I • · • REQUEST FOR SOQ's -FUEL FARM PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Co. Name Washington Group IT Corporation Ecology & Environment LawGibb Group Freese & Nichols, Inc. EA Engr, SCi,&
Tech Ensafe, Inc. Terra-Solve LCA Environmental Atkins Benham I I SCORES i # Copies Phone Jim Neal Mike Mark Totals 4 281-529-3000 . 92 97 108 381 4 972-341-8300 100 104 95 381 ---4
214-245-1000 83.5 98 83 351.5 4 469-828-4100 77 85.5 92 92 346.5 4 817-735-7300 86.5 96 96 344.5 4 972-484-1420 99 82 87 340 4 972-791-3222 87 88.5 86 74 335.5 4 972-267-1900 80 89 82
82 333 4 972-241-6680 79 82 I 86 77 324 4 817--640-6407 55 81 81 47 264 JIY\'I VVI'( Gibs/rY\ 􀁾􀀠Cj7 L 'ff-'1-9077 uJ(l+e·vb FYi J-􀁦􀁾􀁴􀀠wrlJ bnt4--=7 UJ-􀁃􀀻􀀱􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀼􀁊􀁮􀁲
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2871 .. rS·Aug1lsf2U011® Post om.. Box 9010 Addis.n, Texas 75001·9010 16801 Weslgrove Mr, Paul R.. Wild, Manager Environmental Services Washington Group
International, Inc. P.O. Box 1281 Houston, TX 77042 RE: AIRPORT FUEL FARM PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Wild: I am pleased to announce that your firm has been selected to
provide engineering services for our Airport Fuel Farm Phase II Environmental Assessment. I will be in contact with you in the near future for a meeting to discuss a scope and fee proposal
for the project. S""",ly. 􀁾􀀹􀀠es C. Pierce, Jr., P.E. ssistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P.E., Director of Public Works 
(YLJezynttNk 􀁲􀁊􀁾􀀠et 􀀵􀁻􀀩􀁑􀁾􀀠tor Dut.puJ-􀁦􀀳􀀬􀁵􀀮􀁚􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁐􀁾􀁊􀁲􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁾t1.A.L /tJ SOCfY-, 􀁾􀀠flu--ahH., f}J2e4'4R-􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁏􀀨􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀀩􀁾Ir YAL (lYl 81; l' Hr 􀀹􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁌􀀠\
• !) ihrJ-d 􀁾􀁾􀁾Itr-􀁾􀀠􀁩􀁚􀁌􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁊􀁴􀁤􀁰􀀠
HP LaserJet 3200se TOALASERJET 3200 invent 9724502837 􀁊􀁕􀁾􀀭􀀲􀀱􀀭􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀠16:43 Fax Call Report Job Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result 495 6121/2001 16:41:41 Send
99722671902 1:41 3 OK lttQVEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFlCATIONll IlNV1RONMENTAL SERVICES ADDISON A1RFORT FUEL FARM '!he TOM of AddIson is presetrt!y lceepting SI4t.cmmt1. ofQLllllilieatiOnt
from experienced EnWGllnltlltd Fm to provide Pbuc II ElWitonmmlai 􀁾􀁭􀁥􀁴􀁬􀁴􀀠􀀵􀁴􀀺􀁲􀁙􀁩􀁾It !he AdditIOn Aitpott Fut! Farm The purpoae otthe project i9 to establith" "basdinc" ofm.ent
of'lOi.! and ground WIlIer contaminalioll, itMY, in l.IId around the existing opcratin,s fiJd farm. The 5CQpc. ofthe project wiD icdudt, but will not ncccwrily be llmi:ttd to irrYestigztion
u.Mg push probe technology, health l.IId dty plan, IlDd a. reporl with reootnmIlI'IdatioM (or'Illy 􀁾.dlon deemed eppropridt.. Al1 worlc I:htII meei TNRCC atI.I1dmb as: the upon may
be mbmitted 10 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠BiCkgrowlod infunna1.ion um.iW;olo for remwam:U.mililriDlion at thcDt:pertmml of PubHcWmb, Addison wili 􀁾􀁴written Saurnenl! O(b,Ial.i.fiWWIII(SOQ) 􀁦􀁭􀁭􀁡􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁵􀁮􀁴􀁩􀁉􀀠<
I 􀁰􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁩􀁴􀁬􀁍􀁬􀀲􀀵􀀮􀁬􀁏􀁏􀀱􀀮􀀠Fow(4)wpiesoftheSOQMbe&ubmitted, n,SOQ 􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁮􀁴􀁡􀁩􀁮􀀮􀁾mwbeTofthlrty(:Kl)ainale tided PI6tI:S 01111 ¥ot" J1" pbPU. The 􀁾tim:I shoufd 􀁰􀁲􀀮􀁷􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁦�
�􀁬􀀧􀁴􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁩􀁣􀁮􀀠eo 􀁤􀁣􀁾􀀠the 􀁦􀁵􀁭􀀧􀁾􀀠ability to dO' 􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁾􀀬􀀠The SOQ Wll d=gnal:D the individuab who wi.!! bit MSiped to thepmjcct (prindpal.!rH:harse. PlOjll<::! mansgCll',
Project Enginur, ctc..)with I'e5UrIlCI lOr cub hxrMdua), AliJt of limilar pmjecu in 􀁾􀁰􀁥and size that the fum hu rtUUlly completed Inu.t Jut fi:ve (5) )'ellS MIll be provided. For
each project I dcsc:ripIlOtl 􀁾be provided 110"8 with project eo3\ completion dale, names ofprupolcd de.sign team membm. involved in the projed, name oflhc 􀀨􀀺􀁾􀁥􀁭􀀮􀀠􀁃􀁏􀁾pusoa.
IlId phone numM:t for 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁾pei1on, _. ..'ft • 0'
REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADDISON AIRPORT FUEL FARM The Town of Addison is presently accepting Statements ofQualifications from experienced Environmental
Firms to provide Phase II Environmental Assessment Services at the Addison Airport Fuel Farm. The purpose ofthe project is to establish a "baseline" ofextent of soil and ground water
contamination, ifany, in and around the existing operating fuel farm. The scope ofthe project will include, but will not necessarily be limited to investigation using push probe technology,
health and safety plan, and a report with recommendations for any corrective action deemed appropriate. All work shall meet TNRCC standards as the report may be submitted to the agencY.
Background infurmation is available for review and familiarization at the Department of Public Works. Addison will accept written Statements ofQualifications (SOQ) from environmental
consultants until 4 p.m., June 25, 2001. Four (4) copies of the SOQ shall be submitted, The SOQ should contain a maximum number ofthirty (30) single sided pages on 8 'h" x 11" paper.
The environmental firm should provide enough information to demonstrate the firm's ability to do the project. The SOQ shall designate the individuals who will be assigned to the project
(principal-in-charge, Project manager, Project Engineer, etc.) with resumes for each individual. A list of similar projects in scope and size that the firm has recently completed in
the last five (5) years shall be provided. For each project a description shall be provided along with project cost, completion date, names ofproposed design team members involved in
the project, name ofthe client, contact person, and phone number fur contact person. All written Statements ofQualifications submitted shall be evaluated by the Selection Committee,
which will be made up ofMichael Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Works, James C. Pierce, P.E., Assistant Director ofPublic Works, Mark Acevedo, Buildings and Fleet Manager, and Neil Gayden,
Environmental Services Manager. The review of the SOQ's will be based on the selection criteria shown on the attached page, The SOQ should specifically address each criterion for evaluation,
Ifit is deemed necessary, the top ranking firms will be asked to meet with the Town and make oral presentations, The firm the Town deems most qualified will then present a proposal to
perform the work and a fee will be negotiated. The environmental services contract will go to the City Council \:' for approval. \. fI' \ $t>-ll 􀁾􀁜t. ':> Post·it:' Fax Note 7671 PhOl'le#
Fax41J-.Date From co. A: CftSOQ. '1)£ 
Interested consultants should direct questions and submit Statements ofQualifications to: Mailing: James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E. Assistant Public Works Director P.O. Box 9010 Addison, Texas
75001-9010 Street: 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75001 Phone: (972) 450-2879 Fax: (972) 450-2837 
--EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR QUALIFICATIONS POINTS MULTIPLIER SCORE 1. The firm's experience, as well as 0-10 4 proposed subcontractors, in successfully performing similar assignments,
in scope and size, for others within the last five (5) years, by personnel still on the firm's staff, Prime and Sub have worked together befure, 2, Professional background of key personnel
0-10 4 -and experience in environmental assessment and reporting The firm's current staff, both in size and related experience, is qnali:lied to provide the desired service, Indicate
length of time key employees have been with the firm as well as t1ieir home office location, 3, Location of main office andlor branch office 0-10 1 that will provide services and experience
in the local area, 4. Management approach to this project (Include O-IO 1 QAlQf:" schedule and budget programs). 5. Technical approach to this project. 0-10 1 6, Previous clients, fur
similar projects express 0-10 2 satisfaction with the firm's work (8bort listed firms only, ifnecessary), 7. Oml presentation (short listed firms only, if 0-10 4 necessary). 
HP LaserJet 3200se TOALASERJET 3200 9724502837 JUN-20-2001 15:50 Fax Call Report Job Date Time 455 6/20/2001 15:49:45 Type Identification Duration Send 92142451001 1:07 REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS
OF QUALIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADDISON AIRPORT FUEL FARM The Town ofAddison is preseotly aecepting SlatemenU orQua1i6eatiollS from experienced Environmental FimLt to provide
Phl!.JCl n EnYirorunental A&seummt Suvices lithe Addison Airport Fuel FIImI. The pwpoKI oftha project is to establish I ''baKlina'' ofalent of soil and ground water colllaminalian, iCany,
in. and III'OUIId the emting operating fuel finn. The ac.opc oftho project will inc1udc., but will not nceessarily bI:: limited to ilMstigalion using pwh probe tedmology. health and
safety plan, and a rq>Ort wilb rcrommcodaliOIlS for any corrective action deemed appropriate. AU worlr:: lhall meet TNRCC 5lB.Ildards u the report may be .rubrnitttd 10 the agency. Background
infonnation is IvBilable for review and familiarization at tbe Department of Public Worn Adwon will acupt written Statement! ofQualjJieaLioJ\l (5OQ) ITom envirormental consuharlla until
4 p.m., June IS, 2001. Four (4) copiel OCthfl SOQ shall bo allbmined. The SOQ should contain alllll1;/mum number ofthirty (JO) singh! sided pages on 8 W' II II" paper. The mWonmcntal
finn ahould provide cnough information to demoMlntc the finn', ability to do tho project. Thc SOQ!haJl dcsigrwe the individuals who wiD be usigDed lO the project (PrinciPJ!.in-chargc,
ProjOCl managCf, Project Engineer. efc.) with resumes for eacl1 individual. A list ohimilar projects in scope and &izo thlll tho finn hu 􀁾􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁛􀁣􀁴􀁥􀁤inlbe last five (5) ycar3!hall
be ptovidcd. For each project. a dDlcriptioo shaD be provided along with project cost. completion dille, IlI/1le!l ofproposcd design team membm iJIvolvcd in the project, name oflbe client,
contKt penon, and phone number for conllCt penon. All written SliUeme:IIlS ofQualifi,eatiollS IIIbmittcd shaD be 􀁾􀁵􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁤by the Selection Committee, wf:ich. will be made up ofMich.sd
Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Worb, J_C. Pierce. P.E., AuistantDiroctoJ ofPuhtic Worb, Mad:: Acevedo. Building! and Fleet Manager, and Neil Gayden, Environmental Services Manager.
ThercvitN ofthe SOQ's will be bucd on the adcclion criteria shown on the attached page. Tho SOQ ibould specifically addreu each criterion for evaluation. Ui! i, dOCD:lcd nccuwy, the
lOp rankins fimuI wiD be uked 10 meet with tho ToWII and we ontl praerttatiolUl. The finn the Town deenu most qualified wiUthUi pracnt. propoMllO perfOI'll\ the work and • fee will be
negotiated. The erMronmentaJ SCMCCS contnu::r will go 10 the City Council for approval. "" invent Pages Result 3 OK 
Jim Pierce From: Chris Terry Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:48 AM To: Jim Pierce; Mark Acevedo Subject: FW: FYI, Chris -----Origina1 Message----From: Ron Whitehead Sent: Tuesday, June
19, 2001 10:31 AM To: (Trent Petty' Cc: Chris Terry Subject: RE: Trent, Good to hear from you. I will forward your comments to the appropriate folks. We appreciate knowing when good
people are out there, Everything is going fine here. I have followed Westlake and it sounds real interesting. We had a study done by Carter and Burgess to put a duct system under Belt
Line rights of way to relocate our utilities. It is cheaper and easier to do it up front, but we don ' t have that luxury. I have $11 million in bonds for the first phase. We are about
2 years away form implementing the project. Thanks for the information on Mr. Fry. I hope to see you soon. Ron -----Original Message----From: Trent Petty (mailto:tpetty@west1ake-tx.org)
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:13 AM To: Ron Whitehead (E-mail) Subject: Hi Ron, Hope things are going well -haven't talked to you in forever. Since I don't read anything in the DMN
except good stuff about Addison, I am assuming things are doing fine. Things in Westlake are ok too -just waiting to see every day what new hand Perot deals us. We've done some pretty
neat stuff and I have learned that having more businesses than residents can be a really good thing! I wont take up much time but I promised a friend a favor that is pretty simple. There
is an environmental consulting company called IT Corporation that is proposing a job for the Addison airport. I told him you probably were not involved directly but that I would pass
a good word along on their behalf. The guy's name is Herb Fry. He has been on the P&Z in Grapevine forever and is a honest straightforward guy. His company does these environmental assessments
allover the country but I don't know much more than that about them. Anyway, I have done my good deed for the day. Give me a call if you are 1 
HP LaserJet 3200S8 TOALASERJET 3200 9724502837 JUN-18-2001 17:17 Fax Call Report Job Date Time 409 6/18/2001 17:15:57 Type Send Identification 94698284110 Duration 1:19 REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS
OF QUALIFICENVlRONMENTALSERVICES ADDlSQNAlRPORTFUELFARM ATIONS 'l'he Town o£Addiaon if pruently 􀁡􀁣􀁵􀁰􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀁓􀁗􀁭􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁲􀁴􀀮􀁳􀁯􀁦􀁾􀁦􀁉􀁊from expcrimccd 􀁾􀁷􀁯􀁯􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁬􀁬􀁊􀀠Fimu
10 provmPhueH EuYirofll'l'l¢fltai 􀁾􀀠8Cf'liw .t the Addison Altpcrt Fuel f'a;m. The ptll'pOJtl oflho project is to e.nab!Uh a "bue:!lnd' ofcten: ofStJilend 8fO!llUJ min 􀂫􀁭􀁉􀁾illl:!)'.
in&lld armmdthc etiatins operating fut:l!llm\. The #tOpe ofthc pJOjcc: wid 􀁾but will not nec:m:uily be limited to ilmrligation using pus/! probe tedmIogy. heaith led 􀁍􀁩􀁾􀀠pita,.
and a report Mth nc.om.mmdIltiOIU for my conmJvc acrJon deemed lpproprilltt!. A.IJ wade abaU tne« 7NRCC mndtrds as fbI: rq>en may be wlmtittcd 10 Ihe a,gency. 􀁂􀁾W'0I'l'Mtl0n utvailabJo
for 􀁲􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀺􀁜􀁦􀁯􀀧􀀠&nd funllie.tiza.tioo at the 􀁄􀁴􀁰􀁡􀁭􀁮􀁾or J'ublic WOf;:'. Addl!on willlc.ttpt Mitten SL!1tfl'ItW ofQuali!S(WioN 􀀨􀁓􀁏􀁑􀁽􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁬􀀠coDJUlu.nu U1IIi1
4 p.m.., Jullb :21, 200l. Four (4)¢(\pies ofthc! SOQ Wll be 1"JbWtted. The SOQ Jbou!d C(lnWn I ma;Qnwm JllJriJer ufthirty on) lingle sided PlI8et on S If' It 11" paper. Th= erniroM1Cfltal
fum lIhoWd providl! 1!lIOUgb. infomlation to demoMtmte: !he /:Itm'&ilhilitytQ do Ibcptojec:r. TheSOQ &b&ll deJiSMIc lIIe indMduals who will be 􀁾to tbcprojea{Princlpal.in-chlU'g. 􀁦􀀾􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁐􀁴
􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁾􀀮etc.) with 􀁾lOrwh individual. A lilt 􀁯􀁦􀁾􀁡􀁲project! inJcopeanci siu thaI thfinn his 􀁾􀀧􀁹􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁫􀁕􀁤in th&luc rM(S»)'MftWJl be prcwided. Forcech project. df:!aiptlon
w.u bepmvided &lon8 wilh pnljeet CQSt, 􀁃􀁉􀀻􀁭􀀱􀁾dttt, 􀁮􀁾ofproposed dMip tI:m membcrl involved Iu tbD project. lWIIC ofthe client, COIIt&et ptnIm, I$1Id phono-l'IUI'flbeT fur 􀁾pa'JOlI..
AU writ1M Stalemcnu ofQualifiutiom subml1ted $hd1 be IM.IuIltd by the 􀁓􀁾􀁩􀁏􀁴􀀺􀁬􀀠Committee,. whiclt will bi'I made: lip ofMidiad Mulphy. P.E., OircctotofPu'Wic Wodc.s,. ]ame1 C.
􀁐􀁩􀁾P.l!., AitmMt Oittctor ofPublii: WoTts, Mu1c Acevedo, Bllildingl.oo PteerMallaF, IUld Neil Gaydel\ 􀁾􀁉􀁓􀁾M.wgcor. The mitw uflbe SOQ', will be baed OD tlIe meeaon criteria IIhIw.u
(lit the altacl!ed 􀁾Tbc SOQ ahl)Uid 􀁾Iddrweaehctiterlcm lOre¥lluation. IfitLt 􀁤􀁾1Iec::cs:wy,lbt kip I"lU:I.Icini J1nnJ m.tt be IUl«d tomeet with IbIS Town and: rnW ott.! presen.laUoI'IL
The fltm thcTowndomls tIlGSl<plaJilic:d will then pmmt., propOlal to perfurm thework and: • 􀁾will I:oemll'Otlttcd. The envimnmemd #MteJ CGIIIncI w!.II go to the City Co\ultil 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠o.oIW"'"
PoIl.ft"1p;t;a\f -' "" oo •• r􀁾,.' 􀀬􀁾invent Pages Result 3 OK 
HP LaserJet 3200S8 TOALASERJET 3200 invent 9724502837 JUN-1S-2001 10:29 Fax Call Report Job Date Time 371 6115/2001 10:28:20 Type Identification Duration Send 92143332853 1:04 REQUEST
FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS ENVlRONMIlNTAL SERVICES ADDISoN AIRPORT FUEL FARM The Town ofAddiwlt is ptUet!Cy accepling Slatemenu orQuali5cAtirun from c:qll:rit:need &\irtlJlMentll.Finns
to provido PlWe nBnWonmenlal Al'!t:lamtnl 􀁓􀁾at the Addlson Allport Fuel 'Farm. The JlUfPCN: Gftbt: ptC!joet it to estAblish II "budiaen C(l!!Idenl or.loil6llG ground Wlril:lflXlnttttnlnlltiol'l,
lIMY, in and Ifound Ute cxisIilI8 􀁯􀁰􀁾􀁬􀁭􀁧􀀠fuel famt. Tho loope ofthe project will include, but will not necessarily be limited to 􀁩􀁾u!lng pulb probt: lCeimolo8Y, heallh And •.ret)'
phft, and a report with rec.ommc1IdttiOM for Mt'f corrective aetlon deemed appropriAte. All worklhlll meet mRCC SltJ\dard. as the tepart may bo submitted 10 the agency. Background information
is a'flillblt for review and famlUDliDlion at thcDepartmenl of PubIic:PubIic:Woru. Addison will acccp1 written Statemenb ofQuaJifieaOOll5 (SOQ) &em t'I1'I'irtmmernal eoftlUhanls until
4 p.m., June 25, 2001. Four (4)eopiuorthe SOO IlIWl bosubmiltw, Tho SOQ should conWn a maximum number ofthirt)' (}D) aingle aided 􀁰􀁉􀁩􀁾o.n 8 W' x 11" paper. 1ben.Yil'l)nmenlal fum
should provide enough Infotmation ill demonstrate the jjrm'.'1 ability 10 do iliepmjcct The SOQ WI! dmgnlu'I tfwtindMifw.b who willbe uaigoed to the project (PrindpAl.i.n-clIIrge, 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁭􀁾􀀬Prnj«
t F.niinw, de,) with retUm1!3 for eaclJ iJldivid!.Ml. AIisi ofWnilar projcc14 in &Cepe and sim lhIt tho firm .Iw reotI'llty comp!eted in tho rut 1M (5) year. IlIall be provided. Fet
eat.h project I deaeription IlIall be p.rovKIed aIofl8 with pm)et COlI, rompklrion 􀁤􀁉􀁾􀀠I.l.IIIWlS ofp1'OpOJ'lId design team memlHn invoh'ed in the projc.:t, lWIlC oClhc dic:ru, conca
ptt'l'Ion. .w phone JIUlIlber for OOOll!itl penon. All written Sulemenu ofQualifica'lioll! lUbm.itted sh1!l be 􀁾by tho SdttUon 􀁾􀀬wbic.h willbem.tde up ofMldtad M!!fl!by, P.E... Dim::torcfPublX;.Wo
rb. 11!t1M C. 􀁾P.E.. AWfan! DHmor ofPub'lJe Worb. MArk Accvmo. BWldinp...:1 􀁆􀀱􀁾MaD&.!:a, and Neil 􀁾Envirtmmtntd 􀁾Managu, Thert\iit\\! ohho SOQ's will be bueO (1ft the.tdcaion ttited&
fhown 00 the a.ttKhcd pege. The SOQ !Ihould spIIcifu:aIly tddtCOU ud! cmerum for tvalualioo. Ifie is dti:mod 􀁾􀀾the 􀁾mnkins: finrlI will be Wed to rnm with the Town andmab ml pmmtlrionl.
1M firm the Town dRms mostqualitied will then 􀁰􀁾ApropNA! to perfonntl\ewmi:: and • ftc will be 􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀮􀀠The c:nYimnmentll 􀁾colUtlCt will SO to the! Cit)' Co\me.tI ",..􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁐􀁯􀁴􀁬
􀀢􀁦􀁴􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠7&'H􀁾􀀠-' 1l..' 􀁾􀀮􀀠, Pages Result 3 OK 
---• Municipal Services. GPS • Drainage. Boundary & Topographic Surveys. Water Resources' General Civil' 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠'" t 0 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Ole:l•. "'t.iii􀀻􀀻􀀭􀀢􀀧􀁦􀁾..... 􀁾􀀠51 e· 􀁾􀀠fg) 􀁾􀀠®
.. <::> ·Cl.t;'" ieOJ''' 􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁐􀁾􀁌􀁔􀀠n 􀁃􀁊􀁉􀁾􀀽􀀠Q 􀁜􀁏􀁾􀁴􀀧􀁲􀁬􀀠<IIa'" '" . 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠()8 ............ 3' 􀁾􀁎􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠 -r 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠C) (\1\ r 1f'r=J (fJ • Transportation' land
Development. Construction Management. Traffic. Water & Wastewater Systems. 
Jim Pierce From: Jim Pierce Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:32 PM To: Chris Terry Cc: Mark Acevedo Subject: RE: Airport Fuel Farm Received a second opinion from COM: Range $20 to $30K.
I would now suggest a budget of $40K to cover contingencies. Jim. -----oogl""l Message----From: Chris Terry Sent: Monday, June 04, 20018:52 AM To: Jim Pierce Cc: Mark Acevedo Subject:
RE: Airport Fuel Farm I agree that we do need a second opinion on the potential cost. Yes, this should have been done as a mid-year budget adjustment but I believe that deadline has
passed and will be on next Tuesday's agenda. Given that. we may not be able to proceed until we have this discussion with Council in August as part of next FY's Airport Fund budget discussions.
I suggest you get Finance's opinion on how best to proceed. Randy is out until Thursday but Bryan may be able to advise. Do not proceed until the budget question is resolved. As you
remember from our meeting the other day, Mark will be exploring times to share our Airport priorities with Council. hopefully in June but realistically, it may be in August, I am waiting
to hear Mark's recommendation on that. We need to visit further on this issue. Chris -----Orlglnal Message----From: Jim Pierce Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 3:54 PM To: Chris Teny; Mark
Acevedo Cc: Michael Murphy; Randy Moravec Subject: FW: Airport Fuel Farm Chris: Resending this as requested. We may have an opportunity to compress the schedule, i.e. select consultant
directly from their submittals with no interviews, but we are still locked in to Aug 14 as first council meeting in Aug. The other spot to compress is ifthe consultant can do the job
in less than 90 days. The other issue is budget money. I'm not sure what this will cost. I have asked COM to give me a conservative ball park estimate from what they know. Washington
has estimated $33,500 which may be OK but I would like a second opinion. Do we need to do a mid year budget adjustment? It may be too late. Schedule wise, we will not owe the consultant
anything until Sept 15, at the earliest, and that could easily slip to Oct 1st. So we could wait until the new fiscal year. Please advise. Thanks, Jim. ----·oogl""l Message---From: Chris
Teny Sent: ThurSday, May 24, 2001 11:22 AM To: Jim Pierce Subject: RE: Airport Fuel Farm Can we compress the schedule by about 30 days? I would like to get the Final Report by October
15. Take a look at that. Also, as we discussed, I don't want to advertise until Dave, Mark, et. al. have Signed off on the schedule. Thanks. -----ooglnal Messag.....·-from: Jim Pierce
Sent: ThurSday, May 24, 200111,00 AM 1 
To: Chris Terry Ce: Mark Acevedo; Michael Murphy Subject: R.E: Airport Fuel Farm Suggested Schedule: June a -Advertise request for SOQ's June 15 -2nd ad In paper June 25 -Receive SOQ's
Review SOQ's July 9 -Create Short List of consultants July 13 -Consultant Interviews Select consultant, negotiate contract July 25 -Contract negotiations complete Aug 6 -Prepare Memo
for council approval Aug 14· Council approval Aug 15 -Notice to proceed Nov 15 • Final Report ·····0,;gina1 Messag..•••• From, Chris Terry Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:59 AM To: Jim
Pierce Ce: Marl< Acevedo Subject: R.E: Airport Fuel Rlrm What is our schedule for this? I want to visit with you before we proceed. Chris ·····Origlnal Message-···· From: Jim Pierce
Sent: WEdnesday, May 23, 2001 5:20 PM To: Chris Terry; Marl< Acevedo; Michael Murphy Subject: Airport Fuel Rlrm Request for SOQ's and score sheet attached for your review and comment
« File: SOQ's for Airport Phase lI.doc» «File: EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING.doc » Jim Pierce, P.E. E. ASSistant Public Works Director PO 80x9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 972·450-2879
2 
Jim Pierce From: Jim Pierce Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 3:54 PM To: Chris Terry; Mark Acevedo Cc: Michael Murphy; Randy Moravec Subject: FW: Airport Fuel Farm Chris: Resending this
as requested. We may have an opportunity to compress the schedule, I.e. select consultant directly from their submittals with no interviews, but we are still locked in to Aug 14 as first
council meeting in Aug. The other spot to compress is if the consultant can do the job in less than 90 days. The other issue is budget money. I'm not sure what this will cost. I have
asked CDM to give me a conservative ball park estimate from what they know. Washing10n has estimated $33,500 which may be OK but I would like II second opinion. Do we need to do a mid
year budget adjustment? It may be too late. Schedule wise, we will not owe the consultant anything until Sept 15, at the earliest, and that could easily slip to Oct 1st. So we could
wait until the new fiscal year. Please advise. Thanks, Jim. ·-Original Message-···· From: CMs Terry Sent: Thursday, May 24, 200111:22 AM To: Jim Pierc:e Subject: RE: Airport Fuel Farm
Can we compress the schedule by about 30 days? I would like to get the Final Report by October 15. Take a look at that. Also, as we discussed, I don't want to advertise until Dave, Mark,
et. al. have signed off on the schedule. Thanks. ···-Original Messag..•••• From: Jim pierce Sent: Thursday, May 24, 200111:00 AM To: Chris Terry 0:: Mark Acevedo; Michael Murphy Subject:
RE; Airport Fuel Farm Suggested Schedule: June 8 • Advertise request for SOQ's June 15 • 2nd ad in paper June 25 . Receive SOQ's Review SOQ's July 9 -Create Short List of consultants
July 13 • Consultant Interviews Select consultant, negotiate contract July 25 • Contract negotiations complete Aug 6 • Prepare Memo for council approval Aug 14 -Council approval Aug
15 -Notice to proceed Nov 15· Final Report ---Original Message-···· From: Chris Terry Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:59 AM To; Jim Pierce Cc: Marl< Acevedo Subject: RE; Airport Fuel
Farm What is our schedule for this? I want to visit with you before we proceed. Chris ·····Otiglnal 􀁍􀁥􀁳􀁳􀁡􀁧􀁾1 
􀁐􀁲􀁲􀁮􀀭􀁳􀀢􀁾􀀠Jf 􀁾􀀠..• 􀁾􀀠?'fk -I;f JSl'hj/􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁦􀁨􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀻􀁚􀀵􀁊􀁪􀀭􀁾􀀠ff)JJ () 132
REQUEST FOR SOQ's -FUEL FARM PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Co. Name Ensafe, Inc. EA Engr, SCi,& Tech Terra-Solve Atkins Benham Washington Group IT Corporation Ecology & Environment
LeA Environmental Freese & Nichols, Inc. LawGibb Group # Copies 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Phone 972-791-3222 972-484-1420 972-267-1900 817-640-6407 281-529-3000 972-341-8300 214-245-1000 972-241-6680
817-735-7300 469-828-4100 
􀁔􀁅􀁒􀁾􀂷􀀭􀁓􀁏􀁾􀁅􀀠'E N ,v 􀁾􀀠RON 1.1 E N T, A L ' C (I '/11 sur T A}l T S " Charles R. "Rick" 􀁾􀁯􀁢􀁥􀁲􀁴􀁳􀁯􀁮􀀬􀀠CPG Geologist . . 3216 Commander Drive, Suite 103'. Carrollton,
TX 75006·2518 (972) 267·1900 • FAX (972) 267·1902 • e-mail: terrasiV@gte,ne! 
1 T.-t.rr4l...J.<s'Y) -13: /2:f; t :3 0-. lei,' '2 ' '. Fttx Z/r..f -b30 -707D !H,;" ili L CIf-􀁾􀁖􀁬􀀠Vi V'IVl 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁌􀀠[30<td qTL-2-L.(.I-fpbfrl ;: L.: ;1, 􀁾􀁬􀁍􀁟􀁨􀁻􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀠;
, 
CDM Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. consulJJng engineering construction opemOOns One Glen Lakes 8140 Walnut HIli Lane, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75231 Tel: 214 346-2800 Fax: 214 987-2017 May
IS, 2001 Mr. Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director Town of Addison 16S01 Westgrove Drive P.O. Box 9010 Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Addison Airport Dear Jim: Per our telephone conversation earlier today, I have included four examples of Phase II scope of services. Two of the documents are CDM proposed scope of services,
and two are requests for proposals (RFPs) from potential clients. Hopefully, they will provide you with some of the language you are looking for in preparation of the Addison Airport
Phase II RFP. The two CDM documents are included in digital format on the enclosed floppy disk in the event you would like to cut and paste some of the information into your document.
Please do not hesitate to call me with any technical questions that may not have been answered by the attached documents or our earlier conversations. As a geologist, Phase II and Phase
ill assessments within various TNRCC programs have been my technical forte for several years. Thank you again for your time, and please do not hesitate to call me with any questions
or concerns you may have. R SSER & MCKEE INC. Char es Summers Project ManagerITNRCC CAPM 1316 
Section 1 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM) will mobilize to the site and perform limited soil and groundwater sampling using push probe technology
to assist in further defining the nature and extent of subsurface soil and groundwater contamination in and around the aircraft preparation area. CDM will utilize a small diameter driven
probe for rapid sample collection during this project. Groundwater will likely be encountered at a depth ranging from approximately 3-10 feet below ground surface (bgs). A shale layer
is expected to be encountered at a depth between 32 and 35 feet bgs and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) requires proof that the shale layer is laterally persistent
across this site. Therefore, each probe will be advanced to a total depth just beneath the surface of the shale (approximately 35' bgs on average). 'This should allow the field geologist
to tag the top of the shale layer in each probe, Tagging the shale with these probes will be the most cost effective and expeditious method of showing that the shale is continuous across
the site, as claimed in the previous reports, Based on our current knowledge of the site, CDM has differentiated our initial RFI field activities into the following Tasks. Task 1-Initial
Data Review Task 2 -Prepare a Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan Task 3 -Appendix IX and Background Sampling Task 4 -Soil Plume Delineation Task 5 -Groundwater Delineation Task 6 -RFI
Report A detailed description of the scope of work to be performed during the RFI is presented in the following sections. 1.1 Initial Data Review -Task 1 Some errors and discrepancies
were identified by CDM during a cursory review of the previOUS site investigation reports that were prepared for the aircraft preparation area. A brief list follows: • Well numbers have
changed from the September report to the May report (apparently tying into a plant wide well numbering system); • The map proportions change significantly (especislly orientation) between
the reports, even on scaled drawings; and • In the May report, Table 1 data for MW-61 indicate 1,2-DCA and TCE concentrations, while Figure 4 indicates TCE andvinyl chloride. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1·1 
RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) While assuming that the data are generally accurate, CDM will need to conduct a detailed data review to eliminate the existing errors, and establish
overall credibility to the existing data set. Therefore, CDM will review the data packages from the previous investigations to determine their overall reliability for reporting purposes.
Our approach will be to use the lab data sets only and include these results in an RFI report that will be inclusive of all field work (past and present). CDM will also order a water
well search to identify water wells currently located within a 1fo mile radius of the subject site. This database search will consist of gathering information from the State of Texas
water welis database listing on all registered wells in the area of interest. CDM also believes that another critical initial task in the RFI process will be to develop a clearer understanding
of the potential for artificial recharge to be impacting the direction and rale of groundwater flow at the site. In reviewing the data from the September 1997 and May 1998 investigations,
a clearly defined "mound" in the groundwater piezometric surface is apparent in the southI central portion of the site. Based on CDM's understanding of regional groundwater conditions
in the vicinity of the site, it appears unlikely that this mound is natural, but rather represents some other influence such as leakage from localized drainage ditches, ponds, septic/leach
field systems, or subsurface utilities including water lines. We further understand that on-site XXXX personnel have concerns that the latter source may exist. CDM concludes it to be
very important to resolve the source and impact of this groundwater feature early in the RFI process, as it may have a profound impact on the direction and rate of groundwater flow and,
hence, contaminant migration. Current piezometric information show a relatively steep radial gradient, generally trending to the north. However, the existing data are likely not adequate
adequate to determine if this is merely a recent and/or temporal trend resulting form localized artificial recharge sources. Resolution of this issue should occur prior to the installation
of any additional monitoring wells. Without an accurate understanding of the natural groundwater gradients, it will not be possible to site new monitoring wells that are truly representative
of long term groundwater conditions (either in the past, when releases may have occurred and transport of contaminants began; or in the future if the anomalous groundwater effects are
removed). CDM suggests that an evaluation of the potential presence of artificial sources of water be initiated with a compilation and review of existing information regarding all subsurface
utilities in the vicinity of existing monitoring wells MW1 and MW-S4. This initial evaluation should also include review of any records for metering or inventory of fluids flowing through
any such utilities that are identified. Subsequent to these initial subtasks, CDM may make recommendations for further evaluation. Recommendations may include leak testing of utilities,
and I or hydraulic analyses of the expected impact to the piezometric surface if any artificial recharge sources are terminated. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-2 
D223S.SE1 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) 1.2 Prepare a Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan -Task 2 Prior to mobilizing to the site, CDM will develop a Comprehensive Health and Safety
Plan to govern operational safety issues during the site investigation. The Health and Safety Plan will assist in identifying the suspected contaminants of concern that might be encountered
and will detail the procedures to be followed by CDM employees and subcontractors during field work to assure worker protection. 1.3 Appendix IX and Background Sampling -Task 3 The field
activities to be performed during Task 3 include the installation of one (1) soil probe in the source area, adjacent to the most contaminated boring location that was found during previous
investigation activities, so that TNRCC required information concerning Appendix IX contaminants in soil can be obtained. In addition, groundwater samples will be collected from monitoring
wells MW-55 and MW-56 and submitted for analysis of Appendix IX constituents. It It is anticipated that the soil and groundwater samples collected will represent worst case samples.
After analyzing the worst case samples for Appendix IX constituents, CDM expects to be able to limit the artalytical requirements for all follow-on samples by focusing on specific chemicals
of concern that are identified in the source area during this testing. Ten (10) surface soil samples (0-5') will also be collected from random locations at the other end of the airfield
during this task to determine site background concentrations for metals. Field activites to be performed during Task 3 will be competed in the following manner. l.CDM will mobilize a
truck mounted push probe unit to the site and will install one (1) push probe boring to a depth of approximately 35 feet directly adjacent to MW-56/MW-3E. This boring exhibited the highest
contaminant concentrations during previous soil testing and should be representative of worst case soil conditions in the source area. The location of the push probe is shown on Figure
1. Since SVOC and other analyses were not performed on any of the soil samples during previous investigations, CDM feels that this probe will assist in the collection of TNRCC required
information concerning Appendix IX contaminants in soil. 2.The probe will be logged by a geologist and will be field screened using a photoionization detector (PID) for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The probe location will be continuously sampled to document site lithology and so that soil samples for laboratory analyses can be properly collected. All soil samples
will be collected in accordance with the Soil Sampling and Analysis Plan provided in Appendix A. 3.Samples collected from the source area probe hole will be submitted for laboratory
analyses at the following depths: CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-3 
D2235.SEl RCRA Facility Investigation (RFt) • the 0-2' interval, and • the soil zone exhibiting the highest PID reading above the water table. The sample exhibiting the highest PID reading
will be analyzed for the Appendix IX constituents. The sample collected from the shallow boring (02' interval) will be analyzed for VOCs, RCRA Metals and semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOCs). 4.Monitoring wells MW-55 and MW-56 will be purged and sampled in accordance with the Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan provided in Appendix B and will be submitted for
analysis of Appendix IX constituents. These well locations have been selected because they exhibited the most contaminated groundwater during previous sampling events. This analysis
will help guide future analytical protocols. 5.COM will analyze trip blanks for every cooler containing VOCs and will acquire duplicate soil and groundwater samples on a 1 in 20 basis
during the project. A duplicate sample will also be collected for the worst case soil sample collected in the source area and will be analyzed for the Appendix IX constituents so that
QA/QC aspects of this limited analysis can be assessed. In addition, COM will also analyze one duplicate groundwater sample from one of the groundwater monitoring wells that will be
analyzed for Appendix IX constituents so that QA/QC aspects of the limited analysis can be assessed. COM will also split samples with TNRCC, as necessary. 6.Ten shallow surface soil
samples (0-5') will also be collected from the other end of the airfield at random locations and analyzed for RCRA Metals to determine site background concentrations for these metals.
Ten samples is the minimum number required to statistically determine background concentrations under TNRCC rules. The background values for metals will be compared with the new and
previous soil sample results to determine whether metals concentrations are of concern. 7.All drill cuttings and purge water will be containerized in 55-gallon drums and stored onsite.
These materials will be characterized and disposed of in a proper manner. 1.4 Soil Plume Delineation -Task 4 The objective of Task 4 will be to adequately define the horizontal extent
of soil contamination in the vicinity of the aircraft preparation area. Based on previous investigations, the soils appear to have been sufficiently delineated to the east and south
except for the soils in the 0-2' interval. Solis to the north and east have not been sufficiently delineated. The scope of work necessay to adequately delineate the site soils is presented
below. I.CDM will mobilize a truck mounted push probe unit to the site and will install up to four push probe borings to a depth of 35 feet, and four additional CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
1-4 
02235.SE1 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) borings to a maximum depth of two feet bgs surrounding the source area. The locations for the push probes are shown on Figure 1. The four
deep probe locations will be located north and east of the aircraft preparation area as determined in the field and as guided by the preliminary results from the previous investigation
activities. Four additional shallow probes will be advanced to a depth of two feet directly adjacent to the delineation borings previously ad vanced south and east of the source area
to collect samples specifically from this interval since they were not collected during previous site work, and have been requested by TNRCC. 2.Each probe will be logged by a geologist
and will be field screened using a PID for VOCs. Each location will be continuously sampled to document site lithology and so that soil samples for laboratory analyses can be properly
collected. All soil samples will be collected in accordance with the Soil Sampling and Analysis Plan provided in Appendix A. 3.The deep probe holes will be sampled at three depths: •
the 0-2' interval, • the soil zone located directly above the water table, and • the soil zone exhibiting the highest photoionization detector reading between the other two samples.
After analyzing the worst case soil and groundwater samples collected during Task 3 for the broad spectrum of Appendix IX analytes as previously discussed, CDM expects to be able to
limit the analytical requirements for all follow-on samples by focusing on specific chemicals of concern that are present in each source area. For the purposes of this work plan, CDM
assumes that all of the soil samples collected from each deep probe location will be submitted for analysis of VOCs using EPA Method 8260. The sample exhibiting the highest PID reading
in each deep probe hole will also be analyzed for RCRA metals using EPA Method 6010 and SVOCs using EPA Method 8270. 4.Groundwater samples will also be collected from each probe hole
and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. These results will be used to assist in delineating groundwater contaminants near the source area as further described in Task 5. 5.CDM will
also collect one (1) geotechnical sample to determine the physical characteristics of the site soils. The geotechnical sample will be submitted to the lab to determine the soil bulk
density, porosity, water content, fraction organic carbon and hydraulic conductivity using appropriate ASTM methods. This geotechnical soil sample will be collected from an apparently
uncontaminated probe location. 6.Concurrent with the activities described above, the field crew will also collect sediment samples from two locations along the drainage ditch located
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-5 
D2235.SE1 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) adjacent to the aircraft preparation area. For the purposes of this work plan, CDM assumes that the samples collected will be analyzed for
VOCs, SVOCs and total metals. The actual sampling locations will be determined by CDM's onsite field team leader after consulting with XXXX's onsite representative, however, our intent
is to select one location upstream and downstream of the potentially impacted area. 7.CDM will analyze trip blanks for every cooler containing VOCs and will acquire duplicate soil and
groundwater samples on a 1 in 20 basis during the project. CDM will also split samples with 1NRCC, as necessary. 8.All drill cuttings and purge water will be containerized in 55-gallon
drums and stored onsile. These materials will be characterized and disposed of in a proper manner. 9.Upon completion of field activities, a walking field survey will be performed within
a 1/4 mile radius of the site to identify potential onsite and offsite sensitive receptors, points of human exposure and contaminant transport migration pathways. This will include identification
of registered and unregistered water wells, schools, churches, residences, day care centers, businesses, surface water bodies, underground utilities (from visual observations and maps),
etc. CDM will also identify site specific conditions that may effect or limit contaminant movement. 1.5 Groundwater Delineation -Task 5 Task 5 will consist of further horizontal delineation
of the extent of the groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the aircraft preparation area. Based on CDM's review of previous site investigation reports, the groundwater plume will
require further delineation in all directions surrounding the aircraft preparation area. Since soil delineation will have been accomplished by this time, no soil sampling is anticipated
to be needed during this phase of work. This will allow CDM to push directly to the groundwater zone and collect a sample which will allow field activities to be completed in an expeditious
time frame. The scope of work that CDM proposes to adequately delineate the site groundwater is presented below. l.Starting from the perimeter of the property along the north property
boundary, up to 12 push probes will be installed to a depth of 35 feet. The proposed locations of the first 8 probes are shown in Figure 2; the remaining locations, if necessary, will
be selected based on the field results of the first 8 probes. 2.No soil samples are anticipated to be necessary during the installation of these probes. The total depth to shale, if
encountered, will be recorded in the log book. 3.Groundwater samples will be collected from each probe location in the aquifer zone above the shale and will be submitted to a qualified
analytical laboratory for analyses. All groundwater samples will be collected in CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-6 
D2235.SE1 HeRA Facility Investigation (HFI) accordance with the Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan provided in Appendix B. Each groundwater sample will be analyzed for VOCs using
EPA Method 8260. CDM will also analyze trip blanks for every cooler contalning VOCs and will acquire duplicate groundwater samples on a 1 in 20 basis during the project. CDM will also
split samples with rnRCC, as necessary. 4.Based on the results of the groundwater data collected from the push probes, five new 2 inch or 4 inch diameter (as directed by XXXX) monitoring
wells will be installed to serve as compliance points for future monitoring. The wells will be installed and developed in accordance with the approved Compliance Plan Specifications
as described in Appendix C, and new dedicated well pumps will be purchased for the five new wells. 5.After the new wells have stabilized for 48 hours, the 14 existing wells in this portion
of the plant and the five new wells will be sampled and analyzed for VOCs. If the Appendix IX analysis in step 1 above indicates that other parameters (e.g. SVOCs) are determined to
be constituents of concern and require monitoring, XXXX will be contacted at that time to discuss appropriate modifications to the sampling program for submittal to rnRCC. 6.Part of
CDM's sampling protocol is the collection of field parameters which aid in the interpretation of site conditions. These include depth to water, pH, conductivity, temperature and dissolved
oxygen concentration. These data will be recorded in the field log book and reported with the analytical data for the borings and wells. 7.AII of the wells and boring locations will
be surveyed for location and top of casing (f0C) by a registered surveyor and added to the site map for delineation and reporting purposes. 8.All drill cuttings and purge water will
be containerized in 55-gallon drums and stored onsite. These materials will be characterized and disposed of in a proper manner. 9.Maps showing the water table elevations, top of shale
elevations and concentration isopleths for the major constituents of concern will be prepared for reporting purposes. 1.6 RFI Report -Task 6 A report will be prepared to document to
results of the investigations detalled above. This report will include geological cross-sections and groundwater maps for gradient, and concentration maps for total VOC, methylene chloride,
trichloroethylene, and 1,2-dichloroethane. Other compounds will be mapped if appropriate. The data will be summarized in tables for the report, and the full data packages will be included
as Appendices. CDM will also respond on behalf of XXXX to issues outlined in the November 17, 1998 TNRCC correspondence CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-7 
RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) letter regarding previous site investigations. The response to this letter will be included in the RFI report. 0223S"SE1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-8

􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀭CDM Lp >1 􀁾􀁣􀀺􀁬􀁉􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁊􀀮􀀠􀁓􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀬􀁜􀀧􀁉􀁉􀀮􀁴􀀼􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠L 􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁌􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀠c:.) >.,.1 WOI(I( r'£.J4olV 2.do<. WORKPLAN LPST ID No: XXXXX Responsible Party: XXXXX
Facility Name: XXXXX Facility Address: XXXXXX Facility City: Rockwall Facility County: Rockwall Facility ID No.: XXXXXX TNRCC Region: 4 Case Priority: 4.0 Proposed Activity: 04 -Site
Assessment Description ofActivities: An accelerated site characterization will be performed at this site in order to assess the extent of subsurface petroleum hydrocarbon contamination
discovered in soil samples collected during the removal oftwo underground storage tanks (USTs). The assessment will involve the installation of up to eight soil borings using push probe
technology. The probes will be advanced to maximum depths ono feet below ground surface and will be strategically placed around the source ofthe release to effectively characterize the
site with respect to petroleum hydrocarbons. If groundwater is encountered at the site, temporary well screens will be placed into each probe hole and one groundwater sample will be
collected from each temporary well for analyses. Based on the results ofthese analyses, four monitoring wells will be installed to assist in monitoring groundwater conditions. Each monitoring
well will be constructed using 2"-PVC casing and screen. The wells will be developed, purged, then sampled using disposable bailers. All monitoring wells will be surveyed for locations
and for top-of-casing elevations. A potential receptor survey and a water well inventory search will also be performed as part of the required assessment activities. Sampling Procedures:
Three soil samples will be collected from each ofthe probe holes advanced at the site. Samples obtained from probe holes in the immediate source area will be collected from the 0-2 feet
interval, the highest OVA reading encountered between 2-15 feet, and at the total depth of each boring. Samples obtained from probe holes outside the immediate source area will be collected
from the highest OVA reading, the soil groundwater interface, and at the total depth ofeach boring. If groundwater is encountered, one groundwater sample will also be obtained and analyzed
from each temporary monitoring well. Groundwater samples will also be collected from the four monitoring wells installed during this assessment. Each of the soil and groundwater samples
collected will be analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) using EPA Method 8021 and Texas Method 1005, respectively. Laboratory
analyses will be performed by an on-site 
mobile laboratory. Immediately upon generation by the mobile laboratory, the data will be used by the Corrective Action Specialist (CAS) to determine the need for andlor adjust the location
of further probes. Ifresults indicate TPH concentrations in the >C I 0 -C28 range are above the 1NRCC soil or groundwater action levels, the sample exhibiting the highest TPH for each
medium will also be analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by EPA Method 8270. All groundwater samples will be analyzed for methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). One soil
sample will also be acquired to help determine the physical properties of the site soils. This sample will be used to determine the soil bulk density, porosity, water content, fraction
organic carbon, and hydraulic conductivity using appropriate ASTM methods. Reporting of Activities: An Assessment Report Form (1NRCC-0562) will be completed which addresses hydrocarbon
impacts in reference to Plan A criteria per 1NRCC Risk Based Corrective Action Guidelines. Waste Waste Management: All drill cuttings and purge water will be stored in 55-gallon drums.
Following appropriate profiling activities, the drill cuttings and purge water will be transported to an approved 1NRCC disposal facility. Attachments: A Site Map and table of analytical

TLAND 15032329272 ; 03/02/00 11 :45AMiJlIt&&.....#923iPage 4/10 Gl< .Qw 􀀼􀁫􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁫􀀶􀀮􀀠\ 􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁓􀁾􀁴􀁬􀀮􀁜􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁣􀀮􀀻􀀠􀁓􀁃􀀮􀁃􀁉􀁾􀀠Request tor propoJal ....1&􀀾􀁩􀁲􀁬􀁶􀁩􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀠you
10 sublllil a proposallbr environmenlal 􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁏􀁬􀁬services needed in should be prepared to evaluate !be existing imormation, recommend a cowse ofaction. and assist munJeations with
the T""as Narural Re.so= Cmse:rvation Commission ('l'NRCC) to obtain closureusing a Background . . cot is located alone Ii fonn6!ij] !::::.the communily or 17' ,T"""" Is located northwest
of '!'he si'" is no Io!lger OWIIed by.--..-'!'he land. was sold in !WO difl'cn:nl SIeCtioos 10 • rancher ill the 1950'. •IlIl 1970's, The sileconsiots ofthree pits, One ofthe pils was
filled shott1y after the land. was purcllased. '!'he other two contain a $ludge !WI matcriol. l'hcrc is limited bistorioal information availabl", The pilS are visiblegin an aerial photograph
daIed 1952. The original putpoSe of!he pits is unknown, though site visilll have led I WCOIlCIude the site Ill8Y have been .. t.mI:: ear cleaning ClpQ'lItion. As such.. the pits likely
wen: 􀁾10 hold thc residual msteriaJ from !hose activities. The site i.currently owned by a private plU1y and is u:sed for callie grozing purposes. A barbed·wire fenee is located aroUDd
two of the pits. A third (probable) pit is located outside the fenced area. Sludge like mak::rial is located in !he two pits within !be fenced area. The rancher 􀁩􀁮􀁦􀁡􀁮􀁮􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁡􀁴cottle
which graud on rho property. bad died, appou:ently ofunlalown ";'uses. The r!lllcberreporn:dly ammged for tissue samples from the dead conk: to bc analyzed at the Texas A&M Scllool of
Veterinary Medicine, '!'he1abomtory resullS showed that elevated levels of 8I'S<:Ili" and lead were tepOI1ed in the tissue samples. '!'he ingested matcrialllllijl have been the CIilllIe
of!he cattle's deaths. During a 1999 site visit, two samples from the pits w= collected and analyzed for the fcUowing: Tola! l'otrolOlll1 Hydrocarbons (TI'H; TIOOlS Mdhed TX 1005); •
Volatile Organic CompOllnds (VOCs; SW-8640 Method 8260); • Semivolatile Organic Ccmpcund (SVOCs; SW-!l46<l Method 8270); • RCRAMeIals (EPA Mllthods6010Aand 7470); Pesticides (EPA Method8084A);
• Herbicides (EPA Method 8151); and • PCBs (EPA Methcd 8082). . The laborataly results are summarized below. Sample No. Pit I Sample No. Pit 2 . (mglkg) (mg/ll:g) Arsenio <16 <32 Barium
79.1 58.9 Chromium 37.4 <13 Lead 26,100 31,800 M=ury 5.17 0.213 Silver 10 <13 Phenanlhrc:ne 48.1 37.0 TPH (C6· CIO) 642 134 "\ !l'H(CIO-08) 115,000 39,300 RECEIVED TIME MAR. 2, 2:40PM
PRINT TIME MAR. 2. 2:45PM 
----Scopeof_rk 15032329272 ; 03/02/00 11:46AMi!lI!fa.L#923iPage 5/10 This sile is located 011 land nol awned 􀁢􀁹􀁾􀁥land is part ofan active catlle ranching openIIioa. Evety elfort
must be made 10 minimi:ze interference with thai. opllfation. The pits are currently !!Utn:lunded by baIbed wire 􀁾The fence or wire gap may be taken down for acc:=, how"".,.. it must
be replaced ill !be close ofwork each dIIy. ,, Work must be perfoqncd 􀁾􀁧􀁨􀁴􀁢􀁯􀁾􀀬Moaday through Friday. Any work on SaturdlIy or SUIlday IIlWI1 be 􀀮􀁰􀁾in advance'by 􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴1lWl8g<:f.
The scope ofthe project im:Iudes !be investigation and risk based eva1uation oftbc thr= pits identified III !be site 8lI well as oIbcr a1fecIed media adjllCCllt to !be pits. • _ the
natunl and _tofsludge like material ill the pits and idenwy whCllu:;' this ma!erial is or is not bauIrdous • coUect data in 8 manner that would enable the _ ofthe inform.tioo during
polClltial fut\J!l: litigation; • 85SCSII the _Iofaffected:soil and/or shJIlJow ground water; water; ob1ain su1fICiOlt data to filcililate dcvclol'fll"llt of appropriate risk based remedlal
actions plllSWiDt 10 (l1IIRCC) requiremenlZ; and • 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁩􀁾􀁷􀁩􀁴􀁨""""'" to qualified team ou:ml><:r1; far possible meeting(s) witb the r!Illcller, !be rancher's e:xperts, iiiCllhe
TNRCC The following is 8 SU!lllIIaIY oftasks considered appropriate 10 meet !be site investigation 􀁯􀁢􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁶􀁥􀁳􀁾􀀠Task 1: Historical information scaroh. database review and
pro!imi:twy n:ceptor evaluation The pu:rpose ofthis task is to obtain additional infomllltion, ifavailable, regarding bistori<>al. use ofthe sile. This task should also include collection
ofinform.tion sufficient 10 idenwy polQltisl n:ceptors. -Task 2: Prepare Health and Safety Plan All contractors working at the site ere required to Mve a wri!lcJl health and safety plan.
AI. rninlmlllll, this project will require the following specific !asks: • A written health and safety plan whicb mo::ts the requireme:nts ofthe Occupationw Health and Safety AdminlstratiOll
(OSliA) CI.'R29 Port 1910.120. Wor:kers trained IIIlIi e<:rtified to therequin:m.:llts ofCFR 29 Part 1910.120. • Wor:k= lrlIined lIIlIie<:rtified 10 bavemellhenoquiremems ofUPRR's On
Track Safety IIIlIi Contractor Safety programs, nocumente<! safety meetings prior to the start ofeach days' activities Task 3: Assess the Nature and E)C!c:llt of Sludse LikeM.leriai
The waste classification of the sludge IjJce material lias not been completely evaluate<!. Based on a review of the analytical results from the !wo previous samples, additional investigation,
sampling, and annlysb are wmantcd to assess the nature and volume of the sludge lib: malerial in the pits. The following suite of analyses should be performed on the sludge-like material:
• tllllU!l!8.bility', • corrosivity; • i!lJlitability; • reacti\'ity; • pH;free liquids; TCLl'RCRA Metals; rCLP VOCs; and RECEIVED TIME MAR. 2. 2:40PM PRINT TIME MAR. 2. 2:44PM 
15032329272 ; 03/02/00 11 􀀻􀀴􀀶􀁁􀁍􀀻􀁊􀁾􀀣􀀹􀀲􀀳􀀻􀁐􀁡􀁧􀁥􀀠6/10 • fCLP SVOCs. Task 4: Evaluation ofSoil and Ground WIlier To assess the nature and extent of potentially affeded soU
and ground water, eight soU borings win be iastalled at the perimeter oflbe pits. F=of lbe soil borings will be completed Il$ monitor welb. one up gradient and three down gradient. In
addition, three soil borings and ooe monitor wen will be installed to document baclcgrou:ud COIIditioos. The following samples will be submi!ted from the borings: • 26 soil samples (approximately
two from eaclt boring plus two QAlQC samples) win be submitted for analysis of '!PH by 1'<:xS3 MWwd 1005; • five soil samples will be submitled tIlT analysis ofSVQCs by SW-846 Me!bod
S270C to contirm the Il4lUre of !beTPH; . 26 soil samples will be submi!ted fot aruUysis ofRCRA M=taJs; • one sample will be aoaly=! fer gr:or.:clmical paramclers (total porosit;y, Iotal
organic carbon (TOC), :fi:actiollated organic carbon (FbC), bulk density, grain density, density, and moistun: conlem); and The samples will be shipped under appropria'" Chain-of-Custody
prccedoreo. The monitor wells will be installed as two inch PVC wells using hollow stem aUF techniques. Following completion of • soU boring. eech monitor well will be COII.SIn.ld.ed
by placmg • two ineb (inside) dial1U!!er, Schedule 40 PVC, flush· threaded casing tIIld 0.0 I o..iru::h macbJne slotted PVC 􀁾inside the hollow stem auger string and gradually liiting
the aug"'" as a filler pack is placed. A filter pack consistingofsilica sand will be installed in the annular splICe between the borcbcle wall aod the well screen. aod will ext=! a minimum oftwo feet above !he lOp oflIIe screen. PclleUzcd bentonite
will dlen be placed in the annular space to extend • minimum oftwo feet above the filter pacle. Potable water will b. edded to hydrate the bentoni1e.. ifllCCCSSOlY. Monitor wells will
be COIlSInl<:Ied [0 """"'" a= the uppennost portion of the transmissive zone. based on field observations. The remaining annular space will be filled to near ground surfac:e (i.o., tremie.grouted)
with approximately 3% to 5% bentonite cement mix. Soil cultirJgs generatd during drilling will be stored on-site in llIbeled 55-gallon drums. Pending WIlSIe chs",iCf.erization. lb.,."
drums will be handled and disposed in s.ccordJmce wilh TNRCC QIld Fedora! guidelines. The monitor wells will b. completed above grade with • protective steel cover .... in • 4' )( 4'
X 4' thick OOIIcrete ped and locked at the casing. FollOwing well installation, each well should be dco<cloped in order to obtain ground water S8l1lples that arc reasoll4biy rep""""'tative
ofllle ground water quality 81 each Iccalion. DevelopmClll will be compl"'" when water quality pllnll1lClers such is temperature, pH and specific conductM<:e (SC) have sUtbilized and
when water clarity shows DO furlher improvement. Sub""'''''''t to and willlin 24 haurls ofwell dco<e1opmClll, • ground water sample will be collected from e.ach monitor well using the
low-tlow sampling procedur<:S specified by EPA. Field mel<SUl'<'lllents for pH, turbidity, tempe.-aIUTe, aod ,specific conduclance will be recorded during this lime. OroUIldwalcr samples
should be analyzed for the following pllnll1lCl=: TPHbyTXMe!bod 1005 • VOCs including MTBE by sW 8460 Method 8260 • SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 • RCRA M=taJ. by EPAMetbods 6010nOOO Samples
will be placed in. cooler wilb sufficient ice to maintain a temperature of approximately 4·C. Approprillte chain ofcustody procedure! will be followed and samples wiU be shipped vi.
an overnight cauriCl'or band delivered [0 .... approved laboratory, Task 5: Surveying The lOO<11lk... ofeach soil b.mng and monitor well will be surveyed in the tiel<! by 4 registered
probional sutVeyor. The REeE [VED TIME MAR. 2. 2: 40nl PRINT TIME MAR. 2. 2:44PM 
􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀠" ...... 03/02/00 11 􀀺􀀴􀀷􀁁􀁍􀀻􀁊􀁾􀀣􀀹􀀲􀀳􀀻􀁐􀁡􀁧􀁥􀀠7110 natural groWld surface elevation and the elevation ofme top ofweU casing with well cap n:moved will be surveyed
to the nearm 0.0 I foot mean sealevel (Ft M.S.t.) for each well location. AddiUonally, the lateral.-rdillates of each wdJ will be surveyed in referenl:c to a sire-specific coordinate
system. Task: 6: RJsk-Based Evaluation Concentrations of 00IlSIi1Uents of eo,,,:em will be """'pared 10 both RJsk Reduction Standards (RRS) and TCXlIS RJ.sk Reduction Rule (TRRl') requirements.
Sile coneenlnluons including SflItistieally derived repn:sentatille oon<;entrations wiD be compared to iNRCC specilied values. In w:ordance with TRR:? proocdutes. Qte COIICelttaliOllS
will also be =pared with default (Tier I) values.. Task: 7: Report Preparation A sile investigation and risk-baaed ""aluation repo<t will be prepared 10 provide documentall"" for the
1IIlBlysis. interpretation, and compilation of thlil data collected during the investigatiOl!. The final report will ildude: lntrodUClion and 􀁂􀁾􀀠Site D=ription ""d HlSlOty Regional
and LocoI Geolcgic:al Inform.a1icn Regional and local Hydrologicallnfonna1icn Description ofScnsiti1lC Receptors . Objectives ofInvestigati"" Aetivities Selection of ConmlUellts for
Analysis and Comparison Stnndards SUIlUlIlIrY of Soil Sampling Results SUIlUlIlIrY ofSludge-Like Material Results Summory ofGroundwatlilr ResullS Nature and Eldent ofA1fccIed Soil Nature
and E:xte:,t ofAIf<dcd Ground Wat<:r Monitored Hydro geologic zonos and Gr=d Wat<:r elevations Evaluation ofFindings with R.espeet 10 Cattle Deaths SIl!IlIIlIllY ofInvestigative Findings
Suromory ofRJS)( Based Ev.uuatioo Conclusions ReCOOl1!lendatiOllS Figures (Sile Looation. Site B_Map with S8!Ilpiing Locations, Cross Sections, Ground Water Elevations in the UppcnnOirt
Water-Bearing Zone, ConstiruentlSOCODcenlntion maps) Tables (Summary ofScil Quality, Summary ofSludtle-LikeMat<:rial Quality. SummaryofGroWld Water Quality. GroWld Water Elevation Data)
Appendices (Available Soil Boring and Monitor Well Logs, Surveyor Data. Laboratory:Reports) Assume one draft (2 copies) and one final report (4 copies) will be prepared. Task: 8: Meetings
For the ptup08es ofthis scope of work. it wiU be assumed that two meetings are =aryto evalWlle sile conditi""" and a course ofaction for future activities. The first meeting will occur
at an interim in !he project after the anaIytic& dalB bave been received. The """""d meeting will be fur the purpose report Senior w:mbers of,the "/, project team should atlend !he meeting
and the meeting will be held at Task: 9: Waste Management Wastc generated during the investigation will be c<mUlinerized in 55-gallon DOT approved drums, characterizcl thr disposal,
and stored on 􀁳􀁩􀁾􀁧disposal, Solid and aqueous material will be IUlIl!y:zed ror WIlSIe 􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁩􀁳􀁣􀁩􀁣􀁳as deemed appropriate by 􀁾approved dispo.al facility. The waste will be
tran.sponed to the disposal facility Il!lde£, . proper manit..t. RECEIVED TIME MAR, 2. 2:40PM PR! NT TrME MAR. 2. 2: 44PM 
150323292.72; 03/02/00 􀀱􀀻􀂷􀀴􀀷􀁁􀁍􀀻􀁊􀁾􀀣􀀹􀀲􀀮􀀳􀀻􀁐􀁡􀁧􀁥􀀠8110 award the coniract b4Sed on quality of the proposal. suitability of􀁰􀁣􀁲􀁳􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁃􀁾􀀠and 0lSt. The quality
orthe proposal will be based 011: 1) completeness of tho prgposal, 2) timcliuess ofwolk 10 be pcdamlcd.. 3) e.xpct1isc ofthe pe:nIOIlIICl . Only qua.lilic:d proposals willl suitable
pc:r>OllllCl will be evaluated for 0lSt. Suitable pel:liOllllel are tbo3c individuals that demo!lst:rete a high level ofexpertise. "" described below. Cost will be evah!ated on the propooed
llllit rates.. tho lc:vd of effort pet unit rale 10 3lf:task, and lOW estimaled price, The successfu.l bidder will be rcqui:rcd 1.0 cotnplote the UI:sks 10 !he MtilItl!.ction within
!he proposed time and <OSts. No change orders will be allowed for tasJcs thai SIllY within the proposed S<:Opc 0 W Expertise of!he 􀁾􀁧􀁦􀁩􀁮􀁮will be evalWlledon the experienccof!heprojcct
team mmanagingprojedsoflhis natul'e, mowledge ofthe T _ EnvirolUllCllW Regulations. and knowledge oflb.. Federalaad'State regulations pertaining 10 remediation and disposal ofbllZllrdous
_ • ."lid waste, petrolcum wastes. and ICC)'CIing ofmatcriaI>. A proposal thai does nol contain all ofthe Wl>rznation req_ed will be rejected. Proposal. will abo be ""dilated bosed on
the bidders ability to COOlplele lIle projec:l in • timcly 1l1ilIlI\er. Sea_ellt ofProJeci Uaclentandillg Your proposalmW<t iDclude. section tilled "Statement ofProjec:t Understanding."
This sectioo is limiled 10 one page. and must incl""": 1) a SIll=tthaI the engineering firm bas review=d th. instrw:tions and project iafon:nation, 2) • statement oflhc project goals
and objectives ... perceived by a statemenl thai your firm is quaJ.i.ticd 1D work on this 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁾1l!ld=tands and meet!! all oflhe req1lirc:nenlsl Project Team Proposals must include"
descripti<m ofthe primary projecl team. ThAt description should include a brief_to exceed Y, page, of each m""'liilfluding; education. professional registrations, and previous experience
projects with the name ofthe_􀁰􀁲􀁾􀁟􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁗􀁉􀁧􀁥􀁲􀀮􀀠The proposal must also include the primary CO!lIaCt e leam. Alternative Approada The engineering firm must respond to the
scope ofwork as specified ill this request In addition 1.0 the requested reaponsc. the engineering fum is provided the option 10 inolude a proven allernative or innovative approach that
will be more cost effective or tim<: effieiCIIL' Do not provide the alternative approach in lieu ofthe reque;stcd scope of work P .... bid Site Visit Ft'idsy M,ucl. 3 al 10:30 AM. Panioipatioo
in any :ruch visit is recommended though Road. Please organize your proposal document in the following manner. • Statement ofproject underslsnding • SCDpe ofwork including a !Jlsk fur
Health and Safety Guidelines • Proposed COOl! per 1Ml:, including level ofdan and =plions used • 􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁬schedule 􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁴􀀱􀁣􀁡􀁭􀀠• Alteroative option! Appendix A: Service Item BidForn:rs
• Appendix E: Statement ofBusin .... end Legal Rel8uoashlps RECEIVED TIME MAR, 2. 2:40PM PRiNT TIME MAR. 2. 2:44PM 
Closure Standard In addition to submitting the SIR and SIR Addendum to TNRCC in a timely manner, lias tendered a Notice of Intent to 􀁾to close the Site under Standard 3 of the Risk
Reduction Rules ("RRR"). Thus....has the option to close the Site under RRR or the Texas Risk Reduction Program ("TRRP"). The SIR Addendum includes some comparative information regarding
RRR and TRRP relative to sampling results to date. Scope ofProposal This RFP is for a proposal to complete the YCP closure and obtain a fmal Certificate of Completion, including but
not necessarily limited to: I. Recommendation of the most advantageous closure standard for the Site under RRR or TRRP with supporting reasons; 2. Suggestion for phases/steps toward
closure, including additional sampling (if any), a risk assessment (if necessary), a Response Action Work Plan ("RAWP" -the next report due under the YCP Agreement), additional reports
and recommendations for and attendance at client and TNRCC meetings; 3. Estimate of time line and costs for each phase/step of the work; 4. Preparation ofdrafts ofall reports and TNRCC
correspondence for comments from'" and its attorney before finalizing such reports and correspondence; 5. Assistance with access to off-site properties and related discussions with off-site
owners regarding closure and potential institutional controls; 6. Assistance with seeking and obtaining environmental insurance, such as cost cap and pollution legal liability coverage,
ifsought bY1llllllll' 7. 8. Completion ofany other recommended activities to obtain closure in an efficient and cost-effective marmer. Page 2 of3 
􀁲􀁬􀁬􀀧􀀽􀁾􀀠note that any response to this RFP should not simply conform to the list above. is interested in your suggestions and guidance as a technical advocate to CIO'Slll-e as
quickly and efficiently as possible. Response to this RFP _isrequesting this proposal on a complimentary basis. Wprefers a proposal with projected costs on a time-and-materials basis,
including a ' not to exceed" iotal amount/cap. In this regard_might consider incentives for cost savings, such as sharing a percentage ofcosts saved below the cap if the project is completed
under budget. _intends to obtain proposals from several environmental consulting firms. After its initial review ofproposal.-.rrught wish to meet with some of the firms responding to
the RFP before making its selection. If you are interested in responding to this RFP on this basis, then please provide a detailed narrative proposal, proposed contractual terms and
conditions, names of key personnel, and qualifications of your firm and such personnel. The proposal proposal should be sufficiently detailed to allow"to evaluate and compare the proposal
to proposals from other consultants. Please mark all pages of the proposal "Confidential" and keep it and any related information in confidence. Please submit the proposal by April 16,
2001 to: Page 3 of}