,,-: ..' --iii.=:E •Engineenng Progress == !IJB. Slide 5 2114101• 95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT None -Dallas None • 100% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT P04, POl, Pl0, P25, POB, PSO -Dallas None -Richardson POB • Reviews Completed Dallas-PI9 (Mylar). P30(1J'd Final) -TxDOT None • Consolidated Comments -None Engineering Progress 2114101 -Disposition Comments -P11(65%) Complete -P20(100%) Few Things To Work Out -Design Underway -Schematic None -Bridge Design P32 -B5%-None -95% -P11, PI5A -100% -POB, PI2A -100% Re-Design -PI2 -Mylar Production -None -ReceivedlReturned -None 100 """'*Slide 7 Engineering Progress 1fB*Slide 8 Engineering Progress lOD 􀁾􀁾􀀠Sflde9 Engineering Progress 2114/01 ISSqoSlide 10 Right-of-Way Right-of-Way 100 􀁾􀁥􀀠SIid912 I"r.Ul'lirIlIlY PRld.... !!thm Right-of-Way Parcels 2/14101 Appro....d Note: Three Projects (1, 31 & 32) Kavo: No ROW AcquislUort 􀁉􀁓􀁓􀁾􀀠Utility Coordination Slide 13 2/14/01 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies Escrow Progress Escrow Progress -= 􀁾;;;;; Escrow Progress = !Sse Sfide 16 , Action Items Agency • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Duncanville ILA Modifications • Prepare For Combined TxDOT And County Meeting Set 2121101 2114/01 Target Dates ASAP On-going ASAP ASAP Engineering Progress Right-of-Way :ProJ. Right-of-Way lao Right-of-Way Parcels 􀁾􀁟􀁥􀀠Slide 12 512101IJ Complcted oC!lll1pkled Sma:4125AH II.P"lJess @T.nOT 11""""l'iete 􀁉􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀠ApprovedPreliminary 􀁁􀁰􀁰􀁲􀁡􀁩􀁾􀀱􀀠Acquisition PmdoctiDn Utility Coordination 512101 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utilitycompanies Escrow Progress Escrow Progress 512J1)1 Escrow Progress Engineering Progress Engineering Progress 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁃􀀴􀀩􀁉􀁉􀀬􀁴􀀣􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀩􀁮􀀱􀁍􀁏􀁭􀁐􀁬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀠􀁾icOnlltnlt:lICIi compnI; 􀁾􀀠512101 -=-= e==-= ,.., Engineering Progress --ISs. Sffde 5 -95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT None -Dallas None -100% Reviews In Progress -hOOT P04, P05, POB, POB, PIG, PI4B&C, P20, P25, P26, P3G -Dallas None -Reviews Completed -Dallas-P05 (3rd Final) -TxDOT P14A (1st Final) -Consolidated Comments -P14A (Less Dallas Signals) 􀀽􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁢􀀠= ....... Engineering Progress = ISs. Slide 6 -Disposition Comments -None -Design Underway -Schematic None -Bridge Design P32 -65% -None -95% -PII, P15A -100% -PI2A -100% Rs-Design -P12 -Mylar Production -None -Received/Returned -P01 Mylar Title Sheet -Sent To TxDOT -P04 "OFF" Mylar Title Sheet -Sent to TxDOT _P072nd Final -Printing For Review -P11 (95%) -Corrections in Progress 5/2/01 Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 12A C&B Fee Proposal Received -Under Review -Project 12 C&B Amendment # SIn Progress At Dal/as County • Issues -Project 01 Corrections Complete -Signatures Complete, Copy of Plans Will Be Sent To CMAQ Office =-􀀭􀀽􀀧􀁓􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁾!SS. Enoineering Progress b'" Siide4 • Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transp, Group -Grand Prairie Win Fund & Let S5 & C2 May 2001 -Phase C4 To Be FundedTlP4160-TxDOTWiHLetMay2001 -Phase C5 To Be Funded TIP 4160 -TxDOT Win Let July 2001 -CS, & C6 Unfunded -C7 Funded TIP 4161 (Lone Star). GP Let Contract April 2001 65% Reviews In Progress -Dallas· None -TxDOT· None -Richardson None CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE 5/2/01 May2,2001 General Consultants Engineering Progress Right of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items -􀁾􀀠IDO General 􀁾􀁥􀀠Slide 2 5/2/01• Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's • Project OB, Richardson ILA In Progress • Construction • P03/P07/PI3, Dallas County Preparing "Letter ofAuthority" Submittal • Richardson Will Build P08 & PII Action Items Agency • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member • Work Out Office Space • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Develop Office Space Alternatives 512101 Target Dates ASAP 5115101 On-going ASAP 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁏􀁏􀀠CMAQ Project Status YlWlS4Il 611101 2 11 cJ4 • Construction Complete o Construction In Progress o Completed Designs • 100 %Review .95% Review .65% Review • Bridge Review "-:::j: ---HJO Y.IW'IS® I Engineering Progress 611101 In Progress Comments ----100 YJWIB® 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Engineering Progress 611101 Comments -----,100YaM. Engineering Progress 611101 go ,i II! I j "CII ---100YlWlSe I., ::I I .., 11.. Escrow Progress 611101 I I 11 gJI .., ::I .., I .. ., I 􀁾.. ::I .., § c I 􀁾0 a a::I .., .. .. =.5'/' .., !1 !1 =. 11! 11! Comments Escrow Progress 611101 ---100 YlWIS4I) i ]I I= "CI=I "CI"CI I 􀁾􀀠1 V. 'iii= "CI If Q.I I=I"CI 1 I 􀁾􀀠1l. 1l.􀁾􀀠:Ii! :Ii!􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠Comments 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁦􀁏􀁏􀀠Y'I!A.IIB \I) 1:1 1􀁣􀁲􀁬􀁾.I II. Escrow Progress I ::!11:1i 'tila:: II. I "',1:1i 'tila:: II. I ::!11:1I :. Comments Right-of-Way Parcels ----100 YMIIS® 611101 I Incomplete I Completed Since 02/11/00 Din Progess @TxDOT I Completed By 02/11/01 PreliminaryProduclion FinalRcview Approved Contracts Appraisal TxDOTAppraisalRcview Acquisition Proj. # Y&UIB® ner Leftwich ·1!! Right-of-Way in P Final ROW Final ROW Comments In After 2/11101 After 2111101 Dallas Co. 2nd Revised final comments sent to ner5/14f01 611101 estimate ; ---100 Yl!'Ml8® Proj. # 17 18 ner 19 Brown & Root 20 ICF 21 I Mateo 24 Garcia 25 Arendondo 26 27 APM Dikita 29 EarthTech 30 Dal-Tech Wilbur Smith 32 Datum 33 􀁾􀀠! Right-of-Way lit .! i Previously IP rWI'EIViOUSIYln·· ress After 2/11/01 After 2111/01 Comments 11/15/00 To Contribute Funds Sent To TxDOT 11129/00 Revised Final Comments sent to desianer 4/30/0 1 contract 611101 Right-of-Way Status By Intersections ----100 YI!AII8® 100,,------------------------------------------------------------------------, 611101 􀀹􀀰􀁲􀁬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠80 +-1----1 21 70+-1----1 60+-1-40 30 20 10 o ROW Documents Approwd Approwd Contracts letter OfAuthority Receiled Intersections Complete or Canceled DIn Progress II Complete --􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀠.S; 􀁾􀁜􀁴􀀩􀀠Slide 1 􀁥􀁾􀀽􀀠􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀠= 􀁾􀀠CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE June 27, 2001 General Consultants Engineering Progress Right of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items mg.. Slide2 General • Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA In Progress • Construction • P03IP071P13, Dallas County Preparing "Letter ofAuthority" Submittal • POt & P04A To Be Let In August Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 32 Datum Amendment # 21n Progress At County • Issues -Project 14A Soil Nail Wall Comments Received Engineering Progress 6/27/01• Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie "Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Funded & Let S5 February 2001 -Grand Prairie Funded & Let C2 April 2001 -Phase C4 To Be Funded TIP 4160 -June 2001 Bid Too High -Phase C5 To Be Funded TIP 4160-June 2001 Bid Too High -C3, & C6 Unfunded -C7 Funded TIP 4161 (Lone Star), GP Let Contract February 2001 65% Reviews In Progress -Dallas None -TxOOT None -Richardson None ---􀁾􀀠zg = = Engineering Progress == =mil. SlideS -95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT PH, P15A -Dallas Pl1 ,PI5A Richardson Pl1 , P15A -100% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT P05, POll, P08, PIO, PI4B&C, P20, PSO -Dallas None -Reviews Completed -TxDOT -Consolidated Comments P06A, (IS/Final), P07(1" Final), P26 (3'" Final) -P06A 1st Final, P07 1st Final :&:=5_F== Engineering Progress lf1Be Slide 6 -Disposition Comments -None -Design Underway -Schematic None Bridge Design PS2 -65% -None -95%-None -100%-PI2A -100% Re-Deslgn-PI2 -Mylar Pror:Juction -P06A -ReceivedlReturned -P15A Plans Sent For Review -P14A Soil Nail Wall Mark-ups Engineering Progress " Engineering Progress Engineering Progress Right-of-Way . ",,' I CDmmenlS p;; Right-of-Way I!S. Slide 11 !i"'oj., . Right-of-Way Parcels e. Slide 12 Prdiminary Appmved Appraisal Acquisitioo PiOw;tton -= = =ISS. Utility Coordination Slide 13 11/27101 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies • P03 -Coordinating w/County regarding tree cutting North Garland @Walnut Hill (TXU relocation) Escrow Progress Escrow Progress Escrow Progress Action Items Agency • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member • Review Office Space Alternatives • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Get Month To Month Lease 􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁩􀀱􀁒􀁾i).􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁙􀀧􀀠11127/(J1 Target Dates ASAP 6129101 On-going ASAP --;;:=:;, == -= = = == I!!S. Slfde1 CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE July 11, 2001 General Consultants Engineering Progress Right 01 Way Utintiss Escrow Action Items 7111101 􀁾􀀠= 􀁆􀁾􀁾􀀠General Sl/do2 7111101• Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT & Garland In Progress • Construction • POS/POl/PIS, Dallas County Preparing "Letter ofAuthority" Submittal • POI & P04A To Be Let In August --7111/{)1 Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 12A C&B Amendment # 6 Placed On Agenda For 7117101 -Project 32 Datum Amendment # 2 Approved by County 7110101 • Issues -Project 32 Response On Austin Bridge Review In Progress 􀁦􀀵􀀧􀁅􀁡􀁾= == 􀁾􀀢􀀠Engineering Progress $lid/34 7/11101• Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Funded & Let S5 -Construct Start Aug. 2001 -Grand Prairie Funded & Let C2 -Let Bid July or August -Phase C3 To Be Let By City June 2002 Based On Funding -Phase C4 To Be Funded TIP 4160-June 2001 Bid Too High -Phase C5 To Be Funded TIP 4160 -T xDOT Will Let Fall 200 1 -Phase C6 To Be Let By City March 2002 Based On Funding -C7 Funded TIP 4161 (Lone Star). Under Construction 65% Reviews In Progress -Dallas· None -TxDOT • None -Richardson None --􀁉􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀽􀁾􀀠Engineering Progress 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠ISS. Slide 5 -95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT P11, P15A -Dal/as PI5A -Richardson P11, P15A -100% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT. P06, POB, PIO, P148&C, P20, P30 -Dallas None -Reviews Completed -TxDOT P05, (3rd Final), PIO(3rd Final) • Consolidated Comments -P05, (3rd Final), P10(3rd Final) Engineering Progress 7/11/01 -Disposition Comments -None -Design Underway -Schematic None -8ridge Design P32 -65% -None -95% -None -100% -P12A -100% Re-Design -P12 -Mylar Production -P05, paBA, P07, P10, P25, P2B -Received/Returned -None '!eSc Slide 7 Engineering Progress 7111101 Engineering Progress 􀁾􀂭=􀁾􀁾􀂮􀁔􀁔􀁬􀁉􀁬􀁮􀁬􀁧􀀮􀁩􀀮􀁮􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁥􀁟􀁮􀁟􀀮􀁮􀁟􀁧􀁾􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁧􀁬􀁲􀁬􀁥􀁩􀁓􀁉􀁓􀁉􀀡􀀻􀀺􀀽􀀷􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁗􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠 Right-of-Way Proj, Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Parcels 7/11/01 􀁉􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀠BCompletoo II.Progr'" @TxDOT oCompleted Si.ce5123101 IllltOmplete Prelinrinary Fiool 􀁁􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁤􀀠Conlracls Appraisal. Apprnisa1 Acquisition Pro\!oclion Review Review Utility Coordination • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies • POS· Coordinating w/County regarding tree cutting North Garland @Walnut Hill (TXU relocation) • Need to set up meeting w/TXU, TxDOT & County ROW Escrow Progress Proj. Escrow Progress Escrow Progress Action Items . Agency • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member • Review Office Space Alterna tives • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Get Month To Month Lease 7/11/01 Target Dates ASAP 7113101 On-going ASAP CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE July 25, 2001 (Jeneral Consultants Engineering Progress RighI of Way Ullillies Escrow Action /lems General 7125101 • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT & Garland In Progress • Construction • P03lP071P13, Dallas County Preparing "Letter of Authority" Submittal • P01 & P04A To Be Let In August • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's Consultants 712.901 • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 12A C&B Amendment # 6 Approved 7117101 -Project 13 Fee Proposal Received • Issues -Project 07A Request To Modify Plans To Repair Failures & Add Shoulder Work Engineering Progress • Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Funded & Let S5 -ConstfUct Start Aug. 2001 -Grand Prairie Funded & Let C2 -Let Bid Ju/y or August -Phase C3 To Be Let By City June 2002 Based On Funding -Phase C4 To Be Funded TIP 4160-June2001 Bid Too High -Phase C5 To Be Funded TIP 4160-TxDOTWitl Let Fall 2001 -Phase C6 To Be Let By City March 2002 Based Off Funding -C7Funded T/P4161 (LoneS/ar). Un: 214-741-1937 E-mail: cmaqllionramp.nelJanuary 30, 2001 Mr. Jerry Murawski, P.E. City of Farmers Branch 13000 William Dodson Pkwy. FAX Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Deletion Of Two Intersections In Project 12 Deletion Of Right Tum Lane In Project 13 Dear Mr. Murawski: The Town of Addison has provided the attached leiter dated January 24. 2001 that directs the elimination of the construction at the two intersections of Midway Road at Proton Drive and Beltway Drive. It appears that the east leg of Midway Road at Proton Drive and the northbound right turn lane of Midway Road and Beltway Drive is in your city. We request you review their letter and let us know if the City of Farmers Branch is in agreement with the elimination of the improvements at these two intersections. We also need an official letter deleting the eastbound right turn lane from the intersection of Spring Valley Road at Inwood Road in your city. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 214-747-6336 ext. 28 or Kimberly Burks at ext. 29. Sincerely, 􀀯􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀀠ack W. Loggins, P.E.􀁾Program Manager Attachment: Town of Addison letter dated 1/24101 cc: Don L. Cranford, P£., Dallas County, Asst. Dir., Trans. & Plan., w/attachments Moosa Saghlan, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation, w/attaohments 2;..(2/" ( Fraydoon Nalissi, P.E., Texas Department ofTransportation, w/attachments Dave Davis, P.E., City of Farmers Branch, w/attachments ! Mike Murphy, P.E., Town of Addison, w/attaohments 􀁾􀁉f<;f3' .J"1r") -r,A-Lie. e'J) 7'D .T.-t q. Steven Chutohlan, P.E., Town of Addison, w/attachments L (l (ittln Rt::trAfZ. PI Nt; 7J/1.f, Eric Starnater, P.E., C&B, Inc., w/attaohments -n1 C5 .-tt<-'V l.. eTTeR.. If€' f.vtU Fo/ttv/"riZ-i> fV 􀁐􀁦􀁚􀀮􀁥􀀻􀁾􀀠F-1>e....4?,.., "1 E'􀁉􀁖􀁾􀀠77'V1-T A-/C.. e Je €F'C G"I veP 81MM:ff. He 􀀮􀁳􀁔􀁉􀁔􀁾􀀠77'f>A'T /'tPJJIJOt>-(..-1-0/577t:.c.. I€J< "';,1,4.?+"{F" ?/v-£ f't?1C, po,!/, "F 􀁦􀀧􀁾􀁔􀁐􀀧􀁖􀀠f SAte THe G..11//.J} S C.rl-f'1/1/'1. iJ f:Z-T 􀁾􀀠IS" c.o'Vf f-v A-p p/.I 0 M' _ { :r Fa< t#--/'i f!. !):: 􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀻('fY 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀠"V't'1' Itt! :TACK) l3y FAX; PrJg AS. 􀁾􀀴􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀴􀀠u/fCK Se 􀁾dV:ie, R fE"4)v.,!'ff 70 tfd. rc.tJfl. 'JI,:. Sl):j .Over II Century of EngIneering Excellence G:'I304C0RR\G4·10Ul'l'AAMBRANI2OO1'1l55 P12 Celetion ofTwo 􀁉􀁾􀀮􀁤􀁯􀁣􀀠0 l!::'7U _ " 77'l74T C" f AV"ty 􀁾􀁉􀁋􀀮􀀮v-e tv( Vf 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀼􀀠.... " 􀀧􀁴􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀷􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀭􀀴􀀠S-c!A4) Cc:>;2..e€5,P°4?eA-Ce 'Tl' /'j-'PPL>I>JV STII1-Tw f Tl/'4'r /.t.-.e /.hI!!!.e II 'TV te e P CAe e 77fE" PC' c..e '71-0 """"$ 4.11H 􀁃􀀮􀁁􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁨􀁾􀀠1«1. PAl::>&-e ""te."'13 kT􀁁􀀭􀁉􀁫􀀧􀁾􀀠41Ci1'P<>v, Mi'"-..fet Jan 29 01 03:34p Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-741-1937 p. 1 Parsons CMAO Program Office Brinckemolf 1701 N. Mamel Street $uitfJ 410 DIllle5. TX 7521)2 214-747·6338 Fax: 214·741·1937 E-.mail: cmaq@ontamp.netJanuary 30, 2001 Mr. Jerry Murawski, P.E. City of Farmers Branch 13000 William Dodson Pkwy. FAX Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Deletion Of Two Intersections In Project 12 Deletion Of Right Turn Lane In Project 13 Dear Mr. Murawski: The Town of Addison has provided the attached letter dated January 24, 2001 that directs the elimination of the construction at the two intersections of Midway Road at Proton Drive and Beltway Drive. It appears that the east leg of Midway Road at Proton Drive and the northbound right turn lane of Midway Road and Beltway Drive is in your city. We request you review their letter and let us know if the City of Farmers Branch is in agreement with the elimination of the improvements at these two intersections. We also need an official letter deleting the eastbound right tum lane from the intersection of Spring Valley Road at Inwood Road in your city. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 214·747·6336 ext. 28 or Kimberly Burks at ext. 29. Sincerely, 􀁤􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁓􀀬􀀠P.E Program Manager Attachment: Town of Addison letter dated 1/24/01 cc: Don L. Cranford, P.E., Dallas County, Asst. Oi1., Trans. & Plan., w/attachments Moosa Saghian, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation, w/atiachments Fraydoon Nafissi, P.E., Texas Department ofTransportation. w/attachments Dave Davis, P.E., City of Farmers Branch, w/atiachments Mike Murphy, P.E., Town of Addison, w/attachments Steven Chutchlan, P.E., Town of Addison, w/attachments Eric Starnater, P.E., C&B, Inc., w/attachments Over a Centwy 01 Ertgmeerlng Excellence 􀁇􀀺􀁜􀁴􀁬􀁏􀀴􀁃􀁏􀁁􀁒􀁬􀁇􀀴􀀮� �􀀰􀁕􀁬􀁜􀁆􀁁􀁒􀁍􀁂􀁒􀁁􀁲􀀾􀁬􀁉􀀲􀁏􀁏􀀱􀁾􀀠P12 Deletion of Two Inl....Olions .doc p.2 Jan 29 01 03:34p Parsons BrinckerhoFF 214-741-1937 •. 􀁨􀀮􀀥􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀻􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁚􀀧􀁩􀀮􀀡􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀻􀁲􀀢􀁥􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀡􀁩􀁀􀀻􀂣􀀡􀂮􀀠􀁭􀁾􀂩􀁾􀁯􀁷􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠JAN 212001 W By PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 45().2B1l POll Office Box 9010 Addison. TeIal 75001.9010 16801 Wcslgrove Janwuy 24, 2001 Mr. Jack Loggins Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: CMAQ Program, Project !2 Dear Mr. Loggins: The Town ofAddison has perfonned further review ofproposed construction in the CMAQ Program, Project 12. Specifically, our staff evaluated the impact ofcertain intersection improvements on the cxisting landscaping plan. We recognize that this project was established to address air quality issues and enhance traffic flow along Midway Road. However, it was determined that the elimination ofexisting landscaped features in the parkways and medians at two intersections along Midway Road reduces the aesthetic integrity ofthe roadway and our community as a a whole. Consequently, please reduce the scope ofwork within Project 12 ofthe CMAQ Program by eliminating all proposed construction improvements and associated right-of-way acquisition within the intersections ofMidway Road and Proton Drive and Midway Road and Beltway Drive. In addition, we will include provisions in our next fiscal year budget for future streetscape improvements in the medians and parkway areas ofthe Town's three remaining CMAQ, Project 12 intersections. Accordingly. modifications to the current design at each location is requested and should include construction ofsubdrain systems to accommodate the anticipated level ofirrigation and stonn water within the roadway. Your timely assistance in this matter is appreciated. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 972-450-2886. Jan 29 01 03:341' Parsons 􀁂􀁲􀁩􀁮􀁣􀁫􀁥􀁲􀁨􀁯􀁾􀁾􀀠214-741-1937 1'.1 Panolt$ CMAO Program Office Brlnclrerhoft 1101 N. Mark., Street Sutle 410 Dallas, TX 75202 214·141·6336 Fax: 214·741·1937 January 30, 2001 E-mail: cmaq@anramp,nel Mr. Jerry Murawski, P.E. City of Farmers Branch 13000 William Dodson Pkwy. FAX Subjectl Congestion Mitigation Air Quality ICMAQt Program Deletion Of Two Intersections In Project 12 Deletion Of Right Tum Lane In Project 13 Dear Mr. Murawski: The Town of Addison has provided the attached letter dated January 24, 2001 that directs the elimination of the construction at the two intersections of Midway Road at Proton Drive and Beltway Drive. II appears that the east leg of Midway Road at Proton Drive and the northbound right tum lane of Midway Road and Beltway Drive is in your city. We request you review their letter and let us know jf the City of Farmers Branch is in agreement with the elimination of the improvements at these two intersections. We also need an official letter deleting the eastbound right turn lane from the intersection of Spring Valley Road at Inwood Road in your city. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 214·747-6336 ext 28 or Kimberly Burks at ext. 29. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀪􀁾 ack W. Loggins, P.E. Program Manager Attachment: Town of Addison letter dated 1/24101 cc: Don L Cranford, PE, Dallas County, Ass!. Dir" Trans. & Plan., w/attachments Moosa Saghian, P.E, Texas Department of TransPortation, w/attachments Fraydoon Nafissi, P.E" Texas Department of Transportation, w/attachmenls Dave Davis, PE, City of Farmers Branch, w/attachments Mike Murphy, P,E" Town of Addison, w/attachments Steven Chulchlan, P,E., Town of Addison, w/allachmenls Eric Starnater, P.E., C&B, Inc., w/attachments Over 1:1 Gentury of £"glll",1"9 Excellence G:\G04CORRlG4·10UTIFARMBRAM200M55 P12 Delation 01 Two Intersections .doc p.2 Jan 29 01 03:35p Parsons BrinckerhoPP 214-'141-1937 􀁾􀁛􀁅􀂩􀁾􀁜􀁝􀁗􀁛􀁅􀁲􀁭􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠JAN 2$2001 􀁾􀀠Isv (912) 4504871 16801 Wellgrove PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT January 24, 200l Mr. Jack Loggins Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Marli:et Street, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: CMAQ Program, Project 12 Dear Mr. Loggins: The Town ofAddison bas perfunned further review ofproposed construction in the CMAQ Program, Project 12. Specifically, our staff evaluated the impact ofcertain intersection improvements on the existing landscaping plan. We recognize that this project was established to address air quality issues and enhance traffic flow along Midway Road. However, it was determined that the elimination ofexisting landscaped features in the parkways and medians at two intersections along Midway Road reduces the aesthetic integrity ofthe roadway and our community as a whole. Consequently. please reduce the scope ofwork within Project 12 ofthe CMAQ Program by eliminating all proposed construction construction improvements and associated tight-of-way acquisition within the intersections ofMidway Road and Proton Drive and Midway Road and Beltway Drive. In addition, we will include provisions in our next fiscal year budget for future streetscape improvements in the medians and parkway areas ofthe Town's three remaining CMAQ, Project 12 intersections. Accordingly, modifications to the current design at each location is requested and should include construction ofsubdrain systems to accommodate the anticipated level ofirtigation and storm water within the roadway. Your timely assistance in this matter is appreciated. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 972-450-2886. p.3 Jan 29 01 03:36p Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-741-1937 Sincerely. StevenZ. Chutebian, P.E. Assistant City Engineer . Ce: Chris Teny, Assistant City Manager Mike Murphy. Director ofPublie Works Jim Pierce, Assistant Director ofPublic Works !SSe CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE Slide 1 January 24, 2001 General Consultants engineering Progress RighI of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items !SSe General Slide 2 1/241f)1• Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA In Progress • Construction • P03/P07/PI3, TxDOT/Dallas ILA Approved • Richardson Will Build P08 & P 11 • ConsultantslSfle Slide 3 • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Projecll2A C&B New Fee Proposal Expected 113110r -Projecl12 C&B Fee Proposal Expected 1/31/01 -Project 14 HNTB Amendment # 3 In Progress At County Public Wolks • Issues -ProjeCfOI Corrections By TxDOT In Progress 1/24101 -= 􀁾􀀽􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁧=-== 􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀠Engineering Progress SJide4 • Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie· Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Will LeI S5 Early 2001 & Fund & LeI C2 -Phase C4 To Be Funded Using TIP 4160, GP Initialed Letter To COG -C3, C5, & C6Unfunded. 1991 Bond. & CIP2004 To Be Explored -C7 To Be Funded Using TIP 4161 (Lone Star). City WiN Let -C1 CATV Testing Plan To TxDOT -Contractor Revisions Needed • Intersection Improvement Design Status • 65% Reviews In Progress -Dallas -P32 Bridge Design -TxDOT -None -Richardson None 1/24101 --PI! Engineering Progress M1S. SlideS -95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT None -Dallas None • 100% Reviews In Progress -rxDOT P04. P05, P07, P10, P25 • Reviews Completed -Dallas-None -TxDOT None • Consolidated Comments -None 1/2411J1 Engineering Progress fS1S. Slide 6 -Disposition Comments -None ·Design Underway -Schematic None -Bridge Design P32 -65%-None -95% -P15A -100% -P06, P12A -100% Re-Design P12, P08 -Mylar Production P19 • ReceivedlRetumed -P10 (100%) Sent For Review -P14 (100%) Sent For Outside Printing --w== Engineering Progress r§E Slide 7 1124lCl !:?Be Engineering Progress 1124101 Engineering Progress Right-of-Way Pro!.• Slide 11 Right-of-Way CO/l1'l'"ents 100 ....... e Slide 12 Prellmlnnry Right-of-Way Parcels Appro","d Contracts Appnolsa' Appral",,1 Acqulo:ilian Prodtjdlon Rovlo. NOle: Three Projects (1, 31 & 32) Have No ROW Acquisition 􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀽􀁑􀀠r== Utility Coordination !HR. Slide 13 1/24/01 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies Escrow Progress 100-.Slide 15 Escrow Progress Escrow Progress 1124101 Target Dates ASAP On-going ASAP Action Items Agency • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Duncanville ILA Modifications Action Items • City ofRichardson • Engineering Escrow Overdue CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE 1117101 January 17, 2001 Gene"" Consultants Engineering Progress Righi of Way Ulifflies Escrow Ac1ion Ilems Res == Gen era 1 == lSI. Slide 2 • Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA In Progress • Construction • P03lP071P13, TxDOTIDai/as lLA Approved • Richardson Will Build P08 & P 11 Consultants 1/17/1)1 • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 12A C&B New Fee Proposal Expected 1131101 -Project 12 C&B Fee Proposal Expected 1131101 -Project 14 HNTB Amendment #.3 Signature Expected 1117101 • Issues -ProjeclOI Corrections By TxDOT In Progress IHS. Engineering Progress Slide 4 • Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie· Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Will Lei S5 Early 2001 & Fund & Lei C2 -Phase C4 To Be Funded Using TIP 4160, GP Initialed Letter To COG -C.3. C5, & C6 Unfunded, 1991 Bonds & CIP 2004 To Be Explored -C7To Be Funded Using TIP 4161 (Lone Slar). City Will Let -Cl CATV Testing Plan To TxDOT -Contractor Revisions Needed • Intersection Improvement Design Status • 65% Reviews In Progress -Dallas None -TxDOT None -Richardson None ........ 􀁾􀁅􀀽􀀠. 􀁾􀀠= Engzneering Progress EiiiE ISS. SlideS -95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT None -Dallas None o 100% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT P04. P05, P07, P25 -Reviews Completed -Dallas· None -TxDOT None -Richardson P11 (65%) o Consolidated Comments -P11 (65) in Progress L_____----' 􀁾􀁾􀀠= 1i!!i:9.1!!!!!!?r'==-Engineering Progress fIlS. Slide 6 1/17101 -Disposition Comments -None -Design Underway -Schematic None -Bridge Design P32 -65% -None -95% -PI5A -100% -P06, PI2A, P14 -100% Re-Design -P10, P12, POS -Mylar Production -P19 oReceivediReturned -None tBH. Slide 7 Engineering Progress 1/17101 mBe Engineering Progress Slide8 Engineering Progress 1/17/01 Right-of-Way PIa) • • Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Parcels Nate: Three Projcti$ (1,:U &. 32) Have No ROW Acqulsitkm Utility Coordination 1/17/01 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies • Monthly Utility Meeting held this moming No major Issues • DWU asked about County projects that may conflict wlCMAQ projects (ex. Alpha Road) Escrow Progress 1/17/01 r Escrow Progress 1SlB. Slide 15 Escrow Progress Action Items 1/'7101 Agency Target Dates • County • Hire CMAQ Staff Member ASAP • TxDOT • Reviews Due On-going • PM/E • Duncanville ILA Modifications ASAP 100 Action Items Slide 18 􀁾􀀮􀀠1/17/01 • City of Richardson • Engineering Escrow Overdue ---M.'. • A.O••• , I I, 30d?1 I ,I '5.>55 I ...... r . un >'\,l1Q I2,8,.r l· t,e. ; .. 􀁾􀀠􀀱􀁾􀀠I t 'j'l5% t .. : 'v_s l [lOS_ 􀁾􀀠􀂣􀁬􀁏􀀤􀁔􀁾􀀠t £QSTHG • PROPOS£!)RAW'.. I '1> 1\.0.... 11.0.".I-'5.255 'lJii -• '.m I 1 41 " '3.3 3.3 U 1.69 HEICRT, ... ,It=,',o" 0 VAlUEsrc»,..(.i)I ... _ _ O..625'-1.44! '0: TYPICAL SECTIONS SPRING VALLEY ROADSl'RflG YAllEY ROAD WESTBOUND AT IiIDlIAt t Mo'. . • 34.]07 M.W• . ' T 􀁉􀁴􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀠'Hi o 2..... 0 ...... I0 ,.... I v..... • I • I •o I , i... · I t I t I t 0.. I..! I 0 0 I II' Iy-I i I 􀁟􀁔􀀢􀁾􀀠PAOPOS£O £XlStNG t EXl$tlNG PROPoSED"'0.".' ......... J 11.0.... 11.0.". "0.19& •. ----------.. 17M' 21.991 􀁾􀀠I '_4 W)Q< 􀁉􀁲􀀮􀁾􀁯􀁡􀀠$00 􀀧􀀻􀁡􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀠I 􀁬􀀺􀁾􀁟j:>\!.,-.. _SOl MIDWAY ROAD SOUTIIBOUND . :" • • t EXISTIIIC • • EXISTING A.O.". I A.O.....I' 30,840 II 1 • t , • Il.'" I II, 1&.484 • ' I 24.79& I : : 13.095 f 􀁮􀁾􀀧􀁦􀁏􀁉􀀠: VAIIJES !.. .. 􀁉􀀢􀁾􀀠tit .... I VA.!ll£S I I i I EXIST..C t PROPOsalI A.o.,.. PROPOSED EXISTING ExrsllHG : R.n.". A.o.W. I A.O.". I I 35.700 ' • 13.996 16..484 IS.8oo I 15.000 2.' 3.3' 3.3.1. 3.3 • JoiC. 3.3 .1.5 .•.1.8 _. 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 J. t •• ! .. tt _ _ 􀁾􀀠II' 0., 􀁾􀀠0,' :1: I· t BLOCIt SOdBL.OCK SOO-' VAlIJE' WESTBOUND MIDWAY ROAD '" 􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀠!EXISTWG ' ElO$TWG M.W. • , , 11.0••• , 􀁾􀀺􀀠. ,: !In .".. ' :1 . L r,.sl ,1m :;:" l"'I'i '668' YAl!!!il " , I I rn'.::::lc..r:s .\i. . SUTE,. .PF Ti!:KA$;' , . HOTe'l>EPART;fEl'IT'OF TRANSpORTATION 􀀽􀂣􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀬􀁣􀀺􀀢􀀠iO, '.! 􀁭􀀺􀁾􀀠lAm liICl 1IIln;Q 4$ 􀁮􀀺􀁣􀀮􀁾􀀰􀁬􀁴􀀬􀀤􀀠l!(;il", 􀁾Q'O :J."•• .-.... ; ''',: 'N!t 􀀯􀀾􀁉􀁉􀀺􀁑􀀬􀀬􀀼􀁴􀁃􀁉􀀧􀀮 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾f.\Wl..o.u..' tmtJu.!..J.(I 􀁌􀀧􀁑􀁉􀁓􀁾􀀠taIft1UI:J$ "'t'RI-FiM_lV3. PLANS OF PROPOSE!}' " 􀁬􀁊􀀧􀁦􀀺􀁉􀀺􀁍􀁾􀀮􀀱􀁋􀁉􀀻􀀩􀀠'." , . ,", ,';",8TATE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾� �􀀠',C.,;'::' ..􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠, ".:*' 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀠--... t-O m t-C\I tC1. en w 􀁾􀀠.... 􀁾􀀠..J 0: 􀁾􀀠U w !l. en w oJ 􀁾􀀠0: ::0 '" Cl E !l. Q) C N-IJ) o o C\J -N +l 􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀁂􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁃􀁁� �􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾'.» 􀁏􀁉􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁧􀀠p·ne 􀁾. 111t (Qm.ocl'Oflf S'kllJ.: 􀁾?J$" ... 􀁾􀁾􀁭􀁎.un 􀁾􀀬t'tIR,JUIl. OW>'I:f>r I'QNJ, MCI ntAltlAGl 􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀠. ., ",:., ". .<. .. 􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀠..__.._ _.. 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀢􀀠,./,:.;:;,:., 􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀮.. 􀁾"OOD.W' 􀀺􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀠flALtAs COUNTY . • C$.J 􀁏􀁳􀁲􀁳􀁾􀁩􀁔􀀬􀀧􀀴􀀢􀀠. .: NET LE!'ICTIf -.2I'Jtft&t40 ,. 􀀲􀀮􀀺􀁬􀁾􀁫􀁩􀁉􀀠'.. IHlU$(\;'roH . HEI lE.N . . . .' ". 1/8 '.', : " '.,'" .. -, . " . ,; ; ., .. ," /' " !l . '. ,". l .. . Ii! If " t. u .. ':;!:. , . .• ',a 2--.' .'" r G􀁾􀀠'" 􀁾􀀮􀀠' . '/􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀠. ( 􀀢􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀢􀀠.: .. c.z..··.··· . . ,'.' , . ,-' . '. ',.',._ ". : < .. ',. , .'.,.:' ," 'J' - CMAQ Intersection hnprovement Program, Project 12 • In November, 1991, Dallas County voters approved the 1991 Transportation Bond Program, which iocluded funding fur certain transportation improvements. • In October, 1994, the County and the Texas Department ofTransportation (TxDot) entered into a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) improvement agreement to implement transportation projects. These improvements were approved fur CMAQ funding by the North Texas Council of Government (NCTCOG). The agreement provided Program management & engineering services. • In September, 1995, the County entered into an Interlocal Agreement with the Town ofAddison, in accordance with Proposition I ofthe 1991 Dallas County Bond Program, to perform the proposed CMAQ intersection improvements. • In this interlocal agreement with the Town, the County agreed to perfurm the following: a Provide the Town's share ofcosts for the CMAQ project. b. Act as the single point ofcontact with TxDot fur executing all agreements. c. Perform acquisition ofnecessary rights-of-way fur the CMAQ project, and transfer the rights-of-way to the Town. d. Submit prelimioary and final engineering plans to the Town for review prior to submittal to TxDot fur advertising and construction. • Accordingly, the Town ofAddison agreed to fund the cost ofany optional improvements, such as supplementary landscape, streetscape and sidewalk construction. In addition the Town agreed to accept all terms, requirements, and conditions ofthe CMAQ Agreement between the County and TxDot. • The funding for engineering, construction, right-of-way, and construction management is borne by Dallas County and TxDot. The municipalities involved in CMAQ, Project 12, consisting ofAddison, Carrollton, and Farmers Branch, do not have an established funding responsibility. Dallas County and TxDot will proportionately fund any necessary adjustments to engineering and construction costs. • The specific long-term purpose ofthis CMAQ Intersection Improvement project is the reduction in traffic congestion at each intersection, and the resulting improvement ofair quality in our community. • Vehicular movement through each intersection will be affected by the proposed improvements as follows: Keller Springs Road The level ofservice will decline in the westbound and southbound directions and remain the same in the northbound and eastbound directions. The anticipated delay in the intersection will iocrease by 10.5 seconds/vehicle during the A.M. Peak period and decrease by 3.5 seconds/vehicle during the P.M. Peak period. Lindberg Drive The level ofservice will improve in each direction, with the typical delay decreasing by 5.7 seconds/vehicle during the AM. Peak period and 34.7 seconds/vehicle during the P.M. Peak period. Spring Valley Road The level of service will improve in each direction, with the typical delay decreasing by 21.4 secOnds/vehicle during the A.M. Peak period and 54.1 seconds/vehicle during the P.M. Peak period. Beltway Road The level ofservice will remain the same in each direction, with the typical delay decreasing by only 1.5 seconds/vehicle during the AM. Peak period. The expected delay during the P.M. Peak period will remain the same. Proton Drive The level ofservice will remain the same in each direction, with the typical delay decreasing by 2.5 seconds/vehicle during the Peak AM. period and by 2.0 seconds/vehicle during the P.M. Peak period. • The severity ofthe impact ofthese improvements on the existing streetscape features varies at each intersection. The removal oftrees, bushes, and ground cover cover is most prevalent at the intersections ofMidway Road and Proton Drive and Midway Road and Beltway Road, respectively. Existing streetscape conditions are impacted to a much lesser degree at the other three intersections. • At fuur intersection locations, the existing medians will be narrowed to address an additional left turn lane. The new 3 ft. wide medians will only be able to accommodate certain varieties oflandscaping. Initial Findings and Analysis of the Midway Road CMAQ Projects December 16.1996 SUMMARY OF fNl11AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MmWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECI'S TRINITY MILLS ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection with Trinity Mills Road shows operations at level of service (LOS) "F" for both the AM and PM peak hours. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The eastbound and northbound approaches also have an exclusive right turn lane. At this location, Trinity Mills Road has three full lanes leading up to each approach with a lane drop at the intersection for a five-lane section cross section east and west of the intersection. For the eastbound approach, the outside through lane currently becomes a right tum only lane at the intersection, although the lane does carry through to the east side for a mandatory right tum at the first shopping center access driveway. At the westbound approach, the inside through lane becomes a left turn only lane at the intersection. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Rgure 1. Proposed CMAO Improvements The proposed improvements are dual left turns at all four approaches and exclusive right tum lanes for the two approaches which do not currently have them: westbound and southbound. The southbound approach would be widened to 2 left tum lanes, 3 through lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. For the northbound approach, the schematic of the recommended CMAO improvements show one of the existing through lanes being made into a forced left tum to accomplish the dual left tum through restriping only. However, the northbound through traffic volumes suggest that this is more likely an error in the schematic. The highest traffic volume in the PM peak hour is the northbound through movement at 1,764 vehicles per hour, according to existing traffic counts (October, 1996), shown in Rgure 1. Therefore, the recommended geometries for this approach would be widening to a total of 2 left tum lanes, 3 through lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The resultant geometries for the eastbound and westbound approaches would be 2 left tum lanes, 2 through lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The analysis of these improvements show LOS "D" operations for the AM and PM peak hours, with room for a very limited amount of traffic growth. Additional Findings Some additional storage length is recommended for most of the tum bay pockets, as shown in Table 1. IN1"fF1l{A WPD C&BJQb#9S.21tI-ClIO SUMMARY OF lNI11AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROIlD OWAQ PROJECTS r-r-r'"􀁾􀀠r-<0 _ ---'" '" '" co .... '" co--N '" • 37/257 --646/1,505, , -295/205Trinity Mills ---, Road i. 162/331 !I '1 ,370 /1,227 • 445 /139 " f Figure 1 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX -AM peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Trinity M ills Road lNftFIND.WPlJ 2 SUMMARY OF INlTTAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Table 1 Midway Road CMAQ Intersections Geometries and Storage Lengths Inter-Approach Move-section ment Left Easttlound TIlrouoh Rio!rt Left Westbound TIll'OUQh Trinity Rioh, Mills Road Left Nor1hbound TIl"""'h Rloh, Left Sou1hbound TIlrouoh Riohl Left Eas1bound TIl"'''''" Rioht 􀁌􀁥􀁾􀀠Westbound TIl",uah Spring Riohl Valley Road Left i Northbound TIl"'uoh "in'" Lell Sou1hbound TIl"""'h Rinht Left Eas1bound Throuoh 􀁗􀁥􀁳􀁴􀁢􀁯􀁵􀁮􀁤􀁾􀀠Keller Rioh! Springs LeftRoad Northbound Throuoh Rioht Left Southbound TIlrouah Rloh. Existing Proposed CMAQ #01 􀁾􀁅􀁲􀁦􀀠􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠#01 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀁾Lanes Lanes (Feeii 1 350 107 2 250 76 2 3 1 200 61 1 225 69 1 NlA NlA 2 250 76 1.5 2 0,5 NIA NIA 1 Aon 122 1 100 30 2 300 91 3 3 1 80 2A 1 150 46 1 125 38 2 200 61 2.5 3 05 Nil Nil 1 ?il!l 61 1 200 61 2 150 46 2,5 3 0,5 MIA NlA 1 . ?OO 61 1 115 35 2 200 61 2,5 3 0.5 NIA Nil 1 200 61 1 160 49 2 200 61 3 3 1 110 ,. 1 ,nn ., 1 200 61 2 200 61 3 3 1 N14 NI. 1 N14 NIA 1 150 46 2 150 46 1 2 1 NIA NlA 1 300 91 1 50 15 1 50 15 0,5 0,5 0,5 NIA Nil 05 Nil NIA 1 210 54 2 200 61 3 3 1 50 15 1 200 61 I 150 46 2 200 61 3 3 1 5J 15 1 700 61 Final Recommended I #01 􀁾􀁾􀀠Sf01llgll Lanes LenglhfFeeii i 2 150 46 1 2 100 􀁾􀁮􀀠i 1 100 30 I0,5 0.5 MIA MIA 2 200 61 3 1 2M AI 2 150 46 3 1 ,"" 76 IN]TFlND,WPD 3 SUMMARY OF iNmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALl'SlS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECIS Intersection Beltway Road Approach Movement left Eastbound Throooh Riaht WestboUnd Th",uoh Riahl Left Northbound Th"""'" Rloht Left Soulll!louna Thmooh Eastbound Westbound Riaht Left Thmuoh IliJht Left #01 Lanes 1 0.5 0.5 1 3 1 1 3 1 0.5 0.5 1 Undberg Rioltt o.s 0.5 1 1 2.5 0.5 Road left Northbound Thmuoh Roht left Southbound Thllluoh R. Proposed CMAQ Improvements #01 Lanes 1 0.5 M 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 . 2.5 O.S 1 2.5 n< 0.5 1.5 1 1 1.5 n. Storage Length (Feel! 150 150 150 NIA 150 150 100 1M NlA NlA 125 125 160 NlA 200 100 NfA 100 200 Stonage Length (Meters) 46 46 46 NIA 46 46 30 NlA NfA 38 38 49 NIA 61 NIA 30 NlA 30 M'. 61 Final Final Recommended Improvements #of Lanes 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2.5 n. 2 2.5 n< Storage Stornge Length Length􀀨􀁆􀁾􀁩􀀧􀀠􀀨􀁍􀁥􀀡􀁾􀀩􀀠NlA "',. NlA 300 200 200 NJA NIA 01 61 "'A 61 NlA E 1 125 36 1 Northbound 􀀭􀀡􀁟􀁾􀀡􀁊􀁬􀀮􀀵􀂷􀁓􀀧􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀮􀁊􀁎􀀺􀁩􀁬􀁦􀀡􀀮􀁦􀁁􀀭􀀫􀁟􀁊􀀺􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁦􀁎􀁁􀀡􀀭 􀀫􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀺􀁗􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀮􀀡􀀡􀁎􀁴􀁥􀀮􀁉􀁁􀁾􀁉􀀭􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀡􀁎􀁬􀁲􀁡􀁁􀁟􀁉􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀡􀁌􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀡__--I 100 30 100 30 􀀶􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁓􀁯􀀽􀁾􀀽􀁢􀁯􀁕􀀽􀀽􀁮􀁤􀁤􀁾􀀽􀁢􀀽􀁾􀁯􀁬􀀵􀀵􀁢􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁎􀁾� �􀀽􀁾􀁮􀀲􀀮􀀵􀀵􀁢􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁾􀀽􀁫􀀽􀁾􀁎􀀢􀀽􀁫􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀪􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀠1NF1F1ND.WPD 4 SUMMARY OF 1N1T1AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECT1i Existing Proposed CMAQ Final Recommended Improvements ImprovementsInter-Approach MOVE!section men! #01 Storage Storage #01 Storage Storage #01 Storage Storage Lares Length Lenglll Lenes Largth Length Lenes 􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁩􀁲􀀠Length IFeetl IMelers) (Feet) (Meters! Feet (MeIers) lefi 0.5 NlA NIA 0.5 NIA NlA 0.5 NIA NtA Easttlound ThrouGh 0.5 0.5 0.5 Riohl 1 80 24 2 100 30 1 􀀱􀁾􀁲􀀠􀁾􀁯􀀠left 0.5 NIA NtA I NlA NlA 0.5 NIA NlA Wes(bound Throuoh 1 0.5 0.5 Proton Riohl 0.5 NlA NIl>. 0.5 NIA NIA 1 .". .". Dnve Left 1 8S 26 1 150 46 1 175 53 Northbound ThroUGh 2.5 2.5 2.5 Riohl 0.5 NIA NIA 0.5 NIA NIl>. 0.5 ""A N/A Left 1 100 30 1 200 61 1 250 76 Sou1llbound Throuqh 25 2.5 2.5 Rinht 05 NI. NI' n, NIA NJA OS M" "'" left 1 NlA NlA 1 NIA NlA 1 150 46 Eastbound Throuoh 0.5 1 1.5 Riqhl 0.5 NIA NlA 1 100 30 0.5 NIA .". Left 1 NlA NIA 1 NlA NlA 1 250 76 Westbound Thrnooh 0.5 1 1.5 Belmeade/Riohl 0.5 NIA Nil>. 1 100 :m 0.5 "'. "'. Sojourn left 1 100 3!l 1 100 30 1 150 46 Northbound Thrt>uoh 25 3 3 Riqh! 0.5 NIA NIA 1 100 30 1 "'l 69 left 1 100 3!l 1 100 3!l 1 300 91 Sou1Ilbound Throuoh 2.5 2.5 2.5 R"ht 05 NIA NIA OS NIA N'A OS M" "". Left 0.25 NlA NIA M NlA NlA Eastbound Thrnooh 0.5 0.5 Riqhl 0.25 NIA NlA 1 200 61 left 0.25 NlA NlA 1 100 3!l WestboUnd Th"""'h 0.5 0.5 Boyington! RIoh! 0.25 NIA NIA 0.5 NIA NIA Dooley Left 1 100 3!l 1 150 46 NoMbound Th",uo, 2.5 2.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NlA NIA O.S NIA NlA left 1 100 3!l 1 100 30 Sou1llbound Thrnuoh 2.5 2.5 Riah! n. NIA NIA 0.5 NIA NI' 5 SUMMARY OF iNmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MiDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJEClS SPRING VALLEY ROAD Existing Condjtions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection with Spring Valley Road shows operations at LOS "E" for the AM peak and LOS "F" for the PM peak hour. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches also have an exclusive right tum lane. Both roadways have six-lane cross sections. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 2. Proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements would result in all four approaches having dual left tum lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The analysis of these improvements show LOS "0" operations for the AM and PM peak hours, with room for some growth in traffic. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. Figure 2 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX -AM peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Spring Valley Road INTlTlND.WPD 6 C&:8lobil9S-2%ll-oIO SUMMARY OF [NmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS KELLER SPRINGS ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection with Keller Springs Road shows operations at LOS "E" for the AM peak and LOS "D" for the PM peak hour. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The eastbound approach has an exclusive right tum lane and the northbound and southbound approaches also have short right tum separations. Keller Springs Road is a two-lane roadway on the east side and a four-lane roadway on the west side. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 3. Proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements include widening the northbound, eastbound and southbound approaches to include dual left tum lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The eastbound approach would also be widened to include two through lanes, which would narrow quickly to one lane on the east side. These improvements showed intersection operations would be at a LOS of "F" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. Although the physical capacity increases with the proposed geometric improvements, the worsening of intersection operations in the AM peak is due to the change in signal phasing as a result of the dual left turns and the heavy eastbound right tum movement. The dual left tum lanes prohibit the use of permissive left turns on the green phase for the through and right turning traffic. Therefore, due to the fact that the 840 right-turning vehicles requires a significant portion of the green time, the left-turning traffic actually has less opportunity per cycle, even though there would now be two lanes to move and store the traffic in. Additional Improvements The existing eastbound through volume (less than 1 00 vehicles during the peak hours) does not currently warrant two lanes. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing lane balance be maintained by carrying only one eastbound eastbound through lane across the intersection. It is also recommended that a dual right tum be installed for the eastbound approach. This would still result in recommending the widening of the eastbound approach to five lanes but with the following geometries: a dual left tum, one through lane and a dual right tum. These changes to the recommended improvements would result in operations of LOS "D" in the AM peak and LOS "C" in the PM peak. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. Once the portion of Keller Springs under Addison Airport is opened, are-evaluation of the lane assignments will be necessary. INtmND.WPD 7 C&BJob 􀁾􀀹􀁓􀀭􀀲􀀲􀀱􀀱􀀭􀁏􀁉􀁏􀀠 SUMMARY OF INmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECIS ,., "'''' .,,0.-<>::'" '" ::!. 1 ! 162/331, i , • 6/66 Y 6/50Keller 􀁓􀁾􀁮􀁮· "'95'--__________-,-Y________... -Road • 347/419 ' _!55144 • \ I .. 840/228 I I I Figure 3 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic 􀁾-AM peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Keller Springs Road INI7'17ND, WPD 8 ---SUMMARY OF INl17AL TJlAFPIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS BELTWAY ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway Road and Beltway Road shows operations at LOS "0" for the AM peak and LOS "Cft for the PM peak hour. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left tum lane. The eastbound, northbound and southbound approaches each have an exclusive right tum lane. Beltway Road is a twolane roadway. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 4. Proposed CMAO Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements include lengthening the storage lengths for the northbound and westbound tum lanes. The proposed restriping/marking for the eastbound approach is currently in place. These improvements would result in maintaining the intersection operations at the same LOS, but with slightly less average delay per vehicle in the AM peak. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. 􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁩􀀣􀁾.. ,!: I '-14'44 -711145 Beltway,-____􀁴􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁩􀁾􀁟􀀳􀀳􀀰􀁟􀁉􀁟􀀧􀀳􀀵___ Road 129168 .1_ I '"" 'I ,11111138 'I 316/164 I I. I cr.;:! ... !<::!!<: go;:;COI -3Figure 4 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic )QQ!.. AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Beltway Road lNITFfND,WPD 9 C&B lob. 9S-2Z:11.Ql 0 SUMMARY OF iNmAL TilA.FFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS LINDBERG DRIVE Existing Condjtions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway Road and Lindberg Drive shows operations at LOS "0" for the AM peak and LOS "F" for the PM peak hour. The northbound and southbound approaches currently have an exclusive left tum lane. The eastbound and westbound approaches each have an exclusive right tum lane. Lindberg Drive is a two-lane roadway, east of the intersection and a three-lane roadway west of the intersection. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 5. Proposed CMAO Improvements The proposed CMAO improvements are to widen the westbound approach to include an exclusive left tum lane and to increase the right tuming radius for the northbound approach. The eastbound approach is shown in the schematic as currently having an exclusive left tum lane and a through right lane. However, a field survey showed the existing Signing and markings for a through-left lane and an exclusive right tum lane. With the addition of an exclusive left tum lane on the westbound approach, it would be advantageous to complement the left tum movement with an exclusive left tum lane on the eastbound approach. The proposed CMAQ improvements, in combination with restriping the eastbound approach for an exclusive left tum lane and a through-right lane, would result in a LOS of "C' for the AM peak and LOS "0" for the PM peak. Additional Improvements There is capacity available for some traffic growth with the proposed CMAQ improvements, but the eastbound and westbound approaches would still be operating at LOS UF" and "E", respectively, in the PM peak. Altematives were evlauated with the goal of providing a more balanced LOS for each of the approaches as well as an acceptable LOS for the intersection itself. The first altemative consisted of adding a dual left tum at the southbound approach along with the proposed CMAQ improvements and increasing the storage lengths for many of the tum bays. This resulted in approximately the same average delay for the overall intersection, but the LOS for each of the separate approaches was more balanced, with the northbound, eastbound and westbound approaches at LOS "0" and the southbound approach at LOS "C· in the PM peak. The second altemative also added a dual left tum to the southbound approach and increased some of the storage lengths. However, these improvements were added only to the existing conditions. The resultant evaluation showed the same overall intersection LOS of "CO in the AM and "D" in the PM, but the eastbound and westbound approaches would be at LOS "E" and "0", respectively, in the PM peak. This represents a better result than the proposed CMAQ improvements appear to promote, but not quite as good as the first altemative. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. 10 CABJob '9S-ll11-o10 SUMMARY OF iNJ11AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS ,.. "'"0 3: '" "00 .-£t:::;;. -i •, i ; .! I Figure 5 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX • AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Lindberg Drive lNlTFIND. WPD 11 c&tSJob ,,950·2.211.010 SUMMARY OF iNmAL TRAFFIC FiNDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJErn Me EWEN ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway Road and McEwen Road shows operations at LOS "D" for the AM and PM peak hours. All four approaches currently have an exclusive left tum lane. McEwen Road is a four-lane roadway, with access driveways within 1 00' of either side of the intersection. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 6. Proposed CMAQ Improyements The eastbound and westbound approaches are currently signed and marked for an exclusive left tum lane and a through-right lane. The proposed CMAQ improvements are to widen the eastbound and westbound approaches. The eastbound approach would be widened with an exclusive right tum lane. the through-right lane would become a through lane and the left tum lane would be restriped for a through-left lane. The westbound approach would be widened to include an exclusive left tum lane. a through lane and a through-right lane. The proposed CMAQ improvements would result in a LOS of "C" for the AM peak and LOS "D" for the PM peak. Additional Improvements Using the same amount of widening proposed for the CMAQ improvements. but striping the westbound approach to match the eastbound approach would allow the left turns to have a separate phase. This alternative was analyzed to operate at LOS "C· for both the AM and PM peak hours. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. l '-13/93 --951126 0"-30/184McEwenRoad "--------:-.􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭62/179 l 135173 -I ! -501241 \ I I ; , Figure 6 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @lQ(X. AM peak Hour Traffic XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic McEwen Road lNlTFlND.r¥PD 12 C&8 Job;; 95->2211- 15 left 1 100 30 Delay: 3,7 Boyinglon and Dooley Boyington! WestbounQ ThtOugh 0.5 --FIF mlnlveh, ThtOugh 0.5 CIC -. approaches.Dooley RJgl1t 0.25 NIA NlA 4 20 vIc> 1 0 Right 0.5 NlA NJA vlc=O.ls left 1 100 30 132 63 left 1 150 46 Northbound Through 2.5 949 2,626 FIF EM 􀁅􀁬􀀺􀁩􀀡􀁾􀀠Through 2.5 PJB 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁡􀁴􀀠Right 0.5 NlA NlA 35 7 LOSF. RJgl1t 0.5 NlA NlA LOSe. lon 1 100 30 5 7 Delay> 15 left 1 100 30 Delay:::; 11,6 Southbound ThtOugh 2.5 3,042 1.278 FIF m_. Through 2.5 PJB sec/veh. Rlght 0.5 NIA N/A 39 10 vic> 1.0 Right 0.5 NIA NlA vic: 0.69 GE'OMTRIc.xLS Paga5 12117196 Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects ImDrovements In Addition to Proposed CMAQ Other Improvements Geometries Storage Storage Approach Geomelrfes Storage Storage Approach #ot Lenglll length lOS Intersection #01 length length lOS Intersection Intersection Approach MOVfimant Lanes (Feet) (Meters) (AM/PM) LOS Movement Lanes (Feet) (Meters) (AM/PM) LOS Comments Left 1 NlA NlA Left 0.5 N/A N/A Exlstlng eastfwest phase has all movements Eastbound Through 1 CID 􀀶􀁍􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁢􀀠Through 0.5 CIC liM 􀁅􀀺􀁾􀁡􀁨􀀠fUnning concurrently. Phasing changes RIght 1 100 30 lOSC, Right 1 100 30 lOSC, were assumed for aU alternatives. The left 0,$ NlA NlA Delay:;, 18.4 left 0,5 NIA NIA Delay::::: 1a.2 Olher Improvements shO'NS the resulls of Proton Weslbound Through 0.5 CIE seclveh. Tl1mugh 0,$ CIC seC'lveh, maintaining Ihe existing numDer 01 lanes Drive RIght 1 NlA NlA v/c;;O.65 Right 1 NIA NIA vic =0.75 with restliplng of the westbound approach, left 1 1511 46 left 1 175 53 increasing lhe storage lengths, and slgnal Northbound Through 2.5 CID EMEi:u Through 2.5 CIC E:M.fl!i!I! liming and phasing changes, Right 0.5 NlA NlA lOSO. RIght 0.5 NlA NlA lOSC, left 1 2110 61 Delay .. ,32.8 left 1 250 76 Delay =22.3 Southbound Through 2.5 C/D _n. Through 2.5 CIC .-. Right 0.5 NlA NlA vlc =0,94 Right 0,5 NlA NIA vic =t175 left 1 150 46 left Eastbound Through 1.5 DID 􀁁􀁍􀁾􀁴􀀠Through RighI 0.5 NlA NlA lOS 0, RIght left 1 250 16 Delay.o 28,8 left Belmeade! Westbound Thmugn 1.5 DID sedveh. Through SoJoum Right 0.5 NlA NlA vJc =0.91 Right left 1 150 46 left Northbound Through 3 C/O eMEGils Through Right 1 225 69 LOS 0, Righi left 1 300 91 Delay 25.9 left $oulhbound Through 2.5 D/C seclveh. Through Right 0.5 NlA NlA vIc =0.89 Right left Left Eastbound Through Through RIght Right lOft left Boyington! Westbound Through ThroughDooley Right Right left left-T_ Through RIght RIght left left Southbound Through Through Right RIght GEOMTRJCJI DRJI/[WAY .. EXISTING SIDEWALK _ Cw.....Bur8••• /I t , I I "" opi 1 I I 1 􀁾􀁩I 1 r 1 I 1 I 􀁾􀀠1 I I 1 , •I I I , , -. -_ .. _ .. _ .. ---1"'--􀁊􀁊􀁩􀀹􀀺􀀮􀀰􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀠.. _ "'.0+"-"--_.. 􀁾􀀬􀀠"'I>"" 􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭",EXlSTING ROW "'I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 r I I I I I 1 1 r 1 1 r 􀁾􀀮􀀠.. "" i , l 􀁾􀀮􀀠x "'I MEOlAN-. '-R:El.O(:ATE POWER POLE 􀁾ftEWCATE SIGNAL CONTROL 􀁾􀁦􀀡􀁅􀁬􀁏􀀼􀁃􀁁TE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁅􀁌􀁏􀀨􀀺􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀠SIG NAL CONTROL SIGN " POWER POLE '-RI£LOl:ATE SIGN I .. I .. 􀁾􀁆􀀧􀁅􀁌􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀠SIGNAL CONTROL • 􀀮􀁾􀀠I! 􀀬􀁾􀀠.1;\ I t -N􀁾􀀠SCALE 10500 _􀁾􀁧􀁩􀁢􀁾__ .. _ ... _ .. _ .. _ .. _ ... __ .. 􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁵_. _ .. ___ .. _ .. _ .. __ .. _ ... _ .. _ 01 _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ LEGENQ _ EX!STING CONCRETE IlI!III PAVOlENT O EXISTING CONCRIETE • NEDIAN 􀁾EXISTING CONCRIETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY • EXISTING S,IOEWAU< CC_I...Burgell' ..,-..""---.---' ---------\",,-"'--------,--+----------􀁊􀁬􀀡􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀡􀀧􀁉􀀱􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁑􀀡􀀮􀀠____ _ 􀁾􀀠! -V""'et -.L \' \ 􀁛􀀮􀁁􀀮􀀬􀁜􀁾􀁉􀀢􀁒􀁅􀀠􀁦􀀮􀁾􀁫􀁜􀀮􀀭.llr<: 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁮􀁩􀀭􀁬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁑􀀮􀁜� �􀁾􀁩􀀱􀁢􀀮􀀮􀁜􀀮􀀠i'1J-rO \-ted MeOlA..! .. l,ei\.ve M6"f c:>C>\ tor iNa:> , " • •", .. .. 'Z , <.I; :: . 􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀠􀁩􀁾􀁩, l • f • • I I I I • •· . ,· . ., . ·• ----. 􀁾􀁾􀀼􀁉􀀩􀁊􀁯􀀻􀁲􀀢􀁥􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠 􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀧􀁓􀁃􀁁..􀁩􀀮􀁌􀁾􀀠lEGEIID IliiIll EXISTING CONCRETEIlill!I PJlIID.tOO F?1 EXISTING CONCRETE Io::J I.lEDWI 􀁾EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾oruVEWt.Y . REMOVAL PLAN SaTWAY DRIVE 􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭N t"O + o RELOCATE TRAFFIC RElOCATE FIRE HYOlwrr-. ADJUST WATER VALVE-___ RElOCATE TRAFFIC , ....􀀢􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀠I. eJ. I 􀁾􀁉􀀠o. :::1 .... • T • I I I I I • I • t I r-RELIDCAlrE INLET CONTROLlER CABINET ,--REeOCATE SIGNAl. COKTROL BOX ,r--REILQC,UE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ADJUST SANITARY SE1I£R MANHOLE .'/SIGNAL' CONTROL BO) EXISTING ROW 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭.. ---EXISTING ROW SCAlE 1600 LEGEND 􀁾EX5TWG CONCRETE Ii!!!lI,PAVEUENT 0 ' EXISTING CONCRETE -' MEDIAN 􀁾EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY • EXISTINe, SIDEWALK _ C.I....Bulger. -.... _---.. _... _--------EXISTING ROlY • I • 1• fr----------------------------RELOCATE FIRE H'tDRANT ;-iRELC'CATE RECESSED INlET ---• ---------EX-IST-INC-ROW------•• -• --􀀧􀀢􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁲Ii: -----------RELOCATE r-,aOCATE POWER POlE o 9 • c..ur-.!i.q:::;c.A't'io..f\1􀁾􀀼􀀮􀁉􀁓􀀠>4eW . • 116 !-N􀁾􀀠SCAlE .,500 of 􀀢􀁣􀁾􀀢􀁬􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠t;:; 􀁇􀁩􀀼􀀺􀁬􀁾􀁔􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀠t..o 􀁜􀁾􀁾􀁜􀁢􀁐􀁲􀀭􀁲􀁩􀁯􀀢􀀠1..(,-0 􀁾􀀻􀀤􀁔􀀱􀀮􀀮􀁌􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁦􀁓 􀀠'l?fV\ RELOCATE' ..,..,>--' LECEHD Ii1iliI EXISTING COIICRETEIiiiII PA'f£IAEHT [J EXlSTINC COIICRETE.I!iZa EXlSTINC CONCRETE 􀁾􀁟􀁁􀁙􀀠II EXISTING, SIDEWALK GIl: Cu 1••Bur•••• REMOVAL PLAN657. SUBMtTTAl SI'RlNG VAlLEY ROAO SUBMITI1;D FOR REVIEW B't CARl. E. ST.....,.,. P.E. lIOZ91 􀀱􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀭􀁲􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁓􀁦􀁉􀂣􀁅􀁾􀁔􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁉􀁾􀁏􀁬􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁬􀀠_.......... 􀁾tNi =.:: fI'« DIIttt 215J99 oe;JIWi Q!.5. X lEXoII6 Cf,f t J. 􀁎􀀮􀀩􀀧􀁦􀁦􀁑􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁡􀀠􀁾􀀠A-6'::-'" CDitI'I't RELOCATE RECESSED INlE1r_ Rli.LClCA1"E FIRE HYDRANT 􀁒􀁅􀁌􀁾􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀠WATER IA£TIER-_ RELOCATE 􀁔􀁅􀁴􀀱􀁾􀁐􀀮􀀧􀀢􀁉􀁎􀀧􀀠ou."--.. '--REMOVE TREES .. Q o .. .. MATCH LI RELOCATE POWER POII'-' -----􀁗􀁊􀁾􀀠---I" --􀁾􀀮􀀠s 􀁾􀁉•0. : 􀁾􀁩􀀭􀁒􀁅􀁍􀁬􀁤􀀢􀀢􀀠TREES l rice!).) 􀁊􀀬􀁜􀁥􀁴􀁊􀁬􀁬􀁴􀀭􀀢􀀮􀁬􀁾􀀠c-m:..􀀮􀀨􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀢􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀢􀀢􀂷􀂷􀀢􀀢􀂷􀂷􀀢􀀧􀂷􀀻􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠t;T::E -.!:..:!_............---.-II II II 􀁾_______________ _ C-IJtfl .. 􀁾􀁥,11", 􀁾􀀻􀁗􀁲􀀧􀁴􀀱􀁢􀁾􀀠 SCALE •.soo LEGEND _ EXlSlING CONCRETE I!ii!!J PAVEIlENT r.-;l EXISTING CONCaETE L:.J MED.IAN 􀁾EXISTING CONCaETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY iii EXISlING SIDEWALK _Cel.-Bul.n. REMOVAL PLAN SPRING VALLEY ROAD SCAlf 1:500 'D El.l17i1l5 I'IIfP,;"''';&",46 ? CUfU,:y' o o '" o + o __ •• ..fIt2P.ilW> J!9L -----.... _.... .... • _ •• _ .El'lST"!P.R.!!! •• _ •• _ •• _ •• _ •• _ --------------I$jjjj EXISTING CONC1lETE IliIiI FA'Il!Mfl(l r-:l EXlSTlNG CONCRfTE t:..J II€DWI lIZ<'! EXISTING CONC1lETE IZ1>! ORI'Il!WAY IIEXISTING. SIOEWALK REMOVAL PLAN SPRlNG VALLEY ROAD : '.' ....;.. : ., " ....... " Re: CMAQ Program, Project 12 ". Beltway Drive Improvements Dear Mr. Loggins: As we recently discussed, the proposed 􀁲􀁥􀁡􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴ofa portion ofBeltway Drive will adversely impact existing landscaping. The attached drawing indicates our request for incorporation ofa change to the CMAQ, Project 12, to reflect removal ofthe improvements on Beltway, west ofMidway Road. Should you have any questions, pleaSe let me know. 􀁾􀁊􀁾􀀮􀀠Steven Z. Chutchian, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Cc: Mike Murphy, Director ofPublic Works Slade Strickland, Director ofParks & Recreation Jim Pierce, Assistant Director ofPublic Works ,-, Steve Chutchian From: Slade Strickland Sent: Wednesday. October 25. 20004:09 PM To: Steve Chutchian Ce: Jim Pierce Subject: RE: Follow up Tha-;;;:. Steve. one 􀁡􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁴􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁨􀁡􀁮􀁧􀁥􀀠to the plans that I would like to see is elimination of the 􀁲􀁩􀁾􀀠extension they are showing for the southwest corner of Beltway Drive and Midway. I did not 􀁳􀁥􀁥􀀧􀁬􀁨􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁨􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾� �􀁮􀀠us a \, lot in terms 􀁯􀁦􀀮􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁣􀁫􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀮􀀠and it eliminates a large landscaped retaining wall recently completed. 􀁌􀁾􀁴􀀠me know. thanks 􀁾􀀠-----Original Message--From: Steve Chutch!an Sent: Wednesday. October 25. 2000 1:25 PM To: Slade Strickland; Jim Pierce Subject: RE: Follow up I sent a letter to the engineer on October 20th. regarding this issue. A copy of the letter has been forwarded to Slade for his records. Thanks. Steve Chutchian ----Original Messagf'----From: Slade Strickland Sent: Wednesday. October 25,200011:06 AM To: Jim Pierce; Steve Chutchian Subject: Follow up I wanted to confirm that you were going to have Steve contact the responsible party for changing the CMAQ paving plans to reflect leaving out concrete on all medians and filling with topsoil. Let me know if If I understood this correctly. Additionally. I am holding off on the letter slated for mailing to the private property owners impacted by the BeltlinelQuorumlMidway intersection project Let me know When I can mail it out. thanks H6' fXJ e;"rv-J, /tv'/t,yT PeePd,e "'1 71ft..> Slade Strickland 972-450-2869 31/-'1SL/r"PE 8eL T f.c-.-/h;'OF e-;x;j?e.4?e tJF 77Ie PO Mr. Don Harrelson, EIT Baird, Hampton & Brown, Inc. 309 W. 7th St., Suite 500 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 " CMAQ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 12" TOWN or ADOl'SO 1 􀁾􀀠NOT TO seALE REC'O OCT 0 7 r996 DALLAS COUNTY C C, 􀁾cJA. Ie/..e-aAPUBLIC WORKS 10' 7· ft October 2, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Commissioners Court THROUGH: Commissioner Jim Jackson, District I FROM: Allen Bud Beene, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Congestion Mitigation Air Qnality (CMAQ) Improven:tents Program Consulting Engineers Contract -Carter & Burgess, Inc. -Project 12 BACKGROUND As a part of the Dallas County Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) Intersection Improvement Program approved by Commissioners Court, ConSUlting Engineers Contracts are being secured with approved engineering 􀁦􀁩􀁲􀁭􀁾􀀠for the design of intersection improvements. The contract establishes the scope of work, cOmpensation. and terms for design of CMAQ improvements. Twenty-six CMAQ Consultant Engineers Contracts have been negotiated to date with nineteen Notices to Proceed having been issued. The twenty-six contracts include design services for 471 transportation improvements with a design budget of over $47 million and an overall Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) budget totaling $43 million. Carter & Burgess, Inc. of Dallas, Texas, was selected from the remaining qualified engineering firms for the designer of CMAQ Project 12. The consultant was selected after review by the County staff, the Program ManagerlEngineer (pMfE) and with the concurrence of the Cities of Addison, Carrollton and Farmers Branch. The assigned project scope include's geometric improvements to the following nine intersections located in the Cities ofAddison, Carrollton and FarmersBranch: 1. Beltway at Midway -Addison 2. Dooley/Boyington at Midway -Carrollton 3. Keller Springs at Midway. Carrollton 4. Lindberg at Midway -Addison 5. McEwen at Midway -Farmers Branch 6. Midway at Spring Valley -Farmers Branch 7. Midway at Sojourn -Carrollton 8. Midway at Trinity Mills -Carrollton 9. Midway at Proton -Addison 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 Commissioners Court October 2, 1996 Page 2 FINANCIAL IMPACT The nine intersections in CMAQ Project 12 have a total budget for design, right-of-way and construction of $3,795,000. The design fee negotiated with Carter & Burgess, Inc. is $372,072. The following is the breakdown of the design tee for each agency. Dallas COUl)ty will be administering the design phase of this CMAQ Project with the aid of the PMIE Office. Dallas County will invoice TxDOT for the federal and state shares immediately upon receipt of an invoice from the Consulta6l. TxDOT has set up a mechanism to wire funds directly to Dallas County so full payment to the Consultant can be expedited within 30 days. Progress payments will be made to Carter & Burgess, Inc. for professional engineering services as set forth in the design contract. All nine intersections included in CMAQ Project 12 are in the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program and are sponsored by Dallas County in the TIP. The following County Bond accounts have been identified to administer funds for this design contract: Midway Road (IH 635 to Dallas County Line): Bond Fund 492, Project 835, Code 700, Category 4 (492-835-700-4) $128,327 Bond Fund 492, Project 835, Code 700, Category 6 (492-835-700-6) $243,745 Bond funds available ($70,000) for this project are not sufficient to accommodate the County's share ofthe design fee. A transter of funds ($60,000) from the. 1991 County Bond project for the intersection improvement at Josey Lane at Keller Springs Road (Project 721) is proposed in order to continue with this design contract and to fund anticipated TxDOT review costs. The Josey Lane at Keller Springs Road project is in District 1 in the 1991 Bond Program and included in the City of Carrollton which is participating in this CMAQ project.. The Josey Lane at Keller Springs Road project will be advanced under a separate agreement with the City of Carrollton. Under this agreement, Dallas County has agreed to reimburse the city for 20% of improvement cost, which leaves suf;ficient funds available for this transfer. The following is a breakdown of costs as presented in the 1996 TIP, the current cost estimate, and various fee percentages. The cost estimate shown in the 1996 TIP was prepared in 1996. Commissioners Court October 2, 1996 Page 3 ,..--.,..,C!lrrenfcostction Services, Inc., PMIE File (CMAQ -Project 12) p.2 􀁄􀁥􀁾􀀠04 00 10:37a Par$on$ Brinokerhoff 214-741-1937 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠DALLAS COUNTY 􀁾􀀠PUBLIC WORKS 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠December 14, 1995 By 3R Mr. John Baumgartner Town ofAddison P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Subject: Dallas County CMAQ Program Executed Interlocal Agreement Dear Mr. Baumgartner: Enclosed for your file is one (1) executed original InterJoca1 Agreement between the Town of Addison and Dallas County for the CMAQ Program projects. The scheduling ofthe approved CMAQ projects for your City has not been completed. When the time frame has been determined, we will notify all concerned and advise you of any funds that must be escrowed during the various phases ofthe projects. Your participation in the CMAQ program is greatly appreciated and we look forward to your cooperation and input towards successful completion ofthe projects in a timely manner. Sincerely, ilLfll Allen Bud Beene, P.E. Director ofPublic Works 􀁾􀀠Enclosure: Exealted Dallas County CMAQ Interloca1 Agreement xc: Richard L. Peterson, Assistant Director. Transportation Planning Division, Dallas County William B. Dl)'den, P.E., Trame Engineer, Dallas County Ivan F. Nicodemus. P.E., PMIE, Parlions Brinckerhol'f ConsuuctJon Services. Inc. Files (CMAQ -Addison) 214-653-7151411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 ,,: t""'\ '\ Dee 04 00 10:37a Parsons BrinckernoPP 214-741-1937 p.3 ·Py 33 COURTOBDER )'. 􀁾􀁒􀁄􀁅􀁒NO. 95 1996 DATE: NOV 14 1995 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § BE IT REMEMBERED, at a regular meeting of the Commissionera Court of. Dallas County, Texas, held OIl. the 14th d$Yof November • 1995. on motion lllade by Kenneth A. Mayfield, Dist. #4 .andseconded by Mike Cantrell, Dist. #2 , the followiD.g was adopted: WHEREAS, The 1991 Transportation Bond Program included funding for tho IistXB Court that the County Judge is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for implementing the CMAQ transportation improvements in the Town ofAddison. . DONE IN OPEN COURT. this the 14th d$Y of__􀀭􀀢􀁎􀀺􀀺􀁬􀀰􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁶􀀻􀀺􀀻 􀁥􀀢􀀬􀁭􀁾􀁢􀁥􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀠1995 . .' ,' n, County Judge Mike Cantrell, District 2 Heroppro:: d JJC 6,115. . ---􀁁􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁂􀁕􀁤􀁂􀁥􀁥􀁮􀁥􀀬􀁐􀀮􀁅􀀮􀁱􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠Director of Public War JffflP p.4 Dee 04 00 10:37a Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-741-1937 September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 5,1991, pursuant to Election Order No. 91-1636, the voters of Dallas County approved Proposition Number 1 of the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program which includes the authorization to issue bonds under the authority of Article III, Sections 52 and 52e of the Texas Constitution for the purpose oftransportation improvements within Dallas County; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said Proposition Number 􀁾􀂢􀀢􀀮tpe 1991 Dallas County Bond Program, it is the desire of 􀁴􀁨􀁾of 􀁾􀁨􀁴􀀮􀀬Texas, b.ereinafter referred to as "City", and the omas County Commissioners Court, hereinafter referred to as "County", to enter into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement regarding certain transportation improvements within said City pursuant to Chapter 791 ofthe Texas Government Code; and WHEREAS, County and the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "TxOOT", pursuant to Commissioners Court Order No. 94-1777, dated October 25, 1994, have entered into a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Agreement to provide Program ManagemenllEngineering (pM/E) Services for certain transportation improvements in Dallas County; and WHEREAS, said CMAQ Agreement, incOIporated herein as Attachment "A", shall govern the intent of this Interlocal Agreement between County and City; and WHEREAS, said transportation improvements approv-:fI for CMAQ funding by the North Texas Council of Governments ,which is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and are part of the CMAQ Agreement within City are listed in Attachment uB"; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of County and City to expedite the implementation of the improvements listed in Attachment "B", hereinafter referred to as the "Program". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, agreements and promises herein contained, County and City do hereby identify the following: 1. County hereby agrees: A. To the extent of funding authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program for improvements, County agrees to provide the local goverrunent share of costs up to the amount identified in Attachment "B" as "Dallas County Program Costs" which include Program ManagemenllEngineering (pM/E) services, acquisition of rights-ofway, mitigation of environmental issues, relocation assistance, preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and plan review by TxDOT, utility relocation/adjustments and construction costs andlor costs of construction elements by City forces associated with the development of improvements within the scope of this Agreement. Page 10[6 D:\GENERAI..\G06PRMG'l\Q6·SILAIlLA04,OOC 􀁄􀁥􀁾􀀠 04 bo 10:3ea Parsons BrinokerhoFF 214-741-1937 p_5 September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT B. To include improvement locations identified within City as CMAQ Intersection Improvement Projects approved by the MPO and incorporated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) in the Transportation Improvement Program (rIP) as may now be in effect this date or as may be revised, modified or amended. Potential intersection improvement locatioas are identified in Attachment "B", and include projected City, County, TxDOT, FHWA, and total improvement costs. C. To provide a single point of contact with TxDOT for the Program included within this Agreement and to execute, on behalf of City, the necessary agreements with TxDOT;-as authorized by the Dallas County Commissioners Court and the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program. D. To provide for the acquisition ofthe necessary additional rights-of-way for projects in the Program in accordance with TxDOT standard requirements for property acquisition, utilizing existing public rights-of-way to the maximum extent possible. E. To coordinate with City any utility adjustments in public rights-of-way and traffic control during the construction; provided, however, that City shall be the responsible jurisdiction for requiring the relocation and adjustment of utilities. F. To the extent authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program, in cases where a franchised utility has a priVate right-of-way easement for its utility and it is necessary te make adjustments by reason of the widening or improvement of the designated improvement loca!bn, County shall, after submission of satisfactory rights-of-way documentation and cost estimates acceptable to County by the utility company, bear the actual costs IOZ the relocation and/or adjustment of said utility. Where new storm drainage facilities are in conflict with City owned utilities, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, County shall, after submission of an acceptable schedule of work and cost estimate by City, bear the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of City utilities to the extent authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program. G. To prepare documents, coasisting of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for construction of the projects in the Program, acceptable to TxDOT, using the latest editions of TxDOT's Highway Design Division Operations and Design Manual, TxDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction ofHighways, Streets and Bridges, TxDOT's Guide for Design ofPavement Structures, the Texas Manltal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), and/or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official's (AASHTO's) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. H. To submit preliminary engineering plans at the 65% and final PS&E at the J00% completion levels for review and approval by City prior to submittal to TxDOT for advertising and construction. 1. To transfer rights-of-way acquired in the name of County to City. J. To issue to City a "Notification of Completion" from TxDOT, acknowledging a project has been completed and to furnish, through TxDOT, "as-bnilt" reproducible"record" drawings of construction plans for the City upon completion and acceptance of each project in tbe Program. Pagelof6 D:IQENERALIQ06Pl\MGl\G6·S!LAIILA04.D OC p.6 Dec 04 00 10:38a Parsons BrinckerhoTT 214-741-1937 September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT II. City hereby agrees: A. To provide the local government share of costs for engineering desian services PMIE services, acquisition of rights-of-way, mitigation of environmental Issues 􀁲􀁥􀁬􀁾􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠assistance, 􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁰􀁡􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠􀁾􀁦􀁐􀁬􀁡􀁮􀀮􀁳􀀬􀀠Specification s and 􀁅􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁭􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠(PS&E), 􀁰􀁬􀁾review by TxDOT, utility relocation/adjustments and constructIOn costs associated with the development of improvements identified in Attachment "B" within the scope of the Program, beyond the extent of funding authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program as identified in Attachment "B" as "Dallas County Program Costs" and for those improvements sponsored andlor identified as being funded in whole or partially by City' within the current NCTCOG Transportation Improvement Program. City requested specialty items may include, but not necessarily limited to supplementary landscape, streetscape, and sidewalk construction. Estimated City costs identified in Attachment "8" shall be escrowed to County by City. B. To accept all terms, requirements and conditions of the CMAQ Agreement between County and TxDOT as an integral part of this Interlocal Agreement between City and COllnty, and agrees, that aU requirements incumbent upon County shall be incumbent upon City. Accordingly, City shall execute the following documents required by TxDOT as part of the TxDOT/County CMAQ Agreement: I. Attachment "C" Lobbying Certifications 2. Attachment "D" Debarment Certifications C. To participate with County in the selection of design consultants utilized in the preparation of the PS&E for the Program. D. To accept County's Minority/Women Business Enterprise Participation Policy for use in the Program. E. To assist County in developing the scope of services for each intersection in the Program and to assure that the initial Program funding for each location, shown in Attachment "B", is correctly identified. F. To provide to County available alignment surveys, construction plans or other data pertinent to the projects including but not limited to, hydraulic studies, environmental studies, master planning studies, zoning maps, and utility maps and information, and to establish in writing, prior to commencement of project design, any supplemental improvements desired by City for specialty items on additional facilities (e.g., landscaping, streetscaping, new sidewalks) associated with the project. When these features are requested by City for inclusion as part of the design andlor construction contract, those costs not eligible for CMAQ funding as approved by the MPO shall be borne by City. Supplemental agreements outlining funding participation on designated projects may be executed by City, as necessary. Page 3 of6 D:IGENERALIG06PRMG1\G6·SILAULA04.DOC p.7 leo: 04 00 10: 38a Parsons BrinokerhoFF 214-741-1937 September 12,1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT G. To provide traffic signal warranting data for each signalized intersection, including the posted speed limit on the major streets andlor spot speed studies, 24 hour approach volumes collected in 1990 or later for all legs of the intersection, andlor peak hour turning movement counts and traffic volumes. Only those intersections that are shown to meet or exceed the abbreviated TxDOT signal warrant methodology for the Program or the TMUTCD signalization warrants shall be included within the Program. H. To provide inventories of existing signal equipment, signal phasing, and timing patterns 􀀮􀁾􀁯􀁲􀀠each intersection within the Program. 1. To provide a listing of cable companies within City and provide an estimated cost of cable cormections for each signalized location where their facilities are used for signal communications, City agrees to assure that the cable company installs cable cormection from their nearest existing cable line to the controller cabinet. City agrees to require each participating cable company to submit a detailed invoice for each cable cormection describing the actual units required to complete the construction. City agrees to inspect and approve the construction and to submit to County evidence that the construction is completed for reimbursement. The cost of the cable connection for each location shall conform to the construction laoor and materials unit costs established hereinabove. J. To provide a listing of locations and/or descriptions of elements of construction for which City will furnish andlor install traffic signalization equipment by City's forces. City agrees to provide TxDOT a PS&E packag<. detailing proposed construction work and shall provide opportunities, facilities and representative samples, as may be required, to enable TxDOT to carry out suitahJe, frequent and complete inspections of all materials, sufficient to afford determination and certification by TxDOT that all parts ofthe installation and the component materials comply with the requirements of the approved PS&E. City agrees to use its own directly employed labor and supervIsory personnel, machinery, equipment and vehicles necessary for the construction of each City force account element of construction. City agrees to abide by Title 49 CFR Part 18.36 in renting or leasing machinery, equipment and/or vehicles, other than its own, which are necessary for the construction. K. To assist County in conducting public hearings as required for the Program. L. To acquire rights-of-way required for the projects in the Program through voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process and/or other legal means to ensure through the building permitting process that, setback requirements are imposed to limit encroachment upon the required rights-of-way. City agrees to provide County with historical records and reports associated with the acquisition and dedication of rights-of-way required for the Program. City hereby grants County authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within the cOIporate limits of said City for the specific rights-of-way required and as approved by City and County for the Program. Pag.4or6 D;\OENSRALIOil6PRIoI01\Q6·lIL;l.IlLA04.DOC , 04 IJO 10,39a Parsons BrinckerhoFF 214-741-1937 p.e September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT M. N. o. P. Q. R. s. T. To require all utilities located within or using the public rights-of-way in the Program to adjust andlor relocate said utilities as required by the proposed improvement of each project. City shall initiate action to require the adjustment andlor relocation of utilities to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible upon receipt of the 65% design documents from the County, but in no event later than three (3) months after receiving notification in writing from County that acquisition of additional rights-of-way for the designated project has bccn completed. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment andlor relocation of utilities within the public rights-of-way shall be the responsibility of the utility. owner andlor City. In the event that the utilities are not adjusted or relocated within three (3) months after County's written notification is received, received, City shall initiate legal action to compel the adjustment or relocation of the utilities by the utility owner or, if necessary to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the improvements. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of rights-of-way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances in the tights-of-way and, when requested by County or TxDOT, to take such action as appropriate to cause any and atl encroachments on the rights-ofway to be removed prior to starting construction of each project in the Program. City shaH provide for the continuing maintenance of all rights-of-way, sach as traffic control, pavement maintenance, mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period between right-of-way acquisition and construction for each project in the Program. To prepare a "Traffic Implementation Plan" detailing City's continuing commitment to operate arld mairitain the funded traffic signal improvements through the use of training, rc:sources, funding and personnel for the useful life of applicable traffic signal projects identified in the Program. The "Traffic Implementation Plan" shall be in a format approved by County, TxDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). To make a detailed review of and rerum comments on the proposed rights-of-way plans and construction drawings and documents for each project in the Program within a time period not to exceed one (I) month from transmittal to City by County. To assist County in establishing PS&E schedules for projects requiring City funding which address the committed funding and other resources. To authorize TxDOT through County to construct the transportation improvements approved by City within each project, in accordance with the scope agreed upon by City and County and approved by TxDOT. To resume responsibility for maintenance of each improvement in the Program upon completion and acceptance ofconstruction ofthe projects by TxDOT. To allow the regulation of traffic, modification of traffic signals and other regulatory devices consistent with the PS&E documents for the improvements as necessary during construction, and prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way. D;\OENERALI006PRM01\06·S1LAIlLA04.DOC p.9 Dee 04 00 10:39a Parsons BrinckerhoTT 214-741-1937 September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT U. To maintain aU documents, papers, accoWlting records and other documentation relating to City costs incurred under this Agreement and shall make such materials available to TxDQT, FHW A or its duly authorized representatives' for review and inspection at its office for three (3) years from the date of final payment from the COWlty Wlder this Agreement. City agrees to comply with the audit requirements of . the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in paragraphs 6, 8, and 9 of OMB Circular No. A128. Additionally, County, TxDOT, FHWA and its duly authorized representatives shall have access to all records of City which are directly applicable to this Agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and/or transcriptions. III. County and City further agree and acknowledge that neither County or City is an agent of of the other, or of the State, and that each is responsible for its own acts, forbearance, . negligence and deeds, and for those of its agents or employees in conjunction with the performance of work covered under this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. . IV. County and City acknowledge this InterlocalCooperative Agreement may be modified by the mutual consent of the County and City. This includes modification of the specific improvement location identified in Attachment "B" and ill accordance with the current Transportation Improvement Plan approved by the MPO which is NCTCOG .. V. The .cMAQ Agreement shall govern where conflicts exists or. are discovered within this Agreemellt. TIiE<:etml< , Date ATTEST: ATTEST: 􀀱􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀨􀀯􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁨􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀱􀁣􀁦􀁥􀀻 Paula A. Stephens, Clerk of Cmmissioners Page6or6 D;IGENERALI006PRMGlI 06·51t.AIlt.A04.DOC leo 04 00 10: 4121 Parsons Brinokerhoff 214-741-1937 p. 10 Dallas County Interlocal Cooperative Agreement ATTACHMENT A Texas Department ofTransportation (TxDOT) I Dallas County Agreement for Congestion Mitigation I Air Quality Intersection Improvement Program (CMAQ) For the purpose of this presentation to Commissioners Court for action upon the Interlocal Agreement (!LA) between Dallas COWlty and the Town of Addison, the TxDOT/DaIlas COWlty Agreement for the CMAQ Program as approved by Commissioners Court Order 94 1777, dated October 25, 1994, is hereby included by reference in order to reduce the unnecessary amount of paper required for copying. For the purposes of actual filing the approved Court Order authorizing Dallas County to execute the lLA with the Town ofAddison, said Agreement shall be included in its entirety for Court records. D:ICQNTRACTIC.!ILASlCS·!-!\ADDISONIATTACH-A.DOC ILA 􀁾􀀠ATrACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM for Addison NCTCOG Improvement TxDOT Initial Road InterseCting Road Number Type SystemJPASS 2332.000 INT OFF Midway McEwell10 Trinily Mills 􀀱􀀲􀀭􀁓􀀮􀁰􀀭􀀹􀁾􀀠ill '" oFUNDING COMMITMENT BY AGENCY oImprovement Costs" (Thousands) -I>-Addison Dallas County TxDOTI FHWA 1995 TIP Total o o .... o.. -I> 3000.000 5700.000 8700.000 .... 11/Grand Totals· $0.000 $3,000.000 $5,700.000 $8,700.000 "OJ 'l III 0 ::l III I:lI 'l 􀁾􀀮􀀠:::J 0 7" .., ill 'l ::r 0..,.., N .... -I> I -J -I> .... I .... to W -J "Amounts shown in the "1995 TIP Total« column are the '95 TIP budgets. The funding distribution Idenlified is for Engineering and Construction only. The budgets for Rlghts-of.Way, Utility Adjustments, and Envlnonmentallnvestlgations and Remediation are also included In the "1995 Tip Total", but may require dl.llnct funding commitments developed according to ILA Articles Il.L and !I.M, and TxDOTlOalla. County Agreement ArtIcles 10 and 19.C. Inc...,as •• In the '95 TIP budget for each line line Item Improvement shall be made In direct proportion to the funding commitment by Datlas County. the City, andlor TxDOTIFHWA identilled herein and approved as a TIP amendment by NCTCOG. Addison Allac/lmenl B • Page 1 of 1 -a .... .... Dec 04 00 10,418 Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-741-1937 p.12 Dallas County Interlocal Cooperative Agreement ATTACHMENT C Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans. and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension. continuation, renewal, amendment, or modifICation of any federal contract, 􀁾􀁮􀁴􀀬􀀠loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) Ifany funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL. "Disclosure Form to Repon Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this cenification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sUbrecipients shall cenify and disclosure accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 􀀼􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁚􀀠 Ignature City Manage,______􀁾􀀠Title Town of Mdison Agency 11/06/95 Date SDHPr Col 4.90 D:IGENERALIOO6PRMGJ\G6.SlL!\IATICHC&DDOC i Dec 04 00 10:42a Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-741-1937 p.13 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Ajlproved by OM6 034!J.OO<6 Complet. this Iorm 10 disclose lobbying aclivities pursuant 10 31 U,S.C. 1352 (See reverse for public burden discfosure) 1. Type of Federal Action: [!] I. contract b. grant c. cooperative agreement d. loan e. loan guarantee . f. loan Insurance 2. Status of Federal AcUon: 00 a. b. bld/olfer/applicalion Initial award c. 􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁡􀁷􀁡􀁴􀁤􀀠3. Report Type: [!] a. iniHalliling b, material change For Malerial Change Only: year 􀁑􀁬􀁵􀁵􀁡􀁲􀁴􀀺􀀺 􀁥􀁾􀁲====dale ollasl report_ 4. Name and Addr.... of Reporting Entity; o Prime 00 Subawardee Town of Addison P.O. Box 144 Tier 1 Addison, Texas 75001 Congressional District. ifknown: 6. Federal Department Agency: . ilknown 5, Jf Reporting Entity In No. 41$ Subawardee. Enter Name and Address of Prime: N/A Congressional DistriCt, IIknown: 7. Federal Program NarnelDescripliOJl: Department of Transportation Intermodal Surface Transportation Federal Highway AdmlnstratJon Efficiency Act (lSTEA) CFDA Number, ilapplicable: 8. Federal Aclion Number. ilknown: 9. Award Amount. ilkMWn: $ 10.•. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Sefllices (inclUding address il (if individual, lasf name, first name. MI); dillerentfrom No. lOa) (last name, first name, MI): NlA NlA (a/tach 􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁮􀁵􀁡􀀯􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠Shee/(.) SFUJ.-A. ilnece..a'Y) 11. Amount ol Paymenl (check aU Ihaf apply); 13. Type of Paymant (check all that apply); o a. retainer $ 􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀠o actual o planned o b. one-time tee 12. Form of Payment (checkallthat apply); o c. commission o a cash o d, conlinganl fee o b. In-Idnd; speclly: nature N/A o e. deferred value o I. other. speoify: N£A 14-Brief O••cripUon of Sefllices Per10rmed or to be Perlormed end Date(s) of Sennce, Including olficer(s), empfoyee(s). or Member!s) contacted, for Peyment Indicated In It..m 11: The Town of Addison has performed no lobbying activities to secure this Contract. No Federal oHicial or emptayee nor off'"acer, employer or member or Congress has been Gontacted. (attach Con/inua/ion Sheel(s) SF.LJ.L·A. IInecesSB'Y) 15. Conlinualion 􀁓􀁨􀁥􀀮􀁴􀀨􀁳􀁌􀁓􀁆􀂷􀁕􀀮􀁾􀂷􀁁􀀠.!!ached: DYes 􀁾No IS. InlorrMlion nlquestad ttJrough !!lis 101m Is authO=:-_' LEGEND EXIST. R.O.W. CENTERLINE TRAFFiC SIGNAL POLE WATER !.ETER FIRE HYDRAIIT <>-pallER POLE $ IIJNITORING IlELL _________ DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW COG'" -2332.008 MIDWAY AT SPRING VALLEY CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-FARMERS BRANCH Scale: 1=500 Date: 12/08/95 _ _ _ _ .. ExisT: ·R:o:W: •• •• •• -•• •• -•• -'.-•• -•• T. _ .. e ST ..􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀽􀀧􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀽􀀮s ....--A 􀀱􀁤􀁤􀁬􀁾􀁴􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁦 --.-.. CONSTRUCT PROTON 􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀢􀀬􀀽􀀽􀁤􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾 􀀧􀁢􀀽􀀫􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁎􀀻􀁅􀁗􀀻􀁓􀀡􀁯􀁅􀁗􀁁􀁌􀁋􀀠TRANS I T'ION :: L is FOR INTERIM REVIEW INTENOEO FOR CONSTRUCTION. PERMITS PURPOSES. ,.t. 1lQ. THIS DOCUMENT AND NOT StOOING. OR "',..... f=SS 6.1m 3.om 3.om I -i ( -===r or==5.2m 3.9m 3.3m I -i ( 3.3m ( ,;; a 0;. J 􀁾􀀠-;;1-==r rr="l 1 ISECTION A-A 1 1 1 RELOCATE -------r CURB INLET : RELOCATE 􀁓􀁉􀁾􀁎􀁁􀁌􀀠POL l NOTES: i. EXIST. R.C.W. SHOWN is APPARENT 􀁒􀁾􀁏􀀮􀁗􀀮􀀠ACTUAL R.O.w. WILL BE OET£RMINEO BY DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. pROPOSEO RJGHT TURN LANE TO BE QEStGNEO US'NO AASHTO -APOLICY ON GEOMETAJC DESIGN Of HIGHWAYS ANDSTAEErS 1991" ....􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀼􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀺􀁦􀂱􀀮􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀽.. -= . .,.ft.:.... ·.... f" 􀁾____________J.-•. -...... 􀁾􀁣􀀺􀀮􀂷􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁆􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀽􀁣􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀽􀀺􀀻_.. . ......-.. _.. CONSTRUCT NEW SIOEIIALX L.......o-A RELOCATE 􀁓􀁉􀁾􀁎􀁁􀁬􀀠􀀠POLE ANO FIRE HYDRANT INSTALL ADA RAMP (TYP. , .r·· /.. VI -:! . o· 􀁾􀀠'"','1 .' 􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠w'wi I I J ·1 l;e________ ___􀀯􀁾􀁾_ _ _ __ _____________________ -l-___________________ ""','_'_'_. sa. ,. ..LX ./,,'---------:x...!-IL -􀁾􀀠_ 􀁾􀀠E '" TRANSITIOH ·1 LEGEND -.-.-.-.-. CENTERLINE 􀁾􀀠TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE o WATER METER FIRE HYORAIIT -0-POWER POLE s 􀁾􀁉􀁔􀁏􀁒􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀠WELL 􀁾DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW CQG# -2332.007 MIDWAY AT PROTON CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-FARMERS BRANCH Scale: 1=500 Dote: 12/14/95 5m 0 10m 20m,........ SCALE: 1= 500 --.,.: >d: :.;; POWER POLE & UONIIORING WELL 􀁾DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW COG" -2332.006 MIDWAY AT BELTWAY CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON scale' 1=500 Dote: 12/08/95 1 I I " 􀁾􀁩􀀠C!i a: ' , 􀁾􀀬􀀠,􀀬􀁾, EXIST. R.O.w •. _._._._._._._--.-LINDBERG 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠! 􀀽􀁅􀁘􀁾􀁉􀁓􀁔􀀮"=.O.W.==.'=-.-._=.--􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀼􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀠11111 D , NOTES: t. EXIST. R.O.W. SHOWN IS APPARENT R.O.W. ACTUAL R.O.W. WILL 8f OETERMINED BY DESICN ENCfNEER. 2. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE TO 8E UES[CNED USING AASHTO *APOlICY ON GEOMETRIC DESICN OF HiGHWAYS AND SIRfErS aS4" THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR iNTERIM 􀁒􀁅􀁖􀁉􀁅􀁗􀁾􀀠AND Nor tNTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ' BIDDING. OR PERMITS PURPQSES. J,UE:S E. ALLEN ,,_._._.-. --r --I 5m o 10m 20m SCALE: 1" 500 ...-, ..-.-,-.-.....-.-.-.-...􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠' ..􀀭􀁜􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀠 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠_ .. --'... --􀀭􀀭􀀩􀂷􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀁅􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁭􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠􀀢􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀠LEGEND _._._._._. ExIST. R.O.W. 􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀠CENTERLINE iii TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE e wATER WETER .0F I RE HyDRANT <> POWER POLE s--WNITORlHe WELL DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOw # -2332.005 AT LINDBERG -SHT. 1 OF 1 IMPROVEMENT ADDISON Dote: 12/08/95 '+ \. \􀀧􀀮􀁾\:: 􀁜􀁾􀀠:.,. , -RELOCATE U11L tTyPQ., -·---A:-·_·_·_·_·_·J·_·-"'--______ 􀁬􀀷􀂷􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀹􀀺􀁾􀂷􀀠_. _. _. _. -_. -' -. _. _._. -.-. _. -'-' _. -----.-. _. _. _. ----J􀀧􀀽􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮 􀀭NOTES, 1. ExIST. R.C.W. SHOWN ts APPARENT R.O.W. ACTUAL R.C.W. WILL 8E DETERM!NED BY OESICN ENGiNEER. 2. PROPOSEO RIGHT TURN LANE TO BE DESIGNED USING AA$HTO 􀁾􀁁􀁐􀁏􀁌􀁉􀁃􀁙􀀠ON GEOMETRIC DESICN Of HiGHWAYS ANO STREETS 1994" THIS 􀁏􀁏􀁃􀁕􀁾􀁎􀁔􀀠IS FOR INTERIM REviEw AND NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. BIDDING. OR PERMITS PURPOSES. p.i. tel, " KJlefl'{";ct ?lr7{ {vA'rJi , , s. '''",':I' <0 􀀧􀁜􀁾􀀠, ,',...x:,, " \. "'.. '. "'.., , R(LOC,uE FIRE HYDJU1.IT 1=55 I", , , , " " 􀀧􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾... ':<1,..',.. " LEGEND \ _._._-_._. , , -._._,-*_. , , , , , , COG # -2332.003 MIDWAY AT KELLER SPRINGS CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF w ,"'.''",., ., .'0,.. -I o·.,0 ",."'. ,0.'􀁾􀀮􀀠, , , \\ , \ \\ \\ .,,: Cl 􀁾􀁉􀀠.".-,\ ;:;, ><,􀁾􀀧, "'" I j, i i I , 􀀵􀁾􀁾􀀵􀁟􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀡􀂰􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀰􀁾􀁭􀁾__2;;;om, ; I /SCALE: 1= 500i //􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀯􀀠/, , , , , \ , I , , , , , I I I \\ •• 0 /.: • 0 0 • ••"." .. \\ , TRAFF I C SUTTON• CHANNEL IZATION ••• ••••• • o ••• 􀁯􀂷􀁾••+'. '. RELOCATE..' , . STQP " /\, L, STOP SfGN , /'.................... ..".,.,..",." " \\ \ \ " \ .<" "<",,<. 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁜􀁾􀀠\ . 􀁜􀁾􀀠'1>,. '0" 􀀬􀁾􀀠\ . , \ \ 􀁾􀁳􀁳􀀠, \ , , '. '., , \ \ \' , ,F INSJAlL PAVEMENT ./WR)(tNG5 ____ ._.J BOYINGTON -. EXiST 􀁾􀀠-R:ci.-w.----_. _._. -. _. _._._. _. _.---,_. -. -. -'INSTALL PAVEI.IENT MAR POWER POlE THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTER!M REVI£W AND NOT tNTENOED FOR CONSTRUCTION. BIDDING. OR PERMiTS PURPOSES. .'",. \ , , COG" -2332.004 BOYINGTON TO DOOLEY AT MIOWAY CONCEPT DRAWING -SKT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-CARROLLTON Scale: 1=500 Dcte: 12/08/95 Steve Chutchian From: Jack Loggins [Jack.Loggins@DLSCMAQ.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 20009:58 AM To: Eric Stamater (E-mail) Cc: Ivan Nicodemus; Steve Chutchian P. E. (E-mail); Steve Taylor (E-mail) Subject: P12 Proton/Midway Steve Chutchian called from Addison. He said someone from Carter & Burgess called and asked if they were aware that a brick sign and foundation on the SW corner will be impacted by your construction design. I looked on sheet 57 and 58 and found no sign on your drawings. Would you verify this information and correct as needed? Jack W. Loggins, Deputy Program Manager -CMAQ Office Parsons Brinckerhoff, 1701 N. Market Street Dallas, Texas, 75202, (214) 747-6336 x 28 FAX (214) 741-1937 1 Parsons CMAQ Program Office Srl_kemoH 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dal/as, TX 75202 214-747-6336 Fax: 214-741-1937 cmaq@onramp.net November 13. 2000 Mr. Steven Z. Chutchian, P.E. City of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program "NCTCOG Project Status Review" Dear Mr. Chutchian: The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) requested that data sheets be filled out for each project that we are monitoring in the Congestion Mitigation Impact Program (CMAQ). The attached "NCTCOG Project Status Review" sheet(s) were filled out and are within your city/county. We are providing this information for your review and files. Except for a few cases, most of the CMAQ projects are at the Rnal PS&E stage and eighteen (18) of the thirty-four (34) intersection improvement projects in the program are now complete, Fourteen (14) projects are at the 100% level. and two are expected to be completed within the next week, Project 11 is at the 65% 65% level and Project 32, a bridge design, is at the 30% level. Right-Of-Way approval, appraisals, and acquisitions are underway on many projects, If your entity has Right-Of-Way acquisition participation and a request for Right-Of-Way escrow has not been received, you will likely receive a request in the next few months. Dallas County has scheduled many acquisitions in the next six to nine months so that these projects can proceed to construction as soon as possible. The dates shown on the NCTCOG Project Status Review" sheets for construction are based upon a normal acquisition process. Any eminent domain proceeding will delay construction, The attached spreadsheets "Dallas County CMAQ Program -Status" have been developed to assist in your reView, If you have any other questions about this matter, please call me at 214-747-6336 ext. 26 or Jack Loggins at ext. 28. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁏􀁤􀁾􀁐􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁾􀀠Program Manager Attachments: 1) "NCTCOG Project Status Review" sheet(s) 2) "Dallas County CMAQ Program -Status" Sorted By Intersection Name 3) "Dallas County CMAQ Program -Status" Sorted By Project # cc: Donald L Cranford, PE, Dallas County Asst. Dir,. Trans, & Plan, wlo attachments Moosa Saghian, PE Texas Department of Transportation, wlo attachments LaDonna Smith, NCTCOG, w/o attachments Mike Murphy, PE, City of Addison. wlo attachments Over a Century of Engineering Excellence G:\G04CORR\G4-10UTlADDISON\2000016 NCTCOG Status,doc NCTCOG PROJECT STATUS REVIEW llGENERAL INFORMATION I roject Code ..􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀬􀀡􀀭__􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁃􀀻􀀺􀀮􀁓􀀽􀀭􀁊􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁌􀀮􀀮􀁌􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀺􀀮􀁵􀁪􀀠District ocation r City DALLAS &" .'-. rom ·0 Agency 􀁦􀀮􀀧􀀾􀀲􀁾􀁊􀁩􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀡􀀮􀁬􀀮􀁉􀁩􀁊􀁉􀁪􀀺􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Description INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT :omment 􀁾􀀠Total ProJeet Cost (includ•• !'E. ROW, Construcl/on)F Federal Federal Funds Programmed By Year U N State FY2000 .1 FY2003 $0 [) Local FY2001 $0 FY2004 $0 I Total FY2002 $0 FY2005 $0 N Obligated Funding Category ICMAQ IG 3J ADVANCED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 4J RIGHT·OF·WAY PHASE Has agreement with TxDOT been l/Is ROW needed? (YIN) ysigned? (YIN) Date of agreement What agency is responsible for MLLA$ CO.(mm/dd/yy) 􀀱􀀱􀀧􀀭􀀨􀀴􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀵􀀠ROW acquisition? What is the total number ofHas consultation with TxDOT for Iproject development begun? (YIN) y parcels that need to be acquired? Has project been cleared V What number has been environmentally? (YIN) acquired to date? 0, What was was the dale of clearance? What is the date of Final ROW (mm/dd/yy) 􀀢􀀿􀀭􀁚􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀹􀀢􀀠acquisitio n?' (mmlddlyy) O//$I/D/Percent of PSiE complete? far¢:. Have plans been sent to utility yHas PSIE been through TxDOT y company(ies)? (YIN) review? (YIN) Are utility adjustments needed? 5J CONSTRUCTION PHASE (YIN) Y Estimated Contract let Date (mmlyy) 􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀯􀀠What date were utility adjustments completed?' 03/31/0(Estimated Completion Date (mm/yy) 􀀶􀁊􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀲􀀭(mm/dd/yy) , If date has not occurred, please estimate the expected date this item will take place. . . . .JPlease Indicate below if there IS any more information about the project that has not been addressed above: 1()50DO 1121/00 Report completed by: Please print NCTCOG PROJECT STATUS REVIEW ":"1􀁲􀀺􀁉􀁇􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁅􀀺􀀺􀀢􀁎􀀺􀀭􀀽􀁅􀀺􀀭􀀽􀁒􀁁􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁉􀁎􀁾􀁆􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁏􀁾􀁒􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀢􀁍􀁾􀁁􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁔􀀺􀀺􀀢􀁉􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁉􀀠DALLAS'roject Code 􀁜􀀭􀀻􀀡􀀵􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁌􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀴􀁌􀀡􀀭� �􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀽􀁃􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁓􀁊􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁌􀀧􀁥􀀺􀀺􀁬􀁷􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁓􀀮􀀮� �􀁬􀁬􀀮􀁦􀀠District .ocation City 'rom Agency DALLAS CO 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Description INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ro 􀁾􀁯􀁭􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠£ Total Project Cost < (Includes PI:, ROW, Construction)F Federal Federal Funds Programmed By Year U N State FY2000 , FY 2003 $0 D Local FY 2001 $0 FY2004 $0 I Total FY2002 $0 FY2005 $0 􀁾􀀠Obligated Funding Category ICMAQ I 31 ADVANCED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 41 RIGHT ·OF·WAY PHASE Has agreement with TxDOT been Is ROW needed? (YIN) ysigned? (YIN) V < Date of agreement. What agency is responsible for IltIL1AS (!{J.(mm/ddlyy) II.;, f f---913 ROW acquisition? What is the total number of llo(Percent of PS/E complete? Have plans been sent to utility company(ies)? (YIN) /<10 yHas PSIE been through TxDOT review? (YIN) yo Are utility adjustments needed? (YIN) \I5J CONSTRUCTION PHASE Estimated Contract Lei Date (mmlyy) Estimated Completion Date (mmtw) expected date this item will take place, , .IPlease indicate below If there Is any more information about the project that has not been addressed above: What date were utility 􀀨􀁒􀀯􀁾􀀯􀀠adjustments completed?" (mmlddlyy) 03iJI/D(t;,'/e:>Z• If date has not occurred, please estimate the Report completed by: Please print 121100 Dallas County CMAQ Program Status 11-1 0-00 Sorted by Project # 11 I""'············ : 􀁾􀁯Wilhurt 􀁩􀁧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀥􀀠􀁉􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Lp12 􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁩􀁉􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁦􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠05 . Bruton r (Lp. 12\ Dallas 05 DOD 12. 􀁾􀀠􀀬􀁧􀁾􀁟􀁟􀁯􀁮􀁮􀁩􀁥View r(lp. 12\ ___􀀧􀀬􀀬􀁄􀁊􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭,VO ort Worth Dalla. 106 I Sylvan __ ,______ ., 􀀮􀀻􀀻􀁩􀁄􀁾􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁡􀀢􀀭􀁳􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭� �􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀬􀀬􀀰􀀶􀀧􀀡􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀧􀀽􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀭􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁮􀁗􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀢􀁏􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭..􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀢􀁶􀀱􀁾􀁡􀀸􀁮􀁏􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀁉􀁧􀀭􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀠,􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠I:. I 􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠,au ,ua.,,. __ 􀀢􀀮􀀭􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁩􀁡",,-5__-+__ "'" --, 􀀡􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁉􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀽􀁪􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁉􀁴􀁯􀁾􀀬􀀮, . j... 􀁾􀁑􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁡􀁮􀁾.. 􀁩􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁟􀁟􀀠 I SH180 (Davisl, ..􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀺􀁩􀁄􀀽􀁄􀁡􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀮􀁳􀁾􀁟􀁾____" 􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀻􀀺􀀽􀀮􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁶􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀿􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠";g::::: Co, -􀀮􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀡􀀰􀀶􀁾􀁄􀁛􀁾􀁾 􀁊􀁬􀁩􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀧􀂷􀀭􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀭􀁔􀁶􀁩􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠'g::::: ' ' , 􀁧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾'D 􀁾􀁄􀁾􀀧􀁡􀀢􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀵􀀧􀁾􀁃􀁃􀁯􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀺􀁷􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁏􀁮􀁐􀀱􀀳􀁒􀁏􀁗􀀮􀁌􀁭􀁗􀁲􀁴􀁨􀀷􀀦 􀀱􀀳􀁦;_____􀀬􀀪􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀬􀀽􀁲􀀬􀁐􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀺􀀢􀀽􀁡CJn"f--rrt----..· -----'...-,.,􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾:... 􀀺􀀺􀀷􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀱􀀱􀀭---, ,_ ISW 3rd SI. . ,ram 'r. e ,Ian' Carrier Pkwy. __ !iH20 ,ram 'ra e ': lan' ISW23rdSI. ltoSH18C ,ram ' .,__ ; lan' Isw 14th SI. SE 14th 􀁾􀁾􀀠6H180 : 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠Pre Ie 10' 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺 1,1 ISW 19th 51. 1 to SH18D ,rane Pro Ie lan' !SE 14th 51. ,H 303 Irane Pra ie lan' IFM 1382 (SE 8th) ., SH 303 Iran< Prairie lan' 107 Great SW PkwY_ SH 303 ,rane 'rairie 100% Pia 108 JUpiter ____ """""",.,",1. , . ar 108 I 1 .. ,ar' IQlL 'Iano i 108 uoiter I 108 IBeit Une 'lana I I MYI:; 108 IBeli Una iJupiter I ! 􀁾􀁖􀀺􀀺􀀻109 FM 1382 'I ,Rd, :edar jill"______ ChalleyRll, I RUn ' ;.Soto lerler􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁗􀁆􀁾􀁍􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀳􀁂􀀲􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁐􀁏􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁌􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀽􀀢􀀬􀀺􀀧􀀠." _, ;eSoto ,er􀁉􀁾􀀠US 67 ""'_ _ I I 10 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁦􀂰􀀮􀁬􀁃􀁯􀁏􀁏􀁥􀁬 􀁬􀁬􀀠􀀺􀁧􀁧􀁾􀁯􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠Deleted10D IBeit Line Colt --: 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀠i 65% Review Page 1 of 3 Dallas County CMAQ Program Status 11-10-00 Sorted by Project # 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀬D 􀁾􀁯􀁩􀁴􀀠i ina Vallev I Dallas Co. Deleted Midwav ,ton Dallas 􀁾􀁯􀀮􀀠00% Plan , Iwav Dallas Co. 00% Plan Midway Dallas Co. . 100% Plan Midway Trinity Mills Dallas Co. 100% Plan all.. Vaiting on ROW 􀁾􀀮__ : II 1635 SB larland 100% ,I 1d. I I I Run : >.1:010 I Under' i 17 I Wav 'oit i Dallas , laitine on ROW '060 I vier .. Dallas C ,Ieteg......... 1 02 II Hill JS 67 SB : II 􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀡􀁬􀀱􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁬􀁦􀁲􀁬􀁉􀁌􀁏􀁮􀀠ROW. 02 II Hill I I I on ROW 􀀱􀁾􀀲􀀹􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺__,':""::O"C-I______--t;;'rankford 1 lallas Mv:.r I I 1 0 􀁾􀁯􀁩􀀠I'Dallas Co. Deleled 􀁾􀀢􀀠Col ett 􀁾􀀻􀀵􀁾􀁡􀁫􀁫􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠: 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁟􀀬􀀮􀀠i 'alnut Hill Da las 100% Plan Review 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠)a1las Tollwav ,oval 12' Da las Waitina an ROW I"!:''''='-'-< ],.)::!"".I1:=.!as,I� �􀀢􀀮􀀭􀀽􀀢􀀧􀁭􀁩􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀨􀀲􀀩􀀭􀀫􀀢􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁪􀁲􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁶􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁶􀀺􀁅􀁾􀀬􀀽􀂷􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀽􀁣􀁯􀀽􀀮􀀮􀀽􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁍􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀱􀀧􀁾􀁌on ROW 29 IDalias N. Tollway (2) Trinity Mills Dallas Mylar (100%), i6 'Dallas N. Tollwav Dallas . Waitlno on ROW Page 1 of 3 Dallas County CMAQ Program Status 11-10-00 Sorted by Street Names I I I I . i I . , I Page 2 of 3 Dallas County CMAQ Program Status 11-10-00 Sorted by Street Names . j , I 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀁩􀀢􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀫􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭! I i , -.I -(1:;;;---􀀭􀀭􀁳􀀢􀀬􀀺� �􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀠.__ ._-􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭..-------i i i i i i i I i Complete, Waiting on ROW Under Construction 100% Plan Review 100% Plan Review Deleted 100% Plan Corrections 100% Plan Corrections 100% Plan Corrections Page 3 of 3 November 15, 2000 Mr. Eric Stamater, P.E. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elm Brook, Ste. 250 Dallas, TX 75247 VIA FAX Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program 2nd Final Consolidated Review Comments Project 12 Dear Mr. Stamater: The PMIE has received and consolidated the "2nd Final Submittal" review comments from the reviewing agencies pertaining to Project 12. A copy of this letter and the comments will be Emailed to you today. Enter your responses on the electronic copy and retum an electronic and a signed hard copy to this office no later than November 29, 2000. If you feel that some review comments need further discussion, notify this office immediately upon receipt. After all comments have been resolved and dispositioned, you shall resubmit the entire plan set for review. After approval of these corrections, the sealed mylars will be requested. If you have any questions, please contact me at 214-747-6336 ext. 26. Questions or further clarification of the review comments can be directed to Jack Loggins at ext. 28. Sincerely, Ivan F. Nicodemus, P.E. Program Manager Attachments: (1) 2nd Final Consolidated Review Comments (2.) Letter From Addison dated 11/2100 (3.) Mark-up of Beltway Drive at Midway cc: Don Cranford, P.E., Asst. Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachments Moosa Saghian, P.E., Texas Department of Transportation, w/o attachments Fraydoon Nafissi, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation, wI attachments Byron Stephens, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation, wI attachments Matt Hotelling, P.E., City of Carrollton, wI attachments Steven Chutchian, P.E., Town of Addison, wI attachments Jerry Murawski, P.E., City of Farmers Branch, wI attachments C:ITEMP\031 P122nd Final Review .doc J DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2n , Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 1 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. Comment (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. chanoe add delete etc. 1. 88,89,90, Notes, 5lli paragraph, add anotationthaHhe values 91,92,93, are for 30 mph. Also add for 40 mph On taper: 13 m; 94,95 On tangent: 26 -32 m. Resolve with Matt HotellinQ @(972) 466-3051 2. 89 Add distance for sign number lOon the southwest comer Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 3. 89,98,101 Driveway on southeast comer is NOT in accordance Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom D with the City of Carrollton Driveway Ordinance. Delete Hammons 10/26100 this driveway from the plans. Minimum distance for a driveway from the intersection is 45.7 m. Resolve with Matt Hoteliing @(972) 466-3051 4. 90 Remove the left turn arrow that leads into the barricaded area. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 ---------------------------5. 90 Change merging taper to a minimum of 90 m. for 40 mph PM/E Comment: MUTCD requires 90 m. Please change. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 6. 93 Change merging taper for northbound Midway to 90 m. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 7. 95 Change all three solid white lines to the same length Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 8. 97 Delete laydown curb in northwest comer. Provide Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom D standard non-mountable curb. Hammons 10126/00 Resolve with Matt Hotellina @(972) 466-3051 v Action Codes Dispositioned By: ________Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D-Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C-Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required NIA -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2no Final Review Date: November 1,2000 I Sheet: 2 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PMIE Raviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. I Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. chanoe, add delete etc. 9. 99, 100 Removal Notes. Change PALNS to PLANS Resolve with Matt Holelling @(972) 466-3051 10. 101 Add existing traffic pole to diagram Resolve with Matt Hotelling @. {972}466-3051 11. 103 Change. Lane lines dividing exclusive tum lanes should be drawn as solid lines Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 12. 103,104 Clarify what item J is describing. Resolve with Matt Hotellina (Ql (972) 466·3051 13. 107 Add Spread Spectrum Radio antenna to traffic pole nearest cabine!. PMlE Comment: City of Carrollton Standard· Plans must be changed. Resolve with Matt Hotellina @(972) 466-3051 14. 107 Add signal heads 24, 25, 26, and 27 to Signal Head Schedule Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 15. 107 Change existing traffic symbol to match legend Resolve with Matt Hotellina @(972) 466-3051 16. 107 Change location of near side signal heads. Near side signal heads should be mounted on pedestrian signal pole. Where appropriate, near side traffic signal heads should be mounted on back of traffic pole. Delete near side signal heads from mast arms. PMfE Comment: Carrollton prefers that the signal mast arms be near-parallel to the crosswalk and that the signals be angled toward the drivers. If this will reduce the number of near-slde mounts, v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: _____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment C-Disagree, Designer and E-Exception, Resolution Required Date: -------------------Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doe -------------DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2"' Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 3 of 23I Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated Item I Page No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. I change add, delete, etc. you might want to do this instead. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 17. 107 Delete one -5 section head from the dual left turns. Change the location of the remaining 5 section head to be located between the dual left turn lanes. PMlE Comment: Carrollton standard practice is to have one signal head at the mid-point of the dual left turn lanes. Resolve with Matt Hotellina (ill (972) 466-3051 107 Prefer Changing the signal mast arms parallel to the18. D crosswalks with the signal heads angled. PMlE Comment: Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom Hammons 10/26/00. However if you can eliminate near-side Signal heads, you may want to do this. Resolve with Matt Hotelling (ill (972) 466-3051 Pole chart. City of Carrollton only stocks mast arms in the following lengths: 44 ft, 34 ft. 24 ft and 14 ft. Any mast arms i.e. 18.3 or 11.0 m mast amns shall be provided by the contractor. For between 1 and 4 irregular mast arms sizes. the contractor shall provide one (1) spare mast arm for each of the sizes other than those listed on the previous page. Between 5 and 8 irregular sized mast arms, the contractor shall provide two (2) spare mast arms for each of the sizes other than those listed on the previous page. If mast arm requires a bolt ring otherthan 17 inch bolt ring. A spare pole shall be provided using the same 􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁭􀁵􀁬􀁡􀁾􀁾􀀠 19. 107 Dispositioned By: _________ A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: ____________ C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Date: ____________ Reviewer Resolution Required NfA -Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 ConSOlidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc v Action Co des DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Submittal: 2"' Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 4Project:: CMAQ Project 12 of 23I Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated Item I Page No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. I chanQe add delete, etc. above, PMle Comment: Carrollton will delete the comment if a spare 48 feet long signal pole and arm can be provided. We will request approval to do this. In your redesign, please change to their preferred lengths. If no rework is required on a particular corner, you can leave as is If the spare pole is approved.. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051". . Change block numbers on Street blades to the comect block numbers, Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 21, 20. 107 107 Add R3-4 signs to median nose for each approach Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 Hammons 10126/00 22. Add Spread Spectrum Radio antenna symbol to legend Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 107 Change tums of all loop detectors from 2 to 3 turns. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 23. 10S Add standard sheet for 4S-A or metric equivalent. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 24. 10S 25. Change Cable termination chart from 16 CNDR to 20 CNDR. Copy of the 20 CNDR cable temnination chart for the City of Carrollton is located at the end of this document labeled Cable Termination Chart for Midway/Keller Springs -20 CNDR. PMlE Comment: The City Standard is 20 CNDR. Please change throughout. 10S . v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A • Not Applicable C:ITEMPlP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2,doc 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Projecl12 Submittal: 2n , Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 5 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747·6336 x 28 Item No. I Page No. Sheet No. Comment· (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change add delete, etc. Response Action Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 26. 108 Wire Size and Type. Add Spread Spectrum to chart. Resolve with Matt Hotellin!:! @(972) 466·3051 27. 108 Wire Size and Type. Conduit 10 appears to be measure incorrectly according to the plans. Check and change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 28. 108 Wire Size and Type. Length of Run total appears to not add correctly. Check and change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 29. 108 Wire Size and Type. Length of 16 CNDR lotal does not appear to add correctly. Check and change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling@(972) 466-3051 30. 108 Wire Size and Type. NO.6 BARE total does not add up correctly. Check and change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @-(972) 466-3051 31. 108 Wire Size and Type. No.8 SHHW total does not add up correctly. Check and change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 32. 108 Change Traffic Signal Plans Summary Sheet to correctly correspond with above changes. Resolve with Matt Hotellin!:! @(972)466·3051 33. 108 Change saw cut lengths to match plans. Couple do not appear to match plans set. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·30!tl 34. 108 Delete signal heads will be provided by the city. Add signal heads will be provided by the contractor. v Action Codes A • Agree, Designer will comply D • Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________ C • Disagree, DeSigner and E -Exception, Resolution Required Date: -------------------Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:\TEMPIP12 Consolidate. (972) 466-3051 -----------44, 124 Add edge of pavement Resolve with Matt Hotelling @􀀨􀀹􀀷􀀲􀀩􀁾􀀶􀀶􀂷􀀳􀀰􀀵􀀱􀀠45, 124 Clarify the location of the ROW line on the SW comer Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 􀀴􀀶􀀶􀀺􀁾􀀨􀀩􀀵􀀱􀀠.... 46. 124 Add Spread Spectrum Radio antenna to traffic pole nearest cabinet. PMfE Comment: City of Carrollton Standard -Plans must be changed. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 47, 124 Change the name plates for Sojoum/Belmeade to one blade instead of two, Arrows will be added to distinguish which direction is the appropriate street. Block numbers are incorrect on plan set, Resolve with Mat! Hotellina to'>. (972) 466-3051 46, 124 Add additional pull box at pole T-2. Also add conduit run from this new pull box to T-2 pole, PMlE Comment: Carrollton will not let wire go in and out of the base of a signal pole. Change the plans. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-305.1. 49. 124 Add R3-4 signs to median nose for each approach. Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom 0 Resolve with Matt Hotellina to'>. (972) 466-3051 Hammons 10126100 " .... 50. 124 Add Spread Spectrum Antenna to legend. Resolve with Matt Ho!elling @(972) 466-3051 51. 125 All loops shall have 3 turns in concrete Resolve with Mat! Hotellina to'>. (972) 466-3051 v Action Codes Disposilioned By: _________ Title: ___________A • Agree, Designer will comply D-Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C-Disagree, Designer and E-Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2,doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Submittal: 2"0 Final ReviewProject:: CMAQ Project 12 Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 8 of 23I Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Item I Page No. Comment -(state fully action required, Le., clarify, Response Action chanoe, add delete etc.No. Sheet No. I Item 656. Add standards sheet for 48-A or metric equivalent Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 52. 125 Pole chart. City of Carrollton only stocks mast arms in the following lengths: 44 ft, 34 ft, 24 ft and 14 ft. Any mast arms i.e. 18.3 or 11.0 m mast arms shall be provided by the contractor. For between 1 and 4 irregular mast arms sizes, the contractor shall provide 53. 125 one (1) spare mast arm for each of the sizes other than those listed on the previous page. Between 5 and 8 irregular sized mast arms, the contractor shall provide two (2) spare mast arms for each of the sizes other than those listed on the previous page. If mast arm requires a bolt ring other than 17 inch bolt ring. A spare pole shall be provided using the same formula above. PMlE Comment: Carrollton will delete the comment If a spare 48 feet long signal pole and arm can be provided. We will request approval to do this. In your redesign, please change to their preferred lengths. If no rework is required on a particular corner, you can leave as is if the spare pole is approved•• Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 .. Change the cable termination chart to the table located at the end of this document labeled Termination Chart for MidwayfBelmeade/Sojourn -16 CNDR. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 54. 125 Disposilioned By: _________ Title: ____________ v Action Codes A -Agree, Designer will comply 0-Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception. Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A • Not Applicable C:ITEMP\P12 ConSOlidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2'" Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 9 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. Comment -(slate fully action required, I.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. chanQe, add delete, etc. 55. 125 Wire Size and Type: Add Spread Spectrum Radio (SSR) cable to chart. PM/E Comment: City of Carrollton Standard -Plans must be changed. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 56. 125 Wire Size and Type: Conduit 10. Change number of opticom cables from 1 to 2 and change the appropriate values Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 57. 125 Wire Size and Type: Conduit 10. Change the number of 16 CNDR cables from 1 to 2. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 58. 125 Wire Size and Type: Conduit 4. Change to length from 17.4 to 14.4 and Change the aSSOCiate lengths. Resolve with Matt Hoteliing @(972) 466-3051 59. 125 Wire Size and Type: Conduits 1, 5,8 and 10 appear to be different lengths on plan set. Change accordingly. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 60. 125 Traffic Signal Plans Summary Sheet. Belmeade/Sojourn blades will be combined on one blade for each corresponding pole. Change values. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @'(972) 466-3051 61. 125 Change corresponding values to changes stated above in the Signal Summary Plans Sheet Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466-3051 62. 125 Clarify that the city will provide the cabinet, controller, and overhead signs. PM/E Comment:TIl.EI.City of Carrollton will provide v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ___________A -Agree, Designer will comply D-Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ___________C-Disagree, Designer and E· Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A • Not Applicable C:ITEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2'N Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 10 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item No. I Page No. Sheet No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e .. clarify, change, add, delete etc. Response Action the signs and all hardware for overhead streetname signs. Add a note that requires the contractor to install these signs on the mastarms. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 􀀴􀀶􀀶􀂷􀀳􀀰􀁾􀁌􀀢􀀠63. 125 Change that the signal head will NOT be provided by the City. Signal heads will be provided by the contractor. Resolve with Matt Hotelling @(972) 466·3051 64. 125 Recommend Add values in U.S. customary units beside metric for the benefit of the contractor building the new intersection. Resolve with Matt Hotelling,@(972)466-3051 Comment Withdrawn In meeting with Tom Hammons 10/26/00 D Cable Termination Chart for Midway/Belmeade/Sojoum -16 CNDR v Action Codes Codes Dispositioned By: _________ A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: ____________ C • Disegree, Designer and E· Exception, Resolution Required Date: ____________ Reviewer Resolution Required NIA • Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2"' Final Review Dale: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 11 I of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PMIE Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 ---------------------Response IActionItem I Page No. I Comment -(state fully action required, Le., clarify, No. Sheet No. change, add, delete, etc. ---------------------C-"BLE 1 16 CABLE 2 CABLE 3 CABLE 4 CNDR CONDUCTOR NO. COLOR I RED 2 GREEN 3 YELLOW 4 WHITE ! 5 BLACK i 6 BLUE 7 RED/W HITE 8 GREEN/W HITE 9 BL UE/W HlTE 10 WHITE/BLACK II RED/BLACK 12 GREEN/BLACK 13 BLUEIBLACK 14 BLACKIRED 15 ORANGE/BLACK 16 BLA CK/W HITE CNDR 16 CNDR 16 CNDR 16 CNDR FROM T·I FROM T·2 TO FROM T·3 FROM T·4 TO CNTRL. CNTRL. TO CNTRL. TO CNTRL. SH 1,2,3 SH 6,7,8 SH 11,12,13 SH 16,17,18 R R R R SH 1,2,3 SH 6,7.8 SH 11,12,13 SH 16,17,18 G G G G SH 1,2,3 SH 6,7,8 SH I J ,12,13 SH 16,17,18 Y Y Y Y SH COM SH COM SH COM SH COM SH I SH 6 SH II SH 16 .... Y .... Y .... Y .... Y SH 1 ------511 6 SH II SH SH 16 .... G .... G .... G .... G SH 5 SH 9 SH 15 3H 19 DW DW DW DW SH 5 SH 9 SH 15 SH 19 W W W W F 2 PED CALL F6 PED CALL F6PEDCALL F2PEDCALL PB COM PB COM PB COM PB COM SH 4 SH 10 S H 14 SH 20 DW DW DW DW Sil 4 SH 10 SH 14 SH 20 W W W W F4 PED CALL F4PEDCALL F8PEDCALL F8PEDCALL SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPARE SPA RE SPARE SPA RE v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C • Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required NIA -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Reviewer: Consolidated Submittal: 2n• Final Review Organilation: PM/E Item I Page No. L Comment -(state fully action required, i,e., clarify, No, Sheet No. change, add, delete, etc. Date: Novem ber 1, 2000 I Sheet: 12 Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x28 I of 23 Response IAction Cable Termination Chart for Midway/Keller Springs -20 CNDR ... CABLE 1 1. eND R CONDUCTOR eN DR NO, COLOR FROM 1·1 TO eNTRL. .. S H 1,2.3I RED R 2 GREE N S H 1,2,3G 3 YELLOW SH 1,2,3 '{ 4 WHITE SHe 0 M , B LA C K S H I.... Y • B LV E S H I ...G 7 REDfW HlTE S H , DW 8 GREEN/W HITE S H , W 9 BLUE/W HITE F 2 PED CALL 10 WHITE/BLACK PB COM II RED1BLACK SH 4 OW 12 GREEN1BLACK S H • W 13 BLUE/BLACK F4PEDCALL ,. St A C K fR EO S H 24 R " ORA N GElS t A C K S H 24 Y I. B LAC K /W H IT E S H 24 G 17 W H l1'E/RED SPA RE 18 ORA N GE/RED SPA R E 19 BLUE/RED SPA R E 20 RE 0 'GREEN S l'A RE '--. CABLE 2 􀁾􀀮􀁁􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠CABLE 4 16 CNDR 16 eN DR FROM T·2 TO FROM T··3 FROM 􀁔􀁾􀀴􀀠CNTRL, TO CNTRL. TO CNTRL, SH 6,7,8 S811.12.13 SA 16,17,18 R R R SH 6,7,S S811.12.13 SH 16,11,IB G 0 0 S86,7,8 S H J J ,12,1 J S8 􀀱􀁾􀀮􀀱􀀷􀀬􀁉􀁂􀀡􀀠'{ y S 􀁾􀀠COM S8 COM sH COM S H • S H 11 S H 16 ...Y ...Y ...Y S H 6 S H 11 S H 16 4G .... G ...0 su 9 SA U S H 19 OW OW DW 8M 9 S HIS S H 19 .... w w w 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠F6PEDCALL F 6 PED CALL F 2: PED CALL PH CO M PB COM PB COM 8M 10 S H 14 S H 20 OW DW DW s􀁽􀁦􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁾􀀠S H 14 SH 20 W W w F 4 PED CALL FSPEDCALL FaPEDCALL S H 25 8 H 26 SH 21 It R R S H 25 S H 26 S H 27 Y Y Y S H 2.s-SH 26 S H 27 0 G G SPARE SPA RE SPA R E SPARE SPA RE SPA RE SPA RE SPA R E SPA R E SPA R E SPA RE SPA R E D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment E -Exception, Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable , I • v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________Title: ___________A -Agree, Designer will comply Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and Reviewer Resolution Required C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2,doc -----------------DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2n• Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 l Sheet: 13 I of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item1 Page No. I Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response l Action..J::!!L ... Sheet No. change, add, delete, etc. --------Typicals Typical details for proposed sidewalk, rip·rap, and driveway construction include placement of wire mesh reinforcement. #3 steel rebar on 18" c·c, both ways is preferred in lieu of wire mesh. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450-2886 65. The proposed sidewalk detail should include Detail 66. Sidewalk provisions for a 1"·2" sand cushion. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchlan @972-450--2886 The general removal note #4 should be changed to Pavers 67. Landscape read as follows: "Undamaged existing landscaping pavers in medians shall be salvaged and used in proposed medians. Additional landscape pavers shall be used when when necessary, and shall be considered i subsidiary to total cost of project." PM/E Comment The note should call for the salvaging of existing pavers and taking to a city 68. 39 69. 40 70. 70 storage yard, All new installations shall use new landscape pavers, Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450-2886 Square off the limits of removal of existing pavement, from Sta. 9+867.850 to Sta. 9+913.850. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 Indicate how all sign relocations will be performed. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450-2886 Limits of proposed driveway removal and replacement 􀁾􀀠-----------------------------------------v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: _____________A -Agree, Designer will com ply o -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: _____________C -Disagree, Designer and E· Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A • Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2n" Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 14 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. No. Sheet No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change, add, delete, etc. Response Action do not match limits shown on sheet 69, from Sta. 9+939.150 to Sta. 9+947.130. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 71. 70 Widening of the existing pavement along the south side of Keller Springs Road will involve the removal of numerous large trees and create a substantial difference in elevation between the proposed curb and adjacent parking lot facilities. A variable height retaining wall is necessary to address this situation and should be incorporated into the plans and specifications. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 72. 99 Square off the limits of removal of existing pavement, from Sta. 9+818.676 to Sta. 9+910.976. Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 73. 99 Indicated how the eXisting vault and sign will be relocated Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 74. Include the attached typical irrigations notes on the final construction plans as shown below: Typical Irrigation Notes 1. The contractor shall hire a Licensed Irrigator as a subcontractor to oversee all activities that impact existing, or proposed irrigation systems. 2. Prior to demolition or construction activities, existing irrigation systems shall be turned on. The location of heads, valves, and pipe shall be marked v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: _____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: _____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM of 23Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated Submittal: 2" Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 15I Item I Page No. I Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response Action No. Sheet No. change, adcl, delete, etc. where demolition or construction will impact the system. Deficiencies in the system shall be noted and reported to the system owner. A photographic or video record shall be made if appropriate. 3. Piping shall be cut, capped and marked at the limits of construction. 4. At the completion of construction, the Licensed Irrigator shall restore and test the irrigation system for proper function. The test shall be conducted in the presence of the Town's Public Works Inspector, and the system owner. 5. All costs for this work shall be paid for on a lump sum basis (or subsidiary to the job). Resolve W Steven Z Chutchian @972-450--2886 Eliminate the improvements on Beltway. See the Drive at 75. Beltway attached letter from Steve Z. Chutchian and the Midway related drawing. Resolve with Jack Loggins 214-747-6336 x 28 General The City has constructed improvements along Midway Road between 1-635 and Spring Valley Road. Carter & Burgess performed the design. The plans, which have been in the possession of Carter & Burgess before 1997, show all the improvements that have been constructed at the intersection. Resolve with Jerry Murawski @FB (972) 247-3131 76. The barrier free ramps at the four corners of the intersection have been constructed. There is a small retaining wall at the southeast corner that may need to be modified to accommodate the widening on McEwen 77. 19 v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2"0 Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 16 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Response No. Sheet No. chanoe, add delete etc. Road, east of Midway Road. Resolve with Jerry Murawski @FB (972) 247-3131 78. 20 On the southeast corner of the intersection the plans.show "Remove Light (by others)". The signal needs to be relocated On this corner as part of the project, not "by others." The "Removal Notes" on this sheet refer to signal plans that are not included. It is expected that the signal plans would provide for the removal of the existing pole (to be salvaged to the City, removal of the fOUndation, installation of a new fOUndation, installation of a new pole with signal heads, and pedestrian push buttons, extension of conduit to the new pole and replacement of signal cable from the cabinet on on the NW corner to the new signal pole location. The City hopes that adequate ROW exists for this relocation; this needs to be checked by Carter & Burgess. The pole relocation will require changes to the quantity sheets for the project, particularly sheet 7A, because the current sheet does not provide signal quantities for this intersection. Resolve with Jerrv Murawski @FB (972) 247-3131 79. 35 The taper along the south side of Spring Valley Road has already been constructed. ReSOlve with Jerry Murawski @FB (972) 247-3131 80. 36: The median noses on Spring Valley Road, east of Midway Road. and on Midway Road, south of Spring Valley Road. are within Farmers Branch and need to be reconstructed as monolithic concrete median nOseS. The other two median noses are in Addison. of 23 Action v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree. Designer will comply D -Delete. Reviewer Withdraws Comment Dats: ______________________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception. Resolution Required Reviewer Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:\TEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2"" Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 17 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747·6336 x 28 Item No. I Page No. Sheet No. Comment-(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, chanoe add delete, etc. Response Action Resolve with Jerry Murawski (fll FB (972) 247-3131 81. 44 The improvements need to include new lane markings on Midway Road, south of Spring Valley Road. The existing lane markings are not compatible with the proposed intersection improvements. Resolve with Jerry Murawski @FB (972) 247-3131 82. Cover sheet Replace "CONTROLING INTERSECTION· with "CSJ: 0918-45-344". Total net length is wrong. Fix it and show it alone. Fill the Highway No block of the title block by ·CS". Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 83. Index of sheets Update CCCG and all other standards to current edition. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 84. 6·7 A. Revise the thickness of item 360 to 200mm. Revise the few related typical section sheets accordingly. With regard to this matter, TxDOT does not deem necessary to have a supplemental agreement for such a simple reviSion. All parties would be better off if you just avoid making a complex issue out a very simple matter. B. Add item 400 for sewer pipe excavation. C. Delete item 104 (curb and gutter). It's subsidiary to item 104 (pavement). D. Why do you have some of the pavement marking items shown as "for the contractor info only"? E. Relocation and adjustment of the water utility items such as water meters, fire hydrants, sanitary sewer v Action Codes A • Agree, Designer will comply C • Disagree, Designer and D· Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment E -Exception, Resolution Required Dispositioned By: ________ Title: ____________ Dale: ____________ Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2'" Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 18 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PMIE Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. No. Sheet No. I Comment (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change add delete etc. Response Action -manholes, etc., will be the responsibility of the contractor. TxDOT is in the process of making an agreement with the cities involved to take care of this matter. F. Show the location of the two manholes on Spring Valley. G. Why is the vault removed by others? H. Mail box here is a pay item to be removed by the contractor. I. As for the electrical items such as electriC boxes, "by others" applies only when they belong to the utility company. Otherwise they would be considered as pay items that will be handled by the contractor. J. Where light poles are relocated by others, foundation for the relocated "roadway illumination assemblies" shall be paid for by by item 656. K. Remove concrete inlet is the pay item 496. L. Delete the table that has to do with work zone pavement markings. According to the established and standard engineering and construction practice, drums should be placed 0.3 m from the lane lines, which will furnish enough room for construction activities. Therefore, the suggested short-term lane closures or detours would not require any WZ PAV MRKG's. Hence, there is no need for these items in this project. M. Add item 170 while providing quantities for the irrigation systems, along Midway.corridor, that are v Action Codes A -Agree, Designer will comply C -Disagree, Designer and D-Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment E -Exception, Resolution Required Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________ Date: _____________ Reviewer Resolution Required NtA -Not Applicable C:ITEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project;; CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2"' Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 19 of 23 Reviewer: Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item No. I Page No. I Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, Sheet No. change add delete etc. Response Action affected by the project. N. Please revise the quantities as well as the corresponding plan sheets to reflect the above comments. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 85. 7-A The table appears to be incomplete. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 86. 10-12 Some text sizes are too small. Please fix. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 87. Sawcuts: Typical sections and Plans (TCP, Paving and Removals) A. Indicate Max 0.3 m offset from the face of the curb for sawcuts. B. Revise the plans (sawcut locations) to reflect the above comment, especially in the vicinity of the medians. For instance, the sawcut locations indicated for the medians at Spring Valley and Midway have resulted in an unreasonable amount of pavement removal and the subsequent concrete pavement. Same thing on sheet 69 around section B-B. Refer to sheet 97 as an acceptable format. C. Use clip, for sawcut, at intersection and driveway comers. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 88. TCP sheets Other than Lindbergh at Midway intersection, maintain (use) the existinQ lane widths. Then place the drums v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D • Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E • Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A· Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision :a.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 SUbmlllal: 2'N Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 20 of 23 Reviewer. Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 Item I Page No. Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, No. Sheet No. chanoe add delete etc. ---------Response Action at 0.3 m from the existing lane lines during lane closure. No WZ PAY MRKG is needed. The remainder width of the lanes will make the barricades unwarranted. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxOOT (214) 3204434 89. ADA ramps A. On sheet 19 the ADA ramp next to the retaining wall is in conflict with the ramp standard for not having the required landing area. B. Majority of ADA ramps lacks landing area. C. Provide ADA ramp at each new driveway. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 90. 37 The proposed improvement on the east side of Proton Drive appears to be unjustified. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 91. 43-46,59There is no need to show the contour Jines on these 60, sheets. 71-72,80, Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320102-104, 4434 120-121 92. 69 Missing sidewalk north of the driveway on Midway. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 93. 70 Removal, near the driveway on Midway, is not presenting pavement and sidewalk. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 ---------II Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Flnsl Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 of 23 Organization: PMIE Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated Item Comment -(state fully action required, Le., clarify, Response Action No. I Page No. Sheet No. chanQe add delete, etc. """""""""""""""" 􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠76 Use drums instead of WK ZN PAV MRKG for lane Submittal: 2no Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 21I detour. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 94. Modify section B-B proposing a retaining wall that is required due to the difference in elevation between the proposed right lane and the adjacent parking lot. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 95. 86 Incorporate the retaining wall that is needed for the improvement in this area. Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 96. 96 Please revise those quantities affected by addressing sheets and 97. Summary the above comments. estimates Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 3204434 Provide the contract time estimate. time 98. Contract Resolve with Fraydoon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320estimate 4434 " " 􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠The signs to be attached to the pedestrian push button ,108,125 99. 7A,51 ,64,84 assembly ("Push Button for Walk Signal") should not be listed under Item 680. They should be listed in the Small Sign Summaries as subsidiary to Item 688, which is the item number for the push button assemblies. Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 214-319-6413 Only sign panels that exceed 1.5 sq. meters need to , 105,122 100. 47,61 ,73,81 be mounted on type F assemblies. ...... . ...................... Dlspositloned By: _________v Action Codes Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: _____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required NIA -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Submittal: 2no Final Review Date: November 1, 2000 Sheet: 22 of 23I Organization: PMIE Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28Reviewer: Consolidated """"" 􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠ResponseItem t Comment -(state fully action required, Le., clarify, Action No. t Page No. change. add delete, etc. All signs at an intersection should be shown in the Small Sign Summary. Signs that are mounted on mast arms or poles, or on push button assemblies should be included, but with a note concerning mounting location and where they are paid for (items 680, 688 or by city) rather than mounting assembly type. Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 214-319-6413 Sheet No. 50,63,83 If there are existing detectors, they need to be shown on the plans. If the signal is pretimed, please disregard this comment PM/E Comment: Provide a comment clarifying if it is pretlmed. Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀺􀁾􀀱􀀹􀁾􀀶􀀴􀀱􀀳􀀠 101. 102. 2 Standard sheet RAMP-OOA should be replaced with RAMP-OOB (2 sheets). Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 214-319-6413 103. 81 Standard sheet TS-FD-99(M) -From the SMA sheet, it looks like you only have 4 mast arms total, but here you are showing 8 foundations. Change to 1 each, and change the quantity to 16 meters, if you only have 4 mast arms. Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 214-319-6413 104. Standard sheet SMA-130(1)-99(M)(DAL) -Change quantities if you have the 8 poles listed in the TS-FD99(M). Also, the 900-A foundation uses 1 %" diameter anchor bolts -change from the 1 Y:z" bolts listed here. v Action Codes Disposltloned By: ________ Title: ____________A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Date: ____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required NIA -Not Applicable C:\TEMP\P12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc 97 I DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 12 Reviewer: Consolidated Submittal: 2"" Final Review Organization: PM/E Item t Page No. t Comment -(state fully action required, i.e., clarify, No. Sheet No. chanQe, add delete etc. I I Resolve with Byron Stephens, TxDOT 214-319-6413 Date: November 1, 2000 I Sheet: 23 Reviewer Telephone Number: (214) 747-6336 x 28 I of 23 Response Action v Action Codes Dispositioned By: _________ A -Agree, Designer will comply D -Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: ____________ Date: _____________C -Disagree, Designer and E -Exception, Resolution Required Reviewer Resolution Required N/A -Not Applicable C:ITEMPIP12 Consolidated 2nd Final Review Revision 2.doc -"..A1:.Sf>IsoN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2871 ® Post Office Box: 9010 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁮􀀮􀀠Texas 75001-9010 16801 Wes!gtove October 20, 2000 Mr. Jack Loggins Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: CMAQ Program, Project 12 Median Improvements Dear Mr. Loggins: The above mentioned project will greatly impact existing landscaping at most of the affected intersections along Midway Rd. As a result, it is necessary that the following revisions be made to the proposed engineering plans and specifications: a. Placement of6" topsoil in lieu of 100 mm thick reinforced concrete pavement in the proposed medians. Details in the miscellaneous paving detail sheet should be revised accordingly. b. Indicate that existing PVC sleeves in the medians be preserved/replaced in order to permit Town ofAddison staff to reinstall sprinkler systems subsequent to the completion ofall paving improvements. The proposed irrigation notes forwarded to you in a recent correspondence, dated October 11, 2000 shall remain in affect. These revisions will provide reduced construction costs througlIout the project and allow the Town ofAddison to restore aesthetic integrity to these median sections on Midway Road. Ifyou would like to discuss this issue further, please give me a call at 972-4502886. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀩􀁾􀀠Steven Z. Chutchian, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Cc: Mike Murphy, Director of Public Works Slade Strickland, Director ofParks & Recreation Jim Pierce, Assistant Director of Public Works Parsons CMAQ Program Office SrI_em"ft 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, TX 75202 214-747·6336 Fax: 214-741-1937 May 27,1998 Mr. John Baumgartner, P.E. Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Dr. Addison, Texas 75001 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Final Schematic Submittal for Project 12 Dear Mr. Baumgartner: Please find attached the Final Schematic Design Report, Drawings and Environmental Reports submitted by Carter & Burgess. The PMIE has reviewed these documents for compliance and they are ready to be forwarded to TxDOT -Austin for reView and/or approval. The dispositioned design review comments have been included for your information. If you have any questions, please contact me at 214-747-6336 ext. 26. Sincerely, J Ivan F Nicodemus, P.E. Project Manager Attachments: 1) 2) 3) 4) Schematic Design Report 1 copy Schematic Design Drawings 1 set Environmental Reports (6) -1 copy Dispositioned Review Comments cc: Allen Bud Beene, PE, Dallas County Director of Public Works, wlo attach. attach. Don Cranford, P.E., Dallas County Senior Transportation Planner, wlo attach. Over tI Century 01 IInglneerlng Excellence D;IGENERALIG04CORRlG4·1 OUMDDISONl19981OO6.DOC SCHENIATIC DESIGN REpORT MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS PROTON DRIVE Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection with Proton Drive shows operations at LOS "C" for the AM peak and LOS "D" for the PM peak hour. The northbound and southbound approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The eastbound approach has an exclusive right turn lane. Proton Drive is a three-lane roadway. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 7. Proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements include widening the existing two lanes on the westbound approach and restriping these lanes to an exclusive left turn lane and a through-right lane. The eastbound approach is proposed to be widened to include dual right turn lanes and a through-left lane. These improvements showed intersection operations would improve slightly but the LOS would still be "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak hour. Additional Improvements Various phasing alternatives were tested for different geometric alternatives. including the proposed CMAQ improvements. However, analysis showed that the existing laneage could be used along with restriping of the westbound approach. improved signal phasing. and increased storage lengths. The westbound approach would be restriped to match the existing eastbound approach for an exclusive right turn lane and a through-left lane. This alternative would provide operations at LOS "C" for the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 16. Table 17 shows the design criteria used for the geometric design of this intersection. /IVDgt?k!.6/ao Proton Drive 901107 161/26 240177 -------\flrt-LEGEND XXX -AM Peak Hour Traffic XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic 􀁲􀀵􀀯􀁯􀁲􀁾􀁌􀀠-foil􀁦􀁦􀁩􀀭􀀭􀁹􀁾•\...-431308 +--211171 􀀮􀁌􀀩􀁾+16163 ;:?9w-65Z"c Figure 7 1996 Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @Proton Drive SCHMIX1NlRPT 20 C&BJob#95-2211"()10 Proton 81/103-'1"81n265/83-..... 􀁾􀁦􀀠r ....,0... 􀁾􀂭.,...(1).0 􀀭􀁾"'􀁾􀀬􀀽􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 LEGEND j;=.A.M. Peak Hour /jP.M. Peak Hour XXX/XXX *NOTE: 50'R Needed To AI To Turn Into The 17 -AGE I -􀁾.. 't: .:;_•.... " 􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀠-•• 􀁾􀀪l , • i• 1 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠j 􀁾􀀠rt> , ! 􀁾􀁾􀀠..t.. :> 􀁾􀀻􀀠􀁾􀀠::: 0 􀁾􀀮􀀠u PRbpOSED 􀁒􀀮􀁏􀀮􀁗􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠iN§ low Trucks • Lane , ; i , . i· ! I 􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠! ,, Ol, , I I I l􀁾􀀠" ,>, J\ ':( 1 n 1 I ! s I 􀁾􀀠, i ij ij I f, I! I ! I 􀁾􀀠i i i III! i \􀁾􀁉􀀠I I \ ) i• I i0 , I a:: I \!I i \>I 1« \ I 􀁾􀀠! \ I !0 . i 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠i , I I ! ! I i I i ! ,,•• I , I 􀁾􀀠•• "" 􀁾􀀬􀀠, ! 􀁟􀁥􀁾􀀠i 1"', 􀁾􀀠I i i j r!t ! ¢', I ! 􀁾􀀠I ili i , II ( ] ! l!Jj j i(,f} I,. I,, ii i , 1, !,, , i JI '" -I.<..... 0-(.) >-l-(.) -:KING LOT 􀁬􀁾RELOCATE WATER .,.ETER 􀁾__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁌􀀠FNJ BUilDING PROTON DRIVE --1-------------------1---•• Q-. --. -.--:-0--.. -.. -.. -----. -.. -.. -.. -.. CURB -􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠_ M _ 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠_ 􀁾􀀠___ M ____ M ___________ M -. -CONSTRUCT LAY DOWN AMERICAN COLOR 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀭􀁲􀁾􀀠,I PRoposeo R.O.W, STORAGE' """"H -PROPOSED R.O.W. I,• I w o < 􀁾􀀠I I I 111 1;1' , ; " iI 􀁾􀁉o •• 􀁾􀀠PROPOSED R.O.W. ••'....._t• I ) 􀁾􀀠(••I SPRING 􀁖􀁮􀀧􀀭􀀬􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀠PROPOSEO R.O.W. ." ... .... "' ..􀁏􀁾􀁯􀁴􀀠􀁾􀀠.......... (\,1 _ 􀁾􀁭􀁡􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠) 1'1 '-266/259t\ _391/614Spring Valley ,..... 2791426 2041122--'" I t ( 688/425_291156_ 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠10"'«",ott') 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾 􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀿􀀠LEGEND r--A.M. Peak Hour I {P.M. Peak Hour XXXIXXX ADDISON BOTI1.ENECK SruDY MIDWAY RD. & SPRING VALLEY RD. ADDISON, TEXAS RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ffi'ERsECnON tic. DATE: 0RA'tIt< BY: JULY, 1990 LJM SHEET f1L£ NJ.J BY: 1"=40' KMG . OF1-----==« « [bJ Barton-Aschrnan U Associates, Inc. II' • Ii ! i ' , I I I I I Proton I 811103_ 8117,LEGEND265/83 """"""" • 􀁾􀁁􀀮􀁍􀀮Peak HourI I P.M. Peak Hour XXX/XXX .0{> 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠North ! ,• () i I W I : I i • i >... I ... I ::: $ NOTe: 50'R Needed To Allow Trucks To Turn Into The 17' Lane 􀁾􀀠i• • 0::!. T I I Cl \ \ \ i i i I ,.. , I ADDISON BOTTLENECK STUDY tIJ , I I , tIJ \• MIDWAY RD. & PROTON ST.i 11 \ i il! ADDISON, TEXASl. ,•, I >-I \ ! jIi!I \I "=i> ..J . I r. i I' Iii: I I ! 􀁾􀀠I I I Q., I, I I',3': r I r NOTE: EXTEND STORAGE LENGTH FOR BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT TURN BAYS L.____ ____􀁾􀀠_____􀀭􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭'TRANsrnoN-150' I LEGEND r--A.M. Peak Hour r P•M• Peak Ho<.r XXX/XXX ADDISON BOmENECK STUDY MIDWAY RD. & BELTWAY DR. ADDISON, TEXAS RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ""UlS!:C1lCII No. DAl!: ORA"" BY: JULY, 1990 LJM flU: HAUE = APPRO\'Ell S"'J 1"-40' KMG OF Barton-AschIn.an Associa tes. Inc. i , , NOTE: STORAGE LENGTH FOR LEFT-TURN BAY a EXTENDED TO 250'; MAY REQUIRE CLOSURE OF, __kii iff Q:: ... IN MEDIAN OPENINGS NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾.... 􀁾􀀠«>-I:s: 􀁾'" ,....􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀠3: 􀁾􀁯􀀠." 1I;) .... t'J 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺-0"., ..... ) 11' '--3421213I t\ -107141 ' , Lindberg .. 􀁾􀀸􀀷􀀯􀀱􀀱􀀷􀀠13181-""• "tr22/87-17155--.... ,."'.,,,.,,..cc...􀀮􀀬􀁾.,... ... 􀁾A.M. Peal< Ho<.r .,... c ., P.M. Peal< Ho<.r"'''' /I '" XXX/XXX a ,: J -' ,:::i! :;;: '" /i.--d! ........ C\ 'N'>.----:fi+i:--....:C,.'-:J"'---_tC."'!'-+'----,-I________------'-"---+'----' :::....--:r t' 0 t;l!i u 􀁴􀁾􀁴􀁲􀀠!'t\ J iii <, J:J -?.., . (: :; KELLER SPRINGS._-------\ RELOCATE UTJL lTv POLE STEEL o UTILITY POLE " .", '. ..... '.,... \. . , , .. ".. \.,.' ,"C;;" '. ...... '."., '. \ \. .... '. " ) RELOCAfii UTILI.? 􀁐􀁏􀁌􀁾􀀠RELOCATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX \ o , ,-,y. 'r'.U),,. ,." ','0 􀁜􀀮􀁾􀀠.' '.\ \ \ \ o o • o o 0 --L , , TRANS ITlON STORAGE ----􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁘􀀮􀁬􀀮􀀮􀁳􀁲􀁾􀂷􀀡􀀡􀀺􀀡􀀡􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷� �􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀁬􀂷􀀠􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀽􀀽􀀺􀁴􀂥􀀽􀀺􀁡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁯􀀺􀁬􀁑...... . 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠r-'-·........ 􀁆􀀷􀀻􀀷􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁊􀀠'.NOTES: '.'-'" 􀂷􀀭􀂷􀁾􀀺􀁒􀀭􀀺􀁏􀀺􀀮􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠1. EXiST. R.O.W. SHOWN IS. APPARENT ROW ,I RElIJVE RELOCATE ACTUAL R.O.w. WILL BE DETERMINED BY· . EXISTING FiREOESIGN ENGINEER. TREES HYDRANT 2. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE TO SE DESIGNED USING AASHTO 􀁾􀁁􀁐􀁏􀁌􀀨􀁃􀁙􀀠ON GEOMETRiC OESiGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS 1994" THIS DOCUM[NT IS FOR INTERIM REvtEW AND NOT iNT£NOEO 􀁆􀁾􀀠CONSTRUCTION. StOaING. OR PERMITS 􀁐􀁕􀁒􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀠\ , , '., , , " . , , '. \ NOTE: EAST L G Of INTERSECTION SCHEOU EO TO BE IOPRDYED Sm 0,.......... 8Y lExA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY. 10m SCALE: 1-500 20m EXIST. R.O.W. 􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭._._._._",_._._._._._._._., , , \ \ t=55 .$ • 0 o \ \ -• 0 • TRAFFIC BuTTONS • o i i i i LEGEND \ \ , , i ,. ,. , , COG # -2332.003 _._--,_._, _._._.-.-. II @.Q. ... s-MIDWAY AT KELLER SPRINGS CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPRovEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-CARROLLTON SCOle: 1=500 Dote: 12/08/95 EXIST. R.O.W. CENTERL INE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE WATER t,l£TER FIRE HYDRANT POWER POLE IClNITORING WELL DIRECTION Of SURFACE FLOW BOYINGTON NOTES: 1. EXIST. R.D.W. SHOWN [$ APPARENT R.n.w. ACTuAL R.O.W. WILL 8E OETERMINED 8Y DESIGN ENCINEER. 2. PROPOSEO RICHT TURN LANE TO BE DESIGNEO USiNG AASHTO "APOllCY ON CEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS 1994 N THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTERIM REvIEW AND NOT INTENDED FOR 􀁃􀁏􀁎􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁕􀁃􀁔􀀧􀁏􀁎􀁾􀀠BIDDiNG. OR PERMITS PURPOSES. tiiCillll:U .... , '.'"'.of;; " ,1.1',A,. '-"'... ....J 0'.,0 & 􀁾􀀠WATER METER fiRE HYORANT POWER POLE MONITORING WELL DIRECTION Of SURfACE fLOW \ COG # BOYINGTON TO CONCEPT DRAWINTERSECTION CITY LOCAL: AScole: 1=500 -2DOING DDI332.004 OLEY AT MIDWAY -SHT. 1 OF 1 IMPROVEMENT SON-CARROLLTON Dote: 12/08/95 ,.,;,, ,·0..'", ;...:.'"'x;w EXIST. R.O.W. 􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧LINDBERG 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠EXIST. R.O.W. 􀁾I I􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀠\'􀀧􀀭􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀽􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁬􀀠III 11 i , NOTES: 1. EXIST. R.C.W. SHOWN !S APPARENT R.O.W. ACTUAL R.O.W. W'Ll SE OETERM[NEO BY DESIGN EnGiNEER. 2. 􀁢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁧􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀱􀁾􀀶􀀠􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁔􀀵􀁁􀁾􀁩􀁰􀁾􀁐􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS 1994" THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTERlM REVIEW ANO NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCT1QN.SIDO!NG9 OR PERMITS PURPOSES. 6dt i ,...,,. 􀁾􀀠,• 0 . 􀁾􀀠,.0: Cl .,..: 􀀬􀁾"j;;􀁾􀀠: 'W ! -5m o 10m 20m SCALE: 1" 500 , '-􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀬􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁌􀀭􀁩.--.-.--.-.-.--.-.-.--.-.-.--.-.-----.,..-.-.=::::-.-.:::::-.-.-=:!J-y--C------J --{----gl"f f-; -/􀁾􀀠 , ,I I I I , , , 􀀡􀁾􀀠"',, • !o 0,I I :oc , . '" , . 􀁾􀀬􀀠on ,"" ,x 􀁾􀀠;:;j.w t=55 , , , , , , , , , .o.w.EXiST. I LEGEND ---'-'-'-' 􀁅􀁘􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁾􀀠R.O.W. _.-.-.-.-. CENTERLINE 􀁾􀀠TRAffiC SIGNkL POLE @WATER METER .0. fiRE HYDRANT <> POIlER POLE .. IoION ITOR 100 IlEll 􀁾OIRECTION Of SURfACE flOW COG # -2332.005 MIDWAY AT LINDBERG CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON Scale: 1=500 Date: 12/08/95 ., l1!i o'd 0;', 􀁾􀀡-,x. '"' EXIST. R.O.W._._._._._.-._-_._------._.-":.. __ ._._._-_._-􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠--L,--('t EXIST. R.O •••'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'- '-""-._-----------------_._-_._._.-,,------------,./5m 0 10m 20m /"..------, /, ( SCALE: 1 -500 -LEGEND _ .. -•• _ .. -EXIST, R.O.W. _.-._._.-. CENTERLINE T.DOT FUTURE 􀁁􀁌􀁉􀁇􀁎􀁾􀁎􀁔􀀠C""O PROGRAM 􀁉􀁕􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁾􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠................... EXIST. CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE" " WATER IA£TER <> F IRE HyDRANT <> POWER POtE .. UONITORING WELLS 􀁾DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW FSS COG # -2332.006 MIDWAY AT BELTWAY CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON Scale: 1;500 Date: 12/08/95 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠o'.'., 0;', .-I -BELTWAY = [XiST. 􀁒􀀮􀁏􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀠----------_._----._------------._._----.-.," 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭\ " , ; NOTES: 1. (XIST. R.O.W. SHOWN IS APPARENT R_D.W,ACTUAL R.O.W. WrLL 8E DET[RMINED ByDESICN ENCtNEER. 2. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN "LANE TO BE DESIGNED USING AASHTQ "APOl ICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAVS AND STREETS 1"9"94" THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTERIM REVIEw AND NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. BIDDINC. OR PERMITS PURPOSES. 12:9!!-« 3:: Cl-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠z '" o· oI 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀮, 􀁾􀀬􀀠V>.-,x. '"' I I __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --------------------------------------􀁾􀀢􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀾􀀧􀀠􀁜􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀼􀁾􀁵􀀻􀁲􀀺􀀮􀀸􀀺􀁯􀁟􀀬􀁟􀀠􀀼􀁴􀁦􀁬􀁾􀁾 􀀼􀀠",'--·... _---_ .. -.. -__ .1 .' 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠PROTON -TRANSITION _ ST. AL 􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀬􀀢􀀼􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀠e_ N 􀁾􀀠e ..... 􀁓􀁔􀁏􀁾􀀠" >« 3: o ::::;; . ci: "'!x _] 􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀂭􀁾􀀠, 􀁾􀀠, -5m o 10m 20m SCALE: 1= 500 l NOTES: 1. EXIST. R.O.W. SHOWN IS APPARENT R.O.W. ACTUAL R.O.W. WIll BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE TO BE DESIGNED USING AA5HTO "APOL ICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS 1994" THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTERIM REVIEW AND NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. BIDDING. OR PERMITS PURPOSES. JAIoE:5 E. ALLEN 65929 12-14-9!i P.E. 1jQ, 􀁏􀁾􀁔􀁅􀀠I' TRANSITION _. .' 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠JhQ:.!I:. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -' --. -------_ .. -_. _.' .. .. _-" ,"-"-"-"-"-, "',0'-, 􀁾􀀬􀀠..:, 􀁾􀀬􀀠-, x w LEGEND -•• _.---. EXIST. R.O••• -,._,,_,. PROPOSED R.O••• L'!!I TRAFFIC 􀁓􀁉􀁇􀁾􀁁􀁌􀀠POLE 1&1 WATER a.ETER .Q.. FIRE HYDRANT -0-POWER POLE COG # -2332.007 MIDWAY AT PROTON CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-FARMERS BRANCH Scale: 1=500 Date: 12/14/95 ---------------I I I I I I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I -􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁐􀀺􀁒􀀺􀁉􀁈􀁇􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁩􀀺􀀢􀀽􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀦􀁙􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟--_--􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀧􀁉􀀺� �􀀭􀀭--􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀢􀁾􀁉􀁾n,:,.􀁾--1--􀁾--􀁳􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀺:..; ---§-Sr-􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾.... --:T" <>􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁦􀁬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠NOTES: 1. EXIST. A.O.W. SHOWN IS APPARENT A.O.W. ACTUAL A.O.W. wIll BE DETERMINEO BY DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE TO BE OESIGNED USING AASHTO "APOLIC)' ON GEOMETRiC DES!GN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS 1994" THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INTERJM REViEw AND NOT INTENDED FOR CONsTRUCTION. 􀁡􀁉􀁄􀁏􀁉􀁎􀁇􀁾􀀠 OR PERMITS PURPOSES. JAt,ES E. Au,EN P.t. 111,1. I II I -Q. FIRE 􀁈􀁙􀁄􀁒􀁁􀁾􀁔􀀠-0-POWER POLEI I I I .. IIONITORING WELL DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOWI I!lJ: I I FSS COG # -2332.008 MIDWAY AT SPRING VALLEY CONCEPT DRAWING -SHT. 1 OF 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀧INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CITY LOCAL: ADDISON-FARMERS BRANCH Scale: 1=500 Dote: 12/08/95 ,. , ,.. ",. 􀁾􀁉􀁎􀁎􀁓􀁾􀀠 I' 􀁾􀀠... cgj tYfP.1 A 􀁾􀀼􀀾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾••-••• =.=== 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠 ---------4[=; -;;:--------------:=-7577---,I, :f'llf I 'I I I I I I I I,, II!'I 0jill! 1\1: TRAFFIC 􀁓􀁉􀁇􀁾􀁁􀁌􀀠POLE 􀁾􀀠I I I .. WATER METER f -----n--e􀀽􀀽􀁾􀂷􀀺􀁇􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀠SQ,IfH LEG OF ..IOrAY TatE .10£1£0 l't fIfE CI f't " FAN,RS BlUNCK LEGEND _._._.---. EXIST. R.O.". --_._._._. CENTERLINE AGENDA CMAQlCity of Addison Meeting Midway Road Intersections I. Keller Springs A. Coordination with Carrollton 1. Scope of Re-alignment 2. Proposed Intersection Location 3. Re-alignment Schedule B. Scope of Work C. Special Concerns D. R.O.w. Data at Intersection E. Design Issues 1. II. DooleylBoyington A. Coordination with City of Carrollton B. Scope of Work C. Special Concerns D. R.O.W Data at Intersection E. Design Issues 1. III. Lindberg A. Scope of Work B. Special Concerns C. R.O.W Data at Intersection D. Design Issues 1. IV. Centurion A. 􀁅􀁸􀁴􀁥􀁮􀁳􀁩􀁾􀀠B. 􀁳􀁣􀁯􀁰􀁥􀁾􀀠C. Special Concerns D. R.O.W Data at Intersection E. DeSign Issues 1. V. Beltway A. Scope of Work B. Special Concerns C. R.O.W Data at Intersection D. Design Issues 1. :r􀀧􀁍􀁦􀀨􀀧􀁖􀁾􀁕􀀮􀁊􀁳􀀠JY!\IeN-. h( 􀀱􀁃􀁊􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀠I.. "J...E. Design Issues 1. We 􀁾􀁣􀀠􀀾􀁣􀁾􀀯􀁕􀁍􀁣􀀼􀀭􀁉􀀯􀁣􀀠j;. I", tws;e (...{.'1.:'":<\ 1􀁗􀁜􀁦􀁙􀀭􀁏􀁜􀁬􀁥􀁊􀀬􀁍􀀮􀁾􀀫􀀺􀁓􀀠bA. INI JeM ;"" 􀀵􀀶􀁴􀀱􀁣􀁾􀀠of-SPy;", Vall?, I DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS December 14, 1995 Mr. John Baumgartner Town ofAddison P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Subject: Dallas County CMAQ Program Executed Interlocal Agreement Dear Mr. Baumgartner: Enclosed for your file is one (1) executed original Interlocal Agreement between the Town of Addison and Dallas County for the CMAQ Program projects. The scheduling ofthe approved CMAQ projects for your City has not been completed. When the time frame has been determined, we will notifY all concerned and advise you of any funds that must be escrowed during the various phases of the projects. Your participation in the CMAQ program is greatly appreciated and we look forward to your cooperation and input towards successful completion ofthe projects in a timely manner. Sincerely, JLf?J Allen Bud Beene, P.E. Director ofPublic Works 􀁾􀀠Enclosure: Executed Dallas County CMAQ Interlocal Agreement xc: Richard L. Peterson, Assistant Director, Transportation Planning Division, Dallas County William B. Dryden, P.E., Traffic Engineer, Dallas County Ivan F. Nicodemus, P.E., PMIE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc. Files (CMAQ -Addison) 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 \) 33 \0 . \L 'y COURT ORDER V' 95 1996ORDER NO. DATE: NOV 14 1995 STATEOFTEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § BE IT REMEMBERED, at a regular meeting of the Commissioners Court of Dallas County, Texas, held on the 14th day of Noyember , 1995, on motion made by Kenneth A. Mayfield, Dist. 114 ,andseconded bY Mike Cantrell, Dist, !f2 , the followillgwas adopted: WHEREAS, The 1991 Transportation Bond Program included funding for the listed trnnsportation improvements which were considered and approved by area voters on November 5, 1991; and WHEREAS. many ofthese transportation improvements are located within the corporate limits ofDallas County cities; and WHEREAS. the County and the TexaslJepat1ment ofTmnsportation (TxDOn. pursuant to Commissioners Court Order No. 94,1777, daled the 25th day ofOctober. 1994, have entered into a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Agreement to implement CMAQ transportation improvements; and WHEREAS. said transportation improvements were approved for CMAQ funding by the North Texas Council ofGovernment, which is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organizatioo (MFO); and WHEREAS. pursuant to Chapter 791 ofthe Texes Government Code, lnterlocal Cooperation Act, the County ofDallas desires to enter into lnterlocal Agreements with the cities for implementation ofthe transportation improvements; and WHEREAS. the lnterlocal Agreement sets forth roles and responsibilities of the City and the County and outlines the funding responsibilities and commitments ofthe various entities in implementing the improvements; and WHEREAS. the Town of Addison submitted the lnterlocal Agreement for approval by Dallas County Commissioners Court; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works recommends execution of the lnterlocal Cooperative Agreement by the Dallas County Commissioners Court IT IS THEREFORE ORDER, ADJUDGED AND DECREED bY the Dallas CountyCornrnjssionern Court that the County Judge is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for implementing the CMAQ transportetion improvements in the Town ofAddison. Director ofPublic Work'l'rrr DONEINOPENCOURT,thisthe 14th day of__",N",0::,;v:,;:8",m",b,;:8.:;.r__, 1995. ,' on, County Judge Raco 􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁤􀀠1[(i?J􀀭􀀺􀀶􀁾􀀱. --Alli!11 Bud Beene, P.E. ,§...AA\) Mike Cantrell, District 2 September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 5, 1991, pursuant to Election Order No. 91-1636, the voters of Dallas County approved Proposition Number 1 of the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program which includes the authorization to issue bonds under the authority of Article III, Sections 52 and 52e of the Texas Constitution for the purpose of transportation improvements within Dallas County; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said Proposition Number 􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀠1991 Dallas County Bond Program, it is the desire of thWlY. of A. SM., Texas, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the oora;;-County Commissioners Court, hereinafter referred to as "County", to enter into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement regarding certain transportation improvements within said City pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code; and WHEREAS, County and the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "TxDOT", pursuant to Commissioners Court Order No. 94-1777, dated October 25, 1994, have entered into a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Agreement to provide Program ManagementlEngineering (pMJE) Services for certain transportation improvements in Dallas County; and WHEREAS, said CMAQ Agreement, incorporated herein as Attachment "A", shall govern the intent of this Interlocal Agreement between County and City; and WHEREAS, said transportation improvements approv;;:,i for CMAQ funding by the North Texas Council of Governments ,which is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and are part of the CMAQ Agreement within City are listed in Attachment "B"; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of County and City to expedite the implementation of the improvements listed in Attachment "B", hereinafter referred to as the t'Program". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and promises herein contained, County and City do hereby identify the following: 1. County hereby agrees: A. To the extent of funding authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program for improvements, County agrees to provide the local goverrunent share of costs up to the amount identified in Attachment "B" as "Dallas County Program Costs" which include Program ManagementlEngineering (PMJE) services, acquisition of rights-ofway, mitigation of environmental issues, relocation assistance, preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and plan review by TxDOT, utility relocation/adjustments and construction costs and/or costs of construction elements by City forces associated with the development of improvements within the scope of this Agreement. Page 1 of6 D:IGENERALIG06PRMG1\G6-S1LAULAQ4.DOC September 12,1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT B. To include improvement locations identified within City as CMAQ Intersection Improvement Projects approved by the MPO and incorporated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as may now be in effect this date or as may be revised, modified or amended. Potential intersection improvement locations are identified in Attachment "B", and include projected City, County, TxDOT, FHWA, and total improvement costs. C. To provide a single point of contact with TxDOT for the Program included within this Agreement and to execute, on behalf of City, the necessary agreements with TxDOT; -as authorized by the Dallas County Commissioners Court and the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program. D. To provide for the acquisition of the necessary additional rights-of-way for projects in the Program in accordance with TxDOT standard requirements for property acquisition, utilizing existing public rights-of-way to the maximum extent possible. E. To coordinate with City any utility adjustments in public rights-of-way and traffic control during the construction; provided, however, that City shaH be the responsible jurisdiction for requiring the relocation and adjustment of utilities. F. To the extent authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program, in cases where a franchised utility has a private right-of-way easement for its utility and it is necessary to make adjustments by reason of the widening or improvement of the designated improvement Joca!i'Jn, County shall, after submission of satisfactory rights-of-way documentation and cost estimates acceptable to County by the utility compan.y, bear the actual costs 􀁩􀁯􀁾􀀠the relocation andlor adjustment of said utility. Where new storm drainage facilities are in conflict with City owned utilities, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, County shall, after submission of an acceptable schedule of work and cost estimate by City, bear the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of City utilities to the extent authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program. G. To prepare documents, consisting of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for construction of the projects in the Program, acceptable to TxDOT, using the latest editions of TxDOT's Highway Design Division Operations and Design Manual, TxDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction ofHighways, Streets and Bridges, TxDOT's Guide for Design ofPavement Structures, the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), andlor the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official's (AASHTO's) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. H. To submit preliminary engineering plans at the 65% and final PS&E at the 100% completion levels for review and approval by City prior to submittal to TxDOT for advertising and construction. I. To transfer rights-of-way acquired in the name of County to City. J. To issue to City a "Notification of Completion" from TxDOT, acknowledging a project has been completed and to furnish, through TxDOT, "as-built" reproducible "record" drawings of construction plans for the City upon completion and acceptance of each project in the Program. Page 2 of6 D:\GENERALIG06PRMGTlG6·SILAIILA04.DOC September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT II. City hereby agrees: A. To provide the local government share of costs for engineering design services, PMIE services, acquisition of rights-of-way, mitigation of environmental issues, relocation assistance, preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), plan review by TxDOT, utility relocation/adjustments and construction costs associated with the development of improvements identified in Attachment "B" within the scope of the Program, beyond the extent of funding authorized by the 1991 Dallas County Bond Program as identified in Attachment "B" as "Dallas County Program Costs" and for those improvements sponsored and/or identified as being funded in whole or partially by City'within the current NCTCOG Transportation Improvement Program. City requested specialty items may include, but not necessarily limited to supplementary landscape, streetscape, and sidewalk construction. Estimated City costs identified in Attachment "B" shall be escrowed escrowed to County by City. B. To accept all terms, requirements and conditions of the CMAQ Agreement between County and TxDOT as an integral part of this Interlocal Agreement between City and County, and agrees, that all requirements incumbent upon County shall be incumbent upon City. Accordingly, City shall execute the following documents required by TxDOT as part of the TxDOT/County CMAQ Agreement: 1. Attachment "C" Lobbying Certifications 2. Attachment "D" Debarment Certifications C. To participate with County in the selection of design consultants utilized in the preparation of the PS&E for the Program. D. To accept County's Minority/Women Business Enterprise Participation Policy for use in the Program. E. To assist County in developing the scope of services for each intersection in the Program and to assure that the initial Program funding for each location, shown in Attachment "B", is correctly identified. F, To provide to County available alignment surveys, construction plans or other data pertinent pertinent to the projects including but not limited to, hydraulic studies, environmental studies, master planning studies, zoning maps, and utility maps and information, and to establish in writing, prior to commencement of project design, any supplemental improvements desired by City for specialty items on additional facilities (e.g., landscaping, streetscaping, new sidewalks) associated with the project. When these features are requested by City for inclusion as part of the design and/or construction contract, those costs not eligible for CMAQ funding as approved by the MFO shall be borne by City. Supplemental agreements outlining funding participation on designated projects may be executed by City, as necessary. Page30f6 D;IGEXERALlG06PRMG'l\G6·S1LA IlLA04.DOC September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT G. To provide traffic signal warranting data for each signalized intersection, including the posted speed limit on the major streets and/or spot speed studies, 24 hour approach volumes collected in 1990 or later for all legs of the intersection, andlor peak hour turning movement counts and traffic volumes. Only those intersections that are shown to meet or exceed the abbreviated TxDOT signal warrant methodology for the Program or the TMUTCD signalization warrants shall be included within the Program. H. To provide inventories of existing signal equipment, signal phasing, and timing patterns _f?r each intersection within the Program. 1. To provide a listing of cable companies within City and provide an estimated cost of cable connections for each signalized location where their facilities are used for signal communications. City agrees to assure that the cable company installs cable connection from their nearest existing cable line to the controller cabinet. City agrees to require each participating cable company to submit a detailed invoice for each cable connection describing the actual units required to complete the construction. City agrees to inspect and approve the construction and to submit to County evidence that the construction is completed for reimbursement. The cost of the cable connection for each location shall conform to the construction labor and materials unit costs established hereinabove. J. To provide a listing of locations andlor descriptions of elements of construction for which City will furnish andlor install traffic 􀁾􀁩􀁧􀁮􀁡􀁬􀁩􀁺􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠equipment by City's forces. City agrees to provide TxDOT a PS&E packag(. detailing proposed construction work and shall provide opportunities, facilities and representative samples, as may be required, to enable TxDOT to cany out suitah.lc, frequent and complete inspections of all materials, sufficient to afford determination and certification by TxDOT that all parts of the installation and the component materials comply with the requirements of the approved PS&E. City agrees to use its own directly employed labor and supervisory personnel, machinery, equipment and vehicles necessary for the construction of each City force account element of construction. City agrees to abide by Title 49 CFR Part 18.36 in renting or leasing machinery, equipment andlor vehicles, other than its own, which are necessary for the construction. K. To assist County in conducting public hearings as required for the Program. 1. To acquire rights-of-way required for the projects in the Program through voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process andlor other legal means to ensure through the building permitting process that, setback requirements are imposed to limit encroachment upon the required rights-of-way. City agrees to provide County with historical records and reports associated with the acquisition and dedication of rights-of-way required for the Program. City hereby grants County authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within the corporate limits of said City for the specific rights-of-way required and as approved by City and County for the Program. Page 4 of6 D:IGENERALIG06PR.\IGTlG6-5ILAULA04.DOC September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT M. To require all utilities located within or using the public rights-of-way in the Program to adjust and/or relocate said utilities as required by the proposed improvement of each project. City shall initiate action to require the adjustment and/or relocation of utilities to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible upon receipt ofthe 65% design documents from the County, but in no event later than three (3) months after receiving notification in writing from County that acquisition ofadditional rights-of-way for the designated project has been completed. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment and/or relocation ofutilities within the public rights-of-way shall be the responsibility of the utility owner and/or City. In the event that the utilities are not adjusted or relocated within three (3) months after County's written notification is received, City shall initiate legal action to compel the adjustment or relocation of the the utilities by the utility owner or, if necessary to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the improvements. N. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of rights-of-way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances in the rights-of-way and, when requested by County or TxDOT, to take such action as appropriate to cause any and all encroachments on the rights-ofway to be removed prior to starting construction of each project in the Program. City shall provide for the continuing maintenance of all rights-of-way, such as traffic control, pavement maintenance, mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period between right-of-way acquisition and construction for each project in the Program. O. To prepare a 'Traffic Implementation Plan" detailing City's continuing commitment to operate alld maintain the funded traffic signal improvements through the use of training, resources, funding and personnel for the useful life of applicable traffic signal projects identified in the Program. The "Traffic Implementation Plan" shall be in a format approved by County, TxDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). P. To make a detailed review of and return comments on the proposed rights-of-way plans and construction drawings and documents for each project in the Program within a time period not to exceed one (I) month from transmittal to City by County. Q. To assist County in establishing PS&E schedules for projects requiring City funding which address the committed funding and other resources. R. To authorize TxDOT through County to construct the transportation improvements approved by City within each project, in accordance with the scope agreed upon by City and County and approved by TxDOT. S. To resume responsibility for maintenance of each improvement in the Program upon completion and acceptance ofconstruction ofthe projects by TxDOT. T. To allow the regulation of traffic, modification of traffic signals and other regulatory devices consistent with the PS&E documents for the improvements as necessary during construction, and prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way. Page 5 of6 D;\GENERAL\Gil6PRMG1\G6-;ILAIILA04.DOC September 12, 1995 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT III. IV. V. THE XU. To maintain all documents, papers, accounting records and other documentation relating to City costs incurred under this Agreement and shall make such materials available to TxDOT, FHWA or its duly authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office for three (3) years from the date of final payment from the County under this Agreement. City agrees to comply with the audit requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in paragraphs 6, 8, and 9 of OMB Circular No. Ai28. Additionally, County, TxDOT, FHWA and its duly authorized representatives shall have access to all records of City which are directly applicable to this Agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and/or transcriptions. County and City further agree and acknowledge that neither County or City is an agent of the other, or of the State, and that each is responsible for its own acts, forbearance, negligence and deeds, and for those of its agents or employees in conjunction with the performance of work covered under this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. County and City acknowledge this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement may be modified by the mutual consent of the County and City. This includes modification of the specific improvement location identified in Attachment "B" and ill accordance with the current Transportation Improvement Plan approved by the MPO which is NCTCOG. The CMAQ Agreement shall govern where conflicts exists or are discovered within this Agreement. TYOF DALLAS J)6l, Date ATTEST: Paula A. Stephens, Dep y County Clerk Clerk of Commissioners Court 􀀷􀁾􀁷􀁲􀁺􀀠THEGH"X"OF 􀁂􀁙􀁾􀀠.I D Add.'$tH1._ fA J4ilJD (-z.. -9.s-Date ATTEST: Page 6 of6 D,IGENERALIG06PRMGnG 6·5ILAllLA04.DOC Dallas County Interlocal Cooperative Agreement ATTACHMENT A Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) /Dallas County Agreement for Congestion Mitigation /Air Quality Intersection Improvement Program (CMAQ) For the purpose of this presentation to Commissioners Court for action upon the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between Dallas County and the Town of Addison, the TxDOTlDallas County Agreement for the CMAQ Program as approved by Conunissioners Court Order 94 1777, dated October 25, 1994, is hereby included by reference in order to reduce the unnecessary amount of paper required for copying. For the purposes of actual filing the approved Court Order authorizing Dallas County to execute the ILA with the Town of Addison, said Agreement shall be included in its entirety for Court records. D:\CONTRACTlC5ILAS\C5-1-1IADDISONIATJ'ACH-A.DOC ILA 􀁾􀀠ATTACHMENT B 12-Sep-95 CMAQ PROGRAM for Addison FUNDING COMMITMENT BY AGENCY Improvement Costs' (Thollsands) ----------􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠NCTCOG Improvement Number Type TxDOT SystemlP ASS Initial Road Intersecting Road Addison Dallas COllnty TxDOTI FHWA 1995 TIP Total 2332.000 INT OFF Midway McEwen to Trinity Mills 3000.000 5700.000 8700.000 Grand Totals' $0.000 $3,000,000 $5,700.000 $8,700.000 "Amounts shown in the "1995 TIP Total" column are the '95 TIP budgets. The funding distribution identified is for Engineering and Construction only. The budgets for Rights.of.Way, Utility Adjustments, and Environmental Investigations and Remediation are also included in the "1995 Tip Total", but may require distinct funding commitments developed according to ILA Articles IT.L and II.M, and TxDOT/Dallas County Agreement Articles 10 and 19.C. Increases in the '95 TIP budget for each line item improvement shall be made In direct proportion to the funding commitment by Dallas County, the City. andlor TXDOT/FHWA identified herein and approved as a TIP amendment by NCTCOG. Addison AUacflment B -Page 1 of 1 , Dallas County Interlocal Cooperative Agreement ATTACHMENT C Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan. the entering into of any cooperative agreement. and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract. grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclosure accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Ignature City Manager Title Town of Addison Agency 11/06/95 Date SDHPT C-J Dc\GENERAL\G06PRMGliG6-SlLAIATICIlc&D.DOC 4.90 i DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Approved by OMB 0348·0046 Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pUrSuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 (See reverse tor public burden disclosure) 1. Type of Federal Action: 􀁾􀀠 a. contract b. grant c. cooperative agreement d. loan e . loan guarantee . f. loan 􀁩􀁮􀁳􀁵􀁲􀁡􀁑􀁧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: PrimeD 􀁾Subawardee Tier 1 , j!known Town of Addison P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Congressional District, ifknown: 6. Federal Department Agency: , Department of Transportation Federal Highway Adminstration 8. Federal Action Number, ifknown: 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity (if individual, last name, first name, MI): NIA 2. Status of Federal Action; 􀁾􀀠 a. bid/offer/application b. initial award c. post-award 3. Report Type: 􀁾􀀠 a. Inibal filing b. material change For Material a-.ange Only: year quarter date of last report 5, If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: NIA Congressional District, ifknown: ifknown: 7. Federal Program Name/Oescriptlon; Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEAI CFDA Number, if applicable: 9. Award Amount, if known: $ b, Individuals Performing SeNices (including address if different from No. lOa) (Iasl m;me, first name, MI): NfA (attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, ifnecessalY) 11. Amount of Payment (check all that apply): $ N1A o actual o planned 12. Form of Payment (check all that apply): 0 a. cash 0 b. In-kind; specify: nature N/A value 13. Type of Payment (check all that apply): o a. retainer 0 b. one-time fee Dc. commission 0 d. contingent fee 0 e. deferred 0 f. other; specify: N/A 14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be Performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) contacted, for Payment indicated in Item 11; The Town of Addison has performed no lobbying activities to secure this Contract. No Federal official or employee nor officer, employer or member of Congress has been contacted. (attach Continualion Sheet!s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary) 15. Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A attached: Dves [!] No 16. Informalion requested through this form is aulhorized by title 31 U,S.C, section 1352, ThiS disclOSUre of lobbying activities Is a materia! 􀁋􀀢􀀺􀀭􀁷􀁾􀁟􀁃􀀲Signature:rspresen!allon 01 fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into This disclosure is Ron WhiteheadPrint Name: required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This lnfonnation will be reported to the Co'ngrcss semi-annually and will be available (or public inspection, Title; City ManagerAny person who fails to life the required discro$ure shall be sub/ect to a civil penarty 01 not less than $iO.Q(X) and not mOfe Ihan S100.0c0 lor each Telephone; (214) 450-7000 Date: 11[06[95such faHure. IAuthorized for Local ReproductionFederal Use Only: Standard Form-1.LL SDHPT C-2 4.90 Dallas County CMAQ Interlocal Cooperative Agreement ATTACHMENT D Debarment Certification (Negotiated Contracts) (1) The CONTRACTOR certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals; (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public· transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement. theft. forgery. bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicated for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with commission of any of the offenses enwnerated in paragraph (l)(b) for this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions· terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the CONTRACTOR is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such CONTRACTOR shall attach an explanation to this certification. ·federal. state or local );Z 10U EhL:)Signature of CertifYing Official City Manager Title 11/06/95 Date SDHPT D-l 4.90 D:\GENERALlG06PRMGTIG6-Sll.AIATICHC&D,DQC Debarment Certification Information This certification is to be used by contractors pursuant-to 49 CFR 29 when any of the following occur: • any transaction between the contractor and a person (other than a procurement contract for goods and services), regardless of type, under a primary covered transaction • any procurement contract for goods or services when the estimated cost is $25,000 or more • any procurement contract for goods or services between the contractor and a person, regardless of the amount. under-which the person will have a critical influence on or substantive control over that covered transaction. Such persons include principal investigators and providers of federally-required audit services. A procurement transaction is the process of acquiring goods and services. A nonprocuremenr transaction is the granting of financial assistance to entities to assist the grantor in meeting objectives that are mutually beneficial to the grantee and grantor. A COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATION IS TO BE FURNISHED TO AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UPON REQUEST. SDHPT D-2 D,IOENERALlG06PRMGT\Ci6-'lLAIATl'CHC&O.DOC 4.90 North Central Texas Council Of Governments TO: The Surface Transportation Technical Committee DATE: June 20.1996 FROM: Michael Morris. P.E. Director of Transportation SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting. June 28. 1996 There will be a meeting of the Surface Transportation Technical Committee on Friday, June 28, 1996, at 9 a.m. in the Transportation Board Room (Third Floor) of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, 616 Six Flags Drive, Centerpoint Two, Arlington. An amplified agenda and support material for the meeting are enclosed. If you have any questions regarding the Surface Transportation Technical Committee meeting, please call me. kdc Enclosures 616 Six Flags Drive, Centerpoint Two p. 0. Box 5888, Arlington, Texas 76005·5888 (817) 640·3300 FAX; 817·640·7806 @,"CYCled"'""" SURFACE TRANSPORTAnON TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Dave Davis. Chairman City of Fanners Branch Wallace Ewell, Vice Chairman Texas Department of Transportation Fort Worth . Jim Driscoll, SecretarY City of Irving Nancy Amos Fort Worth Transportation Authority Deanna Anderson Fort Worth Transportation Authority Larry Antjerson .. TNRCC Jack Anteb! City of DaRas Palrick Baugh City of DeSoto John Baumgartner City of Addison Roger Beall Texas Department of Transportation AUstin Rick Berry City of Mesqutt. Larry Cervenka City of Gartand Jerry Clark City of Denton Don Cranford Dalias COunty Frank Davis Ellis County Pele Davis TexaS Turnpike AuthoritY Ruben Delga"o GalRn CountY Tom Dingler City of Lewi."'11e Ray Eclwarris TarrantCoun\y Ron".11 Fagan Texas Department of Transportation Fort Worth Steve Gilbreath Town of Flower Mound Perry Harts City of Ceclar HHI Alan H.nrIrIX City of Dallas JerryHoclge City of Grape"'n. George, Human City of Richardson KevinKass City of Irving Paul Kruckemeyer City of Eul... Beverly LeBenske Dallas Atea Rapid Transtt Richart! l.ari-_ Modification Number: 96-150 NCTCOG Project Code: 2332 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-8 and VII-51 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0918-47-913 and 0918-47-924 Project Type and Location: Dallas county-Midway Road from Spring Valley to Dallas/Collin County Une; widen 6 to 8 lanes Original Funded Amount: FY96--$475,OOO total ($285,000 federal and $190,000 local) FY99/01-$8.225,OOO total ($5,415,000 federal and $2.810,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: NIA Percent: NIA Construction Bid Price: NIA Percent: NlA Request: Change scope of work from roadway widening to intersection improvements in FY99/o1 with cost savings of $4.905.000 total ($3,214,000 federal and $1.691.000 local) for $3.795.000 total ($2.486,000 federal and $1.309,000 local) and change funding category from Surface Transportation Transportation Program-Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) to Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) CommentslConditions: Significant savings impact on financial constraint with funds dedicated to request for Texas Transportation Commission discretionary funds; project has been accounted for in the revised air quality conformity analysis Approved By: Michael Morris. P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The follOWing signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: NIA NIA Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District 1 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastem OtherProgram: CMAQ X STP-MM X Transit __ ________ Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTCAction X STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-151 NCTCOG Project Code: 2814 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-48 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0009-02-045 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Dallas)--S.H. 78 from Loop 12 to I.H. 635; widen 6 to 8 lanes Original Funded Amount: FY99/01-$2,500,OOO total ($2,000,000 federal and $500,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Change scope of work from roadway widening to 9 intersection improvements in FY99/01 with cost savings of $775,000 total ($620,000 federal and $155,000 State) for $1,725,000 total ($1,380,000 federal and $345,000 State) and change funding category from Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) to Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Comments/Conditions: Significant savings impact on financial constraint; project has been accounted for in the revised air quality conformity analysis Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: N/A NIA Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer 2 TxDOT, Dallas District 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastem Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __Other Commission Strategic Priority Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTCAction X STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-152 NCTCOG Project Code: NIA NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): NIA TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0353-02-055 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Denton County}-S.H. 114 from 0.5 Mi. E. of I.H. 35W to 1.1 Mi. W. of I.H. 35W; reconstruct existing main lanes and construct a tumaround Original Funded Amount: FY97-$2,500,OOO total ($1,300,000 State and $1,200,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: NlA Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Add project to 1996 TIP as approved by minute order (M.O. 106744) of the Texas Transportation Commission CommentslConditions: No impact on financial constraint since additional funds have been allocated to the TxDOT Dallas District from the Texas Transportation Commission specifically for this project; project was accounted for in the revised air quality conformity analysis; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Monis, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following Signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer 3 TxDOT, Dallas District X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __Other Miscellaneous Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTCAction X STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-153 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0081-13-032 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Denton County)-I.H. 35W from N. of S.H.114to 1.7 Mi. N. ofS.H.114; construct interchange Original Funded Amount: FY97-$3,300,OOO total ($3,300,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Add project to 1996 TIP as approved by minute order (M.O. 106745) of the Texas Transportation Commission Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint as project will be 100% locally funded; project accounted for in the revised air quality confonnity analysis; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT -selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer 4 TxDOT, Dallas District X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STp·MM __ Transit __ Other 􀀡􀀡􀁍􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁩􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁣􀀼􀀵􀁥􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁡􀀵􀀡􀀡􀁮􀀮􀀡􀁬􀀻􀁥􀀼􀁬􀀺􀁯􀀡􀀮􀁜􀁪􀁵􀀡􀁩� �􀀮􀁳_______ Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTC Action X STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-154 NCTCOG Project Code: NlA NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 2374·07·037 Project Type and Location: Irving-I.H. 635 from Belt Line to MacArthur; frontage roads Original Funded Amount: FY97-$13,800,ooO total ($13,800,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: NfA Construction Bid Price: NfA Percent: N/A Request: Add project to the 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint as project will be 100% locally funded; project included in the revised air quality conformity analysis; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Monis, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer 5TxDOT, Dallas District X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Federal Demonstration Projects Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTC Action X STIP Revision Modification Number: 96-155 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-124 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0171-05-055 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth District (Lake Worth)--S.H. 199 frontage roads from Lake Worth bridge to I.H. 820; construct 4-lane frontage roads Original Funded Amount: FY98-$9,500,OOO total ($7,600,000 federal and $1,900,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Change scope of work from construction of 4-lane frontage roads to 6-lane frontage roads Comments/Conditions: Project has been accounted for in the revised air quality conformity analysis; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles·W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer 6TxDOT, Fort Worth District X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STP·MM X Transit __ Other _________ Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTC Action X STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-94 (Revised) NCTCOG Project Code: 2930 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-48 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0353-05-084 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Dallas)--Loop 12 from Buckner Blvd. to Skillman Ave.; widen 6 to 8 lanes Original Funded Amount: FY99/01-$3,129,OOO total ($2,503,200 federal and $625,800 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Change limits of project on Loop 12 (Northwest Highway) from east of Lawther Road to Audelia with no change in funding; widen to 8 lanes (6 through lanes and 2 auxiliary lanes); project to be designed and constructed in conjunction with PASS project on Loop 12 (Northwest Highway) from Buckner Blvd. to Audelia Road (CSJ 0353-05-083) CommentsfConditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; project has been rescored and received a score of 60 (original score =65) Approved By: Michael Moms, P.E. Date Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: NfA N/A Jay Nelson, P.E. Date 7District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District COORDINATED PROGRAMS ..ISTEA , Congestion Management System (CMS) I I I CAAA Conformity i 􀁾􀀠State Implementation Plan (SIP) Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Ii ,Ir r Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) I I . I I I I I I I I I ... • . -.. I ;t1 m "T1 m ;t1 m z n m 􀁾􀀠"" <.oJ -i AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY CONFORM TO THE PURPOSE OF THE SIP: No New Violations No Worsening of Existing Violations No Delay in Timely Attainment (i.e. Keep TCMs on Schedule) CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICS OF THE SIP: Timely Implementation of TCMs Consistency with Emissions Budget Contribution to Emissions Reductions* Action vs. Baseline (VOC and NOx) Action vs. 1990 Emissions * Where applicable 2 MID-YEAR CONFORMITY OF THE 1996 TIP AND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN Volatile Organic Compound Emissions -i;' '0 I 306.60-_Baseline I I Action enc:: 0 ..... w -enc:: .-0 .-en en ____ 􀀱􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀱􀁟􀀱___􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁾______________________ 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾E w 0 i i 126.50 116.12 119.13 0 (-0.02) i> 1 1996 2005 Year 2010 MID-YEAR CONFORMITY OF THE 1996 TIP AND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN Nitrogen Oxide Emissions _Baseline I IActioni:E '.lnnl 293.03 m c· o "" 􀁾􀀠231.40 234.50 233.30 240.78 m (0.00) I .-c o I (0.00) I I .-m m E w >< 􀁾􀀠2005 2010 Year 1 02) 1990 1996 ••• REFERENCE ITEM 2.4 "rhe North Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Transportation Council and Texas Department of Transportation Invite you to attend a public meeting on the: • 1996-97 Unified Planning Work Program • Air Quality Conformity Analysis: Mid-Year Review • Development of the Mobility 2020 Plan: Goals, Components, and Quallty-of-Ufe Areas (Additionallnfonna tion Provided on Reverse) Monday, June 17, 1996 4 p.m. Carrollton City Hall 1946 Jackson Road Carrollton, Texas 6:30p.m.VVedneaday,June18,1996 North Richland Hills Parks .. Rscreatlon Building 6720 N.E. Loop 820, Room &3 North Richland Hills, Texas Thursday, June 20, 1996 4p.m. DeSoto City Hall 211 E. Plea88nt Run Road, MeetIng RoomI1 and 2 DeSoto, Texas FOR FURTHER INFORMA110N, CONTACT: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Trall$pOrtallon North Cenlnll T_Council of Governments P.O. Box 5888 ArlingtOn, T_ 76005 5888 Telephone (817) 695-9240 If you plan to attend one of these public meetings and you have a disability that requires specla18l'l'Bl1gements atthe meeting. contact Michael Morris 72 houlS in advance of the meeting at 817/695-9240. Reasonable accommodations will be made to assist your needs. 1996-97 Unified Planning Work Program The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for regional transportation planning is developed annually under the direction of the Regional Transportation Council and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Executive Board serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization tor the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. The UPWP is a guide for coordinating transportation and comprehensive planning in the North Central Texas region. An overview of the Oraft1996-97 Unified Planning Work Program will be presented at the public meeting including a summary of major emphasis areas, key planning studies identified for the upcoming year, and an overview of anticipated funding levels. Comments on the Draft UPWP will be accepted and considered prior to the adoption of the UPWP by the Regional Transportation Council in July. Air Quality Conformity Analysis: Mid-Year Review Modifications to some planned federally funded and regionally significant transportation projects across the Dallas-Fort Worth region have been requested by local govemments and the Texas Department of Transportation. The Regional Transportation Council is required to ensure that these projects continue to meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. An air Quality conformity analysis quantifies the emission Impacts of these projects to demonstrate compliance. At the meeting, the transportation projects and the Impacts of those projects on air quality will be presented. The specific Impacted projects are: • I.H. 35E from tH. 20 to Parkerville Road -requires modification from 6 to 8/10 lanes in the Mobility 2010 Plan Update. • I.H. 35W/S.H. 114 -various interchange, ramp, frontage road, and shoulder projects to provide access to the Texas Motor Speedway. • Midway Road from I.H. 635 to Trinity Mills -change in project scope from a widening to a series of intersection improvements. • I.H. 635 frontage roads from Bel! Line to MacArthur -locally funded, regionally Significant project that requires a conformity determination to add the project to the 1996 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). • S.H. 199 frontage roads from Lake Worth bridge to I.H. 820 -this project wf)uld change the recommended frontage road design from 4 to 6 lanes. • S.H. 78 from Loop 12 to I.H. 635 -change in project scope from a widening to a series of intersection improvements. • Northwest Highway from Skillman to Buckner/Audelia -shortening of project limits. • Loop 12 from Buckner to Skillman· project to widen roadway from 6 to 8 lanes. Development of the Mobility 2020 Plan: Goals, Components, and Quality-of-Life Areas NCTCOG, working in cooperation with local govemments and transportation agencies, has begun efforts on the development of Mobility 2020: The Regional Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. The Regional Transportation Plan plays a vital role in the development of the region by identifying regionwide goals and future transportation facilities. The financial resources to implement the Plan will greatly influence future growth pattems in the communities within the .Oallas-Fort Worth MetropOlitan Area. A brief overview of the development process and the major components of the Plan will he presented with emphaSis on quality-of-life across the region. An opportunity will be provided for pubiic comments regarding the Regional Transportation Plan and its development proo::ess. REFERENCE ITEM 3,1 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STP·MM X Transit __ cnher ...._______.... Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision __ Modification Number: 96·134 NCTCOG Project Code: 387 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-6 , TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 1047·03·047 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Cedar HiII)--F.M. 1382 from U.S. 67 to Cedar Hill City Limits; widen 2 to 4 lanes and Signal improvements Original Funded Amount: FY93-$8,81 0,000 total ($6.256,000 federal, $1,564,000 State. and $990,000 local) FY96-$80,OOO total ($64,000 federal and $16,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: $8,952,000 Percent: 1% Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Increase FY96 authorized funding amount by $62,000 for estimated construction cost of Signal improvements of $142,000 total ($113,600 federal and $28,400 local) CommentsfConditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following Signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District 1 X • 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION • Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM X Transit __ Other _______________ Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision __ Modification Number: 96-135 NCTCOG Project Code: 2920 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-? TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0281-03-901 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Dallas District (Ganand)--S.H. 78 from Dallas/Collin County Line to S.H. 190; widen 2 to 4 lanes and signal improvements Original Funded Amount: FY94-$9,138,OOO total ($7,273,600 federal, $1,818,400 State, and $46,000 local) FY96--$100,000 total ($80,000 federal and $20,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: $9,268,000 Percent: 10/0 Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Increase FY96 authorized funding amount bi $30,000 for estimated construction cost of $130,000 total ($104,000 federal and $26,000 local) for Signal improvements and railroad preemption equipment Comments/Conditions: No imp".::t on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a projE"ct funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District 2 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ X STP-MM __ Transit __ Other ___________ Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-136 NCTCOG Project Code: 4297 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N1A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): N1A Project Type and Location: DART-DART Transit Fare Program; ozone alert program Original Funded Amount: FY96-$1,906,000 total ($580,000 federal and $1,326,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Correct DCIS to add project entry to the 1996 TIP inadvertently omitted from Original STIP submittal Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality confonnity requirements are impacted by this modification Approved By: /ttldl/itd 􀁄􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠, Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: N1A N/A Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM X Transit __ Other Appendix D-Environmental Clearance Projects Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96·138 NCTCOG Project Code: 3335 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-51 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 1068-04-092 Project Type and Location: Dallas County (Dallas)-I.H. 30 @Chalk Hill Road; ramp construction Original Funded Amount: FY99/01-$2,150,000 total ($110,000 federal, $430,000 State, and $1,610,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Add project entry to Appendix 0 of 1996 TIP to allow for engineering and environmental clearance efforts to continue for Chalk Hill Road/Cockrell Hill Road interchange with I.H. 30 Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint as engineering will be 100% locally funded; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification as engineering is exempt Approved By: 􀁄􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠, Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following Signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: N/A N/A Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District 4 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ X STP-MM __ Transit __ Other _________ Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STJP Revision X Modification Number: 96-139 NCTCOG Project Code: 1561 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-103, VII-116, and VII-122 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 9902-00-938, 9902-00-939, and 9902-00-940 Project Type and Location: Grand Prairie-Various Locations Citywide; signal improvements (12) Original Funded Amount: FY96--$240,000 total ($120,000 federal/State and $120,000 local) FY97--$278,000 total ($139,000 federal/State and $139,000 local) FY98-$332,000 total ($166,000 federal/State and $166,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: NfA Percent: NfA Construction Bid Price: NfA Percent: NfA Request: Identify off-system preliminary engineering as CSJ 0902-00-050 Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint as total project cost does not change; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification Approved By: Date The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxOOT-selected program. Approved By: NfA N/A Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 5 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Westem Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ other Bridges-Off-System Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision _X,-,-_ Modification Number: 96-140 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-117 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0902-50-901 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Johnson County)-C.R. 1080 @North Fork Chambers Creek; replace bridge and approaches Original Funded Amount: FY97-$110,OOO total ($88,000 tederal and $22,000 local) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Change CSJ trom 0902-50-901 to 0902-50-055 Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint as total project cost does not change; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. DaM' ' Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional MetropOlitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 6 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Westem Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STiP Revision X Modification Number: 96-141 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): N/A Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Burleson)--Spur 50 @Wilson Street; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97--$60,ooO total ($60,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Dati! ' Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date DistJict Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth DistJict 7 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Westem Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-142 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): N/A Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Crowley)-F.M. 731 @Industrial/Chalet; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97-$50,000 total ($50,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: NlA Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Dat6! Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 8 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MOOIFICATION Subregion: Westem Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-143 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): N/A Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (North Richland Hills}-F.M. 1938 @Watauga Road; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97--$60,000 total ($60,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. . Date! . Director of Transportation NCTCOG The follOWing signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 9 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-144 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0008-13-184 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Fort Worth)-!.H. 820 @Berry Street; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97--$69,000 total ($69,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP CommentsfConditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxOOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of, Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxOOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 10 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-145 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0019-01-114 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Joshua)-S.H. 174@Country Club Drive; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97--$50,OOO total ($50,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A 'Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Micha I Monis, P.E. Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 11 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-146 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0718-02-038 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth (Saginaw)--F.M. 156 @McElroylWatauga Road; traffic signals Original Funded Amount: FY97-$50,000 total ($50,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality confonnity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 12 X 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ __ STP-MM __ Transit __ Other Traffic Control Devices Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision X Modification Number: 96-147 NCTCOG Project Code: N/A NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): N/A TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0902-00-048 Project Type and Location: TxDOT, Fort Worth--Various non-Interstate highways in District; replace guide signs Original Funded Amount: FY97-$300,OOO total ($300,000 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Project being identified as component of lump sum entry (CSJ 0902-00-906) in 1996 TIP Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Micliael Monis, P.E DatJ' ' Director of Transportation NCTCOG The follOwing signature authorizes: additional MetropOlitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Fort Worth District 13 X I •1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Western Program: CMAQ X STP-MM __ Transit __ Other _________ Type of Modification: Administrative X RTC Action __ STIP Revision __ Modification Number: 96-149 NCTCOG Project Code: 4005 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII-7 and VII-8 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 2374-05-048 and 2374-05-049 Project Type and Location: Arlington-Matlock Road @tH. 20; intersection improvements Original Funded Amount: FY96-$123,295 total ($68,058 federal, $17,015 State, and $38,222 local) Estimated Construction Cost: Percent: Construction Bid Price: $159,224 Percent: 29% Request: Increase authorized funding amount by $35,929 total ($19,834 federal, $4,958 State, and $11, 137 local) to $159,224 total ($87,892 federal, $21,973 State, and $49,359 local) for cost overrun on construction bid price Comments/Conditions: No impact on financial constraint; no air quality conformity requirements impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan PI{mning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Charles W. Heald, P.E. Date District Engineer 14TxDOT, Fort Worth District X REFERENCE ITEM 3.2 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION Subregion: Eastern OtherProgram: CMAQ __ STP·MM X Transit __ ________ Type of Modification: Administrative __ RTCAction X STIP Revision __ Modification Number: 96·148 NCTCOG Project Code: 776 NCTCOG TIP Page Number(s): VII·28 TxDOT Control Section Job Number(s): 0047-07-156 Project Type and Location: Dallas--U.S. 75 from I.H. 635 to Dallas CSD; surveillance Original Funded Amount: FY96--$254,OOO total ($203,200 federal and $50,800 State) FY97··$276,000 total ($220,800 federal and $55,200 State) Estimated Construction Cost: N/A Percent: N/A Construction Bid Price: N/A Percent: N/A Request: Move funds programmed for FY97 to FY96 for surveillance on U.S. 75 from Woodall Rodgers to Midpark Road Comments/Conditions: CUrrent year financial constraint being balanced against CMAQ projects anticipated to carry over; no air quality conformity requirements are impacted by this modification; contingent on TxDOT approval (see below) Approved By: Director of Transportation NCTCOG The following signature authorizes: additional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) allocated funds to be moved into Year One. modification to a project funded through a TxDOT-selected program. Approved By: Jay Nelson, P.E. Date District Engineer TxDOT, Dallas District X ADDisoN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (211) 150-2871 􀁾􀁴􀀬􀁜􀀧􀀮􀀺􀁴􀀧􀁲􀀧􀁩􀀡􀀡􀀱􀀬􀀢􀀧􀁯􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀮􀁴􀀡􀁩􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀭􀁃􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀡􀀭􀀢􀀮􀀮􀁯􀀢􀀺􀁴􀀧􀀺􀁉􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀧􀁊􀁜􀀻􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀡􀀬􀀡􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀠Po.!!t Office llox 144 AddisQ.n, Texll.s 75001 16801 WcSI{,;r'OVl: August 22, 1996 Mr. Ivan Nicodemus, P.E. Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: Dallas County CMAQ Project No. 12 Dear Ivan: Enclosed is the COncurrence letter for the project executed by the Town. Also, enclosed is a copy of the warrallt study for the proposed traftic signal at the Midway/Boyington/Dooley intersection. The Town requests dlat dIe signal be added to the scope of the project for this intersection. If you have any questions please call me at 450-2879. 􀁓􀁩􀁊􀀺􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀺􀁊􀀭David Nighswonger, P.E. Public Works Engineer Enclosures: 1. Concurrence Letter 2. Warrant Study for signal at Midway/BoyintonJDoolcy ATTACHMENT 2 CONCURRENCE PROJECT #12 I have reviewed the Scope of Work for the proposed Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program intersection improvement at the following locations: Location Budget Amount City's contribution Midway Rd. at Saring Valley Rd. $1,750.000 $0 Midway Rd. at Proton Rd. $115.000 $0 , Midway Rd. at Beltway Dr. $ 55.000 $0 : Midway Ad. at Lindbero Dr. $105.000 $0 : Midway Ad. al Boyinoton DrJDooley Rd. i $155.000 $0 , Midwav Rd. at Keller SprinQs Rd. I $530,000 $0C::r:......prove""e... t-.s ..+ rh.'dw,'1 /Bo'/;"j-t-.", /t:?o t"r-"ct .(+t ' (-s..'J M\ I . /I concur with the scope of work outlined in the attached Design Concept Drawings, please accept this as the City's request to forward this material through the Dallas 􀁧􀂷􀁺􀁺􀁾􀁲􀁢􀀠County CMAQ P gram to rxDOT for implementation. John Baumgartner. E Date Signed Director of Trans ortalion Town of Addiso After signing, please return to: Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 D IGENERALIG04CORRIG4·10UMDDISDM 1996\oo2.00C Batl,)n·Ast:hman l\ssOCla!t!s. inc . .s,laS B.JIt Line Rt).)d, SIJI!Q 1'39· Dalli.l5, Ti::}:las 752·10· (?I.l} 991·I!JCO. Ff'lc (21 11J4,)O-'J'?61 MEMORANDUM TO; John Baumgartner, Town of Addison L FROM; ,.1 Pli . Lolly Pond, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. if. L DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Signal Warrant Studies at Midway and BoyingtonIDooley The purpose of this memorandum is to document the findings of a signal warrant analysis conducted at the intersection ofMidway and Boyington/Dooley. The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) sets forth certain conditions by which a signal may be warranted. These conditions consider the following: (1) The trarnc volumes on the main and side streets, (2) Excessi vc vehicle delay (3) Pedestrian volumes, (4) School crossings, (5) Progressive movement oftraflic, (6) Accident experience, (7) Organization of traffic flow networks, I3arton-Aschman Associates, Inc. conducted directional 24-hour vehicular counts and AM and PM peak hour counts at the study intersection. A site investigation was also completcd. Analysis ofthe intersection was then completed using PC-Warrants, a computerized software package that evaluates the twelve signal warrants stated in the TMUTCD. The complete results of the signal warrant analysis are included with this memo and can be summarized as follows: Warrant 1-Minimum Vehicular volumes NOT SATISFIED Warrant 2 -Interruption of Continuous Traffic NOT SATISFIED 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁐􀁁􀁒􀁓􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀠 J. Baumgartner June 14, 1995 page 2 Warrant 3 -Minimum Pedestrian Volumes NOT SATISFIED There were less than ten pedestrians observed during the AM and PM peak hours. Pedestrians must exceed 150 for each of any four hours to meet this warrant. Warrant 4 -School Crossing NOT SATISFIED Warrant 5 -Progressive Movement SATISFIED The study intersection is far enough away from other signalized intersections that it would not create a problem with progression if signalized. There would be interconnect costs associated in addition to the costs ofsignal construction. A coordination problem could be an issue because the signal at Keller Springs is under Carrollton's jurisdiction. Warrant 6 -Accident Experience NOT SATISFIED Police records report only six accidents at this intersection since January of 1994. Only one of these accidents might have been preventable if a signal had been installed at this inlersection. This accident involved two side Slreel vehicles attempting to make left turns at the same time. Warrant 7 -System Warrant NOT SATISFIED Warrant 8 -Combination of Warrants NOT SATISFIED Warrant 9 -Four Hour Volumes SATISFIED Warrant 10 -Peak Hour Delay NOT SATISFIED Warrant II -Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED Warrant 12 -Warrant Volumes SATISFIED The intersection operates today at an acceptable level of service and performance. There are no significant delays occurring during the peak hours. Visibility is adequate. A review ofthis infonnation indicates that the study intersection meets four ofthe twelve TMUTCD signal warrants at this time. These same warrants could probably be meet at many intersections in the Town of Addison today. PC-Warrants Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, Version 3.03 Warrant Study Data File: A:u'\UDDOOL.WAR; Time of Report: 06/141l995; 09;59:29 Major Street Approaches: Minor Street Approaches: Northbound: Eastbound: MidwayRoad Boyingtoll Data File: No Count Defined Data File: No Count Defined Count Type: None. Count Date: 6/7/95 Count Type: None. Count Dato: 617195 Number of Lanes: 2 Number of Lanos: I Approach Speed: 40 Approach Speed: 30 Total Approach Traffic: 20995 Total Approach Traffic: 1047 Southbound: Westbound: Midway Road Dooley Data File: No Count Defined Data File: No Count Defined Count Type: None. Count Date: 6/7/95 Count Type: None. Count Date: 617195 Number of Lanes; 2 Number of Lanes: I Approach Speed: 40 Approach Speed: 30 Total Approach Traffic: 18155 Total Approach Traffic: 446 Warrant Summary: Urban vailles apply. Warrant 1-Minimum Vebicular Volumes NOT SATISFIED. Required values reaehcd for 0 hours. Criteria·-Main SI.: 600; Side SI.: Sec Volume Summary. Warrant 2· Interruption of Continuous Traffic NOT SATISFIED. Required values reached for 6 hours. Criteria·-Main 51.: 900; Side SI.: See Volume Summary. 'Varrant 3 .. 1vtinhnum Pedestrian Volumes NOT SATISFIED. 8th-High Hour--P"dcstrians: O. Criteria·-Ped",trian" 150; Vehicles: 1000. Warrn"t 4 • School Crossing NOT APPLICADLE. Gap dala has not been defined. \Varrant 5 􀁾􀀠Progressive Movement SATISf-IED for the following npproach(cs): Northbound: 1600 feet to ncarest coordi"ated lOignaL Southbound: 2300 feet to nearest coordinated signal. \Vnrrunt 6 􀁾􀀠Accident Experience NOT SATISFIED. I correctable acddents is fewer than required 5. Correctable Accidents: I; Right Angle Accidents: 0; Left Turn Accidents: 2; Other Accidents: 4. Warnmt 7 • Sy,tem, Warnlllt NOT SATISFIED. At least one strect has no major approaches. Peak hour total entering volumc: 3930 NS -Approaches which arc part of the principal through traffic roadway network. NS • Approaches which connect arcas of principal traffic generation. -Approaches which ineludc rural or suburban highways outside, entering or travcrsing a city . • Approaches which have surface street freeway or expressway ramp terminals. NS • Approaches which appear as a major route in an official transportation plan, Warrant 8· Combination or Warrants NOT SATISFIED. Required values rcaehed for 0 hours. Criteria··Main: 720; Side: Sec Volume Summary. Warrant 9-Four Hour Volumes SATISFIED for 6 hours. Warrant 10 • Peak Hour Delay NOT SA TlSFLED. 0.43 veh-hrs delay is lower than required 4 veh-hr'. Criteria--Main SI.: 800 (4 approaches), 650 (3 approaches); Side St.: 100, Warrant 11 • Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED for I hours. Warrant 12· Warrant Volumes for Trame Actuated Signals (Texas Only) SATISFIED; 120. Two Hour condition is satisfied for 5 hours. J2b. Eight Hour condition is satisfied for 7 hours. Page I A:\M/DDOOL. WAR PC-Warrants Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, Version 3.03 Warrant Study Data File: A:\MIDDOOL. WAR; Time or Report: 06/14/1995; 09:59:29 700 ,..... ::t: 600 􀁾􀀠..c: u 500'" e §: -<., 400S ::l '0 >..c: OJ) 300 tIl 􀁾., 200􀁾􀀠en !5 '" 􀁾􀀠100 o 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Directions (VPH) Analysis of 8-Hour Volume Warrlmts (Criteria refers to side street values for that hour); ""'" Warrant Curves "»,.,.. "'-"'" ! --9. Pour Hour Warrant " -Urban ....""""",,... 11. Peak Hour Warrant ...... : I '" Vailles ......... 12a. Two Hour Warrant (2+ lanes &1 lane) -(2+ lanes &1 lane) (2+ lanes &1 lane) ! !. ...·.... i -----12b. Eight Hour Warrant (2+ lanes & 1 lane)1-.·.....-.. "K..􀁾􀀮􀀠". ....... "" .. • .•, . , .. : I I I • 1 I 1.0 __!.6_____ 200 400 '>"""" ! I""" I ! ,-,...",..,. i I..... , .....􀁾.. ! ....,..... '...,.....,',...., i"--. ", ", i -"'"'' .. 􀀡􀁾􀀠" . '.... " ....,.....,." ..." ...... '. 􀁾􀀢􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠........,"" ... I"'" ............, '. "".. ............ ...... :'.,...........,.. i . .............. " '" " """''''''''',. "'''''''''''', -'. '"''''''''''''.. .. r-··1.... '........􀀢􀀮􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠, .. ......, --. -----joT -;'Ij--.. --;. -------.. .. ;'3 2 .7 --􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀭Side 􀁜􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠1 Warrant 2 I Warrant 8Hour i Main Begin: (Total) Vol. Dir. Rank Meets? Criteria Meets? Criteria: Meets? Criteria-. 0 . 416 39 E 11 150 12075 1 260 43 E 10 150 75 120 2 91 7 E 20 150 7S 120 3 77 7 E 21 150 75 120 4 55 1504 E 22 75 120 5 88 150 754 W 23 120 6 313 3 E 24 150 12075 7 1347 15 E 19 MAIN 75MAIN 150 MAIN 120 8 3324 23 E 18 MAIN 150 MAIN 7S MAIN 120 9 3256 MAIN 7533 E 14 􀁾􀀱􀁁􀁉􀁎􀀠150 MAIN 120 10 MAIN 751996 48 E 8 MAIN 150 MAIN 120 177411 39 E 12 MAIN 150 MAIN 75 MAIN 120 237512 80 E 5 --BOTH--75 MAIN 120􀁾􀀱􀁁􀁉􀁎􀀠150 13 2947 94 E 3 MAIN 150 --BOTH--75 MAIN 120 MAIN 7514 2580 47 E 9 􀁾􀀱􀁁􀁉􀁎􀀠150 MAIN 120 MAIN 7515 2249 60 E 7 MAIN 150 MAIN 120 16 2272 --BOTH--7577 E 6 MAIN 150 MAIN 120 ! 17 2763 }1AIN 150 --BOTH--75 MAIN 12096 E 2! 18 3785 117 E 1 MAIN 150 --BOTH--75 MAIN 120 : 270219 86 E 4 􀁾􀀱􀁁􀁉􀁎􀀠150 --BOTH--75 MAIN 120 i !20 1647 30 E 16 MAIN 150 MAIN 75 MAIN 120 21 1175 MAIN 150 MAIN 75 MAIN 12035 E 13 22 996 29 E 17 MAIN 150 MAIN 75 MAIN 120 : I 23 662 MAIN 150 75 12033 E 15 I Page 2 A:\MlDDOOL.WAR N I Not to Scale 􀁾A.M. Peak Hour /rP.M. Peak Hour XXX/XXX ,.• EXISTNG AM. & P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------[k))---' i eS!B5/199S 21:B6 21461BB663 􀁾􀁬􀁅􀁔􀁒􀁏􀁃􀁏􀁕􀁎􀁔􀀠PAGE 82 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT H-+++-! METROCOUNT H-II-HH T",1f\O Data Coll...t""" SUMMARY 􀁄􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀺􀀨􀀬􀀭􀁢􀂷􀁱􀁾LOCATION: Wjdw;::o..y 4 DOQ/e'l/8win@to n OBSERVER(S); HOlle Hig; '1 b,,+-ham I fY'"f" ...... ..... " {Y\ ,..... " from t'dl HORTH on ftotll tho EAST on from th. SOUTH on fr<>m th. WEe T on TIME Ih; tWA, Doole\ fnidwtJ. J (3" .Iint:'l-to" Tolar 1:HRU' ¥ STARTS RT LT RT THAU LT RT THRU LT AT THAU LT 7:00 S" 430 0 I 0 I ,;). /13 Olfc, S-O I :, '10 ,:15" 5" 􀁓􀁧􀁾􀀠0 0 0 0 .;1. 1-43 .;1.'1 1 0 0 7(08 7:3() 13 7.:l//0 0 5 "f 179 ..:2'1 .3 0 1 95"(b ,:"01 0 {8 0 ;J.3 􀁊􀁾􀀠:J. 􀁾􀀷􀀱􀁦􀀠"" tiD 0 rJ.f;, 374-(" volume Count Report Generated by HSC3uOO Version 2.01 Copyright 1990'1991 Hitron Syste,s Corooration Location .......... MIDWAY @BOYINGTON/DOOLEY. S. APPR. MB Location Code ..... 1 County ............ DALLAS Recorder Set ...... 06/05/95 12:45 RecoI'ding Start ... 06/05/95 14 :00 Recording End ..... 06/06/95 14:00 Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes Operator Number ... 13 Machine Number .... 1 Channel ........... 1 Divide 8y ......... 2 Summation ... "" .... No Two-Way ....... "... No Monday 06/05/95 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1500160011001800190020001100220013001400010002000300 0400OSOG06000lOU000900 1000110012001300 1400lotais 1259 1300 1821 2603 1795 1001 164 116 449 304 192 64 60 34 31 133 m 892 1103 896 8n 1241 1589 1409 20995 349 298 3aS 661 581 m 251 205 m 87 92 23 18 6 11 19 51 166 169 249 231 2B3 39J 31B 287 J22 382 696 487 251 110 190 110 85 46 11 13 10 9 19 82 181 214 227 233 288 415 355 326 J33 528 586 406 251 !11 m 85 69 31 14 19 8 7 33 129 247 299 234 197 341 374 3!1 297 347 532 654 321 220 112 111 11l 63 23 12 10 to 10 62 160 292 261 IB6 232 329 401 365 AM Peal< Hour ....... ----.......... 11:00 to 12:00 (1241 vehicles) AM Pe.!1k Hour Factor ....... -...... 91.09" PM 􀁐􀁥􀀬􀁾􀁫􀀠Hour ....... __ ....... __ .. 17:00 to 18:00 (2603 vehicles) PM Peak Hour-Factor .. .. ...... 93.5% 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠 Volume Count Report Generated by "SClOOO Version 2.01 CODyright 1990-1992 Mitron 􀁓􀁹􀁳􀁴􀁥􀁾􀁳􀀠(orDor.lion Location .......... MIDWAY @BOYINGTON/DOOLEY. N. APPR. S8 Location Code ..... 3 County ............ DALLAS Recorder Set ...... 06/05/95 13:00 Recording Start ... 06/05/95 14:00 Recording End ..... 06/06/95 14:00 Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes Operator Number ... 13 Machine Number .... 3 Channel ........... 1 Divide By ......... 2 Summation ......... No Two-Way ...... _.... No Monday 06/05/95 Channel: 1 Direction: S 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀱􀁟􀀲􀁾􀀲􀁉􀁍􀁾􀀲􀁭􀀰􀀲􀁾� �􀁉􀁍􀁾􀀰􀀳􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀴􀁍􀀰􀀵􀁍􀀰􀀶􀁍􀁏􀁾􀀰􀀸􀀰􀀰􀀰􀁟􀀱􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁍􀁉􀁾􀀱􀀳􀁍􀀱􀀴􀀰􀀰􀁨􀁴􀀬􀁬􀀡􀀠990 972 936 1182 901 640 411 280 m Il2 68 21 11 21 51 180 919 1432 2153 1100 881 1134 1358 1111 18155 256 254 n6 3.1 m 168 115 18 64 II 10 9 1 5 11 24 85 m 641 3i4 112 224 191 320 253 233 22B 2B6 245 189 101 19 66 36 13 11 6 4 9 11 146 613 5)I 27B 231 279 JSB 186 250 258 240 Jl1 2JO 148 96 6J 39 26 26 4 2 3 13 56 258 120 514 248 224 322 351 286 231 m 242 236 199 135 83 60 44 19 9 1 2 9 11 13 430 684 m 160 214 309 350 219 􀁾AM Peak Hour ........... ......... 07:15 to 08: 15 (2664 vehicles] AM Peak Hour Factor ............. 92.59" PM Peak Hour ............. ... " .. 12: 15 t.o 13:15 (1385 vehicles] 􀁐􀁾􀁉􀀠Peal< Hour Factor ....... 􀁾􀀠........ 96.7% 􀁾􀀠 Volume Count Report 􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠Ilr H50000 Version 2.01 Coayrigot 1990-1992 Hitron Systels 􀁃􀁯􀁲􀁯􀁯􀁲􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠Location ., ........ MIDWAY @BOYINGTON/DOOLEY. W. APPR. EB Location Code ..... 444 County ............ DALLAS Recorder Set ...... 06/05/95 13:06 Recording Start ." 06/05/95 14:00 Recording End ..... 06/06/95 14:00 Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes Operator Number ... 13 Machine Number .... 4 Channel ..... _..... 1 Divide By ......... 2 Summation ......... No Two-Way No Monday 06/05/95 Channel: 1 Direction: E 15001600110018001900200021002200230 0240001000200030004000500060001000S000900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totals 60 11 96 117 86 30 35 29 33 39 43 7 7 4 2 3 15 23 33 48 39 80 94 47 1047 1J 13 22 38 36 12 8 13 15 16 .JS 2 5 0 2 .J 5 8 14 1.1 11 21 17 12 20 25 31 15 a 3 3 3 5 2 4 2 2 0 1 5 B 13 9 18 22 13 Z2 29 3.J n 23 5 19 7 5 6 S 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 13 12 7 27 23 6 9 15 16 16 12 5 5 6 10 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 8 6 4 9 10 24 22 11 AM Peal< Hour .-. . . . .............. 11:00 to 12:00 (80 vehicles) 􀁁􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀠Peak Hour Facto,' 􀀮􀁾􀀠.... .. 74.1% PM Peal, Hour ........ 16:30 to 17:30 (118 vehicles) 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀂷􀀮􀁷􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀮􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁐􀁾􀀱􀀠Peak Hour Factor ........ ... 77 􀁾􀀠6lff.iJ 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 yglume Count Report Generated by HSC50QO Version 2.01 CODyright 1990'1992 Hitron SYstems CorDoration Location .......... MIDWAY @BOYINGTON/DOOLEY. E. APPR. WB Location Code ..... 2 County ............ DALLAS Recorder Set ...... 06/05/95 12:51 Recording Start ... 06/05/95 14:00 Recording End ..... 06/06/95 14:00 Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes Operator Number ... 13 Machine Number .... 2 Channel ........... 1 Divide By ......... 2 Summation ......... No Two-Way ........... No Monday 06/05/95 Channel: 1 Direction: W 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀸􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀹􀀰􀀰􀁭􀀰􀀲􀀱􀀰􀀰􀀲􀁭􀁭􀀰􀀲􀀴􀀰� �􀀰􀀱􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀲􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀰􀀰􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁏􀁾􀁾􀀰􀁾􀁟􀀰􀁾􀀱􀁟􀀱􀀱􀀰􀀰􀁬􀁭􀀱􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀴􀀰􀀰􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁬􀁳􀀠V 51 31 41 28 21 11 21 20 9 1 3 3 2 4 l 12 21 23 25 31 49 36 446 10 12 10 II 4 4 8 4 5 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 5 l 10 19 5 6 11 7 3 4 10 4 5 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 3 14 13 10 1 11 6 6 0 3 0 I 1 0 0 0 [ 2 0 2 8 5 [0 4 9 15 [0 6 5 11 5 J 5 5 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ 2 10 6 1 6 15 Ar1 Peak Hour ................. ... 10: 45 to 11: 45 (38 vehicles) 􀁁􀁾􀁉􀀠Peak Hour' Factof" --........... 50.0';; pr1 Peak Hour ............ _-_. __ .. 12:15 to 13:15 (50 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor ............. 􀀸􀀳􀀮􀀳􀁾􀁦􀁩􀀠 􀁾􀀠 S 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠, VI o 􀁾􀁜􀀭􀁉􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀠..... ,' /¥' " , ST A. 􀀳􀁾􀀵􀀰􀀠I"Inz I 􀁴􀁄􀁾-10 \OlOVI 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠\ 01 L ' :>:: f2,... 1"1 ;:0 􀁾􀀠S VI 􀁉􀁾􀁮\\ I j' I ","',' 􀁾.:< .. 􀁾􀀯􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀠 II 􀁾􀁾􀀯􀀯􀀭􀀯􀁩􀁾􀀯􀀯􀁾􀀯􀀯􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁃􀀧'," " '" /' ' ' /' .. Q)U)"o STA. 0+00 fTlfTI»orfTI;:O BEGIN' PROJECT' O_A , (PROJECT 􀁾􀀩􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠" :Ezz' " N 7040355':'504 " , U) (';) , " E. 2477292.796 ' ". ,. . ';', 􀀢􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀠, »0 STA. 2+20,1'\1'\ END 12.5' MEDIAN/-' BEGIN TOLL PLAZA 􀁾􀁾•. (BY OTHERS) ,0< fTI , , ' '03: CfTI ;:oz Q)-'!q; 􀁜􀀬􀁾􀁯􀁱􀀠􀁾􀀠<; :t. ooq END TOLL' PLAZA,􀁾􀁯􀁱􀁾􀀠'?> " r"O '-;:0fflO Co. ,.." " ,0 ,.\ "'\\ 􀁾􀀠'"1-! I fTl10 It,.I J 􀁾􀀠:> 0 I ! \ 􀁾􀁜􀀠\ \ \\ \ \ 􀁾􀀠"0t\\\ U1 􀀺􀁌􀀭􀁾, 0\\'\\ tlL \ I -'!\ \ \ 􀁾􀁯􀀠, \,\ '-􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠.!!!o oz'--_..i --'!C;:oI,!!.olo􀁾􀁉􀀠r' I II' Q (Xl " fTI u , 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁦􀁔􀁉􀀠(")􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀡􀀠"00 ;:00Oz Co.-,!fTI;:o0 0::!r I , ,I 1 ' I I STA. 7+64.47,2 L T I (PROJECT ct) E UALS I STA 7+64.47 P OJECT ' CONTROL LINE NORTH) CONTROL LINE SHIFT , I _1'--_-'-_ DOOLEY ROAD -.:.--0Q ..........-:= :;> ;:;:" -􀀻􀀺􀁯􀁾􀀠o-'! e;;fTI :E3: »0"0-<0;:0 􀀧􀁾􀀠-< 􀁾􀁔􀀯􀀮􀀩􀁊􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀲􀁾􀀠, I" VI 􀁾􀀠",;-.1=􀁖􀁉􀁾􀀠!"VI 􀁾􀁏􀀠--0; 'fTI \ :...; )J c I ---' R.O.W. 􀁾...-'\ \....,..; ATTACHMENT 2 CONCURRENCE PROJECT #12 I have reviewed the Scope of Work for the proposed Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program intersection improvement at the following locations: 􀁾􀀮􀀠Location Budget City's Amount contribution Midwav Rd. at Sorina'yallev Rd. $1,750,000 $0 av Rd. at Proton Rd,. $115,000 $0 Midwav R,Lat Beltwav Dr. $ 55,000 $0 Midwav Rd. at Lindberg Dr. $105,000 $0 . Midway Rd. at Boyington Dr'/Dooley Rd. $155 000 $0 Midway Rd. at Keller Springs ...Rd. $530,000 $0 I concur with the scope of work outlined in the attached Design Concept Drawings, D please accept this as the City's request to forward this material through the Dallas County CMAQ Program to TxDOT for implementation. John Baumgartner, P.E. Date Signed Director of Transportation Town of Addison After signing, please return to: Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 D:\GENERAL\G04CORR\G4-10UMODISONl19961O O2.DOC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARDIENT (214) 450-2871 Post Office BOox 144 Addi!i1fin. Textls 75001 16001 Westgrovc September 21, 1995 Mr. Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments P.O. Box 5888 Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 Re: 1996 TIP Dear Mr. Morris: This letter is to reiterate the town of Addison's objection to the change in the 1996 TIP that would move tbe funding for the intersection improvements on Belt Line Road at Quorum Drive and Midway Road (CMAQ Project No. 3076) from 1996 to 1997. The projects have been Transit PASS projects since 1989. These two intersections exist on a portion of Belt Line Road that is one of the most congested roadways in the metroplex. The Town feels it is imperative that these improvements are constructed as soon as possible for the benefit of improving traffic on both Belt Line Road and Midway Road and improving air quality in the region. Addison understands that there is a funding shortage for projects in the eastern subregion and that sacrifices are going to have to be made by some cities in order to balance the program costs with the available funds. Uofortunately, Addison does not have another project that can be moved back in order to make funds available for these intersection improvements. The ouly other CMAQ/STP project that the Town has an interest in is Dallas County STP-MM Project No. 2332, which is various improvements on Midway Road from Spring Valley to Dallas/Collin County Line. Funding for portions oftbis project that would benefit Addison is already scheduled for 1999/2001. The Town is very confident that tbe intersection improvements can be constructed in 1996. The Environmental Assessment has been approved by TxDOT and the construction plans are almost complete. We plan to begin right-{)f-way acquisition before the end of the year. We expect that TxDOT will be able to let the project by May 19%. Addison understands that every city feels their projects should take priority and that yours is a very difficult task in determining the funding priorities for all the projects. We appreciate you and your staffs work and apologize for not bringing our objection to your attention early than today. If you have any questions please 􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁪􀀱􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀭􀀴􀀵􀀰􀀭􀀲􀀸􀀷􀀱􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀠John 􀁂􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁧􀁾􀁲􀁲􀀺􀀮􀁅􀀮Director of Public Works REPORT' . 􀁓􀁅􀁐􀁾􀀲􀀱􀁾􀀹􀁅􀀠THU 12:49 SEND # DATE S.T. NAME 0l SEP-2! 12:47 31164@7806 TIME PGS .NOT.E 1 J 12" 2 OK DP . --, -. TOWN OF ADDIsoN PuBLIC WORKS To: 􀁭􀁬􀂷􀁣􀁾􀁡􀀭􀁥􀀮􀀨􀀠}1iOY(' l'S From: John Baumgartner, P.E.. .• Director Company: 'NCIe 0 Ci Phone: 214/450-2886 FAX: 214/931-6643FAX #: 81J-Cut.{ () -teo 􀁾􀀠16801 WestgroveDate: qJ.2 t/􀁣􀁴􀀮􀁦􀁾􀀠P.O. Box 144 .I l 􀁾􀀠Addison, TX 75001 # of pages (including cover): 2. (original in mail DPer your request OFYj DCal! me . Comments: .-.... .􀁾􀀮􀀠. DRAFT 1996 􀁔􀁆􀁾􀀺􀁁􀁎􀁓􀁐􀁏􀁒􀁔􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁉􀁜􀁉􀀠IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 49 USC 5307 (FORfIIIERL Y SECTION 9 TRANSIT PROGRAM) FEDERAL COSTS IN $1000S EASTERN SUBREGION AGENCY CITY PROJECT NAME WORK DESCRIPTION 1996 DART VARIOUS ADDISON TRANSIT CENTER CONSTRUCTION • CAPITAL 2520 DART VARIOUS ASSORTED TRANSIT ACAPITAL CAPITAL DART VARIOUS COMMIJTER RAIL CAPITAL DART VARIOUS FAIR PARK TRANSIT CENTER cot.ISTRUCTION • CAPITAL DART VARIOUS BE DALLAS TRANSIT CENTER lAND ACQUISITION • CAPITAL DART VARIOUS VEHICLE ACQUISITION _ BUSES CAPITAL 22180 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE BUS REHABILITATION CAPITAL 12 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE FARE BOXES W/SUPPORT EQUIPMENT CAPITAL 36 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE PARK & RIDE CAPITAL 800 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE RADIOJOfSPATCH eQUIPMENT CAPITAL 11 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT CAPITAL 2 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE VEHICLE ACQUISITION CAPITAL 54 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE E & 0 OPERATING ASSISTANCE OPERATING 143 GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE E & 0 PlANNING PlANNING , , MESO.uITE MESQUITe E & 0 VEHICLE ACQUISITION CAPITAL 200 MESQUITe MESQUITe E & 0 OPERATING ASSISTANCE OPERATING 188 MESQUITe MESQUITe E & 0 PLANNING PlANNING 2. PLANO PLANO E & 0 OPERATING ASSISTANCE OPERATING 16 YEAR 1997 1998 99/00/01 24175 1200 4200 46825 1430 2134 12736 13300 3.000 143 143 429 , , 16 80 240 494 260 330 132' 15 16 45 11996 TIP SUBTOTALS 26,100 1 17,9931 18,2331 107,308 I • CARRYOVER PROJECTS FROM FY95 NOTE: FY96 allocation includes $7,2 million of carryover funds from FY95 Balancing to $23 million for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area with 76% (or $17.48 million) to the Eastern Subregion and 24% (or $5,52 million) to the Western Subregion 9/13/95 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 49 USC 5307 (FORMERLY SECTION 9 TRANSIT PROGRAM) FEDERAL COSTS IN $1000S WESTERN SUBREGION AGENCY CITY PROJECT NAME WORK DESCRIPTION 1996 FWfA VARIOUS BUS AAOtO SYSTEM CAPITAl FWfA VARIOUS CNGEOOIHE CAPITAl 34 FWrA VARIOUS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAl 􀁾􀀠vAruoUs COP4EA CAPrrAL 12 VARIOUS FARE BOX SVSTEM CAPITAl VAruoUS MAINTENANCE EOUIPtAENT CAPITAl 340 FWfA V""""'S PASSENGER SHElTERS CAPITAL FWrA VARIOUS RUBBeR TIRE TAN •• 􀁾􀀠1115 ... ... 1200 I'MTIPSUBTOTALS 19.... 1 "".... 1 150,941 I tNClUOES FUNDING FOR COA LIVEABLE cotAMUNfTlES GRANT APfLiCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1.6 MIL.lJOfI.I (FEDEFW..) ,.. COHTINGENOYTASK!: ASSUMING FAVORABlE COST EFF£CTIYENESS AND FEDERAL APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL. STUDIES 6 •• INClUDESFYtrSCARRVOVER 9113/95 i.-:.;., i.··. : i 9113195 ) • 'I DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 49 USC 5309 (FORMERLY SECTION 3 TRANSIT PROGRAM) FEDERAL COSTS IN $1OOOS WESTERN SUBREGION .... I !AGENCY CITY PROJECT NAME WORK DESCRIPTION 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭1996 1997 YEAR 1998 99100/01 I'WTA VAAlOUS FWLTRAH CAPITAL 6000 FWrA VARIOUS TROUE\' CAPITAL ..... < 0 I[!906TIPSUBTOT<",AL=-S____....L-_-=3S"".ooo::cL1__-=,...1 __:..L'I__..::.J •• •• • DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR· EASTERN SUBREGION .. !fl. 7Ii SiGNAL IMPROVEMENTS C.) .. SiGNAl IMPROVEMENTS (4) .. 'l'i . . $6' INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (rRANSrr PAS 50 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (TRANSIT PAS "7.7. (,il WALNUT Pl.AZA INTERSECTI:ON' IMPROVEMENTS 15 50 .. WALNUT PlAZA 30' 50 INTERSECTiON IMPROVEMENTS 15 .. .,. ,.􀁪􀁪􀁬􀁉􀁈􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠.IHOSE ..'" ,.,. .. ,..lNTERSECTtoN IMPROV'EMENTS 50OIH3&E @.IH3OE U'ffEAsECTION IMPROVEMENTS .. ,... 50 .,. .. ,.􀁾􀀮􀁬􀁈􀁾􀀠,i.: 􀀮􀁈􀀢􀁦􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁭􀀺􀀠.. ,. .. eCARROLl.TON CIL sIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS E CARROLLTON CIl stGNAl...IMPROVEMENTs 30.. '" '2 •• ,!J􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁊􀁾􀀢􀀠.. • SfGNAlIMPRO\IEMEHTS .. .. .. stGNAlIMPAOVEMENTs (3) .. " 144•.. "" ,.. I. .. ,. ,. stGNAlIMPAOVEMEHTs .. .. s SlGNAl tMPRovatENTS .. ., .. s • " ,.. ,.. ... .. .. 24 ,.. " r " :x :t rr 2' i. " 9115195 180 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) JUflfTERRD JUPfTERRD 􀀺􀀻􀁩􀁛􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁲􀀮􀀠t.e2 ON..LAS DAlLAS AVE_MILECREEK8IKEWAY 662 ON..LAS DALLAS FFVE-MILE CReEK BIKEWAY 􀁌􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠9/15/95 EASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT COST (dollars in thousands) FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR (dollars in thousands) 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀁣􀁮􀁶􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁈􀁁􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁾____________􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁄􀁕􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀭__􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁯􀁾______________􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁐􀀬􀀻􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁎􀁭􀀬􀀭________􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾� �􀀭􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁏􀁔􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀺􀀱__􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁓􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁔􀁾􀁥􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀁑􀁯􀁾􀀫􀀭􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁯􀁯􀁥􀁾__􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀷􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠4037 CEDAR HILL ceDAR HILL FM 1382 • DUNCANVIllE AD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 87 4S 5 -4, "1 4037 CEDAR HILL OEDAR HilL FM 1382 @DUNCANVlUE AD INTERSECTION IMPRovEMENTS 67 45 .5 .1 .(1 .' 􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁈􀁤􀀤􀀮􀀴􀁉􀁈􀁩􀁣􀀺􀀴􀁾􀁈􀁩􀁬􀀺􀁴􀀮. . . <"" ...... . 􀀮􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁬􀀻􀀻􀁌􀀼􀁴􀁟􀁾􀀠.... ,...80...' 80...' .. 4O!W CEDAR HILL CEDARHlll Ba,TUNETAAIL ANDERSONRD MAlN 􀁾􀁹􀀠eo 65 4038 CEDARHILL CEOARHlll BELTUNETAAIL ANDERSONRD MAlN a.KEWAv 80 66 􀀧􀀯􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀽􀁉􀁾􀀢􀀠..•􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀠􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁬􀀮􀀺􀂷􀀧." ":: .: 4(1&1 COPPELL COPPELL BETHELRD oDENTON TAP RD IHTERSECTIONIMPROVEMENTS f;IO 30 4(le1 COPPELL COPPEll 8€THELRD o OEmON TAP flO INTERSEonONINPAOVEMENT8 eo 30 .􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁪􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁩􀀻􀁩􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀺􀂷􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀧􀀱􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀺􀀡􀀱􀀡􀀱􀀺􀀠;it.,:: 􀂷􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁩". ":.: .oLOeS COPPELL COPfOELL BElTUNEFID o OENTOHTAPi4D INTERSECTtoNlMPAOVEMENTS 60 80 <4O\S3 COPPelL OOt>PELL 8ELTLlNEF\.O GiDENTOHTAPRD !NTEf\SECTK>NIMPROVEUENTS 60 80 .􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁙􀁬􀀺􀀻􀁩􀀧􀁩􀀧􀀧􀀡􀀧� �􀀧􀀻􀀼􀀠..... , , .; 􀀮􀁾....<.• 􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀧..'.'.'..,.••;....,.,•...".:'.:.'.'.•'."'." ......IM.•·.•􀂷􀀮􀂷􀁾.••......·•..••.•.....:.........·•..E....·........'.•..􀁾...•...'..'.;i..􀁾...... · : 8ELTUNERD 􀁾􀁌􀀼􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁔􀁾􀀱􀀱􀁬􀀧􀀠􀀼􀁩􀀤􀁲􀁾􀀢􀀠􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁔􀀢􀀡􀁬􀁒􀁏􀀠<4007 COPPELL COPPELl. neHTOH TAP AD -4007 COPPELL COPPELL COPPEUoeNTON TAP RD In, 􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀠􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀬􀀠.... .•... :."...........•...􀁟􀁾.......•......,.: ...•.:...·....··.,.·l»>.·•.<•.••.•􀂷􀁾􀁣....•.:.·....􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠􀁔􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠HAMPTOHRD HAMPTON RD S23 TXOOTIOART 623 TXOOTIOART 􀁄􀁾􀁌􀁁􀁓􀀠DALLAS .li!..􀁾􀀣􀀡􀀨􀀩􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀻􀂥􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁲􀁾... 􀁾􀀧􀁯􀀠-., MACARTHUR<1> __ :="􀁾􀁐􀁍􀂫􀁗􀁁􀁙􀀠􀁀􀁐􀁾􀁗􀁁􀁙􀀠􀀼􀁉􀀾􀀮􀁯􀁅􀀮􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀡􀀩􀀠.. ' .:. c:.. :•••• ·....􀀬􀁉􀁬􀁅􀁩􀁁� �􀀹􀀡􀁩􀁲􀂻􀀮􀁬􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀠. FORTWOATHAVE FORT 'M)fffH AVE "JNWooo: Ro' ,:' 􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀠US 67 use7 􀀧􀁾􀁖􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠WTEf\SECTK>N IMPROVEMENTS 60 00 IHTEfiSEGTlON IMPROVEMENTS 􀁾􀁅􀁒􀁓􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁓� �􀀠'.. 􀀡􀁩􀁦􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀮􀀠INTERS£CTION IMPRO\IEMENTS INTEftSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ···.lijrefiSEemoo IlifiAO"""'ENrS 􀀧􀀱􀀮􀁽􀁲􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁫􀁉􀀮􀁾􀂷􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀠' INTERSECTKm IMPROVEMENTS (TRANSIT PAS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (fAANsrr PAS 􀀧􀁭􀀺􀁗􀁓􀁅􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁐􀀡􀀧􀁬􀁯􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁱􀀧􀀤􀀨􀀩􀀧􀁉􀁬􀁯􀀧􀀾􀁉􀁜􀁓􀁉􀁊􀀢􀁾􀁁􀀤􀀠..􀂷􀂷􀁉􀁉􀀨􀀡􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁛􀁾􀁐􀁾􀀠INTEftS£CT1ON IMPflOVEMENTS (TRANSIT PAS INTERSecnoN lMPAOVEMeNTS (TRANSIT PAS eo flO eo as.. eo dO «I, ' ... 59 eo -eQ' .... .. "" "" os os '2<). ,2<). 􀀧􀁾􀁪􀁉􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁴􀀩􀁦􀁾􀀮􀁰􀀼.;> ..• ·· •• ··i.. , •• 􀀻􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾•......••.. .. .. 'Ill. ,-7,6 .. .. eo ... @HORTtiWE:BTHWV @HORTHVf'ESTHWV 􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁊􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁷􀀺􀀠WTEf\SECTION IMPROVEMENTS (TRANSIT PM iNTERSeCTION IMPROVEMENTS (TRANSIT pAs 􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀼􀀻􀀾􀁎􀁉􀁍􀁦􀁦􀁬􀀱􀀮􀁾􀁉􀀡􀁗􀀢􀁩􀁲􀁾􀀮􀁁􀀤􀀠􀀧􀁩􀁩􀁲􀁬􀁾􀁦􀁩􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁉􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀤􀀢􀀨􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁾􀀠,. ,. 7 7 •• 13 " ""."".... ... ... ... 100: .-. ''''' ... .25 .,. ... 51 .7 7l! 7l! ,. 2ft..'. ' .. .. 􀀧􀁾.. 52 ... ... ... ... ':\0(1: -4(10 􀀬􀁾.., 62. ... ... "'."'. ... ... 52 52 .. .. .... .. .. .. '" 40. 2 IH35E COOMBS CReEK BIt{EWAY .. COOM:BS CREEK BIKEWAY ..IH35E DRAFT 1996 TRANSpORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) EASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT SiGtw.IMPROVEMENTSC8D,LovE FIELD.FAA NORTH.NEAR NW.PLEASANT aROVE SUBAAEAS7768 DALlAS DALLAS SklNALIMPROVEMENTS CfTVWIOI,: SiGNAL UPGRADE {pHASE I}7TH DALLAS DALLAS 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀂷􀂷􀁳􀁾􀁬􀀱􀁲􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁦􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁗􀂷􀁎􀁣􀁥􀁭􀁭􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀠.;::.' ''is'''''W:,.. 􀁩􀁩􀀻􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁥􀀺 􀁾􀀢􀀠SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTSNEAR NE,STEMMONSliNOUSTRiAL,FAR OAK CliFF SUSAREASDALLAS SlGNAlIMPROVEMEHTS DALUoS 􀀧􀀱􀀿􀀺􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀢􀀻􀁩􀁬􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁭􀀽􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾� �􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀻􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁭􀀺􀁏􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀠DALLASCSD 10M (SEE STP_MM) 'H636DALlAS uS 75 DALlAS ceo IDRS (SEE STP-MM) n8 OAllAS 'H636DALlAS US7S718 DALLAS 􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀺􀂷􀁾􀂷􀁕􀀤􀀬􀀱􀀺􀁊􀀠:> :,';; 􀁉􀁾􀀺􀁾S,!P.-MM}.􀀶􀁁􀁌􀁾􀀠"iii;c;3j. 􀂷􀁉􀁈􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀠􀀺􀀩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁬􀀣􀁾􀁗􀁾􀁥􀀭􀁾􀁍􀀡,􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠... :. 􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀩􀁩􀁗􀁾􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀠US LOCATIONSDALLAS INTERSeCTION IMPROVEMENTS ((104)CIT'iWIDEDALt..AS vARIOUS LOCATIONS 􀁩􀀾􀀻􀁩􀀻􀁋􀁉􀁾􀁬􀀾􀀡􀀺􀁉􀁯􀁩􀀻􀀬􀀾􀀠􀀧􀀺􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀠..• 􀁾...•• 􀀺􀁬􀁴􀀧􀀺􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁩􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀠."􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀱􀁉􀀧􀀻􀀱􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁩􀀭􀀬􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀠OLEMMONAV'E INTERSECTK>N IMPAOVEMEHTS {TRANSiT PAS 186 TXOOT/DART OA1.LAS AIRPAOME @:LEMMONAYE 􀁉􀁾􀁅􀁒􀁓􀁅􀁃􀀧􀁦 􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀮􀁉􀁍􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓(TRANstr PAS 7$6 TXDOT1DAR1 DALLAS NRDAOME . 􀁍􀁦􀁴􀀧􀁊􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁕􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁾􀁍􀁏􀁏􀀮􀁡􀀠.􀀷􀁙􀀱􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁊􀀻􀀢􀀤.. ",,"""l1 8· 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀺􀀻􀁴􀁧􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁕􀀮􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀁾􀀴 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁴􀀨􀁾􀁲􀂷􀂷􀀬' ':t:" ..􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠INTER$EC'TION IMPROVEMENTS (is)OAU..AS vAAlOUS LOCATiONS188 OALLAS INTEMECTJ()t.lIMPAOVEIr,U;.NTS (16)OAL.1.M vAfllOUS LOCATIONS788 DA1.lAS 􀀱􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀻􀀺􀁍􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀢􀁩􀁩􀁦􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁉􀀧􀀠li'HIU&.m 􀁉􀁾􀁅􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁣􀁲􀁴􀀹􀁩􀀧􀁦􀀢􀁟􀁖􀂣􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁩􀀻􀁓􀀻􀁪􀁾􀀠 􀁄􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀻􀀺••􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠@MEANDERINGWAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 7Q2 DALlAS DALlAS MAPAHORO INTERSECnON IMPROVEMENTS• MEANOE.RING WAY 􀀱􀁉􀀨􀁛􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀡􀁓􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁅􀁴􀁭􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀠,./: ',:.. .'," 􀀺􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀬..􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁾..... . @DAL.1.MNOATHTOlLWAV INTERSECTION IMPAOVEMENTS @DAl..I..AS NOFmi TOlLWAV 􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁅􀁒􀁓􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁾􀁉􀁍􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠DALlAS BELT LINE RD .·•.􀂷􀂷􀀮􀂷􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀡􀂷􀁩􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀂷􀁩􀀦􀂷􀀠.􀂷� �􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀬•.;!!?!1'· .. 􀀮􀂷􀂷􀀱􀀨􀁾􀀮􀀽􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀧􀂷􀂷􀀠4$ LOOP 12 (SUCKNERBLW) INTERSECTiON IMPROVEMENTS OALl..AS BAUTONRD. @LOOP"12(BUCKNERBLVO) INTERSECTION IMPAOVEMENTS 􀁩􀁍􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀤􀀧􀀻􀀾􀁈􀁉􀁌� �􀀢􀀡􀁩􀀧􀀠AO' PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀴􀀴􀁾􀁒􀀠""'" ""'" " 11 1083 Hl1l3 •• 3 3 '" .. 10 ,. .. 211 " .. 10,. .. .. .. .. '2 •• •• ... ... ... .. ,_ "GO 50 •• ,. 12 250. .... e. .. ... ""'. ""'. . WI' 36m" .". 8&(7& 8Bl"!6 .8&'76 '3 x .. os 7!1 7!1 ,. ,. '" 7. .. 59 75 75 7S " '" 10 1!) 7. 7!1 ,. 10 '" '" ,... o 7611' ·70466 '013 ,so. ... ... ,.... ,.... '15 15 .44. .44<1 56 56 54,. 54'. 20 '" 15 " '46 ... so so '00 '00 '211 '20 so '" 9/15/95 3 • • • • •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) EASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT fROll TO @MEANOERiNG WAY INTEMEOTfOH IMPA()VEMENTS 15CAMPBELLa14 DAtiAS DALI.AS ., MEANDERNG WAy INTERSECTIOH IMptlOVEMENTS 7[;CAMPBELL&14 DALlAS DALLAS 􀀺􀀿􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁯􀀻􀁴􀀨􀀻􀀢􀁩􀁲􀀠;;\-"-,. 􀁩􀀺􀁩􀁦􀁾􀀬􀁴􀁍􀀻􀂷􀀠·...􀀻􀀺􀁭􀀮􀀺􀁴􀀡􀁬􀁬􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁩􀀮􀀠􀀢􀀯􀁾􀁟􀀠!1'!l􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀯􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁦􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀳􀁾􀀻􀁜􀀠􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁪􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀠􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀠􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁐􀁄􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 70CEoAA SPRINGS AD 6)INIMX)ORO IHTERSECllON iMPROVEMENTS 70 819 DAllAS DALlAS CEOAA SPAINGS RD81 Q DAllAS DAl.l..AS . .. 70··.. 83004w:.. 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀂷􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀱􀀻􀀱􀀱􀁜􀀡􀁪􀁩􀁬􀀡􀀱􀀺􀁩􀀻􀀡􀀻􀂷􀀠.... 􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁉􀀡􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁩� �􀁬􀀺􀀺􀂷􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁏􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠?D: @IH636 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 7.COlT AD @IH636 INTERSECTION IMPAOVEMEN'T8 70 831 DALlAS DAl..LAS COlT AD831 DAlLAS DAU..AS 􀂷􀁾􀀢􀁯􀁬􀀦􀀮􀁩􀀣􀁜􀂷􀀠"OJ,l,V;s 70 􀀺􀁾􀁫􀁑􀂥􀁾􀀩􀀻􀁾􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀭􀀧􀀠􀀠;:': 􀀺􀁾􀀴􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀺􀂷􀂷.. · 􀀽􀁭􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁭􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁩􀀻􀀧􀀬􀀠. 􀀻􀁾􀀽􀁴􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠@WALNUT HILL INTERSECTtON IMPROVEMENTS 10COMPOSITE DR @WAlNUT HILL iNTERSEOTlON IMPROVEMENTS 836 DALlAS DAlLAS COMPOSITE DR838 DALLAS DALlAS '" 􀁾􀀮􀁄􀁁􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁲􀀴􀁬􀁉􀁉􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀬􀀺􀁪􀁬􀁬􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀠.....•.. ..• 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠o Z$􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁊􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀲􀀻􀁩􀀻􀁬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀻􀁭􀁬􀁴􀁾􀀺􀁾􀂷􀀠7. @WAlNUTHILl. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ... DAllAS DALlAS DENTON"" 7' INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS@WALNUT HIll 10 &4a DALLAS DALLAS DENTON"" •􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀩􀁩􀀺􀁴􀂷􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁁􀁴􀀮􀁴􀁫􀀠􀀺􀀺􀁵􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠7S .,715􀀧􀀨􀁷􀁩􀁪􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀦􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀭􀀼􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀬􀀠:.:: 􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻.. • SPUR 368 (IMX)OAlL FIOOGERS) INTERSECTION IMPAOVEMEHTS 7.FlEl.Dsr853 DALLAS DALlAS @sPUR 3066 ('NOOOAU.. FIOOGERS) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 7.FlElJ) or853 DAlLAS DAllAS 􀁀􀁾􀁬􀁴􀁵􀀻􀁷􀀮􀀠::: .. :':}},ii: 􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁩􀀺􀀱􀀺􀁢􀀾􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀧􀀠70􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁾•.. ·i·· '.' DALlAS 􀁾􀀢􀁓􀁋􀁮􀁩􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀧.. :..:):: :\ }:,.:);,:(:\ 􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁾􀂥􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀺􀀠.1ii.,.. ':';:":\:\,." ,􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁊􀀬� �􀀺􀀻􀀠. 􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀠􀀽􀁾􀀥􀀠INTEASECTION IMPROVEMENTS@SH 289 (PRESTON RO) 70FRANKFORD ADMe DALLAS DALlAS @SH 289 (pREs'rON AD) INTERSECTION'MPfIOVEMENTS 7()FfWoIf(FORO AD ... DALlAS DALLAS . 􀁾P.o,lI\.L"􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁜􀀹􀁎􀀺􀁯􀁖􀁾􀁾􀁫􀁻􀀧􀀺􀀾􀀠:,-. ""... P/!:Ll:AS 􀀧􀀱􀀡􀁉􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀹􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁗􀀤􀀠70 􀀩􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁐􀁁􀁁􀁋􀀮􀁌􀁎􀂷􀀠􀀢􀀨􀁉􀁬􀀧􀁒􀀮􀁾􀀱􀀹􀁬􀀧􀁽􀀢􀁾􀁅􀀡􀁻􀁔􀁓􀀠7.􀁜􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁾� �􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀩􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀼􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁌􀀺􀁁􀁳􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 70 DALlAS @ROVAlLNaREEtfllLLEAVE INTERSECllOH ItAPROVEMENTS 10@ROVALLNaAEEtf,i1LLEAVE1l8:i! 0ALt.AB DAlLAS :'f 􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀠..􀀧􀀮􀀫􀀮􀀭􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾..􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠....􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀺􀀠:n;:; >? 􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁗􀀠·.. 􀀻􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀠. 7. .71£' ,􀀬􀀨􀁾􀀺􀁻􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀿􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀤􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀺 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠.. IffTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 7.@UNl\IERSflYBlVD􀁾􀁁􀁜􀁉􀁅eM DAlLAS DAUAS @UNIVERSfTY BLVD INTERSECTION IPAOVEMEHTS 70oREEtMLLEAVE8M DAl..l.AS DAlLAS 􀀮􀁀􀁷􀁾􀁾􀁌􀁫􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁻􀀻􀀠,:;,,:"';-'; 􀀬􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀮􀁔􀁾􀀮􀁬􀁊􀁯􀀡􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁴􀀤􀁟􀀠70 0,. 􀁶􀁶􀁾􀀮􀁱􀁊􀀺􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀂷􀀠:t;:\;:-. 􀀧􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀠"':) 􀀮􀀼􀀬􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀠7.􀀮􀀺􀁦􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁜􀁾􀀡􀀻􀀬􀀼􀀻􀀬􀀺􀁾� �·,;,;1111:: 􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁦􀁬􀀮􀁓􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀠IMPROVEMENTS(l.OOAL FUND@MOCKINGBtRD 70LOOP 364 (HARRY HINES 8LVD)ee7 DALLAS OAUAS @MOCKINGBIRD 70INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTs 6a7 DALLAS LOOI'''' "" ,. 20 "" .. .,. '" 30 30 30 ,. .. .. ..... '007 .. eo ,--, eo PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR TOTAL 15 15 -"1M 􀁾􀀠:':1:50 100 100,.0 eo ,00 :,100 ,.0 "0 .. . ·100 ". • • 10' ". '00 100 n... ,.. .... oo so 100 '00 .. '00 ,.. '50 '50 ,50 '50 '20 .. eo 9115195 120 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) EASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR PROJECT 4}) IRVIN(] BlVD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 4}) IRVIN(] BlVD INTEFISECTION IMPROVEMENTS 􀂷􀀮􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀻􀀻􀀯􀀠􀁟􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀁉􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠4})IH636 INTERSEC'iK>N 􀁉􀁾􀁐􀁁􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠INTERSECTK> N IMPROVEMENTS@IH635 􀀢􀀧􀁀􀁉􀁩􀁾􀁬􀁎􀀠..." .. 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁰􀀮􀀯􀀮􀀠..􀁩􀀮􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁩􀀮􀁬􀀽􀀠 INTERSECTK>N IMPROVEMENTS@MIDWAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (SEE 1261)4})MIDWAY .:.:..::::.:...::-.:...::.:::" . 􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁑􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀢􀁓􀀮􀁲􀁯􀁎􀀺􀁡􀁯􀂷􀂷􀀠.-:)·-::\::f::·:·:-·......􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁱􀀻􀀮􀁾.. 􀀭􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺..":934 􀀺􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁗􀀠 @ROSSAVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 951 DALLAS DALLAS If\IE ON<. ST @ROSSAVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 951 DALLAS DALLAS LIVE ON<. ST 􀁻􀁪􀁓􀀮􀁩􀁩􀁤􀁣􀁬􀁯􀁩􀀣􀁾􀁾􀀠<;;:. 􀀻􀁩􀁩􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁩􀁩􀀮􀀮􀁩􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁲􀁩􀀧: 􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠-..􀀱􀁉􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀠..@iQ;ii..{ii> 􀁾􀁾􀁙􀀡􀀱􀀠956 :ti;:(tM.: '. -)::::@iqJr»L:: 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁬􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁙􀁩􀀹􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀨􀀺􀀭􀀧􀀠.................•.. .. :"..:. 􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁗􀁩􀀿􀁴􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀠./: ();:. 􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀢􀀺􀁪􀁭􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁽􀂥 􀁁􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀢􀂷􀀺􀀠 @NORTtNt'EST tNI'{ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DALLAS MCCREERD 4}) NORTtNt'EST tNI'{ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS SlS1 DALLAS DALLAS MCCREE AD SlS1 DALLAS 􀂷􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀺􀁆􀁴􀀤􀁯􀁲􀀮􀁁􀁗􀁁􀁴 􀂷􀂷􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀀮􀀭􀂷􀁪􀀮􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁨􀀭􀀤􀀠 SNS8 􀀺􀁾􀁬􀀣􀁩􀀧􀀠 ...•..􀁐􀀦􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁾..l\DL" 􀁴􀁬􀂷􀀻􀀢􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁗􀁁􀁙􀀮􀀠. :􀁉􀁴􀁲􀁩􀀮􀁅􀁒􀁓􀁅􀁣􀁦􀁴􀀹􀀧􀀨􀁩􀁬􀀴􀁾􀁾􀀦􀁩� �􀁳􀂷SNS8 􀁾􀀠.􀁾􀀦􀀣􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁌􀁈􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS@YOSEMITE LNDALLAS MOCKINGBIRD LN970 DALLAS @VOSEMITE LN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 970 DALLAS DALLAS MOCKINGBIRD LN iWQ;ii.' 􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁀􀀣. 􀁾􀀮􀂷􀁾􀁑􀀨􀀾􀁐􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁀􀁐􀀩􀀠. •.􀀱􀀡􀀧􀀨􀁲􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁓􀁩􀁩􀁣􀁩􀁬􀀹􀁴􀀼􀀠􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁩􀀮􀁉􀁅􀁴􀁪􀁊􀀺􀁳􀁾􀀢􀁴􀁗􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠. "looP 􀁡􀁳􀀼􀀨􀁩􀁷􀀻􀁒􀀧􀁴􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁢􀁩􀁩􀀾􀁩􀀬 􀀠./􀀺􀂷􀁴􀁎􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀨􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁲􀁓: -@¢6.$: /-::,,: 􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁦􀀼􀁩􀁾􀁪􀁰􀁩􀁪􀀺􀁓􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀷􀀳􀁾􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 975 DALLAS DALLAS @SPRING VALLEYNOELRD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 976 DALLAS DALLAS 4}) SPRING VALLEYNOELRD 􀀮􀁻􀁪􀁓􀀺􀁅􀁘􀁅􀁾•.t!R•• ·•· . <\............................................................... .. .//...•.... 􀀡􀁩􀁪􀁴􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁓􀁩􀁩􀁱􀂧􀁩􀁩� �􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀨􀁲􀀤􀀻•...... . .:/-:-..:::.:::;:::\:;.... 􀀺􀁱􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀂥􀀧􀀨􀁩􀂥􀁾􀁖􀁅􀀺􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁴􀁾􀁦􀀩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀡􀁯􀁩􀁀􀁮􀀧􀁩􀁜􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀹􀁩􀀧􀀠. IH20 HOV (WM'lDENING) 1211 TXOOT/DART DALLAS use7 IH35E IH20 IH35E HOV (WM'lDENING) 1211 TXOOT/DART DAlLAS US'" 􀀧􀁾􀁩􀁪􀁅􀁤􀀧􀁌􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀠. 􀂷􀀺􀁟􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁁􀁁􀁴􀁦􀀻􀁬􀀮􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁩􀀺􀀠 ····:&.11411:&: INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS@MOCKINGBIR D I.N8H 368 (IRVINe BlVD)2218 DALLAS COUNTY DALLAS 4}) MOCKINGBIRD LN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS8H 368 (IRVING BLVD) 22H" DALLAS COUNTY DALLAS 5 9/15/95 DALLAS 914 DALLAS 􀁾􀀮􀀱􀀱􀁟􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁴􀁴􀀻� �􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀠IU1 􀀮􀀺􀁄􀂥􀀺􀁶􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀢􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠DALLAS INWOODRD ..􀁾􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁒􀁐􀀠􀂷􀂷􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀭􀂷􀀬􀀺􀀬􀂷􀀠·..·:<:l_:f@/-:··· 925 DALLAS DALLAS 925 DALLAS 􀁾􀁟􀀱􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁑􀁎􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀭 􀀮􀀧􀀠􀁩􀀳􀀻􀀮􀀺􀁟􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀠832 DAlLAS 932 DALLAS DALLAS DALLAS JOSEYLN JOSEY LN /•., ii:"'i·.... .... ....... 􀁾...􀁾􀁾... DALLAS IH635 DALLAS tH 635 ,II 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁽􀂷􀂷􀀠,. 70 70 ·70· 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 75 7. o. o. .. 80 &00 &00 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠108 108 :1.00· tOO: '50 '50 '" '" '" '" &0 60 '&0 160 ·Joo '" 68,. 68'2 􀀻􀁾􀀠1600 8" 8" "'" '" '" 8 • •• I. 10 30 30 20 20 1112 1112 300 100 '00 40 ,... ,... ,... 00/1)' 23 400 600 " 80 120 24 24 120 120 .." ·80 •• •• • •• • • DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERALAND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION TOTAl. LOCALTO ,.... ,.., ,... INTERS£cTION IMPROVEMENTS (24){iMMEDlAT 2763DAllAS lOOft 12 (NORTHWEST HWV) SH114 ..... "',. '.86" INTERSECTtoN IMPROVEMENTS (24) (iMMEDlATDAlLAS LOOP 12 (NORTHWEST HWi) SH114 " 2763IH'"DALWl ,.iii;lw ....􀁾􀁯􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀾􀁜􀀺􀀬􀀠􀀢􀁬􀁏􀀡􀁩􀁐􀀩􀁩􀁩􀀡􀀧􀁜􀁩􀀼􀁏􀁭􀀺􀁾􀀤􀁔iIWYl 􀁪􀀬􀁩􀁙􀁾􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀮􀀬􀀠.􀁾􀀺􀀩􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀨􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀭􀁬􀀠􀀩� �􀀮􀁴􀀺􀁈􀁾􀀻􀀠 􀁄􀁾􀀠. /.-: .􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠.. .... 􀁾SH 2e9 (PRESTON AD) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 80 270SPAiNG VALLEY @SH 289 (pRESTON RO) INTERSEGTION IMPROVEMENTS so 270 2222 DAlLAS COUNTY DALLAS DAllAS COUNTY DALLAS SPfYNGVA\.LEV so '00 􀁾􀀮􀁰􀁋􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁭􀁜.•..􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁪􀁜􀁪􀁬􀁹􀀬􀀮􀁊􀀻􀁾􀁩􀀡􀀠.􀀶􀁜􀁐􀀼􀁬􀁉􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀪􀀠􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁬􀁩􀀼􀁓􀁅􀀣􀀧􀁩􀀡􀀻􀁾􀀮� �􀁾􀀧􀁲􀀧􀁾􀀠,..􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁅􀁒􀁂􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢"'2m," 􀁾􀀴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀡􀁩􀁩􀀴􀁾􀀱􀀯􀀧􀀡􀁾􀀫􀁾􀁴􀁈􀀮􀀠􀀼􀁬􀁩􀁯􀀬􀁩􀀨􀀮􀀮􀁗􀁾􀁉􀁩􀀧􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀾􀀠'" DeNTON OOUNTY M.W DENTON COUNTY DALlAS INTERSEcT10H IMPAO\iBAENTs (3) 50 ... 2446 INTERSECTION D.fPRQV9.CEHTS (3) 50 ... 2448 􀂷􀁉􀁎􀁲􀁅􀁦􀂥􀁩􀁅􀁱􀁴􀁾􀀺􀁊􀁍􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀠..·"$,,"{l... ."" -􀀢􀁪􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁦􀀱􀀤􀁏􀀠􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁭􀀺􀀤􀀠.. '" TDM(FTA) 56 '48REUNiON AAEHA 􀁰􀁾􀁉􀁎􀁂SUBSIDY2479 DART 0ALlAS TDM{fTA) 56 '48REUNION ARENA pARKING SUBSIDY2479 DART 0All.AS OOI.!'I:!IIlmJ . 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀻􀁊􀁴􀁍􀁬􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁍􀀠HOV 􀁾'''J.:jitiOfIDMT 􀀼􀀻􀁾.. -·mis􀀾􀂷􀂷􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀧􀁩􀁭􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀠_􀀩􀀿􀁯􀁾􀀡􀁩􀀮􀀬􀀠AP ; 􀀺􀁤􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁬􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠HOV􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀬􀁪􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀱􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀠,....5OFUS67 INDUSTRIAl.. BLVO HOVfH 36E (9 RL11 SOFUS87 IHDUSfAIAlBlW HOY 2783 TXOOTJDART ,....Mi 36£ (5 RL1)27&3 TXDOTiDART f)\jy􀀺􀀮􀀻􀁭􀀮􀁯􀁔􀁘􀁴􀁬􀁯􀁔􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀧􀀮􀀨􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠:@;!;!.:.'.;.••􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾.•.􀀺􀀮􀀧� �􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀠-....􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁨􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁦􀂫􀀻􀀭􀁪􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠HOY@IH45 8'2781 TXOOTJDAAT """ HOy@IH1@,IW'!(T-PAS 70 ,,""􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁗􀁩􀁴􀀺􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀢􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁡􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁄􀁵􀁴􀀠􀀼􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁏􀀨􀀩􀁦􀀧􀀪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀪􀁜􀀡􀁉􀁩􀁬􀀨􀀢􀀠􀁩􀀮􀁯􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾...􀁾􀁅􀁾􀀮􀁲􀁴􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀮� �􀁓􀁉􀁔p,," ,. ms􀀮􀁾.•􀁾􀁾.•.. 􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀮􀀡􀁉􀀠US7S IH36E HOY 70 1$199 '<00.1H635(LBJ) '4000279& TXOOTIDART DAL..... IH .... HOV 70 16199 .,..US 75 '4<)00 '....IH 836 (LBJ)2799 TXDOT/DART DAL..... 􀂧􀁬􀁬􀁑􀀼􀀩􀁪􀀾􀀬􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁯􀁜􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀨􀁾􀁅􀁕􀀮􀁥􀁄􀀩􀀠70 ... x 􀁏􀀺􀁾􀁏􀁑􀁐􀀭􀁴􀁾􀀻􀀭􀀭70 0; X @CAMPSEURO􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀮􀁪􀁾􀀹􀀱􀀮􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀮􀂷􀀬􀂷􀀬􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾� �􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁾􀀠• INTeRSECTION IMPROVEMENTs .. .... o 2000 @CAMPSEURD ""0<> o 2&87 TXOOT-DAllAS DAllAS 8H 281) INTERSECTtoN IMPAOVEJAENTS .. 20002&87 lXOOT-OAI..1.AS DAllAS 8H26V ..... '" .. ' .. Ui\$i"iisofj:siOi\l!lilrr,.,.·" •• o 􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀂫􀁴􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀠'k;(i 􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠X;, '04 o OAUOEI.IA SfGNAl.IMPROVENENTS (2) .0@IHtI36&. CPAUDEI.IA SIGNAl. IMPROVEMENTS (2) 60 45 o@IH836&. ""_'.U;8alMAIi' -, "," ......􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀻􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁴􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁔􀁾􀁉􀀶􀁪􀀠, .' 242 "􀀺􀁍􀀢􀁅􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁊􀁩􀁜􀁾􀀯􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀯􀀠􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀧􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁴􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠􀁓􀀡􀀦􀁲􀁪􀁩 􀁜􀁴􀁜􀁍􀁾􀁖􀁬􀀧􀁲􀀬􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁲􀀢􀀧􀀨􀀵􀀩􀀠, 242 AT@SFRR FORESTI.N SIGNAl. IMPROVEMENTs .... • SIGNAl. IMPROVEMENTS .. oAT@SFAA ... 2,.. 22'. 3000 ... '48• 3Cea TXOOT-DALLAS PlANO"D 6 9115195 •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM & STATE CONSTFl -::;:1;"'----' .. 􀀬􀁾􀀩􀀭200 200 "'-" .. ;I2Q ,. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STAlE FUNDING BY ASCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION (dollars In thousands) (doHars in thousands) """'ECT TOTAl. lOCAl.TOPAOJECTNAWECOIlE NilEHC'I I\I!sIlWAI' . .·1 􀁉􀁾􀀠1 .;-;' ..,:;40)".1: 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠Q,\l.LAS 􀂷􀂷􀀹􀀡􀁩􀀧􀀿􀁾􀁅􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁉􀀧􀀢􀀠,.07. «)11 􀀧􀀺􀁄􀁾􀀧􀀠0 ....... 􀂷􀀣􀁱􀁩􀁯􀁯􀀱􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠 􀁾􀀢􀁙􀀠 BIKEWAY 60 ROlfTESIGNS •• " 7 4012 DALlAS DALlAS BlK£WAV 12ROUTE SIGNS.tOn DAllAS OALLAS "" '00....... -.iiOI\I .. •• <, · ...7. :oN:tA$.:. OAt.... "'" eo 100􀀻􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀼􀁾􀀱􀀴􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀠oN...M 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁉􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁚􀀳􀀺􀀽􀀺.. .. "'" INTERSE.CTfQN IMPROVEMENTS (SEE 68&) 507 101 .4015 DAllAS DALlAS OSH 183REGAl. fl'lO!iOEuron 􀂷􀀭􀁖􀁾􀁊􀁓􀀻􀁴􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁁􀀱􀀱􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀠..•􀁾􀀮􀀠 I"􀁩􀁩􀁾􀂷􀀠 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁗􀁐􀁦􀀨􀁉􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁦􀁦􀁲􀁩􀁾: .. .... 07 ...;tDENTON 􀀭􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁏􀁃􀁁􀁔􀁴􀀶� �􀁓􀀠 LOOP 268 CORRIOOR IMPROVEMENTS (13) (TXOOT SPlIT) 16 50 50•u....1045 DENTON DENTON 1M "'"' 1M .... LOOPZ" COAAJDOR IMPROVEMENTS (13) (TXOOT SPlIT) 7. 50 o 50 26 104ti DENTON DENTON U.... 􀁴􀁎􀁔􀁅􀁾􀂣􀁃􀁔􀁾CMffiO'\'EMENT:S 75 20 • ,.􀁀􀀭􀀬􀁕􀁓􀀺􀁾􀁏􀀱􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁦􀀮􀀡􀀠DENTON 􀁾􀁌􀀠@",US:SM tNrERSECr!QN 􀁬􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀭􀁳􀀭7. 20 16•􀀬􀁾􀀠DENTON DEt;lTON 􀀭􀁾􀀠INTERSECTfON IMPAOVEMENTS 7. 3 12 I.@UB77WIt.lQlN SPRINGS 1051 DENTON DeNTON lNTERSECTK'>H IMPA(,)VEMENT$ ",. 3ilusnWILLOW SPRINGS1061 DENTON OENTOW iI_•.􀁾􀀠 .. " 1OQ"12' •• 100􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁂􀁑􀁶􀁩􀁍􀁅􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁻 􀁌􀁟􀀱􀁕􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁽􀀠o•• 12 1052 􀁏􀁉􀀿􀁾􀁏􀁎􀀠􀁯􀁥􀁭􀀺􀁾􀀠125 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀀧􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁅􀁱􀁦􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁦􀁩􀁴􀁳􀁾􀀧􀁔􀁴􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀭􀁬􀁎􀁓􀀩􀀠.. 100 o 10010:52 DENTON. OENTqH 􀀭􀁾􀁇􀁾􀀠INTERSECTION 􀁉􀁍􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓{3}(TURN LAN 70 7. eo eoVAA!OOS LOCATIONS 108t DENTON DENTON " INTERSECTION IMPAOIlEMENTS (3) (TUft.N LAH 7<1 7' 60 I. eo x VNVOUS LOCATIONS1061 DENTON DENTON ,.􀁉􀁎􀀺􀁦􀁊􀁩􀁒􀁓􀂣􀁬􀁬􀁔 􀁊􀀹􀁉􀀼􀀡􀁍􀁐􀁁􀀼􀀺􀁬􀁜􀁬􀁊􀁩􀀡􀀼􀁾􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠70 3 12 . 12􀀢􀁆􀁦􀀬􀁜􀁾􀁻􀀱􀀨􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀮,-: 􀀱􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀺􀁄􀁅􀁎􀀢􀁲􀁏􀁎􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀩􀁪􀀬􀀴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀹􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭70 3 -12 _.􀀴􀁉􀀾􀀬􀁩􀀻􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁩􀁏􀁏􀀢􀀢􀁣􀁋􀁉􀁩 􀁩􀁾􀀠...;:It.Cj;;;'\lEiJT"" oemPif TEMl£V INTeAsECllON iMPROVEMENTS 7£ 25RIO """"DE •us 7728"8 TXOOT-DAlLAS DENTON '" RIO_DE TEASlEY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTs 7S '" 2&•289a TXOOT -DALLAS DENTON U977 "SIG",," liiemvt..,,/lTs . 15 92 .Ol!􀀮􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠•';r..􀁩􀀣􀀧􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁌􀁍􀀠oemoo · ..wi.®!l2P ..􀁣􀀴􀁾.. , ,􀀮􀁩􀁇􀁈􀁁􀁌􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀻􀁯􀁙􀁡􀀮􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀠15 92 o ..􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀱􀀤􀁩􀀻􀀧􀁴􀁬􀁀􀁩􀀾� �􀀧􀁬􀀾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀠􀀮􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁦􀁃􀁏􀁎􀀾􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀠SJGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (CANCEllED) 7. oiii US 380 xLOOP2B83018 TXOOT-DALLA$ DENTON ° ° SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS {CANCEllED} 16 o o 3018 ncOOT_PAlLAS oeNTON 4j} US 380l.00f'288 􀁾􀁎􀁔􀁅􀁾􀁃􀀱􀀱􀁏􀁎􀀧􀁉􀁉􀁁􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀤􀀠55 ,. ° .. x 􀁴􀁜􀀬􀁩􀁪􀁾.. 􀁄􀁅􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁲􀁯􀁾􀀠:􀀢􀁬􀁩􀁳􀀮􀀧􀀦􀁮􀁾􀀬􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀧􀁊􀀩􀁡􀁲􀁲􀁾􀀠 " INTERSECT)ON IMf'ROVEMENT$ so 50 2' 30-4Oa1S .DEmON 􀁾􀁾􀁢􀁾􀀻􀀬􀀠-. 􀁟􀀺􀁾􀀠:." 􀀺􀁾􀁊􀀱􀀮􀁮􀀠 i!>IH"" 79115195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION as 35 ". ,,';'s$" 4' 41 :..􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀠.. .... a;i 33 ., ., '58 ..20' '/iic: "'.' 20; <> .::-..:;::-¥ :' 11 11 .'. ·nr ts' o o .... 21 :.. ".::.: 􀁾􀁡􀀧􀀻􀀠21 􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭..9 71 "9 71 57 57 33 33 33 33 I) I) 􀀻􀁾􀀠.';).$ ,,. •• 47 (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) '...PROJECT TOTAl. ,...TO 1996 1997CODE AGENCY CITY 6) MAYHILL stGNAlIMPROVEMEHTs .. .,-«.We DENTON DENTON @MAYHILL SlGNAi.IMPROVEMENTS .,.."086 DENTON DENTON ,.. ' 􀀧􀀺􀁾.. '''Ii ,;,(I """'" : ,<:":,,::;,;iL . 􀁾􀀻􀀬􀀠. -···j20.􀂷􀀼􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁽􀁾􀀬􀂷􀁴􀀧􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠fP MALOHE. BONNIE BRAE. CARAOLl. & FULTON INTEfiSECTION IMPROVEMENTS «() T7 ,70 ..au DENTON DENTON @MALONE. BONNIE BRAE. CAAAOU.. & FULTON IHTERSECllON IMPROVEMENTS (.) T7 '70 400a oeNTON DENTON '''' 􀀮􀁾􀀠'26􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀢􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠>(,1;1 􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀮􀀠􀁬􀀧􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁉􀁩􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁊􀀡􀁉􀀡􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁭􀀮􀀻􀁩􀁜􀂷􀀢.. ;') 􀀢􀀻􀀬􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀡􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠12 􀁦􀁾.. .. 200􀁾KINOS ROW INTERSECTtoN IMf'ROVEMENnJ '58 CP KiNas RI:JW "Oir(! DENTON DENTON lOOP'" INTERSECTtoN IMf'AOVEMENTS 200 -4000 DENTON DENTON lOOP'" 'eo '0\)􀀬􀀮􀁬􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁏􀂷􀀠􀂷􀀮􀀧􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁚􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠. '\00,. 􀂷􀀮􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁩􀀠.'"·.. 􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁩􀀡􀀻􀀼􀀠....􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠MNAL IMPROVEMENTS eo osliP US 380LOOP 288 "Olr.! DENT0t4 DENTON SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 50CP US 380LooP 288"092 DENTON DENTON '" .􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀧􀀾􀁩􀀻'.' oillrtOll 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀺􀁩􀀠,6' 10,. .'-00-'" 􀁾􀀺􀀨􀁭􀁾􀀹􀁉􀁉􀀧􀀨􀀧􀀠.. • 􀀢􀁯􀁾􀁬􀁦􀁦􀁯􀁊􀀠SIGNAL IMPAOVEMENTS (CANCEllED) ..􀁾\l\£STMORELAND RD298& TXOOT-DA1.LAS DESOTO FM 1382 CP VoJESTMORELAND RP SIGNAL IMPAOVEMENTS (CANCELlEO) .. o o298; TXOOT-DA1.LAS DESOTO FM 1382 ";', .as:,. ..... .... ." .. ·,,',r"·'\.Q<1ATIQIIII 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀧􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁡􀁾􀀧􀁪􀀠. . 'Do! '04 ..􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀮􀁾􀁾..·r} 􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁔􀁊􀁯􀁭􀁬􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 11OCHATTEYRO '20PLEASANT RUN AD 7' .CHATTEVRO 4101 DESOTO OE$OTO INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 11 '204101 DEBOTO DESOTO 􀁦􀀧􀁬􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁁􀁕􀁎􀁐􀁄􀀠􀀮􀀬􀁽􀀬􀁾􀁴􀀡􀁴􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠lj\.P9!J; .... 􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀠17 110 􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁚􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁦􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀠􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀢􀀠􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀠@) P9IJ)i Sf ': I.NTEI'\\> ., .. 􀁉􀂥􀁾􀁾􀀤􀀠 T7 110􀀮􀁩􀀪􀀢􀀮􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁾j., INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 80 loWFM 1382 (eElT UNE AO) I\POU< ST NS'21:12 DUNCNMlLE DUNCANVIllE .................., '''' ... 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀠: : ·l::·􀀾􀀾􀀧􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁟􀁬􀁬􀁴􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁉􀀡􀁴􀁾􀀡􀁛􀁊􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀬􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾MAIN 5T 􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁒􀁓􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁴􀁯􀁎IMPROVEMENTS (tOCAL FUNO 70 26 26 I)1217 DUNCANVillE D4.iNCANVl:u.E VMEATlAND c-__􀁾􀀧􀀲􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀷􀁾􀁄􀁕􀀽􀁎􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁕􀁅􀀽􀀽__􀀭􀀽􀁄􀁕􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁖􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁬􀀡􀁥___􀁗􀁈􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁁􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁾______________􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁍􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁓􀁔􀁾______ ____________________􀁾􀀧􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁥􀁒􀁓􀁾􀁅􀀽􀁃􀁔􀁾􀁉􀁏􀁎􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀡􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀽􀁬􀁾􀁎􀁏􀁾􀁔􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁉__􀀭􀀲􀀷􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀭__􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀠,... '58 .. .. x x 47 9/15195 8 •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) 1223 DUNCANVIllE DUNCANVIllE PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT 4ji CAMP WISDOM 7S, 2HI OUNCNMLlE DUNCANVIllE CEDAARIOOE @CAMP'MSOOM INTERSECTION IMPAOVEUENTS 75 CEDAR-RIDGe ..􀁃􀁩􀁗􀁰􀁾􀂷􀀠70 , 􀀢􀁾􀀡􀁊􀀺􀀩􀁾􀁬􀁌􀀬􀁒􀀱􀀩􀀠􀁾􀁣􀁁􀁍􀁾..􀁾􀀻􀁴􀀠_:<10qqgfEl:J:flILl RO 􀀼􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS @'MtEATLAND 70 @WHEATLAND INTERSECTION IMPROYE\CEHTS 1. SNffAFETR SfflTA FE TR :. 􀁖􀁾􀀤􀁉􀀮􀁏􀁃􀁁􀁔􀁬􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀠 1223 DUNCANVIllE OUNCANVlI.lE ":I)!)􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁤􀁩􀁬􀁋􀁲􀁦􀀠􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁩􀁅􀀠􀀹􀁾􀁢􀁵􀀤􀁌􀁾􀁮􀁯􀁎• 􀀧􀀮􀀽􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁲􀂷􀂷... .􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁙􀁾􀁌􀁉􀀻􀀦􀀠• COCKRELL Hill to • OANIElDAl.E S1BtW. JMPflO\i'EMENTS (2) ...42M 􀁔􀁘􀁄􀁏􀁔􀁾􀁄􀁁􀁬􀁩􀀮􀁁􀀸􀀠OUNc.\NVlLlE US"" @COCKRElLHlll &. o DAHIELDAlE SIGNAl. JMPflO\i'EMENTS (2) (CANCEllED) 0 ";2&4 TXDOT-OM..LM DUNCANVillE U$67 @CEOM 􀁒􀁉􀁏􀀺􀁥􀂣􀀭􀀭􀁰􀁱􀀺􀀬􀀺􀁾􀁻􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀠􀀧􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀠0.:' ." ,.:."􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀻􀁾..•.􀀬􀀮􀀽􀁾[.. .• .•􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀧􀂷􀀠􀁦􀀡􀁃􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠....",!_n􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁲􀁴􀁾􀁅􀁬􀁌􀁅􀁏􀀩"'::4283. 􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀻􀁯􀀺􀁁􀁌􀁴􀁍􀀠:􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀢􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀷􀂷􀂷􀀠IHTERSECTioN IMPROVEUEHTS (2) ...@VAllEWIEW&1248 FARMERS BRANCH fARMERSBfWfCH IH 3SE @VALlEYVIEW&' IHTERSECllON IMPROVEMEHTS (2) 400 1248 FARMERS BRANCH FARMERS BRANCH IH 36E '1'M ..􀀮􀂷􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀺􀁬􀁾􀁲􀀻􀀺􀀠. .,.􀀻􀁴􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻� �􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠''''. lNTERSECTION IMPAOVEMENTS (3) 00@: lH 6:WMEOtcA1. CENTER Of\IMAYBROOK OR ... ,...,13 FARMERS BRANCH FARMERS BRANCH WEBB CHAPEL AD .'"INTERSECTtoN IMPROYE\tEHTS (':3) " 250 ... ,..• 113 FARMERS BRANCH FARMERS BRANCti WEBB CHAPel AD @IH635IMEOIOAlCENTERDAlUAYBAOOI< DR 'lORs 70 􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀢􀀱􀀱􀀴􀀺􀁾􀁆􀁾􀁡􀁪􀀤􀀢􀁾􀀺􀁆􀁾􀁥􀁒􀀹􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁄􀁅􀁔􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎AND RESPONSE 100 ';:: ;';;/;':' ','-'. -'. -, ''''''" "'" ',,:":.>,':;::;:::"::',--:-:-􀁬􀁾􀀠70 ...'-4114 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁆􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁯􀁥􀁔􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎ANDRESPOHSE ''''' IH35E SlGtW.IMPROVEMENTS {12} 7. M3 i 0 ""'" TXDOT -DALLAS FllAoRUOUND/LE Flit 1171 IH",", stGNAl.IMPROVEMENTS(12) 75 843!I •FLwR MOUNDILE FM 11110000 TXOOT-DALlAS 􀀮􀁾􀂷􀁵􀀻􀀠75 3'132 , 􀁾􀁨􀀮􀁥􀀠(Bt'RlAHD flO} .... 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁽􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁲􀁦􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀱􀀰􀀢􀀠.TXOO!/D.'Ial' 􀁾􀀮􀀠"'" ,.....; '; ." . '. 71$􀀳􀀱􀁾􀀠:􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁎􀀠.' ..' 􀀮􀁾􀁴􀀻􀁪􀁩􀁔􀁾􀀨􀀠)(T1WIsrrPASs) H"􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁲􀀮􀀨􀁾􀀬""l 􀀲􀀸􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁲􀁸􀁯􀁯􀀡􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠,..o FIRST, CASTLE. 8UCKINGtiAM, &. CflIST SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (.) '..SH71I2112' TXooT-DALLAS """'-"'" " .. ,..􀁾FIRST, CASTLE. suc:t:;INGHAM, &. CRIST SlIlNAlIMPROVEMENTS (4) 0 ,.. '" TXDOT-DALLAS """'-""0 '" 2112' ..." 7i; .,. 0 ·..• 􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁯􀀠"'" 􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀠..􀁾􀀢􀁃􀁉􀁉􀁃􀀩􀁜􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁆􀀮􀁕􀀾􀀧.............:.􀀧􀁭􀀡􀁗􀁬􀀮􀀻􀀮􀁲􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁻􀁾􀀮􀁅... •. •.. .•..􀀺􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀻􀀮􀂷•..••.::.·.·.·.E.·· ..􀁾.••.:. ............ ...·· · =􀀬􀁾􀀮􀂷􀁾􀂷􀀠....•.•􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀮􀁾􀀠7S .56 200 􀀲􀀶􀁥􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀠:. 2,...•...... 􀁾..... 􀀺􀁬􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁑􀁾􀀻􀀢� �􀂷􀂷􀀼􀀮􀀢􀁈􀁲􀁴􀁬􀀧􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠.' .' 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀭􀂭..GN1lAHORO CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (10) (TRANS(f PM 700 350 360PLANO""FOREST LN3083 TXOOTIDART CW1lAHD GN1lAHORD CORRIOOR IMPROVEMENTs (10) (TRANSfT PAS 700.. 350 350PLANOReFOAEST IN3083 lxooTIDNIT QARLAHO .•􀁾􀁕􀀱•. ,pU<:Kiillofwl' :m􀀮􀁾􀁯􀀺􀀧􀀠...•􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁄􀀢•. ; .'" . 􀁥􀁵􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁴􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁫􀀠 􀀧􀀩􀁦􀁑􀀨􀁩􀀤􀁲􀁌􀁾􀀠􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁬􀁴􀁴􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾.. .'" 􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁏􀀢􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁐􀀧􀀠" SIGNAl.IUPROVEMENl'S (3e) 80 SOO 178 ,..vARIOUS LOCATIONS3100 DAllAS COUNTY GARLAND BlaNN:-I!dPfIDVEMENTS (1;)1) ,.. 400 ." ,..vARIOUS LOCATIONS1$100 DALLAS COUNTY QARl..ANO 71 soo .. ,. 4,􀁾􀁯􀀠􀁾􀁏􀀠.I!l"""or .,I 71 56 􀁾􀀮􀀠99115/95 •• • • • • DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) EASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) _. SCORE: TOTAL. LOCAL .􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀧􀁾􀂷􀁉􀀠􀀮􀁣􀁜􀂷􀀻􀀺􀁴􀀻􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀿􀀡􀀻􀀠il ;􀁳􀁴􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀠298. ... 􀀻􀁾􀀠coc···c;;r". '" 􀁾􀁬􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀠"....;...; '60 183 􀀺􀁾􀁴􀀺'..·.·,.;;.1; ;r;) 3fs1l' •• --".". c· .. ..• 110 •<0 &.STATE CONSTR .... ,...TO ...7 .-INTERSeCTION IMPAOvadENTS T7 '110 .2 118• CENTERVILLE,(151 GARLAND QARt.ANO IH835SBEHTRANCEA.AM P INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS n ,00 .2 118• C'ENTERVlUE4151 GARLAND GARLAND !H«36S8EHTAANCEfWAP '" 􀀱􀁾􀀷ll>Ii\UCI\INGIWI 􀀡􀁶􀀺􀀾􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀼􀁊􀁎􀁑􀀩􀀠􀁕􀀭􀀧􀁲􀁾􀁃􀁮􀁏􀁎IMPf'OVa.tOOS f!1􀀢􀁬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁏􀀠􀁾 􀁏􀀠 􀁾􀁒􀁄. er . 1.7 ,34':􀁾􀁡􀁕􀁯􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁂􀀹􀁵􀀡􀁬􀁏􀀩􀀠􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀣􀁏􀁎􀁬􀁕􀁾􀁩􀁎􀁲􀁳􀂷􀀢􀁬􀀮􀁕􀀿􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁄􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁒􀁄􀀠SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (11) 76 667 311HUNTER-FEARELL AD +H 201.un' aAANDPRA.lRlE GAANDPfWRlE FM 13i2(8THJ9THST) HUNTER-FERAE'iU AD SiGNAL IMPAQIJEMENTS <1 1) 76 37'nAANOPfWFUE FM 130e2(&THll)THST) '721497 GRAND PRAIRIE .itio􀁓􀁩􀁇􀁎􀀮􀁎􀀻􀀬􀁡􀀮􀀴􀁾􀁖􀁂􀁁� �􀁴􀁲􀁲􀁾􀁈􀀱􀀧􀀩􀀠 -,!OGIW'iIl_E· 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮Pl'(1NV·11510 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁰􀀺􀁾􀁅􀀠􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀻􀁏􀀠.. ..􀁾.􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀧􀁬􀁍􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀧􀁡􀁬􀀺􀀠 70 .: 􀀧􀀱􀀶􀀱􀀰􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁂􀁩􀁅􀀠􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁄......􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾� �􀁉􀀴􀁐􀀱􀀧􀀨􀁗􀀨􀀠HUNTER-FERRELL SlaNAL IMPROVEMENTS (9) 7. 1628 GRAN!) PRAIRIE "1180GA..t.NO PRAIRIE BELT LINE R.O HUNTEf4..FERRELL SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (9) 7. 236 118SH 180QRAND PRAIRIE BELT LINE AD162:8 GRAND PFWRlE Ir ®!',1080. 􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀠oN SH ,&1 FRiG At:)$' ""'_""PI\OVEMEtlT..􀁾􀀩􀀠os 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁜􀀧􀁾􀁓lOCAT1oNS .. "" "". ...􀀱􀀪􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀠@WlNGREN, ROCHELLE &. HIDDEN RIDGE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (3) (CONSTRUCTeD) eo 2931 􀁔􀁘􀁄􀁏􀁔􀁾􀁄􀁁􀁬􀀮􀁌􀁁􀁓􀀠IRVING SH 1'. FATG ROs .,WlNGREN, ROCHELLE &. HIDDEN RIDGE SIaNAlIMPROVEMENTS (3) (CONSTRUCTED) sti 11. FRTG ADS2931 TXDOT-DALlAS IRVING 􀁏􀁎􀁂􀁥􀁴􀁔􀁕􀁎􀁅􀁾􀀢􀀠. .. .. .:-. .. ,] . ::$:1'02'" o,",,"l:AS c«Jtff'f 􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀧􀁖􀁾􀁟􀁑LOCATIONS. 􀀽􀀱􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁪􀀡􀁦􀀱􀁜􀁓􀁓􀀩􀀠., . .. 2• ., 􀀾􀀧􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀺'-'. 􀀱􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁏􀁴􀁊􀀮􀁎􀁐􀁾􀀮','/".􀂷􀀺􀀺􀁜􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁹􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁊􀁏􀁗􀁾􀀠􀁑􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀮􀁴􀁔􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀮􀀧􀂷􀀮􀁟􀀺􀀺􀁽􀁾􀀱􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠*-t$sc60mV' 􀁩􀁾􀀠SH 183 STRAIGHT Sf SIGNA1.IMPROVEMENTS 73 ..BELTUNEAD4,56 IRVINO IRYING STRAlGtrr ST StGNAl. IMPRO'Y'EMENTS 73SH 163 ' '40 .. ..SELT UNE ADIRlJINa ". 418& IRVING ui3iE' _ury􀁾􀀱􀀡􀁔􀁎􀁩􀀹􀁅􀀠 110􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁎􀀧􀁦􀀺􀀧􀁉􀁕􀁎􀁅. -$(1:1$3,􀀩􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀬􀀺􀁴􀁆􀁍􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁣􀁏􀁵􀁴􀁻􀁲􀁶􀀮􀁕􀁎􀁅􀀠'JH"36E' . ..0IIiuTv Ass.sr!\l4cl.(SEE_) .. .􀀻􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁤􀀺􀀸􀁓􀂷􀀢􀀮􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁩􀀦􀀠':JR\! 1NG" 􀁩􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁳􀁴􀁇􀁾􀁁􀁩􀀮􀁉􀁍􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓(9) .. •• ..• ,.. ,...04 3-103 OAU.AS couNTY LANCASTER VARIOUS LOCATIONS SiGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (9) '94'" 3. .. ,..3103 DALLAS COUNTY LANCASTER VARIOUS LOCATIONS 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠109115195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) 1814 Hl:i4 LEWISVILLE' 1&18 lEWlBVllLE 1819 LEIMSVILLE VAfUOUS lOCATIONS vAAK>US It,,')CATIONS 􀁾􀁯􀀯􀀧􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀧􀁩􀁴􀀺􀀡􀁉􀀬􀁾􀁴􀀺􀁩􀀺􀀢􀀠2836 TXDOT-DALlAS LEYIIISVIUE 􀁾􀀩􀀨􀀭􀀧􀀡􀀻􀁩􀀻􀁥􀁙􀀩􀀨􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁗.•.•·.....•.·...Jiif\\'" 􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁩􀂷􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠I\I es .00 11 56 71 56 .. eo .. .. 30 7. .. " 76 .. " 75 .. .. 76 .. .. 71 65 2S 71 55 2S 7, .. .. . r.l 50 􀀲􀁾􀀠:.. 00 30 30.. eo '" .. 50 1. 56 " EASTERN SUBREGION' PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR I FEDEIW. ,... SIGNAl IMPROVEMENTS 71 55 .. 2. '"􀁾􀁓􀁈􀁁􀁎􀁏􀁓169$ MESQUITE MESQUITE OATES SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS@sHIINOS 71 30 •• 2'1890 MESQUITE MESQUtTE 57 30 27 57 30 11 9/15/95 --_•.lQO 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀧􀀾􀀠􀁾􀁁􀁩􀁣􀁾...􀀺􀁻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠4'91 fUCHARDSOHJDAR AtCtW\OSOH CCNTENNiAl 4191 RlCHAROSONJDAA 􀁾CENTENNIAl.. '<..􀁾􀁪􀀢􀁦􀀡􀁾􀁩􀀻􀀺.•...•..•..􀁾..•.•.•..•.•...•.'.;... •...,.<.........:..,............... 􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁍􀁓􀀼􀁴􀁗􀀧􀁃...􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁾".,.. 􀁾􀀼􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀻􀁽􀀻􀁾􀁾....HAt""'.... 􀀮􀁉􀁗􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁻􀀧􀁦􀁦􀁬􀁜􀁬􀁅􀁬􀀮􀁜􀁾􀁓􀀬􀁪􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠.. /n...., -1.800􀀱􀁗􀁾􀀢􀁊􀀧􀁉􀀧􀀡􀀹􀁖􀁅􀁬􀀧􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀸-􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀲􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁉􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠 t>Fil$oU SH26$ u:aACYDR steNAL IMPf1O\fEMENTS (3)SH121 '" lEGACVDR SIGNAL IMPROV'EMENTS (3) 2 ••SH289pw;o SH 1212941 TXOOT-DALLAS 600..........,. "-' 􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁽􀁪􀀠 􀀴􀁉􀀾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁗􀁙􀀠.•.•. 􀀮􀁉􀁎􀁬􀁾􀁩􀁲􀀧􀀡􀁐􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀡􀁂􀁯􀁉􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀨􀀨􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁔􀁕􀁒 '-􀀺􀀴􀁟􀀱􀁾􀁪􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠 '----􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁕􀁾􀀺􀁝􀀵􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀦􀀺􀀠􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁗􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁱􀁥􀀻􀀭􀀼􀂥􀁨􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠 X .. ·600􀀻􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀠􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀬􀀭SURVEIllANCE .53COMPUTERIZED TRAFFtC SIGNAl SYSTEMpw;o SURVEILl..A.NCE 53 .53 418:5 PLANO COMPUTERIZED TRAfFIC SIGNAl.. SySTEM4186 PLANO PI.MiO 􀀴􀀱􀁡􀁥􀀺􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀠f'V\!iO.• ¢OI:)JII!'AW< .."". ". OOOJtlCREex MALL 􀀺􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀠.. ".•􀁕􀁍􀀺􀂷􀁾􀀠fI.Alijo.. INTERsECTIOH IMPROVEMENTS (lOCAL FUND ..'" ...lIP AAAPAHO PDCUSTERRD .... RlCHAFUlSON RICH!\AOSON INTERSECTIOH IMPROVENENT$(lOCAL FUND 2O&e RtCI'WU)SON RiCHARDSO+I CP AAAPAHO AI) .. ....CUSTERRD 41> """",NI>/lAM "􀀱􀀮􀀮􀁲􀁲􀀬􀁾􀀡􀁑􀁦􀁴􀀠IMPAOVaAaiTS ... 1..-JfJ1"fTER AD􀀮􀀲􀀰􀀸􀂷􀀨􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠RlCtWlosoN . .iimrml'll) 􀀴􀁉􀀧􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁊􀀼􀀻􀁏􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀁊􀁴􀁕􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁫􀁭􀀠50 1..􀁾􀀱􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁶􀁃􀁴􀁾􀀢􀁁􀁏􀁾􀁩􀀠􀁾... SlGNAlIMPAOVEMENTS (86) 55CITYWIOEvAJV(}US LOCATIONS H'''''21Q.c RlCH,t,.R[)SON RICHARDSON SIQNA.L IMPAO\iEMENTS (86)CITYWIOE .. H,""VARIOUs LOCATIONS21(}.4 RtCHAFU>SON 􀁙􀁖􀁑􀁦􀁕􀁓􀁾􀀠􀁟􀁳􀁾􀀧􀀡􀁬􀁏􀁩􀁩􀀠 .. ...,.􀁅􀁏􀁦􀀺􀀧􀀭􀁇􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀻􀁟􀀠􀁾􀁾_􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀦􀀺􀁅􀁬􀁌􀀠􀁅􀁏􀁆􀀢� �􀀠􀁾􀀬􀁯􀁦􀀺􀁵􀁡􀀷􀀤􀀤􀀠􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁔􀁩􀀼􀁩􀀡􀁉􀀠 .. ,.... .... -8100 ..oo @GREEtMLLE A 1'_$ INTEAsECT!OH IMPRoVattENTS (2) (TAAHSIT P 70 1675 1031 ... @GREENVILLEA INTEASEOllON IMPROVEMENTS (2) (TRANSIT P 1. 1815.i\!lIW!. ... os .,. .""... 2J7.􀂷􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀠216 .. . :21.1:' @JUPITER INTERSECfH)NIMPROVEMENTS 1. 1300 ... 102 10' INTERSECTION 􀁾􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁖􀁅􀀢􀁅􀁎􀁔􀀤􀀠 13007.@JUPfTER 50' 102 702 .NTEfI!!!;yj\o!< 1....􀁍􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀢􀁴􀀻􀁗􀁾􀀠. ,. 41'4i'1'V.Hof'i""" ". 􀁉􀁟􀁎􀁔􀁅􀀮􀁾􀀶􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁎􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁨􀀸􀀠,. 410 ".t>1'VJIO""';W 111 @JUPfTER 'N1ERSECTtoN IMPROVEMENTS 1. 01. .., ... """"AHO4'98 RICHARDSON RlCHm'J$ON INTERSECTlON IMPROVEMENTS 70 91. ... <4198 RICHARDSON 12 ."" 183 .. .. .so .so '" '4& ... 200 .... tOO< C/O """ .. $I .... 9/15195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) EASTERN SUBREGION til BLAIR OAKS o BlAtROAKS til COUGAR ALLEY OCOUGARAI...l..EY DALlAS COUNTY VARIOUS VARIOUS LOCATIONS I; 􀁴􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁩􀀠iRr 􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁮􀀠DART 2",n DART 2481 DART 24al DART 2808 TXOOT/DART 2808 TXOOT/DART VARIOUS VARIOUS 􀀧􀁜􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁖􀁾􀀧􀁓􀀠VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS TRANSIT DISCOUNT PAOGAAM TRANSIT DISCOUNT PROGAAM 􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀤􀀨􀁊􀁐􀀡􀀧􀁏􀁭􀀺􀁬􀁆􀀼􀁩􀁰􀁅􀁾􀀼􀀡􀁅􀁬􀁉􀀡􀁜􀁔􀁅􀀠..:"·..􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀬􀁓􀁕􀀡􀀽 􀀧􀁐􀁏􀁒􀁔􀁉􀁁􀁬􀁾􀂷􀁒􀁅􀁂􀁁􀁔􀁅􀀠INSPECTION SI1EiRlDESHARE EDUCATION INSPECTION SrrEiRlDESHARE EDUCATION IH SSE (STEMJ,lONS) IH 36E (STEMMONS) ..-, SH 121fTRlNITY MILLS IH 636 SH 121fTRINITY MILLS IH 636 IH"s35. PROJECT SIGNAL IMPROVfMENTS SIClNAL IMPROVEMENTS 􀁉􀁲􀁲􀁴􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁩􀁩􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁩􀁩􀁾....􀁾􀁴􀁲􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁲􀀠􀂷􀀮􀀺􀀧􀁴􀁡􀁾􀁾􀂢􀀱􀁴􀀹􀁎􀀺􀀺􀁉􀁜􀀨􀁾􀁾􀀩􀁾􀁀􀁾􀀩􀁜􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀢􀂷􀀠: SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SIClNAL IMPROVEMENTS .􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁪􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁜􀁴􀁅􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁻􀁦􀀻􀀩􀀺􀁜􀀠. 􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀣􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁴􀂷􀀠SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 􀂷􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁉􀁉􀀬􀁡􀁚􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMEHTS (27) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMEHTS (27) 􀀧􀁮􀁩􀁾􀀨􀁆􀁔􀀻􀀧􀀠rOJ.!.(FTA) . TOM(FTA) TOM(FTA) rDIo!.(FrAi 􀁔􀁾(FTA)· TDM (FTA) TOM (FTA) :·...􀀹􀁅􀀱􀀺􀀱􀁬􀀮􀀡􀁴􀁩􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀤􀀧􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀨􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁍􀀩􀀧􀀺􀀢􀂷􀂷􀀠.􀀻􀀮􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀺􀁗􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁳􀀦􀀺􀀣􀂥􀁩􀁍􀀺􀁾􀀩􀂷􀀠ALTERNATIVE FuELS (FTA) ALTERNATIVE FUE:LS (FTA) 􀁁􀁴􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀺􀁆􀁵􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁳􀀺􀀺􀂷􀀠. .􀂷􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁲􀁍􀀺􀀺􀁆􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀠HOV HOV 70 70 ,.., 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠" " 59 7. 76 ·70 70 63 63 7. 76 72 72 80 80 •••• 73 '" n X •••• 52 52 90 90 ... .. PROJECT COST ..0 ..0 '04 10:4 23 23 I,. 64 64 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀠103 .0 80 ..... 2550 20876 20876 ,,. '25 940 040 ... ... 50 50 2700 2700 3063' 3063' no. 7702 16120 14301..,. 640. ... '88 "" "" 10 10 0 0 620. 620. '662 '602 3220 3220 '3011 13.. FEDEIW. '2900 11081 􀁾􀀱􀀤􀀠70,3 FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR ,... 6831 9700 3340 􀁾􀀠3200 2050 .. ·;:.A2O :812 2000 2Iio '64' 3200 '20 9100 '771 15328 7422 7013 7013 139/15/95 •• •• •• • • DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) 3103 DALLAS COUNTY VAAlOUS vARtOUS DART TAANSIT FARE PflOQRAM 1994 ...􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀧􀁉􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀠TXOOT-DALlAS VARIOUS lOOP 364 (HAAAY HINES) lOOP 12 LOOP 12 􀀧􀁬􀁴􀁴􀁾􀀠􀀧􀀡􀁯􀀭􀀱􀁈􀁾􀀠VARK)US LOOP 3b4 (HAARY HINES) 􀁶􀁾􀁳􀀠";;,·.• ',r.•,;,·'.·."•.􀀧􀀢􀁴􀀮􀂷􀀬􀀧􀁾􀀬 􀀮􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀧􀀬􀁴•.·.•.,••,',0.􀁙􀁁􀁾􀁟􀁦􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀬􀀢􀀢􀂥􀀻􀁾􀁟􀀧􀁩􀁦􀀠WAlNUT HILL WAumTHllL OZONE AlERT (F'TA) 􀁾􀀨􀁴􀁩􀀧􀀻􀀨􀁾􀀨􀀠"" 1'\AIt (!'rAj SIGNAL IMPROV'EMEHTS SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 10M lDij$ IDRS PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION PROJECT SIGNAl.. IMPROVEMENTS ('" soVARIOUS LOCATIONS3103 DAlLAS COUNTY VARIOUS StGNALIMPROVEMEHTS{4}VARIOUS LOCATIONS 7.S 'S eo GO .. .. ,.VARIOUS MUlTLJURl50ICTIONAI..IOR NETWORK' 4296 TXOOT-DALlAS ,.VARJOUS Mut..TIJURlSOfCTJONAL lOR NETl/IJORK IORS 4296 TXOOT-DALlAS o;N4333 DARTIODA TOM {.-, i\} xvARIOUS TRANSPORTAllON MANAGEMENT MSOCIATION 4333 DART1CDA >f!'􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁊􀀧􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁉􀁩􀀹􀀮􀀠.TO!' (Frll)􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁪􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀠􀀢􀁩􀁴􀀼􀁩􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁴􀀼􀁩􀁬􀂥􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁊􀀿􀀬􀁴􀁍􀁩� �􀀠.riJ!! .(FiA) V,ARIOUS REGIONAl C<)R.RIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 'OM VARIOUS REfJIONAL 00ftM)0R MANAaEMENT PROGAAM 'OM $\86 43S 􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁜􀁉􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠1018 101eREGIONAl TOM PROORAMl •􀁾NTXClEANAIRC VAfUOUS 101& :.... TDM -12c9 .200 ... ... 3012 ... eo. 818 .,. ..'" 3220 ,., ,., Ii • oj o ! ..'" .... """􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁅􀁾􀀺􀀠Cf,IAOI!NGlNe_IENO 􀁐􀁦􀁜􀁤􀁊􀁾􀁔􀀱􀀻􀁯􀀩􀀠TOt.t(FTA) TOM 19til5TIPSUBTOTALS 1""TIPS:USTOTALS 316,040 312.365 • 87,82& 87,629 • ... SO, ,018 ,.. 226,212 34,711 ...... 1••0$9 224,.". OS,,",, 4'2,210 38.31() 259 NOTES: First row of each project denotes programming in 1995 TIP; second row Is 1996 TIP proposal For Ihose categories with "(FTA)" noted in the Project Description colvmn, money noted In the 'CONSTR' column indicates that the funds have been transferred to FTA not neco" 'I th h ' . . ' 􀁾􀁡􀀢y at I e project IS vnder contract. ;. .PI 9115195 V •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) TOCITY 􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁬􀁪􀁩olIiiitf 􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁂􀁴􀀽􀀺􀀧􀀠"". ALLEN HEKUfTSFM 2170 (MCDEfUAOTT) $H' SH 6 AJ..lEN HEIGHTS 26 TXOOT -DAlLAS AlLEN FM 2170 (MCDERMOTT) 26 TXOOT-DAlLAS ALLEN • 􀁸􀁾....•.. ...!.Il....I'II?,.· ...'-n.•....·.·.·....·....•..'...ol!"" •...•.···\."FII017.MMC . .• ".,,,,,,,,,,,.,,","7;'i, 􀀢􀀻􀁉􀁉􀀮􀁐􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁑􀁴􀁾􀁩􀁉􀁤� �􀁍􀀠"4!i1i 􀀾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀨􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀬􀀯􀀭􀀢􀀠-: .', __􀂥􀀮􀁍􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁷􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺,i:ri 􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁊􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁁􀁌􀁾􀀠FM 211O-(MCDERMOTT) EXCHANGE 33 ALLEN ALLEN .... FtA 2170 (MCDERMOTT) EXCHANGE :33 TXDOT-DAlLAS ALLEN SH 5 -, 9 ,.53 15 9115/95 1769 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAl YEAREASTERN SUBREGION LOCAL 94. ... "􀁾􀀿􀁏􀀠, 21SC ,.., ,$37 '.!f8 '; ''116 ... ... ... ... '0 o • o .'lOOO FEDeRAL & STATE 37.. ,... ... DALlAS 60S DALlAS ... ... 614 DAllAS 674 DALlAS 0& . 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀬􀁉􀀮􀁬􀁉􀁓􀀧􀀠,fQ1ti4.LSi tl76 DAllAS Glii DAI...lAS """; 􀁏􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀢􀀠m OAlI.AS 717 DAllAS 2186 TXOOTIOART 2766 TXDOT/OART DALlAS DALlAS OAl(M o&lAS DALlAS DALWi 􀁾􀀨􀁍􀀮􀀠•...􀁾􀀠DALlAS DALlAS DALlAS DALlAS SAMuell Bt.va SAMUELL BLYO .lIilliw.. Sf _..􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁓􀁔􀀠8PRNB VAUE\" AD SPAING \lAUEY RD (. ''/IiJ.,W?rVJfWIWIIJ.)Off Sf 􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁁􀁩􀀮􀁎􀁵􀁲􀀸􀁔􀀠..... ..... LEMMON AVE LEMMON AVE :NOS nOOT-DAlLAS DAllAS LOOP 364 (HARRY HINES BLVD) :2(1(16 TXOOT-DAllAS DAllAS lOOP 􀁾(HARRY H!NES BLVD) 􀀮􀀣􀁩􀀧􀀱􀀱􀀡􀀰􀀹􀁦􀁾􀁉􀁍􀀮􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀻},;i; 􀀨􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁗􀀧􀁒􀀧􀁦H_IILVD ) 􀀧􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀡􀁾􀀩􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀧../􀁩􀁣􀀺􀁩􀁩􀁪􀁬􀁩􀀧􀁾􀁻􀀡􀁬􀁁􀁁􀁁􀁖􀁈􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁓IlI.I/Ill 2i16 TXCOT -DAll..AS N18 TXOOT-DAllAS DUNCANVIllE US., US" "",,".U)ALf AD AD TOTAL BOEOEKERDR GREENVilLE AVE 4 TOel.ANES 70 4100 TO BOEt>EKER DR GREENVilLE AVE 􀀴􀁔􀁯􀁥􀁾􀁅􀁓􀀠'0 4700 􀀧􀁃􀁦􀁬􀁉􀀢􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁁􀁁􀀠􀀧􀂷􀁔􀁏􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁬􀀧􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀪􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀷􀁬􀁩􀁬􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀺􀁾􀁐􀀺􀀺􀁒􀁒􀀠• TO •.􀁾􀀨􀀤􀁅􀁉􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀦􀀺􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁬􀀠IH 30 MESQUITE OfL 2T04l.NjES IH 30 MESQUrre OIL 2T04l.ANES 􀀭􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀮􀀶􀀺􀁦􀁪􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁏􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀽􀀻􀀮􀀠􀂷􀀻􀀻􀁩􀁾􀂷􀀻􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁩􀀡􀀻􀀠. 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀴􀀭􀁬􀀺􀀰􀀭􀁴􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀭0AL1AS NORTH TOLLWAY MONTFORT DR 6T06lANES DAllAS NORTH TOllWAY MON'1'FORT DR 8TOel.ANES ..􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁻􀀻􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀢􀀠􀀴􀁔􀁏􀁥􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀢􀀠 􀀮􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀧􀁨􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻� �􀀠􀀴􀁔􀁏􀀧􀀸􀁾􀁾 ,H..., us7. tORS (SEE CMAQ) ,H35E US,. IDRS (SEE CMAO) .. 􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁾􀁌􀁩􀁩􀁸􀁲􀀻􀁩􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀻􀁩􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀼􀀠. 􀀲􀁔􀁏􀁟􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀤􀀧􀀠...􀁾􀁂􀁾􀀮􀀻􀁱􀁯􀁽􀂷􀀻􀁩􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠. 􀀲􀁔􀀰􀀴􀁴􀀺􀁁􀁎􀁾􀀻􀁴􀀻􀀧􀀠BlUFFVIEW AlROAOME 6 TO 8 LANES (TRANSIT PASS) (SEE 533) eTO 8 LANES (fAANSIT PASS) (seE 533)8lUFFVlEW """"""'. .: eTO.8-l.ANE:$.􀁌􀁏􀁏􀁐􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀶􀁔􀀶􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾 􀁏􀀼􀀾􀁉􀀧􀁊􀁾􀀠AOYAllN DALlASOIt. 4 TO 8 LANES (PASS) ROVAllN DALlAS 0It. .. TO e LANES (PASS) IWI-NtrrIj!lllJi '.JIi.>Y.!i.:I.H '. 􀀧􀁉􀁊􀁏􀀧􀁾􀀠 WAtHUT.Htll. (N ' 􀂷􀁬􀁉􀁯􀁦􀁾􀁕􀀡.. 4T08J••􀁾􀀠3000 '300 lOOP '12 4 T06 LANES (WJHOV) 7 ....'H35E ,-4 TO 8 LANES (WlHOV) "SO'H35E LOOP " 􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀡􀁉􀀬􀀻􀁜􀀮􀁍􀁾􀁁􀁖􀁅􀀮􀀠􀀸􀁔􀀰􀀸􀀧􀁾􀁅􀁓􀀠o 􀀳􀀱􀁾􀀠SU<><:NElI 􀁾􀁙􀁉􀁬􀀠􀁾􀁦􀀴􀁾� �􀁾􀁾􀀠􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀾􀀮􀁩􀁪􀁾􀁶􀁅􀀮􀀠. ':: 6"Tq 8 􀁌􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁅􀁓􀀠o 􀁟􀀳􀁾􀁩􀀲􀀺􀁓􀀠HARRY HINES 8LVl) .. TO 8 LANES (PASS) CN(ADAOA. '00 12740 HARR'r' HINEs BLVl) .. TO 6 LANES (PASS) CANADA OR '00 12140 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀁗􀁩􀀮􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁖􀁅􀀠􀀺􀀻􀀼􀀺􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁬􀀧􀀨􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁩􀁬􀁵􀀢􀁩􀀠.' 􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀮􀁩􀀺􀀠􀁴􀀮􀀻􀀻􀀡􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀴􀀨􀁔􀁑􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁳􀁊􀀿􀂷􀂷􀀠RAMP CONSTRUCTION @ctt.ALK HILL AD so "50 1610 @CHJUJ( Hill flO RAMP CONSTRUCTION EO 1810"60 ....,.''"1 726 coa.Lo.$ 􀁾􀁄􀀠􀂷􀂷􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁢􀂷􀂷􀀠 􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁌􀀠EOFlOOPU! WOf!LOOP 12 2T06lANES 3219 G-4SHADVGRO\I'e RD1e78 IRVlNGI 1RV1NG. £ Of! lOOP 12 WOFlOOP 12 2T06lANES &4 32111 ....SHADY GROVE M 1&78 IRVING IRVlNa 􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀦􀀳􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀠 ·····,:2w •. 􀁾􀁅􀁩􀁉􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀠􀀱􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠.. , 􀀱􀁾:-tt:MNIJ .􀁉􀁾􀀠􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁴􀀽􀂷􀂷􀀠􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀠 ...􀁓􀁴􀁴􀀻􀀻􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠 49 .'OOQ _..:-::: :;, 􀁾􀁴􀁗􀀶􀀠,tfMNG .-'-"-'-'.:-" --"" NQRTHGATE SH '83 4 TO 8 lANES 55 3000 􀀧􀁴􀁾􀀧􀀠MACARTHUR alVD1716 lRV\oo IRVlNG "'" NORTIiGATE SH 183 4 TO e lANES so 300. ...NACARTtiUA Sl.YO1715 IRV1NG lAVING "SH-,-sj .. .il; 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠...... .. m,,*I,.'SCOUNTY 􀁬􀀡􀁩􀁜􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀨􀁜􀀡􀀱􀀾􀀠 􀀧􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀩􀁾􀀢􀀺􀀠􀀢􀀺 􀁩􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀺􀁡􀀻􀀯􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀭􀀻􀁩􀀺􀁩􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀠􀀢􀀻􀀢􀀺􀁑􀁾􀁾􀀦􀁗􀀭􀀧􀀠SK1fi",i-. .. , """, ,... 􀀧􀀬􀀧􀁾􀀶􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠2000 . 1122 􀀧􀀶􀁾􀁷􀀧􀁃􀁯􀁵􀁭􀀭􀁶􀀠􀁬􀁾􀀠..O"CONNOR lEONE :3TO 6 lANES 800ROCHELLE BLVD ,'''1131 IR\I1NG1 IRViNe ..lEONE :3 TO elANESO'CONNoRf4QCHElLE BlYO .'"1731 lAVING IfMNG "'" .,j9YAl.t'" 􀂷􀀾􀀲􀁾􀁏􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀠 50 62" ·'30Ill"'"􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀱􀁗􀀠TXOO T....QAl.,LAS 􀁾􀀠,:;..􀁾􀁵􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠JH836 .·.i¥AU. . . 􀀲􀁔􀁏􀀮􀁾􀁻􀁩􀀾􀁾􀀾􀀠 50 6211 130 􀀭􀂷􀀺􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠cHEYENNE DR IHt1G6 2ToeLANEs S4 .... ...0 ....BRUTONRD2301 DALLAS COUNTY MESOUrrE IH 836 2 TO 8 lANES 54 ..." 2460 478CHEYENNE Of!BRUTONRD "'"'.2301 DALLAS COUNTY MEsQUITE 􀁉􀀧􀁍􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠.. 􀁾􀁾􀁒􀀠. 􀀧􀁊􀁏􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀨􀁐􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠 \IIi "56 so, 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀠·.1m ,:PVINO PLANo· .., 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾..􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠F"M:=t\.4.4 􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁩􀀠... • 􀁾􀀢􀀮􀁾􀁪􀁉􀀧􀁍􀁩􀁉􀀩􀀻.• 06· 29.. "1M .-Pu.No PlANo US,. ...,SH 269{PRESTON RO} 4 TO 6lANE-S (TRANSff PASS) 52 6001SPRING CREEK PtASS) 52 eo., 400.209'SPAlHa CREEK PKWi1991 TXOOTIOART PLANO ..i?' o􀁥􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀬􀁬􀀼􀁯􀁏􀁯􀁾􀀠i,••..􀁾••. PI.Nlb 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀺􀁴􀀻􀁴􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠.􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁉􀀳􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀬􀀱􀁴􀀻􀀬􀀻􀂷􀁬􀀮􀀡􀂷􀀻􀀱􀁬􀀻􀀱􀁪􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀂷􀁫􀀺􀁴􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀾􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀠􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁾􀂷􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀸􀁾􀀠01 . '-{". .. 1121 :AlMARD PRESTONRD 4TO 6 lANESPLANOPKWV2011 PLANO PWOO ALMA RD PRESTON RD 4 TO elANES 71 -5033 2121 : PlANOPt(.Wi2011 􀁾􀁎􀁏􀀠PlANO 􀁾􀀠i...􀀢􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺� �􀀠􀂷􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁦􀀧􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀠,', 􀀬􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁩􀁦􀁦􀀠􀀺􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀺􀀩􀀧􀀺􀀲􀁹􀀮􀁯􀀺􀁽􀁉􀀧􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀠*" ..;':,::;:X)it.n 􀀩􀀺􀁳􀁴􀀩􀁾.􀀮􀁴􀁉􀁎􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀮􀁎􀁴􀁶􀀠􀁴􀁅􀁾􀁙􀀮􀀻􀀺� �􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀼'" 􀁴􀁾􀁊􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀠􀀧􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁦􀁾􀀩􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠. •• •􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀨􀀩􀀠""'" CHAPJ\RfW.RO 2TOeLANES 3186SPRl:NG CREEK PKW'I PKW'I .'84 3'"3OeO TXDOT-DAl.lAS PlANO SHS(1IVEK} '" CHAPARRAL AD 2 TO e LANES 55 3186SPRING CREe<. PKW'i 3'84 "843080 TXOOT-OALlAS PlANO SH6(J1tVEKl 􀀱􀀶􀁾􀀠. ,:,1&7Q􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁑􀁾􀀻􀀠., .•.•• ',41 '&72 2 .41, 2 1870 11)70· ....􀀧􀁲􀁹􀀾􀁯􀁔􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠...􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀩􀀩.. . 􀀨􀀮􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁈􀁩􀂷􀀠.... ,. 􀀻􀀽􀁾􀁇􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠...............•.. •...•......•.•.•...􀀬􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀠 18" "<;::::306i::. TXOOt:>-I?ALLAS ,,;;:::F4j.NQ:_,,_ ,:', ......,on Dv;y ,... ,..."." .... ji; 􀀮􀁩􀀻􀁾􀀠.,.. ,.. 1;";t.􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀱􀀠92' ..􀀻􀀢􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀠'0. . 􀁾􀀹􀀢􀀺􀀠'00 ,.., 221l. ,'" 2133 20" """. .... '''13:1 􀀬􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠1aS& .... 9/15/95 2280 17 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY ASCAL YEAREASTERN SUBREGION I..., I ... 3Oe3 TXOOT-DAllAS Pl..ANO 3Oe3 TXOOT-DAll.A8 Pl..ANO OT04lANES SYHEAGY RENNER . 0 TO" lANES SYNEMY RENNER N.J,si'RiKq,:\i 􀀢􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁓􀁩􀀬􀁾􀀬􀁩􀀡􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁉􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁻􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁗 􀀠2TOelANES Nor sHeG SH27I NOfSHe8 SHDS zT06l.ANES 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀻􀁆􀀠..."""" FM30i7 􀀺􀀮􀁟􀁓􀁈􀁾􀀶􀀺􀀭􀂷.iliioil"\ "","V"'," 1.2:MISOFIH30 2T04lANEG uMISOFIti30 1.6MISoFIH30 􀀱􀀬􀁾􀁍􀁉􀁓􀁏􀁆􀁉􀁈􀀳􀀰􀀠2 T04lANES 280 􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀬􀁃􀁉􀁴􀀬􀀧􀀺􀀬􀀾􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀠' •TO. ,"&;i':-􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀭􀀭--',.:.' , ...􀁾...􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀬""'"' " -"" -:::j. 􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁾􀂷􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀭􀂷􀀺� �􀀧􀀴􀀱􀀰􀀩􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀨􀁾􀀠'::"i:'" (8' .. sH:M" 11. DALLASJCOllIN O-l. HSACtiSE ell 2 TO "lANES (BoOHDAAV) DALlASJGOU..IN c....L ""'" N 􀁾OIL 2 TO 4 lANES (BOUNDAR\') ...,. ..,.􀁾􀁾􀀠"i 􀀮􀀺􀁉􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀨􀂷􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀻􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀧􀂷􀀠􀀠'506 ,"",0':' silo MOBIUTY ASSiSTANCE (SEE (;MAO) .... NCTCOO VAAJQUS .... NCTCOO VAA/OUS 1995 TIP SUBTOT illS Ut 16,074 1\l9O TIP SUBTOTALS o TO 2 TO 8 lAHES 2TOel.ANES PROJECT COST fEDEfW. roTAI. LOCold... &STAlE 47 120 2100 2100 723 2100 2100 ,. 41. 189/15195 0 1-10 9/15/95 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) EASTERN SUBREGION CJTY PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR· (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) PfI().IECT FEOeW.L ,... ,-I ,..,I,-PIIOJ£CT ....... FROU TO DESCRIPTION SCORE TOTAL lOCAl.. &STATE """"'" CJO ,--, NOTES: First row of each proJect denotes programming in 1995 TIP; second row Is 1996 TIP proposal For those categories with "(FTA)" noted In the Project Description column. money noted In the "CONSTR" column indicates that the funds have bean transferred to FTA, not necessarily thatlhe project is under contract. 19 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY RSCAl YEARWESTERN SUBREGION FM 161 (GOLUNS) 􀂷􀂷􀀧􀂷􀁉􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉􀂷􀁪􀀠GREEN OAKS BLVD """,,303 􀀡􀀭􀁾􀁾􀂣􀀠pNf< & RIDE PARKROWOfl ···""(iffllif.,*f.. 􀀺􀁩􀁩􀁦􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀠flELOERRD <4010 ARUNGTON ARLINGTON PAAtAOWDR $US160 􀀻􀀬􀀯􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁭􀀮􀁪􀀻􀁩􀂷􀀮􀁬􀂷􀀠••.•·.....:.•..•••.·.•..,.•·.;.•.1.•..􀀺􀀮􀁾..•.•􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀺􀂷.•.••.􀁾􀀮􀁎••:O...·...lll<.•.••.•.􀁾􀀮􀀺...•...•..•.•.•••••.> 􀂷􀀮􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁜􀀮􀀮􀀠.", ... SUSAN DR SUSAHDR 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠IHOOAREA IHOOAPEA 􀀮􀁾􀀣􀁴􀁪􀀮􀁩􀀥:.·.•.•·•.•.·•.•.·...•.....E.:•.·.•.􀁾.•. :.••.·.!.· .••..••.•.•.·.• .•••••••. i.·••..••.􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀧􀁟􀀾􀀺􀀠::::;:\?:::;:?: 􀁾􀁮􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀠, §il FM 16T(COlLINS 8T} o FM 16T(COI..UNS aT) IH.20 1ft"" @SH_ (i> ......, .f.IH"" ll'I8."" @pAfI( ROW Oft OCOOPERST 􀂷􀁬􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁦􀁴􀂷􀂷􀀠COOPERS! OOOPEflST SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ii_II;;;· SJGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SlGNALIMPROVEMEHTS ····;!;!IR:...•· PARK A RIDE PAR< & RIDE 􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀺􀁾••􀀻􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁬􀀠INTEAS£CTk:IN IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTtON IMPflOVEMENT,s ..·....􀁊􀁉􀁦􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁩􀀱􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁬􀁕􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀭INTERSECTION IMP'A(')VEMENTs INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ··i••􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀽􀀠􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁅􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁉􀁍􀁐􀁁􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠!NTERSECTlO N IMPROVEMENTS 􀀬􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀽􀁲􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁒􀁉􀁍􀁐􀁁􀁏􀁖􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS .;;.',. ••.. .. ,.,. 1'1 71 e. ,. 'n> --':,:10 1'1 77 "7. 53 53 (dollars in •• SS .,. ,. 415 .15 eo .. "' ., l!® = """ 222f f 1'(0-: "" 1250 '250 1810 1610 •••• '" ., l\l2 ,., .. .75 .,. .SS •• 51. 011 223 57 􀀮􀁾􀀠•• 49 : ". 20 9/15/95 •• •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STAlE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEARWESTERN SUBREGION (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) TOTAL ,... :',120; Q 1... 1...􀁐􀁁􀁏􀁊􀁅􀁃􀁔􀁾􀁅􀀠"m CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS fI3 ...RANDOL MILL AD4012 AALINGTON ,f.RlINOTON COAFUOOR IMPROVEMENTS eo ...RANDOL MILL AD4012 ARLtNGTON ,f.RlINGTON "" ..l'Q. .."., ..i6; :...:....: ·,.',:.·:.:.::... ,.· .•􀀻􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀺􀀮􀂷􀀬􀀮􀂷􀀺:...􀁫􀀮􀁾.•• 􀁾􀀮􀀰􀁉􀁴􀀮􀀬􀀠􀀺􀀢􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀹􀀧􀁩􀀮............. ......􀁾.• ...􀀺􀀮􀀢􀂷􀁾􀀬􀀮􀂷􀀺..•􀀠..• :.:••••••..•••• ••••••..•••..•• 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁣•􀁑􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀹􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS @P/l.f't\SPASNGS8L\IDPIONEER f't(WV<4014 A.RI.JN(1TON NUNGTON Cil 􀁰􀁾SPRINGS BLVD ImERSEcnoN IMPROVEMENTSPfONEERP'KWf<4014 ARUNGTON ARLINGTON iOli􀀺􀁾􀁜􀁾􀁢􀁩􀁪􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁽􀀺􀀠,:,,;::;(AAl:itbTOO.::, 􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀨􀀮􀀠..''-, 􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀠􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀭.. 􀂷􀁾􀁉􀁒􀁴􀁲􀀠INTERSECTlON IMPROVEMENTS .. " @NEWVORI(AVE. .. '904Q18 ARLINGTON ARliNGTON ....""" Sf @NEWVOf«AVE INTEFISECTlON IMPf\O\lEMENTS 100 .......... Sf 4016 ARLINaTON ARLINGTON : ..... ,. " •.. 􀁾􀀠.,􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀡􀀠:50.. •• .. '..􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀠INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS .. 383@OENTAALDRSH1212719 TXOOT-FTW)RTtf SEDFORO INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 354@CENTRALDRSH 1212719 TXOOr-FTWORTH BEDFORD 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁗􀁲•. '''eo ..􀀧􀂷􀀢􀁪􀀻􀁗􀁜􀁩􀁪􀀤􀁑􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁭􀁴􀁬􀀬􀁩􀁬􀁅􀁾􀀮􀀠•.••􀁾􀂷􀁃􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀡� �􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁓􀀮􀁡􀁎􀁁􀁩􀀻􀁴􀁍􀁾􀁍􀁅􀁈􀁔􀁓􀀠eo 129:-'-' --', ','., "-' • 'i', ;.,'􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀪􀁾􀀹􀀧􀀠INTERSECT.oN IMPROVEMENTS .. .. 38.@MURPHYOflBEDFORORD01322 BEDf'ORO BEDfORD INTERSECTfQH IMPROVEMENTS 38.@WuRPHVORBEDFoADRO􀁾BEDFORD BeDFORD .. 3,..•􀀧􀀻􀁅􀁬􀁦􀁩􀁭􀁾􀁬􀀮􀀺􀀠'.i'.• . eEDF<>i;D 􀀬􀀧􀁩􀁯􀁬􀂧􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁟� �􀁱􀁚􀀨􀁾􀀧􀀠􀀮􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁷􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀺􀀻􀂷􀀠. os :m'm--=::t:􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀴􀀳􀀲􀀳􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁡􀁥􀁾􀀠.....􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠.,.INTEASECTION IMPROVEMENTscetrmW..DR '" AIRPORT FRN'i4324 BEDFORI} BEDFORD '" INTEf\S€CT1ON IMPROVEMENTS eo 7. ._ BEDFOfID i> AIRPORT' FR'NVCENTRAL DR BEDFORD ,.,􀀴􀁩􀀾􀁌􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀼􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀢􀁰􀀮􀁲􀀠􀀧􀁈􀀢􀁛􀁾􀁦􀁉􀁪􀁾􀁅􀁉􀁦􀁩􀀤􀀠.. "0_;:BE""""" . 􀁾􀀠􀁩􀁉􀁾􀁑􀁩􀁪􀀠􀁉􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁍􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁓􀀠.. '4$., ...􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾..􀀧􀁾􀀠􀀴􀁉􀀧􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁾.. 􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠,.8INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 55@MCLAINDR ".SEaFORD JiAR'M')OD RO-4327 BEDFORD ,..INTERSECTtoN IMPROVEMENTS is@MClAIHDRBEOFOAD tiAFMOOO AD-4327 aEOfORD 􀀬􀁾􀁪􀁑􀁩􀁪􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁅􀁉􀁦􀁩􀀮(jl 􀁾􀁌􀁁􀀨􀁬􀁓....􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁵􀀮􀁬􀁬􀀠􀀢􀀤􀁉􀁦􀁾􀀾􀁣􀀠􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀠..'" ... 415􀁦􀀧􀁇􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀩􀀧􀀧􀁾􀂷􀀬􀀻􀀢􀀢􀀮􀀨􀁩􀁩􀂷􀂷􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀧 􀀻􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠• INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS{REAl..lGNMEN .. .104i> PlEASAHT AUN .. COLLEWILLE SH284Q6S cotLEVVJi.lE INTERSECTION IMPflOVEMENTS {REAtJGlNMEN@PLEASANTRUN,,0$6 COLl.EV\IIlLE OO1.LEVVn.LE SH 2e 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁗􀁪􀁬􀀠..0 3'0 ,. . ' .--'''''' '.;:,> c',-:,' 􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁲*"""" 􀁾􀀻􀁜􀀧􀀠: c' 􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀮􀀩􀀺􀁾􀀮􀂷􀁃􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀮􀀻•􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀮􀁬􀁾􀀻􀀠.•.•􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀠".􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁊􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁦􀁻􀁴􀁓􀁪􀀶􀁱􀀡􀀬􀁬􀀮􀁗􀁉􀀴􀁚􀁬􀀧􀀢􀀠􀁜􀁾􀀠o.•. .• •. ",W'••".y,',W.,-"._".": SlGNAl...IUPROVEMENTS 60 so:@BRANSFOf'V) AD ..269 TXOOT􀁾􀁆􀁔􀀠WORTH COLLEYVILLE SH 2e SIGNAl...IUPAOVaU;'NTS 00 so@BRANSFORD AD 426'0 TXDOT-FT WORTH COlLEYVILLE SH 215 􀀴􀁩􀀾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀡􀁬􀁩􀀢􀀻􀀻􀀠',' ',:', 􀁓􀀱􀁇􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁍􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀧􀀠, , ",,' 10 i :f' TINKER 􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀠􀀺􀀨􀀫􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁊􀁏􀁈􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁯􀁯􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀱􀁉􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁯􀀨􀁏􀁏􀁍􀀮􀁗􀁉􀁟􀂷􀂷􀀠eo..􀀻􀀻􀁬􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀩􀁪􀁧􀁬􀀽􀀠)1;111.·,· .. "" SiGNAL JMPROVEtAENTS 50@ViNE ... 2776 T'xOOT _FT WORTH El1l..ESS SIGNAL fMPFtOV£MENTS 50 ..@ViNE ... 2718 TXOOT..FJ"VVORTH EULESS •••• M • 2. .0 q 􀁾􀀮􀀠eo eo ••• o •• 70 7. ,. 7S •• '" '" '" .. 53 .. .. tl2 •••• o ,120. ,... ---M':. ... 7. 7. ",1$ , "."."0 :183 7. no '0 I. "0 • 21 9115195 •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) WESTERN SUBREGION PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND SfATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR .110 EULESS 4110 EULESS 􀀬􀀾􀁾􀁬􀁴􀀺􀀧􀀠􀀼􀁾􀁾􀁩;;:Y '.0" 􀀺􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠\ :.;. \AEfITPAfI( wAY.,12 EtJLESS EULESS \\EfITPAFK WAV4112 EULESS EULESS 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀂷􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀬􀂷􀀺􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀬 􀀺􀀮􀀬􀁴􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁪􀁱􀀭􀂷􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁪􀀡􀁴􀁉􀁩􀁬􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀽􀀠••11.4226 TxOOT-FT WORTH eULESS 4228 Txoor-FT VVORTH EULESS stf 10 􀂷􀀧􀀬􀁪􀀧􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁪􀁦􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀠􀂷􀂷􀁭􀁾􀁪􀀭􀁀􀀬􀁩􀀼􀂷􀀠􀁤􀁾􀁈􀁉􀁕 􀀮OR '. 􀁾􀁩􀁪􀁾􀁦􀁾􀁦􀁦􀀨􀀴􀁴􀁆􀀮􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀬􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀨􀀮􀁦􀁾􀀢􀀭􀁬􀁏􀁒􀀠t!-PASSENGER \IAN4\17 FOREST HILL FORESTHILL ts-P!o8SEf'KiER VAN4117 FORESTHILL FOREST HILL 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀸􀁬􀁉􀀼􀁅􀁔􀁦􀁗􀁌􀀠􀀮􀀬� �􀁾􀁆􀁜􀁏􀁏􀁋􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀬􀁅􀁔􀁁􀁁􀁉􀁌􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁡􀀠vARtOUS L('}CATIONS 172.1377 FORTwoATH FORfWOftTH 􀁓􀁬􀁇􀁎􀁁􀁬􀁉􀁍􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁎􀁅􀁈􀁔􀁓(5liit) 􀀨􀁓􀁅􀁅􀀢􀁬􀁾􀀠os ....VAF*)U8lOCATtO+IS 2'"1371 FORT WORTH FMTIN:>RTH IIiW(iTO·US26'N. 􀁉􀁈􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁊􀁈􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠..􀀮􀀧􀀡􀀡􀁬􀁾􀂢􀀼􀀮􀁬􀀢􀁾􀀠Q􀀮􀀺􀁴􀁉􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀡􀀧... IH3fltNToUSa1ill \fiaiiw.,Hl!ATH FOftTw:lR1'H iii'" @UNIVERSITY OR liP UNIVERsITY OR .. SURVEILlANCE • 502771 TXOOT-FTWDRTH FORTWORTH 1H30 􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀡􀁔􀁉􀁾􀁓􀁔􀀬􀀠􀀬􀀮􀀻􀁊􀀻􀁾􀀬􀁉􀀬􀁉􀀺􀁲� �􀀧􀀠􀂷􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁓􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀮􀀠, ell" • AAmEer· 􀁩􀀮􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁓􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁃􀁓􀀼􀀻􀀺􀁽􀂷􀀺􀀠,:,.,.., s.·.. 􀀬􀁾􀁬􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀡􀁉􀁩􀀮􀀡􀀡􀁩􀀻􀀻􀁪􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀺􀂷. ,. Q INTERSECTiON IMPROVEMENTS@11"I30MONTGOMERY4120 FORT WORTH FOfU\\KlRTH INTERSECTIOH IMPROVEMENTS 38􀁾􀁉􀁈􀀳􀀰MONTGOMERY.1'20 FORT 'l«>RTH FORT WORTH 􀁾􀀠...--., .􀀻􀁬􀁾􀀮􀁟􀂷􀂷􀀠INTERSEGTION IMPRQ\IEMENTS .. 52@PENNSVlVANIA ,.,THAVE.122 FORTWORTH FORT \NOfITH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTs @PENNSVtVAN1AFOf{f"WORTK ITHAVE 200 4'22 FORT WORTH 000""" 73 -... .,0a EULESS .,l)a EULESS ECfOROREULess Ii' """''''''' 11'''''''''''''' StGNAlIIdPROVEMEHTS (NOTWARAANTED) >,,;H • 􀀺􀁺􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠􀂷􀀢􀀩􀀡􀁷􀁟􀁾􀁭􀀡􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠• TROJAN TAL @TROJANTAL 􀁴􀁬􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀺􀁜􀁩􀁾􀀠SH 183 SH t8a II'PtPE\.INE.FII1 . 􀁾􀀬􀁰􀁴􀁦􀀺􀀱􀁅􀁕􀁎􀁥􀀺􀁁􀁏􀀧􀀠CJ)ECTOA& 4j} ECTOR & PARKVlEW PARKVlEW o SIMMONS o SlMMONS &. rv i$ OPEAATING C06f "r:v 95 OPEf\A.TlHG COST SOUTlM'E'1t"itw fl6uTf. 7. 7. .e. 02 .. 55 "" "" "" 50 .. 11 11 11 11 " ., 50 .5O ,. .. ,.. .. .. ... ... 2'" so 50,." '" '",,. j,. """ ,... ,... .. 54 n 22 9115195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) WESTERN SUBREGION .12'5 FORTWORTH 􀀢􀀱􀁾􀀠FORTWORTH 4121 FORTWORTH 41H FORT w:>ATH ".;••􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁑􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀾􀀠FORT """'" CI1Y FORTOORTH FoRT WORTH FORTW3RTH FQRTw;JRTH c=·FORTIM>RTH FORTv..oATH '. l'OIUW>Riii JiooTWOfInj FORT v.<>RTH HUlENST HUlENST 􀂷􀂷􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁌 􀂷􀂷􀀠IlMNBURV/WAI3ASH QAANBURVIWASASH 􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀷􀀡􀁈􀀠􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁎􀁭􀁈􀀠NBEA.CH!IT FORTw:>RTH N BEACH ST 􀁖􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾..􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀮"...'􀁾􀀮􀁾.... 􀀼􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁜􀀮􀀧•.􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀢.•.'.:.'.'.'.'. •.'.•.'.'...􀀺􀁾.•..'􀀮􀁦􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺..'.k 􀀮􀁦􀀹􀀡􀁩􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾•.􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀬􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀠@LAS VEGAS @I..A9 VEGAS TO .. ..•.".;..;E.:;.·;:.·;.•.-:;•.,..r...:..􀁾􀀬􀀭􀁟􀀮􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻􀁟􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀧� �􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀧􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁟􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀺.... 1:IA1'.ftf'II.1 :"RTH FORT\\IORTH 4210 TXDOT-FT'WORTH FORTWOATH . ""J7'OOT􀁪􀁬􀀻􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀼􀁬􀁗􀁾􀀧􀀠􀀴􀀲􀀱􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁴􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀠4216 􀁔􀁘􀁏􀁏􀁔􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁈􀀠FORTv.K>RTH TXOOT-Ff WORTH FORT'v.oRTH ..... 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀠4236 TXOOI-FTV«1RTH FORTWORTH "2M TXOOT-FT'lJlK)RTH FORTWORTH SH 183 SH 163 􀁦􀀡􀀧􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀠.􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀺􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠IH'" ."0 . 􀂷􀁟􀁦􀀧􀁰􀁾􀀷􀀠. ,,,,",1!0l' US 287 ""28' ··.vi\iOi 􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠US 287 4238 TXOOT_FT'M:)f{fH FORT WORTH US 267 􀁾􀀻􀁩􀀻􀀮􀁉􀀺􀁉􀁗􀁾􀀮􀀽􀀺'\ 􀀬􀁾􀁾.. 4240 TXOOT-FT'M:)f{fH FORTV«>fU'H TXOOT-FTV\ORTH FORTVYORTH .,," iii"" IH820 IH620 • iii.. .111.. flMCCARTST • MCCART ST 􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁩􀁟􀀠jj>1Ii_ "VAUGHtot BLVD til VAOOtfl 8t.VD 􀀢􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁖􀁁􀁬􀀩􀀨􀀾􀁈􀁉􀀡. 􀀬􀁩􀁾􀁦􀁦􀁩􀀧􀀨􀁾􀀧􀁹􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀭􀀭II BERRYST 06ERRYar 06ERRYar 􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁑􀁉􀀩􀀠. 􀀢􀁾􀁷􀀮􀁩􀀮􀀡􀁩􀁯􀀠6\ FOREST PAFt< FORESTP-INTERSECTlON lMPAOVEWENTS 􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁴􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀡􀀬􀀺􀁴􀀠INTERSECTiON IMPAOVEUENTS INTERSeCTtoN'lMPAOVEMENTS 􀂷􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁭􀁾􀁚􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠GPAOE SEPARATION GRACE SEPARATtoN 􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀻􀀧􀂷􀀧􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀠'DRS 'DRS 􀀾􀀻􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁲􀁲􀀠SURVEIlLANCE SURVEILLANCE 􀀧􀁾􀁬􀁌􀁁􀁴􀁬􀁃􀁬􀀡􀀠􀁾􀁴􀁷􀀼􀀹• SURVEILLANCE Sl.JRVElLlANCE _"";.,;0,,",,00,, 􀁬􀀡􀁉􀀼􀁬􀁾􀀻􀀢􀁾􀁅􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀭Wi!\T,>.TE.FU SIGNALIMPftOVEMENTS SIGNALIMPROVEMENTB '. ". oillW.JMffibvaoEil'r$ ....... .... '" 􀀢􀀺􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁹􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠:,-,:," :'-":, ":':';:'.r::. -_.;:;, SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SlGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 􀁾􀀱􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀦􀁉􀁔􀀮􀀤􀀮􀀠,􀀧􀀺􀀼􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁈􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀪􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠OONALIMPROVEMEHT8 SKiNALIMPROVEMENTS 55 55 --60,:: "':60 53 63 ::;$l ':::-:.:. 􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠00 00 􀀭􀁾􀀾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠":4· so SO -::"4$_ -46;": 􀁾􀀡.., .. 50 PROJECT COST """ """ 1200 ,..., .." .." 􀀮􀀱􀁾􀀠'000 40. 40. """ """.... .... .. • 30 .. II<> .. 30 30 􀀮􀁾􀀠.. as .. 0 0 ••• • •• •• ••.. FEDERAL AND STAlE FUNDING SY FISCAL YEAR ,... ,... ,... ,..7 ,... .,"" 1080 ';"... 4000 2500 " ! .. •• .. 23 9/15/95 •• • • • • • DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEARWESTERN SUBREGION •...•... '"' so 50 •• 45 '"' '"' •• " .. •• '" '"' ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. " •.. ••• 26'... 133 as ••• 0.. •• •• ••• •• ••• 0., e • •.. PROJECTPROJECT 4242 TXDOT-FT IiYORTH FORT 􀁾􀁈􀀠ItUO 0: BEACH Sf SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 4242 􀁔􀁘􀁏􀁏􀁔􀁾􀁆􀁔􀁗􀁏􀁒􀁬􀀧􀁈􀀠FORTw:.JfUH lH30 @8EACtfST stGNAlIMPROVEIAEHTS k •••.·.·.·.)i24...... ·.·.·c.. '. 􀀮􀁳􀁾..􀁾􀁾􀀺." ........... . 􀁔􀁸􀁯􀁯􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁦􀁣􀀻􀀮􀀮􀂥􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁈􀀱..􀁉􀁾􀁯􀁥􀁯􀁒􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀪􀁩􀁲􀁴􀀻� �􀁉􀀡􀀻􀁾􀀮􀀠􀂷􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾...􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁖􀁴􀀡􀀻􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁜􀁬􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁴􀁗􀁬􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀂷... <4244 TxooT-Fl' 'NJR1'H FORT 􀁾􀁈􀀠SH 121 4244 TxooT-FT \MJRTH FORTWORTH SH 121 __:,4245 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁈􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀻􀀠,':; ;"'.:-121 4248 .246 42<48 4248 ..... .􀁜􀁾􀀧􀀵􀀠􀀭􀀬􀀮􀁘􀁯􀁱􀁴􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀠TXooT􀁾􀁆􀀱􀀠WOfffH FORT w:>ATH TxooT-FT \M.'>RTH FoAl VYOATH 􀁔􀁘􀁾􀁔􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀼􀀾􀀡􀁩􀁔􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀡􀂷􀀮'.wi :Txoot􀀭􀁆􀀨􀀺􀁾􀁈􀀺􀀭􀁉􀁬􀀺􀀧􀀹􀁒􀀺􀁦􀀺􀀭􀁷􀁯􀁦􀁦􀁲􀁈􀀠TXDOT-FT 'M>ATH FORT \M)fUH TXDOT-FT w:>RTH FoAl' WORTH 􀁊􀁘􀁯􀁑􀁔􀀭􀁆􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁦􀁑􀁉􀁬� �􀁉􀀢􀁏􀁉􀀡􀁉􀁈􀀠􀀼􀀡􀁴􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁯􀀢􀀠􀁔􀁘􀁯􀁏􀁔􀀭􀁦􀁬􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁯􀁦􀀱􀁴􀁾􀀠·1iI.3iNi <1250 TXDOT-FTWORrH FoRTWORTH 1H3JSW 4250 TXOOT-FT'MlATH FOflT'M>RTH IH36W '25.' 􀁔􀁘􀁬􀁊􀁑􀁔􀀬􀁊􀀧􀁔􀀧􀁜􀀼􀁬􀁉􀁭􀀬􀁬� �􀀼􀁊􀁦􀀼􀁦􀀬􀁟􀁉􀁬􀀧􀁉􀁉􀀡􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀠-4261_ 􀁔􀁘􀁏􀁏􀁲􀀭􀁒􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀭􀁆􀁑􀁒􀁔􀀧􀁍􀀮􀀩􀁆􀀨􀁦􀁈􀀠jttUa 4262 TXOOT-FT \MJRTH FQRl'V'«>ATH IH'" 4252 T)(ooT-FT WlRTH FORT INORTH IH ... ..25:'_ 􀀭􀀮􀁔􀁘􀁯􀁏􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁗􀀹􀁒􀁩􀁴􀀮􀁩􀀺􀀺􀁦􀁻􀀮􀁬􀁡􀁴􀀭􀁶􀀮􀁩􀁣􀀺􀀩􀁦􀁭􀁾􀀠 􀀮􀁬􀁴􀁬􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀡􀁩􀀠􀀱􀁫􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀲􀀰􀀧􀀴􀀲􀁾􀀠􀁔􀁘􀁾􀁔􀀻􀁴􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁫􀁾􀀭􀁜􀁾􀀠U828142.55 TXooT-FT YK>RTH FoAT WORTH 4266 TXOOT-fTw:>RTH FORT\p\IOffl"H U82S1 M!MTXDOT.#Wof{rtl '.' 􀀻􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀠: : 􀀴􀀲􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠􀀧􀁾􀂥􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁮􀀺􀁩􀀻􀁐􀁾􀁊􀀠􀀺􀁦􀁾􀀿􀁾􀁴􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀠4257 TXOOT-FT\IVORTH FDRTWOfU"H iHOO 42$7 lXDOT-FT WORfH FORT w:>RTH Mi 30 􀂷􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁟􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀢􀁩􀀠 4258 rxDOT􀁾􀁆􀁔WORTH FORT w;)RTH IH 20 4258 TXDOT-FT w:>ATH FORT WORl'H '"20 􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀠8M 121 8M 121 􀁩􀁲􀁅􀁴􀁾􀀷􀀠U$217 .... IH 00 @BEACH ST @BEACH ST ...•.􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠@SYLVANNIAAVE @SYLVANNIJIi Ave, BEACH &. RtVERSlDE DR 􀁾􀁾􀁊􀀱􀁓􀁉􀁑􀁅􀀮􀀹􀀢􀀠􀁬􀁉􀀧􀁬􀁗􀁾 􀀡􀁉􀁬􀀡􀀱􀁄􀁒􀀠I'iiI AIOGMAR BLVD 􀁾AIOOMAA BlVD .•􀁃􀀧􀁩􀀡􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁊􀁦􀀧.•E.VEIl>INl·il<> @NORl'HWlDe DR ONOff'fli'MDeOO 􀀢􀀮􀁾􀁓􀁔􀁾􀀠 􀁯􀁐􀁾􀀮􀁷􀀮􀀠 􀁀􀁍􀁾􀁏􀁒􀀠*MEAbOwefIOOK oR ."S\'UR "'" 􀁾􀀺􀁓􀁐􀁕􀁒􀀭􀀳􀁏􀁡􀀠@ERATHsT iilEMTHST 􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀧􀀬􀀬􀀣􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠􀁯􀁐􀀢􀀬􀁉􀁴􀀨􀂣􀁒􀁾􀀮􀀠C!) lAS VEGAS TRL 􀁾lAS VEilASTRL .' 􀀮􀁀􀁕􀀡􀀡􀀰􀁩􀁅􀁾􀁉􀀾􀀧􀁩􀀵􀂷􀀻􀁦􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁜􀁬􀁲􀀤􀁾� �􀁜􀀻􀀠􀀼􀀮􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠• HEMPHILL ST 6) HEMPHILL ST oP$PVRsaO . '". 58C -SfGlNAlIMPROVEMENTS SfGNAlIMPROVEMENTB (COMB w'..m) 􀀧􀀻􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠 SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS slGNAlIMPROv'£WENTS (OOMS Wi4244 & 4245) 􀀺􀀽􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀠SfGNAI.. IMPROVEMENTS SKlNAL IMP8OVEfotENTS 􀁾􀁪􀁩􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁅􀁩􀀶􀁉􀁩􀀯􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀡􀀬􀁲􀁩􀁬􀀠staHAlIMPROVEMEHTS 9IQNAlIMPRO\lENEN'T8 (COMB WI4243) 􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁏􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀡􀁗􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁅􀁾􀁦􀂷􀀧􀀠􀁾􀂷􀀨􀁩􀀮􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀴􀀠SIGNAl.. IMPROVEMENTS SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 􀀤􀁩􀁇􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁬􀁉􀀬􀁉􀁩􀁯􀀡􀁉􀀼􀀾􀁶􀁥􀁩􀀮􀀴􀁾􀀡􀀦􀀮􀀠 .􀀢􀀺􀀸􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁩􀁮􀀧􀁾􀁖􀁅􀁦􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁻􀀬􀀺. SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTs SIGNAL IMPROVEWENTS .... 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀠SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SlGNAL IMPflOVEMENTS ;;" 􀀧􀁜􀁉􀁬􀀾􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁻􀁾􀁾􀁊􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁲􀀡􀁬􀁲􀀮􀀬􀀢􀂭SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SlGNA1.IMPROII9.4ENT8 ... ...• .6 .. 02 , .. "" as "" • 􀁾,.' • ,., ,.7 0 , • • • •,. :111 N-,lO• . ,. • .. 13 13• 22 22•,. •.. , 8: • •,. • •15 • 249/15195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR (dollars In thousands) WESTERN SUBREGION (dollars in thousands) " • '0 80 ·'-.:-k,'; ., ", 􀀬􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠'?,.:'", ., .. '''''. '904 TO TarAL ,...CONSIR ,... ,...L"""" '007 SlGNAL HAPROVEMENTS eo o *BRYANT-lRVlN AD426' TXOOT-FT VIIORTH FORT WORTH IH20 • • • @sAVANT-IRViN AD SIGNAl IMPROVEMENTS ..4261 􀁔􀁘􀁏􀁏􀁔􀀭􀁆􀁔􀁾􀁈􀀠FORT'M>RTH 'H2O ,.􀀮􀁡􀁾.. tJ) TRlIitTY el.VD 'ejI. i • ":D􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀱••. 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠-/􀁉􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁏􀁾􀁂􀁬􀁜􀁉􀁄􀀠􀀽􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾." ... 13 o ,@VlCKERYBLVD SiGNAl IMPROVEMENTS •42t3 TXQOT-FT 'ftIQfUH FORT V«>fUH ...". '" ,@VlCKERY81VD $lNAL IMPROVEMENTS (COMa WI4243)4263 TXOOT-FT VIK'.)RlH FORT \'VORlH ""83 '" 􀀢􀀻􀁾􀀤􀀧􀁾􀁥􀁳􀁲􀀧􀀠......... ';'f'!lO\IaiElil's «( 􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁩􀀼􀁑􀁏􀁔􀀪􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁷􀁯􀁭􀀻􀀮􀀠',·oi:.i' .... •• .. 17 o • ..... ::0􀁾􀁟􀁳􀁲􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁔􀁸􀁯􀁯􀁩􀀺􀁩􀁵􀁾􀁾FORt_ 􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀧􀁾􀀧':0 ." • @:HUlENST SlGNAllMPROVEMENTS so o426& nOOl-FT INORTH FORTWORTH tH 20 f!}HULENST SfGHAl IMPROVEMENTS o426& 􀀱􀁊􀀨􀁏􀁏􀁔􀁾􀁆􀁔􀁉􀁎􀁏􀁒􀁔􀁈􀀠FORT WORTH iH20 '" 1lCi· . .': If c· ::6} OAALAHD'SLVO 􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀠",,'. . 􀀧􀀭􀀲􀁾􀀠tl, . 􀁾o:.lKLANO-BLVO 􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁩􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁳􀀠@ASHlANDAVE SKlNAL HAPROVEMENTS 56 .0 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁲.' o4274 TXOOT-FTIN()RTH FORT WORTH IH30 @ASHLANDAVE SIGNAl IMPROVEMENTS 80 o4274 TXooT-FT \\()Rl'H FORT woRTH IH 30 '" 11·c;>eW:HST GAliAT rm F1<.wY 􀁉􀁎􀁬􀀧􀁆􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠.. ... n 271, 277 CITY\MDE SlGNAlIMPAOVEMENTS (4) os ... .., ...15e1 GAAND PRAIRIE aAAND PRAIRIE vARK>llS LOCATIONS 200 225 CITY\MDE SIGNAlIMPAOVEMENTS (4) .. 140 371> 31<)1581 GRAND pfWF\lE GRAND PfWRlE vAFVOUS LOCATIONS .. 171 6): 􀁗􀁁􀁬􀁌􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀹􀁏􀁌􀁌􀁅􀁡􀁥􀀮􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀱􀁍􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀨􀁔􀁾􀀨􀀳􀀩􀀠os· 􀁾􀀮􀀠eo 􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀠.' "9 􀀱􀁾􀀬􀀠􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁥􀂷􀂷􀀮􀀠􀁱􀁾􀁎􀁥􀀧􀀠·'M.Nt.':Sf. o WAll. WOIffit, &<;ol.l:euSr . 􀀧􀀬􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁏􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠160 ... 􀁦􀁈􀁲􀁲􀁁􀁒􀁯􀁏􀁧􀁦􀀮􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁽􀀺􀀭􀀧􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀁪􀁐􀁩􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁳􀀠60 151 23a . :;:. 􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁧 􀁾􀀠@WATAOGARD INTER6£CTtONIMPflOVEMENTS eo aes 268 41n N RlCHL.ANO HILLS N RICHlAND HILLS RUFE sNO'N I @WATAUGAAD INTERSECTtON: IMPROVEMENTS eo aes 2S6 501 41n N RiCHLAND H!LLS N RICHlAND HILLS RUFE SNOW' 􀂷􀁾􀁩􀀷􀀰􀀠II 􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁗􀁬􀁉􀁪􀁒􀀴􀁃􀁈􀁵􀀼􀀻􀁄􀁈􀁉􀁉􀀮􀁉􀀮􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁗􀀧􀂷􀁾􀀭<;·.·.1>.. I'·· ..􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀠:: : 􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁉􀀭􀀻􀀬􀁴􀁾􀀧􀁽􀀻4178 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾� �􀁪􀁾􀁩􀁪􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀠"I··· . 􀁾􀁙􀀠63 7&0 158 ... ...4179 N FliCHLAND HILlS N flICHLANO HILLS SOUTH ELECTt:UC TFWL BII<.EWAV 63 750 158 ... ... .8I(£HI\Y' 􀁾􀀠I.i6 2400 Ii04 􀁦􀀤􀁾􀀭.' 􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀬􀁻􀀠"..􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠.. BIKEWAY 63 1725 362 58 ·24QO 504 ,_''''' "'63BIKEWAY 63. 1126 362 􀁀􀁗􀁁􀁔􀁁􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀢􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁅􀁴􀁦􀁦􀁓􀀾􀀠66 &0 0 50. 􀀴􀀲􀀲􀁬􀀻􀂷􀂷􀀮􀁔􀁸􀀰􀀹􀁴􀀬􀁲􀁩􀁾􀁩􀀼􀁒� �􀁾􀁾􀁈􀁉􀁗􀁩􀁦􀁬􀀬􀁤􀁾􀀠so 􀁀􀁗􀁁􀁔􀁁􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀮􀁵􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀨􀁅􀁾􀁡􀀠a 50 ., ...􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁴􀂣􀁲􀁜􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁲􀁦􀁩􀀮􀁾􀁊􀀻􀁵􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁉􀀱􀀧􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁾􀀠sIGNAl IMPROVEMENTS 60:3 0• THOUSAND OAKS 4226 TXOOT-FT WORTH N RICHLAND HILLS F14 3029 • THOUSAND OAKS SlGtW...IMPROVEUENTS (CONSTR WistATE FU eo 0 0 4226 1)(OOT-FT WORTH N RroHI...NfD HILLS F14 302G , 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁗􀁥􀁦􀁲􀁾􀀠60 60 e 􀁀􀁾􀁔􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀂷􀀴􀁐􀀺􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀠.􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁳􀀠67 sa e ... 􀀮􀁾􀀠.. :􀂷􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠SIGNAL IMPROVEMEHTs 62 50 3 @STRUMt.4mDR 41 4270 TXDOT-FTWORTH N fUCHLANO HiLtS SH2I!I @STRUMMEA DR SIGNAl IMPROVEMENTS 62 54 3: 4270 􀁔􀁘􀁏􀁏􀁔􀀭􀁆􀁔􀁾􀁈􀀠NFlCHLANDHIlt..S SH2e " Ci' ...EI'lALI>!'iWiW!'.r ...•.. 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁖􀁥􀀮􀁴􀁅􀁩􀁦􀁲􀀢􀀬􀀠.0 50 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀷􀀭􀀬􀀠'.)•••􀀻􀀮􀁊􀀬􀂷􀁾􀁬••􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀂷......· 􀁃􀁩􀀧􀁡􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀣􀀣􀁗􀀺􀀧􀀺􀁩􀀠􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀢􀂮􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀬􀀠fS2'52 a ... .. l6> BOOTH-CAU.OWAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 59 268 , &3 213 13 2116 RICHLAND HlUS RtCtllANP HillS GLENVIEWOR l6> BOOTH-CA1.LOWAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 59 268 53 GLENVIEWOR '13 􀀲􀀧􀁾2116 RICHLAND HILLS RlCHLANDHll18 i\􀁓􀁈􀀱􀀸􀀮􀀨􀁦􀀳􀂥􀁾􀁩􀀨􀁉􀁩􀁩􀀩􀀬􀀻􀁯􀁬􀀮􀀠􀀱􀁎􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁅􀁦􀀨􀁦􀁓􀀠4S 280 0."11'.0.' 􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀹􀀺􀁲􀀣􀁾􀁁􀁬􀁬􀁉􀂢􀁈􀁾􀁛􀁮􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁊􀀮􀁴􀁬􀀧􀀠􀀮� �􀁾􀁾􀁄􀁒􀀨􀁾􀁖􀀢􀀼􀀱􀀧􀀩􀀠.11> 􀁳􀁩􀁩􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁉􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁐􀁩􀀾􀂷􀂷􀀠...􀁉􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁴􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁻􀁴􀁦􀁲􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁌􀁾􀀢􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀨􀁾􀁊􀁒􀀧􀀴􀀷􀀴􀀩􀂷􀀠􀀽􀁴 􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀀠43: .':MAf¥{ETING PAOGFW.tN TX CLEAN AIR C vARIOUS REQ)ONAl ONAl rDM PROORI-.MI MAA(ETING pROGRAM ,• oN TX ClEAN IdRC VAfUQUS AEG)ONAl TOM PROGRAMl 1 4131 N RlCHlA.NDHlllS N RICHLAND HIllS OOTTONBELT TRAIL 4131 N RlCttlANDHIUS N fUCHLAND HILLS OOTTONBELTTRAJL 27 9/15195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) WESTERN SUBREGION .... FWrA 􀁾􀀠􀀯􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀠-FWtA: 􀀬􀁾􀀴􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭n74B VARIOUS 2e748 VAfVQUS 􀁟􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁆􀁗􀁲􀁁􀀠􀀻􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀯􀀠.... FWrA .... FWrA 4213 TXOOT-FT 'N:)RTti VAfU0U5 .... FWrA EXPAND BUSES .􀀲􀀷􀁚􀁩􀀻􀁾􀁩􀀭􀁾􀁴􀀼􀁖􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁌􀁑􀁃􀀬􀁜􀁔􀁬 􀁏􀁎􀀤􀀠􀁩􀁢􀁪􀁾􀀾􀁰􀀺􀁢􀁾􀀻􀁲􀁦􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀾􀀠'.', 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀻􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁴􀁟􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀠4052 CLEARTEXASAIR VARK.XJs 4062 CLEARTEXASAIR VARIOUS ·,'::'>:41:4,', 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁶􀁾􀀢􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺� �􀀠􀁲􀁗􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁶􀁾􀁵􀁪􀀠4145 FWTA VARIOUS 414& FWrA V""""'" 􀀬􀁮􀀴􀁾􀀠FWrA vAAlbOs ...-",-:-".414t -FWt'A V"""""'" 4147 FWrA vARIOUS 4147 FWrA vARIOUS .... fWl'A 􀁖􀁾􀀮􀀠. 􀁾􀀱􀀴􀀸􀀠"fWI'A 􀁖􀁾􀀠4149 FWrA VARIOUS 414& FWrA vAl!lQUS ......􀀴􀁾􀀱􀀱􀀠TXDOT-FTWORTH vARIOUS 4211 TXDOT-FTWORTH VARIOl!S SH'" TO vNVQUS EXPAND BUSES 􀀮􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀂷􀂷•• 􀀺􀀬􀁭􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁛􀁾􀁅􀁔􀂷􀀠 􀁩􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀮􀂷􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀮􀀻􀁾􀁜􀀮􀁩􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁲􀁲􀀠. PUBlIC FLEETVARIOUS vARIOUS PUBLIC FLEET VAI!IQU/I.,'· .'·:!iilitfiWil_,.UTERJWL __ -_.<._,._."__"'-.---._'.--.-.' -.c-' , 􀂷􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁴􀁩􀂷􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻 􀁾􀁩􀀾􀁗􀁩􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁬􀁯􀀡􀁴􀁊􀁔􀁅􀁁􀀢􀀢􀁛􀀠RlDEstiARE pROGRAM V"""",S vARIOUS RlDESHARE PROORAM BtCYCLE pAA:;ING B1C'{CLEPAR .,. .. 83 1> 1> •• O. '" '" a. ., .. 50 50 .. 26' 0 217 , 43 217 43 ... ' 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀠."'" -:141. 1100 428,... eo ., '" ., 200 .. 200 .. ,..... ..... ,.... ..... .. .,.. 21 • 􀁾􀀠• '000 0 """ 01 700 0: I 1232 o! .. eo '00 '00 111a o! '00 '00 0 100 100 1H8 0 11-18 • ... 350 28 9/15/95 9/15195 DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) WESTERN SUBREGION FRaU TO REQtoNA1.. COR.RIOOR MANAGEMENT PROGRMt REGIONAL COAR.OOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM\􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁚􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀻􀁩􀀧􀁬􀀻􀁴􀀻􀀺􀀠,'{::,; ',' @CHAPMANADUS 377 Ij'ICtiAPMMlRD 4M3 TXOOT-FT INOATH WATA.UGA 4303 TXOOT-FTWORl'H WATAUGA U8311 VARIOUS vAlliOUS lIlRS laRS 􀀢􀁩􀀻􀀧􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁩􀀻􀀠'" SlGNAlIMPAOVEMENTS SKUW.IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COST (dollars in thousands) fEllEJW. """"" TOTAL lOCAl. lSTATE 3110 0 3110 :1110 􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠:;.:-. '" 􀁾􀁾􀀭;' 3 '" .. I 3 41 X 56 ; 3 53, FEDERAL AND STAlE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR (dollars in thOusands) '... ,-CONslR C/O ,... ,... ,..1 ,... ..10, 3110 3110 41 63 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁔􀁬􀁐􀁓􀁕􀁂􀁔􀁏􀁲􀁁􀁬􀁓􀀠122,578 2.5,ml ...", 7.282 ,2,26,1 26,9121 01 01 t3,748 16,6$7 25,393 21,898 01 12,61-41 10,545 9,41&!lB98 TIP SUBTOTALS 123,484 25,,,.1 1f7.75S 37,138 NOTES: First row of each project demotes programming in 1996 TIP; second row is 1996 TIP proposal For those categories wllh '(FTA)' noted in the Project Description column. money noted in the 'CONSTR' column indicates that the funds have been transferred to FTA. not necessarily that the project is under contract. 29 •• •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) ". PROJECT COSTWESTERN SUBREGION PROJECT TOTAL 􀁾􀀭.-: 􀁾􀀶􀀠4Toe LANES 344, ABFWA ST PAft{ ROW 4TOe LANES 344' :: 􀀲􀀮􀀱􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾____ ..... ":..:;. 1-145 '-k;.::'';_ "-, 􀀺􀀻􀁉􀁬􀀺􀁦􀀨􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁌􀀠. 'u'4&MAVAELORD 4TOel..ANES 2140 · ..lit.!;;f._; '. 􀀼􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁉􀀧􀀷􀁟􀀠SPUR30SCOLl!NSST'''7 ARLINGTON ARlINGTON SPUR 303 MAYFIELDRD 4 TO 6 l..ANES_TON COLllNSST 2'''' 􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁪􀀺􀁜􀁪􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀠ARLINGTON pOLV \NEBS AD TXDQTJARUNGTO ARUNGTONlfT wr SPUR 303 .•􀂷􀀮􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀱􀁬􀁉􀁯• TXOOT-FT WOfITH ct.VVl.ElHuRSTIN fW 3020 (PRECINCT LiNE) TXDOT-FT V«lfITH ClVVLElHURSTIN Fht 302IJ (PPECINOT LINE) 􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀼􀀧􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠TXOOT-FT WORTH EULESS FM 167 E\lEfWAN FOflEST HilL DR 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀡􀀺􀀻􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁴􀁩􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀺􀀽􀀠. CAMPUS OR CAMPUS DR • 60. 80' • ..... ..... ,... 204' 22S 07 ., ".. "53 ,.... ,..... 􀁾􀀶􀁇􀁑􀀠i I ,... 1700 􀂷􀀮􀀳􀁾􀀠1712147 ARLIHeTON '. 􀁾􀁁􀁁􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁩􀀺􀁗􀀺􀀠'.' {.c·.\;liio<\ 􀀮􀀲􀀻􀁔􀀨􀁪􀂷􀀬􀀨􀁾􀀺􀂷'AIll.I\i;aJON.􀀮􀂷􀀬􀁾􀁬􀁃􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀠􀂷􀁾􀁉􀁩􀁴􀁾􀁩􀀢􀀠...,. ,",:tii;lij 􀀢􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀢􀀺􀁾􀁊􀁎􀁇􀁴􀁏􀁴􀀨􀀮􀀠..,. 4 T06 LANESSPUR 303I1NGREEN OAA.S BLVD182 ARLINGTON .......GTON SWGREENOAKSelYD fJPUROO3 IH 20 '" TO 61 LANES '82 ARLINGTON ARL1NGTON 􀀢􀁾􀀧􀁔􀀰􀀶􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀮􀂷􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀧.• 􀀻􀁾􀀠.••. E.'.'·,·:.'.'.·f.·,.,".· ·.•..... .•. ·.,.·\),·,' ... 􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁜􀀡􀀡􀁏􀀮􀀧.•·.:.•.•.••.•..· .•. •.•. ... .•...'.' 􀀺􀁻􀁪􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠: .􀀢􀀬􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀾􀁮􀀠/i""" •..••••􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁾􀀠PlEASANT AK>QE AD lITTlERO 2T04tANES PLEASANT AlooE AD LITTLE AD 2T04tANES 􀁾􀁭􀀡􀁩􀀧􀁁􀁩􀁊􀀧􀁨􀀠􀀺􀁁􀁑􀁢􀁾􀁾􀀳􀀠􀁴􀁾􀀺􀀠'...􀂷􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀻􀀡􀀬􀁬􀁾 􀁬􀁦􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠";=:,. 2.6 "'I E OF IH flao FIelDER AD -4 TO GlANES (TXOOT SPlIT IN TIP) 2.8 MI E OF IH eM FIElDER AD -4 TO Gl..ANES (TXOOT SPUr IN TIP) flH '1 •.H 􀁌􀁦􀁊􀁬􀁁􀁾􀀲􀀠􀀲􀁔􀁏􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀨􀁔􀀧􀁘􀁾� �􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁲􀁩􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁟􀁩􀁍􀀭􀀱􀀺􀁾􀀲􀀺􀀧􀀠􀁾􀁽􀂷􀁯􀀮􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁦􀁱􀀺􀀮􀀰􀀹􀁦􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀠SH2$ FM 111136 2 TO 7 LANes (TXDOT SPlIT IN TIP) SH 26 FM 1938 2 TO 7 LANES (TXDOT SPLIT IN TIP) . $tN&r', '::ftOO :, 􀀺􀁾􀀱􀀶􀀮􀀭􀁤􀁎􀁅􀁩􀁳􀀠􀀷􀀻􀀾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀻􀁾􀀬􀁲􀁾􀀴􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾8ft 1b3' -:-00 1.a SH 121 SH 18a 2T04 LANESSH 121 SH 183 2T04LANES 􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀧." ., 􀁾..... ,:..􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠.• ..."".':... ..." ...._.".,:,;;,.•.-.m...s . j,...􀁾􀀠:••• 􀀬􀁽􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀭••-••-"".􀂷􀀻􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀢􀀠. '".:'",.,,'.-=....... ',.:' 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀢􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁕 􀁉􀁯􀁬􀁟􀁡􀁲􀁲.. · LON STEVENSON RO 2T0-4lANES SHt;LBVM LON STEVENSON AD 2T04tANES SHEtBYRO . 􀀧􀀺􀁵􀀤􀁾􀁖􀀮'lilpsit: ',:-:': 􀁕􀀸􀁟􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀷􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀠ALTA MESA oTO 6 lANES (PASS)IH20 ALTA MESA oTO 6 lANES (PASS)IH20 􀁏􀀮􀁔􀀰􀀶􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀨􀁐􀁾'I, • ". g.-TOe ... 16S1J .. ,... ,...53 '90' ;.. 63 1900 􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠,."" '" 925 ,....'" 􀀻􀁾􀀠.44_1 ..., ., 50 ,.... 47 .."".",. .. 04 ."'. '. 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀱., ... woo:' ..26 41 ,.... 9006:"'" .. ''''!1.. ''''!1.. 6533 50 """ ... 1125 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀠50 .." IS:! 46" .55 32.. . 50 32,... 2124 2124• 2124•"'" so .... so• .... 50 "'3\\ 50. ..,. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR 11_ "... '704 ... "04 .... .... ..,. "'. ,.". 2124 2124 9115195 30 •• •• DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOLITAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) PROJECT COST FEDERALAND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEARWESTERN SUBREGION FEDERAL ....,TO TOT ..... ,... ,...'00' SH 11<4 2T05 LANES{SEE4164) 3392 "",. 2 TO 6 lANES (SEE 4164) 3392SH11. "" .." . ,'l37 .,....·:..􀀧􀀻􀁴􀁣􀁩􀁾􀀬􀁴􀁁􀁎􀁓􀀤􀂷􀀧􀀠.􀁓􀁴􀁬􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀠.􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀱􀀬􀀻􀀺􀀠 "" lE INT) , 􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾.... 􀀮􀂷􀁾􀀷􀀠4 TOst.AHESSH 114 SH 26 .'" 4 TO S lANESSHl1-48H 26 .'"",' 􀂷􀀢􀀬􀀺􀁩􀀬􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁳􀀠.;,60 •􀁾􀀧􀁦􀁲􀀠􀁾􀁳􀁲􀀠􀁩􀁔􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢. eO "31150 ..BROADW'A.YAVElLONGAV'E LOOP820 2 TO e LANES (PIISS) "".. B'F'tONN/AY AVElLONa AVE lOOP 820 2To fllANEs (PASS) .. ...,. 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁦􀁎􀁅􀁒􀁦􀀩􀁲􀀠. , 􀀧􀀻􀁈􀁦􀁴􀁾􀁥􀁇􀁔􀀠􀂷􀀮􀁔􀁏􀀮􀀤􀀬􀁾􀁓􀀠... .􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠';' 􀂷􀀿􀂷􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁩􀀻􀁩􀁪􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁩􀀻􀀧􀀠.0:. '...·,:fQ6,jANES •• ... lliOUSAHD OMS DR SH a ST07l1\NES "61) ,.... 􀂷􀂷􀁊􀁴􀁦􀁾􀀲􀀹􀀻􀀺􀀬􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠"" .. ,,.,,ST07 LANES ,... ·,7090􀂷􀀧􀂷􀀢􀀧􀀬􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁊􀁰􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁳􀀮􀀠.. 􀁾􀀩􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠'""", WHfTLEYAD AUFE SN!'lIO. 􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀨􀀠2 􀀮􀁔􀀶􀀺􀁻􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁓􀀠.... WA.TAUGARD 4TO a LANESIH020 !i226 ",.... • " o • • o o • ..., ..., '04' "0 ...,1964 N RICHlAND HILLS N RICHlAND HILLS RUFE SNOW DR """ WATAUGARD 4 TOfJLANES 70 " ....IHII20 '0451954 N RlCHt..ANO ttlt.1.S N RICHLAND HILLS RUFE SNOW DR DR ,atl' 4730 .... .. 4Hil 􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀽􀁾􀀻􀀢􀀠i" 􀀢􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁓􀀻􀁾 􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀠..rio SH 18"3 2T04U,NESSti121 3402118 RICHLAND HILLS 􀁾􀁄􀁈􀁬􀁴􀀮􀁌􀀸􀀠tiANOlEN-EOEfMLLERD '24 SH 18"3 2T04LAIIlESsH '212118 RICHLAND HILLS HANf,)l.EY-EOERVlU£ AD 340 ,35. 􀁅􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀮􀁅􀂣􀀮􀁒􀁉􀀱􀁜􀁬􀁇ON!:"( so .. , 􀀢􀀧􀁅􀁾􀁥􀁅􀁦􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁇ONLY: 200'" FoRT w:>RlH CBD ClESUANE FE¥IBUTY 59 .. soSH 121 EXT so FORT 'NORTH ceo ClEBURNE FEASIStUTY VARIOUS 410 TXOOTiFORf w:>R VARIOUS SH121 CffY 2723 TXDOT-WC>RTH GfWJE'v1NE 2723 TXDOT-W()ffiH GAAPEViNE 1818 TXDOTJGRAPf#VIN GRAPEVlNE/OOU. Hn& TXDOTIGRAPEVIM aAAPEVlNElCOlL .. 􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀻􀂷􀀠HURS:T Ft.I 3029 (PRECINCT UNE RO) KELL!:A WILSON LN 􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁭􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀮􀂷􀀬•.. 􀀢􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁬􀀺􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁃􀁎􀀠TXooT-FT WOR1li KELLER Ft-t 1709 TXDOT-FT 'NORTH KELLER .,.. 17" TXOOT-N WORTH KENNEDALE euS2&7 319/15/95 9115/95 ..., VARIOUS TRAVEL SURVEY DRAFT 1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -METROPOUTAN MOBILITY (STP-MM) PROJECT COST FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING BY FISCAL YEAR WESTERN SUBREGION e o JOe 100",e 11WKTIPSU8TOTAl.S I ,,,,,,,,,I 1515121 IHil9CJTIP 8U8l'OTAlS I 123ell I 1Ii287 I 111.... [ '00,.".[ 13,731 10,029 ...... • ...".\ 11,..,·1 􀁾􀀠21,020 I 15.710 0\ ...... 1 13,729 ,..... 1 20.'" I NOTES: First row of each project denotes programming in 1995 TIP; second row Is 1996 TIP proposal For those categories with '(FTA)' noted In the Project Description column. money noted In the 'CONSTR' column Indicates that the funds have been transferred to FTA. not necessarily that the project is under contract. 32 North Central Texas Council Of Governments TO: The Regional Transportation Council The Surface Transportation Technical Committee The Travel Demand Management Committee DATE: September 15, 1995 FROM: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation SUBJECT: Draft 1996 Transportation Improvement Program The development of the 1996 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is now at the point of final review and comment. A copy of the draft 1996 TIP is enclosed for your review. Many of the projects in the various funding programs have been modified. Most of the changes involve delays in the implementation schedule in order to meet the financial constraint requirements of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Other changes were made based on comments received through the public involvement process. In order to expedite the . review process so that the approval phase can remain on schedule, your immediate attention and participation in the TIP process is strongly encouraged. As indicated on the schedule enclosed as Attachment 1, a meeting is scheduled for Thursday. September 21,1995 at 9 a.m. in the NCTCOG Transportation Board Room. This meeting will allow the local government staffs to address specific concerns they have with the enclosed draft 1996 TIP, which has been balanced to available funds. Once comments are received, adjustments made, and the TIP is financially constrained, a final draft will be prepared for approval by each of the committees. The draft 1996 TIP is comprised of the following components: • Attachment 2 -These spreadsheets identify all of the projects contained in the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Program --Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM). They are sorteq by subregion, program, city, and project code. Each project is listed in double.entry format: the first row indicates the project attributes from the 1995 TIP, and the second row shows the project as proposed for the 1996 TIP. Because of a funding slowdown at the State level, many of the projects have been delayed as financial constraint requirements are met. Please review these projects in detail with the recognition that each program in the TIP must be financially constrained. • Attachment 3 -These listings contain all of the projects programmed for implementation by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Because of the significant amount of public involvement that occurred for these projects, we anticipate only minor, if any, changes to these programs. These programs are also financially constrained. 616 Six Flags Drive. Centerpoint Two p. O. Box 5888, Arlington, Texas 76005·5888 (817) 640·3300 FAX: 817·640-7806 @recYCled pape' Page Two September 15. 1995 The listings, which are based on TxDOT's Design and Construction Information System (DCIS). are sorted by subregion. fiscal year, and program. Three years of projects are represented. CMAQ and STP-MM projects are not included with this listing although they are entered in the DCIS. • Attachment 4 -The transit component of the 1996 TIP will be distributed at the September 21 meeting. • Attachment 5 -Regionally Significant. locally funded projects are inventoried annually to support the air quality conformity analysis of the TIP. These will be distributed at the September 21 meeting. Comments are welcome for any project or program in the draft 1996 Transportation Improvement Program through Thursday, September 21. Your assistance and participation is strongly encouraged. If you have any questions or require additional information. please call me, Everett Bacon, LaDonna Smith, or me at (817) 695-9240. Michael Monis, P.E. EB:kdc Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 1996 TRANSPORTATION IIIIIPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) September 15 September 21, 9:00 a.m. September 27, 1 :30 p.m. September 29,9:00 a.m. October 2 October 12 October 16 late October November 9 November 30 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Mail First Draft of 1996 TIP to RTC/SnCfTDMC SnCfTDMC TIP Meeting on First draft TDMC Meeting --Action on 1996 TIP snc Meeting --Action on 1996 TIP First Draft of 1996 TIP Due to TxDOT-Austin RTC Action on 1996 TIP Contingent on Conformity Results Final 1996 TIP Due to TxDOT-Austin Public Meetings on Air Quality Conformity Analysis RTC Action on Conformity Texas Transportation Commission Approval of 1996 STIP RTC -Regional Transportation Council snc -Surface Transportation Technical Committee TDMC -Travel Demand Management Committee ATTACHMENT 3 ROADWAY PROGRAM SELECTION RESPONSIBILITY 17 Principal Arterial Street System (PASS}Austin .. Enhancement projects prioritized by MPO and selected by TxDOT Austin TRANSIT PROGRAM SELECTION RESPONSIBILITY 3 Conaress 9 MPO 16 MPO & TxDOT Districts 18 TxDOT Districts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALlAS·FORT WORTH MPO Friday, September 15,1995FYI996 􀀭􀁎􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁏􀁒􀁄􀁅􀁳􀁔􀁇􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭COMr;;ENTS------rnSTRiCf--FED:-PROG FEDERAL ST. CAT. STATE LOCATION (TO) COUNTY# LOCATION (FROM) PHASE LOCAL Q..S_,L _____ 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁾􀁑􀁛􀁾___________ Ml"..Q. __ _ TOTAL 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭IH35E IH-M 61 DALLAS 1.14MILE SOUTH OF FM 2181, SOUTH 2 18,000 NORTH END OF SB HICKORY CREEK BRIDGE ODENTON 0196-01-06S 4 C REPLACE EXISTING MEDIAN RAIL WITH 0.804 1106 $ 180,000$---72:324 􀁾􀀯􀀱􀀲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭IH35E IH-M 61 DALLAS 8,036NORTH END OF SB HICKORY CREEK 1 2 0.6 MILE SOUTH C ODENTON REPLACE EXISTING MEDIAN RAIL WITH 4 0.549 1106 $ 80,361 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀶􀀱􀁩􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀯􀁏􀁏􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭IH35EDALLAS IH-M 57 IH 30 EASTBOUND 68,200 DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY 1 2 5 o o DALLAS 0196-03-173 C TEMPORARILY CONVERT EXISTING 1.700 1106 $ 682,000 DALLAS $--2',762,001IH35W IH-M 95/10 TARRANT CO LINE61 2 306,895 DRY FORK HICKORY CRK BR 1 o DENTONC4 0081-13-029 12.665 1106 $ 3,068,957 DALlAS 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁃􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____ _ $18,400,000 96/07IH30 NHS-M 57 0.34 MI W OF BELTLINE RD 4,600,000 0,24 MI W OF BOBTOWN RD 3A 4 C o 0009-11-167 RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN AS 8 LANE 1.756 $ 23,000,000 DALlAS 1106 $-4',640,000US 380 NHS·TTS 96/08 DENTONC/L43 3 3B 1,160,000 SH289 2 C o MCKINNEY 0135-1Hl12 WIDEN TO 4 LANE DIVIDED RURAL SECTION 2.100 $ 5,600,000 DALLAS 1106 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁭􀁯􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀳􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭SH 161 NHS-MIS 57 WALNUT HILL LN 146,925 MACARTHUR BLVD 2 3E o IRVINGCOV CONSTRUCT NOISE WALL 4 AND 5 o C 2.970 1106' $ 734,625 $-'5,594',500 96/08DALLAS VA STP·TE 57 VARIOUS LOCATIONS DOWNTOWN DALLAS o o 48o 2,755,800 FEDERAL COST IS 0918-45-199 C FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN 0.001 1106 $ 8,350,000 􀀵􀁾􀁅􀀨􀀩􀀺􀁏􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁾􀁬􀀺􀀿􀁅􀁾􀁌__ DAUlAS $---00,000 96/06CS STP-SA 57 FOREST AVENUE AT UP RAILROAD IN 10,000 (DOT 7a36585) o 4A o DALLAS 0918-45-218 Co RAILROAD SIGNALS 0.001 1106 $ 100,000$---00,000CSDALLAS STP-SA 96106 57 DEXHAM ROAD AT DGNO RAILROAD IN o 10,000 (DOT #415228y) 4A o C o ROWLETT 0918-45-910 RAILROAD SIGNALS 0.001 1106 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------DALLAS LP 12 STP..sA $ 85,500 96/07 57 AT CHENAULT IN THE CITY OF DALLAS 9,500o 4A C oo 0581-1)1-101 0.000 1106 $ 95,000􀁟􀀡􀀮􀀢􀀡􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁃􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀬􀀡􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀺􀁬􀀮􀀮􀁾__ $--17,902 96103--------VADALLAS STP-TE 57 LANCASTER MK&T DEPOT 7 o .0 4B C 7,672 LANCASTER MK&T DEPOT REHABILITATION0918-45-219 0.001 1106 L __􀀲􀀳􀁾􀁾􀀠DALlAS STP-RM $ 3,680,000 96/08 43 FM544 E CITY LIMITS OF PLANO 5 920,000 FM2551 43 DALLAS 57 D094-ll7'{)27 DALLAS 71 0172-S-090 FM 1827 FM545 US3S0 SeAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FM 2478 FM1461 STONE BRIDGE DRIVE SeAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FM FM489 FM 1461 SeAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FM3364 FM982 LAKE LAVON SEAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FM543 FM489 SH5 SEAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FM982 FM545 LAKE LAVON SEAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SH78 BS-78D (NORTH) BS-78E (NORTH) SEAL COAT AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS US 267 BROADHEAD ROAD 0.5 MILE EAST OF SUBINESS 287-R 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀬􀁟􀀧􀀽􀀧􀀡􀀺􀀿􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁖􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡� �􀀢􀀡􀁐______ US 287 0.5 MILE EAST OF BUSINESS 2B7·R COTTONWOOD BRANCH 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀮􀁏􀀡􀀧􀀱􀁟􀀧􀀽􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁾______ US 75 WILSON CRKBR SH121 CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR US75 GRAYSON CO LINE WILSON CRK BR CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR SH 183 GRAWYLER ROAD CONC PAVEMENT AND CONC MEDIAN US 267 MIDLOTHIAN SARDIS 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁉􀀳􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀡􀁟􀀺􀀮􀀡􀀧 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀡􀀮􀁔􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀡􀀮􀁇􀁾__ _ US2ff1 SPUR 394 BROADHEAD ROAD 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁏􀀡􀀧􀀡􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁉􀀳􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀡􀁟􀀺􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀡􀀮􀁇􀁾__ _ FY 1996 -pjii6IiD---F.CLASS LANES _I,!;!i\!f.!:l____ 0 0 10.795 0 0 6.437 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭0 0 5.965 0 0 2.715 0 0 10.115 0 0 2.937 0 0 9.652 2 4 3.891 2 4 3.477 2 0 2.224 2 0 15.600 0 0 0.001 0 0 4.352 0 0 4.008 FED-:-PkOG ST. CAT. PHASE!!1E.Q.. ___ PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1105 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 PM 7 C 1106 Friday. September 15, 1996 FEDEruQ--COMMENTS-----$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭STATE LOCAL 􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁟􀁟􀀠$ 0 96102 141,248 o $ 141,248 84.236 o 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀀭􀀭􀀭$ 0 96/02 76,062 o $ 78,062$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭53,011 o $ 53,011$-----0 􀁏􀁏􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭132,o $ 132,$-----0 57,265 o $ 57,265$------0 170,399 o $ 170,399$------0 326,300 96102 96102 95105 o ENNIS $ 326,300$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭306,700 o ENNIS $ 306,700$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭28,652 o $ 2B,B52$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭200,000 o 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------$ 0 95111 50,000 o $ 50,000$-----0 􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭100.000 o 􀁾__ 􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁯􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀠$ 0 96/03 326,300 o 􀁌􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁊􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀠PHASE: 􀁅􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁇􀁉􀁎􀁅􀁅􀁒􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀬􀀠C=CON STRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALLAS-FORT WORTH MPO FY 1_ Friday, September IS, 1995 -DiSTRiC'F---NAMEORDEsIGNATIciN------------PRoliO---FEO-:-fiROG ------FEDERAL COMMENTS-----COUNTY/! LOCATION (FROM) F. CLASS ST. CAT. STATE <;<.Sl ______ DALu\S LOCATION (TO) _􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁾􀁐􀁂􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁧􀁡􀁾__________ _ U5287 u\NES _􀁌􀁅􀀡􀁦􀁾􀁔􀁊􀀺􀁌__ _ PHASEM!'.Q. __ _ PM LOCAL TOTAL$-----0 96/03 71 COTTONWOOD BRANCH o 7 306.700 SPUR 394 o C o 0172-07-022 DALLAS SH34 3.542 1106 PM $ 306,700$------0 96/03 71 TRINITY RIVER o 7 285,000 COUNTYRDAD o C o 0173-01-039 DALu\S 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁾 􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁃􀀡􀁾􀀨􀁾􀁹􀀵􀁾􀁾􀁾_________ US 57 2.000 1106 PM $ 285,000$-----0 􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭57 COOPER STREET o 7 24,112 KlEST o C o 0261-02-046 DALu\S FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE SP346 0.001 1106-----PM $ 24,112$-----0 􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭57 AT O'CONNOR o 7 7,500 o C o 0353-!J4.071 DALu\S CONC PAVEMENT AND CONC MEDIAN SH 114 0.001 1106-----PM $ 7.500$'-----0 95/11 57 AT ROCHELLE o 7 8,200 o C o 0J53.06..035 DALu\S CONC PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE MEDIAN IH35E 0.001 1106 PM $ 8,200 $'-----0 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭57 OVERTON o 7 10,334 BELT LINE ROAD o C o 0442-02-113 DALLAS FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE------------------------LP 12 0.001 1106 PM $ 10,334$------0 96/05 57 NORTH END OF TRINITY RIVER BRIDGE 1 7 1,938,457 S.H.114 o C o 0581-02-094 DALU\5 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____ _ LP 12 3.980 1106 PM $ 1,938.457$'-----0 95/08 57 IH30 o 7 821,139 SHI80 o C o 0581-02-096-------DALLAS FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE------------------------FM664 0.001 1106 PM $ 821,139$'-----0 􀁾􀀯􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭71 RED OAK CREEK o 7 94,000 BU287 o C o 1051-01-028-------DALU\S 􀁟􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀡􀀱􀁅􀁴􀀡􀀮􀁔􀁟􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾__ _ IH30 8.574 1106 PM $ 94.000$'-----0 95/06 57 WESTMORELAND ROAD o 7 51,195 POSTAL WAY o C o DALU\S FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE---------------------7--FM879 0.001 1106-----I'M $ 51,195$'-----0 􀁾􀀯􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭71 FM 1722 o 7 93,000 FM813 o C o 1159-02-028 DALu\S 􀁟􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀼􀀺􀀮􀁃􀁬􀀡􀁜􀀺􀀡􀀺� �􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀡􀀱􀁾􀁴􀀡􀀮􀁔􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁇􀁾__ _ FM 1389 8.757 1106-----PM 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁹􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------$ 0 96/01 130 US 175 5 7 91,478 END OF STATE MAINTENANCE o C o 1395-01-014 DALu\S SEAL COAT FMSS 6.687 1106-----PM $ 91,478$'-----0 96102 71 US 77 o 7 111,000 SH34 o C o 1451-01-019 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀡􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁔􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾__ _ 10.450 1106 􀁌􀁟􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀠____ ________ DALu\S IH20 PM $ 0 95/06 57 CARRIER PARKWAY o 7 9,947 POLK STREET EXIT RAMP o C o 2374-04-037 FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE 0.001 1106 􀁾___􀁾􀁾􀀴􀀮􀀿􀀧􀀮􀀠PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___________ _ -------------------------- -----------------------------____ ___ -------------DlSTRiC'f--COUNTY# 9,.&,,1 ______ DALLAS 51 :l()[)(H)1.(lfl DALLAS 130 3039-01-008 DALLAS 61 2681-01-006 DALLAS 71 1317'()3-017 DALLAS 61 0619.()5.031 DALLAS 51 2374.QI-909 DALLAS 43 0047-09-025 DALLAS 199 DALLAS 51 0197-02-079 DALLAS 43 0047-14-044 DALLAS 51 061B-OO.o4O DALLAS 57 0048-01-049 DALlAS 57 1047.()2'()31 DALLAS 57 -NAMEOROesfuNATIciN--- --------LOCATION (FROM) 􀁟􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁦􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾___________ SP408 NEAR MERGE NORTH OF IH 20 SOUTH OF IH 20 FULL-DEPTH REPAIR OF EXISTING CONCRETE FM 3039 US 175 FI399 SEAL COAT FM2499 FM 1171 IN FLOWER MOUND FM 407 AT CHINN CHAPEL RD CONSTRUCT NEW 2-LANE FM HIGHWAY FM 1722 PRESTON RD IN ENNIS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭FM544 INTERSECTION OF FM 544 WITH JOSEY INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭IH635 SH 76 IN GARLAND TRAFFIC SIGNALS RIVERCREST BLVD IN ALLEN TRAFFIC SIGNAL SH68 ON FANNIN ST AT KAUFMAN ST IN ROCKWALL REPLACE FLASHING BEACON US17S LAKE JUNE RD IN DALLAS AND HALL ST IN SEAGOVILLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS US 75 US 380 GRAYSON CO LINE GUIDE SIGN REFURBISHING VA 2 INTERSECTIONS IN DALLAS DISTRICT TRAFFIC SIGNALS SH342 CEDARDALE STANFORD CONSTRUCTION OF LEFT TURN BAYS AND 􀁆􀁍􀀱􀁾􀀠DUNCANVlLLR RD IN CEDAR HILL REPLACE EXISTING FLASHING BEACON MH ON MACARTHUR BLVD AT SH 161 FRTG RDS IN IRVING TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALLAS-FORT WORTH MPO Friday, September 15,1995 cOMiia.rTS-----95106 95101 96105 FLOWER MOUND 96101 FY 19S6 o o a.OOl 5 o 4.039 o o 2.900 o o 0.001 a o 0.001 o o 0.001 o o 0.001 9 o o 0,001 o o 0.001 o o 12.000 o o 0.001 FEoERArSTATE LOCAL TOTAL$'-----'0 3,_ o 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0 61,663 o $ 61,663$------'0 4,255,000 o 􀁾􀁟􀀵􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0 68,000 o $ 65,000 FED-MOG ST. CAT, PHASE M!:Q.. ___ PM 7 C 􀀡􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭PM 7 C 1106 FM-NEW 8B C 1106 10 10 C 1106 10 10 C 1106 10 10 C 110610----10 C 1106' 10 10 C 1106 10 10 C 1106 10 10 C 1106 10 10 C 1106 $'-----'0 􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭50,000 o $ 0 96104 100,000 o $ 100,000.$'-----'0 95/12--------45,000 o 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀂧􀁾$ 0 25,000 o 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠$ 0 200,000 o $ 200,000$'-----'0 540,000 o $ 540,000 $ 0 100,000 o $ 100,000 96112 96102 95/04--------95110 95111 96102 95112 IRVING 3 o 2.000 0 o 0,001 3 0 0.001 10-----$"-----0 10 97,200 C 0 !1E6 . 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠10 $ 0 10 25,000 C 0 !1E6____ L __􀁾􀁾􀀠DISCR $ 0 11 100,000 C o 1106 PHASE; E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 6 ----------------_ __________ _ ----------------------------------------------------------------___________ _ TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DAULAS -rnSTRiCf--COUNTYtI 􀁾􀁳􀁬______ DAUAS S'l 0009-21.,()Q9 DALLAS 199 DALLAS 71 DALLAS 57 0581"()1·0B9 DALLAS S'l 0916-45-251 DALLAS S'l 0009..03-025 DALLAS 43 0047..()6..()97 DALLAS 43 0047..()6..()B9 DALLAS S'l 3547..02..003 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭DALLAS 61 3547..()3..()02 DAULAS S'l 0047..()7-150 DALLAS 61 3547.01..004 DALLAS 57 091s..oo.oo7 DALLAS 71 0815..08..019 DALLAS·FORT WORTH MPO 􀀭􀁷􀁷􀁅􀁏􀁒􀁄􀁾􀁦􀁵􀁎􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭LOCATION (FROM) LOCATION (TO) 􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁔􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁗􀁑􀁛􀁾􀀠BS6S-D MAIN STREET SHOO WIDEN FROM 2 LANE TO 4 LANE WITH FLUSH 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭SHaa FM 1141 IN ROCKWALL FM 546 IN ROYSE CITY REPLACE BRIDGES US 77 0.16 MILES SOUTH OF INDIAN DRIVE US 287 CONSTRUCT RIGHT TURN LANE AND LP12 AT FIVE MILE CREEK MODIFY EXISTING BRIDGE AND WIDEN MH 0.164 MI E OF IH 635 0.184 MI E OF IH 635 RECONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭SHOO COUNTRY CLUB RD ROCKWALL CO LINE (DALROCK RDJ WIDEN TO SLANE DIVIDED URBAN SECTION US 75 0.1 MI N OF BETHANY RD S OFSH 121 ADD TWO ADDITIONAL LANES US 75 0.1 MI N OF BETHANY RD S OF SH 121 REHABILITATE ROADWAY AND ADD TWO DENTON CO LINE, EAST DENTON TAP RD (FRTG RDS) 􀁟􀁾􀀼􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁎􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁒􀀮􀀮􀀧􀀺􀁬􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀼􀁉􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉􀂧􀀡􀁾􀁉􀂧􀀮􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁉􀁌__ SH121 SH 121 N OF DENTON CREEK, E DALLAS CO LINE (FRTG RDS) 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁒􀀮􀀮􀀧􀀺􀁬􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀼􀁉􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉􀂧􀀡􀁾􀁉􀂧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁓􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁇􀀡􀀮􀀡􀀡___ US 75 SPUR 366 MIDPARKRD US 75 SURVEILLANCE SH 121 EOFIH35E EXISTING SH 121 NEAR FM 544 (FRTG ROB) 􀁟􀁾􀀼􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁒􀀮􀀮􀀧􀀺􀁬􀀮􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁽􀀧􀁾􀁉􀂧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁇􀀡􀀮􀀡􀀡___ VA VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE DALLAS USP FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 FM 683 FM875 US 287 IN MIDLOTHIAN RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN ROADWAY FYI996 PROJ.ID F.CLASS LANES _tJ;t:!@J.!L ___ o o 0.260 9 5 o 8.360 o o O.S'lS 3 a 0,050 o o 0.020 3 2 5.133 2 4 4.900 2 o 4.900 3 o 1,000 3 o 0.500 2 8 10.000 3 o 5.289 4 o 0.001 o 2 4,940 11 C 1108 DISCR 11 C 1108 DISCR 11 C 1108 DISCR 11 C 1106 DISCR 11 C 1108 STRAT 12 C 1108 STRAT 12 C 1100 STRAT 12 C 1108 13 13 C 1100 13 13 C 1108 13 13 C 1108 13 13 C 1108 URBAN 130 C !.1.Q6____ REHAB 14 C 1100 FEDEifJiI-STATE LOCAL TOTAL$-----0 S'l2,ooo o iI... __􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0 654,400 o $ 654,400$-----0 320,000 o iI... __􀁾􀀲􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠$ 0 999,000 o $ 865,000 Friday, Septemberl5,1999 COMMENTS 96/01 ROWLETT 96100 96/04 96/05 DALLAS $-----0 􀁾􀁾􀁯􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭19,864 o iI... __ 􀁊􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 13,183,581 96109 16,088,821 o GARLAND $ 29,252,402 $--'9.300:000 96100 2,340,000 o $ 11,700,000 $-12.735,000 96/06 15,999,000 o $ 28,300,000$-----0 ;iw--------8,800.000 o $ 8,800,000$-----0 􀀻􀁾􀀷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭5,200,000 ODENTON $ 5,200,000$-----0 􀁾􀁩􀁭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭400,000 o DALLAS iI... __ 􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0 51,877,872 o $ 51,877,872 $-2,752,416 688,104 o 􀁩􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀠$ 0 2,100,000 o 􀁌􀀳􀀬􀀡􀀬􀁏􀁅􀀬􀁾􀀠96/02 95111 96/04 PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 7 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___________ _ TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALLAS-FORT WORTH MPO Friday, Sep!elnber 15, 1995FYI996 -ffiSTRiC'f---NAMEORDEsfuNATION-----------FEDERAL-CO-MMENTr----FED:-PROG LOCATION (FROM) ST. CAT. STATE LOCATION (TO) COUNTY# LOCALPHASE'<-sJ. _____ _ MEQ. __ _􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁾􀀹􀁦􀁾􀀲􀁾􀁾___________ TOTAL$------0US 175 REHABDALLAS 95105 57 1,500,000SPUR 310 2 14 GRAND AVENUE 6 C o OVERLAY EXISTING URBAN FREEWAY 2.687 1106 $ 1,500,000$-----0 􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭MISC 57 IH35EDALLAS 16o oAT SH 335 C 320,986 DALLAS 0196-03-168 10 0,100 1106PAVEMENT WIDENING AND 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------CS MISCDALLAS $ 0 95/12 IN DALLAS ON GREENVILLE AVENUE 1657 3 o AT CARUTH HAVEN o C 1,660,000 DALLAS 0918-45-187 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR DART 0.160 $ 1,660,0001106 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠$-----0DALLAS FM 1192 MISC 95109 61 FM 1192 AT UP RR IN IN PILOT POINT o 16 18,260 (DOT 79586R) o C o 0816-06-900 RAILROAD CROSSING REPLANK 0.000 1106 $ 16,260 DALLAS $-----0 􀁾􀁾􀁯􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭FM455 MISC 43 AT THROCKMORTON CRK 5 16 o o C,E,R 542,000 MC KINNEY 0816-04-032 REVIEW PLANS AND ADMINISTER 1106 $ 542,00000400 $-----0DALLAS FM551 9 MISC 96109 199 FM551 ATDGNO RR IN FATE o 16 14,400 (DOT Y415207F) oo C 1016-01-900 RAILROAD CROSSING REPLANK 0.000 1106 $ 14,400$-----0DALLAS FM679 MISC 95109 71 FM 679 AT SPT RR IN GARRETT 16 11,341o (DOT 765544L) C oo 􀁾__􀁊􀁾􀁾1159-02-901 RAILROAD CROSSING REPLANK 1106·0.001 DALLAS SH 121 MISC $ 0 95109 61 SH 121 AT UP RR IN LEWISVILLE 43,200o 16 (DOT U414717F) oCo RAILROAD CROSSING REPLANK 0.000 1106 $ 43,200$-----0 􀁾􀁾􀁯􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭DALLAS US 75 MISC 57 100,000AT BELTLINE ROAD o 16 IN RICHARDSON C oo 0047-07-901 LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS 0.001 1106 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0DALLAS FM544 MISC 95103 43 ATFM1378 4 16 o o C 1,500,000 0619-03-900 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 0.001 1106 $ 1,500,000$-----0 􀁾􀁾􀁯􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭DALLAS IH635 MISC 57 125,000MESQUITE SOUTH CITY LIMITS o '6 MESQUITE NORTH CITY LIMITS o C o LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS 11062374-02-0B7 7.182 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 0DALLAS PASSMH 95/12 1,540,64957 IN FARMERS BRANCH ON LUNA RD (MH 757) o 18 FR PARKWEST BLVD TO VALLEY VIEW LN C o FARMERS BRANCH2 11068037-18-001 RECONST GR SiRS & SURF 0.565 􀁌􀀧􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C.CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 8 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALLAs-FORT WORTH MPO FYl997 􀁆􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀬􀁓􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁭􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀱􀀵􀀬􀀱􀀹􀀹􀀵􀀠-DlSTRiCr--􀀭􀁾􀁍􀁅􀁏􀁒􀁄􀁅􀁳􀁦􀁵􀁎􀁁􀁦􀁬􀁯􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭-ffioJiD---Fw-:-f fiOG FEDERAL-COMMENTS-----COUNTY# LOCATION (FROM) F. CLASS ST. CAT. STATE 􀀹􀀮􀀮􀁾______ LOCATION (TO) _􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁦􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾___________ LANES_LJilitIT!:I____ PHASE 􀁍􀁾􀀨􀁌__ LOCAL 􀁉􀁑􀀮􀁔􀁾􀁬___ DALLAS IH35E IH-M $ 2,790,000 95111 '57 OAKLAWN AVENUE 1 2 310,000 MOCKINGBIRD LANE 10 C o DALLAS 0196-03-169 _􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀡􀀡􀁓􀀡􀁾􀀼􀀿􀀮􀀰􀀮􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀲􀁾􀁅􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁁􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁬􀁎􀁬 􀀺􀁾􀁾__ 3.409 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭1109-----􀁌􀀡􀁏􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠____________ DALLAS FM 1382 NHs-M $ 5,060,000 96 1 12 57 LP 303, S 3 3A 2,020,000 IH20 2 C o GRAND PRAIRIE 1047-O:W38-------DALLAS WIDEN TO 6 LANE DI\IIDED URBAN SECTION ------------------------IH30 2.600--------1106-----NHS-M $ 10,100,000$'-23',200,000 9611;--------57 IH635 1 3A 5.800,000 0.34 MI W OF BEL TLiNE RD 4 C o DALLAS OQ09.11-138-------RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN AS 8 LANE 2.406--------1106 -----$ 29,000,000 DALLAS US3BO NH5-TTS 􀀤􀀧􀀭􀀵􀁾􀀬􀁏􀁏􀀹􀀠􀁾􀀯􀁏􀁏􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭43 0.2 MILE EAST OF SP RR 3 3B 1,470,992 WEST OF FM 1827 2 C o MC KINNEY 0135-0:W37 DALLAS CONSTRUCT 4 LANE RURAL AND 6 LANE SHI90 1.700 --------1106-----NHS-MIS 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀿􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------$ 5,600,000 95112 57 AT BN RR, WEST OF KELLY RD 2 3E 1.400,000 0 C o DALLAS DRAINAGE SYSTEM 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭LP 12 0.001--------1106 -----NHS-R $ 7,000,000 $-2,491,200 95108 '57 FROM WEST OF SH 310 3 3C 622,600 EAST OF THE SP RAILROAD 4 C o 0581-01-090 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 0.586 --------1106-----􀁾􀁟􀀡􀁏􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠DALLAS US 390 NHS-TTS $ 9,304,000 '57103 43 WOFFM1827 3 3B 2,326,000 PRINCETON 2 C o 􀀰􀀱􀀳􀀵􀀭􀀰􀁾􀀠-------CONSTRUCT 4 LANES WITH CONTINUOUS ------------------------5.510-----1106' $ 11,630,000 DALLAS US 360 NHS-TTS 􀀤􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀠􀁾􀀬􀁗􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭43 PRINCETON 3 3B 1,408,000 W SIDE OF LAKE LAVON 2 C o 0135-04-018 . --------DAlLAS WIDEN TO 4 LANE DIVIDED RURAL -IHZO--------------------3.200 --------1106 -----NHS-MIS $ 7,040,000$'--440,000 95112 '57 AT J.J.LEMMON 1 3E 110,000 0 C o 2374-0:w43 CONSTRUCT EXIT AND ENTRANCE RAMP 0.500 --------1106-----􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------DALLAS SH78 STP-SA $ 230,760 95106 '57 IH635 3 4A 26,640 FOREST LANE IN GARLAND 4 C o GARLAND OOOQ.02-048-------DALLAS RELOCATE LUMINAIRE SUPPORTS FROM ------------------------SH78 3,319--------1106 -----STP-UM $ 256,_$'-'3,440,000 96100--------43 NORTH CITY LIMITS OF SACHSE 3 4D 860,000 FM544 2 C o PLANO 0281-02-047 WIDEN TO 4 LANE DIVIDED RURAL ------------------------1.300 --------1106 -----$ 4,300,000 DALLAS VA STP-TE 􀀤􀀧􀀭􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀷􀁾􀀠􀀹􀀶􀁾􀀲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭71 NE BORDER-US 287, BORDER-2 COLLEGE 2 4B o NW BORDER-S ROGERS ST.-SW BORDER 0 C 326,643 FEDERAL COST IS 091&-22-049 DALLAS ELLIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE FM428 0.001--------1106-----STP-RE $ 1,555,443 $'-l,Oiio,ooo 1,226,443AND LOCAL -----------95/08 61 2.2 MILES WEST OF AUBREY CITY LIMITS 5 4F 270,000 FM 3524 IN AUBREY 2 C o . 0081-05-032 -------DALLAS WIDEN EXISTING ROADWAY FM42B 2.273 --------1106 -----STP-RE $ 1,350,000$'--312.000 97103 61 FM 3524 IN AUBREY 5 'IF 78,000 US 377 2 C o 0917-01-017 . WIDEN EXISTING ROADWAY 0.644--------1106-----􀁾__􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀬􀁬􀁏􀂣􀀠PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 9 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . DALLAS DALLAS-FORT WORTH MPO FY 1997 Friday, Septemberl5,1995 -DiSTRiC'f--􀀭􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁗􀁅􀁏􀁒􀁯􀁾􀁦􀁵􀁎􀁁􀁮􀁏􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭-PiioT.iD---FED-:-PROG FEDERAL-COMiiENTS------COUNTYtI LOCATION (FROM) F. CLASS ST. CAT. STATE «.Sl ______ DALLAS LOCATION (TO) 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁦􀁗􀀹􀁾􀁾___________ US eo LANES 􀁟􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁾􀁬􀀺􀀡___ _ PHASE 􀁍􀁾􀁑􀀮􀀮__ _ STP-RE LOCAL TOTAL $-i,4iio,ooo 96111 51 BELT LINE ROAD, EAST 2 4F 820,000 SH3S2 4 C o 0095-02-081 -------DALLAS 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅____ _ FM455 1.967 1106 STP-5A $ 3,100,000 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀶􀁳􀀰􀀠􀀰􀀰􀀯􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭51 AT CURVE 0.4 MILES EAST OF 5 4A 5,660 WISE COUNTY LINE 2 C o CONSTRUCT PAVED SHOULDERS 0.200 1106 􀁌􀁟􀀳􀁾􀁾􀀠DALLAS FM407 STP-5A $ 31,950 96105 61 AT 2.7 MILES WEST OF IH35W 5 4A 3,550 2 C o 1310-01-(132 CONSTRUCT PAVED SHOULDERS 0.100 1106 L __􀁾􀁾􀀠DALLAS SH310 BROO-O $ 539,200 96108 57 OVERPASS AT LOOP 12 3 5A 134,500 4 C o DALLAS DALLAS REHABILITATE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES SH34 0.093--------o 1106 BROO-O $ 574,000 $-3,933,7ii7 96106 130 AT TRINITY RIVER AND LEVEE S 4 SA 983,445 2 C o ENNIS 0173-;)2-027 REPLACE BRIDGES AND APPROACHES 0.540 1106 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀱􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠____________ 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠DALLAS SHOO 9 BRDG-O $ 478,240 96101 199 AT BOIS D ARC CREEK AND DRAWS 5 SA 119,560 2 C o ROCKWALL_MOVED REPLACEIREHABILITATE BRIDGES AND 0.222 1106 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭DALLAS SH78 BRDG-Q $ 1,260,500 96105 51 AT DUCK CREEK 3 6A 315,200 4 C o GARLAND DALLAS REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES CR 0.190 1106-----BRDG-OF 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀡􀀭􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀬􀁾$ 90,000 -----------97 I 08 51 AT TRIBUTARY EAST FORK TRINITY RIVER 7 6B o 2 C,E 20,000 DALLAS COUNTY 0918-45-923 DALLAS REPLACE BRI DGE AND APPROACHES FMOO 0.063 1106 BRDG-O $ 100,000$--152,000 00112--------71 AT SOUTH FORK OF CHAMBERS CREEK 5 SA 38,000 2 C o WAXAHACHIE REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROAHCES 0.074 1106 􀁾__ 􀀡􀀬􀀬􀀹􀁃􀀺􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀠____________ DALLAS SH352 BRDG-O $ 516,000 96111 51 OVERPASS OF T & P RAILROAD 4 SA 144,000 2 C o DALLAS REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES 0.108 1106 $ 720,000 DALLAS CR BRDG-QF 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀯􀁏􀁏􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭43 AT ELM FORK 7 6B o 1 C,E 7,644 COLLIN COUNTY 0918-24-901-------DALLAS REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES SH 310 0.062 1106 -----BRDG-O $ 38,220$""-""5,600,000 􀀹􀀷􀀯􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭57 AT TRINITY RIVER 3 SA 1,400,000 2 C o 0092-02-098 REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES 0.573 1106 􀁾􀁟􀁉􀀮􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠____________ 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭DALLAS CR BRDG-OF $ 72,000 97103 43 ON CR820AT BRUSHY CREEK 6 58 o 1 C,E 18,000 0918-24-904 REPLACE BRIDGE 0.001 1106 􀁾___􀀹􀁃􀀺􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀠____________ DALLAS FM2170 10 $ 0 97106 43 AT FOUNTAIN GATElHILLSIDE ST IN ALLEN o 10 65,000 o C o TRAFFIC SIGNALS 0.001 1106 􀁾__􀀳􀁾􀁾􀀠____________ PHASE: E=ENG1NEERING, C=CONSTRUCnON, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALLA5-FORT WORTH MPO -DiSTRiC'f--COUN1Y# «.!!,!-----DALLAS 61 156N)2-C14 DALLAS 61 0061-C4-028 DALLAS fil 8079-16-005 DALLAS fil 0047-C7·900 DALLAS 71 0172-C5-064 DALLAS 57 0561-Cl-C88 DALLAS 43 0135-03-031 DALLAS 0916-00-008 DALLAS fil 0561-C1-C79 DALLAS 57 -NAMEORDESfuNATION-----------LOCATION (fROM) 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁅􀁾􀁑􀁒􀁾___________ FM423 S OF STEWART CREEK N OF NORTH COLONY BLVD RECONSTRUCT EXISTING 2·LANE ROADWAY US 377 IH 35E, SOUTH COLLINS ST IN DENTON RECONSTRUCT AN EXISTING FOUR LANE MH IN DALLAS ON ROYAL LANE FROM STREET TO AU DELIA ROAD EXTEND ROYAL LANE ON NEW lOCATION AS US 75 NORTH Of MONTICELLO AVE SOUTH OF MCCOMMAS BLVD CONSTRUCT A SOUND BARRIER WALL ALONG U5267 0.3 MI N OF FM 876 FM678 REPLACE EXISTING INTERSECTION LP 12 BONNIE VIEW LN WOFIH45 RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 US 380 MeDONAlDST 0.2 MI E OF SP RR IN MCKINNEY CONSTRUCT 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY VA VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE DALLAS US? FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997 12 OVERPASS AT SP RAILROAD REHABILITATE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES MH IN IRVING ON ROYAL LANE FROM VALLEY VIEW TO MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCT EXISTING 2·LANE RURAL *This project is not currently in the DCIS, , FY1997 FEo-:-P'ROG ST. CAT. PHASEM!:Q.. ___ DISCR o 11 o C 0.789 1106 DISCR o 11 o C 0.800 1106 DISCR o 11 2 C 0.260 1106 DISCR o 11 o C 0.250 1106 DISCR o 11 o C 0.300 1106 STRAT 3 12 C4 . 0.800 1106 STRAT 3 12 2 C 1106'0.620 URBAN 4 130 o C 0.001 1106 REHAB 3 14 4 C 0.126 1106 PASS 18o 2 C 0.760 1106 but will be added. FEoERArSTATE LOCAL TOTAL$-----0 1,241,409 o $ 1,241,409$-----0 500,000 1,500,000 $ 2,000,000 􀁆􀁲􀁩􀁤􀁡􀁹􀀬􀁾􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀱􀀵􀀬􀀠1995 COMMENi'S-----95111 THE COLONY 96111 DENTON $-----0 􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭� �􀀭fil5,ooo 350,000 DALLAS 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠-----------$ 0 96110 625,000 o $ 525,000$-----0 9911,--------79,440 o $ 79,440 $ -'1,260,000 1,540,000 o 􀁌􀀳􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠$ 810,000 990,000 o $ 1,800,000 $ -3,058,240 764,560 o $ 3,822,800$-----0 1,160,000 96101 97103 96111 001;--------o DALLAS $ 1,160,000$-----0 001;--------1,618,200 991,800 IRVING ACTUAL 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁬􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁆􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁇􀁟􀁓􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁔􀀵_ __ _ PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 11 ---------------------------------------------------TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DALLAS DALlAS-FORT WORTH MPO Frlday, SepkHnber15,1995FY 1999 FEDERAL-cOMtifENTS------PROJ.Io----OiSi"RiCf"--􀀭􀁾� �􀁅􀁏􀁒􀁄􀂧􀁲􀁇􀁎􀁁􀁮􀁏􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭FEo:-PROG F. CLASS ST. CAT. STATECOUNTY # LOCATION (FROM) LOCALLOCATION (TO) LANES PHASE 􀁾􀁳􀀬􀁊􀀮_____ _ 􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁦􀁾􀁧􀁒􀁾__________ _ _IJ'!,!-165 RECONSTRUCT PARTIAL INTERCHANGE & 0.961 $-'6,120,000 98/05TXDOT IH-MFORT WORTH IH35W 660,000TARRANT COUNTY LINE 2127 1 0.4 MI NORTH OF BETHESDA RD C,E,R o4 0014-03-901 UPGRADE TO STANDARDS & ACP OVERLAY 4.700 1106 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠TXDOT $ 12,960,000 97/08FORT WORTH US 67 NHS-TTS 3 3,240,000127 SP 379 E 3B oELLIS CIL 2 C,E,R CONSTRUCT FOUR LANE DIVIDED 7.200 $ 16,200,0001106 $--9'09,600 97/1010FORTWORTH STP-8A 220 VARIOUS HIGHWAYS IN DISTRICT 4A 227,4003 oo C,E 0902-00-903 0.001 1106 $ 1,137,000􀁟􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁂􀁅􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁁􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾_____ _ $-"4,880,000 98106FORT WORTH CS TXDOT BRDG-OF ON Wl:'ST LANCASTER AVE AT CLEAR220 5 6B o TRINITY RIVER IN FORT WORTH C,E 1,220,0004 0902-48-155 REHABILITATE BRIDGE 0.100 1106 􀀤􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠FORTWORTH SH 171 BRDG-O $ 780,600 97/12 NB SH 171 AT EAST BUFFALO CREEK127 5 6A 195,200 2 oC,l:' 0019-02-901 REPLACE BRIDGE 0.160 1106 $ 976,000$--'166.400FORT WORTH CR BRDG-OF 98104 220 KELLER-HASLET I'D AT BUFFALO CREEK o7 6B C,E 41,6002 0902-48-914 REPLACE BRIDGE 0.160 1106' $ 208,000$--'128,000FORT WORTH CR BRDG-OF 98/06 CR 600 AT TRIBUTARY OF WALNUT o127 7 6B 2 C,E 32,000 REPLACE BRIDGE $ 160,0000.160 1106 $ --244.000FORT WORTH CR BRDG-OF 98/06 127 CR 600 AT WALNUT CREEK 6B o7 C,l:' 61,0002 090C-5G-91 0 REPLACE BRIDGE 0.160 1106 $ 305,000 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭$----86:400FORT WORTH CR BRDG-OF 98108 127 CR 1116AT ROBINSON CREEK 7 6B o 21,6001 C,E 0902-50-911 REPLACE BRIDGE 0,160 $ 108,0001106 $-----'0FORTWORTH VA TXDOT PM 98/02 VARIOUS HIGHWAYS 5,843,000220 71 VARIOUS HIGHWAYS oo C,E 1,0000902-00-909 1106􀁟􀁾􀁒􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀡􀀧􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮 􀀡􀀮􀁎􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀨􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁬______ 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠FORT WORTH TMSREH $ 344,000VA 98/06 220 VARIOUS HIGHWAYS IN TARRANT 86,0004 lOB o C,E o 0902-48-918 0,001 1106 􀁾__􀁾􀁅􀀬􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁬􀀡􀀮􀁍􀁟� �􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀹􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁔􀀮􀀡􀁦􀀧􀁟􀁙􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁾􀁾____ _ $ 0FORT WORTH FM4 DISCR 97/11 127 0.6 MI WEST OF SH 174 5 11 1,727,000 SH 174 C,E,R2 o 1513-02-034 WIDEN TWO LANES TO FOUR LANES WITH 0,611 1106 $ l.m,OOO $'-5,666,95'0FORT WORTH STRATIH30 TXDOT 98/01 0.4 MI WEST OF SUMMIT AVE 12 1,466,740220 1 SUMMIT AVE C,E,R4 o 1 068-01-150 0.407 1106􀁟􀁾􀁾􀂣􀀾􀀡􀀺􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁆􀀡􀁬􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁃􀀮􀀮􀀡 􀁾􀀡􀀺􀁁􀀡􀁬􀁅􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁎___ _ 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀿􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROW, T=TRANSFER 27 -------------------------------------------TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FORT WORTH DALLAS-FORT WORTH MPO -DiSTRiC'f--COUNTY # CSJ i' Two Standard Vans Adults Inc. camp Summit Inc. 56 One Standard Van American Religious 66 Two Standard Minivans Town Hall Meeting, Inc. Lancaster Outreach 47 NfA Center Somebody cares 47 NfA Cliff Haven Adult 41 N/A Health Care, Inc. Subtotal Committed -Urban Available -Rural ShortfalliS Ius'" FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE PROJECT FUNDS FUELS FUNDS DESCRIPTION $ 35260 $2000 One Standard Van $ 41993 $3,100 NfA $78,960 0 Two Standard Minivans One Standard WaQon $ 35,536 $2,500 NfA $ 29400 0 N/A $ 33,600 0 Two Standard Vans 0 0 One Standard Van 0 0 Two Standard Vans 0 0 One Standard Van $254,771 $7,600 $193,425 $ 61,126 -$ 220 FISCAL YEAR 1996 FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE PERCENT FUNDS FUELS FUNDS FUNDED $26660 $1000 96 0 0 93 $58,800 0 85 0 0 93 0 0 93 $56,600 0 76 $29,400 $3,100 93 $63640 0 66 $29,400 0 40 $267,120 $4,100 $193,425 $ 90,563 + $ 16866 • This selecllon process Is for applicatiOns that were receiVed by TxDOT on or before the cloSing date ofJanuary 2, 1995. -.The revised spreadsheet reflects the addition of Collin County Committee on Aging who submitted their application before the deadline. The increased funding amount is a result of funds beCOming available through the Rural Program . ... The $220 shortfall In FY 1995 will be funded from the $16,888 surplus in FY 1996, leaving a $16,668 overall Rural funding surplus. SOURCE: Transportation Department, NCTCOG PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY SECTION 16 GRANT APPUCATIONS TxDOT FORT WORTH DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1995 FISCAL YEAR 1996 AGENCY PROJECT FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE PROJECTPROJECT FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE PERCENT DESCRIPTION FUNDS FUELS FUNDS SCORES· DESCRIPTION FUNDS FUELS FUNDS FUNDED $114,240One Standard Light 064 N/AYMCA· Uroan Services 0 0 65 Transit Vehicle Two Liaht Transit Vehicles American Red Cross Branch 0 0N/A Four Minivans 54 $110.880 0 45 One Minivan $27.720 0 N/A53James L. West Special 0 0 42 Care Center Trinity Terrace 0 0N/A One Standard Van 45 $ 28.560 0 61 $141.960 $139,440Subtotal $125,867 $125,867 Available· Rural Committed· Uroan 0 $ 34,836 Shortfali/Sumlus" -$ 16,093 + $ 21263 • A project score of 53 and higher was originally considered for funding. Trinity Terrace, with a score of 45, was added as a result of funds becoming available through the Rural Program. *The $16,093 shortfall in FY 1995 will be funded from the $21,263 surplus in FY 1996, leaving a $5,170 overall Rural funding surplus. SOURCE: Transportation Department, NCTCOG