COWLES & THOMPSON 114 E. lOUISIANA ST., SUITE 200 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION McKINNeY, TeXAS 75069·4463 TELEf'HONE {9n! 542·5000 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 W. ADAMS AYE.. SUITE 321 901 MAIN
STREET, SUITE 4000 P.O. BOX 785 DALlAS, TEXAS 75202·3'193 TEMP!.!,;, TEXAS 76503-0785 TELEPHONE 1:214) 612-2000 TELEPHONE (2541 771-2000 KENNETH C. DIPPEL (214.) 􀀶􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀲􀀱􀀵􀀸􀀠 METRO
197212&3-0005 FAx 12t4' 672-2;020 ONE AMERICAN CENTER. SUITE 771 909 E.S.E. lOOf> 323 TYLER, TEXAS 15701·9684 CHARLES SORRELLS TELEPHONE {9031 581·$566 H925.1982) October 13, 1997 City
Mana r Town of ddison P. O. ox 144 Add' on, TX 75001 Re: ABP Investments HIlI Ltd., et al. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town of Addison Dear Ron: I enclose a notice from the 193rd
District Court of Judge Michael O'Neill setting the Ben Pinnell inverse condemnation case for trial March 13, 1998. Addison will be ready for trial on that date. I would hope the case
is dismissed before that date since the Plaintiff recovered substantial damages in the underlying eminent domain case. Sincer Jy, 􀁾􀀬􀀴􀀮􀀳􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁶􀁌 enneth C. Dippel U' KCD/gk Enclosure
j cc: John Baumgartner DOC I: S3%(ll 
193RD DISTRICT COURT GEORGE L. ALLEN, SR. COURTS BUILDING 600 COMMERCE STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75202-4606 Chambers of JUDGE MICHAEL J. O'NEILL SIM ISRAELOFF 901 MAIN STREET SUITE 4000 DALLAS
TX 75202 SEPTEMBER 29, 1997 RE: Case No. 9706265-L ABP INVESTMENTS 1111 LTD VS. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT All Counsel of Record: Please take note of the following settings: Pre-Trial:
Jury Trial: 04/13/98 Non Jury Trial: Trial announcements must be made in accordance with rules 1.17 and 1.28, Dallas Civil Court rules. When no announcement is made for plaintiff, the
case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Completion of discovery, presentation of pretrial motions and other matters relating to preparation for trial are governed by the Dallas
Civil Court rules, printed at the back of the Texas Rules of Court published by West Publishing Company. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. O'NEILL DISTRICT JUDGE 193RD DISTRICT COURT Dallas County,
Texas 
December3, 1997 Not copied, but open for review at the Service Center: Appraisal dated October 25, 1997 by L.R. Denton & Co. Plan -Proposed Right-of-Way MCM Property Arapaho Road Alignment
Appraisal Consultation Group -Summary & Conclusions Appraisal -Moses & Cline tract Plan -Proposed Right-of-Way Pinnell Property Arapaho Road Alignment "VOID" Appraisal Consultation Group
-Summary & Conclusions Title Survey Quorum West -Addison Addition Final Plat Addison Car Care Addition Land Title Survey (updated) Signed & Sealed Exhibits oftracts A, B, C Exhibits
of Right-of-Way Parcels 3-1, 3-2 (Southwestern Bell Tract) Exhibit H -Interlocal Agreement -Toll Tunnel Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Geotechnical Design Summary Report Addison Airport
Tunnel Environmental Assessment Addison Airport Tunnel Initial Engineering Assessment Addison Airport Tunnel Initial Feasibility Assessment Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Traffic and Revenues
Addison Airport Keller Springs Underpass Study Various Aerials Phase IIA (Subsurface) & Phase IIC (Miscellaneous) Investigation Report for the Former Logic Design Metals Facility Letter
Report Former Logic Design Metals Facility Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Environmental Site Ai;sessment Update Phase III Cost Analysis Forn:{er Logic Design Metals Facility
Letter From Terra-Mar Re: Proposal for Subchapter S Risk Assessment Letter From Ecology and Environment, Inc. Re: Letter Summarizing One Alternative for Closure Activities for the Property
at Arapaho Road and Quorum Drive known as the Proposed Addison Transit Center Letter From Applied Earth Sciences, Inc. Re: Activities and cost pertaining to the two proposals for the
former Logic Design Metals Facility 2 sets ofplans for "Old Town 7-II/Strip Center 1 set ofplans for 4801 Arapaho Road and 15350 Addison Road 
December 3,1997 Copied from John R. Baumgartner's Files: Toll Tunnel Agreement Keller Springs Toll Tunnel Keller Springs Toll Tunnel '94 Keller Springs Toll Tunnel '93 Transportation
Plan Arapaho Road Phases I, II, III Arapaho Road Extension Ben Pinnell Moses & Cline Addison Transit Center Copied from James Pierce's Files: Arapaho Right-of-Way Arapaho Maps & Descriptions
Arapaho ABP Investments MEPC Properties MCM Co. Properties Appraisals -Moses & Cline Appraisals -Addison Colonnade Arapaho Road 1997 DART Transit Center/Arapaho Road Right-of-way '94,'95
Arapaho Road & DART Correspondence '96, '97 Arapaho Phase I Engineering contract Arapaho Road Realignment Right·of-way SW Bell & JB Cline Arapaho -Request -Statements of Qualifications
Arapaho Road Improvements SWBell Land Acquisition DARTILAP/CMS Program' DARTILAP/CMS 10/97 ApprovedlPayment Arapaho Road Realignment Design Tollway to Addison Road Arapaho Road Extension
'93, '94 Arapaho Streetscape Keller Springs Toll Tunnel Clyde Johnson's Files: Announcement Bid Doc. Check List Legal Affidavit Legal Advertising Purchase Order Carmen Moran's Files:
Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Cooperation Agree. Resolution R95·lll Ordinance 094-038 Resolution R94·027 City Council Agenda's Pat Haggerty's File. Arapaho RdiAddison Rd Easement Quorum
Center Ltd. Partnership Arapaho TU Electric Arapaho DesignlEnvironmental Addison DART Transit Center Building Inspection: Files for: 15350 Addison Road, 4801, 4803, and 4805 Arapaho
Road Applications for Certificates of Occupancy 
December3, 1997 Not copied, but open for review at the Service Center: Appraisal dated October 25, 1997 by L.R. Denton & Co. Plan -Proposed Right-of-Way MCM Property Arapaho Road Alignment
Appraisal Consultation Group -Summary & Conclusions Appraisal -Moses & Cline tract Plan -Proposed Right-of-Way Pinnell Property Arapaho Road Alignment "VOID" Appraisal Consultation Group
-Sunmlary & Conclusions Title Survey Quorum West -Addison Addition Final Plat Addison Car Care Addition Land Title Survey (updated) Signed & Sealed Exhibits oftracts A, B, C Exhibits
of Right-of-Way Parcels 3-1, 3-2 (Southwestern Bell Tract) Exhibit H -Interlocal Agreement -Toll Tunnel Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Geotechnical Design Summary Report Addison Airport
Tunnel Environmental Assessment Addison Airport Tunnel Initial Engineering Assessment Addison Airport Tunnel Initial Feasibility Assessment Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Traffic and Revenues
Addison Airport Keller Springs Underpass Study Various Aerials Phase IIA (Subsurface) & Phase IIC (Miscellaneous) Investigation Report for the Former Logic Design Metals Facility Letter
Report Former Logic Design Metals Facility Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update Phase III Cost Analysis Former Logic Design Metals Facility
Letter From Terra-Mar Re: Proposal for Subchapter S Risk Assessment Letter From Ecology and Environment, Inc. Re: Letter Smnmarizing One Alternative for Closure Activities for the Property
at Arapaho Road and Quorum Drive known as the Proposed Addison Transit Center Letter From Applied Earth Sciences, Inc. Re: Activities and cost pertaining to the two proposals for the
former Logic Design Metals Facility 2 sets of plans for "Old Town 7-ll/Strip Center 1 set of plans for 4801 Arapaho Road and 15350 Addison Road 
December 3,1997 Copied from John R. Baumgartner's Files: Toll Tunnel Agreement Keller Springs Toll Tunnel Keller Springs Toll Tunnel '94 Keller Springs Toll Tunnel '93 Transportation
Plan Arapaho Road Phases I, II, III Arapaho Road Extension Ben Pinnell Moses & Cline Addison Transit Center Copied from James Pierce's Files: Arapaho Right-of-Way Arapaho Maps & Descriptions
Arapaho ABP Investments MEPC Properties MCM Co. Properties Appraisals -Moses & Cline Appraisals -Addison Colonnade Arapaho Road 1997 DART Transit Center/Arapaho Road Right-of-way '94,'95
Arapaho Road & DART Correspondence '96, '97 Arapaho Phase I Engineering contract Arapaho Road Realignment Right-of-way SW Bell & JB Cline Arapaho -Request -Statements of Qualifications
Arapaho Road Improvements SW Bell Land Acquisition DARTILAP/CMS Program DARTILAP/CMS 10/97 ApprovedlPayment Arapaho Road Realignment Design Tollway to Addison Road Arapaho Road Extension
'93, '94 Arapaho Streetscape Keller Springs Toll Tunnel Clyde Johnson's Files: Announcement Bid Doc. Check List Legal Affidavit Legal Advertising Purchase Order Carmen Moran'S Files:
Addison Airport Toll Tunnel Cooperation Agree. Resolution R95-111 Ordinance 094-038 Resolution R94-027 City Council Agenda's Pat Haggerty's File. Arapaho RdJ Addison Rd Easement Quorum
Center Ltd. Partnership Arapaho TU Electric Arapaho DesigniEnvironmental Addison DART Transit Center Building Inspection: Files for: 15350 Addison Road, 4801, 4803, and 4805 Arapaho
Road Applications for Certificates ofOccupancy 
􀀭􀀽􀀺􀁲􀁯􀁬􀁌􀁉􀁵􀀱􀁵􀀱􀁥􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠 . ····1 . . -.' . i . ".. J -----I, "' .. I . , , · _'. I . 1 : .: -. i < '.; 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁃􀁾􀂷􀁾􀀧􀁩􀁏􀁒􀁉􀁔􀁙􀀠
. THE "---------------::-:.. J " .;e1) · , · j 
Town of Addison KELLER SPRINGS TOLL TUNNEL POSITION PAPER The Town of Addison feels strongly that both the proposed Keller Springs Toll Tunnel project and the extension of Arapaho Road
within the Town limits are needed to help meet transportation needs of the region and the Town. The Town has long recognized the importance of an effective transportation system to its
success and continued growth. The Town has worked with neighboring (01+:' ___ Dallas County, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the 􀁎􀁏􀀧􀀫􀁾􀀠-. 􀁾􀀭 'Council of Governments
(NCTCOG), and the Texas Turnpike Authr>':> \;Je,;?_d assist in the planning and implementation 􀁏􀁦􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠. 􀁾􀀰􀀮􀁄􀂣􀁴􀀵􀁾􀁥􀀠􀁥􀁤􀁳􀀠of the Town and region. _____ \ Vl'lJ.-UJ.J:;;'
\,,( Lnrle.-f-. I a􀁪􀁜􀁾􀀠'as a logical transportation link that would 􀀭􀀭􀀾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀠. ).:J!" -􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀭􀀭 the highly congested North Dallas County 􀀮􀀠n 􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀼􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀠f
\ 􀁾􀁕􀁘􀀩􀀡􀁬􀀠 . 10'1, nents of Keller Springs Road creating a 􀁾􀁴􀁜􀁾-. 􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀧I 􀁨􀀺􀀨􀁬􀁊􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁹 to the Dallas North Tollway (DNT). . \ 1}'J: ;..r: .\.)-.1-<' ' project by
the TTA. The Keller Springs .. \l (\ \j.eX-􀁾/<;.0;/'\ 􀁉􀀧􀁜􀁌􀀶􀀭􀁾􀀠 ___________,g regional mobility in the area but will 􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁲􀁙􀀧􀂻􀀢􀀾􀁊􀀠 'ng experienced within the Town of
\ equally high priority for the Town. IS at Addison Road, to Marsh Lane e Road and provide increased local 'itizens of the Town. The Town n in 1987 and more recently has dway is included
in the Town of e Town Council is unanimously 1Oning, and implementation of nducted by Wilbur Smith and 11at the two facilities do not and congestion on Belt Line 'ings Tunnel. Although
the s with the Arapaho Road 􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠of the Arapaho Road . Tunnel volumes for the . vvG, as part of the Town of Addison .. ' ,,,nt Study, projected no decrease in traffic volume ....<lgs
Tunnel resulting from the extension of Arapaho Road. t p. Al COl The thesl Assol direct, Road r, WSA r, extensic. extensio, following _________ . . "ast/west travel demand in in the
corridor continues to increase as evidenced by the increasing levels of congestion in the area. Traffic volumes on Belt Une Road are increasing at an annual rate of three percent (3%1.
Any increased 1 
TOWN OF ADDISON ------------------PLAN ., , , ·1 , ------·---------:-··J·Jed for: . , I -----------'-!------1··1diso n .) . . -:".1 ':' .. Prepared by: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
December, 1992 
􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁲􀀮􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁯􀀧􀀧 __ 􀀮􀀭􀀽􀁟􀁾􀀬􀀢􀀭􀀢􀁜􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀠 .. 􀁟􀁚􀀢􀁾􀁃􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀮􀁴􀀹􀀹􀀶􀁟􀁑􀁡􀀠 iTraffic"VO!lim••􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀠 􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾�
�􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀠--" . ......:;.:. _ .-,.0 􀁾􀁾􀀠 Street Localion NB S6 I EB WB Total VPD 1996 I Sto alourn i {Q.o,l!wOOd Parkway 􀁊􀁓􀁏􀁕􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀡 1 IBrookhaven Uuu *. Aarsh Lane
!I'< -Not APplicable NR -Not Recorded 5 1 5620 4815 10435 9359 10391 9706 20097 18076 10867 11167 22034 17130 11356 11904 :i 23260 17505 11529 11902 ,l 23431 18526 11352 12018 􀁾􀀠 23370
20949 1 1 10435 I 20097 22034 23260 23431 23370 54846 52709 59148 69591 68757 66777 49905 51045 8909 5925 5908 5225 3163 124941076 2021 4904 5755 4905 2421 NA 13792 12699 4949 17348
19731 21828 7859 8853 4563 1103 943 622 , 110/, 11% 29% 33% 26% 12% 34% 32% 9°/0 33% 40% 1Q5% 23% 19% J,J :::-r-----l--'􀁾􀀷􀁾􀀷􀀱􀀠 6526 21% '11 I I 28678 7841 38% I i 'I 27488 7380
37,% 27105 6101 29'!.-. I _ -1i79_ NA NA I I I I I I I 􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀳􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀠 􀀱􀁳􀁾􀀠 -1-....,,--.+-,;-,00-1 6803 1 6489 __􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀯􀀠 􀀭􀁾􀀱􀀭􀀮􀀵􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁟􀀽􀁾􀀠2!6S----2962
_=. 􀁾􀀻􀁻􀀱􀀲􀁟􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀠=J 2061 2061 'NA NA B039 􀀱􀀴􀀶􀀳􀀵􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀶􀀵􀀹􀀵􀀭􀀭􀁦􀀭􀁲􀀰􀀳􀀷􀀳􀀠 14635 4262 41% \ I •••• j 2583 5005 NR NR NR 5005 NA NA I _._--,
46321 30835 31503 34325 46321 11996 35% 53467 33931 32980 33987 53467 19480 57% 39526 32787 37942 37196 39526 2330 6% 35518 37531 35382 32621 35518 2897 9% 41517 53648 33421 36878 41517
4639 13% 􀀭􀁾􀀠 ----Page 1 
Town of Addison KELLER SPRINGS TOLL TUNNEL POSITION PAPER The Town of Addison feels strongly that both the proposed Keller Springs Toll Tunnel project and the extension of Arapaho Road
within the Town limits are needed to help meet transportation needs of the region and the Town. The Town has long recognized the importance of an effective transportation system to its
success and continued growth. The Town has worked with neighboring ri·:::.....-Dallas County, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the 􀁎􀀨􀁬􀁲􀀧􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 .-\ Council of Governments
(NCTCOG), and the Texas Turnpike Auth,,':· --('A le.5_d assist in the planning and implementation of a 􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁓􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 eeds of the Town and region. -----.J-...--'.'-'Q--YX\,L::;:;:(
􀁾 􀁉􀀮􀁊􀁬􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁾 1 as a I?gical transportation link that would 􀁾􀀭􀀭 -􀁜􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁊􀀮􀀬􀀠 tl_.-1::::t--the highly congested North Dallas County 􀀭 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾 I \;:1'yJ1D :ro-, Iq2)yents
􀁾l\!-'􀁾 􀀠. 􀁓􀁾􀀠 I I 􀁨􀁾􀀠'Iity too tfh Ke eDllaerll aSsp rNinogrtsh RTooaldlw carye a(tDinNgT )a. . \l 􀁾􀁜􀀧􀁬􀁥􀁙􀀭 􀀲􀀺􀀬􀀮􀁯􀁪􀁯􀀮ifrH􀀵' 􀀵􀁾􀀧􀀱􀁧project by the TTA. The
Keller Springs -_ regional mobility in the area but will 􀁾􀁜􀁩􀁥􀀬􀁜􀁃􀁊􀀭􀁜􀀠 􀁾􀁊􀀠 'ng experienced within the Town of , equally high priority for the Town. 'IS at Addison Road, to
Marsh Lane .. . e Road and provide increased local __________􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁺􀁥􀁮􀁳􀀠of the Town. The Town t n in 1987 and more recently has p. --Al--dway is included in the Town of e Town
Council is unanimously cal The 􀁾mning, and implementation of thes, '1ducted by Wilbur Smith and Asso, 1at the two facilities do not direct. and congestion on Belt Une Road r. 'ings
Tunnel. Although the WSA r, s with the Arapaho Road extensit -:tion of the Arapaho Road extensio. • Tunnel volumes for the following---. vvG, as part of the Town of Addison ....ent Study,
projected no decrease in traffic volume ,,,,, .gs Tunnel resulting from the extension of Arapaho Road, ..:ast/west travel demand in the corridor continues to increase as evidenced by
the increasing levels of congestion in the area. Traffic volumes on Belt Une Road are increasing at an annual rate of three percent (3%). Any increased 1 
. (214) ,150·21171 16801 􀁗􀁬􀀢􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁈􀁗􀀠 November 17, 1994 MEMORANDUM 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁊􀁊􀁤􀁤􀀮􀁬􀁾􀁑􀁬􀀧􀀩􀀠:1t:Cl-LL?J.-(􀁪􀁾􀀮􀁥􀁮􀁴􀂫􀀠 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 􀀽􀁾􀀺􀁌􀁊􀀵􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁇􀁊􀁾􀁦􀁯􀀭􀁥􀁶�
�􀀬􀀵􀀮􀀠􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠 Ron Whit City To: From: John Bau'-'-' Director ( \ Re: DART Tr ____________________􀁾 􀁉􀀠 Ii \ 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀂷􀁉􀀠 DART is continuing to sear -'.
iter. DART and staff like the idea of locatin \ ... 􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁊􀁡􀁣􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁹􀀠when rail travel becomes a reality alo···--·j . 􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀧&-• ..􀀭􀁾􀀬.. 􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀭 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁜􀁜􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾
....... buildingl7·l1 on AddisonII From DART's perspective, . -:lth less flexibility than they would like. DAI ----.-.---r------·q·: \'imateIYwill seek site plan approval, possibl) <'Iand,
and support to buy or lease space adjaC--··----··....----··-··-·-\--.-...----. .􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁬 Attached is a map and sch,·----JRB/gd \ Attachment 
I L. R. Denton & Co. Real Estate Appraisal and Consulting !, L. R.andall Denton. MAl I E. Glenn Silva. MAr David Heatb, MAl Mindy S. Heath. MAl Of Counsel: September 22, 1995 Elise It
Mikus, MAr SENT VIA FACSIMILE (214) 931.6643 Mr. David Nig; --\ --'--"f}--£,{s. 6,JJle;:;.;;SL-__ Town of Addis, 􀁾􀁾 _ .t:.LCi f '\ P. O. Box 144 -fL • R-o')􀀧􀀺􀀭􀀡􀀶􀁕􀁊􀁌􀀭􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀽�
�􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠 Addison, TX 7 t:r.rll.f'j ,"'-'5 􀁾􀁳􀁣􀁮􀁦􀁊􀁾􀀧􀁟􀀠 RE: 􀁁􀁐􀁰􀁲􀁡􀁩􀁳􀁡􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁮􀁬􀀧􀀠 D I ,r.,d.menfs ' .477 Acre 􀁴h 􀀺_􀁴􀁲T􀁾 e􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀯􀀮􀀮􀁬􀁮􀀱􀁊􀀨􀀨􀁾􀁏􀀮􀀮􀁌􀁌􀀠
SOutheast f) ,L::::!..-"-'--__ • 􀁓􀁰􀁥􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁭􀀠 1\;1£:1?1i 􀁴􀀺􀁮􀁬􀁾􀀠 Add1son, 1---1..:::1_ 􀁾􀀠? D,,, M, """. 􀁮􀀡􀀧􀀮􀁻􀀡􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀹􀁌􀁛􀀱􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁡􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁒􀀬􀀭􀀼􀁟􀀺􀀠..nn_,.,_,"C4='_
"'. 􀁷􀁾􀀬􀀭􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁯􀀧􀁥􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁔􀁔􀁟􀀠-'I' -1/􀁾􀁌􀁌􀀶􀁊􀁯􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁲􀁴 on the above_ "1"0",,, pro"", " , _Ib, 􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀢􀀠", market value of th 􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁟􀀭􀁉􀀬􀁨􀁾__________=======We
expect to worl-us With such tl 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁩􀁳􀁨􀀠 additional 􀁩􀁮􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁟􀀭􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁉the repon. 0"􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁭􀀢􀁯􀁾􀀬􀀠•
re bo,., 􀁾􀀭 ' '00"",._ 10"' 0", h, "''' !"', 1&, 􀁾􀀢􀁷􀁩􀁬􀁬􀀠 "'"r eob"k,, ", ""'1<"o"b "'" 3 -!i< 0000';,,,,, M If"', Propo", 􀁭􀁾􀀠 I ,"" "<Om ", same to this office. 1--'-!L1_
_________________-irt. ----,I Respectfully sUbmittcc 􀀢􀀢􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀢􀀢 􀁾􀀠.. " 􀁾􀀯...􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀬􀀮􀁰􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀢􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾.􀀭.. 􀁾􀀠 L Randal! Denton, MAl President ACKNOWLEDGED & AGREED:
BY: 􀀭􀁋􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁵􀁬􀀮􀁾􀀠 DATE: _/() -IC-:..2£ 14800 Quorum D, ve • Su;<c 330 • D.II",. Texas 7524D • (214) 960-1640 • Fax (214) 490-5892 
(972) 450·7000 Addison, Texl.ls 􀀷􀁓􀀰􀀰􀁬􀁾􀁏􀁬􀀫􀀫􀀠 5300 Belt Line Rood FAX (972) 450·7043 MEMORANnllM I May 8,1997 ------=, _-::-".J"-.J PI II􀁾􀀠􀁉􀀢􀁃􀁾􀀺􀁓􀀠 hip $, __ TO: RanI
A iR FROM: Carmto---p. dLd B C(1 SUBJECT: ColorTlMJ-, 􀁾􀁉􀀧􀀠 '+/1+" jflH 1)j 'il \ (1/J . ...vJ3/'\ -L11,hSI 􀁗􀁌􀀺􀁉􀀱􀁊􀁉􀁊􀀡􀁦􀁾􀀧􀀠fI-O-t"j ::::l495 As you are well aw 0._ 􀁾􀀠
RaJ bRT D. 'q' Cj 1 -;ing on it for some timet:IL..-"fl 􀀭􀁾􀀭 􀁾􀁦􀀭􀀭􀁫􀀢􀁌􀂮􀀮􀁰􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁫􀀬􀀠 -Iopment on the south side of Arap; Uv-r. '"􀁾h1= e.hn:L...-Gl!0.ru at . :on the
north Side of Arapaho. 􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁬􀀱􀁊􀀠 l ,':"'if have worked with John and.Slac_'.:lli!/-K.ct I WQ/:L.R:Q-yV 51,U&//<1--fJ3.thne.... lable recommendations II U ' I 􀀭􀁾 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
COLONNADE !I,....'__ ,'_ _ __:_::=JI_--:-.: ":"/' I here are 1nree fl1 l 􀁾􀁲􀀺__:__________--,,1. The trading of I :I I believe 􀁗􀁅􀀭􀁾􀀭 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠 __ __--Ii be. We have gotten appr
i I-of-way we will " abandon,a '--j .foot. What we are forgettil II II practices, which dicta Our piece, as a li part of the '-t=' 15.00 per foot. However, t: I the number and size of
utili\------, vorth $15.00 per 􀁦􀁾􀁯􀁴􀀠on 􀁰􀁡􀁾􀀠 1'1 In reality, our piece, as a i :t we were to try to sell it, nc \i square feet, , which is to,-􀁾..._..._ :_. A-r' .. " 􀁾􀀠of
not less than 3-stories, and it is ercumbered with a storm sewer line, a Southwestern Bell cable, and other utilities, If MEPC was not expandin1 the Colonnade and did not want the abandoned
roadway, we would have three options, First, we could tear out the concrete, install turf and irrigation to t.le area, and keep it in landscaping. By MEPC's estimate that option would
cost about $32,000. Second, we could abandon the right-of-way, but retain an e.\sement for our utilities, By state law, when right-ofway is abandoned by a city, ','he property owners
on each side can take 
___ PUJ3LIC , 􀀧􀁾􀁔􀀧􀁔􀁲􀁾􀀠DEPARTMENT (214) 450·2871 16801 Westgrove March 7,1995 Mr. L. Randall Denton, MA=-S _ 􀁖􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁜􀁓􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀱􀀽􀀢􀁩􀀠􀁬􀁥􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀭__. L.R. Denton
& Co. f1 I) n L . 14800 Quorum Drive, Suire :jjtn I 􀁯􀀧􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀱􀀩􀁥􀀡􀁊􀁾􀁦􀀠/' JiKJJrrlenE ct Ou a.l;:f. Dallas Texas 75240 ()'-r . b ) 􀁟􀀱􀀱􀁴􀁾􀀬􀀠 a. 􀀱􀀱􀁬􀀧􀁜􀁰􀀭􀁹􀀯􀀩􀁾􀁌􀀠
􀀵􀁵􀁊􀁄􀀮􀁤􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁮􀁡􀀮􀀩􀁾􀁦􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀧_ Re: Appraisals 􀁯􀁦􀁍􀁯􀁳􀁥􀀬􀁟􀀮􀀮􀁄􀁾􀀠 lj. L-PrvjJJ1S V\'()B YRrY) Dear Mr. Denton: 1M 􀀱􀁊􀁪􀁪􀂣􀀩􀀮􀂣􀁾􀀭􀀤􀀭􀀭􀁉􀁦􀁐􀁰􀀮􀀯􀀱􀀩􀁶􀁬􀀭Va_yment
The Town bas accepted your-f1-. Qbb 􀁂􀁤􀀮􀀦􀀮􀁾􀁨􀀮􀀠ThS(t1tJ --roll -'ActdRd BenPiDnell and Moses & Cline. Attached is . {; Bd c: 􀀻􀀺􀀭􀁪􀀮􀁾􀀳􀀠 .cr /\ . 􀁲􀁾􀁯􀁣􀁥􀁥􀁤􀀮􀀠TOOe is
of the essence 00 this project 2-. . L/&-'.-..k '-.,)_._':::t hm 30 days from the receipt of this letter. : I bave enclosed a metes and 􀁾􀀮['he taking on the Pinnell tract will ebange
􀁳􀁬􀁩􀁧􀁨􀁾 􀀭􀁾􀀭..__.I ".• tl description and 􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠 exbil?itto you 􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁮 I reeeiv, reeeiv, I' .. ' 􀁾􀀠project for your . -"use. __􀁾􀀠 I !, Both property owners are awa.-.-􀁊􀀧􀁾􀀠
'-----􀀭􀀭􀀴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀳􀀱􀀷􀀱􀀬 􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠 i, , Mr. Ben Pinnell at 811497.32 to lend you my assistance. As we discussed on the plloue ..the Pinnell tract and you may I appraisal to me upon
comple I:.Id I will be bappy : . I I ii' i the appraisal for Ie Moses & Cline ' 1--------If you bave any questions or __ Sfj:t 􀀩􀀯􀁦􀀧􀁾􀀠 David Nighswonger, P.E. Engineer Enclosures
DCN B:\oenCOll,Lt.r 
􀁴􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀧􀀷􀀺􀀬􀁲􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀺􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀽􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀺􀀬􀀧􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀮􀀻􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀢􀀭􀀽􀀧􀁓􀀷􀀢􀀢􀀠 PAlU<S & RECIlA;.:;;:T;:.1.;;.O.;;.N;..-o_____􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀺􀁻􀁾􀀹􀀱􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀲􀀱􀀺􀀮􀀮
􀀺􀀴􀀺􀀮􀀵􀀨􀀩􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀲􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁄􀀵􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁜􀀭􀀮:.;FA:.:.X:.;.{9;,;7,;;.:21,;;.4::;50-:;.;2;::;33::.,;< 16801 WcslgrOYC I'M,,;! Office llox 14.4· Ad on. Texas 75001 November 20,1-------􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾
􀀭􀁾􀀭 J. 1e.rce 􀁳􀁟􀁾􀁛􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭 A. Rene Rodrig-n-. ( 􀁨􀁲􀀺􀀧􀁴􀀵􀁃􀁾􀀺􀁫 DART FaCilities.-1:It:..0J2al::ul .. -r, , 􀀶􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀷􀀧􀁩􀁜􀁬􀁕􀁾􀀩􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀁳􀀠10ll 􀁲􀁊􀀺􀀮􀁵􀁜􀁮􀁾
I 􀁲􀁡􀀲􀁭􀁭􀁦􀁾􀁗􀁬􀀱􀁦􀀠􀁃􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁾􀁲 Re: AddisejlmpJ?d-. I __ .i<L_tu"1iie.rsh'f> i Dear Mr Rodr I 97 regard'ing the i 􀁾􀁒􀁔􀀠Transit Center I wanted to fol------: IN n for planting
25 -4" landscape i55,,'-_______ I -..Quorum Drive. Construction ( 􀀬􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀱 trees in Ihe Tc,________ . pe requirements .-.' ·Ire quiremenlls 96 trees, ..􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀠 Dart will be
CI ................ 􀀭􀁾 .-_. -.. . 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀭􀀭 described in rl----,---"_M) .. 􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀠 while only 75 .. 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀧􀀠􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁣􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾.... .= .l 1 I 􀁌􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾..􀀭􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀭
. . ·l attached planting plan 10 "-':,;...􀀬􀀬􀀽􀀽􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠 .----. is will be planted 10 create Addison ISpI-will fund Ihe remaining Vn bring the sille€---------Town as specified in the
􀁾􀀠 a second ro, 17 sidewalk.--------Inlerlocal A, ! STREETSC'------i e Town's streetscape th , gr een slrip behind the The Inlerlo(:-------apaho Road and IArplan. The, ystem and grass
10 the sidewalK ..•.--------􀁾􀁲􀀠s ler systems and the ;rink Quorum Dt laintenance contractors. back of Ihe;--------confusion I ,we d and approved by the )[letheless, based on our The
landsi ified within the interior Town. ThE estimate,' . I planlltig slnp south 01 me ,"'IlIO"a,,' Please call me at (972)-450.2851 t let me know Dart's deCts·lon. Sincerely, 1 .//J 􀀣􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁶􀁊􀀼
􀀮􀀮􀀠 Slade Strickland cc Jim pierce, Town of Addi, 1 Carmen Moran, Town of I ,dison Attachment 
REQUEST F< ARAPAHO QUALIFICATIONS 􀁾, 􀁏􀁁􀁄􀁅􀁘􀁔􀁅􀁎􀁓􀁉􀁏􀁎 I TOW:r ',o F ADDISON The Town of 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁓􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀠-1 TI:' 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀠 -I ngineering firms for the design of 􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾
' CcS l e../extend Arapaho Road from its existir 􀁃􀁩􀁜􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠 I; -rIA. fJ 11' ched map). The initial phase of the 􀁦􀁊􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁲􀀧􀀠 -:=:i." 􀁾􀁨􀁥􀀠􀁳􀁥􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠phase" I signals,
rallroad cr< _ Addison will accepl through April 30, 19a maximum number firm should provide The SOQ shall deE charge, Project Ma "imilar oroiects in sc_II navho H' . -.T ,T1􀁾􀀠l _ 􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁊􀀧􀁊􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀱􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁊􀁪􀀠 tne laSl ave VI 􀁝􀁾􀀬􀁵􀁟􀀮􀁟􀀭_--;.:;-::.:--;.:;-􀁟􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁟􀀽􀀽􀀢􀀭􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀡􀀠 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠 ----. 􀀻􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭funded
with the To\' -1 business 􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁰􀁲􀁩􀁳􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭 --􀁟􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀮􀁌􀁔􀁉􀀧􀀱􀀠Gt-of-way needs. -􀁾􀁅􀁮􀁖 (raOmurtJn_ ,,:ill be traffic It-...:-r.: _L!l .1-Midway Road. 􀁾􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁳 II ,--en!
tY :ring consultants r-----------'-Q should contain ' The engineering I--------------i:sign the project. __ . ______________􀁾􀁣􀁴􀀠 (Principal-inriduaL A list of _______...;l1as completed
in -lvided along with 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁡􀀭􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁳􀁲􀁾􀁡􀁥􀁤􀁩􀁐􀁶􀀻􀁡􀁮􀀺􀀻􀁴􀀭􀁡􀁛􀁡􀁧􀀻􀂷􀁥􀀧􀁹􀁤􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭 􀁾􀀠 :s are utilized. All written Stateme I-------------_:ction
Committee, which will be made ____ ------1 1--_ .vid Nighswonger, Public Works Engir criteria shown on the attached pages----------l :---_____.________,valuation. If it is deemed necessary
" I the Town and make oral presentat-·----------I f-------------)sal to perform the work and a fee wil Interested consulta Mailing: Phone: John Baumgartner Director of Public Works P.O.
Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 (214)450-2871 '. mcil for approvaL .cations to: ltree!: 16801 Westgrove Addison, Texas 75248 lax: (214)931-6643 
---------􀁾 . 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁾 ,Application foffl'l mU$t b6 aTlSW0rad c:omplqla1y. flam-d. and &1"n6;1 10.( 􀁰􀁻􀂢􀁃􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁪􀁮􀁧􀀠to 􀁬􀀻􀁬􀁾􀁾.• TOWN OF 􀁁􀁄􀁄􀁉􀁓􀁤􀁾􀀠 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY Address of Business 􀁾􀀸􀁣􀀾􀁓􀀺􀀠£2..,nP/1Jb 11-,"/1'0,0. -rX 7"'::::J-4¥ ISuite Mailing Address L900 ..:;V 'f!.. tl..!. 1./0£ (i9c..tl/l 􀁃􀁉􀀺􀁬􀀺􀀻􀁴􀀡􀁤􀀧􀁾􀁬􀁌7lJN
-rx 75"oOG> Number Street r City 1 State Zip Total Square Footage of Space 13Q)O IW14r::. !=! ..... ""-"....... __---: -_.. _-----I2IYes o No Name of Business Type of Business 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠
:8.Je_5 _55 Phon; 􀁾 J,;)<.{ I "" -4(){3 􀀶􀁜􀀢􀁾􀀭 -\n_5p-e.dlDJl t Above Address ,..:,);-:,-£...--'-No. of Employees at Abc -----􀁾, 􀁳􀀯􀁾I 􀀮􀀢􀁩􀀬%􀀠􀁃􀁥􀀮-􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁡􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀮'.􀀬.N
-o.;.;•... -Former !BUSiness Add -"-ID47X 7')000 (!. 'Slate Zip 􀁏􀀢􀀧􀀱􀁬􀀭􀀭􀁩􀀧􀁌􀁦􀁾􀀠 I iUst other Locations ;n Aa-_ ! Owner(s) of Business I --! If Cor oration, rin! name 􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽___􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀻􀁾 IOwner's Address State Zip Owner's Driver's License N lowner of Building A-:is: _---􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀷􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀮􀁉􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀽􀁆􀁓􀁊􀀮􀀳􀁾�
�􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁟􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁟􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁬􀀱􀀠 ,Building Owner's 'Addrss; _------------)L.-_'LIc:.}S,>.-·􀁾􀀮__7<..L@.QC;-__----. State Zip ISignature of Applicant 4-----􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀽􀀻􀁡􀀽􀁬􀁩􀁯􀀽􀁮􀀽􀀶􀀽􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁴􀀽􀀹􀀽􀀷􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀹􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀱􀀱􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁳􀀭􀁬
􀁦􀀭􀀧􀁚􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀬􀀭􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁣􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀬􀀠-Zoning . V Qeoar!ment Fire Landscape PlanningiZoning .UtililiaslStre sts Health Tax Inspeclor's A roval IPermanent Certificate
Issued ! (Building OffiCial) Cash Check No, .0.0 'l CERTIFICATE NO. 95'0(,,:>,. 03 0 
4i 􀁾􀁜􀀠 \.\'\DDISO BUSINESS I\SSOGLI\TION , Gregory C. Roach 􀁰􀁴􀁥􀀵􀁩􀁤􀀮􀁃􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀠 Cr.>iS 'BeVil Vtc.e P1:':,$id.(l',\ --N p.O. 'Bo< 6S] Addison, 'fe<as 1>"(" 0""-N'. 􀁾.....􀀢􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾•
,'W"""""."..􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀬••􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀧􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀬􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠 ...., ...." 􀀮􀀬􀁾.., ••",,,,"," <," " .....􀁾􀀢􀀠.. "",,."" ""...... 0",,·0''', .. •'.".''"'''''M•• ,. ,. 􀁏􀀬􀁾􀀬""."
, ....."".., 􀀮􀁾."'.,.... 0.""-N'._"......, "',..􀁾􀀧􀀬".o'"","",,.,...􀁾,.􀀬" ," •"•". "'""om,........, .• ...•,,·,.·.",'" . "....-,o"m"""'. ..,.0.".""...,.,.'"·' ..,,,., ....." ''''
• _,, ••, .." '" • "'"....., W • ,,,..," " .. ,om'"" • , ••,."" s0ub."je.c.t. t.o. n,o .c o􀁾nd.i.ti"o n s_ wa"s "ap,pr .o.v.e.d... .", 􀀬􀁾.... ""........,,,,,,,,,,,,.......".,. ..
W •,••, ....... , .. " ..􀁾􀀢,..,." " ... '" .'"...􀁾..,.,. _"W ......􀀬􀁾.... '"••• •􀁾􀀮"..."""".,," ...... , ..,m' ,,0"" " .. , ......... , ,,"',,,...,'" -.".".' 
MEMORANDUM TO: John B11lImgartner J FROM: 8im Isrneloff, Cowles & Thompson .A RE: ABP v. DART and Addison -Discovery Requests DATE: November 11, 1997 I am assisting Ken Dippel in the
ABP v. DART and Addison lawsuit. We have been served with the attached written discovery requests from the plaintiffs. The requests include interrogatories, a request for admissions
and a request for production of documents. We must serve our response to these requests no later than December 10, 1997. I would appreciate it if you would prepare draft answers and
send them to me as soon as possible, preferably no later than December 2. I will put the answers in proper form, add any necessary objections and responses to purely legal questions,
and finalize the answers before the due date. H you have any questions I can be reached at (214) 762-2131. Many thanks. 
I, CAUSE NO. 97·06265 ABP INVESTMENTS #Ill, LTD., A § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, § JOSEPH H. JONES, BETH § 􀁂􀁒􀁁􀁎􀁄􀁅􀁂􀁅􀁒􀁒􀁙􀀬􀁃􀁁􀁒􀁏􀁌􀁙􀁎􀁐􀁾􀁓􀀠§ SHIMER MERRITT, AND SAMUEL § THOMAS 􀁐􀁾􀁓􀀬 CO·TRUSTEES OF § THE MARY COFFIELD TRUST, THE § ANNETTE COFFIELD TRUST, § THE EVELYN C. JONES TRUST, § THE BETH BRANDEBERRY TRUST, § THE
CORINNE SHIMER TRUST AND § DALLASCOUNTY,TEXAS A. BEN PINNELL, JR., § § PLAINTIFFS § § VS. § § DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND § THE TOWN OF ADDISON, § § DEFENDANTS. § 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON TO: Defendant, Town of Addison, by and through its attorney of record, Sim Israeloff, Cowles & Thompson,
P.C., 901 Main Street, Suite 4000, Dallas, Texas 75202. ABP Investments #Ill, Ltd., A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., Joseph H. Jones, Beth Brandeberry, Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Samuel Thomas
Perkins, Co-Trustees of the Mary Coffield Trust, the Annette Coffield Trust, the Evelyn C. Jones Jones Trust, the Beth Brandeberry Trust, and the Corinne Shimer Trust, property owners
or Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiffs") in the above-entitled and numbered cause, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 1 3Ot42 00001 LIT 234735.1 
requests, pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 167, that the Defendant produce the documents and things listed below for inspection and copying on or before the expiration of thirty-one
(31) days from the date of service hereof, at the offices of the Plaintiffs' counsel. As used in this Request, "document" shall mean every writing or record of any type and description
and every tangible thing that is or has been in the possession, control or custody of the Defendant, or any of its agents or employees, to which the Defendant has access, or of which
the Defendant has knowledge, including without limitation, correspondence, memoranda, stenographic or handwritten notes, studies, publications, books, pamphlets, pictures, films, tapes,
voice recordings, maps, reports, surveys, minutes or statistical compilations, every copy of such writing or record where the original is not in the possession, custody or control of
the Defendant or its agents or employees; and every copy of every such writing or record where such copy contains any commentary or notation whatsoever that does not appear on the original.
A written response to this request is required pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 167. If you maintain that any document or record requested herein has been lost, misplaced or
destroyed, set forth with respect to each document: (a) The contents of the document; (b) A description of the document, including its nature, date, by whom prepared or sent, and identify
the recipient or person to whom the document was directed; (c) The location of any copies of the document; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF
ADDISON -Page 2 30142 OOJOI UT 234TJ5.1 
(d) The date of and circumstances surrounding such loss or destruction; and (e) If the document was destroyed, the name of the person who ordered, or authorized that destruction and
the reason for the destruction. If you maintain that any of the documents requested herein cannot be produced by virtue of any claims, privilege or inununity, state with respect to each
such document: (a) The date of the document; (b) The author or authors of the document; (c) The identity of the attorney and the client involved; (d) The identity of each person receiving
copies of the document; (e) The nature of the document involved (Le., memorandum, letter, contract, etc.); (1) The general content of the document; and (g) The ground upon which each
such document is considered to be privileged. This Request for Documents is deemed to be continuing in nature pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 166b(5). If you receive documents
supplementing the documents requested herein, you are directed to immediately forward those documents to the counsel for the Plaintiff. Failure to supplement could invoke the sanctions
of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 215(5). PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 3 30142 Oi'XXlt UT 23413', 1 
DEFINITIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 1. "You" and "your," as used herein, means the party, Whether a corporation, partnership or some other entity, or persons to whom these Interrogatories are
addressed, its, his, her, or their employees, agents, attorneys, and all other person acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of such party or persons, whether authorized to do
so or not. 2. "Person," as used herein, means natural persons, corporations, firms associations, partnerships, joint ventures, or any other form of legal business entity; and governmental
agencies, departments, units, or any subdivisions thereof. 3. "Expert," as used herein, means any person who is particularly skilled, learned, or experienced in a particular art, science,
trade, business, profession, or vocation, and whose knowledge of the subject of such art, science, etc. is not possessed by persons generally. 4. "Testifying expert," as used herein,
means an expert who IlIlU!: be called as a witness to testify at the trial of this cause. 5. "Consulting expert," as used herein, means an expert who is IlQ1 expected to be called as
a witness at trial, but whose mental impressions or opinions have been reviewed by a testifying expert. 6. "Document," as used herein, means writings of every kind, source, and authorship,
both originals and all non-identical copies thereof, in your possession, custody or control, or known by you to exist, irrespective of whether the writing is one intended for or transmitted
internally by you, or intended for or transmitted to any other person or entity, including, without PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page 4 3014200001 LIT 234735.1 
limitation, any government agency, department, administrative entity, or personnel. The tenn includes handwritten, typewritten, printed, photocopied, photographic, and recorded matter.
It 􀁩􀁮􀁣􀁬􀁵􀁾􀀠communications in words, symbols, pictures, sound recordings, films, tapes, and information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information storage or
retrieval systems, together with the codes and/or programming instructions and other materials necessary to understand and use such systems. For purposes of illustration and not limitation,
the term includes: correspondence, transcripts of testimony, letters, notes, reports, papers, files, books, records, contracts, agreements, telegrams, teletypes and other communications
sent or received, diaries, calendars, logs, notes or memoranda of telephonic or face-to-face conversations, drafts, work papers, agendas, bulletins, notices, circulars, announcements,
instructions, schedules, minutes, summaries, notes, and other records and recordings ofany conferences, meetings, visits, statements, interviews, or telephone conversations, bills, statements,
and other records of obligations, canceled checks, vouchers, receipts and other records of payments; ledgers, journals, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and other sources
of fmancial data, analyses, statements, interviews, affidavits, printed matter (including published books, articles, speeches, and newspaper clippings), press releases, cbarts, drawings,
specifications, manuals, brochures, parts lists, memoranda of all kinds to and from any persons, agencies, or entities, technical and engineering reports, evaluations, advice, recommendations,
commentaries, conclusions, studies, test plans, manuals, procedure, data, reports, results and conclusions, records of administrative, technical, and financial actions taken or recommended;
and all other writings the contents of PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 5 30142 t'XXX)1 UT 234T.J5.1 
which relate to, discuss, consider or otherwise refer to the subject matter of the particular discovery requested. 7. To "identify" a person, as used herein, means to state the following:
(a) The full name of the person; (b) The person's present employer and job title, ifknown; ifnot known, the answer shall so state; (c) The person's present business and residence addresses
and telephone numbers, if known; if not known, then the person's last known business and residence addresses and telephone numbers; and (d) The person's affIliation at any time with
you by employment or otherwise, including the nature and dates of such affIliation. 8. To "identify" a document, as used herein, means to state the following: (a) The title, heading,
or caption, if any, of such document; (b) The identifying number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, on the document, if any; and the significance of meaning of such number(s), letter(s),
or combination thereof, if necessary to understand the document or to evaluate any claim that the document is protected from discovery; (c) The date appearing on the document, if no
date appears thereon, the answer shall so state and shall give the date or approximate date on which the document was prepared; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 6 301-420000) LIT 1347JS.l 
(d) The number of pages and the general nature or description of the document (e.g., a letter, memorandum, minutes of a meeting, etc.); (e) The identify of the person who signed the
document or over whose name the document was issued; if the document was not signed, the answer shall so state, and shall identify the person(s) who prepared it; (t) The identity of
each person to whom the document was addressed, sent, distributed, or directed; (g) The physical location of the document and the name of its custodian(s); and (h) Whether the document
will be voluntari1y made available to Defendant for inspection and copying; if not, the reasons why not. 9. To "identify" an oral communication, as used herein, means to state: (a) The
time, date, and place at which the oral communication was made; (b) The identity of each person who participated in the oral communication who was present during the oral communication;
(c) The identity ofthe person(s) who employed, or who was represented by, each person making the oral communication; (d) The substance of the communication; and (e) The identity of each
document pertaining to the oral communication. 10. To "identify" a sale of real property, as used herein, means to state: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 7 3014200001 LIT 2341J.S.l 
(a) The identity of each Grantor and each Grantee in the sale; (b) The total area of the real property sold; (c) The consideration paid by the Grantee in the sale, including the terms
of payment; (d) The closing date of the sale; (e) The legal description and the local address of the real property sold; (f) The volume and page number of the official real property
records of every county in which the conveying document was recorded; (g) A description of every flxnrre and improvement located on the real property sold, including the age, condition,
use, size (in square feet), and construction material of the future or improvement; and (h) The identity of each person who was contacted to verify and data concerning the sale. 11.
A request for the "identity" of a thing, as used herein, constitutes a request for the same information by which you are to "identify" the thing. 12. 􀁾􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁰􀁥􀁲􀁴􀁹􀀢􀀠as used herein,
means the entire parcel of real estate described in Defendants' Statement in Condemnation in the condemnation proceeding Cause No. 97-OO352-D. 13. If you claim that any document(s) requested
in these Requests for Production of Documents is privileged, state the precise nature and basis of the privilege claimed, including a reference by number and subdivision to any applicable
provisions of the Texas Rules of Evidence under which such privilege is claimed. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 8 301(2 00101
UT 23473S.1 
Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON & KNIGHT A Professional Corporation Michael E. Schonberg State Bar No. 00784927 3300 First City Center 1700 Pacific Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201 (214)
969-1139 FAX (214) 969-1651 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this the 7th day of November, 1997. a aue and correct copy of the foregoing pleading has been forwarded
to all counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested. Michael E. Schonberg PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 9
30141iXWl Ufll47l5.1 
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1: Any and all photographs, aerial photographs, computer animations, videotapes, motion pictures, file or other graphic depiction or
document including, maps, plats or models of the real property which is the subject of this lawsuit. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2: Any and all maps, plats, plans, surveys, specifications,
blueprints, profiles, analyses, reports, or studies pertaining to site planning, drainage, topography, grades or grading, traffic count, development, construction, zoning or land use
in connection with the real property which is the subject of this lawsuit. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3: Any and all appraisal reports, market analysis, income analysis, cost
analysis or comparable sales data made, offered, reviewed, compiled, used or consulted by any and all witnesses who mayor shall be called to testify upon the trial of this cause, including
any reports, analysis, or data which reflects or forms the basis of the impressions or opinions held by witnesses who may, or shall be called to, testify upon the trial of this cause.
RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 10 30142 lXml LIT 234735.1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4: All statements made by any tenant, employee, agent, or representative of Defendant concerning the condemnation of the Property that is the subject of this
action. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.5: Each written report, statement, transcription, or electronically recorded statement of any fact or expert witness, read or reviewed by
any expert witness you may call at the trial of this cause. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.6: The current resume or curriculum vitae of each expert witness you may call at trial,
including the listing of all publications authored or co-authored by each such expert witness, and a listing of each such witness' educational achievements. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
NO.7: Any and all exhibits to be used at the trial of this cause of action. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 11 3014200001
UT 23473:5.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.8: Any and all photographs, plats, maps, computer animations, videotapes, motion pictures, film, graphic depictions or documents of any and all alleged comparable
sales used to support any expert witness' evaluation. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.9: All contracts, notes, records and memoranda related to any agreement between Defendant and
its contractors regarding construction of tbe public project for which the Property has been condemned. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: Every zoning ordinance or other land
use regulation or rule which you allege, contend, or believe effects the value of the property at any relevant time. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: All correspondence exchanged
between you and Plaintiffs or their tenants relating to tbe Property or the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 12 30142 iXXQt UT 234135.1 
REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTION NQ. 12: All records of meetings, public or private, including transcriptS or minutes, during which you or your employees discussed the Property or the public project
for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: REQUEST FQR PRODUCTION NQ. 13: All correspondence or writings between you and any public utility company in which you or your employees
discussed the Property or the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTlON NQ. 14: All written or recorded statements made by Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs'
employees or tenants. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTION NQ. 15: All notices of public hearings that you held regarding the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE:
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 13 lO142()(X'K)1 UT234735,1 
REQUEST POR PRODUCTION NO. 16: All documents reflecting the projected completion dates for the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NQ.
17: All bid requests you published or issued asking for bids on any portion of the public project for which the Property has been condemned. RESPQNSE: REOUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 18:
All correspondence and communications between you and Southland Corporation or its representatives or any other tenants of the Property. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NO. 19: All
environmental impact studies done in anticipation of the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 14 3014200001 UT 23473$.1 
REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 20: All documents. negotiations and/or contracts relating to your purchase or condemnation of any property within 1 mile of the Property that is the subject
of this claim since 1994. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FQR PRQDUCJIQN NQ. 21: All interoal documents or memoranda relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPQNSE:
REQUEST FQR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 22: All internal documents or memoranda relating to the negotiation of the purchase of the Property by you or Dallas Area Rapid Transit. RESPQNSE: REQUEST
FQR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 23: All scale models of the completed project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN
OF ADDISON -Page 15 3014200Xi1 UT1:34llS.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: All leases or agreements you have made with tenants on the Property since the condemnation of the Property. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25: All
docwnents reflecting plans to condemn or purchase additional property for the public project for which you condemned the Property at issue in this suit. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
NO. 26: All docwnents reflecting or comprising appraisals or drafts of appraisals of all or part of the Property that is the subject of this suit, regardless of when such documents were
prepared. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 27: All documents reflecting zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any of Plaintiffs' tenants. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST
FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 16 30142 00001 UT 23413S.! 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 28: All documents reflecting your decision-making process with respect to all zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any of Plaintiffs' tenants. RESPONSE:
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 29: All documents reflecting your rulings on all zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any of Plaintiffs' tenants. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO,
3Q: All documents reflecting communications between you or your representatives and The Town of Addison or its representatives regarding the Property or the public projects for which
the Property has been condemned, including documents relating to the contribution to be paid by each condemnor toward the purchase price of the Property, the retention of appraisers,
and the determination of the value of the Property. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 31: All documents or correspondeoce you received from the public concerning the public project
for which the Property was condemned. 􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁐􀁏􀁎􀁓􀁅􀀺􀀠 PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 17 301421XlOO1 ur 234735, I 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 32: All notes, records or memoranda dealing with offers made to acquire the Property before tiling the Statement in Condemnation and after filing the Statement
in Condemnation. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33: All requests for appraisal reports to your appraisers concerning the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34: All
notes, records or memoranda dealing with offers made to acquire the property owned by Moses and Cline located immediately to the east of the Property. including all appraisal reports
concerning the property owned by Moses and Cline. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 35: All requests for appraisal reports to your appraisers concerning the property owned by Moses
and Cline located immediately to the east of the Property. RESPONSE: PLAlNTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 18 lOt420:XXH Lrrl3413S.1

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 36: All documents not previously produced that relate to the decision to coudeum all or a portion of the PropertY. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 37:
All agreements and correspondence between The Town of Addison and DART related to the following: (1) The condemnation of the PropertY; (2) The responsibility for retaining appraisers;
(3) The responsibility for negotiating with the PropertY owners and lessees; (4) The type of appraisal to be requested; (5) Instructions to the appraisers regarding the type of appraisal
to be done, its due date, how the appraisal should be done, including what to include in or exclude from the appraisal; and (6) Bearing the costs and expenses associated with the condemnation
of the PropertY. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NO. 38: All documents reflecting actual offers made to the PropertY owners or lessees and any responses from the owners or lessees concerning
the acquisition of the PropertY by you. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 19 30142 1Xm'1 U'r 214115.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 39: All documents concerning your determination of the record owners and leaseholders of the Property. REspoNSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40: All documents,
including photos, reports, comparable sales, retention letters, correspondence, and other information provided to any appraiser or received from any appraiser but not provided to the
Property owners before the Commissioners' hearing. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 41: All correspondence, notes, or memoranda regarding selection of the individual commissioners
to hear the condemnation case, the appointment of the commissioners, and scheduling the commissioners' hearing in the condemnation case, Cause No. 97-00352-0. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
NO. 42: All correspondence, notes, documents, or memoranda regarding changing the decision to take only part of the Property and instead to take all of the Property through eminent domain
proceedings. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 20 30141COXlt LIT134735.! 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 43: If DART or The Town of Addison gave consideration to the potential adverse effects on the Property of: (1) Providing private or public notice of intent
to condemn the Property; (2) Prematurely announcing plans to condemn; (3) Delaying actual condemnation for an unreasonable time period after giving notice of intent to condemn; (4) The
effect notice of condenmation would have on the Property, its owners, and its lessees before condemnation; (5) Deciding first to condemn only part of the Property and then later condemning
all of the Property instead; (6) Southland closing the convenience store located on the Property as a result of the t1treatened condemnation; (7) Lessees not being able to obtain utility
service because utility companies refused to service buildings that are "going to be torn down" by DART or The Town of Addison; (8) Southland relying on written and oral statements regarding
the timing of either defendant's plans to condemn the subject property; (9) Making public t1treats to condemn the subject property for over 3 years prior to filing a condemnation snit;
(10) The rental value of the leased premises deteriorating while the subject property was under t1treatofcondenmation;and (11) By giving notice to condemn part of the subject property
and without doing so, then giving notice of intent to condemn all of the subject property, plaintiffs would incur the cost of 2 separate appraisal reports. produce all documents related
to those considerations. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 44: All correspondance between you and any expert witnesses in this case or in the condenmation matter Cause No. 97-OO352-D.
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 21 3014200001 UT2)41lS.1 
RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 45: All documents relating to the environmental study done in conjunction with the project for which the Property was condemned, including all documents
relating to the date the study was requested and the cost of the study, RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 46: All documents regarding when DART and The Town of Addison decided to
condemn the Property together, and when they agreed to share the costs of condemning 􀁾􀁥􀀠Property, RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 47: All plans, drawings, and reports submitted
to the Addison Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 48: All resolutions of DART and/or
Addison regarding: (1) A partial taking of the Property; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 22 3(tl420000l Lrrl34ntJ 
(2) A total taking of the Property; (3) The taking of the Property constituting a public necessity; (4) Negotiating or settling with Plaintiffs; (5) Negotiating or settling with Moses
and Cline; (6) Rejecting Plaintiffs settlement offers; (7) Making offers based on appraisal reports obtained. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 49: All notes, memoranda, correspondence,
reports, or other communications exchanged between you and any appraiser you have ever retained to render an opinion as to the fair market value of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR
PRODUCTION NO. 50: All notes, records, correspondence, tapes, tape recordings, and memoranda relating to delays of the Arapaho Road project for DART, the toll road authorities, the Texas
Turnpike Authority, or any turnpike, or toll road authority, which is an agency of the State of Texas. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN
OF ADDISON· Page 23 10142 CXXXlI UT 2)4135.1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 51: All notes, correspondence, records, tapes, tape recordings, and memoranda relating to any involvement by the Town of Addison, its employees, agents, and
representatives delaying the Arapaho Road project so that the authorities involved in building the tunnel for traffic going under the airport would not have competition when they opened.
RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 52: Any tapes, tape recordings, or notes or memoranda made from a tape or recording of comments made by Carmen Moran at the Planning & Zoning hearing
on October 23, 1997. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 24 3014200001 LIT 234735.1 
CAUSE NO. 97-06265 A.P. INVESTMENTS #Ill, LTD., A § TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSlDP, § JOSEPH H. JONES, BETH § BRANDEBERRY, CAROLYN PERKINS § SHIMER MERRITT, AND SAMUEL § THOMAS PERKINS, CO-TRUSTEES
OF § THE MARY COFFIELD TRUST, THE § ANNETTE COFFIELD TRUST, § THE EVELYN C. JONES TRUST, § THE BETH BRANDEBERRY TRUST, § THE CORINNE SHIMER TRUST AND § A. BEN PINNELL, JR., § § PLAINTIFFS
§ § VS. § § DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND § THE TOWN OF ADDISON, § § DEFENDANTS. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLASCOUNTY,TEXAS 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON TO: Defendant, The Town of Addison, by and through its attorney of record, Sirn Israeloff, Cowles & Thompson, P.C., 901 Main St., Suite 4000, Dallas,
Texas 75202. A.P. Investments #Ill, Ltd., A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., Joseph H. Jones, Beth Brandeberry, Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustees of the Mary Coffield
Trust, the Annette Coffield Trust, the Evelyn C. Jones Trust, theBeth Brandeberry Trust, and the Corinne Shimer Trust, property owners or Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiffs") in the above-entitled and numbered cause, by and through
its undersigned counsel, hereby PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page I 30142 00001 LIT 243322 
request, pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 169, that the Defendant respond to the following Request for Admissions in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. DEFINITIONS
& INSTRUCTIONS 1. "You" and "your," as used herein, means the party, whether a corporation, partnership or some other entity, or persons to whom these Interrogatories are addressed,
its, his, her, or their employees, agents, attorneys, and all other person acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of such party or persons, whether authorized to do so or not.
2. "Property" as used herein, means the entire parcel of real estate described in Defendants' Statement in Condemnation in the condemnation proceeding Cause No. 97-00352D. 3 . You are
required to respond to these requests in writing within 30 days as required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 169. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page 2 30142 00001 LIT 243322 
Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON & KNIGHT A Professional Corporation 􀁂􀁙􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠 Michael E. Schonberg, Attorney State Bar No. 00784927 3300 First City Center 1700 Pacific Avenue Dallas,
Texas 75201 (214) 969-1139 FAX (214) 969-1651 􀁁􀁔􀁔􀁏􀁒􀁎􀁅􀁙􀁓􀁆􀁏􀁒􀁐􀁾􀁉􀁆􀁆􀁓􀀠 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this the 7th day of November, 1997. a true and correct copy of the foregoing
pleading has been forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 3 3014200001
LIT 243322 
REOUEST NO.1: Admit that you never contacted each of the Property owners of record in an effort to negotiate a purchase price of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO.2: Admit that you
did not furnish to the Property owners all appraisal reports you obtained in your evaluation of the value of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO.3: Admit that when you made your decision
to acquire the Property, you did not give consideration to the adverse effects of giving notice of intent to condemn the Property on the value of the Property or the Property owners'
rights to use and enjoy the Property. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO.4: Adrnit that when making your decision to acquire the Property, you did not give consideration to the adverse effects of
prematurely annonncing plans to condemn the Property on the value of the Property or the Property owners' rights to use and enjoy the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO.5: Admit that when
making your decision to acquire the Property, you did not give consideration to the adverse effects on the value of the Property or the Property owners' rights to use and enjoy the Property
of delaying actual condemnation of the Property for an unreasonable time period after giving notice of intent to condenm. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 4 3014200001 LIT 243322 
REOUEST NO.6: Admit that when making your decision to acquire the Property, you did not give consideration to the adverse effects on the value of the Property or the Property owners'
rights to use and enjoy the Property of deciding flrst to condemn only part of the Property and then later condemning all of the Property. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO.7: Admit that the same
attorney, who is a DART employee, represented both DART and , The Town of Addison in their efforts to acquire the Property through eminent domain. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO.8: Admit that
you did not make written offers to each of the owners of record to compensate them for the purchase of Property before you flied your Statement in Condemnation. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO.9:
Admit that you did not make offers to each of the owners of record to compensate them for the purchase of Property before you flied your Statement in Condemnation. RESPONSE: REQUEST
NO, 10: Admit that the Dallas County District Court has jurisdiction to hear this cause. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 5 3014200001
LIT 243322 
REOUEST NO. 11: Admit that you did not disclose to the Property owners any and all existing appraisal reports produced or acquired by you relating to the Property and used in determining
the final valuation offer at the time you offered to purchase the Property, as required by Tex. Prop. Code § 21.0111 (Vernon Supp. 1997). RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 12: Admit that you did
not attempt to agree with Plaintiffs on the damages as a result of the condemnation before you flied your statement in condemnation as is required by Tex. Prop. Cooe § 21.012(b)(4) (Vernon
Supp. 1997). RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 13: Admit that you did not tender the Commissioners' Award from the condemnation proceeding against the Property into the Registry of the Court until
after the Court signed the Order granting you possession of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO. 14: Admit that you did not try to contact each individual owner of the Property and each
lessee of the Property to discuss purchasing the Property before flIing your Statement in Condemnation. RESPONSE: REQUEST NQ. 15: Admit that you recognized that Southland Corporation's
decision to close its store on the Property after you announced plans to condemn the Property would adversely effect the value of the Property. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 6 30142 00101 LIT 243322 
RESPONSE: REQUEST NO, 16: Admit that, as a result of your announced plans to condemn the Property. the Property owners were deprived of the full rental value of the Property. RESPONSE:
REOUEST NO, 17: Admit that, as a result of your announced plans to condemn the Property, the Property owners' lessees refused to enter into long-term leases for the fair market rental
value of the Property, . RESPONSE: REQUEST NO, 18: Admit that The Town of Addison was relying on DART to ensure that both it and DART complied with all of the procedural requirements
for condemnation set forth in the Texas Property Code, RESPONSE: REQUEST NO, 19: Admit that The Town of Addison was relying on DART to negotiate for both DART and The Town of Addison
in good faith with the Property owners before the Statement in Condemnation was filed. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 7 3('142
00101 LIT 243322 
REOUEST NO. 20: Admit that The Town of Addison was relying on DART to not adversely effect the Property owners' interests in the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO. 21: Admit that The Town
of Addison was relying on DART to furnish timely notice to the Property owners of the Defendants plans to take the Property by eminent domain. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO. 22: Admit that The
Town of Addison was relying on DART to identify and notify the Property owners of record before serving the owners with notice of the Commissioners' Hearing in the condemnation matter.
RESPONSE: REOUEST NO. 23: Admit that you or one of your agents instructed Southwestern Bell to withhold telephone service from one of the Property owners' lessees. RESPONSE: REQUEST
NO, 24: . Admit that before you flied the Statement in Condemnation, you or one of your agents informed TU Electric that the Property was going to be condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS'
FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 8 3014200xn LIT 24;322 
REOVEST NO. 25: Admit that before you flIed the Statement in Condemnation, you or one of your agents informed Southwestern Bell that the Property was going to be condemned .. RESPONSE:
REQUEST NO. 26; Admit that you negotiated the purchase of the property owned by Moses and Cline immediately to the east of the Property without the necessity of ruing a statement in
condemnation. RESPONSE: REOUEST NO. 27: Admit that you or one of your agents refused a zoning variance permit request by one of the Property owners' lessees because the Property was
going to be condemned. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 28: Admit you retained Glenn Silva to do a "limited, restricted," appraisal report. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 29: Admit you agreed with Glenn
Silva that he could furnish his appraisal report to you on August 6, 1997. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 9 30142 OOOOl LIT
243322 
REQUEST NO. 30: Admit you retained Glenn Silva to do an appraisal report to be used for internal decision making. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 31: Admit you instructed Glenn Silva not to bring
his work file to the Commissioners Hearing. RESPONSE: REQUEST NQ. 32: Admit that but for the threats of condemnation made prior to 8-10-95, the 7-11 store on the Property would have
been in operation on 8-12-97. RESPONSE: REQUEST NO. 33: Admit that Glenn Silva did not include his engagement letter in his appraisal report because of instructions from your attorney.
RESPONSE: REQUEST NQ. 34: At the Planning & Zoning hearing on October 23, 1997. Carmen Moran stated the Town of Addison agreed to delay the Arapaho Road project for the toll road authorities.
RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 10 3014200001 lIT 243322 
CAUSE NO. 97-06265 ABP INVESTMENTS #llI, LTD., A § TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, § JOSEPH H. JONES, BETH § BRANDEBERRY , CAROLYN PERKINS § SHlMER MERRITT, AND SAMUEL § THOMAS PERKINS, CO-TRUSTEES
OF § THE MARY COFFIELD TRUST, THE § ANNETTE COFFIELD TRUST, § THE EVELYN C. JONES TRUST, § THE BETH BRANDEBERRY TRUST, § THE CORINNE SHlMER TRUST AND § A. BEN PINNELL, JR., § § PLAINTIFFS
§ § VS. § § DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND § THE TOWN OF ADDISON, § § DEFENDANTS. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 193RD ruDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #llI,
LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON TO: Defendant, The Town of Addison, by and through its attorney of record, Sim Israeloff, Cowles & Thompson,
P.C., 901 Main St., Suite 4000, Dallas, Texas 75202. Pursuant to Rule 168, you are required to answer each Interrogatory separately and fully, in writing, under oath. Your sworn answers
may be offered in evidence at the trial of this cause. Each answer shall be preceded by the Interrogatory to which the answer pertains. The answers shall be signed and verified by the
person making them and not by the attorney for the Defendant. You must serve your sworn answers on the attorney for the Plaintiffs on or before thirty-four (34) days after service hereof.
PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS NIII, LTD.·S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -1 30142 ()(U)t ur 242646 
You have the duty to supplement your answers to these Interrogatories as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and subject ,to the penalties provided therein for failure to
do so. The DefInitions and Instructions and the Interrogatories on the follOwing pages are incorporated herein by reference. Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON & KNIGHT A Professional
Corporation '/By: 􀁴􀁸􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀠L 􀁌􀀻􀁴􀁑􀁾􀁾 GE 􀁾􀀮 CHAPMAN:nomey State Bar No. 04123000 MICHAEL E. SCHONBERG, Attorney State Bar No. 00784927 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas,
Texas 75201 (214) 969-1139 FAX (214) 969-1651 ATIORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #III, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page -2 l6l42000J1 Lrt'l4Ui46 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this the 7th day of November, 1997, a true and correct copy of the foregoing pleading has been forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail, return
receipt requested. PLAINTIFF ASP INVESTMENTS lillI, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page· 3 30142 !XIOO! ur242646 
DEFINITIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 1. "You" and "your," as used herein, means the party, whether a corporation, partnership or some other entity, or persons to whom these Interrogatories are
addressed, its, his, her, or their employees, agents, attorneys, and all other person acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of such party or persons, whether authorized to do
so or not. 2. "Person," as used herein, means natural persons, corporations, firms associations, partnerships, joint ventures, or any other form of legal business entity; and governmental
agencies, departments, units, or any subdivisions thereof. 3. "Expert," as used herein, means any person who is particularly skilled. learned, or experienced in a particular art, science,
trade, business, profession, or vocation, and whose knowledge of the subject of such art, science, etc. is not possessed by persons generally. 4. "Testifying expert," as used herein,
means an expert who 􀁾 be called as a witness to testify at the trial of this cause. 5. "Consulting expert," as used herein, means an expert who is llQ1 expected to be called as a witness
at trial, but whose mental impressions or opinions have been reviewed by a testifying expert. 6. "Document," as used herein, means writings of every kind, source, and authorship, both
originals and all non-identical copies thereof, in your possession, custody or control. or known by you to exist, irrespective of whether the writing is one intended for or transmitted
internally by you, or intended for or transmitted to any other person or entity, including, without limitation, any government agency, department, administrative entity, or PLAINTIFF
ABP INVESTMENTS HIII. LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATOR1ES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -4 30142 00J01 UT 142646 
personnel. The term includes handwritten, typewritten, printed, photocopied, photographic, and recorded matter. It includes communications in words, symbols, pictures, sound recordings,
films, tapes, and infonnation stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information storage or retrieval systems, together witb the codes andlor programming instructions and
otber materials necessary to understand and use such systems. For purposes of illustration and not limitation, tbe term includes: correspondence, transcripts of testimony , letters,
notes, reports, papers, mes, books, records, contracts, agreements, telegrams, teletypes and otber communications sent or received, diaries, calendars, logs, notes or memoranda of telephonic
or face-to-face conversations, drafts, work papers, agendas, bulletins, notices, circulars, announcements, instructions, schedules, minutes, summaries, notes, and otber records and recordings
of any conferences, meetings, visits, statements, interviews, or telephone conversations, bills, statements, and other records of obligations, canceled checks, vouchers, receipts and
otber records of payments, ledgers, journals, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and otber sources of financial data, analyses, statements, interviews, affidavits, printed matter
(including published books, articles, speeches, and newspaper clippings), press releases, charts, drawings, specifications, manuals, brochures, parts lists, memoranda of all kinds to
and from any persons, agencies, or entities, technical and engineering reports, evaluations, advice, recommendations, commentaries, conclusions, studies, test plans, manuals, procedure,
data, reports, results and conclusions, records of administrative, technical, and financial actions taken or recommended; and all otber writings tbe contents of which relate to, discuss,
consider or otberwise refer to tbe subject matter of the particular discovery requested. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIll, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page· 5 3014200001 trr 142646 
7. To "identify" a person, as used herein, means to state the following: (a) The full name of the person; (b) The person's present employer and job title, if known; if not known, the
answer shall so state; (c) The person's present business and residence addresses and telephone numbers, if known; if not known, then the person's last known business and residence addresses
and telephone numbers; and (d) The person's affiliation at any time with you by employment or otherwise, including the nature and dates of such affIliation. 8. To "identify" a document.
as used herein, means to state the following: (a) The title, heading, or caption, if any, of such document; (b) The identifying number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, on the document,
if any; and the significance of meaning of such number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, if necessary to understand the document or to evaluate any claim that the document is protected
from discovery; (c) The date appearing on the document, if no date appears thereon, the answer shall so state and shall give the date or approximate date on which the document was prepared;
(d) The number of pages and the general nature or description of the document (e.g., a letter, memorandum, minutes of a meeting, etc.); PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS 8ITI. LTD:S FIRST AND
SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -6 3()142 IXlOQI LIT 242646 
(e) The identify of the person who signed the document or over whose name the document was issued; if the document was not signed, the answer shall so state, and shall identify the person(s)
who prepared it; (f) The identity of each person to whom the document was addressed, sent, distributed, or directed; (g) The physical location of the document and the name of its custodian(s);
and (h) Whether the document will be voluntarily made available to Plaintiff for inspection and copying; if not, the reasons why not. 9. To "identify" an oral communication, as used
herein, means to state: (a) The time, date, and place at which the oral communication was made; (b) The identity of each person who participated in the oral communication who was present
during the oral communication; (c) The identity of the person(s) who employed, or who was represented by, each person making the oral communication; (d) The substance of the communication;
and (e) The identity of each document pertaining to the oral communication. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS IIIn. LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page -7 30142 OCQ)1 LIT 141646 
10. To "identifY" a sale of real property, as used herein, means to state: (a) The identity of each Grantor and each Grantee in the sale; (b) The total area of the real property sold;
(c) The consideration paid by the Grantee in the sale, including the terms of payment; (d) The closing date of the sale; (e) The legal description and the local address of the real property
sold; (0 The volume and page number of the official real property records of every county in which the conveying document was recorded; (g) A description of every fIXture and improvement
located on the real property sold, including the age, condition, use, size (in square feet), and construction material of the fixture or improvement; and (h) The identity of each person
who was contacted to verifY and data concerning the sale. 11. A request for the "identity" of a thing, as used herein, constitutes a request for the same information by which you are
to "identity" the thing. 12. "Property" as used herein, means the entire parcel of real estate described in Defendants' Statement in Condemnation in the condemnation proceeding Cause
No. 97-00352D. 13. Unless the context requires otherwise herein, the masculine gender includes the feminine gender, and the singular number includes the plural number. PLAINTIFF ABP
INVESTMENTS #111, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -8 30141 OIXXil LIT 242646 
14. If you claim that any information requested in these Interrogatories is privileged, state the precise nature and basis of the privilege claimed, including a reference by number and
subdivision to any applicable provisions of the Texas Rules of Evidence under which such privilege is claimed. INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY NO, 1: State the name, address, telephone
nwnber and occupation of each and every expert witness who you may call to testify at the trial of this cause of action or whose mental impressions and opinions were reviewed by an expert
who you may can to testify. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 2: State the name, address aud telephone nwnber of any persons having knowledge of relevant facts known to you or your attorney.
and your understauding as to the relevant facts or knowledge of which each person is aware. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS IIII, LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -9 3014200001 UT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.3: As to each expert witness previously identified by you, if applicable, state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, the mental impressions
and opinions held by the expert, and the facts known to the expert which relate to or form the basis of the mental impressions and opinions held by the expert. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO.4: State why you initially planned to take only part of the Property in connection with the public project and state when and why you ultimately decided to join DART to condemn the
entire Property, and describe what part of the public project changed, if any, that required a total taking instead of a partial taking. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.5: Describe all conversations
any of your representatives had with Ben Pinnell regarding the condemnation and valuation of the Property and any negotiations for the sale of the Property to you. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF
ABP INVESTMENTS 11111. LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -10 3014l0(XXH UT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.6: State why you refused to honor the oral agreement Mack Turner reached with Plaintiffs regarding the transfer of the Property that was to be consummated by April,
1996 and who decided that the agreement between your agent, Mack Turner, and Ben Pinnell would not be consummated. If you contend there was no oral agreement, state all facts that support
that contention. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.7: Please identitY by name, address, telephone number and professionaiJicense number (if applicable), each and every engineer engaged or retained
by Petitioner to perform any planning, design or construction services in connection with the public project involved within Ih mile of the subject property. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.8:
Please describe in detail each and every design change or modification regarding routing, grade, width, length and right-of-way requirements within II.! mile of the subject property,
and explain, with specificity, how each design change or modification deviated or differed from from the initial design of the public project which is the subject of this eminent domain
proceeding. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIlI, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -11 3014200001 LIT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.9: Please state the anticipated or projected dates of completion of the entire public project which is the subject of this proceeding, and state the number of occasions
such anticipated or projected completion dates have been revised by referencing each such anticipated or projected completion dates in chronological order. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.
10: State the dates of every public hearing held by you or a commission, committee, or council of yours relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO. 11: Describe the date, place, and time, any of your representatives discussed or negotiated with every other property owner within 1 mile of the Property, the acquisition or purchase
price of any other property taken for the public project at issue in this lawsuit. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS NIII. LTD.·S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -12 3CH42 WJOl UT 141646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 12: Describe all conversations Mack Turner had with representatives of DART or The Town of Addison concerning Ben Pinnell, Ben Pinnell's tenants, and the condemnation
and purchase of the Property. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 13: On what specific date or dates was the property involved in this lawsuit inspected or examined by eacb person or expert making
the detenninations of the feasibility of the proposed public project or other evaluations for condemnation purposes and identify who examined the property oneach specific date? ANSWER:
INTERROGATORY NO. 14: Identify every written appraisal you received concerning the Property by staring the appraiser, the date it was prepared, the date you requested it, who you requested
it from, the date it was furnished to you, and whether an offer to purcbase the Property was ever made based upon the appraisal and if so, how much was the offer, when was the offer
made, by whom, and state what you contend Plaimiffs' response was. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS ifill, LTD.' S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page -13 30141 i)XX)1 LIT 241646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 15: If no offers were made based on the appraisals listed above in response to the previous interrogatory, state why not. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 16: Describe in
detail all contacts, written or oral, with Moses and Cline, the property owners inunediately to the east of the Property, regarding the public works project, the condemnation, and/or
offers to purchase their property, including the dates of each conununication, the representative who made the conununication, and the conversations which occurred. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO, 17: Describe all contacts, written or oral, you or your agents have had with the Plaintiffs' tenants stating the date and purpose of the contact, the person who made the contact,
the persons contacted, and the conversations which occurred. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIlI, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page -14 30142 {XO)I UT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 18: If any of your agents, employees, representatives, expert witnesses, consultants or attorneys had any contact or conversation with any of the Plaintiffs' agents,
representatives, employees or attorneys regarding the condemnation of the Property, please state: (a) the date of the contact; (b) the parties involved; (c) what statements were made
by whom; and (d) the purpose for the contact. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 19: State all reasons that you rely upon to explain the delay between the time you decided to condemn any part
of the Property and (1) the filing of the Statement in Condemnation, and (2) the scheduling of the Commissioners' Hearing. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 20: State the names and positions
of each of your employees, contractors, or representatives who ever discussed the Property, the public project at issue, or plans to "tear down" improvements on the Property, with employees
or representatives of TU Electric, Southwestern Bell Telephone, Lone Star Gas, or any other utility utility provider. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #III, LTD,'S FIRST AND SECOND
SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -1S 30142 or.o:!l LIT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 21: State the substance of any conversations the persons described in the previous interrogatory had with the representatives of the utility companies and state the
names of the utility company employees or representatives with whom your representatives spoke. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 22: Identify all offers made to acquire the Property by either
DART or The Town of Addison, stating the dates of the offers, the amounts of the offers, who relayed the offers and what response was received, and identify which appraisal report each
offer was based upon. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 23: Describe all communications between DART and/or its representatives and Addison and/or its representatives regarding: (1) Notice to
the Property owners of plans to condemn the Property; (2) Efforts to negotiate with the Property owners to acquire the Property; (3) Offers made. to acquire the Property and the reasons
or bases for the offers made; (4) Any counter-offers made by the Property owners; (5) The dates any any offers or counter-offers regarding the Property were rejected by Dart and/or The
Town of Addison, and the reasons for the rejection and who decided to reject such offers. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #111, LTD,'S FIRST ANDSECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -16 30142(X)OOI UTZ42646 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 24: State all reasons why acquiring the Property constituted a "public necessity" as is required by the Texas Constitution, both as to the initially proposed
partial taking and the actual total taking, include in your answer when it became a public necessity and describe any contacts between DART and Addison regarding the public necessity
of the project, and describe public discussions or hearings, giving the date and forum, where the issue of the public necessity of this project was entertained. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO. 25: If there were any environmental regulations or concerns that contributed to any delays in condemning the Property please state when those concerns developed, who identified them,
and how they manifested themselves, and when and how the concerns were ultimately resolved. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS Hill, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -17 3Ot42 wxu tIT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 26: Identify all communications between DART and The Town of Addison concerning the apportionment of the costs of condemning the Property and wrung issues related to
the Property. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 27: Who gave Rick Livingston, an employee of Lone Star Gas, orders or instructions to enter Plaintiffs' Property on the afternoon of July 8, 1997,
to excavate the Property, and for what purpose was the digging taking place? ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 28: State every date on which DART or The Town of Addison passed any resolutions
approving or authorizing the condemnation of the Property, and state the resolutions verbatim, or in lieu thereof attach copies. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 29: State the names and addresses
of every appraiser retained to assist in determining the fair market value of the Property, furnishing the dates they were retained and the dates of any written agreement regarding the
appraisers being retained. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #111. LTD.·S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -18 30142 00001 LIT 142646 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 30: State the names, titles, and addresses of all persons who negotiated with the Property owners or lessees of the Property and state: (1) The persons contacted
and the dates of the contacts; (2) What offers were actually made; (3) Which appraisal reports any individual offers were based upon; and (4) How any such offers were responded to. ANSWER:
INTERROGATORY NO, 31: State in detail all reasons for: (1) Filing the Original Petition in Condenmation and not serving a copy on the Property owners; (2) Having Commissioners appointed
to hear the condenmation matter without giving the Property owners an opportunity to recommend potential commissioners as is required by the Texas Property Code; and (3) Requesting the
appraiser, Glenn Silva, who testified for you at the Commissioners' Hearing in the condenmation case, to prepare only a short form or "limited, restricted" appraisal, to not include
rent comparables in his report, and to not inclnde the retention letter agreement you sent to him in the report; PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #III, LTD.' S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -19 301420000t UT 2426016 
(4) Not retaining Glenn Silva to appraise the subject property until late June or early July of 1997; (5) Not furnishing to plaintiffs or their attorneys Glenn Silva's appraisal report
10 days prior to the Commissioner's Hearing as specified in the Texas Property Code; (6) David Schultz having a verbal agreement that Glenn Silva could furnish an appraisal report of
the subject property on August 6, 1997; (7) Your requesting from Glenn Silva an appraisal report of the type to be used by you for internal decision making; (8) Glenn Silva's not bringing
to the Commissioner's Hearing the additional information in his work file, such as rent comparables, which was referred to in his appraisal report; and (9) David Schultz furnishing to
the Commissioners only selected portions of the appraisal report of Glenn Silva. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 32: If DART or The Town of Addison gave consideration to the potential adverse
effects on the Property, its owners or tenants, of any of the following, state the name and address and title of the person who gave such consideration, what consideration was given,
what action was taken after such consideration, and the reasons for taking such action: (1) Providing private or public notice of intent to condemn the Property; PLAINTIFF ASP INVESTMENTS
HIlI, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -20 30H2 {l()l)J LIT U2646 
(2) Prematurely announcing plans to condemn; (3) Delaying actual condemnation for an unreasonable time period after giving notice of intent to condemn; (4) The effect notice of condemnation
would have on the Property, its owners, and its lessees before condemnation; (5) Deciding fIrst to condemn only part of the Property and then later condemning all of the Property instead;
and (6) Southland relying on written and oral statements regarding the timing of either defendant's plans to condemn the subject property; (7) Making public threats to condemn the subject
property for over 3 years prior to fIling a condemnation suit; (8) The rental value of the leased premises deteriorating while the subject property was under threat of condemnation;
and (9) By giving notice to condemn part of the subject property and without doing so, then giving notice of intent to condemn all of the subject property, plaintiffs would incur the
cost of 2 separate appraisal reports. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 33: Describe all actions taken by you or your agents or representatives before depositing the Commissioners' Award into
the registry of the Court in the separate condemnation action that were inconsistent with the owners and lessees' Property rights. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #111, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND
SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -21 30142 00001 LIT 242646 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 34: How much did DART and/or The Town of Addison spend on the environmental study done in conjunction with the project for which the Property was condemned?
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 35: When did DART and The Town of Addison agree that a total taking of the Property would be necessary and when did they agree on how the responSibilities and
costs for condemning the Property would be divided among them? ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 36: Please describe in detail all involvement of the Town of Addison in delaying the Arapaho
Road project in order to accommodate toll road authorities, or in order to reduce competition, by stating: (a) The name, address and title of the persons involved; (b) The conversations
that occurred, stating who said what to whom; (c) The dates of such conversations; (d) The goal in permitting such delays; and PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #Ill, LID. 'S FIRST AND SECOND
SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page· 22 3014Zrxm! 􀁕􀁔􀀲􀀴􀁾􀀶􀀴􀀶􀀠
(e) If there are notes, records, or memoranda referring to such involvement, please copy the contents verbatim, or in lieu thereof, attach copies, ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #III,
LTD, 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -23 30142 00Xl1 UT"M2646 
CAUSE NO. 97-06265 ABP INVESTMENTS #III, LTD., A § TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSH1P, § JOSEPH H. JONES, BETH § BRANDEBERRY, CAROLYN PERKINS § SHIMER MERRITT, AND SAMUEL § THOMAS PERKINS, CO-TRUSTEES
OF § THE MARY COFFIELD TRUST, THE § ANNETTE COFFIELD TRUST, § THE EVELYN C. JONES TRUST, § THE BETH BRANDEBERRY TRUST, § THE CORINNE SHIMER TRUST AND § A. BEN PINNELL, JR., § § PLAINTIFFS
§ § VS. § § DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND § THE TOWN OF ADDISON, § § DEFENDANTS. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLASCOUNTY,TEXAS 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON TO: Defendant, Town of Addison, by and through its attorney of record, Sim Israeloff, Cowles & Thompson, P.C., 901 Main Street, Suite 4000,
Dallas, Texas 75202. ABP Investments #III, Ltd., A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., Joseph H. Jones, Beth Brandeberry, Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustees of the Mary
Coffield Trust, the Annette Coffield Trust, the Evelyn C. Jones Trust, the Beth Brandeberry Trust, and the Corinne Shlmer Trust, property owners or Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to
as "Plaintiffs") in the above-entitled and numbered cause, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page 1 3014% 1XW1 ur13413S.! 
requests, pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 167, that the Defendant produce the documents and things listed below for inspection and copying on or before the expiration of thirty-one
(31) days from the date of service hereof, at the offices of the Plaintiffs' counsel. As used in this Request, "document" shall mean every writing or record of any type and description
and every tangible thing that is or has been in the possession, control or custody of the Defendant, or any of its agents or employees, to which the Defendant has access, or of which
the Defendant has knowledge, including without limitation, correspondence, memoranda, stenographic or handwritten notes, studies, publications, books, pamphiets, pictures, films, tapes,
voice recordings, maps, reports, surveys, minutes or statistical compilations, every copy of such writing or record where the original is not in the possession, custody or control of
the Defendant or its agents or employees; and every copy of every such writing or record where such copy contains any commentary or notation whatsoever that does not appear on the original.
A written response to this request is required pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 167. If you maintain that any document or record requested herein has been lost, misplaced or
destroyed, set forth with respect to each document: (a) The contents of the document; (b) A description of the document, including its nature, date, by whom prepared or sent, and identify
the recipient or person to whom the document was directed; (c) The location of any copies of the document; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF
ADDISON -Page 2 30142 00Xi I t.rr 2.341)5, I 
(d) The date of and circumstances surrounding such loss or destruction; and (e) If the document was destroyed, the name of the person who ordered, or authorized that destruction and
the reason for the destruction. If you maintain that any of the documentS requested herein cannot be produced by virtue of any claims, privilege or immunity, state with respect to each
such document: (a) The date of the document; (b) The author or authors of the document; (c) The identity of the attorney and the client involved; (d) The identity of each person receiving
copies of the document; (e) The nature of the document involved (i.e., memorandum, letter, contract, etc.); (f) The general content of the document; and (g) The ground upon which each
such document is considered to be privileged. This Request for Documents is deemed to be continuing in nature pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 166b(5). If you receive documents
supplementing the documents requested herein, you are directed to immediately forward those documents to the counsel for the Plaintiff. Failure to supplement could invoke the sanctions
of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 215(5). PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 3 3014200»1 ur 234735.1 
DEFINITIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 1. "You" and "your," as used herein, means the party, whether a corporation, partnership or some other entity, or persons to whom these Interrogatories are
addressed, its, his, her, or their employees, agents, attorneys, and all other person acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of such party or persons, whether authorized to do
so or not. 2. "Person," as used herein, means natural persons, corporations, flIIIlS associations, partnerships, joint ventures, or any other form of legal business entity; and governmental
agencies, departments, units, or any subdivisions thereof. 3. "Expert," as nsed herein, means any person who is particularly skilled, learned, or experienced in a particular art, science,
trade, business, profession, or vocation, and whose knowledge of the subject of such art, science, etc. is not possessed by persons generally. 4. "Testifying expert," as used herein,
means an expert who lllil)C be called as a witness to testify at the trial of this cause. 5. "Consulting expert," as used herein, means an expert who is IlQJ; expected to be called as
a witness at trial, but whose mental impressions or opinions have been reviewed by a testifying expert. 6. "Document," as used herein, means writings ofevery kind, source, and authorship,
both originals and all non-identical copies thereof, in your possession, custody or control, or known by you to exist, irrespective of whether the writing is one intended for or transmitted
internally by you, or intended for or transmitted to any other person or entity, including, without PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON.
Page 4 )0[41 OI:XXll Lrr'234'rn.t 
limitation, any government agency, department, administrative entity, or personnel. The term includes handwritten, typewritten, printed, photocopied, photographic, and recorded matter.
It includes communications in words, symbols, pictures, sound recordings, films, tapes, and information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information storage or retrieval
systems, together with the codes and/or programming instructions and other materials necessary to understand and use such systems. For purposes of illustration and not limitation, the
term includes: correspondence, transcripts of testimony, letters, notes, reports, papers, files, books, records, contracts, agreements, telegrams, teletypes and other communications
sent or received, diaries, calendars, logs, notes or memoranda of telephonic or face-to-face conversations, drafts, work papers, agendas, bulletins, notices, circulars, announcements,
instructions, schedules, minutes, summaries, notes, and other records and recordings of any conferences, meetings, visits, statements, interviews, or telephone conversations, bills,
statements, and other records of obligations, canceled checks, vouchers, receipts and other records of payments, ledgers, journals, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and other
sources of financial data, analyses, statements, interviews, affidavits, printed matter (including published books, articles, speeches, and newspaper clippings), press releases, charts,
drawings, specifications, manuals, brochures, parts lists, memoranda of all kinds to and from any persons, agencies, or entities, technical and engineering reports, evaluations, advice,
recommendations, commentaries, cOliclusions, studies, test plans, manuals, procedure, data, reports, results and conclusions, records of administrative, technical, and financial actions
taken or recommended; and all other writings the contents of PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 5 3014200X11 LIT 234735.1 
which relate to, discuss, consider or otherwise refer to the subject matter of the particular discovery requested. 7. To "identifY" a person, as used herein, means to state the following:
(a) The full name of the person; (b) The person's present employer andjob title, if known; if not known, the answer shall so state; (c) The person's present business and residence addresses
and telephone numbers, if known; if not known, then the person's last known business and residence addresses and telephone numbers; and (d) The person's aff!.liation at any time with
you by employment or otherwise, including the nature and dates of such affiliation. 8. To "identifY" a document, as used herein, means to state the following: (a) The title, heading,
or caption, if any, of such document; (b) The identifYing number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, on the document, if any; and the significance of meaning of such number(s), letter(s),
or combination thereof, if necessary to understand the document or to evaluate anyclaim anyclaim that the document is protected from discovery; (c) The date appearing on the document,
if no date appears thereon, the answer shall so state and shall give the date or approximate date on which the document was prepared; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 6 3014Z00001 UT234'm.l 
(d) The number of pages and the general nature or description of the document (e.g., a letter, memorandum, minutes of a meeting, etc.); (e) The identitY of the person woo signed the
document or over whose name the document was issued; if the document was not signed, the answer shall so state, and shall identitY the person(s) who prepared it; (t) The identity of
each person to whom the document was addressed, sent, distributed, or directed; (g) The physical location of the document and the name of its custodian(s); and (h) Whether the document
will be voluntarily made available to Defendant for inspection and copying; if not, the reasons why not. 9. To "identitY" an oral communication, as used herein, means to state: (a) The
time, date, and place at which the oral communication was made; (b) The identity of each person who participated in the oral communication who was present during the oral communication;
(c) The identity ofthe person(s) who employed, or who was represented by, each person making the oral communication; (d) The substance of the communication; and (e) The identity ofeach
document pertaining to the oral communication. 10. To "identitY" a sale of real property, as used herein, means to state: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 7 3014200)01 Uf23473S.! 
(a) The identity of each Grantor and each Grantee in the sale; (b) The total area of the real property sold; (c) The consideration paid by the Grantee in the sale, including the terms
of payment; (d) The closing date of the sale; (e) The legal description and the local address of the real property sold; (f) The volume and page number of the official real property
records of every county in which the conveying document was recorded; (g) A description of every fixture and improvement located on the real property sold, including the age, condition,
use, size (in square feet), and construction material of the fIXture or improvement; and (h) The identity of each person who was contacted to verify and data concerning the sale. 11.
A request for the "identity" of a thing, as used herein, constitutes a request for the same information by which you are to "identify" the thing. 12. "Property" as used herein, means
the entire parcel of real estate described in Defendants' Statement in Condemnation in the condemnation proceeding Cause No. 97-OO352-D. 13. If you claim that any document(s) requested
in these Requests for Production of Documents is privileged, state the precise nature and basis of the privilege claimed, including a reference by number and subdivision to any applicable
provisions of the Texas Rules of Evidence under which such privilege is claimed. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 8 30142 OIXXil
UT 􀀱􀀳􀀴􀀷􀁊􀁾􀀮􀀱􀀠
Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON & KNIGHT A Professional Corporation By: 􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁯􀁭􀁥􀁹􀀢􀀠 State Bar No. 04123000 Michael E. Schonberg State Bar No. 00784927 3300 First City Center
1700 Pacific Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-1139 FAX (214) 969-1651 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this the 7th day of November, 1997, a true and correct copy
of the foregoing pleading has been forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested. Michael E. Schonberg PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 9 30142 cmJl UT'23471S.1 
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 1: Any and all photographs, aerial photographs, computer animations, videotapes, motion pictures, me or other graphic depiction or
document including, maps, plats or models of the real property which is the subject of this lawsuit. RBSPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIQN NQ. 2: Any and all maps, plats, plans, surveys,
specifications, blueprints, promes, analyses, reports, or studies pertaining to site planning, drainage, topography, grades or grading, traffic count, development, construction, zoning
or land use in connection with the real property which is the subject of this lawsuit. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 3: Any and all appraisal reports, market analysis, income
analysis, cost analysis or comparable sales data made, offered, reviewed, compiled, used or consulted by any and all witnesses who mayor shall be called to testify upon the trial of
this cause, including any reports, analysis, or data which reflects or forms the basis of the impressions or or opinions held by witnesses who may, or shall be called to, testify upon
the trial of this cause. RBSPQNSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 10 30142:00001 L1i2J413$.t 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4: All statements made by any tenant, employee, agent, or representative of Defendant concerning the condemnation of the Property that is the subject of this
action. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 5: Each written report, statement, transcription, or electronically recorded statement of any fact or expert witness, read or reviewed by
any expert witness you may call at the trial of this cause. . RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODlJCTION NO.6: The current resume or curriculum vitae of each expert witness you may call at trial,
including the listing of all publications anthored or co-anthored by each such expert witness, and a listing of each such witness' educational achievements. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
NO.7: Any and all exhibits to be used at the trial of this cause of action. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 11 3Ot420c001
LIT234735.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 8: Ally and all photographs, plats, maps, computer animations, videotapes, motion pictures, fIlm, graphic depictions or documents of any and all alleged comparable
sales used to support any expert witness I evaluation, RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCIION NO, 9: All contracts, notes, records and memoranda related to any agreement between Defendant
and its contractors regarding construction of the public project for which the Property has been condemned. RESPQNSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCIIQN NO, 10: Every zoning ordinance or other land
use regulation or rule which you allege, contend, or believe effects the value of the property at any relevant time, RESPQNSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 11: All correspondence exchanged
between you and Plaintiffs or their tenants relating to the Property or the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 12 3014% 0x()1 LIT 114'135.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 12: All records of meetings, public or private, including transcripts or minutes, during which you or your employees discussed the Property or the public project
for which the Property was condemned, RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13: All correspondence or writings between you and any public utility company in which you or your employees
discussed the Property or the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: All written or recorded statements made by Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs'
employees or tenants. RESPONSE; REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: All notices of public hearings that you held regarding the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE:
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 13 lO142 00001 trr2347l$.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: All documents reflecting the projected completion dates for the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.
17: All bid requests you published or issued asking for bids on any portion of the public project for which the Property has been condemned. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18:
All correspondence and communications between you and Southland Corporation or its representatives or any other tenants of the Property. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: All
environmental impact studies done in anticipation of the public project for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FffiST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 14 3014ZIXXlOI LlTZl473,5,1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 20: All documents, negotiations and/or contracts relating to your purchase or condemnation of any property within 1 mile of the Property that is the subject
of this claim since 1994. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 21: All internal documents or memoranda relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned, RESPONSE:
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NQ, 22: All internal documents or memoranda relating to the negotiation of the purchase of the Property by you or Dallas Area Rapid Transit, RESPONSE: REQlfflST
FQR PRQD1JCTIQN NQ, 23: All scale models of the completed project for which the Property was condemned. RESPQNSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN
OF ADDISON -Page 15 lOI4ZIDXlI1JTZ341l5.l 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 24: All leases or agreements you have made with tenants on the Property since the condemnation of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25: All
documents reflecting plans to condemn or purchase additional property for the public project for which you condemned the Property at issue in this suit. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTION
NQ. 26: All documents reflecting or comprising appraisais or drafts of appraisals of aU or part of the Property that is the subject of this suit, regardless of when such documents were
prepared. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCIIQN NQ. 27: All documents reflecting zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any ofPlaintiffs' tenants. RESPQNSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON· Page 16 30141 <XXX)t UT 13473$.! 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 28: All documents reflecting your decision-making process with respect to all zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any of Plaintiffs' tenants. RESPONSE:
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 29: All documents reflecting your rulings on all zoning variance requests by Plaintiffs or any of Plaintiffs' tenants. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO,
30: All documents reflecting communications between you or your representatives and The Town of Addison or its representatives regarding the Property or the public projects for which
the Property has been condemned, including documents relating to the contribution to be paid by each condemnor toward the purchase price of the Property, the retention of appraisers,
and the determination of the value of the Property . RESPONSE: , REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 31: All documents or correspondence you received from the public concerning the public project
for which the Property was condemned. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 17 3014200XH UT 234735.1 
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 32: All notes, records or memoranda dealing with offers made to acquire the Property before filing the Statement in Condemnation and after fIling the Statement
in Condemnation. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 33: All requests for appraisal reports to your appraisers concerning the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FQR PRQDUCTIQN NQ. 34: All
notes, records or memoranda dealing with offers made to acquire the property owned by Moses and Cline located immediately to the east of the Property, including all appraisal reports
concerning the property owned by Moses and Cline. RESPONSE: REOUEST FQR PRQDUCIlON NQ. 35: All requests for appraisal reports to your appraisers concerning the property owned by Moses
and Cline located immediately to the east of the Property. RESPONSE:PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 18 30142 CXlOOI UT234735.1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 36: All documents not previously produced that relate to the decision to condemn all or a portion of the Property, RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 37:
All agreements and correspondence between The Town of Addison and DART related to the following: (1) The condemnation of the Property; (2) The responsibility for retaining appraisers;
(3) The responsibility for negotiating with the Property owners and lessees; (4) The type of appraisal to be requested; (5) Instructions to the appraisers regarding the type of appraisal
to be done, its due date, how the appraisal should be done, including what to include in or exclude from the appraisal; and (6) Bearing the costs and expenses associated with the condemnation
of the Property, RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 38: All documents reflecting actual offers made to the Property owners or lessees and any responses from the owners or lessees concerning
the acquisition of the Property by you, RESPONSE; PLAINTIFFS' FmST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 19 30142 OIXlOl Lrr 234735.1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 39: All documents concerning your determination of the record owners and leaseholders of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40: All documents,
including photos, reports, comparable sales, retention letters, correspondence, and other information provided to any appraiser or received from any appraiser but not provided to the
Property owners before the Commissioners' hearing. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 41: All correspondence, notes, or memoranda regarding selection of the individual commissioners
to hear the condemnation case, the appointment of the commissioners, and scheduling the commissioners' hearing in the condemnation case, Cause No. 97-00352-D. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION
NO, 42: All correspondence, notes, documents, or memoranda regarding changing the decision to take only part of the Property and instead to take all of the Property through eminent domain
proceedings. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 20 3014200001 LIT 234135.1 
REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 43: If DART or The Town of Addison gave consideration to the potential adverse effects on the Property of: (1) Providing private or public notice of intent
to condemn the Property; (2) Prematurely announcing plans to condemn; (3) Delaying actual condemnation for an unreasonable time period after giving notice of intent to condemn; (4) The
effect notice of condemnation would have on the Property, its owners, and its lessees before condemnation; (5) Deciding fIrst to condemn only part of the Property and then later condemning
all of the Property instead; (6) Southland closing the convenience store located on the Property as a result of the threatened condemnation; (J) Lessees not being able to obtain utility
service because utility companies refused to service buildings that are "going to be tom down" by DART or The Town of Addison; (8) Southland relying on written and oral statements regarding
the timing of either defendant's plans to condemn the subject property; (9) Making public public threats to condemn the subject property for over 3 years prior to filing a condemnation
suit; (10) The rental value of the leased premises deteriorating while the subject property was under threat of condemnation; and (11) By giving notice to condemn part of the subject
property and without doing so, then giving notice of intent to condemn all of the subject property, plaintiffs would incur the cost of 2 separate appraisal reports. produce all documents
related to those considerations. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PROD{k;TION NO. 44: All correspondance between you and any expert witnesses in this case or in the condemnation matter Cause No.
97-00352-D. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 21 30142 OOtXllUT 1141JS.l 
RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 45: All documents relating to the environmental study done in conjunction with the project for which the Property was condemned, including all documents
relating to the date the study was requested and the cost of the study. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 46: All documents regarding when DART and The Town of Addison decided to
condemn the Property together, and when they agreed to share the costs of condemning the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 47: All plans, drawings, and reports submitted
to the Addison Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned, RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 48: All resolutions of DART and/or
Addison regarding; (1) A partial taking of the Property; PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 22 30141:OIlXJl LIT1347lS.1 
(2) A total taking of the Property; (3) The taking of the Property constituting a public necessity; (4) Negotiating or settling with Plaintiffs; (5) Negotiating or settling with Moses
and Cline; (6) Rejecting Plaintiffs settlement offers; (7) Making offers based on appraisal reports obtained. RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 49: All notes, memoranda, correspondence,
reports, or other communications exchanged between you and any appraiser you have ever retained to render an opinion as to the fair market value of the Property. RESPONSE: REOUEST FOR
PRODUCTION NO. 50: All notes, records, correspondence, tapes, tape recordings, and memoranda relating to delays of the Arapaho Road project for DART, the toll road authorities, the Texas
Turnpike: Authority, or any turnpike, or toll road authority, which is an agency of the State of Texas. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN
OF ADDISON -Page 23 30141IXXXH 􀁕􀁔􀁬􀀱􀀴􀀱􀀳􀁾􀀮􀁬􀀠
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 51: All notes, correspondence, records, tapes, tape recordings, and memoranda relating to any involvement by the Town of Addison, its employees, agents, and
representatives delaying the Arapaho Road project so that the authorities involved in building the tunnel for traffic going under the airport would not have competition when they opened.
RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 52: Any tapes, tape recordings, or notes or memoranda made from a tape or recording of comments made by Carmen Moran at the Planning & Zoning hearing
on October 23, 1997. RESPONSE: PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT TOWN OF ADDISON -Page 24 30142 00001 Lrr214'n!U 
CAUSE NO. 91-06265 ABP INVESTMENTS #Ill, LTD., A § TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, § JOSEPH H. JONES, BETH § BRANDEBERRY, CAROLYN PERKINS § SHIMER MERRITT, AND SAMUEL § THOMAS PERKINS, CO-TRUSTEES
OF § THE MARY COFFIELD TRUST, THE § ANNETTE COFFIELD TRUST, § THE EVELYN C. JONES TRUST, § THE BETH BRANDEBERRY TRUST, § THE CORINNE SHIMER TRUST AND § A. BEN PINNELL, JR., § § PLAINTIFFS
§ § VS. § § DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND § THE TOWN OF ADDISON, § § DEFENDANTS. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #Ill,
LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON TO: Defendant, The Town of Addison, by and through its attorney of record, Siro Israeloff, Cowles & Thompson,
P.C., 901 Main St., Suite 4000, Dallas, Texas 15202. Pursuant to Rule 168, you are required to answer each Interrogatory separately and fully, in writing, under oath. Your sworn answers
may be offered in evidence at the trial of this cause. Each answer shall be preceded by the Interrogatory to which the answer pertains. The answers shall be signed and verified by the
person making them and not by the attorney for the Defendant. You must serve your sworn answers on the attorney for the Plaintiffs on or before thirty-four (34) days after service hereof.
PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HUl. LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -1 3OIUOOOOllIT142646 
You have the duty to supplement your answers to these Interrogatories as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and subject to the penalties provided therein for failure to do
so. The Definitions and Instructions and the Interrogatories on the following pages are incorporated herein by reference. Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON & KNIGHT A Professional Corporation
I'.).L 1 n By: 􀁴􀁉􀁾􀀮􀀠0 􀁌􀀻􀁴􀁑􀁾􀁾􀀠 GE 􀀮􀁃􀁈􀁁􀁐􀁍􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁹􀀠 State Bar No. 04123000 MICHAEL E. SCHONBERG, Attorney State Bar No. 00784927 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas,
Texas 75201 (214) 969-1139 FAX (214) 969-1651 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIll. LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON.
Page· 2 3014200001 UT 242646 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this the 7th day of November, 1997, a true and correct copy of the foregoing pleading has been forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail. return
receipt requested. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HID. LTD.·S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -3 30'" 0))01 LIT 1426C6 
DEFINITIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 1. "You" and "your," as used herein, ineans the party, whether a corporation, partnership or some other entity, or persons to whom these Interrogatories are
addressed, its, his, her, or their employees, agents, attorneys, and all other person acting or purporting to ad for or on behalf of such party or persons, whether authorized to do so
or not. 2. "Person," as used herein, means natural persons, corporations, flI1llS associations, partnerships, joint ventures, or any other form of legal business entity; and governmental
agencies, departments, units, or any subdivisions thereof. 3. "Expert," as used herein, means any person who is particularly skilled, learned, or experienced in a particular art, science,
trade, business, profession, or vocation, and whose knowledge of the subject of such art, science, etc. is not possessed by persons generally. 4. "Testifying expert," as used herein,
means an expert who 􀁾 be called as a witness to testify at the trial of this cause. S. "Consulting expert," as used herein, means an expert who is nm expected to be called as a witness
at trial, but whose mental impressions or opinions have been reviewed by a testifying expert. 6. "Document,' as used herein, means writings of every kind, source, and authorship, both
originals and all non-identical copies thereof, in your possession, custody or control, or known by you to exist, irrespective of whether the writing is one intended for or . transmitted
internally by you, or intended for or transmitted to any other person or entity, including, without limitation, any government agency, department, administrative entity, or PLAINTIFF
ABP INVESTMENTS #III, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -4 3014200001 ur Ul646 
personnel. The term includes handwritten, typewritten, printed, photocopied, photographic, and recorded matter. It includes communications in words, symbols, pictures, sound recordings,
films, tapes, and information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information storage or retrieval systems, together with the codes and/or programming instructions and
other materials necessary to understand and use such systems. For purposes of illustration and not limitation, the term includes: correspondence, transcripts of testimony, letters, notes,
reports, papers, files, books, records, contracts, agreements, telegrams, teletypes and other communications sent or received, diaries, calendars, logs, notes or memoranda of telephonic
or face-to-face conversations, drafts, work papers, agendas, bulletins, notices, circulars, announcements, instructions, schedules, minutes, summaries, notes, and other records and recordings
of any conferences, meetings, visits, statements, interviews, or telephone conversations, bills, statements, and other records of obligations, canceled checks, vouchers, receipts and
other records of payments, ledgers, journals, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and other sources of fmancial data, analyses, statements, interviews, affidavits, printed matter
(including published books, articles, speeches, and newspaper clippings), press releases, charts, drawings, specifications, manuals, brochures, parts lists, memoranda of aU kinds to
and from any persons, agencies, or entities, technical and engineering reports, evaluations, advice, recommendations, commentaries, conclusions, studies, test plans, manuals, procedure,
data, reports, results and conclusions, records of administrative, technical, and fmancial actions taken or recommended; and all other writings the contents of which relate to, discuss,
consider or otherwise refer to the subject matter of the particular discovery requested. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #I1I. LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE
TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -5 30142 OCQll LIT 241646 
7. To "identify" a person, as used herein, means to state the fOllowing: (a) The full name of the person; (b) The person's present employer and job title, if known; if not known, the
answer shall so state; (c) The person's present business and residence addresses and telephone numbers, if known; if not known, then the person's last known business and residence addresses
and telephone numbers; and (d) The person's affiliation at any time with you by employment or otherwise, including the nature and dates of such afflliation. 8. To "identify" a document,
as used herein, means to state the following: (a) The title, heading, or caption, if any, of such document; (b) The identifying number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, on the document,
if any; and the significance of meaning of such number(s), letter(s), or combination thereof, if necessary to understand the document or to evaluate any claim that the document is protected
from discovery; (c) The date appearing on the document, uno date appears thereon, the answer shall so state and shall give the date or approximate date on which the document was prepared;
(d) The number of pages and the general nature or description of the document (e.g., a letter, memorandum, minutes of a meeting, etc.); PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIlI, LTD.'S FIRST AND
SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -6 3014100001 LIT 241646 
(e) The identify of the person who signed the document or over whose name the document was issued; if the document was not signed, the answer shall so state, and shall identify the person(s)
who prepared it; (t) The identity of each person to whom the document was addressed, sent, distributed, or directed; (g) The physical location of the document and the name of its custodian(s);
and (h) Whether the document will be voluntarily made available to Plaintiff for inspection and copying; if not, the reasons why not. 9. To "identify" an oral communication, as used
herein, means to state: (a) The time, date, and place at which the oral communication was made; (b) The identity of each person who participated in the oral communication who was present
during the oral communication; (c) The identity of the person(s) who employed, or who was represented by, each person making the oral communication; (d) The substance of the communication;
and (e) The identity of each document pertaining to the oral communication. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS UID, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON
-Page -7 30142 IXmltrr 1:42644 
10. To "identify" a sale of real property, as used herein, means to state: (a) The identity of each Grantor and each Grantee in the sale; (b) The total area of the real property sold;
(c) The consideration paid by the Grantee in the sale, including the terms of payment; (d) The closing date of the sale; (e) The legal description and the local address of the real property
sold; (t) The volume and page number of the official real property records of every county in which the conveying document was recorded; (g) A description of every fixture and improvement
located on the real property sold, including the age, condition, use, size (in square feet), and construction material of the fIXture or improvement; and (h) The identity of each person
who was contacted to verify and data concerning the sale. 11. A request for the "identity" ofa thing, as used herein, constitutes a request for the same information by which you are
to "identify" the thing. 12. "Property" as used herein, means the entire parcel of real estate described in Defendants' Statement in Condenrnation in thecondenrnation proceeding Cause
No. 97-00352D. 13. Unless the context requires otherwise herein, the masculine gender includes the feminine gender, and the singular number includes the plural number. PLAINTIFF ABP
INVESTMENTS #Ill, LTD:S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -8 30142 (XXX)1 LIT 242646 
14. If you claim that any information requested in these Interrogatories is privileged, state the precise nature and basis of the privilege claimed, including a reference by number and
subdivision to any applicable provisions of the Texas Rules of Evidence under which such privilege is claimed. INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY NO.1: State the name, address, telephone
number and occupation of each and every expert witness who you may call to testify at the trial of this cause of action or whose mental impressions and opinions were reviewed by an expert
who you may call to testify. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.2: State the name, address and telephone number of any persons having knowledge of relevant facts known to you or your attorney,
and your understanding as to the relevant facts or knowledge of which each person is aware. ANSWER: PLAINTIPP ABP INVESTMENTS 1m. LTD.'S PIRST AND SECOND SET 01' INTERROGATORIES TO DEPENDANT
THE TOWN 01' ADDISON -Page -9 3Ot42 00IXl:1 t.rT242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.3: As to each expert witness previously identified by you, if applicable, state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, the mental impressions
and opinions held by the expert, and the facts known to the expert which relate to or form the basis of the mental impressions and opinions held by the expert. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO, 4: State why you initially planned to take only part of the Property in connection with the public project and state when and why you ultimately decided to join DART to condemn the
entire Property, and describe what part of the public project changed, if any, that required a total taking instead of a partial taking. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 5: Describe all conversations
any of your representatives had with Ben Pinnell regarding the condemnation and valuation of the Property and any negotiations for the sale of the Property to you. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF
ABP INVESTMENTS #I1I, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -10 30142 OOCIOI UT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.6: State why you refused to honor the oral agreement Mack Turner reached with Plaintiffs regarding the transfer of the Property that was to be consummated by April,
19% and who decided that the agreement between your agent, Mack Turner, and Ben Pinnell would not be consummated. If you contend there was no oral agreement, state all facts that support
that contention. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 7: Please identify by name, address, telephone number and professional license number (if applicable), each and every engineer engaged or retained
by Petitioner to perfonn any planning, design or construction services in connection with the public project involved within Ih mile of the subject property. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.8:
Please describe in detail each and every design change or modification regarding routing, grade, width, length and right-of-way requirements within Ih mile of the subject property, and
explain, with specificity, how each design change or modification deviated or differed from the initial design of the public project which is the subject of this eminent domain proceeding.
ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIII. LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -11 30142 «:001 ur 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO.9: Please state the anticipated or projected dates of completion of the entire public project which is the subject of this proceeding, and state the number of occasions
such anticipated or projected completion dates have been revised by referencing each such anticipated or projected completion dates in chronological order. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO.
10: State the dates of every public hearing held by you or a commission, committee, or council of yours relating to the public project for which the Property was condemned. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO. 11: Describe the date, place, and time, any of your representatives discussed or negotiated with every other property owner within 1 mile of the Property, the acquisition or purchase
price of any other property taken for the public project at issue in this lawsuit. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIll, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -12 30142 00001 LIT l42646 
INTERRQGATORYNO,12: Describe all conversatiol1'l Mack Turner had with representatives of DART or The Town of Addison concerning Ben Pinnell, Ben Pinnell's tenants, and the condemnation
and purchase of the Property, ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 13: On what specific date or dates was the property involved in this lawsuit inspected or examined by each person or expert making
the determinatiol1'l of the feasibility of the proposed public project or other evaluatiol1'l for condemnation purposes and identify who examined the property on each specific date?
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 14: Identify every written appraisal you received concerning the Property by stating the appraiser, the date it was prepared, the date you requested it, who
you requested it from, the date it was furnished to you, and whether an offer to purchase the Property was ever made based upon the appraisal and if so, how much was the offer, when
was the offer made, by whom, and state what you contend Plaintiffs' respol1'le was. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS Hill. LTD,'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
THE TOWN OF ADDISON· Page· 13 3014200001 UT241646 
INTERROGATORY NO, 15: If no offers were made based on the appraisals listed above in response to the previous interrogatory, state why not. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 16: Describe in
detail all contacts, written or oral, with Moses and Cline, the property owners immediately to the east of the Property, regarding the public works project, the condemnation, and/or
offers to purchase their property, including the dates of each communication, the representative who made the communication, and the conversations which occurred. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO, 17: Describe all contacts, written or oral, you or your agents have had with the Plaintiffs' tenants stating the date and purpose of the contact, the person who made the contact,
the persons contacted, and the conversations which occurred. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENts Hill, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page
-14 30142 tJXkll LIT 2416ol6 
INTERROGATORY NO. 18: If any of your agents, employees, representatives, expert witnesses, consultants or attorneys had any contact or conversation with any of the Plaintiffs' agents,
representatives, employees or attorneys regarding the condemnation of the Property, please state: (a) the date of the contact; (b) the parties involved; (c) what statements were made
by whom; and (d) the purpose for the contact. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 19: State all reasons that you rely upon to explain the delay between the time you decided to condemn any part
of the Property and (1) the filing of the Statement in Condemnation, and (2) the scheduling of the Commissioners' Hearing. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 20: State the names and positions
of each of your employees, contractors, or representatives who ever discussed the Property, the public project at issue, or plans to "tear down" improvements on the Property. with employees
or representatives ofTU Electric, Southwestern Bell Telephone, Lone Star Gas, or any other utility provider. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIlI, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -15 lO141oexxn LiTl41646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 21: State the substance of any conversations the persons described in the previous interrogatory had with the representatives of the utility companies and state the
names of the utility company employees or representatives with whom your representatives spoke. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 22: Identify all offers made to acquire the Property by either
DART or The Town of Addison, stating the dates of the offers, the amounts of the offers, who relayed the offers and what response was received, and identify which appraisal report each
offer was based upon. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 23: Describe all communications between DART and/or its representatives and Addison and/or its representatives regarding: (1) Notice to
the Property owners of plans to condemn the Property; (2) Efforts to negotiate with the Property owners to acquire the Property; (3) Offers made to acquire the Property and the reasons
or bases for the offers made; (4) Any counter-offers made by the Property owners; (5) The dates any offers or counter-offers regarding the Property were rejected by Dart and/or The Town
of Addison, and the reasons for the rejection and who decided to reject such offers. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #111, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE
TOWN OF ADDISON· Page. 16 30141\WXlOl UT24160C6 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 24: State all reasons why acquiring the Property constituted a "public necessity" as is required by the Texas Constitution, both as to the initially proposed
partial taking and the actual total taking, include in your answer when it became a public necessity and describe any contacts between DART and Addison regarding the public necessity
of the project, and describe public discussions or hearings, giving the date and forum, where the issue of the public necessity of this project was entertained. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY
NO, 25: If there were any environmental regulations or concerns that contributed to any delays in condemning the Property please state when those concerns developed, who identified them,
and how they manifested themselves, and when and how the concerns were ultimately resolved. ANSWER: PLAlNTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS Hill. LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -17 30142 CXXlOI LIT 242646 
INTERROGATORY NO. 26: Identify all communications between DART and The Town of Addison concerning the apportionment of the costs of condemning the Property and zoning issues related
to the Property. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 27: Who gave Rick Livingston, an employee of Lone Star Gas, orders or instructions to enter Plalntiffs' Property on the afternoon of July 8,
1997, to excavate the Property, and for what purpose was the digging taking place? ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 28: State every date on which DART or The Town of Addison passed any resolutions
approving or authorizing the condemnation of the Property, and state the resolutions verbatim, or in lieu thereof attach copies. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 29: State the names and addresses
of every appraiser retained to assist in determining the fair market value of the Property, furnishing the dates they were retained and the dates of any written agreement regarding the
appralsers being retained. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIlI, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -18 3014200())t ur 242646 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 3D: State the names, titles, and addresses of all persons who negotiated with the Property owners or lessees of the Property and state: (1) The persons contacted
and the dates of the contacts; (2) What offers were actually made; (3) Which appraisal reports any individual offers were based upon; and (4) How any such offers were responded to, ANSWER;
INTERROGATORY NO, 31: State in detail all reasons for: (1) Filing the Original Petition in Condemnation and not serving a copy on the Property owners; (2) Having Commissionersappointed to hear the condemnation matter without giving the Property owners an opportunity to reco=end potential commissioners as is required by the Texas Property Code; and (3) Requesting
the appraiser, Glenn Silva, who testified for you at the Commissioners' Hearing in the condemnation case, to prepare only a short form or "limited, restricted" appraisal, to not include
rent comparables in his report, and to not include the retention letter agreement you sent to to him in the report; PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS lilI, LTD,'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -19 3014200001 LIT 242646 
(4) Not retaining Glenn Silva to appraise the subject property until late June or early July of 1997; (5) Not furnishing to plaintiffs or their attorneys Glenn Silva's appraisal report
10 days prior to the Commissioner's Hearing as specified in the Texas Property Code; (6) David Schultz having a verbal agreement that Glenn Silva could furnish an appraisal report of
the subject property on August 6, 1997; (7) Your requesting from Glenn Silva an appraisal report of the type to be used by you for internal decision making; (8) Glenn Silva's not bringing
to the Commissioner's Hearing the additional information in his work fIle, such as rent comparables, which was referred to in his appraisal report; and (9) David Schultz furnishing to
the Commissioners only selected portions of the appraisal report of Glenn Silva. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO, 32: If DART or The Town of Addison gave consideration to the potential adverse
effects on the Property, its owners or tenants, of any of the following, state the name and address and title of the person who gave such consideration, what consideration was given,
what action was taken after such consideration, and the reasons for taking such action: (1) Providing private or public notice of intent to condemn the Property; PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS
HIII, LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -20 3014200»1 ur 242646 
(2) Prematurely announcing plans to condemn; (3) Delaying actual condemnation for an unreasonable time period after giving notice of intent to condemn; (4) The effect notice of condemnation
would have on the Property, its owners, and its lessees before condemnation; (5) Deciding first to condemn only part of the Property and then later condemning . all of the Property instead;
and (6) Southland relying on written and oral statements regarding the timing of either defendant's plans to condemn the subject property; (7) Making public threats to condemn the subject
property for over 3 years prior to filing a condemnation suit; (8) The rental value of the leased premises deteriorating while the subject property was under threat of condemnation;
and (9) By giving notice to condemn part of the subject property and without doing so, then giving notice of intent to condemn all of the subject property, plaintiffs would incur the
cost of 2 separate appraisal reports. ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 33: Describe all actions taken by you or your agents or representatives before depositing the Commissioners' Award into
the registry of the Court in the separate condemnation action that were inconsistent with the owners and lessees' Property rights. PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS HIll, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND
SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -21 30142 00001 LIT 242646 
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 34: How much did DART and/or The Town of Addison spend on the environmental study done in conjunction with the project for which the Property was condemned?
ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 35: When did DART and The Town of Addison agree that a total taking of the Property would be necessary and when did they agree on how the responsibilities and
costs for condemning the Property would be divided among them? ANSWER: INTERROGATORY NO. 36: Please describe in detail all involvement of the Town of Addison in delaying the Arapaho
Road project in order to accommodate toll road authorities, or in order to reduce competition, by stating: (a) The name, address and title of the persons involved; (b) The conversations
that occurred, stating who said what to whom; (c) The dates of such conversations; (d) The goal in permitting such delays; and PLAINTIFF ABP INVESTMENTS #JlI, LTD.'S FIRST AND SECOND
SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -22 3014ZIXXXH UTZ4Z646 
(e) If there are notes, records, or memoranda referring to such involvement, please copy the contents verbatim, or in lieu thereof, attach copies. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF ASP INVESTMENTS #ill,
LTD. 'S FIRST AND SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE TOWN OF ADDISON -Page -23 $0142 oo:xil UT 242646 
AT. 13 BOX 135' DENTON. IX 76205 METAO (817}321-5231 • METRO FAX (817)321-3645 RECEIVED OCTOBER 22,1996 CITY MANAGER RON WHITEHEAD, CITY MANAGER TOWN OF ADDISON P.O. BOX 144 ADDISON,
TX 75001 DEAR RON; FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS YOU HAVE CAUSED DAMAGE TO MY PROPERTY BY THREATENING CONDEMNATION. IN THE SPIRIT OF BEING A GOOD CITIZEN, I HAVE ENDURED THE "CLOUD" THAT YOU
HAVE PLACED UPON MY PROPERTY WITHOUT ANY FORMAL COMPLAINT. THE TOWN OF ADDISON HAS NOT BEEN FAIR AND EQUITABLE TO ME WITH THIS DELAY YOU PERSONALLY HAVE BEEN A GENTLEMAN. IN AS MUCH
AS A DOZEN TIMES YOU HAVE PERSONALLY APOLOGIZED FOR THE MESS THAT WAS CREATED, FIRST BY THE TOWN OF ADDISON AND THEN BY BY DART. SEVERAL WEEKS AGO I CALLED AGAIN, ASKING FOR SOME SENSE
OF TIME. AS OF TODAY, YOU HAVE NOT CALLED ME BACK. MACK TURNER AND I HAD MET MORE THAN A FEW TIMES AND CAME TO AN AGREEMENT ABOUT PRICE AND DETAILS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS AGO. NOW, MACK
TELLS ME THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN A YEAR BEFORE ANY ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS! SOUTHLAND CORPORATION HAS BEEN PAYING RENT ON A VACANT STORE FOR MORE THAN A YEAR AND A
HALF. IN ADDITION, I HAVE HAD THE BUILDING AT 4805 ARAPAHO VACANT FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS. 
'PAGE 2 RON WHITEHEAD TOWN OF ADDISON CAN YOU IMAGINE TRYING TO LEASE A BUILDING AND TELLING THE TENANT THAT THE TOWN OF ADDISON PLANS TO TEAR IT DOWN TO REROUTE ARAPAHO ROAD AND THAT
DART PLANS TO USE THE BALANCE OF THE PROPERTY FOR A BUS TRANSFER STATION AND IF THEY OCCUpy THE BUILDING THEY MIGHT HAVE TO MOVE SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE. THE MARKET IS QUITE ACTIVE AND
I COULD LEASE THE BUILDING, IF YOU WOULD LET ME HAVE OWNERSHIP OF MY PROPERTY WITHOUT A "CLOUD" HANGING OVER IT. CERTAINLY YOU ARE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE MARKET FOR BUILDINGS IN
ADDISON IS VERY TIGHT. RON, IT IS OUTRAGEOUS. THIS LETTER IS TO REQUEST A HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND HAVE A PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE SITUATION, AS DESCRIBED. THIS IS OCTOBER
22ND AND I FEEL LIKE THIS SHOULD BE OF HIGHEST PRIORITY ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL. PLEASE CONTACT ME SOON. YOUR1J;;: TRULY, BEN PINNELL, TRUSTEE ABP INVESTMENTS III, LIMITED
cc: JOE JONES GEORGE CHAPMAN 
COWLES & THOMPSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 􀁾􀁏􀁬􀀠W. WASHINGTON. sune 100 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PO. SOX 1127 SHERMAN. TEXAS 7&09t-1127 901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 01000 TELEPHONE (903) 893-8999
DALLAS, TEXAS 75202-3793 100 WEST A:JAMS AVENUE, SUITE 32\ iELEPHONE (214) 672·2000 METRO t214,263-0QQ5 TEMPLE, TEXAS 7G!!Ol 0755 TElEPHONE (tllJi 771-2500 PAX {214j 612-2020 JOHN M.
HilL ONE AMeRICAN CENTER. sunE 777 1214) 672"2170 CHARLES SORRELLS 909 E.SJ:" LOOP 323 􀀨􀀱􀁾􀀲􀀵􀀱􀀹􀁓􀀲􀀩􀀠 TyLER, TEXAS 75"101,9(184 TELEPHONE {SO:!) 􀁓􀁾􀁊􀀮􀀱􀂷􀀵􀀵􀁡􀁡􀀠 August
4, 1995 VIA TELECOPY AND U.S. MAIL Mr. John Baumgartner City Engineer Town of Addison P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Re: Alapaho Road Dear John: Below is the proposed formula which
we discussed on Wednesday regarding the Pinnell tract: 1. Whole property value (96,834 square feet) $1,665,000 2. Value of 7/11 office building Western tract (7/11 office building +
land) $1,200,000 Land only (28,227 square feet) $ 240,000 Total value of 7/11 office building $ 960,000 960,000 3. 7/11 office building represents 58% of value of whole property (western
and eastern tracts) ($960,000/$1,665,000 = 58%), so land represents 42% of value of whole property 4. Addison will pay for the value of the part it is taking (33,585 square feet, representing
34.68 % of the whole tract (33,585 square feetl96,834 square feet)) which primarily includes land only, plus Addison will pay for the damages to the remainder determined by the L.R.
Denton appraisal which amounts to $385,000. Upon determining the amount to be paid 
Mr. John Baumgartner August 4, 1995 Page 2 for the entire tract (whether by agreement or by a judgment), a determination will need to be made as to the value of the land being acquired
by the City. That can be done by taking the total amount to be paid and subtracting from it the value of the 7/11 office building (determined to be 58% of the value of the whole property),
thus leaving the approximate value of the land only. The City's portion can then be determined by multiplying the value of the land times 34.68% (since that is the City's square foot
portion of the property being acquired). Example: Amount to be paid for whole tract = $2,500,000. Value of 7/11 office building = 58% of $2,500,000, or $1,450,000. Deducting the value
of the building from the entire tract leaves a value for the land only of $1,050,000. The City's obligation would then be $364,140 for the part taken ($1,050,000 x 34.68%), plus $365,000
in damages, or $729,140. We have contacted Randy Denton to confirm these numbers, but have not not yet received a confirmation, and therefore the numbers are subject to change. On the
Moses and Cline tract, the value of the part taken by the City will be determined on the percentage of land being taken by the City out of the entire taking. We are scheduled to meet
with the DART representatives in our offIce on Monday, August 7 at 10:30 A.M. Should you have any questions or desire any additional information before that meeting, please give us a
call. JMH:wn cc: Mr. Kenneth C. Dippel 
RUG-13-1997 17:05 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 572 2020 P.02/05 ." ....􀁾􀀠 Cause No. CC-97-00352-D 'n 􀁛􀀺􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀠 13 r.:: G: [;6 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and § Condemnatio!,!, 􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁣􀁣􀁣􀁤􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠
.\ j" i. f.); TOWN OF ADDISON § Petitioners, § § filed with the 􀁊􀁾􀁤􀁧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀧􀁩􀁊􀁻􀀧􀁉􀀭􀀢-v. § § the County Court at Law NO.4 ABP Invesuncnt #III, Ltd., et ai, § Defendants.
§ Dallas Cowlly, Tellas COMMISSIONERS' REPORT AND AWARP We, the undersigned Special Commissioners, were appointed by the Judge of the County Court of Dallas County at Law No.4, Dallas
County, Texas, are all disinterested freeholders of Dallas County, Tellas, and have sworn to assess the damages in this cause fairly and impartially and in accordance with law. We submit
the following report and award to the Court: In accordance with law, your Commissioners promptly set a time and place for hearing the parties. Written nolice of the hearing was issued,
served on each party and returned as prescribed by law. AI 1:30 p.m. on the 12th day day ofAugust, 1997, in the courtroom ofthe County Court of Dallas County at Law No.4, the time and
place set for the hearing, the following panies appeared or did not appear as indicated: Dallas Area Rapid Transit appeared by and tJuough its attorney. ABP Invesunent #111, Ltd., A',IBen
Pinnell, Jr., General Partner did Bet-app:ar./appeared oy umt, S0 . A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. did-ftot-appcar I appeared .61 (iJO !\.sJ Joseph H. Jones, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust,
The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry 􀁾and The Corinne Shimer Trust did Bet apl'ear /appeared bt 􀁇􀀩􀁌􀁬􀁉􀀧􀀩􀀭􀀾􀁾􀀠 . Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee
orThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annene Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trusnand The Corinne Shimer Trust die not appear /appeared b1 620 Vl S􀁾􀀠. ConuniiSionen'
Report and Award -Pag!: 1 
AUG-13-1997 17:06 COWLES &THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.03/06 Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annelle Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The
Beth Brandeberrytlrust and The Corinne Shimer Trust did..IlQ! 311flGar I appeared 6'1 􀁃􀁬􀁬􀀧􀀾􀀢􀁬􀀩􀁾􀀬􀀠 Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette
Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry lifust and The Corilme Shimer Trust did 116t appear I appeared 1>1 G)t1!lb::ciL . The Southland Corporation die flat appear
I appeared b'l Coy., 􀁾􀁊􀀠 JoM H. King die Rst appear I appeared b'1 (,70b ;:.-e! Citico'l' North America. Inc. did not appear ,;.'uU.]!.'.Ipe!earareedd-_________. TIC United CO'l'.,
d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division orTIC United COIp., as SUl;ceSSOr in interest to the assets oreollier Trucking. Inc. did not appear I .at!llt«lcd Morningstar Entertainment Group, Inc.,
a.k.a. Morning Star Entertainment did not appear 1.fI!!l'clIIe&. Computer People Inc. did not appear ,.."3i1j!!t!')"lel.llll'lII'eedd-􀁟􀁾_________ Dexton Corporation difl ftOl appellf
I appeared 􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀮􀀶􀁌􀁉􀁦􀀭􀁻􀁟􀁁􀁴􀁬􀁩􀀧􀀭􀀼􀀮􀀱􀀭􀀧􀁃􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀯􀀮􀂷􀀯􀀭􀁦􀀮􀁌 _. Evidence of tile damages resultini frem Dallas Area Rapid Transit's acquisition was presented
in accordance with the rules ofdamages established by law. Having heard and considered the evidence, your Special Commissioners fwd that compensation should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid
Transit as follows: \-" 􀀱􀀬􀀠 )wfJ.,J 􀁾􀁾􀀠fH):;lJ () b1 tqq JOO. c Co TOTAL AWARD ................... SJ'lj+J'C{􀁾􀀠 'I ) ABP Investment #III, Ltd.; A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., General Partner
........................................ $_-----A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. . .................... $,______􀁾􀁟􀀠 10sepb H. Jones, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield
{rust, The Evelyn C.1ones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ........................................ , ........... . ........................................
􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭
COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.04/06 Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and
The Corinne Shimer Trust .................................................... . ....... ............................... $,------Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee of The Mary
Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ................................. .. ...................................
..... 􀀤􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀭 Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust. The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer
Trust ........................................... .. ........................................ $__. -----The Sout hi andCorpora'h on.. . .. .. .. . .. $ 17../9...{)[J(),OO -' John H.
KilIg .......................... $_______ Citicorp North America, Inc.........•.. $,________ $,________ TlC United Corp., d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division of TIC United Corp., as successor
in interest to the assets ofCollier Trucking, Inc..•.... , .. ........................................ $ -il-􀁾􀀠 Morningstar Entertainnlent Group, Inc" a.k.a. Moming Star Entertainment
................................... , .... $ -,,-􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀠 Computer PcopleJnc................... $.________ Dexlon Corporation ................... $________ We find and order that
the costs ofthese proceedings sllould be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Ti2XISit and the Town ofAddison, Petitioners. The property being acquired in these proceedings is described in the
First Amended Statement in Condemnation on file with the Court. and in Exhibit nA", attached to this Repon and Award and incorpotated by reference. The property is to be used for the
construction, extension, improvement or development of the transit system public transportation and mass tranSit purposes and for the construction, elctell5ion, improvement or development
of of the system ofpublic streets . Commis,ione ... ' Rcpor1 and Awan!. Page 3 
.RUG-13-1997 17:07 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.05/06 SIGNED AND FILED with the Judge of County Court of Dallas County at Law No.4, lhis Ill'!: day of Av 􀁾􀀧􀁉􀁤􀀺􀀠 ,1997. SPECIAL
COMMISSI The above Commissioners' Report and Award was filed with me, Judge ofthe County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas, this __day of ,1997. JUDGE, County Court at Law Nc.
4, Dallas County, TeKas. Commissioners' Report ami AWiIld· P,,&C 4 
RUG-13-1997 17:07 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.06/05 COMBINED lAND DESClUmON ARAPAHO 1I.0.\D/ABP 1NVES'rMi;Nl' 􀁾􀁊􀁉􀁉􀀬􀀠LTD. TRACT TOWN OF Al>DISON, COtINTY OF DAl.1AS, n:XAS
C.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 4U BEING a tr.ct or )a"d situated iA the G.W. FiSher Survey, Alnt,att No. 482., Towa of Addboa. Otllq Cowoly, Tcus and being I porlioD of & aacl or I
...d dcwibcd iA UlstlumCllt to AlII' Ja"".lIDe"t JIIlll. LId. q ,ewrdecl in Volume 82108,1'agc 2694 of the D.ed Records of Otllu COUlIly. Teus, mcl beillg mort panlcuJarlydescribcd U
(ollowa; BEGINNING II a 5/8 iAch iron rod (ouod &1 !he $Outheast .oruer of said ADI' laYC$lIDcOI "III, LId. (AIIP) Itact...me bema Ihe SOlIthwe.st COI"IIer or a tract of bIId dcscribecl
iA WlMllellllo Southwulem BeU Telepllooe eompIDya r.,orded iA Volllllle 86207, Page 3m of the Deed Records, PaUu Cowoly. Teus, said poim aI$o beiog OD lb. north righl-of·way IiAc of
Aupaho Road; . THENCE North 89 depus 35 ...mlll.. 00 KCOods Wesl aloq the saiel southerly line of said ADI' £rad IDol lIortherly ';gbl",(,-, IiAc of Arapaho !toad a disl .... "" 0{ 430.16
feel 10 a cuI cross sel for the most _th..cstcrly corur 0{ said ADI' tract; '. THENCE North 44 de...... 31 miaulCS OS $ccoods West aloq the ,ou!hwe.stetly IiAe of said AlII' tra'" ....
d Gorthcuterly right..,ro9l1lY 1iA. of Atapaho Road, dlsIlIIOC of 21.18 feet 10 • CUI crass set for a c:or1IU Oil the we.lerly liAe of said ADP trlel IDd east riPt-or.,qy w.. of Addlsoll
!toad 􀀨􀁾􀀠fool wide right-of.way) as described ba deed 10 the Cil)' of Addlsoll recorded ba Voll..... 334 Page 0106 of the Deed Rccor. of Dallu Cowol)'. TClI:U; THENCE Horcb 00 cIegr...
17 millulCS 30 "<ODds EuI aloq the _erIy hI of saW ASP traClIIId _erly tight of WlY line of Addlsoll Road a disluce of lU3S feet 10 , 1/2 bach iroll rod RI with 'Kuitt..zol!&rJ' cap
011 the aorcb_terly IiIIc or sail! ASP Itld; THENCE North iS6 de... e ... 25 mu.ul... 50 secoods EullIloaathe lIorthVICIIlcllyIiAe ofsaid ASP tract a l!iswIu of 282.45 fcel 10 .. 1/2
iacIa iron rod set willi -KWIl-ZoIIars' cap; THENCE South 84 dePUS 55 IlliDIIICI 10 >ccoods 'East alcoa the IIortherly line of said AlII' tra<l a di.swK.c of 8000 feel 10 111 "It' C\I&
leI ill COIICI'etc, THENCE North 60 dep...25 aWwtCl 30 KCOQds 'East 110lIl the IIOl1bwe.ucrly liAe ofsaid AlP Ilact a di$llllOC 01 80.00 reet 10 a S/8 iacll woo rod rowul; THENCE North
44 dcpeea 25 mu.1IICI3O _.East ala'll the .. orth_er!y w.. ofuid ADP Ua<l I di$l·...... of 66.23 reet 10 , 1/2 iadI irOD rod loud 'With "Huilt-ZoJIm" cap rot a comer; THENCE. Solllll
01 cIelfCCl47 llliDutCi 221Ce01141i West 110111 the Wlerly IiAe of said AlIP tractllld easterly racc or UI 􀁾bui.ldiill1Io'III a distUCI of J23.36 feet 10 the POOO OP BEGINNlNG; CONTAINI.NG
􀁾aqWII'C feel or Iud, more or leas. Huiu-Zollan lIIc.. 3131 Mckialley A.Ye. Suile600 􀁄􀁡􀁉􀁉􀁵􀀬􀁔􀁟􀀷􀁾􀀠 (Z14) 871-3311 EXHlBlTA' mTRL P.06 
TOWN OF ADDISoN PUBLIC WORKS To:\-.!oh'l L6 i) From: John Baumgartner, P.E. 􀁦􀁬􀁾􀀠 Director Company: ",1) LV Ie::, <i-jhnm pSG I'L Phone: 972/450-2886 0\ FAX: 972/450-2837 􀁆􀁁􀁘􀀣􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀠
&7/),. -/),0:;,0 Date: 81 /[5/q] 16801 Westgrove I I P.O. Box 144 # of pages (including cover): Ca Addison, TX 75001 oCall me Comments: o Original in mail . 0 Per your request 
COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.01/06 COWLES' &: THOMPSON A ProIis!iioJIIII CospDrlltloa AUvl1le.J1lu J.901 Main Stnet, Suite 41180 DIIIIa. 1'X 7!20Z-3m TdcpbotIe (214) 61z..zeoo Fa
(214) 61:&-201Q FACSIMILE COVER PAGE IMPORTANDCONFIDENTIAL: 'fhi. me...ge ;" iotandec:l anly 101' the use 0I1IIe IndlVid\RIJ ... enllty to which it i. addreslld. TI1I. menoge clll'ltllinll
informnon frOm the law firm of Cow.... .. Thompoon whictl mllY be privileged, comidentilll. and exempt from dis<;1........... IIPllli."". 1_. If the reeder oIlhl, "",,",og8 i. not the
int.nded recipient or I"" .mploy.... or ogent IdfIOI\IllIIa .... llelivering the ......age 10 the _ recipient, you ... IIerabv noIilled thet any di_inotion, 􀁤􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁢􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁵􀁮􀀬􀀠or
c;opying of tN. commUl!ication is .uiC1IV PfOI\Ibited. If you how recelvod thia comrnunicetion in .ITC(, pl_ ngtify UIO immediately etOlO'1eI.pIIone numller 12141 872·2000. We wHl be
happy 100 arrange 101' the retum 01 tN, _lIIoge 10 III. 'IIi" the Unitwd Statn ""'tel Setvic•••t no no coot 10 you. Date: Time: Total Number of Pages (Including this sheet): " NormallRush:
ClientfMatter II: J/fSJtrs;;y( TO: (1) h,., WlhtEIIJ!!AO FAX: ('1;\) 459· '11113 12) 􀁾􀀶􀁊 ;RIlflln(J.IIIlTi1ii 􀁾􀀠 FAX: (9:za) 􀁾 -.wI57 (3) FAX: FROM: Ifi,.; 􀁾 ,'PG'= Dirwct D.'
II: (214) 672· .;lIsa MESSAGE: UN&'tMEQ 􀁾􀀱 liND Attuty, A1'7'IW€D 􀁋􀁉􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀠 􀀿􀀧􀁾􀁉􀀡􀀱􀁎􀀠 .e.ecfy IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION. PlEASE CALL OUR SERVICE CENTER
AT (214) 672-2508 OR AT (214) 672° __, Thank you. ooc:" 16Ul 
I FINANCE ORIGiNAl TO ACCOUNTINGlYELLOW FOR DEPARTMENT FILE TOWN OF ADDISON PAYMENT AUTHORIZATION MEMO CLAIM # ___ CHECK AMOUNT $ 􀁾􀀠0 148.25 Vendor No. -'4...::;;5_'.1...1.. -'--____
Vendor Name Da..! ill.5 1) te C! -go p; d, irq 0 S ;.t Address p. 0, BO,) ( (P Ie 0 1£03 Address .L.<D"""'o.. ....ll-Li.O..... ..l.,_______________ .·Address _T.....f...",t"""'Q""""'-S_______________
Zip Code 75:UIl!P -7.2;2 g TOTAL 􀁊􀀺􀁊􀀺􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁪􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁊􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀭􀁯􀀭􀀬􀁣􀀠 PWJeJJ 􀁴􀀬􀀵􀁾 -Dtl"'t-;l 35 ZA-JdlStfYJj 􀁾 1:VI-HrlocJ 􀀡􀁦􀁊􀁲􀁥􀁐􀁙􀁉􀁜􀀭􀁲􀀡􀁾􀁤􀁡􀀮􀁨􀀮􀀮􀀱􀁬􀀠
11./'fS". en 8/1'2/17 -14 (PUr+-tUVtlrJeeI a +ekl1J.f 1/2,811,5tJt), 00 
THE STATE OF TEXAS } 􀁜􀀶􀀩􀁾􀀠 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF DALLAS t ©􀁾􀀠U INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered
into by DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a regional transportation authority created pursuant to Cbapter 452 of the Texas Transportation Code (Formerly article 1118y of the Texas Revised Civil
Statutes), ("DART"), and the TOWN OF ADDISON, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, (IiCity"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City proposes to acquire certain real property within t)1e
City for the relocation ofa public road known as Arapaho Road (the "Arapaho Property"); and,,"\ WHEREAS, DART proposes to acquire certain real property within the City and adjacent to
the Arapaho Property for the development of a transit center (the "Transit Center Property"); and, ;. WHEREAS, in 􀁾􀁴􀁨􀁥􀀠best interest of the taxpayers of the City and of DART, it
is more economical for the City and DART to jointlY acquire the respective properties; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 452.055(a) and 452.057 of the Texas Transportation Code and
the Interloeal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, the City and DART desire to enter into this Interlocal Agreement to coordinate the simultaneous acquisition of the
Arapaho Property and the Transit Center Property; \ NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein made, the benefits flowing to each of the parties
hereto and other good and valuable consideration, DART and the City do I hereby agree as follows: 1. Property Descriptions. The Moses and Cline Property: 3.877 acres more or less of
land out of the G. W. Fisher Survey, Abstract No. 482 in Dallas County, Texas more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and depicted on the plat marked Exhibit "G" attached
hereto. The Pinnell Property: 2.2232 acres more or less of land out of the G. W. Fisher Survey, Abstract No. 482 in Dallas County, Texas more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached
hereto and depicted on the plat marked Exhibit "G" attached hereto. The Transit CenterlMoses and Cline Tract: 2.511 acres more or less of land out of the Moses and Cline Property, more
particularly described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and depicted 00 the plat marked Exhibit "G" attached hereto. The Transit CeoterlPinnell Tract: 1.40 acres of land, more or less
out of the Pinnell Property, more particularly described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and depicted on the plat marked Exhibit "G" attached hereto. Page 1 of 5 
The ArapahofMoses and Cline Tract: 1.367 aCres of land, more Qr less out of the Moses and Cline Property, more particUlarly described in Exhibit "E" attached hereto and depicted on the
plat marked Exhibit "G" attached hereto. The ArapaholPinnell Tract: 0.7932 acres ofland, more or less out of the Pinnell Property, more particularly described in Exhibit "F" attached
hereto and depicted on the plat marked Exhibit "GU attached hereto. 2. Property Acquisition. City and DART agree to jointly acquire and pay for the Pinnell Property and the Moses and
Cline Property, (sometimes hereafter jointly the "Properties") by negotiation if possible, by eminent domain if necessary. Title to the Properties will initially be vested in the City
with a simultaneous reconveyance of the Transit CenterlMoses and Cline and Transit CenterlPinnell Tracts to DART. 3. Acquisition Duties and Responsibilities. 3.01. City. In connection
with the acquisition of the Properties, the City shall be responsible for the following: , .. a. Secure Secure a boundary survey of each of the two (2) Properties and the four (4) Tracts
which will be used in all contracts, deeds and legal docwnents necessary for the acquisition of the Properties. The cost of the boundary surveys shall be paid by the City and not allocated
pursuant to Section 4.02. b. Order a commitment for an owner's policy of title insurance for each of the Properties from Safeco Land Title Company, (the "Title Company"). Each party
shall pay the cost of owner's title insurance policies for its respective tracts at Closing. c. Provide to DART copies of the City's appraisals of the Properties and authorize the appraiser
to work directly with DART attorneys in eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of the Properties; if necessary. The cost of the appraisals shall be paid by the City and not allocated
pursuant to Section 4.02, but the cost for eminent domain preparation and testimony shall be allocated pursuant to Section 4.02. ., 3.02. DART. In connection with the acquisition ofthe
Properties, DART shall be responsible for the following: a. DART real estate, relocation and legal staff personnel will represent both DART and the City in the acquisition process, including,
but not limited to (I) making the initial Agreed Offer of fair market value; (ii) negotiations of administrative settlements; (iii) initiating and completing eminent domain proceedings,
if necessary; (iv) arranging and supervising hazardous materials remediation, if necessary; (v) providing for demolition of improvements; and (vi) handling all relocation services. Except
for legal counsel, DART staff time will be without further charge to the City in consideration of services performed and to be performed by City staff and others and previously paid
for by City. DART legal counsel time will be billed in accordance with the schedule of fees attached as Exhibit "H" attached hereto, and the cost will be allocated as provided in Section
4.02. b. DART has completed a Phase I HazMat investigation of the Properties for which no charge will be made to the City. Actual HazMat remediation costs, if any, shall be allocated
pursuant to Section 4.02. ADD-ILA: Rev: 12-06-9S Page 20rS 
4. Allocation and Payment of Purchase Price and Costs. The purchase price (whether negotiated or by eminent domain) and the below listed acquisition costs for the Properties shall be
allocated between the City and DART in the percentages set forth in Section 4.02: 4.0 I. Costs. The term "Costs" shall mean and include: (i) actual HaiMat remediation costs; (Ii) actual
improvement demolition costs; (iii) actual relocation expenses; (iv) actual professional wituess expenses for preparation and testimony at eminent domain commissioner's hearings and
jury trial, as necessary; (v) court costs; (vi) attorney fees based on the schedule in Exhibit "H"; (vii) any other actual acquisition expenses not specifically identified in this agreement.
4.02. Allocation. a. For acquisition of the Moses and Cline Property, DART shall pay 65% of the purchase price and Costs and the City shall pay 35% ofthe purchase price and Costs. b.
For acquisition of the Pinnell Property, DART shall pay65 % of the purchase price and Costs and the City shall pay 35% ofthe purchase price and Costs. 4.03. Payment. a. Negotiated Purchase. In the event the parties are able to negotiate
an agreed purchase contract with one or more of the Property owners, each party shall pay its allocated share of the purchase price and Costs at the closing. EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that any
Costs or other expenses ofthe acquisition not reflected in the agreed purchase contract or on the closing statement shall be paid by the Obligated party within a reasonable time after
such Costs and expenses are incurred and the party is notified thereof. b. Eminent Domain. In the event the parties are forced to acquire by eminent domain one or more of the Properties,
each party shall pay its allocated share of the commissioners award! jury verdict, together with· all Costs then accrued at the time the amount of the award or jury verdict is paid into
the registry of the court. Any Costs or expenses not known at the time the award!verdict is paid shall be paid by the obligated party within a reasonable time after such Costs and expenses
are determined. 5. Agreed Offer. Based upon the City's appraisals of the each ofthe Properties, the parties will concur in an offer of fair maIket value to be initially offered for each
Property, (the "Approved Offer Amount"). DART, for itself and the City shall initiate negotiations for the purchase of the Properties by offering the Approved Offer Amount to each Property
owner. 6. Administrative Settlement. In the event DART staff is unable to acquire either of the Properties for the Approved Offer Amount, but is able to negntiate a purchase price for
one or both which the staff determines is fair, just and reasonable, it shall recommend said negntiated price as an Administrative Settlement, to the DART Board and the City Council
of City, who shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such recommended Administrative Settlement to approve or disapprove the Administrative Settlement. As a part of the submission
of a proposed Administrative Settlement, the DART DART staff shall furnish to DART and the City the staft's written justification/explanation of the basis oflhe proposed Administrative
Settlement amount. Before an agreed purchase contract may be tendered to a Property owner, both the DART Board and the City Ccuncil must agree to the amount of the Administrative Settlement.
7. Eminent Domain. In the event the DART staff is unable to negotiate the purchase of either or both of the Properties for the Approved Offer Amount or any approved Administrative Settlement
Amount, and upon Page 30rS 
receipt from DART and the City Council of City of appropriate eminent domain resolutions, DART legal staff shall promptly proceed to acquire the Properties in the name of DART and the
City through eminent domain proceedings. If the amount of the award of special commissioners should exceed the Approved Offer Amount by more than twenty percent C20%), either party shall
have the right to require the filing of objections to such award. After objections are filed to the award of special commissioners, both the City and DART must approve any settlement
of the case that would cause an increase in the amount of the purchase price to be paid for the condemned Properties. 8. Closing. The closing of an agreed purchase of one or more of
the Properties under this agreement ("Closing") shall take place at the offices of the Title Company, or at such other place as the parties may agree as provided in the agreed purchase
contract 9. Contact Persons. Each party shall designate a person through whom all contact shall be directed to the other party in connection with the matters herein contemplated (the
"Contact Person"). The initial Contact Person for DART shall be Herman Wardlaw, Acting Manager of Real Estate and the initial Contact Person for the City shall be John Baumgartner, Director
ofPublic Works for the City. DART or the City may change Contact Persons by notice to the other party. 10. Federal Transit Administration Approval. With respect 10 I?ART, this Agreement
is subject to prior approval by the Federal Transit Administration C"FTA"). DART shall dilig''"tly pursue and use its best efforts to secure such approval and shall notify the City inunediately
upon a determination by FTA. 11. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate Ca) if the FTA fails or refuses to approve this transaction, Or (b) if the DART staff is unable to acquire
either of the Tracts in accordance with the provisions herein set forth. Upon. termination, neither of the parties shall have any further rights, duties or obligations hereunder. 12.
Miscellaneous. 12.0 I. Notice. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given to the party at the address 􀁾􀁉􀀠out below, or to such other
address as the party shall designate by notice to all other parties. ' DART: P.O. Box 660163 ballas, Texas 75266 Attention: DART Contact Person with a copy to the General Counsel at
the same address City: P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Attention: City Contact Person Any notice shall be deemed to be effectively given when mailed by United States Registered or
certified mail with postage prepaid and address as herein set forth, or when actually received by the party to whom addressed. 12.02. Entirety and Amendments. This Agreement embodies
the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, if any, relating to the matters contained herein and may be amended or supplemented only
by a written instrument executed by all parties. ADD-ILA: Rev: )1..(.16.95 Page 4of5 
12.03. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State ofTexas and venue for any legal action arising out of this Agreement
shall be in Dallas County, Texas. 12.04. Parties Bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective approved successors and assigns.
12.05. Assignment. This Agreement may not be transferred or assigned by either of the parties without the prior written concurrence ofthe other party. 12.06. Effective Date. The Effective
Date of this Agreement shall be the date the Agreement is signed by the last ofthe parties. 􀁉􀁾􀀠 \ EXECUTED BY DART this £ day of ..Jtlm1Cj ri .199!"-DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT 􀀺􀀺􀁊􀁒􀁏􀁾􀀠
'I PresidentlExecutive Director 􀁾􀀠 EXECUTED BY CITY this /(fItay of 􀁄􀁾􀁥􀁴􀀺􀁦􀁩􀀻􀀮􀀠,1995. \ THE TOWN OF ADDISON j 􀁾􀁹􀀺􀁾􀀠 􀁌􀀬􀀩􀁾􀀮􀀬􀁣 Printe ame: D Title: ADD-lLA: Rev;
12..()6..95 Page S ofS 
EXHIBIT "A" COMBINED LAND DESCRIPI'ION ARAPAHO ROAD/MCM COMPANY TRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUN'IY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 482 BEING a tract of land situated in
the G.W. Fisher Survey, Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of several tracts of land as described in instruments to MCM Company as recorded in
Volume 78212, Page 3704; Volume 82179, Page 1554; Volume 82179, Page 1559; Volume 84008, Page 1944 and Volume 84133, Page 0532 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southwest corner of the tract of land described in said instrument recorded in Volume 84133, Page 0532
of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said point also being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded
in Volume 86207, Page 3192 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 01 degree 47 minutes 22 se<:onds
East along the westerly line of said Southwestern BeU Telephone Company tract and a easterly face of an existing building wall a 􀁤􀁩􀁓􀁾􀁣􀁥􀀠of 100.00 feet to a point for a corner,
said point being the northwest corner of the Southwestern BeU tract and the POINT OF BEGINNING of this tract; THENCE contiooing N,.orth 01 degree 47 minutes 22 seconds East along said
easterly face of a building wall and westerly line of said' MCM Company tract a distance of 223.36 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "HulttZollars" cap for most westerly northwest
corner of said MCM Company tract; THENCE North 44 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along a northwesterly line of said MCM Company tract a distance of 13.77 feet to a 1/2 inch iron
rod found for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 45s,econds West along a westerly line of said MCM Company tract a distance of 38.17 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for a
corner on the southeasterly right-of-way line of the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Property Acquisition Corporation(DART) tract as re<:orded in Volume 91008, Page 1390 of the Deed Records
of Dallas County, Texas, saidlpoint being the northwest corner of said MCM Company tract; THENCE North 66 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the southeasterly right-of-way line
of said DART tract and northwesterly line of MCM Company tract a distance of 665.58 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a corner on the west right-of-way line
of Quorum Drive (80 foot wide right-of-way) as established by instrument to the Town of Addison, Texas as recorded in Volume 82149, Page 0240 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE South 00 degrees 11 minutes 10 seconds East along the west right-of-way line of Quorum Drive a distance of 300.97 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for
a corner; THENCE North 54 degrees 50 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 23.14 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the
left, having. a central angle of 3 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 848.00 feet, and being subtended by a 51.55 foot chord bearing South 68 degrees 05 minutes 43 seconds West;
THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 51.55 feet to a 1/2 inch rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE South 66
degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 60.80 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of curvature of a curve to the· right, having a central angle
of 11 degrees 28 . minutes 42 seconds, a radius of 260.00 feet, and being subtended by a 52.00 foot chord bearing South 72 degrees G:\JIROJ\011 rnX)f'4)$\£)(Hmrr.A 12IlJ19l 
05 minutes 34 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 52.09 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars' cap at the point of reverse
curvature of a curve to the left, having a central angle of 11 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds, a radius of240.00 feet, and being subtended by a 48.00 foot chord bearing South 72 degrees
05 minutes 34 seconds West; , THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 48.08 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of tangency
of said curve: THENCE South 66 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 299.54 feet t6 a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of curvature of a curve to
the left, having a central angle of8 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds, a radius of 778.00 feet, and being subtended by a 118.13 foot chord bearing South 61 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds
West; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 118.25 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap on the north line of said Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes 43 s(:conds West along the north line of said Southwestern Bell Telephone Company tract a distance of 31.32 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 168,918 square feet of land, more or less. \ For Huitt-Zollars, Inc. 􀁅􀁲􀁩􀀺􀁓􀁾􀁤􀁾􀀠 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4862 Huitt-Zollars,
Inc. 3131 McKinney Avenue Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 871-3311 G;\PROf'D1171201i05\EXHIBIT.A 12flJI9' 
EXHIBIT 'B" COMBINED LAND DESCRIPTION ARAPAHO ROAD/ABP INVESTMENT #111, LTD. TRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 482 BEING a tract of land
situated in the G.W. Fisher Survey, Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of land described in instrument to ABP Investment #III, Ltd.
as recorded in Volume 82108, Page 2694 of the Deed Records ofDallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch 􀁩􀁲􀁯􀁾􀀠rod found at the
southeast corner of said ABP Investment #III, Ltd. (ABP) tract, same being the southwest corner of a tract ofland described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded
in Volume 86207, Page 3192 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds
West along the said southerly line of said ABP tract and northerly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 430.16 feet to a cut cross set for the most southwesterly corner of
said ABP tract; " THENCE North 44 degrees 31 minutes 05 -seconds West along the southwesterly line of said ABP tract and northeasterly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of
21.18 feet to a cut cross set for a corner on the westerly line of said ABP tract and east right-or-way line of Addison Road (60 foot wide right-of-way) as described in deed to the City
of Addison recorded in Volume 334 Page 0106 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; " THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East along the westerly line of said ABP tract
and easterly right of way line of Addison Road a distance of 11235 feet 10 a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap on the northwesterly line of said ABP tracl; THENCE North
66 degrees 25 minutes 50 􀁳􀁾􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁳 East along the northwesterly line ofsaid ABP tract a distance of 282.45 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set willi "Huitt-Zollars" cap; THENCE South
84 degrees 55 minutes 10 seconds East 􀁡􀁬􀁾􀁮􀁧􀀠the northerly line of said ABP tract a distance of 80,00 feet to an "x' cut set in concrete; THENCE North 60 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds
East along Ihe northwesterly line ofsaidABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found; THENCE North 44 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the northwesterly line
ofsaid ABP tract a distance of 66.23 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West along the easterly line
of said ABP tract and easterly face of an existing building wall a distance of 323.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 􀀹􀀶􀀬􀁾􀀠square feet of land, more or less. For 􀁈􀁕􀁩􀁴􀁴􀀭􀁾􀁚􀁯In�
�c.􀁬 􀁡􀁲􀁳 <-􀁾_ . Huitt-Zollars Inc, .< \,--1 t.(" /vis3131 Mckinney Ave. Eric J. ah dy Suite 600 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Dallas, Texas 75204 Texas Registration No.
4862 (214) 871-3311 􀁇􀀺􀀧􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁬􀀺􀁉􀁬􀀷􀁭􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀵􀁜􀁅􀁭􀁭􀁲􀁲􀀮􀁂􀀠 I2f'J,-g, 
EXHIBIT 'C" TRANSIT CENTER/MCM COMPANY TRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, AlISTRACT NO. 482 BEING a tract of land situated in the G.W. Fisher Survey,
Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas Couniy, Texas and being portions of tracts of land described in instruments to MCM Company as recorded in Volume 78212, Page 3704; Volume 82179,
Page 1554; Volume 82179, Page 1559, and Volume 84133, Page 0532 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch
iron rod found at the southwest corner of the tract of land described in said instrument recorded in Volume 84133, Page 0532 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said point also
being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded in Volume 86207, Page 3192 of the Deed Records, Dallas County,
Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 01 degree 47 minutes 22 seconds East along the westerly line of said Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company tract and the easterly face of an existing building wall a distance of 180.77 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a comer, in the westerly line of said
MCM Company tract, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of this tract; " . THENCE continuing North 01 degree 47 minutes 22 seconds East along said easterly face of a building wall
and westerly line of said MCM Company tract a distance of 142.59 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 'HuittZollars" cap for the 􀁭􀁯􀁾􀁴-,􀀠 westerly northwest corner of said MCM Company
tract; THENCE North 44 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along a northwesterly line of said MCM Company tract a distance of 13.77 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for a corner; THENCE
North 00 degrees 03 minutes 45 seconds West along a westerly line of said MCM Company tract a distance of 38.17 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for a corner on the southeasterly right-of-way
line of the Dallas Area Rapid"Transit Property Acquisition Corporation(DART) tract as recorded in Volume 91008, Page 1390 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said point being
the northwest corner of said MCM Company tract; THENCE North 66 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the southeasterly right-of-way line of said DART tract and northwesterly line
of said MCM Company tracts a distance of 665.58 feet to • 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a corner on the west right-of-way line of Quorum Drive (SO foot wide right-of-way)
as established by instrument to the Town of Addison, Texas as recorded in Volume 82149, Page 0240 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 11 minutes 10 seconds
East along the west right-of-way line of Quorum Drive a distance of 167.33 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a corner; THENCE South 36 degrees 13 minutes 52
seconds West a distance of 24.14 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for for a corner, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having
a central angle of 5 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 942.00 feet, and being subtended by a 95.95 foot chord bearing South 69 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly
along said curve to the left an arc distance of 95.99 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars' cap for the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE South 66 degrees 21 minutes
13 seconds West a distance of 459.84 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left, having a central angle of 7 degrees 26 minutes 44 seconds, a radius of 862.00 feet, and being
subtended by a 111.94 foot chord bearing South 62 degrees 37 minutes 51 seconds West; 
THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 112.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and CONTAINING 109,364 square feet of land. more or less. '. \ For Huitt-Zollars
Inc. 􀁳􀁴􀁾 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀿􀁃􀁾􀁨􀀬􀀠 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4862 Huitt-Zollars Inc. 3131 Mckixmey Ave. Suite 600 , Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 871-3311
(,j;\PROMl18!190I\LA..'iDESC 2IlJl9j 
􀁾􀁜􀀠 .." \ \ >w :> r:r. ::> (f) 0: \ W I (f) t.. 􀁾􀀠 <:> \ \ \ \ \ II-.sl$ (K eEARlkGSt THE CEHTEPlII£ I'IotARIHii CK ARAPAHO ROAll lS PiR PAYING IWRO'iEHEHt PlANS 00 flU: AT THE
l'(M( « AOOISOO. MCM COMPANY NATRON U.NlTEO PARTNERSHIP VOL. '9ll3e Pi... 3GJ& 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁜􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁦􀀺􀁪􀁩􀁾􀀿􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀠 , '0:,.';':;'.'It:'::::: :,.(;it'CoHPAN·y::
:::::;::::::: 􀁾􀀠 􀂷􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁏􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁥􀀲􀁈􀀹􀁐􀁇􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁴􀀤􀀢􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀢􀀧􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀢􀀢􀀠 􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀠 􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀩􀁾􀀺􀀠
,-::..-= L CJ ..= (!) Z I(j) X W C\ <t 0 0:: g 0 0 < w 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 i »oTtl AD,JACENT !'ru»'£AT\' 0I/tERS ARr 􀁾 Of REctm J.$ Dt1El\MlhUI af Dd)A: »0 OTHER PUt\LIC JIml!IDS 00 [U1 «ti$lf\UCT
ION £'ASEIt.EHf a l\EMAIt«lER 􀁎􀁏􀁏􀂷􀁏􀁏􀀧􀁏􀁏􀂷􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀮􀁑􀁏􀂷􀀠 5EAR!m AJID DISTANCE I 􀁈􀁵􀁲􀁲􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀠 I I 􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁉􀁉􀀢􀀠 CQIlPUiED-IU_ CXOJit.._ 􀁏􀁒􀁁􀁉􀁉􀁬􀁩􀁟􀁉􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁅􀁟􀁈􀁴􀁬􀁏�
�􀁾􀁟􀀠 􀁾􀁕􀁪􀁡􀀧􀁟􀀮􀁌􀀮􀁙􀁩􀀮􀁉􀀺􀁐􀀮􀁂􀁬􀁴􀁾􀁟􀀠 OAlE 􀁊􀀨􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁄􀀮􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠 .I&. \lQ..'£ PR()f"fATY_.-2Lltt. ________ PARCEl. I.I'\£.t.\I _.....JIi!lW.Ili. ________ 􀁦􀁦􀁅􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁊􀀾􀁅􀁬􀁜􀁋�
�􀁜􀁋􀁅􀀩􀁪􀁔􀀠􀁾􀁊____ c.oosUU.lCTIOO 􀁾_____􀁾____ Ra«UllER (1IlCL. o.satENTS) EXHIBIT "G" 
'.. EXHIBIT "D' TRANSIT CENTER/ABP INVESTMENT #IIl, LTD. TRACI' TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACI' NO. 482 BEING a tract of land situated in the G.W.
FlSher Survey, Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of land described in instrument to ABP Investment #III, Ltd. as recorded in Volume
82108, Page 2694 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southeast corner of said
ABP Investment #IlI, Ltd. (ABP) tract, same being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded in Volume 86207,
Page 3192 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, said point also being on the north right-or-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West along the
southerly line ofsaid ABP tract and northerly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 430.16 feet to an "x' cut set in concrete for the most southwesterly corner of said ABP
tract; THENCE North 44 degrees 31 minutes 05 seconds West along the southwdterly line of said ABP tract and northeasterly right-of-way line ofArapaho Road a distance of 21.18 feet to
an "XI cut set in concrete for a corner on the westerly line of said ABP Iract and east right-of-way line of Addison Road (60 foot wide right-of-way) as described in deed to the City
of Addison recorded in Volume 334 Page 0106 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; '" THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East along the westerly line of said ABP Iract
and easterly right of way line of Addison Road a distance of 27.66 feet to an "0( cut set in concrete for the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East along
the westerly line of said ABP tract and easterly right of way line of Addison Road a distance of 84.69 reet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 'Huitt-Zollars' cap at the northwest corner
of said ABP tract; \ \ THENCE North 66 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the northwesterly line of said ABP tract a distance of 282.45 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars"
'cap; THENCE South 84 degrees 55 minutes 10 seconds East along the northerly line of said ABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to an "x' cut set in concrete; THENCE North 60 degrees 25
minutes 50 seconds East along the northwesterly line of said ABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found; THENCE North 44 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along
the northwesterly line ofsaid ABP tract a distance of 66.23 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found with "Huitt-Zollars" cap for a corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West
along the easterly line of said ABP tract and easterly face of an existing building wall a distance of 142.59 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found with "Huitt-Zollars' cap, said point being
the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left. having a central angle of3 degrees 28 minutes 05 seconds, a radius of 862.00 feet. and being subtended by a 52.17 foot chord bearing
South 57 degrees 10 minutes 27 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 52.18 feet to a point for reverse curvature of a curve to tbe right,
having a central angle of 14 degrees 04 minutes 51 seconds. a radius of 778.00 feet, and being subtended by a 190.72 foot chord bearing South 62 degrees 28 minutes 50 seconds West; 0:\P&01\01
11'T.:OI'>Oj\EXHmIT.0 l71tSl9,S 
THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 191.20 feet to a PK nail set in asphalt paving for the point of compound curvature to the right, having a central
angle of 15 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds, a radius of 240.00 feet, and being subtended by a 66.51 foot chord bearing South 77 degrees 29 minutes 09 seconds West; THENCE Westerly along
said curve to the right an arc distance of 66.73 feet to a point for reverse curvature to the left, having a central angle of 8 degrees 15 minutes 30 seconds, a radius of 260.00 feet,
and being subtended by a 37.44 foot chord bearing South 81 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds West; THENCE Westerly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 37.48 feet to an "X' cut
set in concrete for the point of reverse curvature to the right, having a central angle of 8 degrees 44 minutes 10 seconds, a radius of 768.00 feet, and being subtended by a 116.99 foot
chord bearing South 81 degrees 33 minutes 38 seconds West; THENCE Westerly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 117.10 feet to an "X:' cut set in concrete; THENCE North 46
degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West a distance of 27.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; '. CONTAINING 63,247 square feet of land, mOre or less. \ \ For Huitt-Zollars, Inc. 􀁅􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁡􀁨􀁾􀀼􀀠
Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4862 Huitt-Zollars, Ine. 3131 McKinney Avenue Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 871-3311 􀁃􀀺􀁜􀁐􀁬􀁯􀁴􀁏􀁊􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁔􀁬􀀺􀀡􀁏􀁬􀀧􀁩􀁬􀀵􀁜�
�􀁘􀁈􀁬􀁂􀁲􀁲􀀮􀁄􀀠 IUI$J9j 
o ASP INVESTMENT * III. LTD • N ro '" 0 Z IU « 0:: I (f) (D «,.. w > 0:: :::J (f) 0:: W I (f) u.. ,. (!) \ BA:i!S 0; BtAR1HGSI TtE COOEPJ...IH£ IIfARIH(; Cf" ARAPm> ROAD AS P£A 􀁲􀀪􀁖􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁻􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀺
􀀦􀀮􀁾􀀠ON fiLE "'TE. fZ2Z1 COOSflUlCTlOH E4SEJE.Hf a !lEK4lf(1!'iSl \ \ \ \ ' \ 􀁾􀀠 􀁈􀁏􀁏􀂷􀁯􀁯􀂷􀁗􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁑􀁏􀂷􀀠 I\U.filffil AHD 􀁄􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁾􀀠 IRS 􀁬􀁾􀀠RtO 5£1 .. l .....,
•••1.,. 'hi 11,10 ,,101,.... , .., ..., It... 4 ......, ...4. ... I ... .,t_, _H,t "" _."ltltoll 1$ 0.......1 If. UIU. lkl' 1>101 ... '"u......U••􀁾􀁉􀀠,,,,dH .r nlll 􀀮􀀬􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁕􀀠.........
, •• , "n.., 1.1,11 C..:,:H: d. II ...." •• or_'"....1.... "'" ,rr••1 􀁉􀁾􀁨􀀠"'PII',. 14.4 •• f 􀁾􀁉􀁦􀁕􀀠 , • 􀁾􀀮􀀠 1 􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁲􀀮􀀠01....1 􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀠"'"'" .:' AOOISOt-l
CAR CARE I VOL.S7111 PG.02&6 I'ROPERTY O'ft1llSl tf 􀁬􀁬􀀨􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁬􀁬􀁊􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀬􀀺􀁭.... 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾______ SlREET 􀁁􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀡􀀨􀁾􀁾􀀦􀀺􀁗􀀾􀀮􀀭______________ 􀁓􀁁􀁍􀀺􀁲􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀧􀀮􀀧􀁌􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁆􀁾􀁁􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁋�
�􀁟􀀠O££O 􀁖􀁏􀁌􀁉􀁍􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁉􀀧􀁁􀁇􀀺􀁅􀁟􀀭􀀧􀀶􀀮􀀲􀀡􀀮􀁟􀁉􀁗􀀧􀁓􀁏􀁏􀀠REf.JW.L.ALl!:C 􀀮􀁳􀁷􀁯􀁉􀁙􀁉􀁓􀁉􀁾____________ IJU(. i'IO.--K!£_ lOT 􀁯􀁯􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠 􀁃􀁏􀁬􀁩􀁐􀁕􀁔􀁦􀁄􀁾 _ CI«)JlL_
DRAW_DL£__CIll___ 􀁾􀁒􀀧􀁪􀁉􀁓􀁃􀁦􀁬􀀮􀁟􀁌􀁙􀁊􀀱􀁉􀀮􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁉􀁲􀁬􀀮__ DATE ...lP.J!EQlIIEB..9L __ .IiiiiiiiiiiO"J E"1 '0' 60 eo 'M:l.E .N!i.A. 􀁰􀁾􀁅􀁦􀁕􀀧􀁴􀁟􀁾________ 􀁐􀁾􀁅􀀮􀁌􀀠Af!W
􀁟􀁾􀁕􀀭_______􀁾􀀠 􀁆􀁅􀁅􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁵􀁌􀁟􀁾􀁔 0SDEHf____ CCtfSTA.UCTIOO EASa£HT__________ I\EMA.IIfIIEfl !!NCL. EASENC/I$l_-»..aI_____ EXHIBIT "D" 
EXHIBIT 'E' ARAPAHO ROAD/MCM COMPANY TRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 482 BElNG a tract of land situated in the G.W. Fisher Survey, Abstract
No. 4S2, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being portions of tracts of land described in instruments to MCM Company as recorded in Volume 78212, Page 3704; Volume 82179, Page
1554; Volume 82179, Page 1559; Volume 84008, Page 1944 and Volume 84133, Page 0532 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING
at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southwest corner of the tract of land described in said instrument recorded in Volume 84133, Page 0532 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas,
said point also being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded in Volume 86207, Page 3192 of the Deed Records,
Dallas County. Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road, THENCE North 01 degree 47 minutes 22 seconds East along the westerly line of said Southwestern
Bell Telephone Company tract and the easterly face of an existing building wall for a distance of 100.00 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the northwest ,corner of the Southwestern,)3ell
tract and the POINT OF BEGINNING of this tract; '," THENCE North 01 degree 47 minutes 22 seconds East along the easterly line of said MCM Company tract and continuing along said building
wall face a distance of 80.77 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars"cap, said point being th" beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 7 degrees 26 minutes 44 seconds, a ramus of 862.00 feet, and being subtended by a 111.94
foot chord bearing North 62 degrees 37 minutes 51 seconds East; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 112.02 feet to the point of tangency of said curve;
THENCE North 66 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 459.84 feet to a 1\2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of curvature' of a curve to the right, having
a central angle of 5 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 942.00 feet, and being subtended by a 95.95 foot chord bearing North 69 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds East; THENCE Northeasterly
along said curve to the right an arc distance of 95.99 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap; THENCE North 36 degrees 13 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 24.14
feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars' cap on the westerly right-of-way line of Quorum Drive (80 foot wide right-of-way) as described in instrument to the Town of Addison
as recorded in Volume 82149 page 240 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 11 minutes 10 seconds East alon,g the westerly right-of-way line of Quorum Drive
a distance of 133.64 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap; THENCE North 54 degrees 50 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 23.14 fect to a 1/2 inch iron iron rod
set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 3 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 84S.00 feet, and being subtended
by a 51.55 foot chord bearing South 68 degrees 05 minutes 43 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 51.55 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set
with "Huitt-Zollars" cap ,at the point of tangency of said curve; t'i:\PROJlOll'77Z0I\Oj\EXHmIT.E 1'2115195 
THENCE South 66 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 60.80 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of curvature of a curve to the right, having
a central angle of 11 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds, a radius of260.oo feet, and being subtended by a 52.00 foot chord bearing South 72 degrees 05 minutes 34 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly
along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 5209 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap atthe point of reverse curvature of a curve to the left, having a central
angle of 11 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds, a radius of 240.00 feet, and being subtended by a 48.00 foot chord bearing South 72 degrees 05 minutes 34 seconds West; THENCE Soutbwesterly
along said curve to the left an arc distance of 48.08 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE South 66 degrees 21 minutes
13 seconds West a distance of 299.54 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap at the point of curvature of a curve to the left, having a central angle of 8 degrees 42
minutes 30 seconds, a radius of 778.00 feet, and being subtended by a 118.13 foot chord bearing South 61 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds West; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to
the left an arc distance of 􀀱􀁬􀀸􀀮􀀲􀀵􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀠to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with "Huitt-Zollars" cap on the north line of said-Southwestern Bell Telephone eoo:.pany tract; THENCE North
89 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West along the north line of said Southwestern Bell Telephone Company tra{t a distance of 31.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 59,554 square
feet of land, more or less. For Huitt-Zollars Inc. 􀀼􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀢􀁑􀀻􀁊􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀭 􀁜􀁤􀀲􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁨􀀩 Eric J. aho y Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4862 Huitt-Zollars
Inc. 3131 Mckinney Ave. Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 871-3311 G\IJ'ROJ'.QI ! 11201'JlS\EI(HlBff,E lVI!Si'9j 
EXHIBIT 'F' ARAPAHO ROAD/ABP INVESTMENT #III, LTD. TRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 482 BEING a tract of land situated in the G.W. Fisher
Survey, Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of land described in instrument to ABP Investment #III, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 82108,
Page 2694 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 incb iron rod found at tbe soutbeast corner of said ABP Investment
#Ill, Ltd. (ABP) tract, same being tbe soutbwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded in Volume 86207, Page 3192 of the
Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West along the said southerly
line of said ABP tract and northerly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 430.16 feet to an ''x'' cut in concrete set for the most southwesterly corner of said ABP tract;
THENCE North 44 degrees 31 minutes 05 seconds West along the south"';';sterly line of said ABP tract and northeasterly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 21.18 feet to an
"X-cut in concrete set for a corner on the westerly line of said ASP tract and east right-of-way line of Addison Road (60 foot wide right-of-way) as described in deed to the City of
Addison recorded in Volume 334 Page 0106 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; ) " THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East along the westerly line of said ASP tract
and easterly right of way line of Addison Road a distance of 27.66 feet to an "X' cut set in concrete; THENCE South 46 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 27.38 feetto an
"X' ent set in concrete, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 8 degrees 44 minutes 10 seconds, a radius of 768.00 feet, and being
subtended by a 116.99 foot chord bearing North 81 degrees 33 minutes 38 seconds East; , THENCE Easterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 117.10 feet to an "X' cut set
in concrete at the point for reverse curvature of a curve to the right, having a :central angle of 8 degrees 15 minutes 30 seconds, a radius of 260.00 feet, and being subtended by a
37.44 foot chord bearing North 81 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East; THENCE Easterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 37.48 feet to a point for reverse curvature of
a curve to the left, having a central angle of 15 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds, a radius of 240.00 feet, and being subtended by a 66.51 foot chord bearing North 77 degrees 29 minutes
09 seconds East; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 66.73 feet to a PK nail set in asphalt paving at the point for compound curvature to the left, having
a central angle of 14 degrees 04 minutes 51 seconds, a radius of778.00 feet, and being subtended by a 190.72 foot chord bearing North 62 degrees 28 minutes 50 seconds East; THENCE Northeasterly
along said curve to the left an arc distance of 191.20 feet to a point for reVerse curvature of a curve to the right, having a central angle of 3 degrees 28 minutes 05 seconds, a radius
of 862.00 feet, and being subtended by a 52.17 foot chord bearing North Sl degrees 10 minutes 27 seconds East; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 52.18
feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found with "Huitt -Zollars". cap on the easterly line of said ABP tract and easterly face of an existing building wall; OM'RQl'Oll'mOl \05\EXHfBrr.F 􀀱􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀱􀁴􀀹􀁪􀀠
·-,r THENCE South 01 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West along the easterly line of said ABP tract and easterly face of said building wall a distance of 180.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNlNG;
CONTAINING 33,591 square feet of land, more or less. '. . :.. \ For Huitt-Zollars Inc. 􀁦􀁊􀁾􀁾􀀯􀀠􀁜􀀲􀀮􀁬􀁌􀁾􀁨􀁊􀀠 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4862
Huitt-Zollars Inc. 3131 Mckinney Ave. Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 871-3311 G:\PROJ\OII7720I\Or®CHIBIT.F 12115195 
LEGEND I'm 􀁆􀁾􀁎􀁔 £ASal£HT 8Z21 CO«STAlXTIt»f WEIOT a"'"'''''' NOO-OO·OO·V-OOO.OO· 9E'ARIHG 00 OISTAUCe" IRS IR(.H AOO .$ET PROPERTY DATA PAOP£R'N QWERtS} Of' REC(NI(L __􀁾􀁾______________
SIJlEEJ AIXlIIf'GS______________________ 􀁾􀁙􀁊􀁊􀀮􀁓􀁴􀂣􀁬􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀽􀁪􀁥􀁺􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠0EE!i 􀁾􀁖􀁬􀂣􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁰􀁾􀁃􀂣􀁾􀀠___ /WISCO Aff...QAU..6.S....1.!:.C 􀁓􀁴􀁊􀁬􀁉􀀩􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁉􀁓􀁬􀁾􀀠__􀁾_________
􀁦􀁉􀁬􀀡􀁴􀀮􀁉􀀧􀁩􀁏􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀡􀀮􀀬􀁏􀁦􀀠HO._fI:IIE.!IjiiiiiiiOI E5 I) 􀁾􀀠tOO 􀁬􀁾􀀠 zoo S¢J.I.t HI ntl AREA SUMMARY 'o11OL£ -""􀁾􀀠 􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁦􀀧􀁅􀁊􀁬􀁔􀁙􀁟􀁾􀀠__􀁾􀁾􀁾_____ PARCEL «AS
____________ fEE _____PE.RMJ.NEIfT (4.SEM£Ht __􀁾􀁟􀀠 tooS1RUCT!a< EASDeIT__________ fl£)I:AllRR tlHtl.. (ASD!EKTS! ______􀁾􀁾􀀠 DART PROJECT DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ...,--_.. _,_'M""",'
ADDISON TRANSIT CENTER EXHIBIT INDEX MAP SHEET Of 4 IMI. UO. "" 
· , SCHEDULE OF LEGAL FEES INDIVIDUAL TITLE HOURLYRATE Paul D. Jones Chief Counsel, Real Estate! Environmental Law Division $75.00 David Schulze Assistant General Counsel $50.00 Frances
Wilson ParaLegal $25.00 Exhibit "H" 
SENT l!Y: 8-21-97 3:10PM DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2837;# 1f12 Legal Department Pacsimtle Message Caver Sll«t 1401 Pacific 􀁁􀁶􀁥􀁮􀁵􀁾􀀠 Post Office Box 660163 Diillas, Texas
75265-7255 T'Fax (214) 749-3660 Sending 􀁬􀁾􀁧􀁥􀀨􀀸􀀩􀀬 mduding this cover 8heet. Ifany part of this trall$mission Is miSblnK or poorly received, please (."Qntact the sender, DATE August
21, 1997 IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT, PU!ASE DELIVER TO: John BaUDllllrtner TllLEPHONE NUMBER: T'FAX NUMBER: 972-4S0-2837 MESSAGE: DART and Addison v. ASP Investment #II1, Ltd., et III
The lDformatton I"ODtalDOO to !hi. fa\:Simil. message may be k>galJy prlVlleeed lUld rnnlidrnllallUld is intended 0JIIy for the u.... of 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠iDdlVlduai or entity namt'd above. If
the 􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁬􀁶􀁣􀁲􀀠01 this .....􀁾 is Dot the ig.<nded n:dplent, ur the cmplo}'l!e or dg1!Ilt .....pon$lble to deli."," it to the Intendtt.! n:tipient, you are Ilcn'hy notifl.d that
any di!<.<emination. dIslrlblltion, qr <opytug of tlI/S CIImIlmTIi<atiOD Is strICtly prohibited. If you haY1! 􀁾th1s (ommumtiltton to ClTor, pIe... 􀁾􀁣􀁬􀁹 notify u.< by lflephollC,
and mum the 0Ti1!lnal messagl! tl> u. at tht above .dd.... via the IJ. S. P""tnl $eMC<'. Your cooper.tlnn Is appll!Clat.d. 1b:mk >""1. FROM: David Schulze Assistant General Counsel Real
Estate/EnVirollmental Law SENDER TElfPHONE NUMBER: (214)749-3176 
SENT BY: 8-21-37 3:11PM DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 372 450 2837;# 2/12 Dallas A..a RQpid Transit P.O. Box 􀀶􀀶􀀰􀀱􀁾􀀳􀀠 OftIce ollhct GeII""" Coul1IIIIl DollO!l.leXQS 75266-0163 214/149-32711
Rol.1I1I C ..􀁴􀁯􀁾􀁯􀁤􀁡􀀠 Ge""",1 CO"" .., AI;"'''ant Ge""'al Coon••1 JQrely. AIIIudcle BiB. BeV<llly SoUie A. CIo$by 􀁁􀁵􀁧􀁵􀁾􀁴􀀠21.1997 Joh'nanna Greiner PauID.Jo_ GJenh E. larson
Mr. John Baungartncr. P.E. Via Fax to (971) 450-2837 Mark Niermann Donald L. Powers. Jr. Director ofPublic Works and Certified Mllil David C. 5c11u1ze Town of Addison 168001 Westgrove
Drive Hyatlye O. Simmons 0Qre V. T.,...th P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001-0144 Re: DARTand Addi.fon v. ABi' lnveslment #/JI. Ltd, (If at. 􀁃􀁡􀁵􀀮􀀮􀁾 No. CC-97-G0352-D Dear Mr. Baumgartner:
With this letter please lind a confurmed copy of the CommiSllioners' Report and Award that was signed by Judge Woody on August 13. 1997. You will note that the special commissioners
awarded $2,8799,500.00 as the value of the property being acquired. DART had deposited tllIl fun amount awarded by the special commissionm into the registry ofthe Court this day. DART
and Addison are entitled to immediate possession orthe property by virtue ofthis deposit. Pursuant to the Inlerlocal Agreement of Pun;hase and Sale (If Real Property between Dallas Area
Rapid Traosit and the Town of Addison, DART is to pay 65% of the amount awarded by the specilll commissioners and Addison is to pay 35% of that amount. Pleil5e consider this letter to
be notice that Addison's portion of the award is $1,014,825.00, and that DART hereby requests 1l1at Addison pay this allocated share ofthe commissioners' award. Thank you for youf courtesy
and cooperation in tehis malt.,-r. Yours very truly, David C. Sehulze Assistant General CoUllllt:I Enclosures c: Kermeth C. Dippel 
,SENT BY: 8-21-37 ; 3:11PM DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 372 450 2837;# 3/12 Cause No. CC-97-00JS2·D DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSiT and § CoooernnatiOri:ftocc'cding :'::1 'f.!.1' V"f 􀁪􀁾􀁖􀀮􀀠r._
TOWN OF ADDISON § r;y____,. ___ Petitioners, § il[FU1Y § filed with the Judge of v. § § the County Court at Law No.4 ABP Investment #In, Ltd., et aI, § Defendants. § Dallas County, Texas
COMMISS[QNERS' REPORT AND AWARD We, the undersigned Special Commissioners. were appointed by the Judge ofthe County Court of Dallas County at Law No, 4, Dallas County. Texas. are all
disinterested fu:eholders of Dallas County. Texas, and have swom to assess the damages in this I:a\l$e fairly and impartially and in aooordance with law. We submit the following report
and award to the Court: Inaccordance with law, yOW' Commissioners Pl'Oll1ptly set a time and place for hearing the parties. Written notice ofthe hearing was issued. served 00 each party
and returned as prescribed by law. At l:30 p.m. on !he 12th day ofAUgust, 1997. in tbe courtroom oftbe County Court ofDallas County at Law No.4, the time and place set for the hearing,
the following parties appeared or did not appear as indicated: Dallas Area Rapid Transit appeared by and through its attorney. ABP Investment IITIT, Ltd., A. pen Pinnell. Jr.• GeneIal
Partner did !let appear I appeared "i 􀀨􀀬􀀱􀁉􀀩􀀢􀀧􀁩􀀮􀁾􀀠 . A. Ben Pinnell. Ir. di4 not appear I appeared b1 (il..>o :"..e,.Q Josepb H. Jones, Co·Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust,
The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones TIUSt, The Beth Brandebeny Trust and The Corinne Shimer Tmst did noup,earI appeared ;1 (' .1 . .J", < <I . Beth Brandebmy, Co-TlUStee
orThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C.lones Trust, The Beth 8randebmy T:U:lllld The Corinne Shimer Trust ilia llGt appeiIC I appeared b1 (j) jJ III W c
• 
6-21-97 ; 3:12PM ; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2637;# 4/12 Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield TllISI. The Annette Coffield Trust. The Evelyn C. Jones
Trust, The Be!h BrandebelTY 'Krust and The Corinne Shimer Trust dhh:etllJlPCllI" I appeared 6; (ar.l1"l,:=1 . Samuel Thomas Perkins. Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield TIUst. The Annette
Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Be!h BrandebelTY Tf'rSl and The Corinne Shimer Trust did IIOt appear' appellled hi (UjU\ 50 clL . The Southland Corporation did RIlt BjlJlB&r
I appeared &1 «)􀀡􀁬􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀮􀀠 JohnH.KingdiliRetllpJlllll'/appeami 61 􀁌􀁲􀁊􀀧􀀩􀁯􀁗􀁾􀀠 Citil:Orp North America., Inc. did not appear.!.. .􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁦􀀡􀀡􀁉􀁪􀀡􀁊􀁬􀁉􀁎􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁲􀁣􀁤􀀺􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀬_
_______• TIC United Corp.• d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division ofTIe United Corp., as successor in interest to !he assets ofCollier Trucking, Inc. did not appear I appcarea Morningstar
Entertainment Group, Inc.• B.k.a. Morning Star Entertainment did not appear I appeared appeared Computer People Inc. did not appear I 􀁡􀁪􀁡􀁰􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁰􀁴􀀡􀀮􀁥􀁡􀁲􀀁􀁬􀁦􀁥􀀁􀁥􀁤􀁬􀀭
_________ Dexton Corporation ditlll!lt appear I appeared bt (P,)􀀡􀀧􀀡􀁾􀁊... Evidence oflhe damages resuhing from Dallas Area Rapid Transit's acquisition was presented in accordance
wi!h !he rules of damages established by law. Having heard and considered !he evidence, your Spel:ial Commissioners find that compensation should be paid by DaUas Area Rapid Tr.m:;it
as follows: jl TOTALAWARD ................... s!l, 􀁾􀁏􀁊􀁱􀀬􀀵􀀿􀁊􀁏􀀬􀀠on • ABP Investment #III, Ltd.; A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., General PIIltner ........................................
5______ A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. . .................... $_______ Joseph H.lones. Co-TllISIee of1he MIlly Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Belh Brandeberry
Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ................................................... .. 􀁾􀁾􀀠... 􀁾􀀠.. ".. 􀁾􀀠......... 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠.................. $_-----Commissioners' Report and
and AWInI· PIIP 2 
SENT 􀁾􀁹􀀺􀀠 8-21-37 ; 3:12PM DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2837;# 5/12 Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Tmm, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust,
The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The CorillJlC Shimer Trust .......•..... _.. , .................................. .. ........................................ 􀁓􀁾______ Carolyn Perkins
Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ..................................
.. ........................................ 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustee oCThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth
Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ............................................ . ........................................ $.______ The Southland Crupomtion ............
$--'..'_3_;)_,,-0_0_D_,_ JoOO H. King .......................... $_______ Citiwrp North America, Inc..........•• $________ TIC United Corp., d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division ofTIC United
Corp., lIS successor in interest to the assets ofCollier Trucldng, Inc... " ...•. ........................................ $ 􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁾􀀠 Morningstar Entertainment Group, Tnc., a.k.a.
Morning Star Entertainment 􀀮􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠.....•.. _... 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠.... 􀁾􀀠................. S -u ,. 􀁾􀀠 Computer People Inc................... $ Dex10n Corporation ...................
$.________ We find and order that the costs of these proceedings should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Transit and the Town ofAddison, Petitioners. The property being acquired in these
pIOOeedings is described in the First Amended Statement in Condemnation on file with the Court, and in Exhibit'Aft, attached to this Report and Award and incorporated by n:fen:nce. The
property ill to be used for the construction. extension, improvement or development ofthe transit $)'$1em public tIlInSportaIion and mass transit purposes and for the wnstruction, extension.,
improvement or development ofthe system ofpublic streets . 
SEl'IT BY: 8-21-37 ; 3:12PM; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2837;# 6/12 SIONED AND FILED with the Judge ofCounty Court of Dallas County at Law No.4, this \l􀁾􀀠day of 1\.. 􀁾􀁬􀁬􀀻􀀭􀀧􀀠
,1997. The above Commissioners' Report 􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁷􀁡􀁳􀀠 liay filed wi •Judge ofthe County Court at Law No.4 of Dallas County, Texas,' • 1997. 􀁾􀁾􀀠 JUDGE, County Court at Law No.4,
Dallas County, Texas. 
8-21-97 ; 3:13PM; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2837;# 7/12 COMllINlD UND DESCRJmON ARAPAHO ROADIADP 1NViSTMiNl' .m.1.lO. TRACT TOWN' OF ADDISON. COVN'IY OF DAllAS, 1U'AS G.W. FISHER
SURVEY, AllSTRACT NO. C BEING I Iract of Iud Iitwcd in th8 G.W. rliUr Suney. Ab$tracl No. _ TOWII of Ad4isoa, Dallu 0NaI)' TelW ud beiDa a poniOll or. 􀁴􀁮􀁾􀀠ot Iud 4eKribcd ill QI'1IIIICIII
10 ASP IIlYCIlmCIII 'w. Lt4. II 􀁾􀀠 ill Volume 112108, PI&' 􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁴􀁨􀁣 Deed Recordl ofDIIIas Cowlty. Teas, ud bciIIalllorc p&rIicuIarlyducril:lM 􀁵􀁲􀁾􀀠 . BEGiNNING II • S/8 illeI!
iroo rod low lithe I01Ithust _ of saW ASP faveII.aIeal lim. Ltd. (ASP) tl'lCl. same blilla the solilhWQt COr'llCf of a traer ofIud desaibcd In iIIIIrwIIIell to Sovth_era BeD TeIcphoae
COlDpAllr as recorded ill Vol_lI6201, p.3mor the Deed ReCOrds, Daliaa Cowl!),. Teua, saW poiAllbo bciDl all the lIorth npl-of·-r IiIIe of"'.pUIa R..U; THENCE Nri ., de....... J$ "'"'utes
00 seCOIIds W"t ..the uid tclllherly _ of said AlP trac:l cd IICII'lIM:rty ri&I«-of.way !ilK or AlapUo R.oad a di&wIc:& of 430.16 teet to a C'IIl CI'OSl act for the IIICIl aovtbwcolcrly
_ of uid AlP InId; " THENCS North 4C depea 31 mhllltq OS 􀁾WoIl aIoq the lOIIIII_cr!,y Iiu of uid ASP !rid .md IIOftbe&sterly "PtoOf.....' tiIIo ofArapaho 'Road a dbtlllCll of 21.18
&cI. to a C'IIl CI'OSlICC for • _ 011 the westetlJ be of said ASP Ilael ud cUI; ript-of"'Nl11i11e of Addiaoll. R.oad (150 tooc MIte dpt.o(.way) II 􀁾ill deed to tha C"II)' of Addi.toa
recarde4 ill VoIIIaw 334 1'. 0106 of the Deed RccI.lnIA of Dallu Cc!IuII)', Tga; , THENCE Nordl 00 cIer;rua 17 "'"'lItea 50 aceoada Em aIOII8 the ....17 Ibac of aid ASP traer IIIICI
euterly ripl or W&71i11e of AddiIoII Road a disr'DOC of l1Z.lS rw: to • l/llllcll troc root ICC • "HviU·ZcIUuJ' cap 04 the IIOrth_erlylille of aid AlP Ir_ THENCE Nri66 depeq 2S minutes
50 MCOIIdI East aJOIIJ the D\lIthweaterly IIae ofsaid AlP ulCla 􀁾􀀠 or 2iU.45 feet 10 al/l iDdIlrao rod "' willi 'HviR.zollln· eap; TH!!NCE Soutll 841ftsrect 5! lDiIlutes 10 _d. East
aIoaJ the the IIIOI'IIierIy IIae of Nid AlP _ • 􀁾􀀠 of 110.00 rMt 10 III "I( cut set ill CIlIlCI'CtC; THENCE Nril50 4qrca %S 1I\iJmIa5O aceoIIds East 􀁡􀁉􀁯􀁡􀀦􀁵􀀮􀀮􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁡􀁥􀁯􀁦w,idAlP!rId
a discuee or80.00 teol to • 5/8 iIIdIlroD rooI 1011IIII; THENCENorth4Cdt.,..2SmhIut.5O ..CODdIEast..􀁴􀁨􀀮􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁡􀁥􀁯􀁴􀁵􀁩􀁤􀁁􀀸􀁐􀁉􀁲􀁉􀁃􀁬􀀢􀁤􀁩􀁬􀁣􀁵􀁣􀁣􀀠 of fl6.23 feel to a1/1i1IcIa
IraD root ra-t with "HuiIt.zoDlrt cap lor • CUIIal THENCE SOUI1 01 ....􀁾 mhllItIa 22 __WIIIt aIOII8 the 1IUIWIr" or Nid ASP Irad ... cuIUIr race of aD ....... b1dIdIIII waD • &1_ or
323.36 rc. to .... 1'01Nr OF BEGlNN1NG; CONTAINING 96.8!' III)IIR rccc of lull, aaore Of IcII. 􀁆􀁯􀁲􀁈􀁾􀁨􀁉􀁣􀀮􀀠 HviU.zoIIIn lac. 􀀼􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠9;...< ,..y to!,. I,,.... 3m McIdDIIcJ
AWl. eric J. SuIW. Re,isIcml Prafcaioall.acd SIInq<II' DaIIM, 􀁾1S204 Teas Rqiltrltioll No. _ (214)rn..J3U EXHIBIT A , 
SENT BY: 8-21-97 3:13PM; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 572 450 2837;# 8/12 Cause No, CC-97-00352-D 97 flUG 21 PH 2: 24 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and § Condemnation 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁣􀁥􀁯􀁀􀀩􀁩􀁾􀁌􀀡􀀮􀀮
... 􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁩􀁦􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠;IT LA'll h 􀁾􀀬􀁻􀁔 TOWN OF ADDISON § Petitioners, § IlY_"..__,,_. § filed with the Judge of 􀀨􀁩􀁾􀁐􀁉􀁈􀁙􀀠 v. § § the County Court at Law NO.4 ASP Investment
#1lL Ltd" et al, § Defendants, § Dallas County. Texas NonCE OF DEPOSIT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Come now Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town ofAddison, Petitioners in the
above numbered and styled eminent domain proceeding, and respectfully show the Court the following: I. The written Commissioners Report and Award in this proceeding was filed with the
Judge ofthls Court on August 13, 1997. The amount ofdamsges awarded to the defendants, as adjudged against the Petitioner by the Special Commissioners is Two Million Eight Hundred Ninety
Nine Thousand Five Htmdred Dollars ($2,899,500.00). n. The Petitioners desire to enter upun upun and take possession of the property being condemned and taken in this CIlIlse, pending
further litigation. In order that it may do so, Petitioners this day deposit into the registty ofthe Court the amount ofmoney awarded to Defendants by the Special Commissioners, This
deposit is being made by delivering to the Clerk ofthls Court a cheek from Dallas Area Rapid Transit, numbered 0276169, dated August 21, 1997, in the amount of $2,899,500.00, payable
to "Earl Bullock, County Clerk.", and subject to the order of the defendants. m. By reason ofthls deposit Petitioners are now entitled to enter upon and take possession of the property
being condemned and taken in this eminent domain proceeding. 
· SENT BY: 8-21-37 ; 3:14PM ; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 372 450 2837;# 3/12 WHEREFORE. premises ronsidered. Petitioners pray that this Honorable Court issue such Order as may be necessary
and proper for the enforcement ofPetitioners' right to enter upon and take possession ofthe property that is the subjeet ofthis cause. Respectfully submitted, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT 1401 Pacifie Avenue. 2nd Floor Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, T elCaS 75266-7255 (214) 749·3176 Fax (214) 749-3660 Roland Castaneda General Counsel
State Bar No. 03980600 􀁾􀁣􀁾􀁓􀀭􀀴􀀠 rusistant General Counsel State BarNo. 17848355 Attorneys for Petitioners Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town of Addison 
8-21-37 ; 3:14PM; DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 372 450 2837;#10/12 CBRTIFICA TE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing Notice of Deposit was
served upon !he parties listed below by certified mail return receipt requested on this 21st day ofAugust, 1997. . Assistil!lt Gl:neral Counsel Mr. George Chapman Thompson &; Kniiht
1700 Pacific A"I'CIlue, Suile 3300 Dallas, Texas 75201-4693 Mr. Dan Mastens Hiersche, MiUIlms. HIJ.)'WIIIlJ. Ornkeley It Urbnch, p.e. ]'1303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 700. L.B. 17 DaHas,
Texas 75248 Mr. Carl Gill DextOR COtpOl'lltiOR 4807 Atapabo Road naHas, Texas 75248 Citicorp North America, .Inc. rio C T Corporation Syatem 350 North st. Paul Street Dallllli, TC>'.IIlI
75201 MiclIael M. Barron, ESIj. Barron. Adler, Anderson &; Pol£cl, LLP. 808 Nueces Sum Austill, Texas 78701 Ms. E1il.llbclh Wmsluw TIC United COl]). 464S North Central E..prossway 􀁾􀀮
Texas 75205 Mr. BriBll Mitchell Computer People Inc. 41101 AllIIJIIho Road Dallas, T"""" 78248 Mr. KeJmeIh C. Dippel Cowles &; Thompson 4000 NCNB Plaza 901 Main Street 􀁾􀀬 Texas 75202

· 􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀠BY: 6-21-37 3:14PM DART Legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 372 450 2637;#11/12 Cause No. CC-97-0035Z-D DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and § Condemnation Proceeding TOWN OF ADDISON § Petitioners,
§ § filed with the ludge of v. § § the County Court at Law No.4 ABP Investment #lII, Ltd., et al, § Defendants. § Dallas County, Texas ORDER GRANTING WlUT OF POSSESSION Having reviewed
the Notice ofDeposit that was filed with this Court on August ZI, 1997, and being fully aware and advised ofthe cir<.:umstances and premises in this cause, the Court finds that Dallas
Area Rapid Transit and Town ofAddison, Petitioners, have deposited into the registry ofthe Court, subject to the order ofDefendants, the sum of Two Million Eight Hundred Ninety Nine
'ThouS8lld Five Hundred Dollars ($2,899,500.00), being the full amount ofmoney awarded by the Special Commissioners as compensation for the property being taken and damages, if any.
It is tberefure: ORDERED, ADJlIDGED AND DECREED that, in compliance with the Texas Property Code, Petitioners are entitled to take immediate possession ofthe property that is the subject
of tbis proceeding. The property is more fully descn'bed in Petitioners' First Amended Statement in Condemnation on file in this cause, and in Exhibit A, attached to tbis Order and incorporated
by reference. The Clerk is hereby ordered to issue such writs as may be necessary to enf(l!'ce this order. JUDGE PRESIDING QIlDER GRANllNO WlUT OF POSlIF,SSlON • Solo P&gc 
, SEiIIT BY: 8-21-97 ; 3:15PM DART legal 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁴􀁾􀀠 972 450 2837;#12/12 COMBlNED 1.\lIID DESCRlmOH UAPAHO ROAD/AllP lNWS'l"MiNT 11'111, LTD. TRACT TOWN or ADDISON, COUNl'Y OF DAllAS.
1EJUS C.W. FISHEll SlJIlVEY, AlJ5'l'RACT NO. 4IZ BEING a tract of Iud sillwed ill !lui O.W. F..Surny, AbsIrm No. 482, T_of AddiloII, DiIIIs ColllllY. Tcsu lUld beiDg a portio" or • tract
of Iud dRcribed iD imuumeatlo ADP lllve.sbrleat I'm, LId. u monIc4 ill Volume 81108, P.1694or the Dec4 Records of Dallu ColllllY. T-.andbeiD81110rc 􀁬􀀧􀁡􀁴􀁴􀁩􀁾􀀱􀁹 IIcIcribe4 u I'ollowl:
. BEGINNING at I 5/8 iIIda irOIi rod I'oIIIId It the aouIheut COI'IICI' of laid AlP 􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁬 #UI, Ltd. (ASP) tr.ct. _e􀁢􀁥􀁩􀁄􀁳􀀡􀁬􀁵􀁬􀁾_ of IlfICIof luddcscribed ill ialtnlalClit10
South_em BeUTclcpboDe COIIII'IIIJ as rccor4e4 ill 􀁖􀁾􀁥 8!12117. Pap 3191 of !lui Deed Records, DaIlu CoImIJ. Tau. Aid poiDt aIao belDs 011 tile aonII tipI-of-.., liae of Ar.palIo Road;
i THENCE North 89 dcpea lS IlIiIlulea CO HCOW West ..., the laid IIOlIlIIctly liae of Aid ASP Ifact .u oonbctly ript-of-way liae of Arapallo P.oad I dilllllCC of 430.16 reet to • CU!
cruss HI l\:w the most &""tbwulerly eotlUll' ofllid AlP tn.cCl " THENCE North 44 degccs 31 millulea OS Heoads Welt aiolllthe lOUIIIweaIerl)' \iae of $Ill! ASP IlICI .u IIOfIIIMIIcrly
risht-of-way \iae of Arapallo Road • diat_ of 21.18 feet 10 • cut Q'OIIICC for a _ OIl thc westerly li.ae of IIid ASP If&Cl I11III 11M risJlt.of-way liae of AddIsoa Road (fiG root wide
riI/It-of.way) IS desen'bed iD deed to thc City of AdcIi&oa remrdecl ill Volume 334 Pap 0106 of thc Deed Records of DaIIu CoUIIIY, T_. . THENCE North 00 depeeal1l13iDutu SO --sa Eut
Il10111 !lui waterly _ of Aid ASP Imlllllll cuterI)' ri&bt of _y li.ac of AcIdiIoa P.oad a diRucc of 1l2.35 feId to • lIZ iDdI irVZl Jo4 Rl witlI "H1litt·ZIlIIaq' <lip GIl the lIOrlh..-terly
Iiac of MId ASP tnd; THENCE NIlrIh 66 dcpecs 􀁾 .iIIUla SO RCODds EaII lIoaB the IIOrlhweattrly liu of Slid ADP tract. 􀁾􀀠 of 2814S feet to a 1/7. iIIdI iroa rod HI wkh "H1Iilt.Z.aIlII'.'
cap; THENCE SOIIIh 84 dcpea " mlautel 10 sccomlI East aIolII !lui aorIherly liae of Aid AlP Irai'll a d.i&laace of 110.00 I'c:ct to III "7f' cat set ill_Ie; THENCE NortilfiG dcpHl2S
ml,,,.liO -aEut...,IhoIIlOrIh_1yliae oruidASP tracla d.i&IaDco: of 80.00 leet to I 5/8l11c11 iroa rod I'OIIIId; THENCE North 44 dqrces 2S miIlUla SO lllcoads EuI aIoaa !lui ao.nllweslul)'
IIIIe orSlid AlP tract awlf'aee of fi6.21 r.c to • lIZ iIIch iroa Jo4 fOUIId wiIh "H1Iilt-ZaIIan" cap l\:w • =-: THENCE South 01 ....'" mlaUIeI 2l aecoadI Well aIoq the eulerly liae
of$Ill! AIlP IIICI aacI "IIIUIY r_ of aa 􀁾buiIdiD& WI1I a 41_of 32336 fat to the POlNt' OF BEGINNING; CONTA1N1NO 􀁾lIla&nll'Mt of1I11III, ......a Of' lea&. Hviu·ZoIlarIIIIC. 3131 Mclrinnq
Aft. Suite GOO DaDas, T_7S»I (214) 871·3311 EKHlBITA' 
Dallas Area Rapid TransIT p.o. Box 660163 Dallas. Texas 75266·0163 214/749-3278 Office of the General Counsel Roland Castaneda General Counsel Assistant General Counsel Jecelyn Arbuckle
Bian Beverly Sallie A. Crosby August 21, 1997 Johnanna Greiner Paul D. Jones Glenn E. Larson Mr. John Baungartner, P.E. Via Fax to (972) 450-2837 Mark Nlermann Donald L Powers, Jr. Director
of Public Works and Certifled Mail David C. Schulze Town of Addison Hyattye O. Simmons Dora V. Torseth 168001 Westgrove Drive P. O.Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001-0144 Re: DARTandAddison
v. ABP Investment #III, Ltd., el al. Cause No. CC-97-00352-D . Dear Mr. Baumgartner: With this letter please find a confonned copy of the Commissioners' Report and Award that was signed
by Judge Woody on August 13, 1997. You will note that the special commissioners awarded $2,8799,500.00 as the value of the property being acquired. DART had deposited the full amount
awarded by the special commissioners into the registry of the Court this day. DART and Addison are entitled to immediate possession ofthe property by virtue ofthis deposit. Pursuant
to the Interlocal Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Real Property between Dallas Area Rapid Transit and the Town of Addison, DART is to pay 65% of the amount awarded by the special commissioners
and Addison is to pay 35% of that amount. Please consider this letter to be notice that Addison's portion of the award is $1,014,825.00, and that DART hereby requests that Addison pay
this allocated share ofthe commissioners' award. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in tehis matter. Yours very truly, David C. Schulze Assistsnt General Counsel Enclosures
c: Kenneth C. Dippel 
Cause No. CC-97-00352-D DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and § Condemnation Proceeding TOWN OF ADDISON § Petitioners, § § ftled with the Judge of v. § § the County Court at Law No.4 ABP Investment
#Ill, Ltd., et ai, § Derendants. § Dallas County, Texas ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF POSSESSION Having reviewed the Notice ofDeposit that was ftled with this Court on August 21, 1997, and
being fully aware and advised ofthe circumstances and premises in this cause, the Court finds that Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town of Addison, Petitioners, have deposited into the
registry ofthe Court, subject to the order ofDefendants, the sum of Two Million Eight Hundred Nmety Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,899,500.00), being the full amount of money
awarded by the Special Commissioners as compensation for the property being taken and damages, if any. It is therefore: ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, in compliance with the Texas
Property Code, Petitioners are entitled to take immediate possession ofthe property that is the subject of this proceeding. The property is more fully described in Petitioners' First
Amended Statement in Condemnation on file in this cause, and in Exhibit A, attached to this Order and incorporated by reference. The Clerk is hereby ordered to issue such writs as may
be necessary to enforce this order. 􀁓􀁩􀁧􀁮􀁥􀁤􀁴􀁨􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁡􀁹􀁯􀁦􀁾􀀩􀁴􀀠,1997. JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF POSSP.sSION -Solo Page 
COMBINED LAND DESCRIPTION ARAPAHO ROAD/ABP INVESTMENT #111, LTD. TRACf TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNIY OF DALLAS, TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACf NO. 48l BEING a tract of land situated in
the G.W. FISher Survey, Abstract No. 482, Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of land described in instrument to ABP Investment #lli, Ltd. as recorded
in Volume 82108, Page. 2694 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as foUows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at tbe southeast corner
of said ABP Investment #1lI, Ltd (ABP) tract, same being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in instrument to Southwestern BeU Telepbone Company as recorded in Volume 86207,
Page 3l!12 of the Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas, said point also being 011 the lIorth right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West along
the said southerly linc of said ABP tract and northerly right-of-way line of Arapabo Road a distance of 430.16 feet to a cut cross set for the most southwesterly corner of said ABP tract;
'. THENCE North 44 degrees 31 minutes 05 seconds West along the southwesterly line of said ABP tract and northeasterly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 21.18 fcct to a
cut cross set for a enroer 011 the westerly line of said ABP tract and east right-or-way line of Addison Road (60 foot wide right-of-way) as described in deed to the City of Addison
recorded in Volume 334 Page. 0106 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East along the westerly line of said ABP tract and easterly
right of way line of Addison Road a distance of 112.35 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 􀀧􀁈􀁵􀁩􀁴􀁴􀀭􀁚􀁯􀁾􀀧􀀠cap on the northwesterly line of said ABP tract; THENCE North 66 degrees
25 minutes 50 seconds East along the northwesterly line of said ABP tract a distance of 282.45 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 'Huitt-Zollars' cap; THENCE South 84 degrees 55 minutes
10 seconds East along the 1I0rtherly line of said ABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to an 'Y' cut set in concrete; THENCE North 60 degrees 25 minutes 50 set6nds East along the northwesterly
line of said ABP tract a distanc:e of 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found; THENCE North 44 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the northwesterly line of said ABP tract a distance
of 66.23 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found with 'Hultt·Zollan' cap for a corneri THENCE South 01 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West along the easterly line of said ABP tract and easterly
face of an existing 􀁢􀁵􀁩􀁬􀁾 wall a distance of 323.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: CONTAINING 􀀹􀀶􀁾 square feet of land, more or less. For 􀁈􀁵􀁩􀁴􀁴􀀭􀁚􀁯􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀠Inc:. Huitt-Zollars
Inc:. 􀀼􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮 -􀁾 -< \ .... 1z,<o/C;S-3131 MdWmey Ave. Eric S. ah dy Suite 600 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Dallas. Texas 75204 Texas Registration No. 4862 (214) 871-3311
EXHIBIT A' : 
I Cause No. CC-97-00352-D 97 AUG 21 Pli 2: 24 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and § Condemnation Rr?"e!l9ipg i'. 􀁾􀁣􀀮􀀠,! '" ;' j '''I ,',:';.4 '. " -, ... hH TOWN OF ADDISON § Petitioners,
§ BY________. § filed with the Judge of OfFUTY·-:---v. § § the County Court at Law NO.4 ABP Investment #Ill, Ltd., et ai, § Defendants. § Dallas County, Texas NOTICE OF DEPOSIT TO THE
HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Come now Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town ofAddison, Petitioners in the above numbered and styled eminent domain proceeding, and respectfully show the
Court the following: I. The written Commissioners Report and Award in this proceeding was filed with the Judge of this Court on August 13, 1997. The amount of damages awarded to the
defendants, as adjudged against the Petitioner by the Special Commissioners is Two Million Eight Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,899,500.00). n, The Petitioners
desire to enter upon and take possession ofthe property being condemned and taken in this cause, pending further litigation, In order that it may do so, Petitioners this day deposit
into the registry ofthe Court the amount of money awarded to Defendants by the Special Commissioners. This deposit is being made by delivering to the Clerk ofthis Court a check from
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, numbered 0276169, dated August 21, 1997, in the amount of $2,899,500.00, payable to "Earl Bullock:, County Clerk", and subject to the order ofthe defendants.
Ill. By reason ofthis deposit Petitioners are now entitled to enter upon and take possession of the property being condemned and taken in this eminent domain proceeding. 
WHEREFORE, premises considered, Petitioners pray that this Honorable Court issue such Order as may be necessary and proper for the enforcement ofPetitioners' right to enter upon and
take possession ofthe property that is the subject ofthis cause. Respectfully submitted, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL DAllAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT 1401 Pacific Avenue, 2nd Floor Mailing
Address: P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-7255 (214) 749-3176 Fax (214) 749-3660 Roland Castaneda General Counsel State Bar No. 03980600 􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁣􀁾􀁳􀀭􀁾􀀠 Assistant General Counsel
State Bar No. 17848355 Attorneys for Petitioners Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Town of Addison 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certity that a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing Notice of Deposit was served upon the parties listed below by certified mail return receipt
requested on this 21st day of August, 1997. Assistant General Counsel Mr. George Chapman Thompson & Knight 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75201-4693 Mr. Dan Martens Hiersche,
Martens, Hayward, Drakeley & Urbach, P.C. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 700, L.B. 17 Dallas, Texas 75248 Mr. Carl Gill Dexton Corporation 4807 Arapaho Road Dallas, Texas 75248 Citicorp
North America, Inc. c/o C T Corporation System 350 North St. Paul Street Dallas, Texas 7520 I Michael M. Barron, Esq. Barron, Adler, Anderson & Poteet, L.L.P. 808 Nueces Street Austin,
Texas 7870 I Ms. Elizabeth Winslow TIC United Corp. 4645 North Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 75205 Mr. Brian Mitchell Computer People Inc. 480 I Arapaho Road Dallas, Texas 78248 Mr.
Kenneth C. Dippel Cowles & Thompson 4000 NCNB Plaza 90 I Main Street Dallas, Texas 75202 
Cause No. CC·97·00352·D DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and TOWN OF ADDISON § § Condemnatioll,Ptoce'eding ,::i Y. AT LAW 􀁩􀁗􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠 Petitioners, § 􀁾􀀻􀁙􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭..,---I.G'lHY § filed
with the Judge of v. § § the County Court at Law No.4 ABP Investment #III, Ltd., et al, § Defendants. § Dallas County, Texas COMMISSIONERS' REPORT AND AWARD We, the undersigned Special
Commissioners, were appointed by the Judge of the County Court of Dallas County at Law No.4, Dallas County, Texas, are all disinterested freeholders of Dallas County, Texas, and have
sworn to assess the damages in this cause fairly and impartially and in accordance with law. We submit the following report and award to the Court: In accordance with law, your Commissioners
promptly set a time and place for hearing the parties. Written notice of the hearing was issued, served on each party and returned as prescribed by law. At 1:30 p.m. on the 12th day
of August, 1997, in the courtroom of the County Court ofDallas County at Law No.4, the time and place set for the hearing, the following parties appeared or did not appear as indicated:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit appeared by and through its attorney. ABP Investment #III, Ltd., A. 􀁾􀁥􀁮 Pinnell, Jr., General Partner did lIat appear I appeared "i (j) I) 􀁾 􀁳􀀮􀁾􀀠 .
A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. die not appear I appeared b1 Qv" 􀀱􀀾􀁾􀀠 Joseph H. Jones, Co·Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry
Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust did not iptlli:ar I appeared &1 Co j) oj ...... J . Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn
C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trus?and The Corinne Shimer Trust GiG sat appear I appeared b'1 LP,,11 &.....t . Commissioners' Report and Award -Page I 
Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry "-Krust and The Corinne Shimer Trust
aid Il:6t appear I appeared 61 (aVhS-Cl/. Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry TrYst
and The Corinne Shimer Trust did Rllt appear I appeared hi Co k> (t 􀁳􀁾􀀠 . The Southland Corporation did Il:6t Elflpear I appeared b1 () tJ,."s 􀁾􀀠 John H. King die Ret ElflPsar I
appeared 61 CD..J y'\ :\:f' 􀁾􀀠 Citicorp North America, Inc. did not appear .􀁉.􀀮.􀁡􀀬􀁅􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁐􀁬􀁰􀁾􀀸􀁉􀁡􀁡􀁲􀁐􀁬􀁥􀀺􀁡􀁤􀀭􀀽􀀭________, TIC United Corp., d.b.a. Collier Trucking
Division of TIC United Corp., as successor in interest to the assets of Collier Trucking, Inc. did not appear I Ql"peareEi Morningstar Entertainment Group, Inc., a.k.a. Morning Star
Entertainment did not appear I <Iflpearea Computer People Inc. did not appear I QQjp:llp!eetli!lfl'eee-d-=-__________, Dexton Corporation did flot appear I appeared b1CD /) nse..t..
Evidence of the damages reSUlting from Dallas Area Rapid Transit's acquisition was presented in accordance with the rules of damages established by law. Having heard and considered the
evidence, your Special Commissioners find that compensation should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Transit as follows: 1\ TOTAL AWARD ................... S:J I 􀁾􀁏􀁊􀁱,I $uIJ ,0V ABP Investment
#III, Ltd.; A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., General Partner ........................................ $_-----A. Ben Pinnell, Jr ...................... $__.______ Joseph H. Jones, Co-Trustee ofThe
Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ....................................................
. ........................................ $,------Commissioners' Report and Award -Page 2 
____ ____ ____ Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust
.................................................... . ........................................ $--------------------------Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield
Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ................................... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . $--------------------------Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust,
The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ............................................ . ........................................ 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭 The Southland Corporation
............ $--=.I_·3 :;)..J{:...O O_D . John H. King .......................... $_________________________ Citicorp North America, Inc............ $________ TIC United Corp., d.b.a.
Collier Trucking Division ofTIC United Corp., as successor in interest to the assets of Collier Trucking. Inc. . ....... . ........................................ $ 􀀭􀁵􀀭􀁾􀀠 Morningstar
Entertainment Group, Inc., a.k.a. Mcrning Star Entertainment ........................................ $ -D -'/.¥::-. Computer People Inc................... $________ Dexton Corporation
................... $___________ We frod and order that the costs of these proceedings should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Transit and the Town ofAddison, Petitioners. The property being
acquired in these proceedings is described in the First Amended Statement in Condemnation on file with the Court, and in Exhibit "A", attached to this Report and Award and incorporated
by reference. The property is to be used for the construction, extension, improvement or development of the transit system public transportation and mass transit purposes and for the
construction, extension, improvement or development ofthe system ofpublic streets. Commissioners' Report and Award -Page 3 
SIGNED AND FILED with the Judge of County Court ofDallas County at Law No.4, this \1.'& day of 􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁶􀁊􀀭􀂷􀀠 ,1997. The above Commissioners' Report 􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁾w􀁷as.􀀠 filed wi j' Judge
of the County Court at Law No.4 of Dallas County, Texas, . . (lay ;<,1 􀀼􀁢􀀧􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀯􀀱􀁩􀁣􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀾􀀠1997. 􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀠 JUDGE, County Court at Law No.4, Dallas County, Texas. Commissioners'
Report and Award -Page 4 
COMBINED LAND DESCRlPnON ARAPAHO ROAD/ASP iNVESTMENT #111, LTD. TRAer TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNTY OF DAUJt.S. TEXAS G.W. FISHER SURVEY. ABSTRAer NO. 48l BEING a tract of land situated in
the G.W. F'Wler Survey, Abstract No. 482, ToWII of Addison, Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of Imd described in instrument to ABP Investment "'ru, Ltd. as recorded
in Volume 82108, Page 2694 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod fOWld at the southeast corner
of said ABP Inveslment "'III, Ltd. (ABP) tract, same being the southwest corner of a tract of Imd described in instrument to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company as recorded in Volume
86207, Page 3192 of the Deed Records, Dallas COWlty, Texas, said point also being on the north right-of-way line of Arapaho Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West along
the said southerly line of said ABP tract and northerly right .of·way \ine of Arapaho Road a distance of 430.16 feet to a cut cross set for the most southwesterly corner of said ABP
trad; '. THENCE North 44 degrees 31 minutes OS seconds West along the southwesterly line of said ABP tract and northeasterly right-of-way line of Arapaho Road a distance of 21.18 feet
to I cut cross set for a COl'ller on the westerly line of said ABP tract and east ript-of-way line of Addison Road (60 foot wide right-of-way) as described in deed to the City of Addison
recorded in Volume 334 Page 0106 of the Deed Records of DaJIas County, Texa.s; THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes SO seconds East along the westerly \ine of said ABP tract and easterly
right of way line of Addison Road I distance of 112.35 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 'Huitt-ZOnar,' cap on the northwesterly line of said ABP trld; THENCE North 66 degrees 2S
minutes SO seconds East along the northwesterly line of said ABP tract a distance of 282.45 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with 'Huilt-Zollars' cap. THENCE South 84 degrees 55 minutes
10 seconds East along the northerly line of said ABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to an yo cut set in concrete; THENCE North 60 degrees 2S minutes SO seconds East along the northwesterly
\ine of said ABP tract a distance of 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod fO\ll1d; THENCE North 44 degrees 2S minutes SO seconds East along the northwesterly line ofsaid ABP tract a distance
of 66.23 f«t to a 1/2 inch iron rod fOlllld with 'Huitt-Zollars' cap for a col'ller; THENCE South 01 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West along the easterly line of said ABP tract and
easterly face of an existing buDding wall a distance of 323.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 􀀹􀀶􀁾 square feet of land, more or less. For Huilt-Zon::Inc. Huitt-Zollars
Inc. 􀀼􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾 -< \'2..11.(q/c;,3131 MclWmey Ave. Eric 􀀱􀁾ah dY -Suite 600 Registered Professional Land Surveyor Dallas, Texas 7S204 Texas Registratioo No. 4862 (214) 871-3311
EXHIBIT A·; 
J , DART and Addison v. ABPIII vestments #111 Ltd. Summary of Testimony at Special Commissioners' Hearing August 12, 1997 DART and Addison -Glenn Silva Income Approach -Direct Capitalization
Method $2,620,000 Sales Comparison Approach $2,520,000 Reconciled Value $2,600,000 Pinnell-Robert D. Porcher Income Approach -Discounted Cash Flow Method $2,800,000 Cost Approach $2,915,000
Reconciled Value $2,915,000 Southland Corporation Market Rent $35.00 per square foot Contract Rent $20.00 per square foot Rental Advantage $3,503.33 per month Present Value: $3,503.33
@6.72%for 42.5 months Rental Advantage $132,000 Special CommiSSIoners' Award Total Award $2,899,500 Unapportioned amount $2,767,500 Southland Corporation $ 132,000 TIC United Corp. $
-0Morningstar Entertainment Group, Inc. $ -0Award represents an increase of $299,500 or 11.5% over Petitioners' testimony Total DART Addison 100% 65% 35% Award $2,899,500 $1,884,675
$1,014,825 Testimony $2,600,000 $1,690,000 $ 910,000 Increase $ 299,500 $ 194,675 $ 104,825 
'AUG-13-1997 17:06 COWLES 8. THOMPSCN 214 672 2020 P.02/06 FlU]) <-i'::::.,". Cause No. CC-97-00352-D 􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠 '/{ 􀀨􀀧􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀠 13 I.: "'_ , 􀁾. 􀀶 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT and §
Condemnation, P,rocecding . .-. ,\, iJ)i TOWN OF ADDISON § Petilioners. § 'H § filed with the 􀁊􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁩􀁔􀀢􀀨􀀭􀀭􀀭 v. § § the County Court at Law No.4 ABP Investment #1II.
Ltd.• et ai, § Defendants. § Dallas County. Texas COMMISSIONERS'REPQRT AND AWARD We, the Wldersigned Special Commissioners. were appointed by the Judge of the County Court of Dallas
County at Law No.4, Dallas Count)', Texas, are all disinterested freeholders of Dallas County, Texas. and have sworn to assess the damages in this cause fairly and impartially and in
accordance with law. We submit the following report and award to the Court: In accordance with law, your Commissioners promptly set a time and place for hearing the parties. Wrilten
notice of the hearing was issued, served on each party and returned as prescribed by Jaw. At I:30 p.m. on the 12th day of August. 1997, in the courtroom ofthe County Court of Dallas
County at Law No.4, the time and place sel for the hearing, the following parties appeared or did not appear as indicated: Dallas Area Rapid Transit appeared by and through its attorney.
ABP Investment "/fIll. Ltd., A.IIBen Pinnell, Jr .• Genera! Partner 􀁾􀀭􀁡􀁾􀀱􀀠 appeared by (fWY. S:(4 . A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. did-not-appear I appeared ·6 V(ij() hSJ Joseph H. Jones,
Co-Trustee ofTile Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust. The Evelyn C. Jones Trust. The Beth Brandeberry TflJ1t and The Corinne Shimer Trust did. /leI appear I appeared bl
􀀨􀁯􀁴􀁬􀁴􀀩􀁤􀁾􀀠 . .. Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust. The Annettc Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust. The Beth Brandeberry Trushand The Corinne Shimer
Trust did not appear I appeared b1 6J 6 n.\ eX e • Commissioners' ReJKlrt and Award ¥ Page 1 
AUG-13-1997 17:06 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.03/06 Carolyn Perkins Shimer Merrit1, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coft1eld Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust,
The Beth Brandeberryl1Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust did A'll appsar I appeared 61 􀁃􀁉􀁬􀀰􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀠 Snmucl Thomas Perkins. Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette
Cotlield Trust. The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry :Us! and The Corinne Shimer Trust did "et app;ar I appeared b1 0'''n cd . The Southland Corporation dis Bsl 􀀢􀁩􀀧􀁰􀁾􀁡􀁲􀀠I
appeared b1CaUl"] !>& John H. King die !let 6r¥<ll'1 appeared bi (Dun ;:.,d Citicorp North America, Inc. did not 􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁥􀁡􀁲􀀻􀁨􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁝􀁰􀀧􀁬􀁰􀁣􀁾􀁡􀀺􀁴􀁬􀀧􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀭􀀬􀀼􀁊􀀭_________.
TIC United Corp., d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division of-nC United Corp., as successor in interest to the assets of Collier Trucking, Inc. did not appear I ..apperued Morningstar Entertainment
Group, Inc., a.k.a. Morning Star Entertainment did not appear 1-al"I"atee.. Computer People Inc. did not appear /.4Ja'flprpee!l:lrlree<d!-___________. Dexlon Corporation dill nol aw'1!I
I appeared _ ILl de q.,.!( I Evidence ofthe damages resulting from Dallas Area Rapid Transit's acquisition was presented in accordance with the rules of damages established by law. Having
heard and considered the evidence, your Special Commissioners find that compensation should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Transit as follows: \''tt. '". .I,J . 􀁡􀁾􀁹􀀠 )n/jd 􀁾􀁔􀀻􀁲􀁘􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀯􀁒�
�􀀺􀀧􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀠􀁻􀀩􀀬􀁾􀀠gqq SOD. 0 C TOTAL AWARD ................... S_.Qf,)l'f(;.-lr' . I j ABP Investment #llJ, Ltd.; A. Ben Pinnell, Jr., General Partner ........................................
$_--A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. . .................... $_________ Joseph H. Jones, Co-Trustee ofThe Mary Co!Tteld Trust, The Anne(1e Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry
Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trust ...................... _" ........................... . ........................................ 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭 Commissioners' R¢port and AWald ..
Page '2 
AUG-13-1997 17:07 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 572 2020 P.04/05 Beth Brandeberry, Co-Trustee of The Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry
Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trost .................................................... . ...................................... :. $_-----Carolyn Perkin> Shimer Merritt, Co-Trustee
orThe Mary Coffield Trost, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The Corinne Shimer Trost ................................... . .......................
................. 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 Samuel Thomas Perkins, Co· Trustee ofThe Mary Coffield Trust, The Annette Coffield Trust, The Evelyn C. Jones Trust, The Beth Brandeberry Trust and The
Corinne Shimer Trost .................................... , ...... .. ........................................ $------The Southland Corporation ............ $ John H. King ..........................
$_______ Citicorp North America, Inc ............ $________ TlC United Corp., d.b.a. Collier Trucking Division ofTIC United Corp., as successor in interest to the assets of Collier Trucking,
Inc......... . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. • .. . • .. .. • .. .. .. . .. $ -() -J..J"",= Morningstar Entertainment Group, loc., a.k.a. Morning Star Entertainmeot ...............................
... , ..... $ -<:!-􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀠 Computer People Inc................... $________ Dexton Corporation ................... $.________ We find and order that tne costs of these proceedings
should be paid by Dallas Area Rapid Transit and the Town ofAddison, Petitioners. The property being acquired in these proceedings is described in the First Amended Statement in Condemnation
on file with the Court, and in Exhibit "A", attached to this Report and Award and incorporated by reference. The property is to be used for the construction, extension, improvement or
dcvelopment of the transit system public transportation and mass transit purposes and for the construction, extension, improvement or development of the system ofpublic streets . Commissioners'
Report and Aw.ud .. Page:; 
AUG-13-1997 17:07 COWLES & THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.0S/06 SIGNED AND FILED with the Judge of County Court of Dallas County al Law No.4. this 􀁉􀁚􀀮􀁾􀀠 day of fk 􀁾􀀬􀁊􀀼􀀭􀀬􀀫􀀭 .1997.
-:!1lMAL 􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠 (I 􀀬􀁬􀁪􀁢􀀧􀁖􀀯􀁊􀁕􀁾􀀩􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀱􀁬􀀬􀀠􀀨􀁻􀁌􀀭􀁾􀀭 The above Commissioners' Report and Award was filed with me, Judge of the County Courl at Law No.4 of Dallas County,
Texas, this __day of______􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀠1997. JUDGE, County Court at Law No.4, Dallas COUllty, Texas. Commissioners' Report. and Aw;ud 􀁾􀀠Page 4 
RUG-13-1997 17:07 COWLES 8. THOMPSON 214 672 2020 P.06/06 COMBtNED lJt.ND DESCRIPTION ARAPAHO ROAD/ABP INVESTMENT !\fill, LTO.lRACT TOWN OF ADDISON, COUNlY or DA.l.U.S, TEXAS C.W. FISHER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. om BEING a trlct of I ...d ,ituated in the G.W. Fl.1Iber Survey, 􀁁􀁢􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁡􀁣􀁴􀀠No. 482, lO....1I of Addison, Dall>.\ COUllty Teus and being a portion of • tract
of Imd dC$Clibed in Uutrunlent to ASP Jovt.llDent "Ill, Ud. >.\ recordeJ in Volume 8210l!, Page 2.694 of the Deed Retords of O..u.. County, TeUl, ud being 1110,. pa1licubrlyde.sc.ribed
.. [oUoW\\; • BEGINNING at .5/8 inch iron rod found at the southe",t eorner of said Al3P Investment "m, Ud. (ASP) trael, .lW1e being the southWelt coroer of. tract of liUld de:;cribed
in irulrumenl to SouthweSlel1l BtU Telepbol1e Company as recorded in Volume 86207, PlSe 3192 of the Deed &e",,'ds, Dallas COUl)ty, TeJW, said jlQint also bewg on the north right·or.way
line ot Arapaho Road; . THENCE North 89 degrus 3S lIIinut... 00 seconds W ... t along the said southerly line of said ASP tract &lid northerly rigbt·o/.way line of Arapaho Road" distu!<c
of 430.16 feet to • cut <rou set for the mosl ,oulbwellerly (orner of said Al3P 􀁴􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁴􀀻􀀠 • THENCE North 44 d.peel 31 miautM 05 ._Dds Wut aJoag the $outhwesterly line of said All!'
􀀡􀁴􀁾􀁃􀀡􀀠acd northeasterly 􀁲􀁩􀁧􀁨􀁴􀂷􀁯􀁦􀂷􀁷􀁾􀁹􀀠line of Alapaho Road a d41U!«. of 11.18 feet to a 􀁾􀁴􀀠<ross let fo, 􀁾􀀠cortler on the westerly line of uid Al3P tnct ...d ea,t
riglIt-of'I"ay lin. of Addison Road(CO locI wide right-of.way) as QC$Cribed in d.ed to lbe Cit)' or Addison r_,ded in Volume 3'34 PlSe 0106 or the Deed R_,ds of Dalla. a:.unt)', Texas; THENCE. North 00 degreM 17 minutel
.so uconds wt aloog the wWe'ly line or Aid AllP tnet Illd easterly right of 􀁾􀁹 line of AddisoD Road lL dista.tlcc of 11%.35 feet 10 a 1/1 mel! itoo rod set with 􀂷􀁈􀁵􀁩􀁵􀀮􀁚􀀼􀁬􀁾􀂷􀀠rap
on the nortbwe!terly line of wI! ABP !tad; THENCE North 66 degre... 2.S minute5 SO ,.conds wt along the norlhwulerly Un. of sOlid ABP tract a din ..... of 2.82.45 feet \0 • 1/2 inch
itOtl rod 􀁾 with 'Huitl-Zollat.' up; THENCE South 84 depe... 5$ miaut ... 10 seconds WI aloog the northerly line of ..id AllP lract a disWlCJ: of 80.00 feel to an -,: eut set in conatle;
THENCE North CO degree5 2.5 􀁭􀁬􀁮􀁵􀁴􀁾􀀠SO stGOods Eut alOll8the 􀁄􀁯􀁴􀁴􀁨􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁜􀁹􀀠line of uid All!' !tatta distlIl«' o[ 80.00 leet 10 A S/8 inti! ito" .04 round; THENCE North
44 degre.e5 2.5 minutu 50 $«Ol1ds Eut alo,,!! the oorthwwerly line or sOlid ADP tract a distill" of 66.23 reet to 111/'1. inch iron rod fO\l!ld with 'Huitt·Zollars' cap for lL (oruct;
iHENCE South 01 deg:rees 47 minutu 22 seconds Welt along the easterly line of uid AllP Ind aad easterly fatC of aa e.uti.r!g bulldiq wall a distan«. of m36 f«t to the POINT 0.1' BEGINNlNG;
CONT AINlNG 􀀹􀀶􀀬􀁾􀀠5(jll.UC feet of WId, 􀁭􀁯􀁲􀁾􀀠or leu. f<or -􀁈_􀁾􀀧 􀀡􀁬􀁾􀁚in􀁯c.􀁕 􀁡􀁲 .... Huitt·Z<lIh..... hie. \'1...\ u ... I'l;s-3131 Mciin.aey Ave. ErieJ. 􀁾􀀭 Suitel:iilO
Rtgiltercd 􀁲􀁲􀁯􀁲􀁾􀁑􀁡􀀮􀁡􀁬􀀠l.a.nd 􀁓􀁾􀁹􀁑􀁲􀀠 Dallas, TWo! 75204 TeXIS Reghtratioll No. 4862 (214) 871-3311 EXHlBITA' TOTAL P.06 
ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION -TOLLWAY TO MARSH LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS Parcel No. Owner Address $ I SF 60' R.O.W. 84' R.O.W. Area (S.F.) Cost Area (S.F.) Cost 1 $10.00 1,575 $15,750 1,575
$15,750 2 J.B. Cline $5.00 33,000 $165,000 58,500 $292,500 3 Ben PinneI $15.00 20,000 $300,000 30,000 $450,000 4 Brick Yard -right-of-way $5.00 0 $0 7,000 $35,000 Brick Yard -unusable
remainder $5.00 8,300 $41,500 8,300 $41,500 5 Southern Pacific Lines $5.00 56,000 $280,000 78,000 $390,000 6 City of Dallas -Beltwav Reservior $5.00 0 $0 11,000 $55,000 7 Brinker Tract
$5.00 0 $0 16,900 $84,500 8 Roadway Inn $7.50 22,200 $166,500 29,700 $222,750 9 Yoplait YOQurt $12.50 12,000 $150,000 19,400 $242,500 10 15101 Midway -right-of-way $20.00 32,000 $640,000
47,000 $940,000 15101 Midway -unusable remainder $20.00 121,000 $2,420,000 106,000 $2,120,000 11 41 39 Centurion Way $10.00 1,100 $11,000 5,400 $54,000 12 41 31 Centurion Way $10.00
0 $0 3,100 $31,000 13 4125 Centurion Way $10.00 0 $0 2,400 $24,000 14 4101 Centurion Way $10.00 450 $4,500 2,000 $20,000 15 Mini-Warehouses $18.00 42,600 $766,800 60,300 $1.085,400 16
Bob Hall -1 511 5 Surveyor $20.00 79,200 $1,584,000 79,200 $1,584,000 17 TU Electric $0.00 6,000 $0 8,400 $0 18 Vacant tract on Realtv Lane $5.00 0 $0 5,800 $29,000 19 3801 Realty Lane
$10.00 0 $0 8,400 $84,000 20 3799 Realty Lane $10.00 5,000 $50,000 9,900 $99,000 21 Developed tract s.w. corner Marsh & Realty $10.00 0 $0 11,200 $112,000 22 South side Realtv between
Business & Commercial $5.00 0 $0 5,500 $27,500 23 Tract north of Addison Bank $5.00 0 $0 4,000 $20,000 24 S.E. corner of Runyon & Centurion Way $10.00 0 $0 2,800 $28,000 25 tract to
the east of tract 24 $10.00 0 $0 2,100 $21.000 26 tract to the east of tract 25 $10.00 0 $0 6,300 $63,000 TOTAL $6,595,050 $8,171,400 
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 5485 Bell Line Road, Suite 199' Da'las. Texas 75240 USA' (214) 991-1900' Fax: (214) 490-9261 DRAFT MEMORANDUM TO: John Baumgartner FROM: Robert 􀁗􀁵􀁮􀁾􀁲􀁬􀁩􀁣􀁨􀀠j?C
JJ Gary Jost /:1' . DATE: February 4. 1994 SUBJECT: Analysis of Cross-Section Requirements For Arapaho Road This memorandum presents the findings of an evaluation of two alternative
roadway cross sections for the proposed extension of Arapaho Road in Addison. Texas. The alternatives include a four lane divided ( with median) roadway constructed in an eighty-four
foot right-ofway and a four lane undivided roadway constructed in a sixty foot right-of-way. This study evaluates the benefits and impacts of each of the alternatives on roadway operations
and safety. capacity. and cost. BACKGROUND The Town of Addison has long recognized the need for additional east-west roadway capacity within the Town limits. Presently. the demand for
east-west capacity if served predominantly by Belt Line Road. Development along this regional six-lane arterial has steadily increased traffic volumes over the past several years. Recent
traffic counts conducted along Belt Line Road revealed 24-hour volumes in excess of 50.000 vehicles. well above the design capacity of the roadway. Traffic volumes have increased along
the roadway at an annual rate of over three percent (3%). Thoroughfare Planning There have been several alternatives discussed for providing additional east-west capacity within the
Town. These alternatives. as well as other transportation needs. were analyzed in December 1992. as part of the development of a comprehensive transportation plan to meets the existing
and future needs of the Town. This plan was adopted by the Town's Council in January. 1993. As part of the Thoroughfare Plan Study. a roadway functional classification system was developed
to serve the variety of transportation needs within the Town. This functional classification of roadways was prepared to provide an underlying basis for determining the following: {{PJ
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP 
Mr. John Baumgartner February 4, 1994 Page 2 Desired degree of continuity Capacity level Traffic control strategy Design speeds and other design standards Degree of access control Using
these characteristics, the Town adopted the following five roadway classifications: Principal arterial· six lane divided Minor arterial -four lane divided Commercial collector -four
lane undivided Residential collector· two lane undivided (36') Residential local -two lane undivided (27') These classifications were used to develop a system of roadways where the specific
performance characteristics of each roadway we matched to the demand. Planning Capacity _oAf)-m,portant element of the Thoroughfare Plan Development process was to provide the necessary
roadway capacity to meet the existing and future travel demand within the Town. The effective capacity of any particular roadway is dependent on several factors, including horizontal
and vertical curvature, signal spacing, signal operation, and level of access control to adjacent properties. Considering these elements, the North Central Texas Council of Governments
has developed capacities for various roadway classifications for use in their transportation planning efforts throughout the region. These planning capacities are typically used in determining
roadway cross-section requirements and classifications. These same capacities were used in the Town's Thoroughfare Plan for Four Lane Roadways. The following daily capacities were assumed:
Four lane divided: 28,000 vehicles per day Four lane undivided: 25,000 vehicles per day Projected Arapaho Road Volumes Several roadway netWOrk alternatives were evaluated using the NCTCOG's
travel demand forecasting models and projected and recommended cross-section population and employment levels. To provide additional east-west capacity, the preferred roadway network
included both the planned Keller Springs Toll Tunnel and the extension of Arapaho Road from Addison Road to Marsh Lane. The daily volumes on the Arapaho Road extension are projected
to be as high as 40,000 vpd in certain segments of the roadway. This projected volume exceeds the planning capacity of a four lane design, but the assessment of the Town staff and 
Mr. John Baumgartner February 4, 1994 Page 3 thoroughfare plan steering committee concluded that a four lane divided roadway was the most realistic designation for this arterial. This
recommendation was contained in the final thoroughfare plan document approved by Town Council. COMPARISON OF ALTERNATE CROSS-SECTIONS The following sections contain comparisons of the
two alternative cross-sections for the proposed Arapaho Road extension. Separate sections describe the operations and safety characteristics, PM peak hour level of service and cost differences
between the two alternatives. Operations and Safety Characteristics The four lane undivided roadway does not provide special provisions for left turning vehicles and that through vehicles
are frequently delayed by left turning vehicles. Traffic turning to other streets and driveways can create rear-end conflicts and lane change maneuvers by drivers seeking to avoid delay
which in turn can create capacity and safety problems. Undivided roadways also do not provide a refuge area for pedestrians crossing the street and the entire width must be crossed in
one movement. In terms of capacity, left turning vehicles create disruptions to through traffic at intersections and mid-block areas. Through vehicles are delayed until the left turning
vehicles can complete their turn. This is particularly critical at signalized intersections, where left turns are delayed because opposing traffic is concentrated and the lack of left
turn lanes limits the ability to provide left turn signal phases to reduce delay. 0 perational analyses conducted as part of a national research effort indicate that the four lane undivided
is less desirable in terms of level of service and capacity in mid-block areas than the divided cross-section under high volume conditions such as those projected for Arapaho Road.'
An analysis ofthe projected peak-hour intersection is detailed in a subsequent section of this memo. The undivided cross-section generally has a higher accident rate than roads which
make provisions for left turning vehicles. Research indicates that accidents can be reduced an average of 45 percent by implementing left turn provisions on a previously undivided roadway.'
Other recent research indicates that in suburban areas, raised curb medians provide a significantly lower vehicle accident rate than undivided cross-sections. The pedestrian accident
rate was also found to be significantly lower on divided than undivided roadways! PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations The ability of a roadway to meet the transportation needs of the
Town is dependent on many variables. The optimum operation of signalized intersection is one such key element. Traffic signals assign the right-of-way to the various movements allowed
at the intersection. When right-of-way is assigned to compatible movements, all conflicting movements must stop, 
Mr. John Baumgartner February 4, 1994 Page 4 effectively causing the capacity of that movement to be zero. The ability to effectively supply signal timing plans which minimize the stops
at the intersection allows us to maximize the effective capacity of the intersections. . Turning movements at intersections are often sufficiently high to require special phasing operations
for optimum operation. Without the opportunity to separate turning vehicles from through vehicles, signal operation cannot be optimized and traffic conditions are impacted. An analysis
of projected PM peak hour conditions at Midway and Arapaho was performed to quantify the differences between the divided and undivided cross-sections. Turning movements levels were estimated
based on NCTCOG projected volumes and Highway Capacity Manual methods were used to analyze the level of service provided by each option. Two scenarios were evaluated, the long-term projections
and an interim period where Arapaho volumes were one-half of the ultimate projection. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1. Scenario Divided Undivided Long-term E • {At
(Failure) Interim D E (Acceptable) (Capacity) At the full projected volume condition, the intersection is at capacity with a divided roadway on Arapaho, Without left turn lanes on Arapaho,
east-west capacity is overwhelmed by traffic demand and the reSult would be very high levels of congestion. ·In the interim scenario, an acceptable level of service is provided by the
divided cross-section but the undivided roadway results in at-capacity conditions. The resulting average delay to individual vehicles of about 52 seconds is forty percent greater than
that experienced with the divided cross-section. Estimated Costs Costs have been estimated for each cross-section. Barton-Aschman has prepared an engineer's estimate of probable construction
costs and the Town staff has prepared an estimate of probable right-of-way acquisition costs. These costs are provided in Table 2. 
Mr. John Baumgartner February 4, 1994 Page 5 Construction Right-of-Way Total Divided Undivided $5.2 million $4.5 million $8.0 million $6.6 million $13.2 million $11.1 million The divided
cross-section roadway is expected to cost $2.1 million more than the undivided roadway. The additional cost is directly related to the provision of turn lanes for left turning vehicles
which provide the capacity and safety benefits detailed in other sections of this memo. Conclusions Based on this evaluation, the following conclusions can be drawn. • Projected traffic
volumes prepared as part of the development of Addison's Transportation Plan indicate the need for a four lane divided roadway. • The construction of Arapaho Road as a four lane divided
arterial, as approved in the Town's Thoroughfare Plan, will provide the following benefits over an undivided crosssection: • Increased Capacity • Increased Safety • Improved Signal Operation
• The cost of constructing Arapaho Road as a four lane divided arterial will cost approximately nineteen percent more than an undivided roadway. References 1. Harwood, D. W., "Effective
Utilization of Street Width on Urban Arterials," NCHRP Report 330, Transportation Research Board (August 1990) 49 pp. 2. Bowman, Brian L. and Robert L. Vecellio, "The Effect of Urban/Suburban
Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety." presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 9-13, 1994, Washington, D.C. 
BARTON·ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 􀀵􀁾􀀸􀀵􀀠􀁂􀁥􀁾􀁬􀀠Line RoOae. SI.,;:* 199· Ca,las. Texas 75240 USA. {214} 􀀹􀀹􀀱􀁾1900 • Fax {21";)';90-9261 April 1, 1993 Mr. Ron Whitehead City Manager
Town of Addison 5300 Belt Line Road Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Arapaho Road Alignment Dear Mr. Whitehead: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide a thoroughfare alignment
study for Arapaho Road from Marsh Lane to Dallas Parkway, The alignment study for Arapaho Road from Addison Road to Dallas Parkway will consist of the following: • Field surveying to
establish existing property lines, building locations, existing right-of-way. • Calculated right-of-way alignment based on field surveys. • Detailed right-of-way alignment map. • Right-of-way
descriptions for proposed right-of-way. The alignment study for Arapaho Road from Marsh Lane to Addison Road will consist of the following: • Establish existing property lines from recorded
subdivision plats. • Locate buildings and existing pavement by on-the-ground observation. • Establish alignment on a,large:'scale alignment map. The anticipated costs for field siJrveying,
expenses, and engineering effort is $9,500.00. We arep(epared to begin the wpr,K jll"t)"cii'stely .with completion within four (4) weeks. , ' "' 􀀨􀁾􀁝􀀠PARSONS • 􀁔􀀭􀁾􀁁􀁎􀀤􀁐􀁏􀁒􀁔􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁃􀁎􀀠CiRO
UP 
Mr. Ron Whitehead -' April 1. 1993 Page 2 We have initiated work based on your verbal authorization. If this does not agree with your understanding. please contact me immediately. We
appreciate to opportunity to work with you again. Sincerely, BARTON·ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 􀁾􀁧􀀻􀁅􀀠 Vice President GDJ:tdb ton\afllpaho.ttr 
RESOLUTION R93-034 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,500. FOR AN ALIGNMENT STUDY FOR THE EXTENSION OF ARAPAHO
ROAD, TO BE CONDUCTED BY EARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. serves as the traffio consultant to the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a Transportation
and Thoroughfare Plan which includes the extension of Arapaho Road west to Marsh Lane; and WHEREAS, Barton-Aschman has agreed to provide: field surveying, calculated right-of-way alignment,
detailed right-ofway alignment map, right-of-way descriptions for proposed rightof-way, establishment of existing property lines from recorded subdivision plats, location of buildings
and existing pavement by on-the-ground observation, and establishment of alignment on a large scale alignment map; and WHEREAS, The anticipated costs for field surveying, expenses, and
engineering effort is $9,500.; and WHEREAS, the Town has funds available for the work; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the Town
of Addison does hereby approve an expenditure in the amount of $9,500. for a thoroughfare alignment study for Arapaho Road, to be conducted by Barton-Aschman, Associates, Inc. OFFICE
OF THE CITY SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO. R93-034 
DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, this the 13th day of April, 1993. ATTEST: OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO. R93-034 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450-2871 􀁾Post Offi1)e Box 144 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀀮􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁭􀀬􀀠Tcxn:l{ 15001 June 2, 1995 ABP Investments III, Ltd. c/o Mr. Ben Pinnell Rt. 13 Box 135 Denton, Texas
76201 Certified Mail Receipt # Z 413 960 810 Re: Arapaho Road Realignment Dear Mr. Pinnell: As we have previously discussed, the Town ofAddison will be realigning Arapaho Road and seeking
to acquire 33,585 square feet of land from the tract of land you own at the comer of Addison Road and Arapaho Road. A sketch indicating the affected land area is enclosed. After our
most recent discussions regarding land value and compensation due to you, we have had the property reappraised. The City Council has directed me to make an official offer to purchase
your 33,585 square feet of land needed for the Arapaho Road realignment. The offer is $650,000 in compensation for the land acquired and any and all damages to the remainder, including
the interests of all lessees. This offer is based on the reappraisaL To accept this offer, you may contact Mr. Pat Haggerty at 233-3333 to make arrangements to close this real estate
transaction: The City will pay all necessary closing costs. If we have not heard from you within fifteen (15) days, we will assume the offer is declined. '.1 John R. 􀁂􀁡􀁾􀁚􀀮􀁅􀀮􀀠
Director of Public Works cc: Mr. Pat Haggerty Mr. Ron Whitehead DOC #264787 
"'" Remainder of' 'Western Tract af 􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀬􀀧􀁲􀁩"􀁫 􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠 (.79575 Ac.l " ----" _ Remainder of Eastern Tract ·.5lf-t:'er 'Taking (.65625 Ac.), I " -" " " " .......--" " " ! " .........
, --" " ,I1i ""............,. " .. ,......... '" . " "\-I 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠 ... ... I ..... -" \ ..... "'.. "'.. " ......" .. 􀀬􀀬􀀼􀁾__/' ... '00' R.O.W, 2 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁒􀀧􀁜􀀠 ", '''' ,,' zMa'Fii!q
r,. 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠 I ,.'" 􀀧􀁾􀁓􀁬􀀠."". "" ..'" I " .... ",,"" I ..... .... '" : "' ......" !, ..... _........ " 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁥􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁊􀁾􀀧􀀠C 􀁮􀁾􀁷􀀠 ", " ",,,,,,,,-, ...........o « o 0::
Z o (f) o o « 􀁾􀀠 I _ ",'" J .,' ,,, ,, I ..:,........ ,,, " " " 1.-...' ..... " ,I Ii ,!" ",...--" " " " " " " " .-,,:_-. ----' -'':' 􀀢􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀽􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀭
;.'-'.:.:..;....:._:.. 􀁾􀀠 28.586 SF 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠----􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭 Site Survey,: Remainders After the Taking 
! 9Q 110 ..\-----1 SCAJ.t: jl( (ttl <><1[ .... )''''''''-cu'...... 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁍􀁉􀀧􀀬􀀠 􀁾..... 􀁾􀁉􀀡􀁉􀁏􀁉􀀠 t; ..... " !).Q><...-􀁴􀁴􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁏􀁾􀀬􀀠.,. 􀀧􀁲􀀧􀀻􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀠
....,;111 􀀮􀁾􀀠". = ,. '" I .. t'.. l· .. _r_. -"'__ {,_,""__........_-"'-' -_-_-,-........... .-... _'__...• ....-__ 􀀬􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠 􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀠 .. ... ,.,QoI.,,􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭..
--"'''T'_ '.,......,..1_"' .... PREUMINNIY REVIEW COPY I MP1 .... 􀀮􀀮􀁣􀁾􀁴􀀧􀀢􀀠__It"" -... '" "''''''9 ...􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁉􀀧􀁗􀁾􀁰􀁯􀁲􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀠... ",. FG1.
'fII..t) tit AddlioR PublIc liod. Hum-zoLlARS ' ARAPAHO ROAD' luBOI "'HlqlD"_. ,ld<iIH". n: f!lOClI , ... ...:.. ! 􀁒􀁉􀁇􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁈􀁾􀁏􀁲􀀭􀁜􀁬􀁁􀁙􀀠 EXHI6n 􀁾 •......en·,·lt...., ___..,
lP"" ..···,··n.. 􀁔􀁏􀁾􀁎􀀠OF 􀁁􀁄􀁄􀀡􀁓􀁵􀁾􀀮􀀠 TEXAS EEl E-qt::ire Tract (2.223 Acres) = Part Taken (.771 Acres) Sl Remainder (1.452 Acres) ;; , E " " i " 􀁾􀀠 ,, ?:: ", J .i ,tl (
Site Survey -Entire Parcel ) 
􀁾􀀬􀀠 􀁾􀀠 SENDER: I I . • . h .-• Complete Items 1 3J'1d/Of 2 for additional services. : .. Complete items 3, and 43 & b. f? • Pdnt xour name and address on 1h& reverse of this 10rm
so that we can Q) return thiS card fo you. ;r; .. Attach this form to the front 01 the maiJplec!!. or on the back If space .... does not permit. ' 􀁾􀀠.. Writ..: "Return Receipt Roquested"
Q(\the mailpfecebelow the ilr1lcle number ... • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and thc date 􀁾􀁾􀀠 "'d 3. Article Addressed to: 􀁾􀀠 ABP InvesTments 1ifJ
L+d. 􀁾􀀠 clo MI. Be.ll :?innd \ 􀁾􀁉􀀠 Kt.13 box \35 !􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁟􀂷􀁔􀁥􀀩􀀨􀁾􀀠7& 10 I ::::>' t;;1 " a:, w 4•. Article Number 0: , c: Z. 413 q(PO 310 ; $; 4ob . Service Type
0: Registered o Insured .gCertified DeOD 'c"' ';; J o Express Mail o Return Receipt for Merchandise "w 7. Date of Delivery .2 [ 8. Addressee's Address {Only if requested.::.! and fee
is paid) 􀁾 . ;:: a sO WISII to receive 1 e following: services (for an extra .; feel: ,!/:;; > 1. 1. 0 Addressee's Address f/) 2. 0 Restricted Delivery -' "'0; Consult postmaster fOf
fec. .I..) . 5 􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁌􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 :' ,; PS Form 3811. December ,1991 vu.s.".o".,,-o...-DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT .__.----.-_._-_._--_.
----.""---..·_--_....__·_.._-----'1 I'" III'T 1"1'1"1'1"1' 1111111'" "'11" i 11'1'1'1"'11 1\"1'11"11"111'\""11 WZ9L 􀁓􀁬􀁬􀁘􀁾􀁾􀀠'UO >£1 xog EI IpUO!d 􀁵􀁾􀁧􀀠'lJIi! 'P+1 'Ill 􀁓􀁗􀁑􀁕􀁬􀁬􀁓􀁾􀁁􀁕􀁉
􀀠 .... , 􀁾􀀭... ----. O!)O<' 't . ";:i 􀀡􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀭􀀺􀀯􀂷􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁬􀀠 /" .. j. 􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀠 c; ? 􀁾􀁲􀀮􀁱􀀺􀁦􀁾􀀿􀀧􀀢􀀠/., " ' 1" :." 􀁾􀀠i;:'\" . 􀁾􀁾􀀠 , 􀁾􀀠.. ..,,-'
􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠" I 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 I 􀁾􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀠 . N-" 1I\, 􀁾􀁧􀀺􀀨􀀢􀀩􀀺􀁮􀀠 􀁾􀀠 I ;J_(t)(l) W ' ::0 0 :::1"'1:0 ' j'CI ..... i;:C!'.(b ..n II 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠;;; ::!l _. U-,! .... ;l!:J(D"O Cl
I 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁏_􀀠0(10;l.. .....1.: :. n "" 0 ()o : 􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭 \.􀁾􀀠 \' . 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀬􀁴􀁧􀀠 I I _ c. ' 􀁾􀁈􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1!\l ! ! I 􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀱 􀁩􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀠 E f1 􀁾􀀮􀀠 n 
1 􀀬􀁾􀀠 !'"; ! 'l! !S" 􀀬􀁾􀀠 '"􀁾􀀠 g 􀁾􀀠 oo <? E & Ie ., tAAa·lfl*)fffmr¥'lftftJl(IY..􂂬􀁴􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀱􀁩􀁜􀁬􀁭􀁣􀁭􀁲􀀴􀁩􀁲􀀮􀁾􀁷􀁭􀀺􀁍􀀠 ;"':);<",,, rignt'6! tlie reJoin 􀁡􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀠:-:
";"t'; 􀁩􀀺􀀡􀀬􀀧􀀬􀂷􀁦􀀧􀁗􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀩􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀠 ,. ,",J"",. 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀀧􀀮􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀷􀀠 , .. 􀁾􀀬􀁟􀀢􀀾􀁴􀁾􀀠 ," 􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 , , ,:L ':: ,;, \:r ' ••; 'J" Al56isoN .1": 't i ,:.:
..:,,'; ", l; ""'t'U --_.. Z liB 960 810 􀁽􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀻􀁪......') ,." J t '. PUBUC WORKS DEPT. .'w 􀁾􀁬􀀧􀀢􀀠 􀁾􀀠'i I;;: 􀀺􀀮􀀱􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁑􀁇􀁏􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁷__ 􀀮􀁾􀀠.. ___Box 144 Addison, Texas
75001 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀁍􀀧􀁁􀁬􀁦􀁔􀀬􀀠 .l1K (;..􀀧􀀺􀁴􀀩􀁾􀀢􀀠 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾.. ABP Investments III, Ltd. Io"T;.-'_,1 .. -'It,,, ' ,......; "'''''. CIa Mr. Ben Pinnell >. (;"" ,,;::.. 􀀼􀁾􀀬􀀠":
I . 􀁎􀁏􀁔􀁉􀁇􀁅􀀠 􀁾 f ... ....:' 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀬􀁜􀀧􀀬􀀠 Rt. 13 Box 13 5 . ......:cr.. -:'!,',,: Denton, Texas 76201 -􀀱􀁳􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠 \-􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠t.. r..C:,"" -2nd <;r \. -:!, 11,"1.11,".1.111,"
••• 11,1.,11 ...... 􀁾􀁷􀀢􀀧􀀿􀀠 ">, ... "'.. 􀁾􀀠 ; 􀁾Return 􀁾􀀠 '''+..,:. 􀁾􀀠 c'. ".,.,. ?, ',')<, i \:'). 􀁾􀀺􀀠 1i!1I11" 1111' n,1111,1,,1.1,,1 ,1,,111 11 ,' 
l ALIGNMENT STUDY REPORT 1 FOR l PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION Prepared .for the I TOWN OF ADDISON j I I ADDIsoN j Prepared By J HNTB Corporation 1 GBW Engineers, Inc. Jack Hatchell
&Associates I JANUARY 1999 j 
\ 􀁐􀁾􀁐􀁋􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀠 \ CHARTER • I \ : FURNITURE 􀁐􀁾􀁒􀁋􀁉􀁎􀁃􀀠 D ."====....:::::.=:-=-::::::_-_=::J I 􀁉􀁾􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀀭􀁣􀀠 r N CONCEPTUAL ALIGNMENT STUDIES ARAPAHO ROAD
EXTENSION MIDWAY AT ARAPAHO -AT 􀁾􀁁􀁄􀁅􀀠IHTERSECTlQrll TOWN OF ADDISON. TEXAS 􀁉􀀽􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀽􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀭 -... ."".. IiI. 251'68 1 O'f 1 􀁾􀁌􀀭___________________________________________________________
_􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠
ALIGNMENT STUDY REPORT ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION for the TOWN OF ADDISON Prepared by: HNTB Corporation GBW Engineers, Inc. Jack Hatchell & Associates January, 1999 
Table ofContents Alignment Study Report Arapaho Road Extension EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 8 2 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS 9 2.1 Centurion Way Alignment 9 2.2 Divided Roadway Alignment
10 2.3 DART Railroad Alignment 10 2.4 Traffic Analysis 11 2.4.1 Projected Traffic Volumes 2.4.2 Evaluation ofTraffic Volumes 2.5 Options Studied for DART Railroad Alignment 13 2.5.1
Option 1 -Overpass at Midway Road with EntrylExit Ramps on the North Side ofProposed Arapaho Road 2.5.2 Option 2 -Underpass at Midway Road with EntrylExit Ramps on the North Side ofProposed
Arapaho Road 2.5.3 Option 3-Overpass at Midway Road Without Ramps 2.5.4 Option 4 -Underpass at Midway Road Without Ramps 2.5.5 Option 5 -Overpass Without Ramps, No Taking ofCharter Furniture
Warehouse 2.5.6 Option 6 -Underpass Without Ramps, No Taking of Charter Furniture Warehouse 2.6 Evaluation ofDART Railroad Alignment Options 14 3 TECHNICALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 17
3.1 Coordination Issues 17 3.1.1 DWUEasement 3.1.2 Railroad Crossing 3.1.3 Realty Road Section 3.1.4 Construction Sequencing 3.1.5 Overpass Aesthetics 3.1.6 Right-of-way and Building
Acquisition 3.2 Project Phasing 18 3.2.1 Phase 1 -Marsh Lane to Surveyor Boulevard 3.2.2 Phase 2 -Surveyor Boulevard to Addison Road 3.3 Cost Estimates 19 98-094 2 Februa!}' 1999 
Table o,(Contents (cont'd) LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A ExhibitB ExhibitC ExhibitD ExhibitE ExhibitF Centurion Way Alignment Divided Roadway Alignment DART Railroad Alignment Enhanced
Photograph -Midway Overpass Technically Preferred Alignment (map pocket) Right-of-way Strip Map (map pocket) 98-094 3 Februazy 1999 
Executive Summary In February of 1998, the Town of Addison retained a team of consultants, lead by HNTB Corporation, to study anextension ofArapaho Road as a four lane roadway from Addison
Road west to Marsh Lane. The purpose of the Arapaho Road extension is to relieve traffic congestion on roadways in the project vicinity, particularly on Belt Line Road, the primary east-west
thoroughfare. The project team conducted a traffic study which showed that an Arapaho Road extension would reduce traffic volumes on Belt Line Road and Midway Road. The traffic study
also indicated that the section ofArapaho Road east ofMidway Road should be constructed as a four-lane divided facility based on projected traffic volumes. West ofMidway Road, Arapaho
Road can be constructed as a four-lane undivided roadway ifno entry or exit ramps are installed. The proposed extension, which is approximately 7,800 feet in length, includes intersections
at Addison Road, Midway Road, Surveyor Boulevard, Commerce Street and Marsh Lane. Presently, the section ofArapaho Road from just west ofthe North Dallas Tollway to Addison Road is under
construction. From Addison Road to Marsh Lane, the project corridor must fit between Belt Line Road to the south and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) owned railroad to the north.
At the east end, the roadway must be a continuation of the portion of Arapaho Road which is presently under construction, and at the west end it must align with existing Realty Road
on the Farmers Branch side ofMarsh Lane. Within this corridor, the project team analyzed the following three general alignments for the Arapaho Road extension. • Centurion Way alignment
• Divided Roadway alignment • DART Railroad alignment Exhibits A, B and C within Section 2 ofthe report show these alignments. Due to the constraints presented by the intersections at
either end ofthe project, an electrical substation on the west side ofSurveyor Boulevard, existing buildings in the project corridor and the DART railroad, there is no viable alternative
to the alignment sections east ofMidway Road and west ofSurveyor Boulevard. Althoughthe Centurion Way alignment benefits from the use ofan existing right-of-way, it requires the purchase
ofthe Charter Furnitore property. In addition, at the west end ofCenturion Way where the street turns 90 degrees to the south and becomes Runyon Road, this alignment divides the Mini
Warehouse facility in two and requires the removal ofa significant portion ofthe buildings on that property. 98-094 4 February 1999 
Executive Summary (cont'd) The divided roadway alignment requires the purchase ofCharter Furniture and a smaller portion of the Mini Warehouse property than the Centurion Way alignment.
This alignment also resultsin less convenient access for vehicles entering or exiting the buildings along Centurion Way, which currently carries two-way traffic. If, as part of this alignment, an underpass or
overpass were constructed at Midway Road, access to the buildings closest to Midway would be severely impacted. The DART railroad alignment allows Centurion Way to remain in place as
a service road for the adjacent buildings. Furthermore, no purchase ofthe Charter Furniture building is required, and ouly a comer ofthe Mini Warehouse property is impacted. Given the
potential access and cost benefits associated with the DART railroad alignment, a more in-depth evaluation of its viability was conducted. The analysis ofthe DART railroad alignment
primarily focuses on the intersection at Midway Road. Southbound traffic queues currently extend on Midway Road from Belt Line Road to north ofthe DART railroad during much of the day.
Consequently, an at-grade crossing of Arapaho Road at Midway Road may not be feasible without providing dual-coordination ofthe traffic signals along Midway and Belt Line Roads. The
grade separated options, with or without ramps, all reduce traffic on Belt Line and Midway Roads with one exception. Ifentry/exit ramps are included at Midway Road on the south side
of Arapaho Road, then traffic on Midway Road is increased between proposed Arapaho Road and Belt Line Road. As a result, the following six horizontal and vertical alignment options at
the Midway Road intersection were evaluated. • Option 1 -Overpass at Midway Road with EntryfExit Ramps on the North Side ofProposed Arapaho Road • Option 2 -Underpass at Midway Road
with EntryfExit Ramps on the North Side of Proposed Arapaho Road • Option 3 -Overpass at Midway Road Without Ramps (similar alignment to Option 2) • Option 4 -Underpass at Midway Road
Without Ramps (similar alignment to Option 2) • Option 5 Overpass Without Ramps, No Taking ofCharter Furniture Warehouse • Option 6 -Underpass Without Ramps, No Taking of Charter Furniture
Warehouse Due to extensive utility relocations in a tight construction corridor, the viability of Option 6 is questionable at this point. Ifthe Town wanted to pursue this option, further
coordination would be necessary with DART and DWU prior to developing an Opinion ofProbable Cost. Three overpass and three underpass options were evaluated, and in each case the corresponding
underpass option was more expensive. An underpass may be more visually appealing than an overpass, however, the narrowing ofMidway Road to facilitate construction would increase traffic
delays during the 12 months of construction. Given the increased project cost and the impact on 98-094 5 February 1999 
Executive Summary (cont'd) Midway Road traffic during construction associated with the underpass options, an overpass is preferred. Overpass Option 1 requires the purchase ofthe Charter
Furniture and MNBA buildings in order to make the entry ramp onto Arapaho Road safe at the merge point. Overpass Option 3, like Option 5, has no ramps, however, it would require the
purchase ofthe Charter Furniture building. Ofthe three overpass options, Option 5 is the only one which does not require the purchase ofeither the Charter Furniture or MNBA buildings.
Option 5 places the edge ofthe overpass structure 10 feet from the MNBA building and 15 feet from the Charter Furniture building, with a two-and-a-half-foot sidewalk for emergency access
on both sides ofthe overpass. In addition, it would require DWU of accept 20 feet for maintenance oftheir 60-inch water line. Given the escalating cost of real estate and the traffic
impacts, neither the additional construction area associated with Option 3 nor the ramps associated with Option 1 appear to justif.Y the required property purchases. Therefore, it is
our recommendation that Option 5, an overpass without ramps at Midway Road and no building takes at this location, be selected as the Technically Preferred Alternative. The following
issues will need to resolved to facilitate construction ofthe Technically Preferred Aligmnent. • Use the southem 10 feet of a 30-foot DWU easement which is contiguous with the DART railroad
right-of-way and contains a 6O-inch transmission main. • Gain permission from Union Pacific to cross the railroad wye spur. • Design construction sequencing plans for the affected intersections
at Addison Road, Midway Road, Surveyor Boulevard, Commerce Street and Marsh Lane. • Consider measures to improve the aesthetics ofthe Midway Road overpass in order to integrate the structure
with the neighborhood. • Evaluate extending the column supports from Midway Road to the west end ofthe MNBA building in order to maintain visibility ofCharter Furniture for southbound
motorists on Midway Road and to fil.cilitate covered parking under the roadway deck for both properties. • Proceed with the acquisition ofright-of-way and the property remainders which
are deemed unusable. The Town ofAddison may wish to consider phasing the construction ofthe Technically Preferred Aligmnent. This section describes two separate phases of construction.
• Phase 1 -Marsh Lane to Surveyor Boulevard The expansion ofexisting Realty Road east ofMarsh Lane and the extension ofRealty Road 98-094 6 February 1999 
Executive Summary (cont'd) from the 90· bend at Commerce Street east to Surveyor Boulevard could be constructed separately from the balance ofthe project. This would provide a direct
four-lane connection from Marsh Lane to Surveyor Boulevard for east-and west-bound traffic: Realty Road would be widened from a 41-foot wide two-lane roadway to a 45-foot four lane undivided
roadway within its existing limits. The estimated construction cost for this phase. including right-ofway. is $ 4,093,344.00. • Phase 2 -Surveyor Boulevard to Addison Road The overpass
at Midway Road dictates that the roadway be constructed from Addison Road to Surveyor Boulevard as one phase. This is by far the most costly and time-consuming phase to complete. It
includes coordination with Union Pacific to obtain a crossing of the wye spur and Dallas Water Utilities to obtain use of 10 feet oftheir 30-foot easement. The estimated construction
cost for this phase, including right-of-way, is $ 13,098,120.00. The combined estimated constructibn cost for the Arapaho Road extension, including both phases, is $ 17,191,464.00. 98-094
7 Februaty 1999 
Section 2 Alternative Alignments From Addison Road to Marsh Lane, the project corridor must fit between Belt Line Road to the south and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DARn owned railroad
to the north. At the east end, the roadway must be a continuation of the portion of Arapaho Road which is presently under construction, and atthe westend itmust align with existing Realty
Road on the Fanners Branch side ofMarsh Lane. Within this corridor, the project team analyzed three general alignments for the Arapaho Road extension. 2.1 Centurion Way Alipment The
Centurion Way alignment, which had been identified at a conceptual level in a previous study, makes two at-grade crossings of a Union Pacific railroad wye spur just west of Addison Road.
It then extends easterly between the DART railroad on the north side and several buildings on the south side, including lceoplex, Motel 6, Homewood Suites and Super 6. After this alignment
crosses Midway Road, it angles toward the southeast as it passes through the Charter Furniture Building before bending back to the east along the existing Centurion Way right-of-way.
At the end ofCenturion Way, this alignment passes through a Mini Warehouse facility on the east side ofSurveyor Boulevard. On the west side of Surveyor Boulevard, it passes through a
light commercial building before crossing a concrete lined channel behind Addison Bank and an open field east of Realty Road. The alignment then follows Realty Road to the Marsh Lane
intersection. (See Exhibit A). Due to the constraints presented bythe intersections at either endofthe project, an electrical substation on the west side ofSurveyor Boulevard, existing
buildings inthe project corridor and the DART railroad, there are very few viable alternatives to the alignment sections east ofMidway Road and west ofSurveyor Boulevard. Between Midway
Road and Surveyor Boulevard, this alignment uses the existing 60-foot wide Centurion Way right-of-way which currently contains a 41-foot wide pavement section measured from the back
of curb. Although this alignment benefits from the use of an existing right-of-way, it requires the purchase of the Charter Furniture property. In addition, at the west end ofCenturion
Way where the street turns 90 degrees to the south and becomes Runyon Road, this alignment divides theMini Warehouse facility in two and requires the removal ofa significant portion
ofthe buildings on this property. Both the north and south sides of Centurion Way are fully developed with building and parking improvements which extend out close to the existing right-of-way.
The narrowest portion of this alignment is between the.MNBA building on the north side and the ATC building on the south side where only 103 feet exists between these two buildings.
There is not room for a four-lane divided roadway between these buildings. 98·094 9 February 1999 
1 I II rings Rd ] 􀁉􀁾􀀠 0 \-:ii -----Midcourl Rd £jell line Rd 􀁂􀀮􀁪􀁜􀁷􀁯􀁾􀀠Or " 1 '">:""2 ::1l, cl: PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ( UNDER CONSTRUCTION ) \
'i' I \ 􀁾􀁉􀁔􀁮􀁧􀁬􀁯􀁮􀁤􀀠Rd li;, 􀁾􀀠 "";, 'S t; PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION EXHIBIT 'A' CENTURION WAY ALIGNMENT 
Alternative Alignments (cont'd) The minimum pavement width for a four lane divided roadway is 45 feet measured to the back of curb. The extra four feet of pavement widening would add
to the impact on the businesses along Centurion Way which would have to gain access to and from a much busier thoroughfare. 2.2 Divided Roadway AIi&nmcut The divided roadway varies significantly
from the Centurion Way alignment between Midway Road and Surveyor Boulevard. With this alignment, the roadway splits immediately west ofMidway Road into two lanes oftraffic in each direction.
(See Exhibit B). The two eastbound lanes follow the Centurion Way alignment described in Section 2.1. The two westbound lanes are located next to the DART railroad from Midway Road to
the Mini Warehouse facility. Thewestbound lanes then curve toward the southeast as they cut through a comer of the Mini Warehouses before merging with the eastbound lanes just east of
Surveyor Boulevard. The divided roadway alignment requires the purchase of Charter Furniture and a smaller portion ofthe Mini Warehouse property than the Centurion Way alignment. This
alignment also provides less convenient access for vehicles entering or exiting the buildings onto a oneway roadway rather than existing Centurion Way, which currently carries two-way
traffic. Should access to westbound Arapaho Road be permitted along the divided roadway, motorists may attempt to cut through private parking lots to avoid circuity oftravel. Ifan underpass
or overpass were constructed at Midway Road, access to the buildings closest to Midway would be more severely impacted. After an evaluation ofthe negative impacts to the developments
along Centurion Way, it was determined that this alignment was not desirable. 2.3 DART Railroad AIienmcnt The DART railroad alignment varies significantly from the Centurion Way alignment
between Midway Road and Surveyor Boulevard. This alignment, which generally follows the westbound lanes of the divided roadway, is located next to the DART railroad from Midway Road
to the Mini Warehouses where it curves toward the southeast across a corner of the Mini Warehouse property. It then crosses Surveyor Boulevard at an angle before curving back toward
the east in order to match existing Realty Road. (See Exhibit C). This alignment allows Centurion Way to remain in place as a service road for the adjacent buildings. Furthermore, the
roadway can be configured such that no purchase ofthe Charter Furniture building is required, and only a comer of the Mini Warehouse property is impacted. 98·094 10 February 1999 
""-' \ Keller Sprinqs >􀁾􀀠 -' -o ' >,../V Bell Line Rd 􀁾􀀠 \ 􀁉􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀿􀀼􀁟􀁟􀁟􀀠 􀁾􀁊􀁂􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁜􀁾􀁗􀁯􀁾􀁬􀁣􀁌􀀻􀀡􀁄􀁲􀁔􀀱􀁨􀁂􀁗􀁥􀁬􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀺􀁉􀁗􀁏􀀻􀀻􀁹􀁮􀀻�
�􀁲􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁊􀀠 i \ I\,\0(",00 􀁾J 􀁾􀀠 -g. \ --f r \ 􀀯􀁾o \;:;< -----./􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 --' , J--;= 􀁾􀁟􀀫􀀭􀁤􀁬􀁊􀁉􀀭􀀭 \M Verde Volley Ln Dome R9----I-River Dr ..l-d.. \ § -0 a: PROPOSED
ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ( UNDER CONSTRUCTION ) I SOU1HI'/[Sl RArlRO,Ap .p /\ Langland Rd l0. "fg \\'t \ \ PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION EXHIBIT 'B' DIVIDED ROADWAY
ALIGNMENT 
I I LL I -0: 􀁾􀀺􀀠 co ' R 􀁾􀀬􀀠 >:s: '" .5 It':"' ,' o \'" ----Be·o 10l'I Dr Midcour! Rd -0 oc 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ''"" Wiley Post Rd 1-lindberg Dr Rail --Bellwuy Or River Dr PROPOSED ARAPAHO
ROAD EXTENSION ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ( UNDER CONSTRUCTION ) Keller Sprin s PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION EXHIBIT 'e' DART RAILROAD ALIGNMENT 
Alternative Alignments (cont'd) The narrowest portion ofthe alignment is between the MNBA building and the DART rightof-way where 81 feet is available. Although there are no franchise
utilities to contend with, a 60-inch Dallas Water Utility (DWU) transmission main is located in a 30-foot easement adjacent to the railroad. A concrete-lined channel is also located
along this alignment between Midway Road and the Town ofAddison water tower. Given the potential access and cost benefits associated with the DART railroad alignment, a more in-depth
evaluation of its viability was conducted. 2.4 Traffic Analysis At this point in the study, the project team reviewed traffic assignments fur the year 2020 which were prepared by the
North Central Texas Council (NTCOG) ofGovemments for five alternatives for the Arapaho Road Extension. Two ofthese alternatives included entry and exit ramps at Midway Road, one with
entry/exit ramps on the north side only and a second .' ! with entry/exit ramps on the south side only. These alternatives are described below. f xviii) "No Build" Alternative -what
is the impact on adjacent streets ifArapaho Road is not extended? ii) "At-Grade" Alternative -Arapaho Road extended with the Midway Road intersection at grade. iii) "Grade-Separated"
Alternative -Arapaho Road extended with a grade separation at Midway Road without entry/exit ramps. iv) "Ramps on the North Side" Alternative -Arapaho Road extended with a grade separation
at Midway Road and entry/exit ramps on the north side ofArapaho Road. v) "Ramps on the South Side" Alternative -Arapaho Road extended with a grade separation at Midway Road and entry/exit
ramps on the south side ofArapaho Road. 2.4.1 Projected Traffic Volumes The following table presents a summary ofprojected traffic impacts for the extension of Arapaho Road on Belt Line
Road and Midway Road assuming that the Keller Springs tunnel is in service. 98·094 Il February 1999 
Alternative Alignments (cont'd) 􀁾􀁃􀁖􀁏􀁌􀁕􀁍􀁅􀁃􀁏􀁍􀁐􀁁􀁒􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁏􀁎􀀠 (PROJECTED DAlLY TRAFFIc VOLUMES BY YEAl!.2020) GRADE SEPARATED GRADE SEPARATED GRADE WITH RAMPS ON WrmRAMPSON
NoBUlLD ATGRADE SEPARATED NORTHSIDE SOumSIDE ARAPAHO ROAD Addison to Midway Midway to Surveyor 24,000 6,000 13,000 13,000 18,000 17,000 28,000 17,000 BELT lJNE ROAD Addison to Midway
Midway to Surveyor 58,000 47,000 53,000 46,000 54,000 42,000 46,000 42,000 50,000 45,000 MIDWAY ROAD North ofArapaho South ofArapaho South ofBeIt Line 52,000 58,000 36,000 57,000 52,000
44,000 44,000 46,000 44,000 50,000 47,000 32,000 60,000 52,000 2.4.2 Evaluation ofTraffic Volumes The existing congestion on Belt Line Road and Midway Road supports an extension ofArapaho
Road. Traffic already backs up on Midway Road from Belt Line Road to north ofthe DART railroad much ofthe day; consequently, an at-grade crossing of Arapaho Road at Midway Road may not
be feasible without providing dualcoordination of the traffic signals along Midway and Belt Line Line Roads. The grade separated scenarios, with or without ramps, all reduce traffic
on Belt Line and Midway Roads with the exception ofthe section ofMidway Road between proposed Arapaho Road and Belt Line Road with ramps on the south side. For the grade separated scenario
without ramps, year 2020 volumes on Belt Line Road are projected to be approximately 5,000 vehicles per day (vpd) less with Arapaho Road extended. Volumes on Midway Road are projected
to be reduced by 8,000 to 12,000 vpd. Arapaho Road is projected to carry 13,000 vpd from Addison Road to Marsh Lane ifno entry or exit ramps are installed at Midway Road. According to
the projected traffic volumes, the extention ofArapaho Road can be constructed as a fuur-Iane undivided roadway uno entry or exit ramps are installed at Midway Road. It should be noted
that even though these traffic studies contain a large margin for errorI they do serve to support the grade separated configuration with no ramps at Midway Road. 98-094 12 Februruy 1999

Alternative Alignments (cont'd) 2.5 Options Studied for DART Railroad Alignment After the project team selected the DART Railroad alignment for a more detailed analysis, the following
six horizontal and vertical alignment options were considered. 2.5.1 Option 1 -Overpass at Midway Road with EntrylExit Ramps on the North Side of Proposed Arapaho Road Option I requires
the purchase of the Charter Furniture and MNBA buildings in order to construct a four-lane undivided roadway and provide a safe merge length for the westbound entry ramp on the north
side ofproposed Arapaho Road. Permission would be required with this option to construct the entry and exit ramps within the DWU easement, however, these ramps would be constructed at
grade. 2.5.2 Option 2 -Underpass at Midway Road with EntrylExit Ramps on the North Side of Proposed Arapaho Road Like Option I, Option 2 requires the purchase ofthe Charter Furniture
and MNBA buildings, and the use ofthe DWU easement fur the at-grade entry and exit ramps. In addition, addition, the probable construction sequence for an underpass would require the
removal of one half of Midway Road at a time. As a result, Midway Road would bave to be realigned and narrowed to two lanes through the construction zone. Four lanes oftraffic could
be provided by installing temporary pavement on the outside of each segment. The underpass construction could affect Midway Road in this manner for up to a year. 2.5.3 Option 3 -Overpass
at Midway Road Without Ramps Option 3 follows an alignment similar to Option 1 through the Charter Furniture building, however, without ramps, no taking ofthe MNBA is required. This
option provides more working space between proposed Arapaho Road and the DART railroad on both sides of Midway Road. No roadway improvements would be required in the DWU easement. 2.5.4
Option 4 -Underpass at Midway Road Without Ramps Option 4 follows the same alignment as the overpass without ramps (Option 3) through the Charter Furniture building. It also presents
the same construction sequencing challenges as the underpass option with ramps (Option 2) at Midway Road. 98·094 13 February 1999 
Alternative Alignments (cont'd) 2.5.5 Option 5 -Overpass Without Ramps, No Taking of Charter Furniture Warehouse Option 5 places the north right-of-way line 20-feet offthe DART right-of-way
from Midway Road to the Mini Warehouse property. This requires the use ofthe southern 10 feet ofthe 30-foot DWU easement but does not require taking either the Charter Furniture or the
MNBA buildings. Furthermore, this option places the edge of the overpass structure approximately 10 feet from the MNBA building. The existiog concrete-lined channel next to the DWU water
main would need to be replaced with double g'xS' box culverts under the overpass structure. 2.5.6 Option 6 -Underpass Without Ramps, No Taking of Charter Furniture Warehouse Option 6
follows the same alignment as the overpass without taking the Charter Furniture building, however, it presents the same construction sequencing challenges as the other underpass options.
Inaddition, this option would require the installation ofbox culverts on the north side ofthe railroad to replace the concrete-lined channel presently on the south side. Ifa minimal
separation were to be provided from the box culverts to an existing 12-inch sanitary sewer line, the edge ofthe boxes would be approximately five feet from several existiog buildings.
In addition, multiple drainage and utility relocations would be required under the railroad tracks at Midway Road, and the box culverts would need to cross back under the railroad further
to the west. 2.6 Evaluation of DART Railroad Alienment Options Horizontal and vertical alignmeuts, along with Opinions ofProbable Cost, were prepared for Options 1 through 5. These costs
are included in a matrix ofissues related to these options. in addition to Option 6, at the end ofthis section. Due to extensive utility relocations in a tight construction corridor,
the viability ofOption 6 is questionable at this point. Ifthe Town wanted to pursue this option, further coordination would be necessary with DART and DWU prior to developing an Opinion
ofProbable Cost. The primary goal expressed by Town ofAddison stafffurthis project is to relieve congestion on Belt Line Road. All the options will provide some relief to Belt Line Road.
Three overpass and three underpass options were evaluated, and in each case the corresponding underpass option was more expensive. Although no cost was prepared for Option 6, it is certain
that the extensive utility relocations required would result in its cost exceeding that ofOpt ion 5. An underpass may be more visually appealing than an overpass, however. the narrowing
ofMidway Road would increase traffic delays during the 12 months 98-094 14 February 1999 
Alternative Alignments (cont'd) ofconstruction. Although an underpass would create less noise impact, only five commercial buildings are located within the overpass limits on both sides
of the railroad, including Charter Furniture. As a result of the increased project cost and the impact on Midway Road traffic during construction associated with the underpass options,
an overpass is preferred. Overpass Option 1 requires the purchase ofthe Charter Furniture and MNBA buildings in order to make the entry ramp onto Arapaho Road safe at the merge point.
Overpass Option 3, like Option 5, has no ramps, however, it would require the purchase of the Charter Furniture building. Ofthe three overpass options, Option 5 is the only one which
does not require the purchase ofeither the Charter Furniture or MNBA buildings. Option 5 places the edge ofthe overpass structure 10 feet from the MNBA building and 15 feet from the
Charter Furniture building, with a two-and-a-half-foot sidewalk for emergency access on both sides ofthe overpass. In addition, it would require DWU to accept 20 feet for maintenance
oftheir 60-inch water line. Given the escalating cost of real estate and the traffic impacts, neither the additional construction area associated with Option 3 nor the ramps associated
with Option 1 appear to justify the required property purchases. Therefore, it is our recommendation that Option 5, an overpass without ramps at Midway Road and no building takes at
this location, be selected as the Technically Preferred Alternative. 98·094 15 February 1999 
ARAPAHO ROAD ALIGNMENT OPTIONS Midway Road Section -Matrix oflssues DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE OPTION 1 Overpass with ramps on north side OPTION 2 Undarpass with rarnps on north sida OPTION
3 Ovarpass without ramps OPTION 4 Underpass without ramps OPTION 5 Overpass without ramps; without building take OPTION 6 Underpass without rarnps; without building take Alignment Description
Sepal'l!tad from IlIIlroad right-of·way Same as 1 Soma as 1 Same as 1 Adiacent to railroad right·of·way Same as 5 I Charter furniture building taka Yes Yes Yes Yes No • No MBNA building
take (for romp safetv) Yes Yes No No No No Relocate DWU water line No No No No No Yes Noise Yes No Yes No Yes No Realign Midway for con· struction sequence (4 lanes) No Yas No Yes No
Yes Sump storm sewar No Yes No Yes No Yes Move box culvert to north side of RIR; other utility relocations No No No No No Yes Opinion of Probabla Cost (with-20-%_ contingency) .... _._-_....
$20,160,648 $20,678,292. $19,76n,712 $2.0,631,576 m,191,464 N/A --_....... _._--98-094 094 16 February 1999 
i Section 3 Technically Preferred Alternative The Technically Preferred Alternative (TPA), as shown in the Exhibit D map pocket, follows the DART railroad alignment and Option 5 between
Midway Road and Surveyor Boulevard which avoids taking either the Charter Furniture or the MNBA buildings. This section discusses some of the issues and costs associated with the TPA.
3.1 Coordination Issues 3.1.1 DWU Easement The TPA will require the use ofthe southern 10 feet of a 30-foot DWU easement which is contiguous with the DART railroad right-of-way. The
DWU easement contains a 6O-inch water transmission main which is located approximately six feet offthe DART right-of-way to the center ofthe pipe. A written request has been made to
DWU regarding the use of a portion of their easement, and negotiations are pending. 3.1.2 Railroad Crossing A report has been prepared that will be submitted to Union Pacific requesting
permission to cross the wye spur. This report includes a commitment to place a fully signalized gate at the crossing. 3.1.3 Realty Road Section The traffic volumes indicate that a four-lane
undivided roadway would be adequate along the existing Realty Road alignment. Omitting a median from most of this section of the project would minimize the impact on adjacent parking
lots and driveways. The roadway could still be widened for tum lanes at Midway Road and Surveyor Boulevard. 3.1.4 Construction Sequencing Construction sequencing plans will still be
necessary at the intersections along the TP A, although far less extensive measures will be necessary than those required for an underpass at Midway Road. For example, some drainage
and utility relocations will be necessary, particularly at Midway Road and Surveyor Boulevard. 3.1.5 Overpass Aesthetics Measures can be taken to improve the aesthetics ofthe Midway
Road overpass to integrate the structure with the neighborhood. Discussions with the owners ofCharter Furniture and the MNBA buildings have also resulted in an evaluation ofextending
the column supports from Midway Road to the west end ofthe MNBA building in 98-094 17 February 1999 
Technically 􀁐􀁲􀁾􀀨􀁥􀁲􀁲􀁥􀁤 Alternative (cont'd) order to maintain visibility ofCharter Furniture for southbound motorists onMidway Road and to facilitate covered parking under the
roadway deck for both properties. Exhibit D is a digitally enhanced photograph ofthe proposed Midway Road overpass looking south. 3.1.6 Right-or-way and Building Acquisition Building
acquisitions will include the Metro Brick Company building at Addison Road, a portion of the Mini Warehouse facility on the east side of Surveyor Boulevard, and eight commercial buildings
in the Addison West Industrial Park on the west side ofSurveyor. A right-of-way strip map has beeo included as Exhibit E in a map pocket at the back ofthis report. It gives estimated
right-of-way takes from the properties affected by this project along with remainders ofthese properties which will be unusable as a : I result ofthe roadway construction. 3.2 Project
Phasing The Town of Addison may wish to consider phasing the constroction of the Technically Preferred Alignment. This section describes two separate phases ofconstruction. 3.2.1 Phase
1 -Marsh Lane to Surveyor Boulevard The expansion of existing Realty Road east of Marsh Lane and the extension of Realty Road from the 900 bend at Commerce Street east to Surveyor Boulevard
could be constructed separately from the balance ofthe project. This would provide a direct four-lane connection from Marsh Lane to Surveyor Boulevard for east-and west-bound traffic.
Realty Road would be widened from a 41-foot wide two-lane roadway to a 45-foot four lane undivided roadway within its existing limits. The estimated construction cost for this phase,
including right-of-way, is $ 4,093,344.00. 3.2.2 Phase 2 -Surveyor Boulevard to Addison Road The overpass at Midway Road dictates that the roadway be constructed from Addison Road to
Surveyor Boulevard as one phase. Although this is most important phase in order to relieve traffic congestion on Belt Line Road, it is also the most 98-094 18 February 1999 
i . J I , I 0.. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 ov <: 0.. f 􀁾􀀠 0> IO 0.. >0<: L.u 􀁾􀀠 U 0Z -<: ::::: I Z L.u 
Technically 􀁐􀁲􀁾􀁻􀁥􀁲􀁲􀁥􀁤 Alternative (cont'd) costly and time-consuming phase to complete. It inclndes coordination with Union Pacific to obtain a crossing ofthe wye spur and Dallas
Water Utilities to obtain use of!0 feet oftheir 30-foot easement. In addition, the overpass ofMidway Road is the most costly portion ofthis project. The estimated construction cost for
this phase, inclnding right-of-way, is $ 13,098,120.00. 3.3 Cost Estimates This section provides construction cost estimates for the two phases identified previously. Estimates have
also been included for the right-of-way and other property takes along the project alignment. The combined estimated cost for both phases is $ 17,191,464.00. 98-094 19 February 1999

TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS HNTB 1 GBW Engineers 02116199 ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION FROM ADDISON ROAD TO MARSH LANE ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OPTION 5 -MARSH LANE TO SURVEYOR
BLVD•• Phase 1 ITEMNOI ITEM DESCRIPTioN UNIT QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ROADWAY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 100 PREP, & MAlNT, OF RIGHT -OF·WAY STA 24,0 $ 2,500,00 $ 60,000,00 104 REMOVE OLD
CONCRETE (PVMT,) SY 8,440 $ 3,00 $ 25,320,00 110 EXCAVATION (ROADWAy) CY 16,000 S 3,20 $ 51,200,00 132 EMBANKMENT (ORDINARY COMPACTION) CY 2,000 $ 8.50 $ 17.000,00 260 LIME TREATED SUBGRADE
(6 in) (Mainline) SY 15,200 $ 3,00 $ 45,600.00 360 CONCRETE PAVEMENT (10 in) (Mainline) BY 15,200 $ 31,00 $ 471,200,00 360 MONOLITHIC CURB (TYPE A) (6 in) LF 7,500 $ 2,00 $ 15,000,00
500 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 70 000,00 $ 70,000,00 502 BARRICADES, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC HANDLING LS 1 $ 100,000,00 $ 100,000,00 6.66 REFLECT PAVE MARKINGS LF 20000 $ 1,50 $ 30.000,00 LIGHTING
LF 3,400 $ 35,00 $ 119,000,00 . TRAFFIC SIGNALS (PER INTERSECTION) EA 2 $ 120 000.00 $ 240,000,00 681 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL EA 2 $ 10 000,00 $ 20,000,00 LANDSCAPING LS 1 $ 100 000,00
$ 100,000.00 INLETS EA 5 $ 2500,00 S 12,500.00 MANHOLES EA 5 $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000,00 LATERALS LF 50 $ 50,00 $ 2,500.00 24" RCP LF 3,000 $ 50.00 $ 150,000,00 30"RCP LF 220 $ 65,00 $ 14,300,00
36"RCP LF 500 $ 80.00 $ 40,000.00 2-10' X 7' RCBC LF 130 $ 850.00 $ 110,500.00 HEADWALL CONCRETE CY 30 $ 600.00 $ 18,000,00 REMOVE CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING SY 700 $ 10,00 $ 7,000.00 REMOVE/REPLACE
CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING SY 200 $ 60,00 $ 12 000,00 OTHER UTILITY RELOCATIONS LS 1 5,000.00 $ 15,000,00 RIGHT-OF-WAY LS 1 $ 1,540,000,00 $ 1,540 000,00 DEMOLITION LS 1 $ 100,000,00 $
100,000,00 SUBTOTAL $ 3,411120.00 20% CONTINGENCY $ 682,224,00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 4,093,344,00 --! I 
I ! I TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS HNTB 1GBW Engineers 02116199 ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION FROM ADDISON ROAD TO MARSH LANE ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OPTION 5· SURVEYOR BLVD.
TO ADDISON ROAD· Phase 2 ITEM NO 􀁉􀁔􀁅􀁾􀀢􀀠'"'''':;ION UNIl QUAN111 T 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁔􀁅􀀠 I'PRICE 100 IPREP. & MAlNT. OF RI' STA 54.0 1$ ? .nn nn Is 135,oon,no 104 ,OLD' : (PVMT,) fiN 500
!$ 3.50 1$ 1.750,00 110 ' 'O,.M""..V' CY 7.000 1$ 3,20 1$ 􀀿􀀿􀁾􀁮􀁮􀀬􀁮􀁮􀀠 132 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁎􀁔􀀠 IRY, Cy 34,000 1$ 8.50 1$ ?a nnn.nn 260 LIME '"'' :(6 in), II SY 24,200 1$ 3.00 1$ 72,Rno.nO
􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁉􀁔􀁈􀁉􀁃 CURB 􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀻􀀻􀀵 in)i SY 23,200 1$ 31.00 1$ 71P?nnnn LF 11,500 !$ 2,00 1$ ',. nnn nn 423 ; WALL (CAST IN PLACE) §F 21,000 1$ 32,00 !$ 􀁾􀀷􀀿􀀬􀁮􀁮􀁮􀀠nn 500
"""" LS 1 1$ lennonnn 1$ 10n nnn,nn 502 ,SIGNSAND '''AtJn, II,,,, LS 1 '$ 100nnnnn Is lnn nnn nn 666 I"""LECT PAVE LF 25,000 !$ 1.50 $ 37,500.00 · LF 5,400 1$ 35.00 i$ 1Ra,nnn nn · ,""""'A'
􀁾􀀠(PER I EA 1 I $ 1?n nnn,M 1$ 1?n ono on .,AII_ROAD 1"""'.' " EA 2 I $ ?<n nnn.M Is .00 nnnnn 681 ,. "e,,, l"m'AI EA 1 ' $ 10 nnn.on '$ 10 nnn nn "', LS 1 I $ lFn nnn.nn $ H;nnnnnn
• ISTRUCTURE SF 51.000 1$ 35.00 I $ '7Rfi,OOO no 'INLETS EA 25 1$ ?on.nn 1$ 􀁾􀀿􀀠<nn.M ,,," EA 5 $ <Mn,nn 1$ " 00000 ATF.,A.I' LF 1,180 !$ 50,00 $ .annnnn 124" RCP LF 3,000 1$ 50.00
$ 1<;(1,nnO nO .30" RCP LF 1,310 1$ 55.00 Is 85.150,00 36"RCP LF 500 .$ 80.00 1$ ,n nnn nil 6'XS' RCBC LF 260 $ 250.00 $ 􀁾􀀮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀀠 7'XS' RCBC LF 400 1$ 300.00 $ 120,00000 : I9'X
5'RCBC LF 500 1$ 350,00 $ 175,noo no 2-7'XS'RCBC LF 800 1$ 550.00 I $ 􀁾􀁮􀀬􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁯􀀠 2-9'XS'RCBC LF 1,460 '$ 700.00 I $ ,(m,onn 00 2 -10' X 6' ReBeL LF 920 $ 800.00 • $ 7'" non 00
" cy 30 1$ 600.00 $ ",onn nn _LINING SY 10,500 Is 10.00 $ ,m; ono no A"'F, . LINING SY 1,100 '$ 60.00 $ 􀁾􀁁􀀬􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀀠 'UTILITY ,el:' LS 1 $ 7nnnnno $ 7nnnonn 􀀧􀁾􀁕􀁔􀀠n '" LS 1
􀁾􀀧􀁍􀁯􀀬􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁮􀁯􀀠 S ""'0 000 00 !1FMOUTION LS $ lnO,OOOoo $ 1M,nnn on $ 10.915,100.00 , 20%' $ >lA. 0>0 no 􀁾􀀠 TOTAL r.( , I 􀁾􀁕􀁬􀁶􀀠I IVI'! IvV;:' (( $ 1,nOR,'?000 􀁾􀀠
TOWN OF ADDISoN PUBLIC WORKS From: John Baumgartner, P.E. 􀁾􀀠 Director Company: 􀁃_iJ uJ Ies <4.. 􀁾􀁑􀁭 pSO YL Phone: 972/450-2886 (£)\ FAX: 972/450-2837 􀁆􀁁􀁘􀀣􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀠 fa 7/4 -!AO:;'O
3/I U)J Date: /q] 16801 Westgrove P.O. Box 144 # ofpages (including cover): Cp Addison, TX 75001 o Original in mail . 0 Per your request oCall me Comments: '" : .", . 􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠 -'-.:.<.-:..
..􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀬􀀠 , .',