Sunday; December 28. 2003 s, ,• /Researchers find .quieter way to IlItd airplanes By Gareth Cook THE BOSTON GLOBE Researchers have demonsirated a new way'to quiet 􀁾􀀠 thunderous sounds of jets approal:hing airports, offering hope for people nationwide who suffer from the noise wr dermlljorflight paths. The team, led by a scientist at the MlIBSIIChusetts Institute ofTechnoIOgy, has designed a way for planes to land that keeps their engines quieterand farther from homes. Termed a ·continuous descent apprOach,. the technique callS for ail approaChing plane to stay high for longer thai! is done now, and then glide toward the runway \'rith its engines 􀀡􀁾.. reducing the noise ·it emanateS: In a test of the system'in Louisville, Ky., the first in the United Slates, the noise on the ground decreased by up to 6 decibels -the egaIj. The system. can't be used -for ain::raft that are t;drlng oil Butthesystem represents ali important new way 􀁾􀁯􀀠 help solve a problem that has plagued communities and held up the construction of newrunways, contributing 􀁴􀁯􀂷􀁾􀀠 tion and delays in air travel . . around the country. The test showed the new apprOach can 􀁾􀁧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀪􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁩􀁉􀁯􀁾􀀠. withOut the need for new tech-_ noIogy, and that it·might even 􀁾􀀠 save and get 􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁥 buck," said T. who is Ieading theresearch is an associate professor of aeronautics and asti-ollllUticS at MIT. When an airplane approaches an airport now, air . traffic controHers t;opicaIly direct the plane to to reduce its alti, tude in steps, descending a bit and then flying level. When the plane is close to the airport, it intercepts a radio beam and fuJ. 10Wt< the beam down for tlie final apprOach to the runway. tbls means that jets come in low and with th,eir engines running loudly. Jets land !his way I partly to enSure that they win lock onto the correct radio beam for their Iinal apprOach, I Clarke said. res "', dk ii' ;, _..;I 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭 _._--The new method makes Use ofthe sophisticated aviouics' on I modern jets, which allow planes to pi!lpoint theirposition 􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁳􀁩􀁏􀁮􀁡􀁬􀁊􀁹􀀮􀀠Using the I flight computer, a pnot Can direct the plane to the exact point in the air where it picks Uf' the I correct radio beam. The plane .. can then fuHow the beam in. on a slow gli!1e, to the airport. For the test at the LouisvilIe Intenlallonal Airport lasyt'ear, I the team asked one plane from UPS to land using the tradition .􀀧" 􀀻llU􀀮M􀀼 􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀠,.anet bn!tepwn epmlaentheo tdo. Placing microphones along theflight path. the ,team me3sured' noise IevelS during the landing, and fuund the new technique reduced noise between about 4 and 6 decibels, according to an unpublish·e d paper desaibm' g. the expenment . The landing would notmake any difference to the airporfs immediate neighbors. Clarke .said. since within about 5 miles . ofthe airport therewould he no difference iil altitode. It would make the biggest difference at about 7.5to 15 miles out . The technique wouid add to an array of methods now used to fight, noise poHution, includ-. ing changing the design of engines, fIyiiJg over less-popu1ated areas, using less. engine power whil<;> climbing away from airports and 􀁳􀁯􀁕􀁮􀁤􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁯􀁾􀀠 ing homes. But using coiItinu,. . ous descents is especially' weiI come because there is' no "siNei bullet" that can make enpnes dramatically quieter, 1 said Carl Burleson, director of ,the FAA's Office of Environ-' ment and Enerm'. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2871 FAX (972) 450-2837 Post Office Box 9010 Addison, Texas 75001-9010 16801 Westgrove October 28, 2002 Mr. Bruce Ehly, Airport Planner TX Department ofTransportation Aviation Division 125 E. 11th Street Austin, TX 78701-2483 Re: Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update Dear Mr. Ehly: This is to transmit nine copies of our F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update -Noise Exposure Maps, along with nine copies of Supporting Information on Project Coordination and Local Coordination, all ofwhich was prepared by our consultant, Coffman Associates, Inc. I have also enclosed a Resolution (No, R02-086) by the City Council ofthe Town of Addison authorizing the City Manager to sign and certifY the Noise Exposure Maps document. Please forward these documents to the FAA for their review and acceptance. Very truly yours, 􀁅􀁾􀁾 Assistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Mark Acevedo, Facilities and Fleet Services Administrator En closures RESOLUTION NO. R02-oS6 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND THEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ADDISON AIRPORT FAR. PART 150 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE; THAT INTERESTED PARTIES HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THE MAPS AND THAT THE 2002 MAPS ARE FAIR AND REASONABLE REPRESENTATIONS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE AIRPORT. WHEREAS, the Town's consultant, Coffman Associates, has completed Part 1 of the Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Study; and, WHEREAS, Part 1 consists of the first four chapters of the Part 150 Noise; and, WHEREAS, these chapters cover inventory of airport facilities. aviation demand forecasts, aviation noise, current and future land uses within the study areas and current and future aircraft noise exposure conditions and their impact on the compatibility of land uses in the study area; and, WHEREAS, the study also consists of noise "contour" maps that show current location of various noise levels due to airport operations as well as prOjected noise levels for years 2007-2022; and. WHEREAS, staff recommends certification of the Addison Airport FAR. Part ·150 Noise Study Part 1 and Noise Exposure Maps and accompany documents; now. therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to sign and thereby certify that the Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and accompanying documents are true and complete; that interested parties have had an OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R02"()86 opportunity to comment on the maps and that the 2002 maps are fair and reasonable representations of existing conditions at the airport. DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, this the 8th day of October 2002. Mayor ATTEST: OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R02-0B6 To Dttll-( ht::, i -8'1 􀁾 -'J.:2.tf-?-57Z;; BELT LINE ROAD ON MAP 􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀩􀀠 10' IDATE /0-;0 -0'2. IJOIlND. : ATTENTION , 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂮􀀠 Public Works I Engineering RE: i I1/J/'lJ C;//11 /l-1Y'Jt/l'Jr716801 Westgrove. P.O. Box 9010 I Addison, Texas 75001 Telephone: (9721450.2871 • Fax: (9721 450·2837 GENTLEMAN: WE ARE SENDING YOU riached o Under separate cover via _____the following items: o Shop Drawings 0 Prints o Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications o Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 _______________ COPIES DATE NO. Cj :9 I I i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: DESCRIPTION { ( o For approval 0 Approved as submitted o Resubmit ____copies lor approval )K(For your use 0 Approved as noted o Submit copies for distribution o As requested 0 Retumed for corrections o Retum corrected prints o For review and comment 0 ________________________ _____ o FOR BIDS DUE __________ 19,__ o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US , COPYTO ____________________ 􀁓􀁉􀁇􀁎􀁅􀁄􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 If enclosures are not as noted, please n tit Council Agenda Item:H9 SUMMARY: This item is to authorize the City Manager to sign and thereby certify that the Addison Airport F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and accompanying documents are true and complete; that interested parties have had an opportunity to comment on the maps and that the 2002 maps are fair and reasonable representations ofexisting conditions at the airport. FINANCIALIMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Our consultant for the FAR. Part 150 Noise Study (and Airport Master Plan), Coffman Associates, has completed Part 1, consisting of the first four chapters ofthe Part 150 Noise Study that is now ready for submission to the FAA for review and acceptance. The first fuur chapters covered an inventory of airport facilities, aviation demand forecasts, aviation noise, current and future land uses within the study area, and current and future aircraft noise exposure conditions and their impact on the compatibility of land uses in the study area. The study produced noise "contour" maps that show the current location of various noise levels due to airport operations, as welI as projected noise levels for years 2007 and 2022. Briefly, the 2002 noise exposure map shows that the 65 DNL (noise level ofconcern) contour affects a small area of multi-family residences just north ofthe airport. In 2007, the contour is predicted to expand very slightly, and in 2022 the contour is predicted to shrink back to the southern edge ofthe multi-family development. During the preparation ofthe documents, two Planning Advisory Committee meetings were held, both ofwhich were followed by public meetings to allow participation and input by stakeholders and the public. A copy of the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update -Noise Exposure Maps document is attached, along with a separate document that contains supporting information on project coordination and local coordination. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Manager be authorized to sign and thereby certify that the Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and accompanying documents are true and complete; that interested parties have had an opportunity to comment on the maps and that the 2002 maps are fair and reasonable representations of existing conditions at the airport, and, that the documents be sent to TxDOT Aviation Division for their transmittal to the FAA for review and acceptance. 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁄􀁟􀁄􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁏􀁟_􀁎 _AJ _RP_O _R_T_ __________________________􀁾􀁾 NOISE COMPATIBILITY RESPONSIBILITIES Multiple organizations and groups are responsible for mitigating the eHects of aircraft noise exposure in the vicinity of an airport. The following serves as a guide to highlight the various individual responsjbilities for noise exposure mitigation around Addison Airport, Federal Government The Federal Government, primarHy through Ihe Federal Aviation Administratton (FAA). has the authority and responsibility to control aircraft noise sources through the followtng methods: • Implement and Enforce Aircraft Operational Procedures These include pilot responsibilities, compliance with PJr Traffic Controllnslruclionsj flight restrictions, and careless and reckless operation of aircraft. Where and how aircraft are operated Is under the complete jurisdiction of the FAA. • Manage the AirTraftic Control System -The FAA IS responsible for the control of navigable airspace and reviews any proposed alterations in flight procedures for noise abatement on the basis of safety of flight operations, safety and efficient use of navigable airspace, management and control of the national airspace and air traffic control systems, effects on security and national defense, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. • Certification of Aircraft 􀁾􀀠The FAA has required the reduction of aircraft noise through certification. modification of engines, or aircraft replacement as deftned in F.A.R. Part 36. FAA noise reduction regulations do not apply to military aircraft or aircraftbelow 75,000 pounds. • Pilot Licensing -Individuals licensed as pilots are trained under strict guidelines concentrating on safe and courteous aircraft operating procedures. many of which are designed to lessen the effects of aircraft noise. • Noise Compatibility Studies -Federal Aviation Regulation (F.A.A.) Part 150 establishes procedures and criteria for the evaluation of Noise Compatibility Studi"•. Government The State of Texas does not directly mandate or implement regulations or programs pertaining to aircraft noise or land use. The state does, however. render such power to local governments through enabling legislation. This legislation encourages local governments to establish planning commissions which are assisted by agencies or departments to prepare and adopt a 􀁬􀁯􀁮􀁧􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁧􀁥􀀠general plan, and regulate zoning. subdivision and land developmentj consistent with the plan. Local Government (cities, towns, and counties) Local governments have the authority to enforce land use regulations within their jurisdictions. These include: • Land Use Planning -Local governments are permitted to prepare. adopt and implement comprehensive. long-range, generalized land use plans within their current jurisdictions and for unincorporated areas which are likely to be annexed. • Zoning Ordinance -Local governments use the Zoning Ordinance to guide the uses of property. provide dimensional requirements for lots, building height and density. • Subdivision Regulationa -Local governments can Use subdivision regulations to enhance 􀁮􀁯􀁩􀁳􀁥􀁾􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁢􀁬􀁥􀀠land developmen1 by requiring developers to plat and develop land so as to minimize noise impacts or reduce the noise sensitivity of new development The most common method is the dedication of a noise or avigation easement to the local government by the land subdivider as a condition of development approval. • Building Codes 􀁾􀀠Local governments institute building codes to ensure safe and inhabttable buifding standards. Local building codes may require sound insulation in new residentiar. office, and institutional buildings when warranted by existing or potential high aircraft noise levels. Airport Proprietor -Town of Addison The airport proprietor is responsible for the safe and efficient operation of the airl!eld facility. This includes: • Overall airport planning and the implementation of airport development actions. • Installation of noise barriers and implementation of noiseRreducing ground operating procedures. • Provide community outreach, • Recommend restrictions on airport use that do not unjustly discriminate against any user, impede the federal interest in safety and management of the air navigation system. or unreasonably interfere with interstate commerce. The sirport proprietor does not have the authority to install mandatory noiae abatement procedurea or direct air traffic.. All procedures including noise abatement. sircraft air operations. and curfews must be approvedby the FAA and may require additional studies. Aircraft Manufacturers Aircraft manufacturers have the responsibility to incorporate the latest noise reduction technology in aircraft engine designs. In addition, manufacturers can include aircraft specific noise abatement techniques and settings in aircraft operation manuals. Aviation Users Aviation users have the responsibility to fly in a sate and responsible manner as per the -General Operating and Flight Rules" defined in FAR. Part 91. Current and prospective residents Current and prospective residents in areas surrounding airports should seek to understand the aircraft noise problem and what steps can and cannot be taken to minimize its effects. Prospective residents should research the location of nearby airports and determine if aircraft noise would affeot their quality of life. CoilmaD.." Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmonassoclates.com September 30, 2002 James C. Pierce, JR, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001-9010 Dear Mr. Pierce: Please find enclosed with this letter sixteen (1 􀁇􀁽􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁪􀀮􀁽􀀮􀁰􀁪􀁰􀁩􀀻􀀻􀀡􀀻􀀠of Chapter Five, Noise Abatement Alternatives and Chap1er Six, Land U£e 􀀧􀁽􀁜􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁥􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁡􀁾􀁬􀁴􀀧􀁥􀁳􀀢􀁔􀁢􀁪􀁮􀁹􀀭􀀧􀂫􀀧􀁵􀁛􀀠(34)'copies were ;mii"jduii.'ly mailed to the PAC members. This accounts for the fifty (50) copies in our contract. Also attached to each set of draft chapters are meeting minutes from the May 23,2002 PAC meeting. Please do not hesitate to call me at 800-892-7772 if you have any questions. Associate Enclosures: as stated c,;: Jim Harris, CoiTinan fVi50eiaies, Phoenix Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.w. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Collman.". Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmanaSSoclates.com September 16, 2002 James C. Pierce, JR., P.E. Assistant Public Works Director Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001-9010 Re: Transmittal ofNoise Exposure Map Documents Dear Mr. Pierce: Please find enclosed twelve (12) final copies ofthe Noise Exposure Map (N"EM) document for the Addison Airport F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update. The NEM document is the first half ofa complete F.A.R. Part 150 Study. It consists of the first four chapters orthe study. As you know, before the FAA will review and approve an updated Noise Compatibility Program for the airport, it must have completed its' review and accepted the Noise Exposure Maps (NEM) document. Please submit nine (9) copies ofthe NEM documents to Bruce Ehly with the TxDOT. His address is: Bruce Ehly Ai rport Planner Texas Department of Trallsportation Aviation Division 125 E. 11 Ih Street Austin, Texas 78701-2438 Be sure to have Mr. Whitehead sign the certification statements on page x and on Exhibits 1 and 2 after page x in each ofthe submitted documents. It is important that you include documentation ofMr. Whitehead's authority to certifY the NEMs with your submittal letter to the TxDOT. The TxDOT will accept different forms of authorization, including a resolution ofthe Town Council, an excerpt from the minutes ofa meeting of the Town Council authorizing Mr. Whitehead to make the certification, or an opinion of the Town's attorney that the City Manager has the authority to make the certification. Today we also shipped to you fifteen (15) copies ofthe supplemental volume which documents the public coordination process, including the public connnents received thus far. In your submittal to Mr Ely, be sure to enclose nine (9) copies ofthe supplemental volume. The other six (6) copies are for you to use as you wish. You may wish to place some in public libraries with the NEM document for public review. You may also wish to give them to the local planning departments or city managers for their records. Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NoW. Blue Parkway. Suite 100, Lee's SummIT, MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Mr. Pierce September 16, 2002 page 2 In order to benefit from the legal protection afforded by the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1980, you must publish a notice of the FAA's acceptance ofthe NEMs in a loca! newspaper ofgeneral circulation in the county. An example ofa suitable public notice is enclosed for your use after you receive notice ofFAA's acceptance ofthe NEMs. Please let us know ifyou have any questions about the submittal of the NEMs to the TxDOT. We are prepared to answer any questions and provide any material the TxDOT or FAA may request to aid in their review of the NEMs. Please let us know if we can be ofany assistance. Enclosures: as stated cc: Mr. Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Public Notice Federal Aviation Administration Acceptance of Noise Exposure Maps for Georgetown Municipal Airport [To be published three times in a local newspaper ofgeneral circulation in the County.] Pursuant to Sections 107(a) and (b) [49 U.s.C. 2107(a) and (b)] ofthe Airport Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979: Notice is hereby given that on 􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀮􀁦􀁄􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁔􀀢􀀬􀀧􀁅􀀺 􀀽􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁬__ the Federal Aviation Administration completed its evaluation of, and has accepted, the updated Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps Update for Addison Airport, Addison, Texas. The Maps show airport noise exposure for actual 2002 conditions and forecasted 2007 conditions. The Noise Exposure Maps and supporting documentation are available for public review during normal business hours at the Town ofAddison Service Center, 16801 Westgrove Drive, Addison, Texas 75001. For information, call Mr. James C. Pierce at (972) 450-2879. # # # AIRPORTPLANNING IS OUR ONLY BUSINESS Cof􀁾􀀱􀁬􀁩􀁉􀁉􀀱g ·-d. 􀀭􀁗􀁗􀁗􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁃􀀭􀀰􀀷􀀮􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀀭􀁳􀁯􀀭􀁣􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁲􀁥􀀭􀁳􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁾􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Jim Pierce Assistant Director ofPublic Works Town of Addison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Pierce: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled fo.r October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: . MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These doc\llllents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional infoTDlation, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 1''L,Vl...04l...h 􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. "?r""'-Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway. Suile 100. Lee's Summit, MO 64063 • Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: 816.524.2575 ../_A_IR_P_O_R::::-T_P_LA_N_N_I-:N-:G_1S_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_IN_£_S_S__________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁃􀁾􀁯􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁦􀁉􀁮􀁵􀀨􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Tracy Eubanks Mapsco, Inc. 4181 Centurion Way Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10,2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 Ca"_.d." AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONL Y BUSINESS 􀁾􀀮􀁉n 􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀀭􀀭􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀀭􀁳􀁯􀀭􀁣􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁲􀁥􀀭􀁳􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁾􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants September13, 2002 Mr. Keith Braley Northern Trust Bank 16475 Dallas Parkway Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr, Braley: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10,2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review, Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a,m. to 12:00 p,m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p,m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m, to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M, Harris, P.E. Principal c, Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX, 816.524,2575 _A,,-IR,,-P-,O_R_T_P_LA_N_N-,IN-,-G,,--,IS-,O-,V-,-R-,O:.:.N.:::L:.:.Y.:::B.:::V..::.S:.:.IN:::E..::.8S-=--_________---"'=C;<'o=Uman -' www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Mike Tiller Tenant Area Representative Pizza Hut 4570 Westgrove, #145 Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Tiller: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, 'l'own of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 • Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 􀀭AIR􀁾PO􀀭RT􀀭PL􀁾AN􀀭NIN􀀭G􀀭 IS 􀀭OU􀀭R O􀀭NL􀀭Y B􀀭US􀀭IN􀀭ES􀀭S 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁮􀀯 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13, 2002 Mr. Ron Frederick Tenant Representative Mission Air 4600 Claire Chennault Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Frederick: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 NW, Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee'S Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.25 75 ./􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁭􀁟􀁰􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁎􀁟􀁉􀁾􀁎􀁟􀁇􀁟􀀧_􀁓 _O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_W_E_s_s____________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁴􀁡􀁲􀀱􀁩􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. AlRanyk Tenant Representative FlightiAER Aviation SchoollBAR 13709 Gamma Rd. Dallas, 'IX 75244 Dear Mr. Ranyk: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffinan Associates Kansas Ciiy' Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 • Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ) ../_A_IR_P_O_R"...T_P_LA_N_N_IN_G_IS_O_U_R---,O=--N_L--,-Y...::B_U-=-S=--IN.E..:-:=-ss-=----_________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀡􀁃􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁦􀁊􀁭􀁡􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Al Ranyk Tenant Representative FlightiAER Aviation SchoollBAR 4700 Airport Parkway Addison, TX 75244 Dear Mr. Ranyk: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾'--..11.-... 􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀀧􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁒􀀺􀀻􀀭􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀀧􀁎􀀺􀀻􀀭􀁇􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀽􀁓􀀭􀀽􀁏􀀭􀀽􀁕􀁟􀁒􀀭􀀽􀁏􀀽􀀭􀁎􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁌􀀭􀀽􀁙􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁂􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁕􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁓􀀭􀀽􀀧􀂣􀁎􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁳􀁳􀀽􀀭􀀭_________􀁾􀁃 􀁾􀁏􀁉􀁬􀁭􀀸􀁄􀀠 ." www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants Septemberl3,2002 Mr. Bob Barrett Citizen Representative City Council 14637 Lexus Ave. Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Barrett: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ,, ., 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁉􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁾􀁒􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁉􀁎􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁇􀁟􀁉􀁓􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁙􀁟􀁂􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁓􀁟􀁉􀁎􀁅􀁟􀁟􀁓􀁓 _________􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁊􀁭􀀸􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consullants September13, 2002 Mr. John CUD1D1ings Citizen Representative 3817 Azure Lane Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. CUD1D1ings: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me (602-993-6999) Or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associa tos Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX 816,524.2575 ! AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONL Y BUSINESS Cof.fnian./􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀀭􀀮􀁇􀀭􀁏􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀀭􀀭􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀀭􀁳􀁯􀁯􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁓􀀭􀁇􀀭􀁏􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airpor! Consultants September13, 2002 Ms. Janiece Niemann Citizen Representative 14921 Bellbrook Dallas, 'IX 75254 Dear Ms. Niemann: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwark has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six· Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffinan Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟_􀁾􀁎_􀁎􀁟􀁉􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁟_􀁾_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_W_E_Ss_____________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁉􀀠 ./www.coffmanassociales,com Associates Airport Consultants September13, 2002 Ms. Sue Halpern Citizen Representative 14800 LeGrande Dr, Addison, TX 75001 Dear Ms, Halpern: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10,2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been ;'ccomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review, Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a,m. to 12:00 p,m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m, to 4:00 p,m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p,m, to 7:00 p.m, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time, Sincerely, James M, Harris, P,E. Principal c, Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N,W, Blue Parkway, Suite 100. lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816,524.3500 FAX: 816,524.25 75 " ! .". 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁭􀁟􀁰􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁔􀁟_􀁐􀁾_􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁗􀁾􀁇􀁟􀁉􀁾􀁓􀁟􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁎􀁾􀁌􀁟􀁙􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁕􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁅􀁓􀁾􀁾􀁓 __________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀠 www.colimanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr, Albert Jandura Citizen Representative 14936 Oaks North Dr. Dallas, TX 75254 Dear Mr. Jandura: The third Planning Advisory CoInInittee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory CoInInittee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study, The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review, Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a,m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p,m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives, A public workahop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p,m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) Or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time, Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO MO 64063 Phone: 816.524,3500 FAX: 816,524.2575 ./_A_IR_P_O_R_T_P_LA_N_N_IN.,-G_IS_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B...:.U...:.SI_N..E.:....:.SS"-_________􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀡􀀡􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁊􀁦􀁭􀀸􀁄 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Ms. Elizabeth Knott Citizen Representative 14925 Oaks North Dr. Dallas, TX 75254 Dear Ms. Knott: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀀯􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁫􀀱� �􀀮􀁾􀀠 7r . 􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: 816.524.2575 ../􀁟􀁁􀁟􀀧􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁎􀁟􀀯􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁟􀀧_􀁓 _O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_WE_s_s____________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁡􀁲􀁬􀁬􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Ms. Bonnie Tyler Citizen Representative 17106 Planters Row Addison, TX 75001 Dear Ms. Tyler: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ./_A_IR_P_O_R_T_P_LA_N_N_I_N_G_IS---,-O-,-U_R...;;O_N-=L-,-Y-,-B-=U-,-S-,-IN-,-E-=s-'-s__________􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁦􀁨􀁭􀀨􀁄􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Ed Morales Fixed Base Operator Addison Express 4505 Claire Chennault Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Morales: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Aiternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁦􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E '-"-----J Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas Cily • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. lee'S Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.5242575 ) ./_A_IR_P_O_R;-:-T_P_LA_N_N_I-;N-;G_IS_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_IN_E_S_S__________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁃􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁦􀁮􀁵􀀨􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13, 2002 Mr. Jack Hopkins Fixed Base Operator Million Air 4300 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Hopkins: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four. Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five· Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six . Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602·993·6999) or David Fitz (816-524·3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁨􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.5243500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ./􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁉􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁉􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁟􀁉􀁟􀁓􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁙􀁟􀁂􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁓􀁉􀁟􀁎􀁅􀁟􀁟􀁳􀁳 ___________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁦􀁴􀀮􀁮􀁭􀁡􀁲􀀱􀁬􀀠 www.cofimanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Ms. Kim Phillips Fixed Base Operator Mercury Air 4400 Glen Curtis Addison, TX 75001 Dear Ms. Phillips: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10,2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁵􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠 V 􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. Lee"s Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONL Y BUSINESS Co1fmt(n./􀁾􀁗􀁾􀁗􀀭􀁗􀁾􀀬􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁾􀁣􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁳􀁾􀀮􀁲􀁯􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥 􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr, Bryan Langley Town ofAddison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Langley: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Altornatives Part 150 • Chapter Five Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p,m. to 4:00 p,m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives, A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m, to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002, In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁨􀀭􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠 James M, Harris, P,E, 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, To\\'U ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N,W, Blue Parkway, Suite 100, lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524,3500 • FAX: 816,524.2575 ./􀁟􀁁􀀯􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁌􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀀯􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁟􀁉􀁟􀁓􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁙􀁟􀁂􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁓􀁉􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁅􀁳􀁟􀁳____________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁉􀁦􀀮􀁭􀁮􀀻􀁦􀁉􀁬􀀠 www.cofimanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants Septemberl3,2002 Mr. Chris Terry Town ofAddison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Terry: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.AR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me (602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 J' 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁉􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀀧􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁾􀀯􀁟􀁓􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁕􀁾􀀤􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁾__________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁦􀁦􀁲􀀮􀁮􀁡􀀨􀀱􀁉􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Mark Acevedo Town of Addison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001 Dear Mr. Acevedo: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀀴􀁣􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁖􀁜􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City' Phoenix 237 NoW. 81ue Parkway, Suite 100. LBB'S Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ." 􀁟􀁁􀁟􀀧􀁒􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀀯􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁇􀁟􀀧􀁓􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁒􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁕􀁓􀁾􀀯􀁾􀁎􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁾____________________􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airporl Consultants Septemberl3,2002 Ms. Phyllis Jarrell City ofPlano Planning Department P.O. Box 860358 Plano, TX 75086-0358 Dear Ms. Jarrell: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FA.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, James M. Harris, P.E. "'0<-....3 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 • Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 _AIR_PO􀁾RT PL_AN_NIN􀁾G IS O_UR_ ON_L Y_ BU_SI_NES_S _________􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷gJ􀀭.&􀁤i􀀮DG􀁮I􀁾􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants Septemberl3,2002 Mr. Kaizer Rangwala City of Farmers Branch Planning Department P.O. Box 819010 Farmers Branch, TX 75381 Dear Mr. Rangwala: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, r-􀀭􀁨􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 1....--.....) Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONLY BUSINESS Coffma'o../􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁗􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀁳􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁣􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁥􀀭􀁳􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀁓􀁓􀁾􀁄􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants September13,2002 Ms. Sherell Cockrell Planning Dept. Director City of Dallas Planning Department 1500 Marilla, 5DN Dallas, TX 75201 Dear Ms. Cockrell: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committoe meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁱􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 FAX: 816.524.2575 ./􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁉􀁒􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁏􀁟􀁒􀀽􀀭􀁔􀁟􀁐􀁟􀁌􀁁􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁉􀀭􀀺􀁎􀀭􀀺􀁇􀁟􀁉􀁓􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁒􀁟􀁏􀁟􀁎􀁟􀁌􀁟􀁙􀁟􀁂􀁟􀁕􀁟􀁓􀁟􀀱􀁎􀁅􀁟􀁟􀁓􀁟􀁓__________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁃􀁾􀁯􀀢􀀢􀁦􀁨􀁭􀁦􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociales.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. John Webb City of Carrollton Planning Department P.O. Box 110535 Carrollton, TX 75011 Dear Mr. Webb: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four· Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five· Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six· Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602·993·6999) or David Fitz (816·524·3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fi tz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W, Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816,524.3500 • FAX: 816.524,2575 ./_A_IR_P_O_R-:-;-T_P_LA_N_N_I-:N_G_IS_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_IN_ E_S_S__________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁃􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁬􀁭􀁴􀀨􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Ms. Carmen Moran Town of Addison Development Services P.O. Box 9010 Addison, 'IX 75001 Dear Ms. Moran: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: FAX: 816.524.2575 ../_A_IR_P_O_R::-T_P_LA_N_N_I-:N_G_IS_O_U_R_O_N_L_Y_B_U_S_IN_ E_S_S__________􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁃􀁾􀁯􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁊􀁕􀁭􀁡􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13, 2002 Mr. Mike Sims North Central Texas Council of Governments P.O. Box 5888 Arlington, TX 76005-5888 Dear Mr. Sims: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form ofone draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City· Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway, Suile 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64Q63 • Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: 816.524.2575 AIRPORT PLANNING /S OUR ONL Y BUS/NESS www.cottmanassociates.com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr. Paul Smith Regional Representative National Business Aviation Association 30124 Sawgrass Trail Georgetown, TX 78628 Dear Mr. Smith: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount of material that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, ifyou have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁻􀁝􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. "O'---J Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town of Addison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: 816.524.2575 ./_A_fR_P_O---:R;;-T_P_LA_N_N_fN-;-G-:-fS--,O--,U_R--,O--,N.;.::L..:..Y..::.B..::.U..::.Sf....:N.E.::...::.SS=--_________􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁯􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀡􀁬􀁦􀁭􀁡􀁮􀀠 www.coffmanassociates,com Associates Airport Consultants September13,2002 Mr, Jerry Hooper Regional Representative Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association 3332 Ball Dr, Corpus Christi, TX 78418 Dear Mr, Hooper: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road, It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the F.A.R Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: Master Plan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six· Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m, We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10,2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524·3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁫􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. Principal c. Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas • Phoenix 237 N,W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 Phone: 816.524.3500 fAX: 816.524,2575 AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONL Y BUSINESS Colfmtln./􀀭􀁗􀁗􀁗􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀁳􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁣􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁲􀁥􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁣􀀭􀁯􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀁉􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants Septemberl3, 2002 Mr. Charles Heath President Addison Business Association 200 Professional Plaza 1 1 Medical Parkway, Suite 200 Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Dear Mr. Heath: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation of various alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six. Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a,m. to 12:00 p,m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or ifyou should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, 􀁴􀁦􀁦􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀠 James M. Harris, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Principal c, Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison David Fitz, Coffman Associates Kansas City. Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 • Phone: 816.524.3500 • FAX: 816.524,2575 AIRPORT PLANNING IS OUR ONL Y BUSINESS COIfRiab.,/􀀭􀁷􀀭􀁷􀁷􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁣􀀭􀁄􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁳􀀭􀁳􀁯􀀭􀁃􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁳􀀭􀀮􀁷􀀭􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀁁􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠 Airport Consultants Septemberl3, 2002 Mr. Bruce Ehly Airport Planner Texas Department ofTransportation 150 E. Riverside Drive South Tower, 5th Floor Austin, TX 78704 Dear Mr. Ehly: The third Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting for the Master Plan and FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Addison Airport has been scheduled for October 10, 2002, at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road. It has been several months since our last Planning Advisory Committee meeting in May. Since that time, a considerable amount ofwork has been accomplished including the evaluation ofvarious alternatives for both the Master Plan and the FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The material to be discussed will be in the form of one draft working paper for the Master Plan Plan and two draft working papers for the Part 150 Study as follows: MasterPlan • Chapter Four -Airport Alternatives Part 150 • Chapter Five -Aviation Alternatives • Chapter Six -Land Use Alternatives These documents will be sent to you prior to the committee meeting for your review. Due to the amount ofmaterial that will be covered at the meeting, we will be discussing the Master Plan from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. We will reconvene from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Part 150 noise abatement and land use alternatives. A public workshop has also been scheduled for later that evening, from 5:30 p.m. to 7;00 p.m. at the Addison Conference and Theatre Centre. We look forward to meeting with you on October 10, 2002. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the study or if you should need additional information, please feel free to call me ( 602-993-6999) or David Fitz (816-524-3500) at any time. Sincerely, ij(?-...M- or the noise contours less necessary as it is now easier to determine the exact boundaries of the noise contours. Mr. Rangwala asked what the difference is between the single family and multi-family designations. Ms. Waller stated that the density of development is the only difference. Mr. Rangwala asked ifthere are incentives for not developing within the airport area. Mr. Fitz replied that there aren't. Mr. Rangwala asked if sound insulation is mandatory. Mr. Fitz said that it isn't mandatory, just recommended. Mr. Webb suggested reviewing the sound insulation standards which have been implemented around DaliaslFort Worth International Airport. Mr. Shipp asked why the eontours are larger to the south. Mr. Fitz stated that 70 percent of aircraft depart to the south and aircraft are generally louder on departure. Mr. Webb stated that he was most concerned about single events of noise exposure. He also stated that he would like to see a larger scaled map with more roads labeled. More mixed-use development is likely to occur around the airport -this needs to be addressed. He pointed out that Texas is a Home Rule state so so regional planning is very difficult. Mr. Fitz said that single event analysis can be done, but criterion to determine the level of impact for single events does not exist. Mr. Rangwala asked if the study could account for ambient noise levels (i.e. the tollway and railroads). Mr. Fitz replied that we can't really address ambient noise as this study is focused on aircraft nOIse. Meeting adjourned at J J :40 a.m. ADDISON AIRPORT FAR. PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY A VIA TION TECHNICAL CONFERENCE The purpose ofthe Aviation Technical Conference is to bring together representatives ofthe various groups using or operating Addison Airport to discuss possible noise abatement measures, The preceding list oftechniques has been used to promote noise abatement at airports around the country, FAA requires most ofthese to be considered in F,A.R. Part ISO studies, Not all will be appropriate in the Addison area, but they are provided as a starting point for discussions, The goal of the meeting is to compile a list of techniques that deserves further consideration --not a list of fIrm recommendations, These will then be analyzed by the consultant and presented in a forthcoming working paper. Runway Use and Flight Routing Preferential Runway Use Program Rotational Runway Use Modified Flight Tracks to Follow Noise Compatible Corridors Visual Final Approaches Nighttime Preferential Runway Use or Flight Tracks Airport Restrictions and Regulations Curfews Aircraft type restrictions based on noise level Capacity limitations (operational cap or noise budget) Landing fee differentials (based on noise level or time of day) Ground activity restrictions Training activity restrictions Aircraft Operating Procedures Reduced thrust takeoffs Thrust cutbacks or noise abatement departures Maximum climb departures Increase in pattern altitude Approach flap adjustments Two-stage descents Increase in glide slope angle Limited use of reverse thrust on landing Facilities Del'e/opment Runway lengthening New runway development Displace/relocate thresholds High-speed exits Terminal relocation Ground activity relocation Navigational aids Noise barriers POTENTIAL NOISE ABATEMENT ALTERNATIVES The consultant will evaluate the alternative noise abatement measures to determine their usefulness at Addison. Those attending the Aviation Technical Conference are encouraged to do their own evaluations. We would appreciate receiving any oral or written comments and evaluations. Please send these to: David Fitz, AlCP Coffinan Associates 237 N. W. Blue Parkway, Suite 100 Lee's Summit, MO 64063 1-800-892-7772 Runwav Use and Fligltt Routing APPROACHES: Arril>ing Runway 15 -ILS (standard 3 degree glide slope) Arriving Runway 33 -ILS (standard 3 degree glide slope) Arriving Runway 15 -NDB/GPS (VASI is set for 3 degree glide slope) Arriving Runway 33 -GPS DEPARTURES: Propellor aircraft under 19,000 pounds: Departing Runway 15 -directed to tum right to a heading of 180 degrees Departing Runway 33 -directed to turn left to a heading of 170 degrees (Once established, these aircraft are transferred to Dallas ATC as a means to maintain appropriate aircraft separation.) All propellor aircraft departing under VFR with destinations to the east and northeast (that are not expected to enter Dallas airspace): Departing Runway 15 -directed to turn left to a heading of040 degrees Departing Runway 33 -directed to turn right to a heading of090 degrees (These aircraft are to maintain an altitude at or below 2,000 feet MSL unless otherwise directed.) 2 Instructional flights departing Addison Airport to the northeast under VFR use the "Preston Road Departure Procedure": Departing Runways 15 and 33 -fly to a heading of 060 degrees and maintain an altitude at or below 2,000 feet MSL until leaving Addison Class D airspace. Aircraft departing VFR or IFR Departing Runway 15 -directed to turn left to a heading of 100 degrees before turning on course or a heading designated by ATe. (For Noise Abatement -Fly 1.5 DMEfrom the Addison localizer (I-ADS before turning left to a heading of lOa degrees) Departing Runway 33 -directed to fly the runway heading until reaching 2,000 feet MSL before turning on course or a heading designated by ATC. ISSUES: Airport Traffic Control Tower closed from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (Nov. I to April 30) and 12:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. (May I to October 31). Cost of keeping the tower open 24-hours a day. Remote transceiver (allows IFR traffic from Addison to talk to the TRACON when the tower is closed (is it working)? Airport Restrictions and and Regulations F.A.R. Part 161 sets forth requirements for notice and approval oflocal restrictions on aircraft noise levels and airport access. Part 161 applies to local airport restrictions that would have the effect of limiting operations of Stage 2 or 3 aircraft. These include direct limits on maximum noise levels, nighttime curfews, and special fees intended to encourage changes in airport operations to lessen noise. Before granting approval, the FAA must fllld that the six conditions specified in the statute, and listed below, are met. (1) The restriction is reasonable, non-arbitrary, and nondiscriminatory. (2) The restriction does not create an undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce. (3) The proposed restriction maintains safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. (4) The proposed restriction does not conflict with any existing federal statute or regulation. (5) The applicant has provided adequate opportunity for public comment on the proposed restriction. (6) The proposed restriction restriction does not create an undue burden on the national aviation system. 3 Summary of F.A.R. Part 161 Studies i' ..... . I Year .... Airp!5rt Sta.rted Ended Cost Proposal, Status N.A. N.A. NA The study 11.1S not yet been submilled to Aspen-Pitkin County FAA. Airport. Aspen, Colorado 1991 1994 $50,000 Proposed nightlimc prohibition of Kahului Airport, Kahului. (est.) Stage 2 aircraft pursuant to court MauL Hawaii stipulation. Cost-benefit and statewide impact analysis found to be deficient ! by FAA. Airport never submitted a complete Part 161 Study. Suspended consideration of restriction. 1992 1992 NA Proposed nighttime prohibition of Minneapolis-Sl. Paul Stage 2 aireroft. Cost-benefit analysis International Airport, was deficient. Never submitted Minneapolis, Minnesota complete Part 161 Study. Suspended consideration of restriction and entered into negotiations with carriers for voluntary c02£9ration. 1995 NA N.A. Have not yet submitted Part 161 Study Pease International for FAA review. Tradeport, Portsmouth. New I Hampshire 1998 1999 $200,000 Proposing extension of nighttime San Francisco International curfew all Stage 2 aircraft over 75,000 Airport. San Francisco. pounds. Started study in May 1998. California Submilled to FAA in early 1999 and i subsegucnt!twithdrawn. 199-1 1997 Phase I -Study undertakcn as part of a legal San Jose International $400,000 selliement agreement Studied a Stage Airport. San Jose, California Phase 22 restriction. Suspended study after $5 to $10 Phase I report showed costs to airlines million at San Jose greater than benefits in San (est) Jose. Never undertook Phase 2, systemwide analysis. Never submitted i stud\' for FAA review. 2000 Ongoing Phase I Proposed curfew restricting all aircraft Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena $1 million operations from 10:00 p.m. to 7 a.m. Airport ! (cst) . Naples Municipal Airport 2000 2000 Currently Enactment of a lotal ban on Stage 2 Naples. Florida $7)0,000 gcncnll aviation jet aircfart under Expect an 75.000 pounds. Naples is currentiy in additional ii(igation and may also lI'lYe 10 repay cost of (Ill previous federal runding runding received $1.5 to for airporl projects. ! $3.0 I million in i 1 legal fees N.A • Not availah10. ! Sources: Td.£phollc interviews with FAA officials and slan:,; of various aill)ons. j 4 Aircraft Operating Procedures Mandated reduced thrust takeoffs, thrust cutbacks, approach flap adjustments, and Iimited use of reverse thrust on landing are inadvisable at Addison Airport because of these procedures' reduced safety margins due to the runway length and hot summer temperatures. As an operational flight procedure with a direct effect on safety, decisions about whether to use these procedures should be left to the discretion of pilots. ISSUES: Airspace constraints by Dallas-Fort Worth and Love Field restrict aircraft direction and altitudes. Safety of developing non-standard arrival and departure procedures. Facilities Development In some cases, airport facilities can be developed to reduce airport noise in noise-sensitive areas. For example, runways can be built or lengthened to shift aircraft noise to compatible areas. Runway thresholds can be displaced or relocated to shift noise, and barriers can be built to shield noisesensitive areas from aircraft noise on the ground at the airport. ISSUES Airport vicinity is already heavily developed and Runway 15-33 is generally aligned with a compatible corridor to the south. Limited available space on airport for additional facilities. Aircraft maintenance run-up concerns. 5 .•..........􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀠 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠 􀀬, 􀀬􀀭􀁾 /􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭 --LEGEND ..... u...... Detailed Land Use Study Area .-----. County Boundary Municipal Boundary Airport Property 1I1IIlIIlIIIIII Railroad Tracks Published lnatrument Approaches Marker Beacon STANDARD ATC PROCEDURES Departing VFR Prop under 19,000 Ibs. Departing IFR ProplJet and VFR Jets .•••••••••••• VFR Prop Departures not to be Handled by Dallas A TC .•_......... VFR Instructional Flights to Northeast c:=:J Single Family Residential _ Multi-Family Residential _ MixedUee 􀁉􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠I Noise Sensitive institutions Iii School • Day Care Facility • Community Center flodges + Medical Facltities C Residential Care Facility • Municipal Buildings iii [) Place of Worehip Cemetery Source, North Texas Geographic Information System. Coffman Associates Analysis. DRAFT 4_ I '. '. \ \ \ ADDISON AIRPORT F.A.R. PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY AVIATlON TECHNICAL CONFERENCE July 29, 2002, 1 :30 p.m. Draft Meeting Minutes Location: Addison Convention and Theatre Centre Invitees: Mr. Jim Pierce* (Town of Addison), Mr. Chris Terry* (Town of Addison), Mr. Mark Acevedo'" (Town of Addison), Ms. Darci Neuzil'" (Interim Airport Manager), Mr. Bruce Ehly* (TXDOT), Mr. Alvin DeVane (Addison Air Traffic Manager), Mr. Rick Compton (FAA) Ms. Nan Terry (FAA), Ms. Joan Seward (FAA), Mr. Charlie Cutler (FAA), Mr. Don Day (FAA), Mr. Jerry Hooper (AOPA), Mr. Paul Smith (NBAA), Ms. Kimberly Phillips* (Mercury Air), Mr. Jack Hopkins (Million Air), Mr. Ed Morales (Addison Express), Mr. AI Ranyk (FlightlAER Aviation School), Mr. Ron Frederick'" (Mission Air), Mr. Mike TiIler* (Pizza Hut Aviation), Mr. Jim Harris* (Coffman Associates), Mr. Dave Fitz* (Coffman Associates), Ms. Molly Waller* (Coffman Associates), Ms. Liz Oliphant* (Liz Oliphant & Associates) *" denotes meeting attendance Meeting brought 10 order 1:40 p.m. Mr. Jim Harris welcomed everyone and explained the purpose of the meeting which was to discuss potential aviation alternatives for noise impacts within the study area. He then stated that the next planning advisory committee (PAC) meeting will likely be held in September; however, no date has heen set. Mr. Dave Fitz reviewed the contents of the handout (attached) and discussed current procedures. Mr. Fitz then asked if the remote transreceiver was working. Ms. Darci Neuzil stated that the remote transreeeiver is working and seems to have made a difference in the number of noise complaints. Mr. Mark Acevedo stated that FAA has evaluated a 24-hour tower at the airport. Ms. Neuzil stated that it would be cost prohibitive for the city to fund the operation of a 24-hour tower. Mr. Fitz asked if signage would help pilot awareness ofthe remote transreceiver. Ms. Neuzil stated tbat signage regarding the availability of the remote transreceiver may be helpful for nighttime operations. Mr. Tiller questioned the language regarding current procedures contained in the handout. He thought they may have changed lately. Mr. Fitz said the language regarding the procedures came from Alvin Devane. Dave said he would confirm the procedure language. Mr. Frederick agreed that the language didn't seem accurate. The tower is not necessarily telling pilots to turn at 1.5 nautical miles -they are simply stating the 100 degree turn. He also pointed out that he had never seen a right hand turn occur at the airport. He had never been instructed to use the 180 degree tum. Mr. Fitz said the radar flight track data confirms right turns do occur from Runway 15. Mr. Tiller asked ifthe frequency switch could be delayed. He felt that it would be beneficial for pilots to remain under the control of the Addison control tower for a longer time before being transferred to the DalIaslFort Worth departure control. Mr. Fitz said that we would look into a delay in changing radio frequency from Addison to departure control. Mr. Fitz also stated that some coordination between the tower and departure control, concerning the noise abatement departure tum, may be beneficial. Mr. Frederick suggested that a new procedure be developed for all aircraft to ensure they turn over LBJ. Mr. Fitz stated that this could be evaluated. Airspace and capacity issues are a concern with this type of procedure. Separation standards between small propellor and business jet aircraft make it difficult to keep them on the sanle flight track all the way to LBJ freeway. Ms. Neuzil said she generally does not get complaints from the operation of small propellor aircraft. Ms. Neuzil stated that visiting pilots are the biggest cause of noise complaints; however, it is getting better as the word gets out regarding the noise abatement procedures. Mr. Fitz reviewed aircraft operation alternatives. Mr. Tiller stated that he doesn't prefer NBAA noise abatement procedures. He also stated that the noisier planes are violating the 200 knot speed requirement. Mr. Fitz said that many aircraft manufacturers have developed noise abatement procedures for their aircraft. Gulfstream aircraft is a good example of a manufacturer that develops procedures for their aircraft. Mr. Fitz asked if !Unup noise is an issue. Ms. Neuzil said that the airport gets many complaints regarding run-up noise from businesses on the west side ofthe airport. Run-ups are currently occurring on the south side oflhe airport with the noise aimed to the west. Mr. Fitz said Ihat a run-up facility would be evaluated. Meeting adjourned at 3:lap. m. 􀁾􀁉􀀠 JIM PIERCE, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director · (flt.I. (972) 450·2879 (972) 450·2837 FAX jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Dr. P.O. Box 9010, Addison, Texas 75001-9010 􀁾􀁾􀀠 ( 􀁾/IUd 􀁾􀀭􀀴􀁊 < C /k. a;:J-re.J.--t r 􀀭􀁁􀀱􀀧􀁕􀀯􀁦􀀢􀁴􀀧􀀮􀀯􀁵􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁶􀁾􀀠, 9b r-􀁾 a:ct fI; I.A-<. 􀁾 􀁾'."􀁦􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀷􀂥􀁦􀀮􀀠 S-ttkr􀁾􀀠-ir-􀁾􀀮􀀠 -CoilmaD Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmanossociotes.com Mr. Rick Compton Airport Planner FAA, SOUTHWEST REGION 2601 Meacham Blvd. Ft. Worth, TX 76137 , Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Compton: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29,2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of the meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to proVide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@coffmanassociates.com. or Molly Waller, 􀁭􀁷􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁡􀁮􀁡􀁳􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀮􀁣􀁯􀁭􀀮􀀠Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀁬􀀻􀁣􀁵􀁲􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠 David Fitz, AICP 􀁾....::J Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite loo,lee's Summit, MO 64063 81&524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 -Coffmc(n r Associates Airport Consultants W'WW.coffmanassociotes.com August 26, 2002 Ms. Nan Terry Airport Planner FAA, SOUTHWEST REGION 2601 Meacham Blvd. Ft. Worth, TX 76137 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Ms. Terry: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation of the noise impacts ofAddison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy ofthe meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all ofthose involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, g;fitZ@Coffmanassociates.com. or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. lfyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀁄􀁾􀁾􀀠 David Fitz, AlCP ff 􀁾􀀠 Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. lee's SummIT. MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmonOSSOciotes.com August 26, 2002 Ms. Joan Seward Flight Standards Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Ms. Seward: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts ofAddison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠 meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation ofthe chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitZ@Coffmanassociates.com. or Molly Waller, 􀁭􀁷􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁦􀁭􀁡􀁮􀁡􀁳􀁳􀁯􀁣􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀮􀁣􀁯􀁭􀀮􀀠If you have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀀢􀁩􀀾􀀭􀁾􀀠 David Fitz, AICP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison Kansas • Phoenix 237 N.w. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit MO 64063 81&524-3500. FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants lNWW,coffmOnOSSO.S';iotes.com August 26, 2002 Mr. Charlie Cutler Flight Standards Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137 Re: Addison Airport Part ISO Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Cutler: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation of the noise impacts ofAddison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of thl1 meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@coffmanassociates.com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, "1;r-.J David Fitz, AlCP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway. Suile l00.lee·s Summit. MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmanassociotes.com August 26, 2002 Mr. Don Day Air Traffic Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Day: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts ofAddison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of the meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to proTide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation ofthe chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@Coffmanassociates.com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. If you have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁟􀁜􀀠 David Fitz, AICP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Hams, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.w. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 -, Col.fnian Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmonassodates.com August 26, 2002 Mr. Jerry Hooper Regional Representative Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association 3332 BaH Dr. Corpus Christi, TX 78418 He: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Hooper: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29,2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation of the noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy 􀁯􀁦􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠 meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation ofthe chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@Coffmanassociates.com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com, Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500, Sincerely, "11""'"' David Fitz, AlCP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Porkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit, MO 64063 816-524·3500 • FAX 524-2575 ...., Colfman Associales Airport Consultants www.coffmonossoclotes.com August 26. 2002 Mr. Paul Smith Regional Representative National Business Aviation Association 30124 Sawgrass Trail Georgetown, TX 78628 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Smith: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of the' meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the infurmation in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitZ@Coffmanassociates.com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀾􀀠 David Fitz, AICP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100, Lee's Summit, MO 64063 816·524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants WW'W.coffmonossocioteS.com August 26, 2002 Mr. Jack Hopkins Fixed Base Operator Million Air 4300 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Hopkins: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29, 2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of the meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time, Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9 th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@Coffmanassociates,com. or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500, Sincerely, 􀁄􀁯􀀭􀁾 '::k.. David Fitz, 􀁁􀁉􀁃􀁐􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 N.W. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants www.cofhnonassoclotes.com August 26, 2002 Mr. Ed Morales Fixed Base Operator Addison Express 4505 Claire Chennault Addison, TX 75001 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Morales: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29,2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy ofthe meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation ofthe chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@Coffmanassociates.com. or Molly Waller, mwaUer@coffmanassociates.com. Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, , 􀀧􀁄􀁏􀀭􀀭􀁲􀁯􀀭􀁾 􀀠􀁾􀀠 David Fitz, AICP tt""'-.! Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite 100. Lee's Summit, MO 64063 816-524·3500 • FAX 524·2575 ...". Colfman Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmonassoClates.com August 26, 2002 Mr. AlRanyk Tenant Representative FlightJAER Aviation SchooVBAR 4700 Airport Parkway Addison. TX 75244 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Ranyk: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29.2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation of the noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy of the meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all of those involved in the project to proVide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office. (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitZ@Coffmanassociates.com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. Ifyou have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, ""1r'"-" David Fitz, AICP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town of Addison Kansas Ciiy • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 816-524-3S00 • FAX 524-2575 Associates Airport Consultants www.coffmanassociates.com August 26, 2002 Mr. AlRanyk Tenant Representative Flighl1AER Aviation SchoollBAR 13709 Gamma Rd. Dallas, TX 75244 Re: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study: Aviation Technical Conference Dear Mr. Ranyk: The Aviation Technical Conference for the Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study was held on July 29,2002. The purpose of this meeting was to gain insight into potential alternatives for the mitigation or alleviation ofthe noise impacts of Addison Airport on surrounding land uses. A number of alternatives were presented for discussion purposes. Enclosed are the handouts which were provided at the meeting as well as a copy ofthe meeting minutes. We feel it is important for all ofthose involved in the project to provide input into the alternatives evaluation process; therefore, your comments regarding the information in the handouts is desired at this time. Currently, the chapters which relate to the alternatives are being prepared for our anticipated October meeting. We would like to have any comments on the alternatives in our office by September 9th in order to ensure they are taken into consideration during the preparation of the chapter. Your comments can either be faxed to our office, (816) 524-2575, or emailed to either Dave Fitz, dfitz@coffmanassociates,com, or Molly Waller, mwaller@coffmanassociates.com. If you have any questions feel free to contact either Dave or Molly at (816) 524-3500. Sincerely, 􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠'cr"'""'-" David Fitz, AICP Associate Enclosure cc: Jim Harris, Coffman Associates Jim Pierce, Town ofAddison Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway. Suite 100. Lee's Summit. MO 64063 816-524-35OCl. FAX 524-2575 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2811 FAX (912) 450-2831 ® Post Office Box 9010 Addison, Texas 15001-9010 16801 Westgrove August 26, 2002 Ms. NanL. Terry Airport Environmental Specialist USIDOTIAirports 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-4298 ATTN: ASW-652B Dear Ms. Terry: Please find enclosed one copy of the Draft Noise Exposure Maps Document for the Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update. This copy is for the purpose ofone last review prior to printing the document in final form for submission to your agency for acceptance. Please let us have any final comments by September 16, 2002. Yout attention to this matter will be most appreciated. Very truly yours, 􀁔􀁯􀁷􀁮􀁏􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 ames C. Pierce, Jr., P.E. Assistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Mark Acevedo, Facilities and Fleet Services Administrator Enclosure PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450·2871 FAX (972) 450.2837 Post Office Box 9010 Addison, Texas 75001-9010 16801 Westgrovc August 26, 2002 Mr, Bruce Ehly, Airport Planner TX Department of Transportation Aviation Division 125 E, llih Street Austin, TX 78701-2483 Dear Mr Ehly: Please find enclosed one copy of the Draft Noise Exposure Maps Document for the Addison Airport FAR. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update, This copy is for the purpose of one last review prior to printing the document in final form for submission to the FAA for acceptance, Please let us have any final comments by September 16,2002, Your attention to this matter will be most appreciated. Very truly yours, 􀁔􀁯􀁷􀁮􀁏􀁦􀁁􀁤􀁾􀁾􀀠 es C. Pierce, Jr" P,E. ssistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Mark Acevedo, Facilities and Fleet Services Administrator Enclosure .." . Callman Associates Airport Consultants August 20, 2002 www.coffmonossoclates.com Mr. James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E. Assistant Public Works Director Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, TX 75001-9010 Dear Mr. Pierce: Please find enclosed with this letter five (5) copies of the Draft Noise Exposure Maps document for the Addison Airport F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update. One (1) copy should be sent to Mr. Bruce Ely (Texas Department of Transportation) and one (1) copy to Ms. Nan Terry (Federal Aviation Administration). This accounts for the five (5) copies ofthe Draft Noise Exposure Maps document in our F.A.R. Part 150 contract. These copies ofthe Draft Noise Exposure Maps document are for the purposes of one last review prior to printing the document in final form for submission to the Federal Aviation Administration for their acceptance. Please do not hesitate to call me at 800-892-7772 ifyou have any questions. David Fit, •&:.""'-.--' Associate Enclosures: as stated cc: Jim Harris, Harris, Coffman Associates Liz Oliphant, Liz Oliphant and Associates 􀁾􀁾􀀿􀀠 Kansas City • Phoenix 237 NW. Blue Parkway, Suite 100, Lee's Summit. MO 64063 816-524-3500 • FAX 524·2575 f}/.f-ei-rYl f,!t/jd F4I1-􀁾􀀠 􀁁􀀭􀁊􀀬􀁉􀀻􀁾􀀠A/Em 􀁨􀁾􀁣􀀭􀁬􀀭􀁻􀁹􀁲􀁬􀀻􀀿􀁹􀁙􀁦􀀠 /􀀷􀀭􀀹􀀽􀁯􀁾􀀠 I I • .,., Colfman Associales Airport Consultants www.coffmonassociotes.com June 28, 2002 Mr. Jim Pierce Assistant Director of Public Works 'rown ofAddison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, 'IX 75001 RE: Land Use Technical Conference for the Addison AirportF.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update Dear Mr. Pierce: This letter is to invite you to the upcoming Land Use Technical C4'":!:' ""fA t/I ,t. i.'lJ:'" f) Le)"£J ./vi 'OO:JO 􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀠 i,;tD5cl/./v l ..o:J3 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁎􀁗􀀠 (!.c. 􀁾􀀠 vi o.ro.t4,J ... Il)fJ:tf5 L,ev-:;tr ,,//' &/1 1°/:.21 􀁾􀀧􀀱􀁴􀀮􀀷􀁩􀁉􀀠 ,J IV' .D/:f(J 1'1 e"..f;w V t/... Dlr31t I'/u-j,h v" 􀁾􀀠 o/fi/o 􀁾􀁦􀁍It.. 􀁬􀀮􀁦􀁤􀁻􀁾"If!ry ,/() "',' J./" .I , i I . . -, Aircraft Observations ! I Aircraft Type Time Single Engine , Multi Engine Turbo Prop I Jet Jet Arrival Departure Runway N·Number ott:¥-:. 11.er/rrl 0"/1111-.,. /15 ];.-V {)5:/;l, '1 ,/􀀮􀀳􀀯􀁾􀁦􀁸􀀮􀀠 V Iv OS"; if, (!.ClJ.iW'"􀁾􀀠 (J. ...r11ol. e,e. r/' V I II II I "'" i ! i " . , , i i i , . -, Addiso.n Municipal Airport Ni,.ghttime Aircraft Operations Survey 􀁾􀀠 II Addison, TX Date: n:l..,'..!Y! ,Observer: /{b... "(feN Weather Conditions: Aft.' r /1.41 I /'1, • 􀁾􀀶􀀮􀁓􀁴􀀺􀁊􀀠 ru.. r(1I0 W I Temperature:.M-Degrees (F) Wind: Speed: ... D" m.p.h. Direction: .30 0 0 Cloud Cover: Clear 􀁾. Partly Cloudy_ Visibility: IFR_ VFR.JC! Overcast_ Precipitation: Rain Other Aircraft Observations 'Ill""' Aircraft Type ..... I Time Single Engine Multi Engine Turbo Prop 1 Jet Jet Arrival Departure Runway Ii ! N·Number U , 15 33 II I , 􀀱􀁾􀀭􀁩􀀺􀁄􀀹􀀠 e,-rsO ! I 􀁾􀀠 II" 􀀺􀁴􀀺􀁬􀀺􀁾􀀱􀁐􀀠 c..ISI> I ./! ,/(/􀀧􀀺􀀲􀀬􀀯􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀠 {...I#! ",; '7'1.1..J t/' V 􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀲􀁃􀁦􀀠 .. ! 􀁥􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠 ,/,/􀀮􀁦􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁴􀀪􀀢􀁵􀁤􀀧􀀠,/.lDAF ,/v' Xt.:if? 􀁉􀀭􀁕􀁙􀁾􀁄􀀠,/􀀵􀁓􀁩􀁾􀀠 ,/""I 􀁩􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁦􀁓􀀠 /l1K{;'" ./v1 ... ,Ilt:;. 10 /.,,,.. Ii Iy bit."" 􀁾 /;wttey ./. ./' 􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀁕􀁾􀀵􀁓􀀧􀀠 JIt e. ,. 0.1011􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁾􀀠 v" ''fINE t/' V 􀁾􀀳􀀺􀀰􀀱􀀠: t-t4r itS vi 'II/"'! t/1'/cI 􀀺􀀮􀁺􀁾􀀺II 􀁴􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀠"0 V ..-11 􀁉􀀺􀁴􀀮􀁲􀀺􀀯􀁾􀀠 A .trI."'tIl "o? V vi '.:t,J :.3.: 􀁾􀀱􀁴􀀴􀀠􀁁􀀮􀂷􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠 PQ11'S ,/I vi' IJ.J,' 􀀵􀀧􀁾􀀠-I$e;c hJ .e...1 wi (, 11t.-rf{ ,/./&''lJ.7(){):, 􀁾􀀠 CAeJ11Itt'l r-t1 I:Z.ZA ( V c/C)O!:tS LeN'ifl's ,/If,""",sf",. ,/VI !oo!1f5 􀀱􀁩􀀱􀁥􀀮􀁄􀁾􀀠 vi ,/V I ., , • Aircrl}ft Observations I Aircraft Type I Time Single Engine Multi Engine TurboProp Jet Jet Arrival Departure Runway. N-Nurnber il 15 33 I /I 􀁾􀀮􀀱􀀮􀀻􀀲􀀮􀀧􀀠 L4W.z.f v' .J 1f.P V v' 􀀧􀀨􀁙􀀮􀀨􀀭􀁪􀀱􀁾􀀠 h It ,/􀁾􀁲􀁕􀀠 c/IV' () 'fIlii /1,frc v I./.vf.. c..rl w V ......... ,.' 􀀬􀁰􀀧􀁬􀀼􀁾P PJtA"/;1v $.'2.S' V V1i 􀁾􀀤􀀢􀀺􀀠0 􀁾􀀠 Il t/:vi, ., $'I '$',. I2l-S)f{1UWII..ut 􀁉􀁦􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁧 J( ,/Vi I I • i I I i I, i i ! i II ! ' :1 I . ! ! , i . I , I: , , ! I II i I --. Addison: ¥unicipal Airport 􀁎􀁩􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁩􀁬􀁧􀁥􀀠Aircraft Operations Survey Addison:, TX Date: tJ2/.3..'1fO;" Observer: £l. 􀁁􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠 􀀭􀁾􀀠 , .. 'Weather Conditions: efUt¥ F-.JI􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀻􀀠 Temperature,M.-Degrees (F) Wind: Speed: (>7 m,p,h. , Direction: 􀁌􀀮􀀺􀁊􀁏􀁾􀀠 Cloud Cover: Clear ..JL' Partly Cloudy_ Visibility: IFR 􀁖􀁆􀁒􀁾􀀠, -Overcast_ Precipitation: Rain Snow -Additional Weather Observations: Other -None ,,;" .Aircraft Observations , Aircraft Type '.. i Thne Single Engine Multi Engine TurboProp Jet Jet Arrival Departure Runway N-Number 􀁾􀀺􀀨􀀧􀀠e-hfr.j(e c , 􀁾􀀠 V' 33, 􀀧􀀮􀀿􀀮􀀲􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀥􀀠 IAl:!1."iJ ' :J'..17X .,,/,; ! 􀁩􀁴􀁾􀀻􀀮􀁊􀁊􀀮I(1􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀠 0..'7,,-.1. 􀁩􀀮􀁦􀁾􀀮􀁊􀁯􀀬􀀳􀀠 V V-j 􀁉􀁴􀁴􀁾􀀳􀁣􀀾􀀠 􀀧􀀱􀁥􀀧􀁾􀀹􀀵􀀠 'JI'1P ,,/Iv ! 􀁩􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀻􀀵􀀧􀀠􀁾􀁴􀁓􀁍􀀴􀀮􀁉􀀱􀀺􀁊􀀮􀀠 sJJ ,/IV" , , ;l3:O1 £..t.UI¥'2 􀁾􀁖􀀱􀀮􀁊􀀷􀁃􀀡􀀭􀁁􀀠 ,/Iv : "-.3: I J. (yz.JS N(}..cft>( .ss v'" t/i .u:.:i' 1I1e-rluJ /Iv t3:'/" 􀁃􀁴􀀡􀀬􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀠 ,/I I 51/0/)11, .,/vi 􀁾􀀻􀁳􀁬􀀠 􀁉􀁌􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀡􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁍􀀧􀀠 c/1''1K V c/t.8iS'/IA.uI,·", $I/I/fll V!V f)D!39 ' .'" 'f)C,q r/'191 II ,/v'" 1)Q!51 (rJD c...rts/lfife 􀁉􀀾􀁦􀀧􀁜􀁾􀀧􀀠t/􀀻􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀠rt. 􀁾􀀠 , vi oJ!1J 'J 􀁉􀁣􀀮􀀮􀀼􀁦􀁬􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀧􀀱􀁦􀀱􀀧􀁯􀁦􀀠V V i Il'1tK/'·w J2.1 t/V' , d'51 I 􀀬􀀮􀁳􀀺􀀮􀁳􀁾􀀠 􀁥􀁕􀁊􀀢􀀻􀁉􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠 a.a("AII4." ,/IV' !,;.l;SJ ICIA!(.sf"V tf'hS t/,/11'" --AddisQn Municipal Airport 􀁎􀁩􀁾􀁨􀁴􀁴􀁩􀀧􀀻􀁬􀁥􀀠Aircra:t't Operations Survey 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀬􀁔􀁘􀀠 Date: D;z./:{l//O';(' Observer: Rio.... U lIed I -f , ,Weather Conditions: 40. ()o Alt ITemperature:ft'Degrees (F) I Wind: Speed: ' l.:{ m.p,h. ! I Direction: /'10 11> ! Cloud Cover: Clear _ Partly Cloudy _ • 'i00 Visibility: IFR VFRl!!!! $'1:10 0 overcast./G (J 0'0 I J':J.,'lOc) to ..,. Pre c'l.p.lt atl.On: Rain Snow Additional W cather Observations: Other -􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁥􀁾 Aircraft Observations Aircraft Type , "'" Time Single Engine Multi Engine Turbo Prop Jet Jet Arrival Departure Runway, N-Number ! 15 33 i • C.9D , 􀁾􀀺􀁉􀀨􀀩􀀠, Krll4lty i"-i -" ,/t/V ,/,/, 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀨􀀵􀀠 􀀯􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁥􀀴􀁲􀁾􀀵􀀠 11.1.t: l'i av7t-V-tIlJ c..e.. . V 1'/v! 􀁾􀁚􀀡􀀺􀁕􀀠 fJAlS,JNL I. 11. ii'" 122:,.J /"1'" 􀀯􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀠 vii'" ,I 􀀱􀀱􀀲􀀧􀁾􀁬􀀧􀀠 • It vi t/2.1.:1Y <'?-L)I/11-S V' v 􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀺􀁏􀀧􀀠 (!.t.f;6N V SII r -,/t/;U:I' 􀁌􀁾􀀠vi .;l.s/lf 􀁾􀀠 Iv"" 􀁾􀀳􀀺􀀩􀁾􀀠(!,eJJlltLl'l 􀁾􀀠 ,/􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀠 I'ft.rk,; s'.2.1. ./,/􀁾􀁄􀁏􀀠 Wer" J,./J,./V v' 11If)'O' ':-"/GtJIJS v '1'fr/( e/,/01:33 "',rlitJ ""1 t/v 101':If, A«Ill'1 3:J..o V ,/, '6S'; 07 t..ear" liS r/fj. ,/V' 􀁃􀀣􀀯􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁫􀀻􀁾􀀠 L; f-ls off' # (r 6lO\. 􀁾􀀭􀁦􀀧􀀢􀀠!('."""e-Jy . -. Addison t.,1un1cipi:Ll Airport Nighttime Aircraft 􀁏􀁰􀁾􀁮􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁑􀁮􀁳􀁓􀁵􀁲􀁖􀁥􀁹􀀠 Addison, IX . Date: 􀁾􀀺􀁬􀀢􀁉􀀬􀀬􀀱􀀠I D.:z.. Observer: /(. LLILo"') r ...... -•• r-: Weather Conditions: F'Oq Temperature: tS".;t.·Degrees (F) Wind: Speed: I If' m.p.h. bWI'.,..;t S.2.' Direction: 1'1() • Cloud Cover: Clear _ Partly Cloudy_ Visibility: , IFRL VFR -Overcasta.!' 1.01>I0 '. ?OD• aM􀀯􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁶􀁡􀁲􀀢􀁾􀁫􀀮􀀠$Do'ft, Looo I , Precipitation: Rain Snow • --Additional we'7J?:tS:Y:/rf rff) ("Of; Other/None-=: Olf 31 • ...3/o'@..zlf ft.]1 􀁾􀀮􀁲􀀬􀀠 : . Aircraft Observations"" i Aircraft Type Time Single Engine Multi Engine Turbo Prop !Jet Jet 'Arrival Departure Runway N-Number , , : ! i 15 33 /:12:." 􀁾􀀯􀀦􀁮􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁉􀀠v' /...k!: ,/V i . ""lJ'" , :UW L__ &o tI ,lllin. '/L V ii " 􀁉􀁕􀁾􀀮􀀿􀀧􀀠 fiJ" 􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁳􀀩􀀠 􀁫􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀠t/􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀨􀀺􀀮􀁁􀀠 ,/V 􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠 r91t 16",.,. c/1/)" Y :11'" 􀀱􀁊􀀲􀁾􀀱􀀯􀀿􀀠 􀁲􀀬􀀮􀁻􀁾􀀱􀀠V "''I7(JA V V-I 􀁾􀀱􀀺􀁯􀀶􀀠 fit/u...:Z, ,/J7'1e4 V' ,/! 􀁾􀀳􀀺􀀱􀀱􀀠 ( "'lilA lfu,flr ,/3/15/1'JI 'V t/! f2J:sa A,.,....·sfw r-(t.I1fII.;" t/􀁩􀀧􀁾􀀠yr II' ! 􀁉􀁦􀀩􀀨􀁾􀀠If I tq,. (,(J V 􀁾􀀱􀁓􀀢􀁲􀁘􀀠 e/' t/oJ! 􀁊􀀮􀁾􀀠 l/J1er/:", AA ,/!V 'I;/.; f/ttsrtf,p.e (lar4r11HtJ i4'1:;.. V ,v Ib2:Jcf l)a,b fitl,lr' /V I it>:l ;.3i (,10 f!.IIJ) 􀁉􀁊􀁻􀁊􀀭􀁥􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀠 ,//t/i9:l:S-t D'''4l-ss f}(!. ". 'I . I/" 9lfftlE ,/􀁾􀀯􀀠 ,Iof:".3 /<.;-.v. Aty 􀀮􀁻􀁲􀀭􀀧􀁊􀁾􀀠 ,/V 05: I.{0 /1.-:-5" p. t/C/1 V y -.-: slJ 􀁰􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀠 ((.+oIl 􀁾􀀠 . -, AdclisopMUiiic!palAirpQrtN}ghftitpe Aircraft ·Operations 􀁓􀁵􀁲􀁖􀁥􀁾􀀠 ., ·AddisPIJ, TX . Date: t>.31 ".RiP :t. Observer: A'II 7. R lieN • I 􀁊􀁲􀁾􀁮􀀮􀀠 r • Weather Conditions: 􀀼􀀲􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀯􀀢􀁦􀀠 ·Temperature:MDegrees (F) Wind: Speed: to/-m.p.h. . P.eu If. I/0 Direction: :Ella P I /Cloud Cover: Clear L Partly Cloudy_ Visibility: IFR -VFRL Overcast_ Precipitation: Rain Snow -Additional Weather Observations: Other -None /. . Aircraft ObservatioDIl.,.. . Aircraft Type Time Single Engine Multi Engine Turbo Prop I Jet Jet Arrival . Departure RunWay! I · N-Number ·.,..!L'... , 15 33 I",:z: ;t'i It tAr(,O y' 􀁾􀀠 V Itz: 􀁴􀁦􀁾􀀠 iKlllfAlr IDO:lr ,./I(' i;z.llf1 e -#; 2<::1 Address Address Zip Code TOTAL 􀁦􀀧􀁬􀁾􀀲􀀱􀀠000. t)O wITs G>r 11;" ism,/hrft1 r'i' t:Jt:tI"i-/ro /14U€ 􀁓􀁾􀁴􀁴􀂷􀀠 n l)e>T.ltv/ld·td! btl/jldn /.etfor" t-􀀯􀁴􀁴􀀴􀁲􀀮􀁺􀀮􀁾􀀠 ;)..DD/. cvn.d 􀁾1'fJ-tru:k .rf.c'h1. :z J ty>e 􀁾􀁣􀁊􀁵􀁴􀀠 Finance • I􀁾􀀺􀀪􀀠 Texas Department of Transportation AVIATION DIVISION 125 E. 11TH STREET' AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701·2483 • 5121416·4500 • FAX 5121416-4510 May 25, 2001 Mr. Jim Pierce Asst. City Engineer, Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001 TxDOT CSJNo.: Fund Source: 01l8ADDSN 4002000006 Dear Mr. Pierce: Enclosed are several documents that must be completed by the Town of Addison in order to initiate the airport development project for the Addison Municipal Airport. Please review the instructions in this transmitta11etter for completing the documents and return the documents not later than June 12, 2001.. We are most pleased to provide any assistance possible to help complete this project in a timely manner. Enclosed are two copies ofthe Airport Project Participation Agreement (APP A) between the Town ofAddison, as airport sponsor, and the Texas Department ofTransportation, Aviation Division, as your agent for this project. We request that you proceed as expeditiously as possible to execute the Agreement and complete the certifications. It will be necessary for your attorney to endorse your acceptance of the Agreement to assure that it has been accepted in accordance with local laws. Both copies of the Agreement should have original signatures for acceptance. Please return both copies of the fully signed Agreements to the Aviation Division. We wiD return an executed copy to you for your records. Texas Department ofTransportation -Aviation Division 125 E. 11th St. Austin, Texas 78701-2483 .. The sponsor's share of the negotiated planning project costs is $32,000 .. Please remit payment to the address as follows by June 12, 2001: Texas Department of Transportation Attn.: Diana Ruiz P.O. Box 5020 Austin, Texas 78763. '. An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Tun Pierce May25, 2001 Page Two Jfyou have questions concerning the enclosed documents, please contact Allison Martin at 1-800-687-4568. The Texas Department ofTransportation looks forward to working with you on this important project for your community. Respectfully, David S. Fulton Director cc: Mr. Jay R. Nelson am '. Council Agenda Item: 1--& SUMMARY: This item is for the appropriation of additional funds for the Airport Part 150 Study FINANCIAL IMPACf: Budgeted Amount: None Cost: $32,000 A mid-year budget adjustment of $32,000 will be required. Funds are available from the Airport Fund. BACKGROUND: In October 2000, council approved $15,788 as the Town's share ofthe cost ofthe Part 150 Study. This was based upon an estimate ofthe cost by TxDOT Aviation Division and was for a "basic" study. The scope ofwork has been increased to include an aerial survey, initiation brochure, draft working papers for FAA review, radar flight tracking data, pilots brochure, and use ofour own public relations consultant, all of which makes for a better and more complete project. TxDOT has completed negotiations with our selected consultant and the costs are comparable to another project of similar scope, and should now be firm. TxDOT advises that the Town's share (ten percent) ofthe negotiated cost for the Part 150 Study is $32,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an additional $16,212 for this project. 6/4/01 Jim Pierce From: Bruce Ehly [BEHL Y@dot.state.tx.us] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:34 AM To: jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Subject: Re: Vacation Alert Thanks for the info. Regarding the 150 noise study, I received the cost proposal from Coffman last week. The total cost will be $321,390. I compared these costs with those of Georgetown ($275,000) and the increase is due to the use of Liz Oliphant for public meeting, aerial surveying, initiation brochure, draft working papers for FAA review, radar flight tracking data, and pilot's brochure; all of which are not included in the Georgetown study. I will finalize the Professional Services Agreement with Coffman. When this is completed (hopefully by the end of May) we will send the Airport Project Participation Agreement to you for signature and ask for your 10% share. I still do not want the beging the noise study until the Airport Master Plan consultant selection is complete. »> 04/09/01 08:17AM »> I will be on vacation April 14 thru April 28. If you need assistance, please contact Mike Murphy or Mark Acevedo. Thanks, Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 972-450-2879 1 ONLIBUSINESS . .' . " __ • __􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠 ', ••• 􀁾􀀮􀀠 H .......:...., •• 􀁾􀀠More than 500 Planning Assignments . 􀁾􀀠Prepared 20% of all Part 150 Studies . 􀁾􀀠Experience with Major Metropolitan Reliever Airports 􀁾􀀠Innovative Public Involvement Process 􀁾􀀠Working Relationship with FAA and Texas D.O.T. LEOEND 􀁾􀀠Project Manager is Principal and Owner in Firm *Pall 150 Studies *General Avlallon Poll 150 Siudies EARNING A REPUTATION fOR EXCELLENCE 􀁾􀀠Professional Excellence 􀁾􀀠Personal Service 􀁾􀀠On-Time Performance 􀁾􀀠Service Within Budget N 320 58.11', W96° 50.19' Airport is located 9 miles north of DaUas on Dallas Parkway. 644' Mean Sea Level 1,644' Mean Sea Level May 1 to Oct. 31 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Nov. 1 to Apr. 30 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 15-35 7,202' x 100' CTAF 126.00 ATIS 133.40 UNICOM 122.95 APPIDEP Control 124.30 Tower 126.00 Ground Control 121.60 CLNC DEL 119.55 MAVIZRICKVORIDME 113.10 ILS/DME 110.10 Runway 15 -ILS, NDB or GPS Runway 33 -ILS or GPS Airport Manager (972) 392-4850 Addison Airport (ADS) is a primary reliever airport for Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport and is home base for approximately 750 based aircraft. These aircraft run the gamut from single-engine piston planes to sleek corporate jets. General aviation accounts for the majority of the airport's total aircraft operations (94 percent). Since its inception, Addison Airport has set industry standards for safety, economy and convenience. Excellent aircraft maintenance repair operators, superior security, and an award-winning air traffic control staff have made Addison Airport the preferred choice among owners of private and corporate jets and jet fleets. Addison Airport is also strategically located north of Dallas, providing easy access to several primary business destinations, including Telecom Corridor, Las Colinas, and Legacy Drive. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING CONSULTANTS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING PROJECTS The following criteria will generally be used in evaluating consultants submitting proposals; however, the Consultant Selection Committee may develop additional consultant evaluation criteria and point values, if desired. The Consultant Selection Committee should assign points to be used for the Consultant Rating Sheet if they do not use the suggested point values. The TxDOT Project Manager can assist the Selection Committee in interpreting the criteria and establishing point values for each criterion, if necessary. Suggested Point Values and Selection Criteria 10 points 1. Capability to perform all of the services required for this project. [Does the consultant have the necessary resources to perform all of the services required?) 20 points 2. Recent experience, within the last five years, in the performance of airport planning projects comparable to the proposed project. [Planning airport projects is different than planning streets or wastewater systems. Does the consultant have direct experience performing general aviation airport planning studies similar to those proposed for your location?) 20 points 3. Reputation for personal and professional integrity, competence, timeliness, and quality of performance and work product. [Does the consultant conSistently meet contractual timetables? Has the work performed for other sponsors been satisfactory?) 20 points 4. Professional qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project relevant to the work to be performed. [Who are the professionals that will be working on this speCific project on a daily basis? How does their experience with general aviation airport planning compare with other respondents?) 10 points 5. Capability to meet the schedules and deadlines of this project. [Does the proposed planning team have sufficient time to devote to your project in order to meet the schedule submitted in the proposal?] 20 points 6. Evidence of a technical approach sufficient to address the requirements of this project. [Does the consultant show an understanding of the particular requirements of this project? Is the consultant familiar with relevant planning guidance (ie) TxDOT-Aviation Division and FAA crtteria?] TOTAL POINTS -100 SPECIAL NOTE: Prtor to choosing a consultant, TxDOT strongly encourages representatives of the selection committee to contact airports for which the short-listed consulting finns have completed similar projects. Inquire as to whether the consultant was responsive and timely. How was the quality of the work? And perhaps the most important question: Based on that project, would you, the airport sponsor, select the same finn again? If requested. the Aviation Division will be pleased to supply the nameS of airports for which consultants have done previous work through the TxDOT airport improvement program. Contact your deSignated project manager at (800) 687-4568. Jim Pierce From: Randy Moravec Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:21 PM To: Jim Pierce Cc: Chris Terry; Michael Murphy Subject: RE: Airport Part 150 Study Agenda Item Jim, Although the Council may have approved the $15,788 expenditure in October, it still had not been included in the Airport fund budget that had been developed in September. So, while the Council's action may add to the amount previously authorized, we will still need a budget amendment for the full amount. Rand!:} -----Original Message----From: Jim Pierce Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 4:51 PM To: Jim Pierce; Bill Shipp; Randy Moravec Cc: Chris Terry; Michael Murphy Subject: RE: Airport Part 150 study Agenda Item Revised memo -I added one more sentence under financial impact. Jim. « File: Council Agenda Item for add $.doc » -----Original Message----From: Jim Pierce Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 4:46 PM To: Bill Shipp; Randy Moravec Cc: Chos Teny; Michael Murphy Subject: Airport Part ISO Study Agenda Item Bill, Randy: Proposed consent agenda item for June 12th. « File: Council Agenda Item for add $.doc » Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 972-450-2879 1 A (f2..fOlLr . 'P"L/t-f.Jt\J ltvG . pr 􀁾􀁫􀀮􀀠 􀁾􀀯􀀠􀀥􀁾􀁾􀀠 t-t:?,A('\'(\,S I IDtl)'(I UY'fIYi\ltrIs 􀁆􀁩􀁖􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀠 i2ep'rr-I '" I 101() N "D J F (Vi AM J j AS 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁐􀀯􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾W2 . , ,'",-., ///􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾 ./' 􀀬􀀱􀀧􀁾.•}J;􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠7/;?l;1 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁊" 􀀠,,/. /􀀯􀀻􀀮􀀯􀁾􀀠 􀁗􀁾 􀁉􀁾 ///,/'j; ////􀁉􀀯􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ! -􀁾􀁾􀀠'/􀁾%a􀁾􀀠77Z 􀁾􀀮W;􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾y􀁾. 􀁾􀀠􀀠C) ;% 􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀠 0􀀮􀀬f􀁾􀀠 􀀭􀁾􀀠 , "z. 􀁾􀁪􀀠 􀁊􀁏􀁾􀀠1 N D F. I I i 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 , ! Jim Pierce To: Chris Terry Cc: Michael Murphy; Mark Acevedo; David Pearce (E-mail) Subject: Part 150 Noise Study Message from Bruce Ehly FYI. I believe the last sentance should read ... do not want to begin the noise study•.• Jim. -----Original Message----From: Bruce Ehly [mailto:BEHLY@dot.state.tx.us] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:34 AM To: 􀁪􀁰􀁩􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁥􀁀􀁣􀁩􀀮􀁡􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁯􀁮 􀀮􀁴􀁸􀁾􀁵􀁳􀀠 Subject: Re: Vacation Alert Thanks for the info. Regarding the 150 noise study, I received the cost proposal from Coffman last week. The total cost will be $321,390. I compared these costs with those of Georgetown ($275,000) and the increase is due to the use of Liz Oliphant for public meeting, aerial surveying, initiation brochure, draft working papers for FAA review, radar flight tracking data, and pilot's brochure; all of which are not included in the Georgetown study. I will finalize the Professional Services Agreement with Coffman. When this is completed (hopefully by the end of May) we will send the Airport Project Participation Agreement to you for signature and ask for your 10% share. I still do not want the beging the noise study until the Airport Master Plan consultant selection is complete. »> 04/09/01 08:17AM »> I will be on vacation April 14 thru April 28. If you need assistance, please contact Mike Murphy or Mark Acevedo. Thanks, Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 972-450-2879 1 FRr'" LIZ OLIPHANT PR 214 5229942 P. 1 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁢􀁧􀁑􀀡 PUBLIC RELATIONS-ADVERTISING March 6, 2001 Mr. Jim Harris, P.E Coffman Associates 11022 N. 28rt, Drive # 240 Phoenix, AZ 85029 Dear Jim, I've reviewed the Part 150 study proposal for Addison Airpol1 and tried to analyze the amount of time needed to communicate with the various constituencies that will be part of the study. Your scope oJ serviccs proposal has been invaluable in this 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁣􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠as it highlights numerous documents that will be prepared and various meetings and other activities that need to take place. These include city council briefings (at least two), public advisory committee meetings to be followed by public WQrkshOpS (probably four of each), the aviation technical conference, a visit 10 DFW Tracol1, the land use management technical conference, review and editing all documents, severnI news releases and the preparation, advertising and execution of one public hearing. Assuming that tbe final scope of services agreement does not deviate drastically from your proposal, my estimate for a professional services fee for the above activities would be $25,000. Since I'm not sure how these agr0ements are structured, we need to discuss how this would be billed during the life ofthe contract. It would be my preference to bill on an hourly basis each month. Should there be substantial additions to the scope of . services, we could need some fee adjustment. YQU'1i find enclosed some of the matel"ials .I've mentioned to you previously which you may fmd helpful. Look forward 10 hearing from you, .. Cordially, /Liz OliPhm:r, APR cc: Chris Terry Mark Acevedo 3626 N. Hall street #625 • Dallas, TX 75219. 214-522-9942 FAX 214-522-9947 AGENDA Part 150 Kick Off Meeting February 8, 2001 Introductions: Ron Whitehead Chris Terry Michael Murphy Mark Acevedo Dave Pearce tv!ltvI.1ir"1 FitIt-Bruce Ehly Jim Harris 􀁃􀁷􀁲􀀮􀁾􀀠 Liz Oliphant Jim Pierce <;j11-'2 '2.:2.. :;c,. °7 Introductory Remarks Ron Whitehead Next Steps -Bruce Ehly Scope of Work Town Input Schedule 􀁾 ! Next Meeting 􀁾 tf-o 􀁾􀀭 􀁲􀁾 􀁾􀀭􀁊􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁊􀀿􀀬􀀮� �􀁦􀁦􀀧􀀲􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀯􀀱􀁷􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠 . 􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁾 􀁾 -􀁾 􀁉􀁵􀁾􀀮􀁷􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁦􀀼􀀮􀀮􀀨􀀠.tr 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁦􀀩􀁾􀀠1Jn.:f1,.. 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁬􀀩􀁨􀀱􀀡􀁴􀁾􀀠 b.L 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠. PNeot: I 􀁾􀀠 fJlAA: PMt-􀁉􀁾􀁏􀀠 􀁾􀀠􀁾 11-<-􀁾!v-fW.fAd-(Ptt-d:-/(,,/..h-). tN-t.:Z1 􀁾 􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀁤􀁨􀀩􀀮􀀬􀁾 􀀨􀀮􀀦􀁊􀀨􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁳􀁦􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁌􀁰􀀿􀁕􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀠 H;!-tvdI 􀁊􀁴􀁁􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (912) 450-2871 Post Office Box WIO Addison, Texe.s 75001-9010 1680lWestgrove MEMORANDUM TO: F-150 ENGINEERING EVALUATION COMMITTEE Chris Terry, Jim Pierce, Steve Chutchian, Mark Acevedo, David Pearce-Airport Director FROM: Mike Murphy SUBJECT: ENGINEER INTERVIEWS DATE: 19 December 2000 We have completed preliminary evaluations with the following results: 1. URS 91 Points 2. Shimek 91 Points 3. Coffinan 88 Points 4. Banard-Dunkelberg -87 Points 5. HNTB 83 Points I have turned these results over to Bruce Ehly with TxDot Aviation Division and have requested that he set up interviews with the top four firms. Therefore, according to our suggested schedule for consultant selection, we are targeting Friday, January 12,2001, for interviews. Please advise Sue Ellen or the undersigned ifthis date does not work out for you. Thank you. Michael E. Murphy MM:sef ---.... ----". 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀠 􀁾􀀭 ------.-._-----􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀠 I · '. ",' 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 i '-0' '.n (X) \'" 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀻􀁲􀀠 -..s tJ '-\) (X) 􀁾􀀠&:1 to 􀁾􀁯􀀬􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀀠 t-f\ I \;P 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ".. ,,\ .. 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 (So. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 '-l i t'tu ( ' 1 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 III I I 1 􀁾􀀠 ct 'V 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 t I, I I 􀁾􀀠 I I f U.s.e -fos--􀁾 ct.(( .s:Jmiss"/tTl1 s ( CONSUL TANT TALLY SHEET SPONSOR 􀁃􀁩􀁴􀁾􀀠of Addison PROJECT #Ol15ADDSN Bl.rlt(r.:l CRITERIA PONITS Btleher, Coffman HNTB Shimek, URS 'Nillis &. Associates, Jacobs, & Greiner 􀁾􀁾􀀠 Inc. Finklea, Woodward LLP Clyde 1. Capability to perform 10 all services required for if 6 5 0 7 this project 2. Recent experienc*e". 20 .1 1+ /0 (0 II i 􀀪􀁾􀀠 3. Reputation, quality 20 of performance & work \:) product. 4. Professional 20 l5 10 10 10 (5 qualifications. *"* 5 Capability to meet 10 \S' deadlines. 6. Evidence of 20 technical approach 􀁾􀁏􀀠 JO :10 :20 lO sufficient to address requirements of this project. prbf th fir IEio £X/k'rlfilc. S 5 f 2.0 S' S.J:;s 15v 􀁾􀀱􀀢􀀯􀀭􀁩􀀧􀁲􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀠 SO -5' 0 0 5 TOTAL 􀁾􀀭 st: ! . 􀁾􀀮􀁜􀀵􀀺􀁩􀁩􀁦􀁬􀀠 i§ 15 p '" .. --b;£'jA fm 7 ! IS#) *' 􀁉􀁾􀁖􀁾􀂫􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠 5«k 􀁾􀀯 􀀨􀁾􀁴􀁊􀀠 .vIP' rcaJ.-tJ.0., ;::/rrr:-rf44 􀁾 􀁈􀁡􀀮􀀯􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠 Jim Pierce To: Chris TellY; Michael Murphy; Mark Acevedo; Steve Chutchian Cc: Jim Pierce Subject: Airport Part 150 Study-References A reminder that your scores for the 5 submittals are due to Mike Murphy on December 14. In order to divide up some of the work of reviewing the submittals I'm suggesting each one of us check the references of one submittal as follows: Chris Terry: Coffman Associates Mike Murphy: Bamard Dunkelberg Jim Pierce: HNTB Mark Acevedo: Shimek, Jacobs & Finklea S. Chutchian: URS From the reference check, try to get enough info for the score needed on the Consultant Tally Sheet: 3. Reputation, quality of performance, & work product 5. Capability to meet deadlines The score you assign will be used by each one of us for that consultant. OK? Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001·9010 972-450-2879 1 Jim Pierce From: Jim Pierce Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:04 AM To: Chris Terry; Michael Murphy; Mark Acevedo; Steve Chutchian Subject: Part 150 Noise Study Consultant Selection You all should have a copy of the submittals from the 5 consultants that responded to the RFQ. Please review the submittals in light of the Criteria for Evaluating ... (point system) and fill out the Consultant Talley Sheet. Then, transfer the scores over to the Consultant Rating Sheet (this sheet looks similar but allows us to use a different point allocation if we want to). All this needs to be sent to Bruce Ehly by Dec. 15. So please return your scores to Mike on Dec. 14. Interviews have been scheduled for January 12, 2001, 9AM to 3PM. I tried to put the interview date on y'alls calendar but it came up "no info available", maybe because its into year 2001. I would be interested to know if the Jan 12, 2001 date made it on your calendar Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001·901 0 972·450··2879 1 HP LaserJet 3100 SEND CONFIRMATION REPORT for Printer/Fax/CopierlScanner TOWN OF ADDISON 9724502837 Nov-20-00 3:07PM Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status 606 11/20 3:06PM 0'39" 512 416 4510 Send«.«.... «.. 21 2 EC 96 Completed ...................... .. , .. , ...... . Total 0'39" Pages Sent: 2 Pages 􀁐􀁲􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀺􀀠0 TO'WNOF ADDISON PUBLIC WORKS To: idl'l1£e g(llf/' From: Jim PIerce, P.E. _, IA Asst. Public Wks. Dlr. Company: Iil&1Ltwl46& Phone: 972/450-2879 FAX: ";21450-2837 FAXS: l-!fIJ.-/fI{r 'I-!>I(!). jpiuu@cl.addtwn,l:r..lIs I).te: !/-;J..()-CO 16801Westgro.e 1\ P.O.Box 9tllO II 􀁾􀁲 pages (including 􀁭􀁶􀁥􀁲􀀩􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠 Addison. TX 15001-9010 Ib!:. lMf1MM pt: JAAwk Cq,<;,Hs-hfiJ#ri. w",,tk. 􀁾􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁩􀁮􀁭􀁡􀁕􀀠 0 Puyourrequnl 0 fl! LlcaI1me C,mmmO: iU4r 4k;e Ciu0Litr fc& its/:, . DESIGNATION OF SPONSOR'S CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE . Addison Airport TxDOTNo.: O1l8ADDSN 1, &1') 􀀴􀀮􀁊􀁨􀀬􀁫􀀭􀁨􀁥􀁾􀀠 , . 􀁃􀁴􀁾􀀠􀀯􀀿􀀱􀁬􀀯􀁬􀀱􀁡􀀬􀀹􀁾􀁲􀀠 (Name) (Title) with the Town ofAddison designate the following named individuals as the Consultant Selection committee, for the Noise Study Project. Name Title (ifappropriate): Chris Town ofAddison, Texas (Sponsor) Date';.__􀁾􀀯􀀱􀀡􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁌􀀭􀁾􀀶􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁣􀀩􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 Noise , 􀁾􀀬􀀠Jim Pierce From: Tex_Schmidt@urscorp.com Sent: Thursday, October 12, 20004:28 PM To: jpierce@cLaddison.tx.us Subject: Airport Noise Compatibility Program -Simpler Explanation Forwarded by Tex Schmidt/FtWorth/URSCorp on 10/12/00 04:31 PM Dale Schmidt/ftWorth/URSCorp@URSCORP Applegate To: cc: Tex Compatibility Program -Simpler 10/12/00 Subject: Explanation Airport 03:46 PM Tex, Forward this to Jim at Addision, it should help him out in understanding the FAR Part 150 Program. AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PLANNING PROGRAM Background The Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program is described in Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 150 (14 CFR Part 150). 8stablished under the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (49 U.S.C. 47501 through 47509, hereinafter referred to as the ASNA). Part 150 allows airport operators to submit noise exposure maps (NEMs) and a noise compatibility program (NCP) to the FAA voluntarily. As provided by the ASNA, an NCP sets forth the measures that an airport airport operator has taken or is proposing for reducing existing noncompatible land uses and for preventing additional noncompatible land uses on and around the airport, as depicted on NEMs. The ASNA embodies strong concepts of local initiative and flexibility. Submitting NEMs and an NCP is left to the discretion of local airport operators. Airport operators may also choose to submit NEMs only without preparing and submitting an NCP. The types of measures that airport operators may include in a noise compatibility program are not limited by the ASNA, allowing airport operators substantial latitude to submit a 1 broad array of rneasures--including innovative measures--that respond to local needs and circumstances_ The criteria for approval or disapproval of measures submitted in a Part 150 NCP are set forth in the ASNA. The ASNA directs the Federal approval of an NCP, except for measures relating to flight procedures: (1) if the program measures do not create an undue burqen on interstate or foreign commerce; (2) if the program measures are reasonably consistent with the goal of reducing existing noncompatible land uses and preventing the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses; and (3) if the program provides for its revision if necessitated by the submission of a revised noise exposure map. Failure to approve or disapprove an NCP within 180 days, except for measures relating to flight procedures, is deemed to be an approval under the ASNA. Finally, the ASNA sets forth broad eligibility criteria! consistent with the ASNAts overall deference to local initiative and flexibility. The FAA is authorized, but but not obligated, to provide Federal funding via the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) to carry out measures in a noise compatibility program that are not disapproved by the FAA. In establishing statutory basis for airport noise compatibility planningt the ASNA did not change the legal authority of state and local governments to control the uses of land within their jurisdictions. Public controls on the use of land are commonly exercised by zoning. Zoning is a power reserved to the states under the U.S. Constitution. It is an exercise of the police powers of the states that designates the uses permitted on each parcel of land. This power is usually delegated in state enabling legislation to local levels of government. Neither the FAA nor any other agency of the Federal government has zoning authority. Many local land use control authorities {cities, counties, etc.) have adopted zoning ordinances or other controls to prevent noncompatible development (primarily residential) within the noise impact areas of airports. An airport's noise impact area, identified within noise contours on an NEM, may extend over a number of different local jurisdictions that individually control land uses. Airport operators may include measures in NCPs submitted under Part 150 to prevent the development of new noncompatible land uses through zoning and other controls under the authorities of appropriate local jurisdictions. However, implementation of those measures is the responsibility of the local units of government having land use control jurisdiction. The FAR Part 150 Process FAR Part 150 implemented ASNA provisions for airport noise compatibility 2 planning. The ASNA itself was a product of the great expansion of commercial air 􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁳􀁰􀁯􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠that 􀁾􂂬􀁳􀁵􀁬􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠from the introduction into passenger service of jet-powered civil transport aircraft in the early 􀀱􀀹􀀶􀀰􀀧􀁳􀁾􀀠 The new airplanes made widespread air carrier service economically viable. They also generated complaints about aviation noise?camplaints which increased as jet service expanded into new areas. These complaints led to a two-front approach in attempts to reduce noise impact. The first grew from engine research involving both the Government and the aviation industry. Methods were developed to both measure and reduce aircraft noise. These efforts led to the aircraft noise certification standards in FAR Part 36. The second front involves reducing the sensitivity of areas impacted by aviation noise through land use compatibility actions. These actions include direct land acquisition, acquisition of avigation easements, and promoting compatible land uses through zoning zoning and related controls. This is the arena of Part 150. The ASNA was the first Federal legislation specifically to address airport noise problems. It has a number of requirements, including: Establishment of single systems 􀁦􀁯􀁾􀀠measuring aircraft noise and for determining noise exposure resulting from 􀁡􀁩􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁳􀀠 Identification of land uses compatible with various levels of noise exposure Establishment of a standard airport noise compatibility planning program FAR Part 150 was adopted as an interim rule in January 1981. After 11 months of public comment and 4 years of practical experience, it was adopted as a final rule in January 1985. It: Establishes the yearly day-night average sound level--abbreviated as DNL or Ldn--for measuring noise exposure Sets up the Integrated Noise Model (INM) as the standard noise-modeling methodology Provides for voluntary development of Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Programs by airport operators Part 150 Goals The FAA has several goals in addition to minimizing aviation noise impacts that affect the Part 150 process. These are: To maintain and maximize the capacity of the Nation's air transportation system To ensure fair and equitable access to the Nation ' s airports To minimize burdens on air commerce from whatever sources 3 Part 150 Tools In accomplishing these goals, the FAA has a number of tools to work with. These include: The certification standards in FAR Part 36, which define aircraft noise levels The FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program, which identifies noise problems and seeks their solution The Airport Improvement Program (AlP), which provides Federal funding for noise reduction efforts Policy positions that seek compatibility without excessive costs on the aviation system In the noise context, the Part 150 Program seeks to accommodate these goals primarily through Noise Compatibility Programs (NCPs) for airports. Airport Noise Compatibility Planning The basic purpose of airport noise compatibility planning is to assist airport operators in assessing noise impacts and developing a balanced response that: Mitigates noise impacts caused by aviation activities Protects the National Aviation System by resolving conflicts at local levels There are three basic components to achieving a balanced solution to aviation noise problems through the Part 150 process. These are: Developing Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) for existing & future conditions Developing an NCP to resolve noncompatibilities identified by the NEMs Completing the NCP through: Implementation of the local actions by the local authorities responsible Use of Federal grant funds to assist with measures approved by the FAA Implementation of any agreed-upon operational changes at the airport Noise Exposure Maps The first step is for the airport operator to develop Noise Exposure Maps, which have a number of requirements; Two maps must be developed, identifying both current conditions at 􀁴􀁾􀀠 airport and noise impacts projected for five years into the future. The NEMs must be prepared through adequate consultation with the public, local governments I airport users t and the FAA. 4 Noise contours are developed using the INM with existing and future airport operations information. Information about existing and future land uses comes from local sources. These various information sourCes are used to identify and highlight noncompatible areas on both NEMs. Schools, hospitals, auditoriums, and other sensitive uses are labeled on the NEMs. The ASNA requires identification of land use compatibility in dealing with noise around airports. Land use compatibility is determined for areas within the 65 dB day-night average sound level (DNL) contour through a table included in Part 150 Appendix A, Section AlSO.lOl. This table indicates what land uses are compatible with given noise levels identified by NEM contours. It deals with noise exposure in 􀁩􀁮􀁣􀁲􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁾􀁴􀁳􀀠of 5 dB, ranging from 65 dB, the minimum level of significance for Part 150 purposes, to over 85 dB. Submitting NEMs and NCPs to the FAA After these developmental steps have been taken for both current conditions and the five-year projection! the airport operator submits the NEMs to the Regional Airports Division Manager for review and a determination that the maps meet Part 150 standards. This is not an approval determination--only NCPs are subject to E'AA approval. Submission of NEMs and NCE's is entirely voluntary. The airport operator can submit an NEM only, an NEM followed by an NeF, or do neither. However, most operators who develop NEMs follow them up with an NCP submission. Noise Compatibility Programs The NCP serves a number of purposes: It pulls together fair and workable solutions to noise problems identified by the NEMs. It examines all viable solutions or combinations of actions that are potential NCP measures. It selects the most workable alternative, considering both direct costs of the measures and overall costs of the program. It develops an implementation program and schedule of necessary actions, identifying: Who will be responsible for each element The source of funding and the commitment to obtain it NCP requirements also ensure close and effective consultation with all 5 affected parties. Noise Methodology NCP actions include noise abatement measures, noise mitigation measures, and methods of measuring both the noise itself and its effect on the airport's environment. Two standardized noise units are designated in Part 150 for evaluating aviation noise impacts. These are; The A-weighted sound pressure level (LA) for measuring the single event effect of aviation noise on individuals. This is used in calculating the primary descriptor, DNL. DNL, or Ldn in scientific notation, is the cumulative yearly day-night average sound level used to develop the noise contours on the NEMs. The Integrated Noise Model, or INMr is a computerized noise contour prediction model developed by the ,AA to determine the total impact of aviation noise around airports. The INM predicts noise impacts by computing and drawing noise contours based on the airports operational data-?the types of aircraft and the number of their operations. In addition to the primary output of noise contours for NEM development, the INM also computes noise exposure at specific pOints in the airport1s vicinity. The INM measures noise levels for specific airplanes, mostly civil. The Air Force developed the similar NOISEMAP, which primarily measures military aircraft noise impacts. The FAA also maintains the Heliport Noise Model, or HNM, to measure heliport noise levels. Noise Compatibility Measures A number of measures are available for reducing airport noise impacts. The primary noise abatement activity involves operational control of aircraft. The first Federal phaseout under Part 91 provided for elimination by 1985 of large transport aircraft (over 75,000 pounds) meeting Part 36's Stage 1 criteria. A 1991 amendment Part 91implements the national Stage 3 transition, providing for phasing out Stage 2 airplanes by the end of 1999. The second area of operational controls involves noise abatement flight procedures for take-offs and landings. Departure procedures are subject to FAA Advisory Circular 9l-53A, Noise Abatement Departure Profiles. Compatible land use planning primarily involves noise mitigation actions. Its goal is to permit airport development carefully designed 6 to reduce aviation noise impacts on surrounding communities. Zoning is the most common form of land use control. It is exclusively a state and local matter; the Federal Government has no zoning powers under the Constitution. Limitations of zoning: no Federal control; not retroactive; limited to individual jurisdictions; and subject to change at any time. Regardless of these limitations, zoning still is effective in conjunction with source noise reduction and a comprehensive planning process. When a noise-sensitive use must remain in the airport's impact area, Noise Level Reduction (NLR) measures can be taken. This primarily involves soundproofing of the structures to attain 􀁴􀁾􀀠 NLR values indicated on the Land Use Compatibility Table in Appendix A. Federal matching grant funds for soundproofing existing structures are available under the AlP when soundproofing measures are included in an approved NCP. Developing A Noise Compatibility Program The steps necessary for developing an NC? comprise a relatively relatively straightforward process. The airport operator must ensure that adequate provisions for consultation are included in the program. Making sure all affected parties participate will significantly reduce the number of problems that may arise. NEMs must be developed, showing continuous DNL contours of 65, 70, and 75 dB, and found by the FAA to be in compliance with applicable Part 150 requirements. After the NEMs are developed, the airport operator will be able to identify impacted areas that need to be included in the NCP stUdy area. Once impacts and areas are identified, the operator can explore potential alternatives that can be considered as NCP measures, either individually or in combinations. The next step is to aSSeSs the social, economic, environmental, and aviation costs of each alternative. These various factors are used by the operator to evaluate the alternatives and their associated costs. Select the best and most realistic alternative. Noise Compatibility Program Alternatives Section 150.23 specifies certain alternatives which must be considered by the airport operator in developing an NCP. Land acquisition includes outright purchase and acquiring property interests involving air rights--avigation easements--and land development rights. Barriers and acoustical shielding can take several 􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁳􀁾􀀠 This 7 category includes earth berms, fencing, natural barriers l and soundproofing of houses. Instituting a preferential runway system can redirect noise from sensitive areas either continuously or during critical periods. Modifications of flight tracks and the use of noise abatement take-off and landing procedures can reduce noise impacts, provided there are no adverse flight safety considerations. Use restrictions based on noise can be considered, but will likely be affected by Part 161 considerations. Part 150 also identifies for consideration other local actions or combinations with noise benefits l and other actions recommended by the FAA (advisory committees l noise hotlines, "continuing program" measures) . Various types of use restrictions which may be considered as NCP alternatives. Curfews, capacity limitations base on noise, and noise-based access charges at airports all will be subject to Part 161 provisions. The Federal noise standards found in Part 36 also may come into play in connection with the Part 91 requirements for phasing out Stage 3 airplanes by 1999. Approval of a Noise Compatibility Program Before submitting an NCP to the FAA for approval, the airport must accommodate all Part 150 planning requirements, including selecting the preferred alternative measure or combination of measures. The first step is to develop the selected alternative into a full program which includes: An implementation schedule for all necessary actions An analysis of the funding required to implement the program, including identifying the sources of the funding and obtaining commitments regarding availability Obtaining commitments from local governments for any land use or other locally controlled actions. This can involve a number of independent local jurisdictions Provisions for program revision should they become necessary based on changes in conditions reflected in either the NEMs or the NCP The airport operator must effectively employ the consultation process to assure that consensus is reached on the selected alternative and that the proposed measures are fully supported by all parties responsible for implementation actions. After these steps are taken, the operator submits the NCP to the FAA for approval. FAA approval involves both the regional and Headquarters offices and appropriate action must be taken within 180 days after the region publishes a notice of receipt in the Federal Register. 8 Federal Funding Federal funding for NCP developent is available through a special noise set-aside in the AlP fund. Federal AlP funding for approved NCP measures can come through the Airport and Airway Trust Fund from a number of sources. Synopsis of FAR Part 150 Provisions Part 150--both the NEMs and NCPs--is an entirely voluntary program. The airport operator must elect to initiate it and to carry it out. Part 150 uses standard noise methodologies and units for uniform measurement of aviation noise impacts. This basically means that DNL is consistently used to designate these impacts throughout the system. The INM--and the HNM for helicopters--is used under controlled conditions to develop noise contours defining noise impacts around airports. Approved NCP measures are eligible for Federal AlP grant funds, 10% of vlhieh are set aside for noise relief actions. To be eligible for NCP grant funding, the airport operator must: conduct the analyses required in Part 150 for NCP proposals; ensure that adequate consultation opportunity is undertaken during the NCP process; and obtain FAA approval of proposed NCP measures. Throughout the process, the primary criterion for FAA actions is the protection of air safety and air commerce. Best Regards, Dale E. Applegate Project Manager URS Corporation 4100 Amon Carter Blvd. 3950 Sparks Drive Suite 108 Ft. Worth, TX 76155 Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Phone: 817.545.0891 Phone: 616.574.8470 fax: 817.545.0534 ,ax: 616.285.0017 9 ! I , , Il-IL/--OD 11/03100 08:56 '8'512 416 4510 TXDOT DIV AVIA 141001/004 TxDOT Aviation Division *' *' 'r *' *' *' *' *' *' *' 'r *' *' *' *' FAX Transmittal 125 East IItb Street, Austin, TX 78701-2483 (512) 416-4500 (800) 68-PILOT FAX (512) 416-4510 To: Jim Pierce Assistant Director ofPubJic Works TEL (972) 450-2879 FAX (972) 450-2837 Date: Pages: 3 Nov 00 2 (Including Cover) , From: Bruce Bhly, Airport Planner ITxDOr Aviation Division TEL (512) 416-4543 FAX (512) 416-4510 , I am sending you: Copies: Date: Description: 􀁾􀀠1 !200ctOO IRequest for proposals Remarks: Jim: The Request for Proposals for your Part 150 Noise Study was advertised on 20 October with a due date of 10 November. I plan to meet with you and the consultant selection committee on 14 Nov @11:00 and will bring the proposals with me. See you then. TXDOT DIV AVIA Ii!J002/004 11/03/00 08: 56 'ft512 416 4510Texas Department ofTransportation Aviation Division Requests for Proposals for Professional Services The AiIport Sponsors listed below, through their agent, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intend to engage Aviation Professional Engineering Firms for services pursuant to Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, of the Government Code. TxDOT. Aviation Division will solicit and receive proposals for professional services as described in the project scope for the projects listed below: Airport Sponsor: City of Addison, Addison Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.:0115ADDSN. Project Scope: Prepare a Federal Aviation Regulations, (FAR) Part 150 -Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Stody for the City of Addison. DBE Goal: 5% Project Manager: Bruce Ehly. Number ofcopies to submit: 8 AiIport Sponsor: City of Denton. Denton Municipal Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.: 01l8DNTON. Project Scope:. Update AiIport Master Plan. DBE Goal: 5% Project Manager: Tammy Stone. Number ofcopies to submits: 6 copies Airport Sponsor: City of Eagle Lake, Eagle Lake Municipal AiIport. TxDOT CSJ No.: 0113EGLKE. Project Scope: Prepare an Action Plan. HUB Goal: 5% Project Manager: Tammy Stone. Number ofcopies to submit: 4 copies Airport Sponsor: County ofGrayson, Grayson County AiIport, TxDOT CSJ No.: OlOlDENSN. Project Scope: Update Airport Master Plan. HUB Goal: O"J., Project Manager: Tammy Stone. Number ofcopies to submit: 12 copies Aizport Sponsor: City of Huntsville, Huntsville Municipal AiIport. TxDOT CSJ No.: Oll7HUNTS. Project Scope: Update Airport Master Plan. HUB Goal: 5% Project Manager: Bruce Ehly. Number ofcopies to submit: 5 AiIport Sponsor: Cities of MidlothianlWaxabacbie; Mid-Way AiIport, MOT CSJ No.: OOlI8WAXCH. Project Scope: Prepare Airport Master P1an.HUB Goal: 5% Project Manager: Bruce Ehly. Number ofcopies to submit: 4 *AiIport Sponsor: City of Tomball, TxDOT CSI No. OOI2TOMBL. Project Scope: Feasibility Study ofthe Acquisition ofDavid WaYne Hooks Memorial AiIport by the City of Tomball. DBE Goal: O"J., Project Manager: Sandra Gaither. Number of copies to submit: 6 (see Feasibility study description below) The Proposal shall: 1. Firm name, address, phone number and person to contact regarding the proposal. 2. Proposed project management structure Deterruiuing key personnel and . .. • TXDOT DIV AVIA 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀳􀀯􀀰􀀰􀀴 11/03/00 08:57 '6'512 416 4510 subconsultants (if any). 3. Qualifications and recent, relevant experience (past five years) of the fuin, key personnel and sub consultants relative to the perfonrumce of recent, relevant similar services for aviation planning projects. 4. Proposed project schedule, including major tasks andtargel completion dates. 5. Technical approach -a detailed discussion of the tasks or steps to accomplish the project 6. List of in-state references inclUding the name, address and phone number of the person most closely associated with the firm's prior performance ofsimilar airport planning projects. 7. Statement regarding an Affirmative Action Program. 8. Proposed Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation for each project above if appropriate. '" Feasibility Study description for Tomball: The Feasibility Study will provide the City of Tomball with unbiased facts and figures upon which deteI'll$e whether or not David Wayne Hooks Memorial Airport is of sufficient economic benefit to the citizens of the City to make its acquisition and ,support a suitable expenditure ofpublic funds. . The study will include, though not be limited to, the fonowing: 1. Determine what facilities will be part ofthe airport purchase. 2. Determine significant design standard and safety issues. 3. Determine current and recurring maintenance needs at the airport. Include cost estimates. ' ' 4. Determine short-term capital improvement needs at the airport.' Include cost estimates. 5. Determine environmental issues and recommended processes to be undertaken prior to purchase.' 6. Determine funding sources available to the City as a public reliever airport sponsor. 7. Determine City responsibilities under State and Federal Grant Agreements. 8. Determine the viability of the airport as a self-sustaining asset through financial analysis. 9. Recommend management strategies for the operation ofa publicly owned reliever airport. Initial assumptions for this study: Ifthe airport is shown to be a self-sustaining revenue producing business enterprise the City can, through responsible management, reasonably expect to maintain this facility as self-sustaining asset for the community. Recent history of activity at the airport along with generally accepted aviation trends in the county, state and region will create the foundation for growth and activity forecasts. TlDOT DIV AVIA 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀴􀀯􀀰􀀰􀀴 11/03/00 08:58 '8'512 416 4510 Proposal Submission: Those interested consultants should submit the specified number of copies of brief proposals for each project consisting of the minimum number of pages sufficient to provide the above information for project. Proposals must be postmarked by U. S. Mail midnight November 8, 2000 (CDT). Mailing address: TxDOT, Aviation Division, 125 E. 11 th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. Ovemight delivery must be received by 4:00 p.m. (CDT) on November 10, 2000; ovemight address: TxDOT, Aviation Division, 200 E. Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas, 78704. Hand delivery must be received by 4:00 p.m. November 10, 2000 (CDT); hand delivery address: 150. E. Riverside Drive, 􀀵􀀧􀁾􀀠Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704. The airport sponsor{s) duly appointed committee will review all proposals and may select three to five firms for interviews. The final consultant selection by the sponsor's committee will be made following the completion of the review of proposals and/or interviews .. The airport sponsor reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and to re-open the consultant selection process. If there are any questions, please contact Linda Howard, Director, Planning and Programming or the designated project manager at the Aviation Division, Texas Department of Transportation, (512) 416-4500 or 1-800-68-PILOT. . . IHP LaserJet 3100 SEND CONFIRMATION REPORT for :,Printer /Fax ICopHr IScanner TOWN OF ADDISON 9724502837 Nov-a-oo 1:50PM Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status 363 11/6 1:49PM 0'5411 512 416 4510 Send .............. 31 3 EC 96 Completed ........................................ Total Pages Sent: 3 Pages Printed: 0 roWHor ADDIsoN PUBLIC WORKS To: Bcf§ DESIGNATION OF SPONSOR'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Addison Airport TxDOT No.: Ol18ADDSN I, !Par? ttJl,kJud ."; c'1? #/ttllx 9(!)/o Acid/sod. Tx 7S(!)(!)/-9CJ/o I Physical Address: 1'1IN W-?5&rove.. lJrlve. AdJ(Sot7 77C 75c>CI ( 7 Te\ephone/Fax Number: 972.-Jf!jt) -2i 78 􀁾􀁘􀁉􀀠 41;1.-'f£t!)-')..e 37 DESIGNATION OF SPONSOR'S CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMfITEE Addison Airport TxDOT No.: Ol18ADDSN I, Ron 􀁴􀁊􀁨􀀬􀁫􀀭􀁨􀁥􀁾􀀠 􀀬􀁇􀁾 /?!tlI'l1l9i'r (Name) (Title) ; with the Town ofAddison designate the following named individuals as the Consultant Selection committee, for the Noise Study Project. Name Title (ifappropriate): 􀀭􀀭􀁬􀀮􀀼􀁊􀁲􀀺􀁴􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁦􀁊􀀱􀁬􀁅􀁬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀨􀂣􀀻􀀬􀁌� �􀁾􀀭__.. ASSIs/fl1f-ilJtic. It/drki });i-et:.hr Ii1ttrk. Ac.tlt/edo 􀀦􀀮􀁴􀁉􀁊􀁾􀀠i Fled-􀁭􀁮􀁴􀀧􀁖􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀠 Town ofAddison, Texas (Sponsor) Date::_ _ ----.:..,1􀁌􀀬􀀭􀀢􀀭􀁾􀁢􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀶􀁾􀁣_􀀩 __􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀠 10/19/00 14:38 '5'512 416 4510 TXDOT DIV AVIA Ig] 0011002 TxDOT Aviation Division .... .... + + + + + + .... .... .• 125 Bast 11th Street, Austin, TIC 78701-2483 (512) 416-4500 (800) 68-PILOT FAX (512) 416-4510 ..,. + + + FAX Transmittal : To: Jim Pierce Date: 19 Det 00 ! Assistant Director ofPublic Works Pages: 2 (Including Cover) : TEL (972) 450-2879 FAX (972) 450-2837 ! From: Bruce Ehly, Airport Planner TxDOT Aviation Division TEL (512) 416-4543 FAX (512) 416-4510 I am sending you: Copies: Date: Description: 1 19 DetOO Designation of Sponsor's Consultant Selection Committee RemarkJi: Jim: The Request for Proposals fur your Part 150 Noise Study will be advertised on 20 October with a due date of 10 November. Although you provided a copy ofthe Resolution to me yesterday I do not have a designation of Consultant Selection Committee members. The designation form is attached and should consist of from 3 to 5 members and should be completed and forwarded to me not later than 3 November. I plan to address the consultant selection process with the committee members on 16 November and bring the proposals with me at that time. I'll be in touch for a definitive time. ShOUld you need anything in the meantime, feel free to call. .... .... + .... + + + + + .... .... .... .... .... .... .... + + + + 10/19/00 14: 39 '5'512 416 4510 TXDOT DIV AVIA Ii!l002/002 DESIGNATION OF SPONSOR'S 􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁔􀁁􀁎􀁔􀁓􀁅􀁌􀁅􀁃􀁮􀁏􀁎􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁔􀁔􀁅􀁅􀀠 I. (Name) (Title) with the Town of Addison designate the following named in.dividuals as the Consultant Selection committee, for the Noise Study. Name Title (if appropriate): Town of Addison, Texas (Sponsor) By:______________ Title:_______________ Date:_______________ T:D42IDESIGNAm SPON REP&CON SEl COMM .. DOC RESOLUTION NO. ROO-084 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AN UPDATE TO THE EXISTING FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION PART 150 NOISE STUDY AT ADDISON AIRPORT IN THE AMOUNT OF $157,778, 90% FROM A TXDOT GRANT AND $15,778, OR 10%, FROM TOWN FUNDS. WHEREAS, the Town of Addison intends to make certain improvements to the Addison Airport that require an update to the FAR 150 noise study; and WHEREAS, the general description of the projects is described as: FAR Part 150 Study for Addison Airport, which presents a comprehensive analysis of existing and future noise contours for the Airport; and WHEREAS, the Town of Addison intends to request financial assistance from the Texas Department of Transportation for these improvements; and WHEREAS, the Town of Addison will be responsible for 10% of the total project costs currently estimated to be $15,778.00; and WHEREAS, the Town of Addison names the Texas Department of Transportation as its agent for the purposes of applying for, receiving, and disbursing all funds for these improvements and for the administration of contracts necessary for the implementation of these improvements; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute on behalf of the Town of Addison, at the appropriate time, and with the appropriate authorizations of this governing body, all contracts and agreements with the State of OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY ROO-084 Texas, represented by the Texas Department of Transportation, and such other parties as shall be necessary and appropriate for the implementation of the improvements to the Addison Airport. DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, this the 10th day of October, 2000, G?W-Mayor ' ATTEST: t: 􀁬􀁊􀁜􀁄􀁐􀁾􀁁􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀠 OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY ROO-084 October 3, 2000 MEMORANDUM To: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Through: Mike Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Works From: Jim Pierce, P.E., Assistant City Engineer SUbject: Addison Airport Part 150 Noise Study A Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Study was completed for Addison Airport by Barnard Dunkelberg & Company in March of 1991. These studies are normally updated every five years, so from that perspective, an update to the study is overdue. The purpose ofa Part 150 Study is to assess the noise environment, prepare forecasts of aviation operations, identify land uses within airport environs, and explore ways to mitigate land use compatibility conflicts. In other words, to reduce the number ofpeople affected by noise, consistent with airport operations. Approximately three years ago, a request was made to the TXDOT Aviation Division for funding for an update ofthe 1991 study. However, at that time, federal grant funds were not available. We have now been notified by TXDOT that federal funds are available for this study. The grant money that has been offered is based on a three-year-old cost estimate to do the study for $157,778. TXDOT is offering a grant of90% ofthis amount, with 10% to be paid by the Town ofAddison ($15,778). The Town's share would be paid from the Airport Fund. A consultant selection procedure will need to be initiated to hire a qualified firm to do the work. TXDOT will manage the project with the consultant that is selected by the Town. A proposed resolution is attached that names TXDOT as our agent in applying for and dispersing funds, and administering the required contracts for the study. Staff recommends approval ofthe resolution, and authorization for the City Manager to designate a consultant selection committee, and, designate an authorized representative who shall have the authority to make approvals and disapprovals as required on behalf of the Town for this project. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Town of Addison intends to make certain improvements to the Addison Airport; and WHEREAS, the general description of the project is described as; FAR Part 150 Study for Addison Airport, which presents a comprehensive analysis of existing and future noise contours for the Airport; and WHEREAS, the Town of Addison intends to request financial assistance from the Texas Department of Transportation for these improvements; and WHEREAS, the Town of Addison will be responsible for 10% of the total project costs currently estimated to be $15,778. WHEREAS, the Town of Addison names the Texas Department of Transportation as its agent for the purposes of applying for, receiving and disbursing all funds for these improvements and for the administration of contracts necessary for the implementation of these improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Addison hereby directs the City Manager to execute on behalf of the Town of Addison, at the appropriate time, and with the appropriate authorizations of this governing body, all contracts and agreements with the State of Texas, represented by the Texas Department of Transportation, and such other parties as shall be necessary and appropriate for the implementation of the improvements to the Addison Airport. • , :.'. JIM PIERCE, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director (972) 4S0-287!1 (972) 450-2837 FAX jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Dr. P.O. Box 9010, Addison, Texas 75001-9010 􀂷􀁉􀁊􀁾􀀠Ti 0#1 􀀮􀀵􀁕􀁾􀀠hL 􀁾􀁲􀁡􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀠trL (;uc. 􀁴􀀡􀁦􀁬􀁕􀁾􀀠 -IL 􀀯􀁕􀀣􀁾􀀴􀁲􀁙􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀭 􀁉􀁾􀁶􀁾􀁲􀀠􀀣􀁌􀀭􀁾􀀠 􀁴􀁦􀀯􀁾􀀠 .. I Texas Department of Transportation AVIATION DIVISION 125 E. 11TH STREET' AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2483 • 5121416-4500 • FAX 5121416.4510 October 2, 2000 Mr. Jim Pierce, Jr, P,E, Assistant City Engineer, Town of Addison P,O, Box 9010 Addison, Texas 75001-09010 Dear Mr.Pierce: This letter is to inform you that the Texas Transportation Commission approved an airport improvement grant to the Town of Addison on September 28, 2000, in the amount of $250,000 for improvements at the Addison Airport, The financial assistance will be used to prepare a Federal Aviation Regulations Part 150 -Noise Study, Federal funds have been approved for ninety (90) percent of estimated project costs, The Town of Addison has responsibility for the remaining ten (l0) percent The grant agreement will be sent to the Town of Addison in January 2001 or when federal fiscal year 2000 funds become available, To expedite the consultant selection process, TxDOT intends to issue a Request for Proposals on or about October 13, 2000, If you have questions concerning this process please contact your project manager, Bruce Ehly at 1-800-687-4568, The Texas Department of Transportation looks forward to working with you on this important project for your community, David S, Fulton Director Cc: Mr. Jay R, Nelson An Equal Opport Jim Pierce To: Chris Terry; Michael Murphy Subject: FW: Forms for Noise Study FYI. TxDOT is jumping on this one! Jim. -----Original Message----From: Kathy Griffin [mailto:KGRIFFIN@dot.state.tx.us) Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 8:09 AM To: jpierce@ci.addison.tx.u5 Cc: Bruce Ehly Subject: RE: Forms for Noise Study That is great. We intend to do a Request for Proposals on October 13th. Bruce should be back by October 5th if you have questions concerning the selection process or you can contact Linda Howard at (512) 416-4540. »> 9/27/00 7:56:03 AM »> The resolution will be placed on the agenda for the Oct 10 council meeting. Jim. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁏􀁲􀁩􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁡􀁬􀀠Message----From: Kathy Griffin [mailto:KGRIFFIN@dot.state.tx.usJ Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:55 PM To: Jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us Cc: Bruce Ehly Subject: Forms for Noise Study Attached are the two forms in addition to the resolution that should be sent to our Division. If you have questions please call me at (512) 416-4522. Also, what day is the council meeting set for approval of the resolution? 1 S11d1;1I'fIE RESOLUTION (i=lI4eral er State X]Q)QT act:in11tB Agent) 78wn of 􀁾􀀨􀀮􀁈􀀿􀁴􀀠 WHEREAS, the 􀁾􀀧􀁎􀂥 A:ND1011 eomm'U:l'\ME intends to make certain • A""","lr",,,,-rr.t1I',.,.;tunprovemen ts to the (urne oia.ir.pQI$); and WHEREAS, the general description ofthe project is described as: (add general (!) description); and rt1lt.M. 1II.p..􀁾. WHEREAS, the.€In N.iIlMB A:NJ:)IOR GQW>ll'YN..u.fE intends to request financial assistance from the Texas Department ofTransportation for these improvements; and WHEREAS, the Gfi'YNAME .J&.e& COUNrY NAME will be responsible for 10"A, ofthe total project costs currently estimated to be $ lSi 17k '7"b4 WHEREAS, the ClTYNAMB l\J>U)/QIil GOUN'fl"'NAME names the Texas Department ofTransportation as its agent for the purposes ofapplying for, receiving and disbursing all funds for these improvements and for the administration ofcontracts necessary fur the implementation ofthese improvements; To Il-NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CllYNkMB A:NlJJUlt coUNiY 􀁾hereby directs 􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁆􀁖􀁩􀁂􀁕􀁁􀁌 to execute on behalfofthe 􀀻􀁓􀁾􀀠 . CfiY NA1WI! Al"r'Olt COUNf\' NA:bm. at the appropriate time, and with the appropriate authorizations ofthis governing body, all contracts and agreements with the State ofTexas, represented by the Texas Department ofTransportation, and such other parties as 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 necessary and appropriate for the implementation ofthe improvements to the 􀁾􀁾􀀠 Note to Sponsor. This resolution is r . ed t lIocument the governing body's support and acceptance ofthis project. To meet state . ements, this resolution must provide at a miniunun the governing body's agreement to make . ovements to the airport in general description form, provide 10% ofthe total project costs an wledge TxDOT as agent for adtnitYstration of federal and state funds for projects. This resolution should be modified to suit the s • needs ofyour governing body.. Some governing bodies may want a specific project desc tion and a limited project cost. Ifso, please keep in mind mind that this resolution would then ne to amended and re-adopted by the governing body ifthe description andlor the cost chang . , , i. I ! SAMPLE RESOLUTION (Federal or State -TxDOT acting as Agent) WHEREAS, the CITY NAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME intends to make certain improvements to the (name ofairport); aDd WHEREAS, the general description ofthe project is described as: (add general description); and WHEREAS, the CITY NAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME intends to request financial assistance from the Texas Department ofTransport!ltion for these improvements; and WHEREAS, the CITY NAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME will be responsible for 10"/0 ofthe total project costs currently estimated to be $'--__-' WHEREAS, the CITY NAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME names the Texas Department ofTransportation as its agent for the purposes ofapplying for, receiving and disbursing all funds for these improvements and for the administration ofcontracts necessary for the implementation ofthese improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CITYNAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME hereby directs NAME OR POSITION OF INDIVIDUAL to execute on behalfofthe CITY NAME AND/OR COUNTY NAME, at the appropriate time, and with the appropriate authorizations ofthis governing body, all contracts and agreements with the State ofTexas, represented by the Texas Department ofTransportation, and such other parties as shall be necessary and appropriate fur the implementation ofthe improvements to the AIRPORT NAME. Note to Sponsor: This resolution is required to document the governing body's support and acceptance ofthis project. To meet state requirements, this resolution must provide at a minimum the governing body's agreement to make improvements to the airport in general description form, provide 10% ofthe total project costs and acknowledge TxDOT as agent for adlrIiqistration of federal and state funds for projects. This resolution should be modified to suit the specific needs ofyour governing body .. Some governing bodies may want a specific project description and a limited project cost. Ifso, please keep in mind that this resolution would then need to be amended and re-adopted by the governing body uthe description description and/or the cost changed. [April 20, 1999) T:1D42GRANTlAPPAlRcsoIution Sample f« ogClll.doc nmOT AVIATION DMSION FY 2000 PROGRAM OF FEDERAL FUNDED PROJECTS WHERE FINAL PROJECT AUDIT REPORTS NOT YET COMPLETED 917100 Associated City/Airport TxDOT Detail Number Project Description Total Cost estimate Federal State Local Addison Addison TBD Part 150 Noise Study $157.778 'J> $142,000 $0 $15,778 Jim Pierce From: Jim Pierce Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 8:09 AM To: Chris Terry; Michael Murphy Subject: Airport Part 150 Study Bruce Ehly called and asked about the status of the Part 150 Study. As you may remember, they have the money based upon a 3 year old cost est. to clo the study (Total $157,778). I have a sample resolution for council to authorize support and acceptance of the project. Should we go ahead and put that on the agenda? We will also have to go thru a selection process for the consultant. Shall we get that started? Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001·9010 972·450·2819 􀁾􀀭1 1Ji 􀀭􀁬􀁜􀁾􀀧􀀩􀀠-() \). S 􀁺􀁲􀀢􀀨􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠 CeLl" 􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁐􀁹􀀠 f-ofib-10 87-if5"􀀶􀁾􀀠 fcvJ-ljlj 􀁎􀁾􀁾􀀠 ( The future 70 DNL noise contour encompasses approximately 864 acres. This contour extends beyond airport property to the south by approximately 5,400 feet, extending outside of the Addison City Limits and encompassing a portion of Farmers Branch. The contour also extends approximately 1,500 feet north of the approach end to Runway 15 and overlaps the airport boundary along the west side of the airport, including areas along the north and south end of the runway on the east side of the airport. A portion of the future 70 DNL noise contour also extends into the City of Carrollton along the northwest boundary of the airport. The future 65 DNL noise contour encompasses approximately 1,851 acres and extends beyond airport property in all directions from the runway. To the south, the contour extends beyond airport property by approximately 8,200 feet. This area of the contour encompasses property within the Town of Addison, Farmers Branch and the City of Dallas. The noise contour also extends approximately 4,300 feet to the north of the airport, and encompasses property within the Town of Addison, the City of Carrollton and the City of Dallas. According to preliminary land use estimates for the Town of Addison, there are approximately four (4.4) acres of residential land use located within the 70 DNL noise contour, and twenty-one (20.7) acres ofresidential land use located within the 65 DNL noise contour and no residential development located within the 75 DNL contour. All of the residential land uses identified within the specified noise contours for the Town of Addison are located either adjacent to the south end of the runway or further southeast of the airport. There is also residential development located within the City ofDallas [Le., approximately one hundred and twenty-six (125.7) acres located southeast of the airport], which is contained within the 65 DNL noise contour. An additional seventeen (17.0) acres of residential development is located northwest of the airport, also located with the City of Dallas and contained within the 65 DNL noise contour. Following the completion of this Master Plan Update, a determination will be made as to whether the 1991 FAR Part 150 Study for Addison Airport should be updated. The FAR Part 150 Study, which presents a more detailed and comprehensive analysis of both existing and future noise contours for an airport, utilizes a five-year planning horizon, compared to twenty years for the Master Plan. An FAR Part 150 Update would also specify any revisions, if required, to existing noise mitigation recommendations; however, it is recommended that the twenty-year noise contour be utilized for land use planning purposes by the Town of Addison and surrounding communities. ( AddISon Airport Master Plan Update E.35 ISSUE NEWACT10N RESPONSIBLE PARTIES ( AIRPORTACTION TlMEFRAME COMMENTS Update and Review of the FAR Part 150 Study The FAR Part 150 Study is a five-year program which will be reevaluated at the end of the five-year period. In addition, ifthere is a significant change in either aircraft types or numbers ofoperations. then the Study will be reevaluated prior to the end of the five-year timefrarne. The Airport is responsible for updating and monitoring the FAR Part 150 at the five-year increments or when there is a significant change in aircraft types or numbers of operations. The Federal Aviation Administration could help fimd the update if there are fimds available for such planning. All airport users and those interested in the airport are responsible for providing input mto the updating process. The Airport will monitor the aircraft types and numbers which operate at the airport to determine changes in the forecasts contained in the FAR Part 150 Study, and will reevaluate the program when there is a significant change or at the end of the five-year dmeframe. The Airport will also consider budgeting fimds for the update of the Study in 1994. The Air{x>rt will institute monitoring pr0cedures unmediately and will plan for a full update of the Study in 1994. The airport management will undertake a yearly review of the aircraft types arid numbers, along with the actual number of operations occurring at the airport, and determine ifthey are consistent with the projections contained in the FAR Part 150 document. FAR Part 150 Study defines 81 C · ...' .'.. ( the level ofchange necessary to trigger a revision of the Noise Exposure Map when any change in the operation of the airport would create any substantial new noncompatible use in any area depicted on the map beyond that which is forecast for the fifth calendar year after the date of submission. That is, if that change results in an increase in the yearly daynight average sound level of 1.5 dB or greater in either an area which was formerly compatible but is hereby made noncompatible or in a land area which was previously determined to be noncompatible and whose noncompatibility is now significantly increased. The various recommendations will also be reviewed as to their ability to mitigate the projected noise intrusion and the overall effectiveness of the program. If it is found that the measures are not effective, then new measures will be evaluated and implemented. At the end ofthe five-year program all of the forecasts and aircraft mix will be reevaluated to determine the extent to which they have changed from those projected in this study. and will be updated to reflect the following five years. New mitigation measures will be evaluated and recommended ifthe existing measures are found not to be effective for that timeframe. The Noise Compatibility Stduy will be reevaluated and updated, and public review and comments will be incorporated. This procedure will be evaluated at five year intervals to ensure the validity of the program. . 82