALfor '" 's;:, .9 􀁾Project DeSCription 2 l!!'" c:: 􀁾us 2001 Bond __ i:: '" CL18 1j􀁾􀀠.3 g'=>
1l.W'" E w'" --' 8 1nManIJj}tIIlIJnl_ $ 900.000 $ 900.000 $975000 􀁾􀁯􀁮System GIS $ 450.000 $450000 intelCeplOr Mainlenance($;2.5M Be II 􀁾􀁢􀁊􀀠$ 70000 $945 000 $20000 $1.035.000 [rotals
$1,420,000 $ . $945.000 $20,000 $ 2,385.000 $975.000 TOTAL for 2003 Bond $ 975,000 $ 975,000 The III Assessment developed a list ofrecommended activities to help focus future III management
effurts. These activities include long-range engineering and planning, system modeling improvements, inventory and inspection database upgrades, digital photo mapping, coordination ofIII
management activities with customer city control programs, and initiation ofa system-wide geographic information system. It is anticipated that many ofthe recommended activities will
be implemented by TRA personnel using O&Mfunds. VI-1mACRWS 2001 Five· Ve.r PlIJn Update and SummalY ofProposed Cepitallmprovermmt. 
CHAPTER VI III Management and Maintenance Activities The comprehensive Inflownnfiltration (1JI) Assessment completed by the Authority in 1996 recommended a continuing program of inspection
and In management activities as well as a number of interceptor "maintenance" activities. The table below lists the engineering and surveying costs, land rights costs, construction costs,
and inspections costs currently projected fur the rehabilitation improvements. These costs are outlined in further detail in the 1996 report entitled Infiltrationnnflow Assessment -Phase
n􀁾􀀠Infiltrationnnflow Management Plan. ,---------------------------------------------------------􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠1&1 Mana ement and Maintenance Activities 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond
Series g"0) ., C goO) 􀁾􀀠§.E .2 c: "5i 􀀮􀁾􀀠"" 0 .2 TOTAL for "ai 􀀮􀁾􀀠.2> U 0: 2 0 2Project Descrlplion 􀂷􀁬􀁾􀀠(I) "'''' a: '0 10 a. 2001 Bond .S 2: "0 10 c: c: ., 0> " c: c: ,jJ'"
􀁾􀀠<> .5 ,jJC/) 􀁾􀀠<> <..:> <..:> 'III Management Ac!MIie$ $ 900,000 $ 000,000 $975,000 SysIamGIS $ 450.000 $ 450,000 'nten:eplor Mainletlllll<>l{$2,SM Be II -) 1$ 70000 $945.000 $20000
$1035000 Totals $1,420,000 $ . $945,000 $ 20,000 $2,385,000 $ 975,000 .§ TOTAL for0 􀁾􀀠200380nd .5 $ 975,000 $ 975,000 The In Assessment developed a list ofrecommended activities to
help focus future In management efforts. These activities include long-range engineering and planning, system modeling improvements, inventory and inspection database upgrades, digital
photo mapping, coordination of In management activities with customer city control programs, and initiation ofa system-wide geographic information system. It is <\Ilticipated that many
ofthe recommended activities will be implemented by TRA personnel using O&Mfunds. TRACRWS 2001 Five Year Plan Update and SummaJY ()f Proposed CepitaI/mpnM3men/s Vt-1 
CHAPTER VII Treatment Plant Improvements The Central Regional Wastewater System (CRWS) treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons
per day (MGD) The last major expansion ofthe facility was completed in 1990. Design of the next major expansion is anticipated to begin approximately in year 2005. Treatment plant improvements
funded through the series 2001 and 2003 bonds are generally aimed at rehabilitation or replacement of aging structures, improving the plant's operating efficiency, or controlling odors
for the benefit ofthe surrounding community. Majorimprovements proposed for funding in the next five years are listed in the following table: --..􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀮􀀠-􀁾􀀠-_..􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠..􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀠--􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭-􀁾􀁾􀀭--􀀭􀁾􀀠-I
Treatment Plant Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series a 0 .§ j f J i I:1 ilo 􀁾􀀠TOTAI. for 2001Project [)es(;riptim a:; 􀁾􀀠d 800d !? ! 􀁾􀀠w w fsMlA8sr&:reens $ 250,000 $
2.aoo 000 $00,000 Is 3130000 1Em-Fil8rs Rehab $ 00,000 $1,675000 1$36000 $ 1991000 􀁾&/iO' X-coo_ $ 50000 $ 400000 $ 16000 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀢I!4Spumps $ 20000 1$ 260.000 $ 16,000 􀁾Stabiizafioo
(Class $ 100000 $1500000 1$40000 $ 1640000 􀁾􀁬􀁉􀀡􀀠Be.! Press $ 30000 $ 400000 $ 30000 􀁾System Automafioo $ 200,000 1$2600000 1$40000 $ 3,040,000 $200000 $2,300,000 $ 20000 􀁾􀁬􀀡􀀡􀁉􀀢􀀠V/VI
Odot Control $400000 1$40000 $2,500000 1$100000 $ 3040000 $2000000 $ 00000 OW VoItsgs EIee. System $ 200.000 i $ 1.500.000 $100000 . tisall"ElI!lIuatlm $ 25000 Is 25000 ...... 8t/J1J1o
Mem. DiffuseIs Is 140000 $30000 Is 170000 􀁾􀁾ElIIIIUlIlion & 􀁾􀁐􀀱􀁡􀁮􀁕􀂢􀁡􀁴􀁥􀀠$ 236,000 $ 236 000 $ 750000 $10000000 $250000 􀁾􀁶􀁩􀁬􀁹􀁄􀁩􀁳􀁣􀁨􀁬􀁦􀁩􀁊􀁷􀁐􀁓􀀠&7A $ 50000 $ 50000
$1500000 $ 50,000 􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁥􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁯􀁮ElIIII. $ 100,000 $ 100 000(;.!Raw WBter Pump $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $1,260.000 $ 50000 ,sludge Blend Tank $ 75,000 $1000,000 $60.000 $1135000
Purrhaso RBI) SfJQf 1$350.000 $ 350000 _ 􀀸􀁫􀁴􀁉􀁾􀀮􀀠replace gas $ 20000 '$ 146.000 1$ 10000mot"" Toials $1,618,000 $390,000 $12,615,000 $365,000 $15,009,000 $ 1,270,000 $19,766,000
$622,000 􀁾􀀠TOTAI. for 200iI 800d $ 466,000 $ 296,000 $ 460000 $ 2520000 $ 2.000000 $ 1600000 $11000000 $ 1550.000 $ 1,310000 $ 176,000 $21,656,000 'IRA CRWS 2001 Five-Year Plan Update
and Summary of Proposed Cspital Improvements VIM 
----------------CHAPTER VIII Meter Station Improvements The Central Regional Wastewater System meters wastewater flow from each ofthe customer cities discharging into its interceptor
system. The flow measurements are used to determine the proportionate use ofthe sYstem by each contracting party. This proportion is applied to the total system costs to determine each
party's prorated share ofthese costs. As a secondary benefit, these measurements enable the CRWS to observe flow conditions in individual interceptor segments and identify where potential
reliefinterceptors may be needed. The following table presents the engineering and surveying costs, land rights costs, construction costs and inspection costs currently projected for
the meter station improvements to be funded in the 2001 bond series. ---. -􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠_.. -.. . . Meter Station Improvements 2001 Bond Series g'g' '" c: :E 􀁾􀀠c: "$>en i TOTAl forProject
Description a: 2􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀠"CO 􀁾􀀠2001 Bonda '" w -' (.) .5 1.88 IlT¥JtrNUe<eS/i $ 3000 $10000 $20,000 $800 $33800 .68/nflnlW ae<eS/i $ 3;000 $15000 1$20000 $800 $ 38,800 12.88 Replacs
GsJes $ 750 1$ 5000 $ 200 $ 5950 13.3E Improve "",access; upslz.primaJy element $ 12000 $15000 $80000 $ 3200 $ 110200 .W_temeier& p/pIIg lor I/ow imp. $ 7500 $50000 1$ 2.000 $ 59.500
.OWImprove_ $10000 1$25 000 1$ 1000 $ 36000 1382 HE laksview MS 'moved IOO&M} $20000 $20,000 $150,000 $ 6,000 $ 196 000 [otals $ 46,250 $70,000 $350,000 $14,000 $ 480,250 TRACRWS 2001
Five-Yea, Plan Update and Summary ofProposed caplsJ Improvements VI//·f 
CHAPTER VIII Meter Station Improvements The Central Regional Wastewater System meters wastewater flow from each ofthe customer cities discharging into its interceptor system. The flow
measurements are used to determine the proportionate use ofthe system by each contracting party. This proportion is applied to the total system costs to determine each party's prorated
share ofthese costs. As a secondary benefit, these measurements enable the CRWS to observe flow conditions in individual interceptor segments and identify where potential reliefinterceptors
may be needed. The following table presents the engineering and surveying costs, land rights costs, construction costs and inspection costs currently projected for the meter station
improvements to be funded in the 200 1 pond series. ----------_.._--------􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠Meter Station 1mprovements Project Description 2001 Bond Series .§' 8' ma;..I:j,
i! c:'"WOO '" r.:: :E 􀁾0> il:' 1'! 111 c:.. 0 -' <:) c: 0 􀁾􀀠lil' .5 TOTAL for 2001 Bond Bond 1.08If1VJfWeaCt:il$S $ 3,000 $10,000 $20,000 $ 800 $ 33800 4.681__ $ 3000 1$15000 $20000
$ 800 $ 38.800 12.88 Replaco Gates $ 750 1$ 5000 $200 $ 5950 ::::.Improve mm 8C<:11SS; • primaIy e/eml3lll $ 12000 $15000 $80000 $ 3.200 1$ 110.200 9.OJ __r& pipilgfor /low imp. $ 1,50()
$50000 $ 2000 $ 59500 6.0W Improve sa:ess $20000 $10,000 $20,000 $25000 $150,000 $ 1000 1$ 6,000 $ 38000 $ 196000 1382No I.ake;fewIdS lIlovedillO&M} [Olals $ 46.259 $70,000 $350,000
$14,000 $480,250 1RACRWS 2001 FiYtrYear Plan Update and Summary ofProposed CepH.llmprovemenls VIII·! 
CHAPTER IX Other Capital Improvements The table below presents projected costs for a number ofsystem-wide pJanning and management activities associated with the proposed Series 2001
and 2003 bond programs. Funding for future long-term system planning is suggested for each bond program, as is an appropriate escalation allowance to account for anticipated inflationary
pressures during the period in which the bond program will be implemented. ---􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠--! Other Capital Improvements 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series
g'"" '" c: g'"" '" c 􀁾􀀠0 :5 .:E 0 c 'c c: tl 'c c: 􀁾􀀠0l!!'s:, g TOTALfor l!!'1ii' '" i TOTALlorSegment a: 2 ir ,􀁾􀀠'0 u; Cl. 2001 Bond ._ I! 􀁾􀀠u; 2003 Bond􀁧􀀧􀁾􀀠c: g 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠c
􀁾3 0 w 0 -' 0 I.ongRangs Plsiinina $ 75,000 i$ 75,000 $75,000 $ 75000 􀁾􀀺􀁥$200 000 $1500,000 $60,000 $1.160,000 $50,000 $1,000000 $4(),000 $1,090,000 trolals $275,000 $1,600,000 $60,000
$1,835,000 $75,000 $50,000 $1,000,000 $40,000 $1,165,000 TRACRWS 2001 FIVe-Yaar Plan Update and SummaI}' ofP/oposad CapWallmprovamants IX-1 
CHAPTER X Cost Summary The table below summarizes the cost associated with each category ofimprovements proposed for both the current (Series 2001) bond program and for the proposed
future (Series 2003) bond program. Our opinion ofprobable capital costs (including easement acquisition, engineering/surveying, construction, and inspection) for all improvements proposed
for funding in the Series 2001 bond program is $74.8 million. This includes $4,830,000 for additional costs associated with SRF funding requirements (environmental assessments, program
management and administration, and other cost considerations), A future bond sale (capital costs totaling approximately $89.1 million) is envisioned in approximately the year 2003. The
proposed interceptor relief improvements comprise approximately 61 % ofthe total proposed Series 2001 bond program. It is anticipated that interceptor system improvements will comprise
the majority ofthe anticipated Series 2003 bond program as well. Improvements Interoop!or Relief fmprovements Rehllb/1ltJJlkJn Improvements 􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁉􀁯􀁮􀀠CtYttrd 1&1 Mgml.nd Maintefi81'1C8
Tnaalment PIanI Improvements lAo!", Starim 'other CIlpi!aJ SRF Adlfd/onal CcsIs )tals 􀁾􀀠2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series C» I C) 1 c:'>, i c: 􀁾􀀠i c: 0 c: 0 c:'" 􀁾􀀠0 '" 'B 􀁾􀀠'"
i TOTAL for 2001 '" TaTAL for 0> C) 2 c '" 1il Bond c: '" 1il :if 2003 Bond'co co C '" 'co c: C., '" 8 .5 <D '" 8 .5'" ....J <D ....Jc: co '0> '5c: .nw $ 313.400 $42,800,000 $1.940000
$ 45053400 $ 287200 $3,248620 $53.841000 $4,971,000 $62,347.820 $ 250000 $ . $ 4350,000 $222000 $ 4,622,000 􀁾􀀠2,429,000 $ 28,000 1$ 2487,000 $ 15.000 $20,000 $ 300000 1$ 12,000 $ 347000
$ 500,000 $ 20,000 $ 520,000 $1,420,000 $ 945000 $ 20000 $ 2,385.000 $ 975.000 $ 975,000 $1,618,000 $390.000 $12,615000 1$ 386000 $ 15,009,000 $1,270,000 $19,766,000 $ 622,000 $21658,000
$ 46.250 $ 70000 $ 350000 1$ 14000 $ 490250 $ , !$ . 1$ . $ 275000 $ 1,500 000 $ 60000 $ 1835.000 $ 75000 $ 50000 $ 1000000 $ 40000 1$ 1165000 $4.830,00( $3,937,650 $460,000 $62,660,000
$2,654,000 $ 74,761.650 $2,607,200 $3,296,620 $77,536,000 $5,661,000 $69.122.620 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭OPINION OF PROBABLE CAPITAL COSTS TRACRWS ZOOt FlvlT-Year Plan UPdate and Summary
ofProposed Capilallmprovemenls X-1 
CHAPTER X Cost Summary The table below summarizes the cost associated with each category of improvements proposed for both the current (Series 2001) bond program and for the proposed
future (Series 2003) bond program. Our opinion ofprobable capital costs (including easement acquisition, engineeringfsurveying, construction, and inspection) for all improvements proposed
for funding in the Series 2001 bond program is $74.8 million. This includes $4,830,000 for additional costs associated with SRF funding requirements (environmental assessments, program
management and administration, and other cost considerations). A future bond sale (capital costs "totaling approximately $89.1 million) is envisioned in approximately the year 2003.
The proposed interceptor relief improvements comprise approximately 61 % ofthe total proposed Series 2001 bond program. It is anticipated that interceptor system improvements will comprise
the majority ofthe anticipated Series 2003 bond program as well. mprovemenls tercepfor Relief IJXCNemenfs ohabiTilalion 'provements nsIon Coolrol I Mgmland iJintansnce eaiment Plant
rprovements 􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁲􀀠Station herCBpital IFAdcfdional lS/s ltals 􀁾􀀠OPINION OF PROBABLE CAPITAL COSTS 2001 Bond Series 2003 Bond Series 0> 0> <= <='>"50 '" <= 􀁾􀀠<=2: '" !!!:E .2 <=
0 <=" 0 " -'= u 􀁾en 0> 13 U TOTAL for 2001 UJ 0> TOTALfor 0> jj" 2 '" 0> jj" 2 <D<= "C u; a. Bond <= "C u; a. 2003 Bond􀀮􀁾􀀠<= <= '" 􀀮􀁾􀀠<= <= '" '" 0 E '" 0 E'" --' 0 '" --' 0<=
<='0 "0 <= <=w w $ 313,400 $42,800000 $1,940,000 $ 45,053,400 $ 287,200 $3,248,620 $53,841,000 $4,971,000 $ 62,347,820 $ 250,000 $ . $ 4,350,000 $ 222,000 $ 4822,000 􀁾􀀠2429,000 $ 28,000
$ 2,457,000 $ 15,000 $20,000 $ 300,000 $ 12,000 $ 347000 $ 500,000 $ 20,000 $ 520,000 $1,420,000 $ 945000 $ 20,000 $ 2,385,000 $ 975,000 $ 975,000 $1,618,000 $390,000 $12,615000 $ 385,000
$ 15,009,000 $1,270,000 $19,766,000 $ 622,000 $ 21658,000 $ 46250 $ 70000 $ 350,000 $ 14000 $ 460,250 $ -$ -$ -$ 275000 $ 1,500 000 $ 60000 $ 1,835,000 $ 75000 $ 50000 $ 1000,000 $ 40000
$1165000 $4,83000{ $3,937,650 $480,000 $62,860,000 $2,654,000 $ 74,761,650 $2,607,200 $3,298,620 $77,536,000 $5,681,000 $ 89,122,820 X-1TRACRWS 2001 Five---Year Plan Update and Summary
ofProposed Capital Improvements 
AGENDA ITEM III·B TRINITy RlyER AUTHQRlrv OF TEXAS SCHEDULE OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY -CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FISCAL YEAR SERIES 1993 SERIES 1995 SERIES 1998A
SERIES 1998B SERIES 2001 TOTAL 2003 $ 18,442,189 $ 2,380,902 $ 3,887,132 $ 4,921,808 $ 2,857,102 $ 32,489,133 2004 18,481,520 2,378,152 3,883,873 4,926,558 3,027,102 32,697,205 2005
18,541,430 2,375,902 3,886,012 4,935,808 3,018,435 32,757,587 2006 17,725,030 2,376,863 3,888,063 5,772,737 3,014,695 32,777,388 2007 17,752,510 2,369,250 3,885,910 5,790,587 3,010,700
32,808,957 2008 17,876,075 3,884,470 8,176,013 3,156,535 33,093,093 2009 17,992,375 3,888,475 8,187,388 3,148,215 33,216,453 2010 18,166,813 3,887,465 8,198,212 2,989,575 33,242,065
2011 10,538,375 3,884,925 7,640,761 11,984,900 34,048,961 2012 11,193,000 3,885,460 7,038,662 11,933,555 34,050,677 2013 11,246,500 3,888,460 3,976,563 14,937,155 34,048,678 2014 10,630,250
3,884,873 4,648,575 14,884,540 34,048,238 2015 10,686,500 3,884,573 4,641,750 12,223,380 31,436,203 2016 10,752,000 3,887,020 1,040,000 8,508,300 24,187,320 2017 3,886,660 457,500 8,256,700
12,600,860 2018 456,750 6,601,400 7,058,150 2019 5,991,400 5,991,400 2020 5,542,600 5,542,600 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 TOTAL $ 210,024,567 $ 11,881,069
$ 58,293,371 $ 80,809,672 $ 125,086,289 $ 486,094,968 
HANDOUT ' lENDA ITEM III-e August7,2002 (Previous report August 6, 2001) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ACTIVE PIPELINE DESIGN PROJECTS
BEAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Bear Creek Interceptor, BC-4 Location: City of Colleyville From Little Bear Creek to north city limit of Bedford Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation
of 2700 ft, of 8" to 15" diameter parallel relief pipeline Status: Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 2001 Preliminary Design Report Contract to be completed by November 2002
ELM FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-G Location: Cities of Coppell and Carrollton Adjacent to Belt Line Road, from luna Road to Fairway Type/Size: 48" parallel
relief of 6900 ft. of 33" diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated November 1994 Design Revisions begun May 1997 Final Design revisions completed June 2000 Design is 99% complete Easement/permit
acquisition 95% complete Condemnation proceedings in progress Anticipated construction award by December 2002 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-l location: City of Irving North of
CRWS Treatment Plant, from West Fork of Trinity River to SH 183 Type: 102" parallel relief of 25,300 ft. of 72" & 96" diameter pipelines Status: Design begun in 1996 Design 95% complete
Easement acquisition begun December 2000 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-2 Location: Cities of Irving and Dallas North of SH 183 to
Spur 348 Type: 96" parallel relief of 20,600 ft. of 96" diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated in 1995 Revisions to Final Design made in December 1997 Design 91 % complete Easement
acquisition to begin by January 2002 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 1 
HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM III-C August7,2002 (Previous report August 6, 2001) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ACTIVE PIPELINE DESIGN PROJECTS
BEAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Bear Creek Interceptor, BC·4 Location: City of Colleyville From Little Bear Creek to north city limit of Bedford Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation
of 2700 ft. of 8" to 15" diameter parallel relief pipeline Status: Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 2001 Preliminary Design Report Contract to be completed by November 2002
ELM FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-G Location: Cities of Coppell and Carrollton Adjacent to Belt Line Road, from Luna Road to Failway Type/Size: 48" parallel
relief of 6900 ft. of 33ft diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated November 1994 DeSign Revisions begun May 1997 Final DeSign revisions completed June 2000 Design is 99% complete
Easement/permit acquisition 95% complete Condemnation proceedings in progress AntiCipated construction award by December 2002 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-1 location: City of
Irving North of CRWS Treatment Plant, from West Fork of Trinity River to SH 183 Type: 102" parallel relief of 25,300 ft. of 72" & 96" diameter pipelines Status: Design begun in 1996
Design 95% complete Easement acquisition begun December 2000 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF·2 location: Cities of Irving and Dallas
North of SH 183 to Spur 348 Type: 96" parallel relief of 20,600 ft. of 96" diameter pipeline Status: DeSign initiated in 1995 Revisions to Final Design made in December 1997 DeSign 91
% complete Easement acquisition to begin by January 2002 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 1 
Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-6 Location: Cities of Farmers Branch and Dallas North of Spur 348 to 1-635 Type: 72" parallel relief of 12,900 ft. 72" diameter pipeline Status:
Design initiated in August 1998 Design 41 % complete Easement acquisition to begin in 2002 Anticipated construction award by late 2003 MOUNTAIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Kirby Creek
Outfall Interceptor Location: City of Grand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest Parkway Type: Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment of 20,500 ft. of 12" "
to 24"line Status: Design Contract awarded in August 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed August 1999 Environmental Assessment completed by March 2001 Work is 95% complete Design
to be initiated by October 2002 Easement acquisition to begin by April 2003 Anticipated construction award in October 2003 Name: MCKC 11 Rehabilitation Location: City of Grand Prairie
Upstream of LS 4 along Mountain Creek Lake Type: Rehab 4,650 ft. of 30" diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated in 2001 Design 100% complete Easement acquisition in progress AntiCipated
construction award by October 2003 WEST FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF-G Phase II and I-A-1 Erosion Location: City of Grand Prairie From Bear Creek System
junction approximately 3,900 ft. upstream toward Belt Line Road Type: 84" parallel relief of 3,900 ft. of 45" & 66" lines Status: Design initiated in 1996 Revisions to design made in
1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 Design completed in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition begun in 1999 Construction split
into two phases in October 2000 DeSign is 100% complete Construction contract to be awarded in October 2002 2 
Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-1 Location: City of Grand Prairie From the Plant to Bear Creek System junction Type/Size: 84" parallel relief of 17,800 ft. of 84" pipeline Status: Design
Contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed 2001 Environmental Assessment completed Evaluation of TXDOT conflicts and pipeline reroutes completed by February
2001 Final Design is 80% complete Easement acquisition started December 2001 Anticipated construction award by February 2003 Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-3 Location: City of Grand
Prairie Johnson Creek from junction with West Fork to Hwy. 360 Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation of 24" parallel relief of 11,050 ft. of 30" line Status: Preliminary Design Contract
awarded in June 1998 Environmental Assessment completed by December 2001 Design is 98% complete Final Design contract to be awarded by December 2002 Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-11A
Location: City of Grand Prairie From Johnson Creek to Roy Orr Blvd. Type: Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment of 72" diameter parallel relief 6,900 ft. of 60"
diameter line Status: Design awarded in August 1998 Draft Environmental Assessment completed March 2000 Design is 31% complete Easement acquisition to begin by January 2003 Anticipated
construction award in 2003 Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF·11 B Location: Cities of Arlington and Grand Prairie From Roy Orr Boulevard to west of West Fork of Trinity River Type:
84" diameter parallel relief of 16,000 ft. of 66" to 84" diameter line Status: Design contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment completed March
2000 Engineering evaluations & negotiation of pipeline relocation, November 1999 to December 2001 Revised environmental assessment completed in April 2001 ReVised pipeline alignment
in summer 2001 Design 67% complete Easement acquisition begun in late 2001 Anticipated construction award in March 2003 3 
Name: Type: Status: I and I Management Plan -Phase IV Planning Contract awarded in December 2001 Work is approximately 37% complete ACTIVE PLANT DESIGN PROJECTS: Name: Location: Type:
Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Bar Screening Improvements, Phase f and II PS 6/6A Rehabilitation and Maintenance Design of Phase I is 100% complete
Design of Phase II is 100% complete Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction to be completed by November 2003 Clarifier Piping Improvements Primary Clarifiers Evaluation
and Piping Rehabilitation Contract to be approved in August 2002 Stage VI Odor Control Improvements Plant Design in progress ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS-(as of July 2002) Name: Location:
Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Ultle Bear Creek CO-1/GV-4 City of Hurst East of PreCinct Road, north of SP RRlWest of Hwy 121 & north of Glade Rehabilitation of 1500 ft.
of 12" diameter Iine/200 ft. line repair Project added to BC Rehab, in 199B Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition completed in July 2001 Construction awarded
in October 2001 Construction is approximately B2% complete Bear Creek Rehab .. Section II & III Cities of Irving and Ft. Worth South of DFW International Airport Rehabilitation of 9000
ft, of 39" diameter line Preliminary DeSign Study initiated in February 1996 Engineering Evaluation completed in January 1997 DeSign initiated May 1997 Final Design completed in June
2001 4 
Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Easement and permit acquisition completed in July 2001 Construction
awarded in October 2001 Construction is approximately 82% complete Elm Fork: Interceptor, MS 15.0E City of Carrollton South of 1-635 and north of Luna Road Re-build meter station Design
completed April 2002 Construction in progress Mountain Creek Interceptor, MC-4A Cities of Grand Prairie and Arlington Bowman Branch, South Fork Fish Creek to Loyd Park: Construct new
lift station, 10,000 ft of twin 24" diameter force main to replace existing 18" force main, and build 7,500 ft of 54" diameter pipeline to replace existing 24" diameter gravity pipeline
Environmental Assessment completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Evaluate possible reroute options in South Grand Prairie due to land development Modify design
for two 24" diameter force main and 54" gravity pipeline in July 2001 Easement acquisition begun in October 2000 USACE environmental data and reports to be completed by September 2001
Easement acquisition to be completed by October 2002 Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1 % complete Construction to be completed by December 2003 Mountain Creek
Interceptor, MC-4B Cities of Grand Prairie, Arlington, and Mansfield Loyd Park to Holland Road 16,000 ft of 48" relief pipeline replacement of 24" gravity pipeline Environmental Assessment
completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Final design to begin in September 2000 Easement acqUisition to begin March 2001 USACE environmental data and reports to
be completed by September 2001 Easement acquiSition completed by August 2002 Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1% complete Construction to be completed by July
2003 Harwood Road SS Maintenance Cities of Grand Prairie Fish Creek to Camp Wisdom-Webb Lynn Roads 6,000 ft of 24" relief pipeline replacement of 24" gravity line DeSign completed by
TRA -April 2002 Easement acquisition begin March 2002 5 
Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Easement acquisition in progress Construction contract awarded
April 2002 Construction is 51% complete Construction to be completed by October 2002 West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF-C, N, B, P, & M City of Arlington From West of Hwy, 360 to west
of Collins Street 72" parallel relief of existing 54" & 60" lines Design initiated in 1996 Design completed in December 1998 EA completed by December 1998 Construction contract awarded
in December 1998 Construction 97% complete Construction to be completed by August 2002 West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF-G, Phase I City of Grand Prairie From 3,900 feet west of Bear
Creek System junction to Belt Line Road 84" parallel relief of 2,200 ft. of 45" & 66" lines Design initiated in 1996 Revisions to design made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in
March 1999 Design 100% complete in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition begun in 1999 Construction split into two phases in October 2000 Construction
contract awarded in April 2001 Construction is approximately 99% complete Construction to be completed by September 2002 Bar Screening ImprOVements. Phase I and II PS 6/6A Plant Design
of Phase I is 100% complete Design of Phase II is less than 100% complete Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1 % complete Construction to be completed by November
2003 Gravity Sand Filters Rehabilitation Plant Rehabilitation and Maintenance Design is 100% complete Construction Contract awarded in June 2002 Construction is >75% complete Construction
to be completed by October 2002 6 
list of Construction Project Improvements Completed since August 2001 Report 1. Flow Monitoring and Telemetry Improvements 2. 2000 Odor Control Stage IV Project -Biofilters 3. Solids
Dewatering and Handling Equip. -Belt Presses 4. Sludge Collection System 5. MC-1 Pipeline 6. WF-C,N,B,P,&M Pipeline 7. III Management Phase III-update POE and flow data, and select ESRI
GIS and HydroWorks software 7 
AGENDA ITEM VI FISCAL YEAR REVENUE ALLOCATION 1) Flow Projection and Analysis (See Item VI-A) In early spring of each year Northern Region management requests from each Contracting Party
their projected flows for the following fiscal year. Along with the estimated flows received, the Authority evaluates actual previous fiscal year flows and present year-te-date fiscal
flows to establish the Project's flow allocations from each Contracting Party and the overall total System prOjection of MGD. This average daily flow will be used in the development
of operation and maintenance expenditures and also utilized to determine each Contracting Party's share of the proposed fiscal year system expenditures. 2) Actual Monthly Flow Distribution
(See Item VI-B) A report is distributed monthly to each Contracting Party regarding the flows of the previous month. The "Contributed Wastewater Flow By Contracting Parties" report summarizes
meter station data and cost obligation (CAWS only) pertaining to the flow measurement of of wastewater transported to the Plant for processing. Included for comparison purposes are the
predicted percentage of total flow contributed by each party and the year-te-date actual wastewater flow percent contribution. 3) Mid-Year AssessmentlReallocation (See Item VI-C) Authority
management and the contributing parties recognize that at the time budgets are prepared, actual flow conditions for the upcoming fiscal year can vary due to development changes, drought
andfor wet conditions. At mid-year (usually June), an evaluation of flows from each Party will be conducted. Based on factors including a review of year-te-date flows for the present
fiscal year and flows over the previous twelve months, original flows and contribtllion percentage allocations for the System may be adjusted. 4) End-of-Year Settle-Up (See Item VI-D)
The contract states that adjustments for the previous year's annual requirement shall be credited, or debited, to settle-up the contracting parties accounts. An independent audit will
be performed to establish the actual expenditures during the fiscal year, and a determination will be made as to each Contracting Party's proportionate share of said expenditures. Each
Party's annual obligation is compared with the actual collections from that Party, and if a variance exists, a refund check or a final invoice is issued to close out the fiscal year.

AGENDA ITEM VI· A EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2002 FLOW ALLOCATIONS (.;11 Y . II 􀁆􀁙􀁾􀁙􀀲􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀡􀁆􀁤􀀠􀁾􀀠FY 2002 Lor TI 1f'I.) % 􀁾􀀠ADDiSON , 2.420 􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀀠2:
• 41.osQI ).3601 􀁾􀀠4.' ;661 m 􀁾􀀠.TON 1:!.2m 􀁾􀁌􀀧􀀠1: iOC 11 • JAR HILL •.210 􀁾􀀠tS. (y 􀁾􀁌􀁌􀁅􀀠!.445 1.74 ;,% 1.575 .700 􀁄􀁾􀀠I .200 ;OC 5.15, 􀁾􀀧􀀥􀀠DFW 100 1 10 1.58' 7(
DI IF ( :00 0.14( 0.1S' %: 􀁾􀁂􀁒􀁁􀁎􀁲􀀮􀁈􀀠. 1001 2.79l 2.81' 'Ilo, 􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁭􀀠􀁾􀀠4 􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁏􀁾􀀠O. 11.102'%: 11.􀁾􀀺􀁖􀁉􀁎􀁅􀀠2.7241 1 :.S8C 1 ;T 0.175 0.122' 1831 0.126% 1 􀁉􀁖􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁉􀀠
?Il Ilnn ?fI Rile 􀁾􀀠􀀲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁄􀀠1.850 􀁾􀀠.5 3.Q9( 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁁􀁎􀁮􀀠_LS 􀁏􀀮􀁾􀀠0.37 1.565 1.69' 1.18: 1.694 143.133 1! 14" 1( ! BUDGETED FY 2002 FLOWS 45% 40% 􀁾􀀠35% ::Ja:30%
C!l!!! z25% f--:r: > 5 0 z 􀁾􀀠!! 20% I-en ..J :!􀁾􀀠... ffi 0 􀁾􀀠15% I-II:..J 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁷􀀠o 0 W􀀰􀀡􀁩􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀺􀁬􀀠1I:t;;C!lz iil z 􀁾a: ..J -I 􀁡􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁃􀁄􀁾􀁮􀀠z10% rg--u._
0 ;;: 􀁾􀀠n. ;t « 􀁾􀀠lii !i! 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠... « en 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠« 􀁾􀀠0 Om􀁾􀀠5% 5% r9-+ C!l :;􀁾􀁵􀀮􀀠o5!!!' 0oi .0 u. :r:• 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠0% LL -',.% CUSTOMER CITY SHAREi 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONTRIBUTED WASTEWATER FLOW BY CONTRACTING PARTIES MAY 2002 
..AGENDA ITEM VI·C CRWS -2002 MID YEAR REALLOCATION ! CONTRACTING 2002 2002 2002 2002 PARTY BUDGET BUDGET REVISED REVISED MGD % SHARE MGD % SHARE , 2.2387IADDISON 2.420 1.664% 1.509%,I
!IARLINGTON II 41.080 i28.230%1 44.71311 30.131%lII ICARROLL TON II 12.100 8.315%1 12.72001 8.571%1ICEDAR HILL II 0.245 0.168%10.32861 'IBEDFORD 4.666 3.206%1 4.93821 3.328%1 1 :ICOLLEYVILLE . 1 II 2539 1745%1 211141 IlcOPPELL 3.700 2.543% 3.8984 2.627%11 I 5.154%7.500 9.0639 6.108%1 I:DFW AIRPORT I IDALLAS
1.278%1 ! DUNCANVILLE 2.310 1.587% 1.8967 0.200 0.137%1 0.23541 0.159%1I I : EULESS 1 4.100 I 2.817%1 4.42391 2.981%1 IFARMERS BRANCH II 6.700 I 4.604%1 6.90311 4.652%1 IFORTWORTH II
1.267 I 0.871%1 2.09941 1.415%1 IGRAND PRAIRIE II 16.208 1 11.138%1 15.42141 10.392%1 !IGRAPEVINE 2.380 1.635%1 1.90171 1.281%1II IIHURST II 0.183 0.126%1 0.19341 0.130%1 IIiRVING II
30000 206160/, I 2698341 18183o,q° " IKELLER 2.415 1.659%1 2.57861 1.738%1II 'IMANSFIELD 3.250 2.233%1 3.46591 2.335%1II 'N RICHLAND HILLS 0.565 0.388%1 0.55981 0.377%1I SOUTHLAKE 1.694
1.164% 1.7273 1.164% TOTAL 145.5220 100.000% 148.4023 100.000% CRWS 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2001 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTED FOR INTERCEPTOR In (METHOD 2) FY2001 DISTRIBUTION ADJUSTED ADJUSTED CONTRIBUTION BASED ON OF
FY2OO1 TRA FY2OO1 DISTRIBUTION FY 2001 ACTUAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL INTERCEPTOR CONTRIBUTION OF FY2OO1 ACTUAL ANNUAL CONTRACTING TOTAL FLOW REQUIREMENT BASED III 􀁔􀁏􀁔􀁁􀁾􀁆􀁌􀁏􀁗􀀠ACTUAL
ANNUAL REQUIREMENT PARTY (MG) PERCENT ON ACTUAL FLOWS (MG) (MG) PERCENT REQUIREMENT ADJUSTMENT ADDISON 830.338 1.539% 5790,319 830.338 1.553% $797,506 $7,169 ARLINGTON 16,100.830 29.838%
$15,322,632 0.495 16,100.338 30.111% $15,462,82$ $140,193 BEDFORD 1,751.036 3.246% $1,666,397 1,751.036 3.275% ' $1,681.802 $15,406 CARROLLTON 4.439.217 8.227% $4,224,790 2,53 4,436.687
8.298% $4,261,251 $38,460 CEDAR HILL 􀀱􀀰􀀷􀀮􀁾􀀷􀀠0.200% $102,705 107.737 0.201% $103,219 $514 COLLEYVILLE 912.313 1.690% $867,661 6.007 906.305 1.1195% $870,429 $2,566 COPPELL 1,432.413
2.654% $1,662,902 1,432.413 2,679'1(. $1,375,740 $12,838 DALLAS 3,168,062 5,867% $3,012,668 167.624 2,976.238 5.570% $2,660,346 ($152,516) DIFW AIRPORT 795.167 1.474% 5756,939 795.157
1.467% $753,615 $8,676 DUNCANVILLE 60.654 0.112% $57,515 60.654 0.113% $58,029 $514 EULESS 1,430.274 2.651% $1,361,661 30.426 1,838.S48 2.616% $1,344,415 ($16,946) FARMERS BRANCH 2,160.775
4.004% $2,056,164 0.15 2,16M25 4.041% $2,075,164 $19,001 FORT WORTH 1,009.115 1-.870% $S60,296 ' 68.782 952.333 1.781% $;114,592 ($45,704) GRANO PRAIRIE 5,929.950 10.939% $5,643,153
146.711 5,764.239 10.818% $5,555,340 ($87,813) I GRAPEVINE 596.313 1.105% $567,446 36.969 559.324 1,046% $537,150 ($30,296) III HURST 74,667 0.139% 571,360 74.667 0.140% 571,694 $514
Z IRVING 10,460.669 19.367% $9.955,757 17.724 10,442,965 19,531% $10,029,705 $73,946 & KELLER 770.179 1.427% $732,804 0.946 769.231 1.439'1(. $738,966 $6,162 --I MANSFIELD 1,149.337
2.130% $1,093,813 1,149.337 2.150% $1,104,064 $10,271 III NRICHLAND HILLS 231.433 0.429% $220,303 1.897 229.636 0.429% $220,303 $0 ar: SOUTHLAKE 552.386 1.023% 5525,339 4.036 546.346
1.025% $526,366 $1,027 < $51,362.746 491,521 53,469.364 100.000% $51,362,746 $0 -•CI 114'2002 􀁁􀁾􀁌􀂷􀁮􀀰􀀱􀀯􀁦􀁮􀀮􀁉􀁊􀀨􀁪􀀮􀀠
ClI$tomer Cltyfor 􀁒􀁾􀀹􀀠E\.I!eM EulelJ& Et.llw. Grand Prairie Grand Prairie ReceMng 12,08 13,OW 16,5W 5,OW 5.1M 12,69, 13.08, 12,$8, 13,18 15,OW, 15,SW, la,OW 17,OW a,ow 7.0M, 9.0M,
9.6M, 10.0M ADF 0,4a7 0,566 0,132 0,550 4,662 ADDF 0,362 0"69 0,065 039' ',042 􀁉􀁾􀀠0,125 0,036 0,0'6 0,156 0,820 TRA 162,52 63.1)0 6,06 71.15 566,71 277.21 21$,46 111,96 195,66 1775.86
Total 459,73303,'. 120,06 26S.S1 2344.59 0.0002717 0,000'222 0.0003957 0,0005656 0,00026" TRA TRA AdjUsted Inlef¢epto[ Interceptor TRA III 1/1 􀁪􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁥􀁾􀀠0,050 0,027 0,003 0.042
0,150 18.099 9.666 1.167 15,209 54,662 0.47 150,67 53.36 6,39 70,$2 490,79 0,041 0,017 0,003 0,0" 0.130 The Adjusted TRA Interceptor III (MG) tor the City 01 Keller 􀁾􀀶􀁾􀁥􀁤to O,777MG
aw the FI6cai 'feat 2001 Schedule or Aet\.la! Annual Requirement was: finalized. HoWever, this correction does not Bft'ed the Contribution Sa&ed on Adual Flow (%) or the Actl,.lal Annual
Requirement {$). 6,14'2002 1 􀁾􀁡􀁊􀁬􀁤􀁭􀀲􀁏􀁏􀀱􀀮􀁬􀀼􀀱􀀧􀀠, 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTeM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREA.M ClTV (MEtHOD 2) -,;; City Meter 10 CItY MeterlO I Node 1 lateral Std. No. :eptor-!ilope --I capacltv (cfsI Ilrvlng 14.06 113
. 0' 1'1.88 Dallas Dallas ci!$Qn 􀁛􀁾􀀢􀀮􀁏􀁂􀀠I'F002 􀁾􀁆􀁏􀁏􀀧􀀲􀀮􀀲􀀠:':009 :F014 :F011 F012 FOi2 EF2 EF2 COP EFN EF2R EF2R EF2R . 2906•.' 26900. 1222tL 169'2'2. 􀁾􀀠City !cttv 􀁾􀁑􀀹􀀿􀀿􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁴�
�􀀮􀀳􀀱􀀰􀀠37,998 I slope [0"'" . 􀁾􀀹􀀠_0.00010 __4.11: 􀁾􀀠85S 0.00042· -􀁾􀀠).00220 19.240 ;1 0.00500 4.570 !.L O.OO.,llij-8.910 48 O.QQ.OaQl __ _'!Q,?'1I'1M 12 0.4 36 O.j 18 0.001'20
TIfgI 15 0,001501 2,5091 0.00400 2.250 0.00220 31,369>111.·· :exii 0.00120 3.649 IBe ._1S _o.OO<I'OI __􀁾􀀠IKelier 112.8B 12.0BjEUleSS " 'ora 􀀧􀁙􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀽􀁾􀀠= S.1 1142.32 Cit 12
0.00300 1,957 Sedfore 􀀬􀁾􀀢􀀠g 2821.65 City 18 0.00340 6.142---_..lS.5W BedfOf<: (783.00 10 0.001350 2.025 10 0.00400 '.389IcUles!.. •i--Euless 11B.OW Beafore 650.00 12 0.00317 2,011
12 0.32000 20,209 􀁾􀁷􀀠IFQ14A,3 '52S.()S City 10 0,02000 3.107I IHurst Bedford II 1560.00 18 0.01980 14.a21 18 0.00340 0.142 Bedford )Sa 2741.16 36 0.00440 44.362 27 0.00440 20,599
5.0J Anln on "'IR 20372.$1 Cl 30 0,00550 30.501 Artlngton IVCS 11390,00 21 0.00100 5,024 '21 0.00802 14.228 􀁦􀀳􀁾􀁏􀁍􀀠Duncanville 4.5M _ IM-5,4.5M C2 148.00 Cltv 􀁾􀀠.. " " ......."r.
.. .,..... Grand Prairie S.11 I 18.00 60 0,00150 101,140 Grand Prairie 5..31 r-:109.20 10 0.00100 I 29700.00 FM _ '--Cedar Hili CH 􀀢􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀠GrandPralrleS,1M --ArlIngton 1.0M 110'" FFt..
16340.00 27 0.OOZ60 15.834 27 -0.00260 la.d311 Artl" ._--t, 􀁾􀀠9S3.50 '50 0.00400 26.011 30 0.00400 26.0111 , 4558.00 36 0.00219 31.297 36 • 0,00220 31.369 1 987 1 27 O. 15 8.504 21
0.00015 8.504􀁾􀀠2ISI02 Dltmtrtl1.xls 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METIIODOLOGY Method 2 Method 2 utilizes the CRWS and city inch-diameter-mile (idm) calculations, and the metered flows from
each delta meter to prorate interceptor III on a subsystem basis. The interceptor III is developed by applying the III per.idrn for the delta meter subsystem to an adjusted interceptor
idrn. The adjusted interceptor idm is based on the line size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city. The interceptor III flows are deducted from
the Fiscal Year·Contribution and the Annual Requirement is revised based on adjusted contribution percentages. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR 1II PRORATION METHOD 2 The following is a description of Method 2 for prorating CRWS interceptor infiltration/inflow (Ill) to the contracting
party flows. L Determine the annual volume of 1II for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -ADDF =III (annually) The use of delta meter subsystem values assumes that
the annual average III per idm for the CRWS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
of non-delta meters are considered to be lines required to serve the metered city, regardless of ownership. The evaluation of 1II annually will provide a trending to account for annual
rainfall, III reduction in the CRWS and the city collection systems. and any other changes in the condition of the systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diameter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually, or assumed to to remain the same for a period of three to fi ve years. . 3. Determine the CRWS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. 4. Determine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No. I divided by the sum of No.2 . and No.3) 5. Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The
adjusted interceptor idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope of the existing CRWS interceptor
segments from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor size in excess of the size required for the upstream city is considered to be required to serve the' delta
metered city, regardless of ownership. 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied by No.5) 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution
Based on Actual Flow for each of the contracting parties. 8. Adjust the Distribution of Fiscal Year Actual Annual Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each of the contracting parries.

BLACK & VEATCh MEMORANDUM Trinity River Authority of Texas B&V Project 66779.110 Interceptor III Proration B&V File B Negative Flow Adjustment July 26,2001 To: Patricia Oeveland From:
Layne Parsons, P.E. The following methodology is proposed for adjusting negative average daily flow (ADF) and infiltration/inflow (III) flows used in the interceptor III proration calculation.
ADF Adjustment Ifa negative ADF value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, negative ADF should not be adjusted for the interceptor III proration. ADF and III will be zero (0)
at delta meter locations with negative ADF. III Adjnstment Ifa negative III value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, use the following steps to determine an adjusted III value:
1. Using the estimated developed acres and the current annual III, determine the average gal!ons-per-acre-day (gpad) for the meters upstream of the receiving (delta) meter. 2. Apply
the calculated average gpad III flow value to the cumulative developed acres for the receiving (delta) meter to determine a revised annual III for the receiving (delta) meter. 3. Using
the revised annual cumulative III for the receiving (delta) meter, calculate the delta III. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the total number
of days in the year. The average daily dry weather flow is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow recorded during the year. . The following criteria are established for the
analysis of the flows used to determine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptor III proration. 1. The beginning of the fiscal year for flow recordings may result in partial inclusion of
the first seven day average meter recording. Partial seven day average meter recordings consisting of less than four (4) days will not be considered for use as the ADDF. .. 2. During
the year. there may be a need to adjust the recorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include. but not be limited to line blockage or year-to-date (YTD) adjustments. Adjusted
flows will not be considered for use as ADDF. 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM VI DATE: August 13. 2002 FILE: 3110.102/3110.800 TO: MEMBER. ADVISORY COMMITIEE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM RE: Central Regional
Wastewater System Proposed FY 2003 Budget Authority management annually prepares a proposed budget of anticipated revenues and expenditures of the Central Regional Wastewater System
in accordance with the fiscal provisions of our Wastewater Services Contract for the ensuing fiscal year. We are pleased to present to you the proposed FY 2003 Budget for the annual
operating funds of the Central System. This budget is relevant to the time period for December 1. 2002 through November 30. 2003. This budget reflects the proposed financial activities
of operating and debt service funds. provides for our continuing ability to deliver high quality. efficient wastewater service to our Contracting Parties, and will continue to position
the Central System for increased growth, regulatory changes and maximized internal operational productivity measures to result in cost efficient wastewater treatment. Events of 2001
have led us to re-evaluate priorities and values, and re-assess the vulnerability of our staff and facilities. This past year. the Authority has worked to ensure the security and integrity
of our Central System and the reliability of our services and progress on this effort will continue into FY 2003. Therefore, the budget reflects the Authority's continued commitment
to protect capital investments, keep operational expenses to a minimum and to maximize the process of increasing operational efficiency throughout the Authority. A brief overview of
Central's financial picture for FY 2003 will reveal an increase in overall System expenditures, with only those increases in operating accounts required to meet contractual obligations
for our treatment of wastewater, as well as an increase associated with the debt service reqUirements. as compared to previous year. The operation and maintenance expenditures were developed
based on transporting and treating an average daily flow of 150.150 MGD. The cost of debt service requirements is based on principal and interest payments due on outstanding Central
Regional Wastewater System Revenue Bonds. The anticipated expenditures in FY 2003 total $58,077.710, an approximate 6.8% increase over the $54.352.130 predicted for the current fiscal
year. The projected costs for salaries and related benefits, association dues. maintenance and operating supplies, laboratory Expenses supplies, process chemicals, computer software,
licenses and instrument supplies, .55.49 Debt SeNteo aM Mh.cellaoaousaudits, engineering services, Authority [] 22,02% Other ServtCe.!> and Charges _14.46% Personal Services computer
network, process SCADA and .6.12% Suppliesmaintenance management support, .1.91% Capltal Outlays professional services, postage, 
August 13, 2002 3110.102/3110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 2 Project insurance payments, employee travel, laundry and uniforms, water usage, collection system, equipment, vehicle
and electrical system maintenance repairs, transportation and beneficial use of biosolids, administrative overhead and capital outlays essential for delivering services during the year
have increased $2,183,400 above the predicted FY 2002 Budget. The increase in the proposed FY 2003 Budget for operating accounts is partly offset by a $404,740 reduction in service cost
for power usage and in other operating category accounts by holding the line on controllable costs, as close scrutiny was given to all anticipated expenditures. Along with decreases
in some predicted operating accounts, there is an increase in programmed debt payments of $1 ,946,920, resulting in an overall projected increase of $ 3,725,580 for FY 2003 expenditures
above the FY 2002 Budget. As is shown in the following table, and despite additional costs not foreseen one year ago, the predicted gross unit costl1000 gallons is the same as last year's
projection for the coming FY 2003, and the net costl1000 gallons is slightly less than forecast. Anticipated FY 2003 revenues from the System's Contracting Parties, totaling Revenue$54,613,900,
renects an 8.3% increase above the FY 2002 projected revenue requirement of $50,421 ,660. The resulting _93.49% Centract Revenue predicted gross and net unit costs of 02,64% Interest
Illt;(Ime .;,66% 􀁍􀁩􀁾􀁬􀁡􀁮􀁥􀁯􀁯􀁳Incomeservice for wastewater transportation and .1,42% Operating 􀁾􀁭􀁥􀁡􀁤and Services treatment throughout FY 2003 are 3.5% .0.77% Professional
Fees and 4.9% over the respective predicted FY 2002 budgeted unit costs as renected in the following table: The following exhibits are presented to provide flow allocations, a summary
of budget objectives and detailed information about the five major budget categories, as well as additional quantitative and statistical information for your review: Exhibit A Exhibit
B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Flow Allocations Budget Objectives Budget at a Glance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and
Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous Historical System Data Projected Future Costs of Service 
August 13, 2002 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 3 The proposed FY 2003 Budget (Exhibit K) is presented for your review and consideration and will be discussed in the
August 13, 2002 Advisory Committee meeting. Additionally, a Budget Workshop will be held in the upstairs conference room of the Administrative Building at the Central Regional Wastewater
System on Monday, August 26, 2002, beginning at 10:00 a.m. for those representatives and city staff members who do not attend the Advisory Committee meeting or desire to discuss the
proposed budget in more detail. A later Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 10th, at which time the committee will be requested to recommend the proposed FY
2003 Budget for adoption by the Authority's Board of Directors. If there are any questions concerning the proposed budget or the workshop, please contact the Northern Region office.
􀁾􀁾PATRICIA M. CLEVELAND Manager, Operations Northern Region PMC/rrc Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager, Northern Region Bill Tatum, Project
Manager, Central Regional Wastewater System 
EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2003 FLOW BUDGETED FY 2003 FLOWS 45% .--------------------------------------------, z 40% --g--... ------(!) 35% z 􀁾􀀠30% ----------------------------
----------1 25% -20% -15% -10% 5% 0% CUSTOMER CITY 
EXHIBIT B CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2003 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Trinity River Authority's Central Regional Wastewater System is a large regional wastewater system
located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River and is currently serving approximately one million customers in Dallas, Tarrant, Ellis, Johnson and Denton counties
of north central Texas. The service area encompasses all or portions of 20 cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The Central
Regional Wastewater System treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons per day (MGD). This System consists of an extensive regional
network of interceptors, pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the delivery of treated effluent for golf course irrigation and lake level management under the
first major urban reuse program in Texas. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2003 The Authority's objectives are reflected in the recommended Annual Operating Budget for Central Regional Wastewater
System FY 2003. The major goals and objectives are: • Operate and adequately protect the Central System's capital investments by proper maintenance, which includes a 162 MGD treatment
plant, over 200 miles of interceptors, four lift stations, 138 metering stations, an analytical laboratory, and the DCURD water reuse project. • Provide wastewater transportation and
treatment services for a projected flow contribution of 150.15 MGO. • Continue operating at efficient levels and minimize unit costs while enhancing treatment capacity and meeting all
regulatory requirements. • Continue Authority efforts to reduce overall wet-weather flow impacts to the System by installing new pipelines for capacity, rehabilitating existing collection
system infrastructure and plant facilities as identified in the first and second phases of the 1998 Rve Year Plan; funded by the Series 1998A and 2000 Revenue Bonds, and the third phase
funded by the Series 2001 Bonds. • Operate and maintain odor control facilities consistent with the Odor Control Management Plan and implement additional odor improvements in the primary
treatment areas to reduce risk of adjacent area odors. • Provide Contracting Parties laboratory testing and pretreatment program capabilities and services on a revenue-supported basis.
• Continue 100% land application of System biosolids under a five-year agreement. • Respond in a timely fashion to Customer Cities' requests for aSSistance. 
EXHIBITC FISCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $58,419,360 Expenses $58,077,710 Variance (Retained
for FY 2004 Debt Requirements) $341,650 Revenue .93.49% Contract Revenue 02.64% Interest Income .1.68% Miscellaneous Income .1.42% Operating Overhead and Services • 0.77% Professional
Fees Expenses .55.49 Debt Service and Miscellaneous 022.02% Olher Services and Charges .14.46% Personal Services .6.12% Supplies .1.91% Capital Outlays FISCAL YEAR 2003 FUND SUMMARY
Revenue Summary Contract Revenue Operating Overhead and Services Professional Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Income Total Sources of Funds Expenditure Summary Personal Services Supplies
Other Services and Charges Cap"al Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous $54,613,900 $831,510 $450,000 $1,544,900 $979,050 $58,419,360 $8,399,720 $3,556,400 $12,785,680 $1,108,790 $32,227,120
Total Application of Funds $58,077,710 
EXHIBIT D CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PERSONAL SERVICES FY2003 'l Proposed FY 2003 of $8,399,720 vs Current FY 2002 of $7,901 ,870 = Variance $497,850 or + 6.3%. 'l The budget
category of Personal Services includes eight line item accounts. As compared with present budget, one line item account decreased (-) $2,000 (Education), one remained unchanged (Unemployment
Compensation) and five increased (+) $499,850 (Salaries, FICA, Health/life Insurance, Pension, and Employee Service Recognition). <:;) The anticipated increase in salaries and related
benefit costs is partly due to usual provisions for forecasted salary adjustments based on merit, varying with each individual employee. Also, provisions are included for cost increases
in the Authority's Health Insurance expenses due to claims experience that has resulted in premium increases. 'l Authority management believes that the Central facility can be operated
effiCiently and maintain adequate margins of sefety with one Project Manager, an Operations/Maintenance staff of 98, plus 52 Technical Services/Pretreatment staff, Administrative staff
of 9, and 7 PurchasinglWarehouse staff. Personal Services 14.46% Personal Services expenditures include those costs associated with the staffing required to operate, maintain, and administer
the treatment plant, biosolids program, laboratory, pretreatment program, collection system, and meter stations. Significant line item accounts in this category of expenditures include
salaries, payroll taxes, health insurance, and pension. 
EXHIBIT E CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM SUPPLIES FY 2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $3,556,400 vs Current FY 2002 of $3,177,200 = Variance $379,200 or + 11.9%. Supplies Q The budget
category of Supplies includes eight line items accounts. As compared with the present budget, three decreased (-) $7,810 (Office Supplies, TNRCC Fees and Fuel) and the remaining five
line item accounts increased (+) $387,010 (Dues, Maintenance and Operating Supplies, Lab Supplies, Process Chemicals,and Computer Software, Licenses and Instrument Supplies. 6.12% Q
Q Over 70% of the expenditures for Supplies is for the purchase of process Chemicals. The increase of $1 02, 100 in anticipated process chemical expenditures is primarily associated
with an increase for ferric chloride and polymer necessary for solids thickening and dewatering, as well as ferrous chloride for odor control. Included in the Computer Software, Licenses
and Instrument Supplies account is the Project's share of an Authority-wide Enterprise Resource Planning software which will integrate financial, payroll, human resources, budget reporting,
asset management, and purchasing into one integrated system. The cost to purchase and implement will be budgeted over a three-year period. Approximately 70% of the expenditures in this
category are for the purchase of process chemicals necessary for sludge thickening, dewatering and stabilization, odor control, effluent disinfection and dechlorination, and other treatment
processes. 
EXHIBIT F CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES FY 2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $12,785,680 vs Current FY 2002 of $12,104,910 = Variance $680,700 or + 5.6%. Q The
budget category of Other Services and Charges includes 22 line item accounts. As compared with the present budget, one remained unchanged (Legal), six line item accounts decreased (-)
$394,930, and fifteen increased (+) $1,075,000. Q Over 85% or $279,320 of the decreased expenditures in this category is for power usage due to the competitive negotiation of an energy
contract for the time period of January 1, 2001 through May 31,2003. The remaining decreases in this category are due to reduced expenses for telephone, printing and binding, training,
repair and maintenance of plant and buildings, and equipment rental. Q This category of expenditures includes increases in Authority audit expense, engineering services, Authority's
computer network, process SCADA and maintenance management system support services, professional services, postage, Project insurance payments, employee travel, laundry and unifol111s,
water usage, repair and maintenance of collection system, equipment, vehicles and electrical systems, off-site biosolids land application, and administrative overhead costs. Other Services
and Charges \ 22.02% This category of expenditures relates to the indirect costs associated with the collection and treatment system, vehicles, and off-site biosolids disposal. 
EXHIBIT G CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL OUTLAYS FY2003 <l Proposed FY 2003 of $1,108,790 vs. Current FY 2002 of $887,950 = Variance (+) $220,840 or 24.9%. <l The Capital
Outlays category can vary significantly from year to year as major equipment is only purchased on an annual as needed basis. <l This category consists of 60% or $659,790 of capital expenditures
for replacement items and 40% or $449,000 of new capital equipment items proposed for purchase in FY 2003. <l Approximately 62% or $457,000 of the proposed Capital Outlay items for replacement
are for the Project Manager's sedan, three trucks, the heavy equipment item of a boom truck which all have excessive mileage and wear due to age, and replacement of two analytical laboratory
spectrophotometers for identifying metal compounds (inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometer and heat graphite atomic absorption unit). Approximately 76% of the primary expenses
under the category of new items is for security electronic surveillance equipment, a Vactor/rodder assembly, and one new utilitv vehicle for the pretreatment program. <l A list of all
the projected capital expenditures is on pages 27 and 28 of the attached proposed FY 2003 Budget. Capital Outlays 1.91% The category of Capital Outlays consists of the purchase of machinery
and equipment to achieve a new purpose or replace existing eqUipment. :,. 
EXHIBIT H CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS FY 2003 <;) Proposed FY 2003 of $32,227,120 vs. Current FY 2002 of $30,280,200 = Variance (+) $1,946,920
or (+) 6.4%. <;) The amount budgeted for Debt Service reflects the fixed and established schedules based on outstanding debt of the Central Systam. <;) In July 1998, the Authority issued
$50,845,000 in Regional Wastewater System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Central Regional Wastewater
System. These bonds were purchased by the State Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. <;) In September 1998, the Authority issued $66,950,000 in System Improvement and
Refunding Bonds, with $61,375,000 being refunded, producing a savings of $2.7 million through the life of the bond. <;) In July 2001, The Authority issued $88,225,000 in Regional Wastewater
System I mprovement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Centrel Regional Wastewater System. These bonds were
purchased by the State Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. <;) The increase in debt expenditures over the present FY 2002 Budget is due to the overall increase in scheduled
debt service payments in FY 2003. Debt Service and Miscellaneous 55.49% ,/Debt Services and Miscellaneous includes the annual principal and interest payments due on System bonds and
the associated paying agent fees. Typically, annual principal and interest payments are structured to provide relatively level debt service requirements from year to year until such
time as additional bonds are issued. 
EXHIBIT I CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND FLOW DATA FISCAL BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL PROJECTED ACTUAL PROJECTED NET ACTUAL YEAR EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES REVENUE REVENUE FLOW FLOW COST/1,000 GAL. COST/1,000 GAL. 1995 $44,817,530 $43,621,706 $41,915,240 $40,594,960 112.37 MGD 113.37 MGD $1.0220 $0.9810 1996 $47,693,245 $46,327,057
$44,889,460$42,064,179 114.14MGD 110.08 MGD $1.0745 $1.0440 1997 $48,358,525 $47,401,825 $45,233,590 $42,891,464 116.00MGD 118.01 MGD $1.0683 $0.9958 1998 $47,014,070 $46,752,148 $43,601,935 $43,673,073
118.28 MGD 118.04 MGD $1.0099 $1.0136 1999 $50,390,530 $50,691,945 $45,859,710 $45,808,213 123.31 MGD 120.64 MGD $1.0189 $1.0403 2000 $51,066,490 $51,361,749 $47,812,790 $48,442,041
127.41 MGD 123.47 MGD $1.0253 $1.0720 2001 $54,509,150 $56,087,461 $49,187,660 $51,953,155 143.13 MGD 146.49 MGD $0.9415 $0.9716 2002 $54,352,130 • $50,421,660 • 145.52 MGD • $0.9493
• 2003 $58,077,710 • $54,613,900 • 150.15 MGD • $0.9965 • Central Regional Wastewater System Flow & Net Costl1,000 Gal. 160 r--------------------------------------------------------------------.,
1.5 140 120 100 􀁾􀀠<>Q <>(!) 80 <>.:Ii 80 􀁾􀀠40 20 0 0.5 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Fiscal Year _ACTUAL NET COST/WOO -.-ACTUAL MGD 􀁾􀀺􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀲􀀦􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀳􀁾􀁲􀁥projected
I 
, , TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET /3210) CONTRACT REVENUE -ADDISON (1106.3210) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.518% (1108.321) Debt Service $31.011,893 x 1,518% Rounding $ 358.27R82
470,760.53 0.65 T01£11 Annual Requirement $ 829,040 $ 839,020 /1106:3380) INTER-FUND SERVICES & CHARGES Clean Rivers Program (TNRCC) Ten Mile Creek Denton Creek Red Oak Creek Tarrant
County Walker-Calloway Branches Mountain Creek Northeast Lakeview Joe Pool Lake 70,000.00 193,360.00 36,600.00 11,100.00 35,500.00 21,000.00 16,660.00 5,100.00 25,000.00 Total Annual
Requirement 414,340 (1106.3390) OPERATING OVERHEAD -OTHER PROJECTS DCURD #1 356,390.00 Ten Mile Creek 19,520.00 Denton Creek 9,260.00 Red Oak Creek 3.920.00 Tarrant County Tolal Annual
Requirement 28.080.00 417.170 693,190 (1106.3980) PROFESSIONAL FEES 450.000 450,000 (1108.3810) INTEREST INCOME -I & S 229,600 489,580 (1108.3820) INTEREST INCOME -RESERVE FUND 1.147,800
1,416,420 1110.8.3840\ INTEREST INCOME -REVENUE FUND 123,500 336,320 (1108.3870) INTEREST INCOME -EMERGENCY FUND 44.000 93,030 (1106.3400) OVERSTRENGTH SURCHARGE 600,000 600,000 (1106.3410]
NORTHEAST LAKEVIEW LIFT STATION 14.650 (1106.3430] PRETREATMENT REVENUE 22,000 22,000 (1106.3440) COMMODITY CHARGE 51,810 51.810 (1106.3480) QUANTITY SURCHARGE City ofAddison 36,800
36.800 (1106.3990) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 268,440 10.000 Page 13 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM • DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT Salaries
Under the Salary Administralion Plan for the Following: Manager, Central Regional Wastewater System 1 Maintenance Engineer 1 Sub-Total 2 Manager, System Operation 1 Operations Division
Chief 2 Chief Operator 8 Senior Operator 7 Operator II 17 Operator I 7 Maintenance Division Chief 2 Chief Maintenance Mechanic 6 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 20 Maintenance Mechanic II
11 Maintenance Mechanic I 2 E/E Division Chief 1 Chief Electrician 1 Chief Electronic Technician 1 Senior Electrician 2 Senior Electronic Technician 3 Electronic T echnicial II 1 Electricilm
" 3 Senior HVAC Technician 1 Process Maint Planner/Scheduler o Information Systems Technician o Process Systems Automation Engineer 1 Sub-Total 97 Page 14 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF 􀁔􀁅􀁘􀁁􀁾􀀠 PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT
Manager, Technical Services 1 Laboratory Division Chief 1 Laboratory Supervisor 3 Quailily Assurance Coordinator 1 Senior Biologist 2 Senior Chemist 5 Biologist 7 Chemist 2 Laboratory
Technician II 2 Laboratory Technician I 1 Laboratory TechnicianlBookkeeper o Technical Services Engineer 1 Environmental Services Coordinator 1 Interceptor System Specialist 2 Chief
Maintenance Mechanic 1 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 3 Maintenance Mechanic II 4 Chief Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) 1 Senior Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician)
1 Electronic Technician II (Instrument Technician) 3 Senior Secretary 1 Field Technician II 1 Sub·Total 44 Manager, Administrative Services 1 Office Coordinator 1 Senior Secretary 5
Accounting Clerk 1 Training Coordinator 1 Sub-Total 9 PurchasinglWarehouse PurchaseIWarehouse Supervisor 1 Buyer 2 Assistant Buyer 1 Senior Storekeeper 2 Senior Secretary 1 Sub-Total
7 Total Project Positions WIO Pretreatment 159 Page 15 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES DESCRIPTION Total Project Base Salaries wlShift Diff
Tota! Project Holiday and Overtime Pay Rounding Talai Project Salaries Pretreatment Pretreatment Coordinator Senior Secretary Environmental Inspector Senior Field Technician Field T
echnidan II Total Pretreatment Positions Total Pretreatment Base Salaries wlShift Diff Tolal Prelrealment Holiday and Overtime Pay Rounding Total Prelreatment Salaries Total FY 2003
Budgeled Positions Total FY 2003 Budgeled Salaries NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 1 1 3 2 8 167 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 5,903,629 284,781 6,188,410 268,506 8,974 277,480 $ 6,465,890 Page 16 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED OaM BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET 11106.4000} SALARIES -REGULAR (01) PROJECT 157 Employees $ 6,151,040.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 8 Employees Total Salaries -Regular 277.480.00 $ 6,428,520 $
6,251,780 {1106.4010) SALARIES -PART-TIME (1106.40201 PAYROLL TAXES -FICA (01) PROJECT $ 6,188,410.00 x 7.65% = 473,413.37 37,370 (01) PRETREATMENT $ 277.480.00 x Rounding Total Payroll
Taxes -Fica 7.65% = 21,227.22 {0.59) 494,640 478,260 11106.40301 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -HEALTHILIFE INSURANCE PROJECT (01) Health $ 223.70 X 109 X 12 292,599.60 $ 352.62 X 7X 12 29,620.08
$ 306.03 X 11 X 12 40,395.96 $ 399.19 X 18 X 12 86,225.04 Provision for increase 25% 112,210.17 (02) Life InsuranceIAD&D: 34,274.00 (03) Long Term Disability: 22,863.00 (04) Employee
Assistance Program: 4,770.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Health $ 223.70 X $ 352,62 X $ 306.03 X $ 399.19 X Provision for increase 7X OX OX 1 X 12 12 12 12 25% 18,790.80 4,790.28 5,895.27 (02)
Life Insurance: 1,548.00 (03) Long Term Disability: 1,027.00 (04) Employee Assistance Program: rounding Total Emp. Ben. -HealthfLife Insurance 240.00 0.80 655,250 411,770 Page 17 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERJDESCRIPTION (1106.4040) EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT -PENSION (01)PROJECT $ PROPOSED DETAIL 708,440.00 PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (01) PRETREATMENT Total Emp. Ben. -Pension 32,220.00 $ 740,660 $ 715,800 (1106.4060)
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (01) PROJECT (01) PRETREATMENT Total Unemployment Compensation 19,300.00 700.00 20,000 20,000 (1106.40701 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRA(01) PROJECT SeNice Awards
M $ 16,280.00 (01) PRETREATMENT Total Employee Recognition Program 16,280 15,260 (1106.4080) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT -EDUCATION (01) PROJECT 6,200.00 (01) PRETREATMENT Total Employee Benefit
-Education 800.00 7,000 9,000 Total Personal SeNices 8,399,720 7,423,610 (1106.4100) OFFICE SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Consumables (02) Non-Consumables (03) Computer/Copier Supplies (05)
Vending and Lunchroom Supplies 16,600.00 9,150.00 14,500.00 8,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Consumables (02) Non-Consumables (03) Computer/Copier Supplies (05) Vending and Lunchroom Supplies
Total Office Supplies 300.00 500.00 1,000.00 150.00 50,200 51,200 11106.4110) DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT (01) ProfessionaVTechnical Memberships AMSAlAWWA American Society for Human
Resources American Water Resource Association Chlorine Institute Nail Assoc of Purchasing Managers Nat Safety Councilrrx Safety Association 1)( Water Utilities Association WEFfWEAT WERF
(02) PeriodicalslMagazinesINewspapers (03) Reference Books 12,000.00 390.00 250.00 700.00 700.00 210.00 700.00 1,520.00 34,000.00 2,800.00 1,400.00 Page 18 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PRETREATMENT (Ol)
ProfessionalfTechnical Memberships AMSNAWWA (03) Reference Books Total Dues and Subscriptions PROPOSED DETAIL $ 210.00 970.00 (1106.41201 FEES OTHER THAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT:
(01) Certification Fees (02) TNRCC WW Inspect & WQA Fees $ 5,400.00 75,000.00 (05) TNRCC Sludge Fee (06) Tier Two Fees 100.00 10.00 PRETREATMENT (Ol) Certification Fees 400.00 Total
Fees Other Than Dues & Subscriptions (1106.4130) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Repeir/Replacement of Hand Tools (02) Operational Supplies (03) Maintenance Supplies
(04) Ground Care Supplies (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies (06) Electrical Supplies (07) F acilHies Supplies (08) Protective/Safety Equipment PRETREATMENT (01) Repair/Replacement
of Hand Tools (02) Operational Supplies (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies: Total Maintenance and Operating Supplies (1106.4140) LAB SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Gases (02) Wafer System
(03) Bacti·Filters, Media and Supplies (04) AA. ICP, and IR Supplies (05) Gas Chromatog Supplies (06) TOC and MCTS·l0 Supplies (07) Lab Apparatus (08) Chemical Reagents (09) Glassware,
Plastics, and Disposables (10) Finers, Glass Fiber, Prefiiters and Membran. 25,300.00 17,000.00 27,000.00 13,000.00 6,000.00 28,000.00 15,000.00 35,000.00 280.00 150.00 200.00 13,000.00
4,000.00 60,000.00 5,000.00 13,000.00 3,000.00 22,000.00 63,000.00 55,000.00 20,000.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 55,850 $ 54,860 80,910 86,910 166,930 146,590 Page 19

TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (1106.4140) LAB SUPPLIES /Continued) PRETREATMENT (11) Field Sampling Supplies (12) Operational Supplies (13) Nuclear Sources -Wipe Test & Refoil (14)
Olher -Freight and Shipping (07) Lab Apparatus (OB) Chemical Reagents and Standards (09) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables (11) Field Sampling Supplies (14) Other -Freight and ShIpping
Total Lab Supplies 1,000.00 5,000.00 300.00 1,000.00 B50.00 500.00 2,900.00 10,500.00 300.00 $ 280,350 $ 273,350 (1106.4150) PROCESS CHEMICALS AND SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Lime (02) Ferric
Chloride (03) Chlorine (04) Polymer (05) Hydrochloric Acid (06) Sodium Hydroxide (07) Citric Acid (08) Fitter Cloths (09) Tie Wraps, Bags, Sludge Judges, Etc. (10) T asle/Odor Control
(11) Boiler Chemicals (12) Sulfur Dioxide 1,107,278.00 251,328.00 292,500.00 476,784.00 5,000.00 B,OOO.OO 500.00 68,000.00 7,000.00 150,000.00 2,000.00 155,610.00 Total Process Chemicals
and Supplies 2,524,000 2.421,900 /1106.4160) FUEL, OIL. AND LUBRICANTS PROJECT (01) Gasoline (02) Diesel Fuel (03) Solvents/Cleaners (04) 􀁁􀁮􀁴􀁾􀁆􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁺􀁥􀀠(05) Grease (06) Lubricants
(07) Propane 35,770.00 19,000.00 12,000.00 1,880.00 5,450.00 25,000.00 250.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Gasoline (04) Anti-Freeze (05) Grease (06) Lubricanls 4,000.00 30.00 50.00 200.00 Total
Fuel, Oil, and Lubricants 103,630 104,440 Page 20 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (1106.4170) COMPUTER SOFTWARE. LICENSES & INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Metering Supplies (02) Instrument Repair (03) Drafting/Engineering Supplies
(04) Line Surveillance (05) FM Telemetry . (06) Metering Elec!Iical Repairs (07) G/L. HR & PR Software $ 13,000.00 16,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 250,080.00 PRETREATMENT
(01) Metering Supplies (02) Instrument Repair Total Computer and Instrument Supplies 150.00 300.00 $ 294.530 $ 37,950 Total Supplies 3,556,400 3,177,200 (1106.4200) AUDITING (01) Audit
37,500 36,000 (1106.4210) ENGINEERING PROJECT (01) Engineering Studies (02) III Prorations (03) Triennial Report/Annual Update (04) Pipeline Repairs/Erosion Control 83,090.00 80,000.00
25,000.00 35,000.00 Total Engineering 223,090 160,000 (1106.4220) LEGAL (01) Legal 20,000 20,000 (1106.4230) OUTSIDE SERVICES PROJECT (01) Advertising (02) GraphiCS, Displays, Etc. (03)
Construction Services Charges (04) Security Monitoring/Support (05) Solid Waste Disposal (Odor Control) (06) Contract Labor (07) PClNelworkiSCADA Support (08) Software Mainlenanee -GIL,
HR & PR 60,000.00 7,000.00 50,000.00 17,560.00 34,000.00 10,000.00 373,680.00 90.000.00 PRETREATMENT (Ol) Advertising (02) Graphics, Displays, Etc. (06) Contract Labor 1,160.00 200.00
1,000.00 Total Outside Services 644,590 335,620 Page 21 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET !1106.4240} OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT (01) Drug Testing (02) U.S.G.S.Payments (03) Motor Vehicle Reports (04) Outside Testing -Laboratory (05)
Custodian Fees (06) NEXRAIN Studies $ 10.000.00 26,500.00 1,200.00 86,000.00 52,000.00 20,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Drug Testing (04) Outside Testing -Laboratory 2.000.00 Total Other
Professional Services $ 197,700 $ 175,650 (1106.4300) TELEPHONE & TELEMETERING PROJECT (01) Telephonerrelemetering (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (62) (04) Internet Access 28,000.00
5,400.00 41,640.00 10,820.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Telephonerrelemetering (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (7) Total Telephone & Telemetering 1,000.00 360.00 3,840.00 91,060 106,570 (1106.4310l
POSTAGE PROJECT (01) Postage Meter (02) Stamps/Shipping 3,300.00 4,500.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Postage Meter (02) Stamps/Shipping 500.00 220.00 Total Postage 8,520 8,220 !1106.4320) PRINTING
AND BtNDING PROJECT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary (03) Manuals, Handbooks, Etc. 3,550.00 3,200.00 3,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead,
Envelopes, and Stationary 950.00 310.00 Total Printing and Binding 11,010 12,730 Page 22 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.43301 INSURANCE
PAYMENTS PROJECT (01) Fire (02) General Liability (03) Automobile (04) Contractor Equipment (05) Workers' Compensation (06) 􀁄􀁬􀁲􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁯􀁲􀀯􀁏􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁣􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠Liability (07) Blanket
Bond (08) Equipment Floater Total Insurance Payments (1106.4360) TRAVEL PROJECT (01) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority Business PRETREATMENT (01) CRWS Employees
on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority BUsiness TotalTravel (1106.4370) LAUNDRY, UNIFORM & IND. EqUIP. PROJECT (01) Uniform Rental (03) Patches/Hats (04) Towels, Mops, Mats PRETREATMENT
(01) Uniform Rental Total Laundry, Uniform, & Ind. Equip. (1106,4380) TRAINING PROJECT (01) T mining Wastewater Certification T mining Safety Tmining Technical Training Enhanced Skills/Supervisory
Training Training ManualsNideos Purchasing CertIfication Classes PROPOSED PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET $ 81,550.00 15,750.00 26,390.00 136,440.00 17,050.00
1,490.00 8,760.00 $ 287,430 $ 179,420 15,550.00 750.00 3,000,00 19,300 16,500 38,770.00 650,00 9,000.00 650,00 49,070 44,350 11,900.00 11,920,00 23,320.00 9,450,00 8,410.00 3,000,00
Page 23 
􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀮TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS -.PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET PRETREATMENT (01) Training Wastewater Certification Training 600.00 Safety Training 600.00 Technical Training 1,180.00 Enhanced Skills/Supervisory Training
Training ManualsMdeos 220.00 Total Training $ 70,600 $ 111,940 11106.4400) UTILITIES PROJECT (01) Natural Gas 85,000.00 (02) Water 35,000.00 Total Utilities 120,000 105,000 (1106.4420)
POWER (01) Power 4,553,480 4,832,800 {1106.44301 R & M -COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT (01) Meter Station Structure Rehabilftation 20,000.00 (02) Manhole/Junction Box Rehabilitation 21,000.00
(03) System RepairslLine CleaningffV 317,750.00 (04) Lift StationlROW Maintenance 11,000.00 Total R & M -Collection System 369,760 245,000 {1106.44401 R & M • EQUIPMENT PROJECT (01)
Shop Equipment 4,000.00 (02) Dumpsters 5,400.00 (03) Compressors and Generators 4,500.00 (04) Fuel Powered and Electrical Equipment 11,200.00 (05) Office and Video Equipment 5,100.00
(06) Analytical Equip Repair -Non Contract 29,000.00 (07) Service Contracts-Analytical Equipment 10,000.00 (08) Perkins-Elmer Equipment 14,000.00 (09) MowersfTractors 12,000.00 (10)
Tracked Vehicles & Heavy Equipment 55,000.00 (11) Carts 1,000.00 (12) Heavy Trucks 50,000.00 (13) Trailers 15,000.00 (15) Tire Repair 3,000.00 (16) High Pressure Units 1,000.00 (17)
Forklifts 3,000.00 Total R & M Equipment 223,200 218,300 Page 24 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.4450) R & M
-PLANT AND BUILDINGS PROJECT (01) Packing and Seals (02) Road Repair Materials (03) Machine Shop Stock (04) Mechanical Plating and Coaling (05) Clarifiers, Aeration, Equalization Basins
(06) Specialized Balancing and Machining (07) Valves, Valve Operators, Pipe, Etc. (08) Positive Displacement Pumps/Repairs (09) Filter Press Parts (10) Pump Repair, Pump Parts, Machining
(11) Conveyer System Parts (12) Industrial Air/Oil Filters (13) Power Transmission Parts/Repairs (14) Building/Structural Repair (15) Chlorination/Dechlorination (16) Railroad Repairs
(17) Slorrnwater Regulations -Slreet Cleaning (18) Blower PartsJRepairs (19) Crane Inspection & Servicing (20) Anaerobic Digester CleanJRehab Total R & M -Plant and Buildings (1106.4460)
R & M -VEHICLES PROJECT (01) Automobiles (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair (04) Other-Batteries, Wiper Blades, etc. PRETREATMENT (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair T olal R & M -Vehicles
PROPOSED DETAIL $ 15,000.00 30,000.00 5,000.00 28,000.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 40,000.00 125,000.00 24,000.00 130,000.00 22,000.00 4,000.00 40,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 21,000.00 9,600.00
39,000.00 17,000.00 120,000.00 5,000.00 28,000.00 6,400.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 729,600 $ 777,350 43,500 40,400 Page 25 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIOESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAil PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (1106.44801 R & M· ELECTRICAL PROJECT (01) Components (02) Signal Cable and Wire (03) Electronic Equipment Repair (04) Repairs of Pneumatic Systems (05)
FM Telemetry (06) Compuler Maintenance (07) Vendor Service/Repair (08) Calibration (09) Electrical Parts & Materials (10) Motor Overhaul (11) HVAC Parts and Repair (12) Bevalor Repair
and Service (13) Cathodic Test $ 30,000.00 6,000,00 69,000,00 1,000,00 2,000,00 30,000.00 50,000,00 5,000,00 150,000,00 100,000,00 138,000.00 5,000.00 1,000,00 Total R & M Electrical
$ 587,000 $ 510,150 (1106.4490) OFF-SITE BtOSOLIP LAND APPLICATION (02) Beneficial Reuse 2,665,190 2,534,140 (1106.4510) RENT· MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT PROJECT (01) Cranes and Other Heavy
Equipment (02) Compressors and Special Equipment (03) Postage Meter (04) Tool Renlal (05) Copier Copier Rentel (07) Cylinder Rental (08) Olher Renlal 15.000.00 14,000,00 1,500,00 1,000.00
36,020,00 8,000.00 4,000,00 T alai Rent -Machinery & Equipment 79,520 88,810 (1106.46601 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD PROJECT (01) Relaled Cost Method Allocation 1,754,570 1,545,960 Total
Other Services and Charges 12,785,680 12,104,910 Page 26 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET {1106.4760: MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (Ol)PROJECT-Replacement: (1) Sedan S 17,000.00 (1) Reception Area Sofa 1,500.00 (2) RecepHon Area Chairs 750.00 (2) Reception
Area Tables 750.00 (2) Compact Trucks 24,000.00 (3) MCC/PLC Cabinet·5 Ton Spot Coolers 30,000.00 (1) 2300 Volt Power Disl. Transformer PS#6 10,000.00 (1) Process Control Signal Controller
Software 2,750.00 (4) Portable Laptop Programmers 7,000.00 (1) Laser Jet Color Printer 3,500.00 (4) Heavy Duly Infrared Heaters 4,000.00 (1) Boom Truck 180,000.00 (1) Tractor 40,000.00
{1} Sludge Hauling Trailer 28,000.00 (1) Hot Water Pressure Washer 7,000.00 (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotor 150,000.00 (1) laboratory Distillation System 22,000.00 (1) Heated
Graphite Atomic Absorption Unit 62,000.00 (1) Microbiological Heat Sealing Unit 2,000.00 (6) Ultra Sonic Flow Meters 9,600.00 (2) Portable AreaNelocity Flow Meters 6,200.00 (I) Global
Position System (GPS/GIS) Instr. 20,000.00 (1) Truck Camper 1,650.00 (1) 3/4 Ton 4X4 Truck 24,000.00 (1) 12 inch Pipe Saw 1,600.00 (2) Truck Winches 2,200.00 $ 657,500 $ 704,550 PRETREATMENT·
Replacement: (1) Cont. pH & Temp ModuleiData Recorder 2,290.00 2,290 38,000 Page 27 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUpGET (02) PROJECT-New: (3) Portable Gas Detectors (1) 2-Way Emerg. Response Radio Interface (1) 30 Cubic Yard Dumpster (2) 3 inch Portable 13HP Gas-Driven Pumps
(2) Bar Screen LuMcation System (1) Gate Valve Portable Power Drive (4) Electronic Equipment Cabinets (1) Fiber Cable Terminalion Kit (1) Teleconferencing Equipment (1) Network Performance
Analyzer Software (1) Trailer Axle Assembly (1) Gasoline Hand Auger (1) Vector/Radder Decant Pump (4) 2-Way Radio Noise Reduced Headsets (1) Portable H2S Monitors & Recorders (1) Confined
Space Fall Anestor (1) Confined Space Manlilt (1) Portable Diesel Light Standard Electronic Surveillance Equipment (1) VactorlRodder Easement Reel Assembly $ 5,700.00 4,000.00 4,500.00
5,000.00 6,000.00 1,300.00 8,000.00 2,750.00 19,900.00 1,850.00 14,000.00 2,400.00 5,200.00 5,600.00 5,600.00 2,400.00 2,300.00 7,500.00 288,400.00 32,000.00 $ 424,400 $ 145,400 PRETREATMENT-New
(1) Utility Vehicle (1) Camper for Utility Vehicle 23,000.00 1,600.00 24,600 Total Machinery and Equipment 1,108,790 887,950 Page 28 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION /1108.48001 BOND PRINCIPAL
PAYMENTS Due 8/01/2003: Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Total Bond PrinCipal Payments (1108.4810) INTEREST ON LONG TERM-DEBT Due 210112003: Series 1993
Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 19988 Series 2001 Due 810112003: Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Adjustment for Accrual Total Bond Interest Payments (1108.48301
PAYING AGENT FEES Total Debt Service PROPOSED DETAIL 10,245,OOO,OO 1,855,OOO,00 2,220,ooQ,OO 2,105,OOQ,OO 5,OOO,QQ 4,098,594,38 262,951,25 833,566,25 1,408,403,75 1,426,051,25 4,098,594,38
262,951,25 833,566,25 1,408,403.75 1,426,051,25 (274,013,76) PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET iii 16.430,000 iii 15,580,OOO 15,785,120 14,674,200 12,000 26,000 32,227,120,00
30,280,200,00 Page 29 
EXHIBIT K TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Description of the Project The Central Regional Wastewater
System (CRWS) consists of a treatment plant and appurtenances rated at 162 Million Gallons Per Day (MGD), interceptor pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the
delivery of treated effluent for irrigation and level control under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. CRWS provides wastewater transportation and treatment for the Cilles
of Irving, Grand Prairie, Farmers Branch, Dallas, Carrollton, Coppell, Cedar Hill, Euless, Bedford, Fort Worth, Arlington, Colleyville, DallasIFort Worth Inlernational Airport, Grapevine,
Mansfield, Hurst, North Richland Hills, Duncanville, Southlake, Keller, and Addison. The estimated average daily volume of wastewater predicted to be received from the contributing citles
in Fiscal Year 2002 is 150.150 Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD). 2003 2002 Percent Amount Percent Amount gjy Contribution MGD Contribution MGD Irving 19.148% 28.750 20.616% 30.000 Grand
Prairie 11.116% 16.690 11.138% 16.208 Arlington 30.276% 45.460 28.230% 41.080 Farmers Branch 4.462% 6.700 4.504% 6.700 Dallas 5.661% 8.500 5.154% 7.500 Euless 2.847% 4.275 2.817% 4.100
Carrollton 7.992% 12.000 8.315% 12.100 D/FW Airport 1.539% 2.310 1.587% 2.310 Bedford 3.130% 4.700 3.206% 4.666 Coppell 2.597% 3.900 2.543% 3.700 Colleyville 1.683% 2.527 1.745% 2.539
Fort Worth 0.911% 1.368 0.871% 1.267 Grapevine 1.279% 1.920 1.635% 2.380 Mansfield 2.165% 3.250 2.233% 3.250 Hurst 0.135% 0.202 0.126% 0.183 North Richland Hills 0.468% 0.703 0.388%
0.565 Duncanville 0.133% 0.200 0.137% 0.200 Keller 1.608% 2.415 1.659% 2.415 Southlake 1.132% 1.700 1.164% 1.694 Cedar Hill 0.200% 0300 0.168% 0.245 Addison 1Jill.'l!i. 2.280 1.684%
2.420 Totals 100000% 150.150 100000% 145.522 Located on 495 acres adjacent to lhe West Fork of the Trinity River. the CRWS Facility initiated operation in December 1959, initially serving
four four cities. The original plant consisted of a trickling filter process with a capacity of 30 MGD. The capacity was increased to 60 MGD in 1976 by the addition of mechenical dewatering
equipment and an activated sludge process. In 1980, a two phase expansion program was completed that increased the capacity to 100 MGD and provided tertiary treatment. Growth in the
service area resuHed in the expansion of the CRWS facility to a capacity of 135 MGD, with construction inmated in 1988 and completed in early 1994. Effluent discharged from CRWS consistently
meets or exceeds the requirements speCified in the TPDES permit issued by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). TNRCC approved an upraling of the discharge permit
to an effluent level of 162 MGD with the completion olthe solids dewatering project on April 1, 2001. Page 1 
.• TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Work Program To maintain and operate the Central Plant on
a 24-hour a day, 7 -day a week basis requires a staff of three (3) department managers reporting to the Project Manager. In addition to the management staff, including purchasing and
the inventory department, staffing is as follows: System Operation and Maintenance 97 Administration Services 8 Technical Services 43 Northern Region Purchasing 7 Pretreatment l! 163
The responsibility for selecting process parameters, actual treatment of wastewater, process and non-process equipment maintenance, maintenance, repair of electrical and electroniC equipment,
lift station maintenance sludge disposal and computer monitoring of plant processes lies WITh the Manager, System Operations, and the Operation and Maintenance Department. The Manager,
Administrative Services and staff provide support at the Central System in the areas of human resource administration, benefrts, training. clerical, accounts payable, payroll, and capital
asset control and data processing. The Manager, Technical Services and staff provide analytical data for process control, influent monitoring and effluent quality reports. The laboratory
and Pretreatment Programs provide analytical and technical assistance to cities, state, andlor federal agencies and other TRA Projects on a contract basis. Engineering Services provide
inspaction and surveillance of the collection system and monitoring of flows from the Cities into the system. Page 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM TOTAL FUND SUMMARY FUNDS AVAILABLE Projecled December 1. 2002 17.295,360 ESTIMATED
SOURCES OF FUNDS Contract Revenue Inter-Fund Services & Charges Operating Overhead Professional Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Income $ 54.613.900 414.340 417.170 450.000 1,544.900
979.050 58,419.360 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 75.714.720 ESTIMATED APPLICATION OF FUNDS Appropriation Expenditures: Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capilal Outlays
Debt Service and MiscelJaneous$ 8,399,720 3,556,400 12,785.680 1.108.790 32.227,120 58,077.710 TOTAL FUNDS APPLIED $ 58,077.710 FUNDS AVAILABLE Projected November 3D, 2003 $ 17,637.010 Page 3 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE 2003 BUDGET CONTRACT AND OPERATING
OVERHEAD REVENUE (3010) Contract Revenue -Irving (3020) Contract Revenue -Grand Prairie (3030) Contract Revenue -Arlington (3040) Contract Revenue -Fanners Branch (3050) Contract Revenue
-Dallas (3060) Contract Revenue -Euless (3070) Contract Revenue Carrollton (3080) Contract Revenue -D/FW Airport (3090) Contract Revenue -Bedford (3100) Contract Revenue -Coppell (3110)
Contract Revenue -Colleyville (3120) Contract Revenue -Fort Worth (3130) Conlract Revenue -Grapevine (3140) Contract Revenue -Mansfield (3150) Contract Revenue -Hurst (3160) Conlract
Revenue -North Richland Hills (3170) Contract Revenue -Duncanville (3180) Contract Revenue -Keller (3190) Contract Revenue -Soulhlake (3200) Contract Revenue -Cedar Hill (3210) Contract
Revenue -Addison (3380) Inter-Fund Services & Charges (3390) Operating Overhead -Other Projects TOTAL CONTRACT AND OPERATING OVERHEAD REVENUE PROFESSIONAL FEES (3980) Professional Fees
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES INTEREST IN!<2ME (3810) tnterest Income Interest & Sinking Fund (3820) Inlerest Income -Reserve Fund (3840) Interesllncome -Revenue Fund (3870) Interesllncome
-Emergency TOTAL INTEREST INCOME $ 10,457,470 6,070,880 16,534,910 2,436,870 3,091,690 1,554,860 4,364,740 840,510 1.709,420 1,418,320 919,150 497,530 698,510 1,182,390 73,730 255,590
72,640 878,190 618,230 109,230 829,040 414,340 417,170 55,445,410 450,000 450,000 229,600 1,147,800 123,500 44,000 $ 1,544,900 CURRENT 2002 BUDGET $ 10,394,930 5,615,960 14,234,030 2,321,410
2,598,730 1,420,380 4,192,560 800,190 1,616,520 1.282,220 879.860 439,170 824.390 1,125,920 63,530 195,640 69,080 836,500 586,910 84,710 839,020 693,190 51,114,850-. 450,000 450,000
489,580 1,416,420 336,320 93,030 $ 2,335,350 2001 ACTUAL $ 10,221.781 5,639,307 15,623.824 2,073,978 2,877,391 1,343,646 4,258,815 834.736 1.680,841 1,374,954 870.684 914,070 536,843
1,157.826 71,853 220.177 58,029 738,966 526,619 103,218 825,597 656,740 52,609,895 438,988 438,988 459,263 1,523,753 310,544 130,162 $ 2,423.722 Page 4 
TRINllY RIVER AUTHORllY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME (3400) Overslrenglh Surcharge (3410) Northeast Lakeview Lift Station (3430) Pretreatment Revenue (3440) Commodity Charge (3480) Quantity Surcharge (3990) Miscellaneous
Inccme $ 600,000 22,000 51,810 36,800 268,440 $ 600,000 14,650 22,000 51,810 36,800 10,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 979,050 735,260 GRAND TOTAL $ 58,419,360 $ 54,635,460 2001 ACTUAL
$ 625,408 19,433 61,844 140,017 28,089 49,693 924,484 $ 56,397,089 Page 5 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 'CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE PERSONAL SERVICES (4000) Salaries
-Regular (4010) Salaries -Part-Time (4020) Payroll Taxes -Fica (4030) Emp. Ben -Health/Ufe Ins. (4040) Employee Benefit -Pension (4060) Unemployment Compensation (4070) Emp. Recognition
Program (4080) Employee Benefit -Education TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES (4100) Office Supplies (4110) Dues and Subscliptions (4120) Fees Other Than Dues and Subscriptions (4130)
Maintenance and Operating Supplies (4140) Lab Supplies (4150) Process Chemicals and Supplies (4160) Fuel, Oil, & LuMcants (4170) Computer Software, Lie. & Instr. Supplies TOTAL SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES AND CHABS!ES (4200) Auditing (4210) Engineering (4220) Legal (4230) Outside Services (4240) Other Professional Services (4300) Telephone and Telemetenng (4310) Postage
(4320) Printing and Binding (4330) Insurance Payments (4360) Travel (4370) Laundry, Uniform, & Ind. Equip (4380) Training (4400) Utilities (4420) Power (4430) R & M -Collection System
(4440) R & M -Equipment (4450) R & M -Plant & Buildings (4460) R & M -Vehicles (4480) R & M -Bectncal (4490) Off-site Biosolid Land Application (4510) Rent -Machinery & Equip. (4660)
Administrative Overhead TOTAL OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 6,428,520 $ 6,251,780 37,370 494,640 478,280 655,250 411,770 740,660 715,800 20,000
20,000 16,280 15,260 7,000 9,000 8,399,720 7,901,870 50,200 51,200 55,850 64,860 80,910 86,910 166,930 146,590 280,350 273,350 2,524,000 2,421,900 103,630 104,440 294,530 37,950 3,556,400
3,177,200 2001 ACTUAL $ 5,816,588 41,925 433,322 406,060 573,851 2,737 13,880 3.135 7,291,498 44,008 49,771 67,785 168,709 299,166 2,109,998 101,313 51,588 2,892,338 35,500 233,952 8,317
607,902 182,357 78,489 7,913 9,255 130,630 17,793 53,010 39,225 118,217 4,856,570 509,349 213,768 586,380 50,630 415,002 2,343,012 47,213 1.455,730 12,000,214 Page 6 37,500 223,090 20,000
644,590 197,700 91,060 8,520 11,010 287,430 19,300 49,070 70,600 120,000 4,553,480 369,750 223,200 729,600 43,500 587,000 2,665,190 79,520 1,754,570 12,785,680 36,000 160,000 20,000
335,620 175,650 106,570 8,220 12,730 179.420 16,500 44,350 111,940 105,000 4,832,800 245,000 218,300 777,350 40,400 510,150 2,534,140 88,810 1,545,960 12,104,910 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2003 BUDGET
2002 BUDGET CAPITAL OUTLAYS (4760) Machinery & Equipment $ 1,108,790 $ 887,950 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1,106,790 887,950 DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS* (4800) Bond Principal Payments
16,430,000 15,580,000 (4810) Interesl on Long-Term Debl 15,785,120 14,674,200 (4830) Paying Agent Fees 12,000 26,000 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE ANO MISCELLANEOUS 32.227,120 30,280,200 GRAND
TOTAL $ 58,077,710 $ 54,352,130 2001 ACTUAL $ 312,867 312,867 18,995,000 14,594,062 1.482 33,590,544 $ 56,087,461 Page 7 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 -. CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED CONTRACT REVENUE 2003 BUDGET Operation & Maintenance
Total Expenditures $ 25,862,590.00 less Olher Revenue Sources: Inter-Fund Services & Charges (414,340.00) Operating Overhead (417,170.00) Professional Fees (450,000.00) Pretreatment
Revenue (22,000.00) Commodity Charge (51,810.00) Miscellaneous Income (268,440.00) Overstrength Surcharge (600,000.00) Zone B & Quantity Surcharge (36,600.00) Total Other Revenue Sources
(2,260,560.00) Net Operation and Maintenance to be to Billed Monthly 23,602,030.00 Debt Service Principal on Bonds: Due 8/0112003: 16,430,000.00 x 8/12 10,953,333.33 Due 8/01/2004: 17,455,000.00
x 4/12 5,818,333.33 Interest on Bonds: Due 210112003: 8,029,566.88 x 216 2,676,522.29 Due 8/0112003: 8,029,566.88 x 6/6 8,029,566.88 Due 210112004: 7,618,553.75 x 416 5,079,035.83 Rounding
1.24 less: Interest Income (1,544,900.00) Net Debt Service to Billed Monthly 31,011,892.91 TOTAL CONTRACT REVENUE $ 54,613,922.91 Page 8 􀁾.. 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED OaM BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAl WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL {3010}
CONTRACT REVENUE -IRVING (1106.3010) Operation a Maintenance $23,602,030 x 19.148% (1108.3010) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 19.148% Rounding $ 4,519,316.70 5,938,157.26 (3.96) Total Annual
Requirement {30201 CONTRACT REVENUE -GRAND PRAIRIE (1106.3020) Operation a Maintenance $23,602,030 x 11.116% (1108.3020) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 11.116% Rounding 2,623,601.65 3,447,282.02
(3.67) Total Annual Requirement (3030l CONTRACT REVENUE -ARLINGTON (1106.3030) Operation a Maintenance $23,602,030 x 30.276% (1108.3030) Debt Service $31.011,893 x 30.276% Rounding 7.145,750.60
9,389,160.70 Total Annual Requirement 13MO} CONTRACT REVENUE -FARMERS BRANCH (1106.3040) Operation & Maintenance $23,502,030 x 4.462% 1,053,122.58 (1108.3040) Debt Service $31,011,893
x 4.462% 1,383,750.66 Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3050) CONTRACT REVENUE -DALLAS (1106.3050) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 5,661% 1,338,110.92 (1108.3050) Debl Service
$31,011,893 x 5.661% 1,755,583.26 Rounding (4.18) Total Annual Requirement PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 10,457,470 $ 10,394,930 6,070,880 5,615,960 16,534,910 14,234,030
2,436,870 2,321,410 3,091,690 2,598.730 Page9 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 '. CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (3060) CONTRACT REVENUE -EULESS (1106.3060) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 2.847% (1108.3060) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 2.847% Rounding $ 671,849.79
882,908.59 1.61 Total Annual Requirement $ 1,554.860 :& 1,420.360 (3070) CONTRACT REVENUE -CARROLLTON (1106.3070) Operauon & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 7.992% (1108.3070) Debt Service
$31,011,893 x 7.992% Rounding Tolal Annual Requirement 1,886.274.24 2,478,470.48 (4.72) 4,364,740 4.192.560 (3080) CONTRACT REVENUE -D/FW AIRPORT (1106.3080) Operation & Maintenance
$23,602,030 x 1.539% (1108.3080) Debl Service $31,011,893 x 1.539% Rounding Total Annual ReqUirement 363,235.24 477.273.03 1.73 840,510 800,190 (3090) CONTRACT REVENUE -BEDFORD (1106.3090)
Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 3.130% (1108.3090) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 3.130% Rounding Total Annual ReqUirement 736,743.54 970.672.25 4.21 1,709,420 1,616,520 (3100) CONTRACT
REVENUE -COPPELL (1106.3100) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 2.597% (1108.3100) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 2.597% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 612,944.72 805,378.66 (3.58)
1.418,320 1,282,220 Page 10 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET (3110) CONTRACT REVENUE· COLLEYVILLE (1106.3110) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.683% $ 397,222.16 (1108.3110) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.683%
521,930.16 Rounding (2.32) Total Annua! Requirement $ 919,150 $ 879,860 (3120) CONTRACT REVENUE -FORT WORTH (1106.3120) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.911% 215,014.49 (1108.3120)
Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.911% 282,518.34 Rounding (2.84) Total Annual Requirement 497,530 439,170 (3130) CONTRACT REVENUE -GRAPEVINE (1106.3130) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030
x 1.279% 301,869.96 (1108.3130) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.279% 396,642.11 Rounding Total Annual Requirement 698,510 824,390 (3140) CONTRACT REVENUE -MANSFIELD (1106.3140) Operation
& Maintenance $23,602,030 x 2.165% 510,983.95 (1108.3140) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 2.165% 671,407.48 Rounding Total Annual Requirement 1,182,390 1,125,920 (3150) CONTRACT REVENUE·
HURST (1106.3150) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.135% 31,862.74 (1108.3150) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.135% 41,866.06 Rounding Total Annual Requirement 73,730 63,530 Page
11 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION DETAIL (3160)
CONTRACT REVENUE· NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (1106.3160) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.468% (1108.3160) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.468% Rounding Tolal Annual Requirement (3170)
CONTRACT REVENUE· PUNCANVlllE (1106.3170) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.133% (1108.3170) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.133% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3180) CONTRACT
REVENUE· KELLER (1106.3180) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.608% (1108.3180) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.608% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3190) CONTRACT REVENUE· SOUTHLAKE
(1106.3190) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.132% (1108.3190) Deb! Service $31,011,893 x 1.132% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3200) CONTRACT REVENUE· CEDAR HILL (1106.3200)
Operafion & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.200% (1108.3200) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.200% Rounding Total Annual Requirement ' PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 110,457.50 145,135.66
(3.16) $ 255,590 $ 195,640 31,390.70 41,245.82 3,48 72,640 69,080 379,520.64 498,671.24 __􀀭􀀧􀀨􀁣􀁃􀀱􀀬􀁾􀀠878,190 836,500 267,174.98 351,054.63 0.39 618,230 586,910 47,204.06 62,023.79
2.15 109,230 64,710 Page 12 􀁌􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀢􀁊􀀠 L 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Office July 31. 2002 3110.102 MEMBERS. Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System MEETING NOTICE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA
TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS TUESDA Y. AUGUST 13, 2002, 10:30 A.M. A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has been scheduled
for 10:30 a.m.. Tuesday, August 13, 2002 at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. Immediately following
the meeting. you are invited to join other members for lunch served in the break room. Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott at 817-493-5100 or abbottc@trinityra.org prior to Friday, August 9th.
The FY 2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget for the Central Regional Wastewater System will be the primary purpose of this meeting. but other topics of importance will also be discussed.
An agenda and minutes of the September 11, 2001 meeting are attached for your review. If you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact this office at 817-493-51 00. 􀁾fl· 􀁾􀁦􀀡􀀴􀁉􀀼􀀭􀀯􀀠
WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northem Region WNB/cea Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS P.O. Box
240 Arlington. Texas 76004-0240 Recycled Paper (817) 493-5100 o 
PROPOSAL IRVING AND TRA 8113/02 1. IRVING AGREES WITH RESPECT TO ITS DEVELOPED WATER: a. Sell at a "reduced price" its rights to reuse on developed water to TRA. 1. This gives Irving
a user for its reuse application. 2. It gives TRA a much stronger position on its reuse application. b. Irving would additionally receive its proportionate share of benefit of TRA reuse
agreement that included its developed water. c. Irving, on reasonable notice, could make an independent deal for reuse of its developed water. d. Irving would not oppose, but support
TRA's reuse application. 2. TRA AGREES WITH RESPECT TO IRVING'S DEVELOPED WATER: a. Amend contract to recognize Irving's reuse right and pay a "reduced price" for use of water. I. Assuming
TRA's reuse permit is granted, this would enhance Lake Livingston's firm yield by the amount of Irving's discharge of developed water, less transmission losses, etc. 2. This will enhance
TRA's reuse application significantly. b. Further amendment of contract would be possible to assure continued availability of Irving's reuse water (i.e., Irving gives up right to make
an independent use of the water) ifTRA develops long term purchaser. e. TRA's would not oppose, but support Irving's reuse application. 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2002, 10:30 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless
Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield North Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TlVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Elzie
Odom Council member Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Jim Crites Mr. Kent Cagle Councilmember Glenn Porterfield
Councilmember Paul Walden Mr. Dale Fisseler Council member Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Council member Lewis Patrick Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Blake Evans Mr. Mike
Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Wanda Stovall Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. III. Introduction ofGuests, Consultants and Authority Staff 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 11.2001 Meeting V. Status Reports A. Operations B Financial C. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning (1) Planning. Design, Construction (2)
Series 2001 SRF Bonds VI. Discussion: Presentation ofProposed FY 2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget Objectives
D. Detailed Budget Review VII. Discussion: CityofIrving's Request for a Contract Modification Related to Water Reuse Rights VIII. OtherBusiness IX. Adloum to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREA TMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2001,11 A.M. I. Call to Order-Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 11 :10 a.m. and called roll. II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford
Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N. Richland Hills Southlake
Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Ms. Fiona Ailen f/Mayor Elzie Odom Justin Brown f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Jim Sparks f/Mr. Greg
Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Thomas M. Dunning Mr. Bill Willbom flMr. Kent Cagle Councilmember Glenn Porterfield PRESENT/ABSENT Absent Present Present
Present Present Absent Absent Absent Absent Present Present Mr. Mark Velton f/Councilmember Paul Walden Present Mr. Jay Chapa f/Mr. Dale Fisseler Present Mr. Ron McCulierf/Councilmember
Richard Fregoe Present Mr. Frank White f/Mr. Jerry Hodge Present Mr. Ron Haynes Absent Councilmember James Dickens Present Mr. Ed IIschner Absent Mr. Bud Ervin f/Councilmember Blake
Evans Present Mr. Mike Curtis Absent Mr. Pedram Farahnak Absent Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director Wanda Stovall Present Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Absent III. Introduction ofGuests.
Consultants and Authority Staff Warren Brewer introduced the following TRA staff: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith, Cheryl Abbott, Alison Mackey, Bill Tatum, Bill Cyrus,
Mike Young, and Shelley Fialho. Other city personnel present were Stephen Jenkins with the City of Carrollton, Mr. Phil Grice with the City of Fort Worth, and Mr. Jim Siddall with the
City of Irving. Consultants present were Ray Longoria with Freese and Nichols and Layne Parsons with Black and Veatch. 1 
IV. .Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 10, 2001 Meeting Chairman Gravley asked if there were any changes to be made to the minutes of the August 10, 2001 meeting. There being none, Fiona
Allen made a motion to accept the minutes as presented, Jay Chapa seconded the motion and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum briefly outlined System
operations since the August meeting. He said that the System was producing quality effluent by reducing the pollutants by approximately 95% in the incoming water to the plant. B. Financial-Patricia
Cleveland reminded attendees that during the midyear reallocations the budget was amended by $1.6 million due to increases in power cost and impacts of the January through March high
rainfalls. She continued that we were tracking close to the amended budget. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland stated that in August we had expected the TNRCC to approve the TPDES modified
pretreatment program, but it had not been received. D. Capital Improvement Planning Planning -Warren Brewer said that in the August meeting a detailed summary on improvement planning
had been given and the information was still current. He offered a copy of the itemized listing to anyone who requested it. VI. Action: Proposed FY 2002 Operating andMaintenance Budget
A. Review of Budget Philosophy, Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2002 Budget Patricia Cleveland gave a brief review of anticipated FY 2002 Operating
and Maintenance Budget. Warren Brewer reported that we had provided detailed budget information in the August meeting and then held a budget workshop, and that he felt that all questions
had been responded to. Bill Willbom asked if there were anything new to report on odor control. Bill Tatum gave a summary of the improvements that had been made, the Phase 5 current
odor control projects, and said that Phase 6 had identified hot spots and was addressing those issues. Warren Brewer said that our objective was to balance results and costs and that
we had spent approximately $20 million in odor control. Chairman Gravley asked if there were any further questions concerning the FY 2002 Budget. There being none, Ron McCuller made
a motion to request that the Board of Directors approve the presented FY 2002 Operating and Maintenance Budget in its October meeting. James Dickens seconded the motion and a unanimous
vote followed. The City of Dallas was unable to attend the meeting, but had notified the Authority, via e-mail, that the City agreed with the proposed FY 2002 Budget. VII. Other Business
Bud Ervin thanked the TRA staff for their help during the flooding that Mansfield had experienced. VII. Adjourn to Lunch There being no further business, Chairman Gravley adjourned the
meeting at 11 :45 a.m. and invited attendees to remain for lunch. 2 
12o.00o+1--------------------------------------------1 llMOO +1----------1 100.000 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀴􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀫􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁟􀀫􀁬􀁯􀁾􀀠C--_• CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM HANDOUT
AGENDA ITEM V-A FY2002 PERMITS NO: 10303-001 (TXoo22802) Pe.qMIT uMin DEC AI< FEe """ APR MAY UN 􀁕􀁾􀀠AUG ••P OCT 'OV VO MAX MIN TOTAL Fl.OW FLOW FLOW fLOW FI.OW RAJNFAt.L <.:eoo ceoc
eeoc TSS TSS TSS HH' HH' HH' OD pH pH CUI "'.􀁾􀁉􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁁􀁖􀁇􀀠OLV,AVG, OLY.MAX. 2-HR PI( iZ·HRPK TOTAl. OLV,AVG. DLY,MAX. " Dl,(,AVG. DLY.AVG. DLY.MAX. OlY.AVo. ClY.AVa DlY.MAX. Ol.:'r.AVG,
MIN. MAX. MIN. MIN. OUTFALL ,., .REPORT REpORT :l8U5C , i7 • 45. 15 40 20266 '" 7 2702f!404 , , • 1 .oe. MGO MGO MGO GPM MOO INCHES MOIl. MOIl. LBSIDAY MGIL MGiL LBSICAY MOIl. MOl!.
LaS/OAY MOIl. s.u. S.U, "GiL "GiL 140.159 130.54D 2DB.GItO 165534 236.369 3,420 1.1 '.0 1181.4 1.3 2.0 1470.1 ..,., 1.231 21Ht2: 8.' 7.' e.' 1.04 0.00 13&.851 129.630 218.630 1'15093
252.134 4,320 1.3 􀁾􀁡􀀠1415,S 2.0 3.a 2149.3 0.161 0.555 175.6 8.S 7.' ••• t.O? 0,00 137.479 140.601 2136.390 1157561 241.2tl8 2.27 1.1 ... 13&3,0I •• 3.' 1901.5 a.H16 0.&9<1 231.9
a.8 7.' .., 1.020.00 135.0&3 148.995 265.920 215513 310.3.39 U5 1.3 ••• 1791,T 1.' 8.' 2150.S 0.184 ..... 245.3. 7.' r.s .., 1.Oe 0.00 13&.312 158.695 261.930 197686 284.&24 7.19 1.2
,.. 1804.0 1.' 10.0 2567.9 C.158 ...., 214.1 ... 7.3 7.' 1,020.00 136.526 143.760 205.510 167732 2.41.534 7,85 1.1 3.' 130U 1.0 1.0 1199.0 D.Dsa D.318 n.' 1.' 1.4 7.' 1.04 '.00 136.668
131.660 141.250 113807 163.594 12.00 1.1 '" 1248.4 1.0 I.' 1096.1 '.064 0.163 70,6 1.' 7.' 1.' 1.15 '.00 136.932 134.391 1eO.BBC 11998S172,784 4.81 I.' 2.0 1160.1' I.' I.' 112eA C'(lS6
0.215 75.5 7.' 1.4 8.' 1.00 0,00 137.254 139,m 208.325 165327 231l.C71 6,2$ 1.2 3.• 1m.7 1.4 3.' 1701,7 0.138 0.585 171,8 8.. 1.4 U 1." '.00 140.159 158.595 265".920 215513 310.33tt
12.00 \ .• '.a 17$1,7 ..0 10.0 2587,9 0.227 1.231 289.2 '.8 7.' 1•• 1.1$ 0,00 135.063 129,630 141.250 113607 163.894 :>.27 1.0 2.. 1'160,7 1.0 I.' ,...., ..... 0,153 70.0 6.' 7.2 6.'
1.02 0.00 1G98.030 1118.1'12 50.01 1H159.5 􀀱􀀳􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀹􀀠1374.0 90% FLOW • 14$,&O(I MOO 16% FLOW. l2l.sao MOO • EXCURSIONS: 0 THRee oEPA COLLECT. SYSTEM ""'OF OUTFLOWS 2 ° , • 3 1 ••
TOTAL: 15 FV 2002 EFFLUENT QUALITYIFLOW 190.000 I 􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀫􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠110.000 I ..,' '"
􀁾􀀠150.000 􀁾􀀠!.'-1 􀁾􀁘􀀾􀀠1"'1 I::: 􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀠􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁳􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀡􀀠 15.0 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JIIN Jill AUG SEP OCT NOV I_0600 _TSS _NH3 _2002 Dally Avg. Flow -2001
DailYAvg.l'lowl 
MGD Aug Sep Oct + +Nov 􀁾􀁾􀀠 == =• "'"'"' • 􀁾􀁾􀀠as. 􀁾􀁾􀀠",",",N == Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 􀁾􀀠 0 = 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ;! (JQ 􀁾􀀠m ." ." r-C m Z -t ." r0 􀁾􀀠 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2001 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTED FOR INTERCEPTOR III (METHOD 2) CONTRACTING PARTY FY2001 CONTRIBUTION BASED ON ACTUAL FLOW TOTAL
FLOW !MGl PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF FY2001 ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT BASED ON ACTUAL FLOWS TRA INTERCEPTOR III !MGl ADJUSTED FY2001 CONTRIBUTION TOTAL FLOW !MGl PERCENT ADJUSTED DISTRIBUTION
OF FY2001 ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT FY2OO1 ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTMENT ADDISON 830.338 1._ $796,319 830.338 1.553% $797,508 $7,153 ARLINGTON 16,100.830 29.838% $15,322,532 0.495
16,100.335 30.111% $15,462,625 $140.193 BEDFORD 1,751.036 3.245% $1,666,397 1.751.036 3.275% $1,681,802 $15,_ CARROLLTON 4,439.217 8.227% $4,224,796 2.53 4,436.687 8.296% $4.291.251
$36.460 CEDAR HILL 107.737 0.200% $102,705 107.737 0.201% $103,219 $514 COLLEYVILLE 912.313 1.690% $867,851 6.007 906.306 􀀱􀀮􀀶􀁾􀀵􀀥􀀠$870.429 $2.566 COPPELL 1,432.413 2.654% $1.362,902
1,432.413 2.679% $1,375,740 $12,836 ZDALLAS 3,166.082 5.867% 33.012,866 167.624 2,976.236 5.570% $2.680.346 ($152,518) J> D/FW AIRPORT 795.167 1.474% $756,939 795.167 1.437% $783.615
$5,676 Z.,DUNCANVILLE 80.654 0,112% $57,515 80.654 0.113% $58,029 $514 0 EULESS 1,430.274 2.651% $1,361,361 30.426 1.399.548 2.616% $1,344,415 ($16,946) C FARMERS BRANCH 2,180.775 4.004%
$2,056,154 0.15 2,180.625 4.041% $2,075,164 . $19,001 ... FORT WORTH 1,009.115 1.870% $960,296 ' 56.782 ' 952.333 1.781% $914,592 ($45,704) B GRANO PRAIRIE 5,929.950 10.989% $5.643,153
145.711 5,754.239 10.616% $5,565,340 ($87,813) rn GRAPEVINE 596.313 1.105% $567,445 36.969 659.324 1.046% $537,150 ($30,298) Z HURST 74.567 0.139% $71,380 74.667 0.140% $71,894 $514
B IRVING 10,460.653 19.367% $9.955,757 17.724 10,442.965 19.531% $10,029.705 $73,946 -... KELLER 770.179 1.427% $732,804 0.946 756.231 1.439% $738,966 $6,162 rn I:MANSFIELD 1,149.337
2.130% $1,093,813 1,149.337 2.150% $1,104,064 $10,271 N RICHLAND HILLS 231.433 0.429% $220,303 1.897 229.536 0.429% $220,303 $0 < •IIISOUTHLAKE 562.399 1.023% $525,lI39 4.036 548.346
1.025% $526,399 $1,027 53,960.885 100.000% $51,352.746 491.521 53.469.364 100.000% $51,352,746 $0 "<112002 AdJ.lnOlfinlLxl. 
TRA Q,0002717 0.0003222 0.0003957 TRA 0.042 0.150 TRA 1&.099 9.8.0 1.167 15.209 54.862 150.87 53.36 6.39 70.52 400.79 The AdJU15ted TRA Interceptor iii (MG) for the City of Keller waG
􀁥􀁯􀁭􀁈􀀻􀀻􀁴􀁾􀀠to O.mMG e1W' the Flceal Year 2001 Sd'ledule of ActuBi Annual Requfrllment was ftnaltzed. 􀁾􀀮thl$ 􀁾􀁯􀁮d06Ii not atroct the Contnbutlon SUed on Actual F10w (%) orthe
AotuJi Mnual Requltement ($). ., ;;ctJldm2001.x1sst4'lOOZ 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREAM CITY (METHOD 21 Cltv !Irvlng m:rs Brancn j13.0E Soutn Keller Euless 1"· SB 11.9B 12.8B 12.0B 􀁾􀁎􀁏􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀠Rlcnland Hllls114.0B
nKeliel IGran Arlington Fort Wortn Euless Euless Euless Euless Grand Prairie Dallas IGrand Prairie 19. 1 ' °·OW 11.8W 13.0W 1 16 . 5W 18.0W 15 . OJ f3.OM IS.1M City Dallas 10,11; ortn
Rlcnland 􀁈􀁭􀁾􀀠jrand Prairie jrand Prairie :uless lee Meter 10 I Node Lateral 􀁉􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁌􀁴􀀺􀀧􀁌􀁴􀀺􀁐􀁾􀁕􀁉􀀠!".0e IMs11.oe leFO IMS",.<>n IW_F__ lF011.1 JFO' ,Fa BBP BBP BBP BBRI
lee Bedford Bed 115.0W 2460"'" 2470"'" 2860"'" 3720Yl 􀁾􀀠lur. Bedford Arlin tal Arlin tOI Grand Prairie md Prairie Artln ton Arlin ton Arlin ton Mansfield lW 7.0. MS .rr 37'I n30w 13539W
WF01.t1B EaS MS18.6W WF014A.3 EaSB 3860W WF019 SBT 3480W WF014A EaSB 1810J JT008 CWRR MS8.0J Jt001 ewcs MS4.5M MC002.1 Me2 ... ,,"'.. ..,."',.,.. FCep 5.3M 2120M EMCR eH 2290M Net 7.0M
1080M 9.0M S030M 9.6M 1950M 􀀱􀀱􀀴􀁾􀀠2821. 8783. 650.1 3525.1 7560.1 2747.16 20372.81 ( 11390.00 11390.00 '.00 109.20 29700.00 FM 16340.00 ----gsj" 4558.00 24 ....1:. 􀁾􀀠60 --'" 0.00408
0.0031: 0.01980 0.00440 0.00150 􀁾􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀱􀀰􀀰􀀠0.00260 30 0.00.400 36 0.00219 0.00075 􀀱􀀴􀀮􀀴􀁾􀀠2.01' 14.82' 44.36: 101.140 13.0Q!! " ).766 '.249 ::1.320001 20.20 15 J.0200 ::1.0034
J.00266 102401 100260 100400 361 0.00220 .... 􀁾􀁖􀁬􀀠il.22B 7.526 101.14" 5.01 i.1.t1 31.369 , vs.<l2 1 Dltmtro1,xls 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METIIODOLOGY Method 2 Method 2 utilizes the CRWS and city inch-diameter-mile (idm) calculations, and the metered flows from
each delta meter to prorate interceptor III on a subsystem basis. The interceptor III is developed by applying the III per idm for the delta meter subsystem to an adjusted interceptor
idm. The adjustedinterceptor idm is based on the line size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city. The interceptor III flows are deducted from the Fiscal 􀁙􀁥􀁡􀁲􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁲􀁩�
�􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠and the Annual Requirement is revised based on adjusted contribution percentages. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHOD 2 The following is a description of Method 2 for prorating CRWS interceptor infiltration/inflow (III) to the contracting
party flows. l. Determine the annual volume of III for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -ADDF = III (annually) The use of delta meter subsystem values assumes that
the annual average III per idm for the CRWS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is . the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
of non-delta meters are considered to be lines required to Serve the metered city, regardless of ownership. The evaluation of III annually will provide a trending to account for annual
rainfall, III reduction in the CRWS and the city collection systems. and any other changes in the condition of the systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diameter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually. or assumed to remain the same for a period of three to five years. . 3. Determine the CRWS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. 4. Determine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No. 1 divided by the sum of No.2 , and No.3) 5. Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The
adjusted interceptor idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope of the existing CRWS interceptor
segments from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor size in excess of the size required for the upstream city is considered to be requi red to serve the delta
metered city, regardless of ownership. 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied by No.5) 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution
Based on Actual Flow for each of the contracting parties. 8. Adjust the DiStribution of Fiscal Year Actual Annual Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each of the contracting parties.

BLACK & VEATCH MEMORANDUM Trinity River Authority ofTexas B&V Project 66779.110 Interceptor III Proration B&V File B Negative Flow Adjustment July 26,2001 To: Patricia Oeveland From:
Layne Parsons, P.E. The following methodology is proposed for adjusting negative average daily flow (ADF) and infIltration/inflow (III) flows used in the interceptor III proration calculation.
ADFAdjustment If a negative ADF value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, negative ADF should not be adjusted for the interceptor III proration. ADF and III will be zero (0)
at delta meter locations with negative ADF. IIIAdjustment Ifa negative III value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, use the following steps to determine an adjusted III value:
1. Using the estimated developed acres and the current annual III, determine the average gallons-per-acre-day (gpad) for the meters upstream of the receiving (delta) meter. 2. Apply
the calculated average gpad III flow value to the cumulative developed acres for the receiving ((delta) meter to determine a revised annual III for the receiving (delta) meter. 3. Using
the revised annual cumulative III for the receiving (delta) meter, calculate the delta III. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR IJI PRORATION FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the total number
of days in 1he year. The average daily dry weather flow is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow recorded during the year. . The following criteria are established for the
analysis of the flows used to determine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptor IJI proration. 1. The beginning of the fiscal year for flow recordings may result in partial inclusion of
the first seven day average meter recording. Partial seven day average meter recordings consisting of less than four (4) days will not be considered for use as the ADDF. '. " 2. During
the year, there may be a need to adjust the recorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include, but not be limited to line blockage or year-to-date (YTD) adjustments. Adjusted
flows wilt not be considered for use as ADDF. 
• ., . 
HANDOUT A\iENDA ITEM V-B CRWS -2002 MID YEAR REALLOCATION 2002 2002 2002 2002 BUDGET BUDGET REVISED REVISED % SHARE MGD % SHARE CRWS 
HANDOUT "GENDA ITEM V·D August 7, 2002 (Previous report August 6, 2001) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ACTIVE PIPELINE DESIGN PROJECTS
BEAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Bear Creek Interceptor. BC·4 Location: City of Colleyville From Little Bear Creek to north city limit of Bedford Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation
of 2700 ft. of 8" to 15" diameter parallel relief pipeline Status: Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 2001 Preliminary Design Report Contract to be completed by November 2002
ELM FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF·G Location: Cities of Coppell and Carrollton Adjacent to Belt line Road, from luna Road to Fairway Type/Size: 48" parallel
relief of 6900 ft. of 33" diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated November 1994 Design Revisions begun May 1997 Final Design revisions completed June 2000 Design is 99% complete Easement/permit
acquisition 95% complete . Condemnation proceedings in progress Anticipated construction award by December 2002 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor. EF·1 location: City of Irving North
of CRWS Treatment Plant, from West Fork of Trinity River to SH 183 Type: 102" parallel relief of 25,300 ft. of 72" & 96" diameter pipelines Status: Design begun in 1996 Design 95% complete
Easement acquisition begun December 2000 AntiCipated construction award in late 2003 Name: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF·2 Location: Cities of Irving and Dallas North of SH 183 to
Spur 348 Type: 96" parallel relief of 20,600 ft. of 96" diameter pipeline Status: Design initiated in 1995 Revisions to Final Design made in December 1997 Design 91 % complete Easement
acquisition to begin by January 2002 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 1 
Name: Location: Type: Status: Elm Fork Relief Interceptor. EF·6 Cities of Farmers Branch and Dallas North of Spur 348 to 1·635 72" parallel relief of 12,900 ft. 72" diameter pipeline
Design initiated in August 1998 Design 41 % complete Easement acquisition to begin in 2002 Anticipated construction award by late 2003 MOUNTAIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Location:
Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Kirby Creek Outfall Interceptor City of Grand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest Parkway Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental
Assessment of 20,500 ft. of 12" to 24" line Design Contract awarded in August 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed August 1999 Environmental Assessment completed by March 2001
Work is 95% complete Design to be initiated by October 2002 Easement acquisition to begin by April 2003 Anticipated construction award in October 2003 MCKC /I Rehabilitation City of
Grand Prairie Upstream of LS 4 along Mountain Creek Lake Rehab 4,650 ft. of 30· diameter pipeline Design initiated in 2001 Design 100% complete Easement acquisition in progress AntiCipated
construction award by October 2003 WEST FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF·G Phase /I and I·A·l Erosion Location: City of Grand Prairie From Bear Creek System
junction approximately 3,900 ft. upstream toward Belt Une Road Type: 84" parallel relief of 3,900 ft. of 45" & 66" lines Status: DeSign initiated in 1996 Revisions to design made in
1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 Design completed in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acqUisition begun in 1999 Construction split
into two phases in October 2000 Design is 100% complete Construction contract to be awarded in October 2002 2 
Name: West Fork Interceptor. WF-1 Location: City of Grand Prairie From the Plant to Bear Creek System junction Type/Size: 84" parallel relief of 17,800 ft. of 84" pipeline Status: Design
Contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed 2001 Environmental Assessment completed Evaluation of TXDOT conflicts and pipeline raroutes completed by February
2001 Final Design is 80% complete Easement acquisition started December 2001 Anticipated construction award by February 2003 Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-3 Location: City of Grand
Prairie Johnson Creek from junction with West Fork to Hwy. 360 Type/Size: Preliminary Evaluation of 24" parallel relief of 11,050 ft. of 30" line Status: Preliminary DeSign Contract
awarded in June 1998 Environmental Assessment completed by December 2001 Design is 98% complete Final Design contract to be awarded by December 2002 Name: West Fork Interceptor, WF-11A
Location: City of Grand Prairie From Johnson Creek to Roy Orr Blvd. Type: Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment of 72" diameter parallel relief 6,900 ft. of 60"
diameter line Status: Design awarded in August 1998 Draft Environmental Assessment completed March 2000 Design is 31% complete Easement acquisition to begin by January 2003 Anticipated
construction award in 2003 Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor, W F-11 B Location: Cities of Arlington and Grand Prairie From Roy Orr Boulevard to west of West Fork of Trinity River Type:
84" diameter parallel relief of 16,000 ft. of 66" to 84" diameter line Status: Design contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment completed March
2000 Engineering evaluations & negotiation of pipeline relocation, November 1999 to December 2001 Revised environmental assessment completed in April 2001 Revised pipeline alignment
in summer 2001 DeSign 67% complete Easement acquisition begun in late 2001 Anticipated construction award in March 2003 3 
Name: Type: Status: I and I Management Plan -Phase IV Planning Contract awarded in December 2001 Work is approximately 37% complete ACTIVE PLANT DESIGN PROJECTS: Name: Location: Type:
Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Bar Screening Improvements. Phase I and II PS6I6A Rehabilitation and Maintenance Design of Phase I is 100% complete
DeSign of Phase II is 100% complete Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction to be completed by November 2003 Clarifier Piping Improvements Primary Clarifiers Evaluation
and Piping Rehabilitation Contract to be approved in August 2002 Stage VI Odor Control Improvements Plant Design in progress ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS-(as of July 2002) Name: Location:
Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Little Bear Creek CO-lIGV-4 City of Hurst East of Precinct Road, north of SP RRlWest of Hwy 121 & north of Glade Rehabilitation of 1500 ft.
of 12" diameter Iinet200 ft. line repair Project added to BC Rehab. in 1998 Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition completed in July 2001 Construction awarded
in October 2001 Construction is approximately 82% complete Bear Creek Rehab .. Section II & III Cities of Irving and Ft. Worth South of DFW Intemational Airport Rehabilitation of 9000
ft. of 39" diameter line Preliminary DesigriStudy initiated in February 1996 Engineering Evaluation completed in January 1997 Design initiated May 1997 Final Design completed in June
2001 4 
Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Easement and permit acquisition completed in July 2001 Construction
awarded in October 2001 Construction is approximately 82% complete Elm Fork Interceptor. MS 15.0E City of Carrollton South of 1-635 and north of Luna Road Re-build meter station Design
completed April 2002 Construction in progress Mountain Creek Interceptor. MC-4A Cities 01 Grand Prairie and Arlington Bowman Branch, South Fork Fish Creek to Loyd Park Construct new
lilt station, 10,000 It of twin 24" diameter lorce main to replace existing 18" force main, and build 7,500 It of 54" diameter pipeline to replace existing 24" diameter gravity pipeline
Environmental Assessment completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Evaluate possible reroute options in South Grand Prairie due to land development Modify design
for two 24" diameter force main and 54" gravity pipeline in July 2001 Easemeht acquisition begun in October 2000 USACE environmental data and reports to be completed by September 2001
Easement acquisition to be completed by October 2002 Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1 % complete Construction to be completed by December 2003 Mountain Creek
Interceptor, MC-4B Cities of Grand Prairie, Arlington, and Mansfield Loyd Park to Holland Road 16,000 It of 48" relief pipeline replacement of 24" gravity pipeline Environmental Assessment
completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Final design to begin in September 2000 Easement acquisition to begin March 2001 USACE environmental data and reports to
be completed by September 2001 Easement acquisition completed by August 2002 ConstructIon contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1 % complete Construction to be completed by July
2003 Harwood Road SS Maintenance Cities of G rand Prairie Fish Creek to Camp Wisdom-Webb Lynn Roads 6,000 It of 24" relief pipeline replacement of 24" gravity line Design completed by
TRA -April 2002 Easement acquisition begin March 2002 5 
Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Easement acquisition in progress Construction contract awarded
April 2002 Construction is 51 % complete Construction to be completed by October 2002 West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF-C. N. B, P. & M City of Arlington From West of Hwy. 360 to west
of Collins Street 72" parallel relief of existing 54" & 60" lines Design initiated in 1996 Design completed in December 1998 EA completed by December 1998 Construction contract awarded
in December 1998 Construction 97% complete Construction to be completed by August 2002 West Fork Relief Inferceplor, WF-G. Phase I City of Grand Prairie From 3,900 feet west of Bear
Creek System junction to Belt Line Road 84" parallel relief of 2,200 ft. of 45" & 66" lines Design initiated in 1996 Revisions to design made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in
March 1999 Design 100% complete in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition begun in 1999 Construction split inlo two phases in October 2000 Construction
contract awarded in April 2001 Construction is approximately 99% complete Construction to be completed by September 2002 Bar Screening Improvements. Phase I and II PS 6/6A Plant DeSign
of Phase I is 100% complete Design of Phase II is less than 100% complete Construction contract awarded in June 2002 Construction <1 % complete Construction to be completed by November
2003 Gravity Sand Filters Rehabilitation Plant Rehabilitation and Maintenance DeSign is 100% complete Construction Contract awarded in June 2002 Construction is >75% complete Construction
to be completed by October 2002 6 
List of Construction Project Improvements Completed since August 2001 Report 1. Flow Monitoring and Telemetry Improvements 2. 2000 Odor Control Stage IV Project -Biofilters 3. Solids
Dewatering and Handling Equip. -Belt Presses 4. Sludge Collection System 5. MC-1 Pipeline 6. WF-C,N,B,P,&M Pipeline 7. III Management Phase 111-update POE and flow data, and select ESRI
GIS and HydroWorks software 7 
.. 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM VI DATE: August 13, 2002 FILE: 3110.102/3110.800 TO: MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM RE: Central Regional
Wastewater System Proposed FY 2003 Budget Authority management annually prepares a proposed budget of anticipated revenues and expenditures of the Central Regional Wastewater System
in accordance with the fiscal provisions of our Wastewater Services Contract for the ensuing fiscal year. We are pleased to present to you the proposed FY 2003 Budget for the annual
operating funds of the Central System. This budget is relevant to the time period for December 1, 2002 through November 30, 2003. This budget reflects the proposed financial activities
of operating and debt service funds, provides for our continuing ability to deliver high quality, efficient wastewater service to our Contracting Parties, and will continue to position
the Central System for increased growth, regulatory changes and maximized internal operational productivity measures to result in cost efficient wastewater treatment. Events of 2001
have led us to re-evaluate priorities and values, and re-assess the vulnerability of our staff and facilities. This past year, the Authority has worked to ensure the security and integrity
of our Central System and the reliability of our services and progress on this effort will continue into FY 2003. Therefore, the budget reflects the Authority's continued commitment
to protect capital investments, keep operational expenses to a minimum and to maximize the process of increasing operational efficiency throughout the Authority. A brief overview of
Central's financial picture for FY 2003 will reveal an increase in overall System expenditures, with only those increases in operating accounts required to meet contractual obligations
for our treatment of wastewater, as well as an increase associated with the debt service requirements, as compared to previous year. The operation and maintenance expenditures were developed
based on transporting and treating an average daily flow of 150.150 MGD. The cost of debt service requirements is based on principal and interest payments due on outstanding Central
Regional Wastewater System Revenue Bonds. The antiCipated expenditures in FY 2003 total $@077:110, an approximate 6.8% increase over the $54,352,130 predicted for the current fiscal
year. The projected costs for salaries and related benefits, association dues, maintenance and operating supplies, laboratory Expenses supplies, process chemicals, computer software,
licenses and instrument supplies, .55.49 Deb! SaMes and Miscellaneous audits, engineering services, Authority D:2:2.0:2% Other Services and Chaf9lsS .14.46% PelSOlla! Servicescomputer
network, process SCADA and .6.1.2% Suppliesmaintenance management support, .1.91% Capita! OutlayS professional services, postage, 
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
August 13, 2002 3110.102/3110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 2 Project insurance payments, employee travel, laundry and unifonns, water usage, collection system, equipment, vehicle
and electrical system maintenance repairs, transportation and beneficial use of biosolids, administrative overhead and capital outlays essential for delivering services during the year
have increased $2,183,400 above the predicted FY 2002 Budget. The increase in the proposed FY 2003 Budget for operating accounts is partly offset by a $404,740 reduction in service cost
for power usage and in other operating category accounts by holding the line on controllable costs, as close scrutiny was given to all anticipated expenditures. Along with decreases
in some predicted operating accounts, there is an increase in programmed debt payments of $1,946,920, resulting in an overall projected increase of $ 3,725,580 for FY 2003 expenditures
above the FY 2002 Budget. As is shown in the following table, and despite additional costs not foreseen one year ago, the predicted gross unit costl1000 gallons is the same as last year's
projection for the coming FY 2003, and the net costl1 000 gallons is slightly less than forecast. Anticipated FY 2003 revenues from the System's Contracting Parties, totaling Revenue$54,613,900,
reflects an 8.3% increase above the FY 2002 projected revenue requirement of $50,421,660. The resulting _93.49% Conttact 􀁒􀁥􀁾􀁮􀁬􀁊􀁥􀀠predicted gross and net unit costs of 02.64%
Interest IllOOme _1.68% Miscellaneous Irv.;omeservice for wastewater transportation and _1.42% Operatlng Overhead and Services treatment throughout FY 2003 are 3.5% .0.77% Professional
Fees and 4.9% over the respective predicted FY 2002 budgeted unit costs as reflected in the following table: The following exhibits are presented to provide flow allocations, a summary
of budget objectives and detailed infonnation about the five major budget categories, as well as additional quantitative and statistical information for your review: Exhibit A Exhibit
B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Flow Allocations Budget Objectives Budget at a Glance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and
Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous Historical System Data Projected Future Costs of Service \. 
August 13, 2002 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 3 The proposed FY 2003 Budget (Exhibit K) is presented for your review and consideration and will be discussed in the
August 13, 2002 Advisory Committee meeting. Additionally, a Budget Workshop will be held in the upstairs conference room of the Administrative Building at the Central Regional Wastewater
System on Monday, August 26, 2002, beginning at 10:00 a.m. for those representatives and city staff members who do not attend the Advisory Committee meeting or desire to discuss the
proposed budget in more detail. A later Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 10th, at which time the committee will be requested to recommend the proposed FY
2003 Budget for adoption by the Authority's Board of Directors. If there are any questions concerning the proposed budget or the workshop, please contact the 􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁴􀀠PATRICIA M. CLEVELAND
Manager, Operations Northern Region PMC/rrc Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager, Northern Region Bill Tatum, Project Manager, Central Regional
Wastewater System 
\ EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2003 FLOW ALLOCATIONS 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% BUDGETED FY 2003 FLOWS z Cl E; cr: « 􀁾􀀠(!) :r: z 0 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠CUSTOMER CITY
z 0 ...J ...J f-OJ Z...J '" 0 9 0cr: 􀁾􀀠..J=􀁾􀀠5 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠m ffi 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾z LU VJ J: :::r:j Z () I::;; cr: 0Cl z <n .% SHARE ....................._---
EXHIBIT B CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2003 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Trinity River Authority's Central Regional Wastewater System is a large regional wastewater system
located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River and is currently serving approximately one million customers in Dallas, Tarrant, Ellis, Johnson and Denton counties
of north central Texas. The service area encompasses all or portions of 20 cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The Central
Regional Wastewater System treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons per day (MGD). This System consists of an extensive regional
network of interceptors, pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the delivery of treated effluent for golf course irrigation and lake level management under the
first major urban reuse program in Texas. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2003 The Authority's objectives objectives are reflected in the recommended Annual Operating Budget for Central
Regional Wastewater System FY 2003. The major goals and objectives are: • Operate and adequately protect the Central System's capital investments by proper maintenance, which includes
a 162 MGD treatment plant, over 200 miles of interceptors, four lift stations, 138 metering stations, an analytical laboratory, and the DCURD water reuse project. • Provide wastewater
transportation and treatment services for a projected flow contribution of 150.15 MGD. • Continue operating at effiCient levels and minimize unit costs while enhancing treatment capacity
and meeting all regulatory requirements. • Continue Authority efforts to reduce overall wet-weather flow impacts to the System by installing new pipelines for capacity, rehabilitating
existing collection system infrastructure and plant facilities as identified in the first and second phases of the 1998 Five Year Plan; funded by the Series 1998A and 2000 Revenue Bonds,
and the third phase funded by the Series 2001 Bonds. • Operate and maintain odor control facilities consistent with the Odor Control Management Plan and implement additional odor improvements
in the primary treatment areas to reduce risk of adjacent area odors. • Provide Contracting Parties laboratory testing and pretreatment program capabilities and services on a revenue-supported
basis. • Continue 100% land application of System biosolids under a five-year agreement. • Respond in a timely fashion to Customer Cities' requests for aSSistance. 
EXHIBITC FISCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $58,419,360 Expensee $58,077,710 Variance (Retained
for FY 2004 Debt Requirements) $341,650 Revenue .93.49% Contract Revenue Cl2.64% Interest Income .1.68% Miscellaneous Income .1.42% Operating Overhead and Services .0.77% Professional
Fees Expenses .55.49 Debt Service and Miscellaneous D22.02% Other Services and Charges .14.46% Persona! Services .6.12% Supplies .1.91% Capital Outlays FISCAL YEAR 2003 FUND SUMMARY
Revenue Summary Contract Revenue Operating Overhead and Services Professional Fees Interest income Miscellaneous Income Total Sources of Funds Expenditure Summary Personal Services Supplies
Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous Total Application of Funds $54,613,900 $831,510 $450,000 $1,544,900 $979,050 $58.419.360 $8,399,720 $3,556,400
$12,785,680 $1,108,790 $32,227,120 $58.011.110 
\ 
EXHIBIT 0 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PERSONAL SERVICES FY2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $8,399,720 vs Current FY 2002 of $7,901,870 = Variance $497,850 or + 6,3%, Q The budget category
of Personal Services includes eight line item accounts, As compared with present budget, one line item account decreased (-) $2,000 (Education), one remained unchanged (Unemployment
Compensation) and five increased (+) $499,850 (Salaries, FICA, Health/Lite Insurance, Pension, and Employee Service Recognition), Q The anticipated increase in salaries and related benefit
costs is partly due 10 usual provisions for forecasted salary adjuslments based on merit, varying with each individual employee, Also, provisions are included for cosl increases in the
Authority's Health Insurance expenses due to claims exparience thai has resulted in premium increases, Q Authority management believes that the Central facility can be operated efficiently
and maintain adequate margins of satety with one Project Manager, an OperationslMaintenance staff of 98, plus 52 Technical Services/Pretreatment staff, Administrative staff of 9, and
7 PurchasinglWarehouse staff, Personal Services 􀁾􀀠14,46% Personal Services expenditures include those costs associated with the staffing required to operate, maintain, and administer
the treatment plant, biosolids program, laboratory, pretreatment program, collection system, and meter stations. SignifICant line item accounts in this category of expenditures inClude
salaries, payroll taxes, health insurance, and pension, 
EXHIBIT E CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM SUPPLIES FY2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $3,556,400 vs Current FY 2002 of $3,177,200 = Variance $379,200 or + 11.9%. Supplies Q The budget category
of Supplies includes eight line items accounts. As compared with the present budget, three decreased (-) $7,810 (Office Supplies, TNRCC Fees and Fuel) and the remaining five line item
accounts increased (+) $387,010 (Dues, Maintenance and Operating Supplies, Lab Supplies, Process Chemicals,and Computer Software, Licenses and Instrument Supplies. 6.12% Q Q Over 70%
of the expenditures for Supplies is for the purchase of process chemicals. The increase of $1 02, 100 in anticipated process chemical expenditures is primarily associated with an increase
for ferric chloride and polymer necessary for solids thickening and dewatering, as well as ferrous chloride for odor control. Included in the Computer Software, Licenses and Instrument
Supplies account is the Projecrs share of an Authority-wide Enterprise Resource Planning software which willintegrate financial, payroll, human resources, budget reporting, asset management, and purchasing into one integrated system. The cost to purchase and implement will be budgeted oller
a three-year period. Approximately 70% of the expenditures in this category are for the purchase of process chemicals necessary for sludge thickening, dewatering and stabilization, odor
control, effluent disinfection and dechlorination, and other treatment processas. 
EXHIBIT F CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES FY 2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $12,785,680 vs Current FY 2002 of$12,104,910 = Variance $680,700 or + 5.6%. Q The
budget category of Other Services and Charges includes 22 line itam accounts. As compared with the present budget, one remained unchanged (legal), six line item accounts decreased (-)
$394,930, and fifteen increased (+) $1,075,000. Q Over 85% or $279,320 of the decreased expenditures in this category is for power usage due to the competitive negotiation of an energy
contract for the time period of January 1, 2001 through May 31,2003. The remaining decreases in this category are due to reduced expenses for telephone, printing and binding, training,
repair and maintenance of plant and buildings, and equipment rental. Q This category of expenditures includes increases in Authority audit expanse, engineering services, Authority's
computer network, process SCADA and maintenance management system support services, professional services, postage, Project insurance payments, employee travel, laundry and uniforms,
water usage, repair and maintenance of collection system, equipment, vehicles and electrical systems, off-site biosolids land application, and administrative overhead costs. Other Services
and Charges \ 22.02% This category of expenditures relates to the indirect costs associated with the collection and treatment system, vehicles, and off-site biosolids disposal. 
EXHIBITG CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL OUTLAYS FY2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $1,108,790 vs. Current FY 2002 of $887,950 = Variance (+) $220,840 or 24.9%. Q The Capital Outlays
cetegory can vary significantly from year to year as major equipment is only purchased on an annual as needed basis. Q This category consists of 60% or $659,790 of capital expenditures
for replacement items and 40% or $449,000 of new capital equipment items proposed for purchase in FY 2003. Q Approximately 62% or $457,000 of the proposed Capital Outlay items for replacement
are for the Project 􀁍􀁡􀁮􀁡􀁧􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠sedan, three trucks, the heavy equipment item of a boom truck which all have excessive mileage and wear due to age, and replacement of two analytical
laboratory spectrophotometers for identifying metal compounds (inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometer and heat graphite atomic absorption unit). Approximately 76% of the primary
expenses under the category of new items is for security electronic surveillance equipment, a Vactor/rodder assembly, and one new utility vehicle for the pretreatment program. Q A list
of all the prOjected capital expenditures is on pages 27 and 28 of the attached proposed FY 2003 Budget. Capital Outlays 1.91% The category of Capital Outlays consists of the purchase
of machinery and equipment to aChieve a new purpose or replace existing equipment. 
EXHIBIT H CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS FY 2003 Q Proposed FY 2003 of $32,227,120 vs. Current FY 2002 of $30,280,200 = Variance (+) $1,946,920 or
(+) 6.4%. Q The amount budgeted for Debt Service reflects the fixed and established schedules based on outstanding debt of the Central System. Q In July 1998, the Authority issued $50,845,000
in Regional Wastewater System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Central Regional Wastewater System.
These bonds were purchased by the State Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. Q In September 1998, the Authority issued $66,950,000 in System Improvement and Refunding
Bonds, with $61,375,000 being refunded, producing a savings of $2.7 million through the life of the bond. Q In July 2001, The Authority issued $88,225,000 in Regional Wastewater System
Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Central Regional Wastewater System. These bonds were purchased
by the State Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. Q The increase in debt expenditures over the present FY 2002 Budget is due to the overall increase in scheduled debt
service payments in FY 2003. Debt Service and Miscellaneous 55.49% /Debt Services and Miscellaneous includes the annual principal and interest payments due on System bonds and the associated
paying agent fees. Typically, annual principal and interest payments are structured to provide relatively level debt service requirements from year to year until such lime as additional
bonds are issued. 
------EXHIBIT I CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND FLOW DATA 􀁾􀀮. FISCAL YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 i 2002 L2003 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES
$44,817,530 $47,693,245 $48,358,525 $47,014,070 $50,390,530 $51,066,490 $54,509,150 $54,352,130 $58,077,710 ----ACTUAL EXPENDITURES $43,621,706 $46,327,057 $47,401,825 $46,752,148 $50,691,945
$51,361,749 $56,087,461 • • BUDGETED ACTUAL PROJECTED ACTUAL REVENUE REVENUE FLOW FLOW $41,915,240 $40,594,960 112,37 MGD 113,37 MGD $44,889,460 $42,064,179 114,14 MGD 110,08 MGD $45,233,590
$42,891,464 116,00 MGD 118.01 MGD $43,601,935 $43,673,073 118.28 MGD 118.04 MGD $45,859,710 $45,808,213 123.31 MGD 120.64 MGD $47,812,790 $48,442,041 127.41 MGD 123.47 MGD $49,187,660
$51,953,155 143.13 MGD 146.49 MGD $50,421,660 • 145,52 MGD • $54,613,900 • 150.15 MGD • PROJECTED NET COST/1,OOO GAL. $1,0220 $1.0745 $1.0683 $1.0099 $1.0189 $1.0253 $0.9415 $0.9493
$0.9965 ACTUAL COST/1,OOO GAL. $0,9810 $1,0440 $0.9958 $1.0136 $1.0403 $1.0720 $0.9716 • • Central Regional Wastewater System Flow & Net Cost/1,OOO Gal. 160 1""" r 1.5 140 120 oi100
(!) 1 i§ 80 il c 60 40 20 0 0.5 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Fiscal Year [m ACTUALNET 􀁃􀁾􀁔􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀰􀀽􀁃􀁔􀁕􀁁􀁌MGD I 􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀲􀀠& 􀀲􀀰􀀺􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁥􀁰􀁲􀁏􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠
􀁾􀀮􀀠
EXHIBIT J CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJECTED FUTURE COST OF SERVICE .. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠FISCAL YR. PROJECTED GROSS NET ENDING FLOW COST PER COST PER NOV. 30 (MGD)
1,000 GAL. 1,000 GAL. 2003 150.15 $1.059 $0.996 2004 152.15 $1.062 -----$1.009 -2005 154.15 $1.161 $1.103 2006 156.45 $1.164 $1.106 2007 158.75 $1.228 $1.167 2008 161.05 $1.236 $1.175
(1) NET COST IS PROJECTED TO BE 95% OF GROSS COST BASED UPON HISTORICAL TRENDS FOR FY 2004 THROUGH FY 2008. (2) UNIT COST CALCULATION FOR FY 2004 THROUGH FY 2008 INCLUDES PROJECTED ADDITIONAL
DEBT TO FINANCE PLANT AND COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. (3) PROJECTED FLOW IS BASED UPON THE EXISTING SYSTEM'S CONTRACTING PARTIES ANTICIPATED FLOWS. 
EXHIBIT K TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Description ofthe Project The Central Regional Wastewater
System (CRWS) consists of a treatment plant and appurlenances rated at 162 Million Gallons Per Day (MGD). interceptor pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the
delivery of treated effluent for irrigation and level control under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. CRWS provides wastewater transporlation and treatment for the 􀁃􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠of
Irving, Grand Prairie. Farmers Branch, Dallas, Carrollton, Coppell. Cedar Hill, Euless, Bedford, Forl Worlh, Arlington, Colleyville, DallaS/Forl Worlh International Airporl, Grapevine,
Mansfield, Hurst, Norlh Richland Hills. Duncanville, Southlake, Keller, and Addison. The estimated average daily volume of wastewater predicted to be received from the contributing cities
in Fiscal Year 2002 is 150.150 Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD). 2003 2002 Percent Amount Percent Amount Q!y Contribution MGD Contribution MGD Irving 19.148% 28.750 20.616% 30.000 Grand
Prairie 11.116% 16.690 11.138% 16.208 Arlington 30.276% 45.460 28.230% 41.080 Farmers Branch 4.462% 6.700 4.604% 6.700 Dallas 5.661% 8.500 5.154% 7.500 Euless 2.847% 4.275 2.817% 4.100
Carrollton 7.992% 12.000 8.315% 12.100 D/FW Airport 1.539% 2.310 1.587% 2.310 Bedford 3.130% 4.700 3.206% 4.666 Coppell 2.597% 3.900 2.543% 3.700 Colleyville 1.683% 2.527 1.745% 2.539
Fort Worlh 0.911% 1.368 0.871% 1.267 Grapevine 1.279% 1.920 1.635% 2.360 Mansfield 2.165% 3.250 2.233% 3.250 Hurst 0.135% 0.202 0.126% 0.183 North Richland Hills 0.466% 0.703 0.368%
0.565 Duncanville 0.133% 0.200 0.137% 0.200 Keller 1.608% 2.415 1.659% 2.415 Southlake 1.132% 1.700 1.164% 1.694 Cedar Hill 0.200% 0.300 0.168% 0.245 Addison 1.518% 2.280 1.664% 2.420
Totals 1QQQQQ% 150.150 lOP OQQ% 145.522 located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River, the CRWS Facility initiated operation in December 1959, inilially serving
four cities. The original plant consisted of a trickling filter process with a capacity of 30 MGD. The capacity was increased to 60 MGD in 1976 by the addition of mechanical dewatering
eqUipment and an activated sludge process. In 1980, a two phase expansion program was completed that increased the capacity to 100 MGD and provided tertiary treatment. Growth in the
service area resulted in the expansion of the CRWS facility 10 a capacity of 135 MGD, with construction initiated in 1988 and completed in early 1994. Effluent discharged from CRWS consistently
meets or exceeds the requirements specified in the TPDES permit issued by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). TNRCC approved an uprating of the discharge permit
to an effluent level of 162 MGD with the completion of the solids dewatering project on April 1 , 2001. Page 1 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ENTERPRISE FUND Work Program To maintain and operate the Central Plant on a
24-hour a day, 7-day a week basis requires a staff of three (3) department managers reporting to the Project Manager. In addition to the management staff, including purchasing and the
inventory department, staffing is as follows: System Operation and Maintenance 97 Administration Services 8 Technical Services 43 Northem Region Purchasing 7 Pretreatment !l 163 The
responsibility for selecting process parameters, actual treatment of wastewater, process and non-process equipment maintenance, maintenance, repair of electrical and electronic equipment,
lift station maintenance sludge disposal and computer monitoring of plant processes lies with the Manager, System Operations, and the Operation and Maintenance Department. The Manager,
Administrative Services and staff provide support at the Central System in the areas of human resource administration, benefits, training, clerical, accounts payable, payroll, and capital
asset control and data processing. The Manager, Technical Services and staff provide analytical data for process control, influent monitoring and effluent quality reports. The Laboratory
and Pretreatment Programs provide analytical and technical assistance to cities, state, andlor federal agencies and other TRA Projects on a contract basis. Engineering Services provide
inspection and surveillance of the collection system and monitoring of flows from the Cities into the system. Page 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM TOTAL FUND SUMMARY FUNDS AVAILABLE Projected December 1, 2002 $ 17,295,360 ESTIMATED
SOURCES OF FUNDS Contract Revenue Inter-Fund Services & Charges Operating Overhead Professional Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Income $ 54,613,900 414,340 417,170 450,000 1,544,900
979,050 58,419,360 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 75,714,720 ESTIMATED APPLICATION OF FUNDS Appropriation Expenditures: Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays
Debt Service and Miscellaneous $ [1,399,720 3,556,400 12,785,680 1,108,790 32,227,120 58,077,710 TOTAL FUNDS APPLIED $ 58,077,710 FUNDS AVAILABLE Projected November 30,2003 $ Page 3

TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE 2003 BUDGET CONTRACT AND OPERATING
Ol!ERHEAD REVENUE (3010) Contract Revenue -trving (3020) Conlract Revenue -Grand Prairie (3030) Contract Revenue -Arlington (3040) Contract Revenue -Farmers Branch (3050) Contract Revenue
-Dallas (3060) Contract Revenue -Euless (3070) Contract Revenue -Carrollton (3080) Contract Revenue -D/FW Airport (3090) Contract Revenue -Bedford (3100) Contract Revenue -Coppell (3110)
Conlract Revenue -Colleyville (3120) Contract Revenue -Fort Worth (3130) Contract Revenue -Grapevine (3140) Contract Revenue -Mansfield (3150) Contract Revenue -Hurst (3160) Contract
Revenue -North Richland Hills (3170) Contract Revenue -Duncanville (3180) Contract Revenue -Keller (3190) Contract Revenue -Southlake (3200) Contract Revenue -Cedar Hill (3210) Contract
Revenue -Addison (3380) Inter-Fund Services & Charges (3390) Operating Overhead -Other Projects TOTAL CONTRACT AND OPERATING OVERHEAD REVENUE PROFESSIONAL FEES (3980) Professional Fees
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES INTEREST INCOME (3810) Interest Income-Interest & Sinking Fund (3820) Interest Income -Reserve Fund (3840) Interest Income -Revenue Fund (3870) Interest Income
-Emergency TOTAL INTEREST INCOME $ 10,457,470 6,070,880 16,534,910 2,436,870 3,091,690 1,554,860 4,364,740 840,510 1,709,420 1,418,320 919,150 497,530 698,510 1,182,390 73,730 255,590
72,640 878,190 618,230 109,230 829,040 414,340 417,170 55,445,410 450,000 450,000 229,600 1,147,800 123,500 44,000 $ 1,544,900 CURRENT 2002 BUDGET $ 10,394,930 5,615,960 14,234,030 2,321,410
2,598,730 1,420,380 4,192,560 800,190 1,616,520 1,282,220 879,860 439,170 824,390 1,125,920 63,530 195,640 69,080 836,500 586,910 84,710 839,020 693,19(! 51,114,850 450,000 450,000 489,580
1,416,420 336.320 93,030 $ 2,335,350 2001 ACTUAL $ 10,221,781 5,639,307 15,623,824 2,073,978 2,877,391 1,343,646 4,258,815 834,736 1,680,841 1,374,954 870,684 914,070 536,843 1,157,826
71,853 220,177 58,029 738,966 526,619 103,218 825,597 656,740 52,609,895 438,988 438,988 459,263 1,523,753 310,544 130,162 $ 2,423,722 Page 4 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME (3400) Overstrength Surcharge (3410) Northeast Lakeview Lift Station (3430) Pretreatment Revenue (3440) Commodity Charge (3480) Quantity Surcharge (3990) Miscellaneous
Income $ 600,000 22,000 51,810 36,800 268,440 $ 600,000 14,650 22,000 51,810 36,800 10,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 979,050 GRAND TOTAL $ 58,419,360 $ 54,635,460 2001 ACTUAL $ 625,408
19,433 61,844 140,017 28,089 49,693 924,484 $ 56,397,089 Page 5 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT
2002 BUDGET 2001 ACTUAL PERSONAL SERVICES (4000) Salaries -Regular (4010) Salaries -Part-Time (4020) Payroll Taxes· Fica (4030) Emp. Ben -Health/Life Ins. (4040) Employee Benefit -Pension
(4060) Unemployment Compensation (4070) Emp. 􀁒􀁥􀁣􀁯􀁧􀁮􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠Program (4080) Employee Benefit -Education $ 6,428,520 37,370 494,640 655,250 740,660 20,000 16,280 7,000 $ 6,251,780
478,260 411,770 715,800 20,000 15,260 9,000 $ 5,816,588 41,925 433,322 406,060 573,851 2,737 13,880 3,135 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 8,399,720 7,901,870 7,291,498 SUPPLIES (4100) Office
Supplies (4110) Dues and Subscriptions (4120) Fees Other Than Dues and Subscriptions (4130) Maintenance and Operating Supplies (4140) Lab Supplies (4150) Process Chemicals and Supplies
(4180) Fuel, Oil, & Lubricants (4170) Computer Software, Uc, & Instr, Supplies 50,200 55,850 80,910 80,910 166,930 280,350 2,524,000 103,630 294,530 51,200 54,860 86,910 146,590 273,350
2,421,900 104,440 37,950 44,008 49,771 67,785 168,709 299,166 2,109,998 101,313 51,588 TOTAL SUPPLIES 3,556,400 3,177,200 2,892,338 OTHER SERVICES AND CHABGES (4200) Auditing (4210)
Engineering (4220) Legal (4230) Outside Services (4240) Olher Professional Services (4300) Telephone and Telemetering (4310) Postage (4320) Pnnting and Binding (4330) Insurance Payments
(4380) Travel (4370) laundry, Uniform, & Ind, Equip (4380) Training (4400) Utilities (4420) Power (4430) R /I M • Collection System (4440) R & M -Equipment (4450) R & M • Plant & Buildings
(4460) R & M -Vehicles (4480) R & M • Electrical (4490) Off-sile Biosolid Land Application (4510) Renl-Machinery & Equip, (4660) Administrative Overhead 37,500 223,090 20,000 644,590
197,700 91,060 8,520 11,010 287,430 19,300 49,070 70,800 120,000 4,553,480 369,750 223,200 729,600 43,500 587,000 2,665,190 79,520 1,754,570 36,000 160,000 20,000 335,620 175,650 106,570
8,220 12,730 179,420 16,500 44,350 111,940 105,000 4,832,800 245,000 218,300 777,350 40,400 510,150 2,534,140 88,810 1,545,960 35,500 233,952 8,317 807,902 182,357 78,489 7,913 9,255
130,630 17,793 53,010 39,225 118,217 4,856,570 509,349 213,768 586,380 50,630 415,002 2,343,012 47,213 1.455,730 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES 12,785,680 12,104,910 12,000,214 Page
6 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET» FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROPOSED CURRENT DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2003 BUDGET
2002 BUDGET CAPITAL OUTLAYS (4760) Machinery & Equipment $ 1,108,790 $ 887,950 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1,108,790 887,950 DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS· (4800) Bond Principal Payments
16,430,000 15,580,000 (4810) Interest On Long-Term Debt 15,785,120 14,674,200 (4830) Paying Agent Fees 12,000 26,000 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS 32,227,120 30,280,200 GRAND
TOTAL $ 58,077,710 $ 54,352,130 2001 ACTUAL $ 312,867 312,867 18,995,000 14,594,062 1.482 33,590,544 $ 56,087,461 Page 7 ) 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED CONTRACT REVENUE 2003 BUDGET Operation & Mainlenance
T alai Expenditures $ 25,862,590.00 less Other Revenue Sources: Inler-Fund Services & Charges (414,340.00) Operating Overhead (417,170.00) Professional Fees (450,000.00) Pretreatment
Revenue (22,000.00) Commodity Charge (51,810.00) Miscellaneous Income (268,440.00) Overstrength Surcharge (600,000.00) Zone B & Quantity Surcharge (36,800.00) Tolal Other Revenue Sources
(2,260,560.00) Nel Operation and Maintenance to be to Billed Monthly 23,602,030.00 Debt Service Principal on Bonds: Due 8/0112003: 16,430,000.00 x 8112 10,953,333.33 Due 8101/2004: 17,455,000.00
x 4112 5,818,333.33 Interest on Bonds: Due 2101/2003: 8,029,566.88 x 216 2,676,522.29 Due 8/01/2003: 8,029,566.88 x 6/6 8,029,566.88 Due 210112004: 7,618,553.75 x 4/6 5,079,035.83 Rounding
1.24 less: Interest Income (1,544,900.00) Net Debt Service to Billed Monthly 31,011,892.91 TOTAl CONTRACT REVENUE $ 54,613,922.91 Page 8 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (3010} CONTRACT REVENUE -IRVING (1106.3010) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 19.148% (1108.3010) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 19.148% Rounding $ 4,519,316.70
5,938,157.26 (3.96) Total Annual Requirement $ 10,457,470 $ 10,394,930 (3020} CONTRACT REVENUE -GRAND PRAIRIE (1106.3020) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 11.116% (1108.3020) Debt
Service $31,011,893 x 11.116% Rounding 2,623,601.65 3,447,282.02 (3.67) Total Annual Requirement 6,070,880 5,615,960 (3030} CONTRACT REVENUE -ARLINGTON (1106.3030) Operation & Maintenance
$23,602,030 x 30.276% (1108.3030) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 30.276% Rounding 7,145,750.60 9,389,160.70 (1.30) Total Annual Requirement 16,534,910 14,234,030 (3040) CONTRACT REVENUE
-FARMERS BRANCH (1106.3040) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 4.462% 1,053,122.58 (1108.3040) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 4.462% 1,383,750.66 Rounding (3.23) Total Annual Requirement
2,436,870 2,321,410 (3050} CONTRACT REVENUE -DALLAS (1106.3050) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 5.661% (1108.3050) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 5.661% Rounding 1,336,110.92 1,755,583.26
(4.18) Total Annual Requirement 3,091,690 2,598,730 Page 9 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (3000) CONTRACT REVENUE·
EULESS (1106.3060) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 2.847% (1108.3060) Debt Service $31,011.893 x 2.847% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3070) CONTRACT REVENUE· CARROLLTON (1108.3070)
Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 7.992% (1108.3070) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 7.992% Rounding Total Annual Requirement (3080) CONTRACT REVENUE· DIFW AIRPORT (1106.3080) Operation
& Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.539% (1108.3080) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.539% Rounding Tota! Annual Requirement (3090) CONTRACT REVENUE· BEDFORD (1106.3090) Operalion & Maintenance
$23,602,030 x 3.130% (1108.3090) Deb! Service $31,011,893 x 3.130% Rounding T oIal Annual Requirement (3100) CONTRACT REVENUE· COPPELL (1106.3100) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030
x 2.597% (1108.3100) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 2.597% Rounding Total Annual Requirement PROPOSED DETAIL $ 671,949.79 882,908.59 1.61 1,886,274.24 2,478,470.48 (4.72) 363,235.24 477,273.03
738,743.54 970,672.25 4.21 612,944.72 805,378.86 (3.58) PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 1,554,860 $ 1,420,380 4,384,740 4,192,560 840,510 800,190 1,709,420 1,616,520 1,418,320
1,282,220 Page 10 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -RSCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET (3110) CONTRACT REVENUE -COLLEYVILLE (1106.3110) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.683% $ 397,222.16 (1108.3110) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.683%
521,930.16 Rounding (2.32) Total Annual Requirement $ 919,150 $ 879,860 (3120) CONTRACT REVENUE -FORT WORTH (1106.3120) Operalion & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.911% 215,014.49 (1108.3120)
Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.911% 282,518.34 Rounding (2.84) Total Annual Requirement 497,530 439,170 (3130) CONTRACT REVENUE -GRAPEVINE (1106.3130) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030
x 1.279% 301,869.96 (1108.3130) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1279% 396,842.11 Rounding (2.07) Total Annual Requirement 698,510 824,390 (3140) CONTRACT REVENUE -MANSFIELD (1106.3140) Operation
& Maintenance $23,602,030 x 2.165% 510,983.95 (1108.3140) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 2.165% 671,407.48 Rounding (1.43) Total Annual Requirement 1,182,390 1,125,920 (3150) CONTRACT REVENUE
HURST (1106.3150) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.135% 31,862.74 (1108.3150) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.135% 41,866.06 Rounding 1.20 Total Annual Requirement 73,730 63,530
Page 11 /\ 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL (3160)
CONTRACT REVENUE· NORTH RICHLAND HIllS PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET ,2002 BUDGET (1106.3160) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.468% (1108.3160) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.468%
Rounding T olal Annual Requirement (3170) CONTRACT REVENUE -DUNCANVillE (1106.3170) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.133% (1108.3170) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.133% Rounding
Total Annual Requirement (3180) CONTRACT REVENUE· KEllER (1106.3180) Operation & Maintenance $23,602,030 x 1.608% (1108.3180) Debl Service $31,011,893 x 1.608% Rounding Total Annual
Requirement (3190) CONTRACT REVENUE· SOUTHLAKE (1106.3190) Operation & Maintenance $23.602,030 x 1.132% (1108.3190) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.132% Rounding TOlal Annual Requirement
/3200) CONTRACT REVENUE· CEDAR Hill (1106.3200) Operation 8. Maintenance $23,602,030 x 0.200% (1108.3200) 1108.3200) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 0.200% Rounding Total Annual Requirement
$ 110,457.50 145,135.66 (3.16) $ 255,590 $ 195,640 31,390.70 41,245,82 3.48 72,640 69,080 379,520.64 498,671.24 (1.88) 878,190 836,500 267,174.98 351,054.63 0.39 618,230 586,910 47,204.06
62,023.79 2.15 109,230 84,710 Page 12 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED OaM BUDGET -ASCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET {3210} CONTRACT REVENUE -ADDISON (1106.3210) Operalion a Mainlenance $23,602,030 x 1.518% (1108.321) Debt Service $31,011,893 x 1.518% Rounding Tolal
Annual Requirement $ 358.278.82 470,760.53 0.65 $ 829,040 $ 839,020 11106.3380jINTER-FUND SERVICES a CHARGES Clean Rivers Program (TNRCC) Ten Mile Creek Denlon Creek Red Oak Creek Tarrant
County Walker-Calloway Branches Mountain Creek Northeast Lakeview Joe Pool Lake Total Annual Requirement 70,000.00 193,360.00 36,600.00 11,100.00 35,600.00 21,000.00 16,680.00 5,100.00
25,000.00 414,340 {1106.3390] OPERATING OVERHEAD -OTHER PROJECTS DCURD#1 356,390.00 Ten Mile Creek 19,520.00 Denton Creek 9,260.00 Red Oak Creek 3,920.00 Tarranl County 28,080.00 Total
Annual Requirement 417,170 693,190 11106.3980) PROFESSIONAL FEES 450,000 450,000 11108.3810) INTEREST INCOME -I & S 229,600 489,580 (1108.3820) INTEREST INCOME· RESERVE FUND 1,147,800
1,416,420 {110.8.3840\ INTEREST INCOME· REVENUE FUND 123,500 336,320 (1108.3870) INTEREST INCOME· EMERGENCY FUND 44,000 93,030 (1106.3400) OVERSTRENGTH SURCHARGE 600,000 600,000 (1106.3410)
NORTHEAST LAKEVIEW LIFT STATION 14,650 (1106.3430) PRETREATMENT REVENUE 22,000 22,000 (1106.3440) COMMODITY CHARGE 51,810 51,810 {1106.3480j QUANTITY SURCHARGE City of Addison 36,800
36,800 {1106.3990} MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 268,440 10,000 Page 13 ) 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FlSCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES NUMBER OF BUDGET DESCRIPTION EMPLOYEES AMOUNT Salanes
Under the Salary Administration Plan for the Following: Manager, Cen!ral Regional Wastewater System 1 Maintenance Engineer 1 Sub-Total 2 Manager, System Operation 1 Operations Division
Chief 2 Chief Operator 8 Senior Operator 7 Operator II 17 Operator I 7 Maintenance Division Chief 2 Chief Maintenance Mechanic 6 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 20 Maintenance Mechanic II
11 Maintenance Mechanic I 2 EJE Division Chief 1 Chief Electrician 1 Chief Electronic Technician 1 Senior Electrlcian 2 Senior Electronic Technician 3 Electronic T echnicial " 1 Electrician"
3 Senior HVAC Technician 1 Process Maint Planner/Scheduler 0 Information Systems Technician 0 Process Systems Automation Engineer 1 Sub-Total 97 Page 14 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES DESCRIPTION Manager, Technical Services laboralory
Division Chief Laboralory Supervisor Quaility Assurance Coordinalor Senior Biologist Senior Chemist Biologist Chemist Laboratory Technician II Laboratory Technician I laboratory T echnicianIBookkeepe
r Technical Services Engineer Environmental Services Coordinator Interceptor System Specialist Chief Maintenance Mechanic Senior Maintenance Mechanic Maintenance Mechanic II Chief Electronic
Technician (Instrument Technician) Senior Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) Electronic Technician II (Instrument Technician) Senior Secretary Field Technician II NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES 1 1 3 1 2 5 7 2 2 1 o 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 BUDGET AMOUNT Manager. AdministraUve Services Office Coordinator Senior Secretary Accounting Clerk Training Coordinator PurchasinglWarehouse
PurchaselWarehouse Supervisor Buyer Assistant Buyer Senior Storekeeper Storekeeper Senior Secretary Sub-Total 1 1 5 1 1 Sub-Total 1 2 1 2 1 Sub-Total 7 Total Project Positions WIO Pretreatment
159 
􀁲􀁲􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀢􀀠TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED
REGULAR SALARIES DESCRIPTION Total Project Base Salaries w/Shifl Dift Total Project Holiday and Overtime Pay Rounding Total Project Salaries Pretreatment Pretreatment Coordinator Senior
Secretary Environmental Inspector Senior Field T echnidan Field Technician II Total Pretreatment Positions Total Pretreatment Base Salaries wlShift Dift Total Pretreatment Holidayand Overtime Pay Rounding Tolal Pretreatment Salaries Total FY 2003 Budgeted Positions Total FY 2003 Budgeted Salaries NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 1 1 3 2 1 8 167 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 5,903,629 284,781
6,188,410 268,506 8,974 277,480 $ 6,465,890 Page 16 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL (1106.4000}
SALARIES· REGULAR (01) PROJECT 157 Employees $ 6,151,040.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 8 Employees 277,480.00 Total Salaries· Regular {1106.40101 SALARIES· PART·TIME {110SA0201 PAYROLL TAXES·
FlCA (01) PROJECT $ 6,188,410.00 x 7.65% = 473,413.37 (01) PRETREATMENT $ 277,480.00 x 7.65% = 21,227.22 Rounding 10.59) Total Payroll Taxes· Fica {110S,40301 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT· HEAL
THiLlFE INSURANCE PROJECT (01) Health $ 223.70 X $ 352.62 X $ 306.03 X $ 399.19 X Provision for increase 109 X 7X 11 X 18 X 12 12 12 12 25% 292,599.60 29,620.08 40,395.96 86,225.04 112,210.17
(02) Life Insurance/AD&D: 34,274.00 (03) Long Term Disability: 22,863.00 (04) Employee Assistance Program: 4,770.00 PRETREATMENT (01) HeaHh $ 223.70 X 7X 12 18,790.80 $ 352.62 X OX 12
$ 306.Q3 X OX 12 $ 399.19 X 1 X 12 4,790.28 Provision for increase 25% 5,895.27 (02) Life Life Insurance: 1,548.00 (03) Long Term Disability: 1,027.00 (04) Employee Assistance Program:
240.00 rounding Total Emp. Ben.· Heallhllife Insurance PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 6,428,520 $ 6,251,780 37,370 494,640 478,260 655,250 411,770 Page 17 
􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾..-TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT
NUMBERJDESCRIPTION DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET (1106.4040) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT. PENSION (01 )PROJECT $ 708,440.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 32,220.00 Total Emp. Ben .• Pension $ 740,660 $ 715,800
(1106.4060) UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (01) PROJECT 19,300.00 (01 ) PRETREATMENT 700.00 Total Unemployment Compensation 20,000 20,000 (1106.4010) EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM (01) PROJECT
SelVice Awards $ 16,280.00 (01) PR ETREA TMENT Total Employee Recognition Program 16,280 15,260 (1106.4080) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT. EDUCATION (01) PROJECT 6,200.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 800.00
Total Employee Benefit -Education 1,000 9,000 T alai Personal SelVices 8,399,720 1,423,610 (1106.4100) OFFICE SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Consumables 16,600.00 (02) Non-Consumables 9,150.00
(03) Computer/Copier Supplies 14,500.00 (OS) Vending and lunchroom Supplies 8,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Consumables 300.00 (02) Non-Consumables 500.00 (03) Computer/Copier Supplies 1,000.00
(05) Vending and lunchroom Supplies 150.00 T olal Office Supplies 50,200 51,200 (1106.4110) DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT (01) Professionaiffechnical Memberships AMSNAVVWA 12,000.00 American
Society for Human Resources 390.00 American Waler Resource Association 250.00 Chlorine Inslitute 700.00 Natl Assoc of Purchasing Managers 700.00 Nat Safety CounciiffX Safety Association
210.00 TX Water Utilities Association 700.00 WEFIWEAT 1,520,00 WERF 34,000.00 (02) PerlodicalslMagazines/Newspapers 2,800.00 (03) Reference Books 1,400.00 Page 18 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PRETREATMENT (01)
ProfessionallTechnical Memberships AMSAlAWWA (03) Reference Books Total Dues and Subscriptions PROPOSED DETAIL $ 210.00 970.00 11106.4120) FEES OTHER THAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT:
(Ol) Certification Fees (02) TNRCC WW Inspect & WQA Fees $ 5,400.00 75,000.00 (05) TNRCC Sludge Fee (06) Tier Two Fees 100.00 10.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Certification Fees Total Fees Other
Than Dues & Subscriptions (1106.41301 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Repair/Replacement of Hand Tools (02) Operational Supplies (03) Maintenance Supplies [04) Ground
Care Supplies (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies (06) Electrical Supplies (07) facilities Supplies (08) Protective/Safely Equipment PRETREATMENT (01) RepairlReplacemenl of Hand Tools
(02) Operational Supplies (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies: Total Maintenance and Operating Supplies (1106.4140) LAB SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Gases (02) Water System (03) Bacli-Filters,
Media and Supplies (04) AA, ICP, and IR Supplies (05) Gas Chromatog Supplies (06) TOC and MCTS-l0 Supplies (07) Lab Apparatus (08) Chemical Reagents (09j Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables
(10) filters, Glass fiber, Prefilters and Membram 25,300.00 17,000.00 27,000.00 13,000.00 6,000.00 28,000.00 15,000.00 35,000.00 280.00 150.00 13,000.00 4,000.00 60,000.00 5,000.00 13,000.00
3,000.00 22,000.00 63,000.00 55,000.00 20,000.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 55,850 $ 54,860 80,910 86,910 166,930 146,590 Page 19 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBERJDESCRIPTfON
DETAIL 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET (1106.41401 LAB SUPPLIES (Continuedl PRETREATMENT (11) Field Sampling Supplies (12) Operational Supplies (13) Nuclear Sources -Wipe Test & Reloif (14)
Other -Freight and Shipping (07) Lab Apparatus (08) Chemical Reagents and Standards (09) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables (11) Field Sampling Supplies (14) Other -Freight and Shipping
Totallab Supplies 1,000.00 5,000.00 300.00 1,000.00 850.00 500.00 2,900.00 10,500.00 300.00 $ 280,350 $ 273,350 (1106.4150) PROCESS CHEMICALS AND SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Ume (02) Fernc
Chloride (03) Chlorine (04) Polymer (05) Hydrochlonc Acid (05) Sodium Hydroxide (07) Citric Acid (08) Filter Cloths (09) Tie Wraps, Bags, Sludge Judges, Etc. (10) T astelOdor Control
(11) Boiler Chemicals (12) Sulfur Dioxide 1,107.278.00 251,328.00 292,500.00 476,784.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 8,000.00 500.00 68,000.00 7.000.00 150,000.00 2,000.00 155,610.00 Total Process
Chemicals and Supplies 2,524,000 2,421,900 (1106.4160) FUEL, OIL, AND LUBRICANTS PROJECT (01) Gasoline (02) Diesel Fuel (03) Solvents/Cleaners (04) Anti-Freeze (05) Grease (06) Lubricants
(07) Propane 35,770.00 19.000.00 12,000.00 1,880.00 5,450.00 25,000.00 250.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Gasoline (04) Anti-Freeze (05) Grease (06) lubricants 4,000.00 30.00 50.00 200.00 Total
Fuel, 011, and Lubricants 103,630 104,440 Page 20 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 20()3 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL (1106.4110)
COMPUTER SOFTWARE, LICENSES & INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Metering Supplies $ 13,000.00 (02) Instrument Repair 16,000.00 (03) Drafting/Engineering Supplies 5,000.00 (04) Line Surveillance
3,000.00 (05) FM Telernetry 2,000.00 (06) Metering Electrical Repairs 5,000.00 (07) GIL. HR & PR Software 250,080.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Metering Supplies 150.00 (02) Instrument Repair
300.00 Total Computer and Instrument Supplies Tolal Supplies 11106.42(0) AUDITING (01) Audit (1106.4210) ENGINEERING PROJECT (01) Engineering Studies 83,090.00 (02) III Prorations 80,000.00
(03) Triennial Report/Annual Update 25,000.00 (04) Pipeline Repairs/Erosion Control 35,000.00 Total Engineering 111()6.422()) LEGAL (01) Legal 􀀨􀀱􀀱􀀰􀀶􀀮􀀴􀁾􀀳􀀰􀀱􀀠OUTSIDE SERVICES
PROJECT (01) AdvertiSing 60,000.00 (02) Graphics, Displays, Etc. 7,000.00 (03) Construction Services Charges 50,000.00 (04) Security Monttoring/Support 17,560.00 (05) Solid Waste Disposal
(Odor Control) 34,000.00 (06) Contract Labor 10,000.00 (07) PC/Networ1<lSCADA Support 373,680.00 (08) Software Maintenance -GIL, HR & PR 90,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Advertising 1,150.00
(02) Graphics, Displays, Etc. 200.00 (06) Contract Labor 1.000.00 Total Outside Services PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2()02 BUDGET $ 294,530 3,556,400 37,500 $ 37,950 3,177,200 36,000
223,090 20,000 160,000 20,000 644,590 335,620 Page 21 
ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION {1106.42401 OTHER PROFESSIOtll!L SEBlllCES PROJECT (01) Drug Testing (02) U.S.G.S.Payments (03) Motor Vehicle Reports (04) Outside Testing -Laboratory (05)
Custodian Fees (06) NEXRAIN Studies PRETREATMENT (01) Drug Testing (04) Outside Testing -Laboratory Total Other Professional Services (1106.43001 TELEPHONE & TELEMETERIN!i! PROJECT (01)
T elephoneiT elemetering (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (62) (04) Internet Access PRETREATMENT (01) TelephoneiTelemeteling (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (7) Total Telephone
& Telemetering (1106.4310) POSTA!i!E PROJECT (01) Postage Meter (02) Stamps/Shipping PRETREATMENT (01) Postage Meter (02) Stamps/Shipping Total Postage (1106.43201 PRINTING AND BINDING
PROJECT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary (03) Manuals, Handbooks, Etc. PRETREATMENT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary Total Printing
and Binding TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT DETAIL
2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 10,000.00 26,500.00 1,200.00 86,000.00 52,000.00 20,000.00 2,000.00 $ 197,700 $ 175,650 28,000.00 5,400.00 41,640.00 10,820.00 1,000.00 360.00 3,840.00 91,060
105,570 3,300.00 4,500.00 500.00 220.00 8,520 8,220 3,550.00 3,200.00 3,000.00 950.00 310.00 11,010 12,730 t Page 22 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION (1106.4330) INSURANCE
PAYMENTS PROJECT (01) Fire (02) General Uability (03) Automobile (04) Contractor Equipment (05) Workers' Compensation (06) 􀁄􀁩􀁲􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁯􀁲􀀯􀁏􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁣􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠liability (07) Blanket
Bond (08) Equipment Floater Total Insurance Payments (1106.4360) TRAVEL PROJECT (01) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority Business PRETREATMENT (01) CRWS Employees
on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority Business Total Travel 11106.4370) LAUNDRY, UNIFORM & IND, EQUIP. PROJECT (01) Uniform Rental (03) Patches/Hats (04) Towels, Mops, Mats
PRETREATMENT (01) Uniform Rental Total laundry, Uniform. & Ind, Equip. 11106.43801 TRAINING PROJECT (01) Training Wastewater Certification Training Safety Training Technical Training
Enhanced Skills/Supervisory Training Training ManualsNideos Purchasing Certification Classes PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED 2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET $ 81,550.00 15,750.00 26,390.00
136,440.00 17,050.00 1,490.00 8,760.00 $ 287,430 $ 179,420 15,550.00 750.00 3,000.00 19,300 16,500 38,770.00 650.00 9,000.00 650.00 49,070 44,350 11,900.00 11,920.00 23,320.00 9,450.00
8,410.00 3,000.00 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCR1PTION PRETREATMENT (01)
Training Wastewater Certificafion Training Safety Training Technical Training Enhanced SkillslSupervisory Training Training ManualsMdeos Total Training (1106.4400) UTILITIES PROJECT
(01) Natural Gas (02) Water Total Utilijies {1106.44201 POWER (01) Power (1106.44301 R & M -COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT (01) Meter Slation Structure Rehabilitation (02) Manhole/Junction
Box Rehabilitation (03) System RepairslLine CleaningfTV (04) Lift StationlROW Maintenance Total R & M -Collection System (1106.4440) R & M -EQUIPMENT PROJECT (01) Shop Equipment (02)
Dumpsters (03) Compressors and Generators (04) Fuel Powered and Electrical Equipment (05) Office and Video Equipment (06) Analytical Equip Repair -Non Contract (07) Service Contracts-Analytical
Equipment (08) Perkins-Elmer Equipment (09) Mowersffractors (10) Tracked Vehicles & Heavy Equipment (11) Carts (12) Heavy Trucks (13) Trailers (15) Tire Repair (16) High Pressure Unijo
(17) Forklifts Total R & M -Equipment PROPOSED DETAIL 600.00 600.00 1,180.00 220.00 85,000.00 35,000.00 20,000.00 21,000.00 317,750.00 11,000.00 4,000.00 5,400.00 4,500.00 11,200.00
5,100.00 29,000.00 10,000.00 14.000.00 12.000.00 55,000.00 1,000.00 50,000.00 15,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 70,600 $ 111,940 120,000
4,553,480 105,000 4,832,800 369,750 245,000 223,200 218,300 Page 24 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION 11106.4450) R & M
-PLANT AND BUILDINGS PROJECT (01) Packing and Seals (02) Road Repair Malerials (03) Machine Shop Slack (04) Mechanical Plating and Coaling (05) Clarifiers, Aeration, Equalization Basins
(06) Specialized Balancing and Machining (07) Valves, Valve Operators, Pipe, Etc, (08) Positive Displacement Pumps/Repairs (09) Filter Press Parts (10) Pump Repair, Pump Parts, Machining
(11) Conveyer System Parts (12) Industrial Air/Oil Fillers (13) Power Transmission PartsJRepairs (14) Building/Slructural Repair {15} Chlorination/Dechlorination {16} Railroad Repairs
{17} Stonnwater Regulations· Street Cleaning {18} Blower Parts/Repairs (19) Crane Inspection & Servicing {20} Anaerobic Digester Clean/Rehab Total R & M -Plant and Buildings (1106.44601
R & M -VEHICLES PROJECT (01) Automobiles (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair (04) Other-Batteries, Wiper Blades, etc, PRETREATMENT (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair Total R & M -Vehicles
PROPOSED DETAIL $ 15,000.00 30,000,00 5,000,00 28,000,00 25,000,00 5,000,00 40,000,00 125,000,00 24,000,00 130,000,00 22,000,00 4,000,00 40,000,00 15,000,00 15,000,00 21,000,00 9,600,00
39,000,00 17,000,00 120,000,00 5,000,00 28,000,00 6,400,00 2,000,00 1,500,00 600,00 PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 729,600 $ 777,350 43,500 40,400 Page 25 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAlLED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION DETAIL (1106.4480)
R & M • ELECTRICAL PROJECT (01) Components $ 30,000,00 (02) Signal Cable and Wire 6,000,00 (03) Electronic Equipment Repair 69,000,00 (04) Repairs of Pneumatic Systems 1,000,00 (05)
FM Telemetry 2,000,00 (06) Computer Maintenance 30,000.00 (07) Vendor Service/Repair 50,000,00 (08) Calibration 5,000,00 (09) Electrical Parts & Materials 150,000.00 (10) Molor Overhaul
100,000,00 (11) HVAC Parts and Repair 138,000.00 (12) Elevator Repair and Service 5,000,00 (13) Cathodic Test 1,000,00 Total R & M • Electrical (1106.4490) OFF.sITE BIOSOLID LAND APPLICATION
(02) Beneficial Reuse (1106.4510) RENT· MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT PROJECT (01) Cranes and Other Heavy Equipment 15,000.00 (02) Compressors and Special Equipment 14,000,00 (03) Postage Meter
1,500,00 (04) Tool Rental 1,000,00 (05) Copier Rental 36,020.00 (07) Cylinder Rental 8,000.00 (08) Other Rental 4,000,00 T olal Renl • Machinery & EqUipment (1106.4669) ADMINISTRATIVE
OVERHEAD PROJECT (01) Related Cost Method Allocation Total Other Services and Charges PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 587,000 2,665,190 $ 510,150 2,534,140 79,520 1,754,570
12,785,660 88,810 1,545,960 12,104,910 Page 26 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET PROPOSED PROPOSED CURRENT ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION
DETAIL 2003 BUOGET 2002 BUDGET (1106,4760) MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (01 )PROJ ECT -Replacement: (1) Sedan $ 17,000.00 (1) Reception Area Sofa 1,500.00 (2) Reception Area Chairs 750.00 (2)
Reception Area Tables 750.00 (2) Compact Trucks 24,000.00 (3) MCC/PLC Cabinet-5 Ton Spot Coolers 30,000.00 (1) 2300 Volt Power Dis!. Transformer PS#6 10,000.00 (1) Process Control Signal
Controller Software 2,750.00 (4) Portable Laptop Programmers 7,000.00 (1) Laser Jet Color Printer 3.500.00 (4) Heavy Duly Infrared Heaters 4.000.00 (1) 800m Truck 180,000.00 (1) Tractor
40,000.00 (1) Sludge Hauling Trailer 28,000.00 (1) Hot Water Pressure Washer 7,000.00 (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotor 150,000.00 (1) Laboratory Distillation System 22,000.00
(1) Heated Graphite Atomic Absorption Unit 62,000.00 (1) Microbiological Heat Sealing Unit 2,000.00 (6) Ultra Sonic Flow Meters 9,600.00 (2) Portable AreaNelocily Flow Meters 6,200.00
(1) Global Position System (GPS/GIS) InstL 20,000.00 (1) Truck Camper 1,650.00 (1) 3/4 Ton 4X4 Truck 24,000.00 (1) 12 inch Pipe Saw 1,600.00 (2) T ruck Winches 2.200,00 $ 657,500 $ 704,550
PRETREATMENT-Replacement: (1) Cont. pH & Temp Module/Data Recorder 2,290.00 2,290 38,000 Page 27 • " 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION PROPOSED DETAIL PROPOSED
2003 BUDGET CURRENT 2002 BUDGET (02) PROJECT-New: (3) Portable Gas Detectors (1) 2-Way Emerg. Response Radio Interface (1) 30 Cubic Yard Dumpster (2) 3 inch Portable 13HP Gas-Driven
Pumps (2) Bar Screen Lubrication System (1) Gate Valve Portable Power Drive (4) Electronic Equipment Cabinets (1) Fiber Cable Termination Kit (1) Teleconferencing Equipment (1) Network
Performance Analyzer Software (1) Trailer Axle Assembly (1) Gasoline Hand Auger (1) Vactor/Rodder Decant Pump (4) 2-Way Radio Noise Reduced Headsets (1) Portable H2S Monitors & Recorders
(1) Confined Space Fall Arrestor (1) Confined Space Manlift (1) Portable Diesel Light Standard Electronic SUlVeiliance Equipment (1) Vactor/Rodder Easement Reel Assembly $ 5,700.00 4,000.00
4,500.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 1,300.00 8,000.00 2,750.00 19,900.00 1,850.00 14,000.00 2,400.00 5,200.00 5,600.00 5,600.00 2,400.00 2,300.00 7,500.00 288,400.00 32,000.00 $ 424,400 $ 145,400
PRETREATMENT-New (1) Utility Vehicle (1) Camper for Ulility Vehicle 23,000.00 1,600.00 24,600 Total Machinery and Equipment 1,108,790 887,950 Page 28 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2003 CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION 11108.4800) BONO PRINCIPAL
PAYMENTS Due 810112003: Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 19988 Series 2001 Total Bond Principal Payments 11108.4810) INTEREST ON LONG TERM·DEBT Due 2101/2003: Series 1993
Series 1995 Series 1995A Series 1998B Series 2001 Due 810112003: Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 1995A Series 19988 Series 2001 Adjustment for Accrual Total Bond Interest Payments 11108.4830)
PAYING AGENT FEES Total Debt Service PROPOSED DETAIL 10,245,000.00 1,855,000.00 2,220,000.00 2,105,000.00 5,000.00 4,098,594.38 262,951.25 833,566.25 1,408,403.75 1,426,051.25 4,098,594.38
262,951.25 833,566.25 1,408,403.75 1.426,051.25 (274,013.76) PROPOSED CURRENT 2003 BUDGET 2002 BUDGET $ 16,430,000 $ 15,580,000 15,785,120 14,674,200 12,000 26,000 32,227,120.00 30,280,200.00
Page 29 • 
?5-J3 -o?.. l 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Office August 31, 2001 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System NOTICE -Tuesday, September 11,2001, 11 a.m. MEETING
PLACE -Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 6500 West Singleton Blvd, Grand Prairie, Texas A meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee has been scheduled
for 11 a.m., Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at the Central ReglOIIal wastewater Treatment Plant In Grand Prairie. at 6500 West Singleton Blvd. Lunch will be served immediately following
the meeting. Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott before Monday, September 10, 2001, at 817-493-5100 or abbottC@trinityra..org. The purpose of this meeting will be the recommendation of the
proposed FY 2002 System Operations and Maintenance Budget for approval by the Authority's Board of Directors at their October meeting. A Budget Workshop was held on Thursday, August
23, 2001, and we believe all questions raised in the workshop have been answered. We have enclosed an Agenda and minutes of the August 10, 2001, meeting for your review prior to the
September 11t11 meeting. We encourage each party served by the System to send a representative to this meeting. aJtUfNI rJ. 􀁾􀁾􀀠WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNBIcea
c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS p,o, Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004·0240 0. Recycled Paper (817) 493-5100 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth
Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N. Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENTATIVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Elzie Odom Councilmember Jim Griffin
Mr. Milbum Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Bill Lindley Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Thomas M. Dunning Mr. Kent Cagle Councilmember Glenn Porterfield Councilmember Paul Walden
Mr. Dale Fisseler Council member Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Councilmember Lewis Patrick Mr. Ed IIschner Councilmember Blake Evans Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak
Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Wanda Stovall Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. III. Introduction of Guests, Guests, Consultants and Authority staff IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe August 10.
2001 Meeting 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
V. Status Reports A. Operations B. Financial C. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning VI. Action: Proposed FY2002 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Review of Budget Philosophy,
Strategies, Objectives, and Contents B. Committee Action on Proposed FY 2002 Budget VII. Other Business VIII. AdJourn to Lunch 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 2001, 10:30 A.M. I. Call to Order -Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll. II. Roll Call ENTITY Addison
Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N.
Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT/ABSENT Mr. Michael Murphy Ms. Fiona Allen f/Mayor Elzie Odom Mr. Justin Brown f/Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr.
Milburn Gravley Mr. Jim Sparks f/Mr. Greg Porter Ms. Terry Leake f/Ms. Dianne McWethy Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Larry Patterson f!Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Dan Bergman f/Mr. Thomas M. Dunning
Mr. Dennis Scharwtz f/Mr. Kent Cagle Mr. Randy Byers f/Councilmember Glenn Porterfield Mr. Mark Pavageaux f/Councilmember Paul Walden Mr. Robert McMillon f!Mr. Dale Fisseler Councilmember
Richard Fregoe Mr. Matt Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Mr. Jim Siddall f/Councilmember Lewis Patrick Mr. John Wedele f/Mr. Ed IIschner Mr. Bud Ervin f/Councilmember Blake
Evans Mr. David Smith f/Mr. Mike Curtis Mr. Jim Funderburg f/Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Wanda Stovall Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Present Present Present Present
Present Present Absent Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Absent Present III. Introduction ofGuests.
Consultants and Authority Staff Authority Staff: Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith, John Owens, Randy Brooks, John Nelson, Bill Decker, Cheryl Abbott, John Jadrosich, Bill
Tatum, Mike Young, and Bill Cyrus. 1 
Guests: Arlington -John Kubala and Rick McClery carrollton -Dudley St. Clair Dallas -Maria Alicia Garcia Euless -Ron Young Grand Prairie -Ron McCuller First Southwest Company -Boyd London
Alan Plummer Associates -Alan Plummer Black & Veatch -layne Parsons and Kelly McGlothin Freese & Nichols -Ray Longoria IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe January 24, 2001 Meeting Chairman
Gravley asked if there were any corrections or revisions to the minutes of the January 24, 2001 meeting. There being none, Robert McMillon made a motion to approve the minutes as presented,
Larry Patterson seconded the motion, and a unanimous vote followed. V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum updated Members on the effluent flows from August 2000 through July 2001;
effluent quality; the numerous outflows that had occurred with the wet weather; System repairs due to outflows; the belt presses being put on line; an increase in disinfections; and
increased cost in electricity and chemicals. B. Financial -Patricia Cleveland reported that the FY 2000 settle ups had been mailed earlier and that this was the third year that the III
proration method had been used. She stated that the FY 2001 mid-year reallocations had been sent to the Contracting Parties and that it reflected increases in fuel and chemical costs.
C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland told Attendees that on April 1" TRA began using 162 MGD as its final limits on the discharge permit and that we were now reporting rolling 12-month
averages instead of monthly flows. She explained that the Authority staff had sent the modified pretreatment program to the EPA and TNRCC and we should soon receive the approved pretreatment
program. D. Capital Improvement Planning (1) Planning, Design. Construction (2) Series 2001 SRF Bonds Randy Brooks referred to the construction status report that had been distributed
and gave a summary on the Series 2001 SRF bonds that were sold in February for $88.25 million to continue the improvements and expansion of the CRWS facility. VI. Discussion: Presentation
of Proposed FY 2002 Operating and Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations C. Budget Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review 2 
Warren Brewer explained the fIVe P's of efficiency used in preparing the FY 2002 Budget: planning, purchasing, personnel, processes, and power. Patricia Cleveland then gave a detailed
presentation on the proposed FY 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System Operating and Maintenance Budget. VII. Other Business A. Eiectrical Power Supply Planning: Infonmation Warren
Brewer gave a summary on the Authority's approach to the Senate Bill 7 electric utility deregulation bill that gives electric customers a choice of their Retail ElectriC Provider (REP)
beginning January 1, 2002. He stated that a decision should be made by the end of September as to whether TRA would select a REP for the Authority's electrical provider, or join with
other agencies for a better power contract. B. Mountain Creek Regional Wastewater System Planning: Infonmation Warren Brewer briefed everyone on Midlothian's interest in joining the
Central System last year. He then stated that several months ago, the cities of Grand Prairie and Midlothian had approached the Authority concerning the possibility of TRA developing
and operating a new regional system and that he expects negotiations to be finalized by the end of the year. C. Blosollds Land Application Planning: Information Warren Brewer stated
that CRWS produced both Class A and Class B blosolids for land application on private land. He added that criticism had been leveled by citizens throughout the state to the TNRCC about
the use of Class B biosollds, and he expected that most future permitting would be for Class A only. D. Patricia Cleveland presented Bill Tatum with the American Metropolitan Sewage
Association Gold Award, stating that the Central System had met all penmlt requirements for the year 2000. VIII. Adjourn to Lunch Chairman Gravley adjoumed the meeting at 11 :55 a.m.
and invited guest to remain for lunCh. 3 
/TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEeTING AGENDA CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWA TER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXAS FRIDAY, AUGUST 10,2001, 10:30 A.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ENTfTY Addison Arlington Bedford Carrollton Cedar Hill Colleyville Coppell Dallas D/FW Airport Duncanville Euless
Farmers Branch Fort Worth Grand Prairie Grapevine Hurst Irving Keller Mansfield N. Richland Hills Southlake Trinity River Authority REPRESENT A TlVE Mr. Michael Murphy Mayor Elzie Odom
Councilmember Jim Griffin Mr. Milburn Gravley Mr. Greg Porter Mr. Dianne McWethy Mr. Ken Griffin Mr. Terrace Stewart Mr. Thomas M. Dunning Mr. Kent Cagle Councilmember Glenn Porterfield
Council member Paul Walden Mr. Dale Fisseler Councilrnember Richard Fregoe Mr. Jerry Hodge Mr. Ron Haynes Councilmember Lewis Patrick Mr. Ed Iischner Councilrnember Blake Evans Mr. Mike
Curtis Mr. Pedram Farahnak Mr. Danny F. Vance Director Wanda Stovall Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. III. Introduction ofGuests. Consultants and Authority Staff IV. Approval ofMinutes
ofthe January 24. ;2001 Meeting 1 PRESENT/ABSENT 
V. Status Reports A. OperationsB Financial c. Regulatory D. Capital Improvement Planning (1) Planning, Design. Construction (2) Series 2001 SRF Bonds VI. Dlscu$$ion: Presentation of Proposed FY 2002 Operating and
Maintenance Budget A. Budget Philosophy and Strategies B. System Flows and Allocations c. Budget Objectives D. Detailed Budget Review VII. Other Busine$$ A. Electrical Power Supply Planning:
Information B. Mountain Creek Regional Wastewater System Planning: Information C. Biosolids Land Application Planning: Information VIII. Adjourn to Lunch 2 
) TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND
PRAIRIE, TEXAS WEDNESDAY, JANUARY24, 2001, 10:SOA.M. I. Call to Order -Chairman Gravley called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m. and asked Warren Brewer to call roll. II. Roll Call
ENTITY REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT/ABSENT Addison Mr. Michael Murphy Present Arlington Mr. Charles Anderson f/Mayor Elzie Odom Present Bedford Councilmember Karin Newell Absent Carrollton
Mr. Milburn Gravley Present Cedar Hill Mr. Jim Sparks f/Mr. Greg Porter Present Colleyville Mr. Dianne McWethy Absent Coppell Mr. Ken Griffin Absent Dallas Mr. Larry Patterson f/Mr.
Terrace Stewart Present D/FW Airport Mr. Rusty Hodapp flMr. Thomas M. Dunning Present Duncanville Mr. Bill Willborn f/Mr. Kent Cagle Present Euless Councilmember Glenn Porterfield Present
Farmers Branch Councilmember Paul Walden Present Fort Worth Mr. Robert McMillon f/Mr. Dale Fisseler Present Grand Prairie Mr. Doug Cunny f/Counclimember Richard Fregoe Present Grapevine
Mr. Matt Singleton f/Mr. Jerry Hodge Present Hurst Mr. Ron Haynes Absent Irving Councilmember James Dickens Present Keller Mr. Ed IIschner Present Mansfield Mr. Chris Burkett f/Councilmember
Blake Evans Present N. Richland Hills Mr. Greg Dickens Present Southlake Mr. Pedram Farahnak f/Mr. James Campbell Present Trinity River Authority Mr. Danny F. Vance Present Director
Wanda Stovall Present Director Hector Escamilla, Jr. Absent III. Introduction ofGu!Sts, Consultants and Authority Staff Introduced were Warren Brewer, Patricia Cleveland, Bill Smith,
Randy Brooks, John OWens, John Nelson, Cheryl Abbott, John Jadrosich, Bill Tatum, Bill Cyrus, Mike Young, and Shelley Flalho with the Authority. 1 
Others Present: City of Arlington -Rick Cleary and Tim Barbee City of Carrollton -Dudley SI. Clair and Steve Jenkins City of Farmers Branch -Mark Velton and Paul Lunsford City of Fort
Worth -Buster Fischera City of Irving -Jim Siddall and Bob Chapman City of Keller -John Wendele City of Mansfield -Bud Ervin City of North Richland Hills -Larry Kootnz City of Southlake
-Mike Patterson Alan Plummer Associates -Alan Plummer and Mark Perkins Black & Veatch -Layne Parsons Freese & Nichols -Ray Longoria First Southwest Company -Boyd London and Mary Williams
McCall, Parkhurst and Horton -Chuck Kobdish IV. Approval ofMinutes ofthe September 12,2000 Meeting Chairman Gravley asked if there were any corrections or revisions to the minutes of
the September 12, 2000 meeting. There being none, Charles Anderson made a motion to accept the minutes as presented. A second was made by Greg Dickens and a unanimous vote follOWed.
V. Status Reports A. Operations -Bill Tatum gave a slide presentation summarizing System operations and permit parameters for the prior 13 months. Other items in his report included:
the west Arlington flows entered the System in August 2000; DFW Airport's need to release their detention basins to CRWS due to December's back to back deicings; and the $5 million sludge
improvements that will begin in February. B. Financial -Patricia Cleveland discussed the FY 2000 actual flows and their impact on the FY 2000 Budget; updated attendees on the current
FY 2001 Budget; and stated that work on the FY 2002 Budget was in the early stages. C. Regulatory -Patricia Cleveland stated that the Central System had received its new TPDES permit
and as soon as the solids dewatering improvements were completed and the TNRCC notified, the permit would be upgraded. D. Capital Improvement Planning -Randy Brooks summarized the. projects
that were currently under deSign and construction. VI. Action: Proposed TWDS SRF Funding for Capital Improvements A. Background and facility needs B. Advisory Committee Action -Series
2001 Bonds Randy Brooks gave a presentation on capital improvements and cost that would be included in the Series 2001 Bonds. Warren Brewer summarized the financing options available
for the Series 2001 Bonds and stated that TRA felt that using the Texas Water Development Board's State Revolving Fund would be the most economical. After discussion, Greg Dickens made
a motion to recommend that the TRA Board of Directors approve the Series 2001 Central Regional Wastewater System Bonds using State Revolving Funds through the Texas Water Development
Board. Matt Singleton seconded the motion and a unanimous vote followed. 2 
VII. Other Business Warren Brewer informed members that the City of Midlothian had decided to expand and improve their facilities and would not be joining the Central Regional Wastewater
System. Mr. Brewer explained that TRA was a member of the Texas Water Conservation Association whose mission was water resource management and conservation. He explained that in response
to Senate Bill 7, the TWCA members were conducting an aggregation study to investigate pooling resources and purchasing blocks of electricity. Danny Vance stated that the 1997 Senate
Bill 1 Regional Planning Groups had completed their plans and that the Texas Water Development Board was in the process of meshing the 16 district plans into one plan. Mr. Vance also
updated attendees on legislative issues, including a supplemental bill to the 1997 Senate Bill 1 (Senate Bill 2) and a recodification bill that would combine all river authorities and
water districts into one bill. VIII. Adjourn to Lunch -There being no other business, Chairman Gravley adjoumed the meeting at 12 noon and invited attendees to stay for lunch. 3 
Trinity RiverAuthority of Texas Northern Region Office _. August 3, 2001 3110.102 MEMBERS, Advisory Committee Central Regional Wastewater System REMINDER NOTICE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT 6500 WEST SINGLETON BLVD., GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS THIS IS A REMINDER notice for the meeting of the Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee scheduled for 10:30
a.m., Friday, August 10, 2001 at the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant In Grand Prairie, at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. You are invited to lunch immediately
follOwing the meeting. Please RSVP to Cheryl Abbott at 817-493-5100 or abbottC@trinltyra.org. This meeting will include the presentation and explanation of the FY 2002 Operating and
Maintenance Budget for the Central Regional Wastewater System. An agenda and minutes of the January 24, 2001 meeting are attached for your review. If you have questions prior to the
meeting, please contact this office at 817-493-5100. !iJ:2),U:l1 } /:Jt&£,·0<'/-···· WARREN N. N. BREWER Regional Manager Northern Region WNB/cea Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General
Manager Patricia M. Cleveland, Manager, Operations Bill Tatum, Manager, CRWS P.O. Box 240 Arlington, Texas 76004·0240 o Recycled Paper (817) 493·5100 
Trinity River Authority of Texas Northern Region Office AGENDA ITEM VI DATE: August 10, 2001 FILE: 3110.102/3110.800 TO: MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM
RE: Central Regional Wastewater System Proposed FY 2002 Budget Authority management annually prepares a proposed budget of antiCipated revenues and expenditures of the Central Regional
Wastewater System in accordance with the fiscal provisions of our Wastewater Services Contract for the ensuing fiscal year. We are pleased to present to you the proposed FY 2002 Budget
for the annual operating funds of the Central System. This budget is relevant to the time period for December 1, 2001 through November 30, 2002. This budget reflects the proposed financial
activities of operating and debt service funds, provides for our continuing ability to deliver high quality, efficient wastewater service to our Contracting Parties, and will continue
to pOSition the Central System for increased growth, regulatory changes and maximized intemal operational productivity measures to result in cost efficient wastewater treatment. Therefore,
the budget reflects the Authority's continued commitment to keep operational expenses to a minimum and to maximize the process of increasing operational efficiency throughout the Authority.
A brief overview of Central's financial picture for FY 2002 will reveal a decrease in overall System expenditures, with only those increases in operating accounts required to meet contractual
obligations for our treatment of wastewater, as well as a decrease associated with the debt service requirements, as compared to previous year. The operation and maintenance expenditures
were developed based on transporting and treating an average daily flow of 145.522 MGD. The cost of debt service requirements is based on principal and interest payments due on outstanding
Central Regional Wastewater System Revenue Bonds. The anticipated expenditures in FY 2002 total $54,352,130, an approximate 0.29% decrease below the $54,509,150 predicted for the current
fiscal year. The projected costs for salaries and related benefits, office supplies, association dues, TNRCC Expenses fees, laboratory supplies, process .55.71 Debt Service and Mscellaneouschemicals,
fuel, instrument 022.27% Other Services and Ctlargessupplies, audits, engineering .14.54% Personal Services services, outside laboratory .5.85% Supplies .1.63% Capital Outlaysservices,
Authority network and Process SCADA support, profeSSional services, telephone 
" , 
August 10, 2001 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 2 and communication services, postage, Project insurance payments, employee travel, water and power usage, plant, building
and electrical system maintenance repairs, equipment rental, administrative overhead and capital outlays essential for delivering services during the year have increased $3,508,680 above
the predicted FY 2001 Budget, which is $1,908,680 above the FY 2001 Budget, as amended at midyear. The increase in the proposed FY 2002 Budget for operating accounts is partly offset
by a $330,830 reduction in service cost for transportation and beneficial use of biosolids and in other operating category accounts by holding the line on controllable costs, as close
scrutiny was given to all anticipated expenditures. Along with decreases in some predicted operating accounts, there is a reduction in programmed debt payments of $3,334,870, resulting
in an overall projected decrease of $157,020 for FY 2002 expenditures below the FY 2001 Budget Budget as adopted, and $1,757,020 below the FY 2001 Budget, as amended in midyear. As is
evidenced by the following table, Central's predicted gross unit cost!1 000 gallons is $0.001 higher than last year's projection for FY 2002 and is $0.02 less than the adopted budget
gross unit cost. Anticipated FY 2002 revenues from the System's Contracting Parties, totaling Revenue $50,442,440, reflect a 2.5% increase above the FY 2001 projected revenue requirement
of $49,187,660. The resulting .92.29% Contract Reveoue predicted gross and net unit costs of 04.27% Interesllncome .1.35% Miscellaneous Incomeservice for wastewater transportation and
.1.27% Opemling Overtlead Rewnuetreatment throughout FY 2002 are 1.9% .0.92% Professional Fees under and 0.7% over the respective predicted FY 2001 budgeted unit costs as reflected in
the following table: The following exhibits are presented to provide flow allocations, a summary of budget objectives and detailed information about the five major budget categories,
as well as additional quantitative and statistical information for your review: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 0 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Flow
Allocations Budget Objectives Budget at a Glance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital Outlays Debt Service and Miscellaneous Historical System Data Projected
Future Costs of Service 
August 10, 2001 3110.10213110.800 MEMBER, ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 3 The proposed FY 2002 Budget (Exhibit K} is presented for your review and consideration and will be discussed in the
August 10, 2001 Advisory Committee meeting. Additionally, a Budget Workshop will be held in the upstairs conference room of the Administrative Building at the Central Regional Wastewater
System on Thursday, August 23,2001, beginning at 10:00 a.m. for those representatives and city staff members who do not attend the Advisory Committee meeting or desire to discuss the
proposed budget in more detail. A later Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 11th, at which time the committee will be requested to recommend the proposed FY
2002 Budget for adoption by the Authority's Board of Directors. If there are any questions concerning the proposed budget or the workshop, please contact the Northern Region office.
􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠PATRICIA M. CLEVELAND Manager, Operations Northern Region PMC/rrc Attachments c: Danny F. Vance, General Manager Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager, Northern Region Bill Tatum,
Project Manager, Central Regional Wastewater System 
EXHIBIT A CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2002 FLOW ALLOCATIONS BUDGETED FY 2002 FLOWS 45% 40% 0 􀁾􀀠35% '5a:30% 25% f-20% f-15% r-10% 5% 0% CUSTOMER CITY (!l z 
\ 
) EXHIBIT B CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY2002 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Trinity River Authority's Central Regional Wastewater System is a large regional wastewater system
located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork of the Trinity River and is currently serving approximately one million customers in Dallas, Tarrant, Ellis, Johnson and Denton counties
of north central Texas. The service area encompasses all or portions of 20 cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The Central
Regional Wastewater System treatment plant is an advanced secondary facility currently permitted to treat 162 million gallons per day (MGD) This System conSists of an extensive regional
network of interceptors, pipelines, lift stations, meter stations, and facilities for the delivery of treated effluent for golf course irrigation and lake level management under the
first major urban reuse program in Texas. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2002 The Authority's objectives are reflected in the recommended Annual Operating Budget for Central Regional Wastewater
System FY 2002. The major goals and objectives are: • Operate and adequately protect the Central System's capital investments by proper maintenance, which includes a 162 MGD treatment
plant, over 200 miles of interceptors, four lift stations, 138 metering stations, an analytical laboratory, and the DCURD water reuse project. • Provide wastewater transportation and
treatment services for a projected flow contribution of 145.522 MGD. • Continue operating at efficient levels and minimize unit costs while enhancing treatment capacity and meeting all
regulatory requirements. • Continue Authority efforts to reduce overall wet-weather flow impacts to the System by installing new pipelines for capacity, rehabilitating existing collection
system infrastructure and plant facilities as identified in the first and second phases of the 1998 Five Year Plan; funded by the Series 1998A and 2000 Revenue Bonds, and the third phase
funded by the Series 2001 Bonds. • Operate and maintain odor control facilities consistent with the Odor Control Management Plan and implement additional odor improvements in the primary
treatment areas to reduce risk of adjacent area odors. • Provide Contracting Parties laboratory testing and pretreatment program capabilities and services on a revenue-supported basis.
• Continue 100% land application of System biosolids under a five-year agreement. • Respond in a timely fashion to Customer Cities' requests for aSSistance. 
EXHIBIT C FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET AT A GLANCE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROPOSED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Revenue $54,635,440 Expenses $54,352,130 Variance (Retained
for FY 2003 Debt Requirements) $283,310 Revenue .92.29% Contract Revenue IJ 4.27% Interest Income .1.35% Miscellaneous Income .1.27% Operating Overhead Revenue .0.82% Professional Fees
Expenses .55.71 Debt Service and Miscellaneous IJ 22.27% Other Services and Charges .14.54% Personal Services .5.65% Supplies .1.63% capital Outlays FISCAL YEAR 2002 FUND SUMMARY Revenue
Summary Contract Revenue $50,422,440 Operating Overhead $692,390 Professional Fees $450,000 Interest Income $2,335,350 Miscellaneous Income $735,260 T etal Sources of Funds $54,635,440
Expenditure Summary Personal Services $7,901,870 Supplies $3,177,200 Other Services and Charges $12,104,910 Capital Outlays $887,950 Debt Service and Miscellaneous $30,280,200 Total
lication of Funds $54,352130 
EXHIBIT D CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PERSONAL SERVICES FY2002 Q Proposed FY 2002 of $7,901,870 vs Current FY 2001 of $7,213,510 = Variance $688,360 or + 9.5%. Q The budget category
of Personal Services includes seven line item accounts. As compared with present budget, one line item account decreased (-) $200 (Education), one remained unchanged (Unemployment Compensation)
and five increased (+) $688,560 (Salaries, FICA, Health/Life Insurance, Pension, and Employee Service Recognition). Q The anticipated increase in salaries and related benefit costs is
partly due to usual provisions for forecasted salary adjustments based on merit, varying with each individual employee. Also, provisions are included for an April 2001 Authority-wide
salary plan adjustment. Q Authority management believes that the Central facility can be operated efficiently and maintain adequate margins of safety with one Project Manager, an OperalionsiMaintenan
ce staff of 98, plus 52 Technical ServiceslPretreatment staff, Administrative staff of 9, and 7 PurchasinglWarehouse staff. Personal Services 14.54% Personal Services expenditures include
those costs associated with the staffing required to operate, maintain, and administer the treatment plant, blosolids program, laboratory, pretreatment program, collection system, and
meter stations. Significant line item accounts in this category of expenditures include salaries, payroll taxes, health insurance, and pension. 
EXHIBIT E CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM SUPPLIES FY2002 Supplies Q Proposed FY 2002 of $3,1 n ,200 vs Current FY 2001 of $2,606,140 = Variance $571,060 or + 21.9%. Q The budget
category of Supplies includes eight line item accounts. As compared with the present budget, one decreased (") $15,850 (Maintenance and Operating Supplies), and the remaining seven line
item accounts increased (+) $586,910 (Office Supplies, Dues, Fees, Lab Supplies, Process Chemicals, Fuel, Oil and Lubricants, and Instrument Supplies). Q Over 76% of the expenditures
for Supplies is for the purchase of process 5.85% chemicals. The increase of $558,360 in anticipated process chemical expenditures is primarily associated with an increase for lime and
Approximately 76% of the expenditures in this ferric chloride for solids thickening, dewatering and stabilization of category are for the purchase of process chemicals sludge to produce
Class A biosolids. Also, additional increases in this necessary for sludge thickening, dewatering and area are related to disinfection and dechlorination process chemicals. stabilization,
odor control, effluent disinfection and dechlorination, and other treatment processes. 
EXHIBIT F CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES FY2002 Q Proposed FY 2002 of $12,104,910 vs Adopted FY 2001 of $10,573,680 '" Variance $1,531,230 or + 14.5%.
Actually, this category will be $68,770 less than the Amended FY 2001 Budget. Q The budget category of Other Services and Charges includes 22 line item accounts. As compared with the
Adopted budget, two remained unchanged (Legal and Training), six line item accounts decreased (-) $314,780 and fourteen increased (+) $1,847,010. Q Over 85% or $270,250 of the decreased
expenditures in this category is for offsite biosolids land application due to the competitive negotiation of a new five-year contract which began March 1, 2001. The overall im pact
for hauling and land applying approximately 200,000 wet tons of Class A biosolids annually was lowered from $13.30 to $12.50 per wet ton. The remaining decreases in this category are
due to reduced expenses for printing and binding, laundry and uniform, and repair and maintenance of collection system, equipment and vehicles. Q This category of expenditures includes
increases in Authority audit expense, engineering services, Authority network and process SCADA support services, outside laboratory services, telephone and communication services, postage,
Project insurance payments, employee travel, water and power usage, repair and maintenance of plant facilities and electrical systems, equipment rental, and administrative overhead costs.
Approximately $1.33 million or 72% of the increase in this category is attributable to power expenses which reflect the effects of higher fuel prices and surcharges. Other Services and
Charges 22.27% This category of expenditures relates to the indirect costs associated with the collection and treatment of wastewater and includes accounts such as power, utilities,
insurance payments, repair and maintenance of the plant, equipment, collection system, and vehicles, and off-site biosolids disposal. 
EXHIBITG CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL OUTLAYS FY2002 Q Proposed FY 2002 of $887,950 vs Current FY 2001 of $500,750 = Variance (+) $387,200 or (+) n.S%. Q The capital Outlays
category can vary significantly from year to year as major equipment is only purchased on an annual as needed basis. Q This category consists of 84% capital expenditures for replacement
items and 16% new items of capital equipment proposed for purchase in FY2002. Q Over 55% or $490.000 of the proposed Capital Outlays are for the replacement of three large. heavy equipment
items (roll-off truck, rubber tire loader. and track hoe) which have excessive mileage and wear due to age, and are or will begin experiencing excessive maintenance costs. Other items
in this category which consist of $228,200 for proposed purchase in FY 2002 are fifteen dissolved oxygen meters, four electrical valve operators, six trucks for operations, process maintenance,
pretreatment and collection system monitoring, one automobile for the Technical Services Manager. seven wastewater flow meters, six autosamplers. one six-inch portable pump, one laboratory
mercury analyzer and one laboratory total kjeldahl nitrogen digester unit. Q A list of all the projected capital expenditures is on pages 27 and 28 of the attached proposed FY 2002 Budget.
capital Outlays 1.63% The category of Capital Outlays consists of the purchase of machinery and eqUipment to achieve a new purpose or replace existing equipment. 
EXHIBIT H CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS FV2002 <l Proposed FY 2002 of $30,280,200 vs. Current FY 2001 of $33,615,070 = Variance (-) $3,384.870 or
(-) 9.9%. <l The amount budgeted for Debt Service reflects the fixed and established schedules based on outstanding debt of the Central System. <l In July 1998, the Authority issued
$50,845,000 in Regional Wastewater System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Central Regional Wastewater
System. These bends were purchased by the State Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. <l In September 1998, the Authority Issued $66,950.000 in System Improvement and
Refunding Bonds. with $61,375,000 being refunded, producing a savings of $2.7 million through the life of the bond. <l In July 2001 , The Authority issued $88,225,000 in Regional Wastewater
System Improvement Bonds to finance the design and construction of various rehabilitation and plant improvement projects for the Central Regional Wastewater System. These bonds were
purchased by the Stete Revolving Funds of the Texas Water Development Board. <l The decrease in debt expenditures over the present FY 2001 Budget is due to the overall decrease in scheduled
debt service payments in FY 2002. Debt Service and MIscellaneous Debt Services and Miscellaneous includes the annual prinCipal and interest payments due on System bonds and the associated
paying agent fees. Typically, annual principal and interest payments are structured to provide relatively level debt service requirements from year to year until such time as additional
bonds are issued. 
EXHIBIT I CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND FLOW DATA FISCAL BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL PROJECTED ACTUAL PROJECTED NET ACTUAL YEAR EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES REVENUE REVENUE FLOW FLOW COST/1,000 GAL. COST/1,000 GAL. 1994 $44,175,725 $43,962,791 $41,306,825 $41,922,847 110.00 MGD 110.40 MGD $1.0290 $1.0404 1995 $44,817,530 $43,621,706
$41,915,240 $40,594,960 112.37 MGD 113.37 MGD $1.0220 $0.9810 1996 $47,693,245 $46,327,057 $44,889,460 $42,064,179 114.14 MGD 110.08 MGD $1.0745 $1.0440 1997 $48,358,525 $47,401,825
$45,233,590 $42,891,464 116.00 MGD 118.01 MGD $1.0683 $0.9958 1998 $47,014,070 $46,752,148 $43,601,935 $43,673,073 118.28 MGD 118.04 MGD $1.0099 $1.0136 1999 $50,390,530 $50,691,945
$45,859,710 $45,808,213 123.31 MGD 120.64 MGD $1.0189 $1.0403 2000 $51,066,490 $51,361,749 $47,812,790 $48,442,041 127.41 MGD 123.47 MGD $1.0253 $1.0720 2001 $54,509,150 • $49,187,660
• 143.13 MGD • $0.9415 • 2002 $54,352,130 • $50,422,440 • 145.52 MGD • $0.9493 • Central Regional Wastewater System Flow & Costl1,000 Gal. 160 􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁟􀀢􀀠1.5 140 120 "iii100 C) oc 80 1-----------------+1 1 􀁾􀀠::E C) I .--------. • iii o 40 60 I I I I o 20
I • • • H 􀁾􀀠􀁾 0 0.5 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Fiscal Year 'FY2001 & 2002 are projected_ACTUALCOST/1000 __ACTUAL MGD 
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j 
EXHIBIT J CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJECTED FUTURE COST OF SERVICE FISCAL YR. ENDING NOV. 30 PROJECTED FLOW (MGD) GROSS COST PER 1,000 GAL NET COST PER 1,000 GAL 2002 145.5
$1.023 $0.949 2003 147.5 $1.059 $1.006 2004 149.5 $1.070 $1.017 2005 151.5 $1.171 $1.112 2006 153.8 $1.174 $1.115 2007 156.1 $1.239 ......$1.177 (1) NET COST IS PROJECTED TO BE 95% OF
GROSS COST BASED UPON HISTORICAL TRENDS FOR FY 2003 THROUGH FY2007. (2) UNIT COST CALCULATION FOR FY 2003 THROUGH FY 2007 INCLUDES PROJECTED ADDITIONAL DEBT TO FINANCE PLANT AND COLLECTION
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. (3) PROJECTED FLOW IS BASED UPON THE EXISTING SYSTEM'S CONTRACTING PARTIES ANTICIPATED FLOWS. 
EXHIBIT K = TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED 0&,., BUDGET· RSCAl YEAR 2002 Central ReglonatWastewater System Enterprise Fund Description ofthe Project The Central Regional Wastewater
System (CRWS) consists of a treatment plant and appurtenances rated at 162 Million Gallons Per Day (MGD). interceptor pipelines. lift stations. meter stations. and facilities for the
delivery of treated emuent for irrigation and level control under the first major urban reuse program in Texas. CRWS provides wastewater transportation and treatment for the Cities of
Irving. Grand Prairie, Fanners Branch, Dallas, Carrollton, Coppell. Cedar Hill, Euless. Bedford. Fort Worth. Arlington, Colleyville, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Grapevine,
Mansfield. Hurst. North Richland Hills, Duncanville, Southlake, Keller. and Addison. The estimated average daily volume of wastewater predicted to be received from the contributing cities
in Fiscal Year 2002 is 145.552 Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD). 2002 2001 Percent Amount Amount Percent Amount 9Jy Contribulion MGD Contribution MGD Irving 20.616% 30.000 20.890% 29.900
Grand Prairie 11.138% 16.208 11.102% 15.890 Arlington 28,230% 41,080 27.848% 39.860 Farmers Branch 4.604% 6.700 4,541% 6.500 Dallas 5.154% 7,500 5,030% 7,200 Euless 2.817% 4,100 2.795%
4.000 Carrollton 8.315% 12.100 8.524% 12.200 DlFW Airport 1,587% 2,310 1.467% 2.100 Bedford 3.206% 4.666 3.745% 5.360 Coppell 2.543% 3.700 2.498% 3.575 Colleyville 1.745% 2.539 1,708%
2.445 Fort Worth 0.871% 1.267 0.838% 1.200 Grapevine 1.635% 2.380 1.903% 2.724 Mansfield2.233% 3,250 2.159% 3.090 Hurst 0.126% 0.183 0.122% 0.175 North Richland Hills 0.388% 0,565 0.377% 0.540 Duncanville 0,137% 0.200 0,140% 0.200 Keller 1.659% 2.415 1.292% 1,850 Southlake
1.154% 1.694 1.183% 1,694 Cedar Hill 0.168% 0.245 0.147% 0.210 Addison 1.654% 2.420 1.691% 2.420 Totars lQQQQO% 145.522 lQll.,QQQ% 143.133 located on 495 acres adjacent to the West Fork
of the Trinity River. the CRWS Facility initiated operation in December 1959. initially serving serving four cities. The original plant consisted of a trickling filter process with a
capacity of 30 MGD. The capacity was increased to 60 MGD in 1976 by the addition of mechanical dewatering equipment and an activated sludge process. In 1980. a two phase expansion program
was completed that increased the capacity to 100 MGD and provided tertiary treatment. Growth in the service area resulted in the expansion of the CRWS facility to a capacily of 135 MGD,
with construction initiated in 1988 and completed in early 1994. Effluent discharged from CRWS consistently meets or exceeds the reqUirements specified in the TPDES permit issued by
the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). TNRCC approved an uprating of the discharge pennit to an effluent level of 162 MGDwith the completion of the solids dewatering
project on April 1, 2001. Page 1 
-TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· ASCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System Enterprise Fund Work Program To maintain and operate the Central Plant on a
24-hour a day, 7-day a week basis requires a staff ofthree (3) department managers reporting to the Project Manager. In addition to the management staff, including purchasing and the
inventory department, staffing is as follow, System Operation and Maintenance 97 Administration Services 8 Technical Services 43 Northern Ragion Purchasing 7 Pretreatment !l 163 The
responsibility for selecting process parameters, actual treatment of wastewater, process and non-process equipment maintenance, maintenance, repair of electrical and electronic eqUipment,
lift station maintenance sludge disposal and computer monitoring of plant processes lies with the Manager, System Operations, and Ihe Operation and Maintenance Department. The Manager,
Administrative Services and staff provide support at the Central System in the areas of human resource resource administration, bene fils, Iraining, clerical, accounts payable, payroll,
and capital asset control and data processing, The Manager. Technical Services and staff provide analytical data for process control, influent moniloring and effluent quality reports.
The Laboratory and Pretreatment Programs provide analytical and technic assistance to cities, slate, andlor federal agencies and olher TRA Projects on a contract basis, Engineering Services
provide inspection and surveillance of the collection system and monitoring of flows from the Cities into the system, Page 2 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System TOTAL FUND SUMMARY FUNDS AVAILABLE Projected December 1, 2001 $ 15,878,390 ESTIMATED
SOURCES OF FUNDS Contract Revenue Operating Ovemead Professional Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Income $ 50,422,440 692,390 450,000 2,335,350 735,260 54,635,440 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE
$ 70,513,830 ESTIMATED APPLICATION OF FUNDS Appropriation Expenditures: Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Capital OuUays Debt SeNice and Miscellaneous $ 7,901,870
3,177,200 12,104,910 887,950 30,280,200 54,352,130 TOTAL FUNDS APPLIED $ 54,352,130 FUNDS AVAILABLE Projected November 30, 2002 $ 16,161,700 Page 3 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE Contract and Oll!lrall!}9 Overhead Revenue
(3010) Contract Revenue -Irving (3020) Contract Revenue -Grand Prairie (3030) Contract Revenue -Arlington (3040) Contract Revenue -Farmers Branch (3050) Contract Revenue -Dallas (3060)
Contract Revenue -Euless (3070) Contract Revenue -Carrollton (3080) Contract Revenue -DIFW Airport (3090) Contract Revenue -Bedford (3100) Contract Revenue -Coppell (3110) Contract Revenue
-Colleyville (3120) Contract Revenue -Fort Worth (3130) Contract Revenue -Grapevine (3140) Contract Revenue -Mansfield (3150) Contract Revenue -Hurst (3160) Contract Revenue -North Richland
Hills (3170) Contract Revenue -Duncanville (3180) Conlract Revenue -Keller (3190) Contract Revenue -Southlake (3200) Contract Revenue -Cedar Hill (3210) Contract Revenue -Addison (3390)
Operating Overhead -Other Projects Total Contract and Operating Overhead Revenue Professional Fees (3980) Professional Fees Total Professional Fees Interest Income (3810) Interest Income
Interest & Sinking Fund (3820) Interest Income -Reserve Fund (3840) Interesl Income -Revenue Fund (3870) Interest Income -Emergency Totallnterest Income Proposed 2002 Budget $ 10,395,090
5,616,050 14,234,260 2,321,450 2,598,770 1,420,400 4.192,630 800,200 1,616,540 1,282,240 879,870 439,180 824,410 1,125,930 63,530 195,640 69,080 836,510 586.920 84,710 839,030 692,390
51.114,830 450,000 450,000 489,580 1,416,420 336,320 93,030 $ 2,335,350 Current 2001 Budget $ 10,275,130 5,460,600 13,697,890 2,233,720 2,474,280 1,374,600 4,192,530 721,670 1,841,960
1,228,550 840,230 412,380 936,100 1,061,880 60,140 185,570 68,730 635,750 582,140 72,170 831,640 666,590 49,854,250 425,000 425,000 517,900 1,490.560 214,700 49,400 :& 2,272,560 Aclual2000
$ 10,878,962 5,733,497 11,146,370 2,165,780 2,862,402 1,415,921 4,394,288 842,173 1,814,314 1,371,868 881,431 460,841 669,414 1,212,841 68,953 205,421 76,667 727,855 513,908 80,021 919,314
554,960 48,997,001 422,721 422,721 652,785 1,465,027 448,431 124,042 $ 2.690,284 Page 4 :,---. 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System REVENUE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE Proposed 2002 Budget CUrrent 2001 Budget
Actual 2000 Miscellaneous Income (3400) OV€l1Itrenglh Surcharge (3410) Northeast Lakeview Lift Station (3430) Pretreatment Revenue (3440) Commodity Charge (3480) Quantity Surcharge (3990)
Miscellaneous Income $ 600,000 14,650 22,000 51,810 36,800 10,000 $ 675,000 17,150 35,000 56,850 25,000 10,000 $ 525,340 97,300 28,866 187,185 30,443 6,926 Total Miscellaneous Income
735,260 819,000 876,060 Grand Total $ 54,635,440 $ 53,370,810 $ 52,986,066 Page 5 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE PERSONAL SERVICES (4000) Salaries·
Regular (4020) Payroll Taxes· Fica (4030) Emp. Ben· Health/life Ins. (4040) Employee Benefit· Pension (4060) Unemployment Compensation (4070) Emp. Recognition Program (4080) Employee
Benefit· Education TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES (4100) Office Supplies (4110) Dues and Subscriptions (4120) Fees Other Than Dues and Subscriptions (4130) Maintenance and Operating
Supplies (4140) lab Supplies (4150) Process Chemicals and Supplies (4160) Fuel, Oil, & Lubricants (4170) Computer and Instoument Supplies TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES (4200)
Auditing (4210) Engineering (4220) Legal (4230) Outside Services (4240) Other Professional Services (4300) Telephone and Telemeterlng (4310) Postage (4320) Printing and Binding (4330)
Insurance Payments (4360) Travel (4370) Laundry. Uniform, & Ind. Equip (4380) Training (4400) Utilities (4420) Power (4430) R & M· Collection System (4440) R & M • Equipment (4450) R
& M -Plant & Buildings (4460) R & M· Vehicles (4480) R & M· Electrical (4490) Off·sile Biosolid Land Application (4510) Rent -Machinery & Equip. (4660) Administrative Overhead TOTAL
OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES Proposed 2002 Budget $ 6,251,780 478,260 411,770 715,800 20,000 15,260 9,000 7,901,870 51,200 54,860 86,910 146,590 273,350 2,421,900 104,440 37,950 3,177,200
36,000 160,000 20,000 335.620 175,650 106.570 8,220 12,730 179,420 16.500 44,350 111,940 105,000 4.832,800 245,000 21B.300 777,350 40,400 510,150 2.534.140 88,810 1,545,960 12,104,910
Current 2001 Budget $ 5,680,620 434,580 406,070 649,040 20,000 14,000 9,200 7,213,510 50,950 52.750 83,940 162,440 267,800 1,863,540 91,770 32,950 2,606,140 Actual 2000 $ 5,048,480 374,943
326,296 520,108 1,648 13,578 3.030 6,288,083 35,245 53,739 4,404 113,785 232,451 1,882,169 92,515 38.592 2.452,904 35,500 150,000 20.000 284.960 160,620 95,150 6,320 13,810 140.760 14,270
62.450 111.940 100.000 3,500,000 246,000 242,450 645.000 40,600 370.150 2,804.390 73,580 1,455,730 10,573,680 43.356 109,022 1,307 205,222 132,264 88,560 7,452 10,564 105,654 15,721
83,410 44,961 75,125 3,425.578 1BO,585 140,097 404.576 29,913 403,390 1,623.955 50,466 1,244.130 8,425,308 ,PageS 
J TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Proposed 2002 Current 2001 DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE
Budget Budget CAPITAL OUTLAYS (4760) Machinery & Equipment $ 887,950 $ 500,750 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 887,950 500,750 DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS(4800) Bond Principal Payments 15,580,000
18,995,000 (4810) Inlerest on tong-Term Debl 14,674,200 14,594,070 (4830) Paying Agenl Fees 26,000 26,000 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE AND MISCELLANEOUS 30,280,200 33,615,070 GRAND TOTAL $ 54,352,130
$ 54,509,150 Actual 2000 $ 529,445 529,445 18,145,000 15,519,500 1,509 33,666,009 $ 51,361,749 Page 7 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System REVENUE WORKSHEET CONTRACT REVENUE Proposed Operation & Maintenance Total Expenditures
$ 24,097,930.00 Less Other Revenue Sources: Operating Overhead (692,390.00) Professional Fees (450,000.00) Pretreatment Revenue (22,000.00) Commodity Charge (51,810.00) Miscellaneous
Income (10,000.00) Overstrength Surcharge (600,000.00) Zone B & Quantity Surcharge (36,800.00) Northeast Lakeview Lift Station (14,650.00) Total Other Revenue Sources (1,877,650.00)
Net Operation and Maintenance to be to Billed Monthly 22,220,280.00 Debt Service Principal on Bonds: Due 8101/2002: 15,580,000.00 x 8112 10,386,666.67 Due 8/0112003: 16,430,000.00 x
4112 5,476,666.67 Interest on Bonds: Due 2101/2002: 6,990,863.13 x 216 2,330,287.71 Due 8101/2002: 6,990,863.13 x 6/6 6,990,863.13 Due 2101/2003: 8,029,566.88 x 4/6 5,353,044.59 Rounding
1.24 Less: Interest Income (2,335,350.00) Net Debt Service to Billed Monthly 28,202,180.00 TOTAL CONTRACT REVENUE $ 50,422,460.00 PageS i 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget (3010) Contract Revenue -Irving (1106.3010) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 20.616% (1108.3010) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 20.616% Rounding $ 4,580,932.92
5,814,161.43 Total Annual Requirement $ 10,395,090 $ 10,275,130 (3020) Contract Revenue -Grand Prairie (1106.3020) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 11.138% (1108.3020) Debt Service
$28,202,180 x 11.138% Rounding 2,474,894.79 3,141,158.81 Total Annual Requirement 5,616,050 5,460,600 (3030) Contract Revenue -Arlington (1106.3030) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280
x 28.230% (1108.3030) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 28.230% Rounding 6,272,785.04 7,961,475.41 (0.46) Total Annual Requirement 14,234,260 13,697,890 (3040) Contract Revenue -Farmers Branch
(1106.3040) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 4.604% (1108.3040) Debt Service $28.202,180 x 4.604% Rounding 1,023,021.69 1,298,428.37 (0.06) Totat Annuat Requirement 2,321,450 2,233,720
(3050) Contract Revenue -Danas (1106.3050) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 5.154% (1108.3050) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 5.154% Rounding 1,145,233.23 1,453,540.36 (3.59) Total
Annual ReqUirement 2,598,770 2,474,280 Page 9 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget (3060) Contract Revenue· Euless (1106.3060) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 2.S17% (110S.3060) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 2,817% Rounding $ 625,945.29
794,455.41 (0.70) Total Annual Requirement $ 1,420,400 $ 1,374,600 (3070) Contract Revenue· Carrollton (1106,3070) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 8.315% (1108.3070) Debt Service
$28,202,180 x 8.315% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 1,847,616.28 2,345,011.27 2.45 4,192,630 4,192,530 (3080) Contract Revenue· DIFW Airport . (1106.3080) Operation & Maintenance
$22,220,280 x 1.587% (1108.30S0) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 1.587% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 352,635.84 447,566.60 (4.44) 800,200 721,670 (3090) Contract Reyenue • Bedford (1106.3090)
Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 3.206% (1108.3090) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 3.206% Rounding Total Annual ReqUirement 712,382.18 904,161.89 (4.07) 1,616,540 1,841,960 (3100) Contract
Revenue· Coppell (1106.3100) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 2.543% (110S.3100) Debt Service $28,202,lS0 x 2.543% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 565,061.72 717,181.44 (3.16)
l,2S2,240 1,228,550 Page 10 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget {3110} Contract Revenue· Collellville (1106.3110) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 1,745% (1108.3110) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 1.745% Rounding
Total Annual Requirement $ 387,743,89 492,128.04 (1.93) $ 879,870 $ 840,230 {3120} Contract Revenue· Fort Worth (1106.3120) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 0.871% (1108.3120) Debt
Service $28,202,180 x 0.871% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 193,538.64 245,640.99 0.37 439,180 412,380 {3130} Contract Revenue· Gral1evine (1106.3130) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280
x 1.635% (1108.3130) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 1.635% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 363,301.58 461,105.64 2,78 824,410 936,100 (3140} Contract Revenue· Mansfield (1106.3140) Operation
& Maintenance $22,220,280 x 2,233% (1108.3140) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 2.233% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 496,178.85 629,754.68 (3.53) 1,125,930 1,061,880 {31S0} Contract Revenue·
Hurst (1106,3150) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 0,126% (1108.3150) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 0.126% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 27,997.55 35,534.75 !2.30) 63,530 60,140
Page 11 
" TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget {31601 Contract Revenue -North Richland HiIIli (1106.3160) Operalion & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 0.388% (1108.3160) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 0.388%
Rounding Total Annual Requirement $ 86,214.69 109,424.46 0.86 $ 195,640 $ 185,570 {3170} Contract Revenue· Duncanvill!: (1106.3170) Operation & Mainlenance $22,220,280 x 0.137% (1108.3170)
Debt Service $28,202,180 x 0.137% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 30,441.78 38,636.99 1.23 69,080 68,730 (31801 Contract Revenue· Keller (1106,3180) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280
x 1.859% (1108.3180) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 1.659% Rounding Total Annual Requirement 368,634.45 467,874.17 1.39 836,510 635,750 {3190} Contract R!lvenUll -Southlake (1106.3190) Operation
& Maintenance $22,220,280 x 1.164% 258,644.06 (1108.3190) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 1.164% 328,273.38 Rounding 2.57 Total Annual ReqUirement 586,920 582,140 {32001 Contra!;t Re:tenue
• Cedar Hill (1106.3200) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 0.168% 37,330.07 (1108.3200) Debt Service $28,202,180 x 0.168% 47,379.66 Rounding 0.27 Total Annual Requirement 64,710
72,170 Page 12 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REVENUE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail (3210)
Contract Revenue -Addison (1106.3210) Operation & Maintenance $22,220,280 x 1.664% (1108.321) Debl Service $28,202,180 x 1.664% Rounding $ 369,745.46 469,264.28 Total Annual Requirement
(1106.3390) Operating Overhead -Other Projects Coppell Clean Rivers Program (TNRCC) DCURD#1 Denton Creek Joe Pool lake Red Oak Creek Tarrant County Ten Mile Creek Walker-Calloway Branches
Tolal Annual Requirement (1106.3980) Professional Fees (1108.38101 Inleresl Income -I & S (1108.3820) Interest Income -Reserve Fund 1110.8.3840) Interest Income -Revenue Fund (1108.3870J
Interest Income -Emergency Fund (1106.3400) Overslrength Surcharge (1106.3410) Northeast lakeview Uft Station (1106.3430) Pretreatment Revenue (1106.3440) Commodity Charne /1106.3480)
Quantity Surcharge City of Addison (1106.3990) Miscellaneous Income 800.00 37,000.00 356,390.00 44,900.00 25,000.00 13,550.00 61,640.00 132,810.00 21,100.00 Proposed 2002 Budget $ 839,030
692,390 450,000 489,580 1,416,420 336,320 93,030 600,000 14,650 22,000 51,810 36,800 10,000 Current 2001 Budget $ 831,640 666,590 425,000 517,900 1,490,560 214,700 49,400 675,000 17,150
35,000 56,850 25,000 10,000 Page 13 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET. FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES Number of Budget DESCRIPTION Employees Amount Salaries
Under the Salary Administration Plan for the Following: Manager. Central Regional Wastewater System 1 Maintenance Engineer 1 Sub-Total 2 Manager. System Operation 1 Operations Division
Chief 2 Chief Operator 8 Senior Operator 7 Operalor II 10 Operator I 14 Maintenance Division Chief 2 Chief Maintenance Mechanic 6 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 16 Maintenance Mechanic
II 14 Maintenance Mechanic I 2 E/E Division Chief 1 Chief Eleclrician 1 Chief Electronic Technician 1 Senior Electrician 2 Senior Eleclronic Technician 3 Eleclronic Technicialll 1 Electrician
II 3 Senior HVAC Technician 1 Senior landfill Operator o ChiefLandfill Operator o Proc. Maint Planner/Scheduler 1 Information Systems Technician 1 Sub-Total 97 Page 14 
I /TRINITY RIVER AUrnORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -ASCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES Number of Budget DESCRIPTION Employees Amount Manager,
Technical Services 1 Laboratory Division Chief 1 Laboratory Supervisor 3 Quaility Assurance Coordinator 1 Senior Biologist 2 Senior Chemist 5 Biologist 7 Chemist 2 Laboratory Technician
II 2 Laboratory T echnrcian I 1 Laboratory Technician/Bookkeeper 1 Technical Services Engineer 1 Environmental Services Coordinator 1 Interceptor System Specialist 2 Chief Maintenance
Mechanic 1 Senior Maintenance Mechanic 2 Maintenance Mechanic II 5 Maintenance Mechanic I o Chief Electronic Technician (Instrument Technician) 1 Senior Electronic Technician (Instrument
T eehnidan) 1 Electronic Technician II (Instrument Technician) 3 Field Technician II 1 Sub-Total 44 Manager, Administrative Services 1 Office Coordinator 1 Senior Secretary 5 Accounting
Clerk 1 Training Coordinator 1 Sub-Total 9 PurchasinglWarehouse PurchaselWarehouse Supervisor 1 Senior Buyer o Buyer 2 Assistant Buyer 1 Senior Storekeeper 2 Senior Secretary 1 Sub-Tolal
7 Total Project Posilions WIO Pretreatment 159 Page 15 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED REGULAR SALARIES Number of Budget DESCRIPTION Employees Amount Total
Project Base Salaries w/Shift Diff $ 5,673,321 Total Project Holiday and Overtime Pay 278,156 Rounding 3 Total Project Salaries 5,951,480 Pretreatment Pretreatment Coondinator 1 Senior
Secretary 1 Environmental Inspector 3 Senior Field Technician 2 Field Technician II 1 Total Pretreatment Posilions 8 Total Pretreatment Base Salaries w/Shift Diff 291,637 Total Pretreatment
Holiday and Overtime Pay 8,659 Rounding 4 Total Pretreatment Salaries 300,300 Total FY 2002 Budgeted Positions 167 Total FY 2002 Budgeted Salaries $ 6.251,780 Page 16 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget j110SAOOOl §,ALAR1ES· REGULAR (01) PROJECT 159 Employees $ 5.951,480.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 8 Employees 300,300.00 Total Salafies· Regular $ 6.251.780 $
5.680.620 {1106.4020] PAYROLL TAXES -FICA (01) PROJECT $ 5.951.480.00 x 7.65% = 455.290.00 (01) PRETREATMENT $ 300.300.00 x 7.65% = Total Payroll Taxes· Fica 22.970.00 478,260 434.580
{1106.40301 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT· HEALTHILIFE INSURANCE PROJECT (01) Hospitalization 323.202.00 (02) Life InsuranceIAD&D: 33.211.00 (03) Long Tenn Disability: 32.740.00 (04) Employee Assistance
Program: 4.770.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Hospitalization: 14,282.00 (02) Life Insurance: 1.676.00 (03) Long Tenn Disability: 1.652.00 (04) Employee Assistance Program: 240.00 rounding (3.00)
Total Emp. Ben •• HealthlLife Insurance 411,770 406.070 (1106A040] EMPLOYEE BENEFIT· PENSION (Ol)PROJECT 680,800.00 (01) PRETREATMENT 35.000.00 T olal Emp. Ben .• Pension 715,800 649.040
{110SA0601 !.!NEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (Ol) PROJECT (Ol) PRETREATMENT 19,300.00 700.00 TOlal Unemployment Compensalion 20.000 20.000 Page 17 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -RSCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION {1106.40701 EMPLOYEE
RECOGNITION PROGRAIii (01) PROJECT Service Awards (01) PRETREATMENl Tolal Employee Recognition Program !1106.40SQI EMP!,QY!iE BENEEIT -EDUCATlm (01) PROJECT (01) PRETREATMENl T olal
Employee Benefil-Education T olal Personal Services 11106.41001 OFFICE 􀁓􀁕􀁐􀁐􀁌􀁬􀁅􀁾􀀠PROJECT (01) Consumables (02) Non-Consumable. (03) Computer/Copier Supplies (05) Vending and
Lunchroom Supplie, PRETREATMENT (01) Consumables (02) Non-Consumables (03) Computer/Copier Supplies (05) Vending and Lunchroom Suppli8! Total Office Supplies !1106.4110} DUES & SUBSCRIPTION!
PROJECT (01) Profe.sionalfTechnical Memberships AMSAlAWWA American Society for Human Resources American Waler Resource Associallon Chlorine Institule Nail Assoc of Purchasing Managers
Nat Safety CouncilfTX Safety Association TX Waler Utilities ASSOCiation WEFIWEAT WERF (02) Periodicals/Magazines/Newspapers (03) Reference BllOks PRETREATMENT (01) Professionall1echnical
Memberships AMSAlAWWA (03) Reference 􀁂􀁯􀁯􀁫􀁾􀀠$ Proposed Detail Proposed 2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget 15,260.00 7,500.00 1,500.00 $ 15,260 9,000 7,423,610 $ 14,000 9.200 7,213,510
16,300.00 9,150.00 14,500.00 9,000.00 300.00 500.00 1,300.00 150.00 51,200 50,950 11,920.00 390.00 250.00 700.00 700.00 250.00 180.00 1,520.00 34,000.00 1,900.00 1,900.00 180.00 970.00
Total Dues and Subscriptions 54,860 52,750 Page 18 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET Proposed ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Detail (1106.4120)
FEES OTHER THAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROJECT: (01) Celiification Fees (02) TNRCC Inspection Fees (03) TNRCC Water Quality Assessment Fees (05) TNRCC Sludge Fee (06) Tier Two Fees $ 5,400.00
41,000.00 40,000.00 100.00 10.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Celiiflcetion Fees 400.00 Total Fees Other Than Dues & Subscriptions (1106.4130) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Repair/Replacement
01 Hand Tools (02) Operational Supplies (03) Maintenance Supplies (04) Ground Care Supplies (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies (06) Electrical Supplies (07) Facilities Supplies (08)
Protective/Safety Equipment PRETREATMENT (05) Janitorial and Cleaning Supplies: Total Mainlenance and Operating Supplies (1106.4140) LAB SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Gases (02) Water Syslem
(03) Bacti·Fillers, Media and Supplies (04) AA, ICP, and IR Supplies (OS) OS) Gas Chromalog Supplies (06) TOC and MCTS-10 Supplies (07) Lab Apparatus (08) Chemical Reagents (09) Glassware,
Plastics. and Disposables (10) Filters. Glass Fiber. Prefillers and Membram (11) Field Sampling Supplies (12) Operational Supplies (13) Nuclear Sources -Wipe Test & Reloil (14) Olher
-Freight and Shipping 25,280.00 16,160.00 27.000.00 13,000.00 5.000.00 25,000.00 10.050.00 24.900.00 200.00 12,000.00 4,000.00 65,000.00 8,000.00 13,000.00 2,500.00 15,000.00 60,000.00
55,000.00 15,000.00 1,000.00 6,500.00 300.00 1.000.00 Proposed 2002 Current 2001 Budget Budget $ 86.910 $ 83,940 146,590 162,440 Page 19 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET Proposed Proposed 2002 Current 2001 ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION
Detail Budget Budget 11106.4140} LAB SUPPLIES (Continued} PRETREATMENT (07) lab Apparatus $ 850.00 (08) Chemical Reagenls and Slandards 500.00 (09) Glassware, Plastics, and Disposables
2,900.00 (11) Field Sampling Supplies 10,500.00 (14) Other-Freight and Shipping 300.00 T olal Lab Supplies $ 273,350 $ 267,800 11106.4150} PROCESS CHEMICALS AND SUPPLIES PROJECT (01)
lime 1,139.200.00 (02) Fertic Chloride 200,000.00 (03) Chlorine 302.000.00 (04) Polymer 434,100.00 (05) Hydrochloric Acid 5,000.00 (06) Sodium Hydroxide 8,000.00 (07) Citric Acid 500.00
(08) Filler Cloths 48,000.00 (09) Tie Wraps, Bags, Sludge Judges, Etc. 7,000.00 (10) Taste/Odor Control 70,000.00 (11) Boiler Chemicals 2,000.00 (12) Sulfur Dioxide 206,100.00 Tolal
Process Chemicals and Supplies 2,421,900 1,863.540 11106.41601 FUEL. OIL, AND LUBRICANTS PROJECT (01) Gasoline 36,000.00 (02) Diesel Fuel 19,000.00 (03) Solvents/Cleaners 12,000.00 (04)
Anti-Freeze 1.950.00 (05) Grease 5,420.00 (06) Lubricants 25,000.00 (07) Propane 800.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Gasoline 4,000.00 (04) Anti-Freeze 20.00 (05) Grease 50.00 (06) Lubricanls 200.00
Total Fuel, Oil, and Lubricants 104,440 91.770 
TRINITY RJVER AUTHORITY Of TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· fiSCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget (1106,4170) COMPUTER AND INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PROJECT (01) Metering Supplies (02) Instrument Repair (03) Drafting/Engineering Supplies (04) Une Surveillance
(OS) FM Telemetry (06) Metering Electrical Repairs $ 10,000.00 16,000.00 3,500.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Metering Supplies (02) Instrument Repair Total Computer
and Instrument Supplies 150.00 $ 37,950 $ 32,950 Total Supplies 3,177,200 2,606,140 (1106.4200) AUDITING (01) Audit 36.000 35,500 (1106.4210) ENGINEERING PROJECT (01) Engineering Studies
(02) 1/1 Prorations (03) Triennial Report/Annual Update (04) Pipeline Repairs/Erosion Control 30,000.00 80,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 Total Engineering 160,000 150,000 (1106.4220) LEGAL
(01) Legal 20,000 20,000 11106.4230) OUTSIDE SERVICES PROJECT (01) Advertising (02) Graphics, Displays, Etc. (03) Construction Services Charges (04) Security MoniloJing (05) Solid Waste
Disposal (Odor Control) (06) Contract labor (07) PCINelworklSCADA Support 62,000.00 7,000.00 12,000.00 3,600.00 34,000.00 20,600.00 195,220.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Advertising (02) Graphics,
Displays, Etc. 1,000.00 200.00 Total Oulside Services 335.620 284,960 Page 21 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget 􀀱􀀱􀀱􀀰􀀶􀀮􀀴􀀲􀀴􀁾􀁬􀀠OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT (01) Drug Tesflng (02) U.S.G.S.Payments (03) Motor Vehicle Reports (04) Outside Tesflng -Laboratory
(05) Custodian Fees $ 9,000.00 26,500,00 900.00 86,000.00 52,000,00 PRETREATMENT (01) Drug Testing (04) outside Testing -Laboratory 50,00 1,200,00 Total Olher Professional Services $
175,650 $ 160,620 {1106.43001 TELEPHONE & TELEMETERIN2 PROJECT (01) TelephoneiTelemetering (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (60) (04) Intemet Access 40,700.00 5,400.00 39,620.00 14,830.00
PRETREATMENT (01) TelephoneiTelemetering (02) Pagers (03) Mobile Telephones (7) Total Telephone & T elemeteong 1,000.00 360.00 4,660.00 106,570 95,150 (1106.4310) POSTAGE PROJECT (01)
Postage Meter (02) Stamps/Shipping 1,500.00 6,000,00 PRETREATMENT (01) Postage Me!er er (02) Stamps/Shipping 500,00 220.00 Total Postage 8,220 6,320 11106.43201 PRINTING AND BltjDING
PROJECT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead, Envelopes, and Stationary (03) Manuals, Handbooks, Etc, 4,970.00 3,500.00 3,000,00 PRETREATMENT (01) Special Forms (02) Letterhead, Envelopes,
and Stationary 950.00 310,00 Total Ponting and Binding 12,730 13,810 Page 22 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET· FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget j1106.433011NSURANCE PAYMENTS PROJECT (01) Fire (02) General Liability (03) Automobile (04) Contractor Equipment (05) Workers' Compensation (06) Director/Officer's
Liability (07) Btanket Bond $ 94,740.00 10,740.00 21,460.00 7.910.00 32,640.00 10,730.00 1.200.00 Total Insurance Payments $ 179,420 $ 140,760 (1106.4360) TRAVEL PROJECT (01) CRWS Employees
on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority Business 12,700.00 1,100.00 PRETREATMENT (01) CRWS Employees on Authority Business (02) Others on Authority Business 2,500.00 200.00 Total
Travel 16,500 14,270 j1106.4370j LAUNDRY. UNIFORM & IND. E9!.!IP. PROJECT (01) Unifonn Rental (03) Patches/Hats (04) Towels, Mops, Mats 35,095.00 600.00 8,000.00 PRETREATMENT (01) Unifonn
Rental 655.00 Tolal Laundry, Unifonn, & Ind. Equip. 44.350 62,450 j1106.4380) TRAINING PROJECT (01) Training Wastewater Certification Training Safety Training Technical Training Enhanced
SkillS/Supervisory Training Training ManualslVideos 11,900.00 11,920.00 23,320.00 52,390.00 8,410.00 Page 23 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PRETREATMENT (01)
Training Wastewater Certification Training Safety Training Technical Training Enhanced Skills/Supervisory Training Training ManualsNideos Total Training Proposed 􀁾􀀠600.00 600.00 1,160.00
1,200.00 420.00 Proposed 2002 Budget $ 111,940 Current 2001 Budget $ 111,940 111 06.440!)) UTILITIES PROJECT (01) Natural Gas (02) Water 80,000.00 25,000.00 Total Utilities 105,000 100,000
(1106.4420) POWER (01) Power 4,832,800 3,500,000 (1106.4430) R & M -COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT (01) Meter Station Structure Rehabilitation (02) Manhole/Junclion Box Rehabilitation (03)
System Repairslline CleaningflV (04) Lift Station/ROW Maintenance 18,000.00 21,000.00 195,000.00 11,000.00 Total R & M -Collection System 245,000 246,000 {1106.4442) R & M -EQUIPMENT
PROJECT (01) Shop Equipment (02) Dumpsters (03) Compressors and Generators (04) Fuel Powered and Electrical EqUipment (05) Office and Video Equipment (06) Analytical Equip Repair -Non
Contract (07) Service Contracts-Analy1ical Equipment (08) Perkins-Elmer Equipment (09) Mowersrrraciors (10) Tracked Vehicles & Heavy Equipment (11) Carts (12) Heavy Trucks (13) Trailers
(15) Tire Repair (16) High Pressure Units (17) Forl<lifts 4,000.00 5,400.00 4,500.00 11,200.00 5,100.00 29,000.00 10,000.00 11,000.00 12,000.00 50,000.00 3,000.00 50,000.00 15,000.00
3,100.00 1,800.00 3,200.00 Total R & M -Equipment 218,300 242,450 Page 24 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget 11106.4450} R & M· PLANT AND BUILDINGS PROJECT (01) Packing and Seals (02) Road Repair Materials (03) Machine Shop Stock (04) Mechanical Plating and Coating
(05) Clarifiers, Aeration, Equalization Basins (06) Specialized Balancing and Machining (07) Valves, Valve Operators, Pipe, Etc. (08) Positive Displacement Pumps/Repairs (09) Filter
Press Parts (10) Pump Repair. Pump Parts, Machining (11) Conveyer System Parts (12) Industrial Air/Oil Filters (13) Power Transmission PartslRepairs (14) Building/Structural Repair (15)
ChlorinationIDechlorination (16) Railroad Repairs (17) Stormwater Regulations -Street Cleaning (18) Blower PartslRepairs (19) Crane Inspection & Servicing (20) Anaerobic Digester CleanlRehab
$ 15,000.00 48,750.00 5,000.00 28,000.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 40,000.00 125,000.00 24,000.00 130,000.00 22,500.00 4,000.00 40,000.00 25,000.00 18,000.00 21,000.00 9,600.00 39,500.00 17,000.00
135,000.00 Total R & M -Plant and Buildings $ 777,350 $ 645,000 11106.4460) R & M· VEHICLES PROJECT (01) Automobiles (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair (04) Other-Ballerias, Wiper Blades,
etc. 5,000.00 24,150.00 7,150.00 2,000.00 PRETREATMENT (02) Pickup Trucks (03) Tire Repair 1,500.00 600.00 Total R & M -Vehicles 40,400 40,600 PageZ5 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERJDESCRIPTION Proposed Detail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget 11106.4480) R & M· ELECTRICAL PROJECT (01) Components (02) Signal Cable and Wire (03) Electronic Equipment Repair (04) Repairs of Pneumatic Systems (05)
FM Telemetry (06) Computer Maintenance (O?) Vendor Service/Repair (08) Calibration (09) Electrical Parts 8. Materials (10) Motor OVerhaul (11) HVAC Parts and Repair (12) Elevator Repair
and Service (13) cathodic Test $ 30,000,00 6,000.00 60,150.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 30,000.00 70,000.00 5,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 Total R & M -Electrical
$ 510,150 $ 370,150 (1106.4490) OFF·SITE BIOSOLID LAND APPLICATION (02) Beneficial Reuse 2,534,140 2,804,390 (1106.4510) RENT -MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT PROJECT (01) Cranes and Other Heavy
Equipment (02) Compressors and Special Equipment (03) Postage Meter (04) Tool Rental (05) Copier Rental (07) Cylinder Rental (08) Other Rental 18,000.00 17,580.00 1,440.00 1,000.00 34,790,00
10,000.00 6.000.00 Total Rent -Machinery 8. Equipment 88,810 73,580 (1106.4660IADMINfSTRATIVE OVERHEAD PROJECT (01) Related Cost Melhod Allocalion 1,545,960 1,455,730 Page 26 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION 11106.4760) MACHINERY
& EQUIPMENT (01)PROJECT·Replacement: (1) Portable Dissolved Oxygen Meter (4) Electrical Valve Operators (2) 112 Ton Full Size Pick-up (2) SCBA Air Pack (1) Roll-off Truck (2) Compact
Pick-up (2) Control Loop Calibrator (1) Digital Pressure calibrator (1) Influent Flow Meter (6) Dissolved Oxygen Meters (2) Return Activated Sludge Flow Meter (1) RubberTire Loader (1)
Wheel Balancer (1) Bat·Wing Mower (1) High Pressure Washer (1) Airless Paint Sprayer (1) Sedan (1) pH/DO Meter (1) TKN Digester Unit (1) Autodilulor (6) Ultrasonic Depth Flow MeIer (1)
Track Hoe PRETREATMENT-Replacement: (1) 3/4 Ton Heavy Duty 4x4 Truck (1) Camper Shell (6) Portable Auto-Samplers Revised 5118101 Proposed Detail $ 2,100.00 16,000.00 32,000.00 4,800.00
120,000.00 30,000.00 2,000.00 2,300.00 20,000.00 24,000.00 8,000.00 150,000.00 3,400.00 12,000.00 1,950.00 5,800.00 16,000.00 1,700.00 20,000.00 2,900.00 9,800.00 220,000.00 22,000.00
1,000.00 Proposed 2002 Current 2001 Budget Budget $ 704,550 38,000 Page 27 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET" FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBERIDESCRIPTlON (02) PROJECT-New:
(3) Portable Gas Detectors (1) Fuel Injector Cleaner (1) Fiber Cable Test Set (1) Motor Winding/Coil Tester (1) Westinghouse Breaker Tester (1) Portable 6" Pump Unit (1) Transmission
Flush System (2) Sludge Conveyor AuloLube System (1) Automated Mercury Analyzer (3) BenCh-Top Separatory Funnel Shaker (1) 3/4 Ton Heavy Duly Truck (1) All Terrain Vehicle, 4X4 (1) Plate
Packer (1) Decant Pump (1) Portable Area Velocity Flow Meter PRETREATMENT-New Proposed Detail $ 7,500.00 4,300.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 2,500.00 23,500.00 4,500.00 6,000.00 30,000.00 4,100.00
25,000.00 8,000.00 14,000.00 9,000.00 3,000.00 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT Proposed 2002 Current 2001 Budget Budget $ 145,400 887,950 $ 500,750 Page 26 
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS PROPOSED O&M BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2002 Central Regional Wastewater System DETAILED EXPENDITURE WORKSHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER/DESCRIPTION Proposed Delail Proposed
2002 Budget Current 2001 Budget (1108.4800} BOND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS Due 810112002: Series 1992 Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 199M Series 1998B Series 2001 $ 1,500,000.00 9,685,000.00
1,785,000.00 2,150,000.00 480,000.00 T olai Bond Principal Payments $ 15,580.000 $ 18,995,000 t!108.4810} INTEREST ON LONG TERM-DEBT Due 210112002: Series 1992 Series 1993 Series 1995
Series 199M Series 1998B Series 2001 Due 810112002: Series 1992 Series 1993 Series 1995 Series 1998A Series 1998B Series 2001 Adjustment for Accrual Tolal Bond Interest Payments 46,875.00
4.350,404.38 307,076.25 868,503.75 1,418,003.75 46,875.00 4,350,404.38 307,076.25 868,503.75 1,418,003.75 692,473,74 14,674,200 14,594,070 {110S.4830} PAYING AGENT FEES 26,000 26,000
Page 29 
• 
HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM V.A. CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM 􀀸􀀱􀀸􀀱􀁾􀁕􀀰􀀱􀀠MONTHLY EFFLUENT REPORT 1:43 PM DECEMBER 200II-NOVEMBER 2001 PERMIT FLOW IFLOW 􀁾􀁴􀀭􀁏􀁗􀀭􀁾􀁌􀁏􀁗􀀠ceoo
ceoo caoo TSS Tes ---T88 NH3--1--NH3 NH3 CL2 P IOt-Y.Ava.OlY.MAX. ANN.AVG 2HR PK OLY.Ava. OlY.MAX. OlY.AVa. DlY.Ava. OLY.MAX. OLY.AVG. DlY.AVG. DlY.MAX. OlY.AVG. RES.MIN MGO 􀁾􀀨􀁬􀁏􀀠M(lO
GPM M(lIL M!3Jl.. LBSiDAY MGJl.. MGJI.. LBs/DAY MGJI.. MGJl.. t-SSlDIIY MGJl.. 1 rPH MIN. MIN. MAX. MGJI.. MG/L UNITS UNITS 258.e20 127 --257.560 133,,';111:.101 lQV"fiJ\I IAPR 143.540
159.220 136.172 123760 IMAY 141.244 176.670 138.137 132010 JUN 129.690 148.790 138.108 112617 1.0 1. JUl 132.070 185.120 139.938 146162 1.0 1AUG SSP DOT INOV MIN 129.690 148.790 121.410
112617 MAX In.210 258.820 139.938 199037 2 Ava 145.548 200.615 132.397 152210 1 1 5 3 9456 15.00 40.00 20256 I4.0012.00 I 7.00 15404127021 1.00 <0.10 6.00 6.00 2113.7 2 6 2895.8 0.710
3.692 902.7 1.00 0.07 7.1 6. 1794.S 2 4 2006.1 1.147 4.964 1339.9 1.10 .00 8.: 1416,4 1 2 1436.1436.S 0.190 0.436 240.4 1.02 n.OO 172B.5 1.0 1.4 1494.4 0.365 2.200 603.5 1.: 1368.0 1.1
2.0 127M 0.159 0.621 194.1 1.' 1178.0 1.0 1.0 1178.0 0.080 0.182 95.1 i.' 1081.6 1.0 2.0 1116.8 0.139 0.708 151.6 1.' 1101.4 1.0 2.0 928.9 0.151 0.568 115.4 1.01 1081.6 1 1 928.90 0.080
0.182 95.1 1.00 0.00 6.7 6.7 2113.7 2 6 2695.80 1.147 4.954 1339.9 1.10 0.01 8.5 B.9 1471.8 1 3 1541.93 0.386 1.a87 455.3 1.04 0.01 7.S 6.9 9.00 7.2 7. 7.3 '162 Mao Pgrml! E!l!!c!11'!!
4/1/91 90% FLOW» 14S.8 75% 􀁆􀁾􀁏􀁗􀂻121.5 FY·2001 QUALITYIFLOW 180 14 12160 :1 "'4=::l140 1 10120 8 100 8 􀁾􀀠:I 5 :I80 50 4 40 􀀲􀀰􀁪􀁾􀀠2 o L_ I [ 0 e e iii􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠;;
􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠l -+-Month/yAvg Flow _.....AMUalAvg FlOw -A-Ceot:) -W-TS$ -+-NH3 PERM[ LIMITS '21110910 313'/01. ANNUAl. AVO. FLOW 135 Mao 2Hl!PKFLOW 232639 gpm ceOD DAlLY Ava 7881 IlnJDay TSS
DAlLY AVG 18888 IbIIOay NH3 DAlI.Y Ava • mg/1 NHa DAlLY MAX 10 mg/1 NH3 DAlLY AVO. 6633 lbol1lay DO MINIMUM 4.0 mg/J Page 1 
􀁾􀀠0 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Z 􀁾.. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Inf nnf ABW .IdV .IBW qa.il nBf ;,au AON 􀁬􀁾􀁏􀀠daS 􀁾􀁮􀁶􀀠'f"'I"4 = "S 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I= (J) = OJ:) <= 0) m '(J) + 􀁾􀀠>=.c =-...c 0"S 􀁾􀀠2􀁾􀀠Q\•
Q\ OJ:) < = + 
August 6, 2001 HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM Y-D (Previous report January 2001) CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ACTIVE PIPELINE DESIGN PROJECTS
BEAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Little Bear Creek CO-1/GV-4 Location: City of Hurst East of Precinct Road, north of SP RRlWest of Hwy 121 & north of Glade Type: Rehabilitation of
1500 ft. of 12" diameter Jinel200 ft. line repair Status: Project added to BC Rehab. in 1998 Final Design completed in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition completed in July 2001
Anticipated construction award in August 2001 Name: Bear Creek Rehab .. Section II Location: Cities of Irving and Ft. Worth South of DFW International Airport Type: Rehabilitation of
9000 ft. of 39" diameter line Status: Preliminary Design Study initiated in February 1996 Engineering Evaluation completed in January 1997 Design initiated May 1997 Final Design completed
in June 2001 Easement and permit acquisition in July 2001 Anticipated construction award in August 2001 Name: Bear Creek Interceptor, BC-4 Location: City of Colleyville Little Bear Creek
to north city limit of Bedford Type/Size: 2700 ft. of 8" to 15" diameter parallel relief Status: Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 2001 Preliminary Design Report Contract to
be completed by early 2002 ELM FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Elm Fork Retief Interceptor, EF-G Location: Cities of Coppell and Carrollton Adjacent to Belt Line Road, from Luna Road to
Fairway Type/Size: 48" parallel relief of 6900 ft, of 33" diameter line Status: DeSign initiated November 1994 Design Revisions begun May 1997 Final Design revisions completed June 2000
EasemenVpermit acquisition 99% complete Condemnation proceedings in progress Anticipated construction award by December 2001 1 
Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Elm Fork Reuellnterceptor, EF-1 City 01 lIVing North of CRWS
Treatment Plant, from West Fork of Trinity River to SH 183 102" parallel relief of 25,300 ft. of 72" & 96" diameter lines Design begun in 1996 Design 80% complete Easement acquisition
begun December 2000 Anticipated construction award in late 2003 Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-2 Cities of lIVing and Dallas North of SH 183 to Spur 348 96" parallel relief of 20,600
ft. of 96" diameter line Design initiated in 1995 Revisions to Final Design made in December 1997 Design 85% complete Easement acquisition to begin by June 2001 Anticipated construction
award in 2003 Elm Fork Interceptor, EF-B/MS 11.5E1MS 12.0E Cites of Farmers Branch, lIVing, and Dallas South of 1·635 and east of Luna Road Rehabilitation of 4000 ft. of 33" diameter
line and nearby meter stations Engineering Report completed August 1996 MS 12.0E design 99% completed in 1998 MS 11.0E design 99% completed in 1998 Final Design revised in June 1998
and June 1999 EF-B Final Design 70% complete Evaluation of developer impacts completed in 1999 Design completion postponed due to low priority Elm Fork Relief Interceptor, EF-6 Cities
of Farmers Branch and Dallas North of Spur 348 to 1-635 72" parallel relief of 12,900 ft. 72" diameter line DeSign initiated in August 1998 Design 60% complete Easement acquisition to
begin by April 2001 Anticipated construction award by October 2003 MOUNTAIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: Mountain Creek Interceptor, MC-4A Location: Cities of Grand Prairie and Arlington
Bowman Branch, South Fork Fish Creek to Loyd Park Type: Construct new lift station, 10,000 ft of twin 24" diameter force main to replace existing 18" force main, and build 7,500 ft of
54" diameter pipeline to replace existing 24" diameter gravity pipeline 2 
Name: Mountain Creek Interceptor. MC-4A (cont.) Status: Environmental Assessment completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Evaluate possible reroute options in South
Grand Prairie due to land development Modify design for two 24" diameter force main and 54" gravity pipeline in July 2001 Easement acquisition begun in October 2000 USACE environmental
data and reports to be completed by September 2001 Easement acquisition to be completed by November 2001 Anticipated construction award by December 2001 Name: Mountain Creek Interceptor.
MC-4B Location: Cities of Grand Prairie, Ar1ington, and Mansfield Loyd Park to Holland Road Type: 16,000 It of 48' relief pipeline replacement of 24" gravity line Status: Environmental
Assessment completed in April 1999 Design Contract awarded in August 1999 Final design to begin in September 2000 Easement acquisition to begin March 2001 USACE environmental data and
reports to be completed by September 2001 Easement acquisition to be completed by August 2001 Anticipated construction award by December 2001 Name: Kirby Creek Outfall Interceptor Location:
Cities of Grand Prairie From Fish Creek to Great Southwest Parkway Type: Preliminary Engineering Study and Environmental Assessment of 20,500 It. of 12" to 24" line Status: Design Contract
awarded in August 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed August 1999 Environmental Assessment to be completed by March 2001 Design to be initiated by October 2001 Easement acquisition
to begin by April 2002 Anticipated construction award in August 2002 WEST FORK INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM Name: West Fork Relief Interceptor. WF-G Phase" and I-A-l Erosion Location: City of
Grand Prairie From Bear Creek System junction approximately 3,900 ft. upstream toward Belt Line Road Type: 84" parallel relief of 3,900 ft. of 45" & 66" Jines Status: Design initiated
in 1996 Revisions to design made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 Design 100% complete in April 1999 Additional Design revisions begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition
begun in 1999 Construction split into two phases in October 2000 Construction contract to be awarded by December 2001 3 
Name: Location: Type: Slatus: Name: Location: Type: Slatus: Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type/Size: Slatus: West Fork Interceptor, WF-11A City of Grand Prairie
From Johnson Creek to Roy Orr Blvd. Preliminary Engineering study and Environmental Assessment of 72" diameter parallel relief 6,900 ft. of 60" diameter tine Design awarded in August
199B Draft Environmental Assessment completed March 2000 Design 20% complete Easement acquisition to begin in October 2001 Anticipated construction award in 2002 West Fork Relief Interceptor.
WF-11 B Cities of Arlington and Grand Prairie From Roy Orr Boulevard to west of West Fork of Trinity River B4" diameter parallel relief of 16,000 ft. of 66" diameter line Design contract
awarded in June 199B Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment completed March 2000 Engineering evaluations & negotiation 01 pipeline relocation, November 1999 to December
2000 Revised environmenlal assessment to be completed April 2001 Revised pipeline alignment in summer 2001 Design 50% complete Easement acquisition to begin in lala 2001 Anticipated
construction award in March 2002 West Fork Interceptor. WF-3 City of Grand Prairie Johnson Creek from junction with West Fork to Hwy. 360 24" parallel relief of 11,050 ft. of 30" line
Preliminary Design Contract awarded in June 1998 Environmental Assessment completed by December 2001 Final Design contract to be awarded by mid 2002 West Fork Interceptor. WF-1 City
of Grand Prairie From the Plant to Bear Creek System junction 84" parallel relief of 17,800 ft. of 84" line Design Contract awarded in June 1998 Preliminary Engineering Study completed
2001 Environmental Assessment completed Evaluation of TXDOT conflicls and pipeline reroutes completed by February 2001 Final Design in progress Easement acquisition to begin by December
2001 Anticipated construction award by February 2002 4 
Name: I and I Management Plan -Phase III Type: Planning Status: Contract awarded in August 1999 Updating POE Data from customer cities in progress Collect temporary flow meter data completed
in late 2000 Complete analysis of flow meter data by early 2001 Select ArcView GIS software in March 2001 Design GIS Structure is 80% completed Design GIS. Hydraulic Model. & Maximo
interface is 70% complete Work is approximately 80% complete ACTIVE PLANT DESIGN PROJECTS: Name: Bar Screening Improvements. Phase I and II Location: PS 6/6A Type: Plant Status: Design
of Phase I is 75% complete Design 01 Phase II is less than 10% complete Anticipated construction award by December 2001 Name: Stage VNI Odor Control Improvements Location: Plant Type:
Plant Improvement Status: Engineering evaluation contract begun June 2001 Work is less than 5% complete ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Name: Flow Monitoring Telemetry System Location:
SystemWide Type/Size: Conversion 01 off-Site meter stations to transmit flow data to the plant by flow monitoring telemetry Status: Construction substantially complete in January 1998
There are two meter stations remaining to be converted Final completion in August 2001 Name: Mountain Creek Reliellnterceptor. MC-1 Location: City 01 Grand Prairie South of CRWS Treatment
Plant. from West Fork Interceptor (1-30) to Jefferson Highway Type/Size: 84· Parallel relief of 7,000 It of 54" line Status: Construction contract awarded October 1997 Construction substantially
complete in June 1999 Negotiation of Construction Claim with Contractor and Engineer during 2000 Final completion to be July 2001 5 
, " Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type/Size: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: Name: Location: Type: Status: 2000 Odor Control
Improvements Behind Administration Building/near Headworks In-ground biofilters and weir covers Construction 92% complete Construction to be substantially complete by August 2001 Final
construction complete by September 2001 Solids Dewatering Solids Dewatering Building New belt presses and solids loading area Construction 98% complete Construction to be substantially
complete by Aug 2001 Sludge Collector System Primary Clarifier NO.3 Rebuild chain and flight conveyor system Construction less than 5% complete Construction to be substantially complete
by Oct 2001 West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF-C. N. B. P. & M City of Arlington From West of Hwy. 360 to west of Collins Street 72" parallel relief of eXisting 54" & 60· lines Design
initiated in 1996 DeSign completed in December 1998 EA completed by December 1998 Construction contract awarded in December 1998 Construction 97% complete Construction to be completed
by August 2001 West Fork Relief Interceptor, WF-G. Phase I City of Grand Prairie From 3,900 feet west of Bear Creek System junction to Belt Line Road 84" parallel relief of 2,200 ft.
of 45' & 66" lines Design initiated in 1996 Revisions to deSign made in 1998 Archeological Study initiated in March 1999 Design 100% complete in April 1999 Additional Design revisions
begun in April 2000 Easement acquisition begun in 1999 Construction split into two phases in October 2000 Construction contract awarded in April 2001 Construction to be completed by
March 2002 list of Construction Project Improvements Completed since January 2001 1. Haul and Dispose of BioSolids, completed May 2001 6 
Design Projects Pipelines Plant Other Total Miles of Pipeline Design Projects Pipelines Plant other Total Design Projects Pipelines Plant Other Total Project Summary (Planning, Engineering,
and Construction) for Report Period 8/99 to 08/01 Number of Projects 8/99 8/00 01/01 08/01 15 13 19 16 3 3 3 2 4 ..2 22 18 22 18 33 36 Dollars Under Contract 8/99 8/00 01/01 8101 $9.2M
$7.4M 10.7 Dollars Spent To date 8/99 8100 01/01 8101 $5.3M $3.5M 6.7 7 
., , Project Summary (Planning. Engineering. and Construction) for Report Period 8/99 to 08/01 Number of Projects 8199 8/00 01/01 8101 Construction Projects Completed In Progress Total
8 J.. 15 7 ....§ 12 4 􀁾􀀠9 Miles of Pipeline 4.6 Dolla8/99 8/00 rs Under 01/01 Contract 8101 Construction Projects Completed In Progress Total $17.M $14.5M$14.1M Dollars Spent to Date
8/99 8/00 01/01 8/01 Construction Proj ects Completed In Progress Total $13.1 M$9.8M $12.5M 8 • 
HANDOUT AGENDA ITEM V-B CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2000 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT ADJUSTED 1'01'1 INTERCEPTOR VI (METHOD 2) FY 2000 DISTRIBUTION ADJUSTED ADJUSTED
CONTRIBUTION BASED ON OF FY 2000 TRA FY 2000 DISTRIBUTION FY 2000 ACTUAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL INTERCEPrOR CONTRIBUTION OF FY2000 ACTUAL ANNUAL CONTRACTING TOTAL FLOW REOUIREMENT BASED
1/1 TOTAL FLOW ACTUAL ANNUAL REQUIREMENT PARTY !MGl PERCENT ON ACTUAL FLOWS i!!!GI !MGl peRCENT REOUIREMENT ADJUSTMENT ADDISON 􀀸􀀳􀀴􀀮􀁾􀀠1.846% $883.980 834.245 1.653% $887,425 $3,44$
ARUNGTON 10.479.077 23.188% $11.103,866 0.016 10.479.062 23.278% $11.147.076 $4,'l.210 BEDFORD 1.705.786 3.775% $1.807.706 1.705.786 3.789% $1.814,626 $6.819 CARROLLTON 4,14'7.744 9.179%
$4,398.480 16.551 4.131.193 9.177% $4.394.546 ($\.. ceDAR HIUL 75.260 0.157% $79.970 75.260 0.167% $SO.058 $88 COULEYVIULe 833.738 1.945% $663,501 5.556 828.170 1.840% $860.984 ($2.638)
COPPEUL 1,269.919 2.854% $1.388.674 1.288.818 2.665% $1,372.148 $5,474 DALLAS 2.888.947 6.906% $$2,828.162 0.01 2.566.937 5.929% $2,839,075 $10.913 D/FW AIRPORT 760.815 1.728% 5827.475
780.815 1.735% $830.590 $3.115 DUNCANVIULE 71.966 0.160% $16,618 71.956 0.160% $76.64,'l ($76) eULESS 1.357.4,'l6 3.004% $1.4,'l8.603 26.278 1.331.157 2.957% $1,416,015 ($22.48a) FARMERS
BRANCH 2.036.984 4.506% $2.157.765 0.01 2.036.974 4.523% $2.166.762 $8.007 FORT WORTH 439.005 0.971% $464,976 5.923 439.083 0.962% $460.691 (54.288) GRAND PRAIRIE 5,397.796 11.946% 65.720.014
42.088 6,355.707 11.897% $5.697,120 l$22{ GRAPeviNE 883.410 1.466% $702.970 34.18 62902,')0 1.395% $889,342 ($33,628) HURST 64.981 0.144% $68.956 64.961 0.144% $69,123 $167 IRVlNG 9,992.$SO
22.112% $10.588,610 32.975 9.959.855 22.125% $10.594.803 $6.193 KELLER 685.006 1.516% 5725,956 1.393 683.782 1.519% $727.371 $1,416 MANSFleLO 962.289 2.174% $1.041.047 983.289 2.182%
$1.044,907 $3.660 N RICHLAND H1ULS 199.372 0.441% 8211.178 6.407 192.988 0.429% $205.288 (65.912) SOUTHLAKE 483.806 1.071'11 6512,862 1.1;39 482.169 1.071% $512,905 $44 45.188.426 100.000%
547.8!M!.259 172.885 45,G16.670 100.000% $47.688.259 $0 3/28101 AdLaoOO.xfs 
CENTRAL REGIONAl. WASTEWATER SYSTEM FY 2000 INTERCEPTOR !II Customer TM TRA 􀁁􀁤􀁾􀁵􀁳􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠City fOf TM Interceptor Interceptor TRA Receiving Reoetvlng Up3tteam AOF AOOF In Intereeptor
Cily Total III III Interceptor Matar 0.013 4.687 24,27 Euless 12.0B 12,ea, 13.08.12.98,13.18 0.444 0'.354 0.001 182.52 251.913 434,50 0.0002089 0.Oa8 13.919 150,87 Euleso 13.0W iS,OW,
15,SW. 1S.OW 0.595 0.466 􀁏􀀮􀀱􀁾􀀠83.00 219..16 303.:36 0.0004176 0.035 12.790 53.36 Euls$$ 1S.5W 17,OW 0.043 0.034 0,009 B.OS 111,98 120.06 0.0000725 0,001 0.214 6,39 eulass HI.OW
,a.1W. 18.6W! 19.0W, 19,1W 0.618 0.S!19 0.049 53.90 211.38 2S5,2B 0.0001554 0,010 3.661 41,70 FarmelS Branch 13,oE 13.'E1 13,2E1 13.aE :lea8 ..... 03J54 1,:;8 1344,88 13413.26 0,0000404
0.000 0,(')20 0.66 Fort Worth 10.0W 11,6W, 11.8W O.HIS 0,131 O.OSA 62.43 66.12 131.15 Q,0002fi27 0,015 5.985 61.78 Grand Prairie 5.OJ 7,OJ. B.OJ 4.782 4.637 0.145 505.78 1295.91 1601,69
O.OOOO!IOS 0.041 Grand Prairie SJlW 6.OW MSO 0.522 0.027 71.15 196.08 2.67.2.3 0.0001019 0.007 Grand Prairie 5.1M 7.0M, 􀁾􀁴􀁏􀁍􀀬􀀠9.6M, 10,OM 4.202 4,134 0.008 568.71 1390,54 1959,25
0.0000349 0.020 2115101 Adjidm2000.Xl$ \ ,,/
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FOR UPSTREAM CITY (METHOD 2) City Meter ID 􀁉􀁾􀀠r:;5.0/16.5E IIFarmers Branch Il3.OE 11.8B 􀁾􀀠13.5B Keller 12.8B Euless 112.0B 􀁾􀁎􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀠Richland
Hills 114.OB KaUer I Grand Prairie Grand Prairie IIArlinglon Fort Worth Euless Euless IIEul,ss I Grand Prairie Dallas IIGrand Prairie )15.0B 5.0W 7.0W I·OW 10.0W 11.aW 13.0W 1 '6 . 5W
1a.OW 15 . OJ f3.oM Is.1M City Meter ID Node Lateral IEF002 F002.2 =009 Sta. No. Diameter Slope Dallas Dallas 􀁾􀀠las lison lison 111 .OE MS11 .OE 12.1B 12.7B 10.0E 1930E 3460B 2900B
'--'-IEF2 EF2 􀁾􀁏􀁐􀀠Keller 12. 35908 40908 4060 6280 4920 60908 23958 15808 2460B BC020.4 BC01a C019.3 BBCXIIl 􀁂􀁂􀁃􀁾􀀠XIINorth Richland 􀁈􀁾􀀠13.0B 13.1B 14.7B u.. Keller 15.0B
North Richland Hills 16.0B Arlington 1470W 1780W MS9.5W MS9.7W MS9.8W B13 LBCII LBCII LBG!!... XJB 􀁾􀁲􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁧􀁴􀀨􀀠;rand Prairie 1Euless _ ,rth lArlington II'linaton 1 11 . 6W 11.
MS11.6W WF011.1 2460W WF011 2470W WF011 􀁾􀀸􀀶􀀰􀀱􀀯􀀱􀀠17201/1 3760 3330 3539 XJC IB8P BBP B.6W MS18.6W EO: 19.0W 3860W S8l 19.1W 34BOW EOS8 17.0J 1810J JT008 CWRR 8.OJ MSa.OJ JIOOl
CWCS M MS4.SM MC002.1 MC2 M 380M MCOO6 FCI 􀁾􀀮􀀳􀁍􀀠2l20M MC004 EM -I 2290M MC012 NEL )M 1080M MC007 NFFC lM 8030M MCOOS SFFC 5M 1950M MC010 BOWl 10.0M 1840M MCO W T !L 26900.00\City
􀁾􀀠450.0C 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠"9600.00 2266.00 CIN 35540.00 City 38040.00 12767.50 28;'::1. 8783. tc;; 􀁾􀀠650.1 3525.651city 7560.00 2747.16 20372.81 Icity 11390.00 148.00 18.00 109.20 297OilOO\
FM 17987.61 -..!..'! ..1!! ...l1 -'-" 42 --<1 􀁾􀀠36 􀁾􀀠30 10271 11051 0.00172 1.00200 1.01700 0.00228 0.00200 0.00408 0.008! 0.0031 0.00440 0.00100 0.00100 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀠Capacity
(cfs) Slope 1.858 27.712 1.598 13.700 48.170 7.105 27.249 0.00010 +-+-..1!! -..!..'! " " ., --.1! 0.00240 0.00120 0.0046C ).00172 0.00100 0.00880 0.00241 0.00240 0.00200 0.005 0.00800
0.00480 0.00800 101 0.00340 14.4891 24 0.00411 1450 10339 12 0.32000 10 0.02000 18 0.00340 44.3621 27 0.00440 5.024 13.006 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1.00550 1.00266 ).0026( ).0040( l.O022( Capacity (cis)
􀁾􀀠4.658 W06 W06 􀁾􀀮􀀲􀀴􀀰􀀠t570 3.910 ).738 2.250 2.763 3.649 4.393 27.71::: 􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀱􀀰􀁾􀀠3.351 49.421 1.59E 2.721 􀀰􀀮􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀠0.390 1.084 ...1.1.§l 14.524 10.180 2.080 1.957 6.142
1.389 0.209 3.107 􀁾􀀠20.599 30.501 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠16.016 .148 31.369 􀁾􀀠2/10/01 DltrnlrOQ.xIs 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHODOLOGY Method 2 Method 2 utilizes the CRWS and city inch-diameter-mile (idm) calculations, and the metered flows from
each delta meter to prorate interceptor III on a subsystem basis. The interceptor III is developed by applying the III per idm for the delta meter subsystem to an adjusted interceptor
idm. The adjusted interceptor idm is based on the line size required totransport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city. The interceptor III flows are deducted from the Fiscal Year-Contribution and the Annual Requirement is revised based
on adjusted contribution percentages. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION METHOD 2 The following is a description of Method 2 for prorating CR WS interceptor infiltration/inflow (III) to the contracting
pany flows. I. Determine the annual volume of III for each subsystem defined by a delta meter location. ADF -ADDF = III (annually) The use of delta meter subsystem values assumes that
the annual average III per idm for the CRWS interceptors and the city collection system served by the interceptor is . the same within the delta meter subsystem. The interceptors upstream
of non-delta meters are considered to be lines required to serve the metered city, regardless of ownership. The evaluation of III annually will provide a trending to account for annual
rainfall, III reduction in the CR WS and the city collection systems, and any other changes in the condition of the systems. 2. Determine the city inch-diameter-miles (idm) within the
delta meter subsystem. The delta meter subsystem idm could be determined annually, or assumed to remain the same for a period of three to five years. . 3. Determine the CRWS interceptor
idm within the delta meter subsystem. 4. Determine the annual subsystem III per idm. (No. I divided by the sum of No.2 and No.3) 5_ Determine the adjusted CRWS interceptor idm. The adjusted
interceptor idm is based on the interceptor size required to transport the existing flow capacity provided for the upstream city using the slope of the existing CR WS interceptor segments
from the upstream meter to the delta meter. The existing interceptor size in excess of the size required for the upstream city is considered to be required to serve the delta metered
city, regardless of ownership_ 6. Apply the annual subsystem III per idm to the adj usted CR WS interceptor idm. (No.4 multiplied by No.5) 7. Adjust the Fiscal Year Contribution Based
on Actual Flow for each of the contracting parties. 8. Adjust the Distribution of Fiscal Year Actual Annual Requirement Based on Actual Flows for each of the contracting parties. 
BLACK & VEATCH MEMORANDUM Trinity River Authority of Texas B&V Project 37417.110 III Proration B&V File B Negative Flow Adjustment October 10, 1997 To: Patricia Cleveland From: Layne
Parsons, P.E. The following methodology is proposed for adjusting negative annual flows used in . the interceptor IJI proration calculation. ADF Adjustment Ifa negative ADF value is
calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, use the following steps to determine an adjusted ADF value: ]. Using the estimated subsystem population and the current ADF, determine the average
gallons-per-capita-day (gpcd) for the meters upstream of the receiving (delta) meter. 2. Apply the calculated average gpcd flow value to the cumulative population for the receiving (delta)
meter to determine an adjusted ADF for the receiving (delta) meter. 3. Using the adjusted cumulative ADF for the receiving (delta) meter, calculate the delta ADF. III Adjustment If a
negative IJI value is calculated for a receiving (delta) meter, use the following steps to determine an adjusted IJI value: I. Using the estimated developed acres and the current annual
Ill, determine the average gallons-per-acre-day (gpad) for the meters upstream of the receiving (delta) meter. 2. Apply the calculated average gpad IJI flow value to the cumulative developed
acres for the receiving (delta) meter to determine a revised annual IJI for the receiving (delta) meter. 3. Using the revised annual cumulative IJI for the receiving (delta) meter, calculate
the delta III. 
CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM INTERCEPTOR III PRORATION FLOW ANALYSIS CRITERIA The average annual daily flow (ADF) is defined to be the total annual flow divided by the total number
of days in the year. The average daily dry weather flow is defined to be the lowest seven day average flow recorded during the year. The following criteria are established for the analysis
of the flows used to determine the ADF and ADDF for the interceptor III proration. 1. The beginning of the fiscal year for flow recordings may result in panial inclusion of the first
seven day average meter recording. Panial seven day average meter recordings consisting of less than four (4) days will not be considered for use as the ADDF. 2. During the year, there
may be a need to adjust the recorded flows. The reason for these adjustments may include, but not be limited to line blockage or year-to-date (YTD) adjustments. Adjusted flows will not
be considered for use as ADDF. 
"." 'I 1 '_, 􀁾􀀠1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 , 
HADOUT AGENDA ITE_ . V-B CRWS -2001 MID YEAR REALLOCATION CONTRACTING PARTY! 2001 BUDGET 2001 BUDGET 2001 REVISED 2001 REVISED. MGD % SHARE MGD % SHARE 1.652%ADDISON 2.4200 1.691% 2.3951
ARLINGTON 39.8600 27.848% 41.6897 28.757%1 BEDFORD 5.3600 3.745% 4.7802 3.297% i CARROLLTON 12.2000 8.524% 12.2000 8.415%1 • CEDAR HILL 0.2100 0.147% 0.2627 0.181%1 COLLEYVILLE 2.4450
1.708% 2.4269 1.674%! ICOPPELL 1 3.57501 2.498%1 3.80541 2.625%1 IDALLAS 7.20001 5.030%1 8.7976 1 6.068%1 i DFW AIRPORT 2'm 1.467% 2.3138 • DUNCANVILLE 0.2 0.140% 0.1826 EULESS 4.00
2.795% 3.8567 FARMERS BRANCH 6.5000 4.541% 6.2116 FORT WORTH 1.2000 0.838% 2.6803 GRAND PRAIRIE 15.8900 11.102% 15.9235 I GRAPEVINE 2.7240 1.903% 1.7899 HURST 0.1750 0.122% 0.1965 IRVING
29.9000 20.890% 28.3876 KELLER 1.8500 1.292% 1.9969 MANSFIELD 3.0900 2.159% 3.0175 • N RICHLAND HILLS 0.5400 0.377% 0.6386 SOUTHLAKE 1.6940 1.183% 1.4267 TOTAL 143.1330 100.000% 144.9798
1.596% 0.126%. 2.660% 4.284% 1.849%· 10.983% 1.235% 0.136% 19.580%. 1.377%1 2.081% 0.440% 0.984% 100.000% 
" 
MICHAEL E. MURPHY, P.E. Director of Public Works (lI72) 450-2878 (972) 450-2837 FAX mmurphy@ci.addison.tx.us E-mait 1'Qwn ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Dr. P.O. Box 9010, Addison, Texas
75001-9010 ), ,, -. ., . , ... 
-----• • • EXHIBIT I CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND FLOW DATA FISCAL BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL PROJECTED 􀁾􀁾􀀠ACTUAL PROJECTED
NET ACTUAL YEAR EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES REVENUE REVENUE FLOW, FLOW COST11,000 GAL. COST11,000 GAL. 1997 $48,358,525 $47,401,825 $45,233,590 $42,891,464 116.00 MGD 118,01 MGD $1.0683
$0.9958 1998 $47,014,070 $46,752,148 $43,601,935 $43,673,073 118.28MGD 118.04MGD $1.0099 $1.0136 1999 $50,390,530 $50,691,945 $45,859,710 $45,808,213 123.31 MGD 120.64 MGD $1.0189 ------$1.0403
2000 $51,066,490 $51.361,749 $47,812,790 $48,442,041 127.41 MGD 123.47 MGD $1.0253 $1.0720 2001 $54,509,150 $56,087,461 $49,187,660 $51,953,155 143.13 MGD 146.49 MGD $0.9415 $0.9716
2002 $54,352,130 $53,339,201 $50,421,660 $50,188,032 145.52 MGD 144.22 MGD $0.9493 $0.9533 2003 $58,077,710 $56,099,876 $54,613,900 $53,188,063 150.15 MGD 139.13 MGD $0.9965 $1.0473
2004 $57,839,230 • $55,193,770 • 151.21 MGD • $0.9973 • 2005 $58,421,590 • $55,735,040 • 151.25 MGD • $1.0100 • -Central Regional Wastewater System Flow & Net Costl1,OOO Gal. 160 􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠•140 􀁉􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁲􀀱􀀬􀀵12
0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Fiscal Year ELNETCOST/1OO0 -+-ACTUAL 􀁾􀁇􀁄I *FY2oo4 & 2005 are prOjected 100 c Ii 80 60 40 20 a 0.5 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠o