! IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase !II RFI # __-'3"--__ Date: July 26, 2004 i i or station & offset 􀀡􀁮􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁡􀁴􀁾􀁮􀀠for Ihe ROW In the fOllowing Areas: · North Side from Sia 60+75 to 62+ 73.88 (Sheet 16) · Soulh Side from 60+75 to 63+50.43 (Sheet 16) · North Side from 66+47.29 to 7617 (Sheet 16 & 17) · South Side from 74+51.54 to 78+32.69 (SheeI17) Inc!udung bent point at approxstatlon 771'45 Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Response The. HNTB CtUnponieJ To Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Date August 18,2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AW3 Subject ROW Information Request Please provide coordinate or station & offset info for the ROW on sheets 16 & 17 Response/Action Taken: The attached sheets were created and should answer the questions concerning the coordinates given in the RFI By: Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Date: August 18,2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # ___4'--__ Date: July 26, 2004 In,," T',ok.11 Sections for stallons 67+00 to 85+50 show a typlcal cross slope of 114" 1FT with a note that the cross slope may vary from the typical and 10 Si98 Pavfng Plans for proposed Pa,,;ng, PI,on shows the proposed cross 􀁳􀁾􀁰􀁥􀁳from slatlon 34+12 to station 51 +00 ( sheet 41 10 45), and the bridge layout sheets show the proposed cross stope for Ihe brIdge, I"a""", 51'0010 66+85 (Sheels 239 to 242), but the proposed cross slopes where not included from 66+85 to 85+50.(Sheets 48 to 51} Provide the cross slope information tor the proposed roadway from statlon 66i"85 to 85+50. {Sheets 48 to 51} Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Response The HNTB Companies To Jenny Nicewander, HNTB Corporation Date August 4, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AW4 Subject Cross Slope Information Request Please provide the cross slope information for the proposed roadway from station 66+85 to 85+50. (Sheets 48 to 51) Response/Action Taken: Use gutter grades on cross section sheets (shts 124 to 152) to determine cross slope information. By:JSN Date: August 4, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'5'--__ Date: July 26, 2004 yard excavallon Is only shOWn on the roadway cross sectiOns, 11le lil'Tlils of the excavation appears to extend beyond the Itmits of the ROW on several cross sections, and I cross sections do not have the ROW or Temp Construction Easement shoWn, Please review the fdfowing: sheets and stations: 149 • Stations 78 ...00 to 80+50 150, Stations 81+00 to 84+50 preform brickyard excavation outside the ROWand or TeE? Ipl,,,,,, p,.ovlcle a plan view with coordinate lnformalion for the brickyard excavation, ) Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Tile HNTB COlllponies 􀁾􀁾_____________􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁒􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁥􀀢􀀢􀁳􀁾􀁰􀀢􀀢􀁯􀁾􀁮􀀢􀀢􀁳􀀢􀀢􀁥􀀠_____ To Jenny Nicewander, HNTB Corporation Date August 4, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann RFI Number R-AW5 Subject Brickyard Excavation Request Please provide a plan view with coordinate information for the brickyard excavation. Response/Action Taken: See [mal contract documents for actual required excavation. By:JSN Date: August 4, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'6"--__ Date: July 27, 2()()4 Wes1em would like to utilize the attached crushed concrete fer the for Rep &. RCB bedding. iTh. 􀁧􀁥􀁯􀀧􀀬􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁡􀁬􀀠report prepared by Terra-Mar suggests in section a,3.2· 􀁾􀁃􀁵􀁬􀁶􀁯􀁲􀁴􀀠wall Backfill under pavement and tAS!:: Walls" that crushed cor'lctete is acceptable for use as bedding long as it meets the gradations on table 7 {sheet 20 of the geatach report}. I"",a". ",vi,w the attached ASTM C33-357 sleve analysis for 1 1/2" crushed concrete. The attached analysis meels the grarlauOIls sat forth in tabla 7, IPI"." a,,,,,"v. this malerial for usa on the Pl'OlooL Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 􀀱􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀭􀁊􀀠Request For Information Response The HNTB Companies To Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Corporation Date July 29, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AW6 Subject Pipe Bedding Response/Action Taken: (REVISED) The sieve analysis for 1 \1," crushed concrete provided by Big City Crushed Concrete Testing conforms to the requirements as set forth by Terra-Mar's geotechnical report and is approved far use. By: Daniel J. Filer Date: 07/29/04 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'7:...-.__ Date: __--'J,.,u"'ly'--=26"',.::2:;::OO::.4"-__ IPI"". ,.,,"" the north side ROW jnformation at station 74+2Q.41 to 87+76.65 (sheets 1110 19), The ROW in some areas appears to fa!! under the westbound roadway and other significant amount of permanent work outside the limits shown, work required outside !he proposed ROW? Ipl,,,,,,, pr,"iel. II,. correct boundary information. Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 􀀱􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀽􀁊􀀠Request For Information The HNT!i Companic$ ___________􀁒􀁾􀁥􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁰􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁾􀁥􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭To Daniel 1. Filer, HNTB Date August 18,2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-A W7 Subject ROW Alignment Conflicts Request Please provide the correct boundary info for sheets 17, 18, and 19 Response/Action Taken: The attached sheets were created and should answer the questions concerning the coordinates given in the RFI. By: Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Date: August 18,2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PRQJECTNo. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-,Se...-..__ Date: July 26, 2004 IP"'''."",'W the followfng information conceming the elignment of retaining waDs 1 and 3. Plan ."d ,;;«>'oraSh"et40 􀁾􀀠Retaining wa!! #1 starting @46+oo. 24.00' LT and ends @51+00, 2S.50'lT 􀁉􀁔􀁨􀁥􀁆􀀺􀁥􀁾􀀧􀁩􀁮􀁬􀀧􀀧􀀹􀁷􀁡􀀡􀁬􀀠Plan and 􀁐􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁩􀁬􀁥􀁳􀀠(sheet 119) shOw a same informatIOn ;3slhe Paving Plan and Profile sheels \ ITh.r'm",.'1 section for 4&+00 to 51 +00 shows an offset of 29' L T to the face of wall IRe'.'n',,,, 􀁗􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀳􀀺􀀠and: "",file Sheet 48· Retainingwal! #3sterting@66+6$,28.50LTandends@68+50. 34.40' LT ITh. 􀀢􀀺􀁥􀁾􀀢􀁮􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀠"al'l Plan and Profiles (shoot 121) show a same informef.on as the Paving Plan and Profile sheets ITh. T,.,;o"'1 section fur 67+00 to 70+60 shows an offset of29' LT to the fue of wall Ip"-,,, sm,w", the '.'lowing: '1. Is the offset of the wall calculated from the face of coping or face otwell? 12.00 we use the offsets given to us in !he Plan and Profile sheets? 'I i 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Response .____ To Jenny Nicewander, HNTB Corporation Date August 4, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AW8 Subject Retaining Wall Offi;et Request 1) Is the offset ofthe wall calculated from the face of coping or face ofwall? 2) Do we use the offsets given to us in the Plan and Profile Sheets? Response/Action Taken: 1) Offset was calculated from face ofwall. 2) Use offi;ets given in plan/profile sheets. The HNTD Companies By:JSN Date: August 4, 2004 ) IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # 9 Date: July 27, 2004 :Andrew Schneemann review the attached letter from Texas Concrete (Archer westem's U-8eam Precaster) concerning modification to Ihe U-8eam Design. review and answer as your earnest convenience. Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3􀀱􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀭􀁊􀀠Request For Information The HNTB Companies 􀁒􀁥􀁳􀁐􀁑􀁮􀁾􀁳􀀽􀁥􀁾_________ To Arthur Champlin, URS Corp. Date August 4, 2004 Oliginator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AW9 Subject Texas Concrete V-Beam Questions Request Please review the attached letter from Texas COllcrete (Archer Western's V-Beam Precaster) concerning modification to the V-Beam design. Response/Action Taken: In response to this RFI, an email was received on 04Aug04 from Richard Beaupre, URS Corp. with the following: 3""In response to RFI #9, we have no objection to coring holes through the Ubeam webs for the #5 horizontal reinforcement for the transverse diaphragms 11in lieu of using mechanical couplers. We recommend diameter holes be utilized, so that the diaphragm concrete can fill in around the #5 bars. We recommend that the web diaphragm opening for the lower #9 reinforcement remain the same as shown in the plans." By:DJF Date: August 4, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-,1",-0__ Date: August 2. 2002 Roference to the Town of Add!son Constn,lction SpeclficaUons and Contract Documents, please refer to !ha Technical Specifit:alion, Section WSS, In paragraph llUed 'CONNECTIONS MANHOLES',it states "Manholes are to be poured in place with siX" sack minimum concrete mix." ITO ex"od"'" the project, we would like the option to use precast manholes (In the sannary sewer. Is this ecceplable? ) Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 􀀱􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁩􀀠i=J Request For Information Response The HNTB Companies To Daniel 1. Filer, HNTB Corporation Date August 2, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AWIO Subject Stonn Sewer Manholes Request In reference to the Town of Addison Construction Specifications and Contract Documents, please refer to the Technical Specification, Section WSS, in paragraph titled 'CONNECTION AT MANHOLES', it states "Manholes are to be pured in place with six sack minimum concrete mix." To expedite the project, we would like the option to use precast manholes on the sanitary sewer. Is this acceptable? Response/Action Taken: Precast manholes are allowed to be used as long as the manholes confonn to NCTCOG, item 2.19, "PRECAST REINFORCED MANHOLE SECTIONS". Contractor must submit fabricator specs to HNTB for approval ofconfonnance to NCTCOG. Contractor should verify confonnance of fabricator's specifications before submitting for approval. By:DJF Date: August 2, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'-''--__ Date: August 3, 2004 11'1;"",.",view the attached drawing and plan sheet BR-42. IT:: 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀠cylindric al socket, Clodteller Bridge and Structures International, loe. {CBSI}, has informed AtGttet Western that the stool guide pipe detailad on BR-421s 􀁉􀁲􀁬􀁃􀁏􀀢􀀧􀀨􀀧􀁾h 7 anchor socket actual oulside diameter is 7 9/16ft and CBSI wi!! lequire an additional 114" around the socket ter Installation. IThe .""".d drawing on the Steel guide pipe and Bearing plate show our proposed changes. The changes are as f(lliow: The pipe was Changed to a galvanized 8" schedvle 20 p!pe.ID 8,125" 00 8.625" The bearing plate was enlarged to 1.12' x 1 ,12' In ootrlpenssw for the klse in beating area rrom the larger pipe opening. Ip'"asu,ped,ii"! the approve these changes, SO' that we ean proceed with the shop drawings and submittals, Page 1 ----II-lllI----1 "---r f--I--';'---11 􀁉􀁴􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁪􀀠L------lri" I 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁬2. Drain 6roovc:!> fJearinq Plale Hoi Dipped Galv, --!t/P)5 18 E!t Arapaho Phase 3 I:I􀁾 i i =J Request For Information _______________􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁥􀀢􀀢􀁳􀀽􀁰􀁯􀀮􀀡􀁬􀀤􀀮􀁑􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭The HNTlJ Companies To Cliff Hall, URS Corporation Date August 3, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AWII Subject Pipe Sleeve and Bearing Plate Modifications Request The mannfacturer of the cylindrical socket, Clodfelter Bridge and Structures International, Inc. (CBS!), has informed Archer Western that the steel guide pipe detailed on BR-42 is incorrect The Type 7 anchor socket aetual outside diameter is 7 9/16" and CBS! will require and additional 1/4" around the socket for installation. The attached drawing on the Steel guide pipe and Bearing plate show the proposed changes. The changes are as follow: L The pipe was changed to a galvanized 8" schedule 20 pipe, ID 8.125" 00 8.625" 2. The bearing plate was enlarged to 1.12' x 1.12' to compensate for the loss in bearing area from the larger pipe opening. ResponselAction Taken: I Via email, Richard Beaupre had the following response: "In response to RFI #11, we agree to the following changes per the latest manufacturers anchorage dimensions (we had contacted the manufacturer during design and we were advised to use a pipe with 7 1/2" ID): 1. The pipe changed to 8" schedule 20 (ASTM A53 -10 8.125" and 00 8.625") . 2. The bearing plate enlarged to 1.125l!xl.12S" with a 7 3/4" diameter opening. It was our intention to place the bearing plate prior to casting the diaphragms. The bearing plate should be tack welded to the pipe." By: Daniel 1. Filer Date: August 5, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-,1-"1A,,,-__ Date: August 3,2004 Schneemann review the attached drawing and plan sheet BR-42. manufacturer of tho cylindrical sockel, Clodfelter Bridge and Structures International. Inc. (CBSI), has informed ArcherWestern that the steel guide pipe detailed on BR-42 is i Type 7 anchor socket actual outside diameter is 7 9/16" and CBSI will require an additional 114" around the socket for installation. attached drawing on the Steel guide pipe and Bearing plate show our proposed changes. The changes are as follow: . The pipe was changed to a galvanized 8" schedule 20 pipe, ID 8.125" OD 􀀸􀀮􀀶􀀲􀀵􀁾􀀠. The bearing plato was enlarged to 1.12' x 1.12' to compensate for the lose in bearing area from the larger pipe opening. expedite the approve these changos, so that we can proceed with the shop drawings and submittals. allhe attached drawing of the Bearing Plate. The inside of the plate was changed to 7 3/4" Dia opening. Page 1 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # ___1.0.:2=---__ Date: August 4, 2004 W. Plano Parkway. Ste 200 Texas 75093 Bulen c/o Daniel Filer Schneemann review plan sheet 8S·9. Western would like to use a 4x2x3116 Rectangular Structural Tubing in leu of the 4° diameter Flattened Steel Pipe. detailed on sheet 8S-9. Page 1 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # 12 -Revised Date: August 19, 2004 Western woufd like to use a $x3>:114 Rectangular Structural Tubing in leu of the 4" diameter Flattened 􀁓􀁴􀁾􀁬􀀠Pipe, detailed on sheet BS-9, attached Drawing: of Current and Proposed Cup Page 1 RFI#12 Dowel Cup r1aferial 411 5che:dule 40 Pipe 4" 5chedule 20 Pipe i? Unavaliable, Uxd 5che:dule 40 Pipe. 11/4/1 Dowel 411 5chedule 40 Flafferrn 10 211 ID (CURRENT) PoIyefhylerr or P oIydyrerr F oaf"} 11/4/1I.-/ovvel-... 6x5x.2'5 51rudural /ubinq (PROP05ED) Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Response The HNTB Compalties To Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Corporation Date August 31, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AWI2 Subject Slab Dowel Cup Modifications Request A. W. would like to use a 6x3x 114 rectangular structural tubing in lieu of the 4" diameter flattened steel pipe, detailed on sheet BS-9. Is this acceptable. Response/Action Taken: It is preferred that a 5 Yz X 2 X 3116 be used. This appears to be a standard shape. By: Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Corporation Date: August 31, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-,1.:<.3__ Date: August 4, 2004 Ipl•••• ,e,iewGenera! 􀁮􀁾􀁥􀀠10 on sheet 8R-1. 10 states that 1M Cenltactor is 10 coordinate with the Town ofAddison for the Location. WOI'ding and Mounting Details for the Bronze monuments, IPI".", p""",.",.,I.tails 10 manufacture and Inslalllhe24")( 24" Bronze plaque. Page 1 let IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'-'--__ Date: August 18, 2004 Sheet 24 shows removal or Ihe paving In quesUon st spprox sta 61+65 to 62+65. Sheet 59 shoWs removing the Stripping in Ihe area in question 3. Sheet 63 shows malching the existing paving wiln the curb ang gutter in the area in quostion. previous Icds Archee Western to believe that sheet 24 Is a mistake and the paving in question is not to be removed. provide direction on the exact areas t& be demolished in the Rink parking let Review the Following Sheets: Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 I:I􀁾i i =1 Request For Information Response The HNTB CompanieJ To Guy Van-Baulen Date August 26, 2004 Originator Andrew Scbneemann, Archer Western RFI Number R-AWI4 Subject Esisting Concrete at the Rink Request Sheets 24, 59 & 63 lead Archer Western to believe that there are mistakes and there is question as to what pavement should be removed. Response/Action Taken: l. Sheet 24 -pavement to be removal as per the indicate area for approx. Sta 61+25 to 62+65. 2. Sheet 59 -The two notes in question "removal existing striping', is to be deleted from the sheet 59. 3. Sheet 63 -The note "Match existing pavement grades", should read "Proposed conc. pavement to match existing pavement elevations". The contractor is directed to place the new pavement as per Sheet 58 indicates the area ofproposed concrete pavement. By: Guy Van-Baulen, HNTB Date: August 26, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # ____􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀵_____ Date: August 19, 2004 reference the attached DWU-1 Sheet Sheet DWU·1, the plan view oflhe ''Typical Butterfly Valve Inslallationwilh Blowoff & M.H." shows a 12ft flanged outret with a 6" bypass gate valve. In section E·E a 6ft Flanged Outlet i a 12" by-pass Gate valve is shown for the same location. Since no reducer is shown on either side of the valve and the valve connects into 61\6 flang lee. we conclude the correct 1;"'lalla",," is to heve a 6" flanged outlet with a 6ft by-pass gate valve. attached Drawing of Current and Proposed Cup Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 Request For Information Response The HNTB Componie$ To Daniel 1. Filer, HNTB Date August 27,2004 Originator Andrew Schneeman, Archer Western RFI Number R-AWI5 Subject 12" Valve @60" Waterline Request Verity or correct call out on sheet DWU-I where 12" flanged outlet is coupled with 6" by-pass valve. Response/Action Taken: As per an email correspondence between Katura Curry, Grantham and Assoc. and Jose Orozco, DWU, "the correct installation is to have a 6" flanged outlet with a 6" by-pass gate valve, not 12" as indicated". By: Daniel J. Filer, HNTB Date: 08/27/2004 I/.,. IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-'-"-__ Oate : August 24. 2004 confirmation of convarsations between Archer Western and HNTB. Areher Western is proposing to following procedures for clearing trees adjaneent to the 60" DWU Waterline: Air trees greater then 4" in diameter and outside the proposed roadway, wlll be out off at or below existing ground level and will embanked upon with a minimum of 2: or malerial All trees, grealer Iha 4'"11'1 diameter and under roadway, win have the rootball removed and dirt embanked to final dirt grade. you ooncure with the above procedures? Page 1 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No, Arapaho Phase III RFI # _____􀀱􀁾􀀷􀁾___ Date: August 25, 2004 ConIract SpeCifications stete thai lhe General ProvisiOns of the Contract shall be stated in Ihe Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction, North Texas Council of IG.w.,"n,enl (4th Edition, 2002), Under Division 100, "General Proviskms" ,"" Contract Pians reference speclf!CaIlOIl$ in the 3rd edilion of the Standard Specifications for Public Work Conslruction, North Texas Council 36" ""i,. for the arch has longitudinal weIr! seam. When end welding the pipe together most we!ding codes require rolating the pipe at least 90 degrees fJ'OIY'! the adjacent plpe so ! pipe seams do not align _ the Designer or Owner have a preference? is ready to be sent 10 the bentler and this questlon must be answered before the pipe is bent. IPh,••..",ed'i". this question as not to cause any delay in the fabrication of the arch. Page 1 "Zl'I IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __􀀭􀀽􀀲􀁾􀀱􀀬􀀭􀀭__ Date: August 26, 2004 Fabrication has !he follow fabrication queslion: Steel for the stinger is specified as A572:·5Q T1. is CVN necessary od the stinger since it is decorative only? Page 1 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-='--__ Date: August 26, 2004 W. Plano Parkway. St. 200 Texas 75093 Fabrication has the follow fabrication question: 1W'lenwUl! the Owner want to Inspect the fabteiCalion ShOp facilities. Bef()tC: tho pipe Is sent to bender or at the start or rabrication? pipe is ready 10 be sent to the bender and th1s question must be answered before the p:pe is bent expedite this question as not to causa any delay in the fabrication of the arch. Page 1 Arapaho Phase 3 I:I􀁾i i -1 Request For InformationThe HNfB Cf)1'Ifpanics Response To Guy Van-Baulen Date August 27, 2004 Originator Andrew Schneemann RFI Number R-AW22 Subject Inspections Request When will the owner/inspector require inspection ofmaterials Response/Action Taken: HNTB and Town of Addison does not wish to inspect materials prior to bending. Please advise once pipe is bent and fabrication is ready to begin. By: Guy Van-Baulen, HNTB Date: August 27, 2004 IREQUEST FOR INFORMATION PROJECT No. Arapaho Phase III RFI # __-,2",3,-__ Date; August 26, 2004 􀁊􀁔􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁴􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁃􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀠hetwtren HNTB and Archer Western personnel, there appears 10 be different views on how 10 construct the work in the Rink parking Lot area, Archer Western 1'1 this issue with the fullowing. IP""'o ",forone," pian sheets 24 &. 59. I...􀀮􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠w •••",,", interpretatlOfi of the plans concerning the Rink parking 101 is as fo!fews: . Plan sheet 24 Shows Ihe sawcut and removal at the back of the proposed curb. , The contract has no provision for installing curb and gutter, only integral curb. Archer Western intends to instal! doweled curb in accordance with NTCOG standard drawing 2120 on the axistlng paving and Integral curb on M\IoI Of replaced paving. I􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁨􀀧􀀠Arch", Western interpfetation on how the proceed with Ihe work al the Rfnk Parking Lot area or provide d,rm:;tion at yOut earliest convenience as not tG delay the id Ii" WOik. Page Page 1 "0.1 0""011: a""''''ta 1070:t.., ... 􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠••• ,, iii 0 M .. AN. "! i. l'ebruary 3, 2004 Archer Western Col'ltl:ll¢tors, LTO 2121 Avenue I, Suite 103 ArlingtQll, Texas 76006 Attontlon: Mr. Aud«;w Sclmeeman Re: All!paho Road 'Phm II! Sbeet.8R44 􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁬􀁥􀁭􀁾􀀠We are n:questiog that!he!lleoltani<:al ""\lplm that "",Iocatd on the web of the uU" be&rn bi: eUlllinated I!IId he rel;>laJ:ed by an open bole t!u:u!he 'I'II:b. This would allow for a 􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁮􀁵􀁯􀁵􀁳􀀠bar 10 be used mQ 1\ lap only bcltweon each 'Vbeam. Tllese hOles CoUld be drilled 􀁾pouring. Also Ihe blackout in !he bottnm Oi\nge lI¢cd ""me draft. Plem infunn 􀁵􀀬􀁾􀀠ID the maximwll di1l')\>I\$iQUS Ino hal" oan be on the outside face and the minimUlll dimensions the hole can be on Ill. bWde Ii!ce. If)'Qu, bav.:; any qw:stiollS. please advise. lklIl regards, ., ,. f 'l'.!!XAS CONCR.ETE COMl'ANY 􀀮􀁾􀀭Burson l'attnn Vio....P_ident, Sngln<>:rlng BP:bgo ARCHER WESTERN PAGE 62 9722'13'1353 p.t Q'm Orwp.1no. 9200King Arlhur PRomerINSPECTION Dallas, TIIW 75241 REPORT (214)678.j)227 PROJECT; llIg Cill' CrusI1ed Concrete Testing l:laI9: 4I14J04 M>lletial: 1 li Cr. Co!lCfj!/e Pa!J'j: 1011 lW' 1" 1" K" No. 4 100 lOB IiZ.a 17.7 Z3 100 95-100 35-70 10-311 Q-' 􀁾􀀠􀁒􀁾􀁊􀁬􀁹􀁳􀁵􀁢􀁭􀁩􀁪􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀩􀁉􀀮PJl. This """"_ooIy "".-w, 1W! 􀁾􀀧􀀢ori_",...u" _. Thl< """"