..... CD CD tn ,:. CD CD 0\ n 2c: 3 r::r c '" m '" OJ ?i n 0 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠tD -0'" 0 ::> c. tD ::> tD " \ IV , !0 0 0, ..... » C. 􀁦􀁴􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁬 ::;' 􀁾􀀠Q.. m i I ,􀁾􀀠>-: ,.....:...: Residellt commmifli area.> /(i1.turc sc:yeraloutdoor facilities. -indwfing thIs poolside gazebo. 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁬􀀧􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠Ascension Point If TRUST MANAGERS OF COWMBUS REALTY TRUST Richard 1. Bloch Ghairmanof the Board Robert L. Shaw Chief Executive Officer Will Cureton REALTY T R U S T We are pleased to report for the third quarter of 1995 the following developments: Funds from operations and earnings Funds from operations for the third quarter of 1995 totaled $5,174,000 or $0.45 per share versus $4,299,000 or $0,41 per share reported in the third quarter of 1994, Same property residential net operating income (NOI) increased 5.7% during the quarter over last year) due to Collected rental income increasing interiors OOMI spacious /focr plans and designer features, 􀁆􀁴􀀮􀁦􀁬􀁹􀁾􀀠tq!lipped kitchens, l4ch contain window! ow:r1ooJ;ing amrtYllrds or bluffviews. ResidCII1$ are prol-'ided Ii fuJly· cijflipped fil1less cCllier mljllCfmt to the heaUlf spa tlltdpoo1. ChiefOperating Officer Gregg 1. Engles Jack Kemp James C. Leslie Hugh G. Robinson Roger T. Staobach GENERAL INFORMATION Principal Office 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 855 Dallas, rem 75248 2141387-1492 Fax: 2141770-5109 Stock Listing New York Stock Exchange Symbol: CLB Transfer Agent Bank of Boston m",estor Relations Departlnent P.O,Box644 Mail Stop 45,02-09 Boston, MA 02102-0644 8001730-6001 Fax: 6171575-2665 Member, National Association ofReaI Estate Investment Trusts (NARElT) REALTY T R U S T Ascension Point II 1995 3rd Quarter Report 4.5% and operating expenses increasing only 2.5%, The 9,8% increase in funds from operations per share over last year was achieved as a result of the same store performance and the addition of 1,008 completed residential units to the Conlpany's portfolio between September 30, 1994 and 1995, bringing the total number of completed units to 4,542, Average economic occupancy on the residential properties also increased to 96,8% during the third quarter of 1995 from 95,2% during the same quarter last year, reflecting the strength of our submarkets and our success in achieving one of the Companis goals of operating at the highest occupancy possible. Columbus Realty Trust's core strategies include aChieving significant operating efficiencies through ownership of a dense concentration of units in our various submarkets. Our success toward this goal is reflected in the ratio of operating expenses to revenues, which we believe to be among the best in the residential sector. Our results for the comparable third quarters of 1995 and 1994, respectively, are as follows: 7h.rCCIIH>fIllu ClImpany completed construction and lease-up of the 86-unit A,cension Point Phase UApartments in Arlington, Texas (see photo,). The property is currently 98% leased and 95% occupied The successful lease-up of the property parallels the performance of the 204-unit Trace II apartment community and the 300-unit Uptown Village Apartments, both of which were delivered earlier this year and are effectively fully leased and occupied. Uptown Village was recently awarded The 1995 Urban Design Award sponsored by The City of Dallas Urban Design Advisory Committee. This is the second consecutive year a G>lumbus property has won thi, prestigious award. The O>mpany also has under construction six properties consisting of an additional 1,381 units in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, which are summarized in the following table: Con$truclian Completion 􀁄􀁾􀁾􀀠Thmpanr Thank you for your continuing support We welcome any comments or suggestions for your Company) and invite you to contact us should you care to tour any of your new Columbus communities, Robert L Shaw ChkfExWltiV': Officer 􀁗􀁴􀁐􀀭􀁾􀀠 Will Cureton Chief Opemti'lg Offictt November 15, 1995 􀁾􀀺􀁷􀀬􀀠􀁏􀁥􀂫􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀠,995 199.( A;scts Real estate: Land S 46,\).11 S 44,605 Buildings and improvements 231,342 198,888 Furniture. fixtures, and equipment 4,281 3,828 CollStru.;:tton-in-p rogress 􀁾􀀠lQd§2 314,/(7 U,7J86 tess accumulated depredation (J;lJQl) (22 760) 285,415 245,026 Cash and casn equivalents 3,524 4,9{3 Accounts receivable 764 468 Recei\-ab.!es from affiliates 119 195 Deferred assets. net ofaccumulated amortization 467 476 Defitfred financing costs. net of accumulat«i amortization 1,356 1,571 Other aS$'ts U!.2 !i'!l 'fatal 􀁡􀁳􀀮􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁳􀀠$294,444 􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀳􀀷􀁬􀀡􀀠Lia.bilities lllld Slwrefiolden' Equity Linbitities: Noles payable $ 122,486 $ 79,324 Accrued dividends 4,312 4,28D AccQunl.$ payable and ao::rued expenses 3.981 l/l12 Accrued interest 430 243 Accrued property taxes 3,608 4.172 Tenant security deposits 1.241 I.U79 Prepaid rent 􀁾􀀠i!ll 'futa! 􀁬􀁩􀁡􀁢􀁭􀁴􀁩􀁥􀁾􀀠f36A85 91.511 Sh.1r.:holders' equity: Preferred sharo!S. S .01 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding Comtrl{)n snares,.$ .01 pM value; 100,000.000 shares authorized: II ,498,747 and It,4l3,284 sharCil isrued, respectively It5 114 .-\ddittonal paid-in capital t75,6t2 174,299 Retained earnings (deficit} (JUol') (Jll1lli 157,%5 161,865 less 900 common shares in treasury, at cost (_6) L.JI Total shareholders' equity = ill.m Tota! illIbtlities and sharelhllders' equity 􀁾525),370 􀁾􀁤􀁥􀁤$eplcmb.:r 30. o:mkd ScpIcmWt-.l(l, ------!995 lER SHARE DATA: Net illcome per common share FUllds from operations per common share, as adjusted Weighted average Humber of common shares outstanding (000'5) $10.103 liS :l,;Q $10,668 840 541 151 700 466 1,27) 1.515 139 ua; U&lJ! S t},174 It,574 mOlltin C"nikd Sep(m1bulO, 1m .$7,866 171 ill $8,379 673 405 124 597 472 I,m)) 806 55 􀁾􀀠$5,921 􀀤􀀲􀀬􀁾􀀵􀀡􀀠􀁾􀀿􀀱􀀠10,5 61 􀁭􀁮􀀡􀁬􀁴􀁮􀁾􀀠ended 􀁓􀁾􀁰􀀡􀁴􀁭􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀳􀁬􀀩􀀬􀀠199:; 528,753 40. U2l S30.35J 2,301 1.449 409 2,048 1,532 3,700 4,040 4lJ liJZ.l ill&6Ji 􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠%!1£! U,531 m!ll"l!h, ffl'kd s..plftnw3l}, 1m 520.618 486 ll2Z m.OO! 1.668 1.053 261 1.52\ 1,637 2,587 2.046 161) .4..l.Ql .lli..lJ2 􀁾􀀮􀀲􀀳􀀶􀀶􀀠1thiZ] 9,297 Net income Depredation and amortlutlon Interest related (0 amortiz.atiOI1 of deferred financing costs 􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁷􀁨compensation expense Funds from opemtlons, as adjustd $2,650 2.385 139 52.458 1,786 55 S 7,687 6.771 5 6,26li 4,702 . ,-􀁾􀀠. 260 We are pleased to report for the third quarter of 1995 the following de.elopments: Funds from operations and earnings Funds from operations for the third quarter of 1995 totaled $5,174,000 or $0.45 per share versus $4,299,000 or $OAI per share reported in the third quarter of 1994, Same property resi· dential net operating income (NO!) increased 5.7% during the quarter over last year, due to collected rental income increasing 4,5% and operating expenses increasing only 2.5%, Tne 9,8% increase in funds from operations per share over last year was achieved as a result of the same store performano:: and the addition of 1,008 completed residential units to the Company's port6:l1io between September 30, 1994 and 1995, bringing the total number of completed units to 4,542. Average economic occupancy on the residential properties also increased to 96,8% during the third quarter of 1995 from 95.2% during 'the same quarter last year, reflecting the strength of our submarkets and our success in achieving one of the Company's goals of operating at the highest occupancy possible, Columbus Realty Trust's core strategies include achieving significant operating efficiencies through ownership of a dense concentration of units in our various sub markets. OUf Success toward this goal is reflected in the ratio of operating expenses to revenues, which we believe to be ambng the best in the residential sector. Our results for the comparable third quarters of 1995 and 1994, respectively, are as follows: Thr(t mOluh, 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀠xplcmbtr JO, ins Tota! revenues 100.0% 100.0% Properli' operating expenses J2.8% 􀁾􀀠Net operating income 67,2% 66.5% General and 3dministrative etpenses 4.4% 􀁾􀀠Net operating cash flnw" 62.8% 60.9% "Exdudes interest and nort-ru£if expemcs. I am interested ill participating in the Columbus Realt)' Trust Dividend Reinvestment and Shure Purchase Plan. Please send me information and authorization forms. Please check one: Name I own shares directly in my name. Street Address I own shares through a brokerage firm. City/State/Zip Code I own shares both and through Daytime Phone a brokerage firm. It E A L T Y T R U S T October 1, 1997 Mr. Jolm Baumgartner VIA FACSIMILE Director of Public Works AND HAND DELIVERY Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 RE: Addison Circle Phase II Infrastructure Dear Jolm: Per our conversation today, you have agreed to issue notice to proceed today to North Texas Utilities for Phase II of Addison Circle infrastructure. Columbus ReaIty Trust Agrees that if Phase II of Addison Circle does not come to fruition within six months to reimburse the Town of Addison all costs incurred with this contract. Sincerely, ill r 􀁾􀀠􀁾 􀁂􀀧􀁙􀀬􀀢􀀬􀁾'NW Vice President, Development c: Mark Brandenberg -15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITS 8SS DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 214 387 1492 FAX 214 770·5192 @I'JttNT£1l oN lulCYC1.Rf> .."pl\n -11 Llo COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 770·5151 FAX: 770·5129 MEMORANDUM TO: RON WmTEHEAD, CITY MANAGER FROM: BRYANT NAIL COLUl\iBUS REALTY TRUST €oI-LndSc.o. An,h. , J 􀁾􀁮􀁾􀀠DATE: July 13, 1995 RE: Addison Urban Center· Phase I & II Engineering & Landscape Architecture Contract We have refined the proposed fees for engineering services during discussions with Jolm Baumgartner as follows: The proposed fee for Phase I is $223,400.00 and for Phase II is $340,000.00 The charges to the proposal you received on June 23, 1995 are as follows: Phase I Phase II Surveying & Traffic Items <2,400> Basic Roadwav & Streetscape Design <5,000> <20,000> <7,000> <20,000> Also, the Phase I scope ofwork was amended to included the west side ofQuorum, south to the railroad track. We are requesting the council approve the proposals as amended above and authorize Columbus Realty Trust to execute an agreement with Huitt·Zollars, Inc. for Phase I & Phase II for an estimated fee of $563,000. plus estimated reimbursables of20,500. I am also attaching the engineering evaluations which we discovered a typographical error in tabulation ofthe scores. This error has no substantive effect on the selection. Ifyou have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to confer with me. Thanks! 􀀾􀁾􀀠 \ 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠Columbus Realty Trust Evaluation Criteria For Engineering And Landscape Architecture Summary Columbus Realty Trust Evaluation Criteria For Engineering And Landscape Architecture Lockwood, Andrews &; Newman, Inc, Stemmons Tower North, Suite 1200 2710 North Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75207 &; 2141638-5625 1. The firm's experience in successfully performing assignments 50 300 • Good experience with urban parks of similar scope and size for others within the last three (3) 0·10 • No experience with urban housing years by personnel still on the fl1'm's staff. This evaluation (6) • No roundabout experience will be heavily weighted on experience in urban areas with high quality pedestrian oriented environments dealing with a mix of uses (predominately urban housing, town and neighborhood parks, and streetscape programs). Also, demonstrate experience in the design of a modern roundabout. 2. The professional background of proposed project personnel 0·10 40 • Same comments as above and their experience in engineering, surveying and landscape (8) Little publlc work" architecture (as appropriate), of the firm's staff as an indication of ability, as well as the size and related experience to provide the desired service. If a team is submitted, demonstrate past experience of team projects, and abilities of each firms key personnelln working on these projects, and proposed firm's past projects that they have worked together as a team. 3. Demonstrate ability to: complete projects on schedule and 0·10 30 270 Good track histor:v regarding scheduling and within budget, current and future workload; availability of (9) estimating sufficient finances and other resources to accomplish the assignment within the time allowed; and the ability to provide service. I" 4. The firm's experience in successfully completing work on 0·10 30 150 I· • Little public/private work office that will provide 0-10 40 400 in the local area. 0·106. Mll.l1agement approach to projects. ...(9)􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠7. Technical approach to proj Bets. 8. Client references for similar projects. 9. Oral presentation (or interview) (shortlisted firms only, if necessary). POSSIBLE TOTAL CONSULTANT SCORE 0·10 (9) 0·10 0·10 90 56 20 20 20 20 =:>=:>=:> =:>=:>=:> 180 180 nla nla 2800 1800 Columbus Realty Trust Evaluation Criteria For Engineering And Landscape Architecture Halff Associates. Inc. 8616 Northwest Plaza Drive Dallas. Texas 75225 (7) • • • 0·10 40 160 I:(8) 0·10 30 270 I·{9} 0·10 30 240 ,. . . 0·10 40 400 housing Good masterplannlng experience but mostly on single family subdivisions Few streetscape or urban pedestrian oriented projects Some roundabout experience Project personnel have good engineering background experience I same comments as above Good estimating & 2141739·0095 , ---------experience In successfully performing assignments of similar scope and size for others within the last three (3) years by personnel still on the firm's staff. This evaluation will be heavily weighted on experience In urban areas with high quality pedestrian oriented environments dealing with a mix of uses (predOminately urban housing. town and neighborhood parks. and streetscape programs} Also. demonstrate experience In the design of a modern roundabout. 2. The profeSSional background of proposed project personnel and their experience In engineering. surveying and landscape architecture (as appropriate), of the firm's staff as an Indication of ability, as well as the size and related experience to provide the desired service. If a team is submitted, demonstrate past experience ofteam projects, and abilities of each firms key personnel in working on these projects. and proposed firm's past projects that they have worked together as a team. 3. Demonstrate ablUty to: complete projects on schedule and within budget, current and future workload; availability of SUfficient finances and other resources to accomplish the assignment within the time allowed; and the ability to provide 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁵􀁬􀁮􀁧􀁳􀁥􀁾􀁲􀁶􀁩􀁣􀁥􀀮􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠4. The firm's experience in successfully completing work on ventures. 5. Location of main office and/or branch office that will provide services and experience In the local area. ,11 6. Management approach to projects. 0-10 20 120 I-Some confusion to management firms only, if PossmLE TOTAL ::::>::::>::::> 2800 CONSULTANT SCORE 60 ::::>::::>::::> 1900 Columbus Realty Trust Evaluation Criteria For Engineering And Landscape Architecture 400 360 3131 McKinney Ave., Suite 600, m·10S Dallas, Texas 􀀷􀀵􀁚􀀰􀁾􀀠􀀲􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀸􀀷􀀱􀂷􀀳􀀳􀀱􀀱􀀠(Phone) & 2141871-0757 1. The firm's cxperlenee In successfully performing assignments 500·10 • Good varied mixed use, mld·denslty experience In of sImilar scope and sIze for others within the last three (3) (8) pedestrian oriented environment years by personnol still on We firm's staff. Tills evaluation • Good roundabout expert as part of the team wUl be heavily weighted on experience In urban areas with • Good urban park experience, especially In Addison Illgh quality pedestrian oriented environments dealing with a mix of uses (predominately urban housing, town and neighborhood par!ls, and strcctseape programs). Also, demonstrate experience In the design of II modern roundabout. 2. Tho professional background of proposed project personnel 400·10 • The team has good technical experience and has, wltl! and tholr experlonco In engineering, surveying nnd landscape tho oxceptlon of tho roundabout consultant, worked arcltltecturo (as npproprlate), of tllO rtrm's staff as an (9) together numerous times for several developers on Indication of ability, as well as the size and related sImilar projects experience to provide the desired service. If a team Is • The team has good technical experience submitted, demonstrate past experience of team projects, and abilities of each firms key personnel In worlling on these projects, and proposed firm's past projects that thcy have worJlcd toltetllcr as a tcam. 3. Demonstrate abIlity to: complete projects on schedule and 0·10 30 within budget. current and future workload; avallablllty of (9) estimating sufficient finances and other resources to accomplish the assignment within the time allowed; and the ability to provide service. 4. The firm's experience In successfully comllletinl! work on ·10 together on public/private ventures ventures. for three different developers 5. Location of main office andlor branch office that Will provide 0·10 􀁾􀁯􀀠400 services and experIence In the local area. 6. Management ects. 0-10 20 180 :::::>:::::>:::::>90 2800POSSIBLE TOTAL ::::>:::::>:::::>CONSULTANT SCORE only, If 0·10 20 nfa ,,-;1 BEC'D DEC 3 0 1996 REALTY TRfJST December 20, 1996 John Baumgartner Town ofAddison, Service Center 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 Re: Addison Circle Tree well electrical outlets Dear John: As you know, Columbus was the proponent ofplacing electrical outlets in each tree well in order to have the ability to place lights in trees and to use for various street activities. We have installed these outlets in aU ofour Uptown projects as well as Las Colinas. In a recent portfolio review with our property management division, we discovered that we had overdone this detail. We are not using these outlets except in certain areas. These areas are the main street ofeach development and special activity areas. With this in mind, I would propose that we not install these outlets on the residential streets and mews at Addison Circle. I do feel that we need them on Quorum, Addison Circle (Mildred) and around the park for street festivals and such. I feel this reconfiguration will not only save capital dollars but will reduce maintenance of those facilities for the Town ofAddison. Please call to discuss. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾..... Bryant.Nail . ;. .." BN/nb -15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE ass DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 2143137.1492 FAX 214 770-5192 @f'II,JI'I'f!tu o.s I!.C-GYCLI!-O I'AI'"ER , REA L T Y T R U S T CONSTRUCTION ADDISON CIRCLE ONE /GENERAL PARTNER SPECIAL EVENTS MEETING CHRISTMAS TREE MINUTES 11/5/96 Attendees: Judy Boles I CRT, Bill Barnes I CRT, Heather Wade I CRT, David Myers I Huitt-Zollars, Mark Pearson I Gibson Associates, Jimmy Duty I Intercities Electric I. Tree Facts A. Per Judy: 1. We will be receiving a 40' Blue Spruce from Michigan, with a 24" diameter base. 2. The Tree will be delivered by Fred Pyse on Tuesday, November 26, 1996, installed on the same date and removed on or about January 2, 1996. 3. Paul Shaw wants the base of the tree to be ready to set by November 20th. 4. There will be no decorations on the Tree, the Prop Department with the Theater will provide large Plywood boxes with Plaid Ribbon to go under it. 5. A ramp may be needed to install the Tree as the earth may be to soft and the Cherry Picker or Crane may sink, they may also need it to install the lights. 6. Mark with Gibson says if we can wait until November 18th. to set the base he should be ok as far as taking all ofthe measurements he needs. 7. Judy will check to see when the Tree was actually cut so we know how much of a Fire hazard it will be and how much water it is probably going to need. IL Tree Lights A. Bread & Butter Co., KC Ofshe may be reached at (214)82-GREEN wiIl provide , install, and remove 2000 to 2700 C-7 lights that are probably 240V at 80-100 AMP. They wiIl use a Cherry Picker to install the lights, we may have to close Quorum to do it and we don't know how long it will take. B. Jimmy Duty with Intercities Electric will install a Temporary Power Pole with meter, timer and connect the lights and will get a cost of it to Judy. 'l -., Ie" T[ -lJT ,'\ If Il) Tf T 􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠/j J _I C Il ) V ,-, , REA L T Y T R U S T CONSTRUCTION C. Laura and Robert want the lights to start on December 1, 1996, Robert wants to see the lights from the Tollway. D. Jimmy wants to do a test run before the Tree Lighting Ceremony, should be ok if lights start on December 1st. E. Bill will check with John Baumgartner with the city to give us a Permit rather than paying for one. F. David and Mark said that the gas company would best know where the Electrical Sleeves are running. G. Jimmy is thinking about putting the meter, timer, and light connections on a 3 X 3 sheet of Plywood under one of the presents. III. Tree Lighting Ceremony A. Will be on Friday, December 8th. from 4:00 PM till 7:00 PM sponsored by the Town of Addison. B. They have invited about 7,000 people knowing thst at least 500 will show up. C. There will be 2 showings of the Play "Forever Plaid" as well. D. We need one switch to throw to light the Tree at the ceremony. E. Mildred will still still be closed and we may have to close Quorum and there will possibly be Carriage Rides. IV. Cost A. Tie Downs & Cable: Will Paul with Fred Pyse furnish and cover cost ? Bill is checking. B. Base: Bill will install 24" Galvanized pipe with concrete under and around it with 4 Guy wires and Addison Job will probably cover cost? C. Tree: Will cost $ 4,350.00, Judy thinks that Laura is picking up cost but is not sure. D. Lites: Will cost $ 4,400.00 to buy and install, we will save about $ 1,000.00 next year as we wont have to buy them if they are savable, Judy thinks that Laura will pick up the cost as well ? E. Electric Bill: Addisonjob will probably pick up? F. Water Bill: Ifwater needs to be run to Tree Addison job may pick up cost but not sure yet as we would need a Meter? Ifthe Tree has been recently cut then it wont need much water and Bill will get his guys to do it. G. Permit: Hopefully free, Bill will check with John H. Mulch: Laura and Robert want Mulch around the base so people can walk around it and the presents wont get dirty, Judy will check with Laura to see if she is going to pay for it ? 17rS0 􀁔􀁒􀁁􀁎􀁓􀁐􀁏􀁒􀁔􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀠L1BN 􀁾􀀠214 770 􀁾􀀱􀀴􀀷􀀠00.158 Cl01 S-IAtVOIU..tJ ISoW /4p.J.' 0;./";:;S'pOLE' WOUU) I? f; <'.iI f,), £,.&'1"fI1-l...r Fo A. .so LI B HT...r ..rO -;; =: 't.:J. LIGI174 ()/lEf!.-S'Tt"IJjJ.qJ<:Q tJE'.rfbA/l..v.r 'fA 1../"/17/"<4/􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁲􀀧􀀠'7"''QiC .l..1 g ,.,-:)(#'·'n; VoL􀁾􀀠::: 1t?.3" If.st:J (f:?' LIGH7:J(1fC. 􀁏􀀾􀀦􀁉􀁌􀁾􀀠'" -4t) e-i'-S> 􀁖􀁾􀁢􀀠􀁃􀁬􀁻􀁾􀀯􀀺􀀩􀀬􀁉􀁲)if6 􀀲􀁾􀀠6. 􀁯􀁾􀀠7e TIJ 􀁇􀁾􀁃􀀺􀁃􀀮􀁾􀁒􀁉􀀴􀀮􀀮􀀠Z d 69881 L099£ 'ONIII ;II 'lS/Z I: II 96 ,SZ 'ZO (nHl) 6ZI9-0LL+v/z lSnHl AllV3a SnUWfl100 NOHt PHONE (904) 737;,rREE FAX (904) 131·3457 ORDER CONfiRMATION SKINNERS WHOLESALE NURSERY Large ComalruitT Gtow:n Specimen "I;JIJ;S 6800 Southpoiat Parkway Suite 4()O Jack$onville, Florida 32216 • DATE IO-I? -9-. I INVOICING. --.......... ••_ ............. ....... A 􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠J"'if"\C"'t"'IDI c: 􀁲􀀺􀀺􀁏􀁉􀀺􀁉􀀯􀀢􀁾􀀬􀁕􀁔􀀠=A"f'r:. 􀁾􀀩􀀺􀀺􀁕􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁬􀁲􀀮􀀺􀁩􀀭􀁦􀁩􀀠􀁐􀁒􀁉􀁲􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠8 d 6988!L09g8 􀁮􀁎􀀯􀁗􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁓􀀯􀁾􀀡􀀻􀁉􀀡􀀠96.86 'GO(Hill) 6619-0LWIZ .LSOll.L A.L1V311 SI1HI'I1!'IO:J flOEd UPTOWN VILLAGE LANDSCAPE PLANTING PROPOSDAL QUANTITY DESCRIPTXON UNIT COST TOTAL COST 44 RED QAKS 200 GAL (LABOR ONLY) 400.00 17600.00 38 LIVE OAKS 200 GAL.(LABOR ONLY)400.00 15200.00 37 FOSTER HOLLY S" CAL. 900.00 33300.00 ").'1 ..A"2 440 SALD CYPRESS DWARF YAUPON lOO GAL. HOLLY 1 GAL. 600.00 S.OO pee.'00 I<.IV '" 0 2200.00 TOTAL 􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁯􀀮􀁯􀁯􀀠========:!!t --/2-7 2'cro V d 6988 iL0998 'ON/i 1 : i i 18/81 :II 96 ,£Z 'ZO (fiHl) 6ZI9-0LL+vIZ lSOHl X11VaH SOSWG10D WOHj PAVE:R CONSTRUCTION CO.. tNC. ",! 􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀠.' " " I',', I'll. METRO 2.14-2!!1l-l!24" , ,," :' 1".0. 'BOX 1061 'OEDAR Hlu..: TEXAS 75104 " " . ; .. ,I',.: 􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀠"! :-: , I, . " '\ :' ", ,,,;, I • ' 'At:tn:-George Baobler " , ,/.' .' " " 􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁡􀁧􀁥􀁾􀀮􀀠:;',.l:"1J1 ,/"'. • ,T \, PROPOSAL .. , 'J' 1",,/, vJ , .:.:' '.' '., ':' 􀁾􀀠.I: ,I:,' If' "." c I, ' ,1.I' .' • , ' .,. " , , , '.,'. .,' ... .' ... , ,,' : \, : " "" " , , .' ,,We Propose hateby kJ fl,llrUsh l118Ietfi!J andlBbar -compklls In 􀁡􀁣􀁣􀁾with above specHicaJJOtIIl, lor the BiJf1! 1)1:t" • ' ,< '.' 097.9, :Fifty 'four thousand ninty dollars and no/lOG,...................... 54.090.00' ).'􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀨􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠f't1;nri!m wt.: 􀁾... -AJJ ruii::tfal 􀁾􀁾Jr:) DB liB 􀁾A1J Y.O'k '" taB 􀁾In II eub:&tIJrnJaJ 􀁾􀀠I1FJMIV 􀁾􀁦􀁉fD 􀁾AUbmfrrr:d w 􀀺􀀻􀁷􀁐􀁤􀁴􀀺􀁊􀀱􀁦􀁾Arrf BIrBIB1.Jon or􀁾ftrm ,sJxos 􀁾/mr:Jlv!Itg atW ClIS;!3 wiiJ be 􀁾f:II1Iy I.'PJ wt'oltfJtI cnJMJ, IJIIIJ willi;willi;cctJmQ En lI¥l1B 􀁾I'M:f ;n;J liI:Jt'NIJ me Arftimats.,NJ 􀁾􀁾􀁴J.fO'1 stJ1krsB. 11Cd!J8ltls {)( 􀁾􀁾4Ut t'.IJIffJfJJ. Omu lD C811':1 􀁦􀁦􀁦􀁾􀀠J.amSdD IWi alvJt fJfNW8SatY 􀁾CJtif II.Q'MIO us tr1lf;rJlIY _.􀁣􀁾􀁟􀀠d 69881 L099S 'ON/II' II 'lS/V I 96 ,ed '20 (nHl) 621HLWI2 lS!1Hl Al1V3H SnHfll10:l l'/OHd , ,r;i, PAVER CONSTRUCTION CO .. INC. " PROPOSALPH: McrAO 21_9-2248 , " ",' P.O. SO)( 10117 , :,:' ,, " , ". 􀀧􀁉􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀧􀀯􀀢􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀮􀀧􀂷􀀿􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀩􀂷􀁾􀀧􀀠:.::b:·-> >"if :,'; ,;, r, 􀀢􀁏􀁅􀁦􀁏􀁁􀁾􀀠HILL. "TEXAS. 76104 , , I' 'l • ' 􀀢􀀬􀀧􀁄􀀺􀁡􀁪􀁾" " ' . ,,: '" ..Attn;" GeQrge 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁲􀀠,', 􀀬􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀡􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁉􀁅􀁾􀁩􀀺􀀬􀀠", ",if'".,,,:.,· 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠, ''. , , "n',;' 􀁾􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀧􀀠,L ; 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀩􀁾􀀺􀀠'"".' .' "', ,', .1 , , 􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀧􀀠I' h" , . . .', 􀂷􀀢􀀮􀀧􀀬􀀧􀀡􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁡􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠::rH.::... <. ",': ,',' I:: :,',,\, ::1'1." '. ;',' :.:,1' ., .... :n .... ', 􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁬􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀠...:..'» ..___ 􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠,i\ .,' .:' I I " .'•• ' ,! ' .: 􀁊􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀧􀁦􀀾􀀢􀁜􀀠,," Fifty 􀁦􀁑􀁕􀁾􀀠thousand three hundred twenty five dollars and no/lOO .•• _ ($ 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀥􀀮􀀤􀀵􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀴􀀺􀀡􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀳􀀲􀁾􀀵􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁟􀀬􀁾􀀠," 􀁾ID Ill> rTUlIII_ Ali rntl4itiallS fJIJlilFJI'IMd j!J lIB.as 􀁾AfJ lli'OIIt 􀁾lie 􀁾􀁤Irr tJ IJl.Ibs:mntJaf 􀀩􀁋􀁴􀁉􀀢􀁾􀀠 􀀠 manru 􀁾􀁴􀁯􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁺􀁢􀁑􀁲􀀱􀀤􀀠$UMJ1I.'1IJtl raBIlII'Xf:I!ItJ f;ir1:J1Jt!.BIJ. Anf IIJ'IemJkEI CI dtNfmJrJn from 􀁾5pf"'1'k1&p'!f: 􀂣􀀭􀀮􀁍􀁯􀁉􀁾􀀠EMr.: 􀁾Wit1 m /:iI'8l:t.IWd rdt r:p:.!1 l'HInaIl: 􀁾(;nd tNiIlll!!Cll1D!t It/1 sdIa chIttrP CWf I:J1J/!J 􀁾Jhp 􀁾AJf tI$'IlJIJI1'IM13 􀁾lJPm SI/J;"", 􀁾or 􀁾􀁾CU' 􀁾􀁪􀁦􀀻􀀩􀁴􀀠Qmu lP c:JIIY IlIe, 1.OINJtio;wi (IJ/r; 􀁾Irr:mJlICA .Q;tlNtll/t8UI 􀀯􀁬􀁬􀁄􀁦􀁲􀀮􀁩􀁊􀁯􀁉􀁾􀁢􀁴􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁾􀀠" Acceptance at Proposal-Til81Jboo'81J1f....fIP"CiII_ end Cl).7dmcns IJII) ..􀁾end .,., hSlSby =eplf>d Yw sro 􀁾lO Order is IIOt villid ullIll ,1gosd below by lbe PutGhaso1 ""d 􀁾by tho Sdluby .ill"ing below lII!d retllllllni' ,j(lJ\lld ""pY to th. PlUelt...,. Item No. Description !l'Qd TmrtrucIions Unit Cost Total Cos!. N/A 259,700 Chicago Antique PaVIlnI $235.0011,000 11161,029.50 TAX 5,0'14 I)j TOTAL $66,064.43 Total co" Inelud.. all 1'!!clle ....... 􀀨􀀧􀁭􀁯􀁬􀁵􀁤􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁌􀁉􀁬􀁬􀁊􀀡􀀸􀀢􀁾......p lIIla lllStalIaIiDn """'" ifiDdi_d 8bl>••) lIlId all oppll<8hle ..... 1lI!Ies, "P••ificaily ind;"""'" olh_ Thl. i, not • _ lIIIl.... Sp..1li4\1IIJr ormd otl!orwi5o. GooEll" HooI>JJlt Date: 􀁾•'L'/' 􀁾􀁴􀁦􀀠􀁵􀁹􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀮􀁴􀁚􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁤􀀲􀁩􀀯􀁺􀀻􀁁􀁉 ntle: 􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀯􀀧􀀧􀀭􀁎􀁾􀁦􀀭􀀶􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁆􀀧􀀧􀀭􀀭Accepted (&lJJ!r) Seller 111 reiurn Signed Cupy to Purchlll!e.l' 06 I9-0LLtV I Z l.SllHl. Al.Tv'aH SOHYIfl10:J 􀁙􀁬􀁏􀁈􀁾􀀠 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. ID. I L Aeupbln=-ihls Purebase Or_I wbJch htc1udc5 only lhcsc 2ams ttnd 􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁛􀁩􀁄􀁮􀁳􀁾􀀠􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠mamrial set ibnh on me 􀁾heteo:t; IIlld arr,t spooijjOlltio!li or oihor mul<:rial mIldted herlI8ollot. a.aag... Por<;bll$et tes"",..the tight 1111111'/time In mako .hanses. If any sncb 􀁣􀁨􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁥􀀠ow.. "" """.... in the 003t ofOf the Iinlc r shall nIIt h. binding WlI... modO in wrltinJ; and .igned by an all PIJlOh.." ... 1I.trv.ry lmlllllorlon or Both. time I, Of the (:$SlmtiO itt tbis contract, and ifdeUv""", 􀁤􀁥􀁳􀀡􀁉􀁮􀀮􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀮􀀠 Pfi1so ...!\ ther..,r contained heroin and willi 􀁾􀁰􀁥􀁯􀁪􀁦􀁩􀁃􀀸􀁉􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀬􀀠IflilY, llIIaohed botetb IIlld _ a pon hereof (:klloll'hall c."My mdl' and ""mpare all ....ul'smuor'. numb.... quantities, dcocrIpIloo, Sjll",.. IIIIlIIlhaU tIln '" PlltclIsser.lIs 5UeCCS",'1lI ""d ..,igJIS. OlId all ofsaid 􀁾􀁳shall be .onsuued 􀁾",)"dil'.>r' lIS well as wll!Jll!lt!co DrIIj taO ;" addlri.n to and,?,,! to 􀀱􀁬􀁉􀀼􀁾􀀧􀀢04 of othor wlIII'lIIIIIcs, .""l""! "JiJ ' 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀯􀀠 Implied. /Tte1tP fJritJ( 􀁨􀁁􀁾􀀠/ldrJiJ£i/. 1ti.lJm6«J􀀱􀀡􀀦􀀻􀀱􀁴􀀱􀀱􀁦􀁾􀀠/(4jCI /lN1!1IJ.Ji,J dlt. iJpt (IIWflj QIILJ'v lndellmlly. The 5011<0' age... In Indemnify aM bold batml.!ss Pille.""", .JlIIinSI oil 111!! ft>r 􀁾􀀮ond ",po_ IIt'lslng oot ofplill:nl""nll'CWMIy IIlld lltigalion, 􀁾􀁾.-Of propmy ...."'" 1»' So)l.,'. n.g1,-or oIIJ", falll" IIIId 􀁤􀁯􀁭􀀮􀁾􀀠'" F""" or PlOpct!y arislng out of deli.my, insIaUaIIco, ..mee, repair IIDd 􀀬􀀮􀁰􀁬􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁬􀀬􀀠in """.eo!Inn witl! the work ill tho 1'",_0 Or&r. Terms. All i.v.l"", at. to be sent in ttipUoPIO '" tho Putohaser • IIIld shall 􀀼􀀽􀀼􀁮􀁉􀀱􀁉􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀠lhe ill1l>mllllon and &IlI:'riP"on 􀁴􀀮􀁾􀁤􀁬􀁮􀁧Ille 'am. '" set 1bnh aIIo1t', toplhor with II>; ",&r numb..,. atld iwDizod pti..., for appt.orull,., put.nllSllon 11-706 of'/Ju; 􀁬􀁉􀁮􀁭􀁴􀁉􀀵􀁥􀀢􀀮􀁪􀁾􀀠ProCUl; dau: he".1; Is lncorponaed herein 􀁢􀁹􀁾􀀮􀀠If, ho""",.r, fitr.HM Ailsaelatinn men obWnlnjI11OI... Ihe plllli.. mutually ""e. oIbo!'Ili<.. 'll!is obUgIIIi... fD ""l!lltlWl sball bo ,p.ciliclilly enf......alli......11>; p..,..,umg Bl'bitroliM IlIW. Tha award rOlldcn:d by the _amrs shall b. fittIIi. andjudgmmt may b.""torod upOlllt In acurr. IRRIG. 􀁓􀁾􀁅􀁖􀁅􀁓􀀠LF 5.00 S 3.00 SI5.00 S 6.00 • J ,IRlUGAnoi: SYSTEM LF 3.00 S U.OO S36.00 $18,6/􀁔􀁔􀁾􀀠EA 0.12 S1500.00 5180.00 $32.01 􀁔􀁊􀁬􀁬􀀡􀁅􀁇􀁍􀁔􀁾􀀠EA 0.00 S500.00 S 0.00 A:mQlll! STREET I.IGHTS wIIlASE EA 0.03 S19OO.00 $50.67 SU8DRADI SYSTEM LF 3,00 $ 10.60 $31.80 BcN,Ii. Boo; RAc!:. T! I 􀁾􀀠UTILITIES TOTAL ;t<-se----"" $121. 00 $121 " ! liP,"" , 􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾..􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽 􀀽􀀫􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠STREET CATEGORY "B" SUBTOTAL $820.74 $325 DES., SURVEY, TRSTlr.;c.:, RTC. (20%) ____􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁌􀁟􀁾__􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁓􀁾􀀶􀁾) TOTAL COST PER 􀁌􀁉􀁾􀀧􀁅􀁁􀁒􀀠FOOT $984.89 $39 t Total Cost Offsire (AU P!1ases) IJ40 $984.89 $1,122,775 gI Total Cost 􀁏􀁮􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁥􀀠(PMse mSpecial Events) . 360 $984.89 $354,561 Total CQS! Onsite (Remaining Phases) 420 $984.89 5413.654 􀁾􀀠TOTAL STREET CATEGORY COST: $1,890,990) Note: BaskSlreel Eq!Jiavent to' 45' B.O.C. [Q B.O.C. Undivided Street􀁾􀀠) ) ) RtALTY TRCST April 28, 1995 Mayor Beckert and Members of the City Council 5300 Belt Line Road Addison, TX 75001 Re: Addison Urban Center Mayor Beckert and Members ofthe City Council: As we approach final decision points on Urban Center issues, we at Columbus are very excited about the positive steps about to be taken to make the Urban Center vision into a reality. After engaging in many months ofthoughtful study and expert professional guidance, Columbus as the developer and initiator of the Urban Center study, Gaylord Properties, Inc. as the owner ofthe Urban Center land, and the City of Addison's Planning and Zoning Commission as the public advisory body to the City Council on land use issues, have reached agreement on innumerable details ofthe Urban Center vision. Therefore, we all look forward to the City Council's thoughtful consideration of the plan and the first formal steps for the City to become a full partner in creating a truly great center for the City. In anticipation of the May 3, 1995 work session and public hearing continuation, this letter is written to provide additional background information and perspective on a few issues we expect to capture much ofthe discussion. These issues are set forth below. Level of Participation in Public Infrastructure At the April II meeting, the City Council considered varying levels of financial participation in the Urban Center streetscape and other public infrastructure improvements. These levels ranged from the $12 million deemed necessary by Columbus to a number that is approximately halfthat amount. In proposing a methodology for participation, staffhas suggested taking the position that the City should pay for only the Urban Centers' two most prominent streets as these streets "will create the environment sought by the Town." Such thinking may be consistent with automobile oriented strip retail, where character can be imparted in a linear fashion and gleaned during a drive-by. The Urban Center, however, was not designed to regulate the public two axial thoroughfares or to reserve the remaining streets for the exclusive use ofresidents or their guests. -lSBSl DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 855 21-138:7·1-192 F.\x 21·1 􀀷􀀷􀀰􀀮􀁾􀀱􀀹􀀲􀀠 All the Urban Center streets are intended to be a welcoming place used by all the Town's citizens for public parking, public interaction, recreation and special events. The public use is intended for the entire grid ofstreets. As such, they are designed at a quality and cost that exceeds that which would be warranted to serve only the immediate residential needs. A departure from the on-site/off-site distinction is necessary because the concepts and costs ofthe two types ofdevelopment are very different, and because the intent is to create a "center" that will be embraced by the Town as a whole. Participation at the full $12 million level is warranted because of the extra costs of achieving the kind ofquality sought. It is also justified because it will be put toward creating spaces for enjoyment bythe Town as a whole. Ma:timum DensitylFloor Area Ration (F.A.R.) One of the basic operating principals for ail properties since the inception of the Urban Center study, has been that the Urban Center was not conceived as a downsizing of development rights, but was conceived as a way to bring an exciting mixed use (urban residential) enviromnent to an area previously slated exclusively for automobile oriented office uses. Nevertheless, because ofconcerns regarding changes proposed to Quorum Drive, staff recommended that a floor area ratio limitation be imposed, and that the ratio be set at "1.6: 1". . . From the time it was proposed, we have felt that the recommendation to have a floor area ratio limitation ran counter to the understanding that we had regarding development rights. Moreover, the spirit of neotraditional urban planning is to reject a street classification system based on sprawl and dissipation ofuses in favor ofthe realization that some traditional street patterns in America's greatest urban enviromnents have proved the capability ofaccommodating densities which are far greater than anything proposed for the Urban Center. A compromise was reached at the Planning and Zoning Commission in favor of eliminating the F .A.R. limitation, but requiring traffic mitigation measures for office uses in the Residential Subdistrict. Following the Commision's public hearings, staff has remained in favor of having a floor area ratio limitation. We have also had our traffic consultants do additional study on the issue ofoffice uses and the street pattern proposed. The results indicate that even if2,500,000 square feet ofoffice uses were developed, the street system proposed could comfortably handle 9,400 more vehicle trips per day than what such office uses would generate. . In light of the traffic study we remain convinced that the changes to Quorum Road do not warrant the imposition ofa stringent limitation on development rights. Nevertheless, because of staff s conviction that a floor area limitation is necessary we will accede to a floor area ratio of2.2:1. We feeL this number is appropriate and will not result in too 2 much further damage to the land owner's willingness to further restrict the land. Moreover, our further analysis on the street system, should provide comfort that this ratio is allowable without any need to modify the street patterns proposed. OpenSpace . After a great deal ofdebate, we have reached agreement between our urban planning expert and the Planning and Zoning Commission that 1.5 acres of open space per 1,000 residents will amply provide for the needs ofresidents and will be an enhancement that does not do damage to the concept ofhaving lively, compact, urban enviromnent. This number is a compromise between the 1.0 acres/I ,000 residents originally recommended by our consultants and the 2.0 acres/I ,000 residents originally recommended by staff. Staff's current recommendation is for a sliding scale that would "front-load" open space. The practical effect, however, is to require an additional 1.125 acres ofland to be dedicated. Therefore, we do not view it as simply an issue of􀁾land is to be dedicated. If it were solely a matter oftiming, we might agree such a further compromise does not go against the spirit ofthe compromise reached at the Planning and Zoning Commission stage. Exterior Appearance and Materials With regard to the cladding materials for the parking structures, we continue to believe that the 40% brick cladding requirement recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission is the most appropriate for achieving compatibility with regard to materials while allowing design flexibility so that compatibility will also be achieved as to form and other elements ofdesign. With regard to the Exterior Appearance section of the Commercial Subdistrict regulations, our understanding ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation as to Spectrum and Mildred is that the regUlations would apply to both a height of30 feet. We continue to believe this is the appropriate limitation to insure compatibility without unduly restricting commercial development in the Commercial Subdistrict.. The recommendations reached by the Planning and Zoning Commission followed by lengthy and detailed public hearing. Also preceding the City Council determinations on the first Urban Center items cap many hours ofthoughtful involvement by Columbus, Gaylord and the City. The vision started by the Town ofAddison and RTKL brought . Columbus and Gaylord to the table. Each brings unique items with them. Columbus brings its vision and development expertise in a specific type of urban residential development and the willingness to have expended a great deal of money on exhaustive planning studies and property arrangements. Gaylord brings its land and, even after a 3 long history ofcontributing to infrastructure improvements and civic well being in the area,1 the willingness to give up some development rights and to have that land regulated by a complicated set ofdevelopment guidelines. The City, in addition to its original vision, brings to the table a willingness to provide further infrastructure improvements that will shortly make the Urban Center one ofthe City's finest assets. We look forward to working together to make the vision a reality. Very truly yours, Bryant Nail Columbus Realty Trust Vice President -Development I Donations of land to exlensions ofNorth Dallas Tollway; donalion of moneys for underpasses at Belt Line, Arapaho and railroad; extension ofthe sewer line that serves the Quorum area from North ofBelt Line Road; donation ofhalfthe right-of-way for Quorum Road; regularly granls permission to use land for City ofAddison special events parking at no cost to the City. 4 _.. , , " .(,r ,"" ' -.> . -" ' ...... '.,. '.': " ... :,."." , , ,' '.:, , , , , .... . -', , '-". '.: , " " 􀀨􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀠, , " SClfnsrlo Theoretlelll Maximum 3000 unit R ••ldentlal Y19Id B1I8!Jd on Cummt Plan: Maximum Residential Development Yield ( Msuming 300.000 61 of retail end a total of 3000 units averaging 1360 sf in size) , Total Maximum Yield: 4,360,750 sf Open Space Requirements ( aSliuming 1.5 acres per 1000 reeidents); Quorum East: 0.69 Bosque: 0.S6 Rotary. 0.58 Mildred Eaa!: 0.74 Special Events I: 3.00 Total Open Space: 7.73 Bores a.36aere parcel next 10 DART held in reserve. Net developable area: 26.06 acre Average Net FAR: 3.8623: 1 Gross FAA: l.BlI:] , Scel'Ulrlo: MaxImum YIeld Undtlr Exl.tlng Cl ZonIng 12 story office towers with separate parking footprints: OR 9 story atrium offIces over 3 levels of parking: Max. Net FAR: 2.89:' Max. Net FAR: 3.25: 1 Totel Maximum Yield 4,750.000 sf -to -5,375.000 sf. Gross FAB: 2; 1102,3: 1 Assumotigns' Gross site area: 53.3 aeras Net developable area under existing C, zoning; 38 acres Mwdmum building height under existing Cl zoning: 150 feet Maximum Lot coverege under existing Cl zoning: 80% Parking structures not included in development yield. Berm.rlo: Theon/tical Mllx/mum Ylgld Under Current Pilln PropOlltll Maxjmllm Residential ( 1500 units with 50.000 sf of street lellal retail); Parcels; Area: Stories: Development Net FAR's Units (82061) Yield: 􀀢􀁾􀀮􀁷•••􀁾___........􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀢􀀢􀀢_____􀁾__"""_""'."""""'''''_·''''''''''''_._...... _ ....._.-_......_ ............ _ ...................... _ ......,................_ -.. A 1.23 4 144.600 sf NelFAR : 2.3 169 8 1.60 4 130.750 sf : 2.3 157 C 1.B9 4 150.900 sf : 2.3 164 D 1.17 6 176,550 sf :3.6 241 E 1.12 6 167,500 sf :3.6 97 N 1.76 6 413,800 sf :5.4 314 0 2.41 13 S65.BOO sf : 6.4 466 Total: 1,749.9008f Total: 1.628 at 620 iii or 1500 at 1,130 af Maximum OffiCf! Parcels: Stories: Development Maximum Net FAR's Yield: F G H I J K L M p a west Oees! 1.66 1.e8 2.31 1.51 0.67 2.43 1.36 0.97 1.85 1.43 0.69 5 6 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 7 284.000 sf 268.600 sf 351,000 sf 321,250 sf 166.750 sf 516.650 sl 290,300 sf 206.eOO af 393.BOO sf 185,050 sf 124,450 sf Mal!. Net FAA ;3.5 : 3.5 : 3.5 : 4.9 :4.9 : 4.9 : 4.9 :4.9 : 4.9 : 3.5 : 4,9 Total: 3,149,550 sf Total Maximum Yield: 4,899.450 sf Open Space Requirements ( assuming 1.5 acres per 1000 Bosque: 0.96 Rotary: 0.56 Mildred Eat: 0.74 Special Events I: 3.00 residents): Totsl Open Space: • 5.2B acres Nat Developable area: 28.54 acres (3,361i1cre parcel next 10 DART held in reserve). Average Nel FAA: 3.9: 1 Gross FAR: 2.1: 1 Sc;enario: Thllor&tlc;.1 Mllxlmum 4000 unit R""fdllnt/af Ylllld BallI/a on Curr&nt PI,n: Maximum Residential Develocment Yield ( Assuming 300,000 sf of I'lliailand a !gtel of 4000 units averaging 950 sf in alze) . Parcels: Area: Stories: Development Net FAR'e Unite) Yield: .-.............--..--.."'-.................. ....----..-..... ....-.........."'''....-.....-.........."' ........__........................................._-...................................... 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠A 1.23 4 144,60081 : 2.7 169 B 1.80 4 130,750 sf : 2.7 157 C 1.89 4 150,900 sl : 2.7 164 D 1.17 6 178,550 lSI : 3.5 241 E 1.12 6 167,5008t : 3.5 97 F 1.B6 6 291,650 af : 3.5 350 G 1.68 6 294,600 af :3.5 350 H 2.31 6 362.250 sf : 3.5 400 I 1.51 e 276,600 sf :4.2 300 J 0.67 6 159,500 al :4.2 160 K 2.43 8 445,500 sf : 42 500 L 1.36 8 249,300 sf : 4.2 280 M 0.97 8 177,BOO sf :4.2 200 N 1.76 8 322,000sl ; 4.2 380 0 2.41 6 441.750 sl : 4.2 500 P 1.6S 8 339,100 sf :4.2 370 Tolal Maximum Yield: 4.130.750 at Open Space Requirements ( assuming 1.6 ElCres per 1000 residents): Quorum Weat: 1.43 Quorum East: 0.69 Bosque: 0.96 Rotary: 0.66 Mildred Eat: 0.74 Special Events I: 3.00 Total Open Space: 9.16 acres 3.36 acre parcel next 10 DART held In reserve. Net developable area; 24.65 acre Average Net FAR; 3.B4: 1 Gro§1i EAR: 1.78; 1 •.:....-:i 􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀠,',', ", 􀀻􀁾, I '::':::' " -" " ''.,'''·Y' " , 􀁾􀀠, , 􀁾􀀠" " " If?< H , T • C S T .. ,_.' ': ' Nui!",:L ;" 􀀧􀂷􀁕􀀺􀁜􀂷􀁤􀁾􀀢􀁲􀁴􀁾􀁲􀁲􀁬􀁐􀀮􀀱􀁾􀁮􀁙􀀠. 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀠 iu a:i.': 􀀱􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁬􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀁊􀀮􀁦􀁾􀀺􀁴􀀠􀀩􀀢􀁲􀁩􀀮􀁴􀁩􀁾􀀠:.:.. : ;;;1';'-;.;:.1.::-iT. a} Z"'.zbk:: to ;;.t'e:)',--, "<'" r;.) ct.h..GdC',:;;u,:L It b ::.:=:::ee: 􀁾􀀠..:, !:'i" tt;;: 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁜􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀬􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀠􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁉􀁬􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀠􀀮􀀭􀀾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀠4I!! 􀁤􀁩􀀺􀀡􀁳􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁡􀀧􀀲􀀬􀀠􀁮􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀻􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁴􀀺􀀬􀀡􀀮􀁅􀀮􀀠"::, r;; !.!.;--x '.. ;, 􀂷􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁨􀀠this 􀁦􀀻􀁴􀁃􀀢􀀮􀀤􀁩􀁭􀁩􀀱􀁾􀀠by c; (I.; 􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁆􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀾􀀺􀀧􀀠e·_ ..... 􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠-􀀺􀀬􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁌􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀺􀁲􀀠pr;:;h-:biwci.. II yo'..' 􀁨􀁲􀁟􀁹􀁾􀀠􀀨􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀭􀀧� �􀀮􀀠::---􀁣􀁾􀁲􀀧􀀱􀀡􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀠uEte:i.. Ji_'r'j f:::.::..:.-i:::i1c 1.:;.;,_,-' ,::,,:;L "l 1i 􀀼􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁩􀀮􀁬􀁴􀁢􀁣􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀼􀁬􀀺􀁪􀀻􀀠􀀻􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀭􀁲􀀺􀁴􀀻􀀮􀁤􀀠t:,: 􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀻􀀺􀀠 i !'. :, .' ' 􀀭􀁾􀂷􀁴􀂷...... : 1 ". " .... i 􀀺􀀺􀀬􀁶􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀠. l ... , :"" JRIGHT &. 􀁊􀁁􀁗􀁏􀁾􀁓􀁋􀁉􀀠 Ll.P. . ,.:. 􀁾􀁔􀁾.... 􀁾􀁏􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀡􀂷􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀻􀁏􀀠L,J"Df!.J"'TY' 􀁴􀀾􀀧􀁁􀁪􀀻􀁦􀀢􀁎􀁅􀁁􀀻􀀻􀀢􀀢􀁉 􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁃􀁊􀁏􀀠􀁒􀁏􀁾􀀵􀀠,AvS:huJS· SUI..-/?: i?'800 oAl...LA5, T£:XA$ J5t:I OI MEMORANDUM '{'o: 􀁂􀁲􀁹􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠N"!il DATE; .Juflo 1, 1995 FROM: My'l'cP D. DOlnic BE: Assignment of Publicly 8id C'..ontracts PUl'lluant tc your request, e.ttsched arc E!'JI:/impl"$ of how LYPicaiiy deals with construction contrae!:$ assigned to priva!.e 􀁤􀁥􀀬􀁾􀁫􀀠1. The City ent..i!rs into a development agrelrolent The City's :right to inspect, l"Hquir!!ment.'l for cur', payment, payment particulars are set forth m tho ·,.:d other 􀁳􀁡􀁦􀁾􀀡􀁦􀁣􀀮􀀡􀁡􀁲􀁤􀁳􀀠are found in this agreement. See t·: Pari',mm:hip Agreement. parlicularly at page 3 and 􀀬􀁾􀀠, B., attached. 2. Bid specifications are prepared and the 􀁃􀁄􀁬􀀱􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠 the City. The Re$Olution awarding the bid dr.l: assignment of the contract to the de1.·eloper ::C;"". 2 of Rescrlution 941561, atta.ched. 3. The develover use .. itf. own tann of coutrL!.CL W;cfl ,h·;. I;;ontract incorporates the bid specifications, see cr;:,v ·.-,"PiC" contract with Bowman Construction attached, The LrLY dC''i! not generally review or approve the 􀀻􀀻􀁻􀁩􀀡􀁬􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁴􀀠"e'''''He.!! "be d"'''ejaper/construction manager and the 􀁾􀁉􀀱􀁬􀀻􀁴􀁔􀁕􀀼􀀺􀁴􀁩􀁏􀁊􀁊􀀠;:O H.,psny. Rut.her, tbe City hold .. the deveJoper 113 construction nW(ll.ll<'" 􀁩􀁾􀀱􀀠tbc6lI'!'tivl:! prClgra:ms, including' infrastructure Clost participatil:m, ,;.;"" c'; c ,.,):.:"" fee rcl:lllltes, puI;;Ilic 1mprov'!lllent& cU.strir.:::ts, 'tax 􀁦􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁮􀁣􀀮􀀮􀁣􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀠.. ' .',','" d.i.stricts, and land buy-bac:k guarantees; l\\tld WH:t.RE:AS, 'the city, pursuant to orainance " .... ;(.(,!;;.:;;,;. " bj 􀁴􀀺􀁨􀁾􀀠Dallaa City Cotll!.ci1 on OOc@mber 14, .,i63 r ' '", ',<",ed 􀁒􀁥􀁩􀁮􀁶􀁥􀀵􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠ZOn@NUlII.ber,One, city of Dallas, 􀁔􀀮􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁡􀁬􀀡􀀡􀀠(Y"''''''''''' ,C'! "':0 promote development 􀁾􀀠redevelOpJllent in t;hl!' ..􀀺􀁴􀀧􀁾􀀧􀂷􀀢􀀠" , 􀁡􀁾􀀠State-Thc!lMl""; throuqh the use of talC i1'1crelllent. f.inll.l'Ici.;();,l, ",.,,'. WHEREAS. owner aWTlS certain property \oIit:.hin tbli Zona 0. ,,:,,:i;;ll it plans to construct 􀁭􀁑􀁬􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁡􀁭􀁩􀁬􀁙􀀠housing; 􀁾􀁮􀁤􀀠WR£R.t:AS. owner haa aSked fOl: installaticm Qf cartit illlPravel!lll!nta pursuant to the stat.e-1'hONS 'f;r.x :tl\Crement: Finllncinq oistrLct PrOjec:t and Financing' Plan (the "'fIl" Plan", submit.ted to' and u.pprQVeQ by the City Council an Decelilbet" U. 1989 (Ordinance No. ;<0510), 􀁾􀁯􀁷􀀠THERSFORE. in 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀱􀀴􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁴􀀱􀁯􀁮􀀠of the mutual covenants and 􀁾􀁢􀁬􀁩􀁱􀁡􀁥􀁬􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀠herein. the parties aqree as fellows: SECTIOlO 1. OWner agrees to construct four (4). 􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁥􀀭􀁳􀁴􀁯􀁴􀁹􀀠􀁲􀁥􀁳􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀠apa:r:tment bui14in9s haviniil' 300 rental 􀁵􀁮􀁩􀁴􀁾􀀠and one (1) five-s:::;"t':, i1e.6f 1 -. -.'-" ." .y . 9;j229? elevated par;:;ing garage having approKilll...:.􀁄􀁥􀁶􀁥􀁬􀁑􀁰􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁏􀁩􀁲􀀮􀁴 􀁾􀁩􀁣􀁴􀁟􀁈􀁯􀀬􀀠􀀱􀀹􀀳􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁟􀁋􀁯􀀮􀀠􀀲􀀱􀁾􀁬􀀲􀁬􀀮􀀠Oll'!,s ,!lj" approvals necessary to allolol publicly bitJ <;:ont<:,a.:;'"s for i:fle construct1on 􀁯􀁾􀀠infrllstructure pursuant to thd. Agn,''',mU!int-to l::J£! 􀁡􀁶􀁡􀁲􀁏􀁾􀀠and notice to prQcep.o 􀁱􀁩􀁶􀁾􀁮􀀠prior to J.nyary 1, 1994. SECTIOM 2. A. In consideration of anQ as incentive to 􀀴􀁾􀁥􀀠􀁏􀁾􀁮􀁥􀁲􀀠fur the development of the Project, the City agrees 􀁾􀁜􀁾􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀀠tQ the conditions contained herein and 􀁰􀁵􀁲􀁳􀁵􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠to the 􀁾􀁉􀁆􀀠􀁐􀁬􀁾􀁮􀀬􀀠to asSumh tne 􀁣􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁳􀀠of and to 􀁾􀁾􀁪􀁧􀁮􀀠and construct 􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁨􀁩􀁮􀀠􀁥􀁨􀁾􀀠time 􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠stated herein certain eligible infrastructure improvements in C':Ol"..ne-etiQrt with Phase II of the TIF Plan. ':i:he l.nfl'::!structun;, .impr-t1VI!lInt:,mts eligible for design and construc:tier; "t th", City l.U1ciL'!£ tltis AC]t'eement and the TIF Plan shall incil"de til", -iemoliti..-,,,, removal. qradinq, stabilization, c:oru;:truc:tion ilnd '.rl"'<:l'llletiQ'" act1.vleies and items more peorticular1y descrL.b",cl in t.he: Inf:c'l!Istructure List attached hereto as Exhibit B. city "m! 0"11"," 􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀀠\:hat construction of the eliqible 􀁩􀀮􀁮􀁦􀁲􀁡􀁳􀁥􀀮􀁴􀁜􀁬􀀧􀁾􀁴􀁵􀁚􀀧􀁥􀀠imf;rovel!\entc\ .:;hall !:Ie I!IPPQrtii'med between a pl.lblicly bid constr.Jctiofi com:J: the lOV/i;ii,'t. respc;msible bidder, the Cit:,y sl'lall "o1:.ify Owner of the amount of th!7! lowest respons1blQ bid recommended for award, or any other determination (e.q., rejection of all bids, rebi4, that 􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀠􀁢􀁾􀀠-cequired 􀁵􀁮􀁤􀁾􀀠state· law. Shoyld th(!! !;lids rellfiy 􀁥􀁬􀀮􀁬􀀮􀁱􀁩􀁢􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀠infrastructure 􀁩􀀡􀀱􀁬􀀢􀁴􀀧􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁾􀁮􀁴􀀠CO$ts OWl!!!%' has incu:rred l.md,"" ttl" privatl:!ly bid contracts, provided, however, that City sh<:lll .i..tl r", event be c:tbligated under this section to make rei1llburIlCUl.:mt to O1oty,,,,l. of an amount whi-.:h WOUld exc:eed 30t ef the construct.ion Cl 􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀢􀀠􀁡􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁤􀁥􀁤􀀠􀁵􀁮􀁾� �􀁲􀀠such privately bid contraot&. B. The City &hall award the publicly bid e;:';m5t);'Uctiotl ee·,;..cact and 􀁡􀁇􀁾􀁩􀁧􀁮􀀠Ga.e 􀁾􀁯􀀠owner, au the citr'$ 4qene and 􀁾􀁑􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠Jll8.n l1g'er for all Pu:t'l'OI!l'l!!!II includinq inspec:fdon, material. .. 􀁴􀀺􀁥􀁾􀀬􀀻􀁩􀀬􀁮􀁱􀀠, 􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁫􀁩􀁾􀀮􀀠gUperwision and 􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁡􀁴􀁬􀁯􀁮􀀠or all construction VQck. 􀁾􀁨􀁾􀀠<:ity shall look to OWner as the City'. 8.,@nt. to lnaurB that. aI' i,nrrastt:Ucture blpX'ovl!lllents are QQlllpleted in A timely lll'inner"." ac:eordance with the contract dOClJments, plans and, speeific:atic.u; approved by the city. OWler shall review all monta:j.:t and final p4YJ1lent estimates and forward 5_e to' the city for paYlIien't. wi.;J:l such .;upportinq doc:umenti'ltion as the City may require. All payments for 􀁷􀁯􀁾􀁫􀀠performed under the construction contract shall 􀁾􀁥􀀠made by the City to the owner for forwarding to the 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁴􀁕􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁑􀁦􀁴􀀠􀁣􀁥􀁦􀁴􀁴􀁲� �􀁣􀁾􀁯􀁲􀀮􀀠'The City shall not make any pAyment under a montnly or final estimate unless OWner has provided 4 􀁾􀁥􀁲􀁴􀁬􀁴􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁤􀁩􀁮􀀹􀀠the work 􀁰􀁥􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁀􀁤􀀠an& OWner bas reviewed and approved the 􀁤􀁲􀁴􀁴􀁾􀀮􀀠OWner's 􀁣􀁥􀁲􀁴􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁥􀁡􀁾􀁪􀀮􀁯􀁮􀀠shall be 􀁾􀀠affidavit. I!Iworn t\!! 1;'1' .til", corporate otticial or employee 4uly authorized to 􀀵􀁜􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁩􀁴􀀠lliame, 􀁾􀁭􀀧􀀺􀀠shall cert1fy that t.he estbmte of 'IoIOrk completag lOt:;,e th@period i ,. c:p.alJst::!.Cln is true anci correct to thG beet gf tll.;: aff.iant";,; information and belief, ha& been measured 􀁡􀁾􀀠verified in 􀁡􀁣􀁣􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀠with the contract ciocuments, and that 􀁡􀁾􀁬􀀠contract preconditions tc payment have been met. Copies of all 􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁩􀁡􀁬􀀠􀁴􀁥􀁳􀁴􀁩􀁲􀁾􀀠rasults shall be furnished with thG certification. The city 􀁾􀁳􀁥􀁲􀁶􀁥􀁳􀀠the right to perform inspections. 􀁭􀁥􀁡􀁳􀁙􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁶􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩 􀁾􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁅􀀠the e$tiaates or work quantities as are 􀁮􀁥􀁥􀁥􀁳􀁳􀁡􀁾􀀮􀀠Final 􀁰􀁡􀁹􀁾􀁥􀁦􀁴􀁴􀀠to 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠construction 􀁥􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁴􀁯􀁾􀀠under the publicly 􀁾􀁩􀁑􀀠􀁾􀁑􀁮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠􀁣􀁯􀁮 􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁾􀀠shall not Qe made until all infrastructure improvements 􀁲􀁾􀁶􀁾􀀠been finally 􀁣􀁾􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠(AR verified by 􀁯􀁶􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀠and tbe City) in 􀁡􀁣􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁤􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁾􀀠with tne approvft4 eontract docu=ants, plans and speeifications and have been ac::c:ept:1I!d by the City. c. All work 􀁬􀁑􀁣􀁡􀁾􀀠within. public s'b:eet, alley, flIa&i!!mlUlt or other r1gnt-of-way belonginq to the City shall become the sole property 􀁯􀁾􀀠'CIte Ci.ty upon 􀁣􀁏􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠of 1:be Work in accordance with the planII aJld IIIp11c1tieatiol'ls: approval of the vork by' tho Oirq,c'l:or 􀁯􀁾􀀠Public 􀁷􀁯􀁾􀀠and/or the Director Qf Dallas 􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁲􀀠ueilitie5, or the.ir 􀁤􀀮􀁳􀁩􀁧􀁮􀁡􀁾􀀠zoep:r:Hentatives: and 􀁡􀁃􀁏􀀧􀁣􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀸􀀠of the Work l:Iy the city. Upon tinal acceptanee, the 􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁹􀀠shall take the 􀁷􀁯􀁾􀁫􀀠free 􀁦􀁾􀁯􀁾􀀠any liens or encumbrances thereon. Upon Kinel aCC$ptanoe 􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠receipt of documented inVOices frl;'/lll OW'n@:&', City Sball make paYJllentfor any 􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁭􀁢􀁵􀁾􀁳􀁥􀁭􀀮􀁮􀁴􀀠of 􀁾􀁏􀁇􀁴􀁳􀀠􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁲􀁲􀁲􀁥􀁤􀀠unde: privately bid contracts tor which the City beCCMGS 􀁯􀁢􀀱􀀱􀁱􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁵 􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠to sectior, l.A. of thi5 􀁁􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀮􀀠2166< 4 9 91 SECTION 4. Owner's 􀁏􀁢􀁬􀁩􀁧􀁡􀁴􀁾􀁑􀁾􀀠A. Prior to the ...ward of the publicly bitt COn, 􀁾􀀼􀀮􀀺􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠Gontri\ct, owner shall convey to the City by t'eplat or inli:\::;r=,;,j';'''' 1':."'", area shown on ExnibiJ;.J2 a1:tac:hed hereto and mad.. a. part her-eQ£, for 􀁥􀀳􀀮􀁳􀁬􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀡􀀡􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠in connection ioIith thll! c.onst.ru.cti':>tl of" the eligible: infrastruct.ure improvements. 'l'be eligible inf:r.'a;st:ructu]"'" impravlOillents consttUc:ted. pll.2:s:uant 􀁨􀁾􀁲􀁃􀀡􀁴􀀮􀁃􀁉􀀠al:ulI,ll becolllEl the property of the City. Failure of Owner to convey the necessakY easements to the city ...􀁾􀀠providad herein shall render the City's obligaeion& hereunder nQll and void and of no 􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀠effect. B. O'Wne,r will, pursuant to the cc:mtrac:t apPQrtiomnen" 􀁾􀁥􀀹􀁡􀁲􀁩􀁢􀁥􀁤􀀠in Exbibkt e 􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀴􀁴􀁾􀀬􀀠construct p=rtiens of the ellgib4E 􀁩􀁮􀁦􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠􀁩􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠under privately bid contracts. Owner 􀁡􀁧􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠to assuae minimum 􀁡􀁵􀁤􀁩􀁴􀁾􀁤􀀠C05tS in connection with the eQnstruction and deSign of eligible infrastructure 􀁩􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁭􀁵􀁮􀁴􀁾􀀠e.qual to the lesser of $500,000, or one-third of the totaL construetiQfi and desiqn COGts ror eligible infrastructure cQnsb:Ucted pursuant to this Aqreemellt ("Owner's cont:ri.bUtionrr). For 􀁰􀁵􀁲􀁰􀁯􀁾􀁥􀁳􀀠of caloulatinq Owner's Contribution, 􀁡􀁵􀁤􀁩􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠mayinclude, but shall not be limited to, cost.s of materials and. labor, design, 􀁾testinq and 􀂣􀁮􀁳􀁰􀁾􀁥􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠􀁣􀁯􀁳􀁴􀁾􀀮􀀠c. opon 􀁾􀀠City's assiqn:lllent of the constructiol1 cantr.;}I;t;" OWner, as the City's aqent, shall perform the usual 􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁰􀁥􀁃􂂬􀁓􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁦􀀠traditional construction Ina."'lagement services i,m::id:e:m; 􀁴􀀺􀁾􀀠construetion proje=ts of the nature and 􀁳􀁥􀁯􀂻􀁾􀀠of this project. contt"ac:tinq with the allsi9'l'lec! contractor, Owner shall. c. C!(ln!':tructiQrI Clontract ami pe;rto:r:'!IIlSn¢v!anC payi:l1Rut };Iorld forms 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠have be1lm reviewed and apprC1Ved. by the City Attorney. 􀁔􀁨􀁾􀀠performance and paYII\e.nt bonds shall name O'.me:{' and the City as joint 􀁾􀁢􀁬􀁩􀀹􀁾􀀦􀀮􀀠Owner o:{, Owner's aqent shall 􀁴􀁨􀁑􀁾􀁯􀁵􀀹􀁨􀁬􀁹􀀠􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁓􀁰􀁾􀁃􀁾􀀠the work Qf the assigned contractor to 􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁤􀀠the cttr aqainst 􀁡􀁥􀁦􀁥􀁾􀁴􀁳􀀠and 􀁤􀁥􀁴􀁩􀁥􀁩􀁥􀁮􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠in the infrastructure 􀁩􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠􀁷􀁩􀁴􀁢􀁾􀁵􀁴􀀠assuminqresponsibilities for means and methods used by 􀀧􀁾􀁨􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀠aS$ignad <:ontrao;tor. In addition" Q';Iner SMil fully and COlli}' ',1;:",:)"y payor settle, by litigation or otherwise, any claims of 􀁾􀁥􀀠􀁦􀁴􀁳􀁳􀁩􀁧􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀠􀁣􀁑􀁮􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁴􀁯􀁲􀀠arisinq out of performance of tbft construotion CQntrdct without involvinq the city. unless such claims result from tne 􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁧􀁾􀀠railurB 􀁾􀀠the city to make 􀁥􀁏􀁮􀀤􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠payments 􀁴􀁾􀀠Ownqr in 􀁡􀁾􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁤􀁡􀁮􀁣� �􀁥􀀠with t.he te:rm.s of this Alire--'-flt. xi owner intencJ.s to seek rei=bursement fro. the City f04 en. expense of resolving anyclaim caused directly by the City's wrQnqful fa11Qre to 􀁾􀁡􀁫􀁥􀀠construction payments under 'the 􀁴􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀠of this Agreement, OWner shall notiry the City in writing in advance of the claim and any proposed settlement or resolution, by change order. litiqatioh or otherwise. The City reserves the righ.t upon such. natioe. and at the City's lIole election, to make a reasonable aul1it: of all bQOks, recortls, aCCCl.lnts. and other data ott the assigned cofttractor relat1nq to the 􀁣􀁾􀀶􀁩􀀮􀀠and gyerall performance of the eon5tructton eontract be£ore 􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁾􀁯􀁶􀁩􀁮􀀹􀀠reimbursement o£ expenses for such claim. OWner shall provide fer 2 ! 66 F s -:: fO:.":", . ;iv< I . -. -. 932291 the City's riqht to audit claims and c!:lange Qrciel: req"':;':6 ::,$ in its 􀁦􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁲􀁾􀁣􀁴􀀠with the assigned 􀁾􀁑􀁮􀁴􀁦􀁡􀁥􀁾􀁯􀁲􀀮􀀠O. owner sball by deed restriction, the minimum term af 􀁾􀁨􀁩􀁣􀁨􀀠shall be 􀁣􀁯􀁾􀁲􀁲􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠with the term of thq Zone, 􀁲􀁥􀀵􀁡􀁾􀁶􀁾􀀠ten 􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁣􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠(lot) of the 􀁐􀁲􀁥􀀻􀁾􀁥􀁴􀀧􀁾􀀠residential unite for lease Qnly to LOw IneOll1e Ten"'llts. tor purposes of this A9'reement, ·'1..ow Incolll'e Tenants:" shall 􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁮􀀠these tenants 􀁷􀁨􀁯􀁳􀁾􀀠household income is less than or equal to the Qualifyin9' Income. For purposes of this: Agreement, "Ql:Ialif::"'il'lq l:m:Pllle: m(;oalli:;: (a) for a four person household, 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠qreater 􀁯􀁾􀀠80\ of the median income most recently published by the United Statas 􀁇􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠for a four person household of the 􀁐􀁲􀁑􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁾􀀧􀀵􀀠Primary 􀁍􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁏􀁬􀀧􀀰􀁬􀁩tan stetit!lt:ic::al Area ("PHS..... " ol:' &0-9: of 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠1993 ::>MSl\ median 􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁑􀁭􀁥􀀠for a four 􀁰􀁾􀁾􀀵􀁡􀁮􀀠􀀠household ($45,500.00) adjusted to reflect annual changes in the Consumer 􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁣􀁥􀀠Index; (b) for households havin9 􀁬􀁾􀁳􀁓􀀠than 􀁦􀁑􀁵􀁾􀀠􀁰􀁥􀁾􀁳􀂢􀁮􀁳􀀬􀀠an amount equal to the four 􀁰􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀧􀀠􀁨􀁯􀁵􀁳􀁥􀁨􀁯􀁬􀁾􀀠Qualifying Income minus ten percent of that amount for each 􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁀􀁲􀀠of 􀁰􀁥􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀠by Which the household 􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁥􀀠is less than four; and (0) for a household of qreat@.r than four, an O!mOUllt eq'..Jal to the 􀁑􀁵􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁹􀁩􀁮􀁱􀀠Income for a 􀁦􀁾􀁲􀀠person 􀁨􀁯􀁵􀁾􀁥􀁨􀁯􀁬􀁤􀀠plus 􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀢􀁻􀁪􀁱􀁴􀀺􀀠percent of that amount for each n\J.1!lllet" gf p@rsci'ls by ",j:o;i,,;;h. j:.Ilf.! housebold si%e is 􀁱􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁲􀀠than four. E, OWner aqrE!'tes to assum@r:outirie maintenance and ,l;epair responsibility for any brick-on-sanQ 􀀤􀀱􀁾􀀦􀁬􀁫􀁳􀀠􀁑􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁾􀁥􀁑􀀠􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁳􀁵􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠to this Aqreement. Owner's obliqation te &aintain and cepair sucn sidewalks shall be 􀁬􀁩􀁭􀁩􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀠to maintenance and repair neceasitaecd 􀁾􀁹􀀠normal wear and 􀁴􀁥􀁡􀁾􀀬􀀠and suen obliqation shall 􀁳􀁰􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁦􀀱􀁣􀁡 􀁬􀁬􀁹􀀠􀁾􀁯􀁴􀀠􀁩􀁮􀁣􀀺􀁾􀁵􀁤􀁥􀀠the respol'lsi.bility to reconst:r:uc:t sidewalks dist:Il.l':i;)ed hi construction or utility work vhich has nat bee" initiated by OWner. SECTION 5. It i8 .xpressly understood and 􀁡􀀹􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁤􀀠by the parties to this Aqreement that if tb. sUbstantial completion of the eonstruction of any improv.-.nts contftmPlated hereunder is delayed by 􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁓􀁑􀁮􀀠of W"':'$, civil c::emmotion. aets of Gor;l, incleme1'lt wea'l:het', qov(!lrnment:al restriction., requlaticns, or interferences, delay$ caused by the franchise 􀁵􀁴􀀱􀀱􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁥􀀸􀀠( TU Electric, 􀁾􀁔􀀧􀁔􀀬􀀠Southwestern Bell 􀁔􀁥􀁬􀁾􀁰􀁨􀁯􀀢􀁥􀀬􀀠'l'el: cablevision of" Dallas, Inc. • LonG Star Gas, or their contractors), fire or other casualty, 􀁣􀁯􀁵􀁾􀀠injunction, 􀁮􀁥􀁣􀁥􀁓􀀵􀁡􀁾􀁹􀀠condemnation proceedinqs, acts Qf the other party, its affiliated/related entities and/or their Contractors. or any 􀁥􀁩􀁲􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁥􀁳􀀠Ynich are reasonably 􀁾􀁥􀁹􀁯􀁮􀁤􀀠th.. control of the party 6 · 􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀬􀀠--,.,....,. -..1,:;\1::", ;: 􀀬􀁾􀁌􀁾􀀬􀁦􀁩􀀠L : ': . " I,..... :..;c .:::;. :"", 932297 oJ:)ligated Qr permitt.ed. under the teI'lJi.5 of this Agre'-'i11"mt to do t:Jr perform 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠same, regardless of 􀁷􀁨􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀠any such circumstances is similar tQ any of those 􀁾􀁮􀁜􀁊􀁬􀁕􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁅􀀧􀁤􀀠or not,the party so obliqated or permitted shall be 􀁾􀁸􀁃􀁕􀁳􀁥􀁤􀀠from doing or performing the 􀁳􀁡􀁾􀁥􀀠durinqsuch periCJid ot delay, so that the tillle pe.t'icc1 􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁬􀁩􀀮􀁣􀀻􀀻􀁌􀁢􀁬􀁾􀀠to 􀁭􀁾􀁣􀁨􀀠􀁰􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁥􀀠shall be extended 􀁦􀁯􀁾􀀠a period of time equal to the 􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁯􀁤􀀠􀁾􀁵􀁣􀁨􀀠party was delayed. SJ!:(:."TION 6. the term of this 􀁁􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁴􀀠shall bf!.qin on the dat.t! 01' e-x:e'::1J.tion, end upon th@city's 􀁩􀁾􀁳􀁵􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀠of a tinal 􀁣􀁥􀁲􀁴􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁣􀁾􀁴􀁥􀀠of 􀁯􀁣􀁣􀁵􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁹􀀠'the ProjeC"t. SECtION 7. Indmnnity; QWT!er agrees t;Q 􀀻􀀻􀁩􀁾􀁦􀁅􀀡􀁮􀁤􀀬􀀠inde:mnif)' and: hold the City, its Qffic'iJ'l;'$, agents and employees, harmless against any dnd all all claims, la\olS1,1i1:&, j\tc!5Clciates, employees or 5uOOon8u1tants. in 1=Jte performance af tbis Aqreelllent. The il'ldellUlity provided fer in this para9raph, 􀁨􀁯􀁾􀁥􀁶􀁥􀁲􀀬􀀠shall noe 􀁾􀁰􀁰􀁬􀁹􀀠to 􀁾􀁮􀁹􀀠liability resultinq rrom 􀀧􀁾􀁥􀀠sQle 􀁮􀁥􀀹􀀱􀁩􀁧􀁥􀁮􀁾 􀁥􀀠of tna 􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁹􀀬􀀠its 􀁾􀁦􀁲􀁩􀁣􀁥􀁲􀁳􀀬􀀠aqents, eMpLoyees, or 􀁾􀀤􀁰􀁡􀁲􀀦􀁴􀁥􀀠􀁣􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁴􀁯􀁾􀁳􀀮􀀠In the event of joint and ecncurr@nt neqliqertee 􀁾􀁦􀀮􀀠both Owner and tne City, responsibility and. indem'lity, if arty, shi!U b<" appot"i::icl1ed 􀁣􀁣􀁭􀁰􀁡􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁹􀀮􀀠in 􀁡􀁣􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁤􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁥􀀠􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁢􀀠tae law5 of the 􀁓􀁴􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠ef rexas. witbl!lut, l\oWf!Ver, wlt,lving-any qavel:'nl!!ental im.ll\unity a'lrailable to 'the city under Texas lev and 􀁷􀁩􀁴􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁴􀀠waivin9 any 􀁤􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁮􀁳􀁥􀀵􀀠of the parties un4er Texas law. The provisions of this 􀁰􀁡􀁲􀁡􀁱􀁲􀁾􀁰􀁨􀀠are solely for the 􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁦􀁩􀁴􀀠of th@partiea hereta and not 􀁩􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁤􀀠to create 04 qr6r 􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀭';'" " 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀁾􀀧-' 􀁾􀀠,-' . " :-; i 932297 party to dC!signata a different address by notice given in the manner jus;t described. If 􀁩􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁮􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀠tor the City. to: Dennis 5. 􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁥􀁺􀀬􀀠Director ECl;lnomic 􀁄􀁥􀁖􀀮􀁾􀁬􀁯􀁰􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠Department city gf Dall.as city RaIl. Room 􀀴􀁡􀁾􀀠 1500 Marilla Street 􀁏􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁡􀀤􀀬􀀠􀁔􀁥􀁸􀁡􀁾􀀠75Z01 If intended for OWner, to: RQbert Shaw 􀁕􀁰􀁾Village Partn@rship. Lta. 6750 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1160 Dallae. 􀁔􀁥􀁸􀁾􀁳􀀠75240 SECTION 􀀱􀁾􀀮􀀠The fQllowinq section of the Charter of the city of Dallas shall be one of the conditions of, and a part of, 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁾􀀠of this Contract, tQ-wit: "CHAPTS1( XII. Seu:. 11. 􀁮􀁎􀁾􀁃􀀻􀁘􀀺􀁁􀁌􀀠Il'fTElU:S'l' OF EI'lPWYEE on o'fFICSa PROilIBITEO 􀀭􀁾􀀠(a) lie officelt or employee shall have ..ny financial interest;, <;l:!'reet or hldirect, in any contract with the; Ci.ty or be finanoiall.y interested, 􀁾􀀱􀁲􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁬􀁹􀀠or indirectly, 1n the sales to the city of any 􀁬􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀬􀀠materials, supplies or services, except on behalf of the City as an officer or employee. Any violation of this Gection 􀁾􀁨􀁡􀁬􀁬􀀠constitute 􀁾􀁡􀁬􀁲􀁥􀁡􀁳􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀠in office, and any officer 􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁯􀁹􀁾􀁥􀀠guilty thereof shall thereby 􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁦􀁥􀁾􀁴􀀠the 􀁯􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁣􀁥􀁲􀀧􀁳􀀠or eupLoyee's office or PQsitign with· the City. Any violation ot this sec;;tiQn, !o'itb knQlolledge, e:gpre:5i15l or implied, of tl::ts person or corporatilm eontractil'lg' with. the City shall render the contract. inv·olved voidable by the c1ty Manager or the City Council. (b) The 􀀦􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁧􀁾􀀠violatiQns of this section shall be 􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁳􀀠to be 􀁤􀁱􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁭􀁾􀁮􀁥􀀴􀀠either by the 􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁡􀁬􀀠Board in the cas@of pmployees WHO Jlave the ri;1lt:. to appeal to th.e Trial Board, and by the!! City Couru::il. in the 􀁾􀁡􀁳􀁥􀀠of otller o!!".Qlployees. (c) 'rho prohlbiticms ot thim: section shall not apply to the partieipation by city employeeu in 􀁲􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁹􀀭􀁦􀁵􀁮􀁤􀁥􀁤􀀠hou$inq proqrams. to the extent permitted by applicable fedaral or state law." 9 " ,:: ,..,.7 .-. SECTION 14. 932297 A. 'rl1e City may t.e.rminatl! this Agreement illlIl1.ediately if Ovner has 􀁑􀁦􀁦􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀬􀀠􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀬􀀠􀁏􀁾􀀠agreed to 􀁣􀁾􀁮􀁲􀁥􀁲􀀠any 􀁢􀁾􀁮􀁥􀁦􀁩􀁴􀀠􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁮􀀠a 􀁣􀁾􀁴􀁹􀀠employee 􀁃􀁾􀀠cfeioial ehat the City 􀁥􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁾􀁹􀁥􀁥􀀠Qr of!1eial is prohibited by law from accepting. (The City 􀁾􀁡􀀡􀁬􀁬􀀠h!'!l'!n advt",'!!(f by' the 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁱􀀠􀁡􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁯􀁲􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁥􀀵􀀠that 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠􀀵􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠36.10(bj and eel 􀁥􀁸􀁥􀁥􀁐􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠to section 36.08 and 􀁾􀀶􀀮􀀰􀀹􀀠r.aspectively of the Texas Penal Code are not :JVailal::.le to public servants who have 11'1:) le<;l'al t'l! to the Contractor in accordance with item 1.51.1 of the Standard Spedtic:at!ms for Public Works Construction, as roilV hi! "!nQm:Red by-the1::ity of D;ii'i;SPubUt: Works Aifirinou.m tol:nrStandi4rd SpetiIications. 111e peromi:age flltairuJd will be ll.S provided in Item 1.51.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public: Works Construction,. a.<; m'ly bl: modi.fu?d r:"r tl-t'" Public Works Addendum to the Standard Sped£i.catiom. The Contrll(;tt1, U !u.mJsh i'h.ii! Eng'J:leeI" information lIS may be requested to aid. l>im as a guide rr:. 􀁴􀀮􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀠p1"it'iaralio)."). of partial. 􀁥􀀼􀀻􀁴􀁩􀀡􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁡􀁾􀀮􀀠(o} Coni::!'acttlr shall cooperate fully with Oak 􀁃􀁲􀁾􀁫􀀠a..,.,..d ;ill emplDyQ'.o!s and cOJ:i5ultant:s of Oak Creek who afli! utilized or hl!:ed to 􀁾􀁲􀁦􀁯􀁮􀀺􀁮􀀠mani!j;";=ment, t',-,.p>!rv'l$!on a..1"\d W.$ped;iOil of the work under this Contr'ar to Qak (:.......1<; that, ;,t a.ny time during the eldst:ence at this ComJ:'l!ct, !:.he sur on the said Contractor'S bend has-become insolvent, banJaupt or ot1:terwise 􀁾􀀠.ally u.nable to protect Oak Creek or the City of Dallas as joint obligl!es on bone:!, under the teml5 or thl> Contract, Oak Creek may demand the said 􀁃􀁾􀀻􀀭􀁴􀁯..􀁾additional securiP' in some approved sw:ety company satisfactory 􀁃􀁩􀁴􀁹􀀭􀀭􀁰􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁪􀀡􀀮􀁡􀁣􀁉􀁤􀀠the City of Dallas 11.;\ joint obligees on the bond; the act of Oak Ctee 1 reference to dem.anding new or additional security shall never be construed to relieve !:he original surety of it:; obligation under the said Contract, or to relieve said Contractor. Oak Creek !ru'lY stop the said wotk under the Contrad: until additional security has been fumished by the Hid Contractor. and Oak Creek shall in no case be liable to the said Contractor on account thereof. Oak Creek may exercise its right as provided herein to take z ,",r.' -, 􀁾􀀠7 ',. ,..,;, ',' ;:r.zrg-'" ;;r 􀁾􀁨􀁬􀁃􀀠:mid \-..od, iI!. tl"te .evE'!'l-t of the refusal OT failure of 11-"" 5,,:d' '.tor to comply with w.e deff.:!m:!s of Oak Creek With 􀁊􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁥􀀡􀁥􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀠to f'l.u-nish.in:(.. ·itionai v. "'g'-? c'Id;m;. to frJs Contract agreed to and tecoau:nend2d by Oak en:'"" 'IN :cfJbje.:t to and pnoconc.!itioned upon approvalb)' t:'1.e -:-;'" of Dail;.' Ct>:iw.:d, f'und.!i by the Gty or Dallas for .satt'Ie, VI. That in oonsicieration of the Contnu::tor fw;; ",nd faithr..wy :;(';lXij?ly' ,. 􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠􀀮􀁾•.•_.-l r'-' •• Ii f ...." ,.. . .!'\. ;.. ",,,,, ,,:,,";;::.' '.' . 􀂷􀀭􀀨􀂷􀀮􀁾􀁮􀀺􀀭􀀡􀀬􀀮􀀠􀁬􀂷􀁾􀀺􀁃􀁙􀁬􀁓􀁬....oi-w:7 k1.uu ''7w.pt:ua ons 0 L.u.t.S. __ \.::ltr21t'1:', 􀀧􀁬􀀮􀁲􀀧􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀭. 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠..... t....I .... : f1}.1 ·!r.i:t'(iQ'$ to pay w t:'1C! Contractor (subjeci' 􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀠-:lr;.ci 􀁹􀁌􀁢􀀺􀀮􀁪􀁮􀀶􀁌􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀮􀁥􀁣􀁾􀀠.: d fund:; !tom the City of Dallas) for the t;.ll:1ll21.;'t1G 01' 0311 , perfo:rmaru::e Df the work. ruerlo!iX't 􀁣􀁲􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀢􀂷􀀾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀠rM, J. ,':d ':" "··'·'JS.al of the Contractor... whic.'Iz ;.. ....:; '.'.. 􀁾􀀠'.' . " by the 􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁸􀁡􀁣􀁴􀁾􀁴􀀠UJ1der tl:w 􀁢􀁾􀁲􀀠h '. 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁊􀀻􀀠'N, 􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀠􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁤􀀠,n 􀁰􀀢􀁾􀁟􀀬􀀬__.,.,,c I , ••. -,'l...<-4.,nL', '"-"'l ,;.n",U.,kL 􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀱􀀮􀁃􀀠,u,'----\-'-'-oJ. a ..... 􀁟􀁾r 􀁾􀀭..", , ': 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀠:" .:. : r :-\:,);,', ..􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠on November iii, 19'3. the: City CC>l1ne!.l .spt:;rtWee t!. 􀁤􀁥􀁶􀁥􀁬􀁑􀁾􀁴􀀠􀁡􀁧􀁲􀀮􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁾􀀠with cltyplaee Company for tbe purpose of 􀁥􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁥􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠ee:tain 􀁩􀁯􀁦􀁲􀀴􀀮􀁴􀀺􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁴􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁭􀀸􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀠in tee 􀁔􀁾􀀠 InerlDlCnt 􀁐􀀧􀁩􀁊􀀮􀁬􀀮􀁉􀀱􀁔􀀱􀀱􀀻􀁾􀀠Re.i.nve3tlllant !to!:.e No. '!'wCl [Cityplae8 TIP OilttZ'ic::t,; &lnd, WBEUIB, the 􀁤􀁩􀀡􀁖􀁥􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁃􀁬􀁴􀀠&g1:"eulI_n,t provide. that After the City Awards the 􀁥􀁾􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁮􀀠coatraet. it will be Aftsiqned to 􀁃􀁩􀁴􀁹􀁰􀁬􀁡􀁾􀁥􀀠 Company for 􀁡􀁤􀁭􀁩􀁮􀁩􀀸􀁴􀁲􀀦􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠and, "'RXA8, Cityplace Company h&. 􀁁􀁱􀁲􀁾􀀠to advanee 􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁦􀁾􀁤􀁩􀁮􀀹􀀠tor the 􀁴􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁬􀀠project COAt 􀁾􀁮􀀠tn. 􀁡􀁭􀁯􀁮􀁮􀁾􀀠of $542,074.10, and that the fund.tnq horus been prO'9'ided and will be reimbu.rsed £''1:"''',,", :tutl.'lrl!f eityplac:e 'l'Il" flll3ds; 4Da, 􀁾􀀬bids were 􀁲􀁥􀁣􀁾􀁩􀁶􀁥􀁤􀀠on February 4, 1994, for 􀁣􀀹􀁾􀀸􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠 of infra$tructure improvement. for the Vill&D of 􀁃􀀱􀁴􀁹􀁰􀁬􀁾􀁣􀁥􀀠 Ap4rt••􀁮􀁾􀀮􀀠located at the area 􀁢􀁯􀁵􀁾􀁤􀁥􀁤􀀠by Lemmon AvenUe 241t, Cole 􀁁􀁶􀀮􀁮􀁾􀁥􀀬􀀠Blackburn Street and absndoned Travis St.eet, as 􀁦􀁑􀁬􀁬􀁑􀁗􀁾􀀺􀀠 Ji.u: 􀁓􀁏􀁾􀀠CQ!:llJtructiOil 􀁃􀁾􀀧􀀴􀁮􀁹􀀠5471,934. H.1 Gibson , Associattia S488,199.25 30ske 􀁃􀁯􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁑􀁴􀁾􀁯􀁁􀀠5503,935.50 Walia 􀁇􀁲􀀮􀁥􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁮􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁡􀁥􀀮􀀠$529,708.40 􀁁􀁲􀁣􀁢􀁩􀁴􀁾􀁵􀁲􀁡􀁬􀀠􀁕􀁴􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁩􀀸􀁾􀀬􀀠Ioc. $563,059.S0 S.';;:'1011 1. That Ji..!II 􀁾􀁩􀁕􀀱􀀠Ccmat::::uction COlfipany is hersby a"larded the c::octr!iLCt for eonllt:::uc:tion of infrallt.t:'ll.c;tl1re improvemt!lnt. for the ViUag of i:ityplace .Ap&:r:t.menta 10l!ated at the arid"" 􀁢􀁯􀁵􀁾􀁤􀁾􀀠by Lemmon ATenue Ba8t. Cole Avenue. Blackburn 􀁓􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁴􀀠and 􀀦􀁢􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁯􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀠'l'r&vilJ St:r:t!!et, thl. beil:l9 the l""",,lIIIt and beat hid reC'ei.vlOQ 􀁾􀁂􀀠indicated by the tabulation of bid•• he1:.i,oQ 2, That ira lICC07;da.nce with the 􀁃􀁩􀁴􀁹􀁰􀁬􀁡􀁣􀀺􀁾􀀠i,,.,Yelopment Aqreemeftt. t.he contra.ct foZ', theae infr3ei:ruetlU"e iln"I)'l!!lItents is hereby aSsigned to cityplace Company for construction 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁡􀁱􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀮􀀠Sor.:t::i"" ,. That. the City 􀁃􀁧􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀻􀁲􀁧􀁬􀁬􀀮..z; l.i! '!'eby autl'lgr!.zeQ to depo"i1;, the 􀀤􀀶􀁕􀁉􀁏􀀢􀀴􀀮􀁾􀀹􀀭􀀺􀀠from 􀁃􀁩􀁾􀁊􀁐􀀮􀁜􀀮􀀮􀁡􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀠􀁣􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁰􀁾􀁾􀀠into tile 􀁃􀁩􀁴􀁹􀁰􀁬􀁡􀁣􀀺􀁾􀀠..'I'q; Increlllllult Fund 030;' 􀁾􀀮􀁲􀁮􀀺􀀺􀁹􀀠BIlOVOr'3'_ 982v'f RII!rO"Ol:l.lltli Scnu:,;:'!1 948!LV 01-􀁾􀀷ADDIsoN Post Office Box 144 Addison, Texas 7SOC)l·OI44 5300 Belt Line Rood January 15, 1996 l'lr. Bryant Nail, Vice President ColunIDus Realty Trust 15851 Dallas Parkway Suite 855 Dallas, TX 75248 RE: Public Infrastructure Improvements for Addison Circle Dear Bryant: For several ,.reeks now, you and your consultants have been wo:;:-king 'With our staff and our consultants on the design documents for the construction of the public infrastructure improvements ill Addison Circle. Prior to the Conicil's approval of the develcpment plans on Decelfiber 12, 1995, there were several items th.at 􀁾􀀻􀁥􀀠could not corne to closure, and those items were left to t.lle staff to approve. I have met with the staff, and we believe that it is time to quit haggling over these items and move on to construc·cion. Therefore, these are Ol.1r final decisions on the following: 􀁾􀁬􀀮􀀠 DESIGN OF ROUND-ABOU'!. We have furnished comments to your staff from Barton-Aschman, our traffic consultants. Those comments, dated January January 5, 1996 recommended that the desi.gn of the planned Addi.son Roundabout be analyzed further to provide more stable conditions for the traffic volumes that are anticipated for Quorum Drive. We have asked repeatedly 􀁉􀁐􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁪􀁾􀀠for this further analysis, but have not seen anything as (» ::> 10 c.IJ'" <"yet. We have never approved a design for the rotary becauseY: (ge did not have sufficient information to review. We still t;;.O/CiJ71" . do not have sufficient information. Please have your roundabout designer run the additional analysis recommended by Barton-Aschman, and submit a revised design that is less sensitive to increases in traffic volumes. ive are not approving the latest design submitted by Huitt-Zollars. PAVING PATTERN AND APPROACH FOR B.Omm-ABOUT. We do not feel that the paving pattern for the round-about is acceptable. We would like for Alan E'ujimori of Sasakl Associates to be involved in revisions to. the paving plan. However, we realize that the pattern may change after the design proposals are 􀁲􀁥􀁶􀁩􀁥􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁤􀀠on May 17th. (214)450·7000 FAX (214) 960·7684 Letter to Bryant Nail Page 2 January 15, 1996 In addition, we feel that trees and lights need to be added to the east side of Quorum Drive from the rotary feature south to the railroad tracks. We realize that this side of Quorum was to be funded in Phase II, but we are willing to go to the Council with a request to fund the trees and lights at this time. 3. COMPLIANCE TO ADA. We will not approve any plans to construct public infrastructure improvements that do not fully comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. If there are any elements in the plans that are questionable as to ADA compliance, we expect those elements to be reviewed by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation-Architectural Barriers-Project Registration and revised if necessary. EYE-BROWS WHERE MEWS INTERSECT WITH RESIDENTIAL STREETS. We have repeatedly recommended that eye-brows (with curbs) be shown where the mews intersect with the residential streets. We believe the eye-brows will clearly delineate these these points as "no parking" zones. We also believe the curb around the eye-brows will protect pedestrians and the necessary street furniture such as light poles and street signs. Please revise plans to reflect a curbed eye-brow as staff has recommended. 5. HANGING LIGHTS IN MEWS. We do not support the concept of hanging lights in the mews. We have seen the pictures, and we understand how they work, and we are not going to approve them. Our reasons for not approving the hanging lights are as follows: The fixture is a "specialty" fixture that we will be required to stock extra parts and supplies for. The wires that support the hanging lights are an encroachment into the public way and will hamper our ability to use emergency equipment in the mews. We are not persuaded that the suspended lights will be able to handle strong winds and turbulent weather. The wire that must connect the lights will be attached to your building, which places a public sector improvement on private property. We believe that pole-mounted lights will provide another element in the mews that will separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Please revise the drawings to indicate lights on poles similar to those used throughout the district. 􀁾6. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE EASEMENTS IN BOSQUE PARK AND DEDICATED OPEN SPACE. Representatives from Southwestern Bell Telephone have indicated that they need 20' x 30" easements for equipment in the bosque park and dedicated open space. As per the Council's approval, the only Letter to Bryant Nail Page 3 January 15, 1996 easements that will be given in the bosque park or open space are for electrical switch gears and a transformer to serve public facilities. We will not approve the location of any equipment for Southwestern Bell, or any additional utility equipment, in the bosque park or the dedicated open space. 7. CROSS-WALK AT MC KAMY AVENUE. We believe the mid-block 􀁾􀁜􀀠. cross-walk proposed on Quorum Drive at McKamy Avenue to be 􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁢􀁬􀁥􀁭􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁣􀀮􀀠 Please revise plans to delete it. In addition, please revise plans to indicate cross-walks with eye-brows where the Mews intersect Morris Avenue, McKamy Avenue, and Mildred Street. B. STREET NAMING SCHEME. We would like to see a logical structure for the names of streets and mews. First, we believe that "Mews" is being used incorrectly. We have checked two dictionaries and the term "mew" refers to one alley or back street. We have not been able to accurately determine whether "Mew" or "Mews" is the correct term. We believe the term to be meaningless to almost everyone who comes into the districty. We would like t.o see another term, such as "Place" or "Row" used. 9. DUMPSTER LOCATIONS. Your plans 􀁩􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠a dumpster location facing the bosque park that will be serviced from Quorum Drive, and a dumpster location on Mildred Street that is too close to the rotary to be serviced safely. We will not approve dumpster pick-up at these locations. Please submit revised plans which relocate the dumpsters to the mews or internal residential streets. I have reviewed the attached list of comments that Slade Strickland, John Baumgartner, and John Hill have made regarding your construction plans. I am not willing to put this project out to bid with this many unresolved items and questions. I believe that to bid the project with these incomplete documents will result in higher bids, contractor frustration, and an unacceptable amount of revisions, addendums and change orders. I have asked John to notify all potential bidders that that we are postponing the bid opening for five weeks. This will give your consultants two more weeks to complete the plans. Then, assuming that the revised plans adequately address the staff's concerns, our staff will have one week to review them, and contractors will have two weeks to prepare bids. This project is very important to both our Town and your organization. We know now that the construction of the public infrastructure improvements will be a long and arduous process. Letter to Bryant Nail Page 4 January 15, 1996 I am not willing to handicap this project by starting out with incomplete information that cannot allow us to get accurate bids. I think all of us involved will benefit from the additional time we need to get things right on the front end. Sincerely , Ron Whitehead City Manager RW!cm ENCLOSURES 'l)'1§©1§ OWI§ ij,JAN I 6 1996 , . (214) 450-2871 16801 Westgrove ADDISON CIRCLE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARnlENT cpUPUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE THIRD REVIEW JANUARY 16, 1996 I. ModifY bid documents to conform to comments dated January 11, and January 12, 1996 from John Hill with Cowles and Thompson. 2. ModifY round-about design to reflect comments from Barton-Aschman dated January 5, 1996, Provide alternate design for consideration that is more stable at these anticipated volumes. 3. Address comments from the Police Department dated January 5, 1996. 4. Modify documents to conform to Parks Department comments dated January 16, 1996. 5. Provide plan for the placement of spoils. Plan should include erosion control, permanent restoration, and a description of acceptable materials if it is the intent ofColumbus to allow the placement of spoils on their property not included in this phase. See page pf 3 of bid documents. 6. Provide street lighting plan; including conductor, grounding rods, meter pedestal, etc., necessary to complete system. Note that hanging lights in the mews are not approved. Provide TU with an opportunity to review system. 7. Provide three copies of an updated design report for the rotary. Please remove the language regarding the constrained design or provide an unconstrained design alternative. Please provide sections in the report that address grading, 􀁲􀁯􀁡􀁾􀁷􀁡􀁹􀀠profile, and drainage; and incorporate a full set ofplans for the rotary (geometries, lighting, signage, grading, etc.) with the design report recommendations. This information is necessary for our transportation consultant to complete their review. 8. Provide a design report supported by an engineering recommendation for the use/application for the materials/elements not historically used within Addison. As a minimum, please address; operation, safety and serviceability of the material/elements recommended. Addison Circle Public Infrastructure Review Page Two A. Bricks Please provide information regarding the use ofthe brick for roadway and sidewalk purposes. Please include elements addressing the function, safety and serviceability ofthe proposed product. Ofparticular concern is the use ofbrick in the valley ofthe Mews streets and at the valley intersections where run-off/irrigation water mixed with vehicular traffic may subject them to accelerated deterioration or affect their skid resistance. B. Curbless StreetJMews Intersections Please address how this functions. Ofparticular concern is the potential for conflict between the pedestrians and vehicular traffic at these intersections, and our ability to maintain signage that will not require continual replacement. C. Mid-block Crosswalks on Quorum Drive We have a number ofconcerns with mid-block crosswalks on streets with ultimate traffic characteristics ofQuorum Drive. If you desire the proposed crosswalks at stations 7+75 and 20+57 Quorum Drive, please include information in your engineering report that addresses the function operation, safety, signage, markings, visibility oflfor both the pedestrians and, vehicular traffic including the affects ofroadway geometries and landscaping. This should be supported by an engineering recommendation. This element is not required ifthe mid-block crosswalks are eliminated at this time. 9. Provide complete water meter backflow prevention details for publicly installed meters. IdentifY box locations. Place them in a location that does not conflict with vehicular traffic or dumpsters. Review plans to assure conflicts between private water installation s and vehicular/dumpster traffic do not exist. 10. Provide brick specifications. 11. For all areas ofdirt work/grading, provide detailed restoration plan/notes. All rocks shall be removed from top 6 inches ofsoil, soil shall be tilled, hydra-mulch shall be watered everyday or as needed with a temporary irrigation system. Contractor shall pay for water. Addison Circle Public Infrastructure Review Page Three 12. Provide specific irrigation/planting plan for north side of Conference Centre. 13. Provide detail for typical concrete street/parking lot repair. 14. Provide for-continuous power and telephone service to the water tower and stone cottage. Recommend establishing temporary service to the facility until the drainage infrastructure is complete, and then re-establishing underground service to both facilities. This involves setting one or two meter bases and at grade transformer. 15. Provide for the completion of existing street lights and electrical systems on Mildred and Quorum affected by this project. Verity that there is no charge for work identified as "by others". Have the contractor coordinate the work "by others" and identity who "by others" is. 16. Provide for electrical power service to the rotary. 17. Provide for the relocation of median lights displaced in Quorum. Provide for getting them operational prior to completion ofthe project. 18. Add Add six-inch jiggle bars to the bid fonn. 19. Provide details for electrical services, street barricades, sign installation, and conduit installation (depth? and 1 foot of sand as a minimum). . 20. All inlets shall be recessed. Adjust size andlor add inlets ifnecessary. 21. All residential street intersections (Mildred, Morris, and McKamy) and crosswalk locations shall have eyebrows. 22. Provide plan to segregate the pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic in the mews. 23. Submit plans to Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation--Architectural BarriersProject Registration (p.O. Box 12157, Austin, TX 78711) for compliance with ADAlhandicap accessability requirements. 24. Provide compaction specifications for water line typical trench on sheet 90. 25. Provide detail for typical public sewer clean-outs. 26. Provide for the 40 yard dumpster at building "C". Addison Circle Public Infrastructure Review Page Four 27. Clarify expansion joint locations where they conflict with pay lines. 28. Private sleeves require license or franchise agreement. 29. Resubmittal required. I N T E R MEMO OFF C E To: John Baumgartner, Director it:Public Works, City Engineer From: Lieutenant BobMcKitrick j.:t:1}111'fY Subject: Preliminary Signage Recommendation for Phase I Urban District Dllte: January 5, 1996 The following is a list ofrecommendations for signage and traffic markings for the Urban District Phase I. 1. Signage to warn motorists ofthe traffic circle placed at the following locations: A Morris and SIB Quorum B. McKamy and SIB Quorum. C. NIB Quorum (near DART right-of-way) D. WIB Mildred (proposed street) E. EIB Mildred at Witt 2. Pavement markings at entrance and interior ofcircle to mcilitate a natural flow to traffic entering and exiting the circle. 3. Speed limit signs with recommended speeds due to the integration ofbrick pavers and its unknown performance versus a concrete roadway. A Quorum 30 mph B. Mildred 30 mph C. Witt 20 mph D. Paschal 20 mph E. Morris 20 mph F. McKamy 20 mph 4. Signage placement and street markings for pedestrian crosswalks at the following locations: A A Traffic circle B. Mildred at Witt C. Morris at Paschal D. McKamyatPaschal John Baumgartner Page 2 January 5, 1996 5. No parking signs at the following locations: A. Morris at Witt B. McKamy at Paschal Let me know ifyou have any questions concerning these recommendations. RMlaf Attachment -Preliminary Signage Plan BARTeN'A 5 CH M AN A PM,SONS TRANSPORTAtiON Gqoup CO'.IPAW 8arton-Aschman Associates. Joe. 5485 ael! line Road, Suite 199' Dallas. Texas 75240' (214) 99]·1900' Fax: (214) 490·9261 Memorandum TO: John Baumgartner Town of Addison FROM: Gary Jost DATE: January 5,1996 SUBJECT: Addison Roundabout -Additional comments We have completed our review ofthe sensitivity analysis completed by Ourston and Doctors and design plans prepared by Huitt-Zollars for the proposed Addison Roundabout. This memorandum presents our findings. Sensitivity Analysis Ourston and Doctors present in their sensitivity analysis fmdings based on 50 percent and 85 percent confidence levels. If queues and delays are calculated at a 85 percept confidence level, this means that one can be 85 percent certain that actual queues will not be greater than the calculated values. Based on the uncertainty ofoperations of the first modem roundabout in North Texas, we would recommend that the 85 percent confidence level be used for calculating operating conditions of the planned roundabout It should also be noted that there is currently no consensus in the transportation profession regarding the most appropriate traffic engineering tool for analyzing modem roundabouts. The Transportation Research Board has established a committee to review current capacity analysis techniques and develop a new Highway Capacity Manual by the year 2000. This committee, chaired by Mr. John Zegeer of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., is working to include a recommended procedure for analyzing modern roundabouts in the new manual. The sensitivity analysis reports that at the 85 percent confidence level traffic volumes can be increased, from volumes originally projected, by 4 percent in the A. M. peak period and 11 percent in the P.M. peak period while still maintaining a level of service D. This suggests that the current design is highly sensitive to small increases in traffic volumes. With an 11 percent increase in traffic volumes, and assuming that 10 percent of daily traffic occurs during the P.M. peak hour, one could estimate that the effective capacity of Quorum Drive, assuming 10,000 vehicles per day (vpd) on I fi!jl 􀁾PAl'lSON5 Mildred, would be less than 30,000 vpd. Of particular note is the comparison ofaverage and maximum queue lengths between the original projections and the maximum volumes that can be accommodated at Level of Service D. Tables 1.0 and 2.0 present this comparison for the A.M. and P.M. hours, respectively. Table 1.0 Average and Maximum Queues A.M. Peak Hour ApPROACH LEG ! AVERAGE QUEUES (VEH) I MAXIMUM QUEUES (VEH) , ORIG. LOSD ORIG. LOSD NBQuorum 0 1 1 1 WB Mildred I I 1 1 SB Quorum 17 30 35 69 EB Mildred 4 5 6 9 Table 2.0 Average and Maximum Queues P.M. Peak Hour ApPROACH LEG AVERAGE QUEUES (VEH) MAXIMUM QUEUES (VEH) : ORIG. LOSD OruG. LOSD NBQuorum 4 12 6 : 25 • WBMildred 5 30 10 57 SB Quorum I 1 I 2 EB Mildred 1 2 2 3 As shown in these tables, average and maximum queues increase significantly with very little increase in total volume entering the roundabout. Based on the sensitivity to small increases in peak-hour volumes identified in the analysis conducted by Ourston and Doctors, it is our recommendation that the design of the planned Addison Roundabout be analyzed further to provide more stable conditions at these anticipated volumes. 2 ....... OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Parking On -street parking along Quorum and Mildred should be restricted within 150 feet ofthe roundabout on the departure legs of the roadways to provide adequate sight distance. Paving Typica I Section The typical section for Quorum Drive specifies a full sawcut with existing steel to remain. The full depth sawcut will also cut the steel. Ifa full depth sawcut is desired, steel dowels will need to be drilled and inserted into the existing concrete pavement. Signing and Markings • The stop sign at Witt Mews and Mildred should be moved behind the barrier free ramps. • The no parking signs on Mildred appear to conflict with the paving plans. • Ifpedestrians are to be restricted from entering the roundabout island, then "No Pedestrian" signs should be installed in the island. • All discussions to date regarding pedestrian crossings at the roundabout have indicated that the crossings should be located one to two vehicles behind the yield line. This needs to be reflected on the plans. • Addison has typically utilized pavement markers rather than striping for lane delineation. • Advance warning signs for the roundabout should be provided. • Additional signs (i.e. chevrons) identifying the roadway curvature are recommended. Miscellaneous • There appears to be an abrupt change in crossfall on the north side of the roundabout at Quorum. • Loading and unloading areas should not be allowed in the area ofthe roundabout. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 3 0: John 􀁂􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁴􀁮􀁥􀁲􀀠From: JQhn Hill l-11-So 16:32.. Q. Z of a COWLES & THOMPSON 001 w, WA:t"'tNIJTOI'I. IJVIT1I100 "0 􀀮􀁏􀁾􀀱􀀱􀁬􀀷􀀠􀀨􀀻􀁈􀁅􀁒􀁍􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁮􀁾1"'91·\\21 TElEPH¢rE 􀁉􀁴􀁑􀁾􀀧􀀠eO'J.8'On 101 /YI.:uN 8'TK!E'I". aurr£ 4000 DAUAa, 􀀧􀁔􀁅􀁾􀀮􀁓􀀠'1S:l:o:l:'3193 .. 0 IJOX 18'li Ttwu., TGlI;A\'I '''0:;'-011'1'10 'fClD"HClNE lin 1J '171':'000 􀂢􀁴􀁦􀁁􀁒􀁬􀁦􀁾􀀠􀁬􀀺􀀺􀁑 􀁒􀁒􀁅􀁴􀁬􀁾􀀠ItSU·'1811 TYI,.IlR,. Tftt.1l1f nl'Ol'llI'lJol .I0HNM. HIl.I.. f214} 012·2170 TaaoHOHE 􀀡􀁏􀀨􀁪􀀧􀀱􀀱􀀬􀁩􀀮􀀶􀀱􀂷􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁥􀁥􀀠January II. 1996 VIA TEI.ECOPY AND U.S. MAIL Mr. John Baumgartner City Engineer Town of Addison P.O. Box 144 Addison. Texas 7500 I Re: Addison Circle Phase r • Contract Documents Dear John: You have ask.ed us to review the Advance Filllli draft of the Construction Specilicalion and Contract Documents for Phase I of the Addison Circle project. Below are our comments: I . Section 1E!...l!n.sLructiolls to Biddersl. A. Paragraph C describes the documents which comprise the construction contract, and should be amended to reflect additional documents which are included in the bid packet, as follows: "Documetns include the Bidding Requiremenls (including the Advertisement fur Bids and these Instructions to Bidders). P!'Q!losal !'onn, Contract Asreement. General Provisions, Special Provisions, Technical Specifications, Drawings plus Addenda which may be issued by the Consultant during the bidding period. Bidding Documents may be viewed and/or obtained under the temlS and conditions set forth in the Advertisement for Bids, Sect ion AD of this Project Manua1." B. Paragraph P is entitled "Execution of tile COl1tract" and should be amended to read as follows: 'The successful bidder wUl be required to enter into a contract witil tile Owner within seven (7) calendar days notice by the Owner that his bid has been accepted. Failure to enter into II contract within the established time limit wilhelll proper jl!stlfieatien shall "0; John BllUllq"rtner From: John Hill 1-11-5& 􀀱􀁾􀀻􀀳􀀲􀀮􀁭􀀠p. 3 of B Mr. John Baumgartner January II. 1996 Page Z be considered grounds for forfeiture of the bid bond. In COluullction and simultaneous with the construction of Addison Circle Phase I. Gaylord Properties. Inc. ("Gaylord") and Columbus Realty Trust ("Columbus") will be constructing certain private improvements within Addison Circle Phase I lipan Ihst partie" eflhe Prepert)' ineliitiea within the 8{lplieftble phftge er Sli" phltSe. Therefore. upon the award and execution of the construction contract between the Town of Addison and Ihe successful bidder as the contractor and in order to coordinale the construction ofthe public IlIld private facilities, the Town of Addison will s!taH assign all of its rights, powers, duties and obligations under the construction conlracllo Gaylord and Columbus. Gaylord and Columbus shall thereafter act and serve as the owner and construction manager under the contract tor all purposes. including inspection. lllaleriaJ tesling. staking. supervision and coordination of all construction work. The successful bidder as the contractor shall look solely 10 Gaylord and Columbus concerning any claim under the contract." C. In Paragraph R {"Liquidated Damages"} the ticst and secolld sentences should be amended 10 read as follows: "Tile time of completion is of the essence of this contract. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Documents comgrising the construction contract for the Addison Cin::le Phase I project. tor each calendar day that any work shall remain uncompleted after the time specified in Ule proposal and the contract, or the increased time granted by the Owner. or as equitably increased by additional work or materials ordered after Ule contract is signed. the sum per day given in the following schedule shall be deducted from the Illonies due Ihe Contractor: $500 per Calendar Day.' At the end of Paragraph R the tollowing sentence should be added: "Ill the case of any cantlict, the terms of Ihis paragraph regarding liquidated damages shall control.' D. The fourth line of Paragraph II ("Bid Security") should be amended to provide that if a bid bond is submitted as the security for the bid. then the surety company which issues the bond must be licensed to do business in the State of Texas: "...a reliable surety company licensed to do business in the State of Texas as II guarantee lhal Ule bidder will enter into a contract and execute .l! Performance Bond and Payment Bond within ten (10) calendar days after notice of award of contract to him ... " from: John Hili 1-11-S6 10:1Z.. p_ 4 of a Mr. John Baumgartner Jalluary II. 1996 Page 3 2. Section PrB O'erfoppance Bond). The third line of the first full paragraph should be revised to read as follows: •...Realty Trust. 􀁴􀁯􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀠hereinafter caned the OWNER. in the penal sum orthe amount stated above. for the ... • The last word in paragraph beginning "NOW THEREFORE" is "virtue" and should be "effect." 3. Section PyB (Payment Bond). The comments regard ing the performance bond apply to the payment bond. 4. Section MB , A. Pal'llgtaph 33 (Removals. Adiustments and Replacements): The word "requirement" in the third line of the second paragraph should be "required." The word "obstruction' in the first line of the third paragraph should be plural. B. Paragraph 35 us have /tag reviewed and approved the same. Such certification shall be by affidavit sworn to by the appropriate official of Gaylord and Columbus authorized to submit the same. and shall certify that the estimate of work comp:jeted for the relevant period is true and correct to the best of Gaylord's and Columbus' information and belief. has been measured and verified in accordance with the construction contract documents. and that all construction contract preconditions to payment have been met. Copies of all material testing results shall be furnished wilh the certification. All change orders shall be processed and approved in accordance with the Town of Addison's procedure for the review and approval thereof.' The additions are to retlect what is provided for in Section 6.B.2(d) of the Master Facilities Agreement. The 􀁬􀁡􀁾􀁴􀀠paragraph should be amended to read as follows: "Final payment to the construction contractor shall not be made until all Work has Iml'Fe·temenlS ha'ie been finally completed (as verified by Gaylord and Columbus and the Town of Addison) in accordance with the construction contract. plans and specifications and have been finally accepted by the Town of Add ison. " E. Paragraph 48 (Special Construction Seguenc ingl: In the 􀁴􀁯􀁾􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀠paragraph (whicll begins" For bidding purposes")•.add the words "Town of Add ison 's" prior to "Director of Public Works' ill the third line. F. Chapter 2258 of the Texas Government Code requires that the City must pay Ii worker 'employed by it or on behalf of it" (and including Ii work.er employed 011 a public work if tire worker is employed by a contractor or subcontractor) 110t less !llan the: FrGI!I: JGhn Hi.ll 1-11-9& 13,34.. p. 8 of 8 Mr. John Baumgartner January II. 1996 Page 7 (i) general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work. of a similar character in the City; and (2) general prevailing rate of per diem wages for legal holiday and overtime work. The statute further provides that the City must 'specify in the call for bids for the contract and in the contract itself the wage rates' detenllined by the City. In accordance with this requirement, the City's schedule ofwage rates should be attached to and made a part of the contract. and a new paragraph should be added to the Special Conditions to read as follows: 'Wage rates paid on this project shall no! be less than specified in the schedule of general prevailing rates of per diem wages as attached hereto.' Additionally. a reference 10 the minimum wage rate schedule should be made in the notice to or instructions to bidders. Finally, as we have discussed, [ am preparing an assignme.lt and construction services agreement between the City and Gaylord and Columbus to reflect what is in the M&ter Facilities Agreement. These are all ofour comments at this time. Should you have any questions or desire any additional infonnation, please give us a call. Very truly your:s• . 􀁾􀀠John M. Hill JMH:Wll cc: Mr. Kenneth C. Dippel To: John 􀀸􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁴􀁮􀁾􀁲􀀠From: John Hill 1-12-56 9:37a. p. Z of 4 COWLES & THOMPSON 30'1 w waa:kll 1 " ,. , . (. ', . . ,( : ": , . , , .. ',,' i, , .. , ': ,.,i 'J,: ."l ..: ': :'"'"--"t.>, : I:. I·': :. : ,', ..' . ,. ," ': .' , " j j.: 'I' .1 I• •·..• •• ! '1·, ", " .' " :" ..' ,', '. ,: . 􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠,'.! " I' Hain Master redel. Installation. Detail ,'." 'Figure RMIS-EV1M' .: :'" .'.' 􀀧􀁾􀀠: . . .. .: .' .... -". .'-.", : .. r--t '.1 , . "-'; '.. .'(," 􀀧􀀮􀁌􀀺􀁪􀁾􀀬􀀠: :. .. Grooml 0-1.-Clampf-2a.. 􀁾􀂷􀀠.Jj:J' (RrollIe} .1.1 .' .." ' .• "'. ,. .875 "". ... ,'........A·:... · .. : 􀀬􀁾􀀠.( . , .... 􀁾􀁩􀀠lSI I -..J!, ,,' O3i . Ai .', ,..1 "'. 'A' , . .• I" , ": , ,'.' &51 '. ;o!... BoU'.temptale' ' 􀀧􀁾􀀡􀀠D'.' . . _, Z . . 3: I '.' DI1-+ . 2.250 􀁾􀀠'13550 ....!;j: N-" -7i 2.00 . 􀁾􀀠, . .' f . 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠OJ... W . fROMT.13'" .', . 15'".;:;;-v. 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠,1'""f" : .ol1nung Pad'􀀮􀀧􀁾": 􀀺􀀻􀁌􀀲􀁾.....:.:, ...M'" I:,..·· ..,􀂷􀀸􀁾􀂷􀁉􀀮􀁟􀀧􀀺􀀠", '11 ':' { .. I·· .. C'1lhI. 􀁃􀁾􀀱􀁬􀀱􀀸􀀠':." .:, ..:;, t . _I.... _ SO" Sweelf' " .' ...-􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭. 􀁾􀀠";" ... 􀁾􀀠. .' . H. applicable d, I I 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀤􀂷􀀲􀀵􀀭􀀴􀁂􀀮.' ,... .-'r 'j , '.. t ....". "r, . ' . ,..1. applicable. --'l2."Jlpart ___􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠1.. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀁥􀀻􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧� �􀀭􀁣􀁴􀁾􀀠"." ...􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀧􀀠",..,,_: ... 􀁾􀀠-... _. 􀀮􀁾...! .,' : .'.􀀾􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀠.. 􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀱􀀱􀁇􀁖􀀮􀀼􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀠􀁜􀁾􀀧􀀷􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀻􀁾􀂣􀀮􀁊􀁬􀀠. . ' Ptm!r Sllp,ly '.:: . , ". 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠' _." ' ., .: '" ....: 􀀮􀁾􀀠.:.. %" S' tollg _._ . 911" Sweep .. :', ., ,Clipper. GroulII! Rod . 􀁓􀁴􀁡􀁉􀁬􀁄􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠1-2'" '. .' , 􀁴􀁯􀁭􀁭􀁯􀁾􀀧􀀠.. '1J . ,.. ' ...... 􀁾􀀠.: . '" . • V1 '. . . .,,', '. REALTV TRUST February 8, 1996 Mr. John Baumgartner Director of Public Works Town of Addison POBox 144 Addison, Texas 75001-0144 HE: Addison Circle Development Dear M.r. Baumgartner: After reviewing the bids for public infrastructure at Phase I of Addison Circle, we request that the project be re-bid based on the folJowing explanation: Regardless ofthe fact that it is over budget, ifwe (1) revise the scope on various items and (2) try to be more creative with the staging between the public and private project, we can create substantial savings for both the Town of Addison and Columbus. Thank you for your assistance and diligence in this effort. Sincerely, Bryant Nail Vice President -Development Columbus Realty Trust BN:ds -15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE ass DAI.LAS, TEXAS 7$248 214387-1492 FAX 214 110-5192 FROM COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 214+770-5129 (THU) 02. 15' 96 1306/ST. 13:G5/NO. 355U(I:;:;)8 P 􀁾􀀠February 15, 1996 Mr. John. R. Baumgartner, P.E. Director ofPublic Wolks Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive POBox 144 Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Addison Cirde Phase I PIlblie lDfram:u.eture Dear 10hn:: Pursuant to our di!Kl1lSSion, this letter is to «Infirm that Columbus Realty Trust win execute the rough grading ofMoms Avenue, McKamy Avenue, Witt Mews and Paschal. Mews as well as the gradin& on the water tower site prior to commencement ofthe public infIastructure contract These areas will be delivered to the Town's «IntJ:ac:tor consistent with the specifications fur rough grading at a tolerance of±O.lO foot We believe that by combiniDg most Qfthe infx:astructure earthwork with our development's earthwQrk, we can realize a savings over the Town's contractor and mitigate the delay whidt we have caused through the rebidding ofthe infraslmCtu1'e project Please give me a call ifyou have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST • BtyantNail Vice President -DevelQpn1ent BN/ds -1 iJIJ51 D",1.1.II.II 􀁐􀁁􀁒􀁾􀁗􀀬􀁬􀁬􀁴􀀻􀁙􀀠􀁊􀁩􀁖􀁉􀁔􀁾􀀠ass D.Ud.A!t. T£)l.A*' 75:r:48 214: 387 .. 1 .. 91: YA" :14: 􀀷􀀷􀀰􀁾􀀵􀀱􀀹􀀲􀀠 REALTY TRUST February 15, 1996 Mr. John R. Baumgartner, P.E. Director ofPublic Works Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive PO Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Addison Circle Phase I Public Infrastructure Dear John: Pursuant to our discussion, this letter is to confirm that Columbus Realty Trust will execute the rough grading of Morris Avenue, McKamy Avenue, Witt Mews and Paschal Mews as well as the grading on the water tower site prior to commencement ofthe public infrastructure contract. These areas will be delivered to the Town's contractor consistent with the specifications for rough grading at a tolerance of ±0.10 foot. We believe that by combining most ofthe infrastructure earthwork with our development's earthwork, we can realize a savings over the Town's contractor and mitigate the delay which we have caused through the rebidding ofthe infrastructure project. Please give me a call ifyou have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST Bryant Nail Vice President -Development BN/ds -15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 855 DALLAS. TEXAS 15248 214387-1492 FAX 214 770-5192 ---------􀁆􀁒􀁏􀁾􀁉􀀠COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 214+71U-J129 \iHU) U2. C( go 11: 􀁾􀁯􀁮L II: 􀁾􀁩􀀧􀀡􀁎􀁖􀀬􀀠d:JOJ 11 d4UU Y :Cft. 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭-􀀬􀁾􀀠(': T f --, -: p T -': ,_ 􀁾􀀠_ "._ .J 􀁾􀀠.. It I \ I ,T' T Ii( t 􀁾􀀠T February 22, 1996 Mr. John R. Baumgartner, P .E. Director ofPublic Works Town ofAddi$(!n 16801 Westgrove Drive POBox 144 Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Addison Circle Dear John: Pursuant to your discussion with Mark Brandenburg, this letter is to confirm that Columbus Realty Trust will be pennitted to utilize the parking lot next to the stone cottage, west ofthe Building B parking garage, during the construction ofAddison Circle. It will be necessary fur us to remove the existing electric light polls during the constmction process. When the project is completed, we will replace them to your satisfaction. Please give me a call ifyou have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLUMBUS REALIT TRUST Bryant Nail Vice President -Development BNltIs -',!IiItSI DAl,.f.AH PARKWAY SIJIT6 ASS QALLAS. 􀁬􀀧􀁆􀀮􀁊􀁉􀀺􀀮􀁜􀁾􀀠1$:t... 􀁾􀀠 :114 al:l1·1.c92 􀁆􀁁􀁾􀀠'1.( ... 1711-$192 RE,\J,TV TRl'ST February 22, 1996 Mr. John R. Baumgartner, P.E. Director ofPublic Works Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive PO Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Addison Circle Dear John: Pursuant to your discussion with Mark Brandenburg, this letter is to confirm that Columbus Realty Trust will be permitted to utilize the parking lot next to the stone cottage, west ofthe Building B parking garage, during the construction ofAddison Circle. It will be necessary for us to remove the existing electric light polls during the construction process. When the project is completed, we will replace them to your satisfaction. Please give me a call ifyou have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST Bryant Nail Vice President -Development BN/ds . .. . . , ." "" ." . '-1:: ".". ',", .. -15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 855 DALLAS. TEXAS 75248 214 􀀳􀁂􀀷􀁾􀀱􀀴􀀹􀀲􀀠FAX 214 􀀷􀀷􀀰􀁾􀀵􀀱􀀹􀀲􀀠 FROM COLUMBUS RtALTY THUST 􀀲􀀱􀀴􀁴􀁻􀀨􀁕􀀭􀁯􀁬􀁩􀀧􀁾􀀠{MONJU::J. U4 YO lU:::JUnr. IU:;:Y/NU. 􀁊􀁏􀁢􀁕􀁉􀁬􀁊􀀴􀁾􀁴􀁬􀀠Y JIJ 'C 0 L If IVJ I;, U :3 I 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠Itt.-l.r'-TNI'II! Fcu::;imill! Tra.nsmisnon. TO: FAXN: LOCATION: FROM: fa:\: # 170·5129 Voice#-770-5151 Time 􀁱􀀻􀁾􀀠3-#P"ges (lnciuciin!! 􀁃􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁾􀀠She::) 􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁃􀁅􀁏􀁦􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁮􀁄􀁾􀁾􀀠1 ... inronnaticm cOlIU:.d in :nul tronsmilld with this r.coimila is: z) "'bj"'" to _mq/ine ill :md Irn'"'lllilld wid! this 􀁾􀀬􀀮by or ., ;my0ll••_ limn !he mipio:lt dcipalod alJcv. by tho 􀀬􀁾is 􀁟􀁾and Jitidly prohibited. lC 􀁾lIa"" reo,... Cri< IO<..-imile ill =,plese notify l!$ immrii...!y by 􀁾..e at Ill. aWllbc:-listO"""j".o ., )"a should b. ilnme!btc!y rt::u.rn" ., !I'.e .de:by U.S. """1. or iC autbmimtion is piled by !he ,.".".,.. d.o'....􀁾􀀠".... .,.•. llHt$1 0.\1.1..'" P.\KK1, \\" Sl'JTK HS5 0\1.1.'''. "t">:'.\:f 7S!..tk :1.-􀀮􀀱􀀢􀀷􀁾􀀱􀀢􀀻􀂷􀁊􀀺􀀠F" 􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁩􀀧􀁕􀀮􀁓􀁬􀁦􀀯􀁾􀀠 FROM COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 214tnO-5129 {MONIUj. U4 90 lU:3U/H lU:;:Y/NO. 􀁪􀁾􀀨􀁪􀁕􀁉􀁉􀀨􀁬􀀴􀁯􀀨􀁪􀀠􀁾􀀠V"d COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST DEVELOPMENT DIVISIO.N 170-5151 FAX: 770·5129 MEMORANDUM I TO: 101m Baumgardner FROM: BRYANT NAIL DATE: March 4. 1996 HE: Addison Cirde, Phase I VIa Facsimile: 931-6643 Please find the attached k:tter from Saad Hineidi with Fugro McClelland. They are proposing, in addition to perfonning the rough grading ofthe public Slreets, to perform this 500pe of work in lieu of lime stabilization. In performing this scope, we propose to overcut the two slreets with surface class 6". Then, after the utility contractor has performed his work, we will briIlg in and process the 6" oftan and pay !immune before paving. Please let me know at your earliest convenience ofthis meets with your approval. , . FUGRO McClEtlaND (SOurHWESt). INC. ....._........ 􀁾.. -.......---Mr. Bryant Nail ClIlumt.ul Fk!aItr TIU5t 1H:i1 NorIh DIIIn. p.ncw;q &.dIBS5.5 Del.., T_ 752118 Reo Pr...rt .... D751·1C171 .......Clr<;la, Ph...I AddIIIIm.T_ Clear Mr. Hail! CutRltlt pI_ require thai tha .araar. canc::rete pa"...,lIent .. PI4lI:i1d gn :II saHndl :lhil;;k lima ttabifimd subyi acla. lJrIIa sIabIfarian is not IIfI\ lIlY In IJ'nS wIJaI1= tn. tan WIIdI"" Q",1Ifoi» is .0; auerhir the IUb9l1ufelewl. In __1IIItIetethe r:t.,. buflUS. iIIllne Illl:iIIIJrade 1awII, .,. _ "" inc;ha of the 􀁾mar be .:aabRt anOIlfllIll ...... IffttI.,or gray IIrneSll:!rle wrr ,. pllICieG 􀁾,...,. r .. in 􀁾with !he l8CG1ft"'IIIIIIatiIlMli JMNided in the SIte Pr¶lfot. »eeIIon (page 10) oftIW 􀁾􀁑􀁊􀁉􀁉􀁏􀁉􀀸􀁣􀁉􀁉􀁩􀀱􀁾􀀠R8pGrf. We 1rUIIf Itre it"O",!8fion DfOWIeCI hfiW:In itsvI'IIc:ient IVr ,.our pI1IIIIIIIt UIMI. PIe..... c:cmcacc &.IS If JDI.I netJd iII'IJ iIIIlI/IIonaIlrd'om!iIIiotI arlf_ can /:Ie "",.IIftllill'.I'lfk;e. I5MHlmeI co",.fI:r. MIJI'k..nd!Inb.... CCllllmDUS RnlI.y T.-..t 􀁴􀁦􀁴􀀺􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀂭.... 􀀮􀁾􀀠--_._-SIS d I􀁾􀁾􂂬􀁓􀁾􀀰􀀹􀁓􀀸􀀠'oWl! : 0 I IS/81: 0I 96.Ll 􀂷􀁾􀁏􀀠(4I1J.) nOlia -, .. 􀀧􀁾􀀠Facsimile TrarwnissioN TO: LOCATIO\': FRO:V!; F􀁡􀀮􀁾􀀨􀀠#: V0l.:-:e ;: -------"--). ,',\ (j _\:i..'_::.t...I.J.{_ :"f'?... 􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁜... _􀁾􀁾.){:A.,=_;'-:(. 7705129 7105151 ----.---... ----------------_•.._. "-l'10TlCE Of lO:>fIDEYllALITY TJl.-: 􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁴􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀠ct;,;;::.:u.."':1!.:! :"'1 8,,;iJ c: ....􀀧􀁕􀁩􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁴􀀺􀂢􀀮􀀺􀁩􀀠""ill:. 􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁊􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠i!. a: 􀀬􀀻􀀢􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁪􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀠: .. 􀀺􀁡􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀨􀀺􀁾􀁬􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁬􀀠F."'i ..12e;'!; b. 􀁡􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁲􀀻􀀭􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀠􀁜􀁉􀁯􀁏􀁾􀁁􀀠􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁤􀀧􀀮 􀀮􀀺􀁣􀁾􀀠a.'1c..·cr c) coclld::'",.;,ti.:1. It C: ir.te:.C:e.':! o:-..:y for th::: 􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀮􀁤􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁤􀁾􀁬􀀠or 􀁃􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁤􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀻􀂷􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁰􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁥􀀭􀀡􀀠a:cve. Yo...: 􀁡􀁾􀁾􀀠b::ie:'by 􀁫􀁃􀀺􀁵􀀱􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁉􀀠tl:ut a.."1)' d::r:::e::-.lrw.tiIJQ., 􀁾􀁴􀁲􀀺􀀢􀁃􀁩􀁵􀀮􀁴􀀮􀁩􀁑􀁨􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁣􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀭􀁩...g, c; us'! or 􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁣􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁯􀀺􀁡􀀻􀀧􀀡􀀠u,cr: 􀀱􀀱􀀺􀁾􀀠l"'..foo:r .::H.':.:;:r; 􀁥􀁯􀁲􀀮􀀨􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁌􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠a.1d 􀀱􀀮􀁲􀀢􀁊􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀮􀁓􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁲􀀺􀁥􀀺􀀬􀁾􀀠1S.i.i..i lh:s 􀀡􀀢􀁊􀁃􀁾􀁩􀁴􀀺􀀭􀀮􀁩􀁬􀀻􀀠by cr to anj'Qne 􀁣􀁾􀀢􀁥􀁾􀀠1..L..:;..."1 the 􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁃􀀺􀀱􀁩􀀺􀀠􀁤􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁬􀁴􀀼􀀢􀁤􀀠a;'<;Ivc by ::-:: 􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁤􀁴􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠i" 􀁵􀀮􀁩􀀮􀁬􀁯􀀻􀁡􀁨􀁣􀀼􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠:Jr.:! 􀁨􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀻􀁹􀀠prc:b.ibjld. U yQIJ. b.1ve rc;;:v{l;"; !l-i::: f':;CT..-r.:!.:! in 􀁥􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁲􀀮􀀠􀁰􀁪􀁯􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁯􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁍􀁾􀁦􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁬􀁾􀀠i....􀁲􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀡􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀡􀀧􀀡􀁲􀀠r:: tc::::;:!:.or;.; a: U":C c.:l.!IlCe: listeo.. 1-..,'1 􀀨􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁣􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀠􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁬􀁊􀀮􀁓􀁩􀀩􀀧􀀠'I..-...u.:;::-.lr.eo:! to j'et: ..:ho:.t1d be i:-...􀀭􀀺􀀻􀁃􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁬􀀡􀀢􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀭H!:-.t.r::d tc 􀁴􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁳􀁣􀀺􀁤􀁥􀁾􀀠by U S. 􀁾􀀱􀀬􀀠0:' If <}''':'l.'oriz..;;zuoc )'5 􀁧􀀺􀀮􀀷􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠by tl',e 􀁳􀀽􀀺􀀧􀀮􀁤􀁥􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀮􀁲􀁣􀀺􀁶􀁣􀁩􀀠""'" 1 .'i !1 oS 1 f} ..,1. L ,,'f. p)'LEASE 􀁾􀀧􀁄􀁬􀀡􀀩􀀠THE, wETTE;{$ Ff.OM GLEN-eRRY 􀁓􀁾􀀧􀁁􀀢􀁬􀁎􀀧􀀧􀀻􀀠Iii"'; IJAB TEST RE$ULTS ON THI3 SERB:NDll?l'Ti l\.NlJ )'QUK3HIRE PAVRR,;, h:!' THIS TIME, ';:HEY no NOT HAVE A TEST REPORT ON THE SHILLINGTON ?AVER, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE': FROM THEIR LETT8RS TH!:;Y qRE ;lAVING 'TFI'FSE ""ESTED, AS SOON AS TIiESE RESULTS COME TN, 􀁾􀀠WI :JL PORWi..-'Z..') ,'.I, CI!py ro YOU, THESE iU'.f'. 'rHF. THRF.E 􀁃􀁏􀁉􀀬􀀨􀁾􀁒􀁓􀀠THAT WE WILL EE SUP?l..Y LNG FUR :'H?: J)"DDTSON r'iRC':LE STREETS AND SIDEW.l\r,KS. I!" YOU HAilE .-'lNY QU$ST10NS, OR .l l' ' CAN 1'." CF' FU,<,'"ER ASS I ST.;NCE VLBASE CALL_ FHO)!' 􀁃􀁇􀁾􀁕􀁍􀁴􀁃􀁓􀀠RElL':V >:..' , Gl4n-Gqry Cor punttion T*e,,"icaf Sbrvices/RSA4ifafOh 􀁒􀁯􀁾􀁻􀀡􀁏􀀼􀀠61 PO Box 340 􀁓􀁨􀁊􀁾􀁭􀀸􀁫􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁶􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁥􀀬􀀠PA 1'3S55 610/562·3075 Fax: 610/562·2084 'l.brv 􀁈􀀺􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀠........ I􀀺􀁈􀀨􀁊􀁌􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁊􀁩􀁤􀁴􀀻􀀺􀀧􀁡􀁡􀀠,':,',',; .􀁄􀀺􀁩􀁉􀁬􀁡􀁳􀀻􀁴􀁤􀁉􀁊􀁩􀁾􀀠􀀷􀀵􀀲􀁾􀁩􀁉􀀠 .' . i􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀬􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀧 􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀢􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀻􀀼􀀡􀁻􀀯􀁙􀁽􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀠>: ,', '" ):;-. ". " '''\;.. ::,'.!. .'.. ' , 􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀠'"?:':', . , :: ' ....( ..;.... .'(.: 'itiWCRl!:NQtt:;' 􀁁􀁤􀀨􀁝􀁊􀁾􀀨􀀬􀁾􀀻􀁲􀁩􀁲􀁃􀁜􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀻� �, .,' ' . , ',' .􀁾􀀠. : .".. . .. 􀁾􀀠",tld,,;'n. T ex" . COil tractotE' 􀁃􀁑􀀡􀁕􀁴􀁲􀁴􀁴􀁩􀁵􀁧􀀮􀀻􀁋􀁥􀁮􀁬􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀠'" .􀁰􀀢􀀼􀁬􀁉􀁾􀁲􀁻􀁾􀀡􀀦􀁷􀁢􀁴􀁩􀁉􀁓􀁩􀀺􀀠􀁍􀁾􀁯􀁂􀁗􀁃􀁒􀀬􀀠"• !' "," ; .." T(l 􀁜􀀧􀁖􀀧􀁨􀁯􀁭􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀮􀁬􀀺􀀺􀁍􀀳􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁃􀀡􀀺􀁏􀁲􀀮􀁜􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁲􀀮􀀻􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁲􀁬􀀠,':' .' :', ';" 􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀠' ..,' I '::;; 􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀠" ":' />'5 rC'-1uOOie,;(by';j(idTlI '') 􀀵􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁩􀁴􀀵􀀠al 􀁭􀁡􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁉􀁩􀁾􀁣􀀺􀀱􀀮􀁩􀁲􀁩􀀺􀁲􀁬􀀠j," 􀁴􀁬􀁩􀁩􀀰􀀱􀀡􀁩􀁩􀀺􀁲􀀧􀁾􀀠plnm of the 􀀨􀁪􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀨􀁪􀁦􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀂷􀂷􀁃􀁾􀀬􀀮􀁰􀁢􀁮􀁖􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁜􀀺􀁾􀀠.: 􀀧􀁾􀁉􀁲􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀢􀀠, "'.' ::.' 􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀠'?tf" .... 􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀠􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀾􀀮􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀠"dUnlO;! ,,'" rcqu!iS.IijI:-'{!erter, 􀁯􀁦􀀭􀁣􀁥􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁦􀀧􀁾􀁴􀁬􀀼􀁬􀁴􀁬􀀠and2tesr ·report ;YriC&! ofthe ShiH,ngl,)" \'",;" !ac P:hU 􀁾􀁜􀁊􀀡􀀧􀁣􀀧􀀠(:'-114"* 3,,?/lf' X ,7-511.'") 􀁁􀁾􀀮􀁴􀁬􀀻􀁃􀀮􀀠􀁰􀁲􀁥􀁬􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁪􀀱􀁬􀁩􀁩􀀬􀀠􀀮􀁷􀀢􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁏􀁴􀀠have a tcst ICpO;; f,octl "'nch '" 􀁾􀁣􀁲􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁹􀀠,I". 􀀺􀁢􀁩􀁪􀁾􀀱􀀼􀀧􀀠. 􀀨􀀩􀁾􀁦􀀠􀁣􀁬􀀱􀁪􀁾􀀠hasT£quc,C'I'{iyy.;Ikran/Rfi566rcn 􀁒􀁯􀁜􀁊􀀡􀁾􀀠6 1 p,O, Bax 340 􀁓􀁨􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁲􀁳􀀮􀀻􀁦􀁬􀁥􀀠PA 195G5 610/562-3076Fax' al 􀀰􀀯􀀵􀀶􀀲􀀭􀁾􀀰􀀸􀀴􀀠I Apnl 􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀩􀀠. , , ;. ,!' •. , ; " Tn 􀁜􀀢􀁩􀁢􀁯􀀻􀁾􀁬􀀧􀁴􀁽􀁾􀁡􀁪􀀧􀀺􀀼􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠/1"1:"1\ ::'" ,-,; S'! . ""';, ":", :.. ; ,:. 􀀺􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀠¢; 􀀧􀀺􀁜􀀫􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀼􀀺􀁜􀀺􀁜􀀠,',,-' Th; YorksilireM6dular. Pllcii.cr 􀁓􀀢􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁮􀀲􀁾􀁬􀁩􀀴􀀢􀀻􀁊􀁬􀁃􀁾􀂷􀁖􀁧􀀢􀀠􀁘􀀺􀀧􀀷􀁾􀀵􀁮􀁮􀀠􀁓􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁕􀀷􀀧􀀮􀁜􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠;11at)"fu<:mru;f b: Ihe Ibm' 􀀨􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀠􀁾􀁦􀀬􀁴􀁨􀁥􀀮􀀠􀁱􀁩􀁾􀀡􀀢􀀮􀁇� �􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀡􀁴􀁾􀁪􀁪􀀺􀁘􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁩􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁁􀀺􀁓􀁔􀁾􀁐􀁃􀁓􀀡􀁧􀁩􀀮􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁱􀁬􀁻􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀹􀀰􀀲􀀮􀀧􀁩􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀬􀁾􀀠Standard SpCL,:'.:::u;tOn 􀀨􀁑􀀬􀁦􀀾􀁣􀀾􀁤􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁦􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁬􀁩􀀬􀁤􀁊􀀺􀀻􀁩􀀡􀁬􀁬􀀱􀁴􀀠 Traffic Par,lIl8,Snck, 􀁃􀁬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁳􀁾􀀠X, 􀁔􀁾pe L ,,'\ppliciltlt711 PS "', ':.., 􀀺􀀮􀀧􀀬􀁩􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀠'.... ':'F' ,··, ,Trlliy"JUrs, 􀁾􀀠.. ;:,:' 􀀻􀁊􀁾􀀠/)/􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁩􀀱􀀬􀁾􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀠",f e" Ir(, " ';'.,'_.....:;;:;;.0,..__•___,,' ::': ',,,:',; 􀁇􀁯􀁯􀁲􀁾􀀠RQbi;TS(1I'l 􀀧􀀩􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀻􀁪􀀻􀁩􀀧􀀠􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀮 􀀬􀀠"t, " ': '" Dirct,;Luf of Tcchmcid 􀁓􀁣􀁴􀀧􀁜􀀧􀁪􀁾􀁃􀁓􀀠.'" ,:. 􀁩􀁾􀀬􀀠'" ,." McCreath Laboratories, Inc. 610 WIUDW STlIlJll"n l 􀀧􀀡􀀢􀀲􀂷􀁜􀁬􀁪􀀻􀂷􀁾􀁨 􀁣􀀠$r;1J"kJ Speqftca1kwJi1r' 􀁐􀁣􀁤􀁣􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁩􀁡􀁮􀀠􀁡􀁾􀁤􀀠Ught 􀁔􀁩􀀧􀁡􀁦􀁩􀀧􀁪􀁣􀀺􀀧􀁰􀀧􀁡􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁧􀀠Brick Cia" SX. ·type i. 􀀭􀀧􀀮􀁰􀁲􀁨􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁊􀀢􀁾􀀠1'S.: ,. ,'" • '.'1'. :' 􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀠'. ';:.J.:" '. ,:J,';' 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠. .􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀠',' gr jy ... I;/.! Cc 􀁋􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀳􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀺􀀠Crl.!v f>istnbut:oll Cet'\tcr I I r'f: lBER!r!-􀁟􀁾􀀮_________. r...., (.t)ruplef.tid 􀁟􀁾􀁝􀀬􀁦􀀠1:.9:.9;.·4:....__ 􀁦􀀱􀁾􀁲􀁪􀁊􀀠ObI" I L'roil Cort\prc..t..-o ,"(r-"'t,th i d"'ndJ1(' ..aool"! (Cron "nltl,,'.1."tem facilities; provided, however, that die City shall never be liable for sueh reimbursemem. I D. In the evem that Grantee has not relocated those of iD affected System. facilities which are located in a public strl!et. alley, or right-of-way within a reasonable length of time (as determined by die City'S En&inl!er) prior to the City'S commencement date for public street, al\ey. or right-of-way constnICU,n or reconstruction, the City shan bave die right 10 relocate or cause 10 be relocated the affected portion of the System. and the GJantee shall reimbl!rse die City for all costs of relocation . ....,..1Ioa 􀁾.PalC 5 or 16i IlOC I, UIl4I E. During the term de this Agreement. Grantee shall be liable to the City for the acts or omissions of any entity used by Grantee (illtluding an Affiliate) when such entity is involved directly or indirectly in the conitruclion, installation. maintenance or operation of the System as if the acts or omissions of 􀁓􀁜􀁉􀁾􀁨􀀠entity were the acts or omissions of Granlee. Sec:tiou 8. Compllaote with City Charler. Grantee recognizes, accepts and agrees that the terms. conditions. and provisions of lhis Agreement an: SUbject to the *'Plicable provisions of the ToWl'l of Addison Charter. Any request by Grantee for a modlfltation to this Agreement shall be subject to review by the City Attorney for compliance with the applicable proVisions of the City Cbarter. Seedoa'. 􀁃􀁾􀁴􀁯􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁃􀁉􀁴􀁹􀀮􀀠developntem of the Property, Grantn agrees 10 .. to the City in the sum ofTwo DoU . the City's streets traversed and a fee of One A. ... 􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁬􀁃􀁯􀀱􀁉􀁉􀁰􀁥􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀮􀀠For the reason that the public stmts. llleys aDd righlSof-way to be used by Gramee u1 the operation of the SyStem widlln the boundaries of the City are valuable public properties. acquired aDd mailUained by the City at a great expense to ilS taxpayers. aDd that the reservation to the Grantee of the use of said public streets. alleys and rights-of-way is a valuable prodetty right withoul which Gramee would be required to invest substantial capital in n,ht-of-way costs and acquisitions. the Grantee agrees 10 pay to the City as general compensation during each year of this Agreement and for ..... ",. flf utility service (including but not limited to c:fcclric, gas, telepbone. water and cable cclevi,ion) provided through aB1 by the System facUlties, a SlIm !:quallo the 1IRII-1Jf l1li' Uinimvb ,\aRu1il Ft, Ir Anllual Gross, Revenue BIIIICd Pee. 'RIe MiRilMIR 01..1l1li11 FtI far 1M AN. Yllf ef epeAllieli !haHllel 8. \:. Calculation GIld 􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀢􀀢􀁮􀁴􀀠011 Q (lttalTtrly Basis. For ••• .",. If utility service 􀁰􀁾by the Grantee by IIIICl througb the System. Grantee shall pay to the City for each calendar quarter an amoum equII. to 1M JAIl'" ef: (iJ 9. IwrIII (&14) 􀁾rIIIit Min;"UM MJIIIa! Pee. eIll8..1... 1ft .8'''.i, IfI Pl' elvc .a_ Ca ; '11'figll ¥taF, or Z% .* J$. of Gross Rcvfmues for such quarter. 􀁔􀁨􀁥􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁴􀀹􀁦(ij Sf 􀁾above shall be referred to as the "Quarterly Payment.' Grlnlee shall forward a cbeclc or money order in an amount equal to the Quarterly Payment by the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month immediately following the close of the calendar quarter for wbicll tlte paymem it 􀁣􀁡􀁫􀁵􀁬􀁡􀁾􀀬􀀠Ally necessary prorations sba1l be lUlde. ......-Aal_·Pap60fI6 DOt I: nl3'1 ! UI-;.\LTY T R l' S T May 23,1996 Mr. David Meyers Huitt-Zollars, Inc. 3131 McKinney Avenue Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 Dear David: RE: Addison Circle Phase I Public Infrastructure HZI Project No. 01-2013-01 Dear David: On the morning of May 23rd, 1996, it was observed that sawed joints on the Witt Mews were not placed per the plan submitted to Gibson & Associates on May 21, 1996. Huitt-Zollars met with Gibson after the construction progress meeting on May 22nd and clarified which joints needed to be sawed. The plan called for two longitudinal joints parallel to the center line of Witt Mews 6' left and right of center. These sawcuts were left out and instead a joint was sawed down the center of Witt Mews. HuittZollars recommendation to Mr. Mark Person was to not attempt any additional sawing because it is likely too late to help the situation. Bruce Ellis has been notified and he is in agreement that no additional saw cuts should be made at this time. Does the Town of Addison wish to accept the joints as sawed? Ifnot, what action does the Town want taken to correct the work in place? Gibson & Associates has requested payment for the concrete placement of Witt Mews in Pay Estimate No.2. Should this portion of the payment be withheld until this situation is clarified? . Please call ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, f\i\eu.k 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀭􀁖􀁌􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁁􀁁􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀩􀁾􀁲􀁲􀁲􀁴􀁥􀀠Mark Brandenburg (J Project Manager MB/kar cc: Bryant Nail, Columbus Realty Trust Jim DuftY, Columbus Realty Trust John Baumgartner, Town ofAddison Tony Johnston, Gibson & Associates -ISSS1 DALLAS P,\R}l:WAY SUITe 855 DALLAS. TF;XAS 75248 21"" 387·1492 F,.\x 214 􀀷􀀷􀀰􀁾􀀵􀀱􀀹􀀲􀀠 \WtlJ1UI, 1r90 10: 􀀱􀀴􀀯􀁾􀁲􀀮􀀠jl):lJ/NU, 􀁊􀁾􀁉􀁪􀁕􀁉􀀱􀁊􀀱􀁊􀁏􀀠yFROM COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 2! 4+m-51Z9 TO; FAX#:: LOCATION: FROM; Fa.:d Voice If. NonaOf CCrmDENtIA.In'Y " " 􀀷􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 770-51 1 􀁄􀁡􀁴􀁥􀀺􀁾􀀠Timt::¢-' B-\..:J Ii-Pages (Including Cover 􀁓􀁮􀁥􀁥􀁾􀀩􀀠 I'M 􀁾Cnn!ablrl in iII:!d Ir.Wmitrd v.iIh !his flK.simil" is: a) S1Ibj.... to __"cUe>! jlriYil«<; b) -='1 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠1DdI.. c) eo. 6d...tjol II is 􀁾ouly lOr \he indi.u!wll or o:ilit)r 􀁾'"""'" 􀁙􀀮􀁾􀀠uc b>,...."Y 􀁾Ih.r. .",. &<=;""';0iI, 􀁾􀁾or _ .ror 􀁾IIpOlt \he: infO!tWllion con";".:! il1 ;md fr.uIsmitrd 10ith Ibis fh..u· by "" to :!D)'d mi lIMty ptOlu'bitei. If1""...... re..a Ibis 1isIl!ilill$ """''''''.lI!!y by 􀁾allhc: lI!mlhe: 􀁾Arq f=lmil. 􀁾􀁹tcmmiru:d 10 􀁹􀁣􀁾􀀠.hould bo imme:!i>to.'y 􀁾10 ll:. s=le:byU.s • 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁮􀀬􀀢􀀧􀁬􀁃􀁬􀁬􀁾..􀁰􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁬􀁢􀁹􀁬� �􀁣􀁳􀀽􀁬􀁥􀀺􀀮􀁗􀁉􀁲􀁯􀁾􀀠-15&51 DALLAS P.\JUtWAY SUITE (U$ DALt.AJ. TEXAS 1'$2: .. , .", 21" 387·li9l 􀁆􀁾􀁾􀀠2H 110·;51'92 FROM COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 214+710-5129 (WED)07.1n5 15:14/ST 16: 13/NO. 3560713135 P 3 1l£SC!!!PD!!t! OF CIWIGES: 1B!SCHANGE ORDElt ISTO ADDRESS llEMSlHATARE 􀁂􀁾􀁹DEIJmi!) FlIOMniE P!<. VNI(I 1I<-l'U\c:li. CONSTRUCTION, ACTIJAL II< I'LACiQIIANlTl1l$ '\VII.L BE \/SliD FOR AlMlMiy -.mitt.::! t1.... WeiP 􀁾􀀠;aCQtdWNtEkriI"'sW ..... i.a Q. M1aure Po.uok p.". '"""'" I... (M1'lt) p", c..n 0-..P,..C-􀁎􀁯􀁅􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁯􀁾Ie IIiC 0.651.1 0.929980 (206,8) IIC N""Wo_ce2C /7C 1.6 0.712.2J7.800 a:zo.J)I2C No Effiore:scencelC I8e 0.7{29090 (200, 7) 1.4 1.01JC No Emo""""""",4C 19C 'IQ/W (208.1) 0.75IAI4C 1.1 No Efflo",""""ce 5C I l!IC lOC J.;2]2O(ii} (2U.2U.2) 0.710.6 0.71􀁊􀁜􀁾􀁃􀂣􀀠30N20 (lJl,6) 1l.5 1.1 nc 􀁢􀁲􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁣􀁰􀁾lJy tk 􀁾􀁾􀁵􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀠􀁾tol'Dply ""til die St..udud 􀁓􀁰􀁣􀁣􀁩􀁦􀁩􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀠(ASTht C1l-!9l) CUr St!IIttt Srldl: eel'll"".$S,, SM) qd MaoIsQle BriGt (GftIdta:; MS. MM), BvildiAj: sri'" (ASTM C6l-92c) (GmfosSW.l\IW. NWl. Foei"l! Bride (,uTIlI 016-9<0) (a.....sw. MW) _ ................ up.T..tGo Pav;og Bncl:lA.'Sm cm·9:I) (Clasus iX. we. NX) (l}ltl<:!u:!:1 80:1:' IASfM 􀁃􀀶􀀱􀂷􀁙􀀲􀁾􀁽􀀠(Orodc.\ SW. til"', NWJ. F'o!oQ" Bntk tASTM 􀁾􀁾􀀶􀀮􀀴􀀮􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁬􀀠;Cn;de, SW'. MWi tnd 􀁰􀀢􀀬􀁦􀁢􀁥􀁾􀀧􀁉􀀢􀀱􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁤􀀠􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁨􀁴􀀠Tnu1 k P.v... , 8rr.:t (":$TM r 9,'1 (Oliff>!, SX. MX. fIlX; (il{1<' f. I). JJ1f A!)r'lUOI) Inilt,(: MO\kIIIIf of aVr"!'r", 1111 1111 M16 UM No e $, I, 􀁲􀁾􀁲...J 118 0.£)19 C;p: 237S 06.41 ill Q,Qf9 7a ::,! (U,51 fuQ 􀁏􀀮􀁻􀁬􀁾􀁬􀀠1J1J 2395 (16 'I 􀁬􀁾􀁓􀀠O.I)lJ vB 􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁊􀁢􀁾􀀩􀀠 􀀢􀁾􀁉􀀠Q (T.:::) .OS 􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁬􀀶􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠 AVe. 􀁾􀀠(l6.ltIl liROM 􀁃􀁏􀁌􀁕􀁍􀁬􀁬􀁕􀁾􀀠HMLlY IHUH {' 14+11U-O 129 (WEDJUo. 20 \II U834/H U8::J3/NO 􀀺􀁊􀁾􀁴􀁪􀁕􀀨􀁉􀁊􀀲􀀹􀁴􀁪􀀠P {' T 1l 0' S T June 25, 1997 Mr. John Baumgartner Director ofPublic Wow TOWN OF ADDISON, SERVICE CENTER 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 RE: Addi50n Circle One Window Encroachme,lts on Witt Place and Pascllal Place Dear John: In response to your letter ofJunc 12th, IlIld our subsequent telephone conversation, I offer the following resolution procedure: • Columbus agrees thlll: on Paschal Place, and all future phases, this condition will not exist. • Since we really can not assess the impact of the encroachment until the streetscape is complete, Columbus will complete the associated sb:eel5cape within 2 weeks from the date of this letter. • Once s\reetscape is complete, you, Paul Sbawand I will visit the site and decide on a specific remedy. • If said remedy is to replace the windows, Columbus will immediately initiate their procurement, which !be supplier has verbally told us will take approximately 6 weeks. • Jfthe remedy is other than windoW replacement, we will initiate it immediately. Columbus agrees to be bound by your decision once the streetscape is complete and we have had our discussion. Columbus also agrees to restructuring all windows except the bedroom prior to occupancy and barricading pedestrian access along the side walk until the remedy is complete, furthennore we agree that whatever the remedy becomes we will complete it within 60 days from receipt ofthis letter. , Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠BIjTant Nail Vice President, Development -JSf3f;d OALI.AtIi r"aK'Wj\'Y SUITE 1f5S n",.,r.,",s, T£XA9 1524-8 2,. 3fp.14YZ F"x 􀀺􀀲􀀱􀁾􀀠􀀱􀀱􀀰􀁾􀁓􀀧􀀹􀀲 o ,.llljIO' til _n...,,.... l"lll,n ......... '" yR E A L T T R u s T FAX6z9z Partner/Addison Circle One MAY 01 1997 . . •• .. Fax TransmIssIon TO /I1J9KK 􀁰􀁾􀁏􀁐􀀵􀀠FAXNUMBER 􀁾􀀷􀀲􀁽􀀾􀁓􀀷􀀭􀀱􀀵􀀡􀀾􀀠COMPANY G/85dJV tT ,I9.sSGI""r4!:> PHONE NUI/IBER "'nZ) >51-11'11 FROIlif /!lARK BRANDENBURG DATE IF/2m PAGESi I SUBJECT I 􀀢􀀯􀁊􀀬􀁦􀁾􀀠IIvl'f"". ZeJL'-"'RS 111'1.5 ,.:it!!:1" 5/MD4.J> t:lP ..,..#1[{ 􀁓􀁑􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀷􀀢􀁾􀀠PST;, AM) #OR711 $,De.S Or 8J.,.Pd..I1. we /l1'f4t' r,p'5HI1V6 􀀢􀀢􀀱􀀿􀁊􀁶􀁥􀀻􀀬􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁐􀁾􀀠l/P ..,...#.t! l!fi,vD -6RI9C)I!C A.MP WI,/.' /-10191/6" -7"NeS.E ,Ii/?l!I95 1?4JI1f)j' F"gR 71/4!' IHRIGIf"'f'tJU i'" .>"-P£l:."' U6/-I'7"IP(f. pHJ'I5i!:.S 􀁾􀁲􀀠!/pvR WO/(I< Ar 7.00 A.II"/.., rHlJ7Ay;' 􀀯􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁙􀀺􀀲􀀮􀁾􀀠1'1'17WG! )lAI/4! 􀁉􀁊􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁓􀁾􀀠CL£AP rfGH/Jf)I§£) 􀁾7716 􀀮􀁶􀁾􀁈AIllP W/f.yr :)"Ipes Or -rH$ P;lJAK /I'IAKIIVG ..."t'15 tiRE/} AIMILA8t-€ 7tJ 􀁹􀁴􀁬􀁖􀁾􀀠IRRIG./i 􀁲􀁾􀀱􀀼􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠, a:.; Jim Pv"rt"r't" 􀀯􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀠('1'Tz,J 770-57'17 PAVIO /I1Ii-,'4"R//I-z. 􀀨􀁾􀀴􀁦􀁊􀀠S71-Q757 :1bIIP 􀀯􀁊􀁒􀁶􀁉􀁉􀁦􀁪􀁇􀁉􀁉􀁒􀀢􀀧􀀣􀀣􀀡􀀡􀀢􀁒􀀯􀁾􀀣􀀧􀁪􀀺􀁬􀁐􀁉􀁨􀁊􀁗􀀢􀀧􀁚􀀩􀀧􀀱􀀤􀁏􀀭􀀲􀀸􀀳􀀷􀀠4949 MILDR.ED • ADDISON.TX 15248 (972) 126·0;147 FAX (972) 8 6 6·6S60 FROM COLUMBUS REALTY TRUST 􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀫􀀱􀁩􀁕􀀭􀁾􀀱􀀲􀀹"j T RUe: T June 25. 1997 Mr. John Baumgartner Director ofpublic Works TOWN OF ADDISON, SERVICE CENTER 16801 Westgrove Addi:ion, Texas 75248 RE: Addison Circle One Wllfdow Encroadtmel1l1I on Wilt Place and Paschal Place Dear John: In response to your letter ofJune 12th, !lDd our subsequent telephone conversation, loff-er the following resolution procedure: • Columbus agrees that on Paschal Place, and all future phases, this condition will not exist. • Since we really can not assess the impact ofthe encroachment Wltil the streetscape is complete, Columbus will complete the associated streetscape within 2 weeks from the date of Ibis letter. • Once streetscape is complete, you, Paul Shaw and I will visit the site and decide on a specifiC remedy. • If said remedy is to replace the windows, Columbus will immediately initiate their procurement,. which the supplier has verbally told us will take approximately 6 weeks. • Ifthe remedy is other than window replacement, we will initiate it immediately. Columbus agrees to be bound by your decision once the streetscape is complete !1I1d we have had our discussion. Columbus also agrees to restructuring all windows except the bedroom prior to occupancy and banicading pedestrian lIl:CtlSS along the side walk until tile remedy is complete, furthermore we agree that whatever the remedy becomes we will complete it within 60 days from receipt (If this letter. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁴􀁢􀀪􀁾􀀠Bryant Nail Vice 􀁐􀁾􀁥􀁳􀁪􀁤􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀬􀀠Development -158$j DAI.t.A5 '-'JI.1\1(,"'''''' Sult"1:t ass n"LLhSl. Tex ... ,. 7SZi9 Z,4 􀁾􀁍􀀱􀂷􀀱􀀴􀀹􀀲􀀠􀁆􀁁􀁾􀀠214 110.5'92 '0 ".,!'IT .. ., '''" 􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁴􀁡􀀧􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀢􀀡􀀱􀀠,,,Ikt ,HUll. CU LUMMUS 􀁈􀁾􀁁􀁌􀁔􀁙􀀠1l{UH 214+ 􀁉􀁉􀁕􀀭􀁾129 FAX Il!ALTY'fIlI:'" Phone: FnphOlle: '7"Tz. 4-B6-􀀲􀁾􀀳􀀷􀀠cc: Number ofpagt!. lneluding cover 􀀮􀁾􀁥􀁥􀁴􀀺􀀠Z From: 􀁾􀀴􀁊􀀺􀁁􀀠rwl Phone: (972) 770-5121 Fax phone: (972) 770-5129 o Urgent o For your review 0 Reply ASAP o Please comment -15851 DAf.J"A" PAttK.WI\.Y SUITE 855 DALL...... 'l"IiXAJ 152"B 2[43&7-1192 FAX 214 􀀷􀀷􀀰􀁾􀀡􀁈􀀹􀀲C f'.I",.,.r:;O "I!' .>I..,....w .. " r#··.. IW1WJ lU, UI Y( 􀁉􀁊􀀺􀀴􀁩􀀧􀀯􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀠ij:4U/NV, 􀁪􀁾􀁏􀁕􀀨􀁬􀀻􀁪􀁡􀁾􀀠r Iii 􀀱􀁾􀀸􀁁􀁌􀁔􀁙􀀠October 1, 1997 Mr, John Baumgartner VIA FACSIMILE Director of Public Works AND HAND DELIVERY Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 RE: Addison Circle Phase II InfraStructure DearJohn: Per our conversation today, you have agreed to issue notice to proceed today to North Texas Utilities for :Phase II of Addison Circle infrastructure, Columbus Realty Trust Agrees that if Phase n of Addison Circle does not come to fruition within six months to reimbur5e the Town of Addison all co5t5 incurred with this contract Sincerely, Bryant ail Vice President, Development c: Mark Brandenberg -lfilin' 􀁮􀁁􀁲􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀮􀀱􀁪􀀠'f>AJ\,k.W..,,'k' SUITE 855 0"'1141:1. TJ5XAS 􀀱􀁓􀀧􀁚􀁾􀀸􀀠 214 3K7.1492 PAX' 2f1-111J.S10Z 0. ,."",.,,,11 ... "" 1\00 .. rC:LIIIl' ,.... I'IUI REA L T Y TRUST August 20, 1997 Mr. John Baumgartner TOWN OF ADDISON 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 Dear John: Columbus recognizes that portions ofthe streetscape along Morris Avenue are still under construction at the Addison Circle project at 4947 Addison Circle, Addison, Texas. Columbus further acknowledges that the Town of Addison does not consider Morris Avenue open and that Columbus excepts sole liability for use ofthe street. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Bryant Nail Vice President, Development -15851 DALLAS PAHKWAY SUITE 855 DALLAS. TeXAS 75248 214387·1492 FAX 214 770·5192 ,,§ PItI"'T!!!) ON YHC'·C;I,1l1> rAl'llK