Organizational Chart . .. 􀁍􀁩􀀱􀁌􀁾ARAPAHO ROAD BRIDGE DESIGN CONCEPT Presented by: Presentation Outline . • Introduction • Architecture I lighting • Urban Design I Landscaping • Engineering
• Team Approach & Experience .Q&A • Summary l. 􀁾􀁲􀀨􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁃􀁾􀁔􀀭􀁲􀀠CI'\-\'l '2.7, 􀀧􀁕􀁘􀀾􀁾􀀩􀀠J,. Tw t-J :30 0 k)-t; {. Jul 􀁾􀀠bO 0 􀁾􀀼􀀬􀀠j:'U& c.. f., b 􀁾V"(s 1 
Architecture &. Lighting Design Concepts Blue Bridge • Approach • Image • Thrust Blocks • Railings • Lighting 2 
Beacon Bridge • Approach • Image • Materials • Beacons • Public Art • Lighting 3 
Urban Design Or how does it fit in th!!' area Urban Design • Land Use • Roadway System • Context • Analysis Design Concepts • AcCESS • Enhancements • Landscape 􀁌􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁰􀁥􀀠Design
􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁐􀁯􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠• Landscape and Features • Pedestrian and Bicycle Access • Parking 4 
Engineering Concept to Reality Girder Alternative • COocrete Box Girder • cast-in-place on Falsework • Post Tensioned • COntinuous COnstruction • Dlilled Shaft Foundations Bridge Issues
• Aesthetics • Bridge Details, Typical Section and layout • ConstructablejMaintainable • Consideration of Drainage Structure • Construction Cost • Acoustics and Vibration • VISibility
of Adjacent Commercial· . Properties Span Layout -Girder Alternate . 5 
__ Span Layout -Girder_ Alternate Girder Alternate Main Spall Typical Section II. JL • •􀁊􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀠--b-b.J-. ____ . -. Girder Alternate Approach Span Typical Section I... ... ItJL'
􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁜􀁾\ I -b..J-.. Plan -Girder Alternative 6 
Plan -Girder Alternative Plan -Girder Alternative Construction -Girder Alternate Slagel 􀁾􀀺􀁊􀁃􀁾􀀠en U...::= Arch Alternative • FeabJre Main Span Tubular StEel Ard1 • Precast Texas
U-Beam Superstructure • Precast Superstructure • Single Flared Piers • Inverted T-<:ap • Drilled Shaft F'oundaHoiis 7 
Span Layout -Arch Alternate Span Layout: -Arch Alternate Arch Alternate Approach Span Typical Section Arch Alternate Main Span Typical Section -"" -...'1 . • • • II -' 􀁾􀀭􀀭--< 􀁌􀀮􀁣􀁾􀀭􀀭"'8

Plan -Arch Alternative Plan -Arch Alternative .. Plan -Arch Alternative Construction -Arch Alternate Stagel __+--L _+__ Stagell Stagem Stage IV 9 
Constlllction Costs Girder A11lema... An:h A1tema... • Illidge Cost $5.3M • Bridge Cost $3.9M Acoustics and Vibration ConstJudion Sources In-Service Sources • Vibration • Vibration -Oli!ierl
Shaft: FoundilHons -No e.xtmordlnarysouras • NoiSe • Noise -􀁒􀁥􀀺􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁩􀁣􀁴􀀺􀁾􀀠forc.n_ -AiWA Traffic Notse Model -66 dB Cootoor: 250 feet Visibility of Adjacent Properties 10 
Team Approach Design Concept Or howdidwegethere ? 11 
Free Flowof,Creative Ideas I. \t:::nr-I!.k)Sfi 􀀧􀁓􀀧􀁦􀁾􀁴􀀠/fiitt c..,1,I1L. livl'£:r Z) 6CIlf:-J'.Are 􀁷􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀠􀀳􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁁􀀧􀁻􀀠"!oO 􀁍􀁾􀀬􀁱􀀮􀀧􀀨􀀠4,) r''1" "'''''," -AaA §.)
C'-"'" s". iN""'",,?=-10) 􀀧􀁉􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀬􀁭􀀢􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀧􀁔􀁬􀁦􀁓􀀻􀀠Meet Objectives ? NOI YES! Concept Development·· #1_ #2_ T................d} • Drfnr.Under ..... ...co.......
.---. -12 
Final Concepts Team Approach After Selection Or where do we go from here;> The Missing Piece 13 
Final Design • Design & COOrdination • COnstruction Plans, Specifications and Estimates • COnstruction Services Cliff HalJ, P.E. -Project Manager Team Experience Or who is going to get
it done! Cliff Hall, P.E. -Project Manager .. Remoobjlj!ies • Single PoInt of COntact • Team Leader • Coordination • Maintain Schedule • Lead Engineering Design Kap Shui Mun Illidge
• OO>£ite Design PM • Design CoordinatIOn • Met Schedule • Resolve Design &. Construction Issues • ACEC Grand Award 14 
Chuck Armstrong, AlA 􀁾􀀠Architecture ... RffiOO11S1bllities . "c;:g:; f1yr<" . 'l''''i . 􀁟􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀢􀁨􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀡􀀬􀁴􀁬􀁬• Look & Feel 􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁜􀁾􀀠! j 􀁾􀀠_ :l:Jf..Y!.:.!lll •
Archibactural Details " • Treatment SChemes • Color SChemes Chuck Armstrong, AlA 􀁾􀀠Architecture Walkins MemO!ial • 􀁾􀀠"""F"Il!! Drive A1!eway -; -􀁾􀀠"",,'IllII! ,,,,, '" ';-:<;F'
:;1iliJli!ill!l""'1 j "J_!l!!!!gg • Ragship Structure .. , -􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠• Compliment HistoriC District • Urban Amenities • ASI.AAward _ Sara Jane Madennan, ASLA, AICP 􀁾􀀠Urban Design Responsibilities
• Urban Design • landscaping • ftJnctional -Paoong -Safety -Hike &. Bike Sara Jane Madennan, ASLA, AICP :.: Urban Design Colorado SPrings-Downtown Action Plan • Urban Design • Redevelopment
• Bike Trail • landscaping & Streetscaping • ASI.A Award ._ 15 
Robert Prouse, IALD, MIES -Lighting 􀀮􀁾􀀠Resoonsibilities • Ughting Design Scheme f',II"1• Feature • > Enhancement Ughting i • funCtional Ughling Steve Stroh, P.E. -Engineering Responsibilities
• Bridge Details • Constructability • Civil Design • Cost Control Robert Prouse, IALD, MIES -Lighting" .. Pearl Harbor MemQdal Bddae • Ughling Design • Create a "unique" , .I I 􀁉􀁦􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I
11· • I look • Dedicated as a Memonal Steve. Stroh, P.E. -Engineering 17th Street Bddae • Lead Engineer • ConceptDevelopment • Rnal Design • Constructability • CostControl 16 
Dave Johnston, P.E. Project Principal . Responsibilities • Project Priority • Commitment of URS Resources • Peer RevIew Dave 􀁊􀁾􀁨􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁯􀁮􀀬􀀠P.E. ProjecfPrinclj)a1 Key 1'r9jeCl:S
• SH 87, Bolivar Bridge over Houston Ship Channel • Corpus Christl, Harbor Bridge Replacement • Border Highway West Elevated Roadway The Start ofa New Beginning 17 
URSTEAM TBEBIGHT CHOICE! 18 
Slid,. D.,i,1I 0110,." m.,I7.II0011 I. BlvG' IV &wD 􀁉􀁾􀀠I. G....'GI DilCUl/ion 2. l8-JvS 􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁦􀀠10 􀁛􀁍􀁊􀁾􀀠l> IIhahluutftMUy 􀁨􀁡􀁾􀀠.3. Tit (Nk-AP,iXrr 􀁁􀀮􀀬􀁰􀁾􀀠:: :;:::':'::,e
1-Ll 􀁾􀀠IHts 􀁐􀁆􀀭􀁐􀀼􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁮􀁣􀁾􀁛􀀠􀁾􀀠l> lIue Afoh Brid,e 7-Gcot> \/61171 LI-c-y 􀁾tAd t a. IIhat lIIenke about It 1 b. IIhatllledon'UlknbouUt (p -Ll &A-TiJ& 􀁔􀁾􀀠􀁃􀁾􀁇􀁥􀁳􀀠l>
U,h," Brid,e V\J H 4.\ 􀁾􀁎s. a. IIhat IIIIt like-about It b. Whatllledon'tlikullouUt 1 􀁦􀁾􀁦􀁬􀀮􀀭􀁜􀁁􀁎􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁃􀀿􀀧􀁐􀁴􀁛􀁉􀀨􀁾􀀠t .....h'.., g. 􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁤􀁌􀀮􀀠􀁜􀀮􀀩􀁯􀀮􀀩􀁾􀀠BP-tl>&E'
l> U,htlft, l> &candlectpin, q. CDV' 6 IJ"'{. f (A)T.» 'arklft' TD M A\i;-PED<;,. iVlo12-t' s. nnGI Dct/ig" Ie," 􀁾􀁌􀁁􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀧􀁥􀀧􀀠
B,id,. DNi,. 011",." .._, 17. 1001 I. koft.HlI DUoUllioft $ Tl . "'lILJ.-l 􀁾􀁴􀁴􀀺􀁜􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁜􀀩)i> Who' ••cvfflMBy hen. 􀀱􀁾􀀠I.. :: 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀠% Lo:>\L k), 􀁾1􀀦􀁾T )i>
Bludtoh Brld,. Jl l1 &rVT rN&o. Who' ••IIke> o'Hu' It !:t. ,,'••dOIl'Uke>oMUU' 'bLoc-􀁾􀁦􀀮􀀱􀀠)i> U,hW Brld,. o. Who' •• like> o!:lout " '4 Q I' /I A • r1'"" b. Who' ••doll'Ulke>o'HuUI
I7U( LD 􀁶􀁾􀁾􀁹􀀠I. n•• ldMI * 􀁾􀁦􀁌􀀡􀁾􀁜􀀠􀁴􀁥􀀩􀁜􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 WWiJ: '4 􀁾􀀡􀁜􀁊􀁾􀀠􀁌􀁁􀀶􀁾􀁜􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀠y( 􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁜􀁬􀀡􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀯􀁁􀁴􀀰􀀠􀁁􀁂􀁾􀀠10 S:U; 􀁕􀁾􀁾􀀠c* 􀁾􀁻􀁶􀀶􀁦􀀻􀀠􀀵􀁯􀁾􀁁􀁪􀀦􀀠1b
fAf 1'-1iMIC4> lA{W 􀀭􀁃􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁓􀀠
---------------06'11/2001 II' .• 04 FAl 9727889334 WS ADDISOi\ AIRPORT Ii!: 001 4651 Airport Parkway. Addison, T.... 75001 • 972-392·4854 • 972-7&3-9334 Fax FAX COVER SHEET DATE: lJi--l
d-TO: FAX: FROM: . FAX: Pages (including cover): COMMENTS: clUJ /fRJy.,,/lAI'/C1L .----J(M{ /' /-7 E Mp.j<
􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀲ws 􀁁􀁐􀁐􀁉􀁓􀁏􀁾􀀠AIRPORT06112/2002 11:04 FAX 9727889334 :-725 P,OIIU& Nil .Jun-lo-al 12:53pm Fm,-fAA AIRSPACE eRANCH 81NZNI81 B-36 THE PEACEMAKER Bl11ce Beard. -SeJdo:r 􀁏􀀧􀁢􀁳􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁺
􀀺􀁬􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁊􀁴Specialist Feden! Aviation AcbninbtlUtion /Southwel!lt Regional OOlee Ak Traft'ie Airspace Bmnoh I Fort Worth TX 76193·0520 Oftloel 817-222·5586/FAX: 817-222-5981/b:ruce.'beud.@
faa.gov "1'0, PAX #. COVER SHEET + PAGES .. 􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁟􀁓􀁟􀂷􀁟􀀠TwR (JiB www.faa_gov!ats/ataJata400/oeaaa.cfm A JiAlU) COPY WILL [J BE SENT. WILL NOT 􀁾􀁂􀁅􀀠􀁓􀁾􀀮􀀠
IjjJ003OO/12/20Qg 11:05 FAX 9727889334 WS ADDlSOI' AIRPORT 81T-m-!I81 T-721 p,DlIO; F-;S'Ju,-10-02 lZ:S3pm 􀁆􀁲􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁆􀁁􀁾􀀠AIRSPACE 􀁥􀁒􀁾􀁎􀁃􀁾􀀠AERONAUTICAL STUDYfederal Aviation
Administration souchwest Region No: 02-ASW-1470-0E Air Traffic Division, ASW-520 PRIOR STUDY Vort Worth, TX 76193-0520 􀁾􀁯􀀬􀀠02-ASW-1466-0E ISSUED DATE: 06/10/02 KEV!N JOHNSON FREESE
-NICHOLS 1700 MARKiT ST ST2 #500 La 51 DALLAS TX 75202-2001 ** PRESUMED HAZARD ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical studyunder the provisions of 􀀴􀁾􀀠U.S.C.,
Section 4471B 􀁡􀁾􀁤􀀬􀀠if applicable,Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77 concerning: Description: ADDISON BRIDGE POINT #2 (HIGHEST POINT OF BRIDGE) Location: ADDISON
'l'X Latitude: 32-57-23.64 MAO 83 Longitude: 096-50-20.22 Heights: 200 feet acove ground level (AGL)826 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) The initial findings of this study indicate that
the structure as described above would exceed obstruction 􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁤􀁳􀀠and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air
naVigation facIlities, Therefore, pending resolution of the issues described 􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁯􀁷􀀬􀀠it is hereby determined that the structure is presumed to be a hazard to air navigation. If
the structure were reduced in height so as noc to exceed 168 􀁦􀁥􀁥􀁾􀀠aboveground level ( 794 feet above mean sea level), it would not exceed obstruction standards and a favorable determination
could subsequently be issued. Any height exceedin9 1Ga feet above ground level ( 794 feet above mean sea level) will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Deternlination
of Hazard to Air Navigation. See attachment for further information. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communicatior-s 􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁾􀁬􀁳􀁳􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠if the 􀁳􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠is
subject to cheir licensing authority. NOTE:: PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUES DESCRIBlilD ABOVE, THE STRUCTtrRE IS PRESUMED 'to BE A HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION. THIS DETERMINATION DOES
NOT AU'l'll.ORIZ.!! CONS'I'RUCTION Ov THE STRUCTlJRE EVEN AT A REDUCED HEIGHT. ANY RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUES DESCIUS:SD A.BOVElMUS'l' BE COMMUNICATED TO THE FAA SO THAT A FAVORABLE DETERMINATION
CAN SUBSEQUENTLY BE ISSUED. IF MORE THAN 􀁾􀁏􀀠DAYS FROM 'l'HE DATE OF 'l'HIS LE'l'TER ".AS Et.Al?SED WITHOUT ATTEMPTED RESOLUTION, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR YOU TO REACTIVATE THE 
06/12/2002 11:07 FAX 9727389334 ws 􀁁􀁄􀁄􀁉􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀠AIRPORT Iii004 BlT-2ZN98I 1-7Z5 p.oa/os F-55EJ.n-le-Q' 􀀱􀀲􀀻􀀵􀁾􀁰􀁭􀀠Frcm-FAA 􀁁􀁉􀁒􀁓􀁾􀁁􀁣􀁥􀀠􀁂􀁒􀁾􀁈􀀠STUDY BY 􀁆􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀠A
NEW FAA FORM 7160-1, NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR .A:"'l'ERATION. If we can be of further 􀁡􀀵􀁳􀁾􀁂􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁥􀀬􀀠please contact our office at 817-222-5534. On any future correspondence
concerning this 􀁷􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁥􀁲􀀬please refer to 􀁁􀁥􀁲􀁯􀁮􀁡􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁾􀀠Study NUmber 02-ASW-1470-0E. 􀁾􀁾􀁡􀀬􀀯􀁌􀁾􀀠(DPH) . Specialist, Airspace Branch Attachment 
06/12/2002 11:07 FA! 9127389334 WS 􀁁􀁄􀁄􀁉􀁓􀁏􀁾􀀠AIRPORT I4i 005 BIH2N81\ T-m P.04l06 F-m'JuR-IO-Gl 12:14pm Frgm-PM AIRSPACE 􀁥􀁒􀁁􀀮􀁾􀁃􀁋􀀠ATTACHMENT PAGE AERONAUTICAL STUDY NUMBER
02-ASw.141o-oe . ADDISON, TEXAS , AGL'" Above Ground Level JAMSL '" Above Mean Sea Level SlAP'" Standard Instrument Approach Prooedure NM'" Nautical Mile I RW(" Runway MOA'" Minimum
Descent Altitude The proPQsed construction would be located approximately 2,240 feet south of Rwy 33 at the Addison Airport, Addison, Texas. It would exoesd the obstruction standards
of Title 14 of the Code of Federal RegulationS, part 77, as follows: • Section 77.23 (a}(5) by 32 feet -a helght exceeding the horizontal surface as applied to the Addison Airport. In
addition. the proposal would lie within the Addison Airport traffic pattern airspace required to be protected. The proposal would have a Significant adverse impact on both arriving and
departing aircraft. ONLY OPTION -168 FEET AGl/794 FEET AMSL A favorable determlnatlon can be issued immediately at a structure helght of 168 feetAGL/794 feet AMSL. once we have received
notification of acceptance of the lower height. . . Any height that exeeeds 1G8 feet AGL I 794 feet AMSL would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination
would be based on the slgnfficant liIdverss Impact the structure would have on aircraft operating within the Addison Airport traffic:: pattern. Due to 1I1e Significant adverse impact
on aeronautical operations at the Addison Airport.. the maximum allowable heightatyour proposed location is 168 feet AGL I 794 feet AMaL. We will hold this case in abeyance untO we have
been notified of your decision. Your response may be faxed to us at 817-222-5981 or you may a-mail It to bruce.beard@faa.gov, Please Include the aeronautical study number on your correspondence.

􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀶WS APIH SO!' AIRPORT06/12/2002 . Jun-1Q-nZ II!I i: :t: • 11:08 FA! 9727889334 lZ,S4pn 'r..􀀭􀁦􀁁􀁾􀀠AIRSPACE 8,ANCH m-m-58S1 T-m HiS 
URS June 6, 2002 Mr. James C. Pierce, Jr., PE Assistant Public Works Director 1680I Westgrove Drive P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 Re: Arapaho Road Bridge at Midway Road Phase
n -Design Development and Final Plans, Specifications and Estimate Draft Scope of Services . Dear Mr. Pierce: Enclosed please find a draft copy of the Scope ofServices for Pbase II of
the referenced project for your review. We would like to discuss this scope with you and perhaps your Consultant (HN1B) to ensure that there is no overlap ofservices within the draft
scope before we finalize our fee proposal. We can be available any time next week that is convenient for you We have also examined the construction costs in a very preliminary manner
for the items detailed in our scope and based on the discussions in our May 28 meeting. As previously advised, we believe the construction cost ofthe bridge structure will be approximately
$4,000,000. The construction costs for the other items such as; landscaping and bardscaping along Arapaho and Midway Roads, retaining walls, grading and parking lot pavement under the
bridge, parking lot drainage, parking lot lighting, Midway Road lighting, etc., we believe could be an additional $2,500,000 to $3,000,000. Additionally, standard estimating practice
would apply a contingency factor to an estimate of this preliminary nature. This project differs from a typical roadway project given the importance and scope ofaesthetics, lighting,
urban design and landscaping as well as the unique characteristics ofthe bridge structore. Tn addition, we are tasked with developing mUltiple concepts for some areas of lighting, landscaping
and architectural details. While a typical project may consider 10% to 12% of the construction cost as a benchmark for an appropriate desigo fee, the uniqueness ofthis project may preclude
such typical "rules-of-thumb". We look forward to discussing our Scope ofServices with you and finalizing our fee proposal for your approval. Sincerely, . URS Corporation .&(/?LIL( CliffR.
Hall, PE Project Manager Enclosure URS Corporation Prestonwood lower 5151 Beft!!ne Road. Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75254 Tel: 972.980.4961 Fax: 972.991.7665 
ARAPAHO ROAD BRIDGE AT MIDWAY ROAD WORK ORDER NO. 002 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE II -DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES DRS will provide the engineering,
architectural, urban design and lighting design services including plans, specifications and estimates as it relates to Arapaho Road from approximate Station 40+67 to approximate Station
70+28 and as provided in the itemized scope. The construction will consist of an elevated four-lane roadway with sidewalk located within the proposed Arapaho Road right-of-way (ROW).
DRS shall prepare plans, details and compute quantities for a steel arch bridge over Midway Road, with prestressed concrete beam approach spans and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)
retaining walls. DRS will also prepare plans, details and compute quantities for any grading, paving, landscaping, hardscaping, sidewalks, parking areas, drainage, lighting & illumination,
pavement markings, traffic control, and storm water pollution prevention plans for the areas under and immediately adjacent to the bridge and retained wall portion of Arapaho Road with
the exception of those portions to be prepared by the Town of Addison's Consultant. Additionally, URS will prepare plans, details and compute quantities for landscaping, hardscaping,
and lighting & illumination along Midway Road from approximately Belt Line Road to approximately Lindberg Road. URS will prepare and submit technical memorandums, preliminary plans and
preliminary construction cost estimates at the end of the Design Development phase for the Town's review. After resolution ofcomments and selection ofalternatives provided, DRS will
provide all fmal detail plans, specifications, and estimates as previously described, to be included into one fmal construction package prepared by the Town's Consultant. DRS will coordinate
with the Town of Addison and/or the Town's Consultant for all interface design issues as well as coordinate the format and consolidation of construction plans, specification and estimate
into one final construction package. DRS will coordinate with the Town and/or the Town's Consultant for revising the horizontal alignment and vertical profile ofArapaho Road to accommodate
the proposed bridge structure. DRS will coordinate with the Town and/or the Town's Consultant fur the revised alignment and construction sequencing of the proposed box-culvert under
Arapaho Road as well as surface and bridge drainage tie-ins. URS will coordinate with the Town and/or the Town's Consultant for all geotechnical information required for the foundation
design for the bridge and retaining walls. The Town of Addison will provide to DRS all available Arapaho Road geometries, including but not limited to electronic files for horizontal
alignment, vertical profile, topography survey, field survey, and utility information. The Town will also provide boring logs, stability analysis, settlement analysis, soil parameters
and foundation design recommendations required for the bridge and retaining wall foundation designs. The Town of Addison will provide to DRS a field location survey of the existing 6O-in.
diameter water main, locating the water main precisely, both vertically and horizontally, along the prQject limits and specifically in the vicinity of the arch-bridge's main foundations.
All ROW documentation and plans, Arapaho Road geometries and roadway design, noise modeling. survey, and geotechnical engineering are outside the scope ofthis agreement and wilfbe performed
by others. 
Itemized Scope of Services Provided by DRS TASK I· URBAN DESIGN A. Design Development L Inventory and Analysis of Project Area and Influence Area • Review existing plans • Ideotil'y
prevailing patterns • Analyze project needs based 00 above • Develop urban design principles for project • Prepare technical memo ofunderstanding ofexisting plans 2. Develop two scenarios
for the primary project area (limits ofproject) !hat incorporate the design principles in item number L • Landscape • Parking and parking access • Hardscape • Element relocation, adjustment,
elimination, or addition (utility poles, sign'go, medians, sidewalk, etc.) • Prepare plan & elevation with typical sections ofprimary project area 3. Develop 2 scenarios for the influence
area (up to 14 mile) • Integration into existing urban design • Enhancement ofconnections to existing nearby areas (Belt Line Road, Arapaho hikelbfke trail) • Develop designs and plans
!hat integrate with existing plans C\...Prepare plan & perspective views with typical sections ofinfluence area Vevelop final preliminary concept • ldentil'ya final preliminary concept
to go forward into final design. • Prepare support drawings for final concept 0.S. Prepare for and attend meetings in Dallas to collect date and present options (2 Iotal) B. Final Design
---;y L Project Area • Design development of bardscape (surfaces, railings, etc.) • Plant identification, planting plan, plant list, maintenance requirements • Urban design and landscape
coustruction documents for the project area 2. Influence Area • Draft report and graphics to integrate the project area into its surroundings • Final report document with supporting
plan graphics. 3. Prepare for and attend meetings in Dallas (])-TASK n . Engineering A. Civil Site Works 1. Design Development • Geometric Layout f Paving Plans • Quantities & Cost Estimate
2. Final Civil Design & PS&E • Title Sheet (By Town's Consultant) • Index of Sheets (By Town's Consultant) • General Notes (By Town's Consultant) • Typical Sections • Summary ofQuantities
(By Town's Consultant) • Removal Plan • Geometric Layout • Grading and Drainage Plan • Paving Details • Slorm Sewer Computation Data 'l• Drainage Area Map .. 􀁾􀀠
• Drainage Profiles ? • Drainage Details I • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan • Traffic Control Plan . • Utility Adjustment Plan • Cross Sections • Roadway Lighting Plan • Miscellaneous
Roadway Details • Striping and Marking Plan 1 1 • Retaining Wall Layouts (2 walls-2120' & 710') /' • Retaining Wall Typical Sections • Retaining Wall Miscellaneous & Architectural Details
• Compile, Verify & Modify TxDOT Standard Drawmgs • QAlQ!:. • Cost Estimate • Special Provisions & Specifications • Coordination with Town's Consultants B.Bridges 1. Preliminary Bridge
Design • Preliminary Bridge Layout (Finalize Bridge Location) • Typical Section • Refine Arch Shape • Size Thrust Block & Refine Shape • Size Foundation • Size Diaphragms • Size Traffic
Railing Members • Investigate Culvert Layout • Quantities and Cost Estimate • QAlQC 2. Final Bridge Design, Plans, Specifications and Estimate • Final Bridge Layout • Quantities and
Bearing Seats • Foundation Layout • Drilled Shaft Details . • Abutment Plan & Elevation • Abutment Details • Bent Plan & Elevation • Bent Details • Thrust Block Plan & Elevation • Thrust
Block Details o Prestressed Concrete Beam Unit -Deck Plan o Prestressed Concrete Beam Unit -Deck Sections o Miscellaneous Superstructure Details (drains,lighting) • Diaphragm Details
• Closure Pour Details o Suspension Hanger Details o Steel Arch Design and Details o Bearing Details • Drainage Details • Railing Details • Stinger Design & Details o Approach Slab Details
• Erection Sequencing • Prestressed Beam Tables • Compile, Verify & Modify TxDOT Stanllard Drawmgs • QAlQC " 
o Coordination with Town's Consultants o Bridge Total Quantities & Cost Estimate o Bridge Special Provisions & Specifications C. Electrical Engineering L Design Development o Develop
a load study for Arapaho Road, bridge, parking and portion ofMidway Road o Prepare a pre1iminary cost estimate 2. FinaIPS&E o Finalize a load study for each electrical service source.
o Prepare Lighting Calculations ? o illumination Layout (4500', l200'/sbt x 2 Elevations + 2 Midway') ./'" , o Electric Service I Pole Suromary • Conduit Runs I Contents o Insert Lighting
Consultant Special Details 'I o Insert Latest Town or TxDOT Standards ..... , • Quantity Suromary • Develop Final Cost Estimate (Using Estimator) • Prepare Construction Scope ofWork
• QA ON 90% PLANS • Update Drawiogs per City Review TASK m -ARCmTECTURAL A. Design Development 1. Architectural Studies & Details o Develop three rail options addressing the issues of
bikerlhi.ker separation from the vehicular traffic and !be architectural options to realize the proposed ,!riangular pattern. ? o Coordinate with the engineering team to refine the curvature
and size of the steel. Produce drawings representing viable options o Explore options for the final material and form ofthe thrust block. Provide sketch optinns initially followed by
CADD drawiogs ofprefened scheme. • Develop detailed options and refine panel schemes for precast concrete retaining walls at approaches. • Study and Present Options for center pier support
shape. • Explore and refine alternate "stioger" designs incoIporating ligbtiog as the primary feature. • Attend Team Meetiogs and Conference Calls to coordinate the architectural aspects
ofthe design with structural and lightiog Consultants. 2. Computer Animation • Minor updates to existing video animation for landscaping, parking, etc. • Produce video animation in DVD
and VHS tape format B. Final Design 1. Coordination 2. Review 3. SpeCifications TASK IV -Lighting Design A. Design Development 1. Develop two alternatives for ligbiing ofstiogers. 2.
Research and mock-up options for color changing on existiog Addison sculpture (to determine range of possibilities for color changing on bridge structural. 3. Develop lighting concepts
for Midway Road in the blocks immediately north and south ofArapaho. 4. Develop two alternatives for lighting ofbicycle/pedestrian path. 5. Develop two alternatives for ligbting ofroadway.
6. Develop mounting concepts for bridge structure !igbtiog. 􀁾􀀠7. Develop two alternatives for lighting of outboard railings. 
8. Develop two alternatives for lighting ofunderside ofbridge, roadway under bridge and any adjacent parking areas under bridge. B. Final Design I. Final details fur lighting ofstingers.
2. Final details offixtures and mounting for bridge structure illuntination. 3. Final details of fixtures and mounting fur roadway lighting. 4. Final details offixtures and mounting
for bicyclelpedestrian pathway lighting. 5. Final details offixtures and mounting for ontboard railing illuntination. 6. Final details of fixtures and mounting fur lighting ofunderside
ofbridge, roadway under bridge and any adjacent parking areas under bridge. 7. Provide control concept diagrams and other information suitable for use by electrical engineer describing
controllntent. TASK V -PROJECT MANAGEMENT A. Reports and Invoices 1. Prepare Project Management Plan 2. Prepare Progress Reports 3. Prepare Invoices and Billings B. Coordination 1. Coordinate/Adminis
ter the Project 2. Prepare and Update Schedule 3. Manage Subconsultants 4. Implement Implement Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program 5. Prepare for and Attend Town Council or other
Town Meetings (3 total) 6. Prepare for and run internal project coordination meetings (8 total) 7. Prepare for and attend project meetings with Addison Pnblic Works (8 total) 
". CH 􀁾􀁅􀁒􀀠April 29, 2002 City of Addison Addison, Texas 75001 RE: Arapaho Road Project Gentlemen: Establishing a fair and accurate value for the condemnation of land, 'coupled with
the negative impact the bridge construction may have on Charter Furniture is very difficult to. calculate. Using your appraisal as a guide the following are my conclusions and requests.
First, let me start with some questions and statements I have concerning the Appraisal, which I think are relevant to the conclusions drawn in the Appraisal and subsequently the offer.
Statement: Page two ofthe Appraisal states there are no known contracts or offers for the sale ofthe subject propertY as ofJanuary 23, 2002." Point: The original contract for the sale
ofthe proPerty was dated December 2001. The final agreed upon price of$3,400,000.00 was signed and an earnest money check was deposited with Chicago Title on January 1 4, 2002. Statement:
The Appraisal on page 29 states the building is tilt wall. Point: The building construction is is brick veneer over concrete block, a superior and more expensive type of construction.
Land Valuation The value of 3.5 acres ofretail land fronting Midway in Addison is not $6.50 per foot. The comparisons used were properties on secondary streets and not retail property
.. SALES RENTAL \ SALES 15101 Midway Road Addison. Texas 75001 14430 Midway Road Dallas. Texas 75244 8100 Bedford-Euless Road North RIchland Hills, Texas 76180 (972) 3Jl5.3411 (972)
385-3204 . (817) 577-2300 metro (972) 385-{J621 Fax (972) 385-7650 Fax Fax (817)577-5333 melro . 
Value Offer Acquisition Page 72 ofthe Appraisal specifically states using the "sales comparison and the income approach ..:'. to establish value." Sales Comparison . Value before Acquisition
Value after Acquisition $3,400,000.00 Purchase Price Per Appraisal $3,500,000.00 After Re-Model $2,850,000.00 Difference $650,000.00 Income Approach 24,000 Ft. x $ 8.00 per Ft. = $ 192,000.00
28,800 Ft. X $12.00 per\Ft. = $ 345,000.00 Times 10 Cap = $5,370,000.00 Page 64 ofthe Appraisal states 6,851 square feet ofthe building will be non-conforming..This equates to a 13%
loss ofincome. 6,851/52,800 = 13% times $5,370,000.00 =$698,100.00. Facts: Retail space at Midway and LBJ leases for $30.00 per foot. The only other 30,000 square foot retail space on
Midway is Englishmen's Antiques at $12.00 per square foot. . . . Mapsco made a $200,000.00 improvt?IIlent to their space to obtain a $7.00 triple net leR!le. Appraisal Offer Verses Land
Value The current offer from the City ofAddison is $450,000.00 based on a land value of$of$6.50 per foot. !fthe land value is $10.00 per foot and the same percentage adjustment is used,
then the value is $691,041.00. !fthe land value is $12.00 per foot and the same percentage adjustment is used, then the value is $829,249.00 , . \ 
Summary As I stated in the outset, it is difficultto calculate the loss; only time will tell. We think a fair price today is $700,000.00 with the foHowing concessions from the City ofAddison. I. City to build and maintain lighted parking
under the bridge. The building owner to be granted permanent arid formai rights to the parking. 2. Exemption from set back requirements, ability to rebuild to present size. 3. City responsible
for damage to the building caused by soil andJor drainage changes due to construction. 4. Retain present curb cuts. 5. Sign variance for better visibility. Protect visibility for southbound
traffic. 6. City will not close Midway Road during business hours including weekends during construction. 7. City endeavor to keep road and bridge as fur from building lines as possible,
the absolute minimum is 10 feet. The above represents our efforts for a fair response'based on current conditions. Please feel free to contact me at (972) 385-32411 with any questions
or concerns you may have. Sincerely, Bill Crepeau CEO Charter Furniture WMC:dc Cc: file \ 
PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Presentation Script for Bridge Design Engineers 1. Brief Summary of Process > How did we get where we are today ./>Intro of Bridge Design selection committee
􀁾􀀧􀀷􀀠> Final selection process > Why we chose URS /Emphasis on Team concept and Approach 2. Introduce the Computerized 􀁶􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁯􀁾􀀮􀀠z 􀁥􀀦􀀾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀼􀁥􀀮􀁰􀁾􀀠d..___􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀠􀁾--􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁾."
be-» Play video (approx. 10 minutes) 0---'1 pc aV' 3. Introduce URS Tea") 􀁾􀁯􀀠clO W 4. 􀁍􀁡􀁙􀀽􀁟􀁒􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁮􀁳􀁾􀀠wtV􀁬􀁻􀁩􀁯􀁾􀀠5.Q&A 
PUBueWO_ Presentation Script for Bridge Design Engineers 1. Brief Summary of Process 􀁾􀀠How did we get where we are today • Seeking a Meaningful Bridge DeSign • Wanted to get ideas
from several design firms • Decided on competition to accomplish goal 􀁾􀀠Intro ofBridge Design selection committee • Scott Wheeler -Mayor • Diane Mallory -Council Person • Bill Creapeau
-Owner ofCharter Furniture • Ron Whitehead -City Manager • Chris Terry -Assistant City Manager • Mike Murphy -Director ofPublic Works 􀁾􀀠Final selection process Narrowed all Submittals
ofQualifications down to three firms Paid each of the three finalists a stipend of$10,000 Each firm made a formal presentation to the Design Selection Committee Selection Committee evaluated
each firm based on the following criteria: 
􀁎􀁾􀁏􀁆􀁆􀁬􀁬􀁕􀁍____________________ SCORE SHEET 1. Aesthetics -appearance day and night, should include lighting design plan (1.10) POINTS 2. Landscaping (1·10) _______POINTS 3. Acoustics
(how will noise affect adjacent buildings) (1.10) POINTS 4. Vibrations (how will motion impact adjacent buildings} (1-10) POINTS 5. Estimated cost of construction of the bridge design
(1-10) POINTS 6. FunctionalityI build ability (parking, pedestrian and bike users, safety, ADA etc.) (1-10) POINTS 7. How does the bridge minimize obstruction to adjacent buildings from
roadway (1-10) POINTS 8. Overall quality and creativity of presentation (vision, team plan I effort) (1-10) POINTS TOTAL SCORE ___,POINTS 
Presentation Schedule: rune (April lllhj Firm 7:30am -8:00am Committee Members 8:00am -lO:OOam URS Griener lO:30am 12:3Opm Freese & Nichols 12:3Opm -1:30pm Lunch 1:30pm -3:30pm HNTB
3:30pm -5:00pm Panel Discussion/Selcction Conference Centre Location BoardRoom Stone Cottage BoardRoom BoardRoom Stone Cottage BoardRoom 
Arapaho Road Bridge Competition Agenda April 11J 2002 I. Welcome and introductions: Ron Whitehead. City Manager II. Directions to Committee Members: Mike Murphy. Director of Public Works
A. Announce presentation schedule: 1. First Presentation URS 8:00am·10am 2. Second Presentation Freese & Nichols 10:30am·12: 30pm 3. Third Presentation HNTB 1:30pm-3: 30pm III. Grading
will be based on the following criteria A. Aesthetics -appearance day and night, should include lighting design plan B. Landscaping C. Acoustics (how will noise affect adjacent buildings)
D. Vibrations (how will motion affect adjacent buildings) E. Estimated cost of construction of the bridge design F. Functionality I build ability (parking, pedestrian and bike users,
safety, ADA etc.) G. How does the bridge minimize obstruction to adjacent buildings from roadway H. Overall quality and creativity of presentation (vision, team plan I effort) 
Evaluation Guide Lines: » Each firm will be given two hours to nwke their presentations and anSWer questionsfrom thepanel, with at least 30 minutes dedicated to question and answer.
» Group will have open discussions about individual concerns and opinions. » Panel will use evaluation criteria stated in infornwtion below, with each item having equal value to assist
in ranking each firm. » Each member will then individually grade each firm, in a similar nwnner, giving each item a gradefrom 1-10, with 10 being best. » Each member based on the total
score given will rank thefirms in order of grade 1", r, or 3'd. » Allpanel members will submit their rankings to establish initial order. » Each firm will begiven an overallgradebased
on rank submitted by each member. 1" place will be awarded one paint, r place will be awarded 2 points andr place will beawarded 3 paints. Thefirm with thefewest total paints will be
the competition winner. 
· at DCK Pr«fil-rM1oJ. 􀁾􀀠t=== 􀀮􀀭􀀱􀁢􀁜􀀲􀀭􀁴􀁾􀀠􀀼􀁦􀁬􀁾􀁍􀁾􀀠of Pvvc# U-ovJ \:)(0 iAJt:' b:-r -It) 􀁾􀀥􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀠Pf?:f.16j Jt r::,.j1JlO Dutf3" 􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁴􀀺􀀺􀁾1U71'-i CON"A111¢ *'httd
􀁾􀁲􀁦􀀺􀁕􀁩􀁯􀀬􀁊􀀠tf-wI1 􀁾􀀠(J)p£ 􀁵􀁾!􀁫􀀺􀀯􀁉􀁁􀁰􀁴􀁬􀁁􀀴􀀱􀁾􀀠ON 1G-kM-􀁁􀁦􀁐􀁖􀁻􀀩􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠􀀺􀀰􀁊􀀭􀁦􀁾􀁷􀁡􀀺􀀻􀀠V(pEO /􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀰􀀠rJ Yl \)r;o 􀁾􀀠-:I:--N-1\2t> U 'CL s -It:::
􀁾f: ('{\ 􀁾􀁯􀁴􀀧􀀰􀀰􀀠􀁾􀁳􀁰􀁄􀁾􀁴4C \ 􀁾􀁏􀁣􀁴􀁁􀀠
March 7, 2002 Dear Committee Member, First ofall, I would like to express my appreciation on behalf ofthe Town ofAddison. This is an exciting inftastructureproject for the Town and I
am pleased you 􀁨􀁡􀁶􀁥􀀮􀁾to participate in our evaluation and recommendation process for the Bridge Competition. As you are all aware, the competition is scheduled for April 11tb from
7:30am -5:00pm at the Addison Confurence Centre (see schedule below). I would also request that all committee members meet in the Board Room at 7:30 am to go over the upcoming days events.
There will be breakftl!Jt refreshments available. Just a very brief update on what events took place to get us tothe point at which. we are today. In February 2000, the Town ofAddison
conducted a bond election in which the town ofAddison voters, approved $20.5 million togo.toward the design and construction ofthe extension of Arapaho Road from Addison Road to Marsh
Lane. kkey and crucial element to the overall project is, the design and construction ofa bridge bridge 􀁴􀁯􀁾over Midway Road. In November of2001, we initiated the process by requesti,n.g
Statements ofQualifications from engineering and architectural firms. The Town received 12 proposals from a wide vari<;ty of firms with connections around the nation. These I2.p-!'Oposals
were evaluated by a selection committee and reduced to the three finalists· for the competition (HNTB; URS-Griener and Freese & Nichols). The Town ofAddison City Council, prior to Rllquest
for Qualifications, ilpproved a $10,000 stipend to be paid to each·ofthe three finalists to assist in the costs associated with preparation oftheir proposed bridge designs. The evaluation
process will be conducted as, follows: » Each firm wil! be given two hours to make their J1I'e9entations and answer questions from the panel. with at least 30 minutes dedicated to question,
and answer. » Panel will use evaluation criteria stated in information below, with each item having elJualllallle to assist in rankin.g eachilrm. » Each member will then individually
grade each firm, in a simillY' marner, giving each item a grade from 1-10, with 10 being best. » Each member btl!ied on the total score given will rank the firms in order of grade 1",
:1'4, or 3'". » Allpanel members will submit their rankings to establish inidalorder. 
» Group will have open discussions about individual concerns and opinions. » Allpanel members will review theb-initial rankings and riNUbmitforfinal order. » Eachfirm will begiven on
averallgrade bosedon rank submitted by each member. 1"place will be awarded one point, :1'4place will be awarded 2 points and:rplace will be awarded 3 points. Thefirm with thefewest
total points will be the competition wiltfler. Please note that I have included a copy ofeach finn's originaJ Statement ofQualifications submittal. Thank you, and I look furward to seeing
all ofyou on Aprillllh. Should you have any questions prior to Aprillllh, fuel free to contact my office at 972-450-2871 and speak with me or the Assistant Director ofPublic Works, JimPierce.
Sincerely, Michael E. MurphyfDiiector ofPublic Works 
Arapaho Road Bridge Pre-Competition 􀁍􀁥􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠 Agenda February 14,.2002 I. Welcome and introductions: Ron Whifehead6 CiW Manager II. Directions to Consultant: Mike 􀁍􀁕􀁬􀁐􀁨􀁹􀁾􀀠DirectorofPu,
blic Works A. Announce tentative day and time of presentations 1. First Presentation 8:00am·10am 2. Second Presentation 10:30am&12: 3qpm 3. Third Presentation 1:30'pm-3: 3Qpm B. No morethan
two designs III. Grading will be based on the foliowin.S criteria A. Aesthetics -appearance day and night, should inClude lighting 􀁤􀁥􀁓􀀡􀁾􀁧􀁮..plan B. 􀁌􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠C. Acoustics..(how
will noise affect.adjacent.buildil.1gs) D. VibrationlL(how will motion affect adjacent buildings) E. Estimated cost of construction of the bridge de!illgn. F. FunctionalityI build ability:(parkin.g.p
edestrlan and bike users. safety,ADA etc.) G. How does the 􀁢􀁲􀁩􀁾􀁧􀁥􀀠minimize obstruction to ar,tjacent buildings from roadway H. Overall .quality and creativity of presentation
(vision. team plan I effort) 
Presentation. Schedule: Tune (,4/l.rilll"'t , Firm 􀀮􀁾􀀠7:30am 􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁯􀁯􀁡􀁭􀀠Committee Members 8:00am -IO:OOam URS Griener l0:30arn -12:3OpJa 􀁆􀁾􀀦􀁎􀁩􀁣􀁨􀁯􀁬􀀦􀀠12:3Opm-l:30pm
Lunch 1:30pm-3:30pm HNTB 3:30pm-5:00pm Panel Discussion/Selection Conference Centre Locat:ion BoardR<?Om Stone CotIl!ge BoardRoom BoardRoom Stone Cottage BoardRoom 
EXAMPLE SCORE SHEET 1. Aesthetics -ilPp_rance d!ilY and night, should include lighting deSign plan (1-"ll) 10 JllOINTS 2. "Landscaping (1-10) __7!--_JIIOIN,TS 3. Acoustics (howwill noise
affect· adjacent 􀁢􀁵􀁩􀁬􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁧􀁳􀀩􀀠(1-10) §-POINTS 4. Vibrations (howwill motion impact adjacent buildings) (1-'IO) 8 POINTS 5. Estimated costof construction ofthe bridgedf!$lgn
(1-1OJ 6 cPOlNTS 6. FunctionalityI buildability (parking,.pedestrianand bike users, 􀁳􀁡􀁦􀁥􀁴􀁹􀁾􀁁􀁄􀁁􀁥􀁴􀁣􀀮􀀩􀀠tt-10) 4 -POINTS 7. How does the bridge minimu:e obstructioft to adjaqent
buildings fr_roadway (1.10) 10 :poJNTS 8. Overall quality andcreativity of presentatioft (vis,ion, team plan/effoJt) (1-10) 9 1tOIIITS TOTAL SCORE 59 POINTS COMMITTEE-==-c.. 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 TOTAL8.CORE FIRM#1 3 1 3 2 1 3 3 16 #3 FIRM#2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 12 #1 FIRM#3 1 3 1 3 3 2 1 14 #2 """"_M.__ 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
2 
3 
4 
1 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
v 18 
URS May 9, 2002 Mr. James C. Pierce, Jr., PE Assistant Public Works Director Town ofAddison 1680 I Westgrove Drive P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 Re: Arapaho Road Bridge at Midway
Road -Presentation Files Dear Mr. Pierce: As requested, we have enclosed a CD with the files required for our PowerPoint presentation. These files include two PowerPoint files and three
mpeg video files. To view the entire presentation all files will have to be loaded on the computer. The files include: Powerpoint Files: Arapaho Presentation.ppt (main PowerPoint presentation)
Draft Presentation.ppt (continuous loop of pictures ofbridges & concepts fading in and out) Video Files arapahoe_driver _ view.mpg (drive under video) arapahoeyans.mpg (pan across elevation
video) arapahoe _ spins.mpg (360 degree helicopter view video) It should be noted that within Arapaho Presentation.ppt, slide number four is linked to the Draft Presentation.ppt file,
slide numbers five and 70 are linked to the arapahoeyans.mpg file, slide number 12 is linked to the arapahoe _spins.mpg file and slide number 40 is linked to the arapahoe_driver _ view.mpg
file. Deletion ofany of these files will delete the link and remove the video or continuous loop from the presentation. Also, when viewing the slide show in PowerPoint, the continuous
loop can only be stopped by pressing the "escape" key on the computer. The slide show can then be resumed by pressing the down arrow. As there may be some "quirks" in running the slide
show we will be happy to assist you in any way we can. Please I call ifyou have any problems viewing the presentation or would like our assistance. \ Sincerely, URS Corporation 􀁾􀁒􀁤􀀮􀂣􀀨􀀠CliffR.
Hall, PE Project Manager Enclosure -CD URS Corporation Prestonwood Tower 5151 Beltline Road, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75254 Tel: 972.980.4961 Fax: 972.991.7665 
􀁃􀁁􀁐􀁾􀀲􀀮􀁔.. .PROwTBC>1i 􀁓􀁾􀁙􀀮􀁂􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁅􀂣􀀠.:T'CJ2IIiT.BBOOa 
FROM P. 1 -rlIt:s􀁾􀀠:;11t.i! H􀁾Y';K, 􀁾􀀠H:testJ,J 􀁾􀀠f.,. .jJl1Te' $ lioN !HI!. 􀀧􀁉􀀭􀀯􀁾􀀭OZ. ; 􀁬􀁡􀁷􀁾􀀠H&􀁾􀀧􀁔􀀧􀁎􀁴􀀻􀀠P.eese.J TAnillAl •. I ..' G.:J/.1. j • . • Introduce
City Council and Ci,y Management • LP Cookingham award -leM-+--topS awards -Mentorship • In 1995, Intern project --collElct photos • Andy Eads .;.. Town Historian: • New Career • Photos,
journals, certificates, newspaper clippings, report cards, and tax statements o Book Idea Approved 01/97 • Arduous process The book quickly grew from 128 pages to 192 pages. o December
of 2001, 192 pages o Some said it might never happen • Andy Proclamation TRIVIA ANSWERS: 1. Who was the Town of Addison Named after? o Addison Robertson o 1838-1927 o Confederate Captain
o Carpenter o Addison Postmaster o Under Cover Secret Agent in WW1 2. What Year was the Town of Addison incorporated? . o Settled In early 1840's' . o Incorporated in 1953 to avoid 􀁡􀁾􀁮􀁥􀁸􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯
􀁮􀀠by Dallas 3 Who was KeUer Springs named after? _____ o Henry and Mary Jane Keller -. 􀁾----h • ••• o Former slaves in Tennflssee . . o Settled North of Keller:Springs;Road. o Natural
springs on their property --shared with other local farmers ! . . o Land was betweenPrersto'n Road and the Tollway, north of Keller Springs Road , ,i 4. What was Town Hall before?: .
a Stonegate Halt built inj1939 for. Maud and J. B. McEntire o Mrs. McEntire's dream house . o Named for the stone gate entrance that used to be on 8elt Line Road. i' a Driveway Part·ofthe
old Preston Trail System o Friends -Langfords !lyed there 
P.25-09-2002 3,57AM FROM 5. What was dubbed the new "State Bird of Texas" in the 1980's due to its prevalenc.e in Addison and North Dallas7 o Building cranes 6. Where was the first restaurant
in Addison? o At the Addison airport, which opened in 1957 7. What is the oldest commercial building in Addison? o The Addison State Bank o 1913' o Broadway Street and Addison Road o
Grocery store in the late 1920's o Refurbished in 1983·· awarded a Historical Marker o Network Funding Corporation (a residential mortgage bank) 8. What is the oldest church in Addison7
o The White Rock Chapel • Wlnowood o Only traditional church in Addison. o Built in the mid 1880's by freed slaves o Still going strong today. .. o S.S. Noell land storY _ .. _, .....================
==::======================= 􀀬􀀭􀁾< ••• 
FRO,"1 P.3 THEN AND NOW; • Transportation and accessibility • Commerce • Neighborhoods • Schools • Amenities • Numbers • Other Information PIONEERING AND ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT: Yesterday:
• Early farmers • Vil1lionaries S. S. Noell and W.W. Julian --$ & land for Cotton Belt • Preston Witt· 1 of 1$' known settlers, first mill and trading post • Landscaping Vision • Zoning
Vision 􀁔􀁑􀁤􀁡􀁹􀁾􀀠• We have entrepreneurs building businesses from the ground up • Fortune 500 companies •. Restaurant owners • Residents who care about the community THEN, NOW AND
FUTURE • Pioneering and entrepreneurial spirit • Vision' . --------------=--=====-=:::======:::=-=========-=--=-=, 
P.45-09-2002 3,5BAM FROM TRANSPORTATION/ACCESSIBILITY BEl. T LINE. BELT LINE. BELT LINE Yesterday: • 70's· 4 lane asphalt road Today and Future: • Thriving. busy road • Reinventing Beltline
• Bond Program • ULI • Opportunities for change: o Entertainment o Alleviating traffic o Attracting new tenants o Making Beltlirie pedestrian friendly o Beautification ' o Safety o Utility
Relocation • Arapaho extension o Phase II _. 12 mos. ahead --$300K under budget o PhaSe III· Design UnderWay o Bridge over Midway o Design Competition TOLLWAY Yesterday: • Extension
to Addison --early 1990's • Dig down and landscape Today: • Tollway still provides that main access to Addison • 450K cars per day 􀀭􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺
􀀽􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀮􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁾..:.. • Opened in 1957 Today: • More than 750 aircraft
based • AA -busiest general. aviation airport in Texas • Top 3 to 4 bUsiest general aviation airports in USA • National Air Transportation Association·· one of the 100 most needed airports
in the nation COnON BELT Yesterday: • Came to Addison·· late 1890's • Depot in 1904 Today: • Bring Dart trains to Addison on the Cotton Belt line 
COMMERCE Yesterday: • Started with farming • Then, area's center of commerce • General Merchandise·· Grocery Stores • Due to Train Depot at Addison Road and Broadway • "Wet" town in
1975 􀁾􀀭Addison a dining destination Today: • 100's of businesses .• Technology start-ups to established Fortune 500 HQ's • 21 hotels • 150 restaurants • Retail·· Village on the Parkway
is 90% full -·Kmart • CompUSA • Addison and surrounding area employ more people than downtown Dallas Future: • Long-term viability • Look at everything -ordinances, etc./tax abatements
and incentives) • Attract & retain businesses • Restaurants: Tin Star, Flying Fish, Dukes Original Road House, Enchiladas, etc. • We want people to come to Addison to dine and stay for
the funl • Office buildings make It happen NEIGHBORHOODS: Yesterday: • Farms • Visionaries --Landscape o. Make Addison Livable Today: • Addison Is proud to have neighborhoods of all
types and socia9s0Aemis levels --• Integrated and Urban Future: . • Health Club Update -Contractor -·Site Work -Swim Next Summer • Live, Work and Play in Close Proximity . • Density
• Addison Circle • Plans for high rise condo's and apartments 
5-09-2002 3,58AM FROM P.S SCHOOLS Yesterday: • 1st schools -1 Room • Addison School built in 1914 • In the 􀀱􀀹􀀵􀀰􀀧􀁳􀁾􀂷􀀠Addison made the decision to fold our schools in with the
Dallas Independent School District Today: • Addison School now Magic Time MachiM Restaurant • Oldest Building in Addison Future: • New DISD school site -closer to Addison residents RESIDENT
& VISITOR AMENITIeS Yesterday: • In 1975, Addison built Town Park • Sidney Drive •• Brookhaven Club Neighborhood Today: . • 10 parks, over 55 acres • Preserve and Enhance the Town's
exceptional quality of life '. Through Landscaping of the Community's Public & Private Properties. . • Planted 88,000 Tulip Bulbs this year • Planted over 300 trees in last two years
• 90 new Crape Myrtles ". Tollway service road • Created Arbor Foundation • Enhance Town's spring and fal! color presentation by planting flowers and trees .in parks and greenways •
Numerous Awards: o American Society of Landscape Architects o Texas Forest Servh;e --_..__....... o PtbUliiij6hai GdJD!lP .. Illianagf;lwenf SOcIety o Texas Recreation and Parks Society
:t!11!1 • Yesterday, today and in the future' • Addison is safe and cleiln! • Arts and events district update 
5-00-2002 3, 59AM FROM P. 7 THE NUMBERS 1976. 2002 General fund revenues $536,232 $21.889.920 General fund expenditures $649,376 $22.647,720 Property tax (GF only) $141,232 $5,731,820
Sales tax $210,000 $9,700,000 Today: • Financially Sound o 25% Fund Balances o Stili no budget cuts (X Hotel !=und) o Moody's 􀁾􀀠A vibrantlOlfal eCooomy and sizable tax base highlighted
by'Ipw debt levels ar.td solid financial operations o S&P· The c:ontin!;leddiversificati;on ofthe tax base coupled with a financial position that continues to strengthen. • Sales Tax
o Numbers (Fiscal thru Feb) • Addison +1.87%. Dallas -7.67%. Richardson -18.25%, DaMas .County -8.97% . o latest Month o Sales Tax Importance o ·Pays for Y. salarY"of police and fire
o Ad, campaign • Advertising Campaign for shopping and restaurants o Radio " .DaUaS Morning News Guide o DMag o TX Monthly o DBJ o Guide live.com o Dallasdine.soulcom ---........ . II
􀀤􀀲􀁾􀁑􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠o Here forward· $15,000 o Much more on PR • HotelsfHotel Tax/Occupancy Year over year :% of Occupancy • % of Occupa.ncy i Tax July 2001 Down 8% Down 14% October 2001
Down 28% Down 43% . December 2001 i Down 12% Down 28% February 2002 IDownS.7% Down 12% : o $480K 9110111, 2001 o Ad Campaign -with hotel association o Traver click, StarCite, David Green
leads o $280K . 
P.B5-09-2002 3,59AM FROM .. OTHER INFORMATION: Hoops & Hopes check presentations to charities • $2965 each charity • Lynn Pokorny of TCA" Lisa Landry Childress Fund. • Nancy Gale, Executive
Director ,:>f BrYan's House • Bryan's House Is a local non-profit agency that provides day care and medical assistance for small children who are HIV-positive and children with siblings
or parents who have ,AIDS. • The Lisa Landry Childress Foundation was founded in 1995 in 􀁭􀁾􀁭􀁯􀁲􀁹􀀠of former Dallas Cowboys cbach Tom Landry and Mrs. Landry's youngest daughter Lisa.
The organization aims to further public awareness of, organ and tissue donation and transplantation. Elections • Early Voting· Now through April 301h, Central Fire • Saturday, May 4th,
Election Day, Central Fire Station and Fire Station Two ' Special Events , • Arbor Day, las Lacs Pavilion -Saturday, April 27th • Addison Garage Sale -Saturday, May 11th • Taste Addison
-May 18·1.9 • Shakespeare Festival-June 27-29 • Kaboom Town ,-Wednesday, July 3fa • Spikefest -July 20-21 • OktQberiest -September 19-22 CLOSE • 5mall Town to Entertainment Destination
and Business Hub • Addison·· Dedicated to Quality • Making it Better to Live, Work and Play in Addison • Finite Area· Keeps Improving • Stable politically 􀀽􀀭􀀽􀁟􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁟􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀺􀀽􀁉􀁆􀀺􀀺
􀁴􀁩􀁳􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁓􀁃􀁬􀁡􀁴􀁱􀁬􀁹􀀭􀁃􀁓􀁓􀁊􀁑􀁾􀀧􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁬􀂣􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁵􀀺􀁬􀀺􀀱􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀁟􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀠• Safe and Clean
• • Q&A Embarking on New Directions 􀁡􀁮􀀢􀁤􀀧􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁤􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁥􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁡􀁾􀁶􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀮􀁯􀁬􀀮􀀡􀁲􀁳􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮______-..c-Bright New Future -
t EXISTING EXIST...., R.O.I'I. . I R.O.W. 􀁾________________..____________􀁾􀀳􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀮􀀸􀁾􀀧􀀰􀁾􀀱__________________________________________􀁾􀀧􀁉􀀠• 13.996 I' 16.484 _ VARIES' 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀳􀀧􀁾􀀰
􀀹􀁾􀁓__􀁾_______􀀲􀀧􀁟􀀧􀀷􀁟􀀹􀁓􀁾􀀭􀀧___􀁾__􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁉􀁌􀁾______􀁾__􀁾􀀠VARIES PROPOSED R.O.W. 2.4 BLOCK SOD VARIES IOOmm TOP SOIL E EXlSTlNG R.O.W. I EXISTING "I • I PROPOSED
R.O.W.• EXISTING' R-O;W. I •••____________􀁾􀀳􀁾􀀵•.􀀷􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀱􀀳􀁾􀀮􀀹􀁾􀀹􀁾􀀶􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀴􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀮􀁾􀀱􀀶􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀴􀀸􀁾􀀴__________________􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀠, 15.800 15.000 I 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.4, -' ·it BLOCK 500 VARI S o 100mm TOP 5011. SECTION C-C MIDWAY ROAD * MATCH
EXISTING CROSS SLOPE \, \ LEGEND ® 200mm CONCRETE PAVEMENT-CPCO ® RAISED MEDIAN © ""NOUTffle CURB (TYPE U) ® FULL DEPTH SAW CUT ® IOOmm ACP TY B BASE ® lOOrom CONCRETE SIDEWALK ® RETAINING
WALL GENERAL NOTES I. SEE PAVING PLANS FOR SECTION LOCA TIONS. 2. ALL ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN METERS UNlESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE NOT DRAWN TO SCALE. 4. MATCH
EXISTING CROSS SLOPE. _ Carter·...se.. TYPICAL SECTIONS KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY 
. ---CONe ORIVEWAy(11So",m) ! -NSCALE IN METERS --􀁾􀀠:OS 10 ISm SCALE, "500 LEGEND Oil PROPOSEO CONCRETE ____________________ •• _ .. _ .. _______ • ________________ OlQSJIJ:lQ...!lQ.W_
_ PAVEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MONO CURB (TYPE IIHISOmm) 􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀴􀀠-Ioi ------------------_.BEGIN RET WALL "A" '--MOI'O CURB (TYPE tt)USOmm) 82.5 y N E 13960.240 .. -------1-13S'-'BEGIN
RET WALL "S" STA 9<939.4S, 16.16 RT '--C<»lC DRIVEWAY 1150"",,) 36.8 M2 l138li PAVER MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY n PROPOSED GRASS LJ MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED SIDEWALK 29.T M2 MONO
CURB <TYPE 1I)(l5Omm) S.60 M NOTE: I. SEE SIGNAl. DRAWING FOR DETAIL$. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURS UNlESS OTHERWISE
NOTEIA 4. PAVER AND SUB-BASED TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY TOWN OF ADDISON. 5. SEE MIS. DET AILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAvER DETAILS. 2002 I.OOT PAVING PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY -
I I SCALE IN MtlERS IIJIMj o 5 10 SCALE: 1:500 i 15m -.. CONSTRuCT lAYDOWN'--------.... ----.. _.... -.... "--.. ,'MOliro CURB (TYPE U)(150mm) 141.0 .. PAV 􀀨􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀻􀀻􀁮􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁐􀁃􀁏􀁽􀁾􀀭􀀮__
!'. "'DWAY ROAO J.I2 .•_.;;___ •••• . -,-.-0--. +-. -. ANOSCAPE'P.vERs • -CoNC PAv' _. , -----"\::CRV:C-· -...--.•.-----..---1:;0,"''''2 (200mm)(CPCD) /'-_0." '" OFFSET ;Ui!.!.•􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁃
􀀠PAY (200"",,)(CPCD) RAMP TYPE I 40,4 􀀯􀀧􀁦􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁬􀂣􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁾--544.11 "'2 􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀧􀁏􀀱􀁾􀁏􀀠CURS <TYPE U)USOmml 85.4 .. Lc CONSTRUCT lAYOOWN 011"8-../\ J 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭CONC-I'AV
(20OmmHCPCll) 33.4M2 __J􀁁􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀾􀀠/I CURVE OAT.. CRV'E PT=9+954.10 A=IO' 44'24'LT lE(lfND----I iii PROPOSED CONCRETE II!II PAVEMENT l8&'I PROPOSED LANDSCAPE IIl2!i PAVER MEIllAN
􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY 􀁾PROPOSED GRASS L.J "'ElllAN 􀁾PROPOSED 􀁓􀁾􀁅􀁗􀁁􀁌􀁋􀀠􀁾PROPOSEO CONCRETE L.a.::I tAEOIAN NOTE; I. SEE SIGNAL ORAWINO FOR Il£T ALS. -= CarI_.Burge..
2. SEE niLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE Sill'S AND ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS"OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. PAVER AND SUB-BASE TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY PAVING PLAN TOWN
OF ADDISON. KELLER SPRINGS ROAD S. SEE MISC. DETAIlS SHEET AT MIDWAY FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAilS. 
I /, /END CsJ 0918-45-344 , STA.10+067.S8 t KEl.L£R SPRINGS ROAD /LEGEND 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE IIIiII PAVEMENT m PROPOSED LANOSCAPEI!l!l!l PAv£R MEDIAN A 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED GRASS r-MV"V CURB (TYPE IIH150mm) MEDIAN 23.1 M CURB <TYPE ""50""') PROPOSED, SIDEWALKRECESSED INLET 55.6 M DRIVEWAY F'1 PROPOSED CONCRETEHSO.mm) LJ MEDIAN ,18.1 MZ ( (200mm)(CPCD)
CONC PAY (200mmHCPCO) 774.7 M2 .-. 'i _.--+ __'=. 􀁍􀁬􀁄􀁙􀀡􀀮􀁁􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾_t--_-_______ ... -1--_ .. __ _ -.-----􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠-.. "2 92􀀧􀁻􀀧􀁬􀀻􀁷􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀧􀀭"ONO CURB !lSOmm){TYP
H) END CSJ 0918-45-344 CONe PAV (200mml(CPCO) 0.98 " STA.IO+181.655 'l MIDWAY ROAD 0.5 M2 • -------r.lIISTING RO,,-----• ---.----------------------------.-----• -----EX1STINC-ROW --A
NOTE. I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWING FOR DETAilS. 2. SEE INLET EJ(TENSIOII DETAILS FOR -SCALE IN METERS .-i o 5 10 15m SCALE,I,500 r-MIllIO CURS (TYPE U) {ISO mm) 32.0 M PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS.
3. ALL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB Cai.er.Bulg.u UNLESS OTHERMSE NOTED. 4. PAvER ANO SUB-BASE TYPES TO BE APPRoVED 8Y TOWl! OF AOIlISON. S. SEE MISC. DElAiLS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER
PAVING PLAN DETAILS. <ELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY c 
t -NREMOYAL NOTES I. SEE SIGNING AND PAVEtJENT !.lARKING SHEETS FOR SIGN RElOCATIONS. 􀁾􀀠 2. SEE SIGNAL PLANS FOR SIGNAL SCALE IN METERSRElOCATIONS. I3. EXISTING LANDSCAPE PAVERS IN
!.IEOIANS -SHALL BE SALVAGED AND USED IN 0 5 10 15m PROPOSED MEDIANS. SCALE: 1:500 REMOVAL LEGEND ___________________________􀁾􀁬􀁊􀁎􀁓􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀹􀁌􀀠_________ ,,-____ IIiIIII EXISTING
CONCRETES!!!I PAVEMENT ["'] EXISTING CONCRETE f..:) MEDIAN I«'«l EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY i 􀁾EXISTING SIDEWALK . . It KELLER SPRINGS ROAD . 5+900 ....... -----------,---------:;'--;t-'
􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾RElOCATE 􀁾􀀠REt.IOVE TRE'ES'---r-.. [ffi(iPOSED ito.W:----RELOCATE FIRE HYl>RANT_J '-"[l(le"IE SIGN (BY OTHERS) REMOVE TREES 􀁎􀁏􀁔􀁅􀁾􀀠EXISTING IRRIGATION
IN CENTER MEDIANS SHALL BE CAPPED AND REMOVED AT THE !.IEDIAN REMOVAL LIMITS.iRRlGATION CAPPING SHALL BE SUBSIDIARY TO MEDIAN REMOVAL. .:'. _ _ ear........... REMOVAL PLAN KELLER SPruNGS
ROAD AT MIDWAY 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀾􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
'-.) 􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠__ ..---: .... .... ---__􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀽􀁟􀀽􀀠.. --.. -/?RPPOSED􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀠__ _ .. 􀁽􀁾􀁏􀁗----::.:.:.:."-:.::"'2-M -• • •--.... _ v --".􀁾􀀢􀀭-...."": 0 REMOVAL NOTES I. SEE
SIGNING AND PAVEMENT NARKlNG SHEETS FOR SIGN RELOCATIONS. 2. SEE SIGNAL PLANS FOR SIGNAL RELOCATIONS. 3. EXISJING LANDSCAPE PAVERS IN MEDIANS SHALL BE SAl.VAGED AND USED .. PROPOSED
NEOIANS. RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT j(BY OTHERS) RELOCATE SIGN -•• • -_f<\.. _ V "..•-._ t EiIS"TlN11 RELOCATE SIGN SCALE IN METERS-o 5 10 15m SCALE, hSOORELOCATE FIRE HYONANT ISY OTHERS) RELOCATE SIGN _ ... _--...;.------􀁾􀀭.. --_ .. _.. _-.'" .' '.... _ I '. -I "" -............... -"'-..7"--1 .. ___ ..... --.. .. _ .I 􀁾REI.OCATE FIRE
HYDRANT -•• _ :-: • " -• • J \ ' IBY OTHERS) 􀁰􀁾􀁤􀁉􀀾􀁾􀁬􀀵􀁬􀁩􀁤􀁗􀀧􀀠􀁟􀁅􀁾􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁊􀁎􀁉􀀻􀀮􀁊􀁉􀀠LRELOCATE SIGNOlt... 􀁾􀀠EXISTING IRRIGATION IN CENTER MEDIANS SHALL BE CAPPED AND
REMOVED AT THE NEOIAN RENOVAL LIMlTS.IRRlGATlON CAPPING SHALL BE SIJBSIIlIARY TO MEDIAN REMOVAL. . " . --"" 􀁾􀀭RELOCATE POWER 􀁰􀁯􀁑􀁾􀀯􀁾􀁾􀀹􀀮􀁜..... '\ " J RELOCATE ELECTRiC 80/􀁾􀀮􀀠IBY
OTHERS> l£' RaOCATE SIGN I RELOCATE SIGND7;1 J '" ' . , J 􀀯􀀭􀀾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀠I 1 1 ,• REMOVAL PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY REMOVAL LEGEND IIIIiII EXISTING CONCRETE II!!!II PAVENENT
f'7.l EXISTING CONCRETEt..J MEDIAN . !S1>'l EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY CB] EXISTING SlDEWALI( 
___________ _ I 􀁾􀀠L. ,I , I I REMOVF;. KET _______􀁐􀁾􀁯􀁐􀁯􀁳􀀮􀀼􀁾􀀠!:..o:w: _ <TYP) ---:....0+ .._ It. f,IIi)'/fAY.. __ '-'-____ ROAD __ --􀁾􀀠2002 hOOT SCALE 1M L4ETERS o 5 10
15m SCALE; 1:500 '-REMOV AL NOTES I. SEE SIGNING AND PAVEMENT I.WlltING SHEETS FOR SIGN 􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁏􀁃􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀮􀀠2. SEE SIGNAL PLANS FOR 􀁓􀁉􀁇􀁎􀁁􀁾􀀠RELOCATIONS. 3. EXISTING 􀁾􀁁􀁎􀁄􀁓􀁃􀁁􀁐􀁅􀀠PA
VERS 1N NEOIANS 􀁓􀁈􀁁􀁌􀁾􀀠8E SALVAGED ANO USED IN PROPOSEO MEDAlHS. REMOV At LEGEND IiiiiI EXISTING CONCRETE .. PAVEMENT r.1 EXISTING CONCRETE L::J MEDIAN 􀁾EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY
Iiljill EXISTING SIDEWALK --.... .. _-.... -... _. EXISTING R.O.W. ----------------------.._..-"":::..._--_.... -r--_ ... ___ _ 1---• -• -: "l':J1IS"1ING Rc)W--------------------------------------__
NOTE; EXISTING IRRiGATION IN CEIITER NEOIANS SHALL BE CAPPED AND REMOVED AT THE NEDIAN _OVAL LIMITS. IRRIGATION CAPPING SHALL BE SUBSlOlAIIY TO "EDIAN RENCVAL. REMOVAL PLAN KELLER SPRINGS
ROAD AT MIDWAY c 
SCALE IN MEiERS o 5 10 15m SCAL£;!:SOO 'f:, e.AVEMENT MARKING LEGEND ® 1000m WHITE SOlI!) ® 1000m WHITE BROKEN © 1000m YELLOW SOliD @2-100mm YELLOW SOlID ® 150mm WHITE SOliD CD 200mm
WHITE SOliD © ZOOmm YELLOW SOLI!) ® 600mm WHITE SOLID Q) TV "C-R R.P.M. ® WHITE LEH TURN ARROW-PREFAB (TV C) © WHITE RlCIlT TURN ARROW-PREFAS CTY C) @'ONlY' WHlTE-PREFAB CTY C) ® WHITE
STRAIGHTIRlCHT ARROW-PREFAB <TV C> ® £OOmm X '800mm WHITE SOlI!) 􀀭􀀢􀁘􀁉􀀧􀀺􀁔􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀠SIGN RELOCATION __ •• _ 􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀰􀁦􀀲􀁓􀁊􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀡􀀡􀀺􀀹􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀠# ......􀁾􀀠.. • "-, .......
! \ " . R 􀁾􀀱􀀵􀁜􀁮􀀭􀀮􀀯􀀠R =15,m-, RIGHT lANE MUST TURN ROO =15m 􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁅􀁘􀀱􀁓􀀱􀁃􀀡􀁎􀁇􀀠SIGN RELOCATION '--EX''''''" SICN RELOCATION _F.,<1'IN'" SICN RELOCATION 100----"
=15m 􀁾EX!S'IING SIGN RELOCATION to <.D o + o 􀁐􀁁􀁖􀁅􀁍􀂣􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁟􀁁􀁒􀁋􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀠NOTES I. DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN IN "'ETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. REFER TO THE PAVEMENT MARKING PETAILS
SHEET FOR MARKING DETAILS AND ADDITIONAL INFORt.lATIOH. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALIGN AND MATCH PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO THE ORIGINAL EXISTING MARKING LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENOlNEER. 4. CROSSWALK LOCATION SHALL BE ADJUSTED AT TH, DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER TO INSURE THAT HAN!)lCAP RAMPS (EXCLUI)lNG FLARED SlOES) ARE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITION THE CROSSWALK.
5. [KIST1NG ROADWAY SIGNS SHALL RE!IAIN IN PLACE AT THE ENO OF THE PROJECT E*CEPT WHlERE REOUIREO TO BE REMOVED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TillS PROJECT. 6. PROPOSED ROADWAY SICNS ARE DESICNATED
BY TMUTCD NO. T. FOR SIGN INSTALLATION ON SIGNAL POLES. SEE SIGNAL PLANS. a. REFER TO 'SUMMARY OF SMALL SIGNS' PAY ITEMS. 9. FOR ALL EXlSl1NG SIGNS TO BE RELOCATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW BREAKAWAY STUB POSTS ON A NEW FOUNDATION. REPlACE DAMAGED ATTACHMENT HARDWARE. ANO REPAIR ALL DAMAGED GAl. VANIZING. 10. ALL BEGIN AND END STATIONS FOR PAVEMENT
MARKINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD-VERIFY ALL. _Carter & PAVEMENT KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT ""OWAY 
,, G-___ C I 1'1' 􀁯􀁾􀀠-----..::.. ADO I S ) --..􀁾􀀠" 􀁾􀀮􀀱􀁾􀁥􀀳􀀵􀀮􀀰􀀴􀁟􀀯􀁟􀁟􀀠9LtrON END/PAVEMENT tMARKiNG /MAfCH EXISTrNc I /,,, , ,, ,, , ,, /,,. \ -,, \ 􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠.. .' \
\ \ , \ \ .... II \ , ---. -.. -. ./RIGHT lANE MUST TURN RIGHT R3-7R , > Ii f/) 􀁾􀀠-' is f􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁌􀁊􀀠RIGHT lANEl MUST' ITURN RIGHT R3-7R > SCAlE IN METERS i -:s o 51015m SCALE;
h5QO PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS 'RE SHOWN IN METERS UNlESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. REFER TO THE P.VEMENT M'RKING DETAILS SHEET FOR MWING DET.Il.S .ND ADDITIONAL INFORMA􀁔􀁩􀁏􀁎􀁾􀀠3.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AllGN AND MATCH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ....IlKINGS TO THE ORIGIN'L EXISTING MARl<lNG LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. CROSSW'LK LOCATION SH'LL BE ADJUSTED .T
THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER TO INSURE THAT HANOICAP RAMPS (EXCLUOING FLARED SIDES) ARE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE CROSSWALK. 5. EXISTING RO'OW'Y SIGNS SH.LL REM.IN IN PLACE AT THE
ENO OF THE PROJECT EXCEPT WHERE REOIJIREI) TO BE REMOVED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. S. PROPOSED RO.DWAY SIGNS ARE DESIGNATED BY TMUTCD NO. T. FOR SIGN INSTALLATION ON SIGNAL
POLES. SEE SIGNAL PLANS. 8. REFER TO "SU......ARY OF SMALL SIGNS' PAY ITEMS. 9. FOR ALL EXISTING SIGNS TO BE RELOCATED. CONTRACTOR SH'LL FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW BREAKAWAY STUB POSTS
ON A NEW FOUNDATION. REPLACE D.....GED AnAGNMENT HARDWARE. AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGED GALVANIZING. 10-ALL BEGIN AND ENO STATIOI/$ FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE APPRO""'ATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
FIELD-VERIFY ALL. PAVEMENT 􀁍􀁟􀁾􀁒􀁋􀁉􀁎􀁇􀁟􀁬􀀮􀀬􀁊􀀺􀀺􀁑􀁟􀁅􀁬􀁩􀁑􀀠® 100""" WHITE SOLID ® loomm WHITE BROKEN © 100mm YELLOW SOlID ® 2-100mm YELLOW SOlID ® 150mm WIIITE SOL1Il ® ZOQmm
WHITE SOLID ® ZOOmm YELLOW SOUD ® 600""" WIY1E SOLID Q) TV " C-R R.P.I.!. ® WHITE LEFT T!JRN ARROW-PREFAB (Ty C) © WHITE RIGHT TURN ARROW-PREFAS (TY Cl ® ·ONLY" WHlTE-PREFAB <TY C) ®
SQOmm X 1800mm WHITE SOLID CCWler........ & PAVEMENT KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT tJlOWAY 
____________________ _____ _ ! -N􀁾􀀠.-SCALE IN METERS o 5 10 ISm SCALc.ll:500 PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES EXISTING SIGN RELOCATION • ---EXIStiNG RO , >,,.J'. __ ./, ,, ,, , 1///0 ./.-/1//tJ{iSTING
$lGN RELOCATION , I. DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN iN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 􀁅􀀡􀀡􀂧􀁔􀁊􀁎􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁒􀀹􀁾􀀠Z. REFER TO THE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS SHEET FOR MARKING DETAILS AND ADOITIONAL
INFORMATION. , 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALIGN AND MATCH PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO THE ORIGINAL EXISTING MARKlNG LOCATIONS AS DiIlECTEO BY . THE ENGINEER. 􀁾􀀮􀀠CROSSWALK LOCATION
SHALL BE ADJUSTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGlNEER TO INSURE THAT HANDICAP RAMPS (EKCLUOING FLARED SIDES) ARE WHOLLY CDNTAlNED WITHIN THE CROSSWALK. 5. EXISTING ROADWAY SIGNS SHALL REt.lA/N
IN PLACE "AT THE END OF THE PROJECT 􀁅􀁾􀁃􀁅􀁐􀁔􀀠WHERE REOUillED TO BE REMOVED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 6. PROPOSED ROADWAY SIGNS ARE DESIGNATED BY TMUTCD NO. AND NO. ON
THE SHEET. 7. FOR SIGN INSTALLATION ON SIGNAL POLES. SEE SIGNAL PLANS• i8. REFER TO 'SUMMARY OF SMALL SIGNS' PAY ITEMS. _ •9. FOR ALL EXISTiNG SIGNS TO BE RELOCATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
FURNISH 0>10 INSTALL NEW BREAKAWAY STUB POSTS ON A NEw FOUNDATlON. REPLACE DAMACEO ATTACHMENT HARDWARE. AND REPAlR ALL DAMACEO GALVANIZiNG. 10. ALL &GIN ANI) END STATIONS FOR PAVEMENT
MARK1NGS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALl. FIELD-VERIFY ALL. PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND ® 100mm WHITE SOLI!) IlIGlII LANE @100rom WHITE BROxEN I© 100mm YELLOW SOlJD MUST /IURH RIGHT@2-IOOmrn
yaLOW SOLID R3-7R® ISO""" WHITE SOLlD ® 20Dmrn WHITE SOLID © 200mm YELLOW SOLID ® 600mm WHITE SOLID Ql TV " CoR R.P.M. ® WIllTE LEFT TURN AAA()W © WHITE RIGHT TliIlN ARROW & PAVEMENT®
'ONLY' WHITE KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY® 600mm X 1800mm WHITE SOlID 
--------------------PROPOSED R/w 􀁾60' WATER \ PLAN OVERALL LEIIGTH OF BRIDGE = 1600'-0' FFfJII END BEIIT I 650 640 630 620 610 'r-----600 I ..􀁾􀀠Ii: PIER 6 MATCH LIIiE I 650 640 630
620 , I I 610 I .-J 􀁾􀀠'------.600 I I ---, 􀁾􀀭􀀼􀀠-----'-I I , I , 590 590 b.. I.i. 580 !d-ki J. 560 EXISTING GROUIID , ,r -0 I/J DRILLED SHAFT (ITP) ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE . TOWN
OF:ADDISON, TEXAS . 􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀠"... 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀠. 
"",\1 RAILROADRAPID TRANSIT 􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁣􀀠PROPOSED R/w • WATER -IilARAPAHO ROAD-------------PROPOSED R/w PLAN OVERALL BRIOOE LENGTH
= /600'-0' 316'-f!. _3 SPANS Q 105'-6" ; "'--__ _____ _____-;-._________􀁾􀀱􀀷􀀲􀀴􀁟􀂷􀀭􀁑􀁟􀀢____􀀮􀁾____􀁴􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁉􀀰􀀵􀀧􀁾􀀶􀂷􀀠q:: PIER /I 650 q:: PIER 6 MATCH LINE 2 MATCH
LINE I 650 640 640 630 630 61'.0 620 610 610 600 600 • 1 590 590 580 580 ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF:ADDISON, TEXAS' . .. "', 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀠 
HANGER 􀁒􀁏􀁐􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀠/1-6" SIDfWAlX DIAFRAM /'-6" SHLDR. 58'-0" 4 LANES iii II' 􀁾􀀠44'-0" • • }'-6" SHWR. 54" U-BEAM (T'fP) 7'-0" 􀁾􀀠DRILLED SHAFT 1'-6" TfPICAL SECTION ARAPAHO BRIDGE
TOWN OF:ADDISON TEXAS' , ; '" .. 􀁾.• 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀠. 
60" WATER r-PR,OPO.SED R/w -\ -PLAN .O..V_ER.A.. .•L._L .Lf._IIG7J:L.!jF BRIDGE -1600'-0" .. .-.-.----------4 SPANS .. 141'-0" 􀁾􀀠564'-0" FFBW END BENT 1---f2 PIER 5 =:l MATCH LINE
1 . 650 650 640 640 I _ I 630 630 I I I I l I l I TI L I ,I I 1 620 , 620 I I .1 I I , 1 610 􀁾􀁾􀀠6/01 ----' '--,11;-----------600 -------I ' , 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮600 ,1 1 1 590
590 .:.. I I.L ,.;,. L.i.580 580 EXISTING GROUNDJ7,-0 " 1/1 DRILLED SHAF T ITYP) ELEVATION 
DALLAS AREA RIlF'ID TRANSIT PROPOSED R/w PROPOSED R/li\I--' ROAD eTA. JO-KiOJXJ I; )fL --.\) 62 Q. 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁴􀀫􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀭.--------_. ---_.------_..----_.
-----',--• PLAN OVERALL BRIOOE 􀁌􀁅􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁉􀁇􀀢􀀧􀁔􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀧􀁈􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀧􀁉􀀶􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁏􀁟􀂷___________________________ 146'-0" 650 640 [ PIER 5 MATCH UNE I 7'-0" I/) DRILLED
SHAFT (ITP) ------J--􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀧􀁓􀁾􀀠[ PIER 9 MATCH LINE 2. 􀀺􀀺􀁾630 620 630 620 610 600 :j590 580J580 EXISTING GROUNO ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE . TOWN O(ADD/SON, TEXAS'
.. " 􀀭􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀠• 􀁾􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀠 
58' 0'/-I 1'-6" 1'-6" a'-o" rr-6'SHWR. 4 LAIIES f} /I' = 44'-0' 􀁓􀁈􀁗􀁒􀀮􀁾􀀠t-6n SIOEWA/J( • • • • r \ n T"'I 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠h , I I \h ! I I I, I I \ ': L T I ! \; ->. C:>........)'"----r-o·1/!
DRIL--TYPICAL SECTION LED SHAFT IITP) ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF:ADDISON, TEXAS ' '. :," • :.:,:: . 
i TOW N 0 F l\))DISON A PAHO ROAD BRIDGE " PRESENTATION HANDOUT ) .' ) , ) ) ) j 􀀢􀁄􀁾􀀧􀁇􀁎􀀠" 
',' " /-". 􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀠-.-.__. ".·.",.--.,c,..>;c::C,,,· ----,-. ..; 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀺􀀯􀀺􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀠. :'.; 􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀠,.... ,;. -,"
,-.. "'-. '-, . . 􀁾􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠... -.,.. 􀁾􀀬􀁩􀀭􀁽􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀬􀂷􀀺􀀭..c_•• 􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀿􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀭,," 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀬􀂷•... '-":"'-.-" -....:.:-":'. "-.. 􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀭􀀧�
�􀀾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭. 􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀠"._,-.--.-:., 􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀬􀀠.􀀭􀁾􀀭.:-:.... .--',-; -"". 􀀭􀁾􀀠-,.-. 􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀻􀀠.􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁤􀁲􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀮
􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁾􀀠􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠?;-: ">,,-." ;-. -􀁾􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀠..'􀀺􀀧􀀼􀁾􀀧􀁜􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀠􀂷􀁾􀀬􀀧􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀺􀂷􀁾􀀭􀁓􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀭"--. /->,,:<. 􀀭􀀼􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁟
􀀠􀁾􀀠:,,:, 􀀺􀀢􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀾􀀠-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀽􀁽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-•• :: : '> • '.' . -􀀢􀁾􀀠-'􀀭􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀠. -"---􀀮􀁾􀀠: 􀀮􀁾"-,; 􀁾," '. 􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀺􀀺􀀠.-,
'< -,":---...--," 􀀧􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮;. -, "-. 􀁾􀁾􀀭... ". -"'"􀀧􀀬􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁣􀀧􀀠--.::.",'"r:'...􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠""'('" '.. -􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀧􀀬􀂷􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀮􀂷..􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀢􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺..;?i_-.;.
.􀁾􀀮􀁲􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁩􀀮􀂷􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀠...􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠-,..-;, ..-' .... L' ...i....,' •• 􀁴􀀭􀀺􀀩􀁍􀀧􀀮􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀶􀁾􀀼􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁟􀀭􀁾􀀠-.=-:--,. ........ 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀠.....
􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀠'.-." -;-􀁾􀀠 "k . ,,'_., 􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀠:." "-;-._,..... 􀁾􀀠.i.. .:': : .. '''" ..􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀨􀀧􀀠-. -. "􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁊􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁪􀁴􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠'" .. . ,.,.-."., I.
.--..􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠.• __ -. ,. -" ,.... . r,\ .. __ , , I ---,ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF:ADDISON, TEXAS , --'-.:\-􀀬􀁾􀀧􀀠• . 􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀠
) 
-----5TA. 􀁾􀁉􀀫􀀨􀁊􀀨􀁊􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠. ' , ' . -.. " I A, 􀁾􀁩􀀡􀀢􀀢􀁉􀀮􀁕􀁕􀀠\ PROPOSED R/w PLAN OVERALL LENGTH OF BRIDGE = 1600'·0" -. 4 SPANS 41 141'·0' =564'-0' FFBW END BENT 1---􀁾􀀠PIER
5 I MATCH LINE I650 650 640 640 630 I I 630 I .1 I I I I ..1 I I I I , 1 620 6ZO...l I I I , 1 ,610 -􀁾􀁾􀀠610 I .,L1,-_____-------'600 ---,􀁾􀀭􀀱􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭600 1 1 590 1 590 􀁾􀀠II w..
5BO 580 "" EXISTING 􀁇􀁾􀁎􀁄􀁝7'-0" DRILLED SHAFT ITYP) ELEVATION . . 􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀀠,) ,-, , 􀁾􀀠:t"......l'.."'....pI..,ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS .' :, ) • 􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁟I 
􀁾􀀠I 􀁉􀁾􀁌􀁊􀁉􀀠,I" //fl􀁾􀁉1· -, -, /"A" fmAn DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT 01 ,/t', P. , I Ii ,-, , 􀁾􀀠. '" -,5 • 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠J H._""... ".... 􀁾..,-60" WATER 􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁅􀁄􀀠RM
""",, 11I -£"'"􀁾􀀠l.//􀁾􀀺􀀧' ;, 􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀽􀀠, c.._ .._ .. ,_ .._. '-􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀷􀀠----_..f-;I􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭---.-..--. c·..y ; .. cc . ""'. /' I !I /,--:.
/.: , ,," 􀁾􀀭-',' ",' j .... .,.'. '. ../.;. '," ,f-" 􀁾􀀠I 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠nF','; . ",' -, "::. " ......... I 􀁾􀀠"f.I ---a 􀁾i";;-I 􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀠+ • 62 -" 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁲􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁴􀀺... kllh
;,..10\ 5,7 9 I 5I!. -.. -.. -';' n 􀁾􀀭----+-:;;;;1;; ';;' S89"S8'4n: ......... -........: i V , .'!. ... I.. /: .......... -: i c.• 'I 􀁾􀁜􀀠, \ "-..􀁾􀀠/: .' -n I\{ It PWf> " /:s
I A, 􀀧􀁉􀀮􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀱􀁾􀀠I1ft PIFf> <; PROPOSED R/w /STA.. ...., I -I ;1: PIF!'? sr. ." 􀁩􀁾􀀠. i",,',,' .,ii: 􀁾􀀮􀀢r-:-..I ,'. . ' .. i; r 1).. /.:;:j----. /-.. .. , . 0' ,/􀁾􀀬􀀮..
I<f1..."nt< Ir--'----' :0-{ MIDWAY ROAD J (Sr,􀁾􀁓􀁔􀁁􀀮to-KJO.oo I I: " ;\I-:L J .i If>'! "" \ 􀀧􀀮􀁃􀁩􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀻􀀻􀀩􀀼􀀻􀁜􀀯􀁪􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀢􀂷􀁾􀀩􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁻􀀠\';1: 􀀭􀀻􀀧􀁷􀁾􀀧􀀠8" .. ..
􀁾􀁉􀁁􀀮􀀠• ... .. .. • .. , . .. '\i.'PI-;'R 9 :s I A. PLAN OVERALL BRIDGE LENGTH = 1600'-0" 640 145'-0" [ PIER 9 If PIER 5 MATCH LINE 2 MATCH LINE 650 650 640 630 630 620 620 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭610
6/0----....... -------600 600 590 590 580 580 7'-0" I/) DRILLED SHAFT ITYP) ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OFADDISON, TEXAS . .,: 􀁾􀀺􀀠• 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀠 
􀀭􀀮􀁾PLAN OVERALL LENGTH OF BRIDGE = 1600' -0" L ---.3 SPANS fi} 􀀱􀀴􀀶􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁏􀁵􀀠= 􀀴􀁾􀁂􀀡􀀭􀁏􀀢􀀠'!:!.-..-=---------------------i: FFBW END BENT 12 If PIER 9 --1MATCH LINE 2 650
640 I 􀀺􀁾I I I I I I I ..1 I I I I I I I6JO 630I I I, I .i 620 I 620--.r--.-,f--.-----􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭610 I 610I, I􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁊600 600I , I590 Li. 590 580 580
7'-0' IjJ DRILLED SHAFT IITP} ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS t' ;: I.􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀠 
-);... _. 􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁜􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀂭. -􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀭􀀬􀁪􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀭􀂭' ....􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠. :.:.::;:;;;-.:-.;;, 􀁾􀀭􀀭""": 􀀺􀀧􀁟􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁊􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀧􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁦�
�􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀮􀁩􀀻􀀻􀀢􀀺􀀧􀀬􀀩􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀼􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀧􀀧.. . .: 􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠. -;,.. ::; 􀂷􀁟􀁯􀂷􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁟􀁾􀁟􀀮􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮.. '", : -';-..
.... -:--:..--..:......:.-.:..,:::: -,." .-: 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠-;.,-:. ':'-,,: .....--..:"':' =-:--..:.<􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀂷􀀳􀀢􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁩􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀺􀂭.
-'.:=:. -' . , -: 􀁾􀀠:.,' --. -􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁽􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀠.." :--'----"􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀭􀁾...... -:':; .. 􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀺t 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠....... ... 􀀭􀁾􀀠-' -, -::.........--.
. 􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀼􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀠􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀂭 -...:, . 􀁾􀀧􀂭--...:..􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀠--:.:----:. " ...... -. -.' ":' --. ",;-"---. ,<..􀁾􀀢􀀠.;'-".---􀁾􀀭. ,,' ';-0-,-􀁾􀀠-,""'--"" .".
' . 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀧􀁖􀀧􀂭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠.' '-. ARAPAHO BRIDGE '. TOWN OF:ADDISON, TEXAS 􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠.,' 􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀠'. :==--'
􀀢􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀪􀀢􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀽􀀠􀁾􀀠... 􀀬􀀺􀀼􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁵􀁲􀁹􀀮􀁯􀀺􀁊􀀢􀀢􀀻􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀠􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀢􀀢􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀪􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀠􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀠.:" \""' c· ,. 
.-r-60" WATER r-PRO DRPOSE IW 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁦􀁪􀀺􀁐􀁉􀁆􀁾􀀠, 􀁾􀁻􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠..". -= 7 ------'-------1--------,-----"""':111 ROAD , ,,,.', i' . fT. 􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀾􀁊􀀮􀀧􀀠􀀧􀁾􀂥􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁬􀀠c,:
",-, . 􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀼􀀺􀀬􀀼􀀬.,, : ':', . 􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀺􀁩􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀠(;, Il" ,'.,:,/,,,c' r, I t:i:: : "". 􀀬􀁾􀀵􀁾, .' ,., " ':'/'; 1:1 Ib in 1",5;'1!'17 5:' K s;; , , 5f5 11.2-' ":'".-.,,
' , 􀁉􀁾􀀠, /-,--, i9 -'-<i I\; iF!' ."""" .....". j}\>., , '".. , ' "'::."', ' I/' ,! 1/i b--1\ ;; .,. I 􀁾􀀠I", : ( I. ..... k '\ \ --\ \ .. I ! ,,_ ..5'--􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠It 1 I: I. 􀁉􀁾􀀠\
....... ".. ! \i j '--,----t-._-_. r-" -'1 -,._\ 􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠r-1 ' , I \T 􀀬􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀠r;; PIFR I, 141/"..... 1/1 􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀠' , <0 " . 􀀭􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠\ q; PIFR'i 􀁾􀀠, ' I '" O::::.:T • 'il􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁩􀁊􀁦􀁪􀀠
BRIDGE , , STA., , " .......... 􀀧􀁬􀀺􀁉􀀢􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠, [ PI""""IA ' , 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠"1 A. ;:\ PROPOSED n, , " «I \ \ I \ , OF ,r;; PIFR Ii STA. 􀁾􀁏􀁔􀁃􀁦􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀠) PLAN OVERALL I.£NGTH OF
BRIDGE = 5 SPANS ill 105'-6' = 5Zl'-6' FFB/I END BENT 1􀁾􀀠PIER 6 MATCH LINE I650 650 640 640 630 630 620 620 I I 1 610 610 I 􀁾__ -1_-----_.-''------600 --􀁾..... ---􀁾-----;1 ----1
,1 590 I 590 W. l,i. J I .:. 􀁾􀀧􀁯􀀬􀁾􀁟􀁊􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁊􀀭􀀭600 580 580 7, if! H FT-0 .. DRILLED S A IITP) ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF:ADDISON, TEXAS', 􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀠􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀽􀁾..'" 
--:.. \ I -"'-!, rRAILROADDALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT 􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠',,, I PROPOSED R/w I " , " " ',,(':, ","/,;:. "::;',;< ,
' 􀁾􀀠, "',. ""T" . ' , 5,6 l' 􀁾􀀠10 􀁾􀀠-'􀁾􀀠I, I", 􀁾􀀢.."'.. /: I PLAN ____________________ _____,,--'O"'VE""R::,:AL"'L""'B""RIDGE LENGTH 􀁾􀀠1600'-0" -f74'-0" 105!-6" , 3 SPANS
tJ 105'-6" = 316':-::«6_"􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀺I I € PIER /I If. PIER 6 MATCH LINE 2.MATCH LINE I,
650 I 640 630 620 610 -----,I¥;--------,!./.k600 590 580 7'-0" I/J DRILLED SHAFT (TYP) """".--_.=--".... 650 640 630 620 610 600 590 580 ELEVATION ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF'ADDISON, TEXAS
' , • 􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀮􀀠 
• • • • \ ! I(􀁾􀀮􀁜􀀡􀀠1-\ \ ! I --.j---i-------"7nV'7'l'YT'-... -·..1l-----1_.._________􀁲􀀭􀀭􀁩􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1-----7'-0·1/1 ORILLED SHAFT 􀁾􀀠. , j /TYPICAL SECTION HANGER ROPE ___ 58'--0'
t'-6fl ,'-6" SH/JJR.\ 1'-6' 8' O· [ SHLDR. ________ . 􀁜􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀶􀀧4 LANES@II';44'-0' _t_'_ 􀁾􀀴􀀮􀀭􀁲􀀧􀁓􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁗􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁖􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠I " 􀁾54'
U-BEAM IT)'PI 􀁄􀁉􀁁􀁆􀁒􀁁􀁍􀁾􀀠ARAPAHO BRIDGE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS .' ; ::.) .􀁾􀀠• 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁊􀀠 
􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁏􀁾􀁈􀁅􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀬􀀴􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠i 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀭􀁌􀀢􀀺􀀢􀀴􀀠􀁾􀀯􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁴􀀿􀀠􀁾􀁰􀁥􀀬􀁔􀁾􀁉􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀭i 􀁾􀀭􀁴􀂻􀀭􀀧􀁓􀀮􀀧􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁲􀁾􀀠WJ..LK. r ,., ,/􀁾􀁗􀀭􀁍􀀲􀀡􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁬􀁔􀀧􀀬􀀴􀀮􀀱􀀬􀀮􀀮�
�􀀮( 􀀢􀀬􀁮􀀮􀀢􀁥􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁴􀀺􀀿􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠II...,,,," o..w",: 1.Ic<l..,,'...I1" """"''''''/_"'''''--( !\)!N4 􀁾􀁾􀀠!<'(""'w.". 􀀤􀁾􀀠",". 1 􀁬􀁻􀁁􀁐􀁁􀁩􀀲􀁉􀀨􀀯􀁦􀀯􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁛􀁪􀁇􀁩􀀺􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁭􀁾􀁲􀀷􀂷􀀠T
OWN OF ADDISON TEXAS II 􀁾􀀠 I -HC--V-:, _ 
, .... -.'.r' • i I , , . ] t •• ill , ; , " .f • , 1.' '" , . )if .' ", '.... 􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀠t • I ·f • . It U ..:, • t 1: _ '" ..1 .. 􀁾􀀠.. 􀁴􀁾􀀠"'till􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁆􀀠".;... . 
-.. 􀁾􀀠.. ) .-.... -..... ..::. .......' . 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠:: 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠i.. 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭"'...... or.. .-... -:".