( 
P?X'm the :158.$£of 7;arme:n :J(l;,ra:n To: __ sn 
, ( .... 􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠THIS Copy OF PROCESS WA5. ' DEO);;ERED TO YQU C)N THEIL day oCIVt?V tW___ RICK RJCHARDSON, Constable NO. cc-02-ahSC:,t, 􀁾􀀠F pcq(oailas, 􀁃􀁏􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠Tx.-'_.L"',",_"-""_""___
• _.-"yl (14"C::=::: 􀁄􀁥􀁰􀁕􀁾􀀠..., L--􀁾􀀴􀀲􀀮􀁌􀀠DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING § Plaintiff, § § FILED WITH THE JUDGE OF § V. § THE DALLAS COUNTY COURT § EAGLE-MIDWAY
PLACE, L.P., et al § AT LAW NO.--.5.:: § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF HEARING To: City of Addison ATTN: Carmen Moran, City Secretary 5300 Belt Line Road Dallas, Texas··
J5254 You are hereby notified that the undersigned Special Commissioners, having been appointed by the Judge of the above captioned Court to assess the damages and compensation occasioned
by the condemnation ofthe property described in Plaintiffs Original Petition in Eminent Domain, a copy of which is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein, have set the time and
place of hearing the parties and said matters at q:0 () o'clock fl..m. on the "i12tL day of ':Vl 􀀦􀀲􀁾􀀠, 200Ji-, at the 11 C ------, --------1 --.Da as ounty Courtroom No. 409, Records
Bui ding, 4th Floor, 509 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75202. At the time and place appointed for the hearing, the undersigned Commissioners will proceed to hear the parties and consider
the amount ofdamages to be paid the owners of the property to be condemned. WITNESS OUR HANDS, 􀁴􀁨􀁩􀁳􀀳􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀠of 􀁾􀁾􀀬200.:!:/::.. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠v n 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀽􀀷􀁦􀀭􀁾􀀠
SPECIAL COMMISSIONERS NOTICE OF HEARING Solo Page L:\Liligalion\Edomain\ Eagle Midway Placc\Documents for Hearing\Notice of Hearing -City of Addison 􀁾􀀠kp 
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § :' -(;OlSDEMNATION PROCEEDING .-• " , i,.. .t i ' ! r" ._, § 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀠j -r 􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀠,: , " -"..... "I Plaintiff, § . FILED WITH THE JUDGE OF §. v. §, -. THE DALLAS
S;0UNTY COURT § , b EAGLE-MIDWAY PLACE, L.P., et al § AT LAW NO. 5 § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID
COURT: NOW COMES Dallas County, Texas, (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiffs"), acting herein by and through the Criminal District Attorney ofDallas County, Texas, and files this their
Second Amended Original Petition in Eminent Domain for the condemnation of the interest or rights pertaining thereto, as hereinafter described and shows that the alleged owners, lienholders
and interested parties oflhe land and their addresses are as follows: I) Eagle-Midway Place, L.P, Registered Agent: Lawrence E. Steinberg 5430 LBJ Freeway #1575, LB 29 Dallas, Texas
75240-2605 2) Eagle Equity Management, Inc. Registered Agent: Lawrence E. Steinberg 5430 LBJ Freeway #1575, LB 29 Dallas, Texas 75240-2605 3) ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
FlkJai Golden American Life Insurance Company, as Successor by merger with USG Annuity & Life Company AFS: C. T. Corporation Attn: Barbara Pfister or Sbirley Dillon 350 N. St. Paul Street
Dallas, Texas 75201 SECOND AMEl'DED ORIGINAL PETITION Page 1 of 5 L;\Litigatial]\EDomain\ED OPEN FILES\Eagle-Midway Place\2nd Amended Origmal Petition. doc -kp CMAQ 12. Parcel I, Mid\vay@Keller
Springs 
4) Texas Utilities Electric Company N/kJa TXU Holdings Company AFS: TXU Business Services Company C/o Office of Corporate Secretary Energy Plaza 1601 Bryan Street, 43,d Floor Dallas,
Texas 75201-3411 Taxing authorities entitled to notification ofthis proceeding: 1) County ofDallas At.tn: Edward Lopez, Jr. AFS: Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, LLP Univision Center
2323 Bryan Street, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201-6244 2) Dallas Independent School District Attn: Edward Lopez, Jr. AFS: Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, LLP Vnivision Center 2323
Bryan Street, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201-6244 3) City ofAddison Attn: Carmen Moran, City Secretary 5300 Belt Line Road Dallas, Texas 75254 I. Discovery Control Plan Plaintiff intends
to conduct discovery under Level 2 ofTexas Rule ofCivil Procedure 190.3 because this suit involves monetary relief that may aggregate to more than $50,000, excluding costs, prejudgment
interest, and attorney fees. II. Plaintiff is acting under and by virtue ofthe authority ofthe laws ofthe State ofTexas. SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Page 2 of 5 l:\U[jgalionI.EDomain\ED
OPEN 􀁆􀁬􀁌􀁅􀁓􀁜􀁅􀁡􀁧􀁬􀁣􀁾􀁍􀁩􀁤􀁷􀁡􀁹􀀠Place\lnd Amended Onglnal PetitiOTl.doc -kp CMAQ 12. Parcell, Midway@Keller Spnngs 
III. Defendants are the record owners or are holding or claiming some right, title, or interest in and to the real property described in the field notes attached hereto as Exhibit "A",
and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set out herein. The acquisition by Plaintiff of the permanent easement in, to, upon, over, across, and under the afore described real
property located in the City of Addison, Texas, and for the acquisition of the permanent improvements thereto affixed, if any, is necessary for construction or reconstructing, maintaining
and operating public roads as integral parts of the County Thoroughfare System of Dallas County. IV. Plaintiff would show that the property sought to be condemned is required for the
following purposes: A permanent easement for public road purposes in, over, across and beneath a parcel ofJand, containing 359.53 Square Meters (3,870 Square Feet) ofland, more or less,
situated in the George Syms Survey, Abstract No. 1344, being a portion of Lot A, Block B. ofthe Beltwood North -JWL Addition to the City ofAddison, according to the Map thereof recorded
in Volume 82073, Page 2483, Map Records, Dallas County, Texas and title to all ofany fixed improvements wholly or partly situated on the said parcel of land; said parcel of land being
a part of a certain tract of land, conveyed to Eagle-Midway Place, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, as described by Deed dated December 30, 1996, and recorded in Volume 97003, Page
05548, ofthe Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, and said deed record is incorporated herein for all purposes by reference and adoption; the said parcel of land being more particularly
described by metes and bounds in the Field Notes attached as Exhibit AA@and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set out herein. It is EXPRESSLY PROVIDED that access to and
from the remainder ofthe tract ofland of which the above described parcel of land is a part, to the public road facilities to be built, SHALL NOT BE DENIED. SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION
Page 3 of 5 L\Liligation\EDomaill\ED OPEN F1LES\Eagle-Midway Place\2nd Amended Ongmal Petition.doc -kp (,MAQ 12. Parcel I. Mldw'ay@Keller Springs 
V. That the herein above described parcels of land, as described in Exhibits "A" is located within the municipal limits of the City of Addison, Texas. Dallas County, Texas and City of
Addison, Texas have entered into an interlocal agreement authorizing Dallas County, Texas to acquire the herein above described parcels of land, as described in Exhibits "A", by Eminent
Domain. VI. Plaintiff and Defendants, whether one or more, have been unable to agree upon the value of the real property which is subject to this proceeding and of the permanent improvements
located thereon, if any, orthe damages, ifany, which may be sustained by the remainder ofthe Defendants' land by reason of such condemnation. Plaintiff asks that Special Commissioners
be appointed as provided by law to assess the damage of the Defendants or owners. VII. The Dallas County Commissioners Court has found and determined that the above described parcel
of land is suitable for public roadway purposes and that it is necessary to acquire said easement, together with title to any fixed improvement thereon to provide right of way for pUblic
roadway purposes. Therefore, public necessity exist for the acquisition ofthe permanent easement in and to the real property described fully in the Field Notes attached hereto as Exhibit
"A", and for the acquisition of any and all pennanent improvements, if any thereto affixed, for which Plaintiff has filed this condemnation action, hereby exercising its power ofeminent
domain. VIII. Plaintiff further affirmatively pleads that it does not desire to acquire, and expressly takes the easement subject to and reserves to Defendants all oil, gas and other
minerals beneath the surface of the tract hereinabove described in Exhibit "An. PROVIDED that the owners of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the above described parcel ofland
shall have no right whatsoever to enter upon or use the surface of the said parcel ofland for the purpose of exploring for, drilling. mining or developing said oil, gas and other minerals,
minerals, but will be pennitted to extract oil. gas and other minerals from and under said easement by directional drilling or other means from land located outside the boundaries ofthe
easement, so long as Plaintiff s use ofthe said easement for the purposes set forth herein is not disturbed, and the SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Page 4 of 5 L:\Litigallon\EDomam\ED
OPEN F!LES\Eagle-Midway Place\2nd Amended Ongillal Petltlon.doc -kp CMAQ 12, Parcel !. Midw,\ly@KellerSpnngs 
facilities located and to be located thereon and the public's use of the same are not obstructed, endangered or interfered with. WHEREFORE Plaintiff prays that Special Commissioners
be appointed as required by law; that the Special Commissioners set a date for hearing; that the Defendants be notified ofthe date of such hearing; that at said hearing the Special Commissioners
assess the value of the land and the improvements, ifany thereon, belonging to the Defendants which are sought to be condemned, and the damages, ifthere be any, to the remainder of Defendants'
land because ofthis acquisition; that Plaintiff have a decree of condemnation, vesting a permanent easement for the purposes of constructing or reconstructing, maintaining and operating
public roads as integral parts ofthe County Thoroughfare System of Dallas County, as above set out, in, to, upon, over, across, and under the real property which is the subject of this
proceeding, including the improvements thereon, in the Plaintiff; and that upon payment into the Registry of the Court of the amount so awarded, the Plaintiff have its Writ ofPossession
and for costs ofcourt, and such other and further relief, both general and special, as the Plaintiff may be entitled to receive. Respectfully submitted, Bill Hill Criminal District Attorney
Dallas County, Texas ..71///􀁾􀁑􀀣􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭Bowen Weems Assistant District Attorney Texas Bar#2!073000 411 Elm Street, 5th Floor Administration Building Dallas, Texas 75202
(214) 653-7358 (214) 653-6134 FAX SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Page 5 of5 L-\Ll!igatiop\EDomain\ED OPEN FILES\Eaglc-Midway Place\2nd Amended Original Petltion.doc -kp (,MAQ [2, Parcel
I. M!d\\ltly@KellerSprings 
EXHIBIT "N' County Dallas Page 1 of 3 Parcell 0-15Highway Intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road June 7,1999 CSJ: Account: Legal Land Description for Parcell BEING 359.53
square meters [3870 square feet) of land in the George Syms Survey, Abstract No. 1344 in Dallas County, Texas and being a portion of that 0.99875 hectare [2.4680 acres] parcel of land
conveyed to CB INSTITUTIONAL FUND VII (CB tract) as recorded in Volume 84250, Page 4372 01 the Deed Records of Dallas County Texas (D.R.D.C.T.), said CB tract being Lot A Block B of
the Beltwood North-JWL Addition as recorded in Volume 82073, Page 2483 of the Map Records of Dallas County Texas (M.R.D.C.T.l, said 359.53 square meters [3870 square leet] 01 land, being
more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at the northeast corner 01 said CB tract, THENCE, South 09 degrees 59 minutes 24 seconds East. along the east property
line 01 said CB tract, lor a distance of 145.562 meters [477.56 feet) to a point on the existing existing north right-ol-way line of Keller Springs Road, THENCE, South 89 degrees 34
minutes 38 seconds West, along the existing north right-ol-way line of Keller Springs Road, for a distance of 38.490 meters [126.28 feet) to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked
AB&A set for corner on the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, said iron rod being the Point of Beginning 01 the tract 01 land herein described; . 1. THENCE, South 89 degrees
34 minutes 38 seconds West, continuing along the existing north right-ol-way line 01 Keller Springs Road, for a distance 01 5.609 meters [18.40 leet) to a point at the intersection between
the existing north right-ol-way line of Keller Springs Road and the existing east right-ol-way line 01 Midway Road; 2. THENCE, North 33 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, along the
west property line of said CB tract and the existing east right-ai-way line of Midway Road, for a distance 0132.725 meters [107.37 feet] to a point at the beginning of a curve to the
right whose chord bears North 28 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, 45.602 meters [149.61 feet], having a radius of 270.657 meters [887.98 feet]; 3. THENCE, Northerly, continuing along
the west property line of said CB tract and the existing east right-ot-way line of Midway Road, and along said curve to the right through a central angle of 09 degrees 39 minutes 54
seconds, for an arc length of 45.656 meters [149.79 leet] to a point at the end of said curve; 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page 2 of 3 Parcell 0-15Highway Intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road June 7,1999 CSJ: Account: Legal Land Description for Parcell 4. THENCE, North
24 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds West, continuing along the west property line 01 said CB tract and the existing east right-ai-way line 01 Midway Road, lor a distance 0157.748 meters
[189.46 leet] to the northwest corner of said CB tract at the intersection between the eXisting east right-of-way line 01 Midway Road and the existing south right-of-way line 01 Kellway
Drive; 5. THENCE, North 65 degrees 57 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north property line of CB tract and the existing south right-of-way line of Kellway Drive, lor a distance of
0.753 meter [2.47 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set lor corner on the new easterly right-ai-way line of Midway Road; 6. THENCE, South 26 degrees 20 minutes 00
seconds East, along the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, lor a distance of 59.061 meters [193.77 feet] to a one hall inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner at
the beginning of a curve to the left whose chord bears South 29 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds East, 43.816 meters [143.75 feet], having a radius of 267.550 meters [877.79 feet]; 7. THENCE,
Southerly, continuing along the new easterly right-ai-way line of Midway Road and along said curve to the left through a central angle 01 09 degrees 23 minutes 37 seconds, lor an arc
length of 43.865 meters [143.91 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A at the end 01 said curve; 8. THENCE. South 33 degrees 42 minutes 22 seconds East. continuing along
the new easterly right-ai-way line of Midway Road, for a distance 01 29.665 meters [97.33 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner at the beginning of a
curve to the left whose chord bears South 48 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds East. 6.336 meters [20.79 feet]. having a radius of 20.107 meters [65.97 feet]; 
EXHIBIT "A" county Dallas Parcel 1 Highway Intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road CSJ: Account: Page 3 of 3 D-15June 7,1999 Legal Land Description for Parcel 1 9. THENCE,
Southerly, continuing along the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road and along said curve to the left through a central angle of 1 B degrees 07 minutes 49 seconds, for an arc
length of 6.363 meters [20.88 feet] to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract of land contains 359.53 square meters [3B70 square feet] of land more or less. A plat of even
survey date herewith accompanies this legal description. The basis of bearings for this intersection is the north property line of Volume 97251, Page 2B77 D.R.D.C.T. All dimensions are
in meters unless otherwise noted. English units are given for information only. Company Name: Arredondo, Brunz & Associates, Inc. By: Date: k-07-y9 Surveyor's Name: Eddie L. Dunn RP.L.S.
Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4580 
-------------"65" 57'30"E O.75JmC2.47'] LOT BEL TWOOD CB R '" '" 5 = AU. brMfJt$IOH$ SHOWN 􀁁􀁁􀁾􀀠rN 􀁍􀁾􀀠I./Nl.£$S OTtiE'.FlW'lSt! NanD. lASts OF lUUttNO FOR THIS INTEJt,SEC'nONg:
J:s M NOIfT'H rAOfi'ERTY LINE 01 VOL WZS1,5!> 􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁔􀀷􀀠DJIU).C.T. 􀁾􀀠LEGEND DlITV«J 􀀱􀁉􀁉􀁉􀂻􀁮􀀧􀁾􀀮􀁹􀀠IN .=..-•• _ •• _ ••_ MDt AIIQHJ-OfI-WA'f \INt e -.,.". ... .go c:wm'LN
,§ COftI'JJOL C# J.C:CQ,a: LIMe __111 __ l' AIIt'I('t Ur4 ij: PDIC:I tM: -x--x􀁾􀀠em' UI«'t1 􀁾􀀠.........,.. :g ........ 􀁾􀀠.......... .go III lIlT I.M.IA QTtClIM'IU .:nu -:: .,. N)..
'hOOT 􀁾oa: ft'T ON TOP or .... I4-INOI u .,. 111:/.. TdIOT IWIIOHZl "'" AT ... CCfrIC:IIlIl"( PMCc/' , EXHIBIT WB" P.O.C. _.,_..-..-.. --..l , A.BLOCK B NORTH • JWL ADDITION CRN'HlC
SCALE VOL. 82073. PG. 2483 0 1() 20 30 'Om , .I I I I IIA.R.D.C.T. I i SCAlE • 1: 1000 INSTITUTIONAl FUND VII VOL. 84250. PG.4372 D.R.D.C.T. ll· 09-23"37" 3 LOT B. BLOCK B .. 267.S50mCS77.19']
BEL TWOOO NORTH • JWL ADDITIONL • 43.S65mC143.91'1 CH.B.• 529' 00'35"E CH... 43.S16trtC143. is") PPRCEl I 359.53 $(j.m. (3870 S.'.) A" 18-07'.13" R • 20.107mC65.97·J L. .. 6.363mC20.S8')
CH.B." S04S·0S''''6''E " 6.3J6m(20.79·] 16.764mr:SS'.OOl BLOC. tiNE 􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀴􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀂣􀀭􀀢􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀂷􀂣􀁸􀁩􀁓􀁔􀁩􀁎􀁇􀁾􀀠􀁒􀀮􀁯􀀺􀁾􀀠VOl. 97009. Pc. OJS52
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀡􀀻􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭KELLER SPRINGS ROAD t • VARIABLE WlOtH R.O.W. A PLAT OF A SURVEY OF A 359.53 sq.m. [3870 S.F.J TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE SYMS SURVEY
ABSTRACT NUMBER 1344 CITY OF ADDISON DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS R)II( I'lOO 
DALLAS COUNIY PUBLIC WORKS February 19, 2004 Mr. Mike Murphy, P.E. Town of Addison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Control!
Right-of -Way Appraisal Report -(project: Dear Mr. Murphy: Attached please find the right-of-way appraisal report and approved value sheet for parcel 5 for the intersection ofKeller
Springs at DNT located in the Town of Addison contained in the CMAQ Program for review purposes only. This intersection is contained in the City of Dallas and Dallas County Bond Program
and does not require Town fimding. If you have any questions regarding the provided materials, please contact this office at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀯􀁙􀁾Craig
J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachment: Project 29 Appraisal Report and value sheet as stated above -1 copy cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo
attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT, Roadway Design, wlo attachment Steven Chutchian, P.E., Town ofAddison, wlo attachment Alan Hendrix, P .E., City ofDallas, wI attachment ofapproved
value sheet Tim Starr, P.E., City ofDallas, wlo attachment S61as Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S., Dallas Co. Asst. Dir., Property Div., wlo attachment Sid Homer, Dallas County Senior Right
ofWay Agent, wlo attachment Craig Marek, Dallas County Chief Property Appraiser, wlo attachment Jon Engelke, P.E., Earthtech, wlo attachment 􀁓􀀺􀁜􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁇􀀰􀀴􀁃􀁏􀁒􀁒􀁬􀁇􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀰􀁕􀁔􀁜􀁁􀁄􀁄
􀁉􀁓􀁏􀁎􀁜􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀴􀁜􀀰􀀲􀀶􀁟􀁐􀀲􀀹􀀠ROW Appraisal Report.doG 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS February 19, 2004 Mr. Mike Murphy, P .E. Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Control
(CMAQ) Program Right-of -Way Appraisal Report-(project 29) Dear Mr. Murphy: Attached please frod the right-of-way appraisal report and approved value sheet for parcel 5 for the intersection
ofKeller Springs at DNT located in the Town of Addison contained in the CMAQ Program for review proposes only. This intersection is contained in the City of Dallas and Dallas County
Bond Program and does not require Town funding. If you have any questions regarding the provided materials, please contact this office at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421.
Sincerely, 􀁾􀀯􀁾Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachment: Project 29 Appraisal Report and value sheet as stated above -1 copy cc: Sam Wilson, P .E., Assistant Director, Transportation
and Planning, WiD attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT, Roadway Design, wlo attachment 􀁓􀁴􀁾􀁘􀁾􀁰􀁰􀁃􀁨􀁵􀁴􀁣􀁨􀁩􀁡􀁮􀀻􀀠P.E;, Town ofAddison, WiD attachment \ Alan Hendrix, P.E., City
of Dallas, wi attachment ofapproved value sheet Tim Starr, P.E., City ofDallas, wlo attachment Selas Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S., Dallas Co. AssL Dir., Property Div., wlo attachment Sid
Homer, Dallas County Senior Right ofWay Agent, wlo attachment Craig Marek, Dallas County Chief Property Appraiser, wlo attachment Jon Engelke, P .E., Earthtech, wlo attachment S:IGenerallG04CORRIG4-1
0I.ffiADDISONl20041026_P29 ROW Appraisal Report.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
DALLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS APPRAISAL REPORT Project No: CMAQ 29 (82l1oo82I)(Keller Springs @DNT) Parcel No.: 5 CSJ No.: 0918-45-595 ROW No.: 9118-00-80 Location: 16111
Dallas Parkway, Addison, TX Whole Acquisition _ Partial Acquisition X Property Owner: Richmont Properties Ltd. Address: 16251 Dallas Parkway, Addison, TX Occupant's Name: Vacant Address:
PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal report is to estimate adequate compensation, in compliance with the Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 17, to be paid by Dallas
County for the acquisition of real property interest as described herein. MARKET VALUE Market Value may be defined as follows: Market Value is the price which the property would bring
when it is olTered for sale by one who desires but is not obliged to sell and is bought by one who is under no necessity of buying, taking into consideration all of the uses to which
it is reasonably adaptable and for which It either Is or, in all reasonable probability, will become available within the reasonable future. AFFIDAVIT OF APPRAISER I have personally
inspected tbe property herein appraised and to the best of my knowledge and helief the statements contaIned in the appraisal hereinabove set forth are true, and the information upon
which tbe opinions expressed therein are based is correct. On December 10, 2003 I personally inspected, in the Ilcld, the property herein appraised. I afforded the property owner the
opportunity to accompany me at the time of this inspection and the ·property owner's representative, Mr. Gage Hunt, met me at the property during this inspection. A Permission-To-Inspect
form was signed by Mr. Hunt at that time and given to the appraiser to deliver to· Dallas County Public Works. I have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest
in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised and sbould lor any employee in my service acquire any interest in or to the property appraised prior
to the acquisition of the parcel by the County, I wlll immediately notify the County of such interest or interests; I have not revealed and will not reveal the findings and results of
sucb appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the County of Dallas until authorized by County officials to do so or until I am required to do so by due process of law or
until I am released from this obligation by baving publicly testified as to such fmdings. My opinion of the market value of the acquisition plus damages, ifaoy, as of the 10th day of
December, 2003 is $ 15.829 and the exercise of my professional judgment. 􀁾􀁡􀁾􀀮2.-\'2.-0l4 William A. Stoll, RIW·AC Date of Report State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Texas
Certificate No. TX·1331609-G THE STATE OF TEXAS) ) COUNTY OF DALLAS ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for Dallas County, Texas, on Illls day personally appeared WILLIAM
A. STOLL, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein
expressed. G"""...,,,,MY""'""'"_ o,om", "'" IP--􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀠-t,_.􀁏􀁴􀁫􀁩􀁾􀁫􀁋􀁊􀀠􀁾􀀠NotarY Public,1>lIiICounty, Texas My Commission Expires 
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY AND DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION 1-1 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED, INTENDED USE OF THE REPORT, JURISDICTIONAL EXCEPTION, DATE OF V ALUE ESTIMATE, EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENTAL
DISCLAIMER, DEFINmON OF MARKET VALUE, SITE ANALYSIS, IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION, PROJECT DESCRIPTION SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL 1-2 PERIOD, REPORT TYPE, HISTORY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 1-3 INSPECTION
INFORMATION, NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION 1-4 HIGHEST AND BEST USE 1-5 HIGHEST AND BEST USE CONCLUDED 1-6 WHOLE PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS 2-1 WHOLE PROPERTY PLAT 2-2 AREA MAP 2-3 ZONING MAP
2-4 FLOOD PLAIN MAP 2-5 PHOTOGRAPHS OF SUBJECT Picture Pages 1, 2 & 3 . VALUE OF WHOLE PROPERTY 3-1 COMPARABLE SALES SUMMARY & ADJUSTMENT GRID 3·2 DISCUSSION OF ADJUSTMENTS 3-3a& b COMPARABLE
SALES PICTURES & PLATS (MULTIPLE PAGES) 3-5, 3-7 & 3·9 COMPARABLE SALES MAP 3·10 COMPARABLE SALES DATA (MULTIPLE PAGES) 3·4,3-6 & 3-8 VALUE OF AREA ACQUIRED 4-1 VALUE OF REMAINDER BEFORE
ACQUISmON 5-1 VALUE OF REMAINDER AFTER ACQUISmON 6-1 ADDENDA: CERTIFICATION PAGE, ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDmONS, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AREA ACQUIRED, RIGHT OF WAY PLAT AND PERMISSION-TO-INSPECT
FORM 
SUMMARY & DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION Parcel #: 5 Project Name CMAQ#29 821100821 Location or Address 16111 Dallas Parkway, Addison, Dallas County, Texas Character of Acquisition: Whole
[ ] Bisection I [] Partial [x] Bisection II [ ] Owner Richmont Properties Ltd. Address 16251 Dallas Parkway, Addison, Texas Telephone 972-233-6948 WHOLE PROPERTY (from 3-1) AREA ACQUIRED
(from 4-1) Area 4.5433 Acres, 197,908 Sguare Feet Area 806 SF (Fee) Value from Information on Whole [x] Highest & Best Use Planned Development District Value Determined Independently
[ ] Highest & Best Use As part of Whole Value by Market Data (Land Only) $ 3,364,436 -Improvements: Value by Cost Approach $ N/A Sod (See Page 4-1) $ 448 Value by Income Approach $ N/A
Sprinkler System (See Page 4-1) $ 413 Tree $ 500 Concrete Paving (See Page 4-1) $ 376 FINAL VALUE CONCLUSION $ 3,364,436 Curb (See Page 4-I) $ 390 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 2,127 Land REMAINDER
AFI'ER ACQIDSITION (page 6-1) Fee $ 13,702 Area 4.5248 Acres, 197,102 Sguare Feet TOTAL LAND $ 13,702 Highest & Best Use Planned Office Development TOTAL ACQUISITION VALUE $ 15,829 Value
by Market Data (Land Only) $ 3,350,734 REMAINDER BEFORE ACQIDSITION (CALC.) Value by Cost Approach $ N/A Value by Income Approach $ N/A Value of Whole (Land Only) $ 3,364,436 LAND Value
of Area Acquired $ 13,702 FINAL VALUE CONCLUSION $ 3,350,734 LAND Value of Remainder $ 3,350,734 DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION Value of Area Acquired (Land only )-------------------------------------
-----------------------------$ 13,702 Value of Remainder Before Acquisition $ 3,350,734 Value of Remainder After Acquisition $ 3,350,734 Damages (or Enhancement)--------------------------------------
---------------------------------------$ Permanent Drainage Easement (from Page 4-2)-----------------------------------------------------$ Temporary Easements (from Page 4-3)-------------------------
--------------------------------------$ Improvements within ACQUISITION AREA (from Page 4-1)-----------------------------------$ 2,127 TOTAL COMPENSATION···········_················_··············•••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• $ 15,829 Comments: It is the appraiser's opinion that there is no damage to the remainder as a result of the acquisition and no compensation is due in this
regard. I-I 
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 'rHE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is legally described as being a 4.5433-acre tract in the William Lomax Survey, Abstract 792, an addition to the City of
Addison, Dallas County, Texas. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAlSED The property rights being appraised consist ofa fee simple estate andlor an easement in the subject property. Fee simple estate
is defmed in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Fourth Edition, copyright 2002, page 113. by the Appraisal Institute as being: «Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest
or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taXation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. .. An easement is defmed in The Dictionary of Real
Estate Appraisal, Fourth Edition. copyright 2002, page 90, by the Appraisal Instituteas being: «An interest in property that conveys use, but not ownerShip of a portion of an owner's property. Access or right-of-way easements may be acquired by private parties or public
utilities.» INTENDED USE OF THE REPORT The intended use of this report is to provide an estimate of market value of the subject property and total compensation due to the owner. The
intended user is Dallas County to assist in the acquisition of right-of-way for a public purpose. Any other use of this report is not authorized. SCOPE OF THE APPRAlSAL The scope of
the appraisal means the extent of the process of collecting. confirming and reporting data. An estimate of the total compensation due to the owner of the property as the result of a
proposed acquisition from the property is prepared. This will require an appraisal of the Whole Property. the Area Acquired and the value of the Remainder Before and After the Acquisition.
The process included collecting data and information concerning the subject property and an inspection of the property. The appraiser has examined public records including plat and map
records such as zoning maps, ordinances, and flood plain data. Upon determination of the subject's Highest and Best Use, the appraiser has researched public records for recent sales
of comparable properties. Factual data collected on the comparable sales included characteristics of the site and improvements, if any. consideration of the sale price given. extent
of fmancing made available, if any, and dates of sale. Where applicable, the appraiser has also examined and researched rental rates and expenses in the development of the Income Approach.
Where applicable, the Cost Approach has been developed through the Marshall and Swift Cost Calculator Service, file data andlor interviews with developersfbuilders/contractors. This
information has been analyzed and is presented in the following report. 1-2 
JURISDICTIONAL EXCEPTION This appraisal is intended to conrorm to the requirements of the USPAP. Jurisdictional exception provides for severability preserving the balance of USPAP if
one or more parts of USPAP are "contrary to law or public policy of a jurisdiction." According to USPAP, "law means a body of rules with binding legal force established by controlling
governmental authority." This includes federal and state constitutions, legislative and court made law, administrative rules, regulations and ordinances. As appraisals performed for
eminent domain are subject to certain constraints based on statutory and case law regarding compensability, the issue of jurisdictional exception has been invoked in the preparation
of this appraisal and report. DATE OF VALUE ESTIMATE The effective date of this appraisal is the date of the last inspection, December 10,2003. The date of the report is the date of
the signature on the first page of this report. EXPOSURE PERIOD A reasonable exposure period for the subject property is considered to be within twelve months, approaching a value, and
highest and best use, as stated herein. REPORT TYPE Due to the jurisdictional exception granted to governmental agencies with the power of eminent domain, such as Dallas County, some
of the traditional requirements of USPAP are not applicable. As required by Dallas County, standardized forms have been completed and are included herein, along with supplemental comments
when appropriate. In accordance with the USPAP, the appraisal of the subject property is reported in the following text as a summary appraisal report. As such, it represents a summary
discussion of the data, reasoning and analyses that were utilized in the appraisal process to develop the appraiser's opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data,
reasoning and analyses is retained in the appraiser's me. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated previously.
The appraiser is not not . responsible for unauthorized use of this report. mSTORY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY The Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice require full disclosure of any
sales or property transfers occurring within the previous three years of the date of value for all properties. On Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)-managed projects, such as
the one involving this property, TxDOT requires like disclosure for five years prior to the date of value. Dallas County deed records show that the property was transferred from Carter-Crowley
Properties, Inc. to Richmont Properties Limited, LP by special warranty deed dated August 12, 1994. The appraiser is not aware of any other changes in ownership or any current contracts
or offers to sell the property. 1-3 
ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLAIMER The value estimated in this report is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental
environmental conditions. The appraiser's routine inspection of and inquiries about the subject property did not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous
substances or detrimental environmental conditions which would affect the property negatively. It is possible that tests and inspections made by a qualified hazardous substance and environmental
expert would reveal the existence of hazardous materials and environmental conditions on or around the property that would negatively affect its value. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE Market
Value is defined by City of Austin v. Carmizzo, 267 S.W. 2d 808 (Tex 1954) as being: "The price the property would bring when offered for sale by one who desires to sell, but is not
obliged to sell, and is bought by one who desires to buy, but is under no necessity of buying, taldng into consideration all of the uses to which it is reasonably adaptable and for which
it either is, or in all reasonable probability, will become available within the reasonable future." INSPECTION INFORMATION A Permission-To-Inspect form was mailed to the owner on August
29, 2003. On September 23, 2003 Mr. Clemson in the County Commissioners' office received a call from a Mr. "Grant" Hunt of the Mary Kay Corporation regarding the subject property. The
appraiser contacted Mr. Gage Hunt on December 8, 2003 and made arrangements to meet Mr. Hunt at the property on December 10, 2003. At that time the appraiser pointed out the acquisition
area; answered questions regarding the project; and then asked Mr. Hunt to sign a PermissionTo-Inspect form, which he did. NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION The subject property is located in
Addison, Texas in an area of mixed office and local retail uses including the Addison Airport and borders the Dallas Parkway (southbound) on the east. The area to the east (Dallas) Dallas)
is a mature area that is almost totally developed with commercial uses abutting the Dallas North Tollway and residential uses . just east of the commercial sites. The neighborhood is
bounded to the north by Trinity Mills Road, to the east by the Dallas North Tollway, to the south by Belt Line Road and to the west by Midway Road; 1-4 
SITE ANALYSIS The subject property contains 4.5433 acres (or 197,908 square feet per the Dallas Central Appraisal District records) of land with approximately 643 feet of frontage on
the Dallas Parkway, 306 feet of frontage on Keller Springs Road and 639 feet of frontage on Mary Kay Way. IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION The subject property is an unimproved site. Only improvements
in the part to be acquired are valued in this report. PROJECT DESCRIPI'ION The proposed road project is designed to improve traffic flow on Keller Springs Road, Knoll Trail Drive and
Dallas Parkway between Knoll Trail Drive and Mary Kay Way, on Trinity Mills Road @Dallas Parkway, on Frankford Road @Dallas Parkway and Coit Road @Frankford Road. Specifically, right
and left turn lanes will be added, vehicle-turning radii will be increased, accessibility for the disabled will be enhanced and utility and traffic signal adjustments will be implemented.
This project involves partial acquisitions consisting offee acquisitions. The project includes six intersections including Keller Springs @Knoll Trail, Keller Springs @Dallas Parkway
(northbound) and Keller Springs @Dallas Parkway (southbound), Trinity Mills @Dallas Parkway, Frankford @Dallas Parkway and Coit@Frankford. The overall purpose of the project is to provide
the traveling public safe, functional public streets while reducing traffic delays so as to improve air quality. HIGHEST AND BEST USE According to the Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal
of Real Estate, 121h Edition, the highest and best use of a property is defined as "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or improved property, which is physically possible,
appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." The highest and best use is estimated hased upon two different premises: 1) as if vacant and available
for development, and 2) as presently improved. Since the subject property is unimproved only the "as vacant" premise is applicable. In the highest and best nse, the following four criteria
must be met. HIGHEST AND BEST USE -WHOLE PROPERTY, AS VACANT Physically PoSsible. The subject Whole Property is a 4.5433-acre tract located on the Dallas North Parkway at Keller Springs
Road, City of Addison, Dallas County, Texas. The Whole Property has 643 feet of frontage on the Dallas Parkway, 306 feet of frontage on Keller Springs Road and 639 feet of frontage on
Mary Kay Way. The topography is essentially level and there are no adverse physical conditions associated with easements or floodplain to limit development. Nearby land uses are residential
and commercial in nature, including single family homes, retail and office uses. The iocation, shape, and topography of the Whole Property suggest it is suited for any of these uses.
1-5 
Legally Permissible. The Whole Property is located in City of Addison, Dallas County. Texas and is zoned PD (Planned Development District). This classification allows more flexibility
in the planning and development ofprojects while allowing the city council greater control over the development of areas adjacent to residential districts. The land directly west of
the subject land is zoned C-I (Commercial-I) which primarily encourages local retail uses. To the north and south of the subject property. land is zoned PD (planned development district)
as is the subject property, while land immediately to the east, in Dallas, is zoned for community retail. Financially FeasiblelMaximally Productive. The study of surrounding land uses
and market conditions is essential in detennining the [mancial feasibility of any particular land use. Based on the physically possible and legally pennissible uses, an office development
would be considered homogeneous with the neighborhood and would represent a financially feasible and maximally productive use of the Whole Property. mGHEST AND BEST USE -WHOLE PROPERTY,
AS IMPROVED The Whole Property is unimproved. mGHEST AND BEST USE -PARTS ACQUIRED The Part Acquired is a fee simple, irregularly-shaped parcel located at the southeast corner of the
site containing 806 square feet of land which has no separate economic use. Therefore, its highest and best use is as part of the Whole Property. mGHEST AND BEST USE -REMAINDER The highest
and best use ofthe Remainder Before the Acquisition is the same as the Whole Property less the Parts Acquired. After the acquisition the Remainder will be essentially the same as the
Whole Property except that it will be slightly smaller. The appraiser reviewed the paving plans for this project and determined that the proposed street and sidewalk improvements will
not impact the function or desirability of the property. Therefore, it is concluded that the highest and best use of the Remainder After the Acquisition is the same as that ofthe Whole
Property. 1-1-6 
WHOLE PROPERTY SITE _ DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS Legal Description: Being 4.5433 acres of land located in the William Lomax Survey, Abstract No. 792, an addition to the City of Addison,
Dallas County, Texas Size: 4.5433 Acres or 197,908 Square Feet (per Dallas Central Appraisal District records) Site Dimensions: 293 feet x 67 feet x 54 feet x 522 feet x 306 feet x 639
feet Present Zoning: PD (Planned Development District) Highest and Best Use: As Vacant -Planned Office Development As Improved -N/A Zoning vs. H&B Use: Zoning is consistent with the
highest and best use Utilities: Typical utilities including city water and sanitary sewer, natural gas and electricity Terrain and Topography: Generally level Drainage: Appears adequate
Flood: The subject property is not within a designated flood zone. Easements of Record and Effect: Typical utility and ROW easements. Relationship of Site to Nearby Streets: West side
of southbound Dallas Parkway and north side of Keller Springs Drive Type Street: Dallas Parkway -Tbree lane (southbound), concrete road with curbs and gutters . .' Keller Springs -Four
􀀩􀁡􀁾􀁥􀀬􀀠concrete, divided road with curbs and gutters Describe Adjacent Development: Nearby properties are developed as connnercial uses. Size of Part Acquired: 806 Square Feet (Fee)
Size of Remainder: 197,102 Square Feet Mapsco 4.V 2-1 
Dallas Central Appraisal District Page I of 1 WHOLE PROPERTY PLAT I \ \ 􀁾􀁜􀀠j 􀁾􀁎􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁄􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁾􀀠\ \ , \ \ 1 . -i I A 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀯􀀠'\ '\ .--I ( '-.... ! I 􀁾􀀠'--􀁾􀀠... 􀁦􀀡􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠gE
z 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠/1 !lJ(/􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠!Subie2}> ! i JI ... 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭... 1KELLER SPRINGS e :J: \\c;;Ii 0 z /) co c: S0 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠:0c: i: I 􀁾􀀠\ =A, i i -l I !IiII 14_ @DISCLAIMER
Dallas Central The Dallas Central Appraisal District does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevancy, timeliness or completeness of Appraisal District this data, DeAD assumes no
legal responsibilities for the www.dallascad.org infrnmation represented on this map. Users should independently verlfy the data on this map before making any conclusions based on this
data, . . 2-2 http://maps.dallascad.org/servletlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=dcad&ClientV... 12/0412003 
--AREA MAP Hi!ton Head Dr Town Dr iSUBJECT ;r-IAddision"T....."""" , , 116111 Dallas North Parkway 􀁾􀀬􀀠.. 0::" 􀁾􀀠'Oi o 0. Orinda Dr Belt Une Rd \ 􀁾􀀬􀀠Boll;I",Y Omi 0,2 OA 0,8 •
: Keller S (in s Rd Streets98 Copyright l!) 100e-1997, Mcmsoft Corpor,ukm and'lor rt.s suppliers. All righls roseJ'Vlld, Please Visit our web site al htlp:Jlmaps.expetfla.COIll. Page
1 2-3 1 
ZONING MAP .",-, .... 􀂷􀀡􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁾􀁉􀁊􀀬􀀠..• A: • .. ,c' ..... --'" 􀀢􀀧􀀯􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀠 , ,,', 􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠. ... ------. .......... .... ",' , . /. ...... . .........􀁾.... . . " ',' -.;;;:
. " i" ....... '/...... .' /' ........./\Q '\..., ,. '. ./. /,-'., '/" ",--'/.' . . ,//" "'-./.' 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭Town of Addison Zoning Map .􀂷􀀿􀀺􀁾􀂷􀀻..'.:·.• 􀂷􀁕􀀮􀂷􀁾􀀬.".::.
::'.,...,...__ ..•. '. '. 􀀢􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀠, .' . '. -􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠,': 􀀬􀁾􀀭'. ", . . . ' ........ -...,.... -'.::. ',' , " .. . .. . :: ,",' ";.-' r :-, .,", uc.,· '> . :. ,', , ' 2-4

FLOOD PLAIN MAP ADDISON MUNICIPI-J. .4JRPORT TOWN OF .ADDISON 481089 -FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DALLAS COUNTY, PANEL 180 OF 725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) EFFECTIVE DATE:
AUGUST 23, 2001 2-5 
PHOTOGRAPHS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY CMAQ 29, Keller Springs Road @Dallas North Tollway, Parcel 5 Date Taken: 12/10/03 Northeast View ofAcquisition Area North View ofAcquisition Area Picture
Page 1 
PHOTOGRAPHS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY CMAQ 29, Keller Springs Road @Dallas North Tollway, Parcel 5 Date Taken: 12/10/03 North View ofDallas North Tollway ROW along Property West View ofKeller
Springs Road ROW along Property Picture Page 2 
PHOTOGRAPHS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY CMAQ 29, Keller Springs Road @Dallas North Tollway, Parcel 5 Date Taken: 12/10/03 Northwest View of Property from Acquisition Area Picture Page 3 
VALUE OF WHOLE PROPERTY Correlation of Approaches to Value: Income Approach ..................................................... $_...::N..:.:./.:..:A_ Cost Approach ................................
........................ $_-::N-::-/:,;-A:-:-: Market Data Approach.(Land Only) ............................ $ 3,364,436 Discussion: The Market Data Approach is considered the only appropriate
method of valuation and indicates that the value of the subject site is $17.00 per square foot which equates to $3,364,436 for the 197,908 square foot Whole Property. Estimated Land
Value of the Whole Property $ 3,364,436 BREAKDOWN FOR COMPUTATION PURPOSES: Improvements: $_-$_-$_-$_-$_-$_-Total Improvements $ N/A . Land: Fee 197,908 SF @$ 17.00/SF $ 3,364,436 Total
Land Value, Whole Property $ 3,364,436 3·1 
COMPARABLE SALES SUMMARY SALE SALES ZONINGLOCATION DATE PRICE SIZE SUBJECT 16111 Dallas North Parkway Addison, Texas i N/A N/A 197,908 SF 4.5433 Acres PD SALE 1 6210 LBJ Freeway Dallas,
Texas ! 3/03 $15.00/SF 99,766 SF 2.2903 Acres NO(A} SALE 2 SALE 3 NW Quadrant Park Lane N. Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 4650 Belt Line Road Addison, Texas 7/00 9/00 $22.50ISF $23.97/SF
294,948 SF 6.7711 Acres 28,868 SF 0.6627 Acres RR LR The adjustments, discussed on page 3-3 of this report, were made to compare each sale to the subject site and are summarized below.
ADJUSTMENT GRID SALE NO. 1 2 3 SALE PRICE/SF $15.00/SF $22.50/SF $23.97/SF ! TIMElMKT CONDITIONS -0-10 % -10 % ADJUSTED SALES PRICE $15.00ISF $20.25/SF $21.57/SF LOCATION -15 % -10 %-0SIZE
-10 % +5% -30 % CORNER INFLUENCE +5% -0+5% FLOODPLAIN -0-0-0ZONING cO-0..Q.. UTILITIES -0..Q.. cQ-NET ADJUSTMENTS -20 % -5 % -25 % INDICATED VALUE $12.00 ISF $19.24/SF $16.18/SF I Estimated
value per square foot for the subject site is $17.00/SF or $3,364,436 for the 197,908 square foot site. 3-2 
DISCUSSION OF ADJUSTMENTS TO COMPARABLE SALES The adjustment process is typically applied through either quantitative or qualitative analysis. Given the availability of data and imperfect
nature of the real estate market, participants most often rely on relative or qualitative comparisons. In this appraisal a blended adjustment technique has been used. This is accomplished
by pre-assigning quantitative adjustments for relative comparison as illustrated below. BLENDED ADJUSTMENTS Relative Adjustments Pre-Assigned Qualitative Adjustment Slight Adjustment
5% Moderate Adjustment 10% Fair Adjustment 15% Significant Adjustment 25%+ Market participants can often identify superior or inferior characteristics when comparing properties. Without
significant statistical information, applying quantitative adjustments to reflect the differences is often problematic or subjective. For this analysis the above listed quantitative
adjustments reflect the need for slight, moderate, fair and significant adjustments. TIMEIMARKET CONDmONS: Sale 1 occurred in 2003 while Sales 2 and 3 occurred in 2000. Sale 1 is not
adjusted while Sales 2 and 3 are adjusted down when compared to the subject. The downward adjustments are a result of reduced demand f9r office space since the year 2000 pullback. LOCATION:
All sales are located on and with easy access to major arterial streets and highways in the north Dallas area. Sales 1 and 2 are considered superior due to higher traffic counts while
Sale 3 is considered comparable to the subject property. Thus, Sales 1 and 2 are adjusted down while Sale 2 is not adjusted when compared to the subject. SIZE: The subject contains 197,908
square feet or 4.543 acres of land. Larger properties are typically sold at a lower price per square foot than smaller parcels. This phenomenon is attributed to the greater number of
potential buyers for smaller parcels. These buyers eventually bid up the price of a property through increased competition. As the size of a tract decreases, the price per square foot
increases. The comparable sales range in size from 28,868 square feet (0.6627 acre) to 294,948 square feet (6.7711 acres). Thus Sales 1 and 3 are adjusted down and Sale 2 is adjusted
up when compared to the subject. CORNER INFLUENCE: The subject, as well as Sale 2, have exposure from a main arterial road and a major highway while Sale 1 has exposure to a major freeway
and Sale 3 has exposure to a major arterial road. Thus, Sales 1 and 3 are adjusted up and Sale 2 is not adjusted when compared to the subject. FLOOD PLAIN: The subject and all sales
are located outside the 5OO-year floodplain so no adjustments are made to the sales when compared to the subject. 3-3a 
ZONING: The subject is in a planned development district as is Sale 2. Sale I is in a neighborhood office district and Sale 3 is in a local retail district. All these zoning categories
have overlapping uses that allow commercial office development. Thus, no adjustments were made to sales when compared to the subject. UTILITIES: The subject property, as well as each
sale, has electric, water, sewer and gas service available at the property so no adjustments were made to the sales when compared to the subject. CONCLUSION: Based on analysis of the
above data, it is the appraiser's opinion that the Estimated Market Value for the subject site is $17.00/square foot for the 197,908 square foot site, or: $3,364,436 THREE MILLION THREE
HUNDRED SIXTY·FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX . DOLLARS 3-3b 
COMPARABLE SALES DATA SALENO. One PROJECT: CMAQ No. 29 1. AddresslLocation: 2. Legal Description: 3. Grantor: Grantee: 6210 LBJ Freeway, City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas Being a
part of the Thomas Dykes Survey, Abstract No. 405 and a part of the McKinney & Williams Survey, Abstract No. 1032, a part of Lot 1, City Block AI7443, 6200 L.B.J. Office Park. an addition
to the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas DALLASSCOB, LP Huffinan Custom Builders, LLC 4. Recorded: Deed Date 03/17/03 File Date 03/31103 Vol/Page 200306110840 S. Actual Sale Price:
$1,496,490 or $15.00 per Square Foot 6. Special Information on Background of the Sale: 7. Title Company: 8. Type Financing: 9. Lender: 10. Land Size: 11. Improvements: Reunion Title
Cash to seller American National Bank of Texas 99,766 Square Feet (per deed) Some concrete pavement (some dispute as to whether pavement was valued as part of the sale price. Owner said
"No" but incorporated it into his plan.) 12. Highest and Best Use: Neighborhood Office Development 13. Zoning/Comments: NO(A) Date Inspected 10/30/03 14•. Condition of Improvements at
time of Sale: NIA (Attached photographs should depict condition if possible) 15. Type Street: Three-lane, concrete, one-way access road (to IH-635) with curbs and gutters 16. Utilities
Available: All x Electric Gas Water Sewer 17. Comments: Sales price and terms conftrmed through grantee. Mapsco 15.p 3-4 
COMPARABLE PROPERTY NO. One PHOTO TAKEN 02/03/04 Address/Location 6210 1.8.1. Freeway, Dallas, Texas U LYNDON B JOHNSON 1635 ., IllS., ..􀁾􀀠JOHNSoN I 1 I I I i ( j I I I I I I I 11
3-5 
COMPARABLE SALES DATA SALE NO. Two PROJECT: CMAQ No. 29 1. AddresslLocation: NWQ N. Central Expwy and Park Lane, City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 2. Legal Description: Being a tract
of land situated in the L. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 924 and being all ofLo! 4, City Block 14/5453, Park Central North Addition, an Addition to the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas
3. Grantor: CP-Central Park, Ltd., LP Grantee: NCX Office Development II, LP 4. Recorded: Deed Date 07/31100 . Flle Date 07/31100 Vo1lPage 2000147/6601 5. Actual Sale Price: $22.50 per
square foot (quoted as $20.00 to $25.00/square foot) . 6. Special Information on Backgroundl of the Sale: 7. Title Company: 8. Type Financing: NIA 9. Lender: Cash to Seller 10. Land
Size: 6.7711 Acres or 294,948 Square Feet plus three easement tracts totaling 88,665 square feet 11. Improvements: None at time of sale 12. mghest and Best Use: Office Development 13.
Zoning/Comments: PD -260 (Planned Development District) Date Inspected 02/03/04 14. Condition of Improvements at time of Sale: NIA (Attached photograpbs should depict condition if possible)
15. Type Street: Three-lane concrete access road (to Central Expressway) with curbs and gutters 16. Utilities Available: All x Electric Gas Water Sewer 17. Comments: Sales price confirmed
by Steve Madory, representing the grantee. Mapsco 􀁾􀀶􀀮􀁎􀀠& S 3-6 
COMPARABLE PROPERTY NO. Two PHOTO TAKEN 02/03/04 AddresslLocation NW Quadrant -N. Central Expressway and Park Lane, Dallas, Texas ""( -Ill \ I J I_I , /, 􀁾􀀠; ( Uti ITT I .J I ,i C
i ... (i i 􀁾i ,I ...... D& ,.. --􀁾􀀠r' c UI 􀁾􀀠7z .--.....,..J! 􀁾􀁾􀀠j 􀁾D i5 u 1􀁎􀁏􀁾irHPARK 􀁾I 3-7 
COMPARABLE SALES DATA SALE NO. 3 PROJECT: CMAQ 29 1. Address/Location 4650 Belt Line Road, Addison, Texas 2. Legal Description Lot 1, Block A of the Bel-Air Grill Addition Revised to
the Town of Addison, Dallas County, Texas 3. Grantor Beltwood/Addison, Ltd. Grantee Lone Star Bank 4. Recorded: Deed Date 9-25-00 File Date 9-26-00 VollPg 2000187/5964 5. Actual Sale
Price $692,000 or $23.97 per Square Foot 6. Special Information on Background of the Sale 7. Title Company Fidelity National Title 8. Type Financing Cash to seller 9. Lender N/A 10.
Land Size 28,868 Square feet or 0.6627 acres 11. Improvements None of value 12. Highest and Best Commercial 13. Zoning/Comments LR (Local Retail) . Date Inspected 09-25-2002 14. Condition
of Improvements at time of Sale NiA (Attached photographs should depict condition if possible) 15. Type Street Belt Line -6 lane concrete divided roadway with curbs and gutters Beltwood
-2 lane concrete with curbs and gutters 16. Utilities Available: All x Electric Gas Water Sewer 17. Comments: Sale price confmned by grantor. Mapsco 14/G 3-8 
COMPARABLE PROPERTY NO, Three PHOTO TAKEN 09/25103 AddresslLocation 4650 Belt Line Road, Addison, Texas .. 1t26.56 \ BELT LINE A-J26 􀁁􀀬􀁜􀀱􀁾􀀶BELT LINE '59.sa ,'116.90' ., '''--:ro.
H>'<' 220,10' 􀁾... N.. 􀁾􀀠N .. ...'" 0 '2' " 0 1􀁾􀀠\C!I 'TR l'0 'TR l' ; '"0-11 􀀹􀁓􀀸􀀷􀁁􀁃􀀺􀁟􀁉􀁾􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁌􀁯N ' ..3467 .9628AC'" I. 0.6627AC =!).,'214 "C q g EASl .-􀀲􀀲􀀢􀁾􀀡􀀱􀀠----...-221.90'
250.09''TR2' 􀁾589'57c , .557 AC 􀁾􀀠1.274 AC '" '...." 􀁾􀀠'" 589'36WTR 1A-2' III ·19 221.90' .459.AC .. .'296' "c '"i '" '" 0 NeB.'M'E'TR 1A' 0 !""' 3-9 
SALES MAP 􀀧􀁩􀀮􀁾E Frankford Rd W Renner Rd oRenner I -----f 􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠.carrolHOn , I , I • Bel! 􀁌􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁾__ , 􀁾􀁅􀁙􀁫􀁥􀀠Rd_ ----,aFarme1s 􀁂􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁃􀁨􀀠:-<"-+ Rd --1--· '5w Campbell
Rd G:: "0 Cl: (:) -"0 Cl:, 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁀􀁥􀁡􀁨􀁾􀀠f{iI J _____2( I .--, 􀁾􀁉􀁣􀁨􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁤􀁳􀁾􀁾􀀠( W Bel! Line -r 􀀽􀁣􀁾􀁣􀁟􀁾􀀬___ _ Pagel , -!---f---------'-􀁩􀁾􀀠__, 􀁟􀁎􀁾􀁲􀁴􀀡􀁟􀁾􀀡􀂣􀁒􀁴􀁣􀁬􀀮􀁤
____􀁾􀀭,0>,,, c::r ,, I' c::r --)-<1>----_.I i9 I '"-'0 􀀭􀁾􀀠e __ _ 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠+ --KinQisley Rd Streets98 􀁃􀁯􀁰􀁾􀁧􀁨􀁴e 1988-1997. Microsoft Corporatlon and/or Its suppliers.
All rights rnserved. Please vISit our web site at hHpJfmaps.expedJa.com. 3-10 
VALUE OF AREA ACQUIRED The property acquired is considered as severed land. The market value of the Fee Simple Estate and/or easement rights of the area acquired -less oil, gas and sulfur
-is subject to existing easements (utility, drainage, pipeline, etc.). If any easements exist, they are not to be extinguished. Highest and Best Use As a part of the Whole Property Value
is: Based on Value of Whole Property: (x) Independently Derived by Consideration of: Income Approach () $ N/A Cost Approach () $ N/A Market Data Approach () $ N/A (If independently derived,
provide details on the proper forms on the following pages.) Discussion: The Area Acquired has no self-sustaining use and its estimated value is based on the value of the whole. The
Area Acquired will be used to increase the vehicle turning radius at the intersection and will be improved to accommodate handicap access. BREAKDOWN FOR COMPUTATION PURPOSES: Improvements:
Sod (700 S9 Ft x $0.64/S9 Ft) $ 448 Sprinkler system (700 S9 Ft x $0.59/S9 Ft) $ 413 􀀭􀀭􀀷􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭$
500 Concrete paving 􀀨􀀹􀀴􀁾􀁱􀀠Ft x $4.00/S9 Ft) $ 376 Curb (30 Ft x $13/Ft) $ 390 Total Improvements $_--=2-,-=,1.:.;27,-Land: Fee Simple 806 SF @$ nOO/SF = $ 13,702 Total Land $ 13,702
TOTAL AS A UNIT $ 15,829 ====== 4-1 
VALUE OF REMAINDER BEFORE ACQUISITION ffighest and Best Use: Planned Office Development Improvements: $_-$_-$_-$_-$_-$_-Total Improvements $ N/A Land: Fee 197,102 SF @$ 17.00/SF $ 3,350,734
Total Land $ 3,350,734 MARKET VALUE, REMAiNDER BEFORE THE ACQUISITION: $ 3,350,734 Discussion: The value of the Remainder Before the Acquisition is the mathematical difference between
the value of the Whole Property and the value of the Areas Acquired . . $3,364,436· $13,702 = $ 3,350,734 5-1 
VALUE OF REMAINDER AFTER ACQUISITION Highest and Best Use: Planned Office Development Correlationof Approaches to Value: Income Approach ( ) $ N/A Cost Approach ( ) $ N/A Market Data Approach (X) $ 3,364,436 Discussion of Damaging Influences and Method of Valuation: The utility
of the subject site will not be negatively affected after the acquisition and it is the appraiser's opinion that no damages will have occurred. The appraiser reviewed the paving plans
and determined that the proposed street and sidewalk improvements will not negatively impact the property. The same comparable sales used to value the Whole Property were used to value
the Remainder After the Acquisition. Cousidering the use to which the area acquired is to be subjected, the market value of the remainder immediately after the acquisition $ 3,364,436
BREAKDOWN FOR COMPUfATION PURPOSES: Improvements: $_--$_--$_--$_--$_-$_-Land: Fee Total Improvements 197,102 SF@$--'1-"7."'OO"'-I""'SF'--__ Total Land == $ 3,364,436 $ N/A $ 3,364,436
6-1 
CERTIFICATION 1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: -The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. -The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions
are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. -I have no present
or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. -I have no bias with respect to the property
that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. -My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
-My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client,
the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. -My analyses,
opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. -I have made a personal inspection
of the property that is the subject of this report. -Noone provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. 2.-\ 2,.-0 It-Name Date 
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMmNG CONDITIONS For the purpose of this appraisal, the following assumptions and contingent conditions are made a part hereof: I. This appraisal has been assigned to
this appraiser with the expressed condition that an appraisal be made of the real property taken and the value of any improvements thereon which are materially affected by the proposed
project. It is intended for the sole use of Dallas County. Others may receive a copy of this report due to legal requirements of disclosure, but the appraiser does not intend use of
this report by entities other than Dallas County. 2. This appraisal is made for the express purposc of establishing just compensation to the landowner by Dallas County; such compensation
being based on fair market value as defined elsewhere in this report. 3. Consideration is given to but no responsibility is assumed by the appraiser for matters of a legal character.
The title is assumed to be marketable. The appraiser has not made a survey of the real estate and does not assume responsibility for accuracy thereof. 4. While it is believed the infonnation,
estimates and analysis contained herein are correct, the appraiser does not guarantee them and assumes no responsibility for errors in fact. analysis or judgment. Information furnished
by others is believed reliable and has been verified where possible but it is not guaranteed to be accurate. 5. Information obtained from the flood prone maps prepared by the U. S. Corp.
of Engineers or other appropriate entities is assumed to be accurate. 6. If condemnation proceedings become necessary, this appraiser will testilY to an updated opinion reflecting the
value of the part taken considered as severed land, the value of the entire remainder prior to the taking and the value of the entire remainder after the taking, reflecting any change
in the size or character of the land andlor changes in number andlor conditions of the improvements located thereon. 7. The appraiser has no interest either real or implied in the subject
property and his opinion of value was not prejudiced by any influence other than that exerted by the normal procedure of appraisal. 8. The values stated herein are estimates. The appraiser
makes no guarantees written or implied, that the subject will sell for the value stated. 9. The supplied information indicates the size of the Whole Property, the Proposed Acquisition
and the Remainder Property. The appraiser used this information, which is assumed to be correct, to value the subject property. 10. The appraiser has made no investigations into the
presence or absence of hazardous materials. The appraiser is not qualified to detect hazardous material and assumes no liability in such regard. Environmental liability may greatly affect
the value of the property and shnuld be determined by a competent environmental professional. 11. The State ofTexas does not have full disclosure laws regarding real estate transactions.
Therefore the appraiser had to confinn all sales with brokers, property managers, mortgage brokers, grantors, grantees and other parties familiar with the transaction. The appraiser's
results are limited by the accuracy of the information supplied by the aforementioned individuals 12. Appraisers for Dallas County are required to estimate values of fractional portions
of ownership and establish compensation for property taken for public use. If any part of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice is contrary to the policy of Dallas
County, the policy of Dallas County shall prevail, but only for that part of the USPAP that is directly affected under the Jurisdictional Exception clause. 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page 1 of3 Parcel 5 Highway Keller Springs Road @Dallas North Tollway July, 2002 CSJ: 0918-45 .. Legal Land Description for Parcel 5 BEING a 0.0075 hectare
(0.0185 acre) tract or parcel ofland situated in the William Lomax Survey, Abstract No. 792, Town ofAddison, Dallas County, Texas, being a portion ofthat certain called 33.448 acres
(13.546 hectares) parcel known as Tract I conveyed to Richmont Properties Limited as evidenced by the deed recorded in Volume 94155, Page 3422 in the Deed Records ofDallas County, Tex.as.
Said 0.0075 hectares of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING by deed reference at a \1:," iron rod at an angle point in the East line of
said Richmont Properties Limited parcel and the West right-of-way line ofthe Dallas North Tollway (a variable width right-of-way); .. TImNCE South 02 degrees 51 minutes 12 seConds West,along
said.West riglit-of-way . and said East line, adistai:ice of158.825 meters (521.08 feet) to.the POINT OF· . BEGlNNlNG; I.) TIlENCE South 02 degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds West, continuing
along said West right-of-way and said East line, a distance of 12.192 meters (40.00 feet), to a point at the intersection of said line with the South line of said Richmont Properties
Limited parcel and the North right-of-way line ofKeller Springs Road (a variable width right-of-way); 2.} TIlENCE North 87 degrees 41 minutes 12 seconds West along said South line and
said North right-of-way line, a distance of9.144 meters (30.00 feet) to a point; . 3.) .. THENCE North 02 degrees 18 􀁭􀁩􀁮􀁵􀁾48 seconds East,'departirigSotith lirie and said North
right-of-way line, a distance of6.096 meters (20.00 feet) to a point; 4.) TIlENCE South 87 degrees 41 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of3.105 meters (10.19 feet) to a point; 5.}
THENCE North 47 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of8.662 meters (28.42 feet) to the POINT OF BEGlNNlNG; CONTAlNlNG 0.0075 hectares (0.0185 acres) ofland more or less. 
... County Dallas Page 2 00· Parcel 5 Highway Keller Springs Road @Dallas North Tollway July, 2002 CSJ: 0918-45 Note: The Basis ofBeaii.!ig is Westline 􀀨􀁩􀁴􀁨􀁾D;N.T. perTxDOT 􀁲􀁩􀁧􀁨􀁴􀁾􀁯􀁦􀀭􀀧�
�􀀢􀁡􀁹􀀠map. A plat of even survey date herewith accompanies this land description. THE STATE OF TEXAS . KNOWN BY ALL THESE MEN PRESENT: COUNTY OF DALLAS That I, Brian C. Wright, a
Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property descn"bed herein
was determined by a survey made on the ground during July & August, 1999 under my direction and supervision. Earth Tech ... ' . 1420 Mockingbird Lane . Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75247
", '. "', ',' 􀁾.. 􀁾􀁥􀀮uJ./i,.t7 (s/o?. . riaIi C. Wright .. Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4560 -State ofTexas 
f1'-p.a.c. ABSTAAcr-7'l2 a.oll!.! ACII!S 0.0075 R£CT,\R£S 111_ PIlIlPEIITIES LINITEP REllAIIIIIEII OF c.u.LEII 33.4M1 " 111.546 HECT,\R£SI 5. PO. 3422 o ,1 1 . ,. T, I, 􀀰􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀡􀀵􀁚􀁾􀀵􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾
􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀠I 􀁩􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾I .. i! if i! lca 􀀧􀁾l§ o o 􀁾􀀠0 I a: I !t ' .... ! Ieli·. 1'1 04( .!I ..I I.!'j ..I !􀁾􀁩􀀠0 ___ 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠L.I1'16'16'£ _________􀁾􀀱􀀰􀀠Tri:r&")'ii'e-" 􀀭􀁾􀀭...
o i I I I I I I I O 'ro 0 I.,..,-I ..,.., ,. tp,lrL DQCtI:lmat " IW:Il StM:T DolTA JlIM11ni 􀁾􀁊􀁉􀁈􀁕fltUi f\A1'(. IMo..ISIl UlITl "" I'fQtlEiO PCI 􀁬􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁑􀁉􀁉􀀠usc _1. ICIf"3PAGE'
COJt<lYPUrE CE l $Urt"£'I DtSf. tw£ rtF ........" DALLAS DALLAS RIC!IIOfI PROPERTIES LIIiITEP p..,:a. .." """ C$J10111 .... ' IlAY 2002 IGUlR SlRllI3 ROAD5 • I).Ul...l$ )I!IfI'M TtI,.1.'l.t.l'
ROW TAKING 0.0015 HII 0.0185 Ae PEE!) va... • PO. APPRIlX. AElIAINIlER-33.4295 􀁾􀁒􀂣􀁓􀀠13.519 HECTo\I!ES -+;\EXISTING tIQ'f-....j WIU.IAM LOMAX SURVEY 􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮
􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾.. 􀁾􀀮_ ____________+ __=-_______ . :) ______,_ 􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀠KELLER SPRINGS ROAD ---------------------------------------, 􀁾􀀠 . ' :' ."LEGEND .. ' ........ "" ...._ ••_ ••_
IXlSlUd'"_'IIC -ll'_ CQ(Qil. CF ACQl.$$ ioU« -t.-SUlt\'l.TLuc. -x-x-f'I)ICt UK ____ .errtLtvm _______ IJ,$OoCI(f ItA"""'" to 􀁾􀁾􀀠 P.D.C. I"CIPff fJ/I 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀠P.0.8. f(lnff tE SDlitM4
a rUG CJ:Mr:., MtIlOl' xxxm «yyy') ICICt WImItS cxoc: fUfl 
, COUNTY OF DALLAS DEPAIlTMENl' Of PUBLIC WORKS ROW 3 (519S) Project: 29 91-821100821 (Keller Springs at Dallas North Tollway) Parcel: 5 Owner: Rlchmont Propenies, Lui.. .Attri: Global
Real Estate Address: 16251 Da1Ias Parkway Addison, Texas 75001-6801 County ofDa1Ias Department ofPublic Works 411 Elm Street Da1Ias, Texas 75202 ATIN:Assistant Director ofPublic Works
-Property Division Gentlemen: o ..!fo Gffixt IllY sallatie!!; 1 herch) dgtCC to vrai'is the .tte 􀁾eompeasatiollll Md apprii:isels arid' check, 'agl'ee t9 Elem!te om, laud to 'the COtmlj
due wany fiILwe beitefits I may d.'ei'iVe ftum coIistrtIciton .,' -efthe l'GIId.' . . " Permission is hereby granted for appraisers employed by the County ofDa1Ias to enter on my property,
as identified above and shown on property plat furnished to me by the County for the purpose ofappraising my property in connection with the improvement project for the above identified
road, Permission is also granted for employees ofthe County to enter my property for the purpose ofstaking the right-of-way line should it be necessary. 1am desirous ofaccompanying or
having my designated representative accompany the appraiser c;heck, ,during his inspection o(my property" . . . -," '. . '. -'-.. ":• c':' , ': Date GA6E:. l-tvNr: fbII\£.1l)L-FAqu n
f"5 Print Name 1:\11... "S7. 5t(,,?> Telephone Number PI-\'P (\'n, fa fll, 􀁛􀁾􀁏􀀧􀁌􀀮 FormslCinapert App 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORAPPROVED VALUE SHEET KS Project Name/# Locati.on OWner-Name Address CMAQ 29, Keller Springs @DNT Review Board 16111 Dallas N. Pkwy, Addison, Texas Richmont Properties
Ltd., LP Appraisal # 16251 Dallas Parkway .. Appraiser Addison, Texas Parcel No. Date 02111/2004 􀁏􀁉􀂷􀀫􀁏􀁤􀀮􀁏􀁾􀀠WAS 5 _____􀁾􀀠_______________ M _________• __________________􀁾__
􀁾􀁟􀁾______ _ I; General Information -Whole Property: Present Zoning: PO (Planned Development District) Present Use: Vacant Highest and Best Use: Office or mUHiple restaurant development
Size: 4.5433 Acre(s) 197,908 Sq. Ft. Property Shape: Irregular 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭II.
Acquisition in Fee: Is Acquisition a BISECTION? No Category Land: 806 Sq Ft@$17.00/Sq Ft Total Land = $13,702 $13,702 Improvement Sod 700 Sq Ft @$O.64/Sq Ft Sprinkler 700 Sq Ft @$0.59/Sq
Ft Tree Paving Curb . 94 Sq Ft @$4.00/Sq Ft 30 Ft @$13.00/Ft Total Improvements " " Value. $448 $413 $500 $376 U!!Q. $2,127 Retention Value $1 $1 $1 $1 n $5 Sub Total: Fee Acquisition
= $15,829 III. Permanent Easement Land: Total Land = $0 Improvement Value Retention Value Total Improvements = $0 $0 Sub Total: Permanent Easement = 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭.. IV, Temporary Easement .I.!m!;!;, Total Land $0 Improvement ValUe Retention Value Total Improvements = $0 $0 Sub
Total: Temporary Easement = $0 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭V.Relocation Allowance Improvement
Amount iQ Total Relocation = $0 Sub Total: Relocation Allowance $0" 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭VI,
Damages Amount iQ Total Damages = $0 Sub Total: Damages = $0 TOTAL COMPENSATION (II" III .. IV .. V .. VI) $15,829'" 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭VII. REMARKS: Approved as wrltten 
DALLRS co RDMIN Fax:214-653-6517 Mar 25 '04 11: 16 P.Ol Car1er FergusonDALlAS COUNlY PU8l1C WORKS Property AgentProperty Oivision (214) 653-6497 direct411 Elm Street, Suite 300 Dallas,
Texas 75202-3389 (214) 653·6517 fax (214) 653·6400 cferguson@dallascounty.org FACSIMILE COVER PACE DAn I TIME: Marcn-25-2004 10;04 AM NUMBER OF 􀁐􀁁􀁇􀁾􀁓􀀠-1-INCLVDINCCOVER Pi\CE. TO:
Mr, Steve Chytchian. P.E. Asst. City Engineer Town of Addison, Public Works Department AOORESS: 16801 Westgrove Drive, Addison, Texas 75248 FAX: (972) 450-2837 PHONE: (972) 450·2886
Re: Parcel Site: CMAQ#12 2 15980 Midway Road CS/: 0918-45-486 Project No: 91·835/008358 (Midway Road @Keller Springs Road) M & f Development Company, 1m::. ROW: 9118-00-040 li1I Original
Will NOI follow 0 Original Will Follow Via: o Regular Mail oCertified Mail o Hand Delivery oOvemight Delivery COMMENTS Mr. Chutchian: Following for your review and consideration is my
letter to Mr. Coke and the letter from your office dated July 24, 2002. Also included IS an 8.5" x11x11· copy of dle 11" x 17" preliminary plat that was attached 10 my copy of the letter
from your office. Mr. Coke, attorney for Mr. Duda, has requested that jf he could obtain a letter mOr>! specific to the issue of the "100 foot access area" along Midway Road and tied
in with the. revised plans or plat(s), that Mr. Duda is prepared to dose. tnjs transaction. I am sure that Mr. Coke realizes that any proposed access would be subject to the items previously
Slated in me July 24, 2002 letter. In the alternative, it appears that we would have to obtain this parcel through condemnation proceeding>, if we cannot satisfy Mr. Duda's attorney:'
request Please contact me if you have any questions or if Ican furnish any additional Information. Thank you very much for your time and consideration in this matter. cdf I"" If 12.02
1M" FOle. CO., INC.I· Isc@1101 􀀬􀁲􀁾􀀠REQ. COYER PA,C11 Of 1 3/25/04 nl.""py: CMAQ""2/P-2/M & f!lev. Co.. ln<. CONftDENTIAUTV 􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠T"tS FAX Is INnNO(O FOR THE US, OF THE ADDUSSU
ONLY AND MAV CONTAIN INFO_T/ON THAT Is PRIVlLECEO, CONfIDENTIAl OR ExIMPT FROM DISClOSURE UNDERAPPll1;A8lf LAW. II someone ",ce;ves thi' Fax oilier than the .dd'..... or employee or
.gent ...ponsible (0' delivering this message to the .dd...see, you are he,.by notified that any di,semination, distributiOn 0' copying of this communic.atlon IS Sl1ictly prohibited.
If you have received !.his fax in error, plea", notify this office immediately and return the original me...ge to me at the add,e.. above vi. regular mail service by the U.S. POlla1
Service. POSlage will be ••imburled by this office. Thank You. 
DALLAS CO ADMIN Fax:214-653-6517 Mar 25 '04 11:17 P.W 􀁍􀁭􀀺􀁢􀀴􀀬􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀴􀀠M &: F Developlilent Company CERTiFlEDMAlL C/o Wesner, Ccke & Clymer, p.e RETURNRECElFI'REQUESTED Attn: Mr.
Stepheu A, Coke, Atty. 117001 1940 0000 3600 4243 U15S Noel Road, Suite 800 Three Galleria Tower Dallas, T<!leiS 75240-6602 R.'£: 15980 Midway Road, Addison, TX. PROJECT: CMAQ 1112 91-8J'/00S35B
PARCEL: 2 (Midway Road@KeUer Springs) CSJ: 0918-'15-486 ROW: 9118.()0.040 Dear Mr. Coke: " 111 :rnpPnSe to YOUt fo,,,ed 􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁲􀀧􀁲􀁥􀁱􀁵􀁥􀁳􀁴􀀠rec:elved FebrUary :27; 2004, folloWing
􀁦􀁑􀁾􀀠your review:and consideration: h 􀁡􀁬􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁤􀁲􀁯􀁩􀁮􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀠Micbiel Murphy, P.E., 􀁄􀁩􀁲􀁥􀀺􀁣􀁴􀁤􀁾􀀠of Public\Vorh for the Tow/:1' of Addison, dated July 24"; 2002 and an
11" x 17" cOpy of the "Preliminary" Pavmg P!ati prepared bY the consultant engineering fmn, Caner &: Burgess, me. You may note on the "prelimmary" Pavh1g Plan the original proposed acquisition
area and the revised proposed acquisition area. In addition, there is an area of apprwcimately 100 linear feet that is marked and denoted as •Access AUowed" along Midway Road, 􀁁􀁣􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁤􀁩􀁮􀀮􀁾􀀠t
o our 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁾􀁭􀀠􀁍􀀮􀁮􀀮􀁾􀀠and computations from the consultant'S (des, I believe if you compare tbh ·preliminary" Paving PliUl with the final Paving PliUl, a copy of which was IWIlled
to y01.l on or about JanuU}' 21, 2004 (see Sheet #83), the two maps are very similar, ifnot identical. Therefore, it would 'ppear that the final Paving Plan has allowed tor the same
100 feet of access along Midway Road and the possibility of a Meurb eutW and "driveway" punuiUlt to your request, subject to the 110rmal platting! site development plan proced1.lres
of the Town of Add,;$on (please see Appraisal Report, Section 1·10 􀁾􀁮􀁤􀀠􀀱􀀺􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠copies included). , , ". , . . . 􀁉􀁮􀀧􀁬􀀮􀁳􀁭􀁜􀁬􀁾􀀠as i􀁩􀁬􀀯􀁩􀁤􀁥􀁲􀀤􀁴􀁾􀀠your 􀁣􀁯􀁾􀁣􀁥􀁲􀁮􀁳􀀠md
request, Iu.; 􀁉􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁾􀁩􀁮􀀠􀁗􀁨􀁾􀁴􀁄􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁗􀁬􀁴􀁲􀀠can 􀁲􀁥􀁱􀁾􀁩􀁲􀁾􀀠or expect from the various municipalities witb which we partner on projects. I did speak with Mr. Steve
Chutchian, P.E" Assistant City Engineer for the T,own of Addison on March 2, 2004 regarding ,this matter. Mr. ChutchiiUl $ud that he is satisfied with the current proposed design III1d
construction of the planned project and furthermore, he believes that with tbe revised ali&nment that there will be no de.nial ot access. Mr. Chutebian also pointed out that the property
j. now served by an __t /joint use access at the soutb end of the properly (mgress and egress easement, Volume 83046, Page 4022, set forth ii the title commitment, copy mcluded). From
my review of the easement document, it appears as if yOut client Can use tho road that is located in the easement. Our CMAQ Pro&,"am Manager is ,,1$0 :satisfied a. '0 h"w .hi, wue .I...
b..." r.solved ....ith respect to the 􀁾􀁣􀁣􀁥•• l.sue along Mld..,2Y Road. 411 Elm Street, Suite 300 • Dallas, Texas 􀀷􀀵􀀲􀀰􀀲􀁾􀀳􀀮􀀮􀁬􀀮􀀸􀀬􀀹􀀠• , I d t .. . .'. " ' 
Mar 25 '04 11:17 P.03Fax:214-653-5517DALLAS CO ADMIN ...􀁾...........,:,. ..........,...",,,"'----------"CMA.Q #/2 9J.8351008358 PtJrc.l: :2 M & fDevl!ltJpmenl (4, . PtJge2 , ... P!easecontact
me ifyou hav:e au.y queroolU or if!can b. of further assistance. Mr direct lin. is (214) . 653-6497, fax (214) 653·6517 Of e·lnill cferguSon@clallascounty.otg. Thank you for your time
and help in wmpleting this trall$acdon. 􀁾􀀮􀁃􀁁􀁲􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁆􀀧􀁾􀀠Property 􀁁􀀺􀁾􀀠(J PropettyDivision -D.C.P.W. , 􀁣􀁤􀁦􀀮􀁓􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀠. 􀀦􀁾-LIT. -Addis.. P!lblfc We,*, Dept.• dated July
:14. ;J002 fulimiM;;, Paoing P14., Shm J AppNisaJ ""<rrpI>. S«tioru 1·10 & I·U Grant of'&s.emtll" Yo 8J046, P. 4012 􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀠. " .' " -. :. " ',',' 411 Elm Street, Suhe )00 • Dallas,
Texas 75202.3389 • 214·653·6400 .' . 
DAlLAS CO ADMIN Fax:214-653-6517 Mar 25 '04 11:17 P.04 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT " : (9'12)400.2871 .16BOI W"'iuftt . July 24, 2002 Mr. Fritz L. Duda, Jr. FRITZ DUDA COMPANY .One GaIlerla
To'Wer 13355 Noel Road. LB 3, Suite 1315 Dallas, Texas 75240-6603 Re; Right-Tum Lane lit Southeast Comer ofMidway Rd. & KelJl.lr Springs Rd. Deat Mr. Duda:..: :, ,.... . . . .... ::.
."," : ". :., ' " .\ .: 􀁾􀀬􀀠" " ',.' .... ..' Previously; our Public Works Department'stliJfmetwith you and representatives of .• Dallas County Public Works and Property Acquisition
Departments. regarding proposed access to a lot loeated along Midway Road, near KeUer Springs Road. The ToWII indicated that limiting the capecity ofa neces:;ary right-tum lane onthe
southeast comer . ofthis interseetion (see attached alternate #1) would allow the construction ora proposed access drive approach 8Ild adhere to our Comprehensive Tl1IDSpOrtation PIm.
However, final approval ofthe location ofthe drive approach is subject to review ofyour site or development plans by our statt and our concUlTence that it is located within the limits
set furth in the Tnwsportation PIm. i, Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Steve Cbutcbian, P.E., 􀁾􀁴City p.ngineer. at 972-450.2886, or myself.
. " . ,' ... .,.. Sincerely. 􀁾􀁻􀀮􀁾􀁲􀀯􀀨􀀠MichaelMurphy,P.E. r Director ofPublic Works Cel 1sclc Losgl=; Pano.... Drin.okc.rhDa;. CMAQ Program 05.... Sid Homer, P.E., Dallas County,
Senior Property Acquisltioll Agent 􀁱􀀺􀁮􀁊􀁾􀁶􀀮􀁌􀀺􀀮 .. 􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠'.' .-
• •• --P.05Mar 25 '04 11:17Fax:214-653-6517DALLAS CO ADMIN c o.(/) > (J) 0::: o I+() (J) ...... .D :J (,/) )-, L o C E (J) L a.. ','. J , 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀡+-• .,., ../, ' 􀁾􀀠! i ; i I I
l 1 ! I i I i i I i , ! j f • I 141'! i ,i, II ,,! ij i, i i I' , 􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁉1f. 
Steve Chutchian To: cterguson@dallascounty.org Subject: CMAQ #12 Project No. 91-835/008358 Carter: Our staff reviewed our letter, dated July 24, 2002, to Mr. Fritz L. Duda. Jr. and your
recent correspondence. dated March 4. 2002. We feellhal both letters sufficienlly detail and describe OUf positions regarding access to the property at Midway Rd. and Keller Springs
Rd. II is respectfully requested Ihat Mr. Duda be advised of this and consider finalization of negotiations for right-of-way acquisition with your office. Should you have any additional
questions, please let me know. Thanks. steve Chutchian, P.E. Assistant City Engineer 1 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS January 9,2004 Mr. Suja Mathew, P.E. Texas Department ofTransportation 4777 East Highway 80 Mesquite, Texas 75150 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality
(CMAQ) Program Mylar Revisions, Keller Springs Road at Midway Road -Project 12 Dear Ms. Mathew: Attached please find the revised mylar sheets for the intersection of Keller Springs Road
at Midway Road in the City ofCarrollton and the Town Addison. Services that were perfonned by Carter & Burgess, Inc. included modification of the design to NITA's parking lot on the
SE comer of Midway Road. The previous design had a potential loss ofparking for NITA and this modification was necessary. The design revisions were approved by NITA and completed by
the consultant. Please insert these revised sheets into the plan set that were previously sent to your office and destroy the replaced sheets. If you have any questions or concerns,
please call 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁊􀀯􀀯􀁾Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachments: (1.) Mylar Plan Sheets 6, 7, 83, 86 and 87 -I copy (2.) Paper
Copy ofthe above sheets -2 copies (3.) Revised Engineers Estimate -2 copies cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Dallas County, Asst. Dir., Trans. & Plan., w/o attachments Sam Moghadassi, P.E., TxDOT
Roadway Design, w/o attachments Jerry Murawski, P.E., City ofFarmers Branch, w/l copy attachments 2 and 3 MiKe:iM:Y!iPhYiP;RjTQ\V:n)6fAddison, w/lcopy attachments 2 and 3 I Steven Chutchian,
P.E., Town ofAddison, w/o attachments Nancy Cline, P.E., City ofCarrollton, w/l copy attachments 2 and 3 Cesar Molina, P.E., City ofCarrollton, w/o attachments Selas Camarillo, P.E.,
R.P.L.S., Asst. Director, w/1 copy attachments 2 and 3 Sid Homer, Dallas County Property Division, w/o attachments Mark Bouma, P.E., Director ofEngineering NITA, wll copy attachments
2 Eric Stamater, P.E., Carter Burgess, Inc., w/o attachments S:\General\G04CORR\G4-1OUTlTXD0l\2004\1095 P12 Updated Mylar Revisions NITA parking lot.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas,
Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS January 9,2004 Mr. Suja Mathew, P.E. Texas Department ofTransportation 4777 East Highway 80 Mesquite, Texas 75150 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality
(CMAQ) Program Mylar Revisions, Keller Springs Road at Midway Road -Project 12 Dear Ms. Mathew: Attached please find the revised mylar sheets for the intersection of Keller Springs Road
at Midway Road in the City of Carrollton and the Town Addison. Services that were performed by Carter & Burgess, Inc. included modification of the design to NITA's parking lot on the
SE comer of Midway Road. The previous design had a potential loss of parking for NITA and this modification was necessary. The design revisions were approved by NITA and completed by
the consultant. Please insert these revised sheets into the plan set that were previously sent to your office and destroy the replaced sheets. If you have any questions or concerns,
please call 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁪􀀯􀀯􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program Program Manager Attachments: (1.) Mylar Plan Sheets 6, 7, 83, 86 and 87 -1 copy
(2.) Paper Copy ofthe above sheets -2 copies (3.) Revised Engineers Estimate -2 copies cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Dallas County, Asst. Dir., Trans. & Plan., wlo attachments Sam Moghadassi,
P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachments Jerry Murawski, P.E., City ofFarmers Branch, wI! copy attachments 2 and 3 Mike Murphy, P.E., Town ofAddison, wll copy attachments 2 and 3
􀁓􀁴􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁱􀁬􀀬􀁱􀁴􀁣􀁨􀁩􀁡􀁮􀀬􀀠p.E., Town ofAddison; wlo attachments Nancy Cline, P.E., City of Carrollton, wI! copy attachments 2 and 3 Cesar Molina, P.E., City of Carrollton,
wlo attachments Selas Camarillo, P.E., R.P .L.S., Asst. Director, wI! copy attachments 2 and 3 Sid Horner, Dallas County Property Division, wlo attachments Mark Bouma, P.E., Director
of Engineering NITA, wI! copy attachments 2 Eric Starnater, P.E., Carter Burgess, Inc., wlo attachments 􀁓􀀻􀁜􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁇􀀰􀀴􀁃􀁏􀁒􀁒􀁜􀁇􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀰􀁕􀀱􀁜􀁔􀁘􀁄􀁑􀁔􀁜􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀴􀁜􀀱􀀰􀀹􀀵􀀠P12
Updated Mylar Revisions NTfAp<lrking lot.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
Midway Road CorrIdor Intersoction Jmprovomonts DesIgn CO$t EstImate Design, Construction, and R,O.W, Aequlsltlon MIdway at Keller Springs 
TOTALS ,IUtALS: : 􀁾􀀠$127. i :y ,,,.,0 :.72 : 􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠,,37 , ;507.584,.76 " ' II"'''' , IJOB I ... 17.93' CMAQBK.1 00%(4 ).xLS • 
1 , PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY 06" ;0 .. OSSS 066S· OSSG .. • OGGS 06SS 0666 0666 OG66 06G8 0668 SMALL ROSa REfL PAY MRK REFt PAV MRK REFl PAY 􀁾􀁒􀁘􀀠REFL P A \f MRK REFL PAY MRK AEFL
PAY MRK REFL PAY MRK REFL PAY 􀁍􀁒􀁾􀀠REFL PAY MRK REFL PAY MRK REFL PAY MRl< REFL PAY MRK PREFAB PAY PREFAB PAV LOCATION SGN ASSM TY J(W}(BRI\) TY I m(SLQ) TY I <W)($LD) TY I (w)(oon
TY I (WHSLD) TY I (WH$LO) TY I (Y)(SLD) TY I (WHSLD) I TY II (W)(SLO) T'f II {W)(OOT> TY II (WHSLQ) TY II (W)(SLD) MRK TY C MRK TY C (lQOmm) (lOOmm) 􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠<IOOmm) UOOmm) USOmm) (200mm)
(20Omm) (6.00mm) ! (lOOmm) nOOmm} (JSOmm) (600mm) (If) cARROw} tW) (WORD> E' M M M M M M M ... M M M M EA EA McEWEN ROAD . 157.68 15'.55 · -14.50 56.50 8..9 25.00 -. 14.50 25.00 2 I
I SPR!NG VALLEY ROAD 14.0 1819.03 -· . so.O 290.91 534.02 -19.93 􀁾􀁯􀀠290.91 19.93 18 9 I LINOaERGK DRIVE 2.0 . 194.90 · 5.79 116.86 83.00 -45.72 19 116.86 '5.72 6 2 KELLER SPRINGS
ROAD 12.0 1099.30 -22.SO 64.5 -461.16 -340.08 22.50 .5 -340.08 18 10 I SOJOURN DRIVE 1.0 109.39 251.55 -. 216.9S 173.38 23.01 53.58 -I -216.96 53.58 8 2 I * FOR CONTRACTORS INFORI.IATION
ONtY SURFACE PREPARATION SUMMARY RAISED PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY IOG18 OG18 0678 OGT8 0678 LOCATION PAY SURF PREP fOR MRKS UOOmm) M PAY SURF PREP FOR MRKS U50mm) M PAY SURF PREP FOR
MIlKS (600mm) M PAY SURF PREP FOR MR1<S (ARROW) EA PAY SURF PREP FOR MR'S (WORf) EA McEWEN ROAD -7'.50 25.00 2 I SPRING VALLEY ROAD 50.00 290.97 79.93 18 9 LINDBERGH DRIVE5.79 176.86 45.72 6 2 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 87.00 -340.08 18 10 i SOJOURN DRIVE -216.96 53.58 8 2 0612 0672 0672 0672 0672 RAlS PAY !.tRKR RAIS PAY MRKR RAIS PAV MRKR RAIS PAY "'RKR RAiS
PAY !.tRKA LOCATION L C(TRAF BTN b. C<TRAF BTN CL B (REFL) CL B IREFL) CL B (REFL) TYPE W TYPE Y TYPE I-C TYPE I-A TYPE II-A-A EA EA EA EA EA i McEWEN ROAD 141 82 7 17 32.0 SPRING VALLEY
ROAD 1531 -79 -178.0 LINDBERGH DRIVE 83.0 96.0 --60.0 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 1014 -'6.0 -163.0 I SOJOURN DRIVE 232 126 5.0 42.0 58.0 I PAVEMENT. GRADING. AND DRAINAGE QUANTITIES 0100 0110
OlGO 0162 I 03.0 03GO 0360 400 0423 0464 0'.' 0464 0.6. 0465 0530 1;0 0531 0531 0531 053. 536 5027 .. 529 I EXCAVATION FURN AND BLOCK SOOACP (SASE) CONe PAY MONO CURB STRueT RET WALL
RC PIPE RC PIPE RC PIPE Re PIPE INLET DRVWYS I RAMP CONC WHEELCHAIR WHEELCllAIR COlIC MONO MED LANDSCAPE LAYQQWN CONC CURB' (RDWY)PREP ROW PLAC TPSL (BERMUDA) <TY B) (CPCOl <150mm) EXCAV
(CAST-IN-(CL III) (eL III) (CL III) (CL III) <COMPLETE) (eONC) SIDEWALK SIDEWALKS RAMP RAI.IP MEDIAN NOSE PAVERS CLRS RAMP <DOwEll iLOCATION (CL 2H150mm) <IOOmm) (200mm) (CULV}(SMALL)
PLACE) (450mm) (525mm) (60Qmm) C900mm} (TY C) (15Otnm) tty 22) (TY 2) tTY II} I M___􀁲􀀮􀁍􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁅􀁗􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀭􀀰􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀫􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀫__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾__􀀫􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭�
�􀁉__􀁍􀁇􀁩􀀵􀀲􀁾􀁒􀁾􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀽􀀲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀸􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀴􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁾__-4__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀭􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁴__ M 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀀱􀀭__􀁅􀁁􀁾􀀲__-1__􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀁲􀀭􀁟􀁅􀁾􀁁􀁾􀀱􀀭􀁾􀁏􀁦􀁴􀀽􀀳􀁍􀁾􀁇􀀬􀀲__-+___􀁅􀁟􀁾__
-4L-__􀁾􀁾􀁁􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁒􀁎􀁇􀁾􀂧􀁖􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁌􀁌􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁄􀁾􀀽􀀰􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀵􀀧􀀷􀀹􀁾􀀵􀀵􀁾􀁴􀀽􀀽􀁊􀀳􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁾􀀽�
�􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀹􀀲􀀰􀁾􀁓􀁏􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁴􀀽􀁾􀀹􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁴􀀽􀁾􀀵􀀲􀁾􀀹􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀹􀁧􀁇􀁾􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀳􀁾􀀶􀁾􀁂􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁪􀀴􀁾􀀹􀂷􀁴􀀸􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀧􀁇􀁾􀀶􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀰􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀹􀀸􀁾􀁴􀀽􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀹􀁾􀀱􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀷􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀷􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀲􀁾􀀱􀀭􀁾􀀼􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁴􀀭􀁾􀁟􀀠4.0 221.0􀁾􀁉􀁎􀁏􀁂􀁅􀁒􀁇􀁈􀀠DRIVE 􀁾􀀠235 H172 71 =H 8-9 -􀁾􀀠I
18 -----8.6 KELLER 􀁓􀁐􀁾􀀠ROAD 􀁾􀀵􀀹􀀴􀀠􀁾􀁌􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀳􀁾􀀴􀀱􀁾􀀭􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀷􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁾__􀁴􀀭􀁾􀀧􀁏􀁾􀀶􀀲􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀧􀀬􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀳􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀵􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀵􀁾􀀮􀁾�
�􀀶􀁾􀀽􀁴􀁬􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀮􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀱􀀵􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀲􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀵􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀳􀁾􀀰􀁾􀀷􀀮􀁾􀀰􀀽􀀽􀁾
􀁾􀀽􀁩􀁉􀀴􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀴􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀹􀀮􀀻􀀴􀀽􀀽􀁾ISOJOURN DRIVE 0.49' 205 418 418 1355 589 11.3 -1.05 1.70 -I -2 68 5 343.. -3 --36.0 -*FOR CONTRACTORS INFORMATION ONLY •• INCLUDES CONC
FOR RAMP Sl[)£,.ALKS Bcwl...=....... OUANTITY SUMMARY SHEET SHEET lor z-_.􀁾􀁾􀀠••tt 􀁦􀁉􀁩􀁉􀀺􀁩􀁩􀁍􀀮􀀮􀀯􀁏􀀮􀁯􀁾􀁵􀀮􀀮tE$11HI) 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠• 01 J:V't81'1..... -co 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠""
_.h-. 􀁾􀀠IK h 􀁾􀀠-® 2003 hOOT ..,., ......... <WU& '""'" -
. I j "" -,, PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SUMMARY1 REMOVAL SUMMARY •£ 􀁾􀀠, i 􀁾􀀠0104 0104 0104 0104 0104 0104 OlOS 0496 LOCATION REMOV CONe (PAY> M2 REMOV CONC <SDWl.K) M2 REMOV CONC <DRVWn
M2 REMOVE CONC (MEo) "2 REMOV CONC (CURB OR C&G) " REMOV CONC {RETAIN WALL} M2 RMY STAB as &lOR ASPH PAY tel 2) VAR OEP U2 REMOVE CONe (INLET) EA McEWEN ROAD 62 38 -182 -39,,11 -2 SPruNG
VALLEY ROAD 1399 331 111 868 ---7 LINIlllERGH ORNE 34 -10' ---17 I KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 1115 -32' 259 13 --4 SOJOURN DRIVE 323 447 12. 417 ---2 0677 0677 0677 LOCATION ELIM EXT PAY MRK
II< MRKR (lOOmm) M ELIM EXT PAV MRK I< MRKR <lSOmm) M ELIM EXT PAV _ I\. MRKR <450mm) .. McEWEN ROAD 185 45 173 SPRlNG VALLEY ROAD 1663 -65 LINDBERGH DRIVE 229 -41 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD
1056 -52 SOJOURN DRIVE --41 t , • 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I, 􀁾􀀠WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY RELOCATION SUMMARY j ,􀁾􀀠, 0502 0662 0662 0662 0662 0662 0662 LOCATIO!! BARRICADES. SIGNS AND TRAF
HANDLE MO WRK ZN PAY JARK REMQV (W}($lD) UOOmm) .. WRK ZN PAY MR. REMOV <W)(OOTl tlOOmm) M WRK ZN PAY MRK HEMOV' <W)tBRK) UOOmm) M WRK ZN PAV MRK REMOV (Y}(SLDl (IOOmml M .RK ZN PAY
<IRK REMOV <W)(WORO) EA WRK ZN PAY MRK REMOV (W)(ARROWI EA McEWEN ROAD I ---172 --SPRING VALLEY ROAD 3 -38.0 646 ---LINDBERGH DRivE I ---224 --KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 3 68 -259 -2 4 SOJOURN
DRIVE 3 ------: \' " 􀁾􀀠0649 LOCATiON RELOC SMALL ROSD SGN ASSMS EA McEWEN ROAD 3 SPRING VALLEY ROAD 5 LINDBERGH DRIVE 3 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 17 SOJOURN DRIVE 7 f "" :! _ea..........e••
􀁻􀁬􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀪􀁾" < <. 􀁾􀀠CARL E. ITuas Depor/mIIIt of Tronspottallon2 80291 QUANTITY 􀁾􀀠SUMMARY, I\. SHEET;; 'r:;;:> '1 SHEET Z OF 2 􀁾􀀠" 1 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀠􀁾AI:I <m.m'f""I,IoJ,. tEsltl'£Do
tM-I 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠-"I Of'i/7te'1J􀁾􀀠• m-"" '" 􀁾􀀠.,., ""'" 􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁃􀁮􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠I --. 􀁾􀀠􀁾® 2003 TlIIlOT DOU..06""'-" ... 1 '"iii 􀁾􀀠-"" "" 
----------------------/END CSJ 0916-45-344 5T'.10.067.58 'I. KELLER SPRINGS ROAD //, , , . ,"; 􀁉􀁾􀀠,.,'" 􀀱􀁾􀀠,w RAfip'.TYPE 22 a N a ,+ (200mm)(CPCD)a . CONC PAV 1200mm)(CPCO)« f671.7
"'2 Vl MIDWAY ROAD 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭______ _w z :::; 0.152 "2 :c UONO CURB U50mmHJ'(P II)u 0.98 Idf« :::;: -------ID1\S'rfNG Mw-•• ---------A SCALE IN METERS 􀁾􀀠I o 5 10 ISm
SCALE: I:SOO CURB (TYPE 1I){ISOmm} MONO CURB (TYPE 11}(ISOmm) 56.1 t.I 28.0 t.I DRIVEWAY oso mm} 3.Om RECESSEl) INlET 18.11.12 ,-,,0/10 CURB (TYPE 1I10S0mml in LEGEND r.i9 PROPOSED CONCRETE
l!l!Il PAVEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Il88l PAVER MEOlAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE I12lJ DRIVEWAY rr1 PROPOSED GRASS L.:.:J MEDIAN ij] PROPOSED SIDEWALK r'1 PROPOSED CONCRETE LJ MEOIAN _ •
PROPOSED ROW .. ---"--.. -.. "-.. 􀁾􀀠_.... ---.. :' i 􀀭􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭92 NOTEo I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWlNC FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLE T EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS. J. ALL
CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWlSE NOTED. 4. PAVER AND SUB-SASE TYPES TO BE _VEO BY TOWN OF ADDISON. S. SEE MISC. DETAILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAILS. Gl:CWler..........
􀁪􀁔􀀮􀁾􀁡􀁳􀀠Derx>rtmont of TrOllSpor/qilon PAVING PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MlDWAY ® 2003 T.OOT -SKEET 3 OF :5 􀁾􀁍􀀠,,,., 􀁾􀁍􀁑􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀁾􀀮􀁾-􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠(Ii !il7t87J .-􀁾􀀠• $fAot
""'" -m_.k 􀁾'""""" ...... ........ ... .. "" 􀁾􀀠 c 
____ • -• ---. 􀁾;ElS 􀁊􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁪.-0 ""..:: 􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁉Iii.8 􀁩􀁾􀁉􀀠!:i!!h! 􀁾􀁲􀀽50! 􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀠jj-' 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺".0 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾• 􀁾• 􀁾􀀠0 " 􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀠f:§ 􀁾􀁨􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀠b!:..!.
􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺8g!ii"" , 􀂧􀁾􀁩􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠;!.. ;jiu. 􀀡􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀠....--􀀺􀁧􀁾􀀠-': 5Ei 􀁾􀁾􀁾."" 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁩􀀠 «("" 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠• ! '1 􀁾􀀠T 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀠􀀡􀁾􀁩􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁈􀀠,􀁾􀂧􀀠􀀡􀁾􀁾�
�􀁈􀀠􀁾􀀡􀁬􀀠􀁾􀀠os, , I , I I I SCALE IN METERS ! i o 5 10 15m SCALE. 1,500 REMOVAL NOTES, 􀁉􀁾􀀠I. SEE SIGNiNG AND PAVEMENT MARKING SHEETS􀁉􀁾􀀠FOR SIGN RELOCATIONS. • <.> 2. SEE SIGNAL
PLANS FOR SIGNAL.;,; RELOCATIONS.􀁉􀁾􀀠3. EXISTING LANDSCAPE PAVERS IN MEDIANS ,w SHALL BE SALVAGED AND USE!) IN PROPOSED MEDAINS. 4. ALL RELOCATIONS. REMOVALS, AND ADJUSTMENTS BY OTHERS
SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES OR THE RESPECTIVE C!T!ES. REMOVE INLET REMOVAL LEGEND IiIil EXISTING CONCRETE I!!!l!!l PAVEMENT r-l EXISTI>IG CONCRETE
L!J MEDIAN I:<"ia EXISTING CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY EXISTUIG SIDEWALK !--.. _ . 􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁴􀁄􀀠• I -.. 􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁯􀀮􀁷􀁾􀀠 1 "'''-''_ L .. ____ .. 0 N 0 + 0 <i .... '" ... MIOWAY
ROAD -l-__ R 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭UJ Z ::::i +-'·';'1__ _ RELOCATE LIGHT (BY OTHERS) ::x: U RELOCATE LIGHT.... (BY OTHERS)4: :::;: •• ","STING R()W----• ----•
-•• -•• -•• 􀁾􀀠EXISTlNG MGATJ()N IN CENTER "'EDIANSPOLE SHALL BE CAPPED AND REMOVED AT THE MEOIAN REMOVAL LIMITS. IRRIGATION CAPPING SHALL BE SUBSIIlIARY TO MEOIAN REMOVAL. _Carlel'.........
" RELOCATE SIGN REMOVAL PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY SHEET 3 OF 3 􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀠 IC' Z003 r.001 ',􀁴􀀧􀁾􀁬_________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________c-____________________􀀭􀀧􀀡􀁣􀀬􀀢􀀭􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁉􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁬􀀡􀀱􀀡􀀡􀁬􀁾􀂷􀁬􀁾􀂷􀀺􀂷-a. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀦􀀠
PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND ® IQOmm WHITE SOLID ® IOOmm WHITE BROKEN © IOOmm YELLOW SOUD ® 2-IOOmm YElLOW SOLID ® 150mm WHITE SOLID ® 200mm WHITE SOLID ® 200mm YELLOW SOLID ® 600m", WHITE
SOLID Q) TY • CoR R.P..... ® WHlTE LEFT TURN ARROW-PREFAB (TY CI EXISTING SIGN RElOCATION L() o '" + o <i l-V) w :J , "... • .. • .. I ,, '"'' .. M R =15m 􀁾􀀠RI-2 􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀁩􀁌􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁙􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀷􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀠ONLY ONLY R3-8Ll 􀀮􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁓􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠'" y:·"....---EXISTING SIGN RELOCATION EXlSTlNG SIGN RELOCATION , , , ._\􀁾􀁾􀀠ONLY ONLY
RHlL w © WHITE RIGHT TURN ARROW-PREFAB (TY CI @"ONLY" WHITE" PREFAB <TY CI ® WHITE STRAIGHURIGHT ARROW" PREFAB <TY CI ® 600rnm X IBOOrnm WHITE SOLID ;;::; .. 􀁾􀁾􀀠ONLY ONLY R3-SLL R
=15m ROO LANE MUST TURN RIGHT R3-7R I STA.IO+053.480 /􀁲􀀮􀁅􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁄􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁖􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁾􀀠MATCH EXISTING , RI-2 ,< , "\": , , , ,, ,, ,,,,,, " • SCALE IN METERS
1iijiM-i o 5 10 15m SCALE: I,soO PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES I. DIMENSiONS ARE SHOWN IN "'ETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. REFER TO THE PAVEMENT ",ARKING DETAILS SHEET FOR MARKING DETAILS
AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALIGN AND MATm PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO THE ORIGINAL EXISTING MARKING LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. CROSSWALK LOCATJON
SHAll BE ADJUSTED AT THE DlRECTlON OF THE ENGINEER TO INSURE THAT HANOICAP RAMPS (EXCLUDING FLAREO SlOES) ARE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE CROSSWALK. 5. EXISTING ROADWAY SIGNS SHAll REMAIN
IN PLACE AT THE END OF THE PROJECT EXCEPT WHERE REOUIRED TO B£ REMOVED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THJS PROJECT. 6. PROPOSED ROADWAY SIGNS ARE DESIGNATED BY TMUTCD NO. 7. FOR SIGN INSTALLATJON
ON $lGNAl POLES. SEE SIGNAL PLANS. S. REFER TO ·SUMMARY OF SMALL SlGNS· PAY ITEt,AS• 9. FOR ALL EXlSTING SIGNS TO BE RELDCA TEO. CONTRACTOR SJiALL FURNISH ANO INSTALL NEW BREAKAWAY Slue
POSTS ON A NEW FOUNOATlON. REPLACE OAMAGEO ATTACHMENT HAROWARE.AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGED GALVANIZING. 10. ALL BEGIN AND ENO STATIONS FOR PAVEMENT ...ARKINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL FIELD-VERIFY ALL. _e-.......ge .. SIGNING 8. PAVEMENT MARKING KELLER SPRlNGS ROAD AT t,UOWAY SHEET IOF 3 􀀽􀁾􀀠--"'-..,II AiI1.D>T >10.1XJ!;I<U1'I> tJ.I.j 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠"-..,.. go; ",...
O4lmen os•􀁾􀀱􀁩􀀬􀁦􀁉􀀮􀀠h '::.'􀀭􀀬􀁾""IS> 20Ql r.oor ,... ........ ---... --.. ,.. 􀁾"" """'" 
DALlAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS February 11, 2004 Mr. S6las Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S. Dallas County Department ofPublic Works Property Division 411 Elm Street Dallas, TX 75202 Subject: Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality Control (CMAQ) Program Right-or-Way Correction, Parcel 2 -Project 12 Dear Mr. Camarillo: The designer Carter and Burgess, Inc. has arranged for the surveyor, AZB,
Inc. to make the revisions requested by your office for the above project. The surveyor has made all requested corrections. Attached please find the revised final right-of-way documents
for the intersection ofKeller Springs Road at Midway Road. Parcel 2 was revised because of pre-amble corrections and an existing easement not stated on the plat. Attachments 2 and 5
have been forwarded to TxDOT for their records. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact this office at (214) 653-7460 or Sam Wilson at (214)653-6421. ' , Sincerely, 􀁾􀀯􀁊􀀷􀁾
Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachments: I) ROW Map (22 x 34 Mylar) 2) ROW Map (22 x 34) -(I paper copy) 3) ROW Map (II x 17) -(1 paper copy) 4) Parcel 2 Plat and Legal Description
-(2 originals) 5) Electronic files ofROW corrections-(l disk) co: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachments Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT Roadway
Design, wI attachments 2 -5 Sam Moghadassi P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachments Jonathan Cox, R.P.L.S., TxDOT Right-of-Way Division, wlo attachments Sid Horner, Dallas County
Property Division, wlo attachments Craig Marek, ChiefProperty Appraiser, wlo attachments LaVaughn Fisher, Dallas County Right-of-Way Division, wlo attachments Mike Muiphy;P.E., Town
ofAddison, w/l copy 􀁡􀁴􀁴􀁡􀁣􀁬􀂥􀁮􀁾􀁉􀁬􀁣􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁬􀁬􀁊􀀱􀁾􀀴􀀬􀀠". Eric Starnater, P.E., Carter & Burgess, Inc., wlo attachments' ' 􀁓􀀺􀁜􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁇􀀰􀀴􀁃􀁏􀁒􀁒􀁜􀁇􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀰􀁕􀀱􀁜􀁄􀁁􀁌􀁌􀁁􀁓�
�􀀰􀁜􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀴􀁜􀀶􀀰􀀱􀁟􀁐􀀱􀀲􀀬􀀠Parcel 2 ROW Corr., Keller Springs at Midway.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
EXHIBIT County Dallas Page 1 of2 Parcel 􀁾􀀠D-15Highway Intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road June 7,1999 CSJ: Revised: May 15, 2003 Account: Revised: February 06, 2004
. Field Note Description for Parcel 􀁾􀀠BEING 179.12 square. meters [1,928 square feet] of land in the David Myers Survey, Abstract No. 923 in Dallas County, Texas and being a portion
of that 1.21646 hectares [3.0060 acres] parcel of land as described as Tract II in a deed to M & F DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (M & F tract) as recorded in Volume 90081, Page 3202 of the
Deed Records of Dallas County Texas (D.R.D.C.T.), said M & F tract being in Lot 2 of Midway Park North II, an addition to the City of Addison as recorded in Volume 83035, Page 1180 of
said Deed Records, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an "X· cut on concrete found at the southwest corner of said M & F tract on the
existing west right-of-way line of Midway Road, 1. THENCE, North 33 degrees 21 minutes 06 seconds West, along the west property line of said M & F tract and said existing east right-of-way
line of Midway Road, for a distance of 82.987 meters [272.27 feet] to a one-half inch steel rebar with yellow plastic cap marked "ALB." set for the intersection of said existing east
right-of-way line of Midway Road and the existing south right-of-way line of Keller Springs Road as described in Volume 97009, Page 03547 D.R.D.C.T.; 2. THENCE, North 56 degrees 37 minutes
56 seconds East, along said existing south right-of-way line of Keller Springs Road, a distance of 5.533 meters [18.15 feet] to an "X" cut on concrete set for corner on the new easterly
right-of-way line of Midway Road; 3. THENCE. South 33 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds East. along the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, for a distance of 1.182 meters [3.88
feet] to a onehalf inch steel rebar with yellow plastic cap marked "AZ.B." set for corner; 4. THENCE, South 25 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly
right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 22.379 meters [73.42 feet] to a one-half inch steel rebar with yellow plastic cap marked "AZ.B." set for corner; 5. THENCE. South 31 degrees
39 minutes 26 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 59.687 meters [195.82 feet] to an "X· cut on concrete set for corner; @Tripod
E:\Jobs41203009 _ C&B-Cma<J...Keller\Send]ileslSend_ 02-06.jJ4\par2-klm.doc 
EXHIBI1 County Dallas Page 2 of2 Parcel 􀁾􀀠D-15Highway Intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road June 7,1999 CSJ: Revised: May 15, 2003 Account: Revised: February 06, 2004
Field Note [Description for Parcel 􀁾􀀠6. THENCE, South 59 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds West, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 0.553
meters [1.81 feet] to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described tract of land contains 179.12 square meters [1,928 square feet] of land more or less. A plat of even survey date herewith
accompanies this legal description. The basis of bearings for this intersection is the north property line of Volume 97251, Page 2877 D.R.D.C.T. All dimensions are in meters unless otherwise
noted. English units are given for information only. Company Name>;-+lfl'e!l,ondo, Brunz &Associates, Inc. By: E, Date: Fe:; fa C, 2-00 Lf Surveyor's Name: E. David Utzman, R.P.l.S.
Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4607 @Tripod E:\Jobs41203009 _ C&B-B-Cm''LKcller\Send ]i\esISend_ 02-06-04Ipar2-klrn.doc 
I ,.'8Zmt3 •• 8') SZs'()S'Z9'E MIDWAY PARK NORTH II x:: 22.319mt73.4Z'] VOl. 83035, PG. 1180 \'II, D.R.D.C.T. ",. PARCEL 2 􀁜􀁾􀀠179.1"2 sq.m. 􀁜􀀧􀀨􀁾􀁴􀀠E1.92B 5.F.l v' M 8< F DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY. INC. Tract " VOL. 90081, PG. 3202 D.R.D.C.T. .......... _S56·41'04·W P.O.8, O,s5lmt',.,,) 'X' CUT FO IN CONe. 􀁾􀀠Exw.W,: ),C-=..--=-f --=-.::..-::.-.:.:: : s \) " 􀁾!􀁾'.I
\ 'X'CUT SET /' -rI\'" \\0' , IN CONC. /' "" ••• C ... 1156'31'56'['" -rI...... "I " 5.S33m .---533'21".-£ "Ii'> S t18.'s'] LOT 2 DAVID MYERS SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 923 §. Nonl 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠AU.
DlMtNJlONS SHOWN AU IN M£'TUS UMUSS 􀀧􀀠 ==.PO. nus IMrIUlCTtON IS 'Of, EXHIBIT "B" M 8< F DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. INC. TRACT" {Not To KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 􀀯􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠f
r" TEXAS TuRNPiKE AUTKORITY I UTILITY EASEMENTI VOl. 97009. PG. 03547 IIi VOl. 91009. PG. 03547 I D,R,D.c.r. 􀁾􀀠O.!W.C,T. 􀁾NOWI PROPEI'rr UNI OJ VOL 97251. PO. 2177 r....I>.c.t. 􀁾􀀠A
UOAI. HSaUJrnON 141 MN 5UWff DAll .:a HIUWI1'H ACCOMf'ANIB ntiS PlAT. 􀁾􀀠::::o:.PROVtbD fOR fOR UGEND li 􀁾􀀠IlXdTIHO 1I0000000000AY UNI 􀀮􀁾􀀠NEW I»Ifl'-OP-WAY lJHI _1: CON'tROI. Of
ACCUS UNI IUWH UN. fDlCl un 􀁾􀂷􀀽􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀂷􀀠em ""'" ............ 􀁉atMaOAD.......... PARe£!. 2 __􀁾􀁟􀁍___' --111--+-x-x-A PLAT OF A SURVEY OF A 179.12 sq.m. [1,928 S.F.] TRACT OF
LAND IN THE DAVID MYERS SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 923 eAND BEING PART OF LOT 2 OF MIDWAY PARK NORTH II CITY OF ADDISON DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS l , GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 30 I I I I! SCALE::
1 , 1000 --'--40m i 
----CONVENTIONAL SIGNS EXISTING R.D.W. UNE NEW R.C.W. LINE It COUNTY LINE --CONTROL OF ACCESS LINE SURVEY LINE --t-PROPERTY LINE FENCE CITY UMITS RAILROAD STRUCTURE ):=:::( 􀁾􀁎􀀠ROO
SET UNLESS 0OTHERWISE NOTED PARca NUMBER CD 􀁾􀀠􀁾• REVlSEO MAY 􀀱􀀵􀁾􀀠2003 REVISED FEBRUARY 06, 2004 STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀩􀀠0 CC""====PLANS
OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROJECT DALLAS COUNTY PROJECT NO. ACCOUNT NO. CSJ NO. KELLER SPRINGS R0AD AT MIDWAY ROAD Kt:LLt:R SPRINGS ROAD Nt:T Lt:NGTH OF PROJECT; 248.376 M [814.88 FEETJ
= 0.248 KM to.15 MUS] MIDWAY ROAD NET LENGTH OF PROJECT = 345.400 M [I133.2OJ FEU ; 0.345 KM [0.21J MILES FW.RO.u;""."'""''''' ... ,,.,,".• STATE ""'. """"' -" "'"' OAlLAS ..... ""'.
SECT• ... """"""'" """. sa:T. ... AIRPORT 􀁾􀀠il o ICD INOICATES PARCEL lOCATION PROJECT I, COUNTY I tIl"'",.1 ••• ;'.,. DALLAS 􀁏􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀠--_______L ____ ELus co. VICINITY
MAPLOCATION N.T.s.BEGIN PROJECT STA 09 + 836.255 MIDWAY ROAD END PROJECT STA 10 + 067.058 KELLER SPRINGS SPRINGS ROAD BEGIN PROLIECT END PROJECT STA 09 + 818.682 STA 10 + 181.655 KELLER
SPRINGS ROAD MIDWAY ROAD • t RECOMMt:NDt:D FOR ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY __19_ DALLAS-.r,.. ! ---'·":<:'0--·-'-,'-. ..:....-:-. APPROVED FOR ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY __19_ FINAL
APPROVAL __'9_LAYOUT SCALE 1 : 750 [1" = 62.50'J DISTRICT t:NGINEER . I I 
I:!J. -<11M"&,, 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁃􀁑􀁉􀁉􀁯􀁃􀁉􀁮􀀮􀁬􀀧􀀹􀀱􀀠Lo;;.,.2:tI(21).!$') 􀁡􀁕􀁬􀀮􀀻􀀪􀀬􀁣􀁲􀁾􀀠OL"s..13&lt2O.11'1 .0. 4?'51"lt' R"lUlOClr!lli<ll••'Wl 􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁬......,..,"""at.-ll.H!IIII:Wl'l
LOT a, BLOCK S ,... • 10 20 30JII SCALE-H150 C -20 .w A &0 11lOfT J,4 .. F OlMlOPMOO COMPANY. INC. tract II Q;l)T TO SC4LEl I I P.!).t. lA.NNY HOLILUON vm. ,PO. IlJUl.C.T. @m.n_ f>(?n
SJ'.l "'"..."., ... ...-.,., r-------"''' ,,/. (lEXM tl.M'9'.E .4lfllIIHn'. I 􀀮􀁖􀁴􀁌􀁦􀁬􀁏􀁃􀁬􀁴􀀮􀁐􀁇􀀮􀁄􀁾􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀠OJUl,.C.T. ""'"II AU. 􀁾$!lOll( _ tt t.Elt:RS ! tK£SIi, I)llIIl.IIJ!IS\£
wnm. 1l0lQ.l$:lt IMl$ ARE I'1tO'IIlm f(fl lllSUlS I;S 􀁾110ft ms fiTERS€ClIOO 1$ net HOlm( PIKlPElm' U£ Q' 'IIL!12Sl. ro.2!f7 D.l't.G.C.T. i KELLER Sl'RJNGS ROAD AT MIDWAY ROAD 􀁭􀀺􀁦􀁾􀀱􀀡􀀱􀀠R.O.W.
ACQUISITION ARREDONDO,BRUNZ & {fI::t STATe: FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 􀁾􀀠rEUSASSOCIATES, INC. 113S5 IIOCREE ROAD 􀀱􀀮􀀮􀁇􀁾􀀧􀀵􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠COUNTY a;;:.-􀀢􀁾􀁃􀁉􀁉􀀠Q:! ':,ltl OAlW. T!XAS.lS2!B
Ph. t2Hll41-990Q OAL OALLAS 2 
DALLAS COUN'lY PUBLIC WORKS January 6, 2004 Mr. Mike Murphy, P.E. Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Control (CMAQ)
Program Right-of -Way Appraisal Report -(project 12) Dear Mr. Murphy: Attached please fmd the right-of-way appraisal report and approved value sheet for parcel 2 at the intersection
ofMidway Road at Keller Springs Road contained the CMAQ Program for review purposes only. This intersection is contained in the Dallas County Bond Program and does not require Town funding.
If you have any questions regarding the provided materials, please contact this office at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀩􀁊􀀯􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program
Manager Attachment: Project 12 Appraisal Report as stated above cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT, Roadway
Design, wlo attachment Steven Chutchian, P.E., Town ofAddison, wlo attachment Selas Camarillo, P.P.E., R.P.L.S., Dallas Co. Asst. Dir., Property Div., wlo attachment Craig Marek, Dallas
County Chief Property Appraiser, wlo attachment Eric Stamater, P.E., C&B, Inc., wlo attachments, wlo attachment S:IGeneraI1G04CORRIG4-lOUliADDIS0N\20041025.P12 ROW Appraisal Report.doc
411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS January 6, 2004 Mr. Mike Murphy, P.E. Town ofAddison 16801 Westgrove Drive Addison, Texas 75001-9010 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Control (CMAQ)
Program Right-of -Way Appraisal Report-(project 12) Dear Mr. Murphy: Attached please [rod the right-of-way appraisal report and approved value sheet for parcel 2 at the intersection
ofMidway Road at Keller Springs Road contained the CMAQ Program for review purposes only. This intersection is contained in the Dallas County Bond Program and does not require Town funding.
If you bave any questions regarding the provided materials, please contact this office at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-6421. . Sincerely, 􀁏􀁵􀀻􀀩􀀯􀀯􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program
Manager Attachment: Project 12 Appraisal Report as stated above cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT, Roadway
Design, wlo attachment 􀁓􀁴􀁥􀁶􀀢􀁩􀁭􀁀􀁬􀁩􀁵􀁭􀁨􀁩􀁡􀁮􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁅􀀧􀀮􀁻􀁮􀁬􀀢􀀱􀁬􀁬􀀠ofAd4ispn, w/o attachment f S6las Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S., Dallas Co. Asst. Oir., Property Div.,
wlo attachment Craig Marek, Dallas County Chief Property Appraiser, wlo attachment Eric Starnater, P.E., C&B, Inc., wlo attachments, wlo attachment S;IGeneranG04CORRIG4·10LmADDIS0N\20041025.Y12
ROW Appraisal Report.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page of 1 of 4 Parcell D-15Highway Intersection of Spring Vi3l1ey Road at Midway Road June 4, 1999 CSJ: Revised: October 17,2003 Account: Revised: November
12, 2003 Legal Land Description for Parcell BEING 918.68 square. meters [9,889 square feet] of land in the Elisha Fike Survey, Abstract No. 478 in Dallas County, Texas and being a portion
of that 2.64700 hectare [6.5410 acre] parcel of land conveyed to the Government Employees Insurance (Government tract), as recorded in Volume 89033, Page 2066 of the Deed Records of
Dallas County Texas (D.R.D.C.T.), said Government tract being Lot 2, Block G of the Metropolitan Business Park Section 5 as recorded in Volume 84020, Page 5267 of the Map Records of
Dallas County Texas (M.R.D.C.T.), said 918.68 square meters [9,889 square feet] of land, being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest
comer of said Government tract, THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 31 seconds West, along the west property line of said Government tract and the existing east right-of-way line of
Midway Road, a distance of 57.092 meters [187.31 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner in the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, for the Point
of Beginning; 1. THENCE, South 01 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds East, along the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 66.780 meters [219.09 feet] to a one half
inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 2. THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 35 seconds West, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance
of 53.994 meters [177.15 feet] to a point for corner; 3. THENCE, South 13 degrees 34 minutes 09 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance
of 2.727 meters [8.95 feet] to a point for corner; 4. THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 09 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance
of 4.868 meters [15.97 feet] to a point for corner; 5. THENCE, South 15 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds West, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance
of 2.557 meters [8.39 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for the beginning of a non tangent curve to the left, whose chord bears South 44 degrees 40 minutes 35
seconds East, a distance of 17.773 meters [58.31 feet]; @TRIPOD E:\Jobs4196065_Dallas-Cma<LMid-Spring_RevisionslSEND_11-12-03\Desc\P ARl_ MSV.doc 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page of 2 of 4 Parcell 0-15Highway Intersection of Spring Valley Road at Midway Road June 4, 1999 CSJ: Revised: October 17, 2003 Account: Revised: November
12,2003 Legal Land Description for Parcell 6. THENCE, Southeasterly, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road and along said non-tangent curve to the left
through a central angle of 89 degrees 42 minutes 14 seconds with a radius of 12.600 meters [41.34 feet] and an arc length of 19.727 meters [64.72 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with
cap marked AB&A set for corner in the new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road at the end of said curve; 7. THENCE, North 74 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds East, along said
new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.777 meters [9.11 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 8. THENCE, East, continuing
along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.734 meters [15.53 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for comer; 9. THENCE, South
73 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-ot-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.650 meters [8.69 feet] to a one half inch iron rod
with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 10. THENCE, South 89 degrees 45 minutes 04 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance
of 14.958 meters [49.07 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 11. THENCE, North 74 degrees 51 minutes 38 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly
right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.734 meters [8.97 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 12. THENCE, East, continuing along said
new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.812 meters [15.79 feet] to a one half inch iron with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 13.THENCE, South 73 degrees
09 minutes 59 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line at Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.614 meters [8.58 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked
AB&A set for corner; 14.THENCE, South 89 degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 25.778 meters
[84.57 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; •@TRlPOD E:\Jobs4\96065 _DaUas-Cmaq}vlid-Spring_ Revisions\SEND _11-12-03\Desc\PARI_ MSV.doc 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page of 3 of 4 Parcell D-15Highway Intersection of $pringValley Road at Midway Road June 4,1999 CSJ: Revised: October 17, 2003 Account: Revised: November 12,
2003 Legal Land Description for Parcell 15. THENCE, North 74 ,degrees 21 minutes 10 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance
of 2.667 meters [8.75 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 16.THENCE, East continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road,
a distance of 4.838 meters [15.87 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 17. THENCE, South 73 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds East, continuing along said
new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.710 meters [8.89 feet] to a one half inch iron rod with cap marked AB&A set for corner; 18. THENCE, South 86 degrees
12 minutes 25 seconds East, continuing along said northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Valley Road, a distance of 47.701 meters [156.50 feet] to a point for corner; 19. THENCE,
North 78degrees 16 minutes 59 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.624 meters [8.61 feet] to a point for corner; 20. THENCE,
South 86 degrees 16 minutes 01 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.830 meters [15.85 feet] to a point for corner;
21. THENCE, South 70 degrees 49 minutes 04 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.624 meters [8.61 teet] to a point
for corner; 22. THENCE, South 86 degrees 16 minutes 01 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 20.409 meters [66.96 feet]
to a point for corner on the existing north right-at-way line of said Spring Valley Road and the south property line of said Government tract; 23. THENCE, North 89 degrees 45 minutes
43 seconds West, along said south property line of said Government tract and said existing north right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 163.383 meters [536.03 feet] to
the southwest corner of said Government tract and the intersection between said existing north right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road and said existing east right-of-way line of Midway
Road; •@TRIPOD E:\Jobs4\96065 _ 􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁊􀁡􀁳􀀭􀁃􀁭􀁡􀁾Mid-SprinK-Revisions\SEND_11-12-03\DescIPARI_MSV.doc 
EXHIBIT "A" County Dallas Page of 4 of 4 Parcell 0-15Highway Intersection of Spring Valley Road at Midway Road June 4, 1999 CSJ: Revised: October 17, 2003 Account: Revised: November
12, 2003 Legal Land Description for Parcell 24. THENCE, North 00 degrees 10 minutes 31 seconds East, along the west property line of said Government tract and the existing east rIght-of-way
line of MIdway Road, a distance of 148.124 meters [485.97 feet] to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract of land contains 918.68 square meters [9,889 square feet] of land
more or less. A plat of even survey date herewith accompanies this legal description. The basis of bearing for this intersection is the South RO.W. line of Spring Valley Road per Government
Business Park No. 7 plat as recorded in Vol. 79181 Pg. 3133 M.RD.C.T. All dimensions are in meters unless otherwise noted. English units are given for information only. Co & Associates,
Inc. Date: NtJU 􀀯􀀲􀁾􀀠;Z<Dt03 Surveyor's Name: Jo n F. Pierce, RP.L.S. Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 2011 @TRIPOD E:\Jobs4\96065_Dallas-Cma<LMid-Spring_RevisionsISEND
_11-12..Q3\DescIPAR I_MSV .doc 
6. ;;69'42'14' {LTi R=12.60omC41.34'] EAST 5B9'45'04'£ 513'09'59'E , I I I I I I I I SURVEY DATE HEREWITH ACCOMPAN:lES THIS PLAT. EMGLISH UNITS ARE PROV10r.o fOR INfORMATION ONLY. 2.624mC8.GI']
S10'49'04'E SPRING VALLEY R 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀀠LEGEND 18.288m[6D.OD'l R.D EXlstmG rueHl-or-WAY 􀁌􀁲􀁮􀁅􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭MtW RiGNT-Of-WAY I.JME
-----PROPeRlY UN£' Fl COUNT'!' ONE CONTROL OF ACCESS UN;; SURVEY UlIE fEHeE U'ME Cln' uwrs W£loiEMTS AAI\J!OAO --111---$.--x--·xo SET ao: 􀁔􀁾􀁄􀁏􀁔􀀠8RONZ£ OISK SET jN CONCftrTE A PLAT
OF A SURVEY OF A 918.68 [9,889 S.F.] TRACT OF LAND IN THE ELISHA FIKE SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 478 CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS EXHI BIT "B" .__􀀵􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀢􀀮􀀲􀀮􀁭􀀨􀁉􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀳􀀱􀀧􀁝􀀠SOO'
IO'31'W I l I ,I p.o.e·1 I GRAPHIC SCALE I 0 10 20 30 40m I I I I I I SCALE e t : 1000 I LOT 2, BLOCK G METROPOLITAN BUSINESS I PARK SECTION 5 VOL.B4020,PG.5267 S01'51'07'[ M.R.O.C.T.
I Ilj! PROTON DRIVEI:> 􀀱􀀸􀀮􀀲􀀸􀀧􀁭􀁉􀁃􀁓􀁏􀀮􀀧􀁏􀁾􀀧􀁬􀁒􀀮􀁏􀀮􀁷􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭---.. 7.31Smt24.00'] FIRE AND "􀁉􀁾􀀠unuTY EASEMENT ----,\,--I§----'\ \ 􀁉􀁾􀀠\ Ii 􀁉􀁾􀀠GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES INS , I ., Ii!! VOL.89033,PG.2066';l O.R.D.C.T. I 􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠NOTE: 53.S94fl'l177.15'J All OIt.4ENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN METERSI ISOO'10'35-W PARCEL
1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOIED,, [9,889 S.F.l I918.66 aq.m. BASIS or BEARING fOR; 'THIS INTERSECTION IS, I THE SOUTH R.O.W UHf or SPRING VALLEY ROAD PER METROPOLITAN BUSINESS PARK NO.7 PLAT
4.S12mtIS.79') I I AS RECORDED IN VOL. 79181 PO. 3133 M.R.D.C.T • ..--."T , I A lE;GAI. DESCRIPTION AT E;II£N 
MAP CHECK TRAVERSE/CLOSURE AND AREA Tract name PARI-MSV Origin : Northing /Easting 50,000.000 50,000.000 Course 1 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance S I' 51' 7.0· E , 66.780m 219.094' Delta
North/Delta East -66.745 2.158 Northing /Easting 49,933.255 50,002.158 Course 2 : Southwest Azimuth/Distance S 0' 10' 35.0· W , 53.994m 177.145' Delta North/Delta East -53.994 -0.166
Northing /Easting 49,879.261 50,001. 992 Course 3 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance S 13' 34' 9.0" E , 2.727m 8.947' Delta North/Delta East -2.651 0.640 Northing /Easting 49,876.610 50,002.632
Course 4 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance S 0' 10' 9.0· E , 4.868m 15.971' Delta North/Delta East 4.868 0.014 Northing /Easting 49,871. 742 50,002.646 Course 5 : Southwest Azimuth/Distance
S 15' 37' 12.0" W , 2.557m 8.389' Delta North/Delta East -2.463 -0.688 Northing /Easting 49,869.280 50,001.958 ** CURVE DATA ** Central angle 89 degrees, 42 minutes, 14 seconds Radius
12.600 Chord length 17.773 Tangent 12.535 Arc length 19.727 Area 89.802 89.802 SM Course 6 : Southeast -CHORD Azimuth/Distance S 44' 40' 35.0" E , 17.773m 58.310' Delta North/Delta East
-12.638 12.496 Northing /Easting 49,856.642 50,014.454 Course 7 : Northeast Azimuth/Distance N 74' 54' 28.0" E , 2.777m 9.111' Delta North/Delta East 0.723 2.681 Northing /Easting 49,857.365
50,017.135 Course 8 : East, Azimuth/Distance S 90' 0' 0.0" E , 4.734m 
Delta North/Delta East Northing /Easting Course 9 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta Bast Northing /Basting Course 10 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta Bast
: Northing /Basting Course 11 : Northeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta East Northing /Basting Course 12 : East Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta East Northing /Easting Course
13 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta East : Northing /Easting Course 14 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta East : Northing /Basting Course 15 : Northeast Azimuth/Distance
Delta North/Delta East Northing /Easting Course 16 : Bast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta Bast Northing /Easting Course 17 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance Delta North/Delta East : Northing
/Easting Course 18 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance • S 73" S 89" N 74" S 90" S 73" S 89" N 74" S90" S 73" S 86" 15.531' 0.000 49,857.365 11' 57.0· B , 8.694' -0.766 49,856.599 45' 4.0"
B , 49.075' -0.065 49,856.534 51' 38.0" E , 8.970' o . 714 49,857.248 0' 0.0" E , 15.787' 0.000 49,857.248 9' 59.0" E , 8.576' 0.757 49,856.491 44' 56.0· E , 84.573' -0.113 49,856.378
21' 10.0" E , 8.750' 0.719 49,857.097 0' O.O"E, 15.873' 0.000 49,857.097 28' 15.0· E , 8.891' -0.771 49,856.326 12' 25.0· E I 4.734 50,021. 869 2.650m 2.537 50,024.406 14.958m 14.958
50,039.364 2.734m 2.639 50,042.003 4.812m 4.812 50,046.815 2.614m 2.502 50,049.317 25.778m 25.778 50,075.095 2.667m 2.568 50,077.663 4.838m 4.838 50,082.501 2.710m 2.598 50,085.099 47.701m

156.499' Delta North/Delta East : -3.156 47.597 Northing /Easting 49,853.170 50,132.695 Course 19 : Northeast Azimuth/Distance N 78" 16' 59.0· E , 2.624m 8.609' Delta North/Delta East
: 0.533 2.569 Northing /Easting 49,853.703 50,135.265 Course 20 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance S 86" 16' 1.0· E , 4.830m 15.846' Delta North/Delta East : -0.314 4.820 Northing /Easting
49,853.389 50,140.084 Course 21 : Southeast Azimuth/Distance S 70' 49' 4.0· E , 2.624m 8.609' Delta North/Delta East : -0.862 2.478 Northing /Easting 49,852.527 50,142.563 Course 22
: Southeast Azimuth/Distance S 86' 16' 1.0" E , 20.409m 66.959' Delta North/Delta East : -1.329 20.366 Northing /Easting 49,851.198 50,162.928 Course 23 : Northwest Azimuth/Distance
N 89" 45' 43.0" W , 163.383m 536.032' Delta North/Delta East : 0.679 -163.382 Northing /Easting 49,851. 877 49,999.547 Course 24 : Northeast Azimuth/Distance N O' 10' 31.0" E , 148.124m
485.970' Delta North/Delta East : 148.123 0.453 Northing /Easting 50,000.000 50,000.000 TOTAL LENGTH OF TRAVERSE 609.666 m CLOSURE S 68" 10' 40.2" E O.OOOm 0.000' Ratio : 1 in 9,818,308
Parcel Area = 918.681 SQ. METERS Parcel Area = 0.0919 HECTARES • 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS December II, 2003 Mr. Selas Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S. Dallas County Department ofPublic Works Property Division 411 Elm Street Dallas, TX 75202 SUbject: Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Temporary Construction Area Drawings, "OffSystem ROW" -Project 12 Dear Mr. Camarillo: We have been requested by your office and the consultant Carter
& Burgess, Inc. has provided temporary construction area drawings for your right ofway division use to gain pennission from the property owners for construction beyond the proposed and
or existing rigbt of way line. The attached drawings include driveway adjustments located at the intersections of Belmeade at Midway, Sojourn at Midway, Lindbergh at Midway and Midway
at Keller Springs. Please forward these to your personnel that will be obtaining this pennission. When you receive a written pennission for each then send me a copy for our files. If
you have any questions or concerns about this matter, please call me at 214-653-7460 or Sam Sam Wilson at 214-653·6421. Sincerely, 􀁾􀀩􀀥􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachment:
Temp. Construction area drawings with accompanied paving sheets -1 each cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT
Roadway Design, wi attachment Sam Mogbadassi P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachment Jerry Murawski, P.E., City ofFarrners Branch, wi attachment Nancy Cline, P.E., City ofCarrollton,
wi attaclunent MfReMfu:phy, P ;E., Town ofAddison, wi attachmenti Sid Homer, Dallas County Property 􀁄􀁩􀁶􀁩􀁳􀁩􀁯􀁾􀀠wi attachment Craig Marek, Dallas County ChiefProperty Appraiser,
wi attachment Eric Stamater, P.E., Carter & Burgess, Inc., wlo attachment 􀁓􀀺􀁜􀁇􀁥􀁮􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁇􀀰􀀴􀁃􀁏􀁒􀁒􀁜􀁇􀀴􀀭􀀱􀀰􀁕􀁮􀁄􀁁􀁌􀁌􀁁􀁓􀁃􀀰􀁜􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀳􀁜􀀵􀀹􀀰􀁟􀁐􀀱􀀲􀀠Temp. Const. area
drawings.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
-... 􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠-.. _., 􀀮􀁾.. 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾.. 􀁾􀁾􀀠.. 􀀭􀁾􀀭...--. --.. --f':<!S'[Jf¢ ROW -....., .. -... .. -. -... .. 􀁾􀁟􀁉􀀠, , 􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀭.. 􀀭􀁾􀀠.. 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾�
�• . "11_,," -􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁕􀀢􀀧􀀴􀁊􀀠R. Q"----..:..:::: -'I, 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭.. 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭.. 􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀧... 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭.. -"-.. -.. .. 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾.. -----------------􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾�
�.. --.. 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭.. 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾.. 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾.. -.---􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁷􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁾_____ .. _.. _____ 􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭.. 􀁾􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠SCALE IN METERS r 2 ., Sm _ ea'.er.Buraess 1'T!as Oopcrtmerd
or Transport."." TEMPORARY DRIVEWAYNDt IV1. AJJI.J:M CONSTRUCTION AREA NEAl! STATION 9+888 WEST SIDE OF NlDWAY ROAD NORTH OF KELLER SPRINGS ROAD 
􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-.. --􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭'-RO.6 I INLET STA 09+857,476 13,4 LT 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾.. PAY 371.1 M2 .---.... --._-.-------.􀁾􀀠􀁾.. -􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭.-PAV 􀀨􀀲􀀰􀀰􀁭􀁾􀀩􀀨􀁴􀁐􀁃�
�􀀩-_ 1.42 --._;.-._-------EX1SiriiG" -_ ROW-------"----1' CURB (TYPE IIH150mm) 33,S M CONC DRIVEWAY 31.4 M2 CURVE DATA:CRV-E PC=9+905,87 PT=9+954.10 60=10· 44'24°LT CONSTRUCT LAYDOWN
RECESSED INLET SCALE IN METERS ...o 5 10 15m . ·SCALE: 1:500 : //􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁅􀁧􀁇􀁉􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀧I 􀁾􀁏􀁎􀁏􀀠CURB (TYPE 1IH150mm) STA,10+000 It. KELLER 141,0 M --,---+---------\:CRV:E
-..----. -----------ItO.'!-M2 ---􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁐􀁮􀀼􀀧􀁕􀀧􀀻􀁊􀀮􀀠____:-:-:C:ONC· PAV (200mm)(CPcm --54 •. 0 M2 ... _--------. __ . "PROPOSED 􀁾􀀺􀁏􀁘􀀠=-= 􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀬􀂷􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀮􀁳􀁬􀀡􀁬􀀡􀁦􀀬􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀯􀁬􀁏
􀁾􀀠CURB (TYPE IIlC1S0mm) LEGEND 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾PAVEM.ENT 85,4 M 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE 􀁾PAVER MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY rcl PROPOSED GRASS L..J MEDIAN [!j@PROPOSED
SIDEWALK '"" PROPOSED CONCRETEW MEDIAN CONSTRUCT LAYDOWN 􀁲􀁵􀁉􀀧􀁒􀀧􀁾􀀠NOTE: I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWING FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES ·AND ELEVATIONS. 3_ALL
CALL OUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.PAVER AND SUB-BASE TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY TOWN OF ADDISON. 5. SEE MISC. DET AILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAILS. RAMP TYPE
@2003 hOOT CONC PAV (200mm)'CPCD) 33.4M2 __J 􀁁􀁾􀀱􀁍􀀡􀀡􀁄􀀮􀀠(. MIDWAY ROAD -CONC··PAY --(200mmHCPCm ///􀁾􀀭􀁏􀀮􀀲􀀢􀀠M OFFSET 􀀯􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-----.AI Texas Departmed of Trans{X!rlailon
PAVING PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD o N o + o <i lV> W 􀁾􀀠--' :r: u I« :::;: AT MIDWAY SHEET 2 OF 3 o-El:I'mo c:ES 15 TEXAS Cl'$>t-I FK 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀠guo" 2. 
------------------I ! --------------------------.. --.. ------􀀭􀁾􀀭SCALE IN METERS ----" o 2 4 6m SCALE: 1:200 -, -..-... '.,. -, .--" 9+940 -'-'" . 9+920 ---. -------------____ -/________
( BELI,fEADE DRIVE " ............. . 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭-----------', -'. " . .. -.. -.. _ _ 9'#0960 -"'-"'-...... -...... TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AREA 38.51 m2 (415.16
ft2) -.... -.... -PI/OPOSED I/OII' -__ _ -...... ell Ca.....•aurae.. -*' ITexas DBpartmen!of Transportallon TEMPORARY. DRIVEWAY .CONSTRUCTION AREA rJo+-JV/􀁾􀀠NEAR STATION 9+939 SOUTH
SIDE OF BELMEADE DRIVE WEST OF MIDWAY ROAD 
􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠'\ !: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠'0􀀧􀁾􀀠"'s,:":,,=.􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽f SCALE IN! M€TERS '.....􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀨􀁦􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠•
6m . SCALE: 11200 10+100 10+080 __ _ __________________ .________ -+ __ __ I!. SOJOURN DRIVE 10+060 + 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠ExiSTING ROW----•------------I._--_.,
I TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY A I I ICONSTRUCTION AREA. I V. I!) m 22.33 m2 (240.36 rt2) " ... '" ..6., ______________􀁐􀀡􀁬􀁏􀁐􀁏􀁾􀁅􀀡􀀿􀀡􀀡􀁑􀀧􀁉􀀡􀀮􀀠• __ • _____ • _ o 􀀺􀁲􀁾􀀠􀁷􀁾􀁾􀀿􀂷􀀠
_ Ca.......Burge.. 1 T!" OopartlfJ6ltf cr Transportat!en TEMPORARY, DRJVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AREA .NEAR STATION 10+080 NORTH SIDE OF SOJOURN DRIVE EAST OF MlDWAY ROAD 
NOTE. I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWING FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR . PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS. 3. CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERwiSE NOTED. BEGIN CSJ 0916-45-344
STA.09+8Y0.33 BELMEADE DRIVE 9+900 -----I" -----------.......... '" --􀁾---CURB (TYPE D)(15Ornm) 48.0 " '--COt.C SI!)£WALK (100"",,' 􀀶􀀰􀁾􀀰􀀠M2 CONe fAV <100mm)(CPDC) 3.9 􀁍􀁚􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀠BUY,
SOUARE CUT ON TOP OF INLET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF UIDWAY AND SOJOURN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SOJOURN. ELEVATIO", 200.665 CONSTRUCT LAYDOWN CURB 􀁾􀀠'.\\ ' MONO CURB CONC PAV a (TYPE
nl <200 rom) (CPCO) {150mm} I 151.8 U2 55.5 􀁍􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠////.' //r i '" OJOIJ-io-l" 􀁄􀁲􀁴􀀯􀁾􀀿􀀭.. !-N􀀮􀁾􀀠-SCALE IN METERS o 5 10 ISm StAlE:b500 CURVE DATA:CRV-J PC=9+927.18 PT=9+984.T5
SIDEWALK R=134.11 mm) ...2 A=2Y-IS'4S-RT T=2S.24 L=5Y.51 CURVE OATAtCRV-K PC=10+01S.24 PT=lO+044.04 A=21' 3G'lG'L T CURVE OATk. CRV-M PC=9+813.t3 LEGEND PT =10+008.84 iin PROPOSED CONCRETE
_ PAVEMENT Ll.<2S'06·00-RT mfQ PROPOSED LANDSCAPEIIlll:I PAVER MEDIAN : 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY L=135.1I r%1 PROPOSED GRASS W MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED SIDEWALK BEGIN CSJ 0916-45-344
ST... 9+891.19 ( NIOWAY ROAD, cr-.c Carter-Burgen PAVING PLAN SOJOURN DRIVE/SaME'OE DRIVE AT MIDWAY SHEET lor 2: _ ..􀀧􀁴􀁉􀁾􀁟􀀠-,If3fG'fl) r;&.H ""-􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀠--.. ... ...0;--•,.,.. 01:
97161l 􀁾as -@2OO3 hOOT -..,., '"' C%.......... 00<U6 "" '"" SIDEWAlK I , , I fcoNC 4(200 '10.7 If.n 􀁾􀀠':,'-; _. 
I I, .:.: 3i A MATCH LINE STA.10+040:...-_____ ",' Iill 􀁾􀁩􀀠I 1", i " !'I i3:}(' " ! w' 􀁾􀁉:s, 􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀬5q"", t 􀁾􀀧􀁵􀀬􀀧􀁾􀀠PAY <200mmHCPCOJ 236.6 t.I2 􀁾􀂷􀁃􀁏􀀧􀁾􀁃􀀠SIDEWALK
tloOmm) 47.2 ,,2 r--t.l(INO CURB (TYPE It}U50mm) 65.3 t.I RAt.lP SIDEWALK R3 􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀠ORIVEWAY USOmm) "2 􀁾􀀭􀁴􀀮􀁬􀀨􀁉􀁎􀁏􀀠CURB {TYPE 'ltISOmml 3B.0 M --. r-=1:01'IC:.'PAV
'(200mmi(CPCDI 241.6 U'--"_ -. --....,' -. NOTE. I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWING FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAllS FOR PIPE SIZES ANa ELEVATIONS. 3. CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB U>lt.ESS
OTHERWISE NOTED. '.". "',"'., CONTfioi:"Powrr'IL, N 1910B.B24 E 190B9.05, CURVE DATA,CRv-L PC=IO+049.BO ' PT=IO+l1S.S9 T=65.37 I 􀀺􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁟􀁾􀀩􀀭z -3J!!!!!--I SCAlE IN J.tETERS-o
5 10 ISm 5CALE;1:500 PAVING PLAN SOJOURN DroVE/BELUEAOE DroVE .􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠AT MIDWAY SHE£T 2 Of • ENO CSJ 09IB'45-344 --'P 􀁾􀁾􀀮___________􀁓􀁾􀁔􀀽􀁁􀁾􀀮􀀱􀀽􀀰􀀫􀁾􀁉􀀽􀁇􀀲􀀽􀀮􀀲􀁾􀀴􀁾􀀴􀁟􀁴􀁾􀁓􀀽􀀰􀀽􀁊�
�􀁕􀁾􀁒􀁎􀁾􀁏􀁒􀁾􀁗􀀽􀁅____􀁾________________________________________________________________________________________________________􀁓􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀳􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁔____________________􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀠LEGENO
IilfI PROPOSED CONCRETE I!!IJ PAVEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE l!IJIi PAVER !.IEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE I!!2i'J DRIVEWAY 􀁾PROPOSED GRASS U !.IEDIAN III PROPOSED SIDEWALK 
... , I SCALE IN METERS o Z 01 6m SCALEll:200 /' ...« ... ,'"... ,..,." .."./' 􀁟􀁅􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁔􀁬􀁎􀁇􀁟􀁒􀀮􀁯􀁾􀀠____________ _ m ____________________ 􀁾􀀬􀁉TEMPORARY QRlVETfAY CONSTRue
TION AREA 44.20 m2 (475.16 ft2) I _L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________ _ g -------( ____________􀀧􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁏􀀭• _ • _______ • ______________ 􀁉􀁏􀂷􀁦􀁟􀁓􀁾􀀠____________ • __ ..! 􀁾􀁬􀁎􀁄􀁂􀁾􀁒􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁒􀁾�
�___ 􀁾􀁴􀁾__ 􀁁􀁬􀁬􀁁􀁾􀀠 _ Ca......Burgzr g.. DoparIITIIIlII or Tr_at/on TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AREA NEAR STATION 10.073 NORTH SIDE OF LINDBERGH DRIVE EAST OF MIDWAY ROAD

t , I I 􀁾􀀩􀁬􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁕􀁃􀁔􀀠LAYDOWN CURB t.lOWO CURB (TYPE K)(lSOmm) S.IM --.. _---+--" "". L_-i'''--\'MOfIO CURB <TYPE U)«SOmm) '" ", f-􀁍􀁾􀀢􀁏􀀠􀁾􀀢••, 􀁾􀀬􀁹􀀮􀀬􀀠U)(ISOmm) j. ,
I I 􀀬􀁾􀀠"" 􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀀠0:, I ,t.>' 􀁾􀁉􀀠 ;§ '"x'w, I 'C" I I , .J .. 􀀩􀀡􀁬􀁦􀀹􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁲􀀭􀁾􀁉􀁏􀁎􀁏􀀠CURB (TYPE D)(ISOmml II. LINDBERGH DRIVE--_ ... _-----1--------l!!.!i; RR
SPfl(E O.5m ABOVE GROUND '" POWER POtE(F4200) IOG.7m EAST OF MIDWAY em SOUTH SIDE OF LINDBERGH. ELEYATION,191.015 !!.<lI.tI. I. SEE INL£T EXTENSION DETAIl.S FOlt-. Pl'E SIZES AND ELEVATIONS
2. CAtlOUTS ARE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. PAVER AND SUB-BASE TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY TOWN OF ADDIsem. 4. SEE MISC. DIETAILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DlETAlLS. TO FACE OF CURS ,', 􀁉􀁲􀀮􀁾􀁏􀀤􀀠Depc
_of Tr. "'!(]I) PAVING PLAN UNDBERGN ORIYE AT MlIlWAY T IOF I !-N􀁾􀀠" , SCALE IN METERS IIMM-I o 5 10 . 15m SCALEI1:500 I , I LEGEND iii PROPOSED CONCRETE I!!!II PAVEldENT IlQI PROPOSED
LANDSCAPE I;<Ql PAVER MEDlAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 11'!<:11 IlRlVEWAY 1':'1 PROPOSEO GRASS L;;:J MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED SIOEWALK ! I 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS November 21, 2003 Mr. Eric Starnater, P.E. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Ebn Brook, Ste. 250 Dallas, TX 75247 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)
Program Temporary Driveway Construction Area Drawings -Project 12 Dear Mr. Starnater: Back on October 2, 2003 Debbie Willliebn informed me of four additional driveway locations that
we wiU need to obtain letter of permission from property owners because ofconstruction encroachments onto private property for project 12. Currently, the construction plans do not dimension
this encroachment area. The encroachment area needs to have dimensions in Metric and English units with total area and at this time we will not need the bearings called out. Below are
the approximate locations for drawings that are needed in order for us to obtain letter ofpermissions from property owners. Midway at Keller Springs • Label drawing as "Temporary Driveway
Construction Area near Station 9+888, West Side of Midway Road North of Keller Springs Road". Road". Eric, see paving sheet 82. Midway at Lindbergh • Label drawing as "Temporary Driveway
Construction Area near Station 10+073, North Side of Lindbergh Drive East of Midway Road". Eric, see paving sheet 63. Midwav at Helmeade/Sojourn • Label drawing as "Temporary Driveway
Construction Area near Station 9+939, South Side of Sojourn Drive West of Midway Road". Eric, see paving sheet 102. • Label drawing as "Temporary Driveway Construction Area near Station
10+080, North Side ofSojourn Drive East of Midway Road", Eric, see paving sheet 103. . Please provide me the electronic files and 8 11," x II" paper copy drawings by December 12,2003.
Ifyou have any questions or concerns, please call me at this office at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214-653-642L Sincerely, 􀀨􀀲􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀯􀁊􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁡􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀷􀁇􀁏􀁏􀁤􀁲􀁏􀁡􀁤􀀠Progtatn
Manager Attachment: E-mail dated 101212003 ce: Sam Wilson, P.E., Ass!. Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachment Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachment Sam
Moghadassi, P.E. TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachment St!las Camarillo, P,E., R.P.L.S., Assistant Director, Property Division, wlo attachment Sid Horner, Dallas County Property Division,
wlo attachment Craig Marek, Dallas County Property Division, wlo attachment Nancy Cline, P.E., City ofCarrollton, w/o attachment MikeMwphy;P£., Town ofAddison, w/oattachment , 􀁊􀁾􀁮􀁙􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀬P.E
,; dty ofF-armers Branch, wi" attachment Debbie Willlielm, P.R., Cater & Burgess, wfo attachment S:lProjeclsIP14CORRIP14-10Unp12-C&b\2003\42_ P12 Remaining Temp. Const. Area Drawings.doc
411 Elm Street, 4th Floor' Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
DALLAS COUN1Y PUBLIC WORKS November 20, 2003 Mr. Selas Camarillo, P.E., R.P.L.S. Dallas County Department'ofPublic Works Property Division 411 Elm Street Dallas, TX 75202 Subject: Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Temp. Construction Area Drawing, ROWand Plan Revisions -Project 12 Dear Mr. Camarillo: We have been requested by your office and the consultant
Carter and Burgess has provided corrections for parcel I at the intersection of Spriog Valley Road at Midway Road. The revisions were due to an increase of needed ROW because of the
construction of an inlet on the NE comer. They also provided plan revisions due to the revised proposed ROW line and a needed temporary retaining wall construction area. In support of
a Right of Way condemnation case for parcel I, we have provided a temporary retaining wall construction area drawing and exhibit "AU labeled parcel ITEA. This drawing and exhibit does
not need to be signed and sealed. Attachments 5·7 have been passed onto TxDOT for their files in support of this project. Please insert these revised sheets into the plan set that were
previously sent to your office and destroy the replaced sheets. !fyou have any questions or concerns about this matter, please call me at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson at 214653-6421. Sincerely,
􀁾􀁽􀀥􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attachments; 1) Temporary Retaining Wall Construction Area Drawing and Exhibit "AU -2 copies 2) Revised Legal, Plat and Calculation, Parcel
I -2 Signed originals 3) Revised 22"xJ4" ROW Map -1 Mylar 4) Revised II "1'17" ROW Map -2 copies 5) Revised Plan sheets 41, 43, 53 & 54-Mylar and 2 copies 6) Electronic Files of the
ROW revisions -1 CD 7) Revised 22"xJ4" ROW Map -I paper copy cc: Sam Wilson, P.E., Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attachments Suja Mathew, P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design,
wI attachments 1, 2, 4 -7 Sam Mogbadassi P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attachments Jerry Murawski, P.E., City of Farmers Branch, wll copy attachments 1, 2, 4 and 5 Sid Homer, Dallas
County County Property Division, wI 1 copy attachments 1,2,4 and 5 Nancy Cline, P.E., City ofCarrollton, wll copy attachments 1,2,4 and 5 􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁨􀁹􀀻􀁐􀂣􀀻􀀻􀀧􀁦􀀨􀁪􀁷􀁮􀁯􀁦􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁯􀁩􀁬􀀬􀁗􀁬􀁬�
�copy attachments I, 2, 4.and 5 j Eric Starnater, P.E., Carter & Burgess, Inc., wlo attachments S:IGeneraIlG04CORRIG4-10UTIDALLASC0\2003\588_P12 ROW doc. and Temp.drawing and legal for
ED case parcell. Spring Valley at Midway.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-7151 
.; EXHIBIT "A" Page of 1 of4 CMAQ Project 12 Spring Valley Road at Midway Road Parcel1TEA . November 20, 2003 BEING a tract of land in the Elisha Fike Survey, Abstract No. 478 in Dallas
County, Texas and being a portion 'of land conveyed to the Government Employees Insurance (Government tract), as recorded in Volume 89033, Page 2066 of the Deed Records of Dallas County
Texas (D.R.D.C.T.), said Government tract being Lot 2, Block G of the Metropolitan Business Park Section 5 as recorded in Volume 84020, Page 5267 of the Map Records of Dallas County
Texas (M.R.D.C.T.), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a one half inch iron rod set for a corner in the new easterly right-of-way line
of Midway Road, THENCE, South 01 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds East, a distance of 66.780 meters [219.09] feet, THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of .640
meters [2.10] feet along the new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, said point also being the Point of Beginning of the temporary retaining wall construction area herein described;
1. THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 35 seconds West, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 53.3544 meters [175.00 feet] to a point for
corner; 2. THENCE, South 13 degrees 34 minutes 09 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 2.727 meters [8.95 feet] to a point
for corner; 3. THENCE, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 09 seconds East, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 4.868 meters [15.97 feet] to a
point for corner; 4. THENCE, South 15 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds West, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road, a distance of 2.557 meters [8.39 feet]
to a one half inch iron rod set for the beginning of a non tangent curve to the left, whose chord bears South 44 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 17.773 meters [58.31
feet]; 5. THENCE, Southeasterly, continuing along said new easterly right-of-way line of Midway Road and along said non-tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 89 degrees
42 minutes 14 seconds with a radius of 12.600 meters [41.34 feet] and an arc length of 19.727 meters [64.72 feet] to a one half inch iron rod set for corner in the new northerly right-of-way
line of Spring Valley Road at the end of said curve; • 
EXHIBIT Page of2 of4 CMAQ Project 12 Spring Valley Road at Midway Road Parcel 1 TEA November 20, 2003 6. THENCE, North 74 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds East, along said new northerly
right-ot-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.777 meters [9.11 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 7. THENCE, East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way
line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.734 meters [15.53 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 8. THENCE, South 73 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, continuing along
said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.650 meters [8.69 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 9. THENCE, South 89 degrees 45 minutes
04 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 14.958 meters [49.07 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 10.
THENCE, North 74 degrees 51 minutes 38 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.734 meters [8.97 feet) to a one half
inch iron rod set for corner; 11.THENCE, East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.812 meters [15.79 feet) to a one half inch
iron rod set for corner; 12.THENCE, South 73 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.614 meters
[8.58 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 13.THENCE, South 89 degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley
Road, a distance of 25.778 meters [84.57 feet] to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 14.THENCE, North 74 degrees 21 minutes 10 seconds East, continuing along said new northerly
right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.667 meters [8.75 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 15. THENCE, East, continuing along said new northerly right-of-way
line of Spring Spring Valley Road, a distance of 4.838 meters [15.87 feet] to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; 16.THENCE, South 73 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds East, continuing
along said new northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 2.710 meters [8.89 feet) to a one half inch iron rod set for corner; • 
EXHIBIT "A" Page of3 of4 CMAQ Project 12 Spring Valley Road at Midway Road Parcel 1 TEA November 20, 2003 17.THENCE, South 86· degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East, continuing along said
northerly right-of-way line of Spring Valley Road, a distance of 10.596 meters [34.76 feet] to a point for the southeast corner of the temporary retaining wall construction area; 18.THENCE,
North 03 degrees 47 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 1.050 meters [3.44feet] to a point for corner of the temporary retaining wall construction area; 19.THENCE, North 86 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds West, continuing along of the temporary retaining wall
construction area, a distance of 10.609 meters [34.80 feet] to a point; 20.THENCE, North 73 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 2.742 meters [8.99 feet] to a point; 21.
THENCE, West, a distance of 5.136 meters [16.85 feet] to a point; 22. THENCE, South 74 degrees 21 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 2.663 meters [8.73 feet] to a point; 23. THENCE,
North 89 degrees degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 24.480 meters [83.57 feet] to a point; 24. THENCE, North 73 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds West, a distance of 2.616
meters [8.58 feet] to a point; 25. THENCE, West, a distance of 5.108 meters [16.75 feet] to a point; 26. THENCE, South 74 degrees 51 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 2.732 meters
[8.96 feet] to a point; 27. THENCE, North 89 degrees 45 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 14.663 meters [48.09 feet] to a point; 28. THENCE, North 73 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds
West, a distance of 2.652 meters [8.70 feet] to a point; 29. THENCE, West, a distance of 5.021 meters [16.47 feet] to a point; • 
EXHIBIT ''Po:' Page of4 of4 CMAQ Project 12 Spring Valley Road at Midway Road Parcel 1 TEA November 20. 2003 30. THENCE, South 74 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West. a distance of 2.765
meters [9.07 feet] to a point ·for the beginning of a non tangent curve to the left. whose chord bears North 28 degrees 29 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 16.072 meters [52.73
feet]; 31. THENCE. Northwesterly. continuing along temporary retaining wall construction area and Spring Valley Road and along said non-tangent curve to the left through a central angle
of 88 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds with a radius of 11.550 meters [37.88 feet] and an arc length of 17.782 meters [58.32 feet] to Midway Road at the end of said curve; 32. THENCE, North
15 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds East. a distance of 2.556 meters [8.38 feet] to a point; 33. THENCE, North 00 degrees 10 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 5.091 meters [16.70 feet]
to a point; 34. THENCE, North 13 degrees 34 minutes 09 seconds West. a distance of 2.864 meters [9.39 feet] to a point; 35. THENCE, North 00 degrees 10 minutes 35 seconds East. a distance
of 53.354 meters [175.00 feet] to a corner point of the temporary retaining wall construction area; 36. THENCE, North 89 degrees 49 minutes 25 seconds West, along the temporary retaining
wall construction area, a distance of 1.050 meters [3.44 feet] to the Point of Beginning of the temporary retaining wall construction area, and containing 172.78 square meters [1.858.84
square feet] or .0427 acres of land more or less . • 
P.o.c.-..., , 'I 66.780m[219,09'] VSOj· 51'07"£ 􀁾􀀠: 1,., '0 I'" '0 􀁩􀁾􀀠:?;I",1 ,Q. .,: .640rn(2.1Q']􀁾􀀡􀀠,t SOO"10',3S"W limits of [i'-I roee or l Proposed Construe {ion1.050""'3.44')I
Curb m ROW hoo􀁾􀀺􀀠2'< P.O.B. 􀁾􀀡􀀠􀁴􀀶􀀸􀁾􀀠,yp 0.7'2. typ: 1.05 m, !􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢􀁾􀁔􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠1.14 m 􀁴􀁾􀀺􀀠·3'1·... -'<6;::-.,,3 ;J2.;. 'J '. 650 :300 :325{'. :r, \<.:
R' mm mm mm , ,," Elev_ , 161.285l.354rnt17S.00'] 500'10'35"" I 'SCAlE IN METERS 􀁾.. SECTION kit. T ALLESl WM.1. HEIGHT AT Retoinil'lq woU dimensionsRET, WM.!..: 51 A. 0·045.00 􀁢􀀨􀁬􀁳􀁾􀁤􀀠(In
H-t.1S M(Not :10 ScoIe1 +172.78 SQ.M. [1,858.84 S.F .J TEMPORARY RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION AREA OFFSET 1.05 M FROM$"i[1 l;::,:}_,7 L? . 􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁄􀀧􀀬􀀧􀀱􀁴􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀠􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁾􀀠PROPOSED
R.O.W. NOTES:2.727mtS.9S'1 S13-34'09"( Delto·SS-1Z"4S" 1. BEARINGS N-IO DISTANCES ARE PROVIDED fORR-1I.S50tnC37.88'J 4.B6Smtl!;,g7") L"17.782mt58,32') !NrORMATtON PURPOSES ONLY. TH15
DRAWING ISsao' 10'09"£ , C.H.·'S.072rntS2.73'J ,.;01 INTENOED TO BE USED AS A SURvEy PLAT, CH.B.aN28· 29"U"W1, 2.557m[B.39'] • 515' 37'12"W I to!;OmC3.44'J NOl'''7'35''(I J BEGIN RETAlNtNG
WALL fPC ' , 32.49 L. T • SPRING V.,U.EY I STA to·Q17.36 • , , STA 0-000 • ReT, W4__ I , OeUo-89'""2'14" {LT) 2,734m!S.97·1R·'2.S00m[4U4'l TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA􀁎􀀷􀀴􀁾􀀠51'38''[I
t·'9.727ml64.72'J NO R T AlMNC WAlL C.H.-n.773mt58,31'1 18.34 LT' SPRING v.-'J.J.EY PARCEL nEA 5TA 􀀱􀀰􀁾110,80 • STA 1-001.58 • RET. WM-t. CH.a,"S44a 40'35"£ 14.958mC49.07'J 4.812mt1!;,19']
S89· 45.'04"£ EAST SPRING V ALLEY ROAD AT MIDWAY ROAD PL'" • ... \Parcel1TEA revised.dgn 11/20/200311:21:11 AM 
• • CONVENTIONAL SIGNS EXISTING R.O.'. LINE NE' R.a.'. LitlE Il COUNTY LINE CONTROL OF ACCESS LINE SURVEY LINE --t--FElICE CITY LIMITS RAILROAD PROPERTY LINE STRUCTURE )::::::::( IRON
ROO SET UNLESS oOTHERWISE NOTEO PARca NUMBER G) STATE OF TEXAS SEer. .."􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀮DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION fSj,I\(l.lO """'" -","" StUl «U<TT "'" DALlAS """. steT. """ 􀁾􀀠_u ... """""....
􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁊􀀩􀀠0 c=. PLANS OF\ PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY· PROJECT 􀀮􀁾􀀠Vr DALLAiS COUNTY I I PROJECT NO. ACCOUNT NO. CSJ NO. SPRING VALLEY ROAD AT MIDWAY ROAD SPRING VALLEY ROAD
NET LENGTH OF PROJECT = 363.544 M (1192.73 FEETl = 0.364 KM (0.23 MILES] MIDWAY ROAD NET LENGTH OF PROJECT = 218.B60 M 􀁃􀀷􀀱􀁡􀀮􀁯􀁾􀀠FEETl = 0.219 KM [0.14 MILESl 􀁾􀀭􀀭I END PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION STA 10 + 188.110 MIDWAY ROAD BEGIN PRO,JECT STA 09 + 871.240 SPRING VALLEY ROAD • t i, DALLAS COUNTY I "."_ •• ! ! .iii i j l .... DALLAS DISTRICT 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀁌􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁯􀀻�
�􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀾􀀽􀀠dEND'PROJECT 􀀬􀁾􀀠STA 10 + 234.784 13 1il SPRING VALLEY ROAD ·z ;! 􀁉􀁾􀀠i, BEGIN PROJECT STA 09 + 969.250 MIDWAY ROAD _____.-1 'i!J VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SCALE
1 : 750 [1" = 62.50'] RECOMMENDED fOR ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY 19 , 􀁾􀀠. .I APPROVED fOR ACQUISITION Of RIGHT OF WAY 19 _ FINAL APPROVAL 19 DISTRICT ENGINEER 
􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁩FtD 20 JOM SCAU-111l!10 -, 􀁾􀁪􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀧􀀱AIlOmClUl. 1tG..•• OEDCAJm to DEar",,,,,,,,,,, WOaL SERVICE STATION' VOL. 8'1208, Po. 0119 ),I.RJ).C.T. 􀁾􀁚􀁴􀀧􀁉􀀨􀁬􀁓􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀠£AS'
2.:ni)'l(UYl SU'U1S'£ 􀁚􀀮􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀠rn'09'U"E :tl!..n'triIi.ut"1 􀁳􀁮􀂷􀁈􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀨􀀠WEJ'ROPOUTAN BUSlBS PARK SECTiON fi VOL. 􀁉􀁭􀁬􀁾PC. 3152. MAD.c.r. • )I IL-...-...____---l I I
I I I I I I I I I 2.62,,",,""1'1 II1ln6'!Ift ...,.,.,....., Hf".'(»,£ 􀁚􀀮􀁦􀀬􀀲􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁕􀁴􀀧􀁬􀀠$7O'U'O{"E 􀁾􀀮􀁭􀀻􀀻􀁲􀁾􀀧􀁽􀀠V£j:f;f!J ARREDONOO.BRUNZ & ASSOCIATES. INC. t 1355 MeCfI£E
Rt)I.O GAl.lo\S, T£tA.S 15U. f\'h. (ZH) 􀀳􀀼􀀱􀁴􀀢􀀧􀁬􀁯􀁬􀁾􀁴􀁬􀁏􀀠I' SPRING VAllEY ROAD AT IIIDWAY ROAD R.O.W. ACQUISITION .>T" ...,. 1I1W'1'S f:l' 􀁾Jilt lIC IIO'ERS.ErTlOIII$ nt!:
$OUTlt IU),., LM 01' 􀁾􀁶􀁾f!C,lO ret IiIlllIC»'OUTAM I!IJ$IlE.U PI.itII: .IIQ.., 1U;T AS 􀁾,. '«L l'!l!to f'l:..l'IJJ lUUI.c:r. 
MONO CURB (T'I'PE tI) HSOmm) 53.90 M o '" .." + ." , W Z r <J t-􀁾􀀠3.0m RECESSEll INLET B MONO CURB {TYPE II} USOmm) 37.08 M --------""" ,: : '--C,ONC PAY {200mm}(CPCCH 339.4 tJ2 .
I 􀁾􀀠, I , I , -UON,O CURS (TYPE II} USOmm} 􀀷􀀳􀀮􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀢􀀠CAST IN PLACE RtTAlN1NC WALL RW HU A(M) MONO CURB (TYPE " <I$Omm) 21.•011.1 B A l NOTEt 􀁾􀀠I. SEE SICNAL DRAWING FOR DETAILS.
2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES ANo ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL CALLOUTS ARE' TO FACE OF CURB 􀁕􀁾􀁌􀁅􀁓􀁓􀀠OTHERWISE NOTED•. 􀁾􀀮􀀠PA,V,ER ANO SUB·BASE TYPES 􀁔􀁾􀀠i!3E APPROVED
BY T61'1N OF ADOISON. 5. SEEl"USC, DETAILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER 􀁏􀁾􀁬􀀧􀁁􀁉􀁌􀁓􀀮􀀠6. SEEl.RETAINING WALL LAYOUT FOR'TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA DE TAILS. RECESSED INLET RECESSED
INLET ,.--1.101'0 CURB CONSTRUCTION AREA ,---.M(lNO CURS !TYPE tnU5()mm} 􀁬􀁓􀁾􀀳􀀹􀀠M fr CONt. ORiVEWAY (ISOmm)35.61.12 MONO CURB {TYPE IIHI50mml . . IG.G 1.1--, t -N􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠o 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁭􀀠92.8
M2 -::--'" 􀀻􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠--··---·....·"---C"--·":O"""··-=--.= --:--;-----􀁾􀁾􀀠.-.......:. --(20Omm}tcpcO), .,." STA. 09+969.25 <.: MJOWAY, .•__ J. f I , . A 8M3, R.R. SPIKE IN THE FIFTH
POWER POLE SOUTH Of SPRING VALLEYfP,P.2202-463-9341) 110m SOUTH Of SPRING VALLEY ON EAST SIDE OF MIDWAY ROAO ELEVATfONI118.449 PAY <200mm)(CPCQ} 253.5 "'2 LEGEND ",ONO CURB (TYPE <lSOmm)
235.2 M PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE QQl 􀁐􀁁􀁖􀁅􀁾􀀠MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRII'EWAY D'.:· PROPOSED GRASS ,MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED SIOEWAlK N 2989.495 E 3113.714
--:----------------C"-iC Carter.Burgess PAVING PLAN 􀁓􀁐􀁒􀁾􀁇􀀠VALLEY ROAO AT MIOWAY SHEET 2 OF 4: '-----...•.---' 􀁾􀀠R-tS 􀀺􀀧􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀧􀀢􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁡􀁊􀁯􀁾􀀠􀁍􀁾􀀠_ o.[DtDo ccs n.o.uJ,$
lW..I.A$ 9l.8 AS 344® 2003 T,OOT• 
SCALE IN METERS 􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀠Io 5 10· 15m SCALE: 11500 o <£> o + o -ci lV> CURB PAY (200mml(C.PCO) 135.9 ..2 IT YPE ""50,omJ______+__1 52.4 M CAS T IN PLACE r-MOtlO CURB HyPE DHlSOmmJ 55.3
M <tSOmm) 􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺􀀭􀁾_-:.: .::.....-..􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭EXlsriNG1!(}w· 􀁾---1........,)No CuRB <TYPE RHl50mm) 15.1 M CONTROL POINT 2000 N 3206.'S8
E 3021.476 ______________ 􀁾􀀱􀀱􀁩􀁔􀁊􀁎􀂣􀁒􀀮􀀹􀁜􀀡􀀠____________________________________ __ LEGEND 􀁾PROPOSEQ CONCRETE laB PAVEMENT Fi?I PROPOSEO LANDSCAPE 􀁾PAVER MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED
CONCRETE 􀁾QRIVEWAY 􀁾PROPOSED GRASS LJ MEOlAN 􀁾PROPOSED SIDEWALK RETAINlNG WALL RW Ill) AIMJ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA NOTE: I. SEE SIGNAL DRAWING FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION
DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. PAVER ANO SUS-BASE TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY TOWN OF ADDISON. 5. SEE MISC. DETAILS
SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAILS. '"., _ Carter aBvrgess -=* ITexas Departn>dcF Tft1l1Spor/oIlon PAVING PLAN 􀁓􀁐􀁒􀁾􀁇􀀠VALLEY ROAD AT MIDWAY SH££T" OF" <4 6. SEE RETAININC WALL LAYOUT
D,CEtlo 􀁄􀀾􀁴􀁩􀁦􀁲􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠".Arc 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁏􀁾􀁉􀀢􀀢􀀠..'t;'..... 􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠AREA DETAILS. .... »-. RiSI 􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁺􀀮􀀮􀀠a....n 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁋􀁾􀀠'!:.: 􀁾􀁬·1________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________􀁾􀁆􀀺􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁔􀁅􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁒􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁙􀁾􀁃􀀺􀁏􀀺􀁎􀀺􀁓􀁾􀁔􀁒􀀺􀁕􀁃􀁾􀁔􀁾􀀧􀁏􀁎􀁾________􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾______________
________􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁡􀀳􀁾􀁩􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀢􀁾􀂷􀁾􀀢􀁴􀀱􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁅􀁪-; 􀁾􀀠.. ® 2003 T)(ooT >e>o a:s! t\oIUAS DoIU..IS $18 .C5 􀁾f 
_______ _ _ _ _ stGIN RETAINING "At PC 32.49 L T l SPRING VALLEY STA 10+011.36 :: STA 0+000 It RET. WALL PT 19.27 L T If" SPRING VALLEY ST A 10+030.65 , STA 0+020.82 iii. RET. WALL PI
19.8S LT If" SPRING VALLEY STA 10+032.91' STA 0+023.16 Ii. RET. WALL PIJ19.21 L T If" SPRING VALLEY sr. 10+055.54 , sr. 􀀭􀀬􀁦􀁌􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁟􀀢􀀮􀁣􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀮�
�􀀮􀀺.. 􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀱􀂷􀁴􀂷􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀁦􀁅􀀡􀁾􀁱􀁦􀁾􀁀􀀺􀁴􀁲􀁬􀁾􀀱􀁬􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁑􀀮􀀺􀁌􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁪􀀭􀁅􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁩􀀭􀁜􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀂧�
�􀁾􀁲􀀠STA 1+001.58 Ii. RET. WALL􀁾􀀠􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠19.97. LLt.. SPRINCTVAUEY STA 10+037.18 =: STA 0+21.45 6.. RET. WALL PI 19.27 LT Ii. SPRING VALLEy STA 􀀱􀀰􀀫􀀰􀀱􀁬􀀮􀀰􀁾􀀼􀀴􀀳􀀠=: srA
0+030.79 Ii. RET. WALL PI 19.97 l SfmlNG-lIAt.lEY ..... , STA 10+052.80 :; STA 0+053.25 II. RET. WALL PI 19.2"7 l N VALL Y STA 10+065.35 =: STA 0+05S.90 It RET. WALL Ii. RET. WALL ,
􀁾􀀠_.,..-.-. PI J9.27 LT.'!. SPRING VALLEY STA 10+101.12 =: STA 0+091.8& 091.8& It RET. WALL 􀀱􀀹􀁾􀀹􀀱􀁬􀁔􀀠It SPRING VALLEY STA 10+098.54 = STA 0+089.18 Ii RET. WALL 10+020 10+040
10+011i0.•• -· 􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭-lo+oao ¢. SPRING VALLEY 101'100 _ .. ------+----􀀭􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀮􀀽􀁟􀁩􀁴􀀠--:....-::::::,_-=_":.";;,,,::,,,'''---''''f-------:...:---I-------􀁾􀀠--􀁾,"10+120--
.. 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠PLAN SCALE IN METERS ....012 VERr. SCALE: fdOO 3m J 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠!􀁾􀀠, -􀁾􀀠I􀁾􀀠. i 􀀻􀁩􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁟􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁃􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀺
􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁃􀁃􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁟􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁃􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀱:. :.
:: : 􀁾􀀠1 ";1" .-.-: -􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀮􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁻􀀭•. : TOP OF WALL/;-COPING I ..185 ':,' _:______ 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀳􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁓􀁾􀁟􀀺􀁟􀀢• ,, , j ". --0:v.
';, 0: m. -, .."":",g: N'.'C;. ....... -, o·"'.N. " o· 􀁾􀀺􀀠N.'.􀀨􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀠, , , ,,' t 00· 􀁾􀀺􀀼􀀡􀁩-'.,., -'i 􀁧􀀼􀁽􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾�
�􀀠􀁾􀀠.. 􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀠,. : .. 􀁾􀀠---:--..􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠_􀁾􀀠__ 􀁾􀀠􀀼􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠____ ;______􀀺􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠__ .: ______ 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁒􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾______ 􀁾􀀠______􀀺􀁾􀀠___ • 􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀠_ ••• 􀁷􀀧􀁾􀀠___
• _. ----􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠.....r....􀀭􀁾... w----..􀁾􀁟􀀠181 ' .. , 177 , J , !' ' 􀂷􀀭􀁩􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁦􀀭􀁾􀀻􀂷􀁾􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀁬􀀭􀂷, , , , _'_w ___ .'w. -'----., .:. -----;---􀁾􀀠--..:
--_. 􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠--, ... ,,,,, .C•, ,, , _ • _L_ TOP J. WALL/COPING: ., __ 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠__ ,-w __ 􀁾􀀠_, 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁟􀀠---I""--w----􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁲􀀠--------.. f 􀀬􀁾􀀠, -_. -:. -, , -􀁾􀀠',,
END WALL, ! , . .... $T),;Q'10f.sg1i, 􀀧􀁒􀁅􀁔􀀺􀁦􀁻􀁾􀁌􀁃􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠-..... ELEV. ISI.04q. ,--.,-----------._ 􀁾􀀮􀀠__ -< ____________ • __• ____ 􀀮􀁾_____;_ _____ .. ______ ... _____
--. ____ 􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀠r __ __ •• ___ • _ •• ---􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭.' , ,,-----,----___}_ ... ___._____ }-. ,._'c·,. , ' , . I"·,, , , .. 􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭,,, ...􀁾􀀮􀀠__ "..􀁾􀀨􀀠__ 􀀮􀀭􀁧􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁧􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀷􀀭􀀭-g ' _____􀁏􀁾_ * __ .0_" __ 􀁾􀁏􀁟􀀮􀀠__ . 1:.> ••0. _ •• __0. _ ___ 0,'-􀁾􀀠w w 􀁟􀁯􀁾􀀠____ 􀀮􀁯􀁾􀀠___ .0.: ____ ..0'____ 􀁑􀀻􀁾􀀠___ ..0: w ••• ° <>
----' 􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠--, ------0---•. ·_R •. -----o (1'1, m. Q'>. 0>; 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠g' -.:r 􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀠g 􀁾􀀧􀀠<.:1; 􀁾􀀻􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠:i: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀁄􀀠. 00'). m: 􀁾􀁾􀀠0;: 􀁾􀀠0:
0' 0 ° ° 0 0 O' 􀁯􀁾􀀠o· 0; 0: o· .0'0 􀁾􀀠__ . ...... ..... .... •• 􀁟􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠.... O'J 􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠(Q to 􀁾􀁟􀀠co 0>.: 0). 􀁾􀀻􀀠Q;I 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠0) 0)0) NOTES: THE WALL LAYOUT SHOWN HAS
BEEN DEVELOPED BASED ON CAST IN PLACE RETAINING WAllS (TXDOT RW I<L)A{},O. THE AREA OF PAYMENT FOR ITEM 423. RETAINING WALL. IS MEASURED AT THE FACE OF THE WAll BETWEEN TOP OF WAI.L/COPlNG
AND ONE FOOT BElOW FINISHED CRADE. 􀁾􀀠.ITexlJS (Jeporttrenl or Tronsporlallon RETAINING WALL LAYOUT SPRINC VALLEY ROAD AT MIDWAY SHEET .OF • 0+045.90 1iI.. RET. WALL PI 19.97 LT t 􀁓􀁐􀁒􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀮􀁖􀁾
􀁌􀁌􀁅􀁙􀀠STA 10+058.10 = 􀀻􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀠STA 0'048.55 It 􀀱􀁬􀁅􀁾􀀮􀀠WALL 􀀮􀁾􀀠r! t 􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀠;-. 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠105.53 "'2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA OFfSET 1.05 m FRO'" PROPOS£O R.O.W. -N1.05
m 19.27 l T '!. SPRING VALLEY STA 10+091.28 = 􀁾STA 0+081.83 fi.' RET. WALL .. PI 19.91 Lr '!. SPRING VALLEY 20.35 SCALE IN METERSSTA 10+093.84 ' (", STA 0+084.48 fl.. 􀁒􀁅􀁔􀁾􀀠􀁗􀁾􀁌􀁌􀀠1iM=
1 NO RET AINING WA OSlO ISm 􀁾􀀠16.34 LT Ii. SPRING VALLEY HORZ.SCALE,hSOO _ _ _ sTA 􀁉􀁏􀀫􀀱􀀱􀀰􀁾􀀸􀀰􀀠;> 
--i RT. ' STA 1+062.13 Ii RET. WAll RET. WAlLCl ./.•.• 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾__􀁾__;;:_􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁟􀀭􀁩􀁌􀀭􀀮􀀭..-..-17.48 RT.= 5TA 1+007.36 Ii RET. WALL 67.25 1.12 TEMPORARY 1.05 m CONSTRUCTION
AR£A OFFSET 1.05 m FROM PROFOSEIl R.O.W. t PLAN SCAl. 1/1 METERS 1iiMo 5 10 15m OO,RZ. SCALE! I:5{tO SCALE IN METERS o 123m VERT. SCALEI hlOO , ,, , ,, ,. , , , ,, ,, , I ill .j .,;
,!o !... 􀁾􀀮􀀠-, . ,,'g 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁩􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀠",V\ • : TOP OF WALL!, , . 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀠
'" . 􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠,'C."" • COPING '0 o '0 10 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0I ,<» ..,UI :CQ ieo 'ei? 'CQ '0) '«I: €LEVAT IONS•• ____ 􀁾􀀮􀀠_____ J_. '·185 , , -._---...􀀬􀀬􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀮�
�􀀮􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀺􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠... 􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭::-􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀠,, , , , , ... 􀁾􀀠____ --;-----.􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠--:----* ...: ----•.:•..•. -..: ------i-------:---w •• -<-􀁾􀀭􀀭_.:: ------.---􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀠.
• -􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠..--..;...•.•.􀁾􀀠----184 --:------;"-----'. -----􀁾􀀭-----;------􀁾􀀠------'-. ----4-----􀀭􀁾􀀭 .---.. 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾, I l' • , , '--,_.-..:_--_ .. _....
_.183 -' , 􀀢􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀠...,􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭...., 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 , , -􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠, ; PVI' , , STA.:I+056.40 1.i REt WALt " , . 1:I ELEV. ISO.910 • , , I. "-1-'82 -􀁾􀀭􀀭•• __ 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠_._ 􀀢􀀢􀁟􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠􀁷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭
􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀠,-􀁾􀀠---;---􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-;􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠--------..,-."....••;.,...............
"" ......... ·····r-􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀭􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲" . ,ENO WAll •, , I STA..1+062:13 I RET. WALL ElEV. 180.682 ' 181 _.C , , ,__ 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀠__ 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠_______
_____ 􀁾􀀠___ 􀁷􀁾+80--....•.; -.--. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭....􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭, 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀠!-, . , PR9pOSED .CRADE ';,
, 􀁾, ______ •I ____________ 4, ______ !􀁾􀀠_____ 4• _____ 􀂷􀁾􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀁾􀁾􀂷􀀠, __ 􀁾􀀠_____ ' ..􀁟􀁾􀀠____ 􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀴􀀴􀀮􀀠____ 􀁾􀀮􀀠....,......_..............•...•'" ....; ......􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀠
, . 􀂷􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭___ 􀁍􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠,, , ,, , ELEVATlON: • _ • I ;177 ._-,.-.---,------.-----􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀠 ,:--,. ... -1·-' ---:.
􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭-􀁾􀀠.;---.'{ "-.-. -:... t -_.--" -,-. , , , , 􀁾􀀠• I ! , ' • j • 1 ___ 􀁾􀀠______􀁾_____ 􀁾􀀠____________ 􀁾􀁍􀀠__ • __, " ___􀁾􀁾􀁊􀁾􀀠____ 􀁾􀀡􀀲􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁽􀁮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀹􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀴􀀢􀀠i(Q
IN It£) L It£) 􀁉􀁾􀀠I,... In IN: : : : ; . :·>76··· .---...•• 􀀮􀁾􀀠;m 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁯􀁾􀀠--􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭--􀁾􀀠19----!!"---􀀭􀀱􀁾----􀀺􀁾􀀮-􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁾􀀠.􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠--g;" -..-􀁾-􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀷􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀻------------,-----
--;:. -􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠. -;------:--􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠--.... --. -􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾.. -----.. 􀁾􀀠--􀀭􀁾iPROPoSEO • : 􀁇􀁾􀁁􀁄􀁅􀀧􀀠 ,," .'" 􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠ig ;g 􀀡􀁾􀀠!g .g ,2 g 'g g g:ELEVATIONS 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠175·
,(-··-'----T----"·,-""-""''! •• , 􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀁾􀁬􀀧􀀺􀀢􀂷􀀭􀁾􀀭􀂷􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀢􀂷􀀠! .;---..-..••••• , 0 0 ... '"0 0 0:+ 􀁾􀀠S""'" JOF I 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀡􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁴.... ---0/9" (si"
'" 􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀠'M';!!" -􀁾􀀬-O<UJS ... .. ... NOTES, .'. . THE WALL LAYOUT SHOWN HAS SEEN DEVELOPED BASED ON CAST IN PLACE 􀁾􀁅􀁔􀁁􀁉􀁎􀁉􀁎􀁇􀀠WALLS nXOOT RW 􀁉􀁻􀁕􀁁􀀮􀁵􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠THE
AREA OF PAYMENT FOR ITE'" 423. RET AlNJNG WAlL. IS MEASURED AT THE FACE OF THE WALL BETWEEN TOP Of 􀁗􀁁􀁌􀁬􀀯􀁃􀁏􀁐􀁾􀁇􀀠AND ONE FOOT BELOW flN!SHEO GRAVE. cr-.c Carter.Burgess RET AINiNG
WALL LAYOUT MIDWAY ROAO 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS September 4, 2003 Mr. Selas Camarillo, P.E., RP.L.S. Dallas County Department ofPublic Works Property Division 411 Elm Street Dallas, TX 75202 Subject: Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Temporary Construction Area Drawing -Project 12 Dear Mr. Camarillo; We have been requested by your office and the consultant Carter and Burgess
has provided a drawing and plan revisions for a temporary construction area, SW side of the intersection of Keller Springs Road at Midway Road. These were provided in support of a Right
of Way condemnation case for parcel 3. The plan revisions and drawing was provided due to a needed temporary construction easement for the construction of the retaining wall located
on the South side of Keller Springs Road West of Midway Road. Attaclunents 1 and 2 are included for your files for support of this project. Please insert these revised sheets into tbe
plan set that were previously sent to your office and destroy the replaced sheets. If you have any any other questions about this matter, please call me at 214-653-7460 or Sam Wilson
at 214-653-6421. Sincerely, 􀁥􀁾􀀯􀀯􀁉􀁾􀀠Craig J. Goodroad Program Manager Attaclunents: 1) Temporary Retaining Wall Construction Area Drawing -2 copies 11 x 17 2) Plan sheets 71, 73,
74, 81,82,84 & 91-Mylar and 2 copies cc: Sam Wilson, PE, Assistant Director, Transportation and Planning, wlo attaclunents Suja Mathew, PR, TxDOT Roadway Design, wI attaclunents Sam
Moghadassi P.E., TxDOT Roadway Design, wlo attaclunents Jerry Murawski, P.E., City of Farmers Branch, wfl copyattaclunents Sid Horner, Dallas County Property Division, wI 1 copyattaclunents
Nancy Cline, P .E., City of Carrollton, wll copy attaclunents Mike Mmphy, P.E., Town ofAddison, wI 1 copyattaclunents Eric Starnater, P.E., Carter & Burgess, Inc., wlo attaclunents S;\General\G04CORR
\G4-10UlIOALLASC0\2003\583_P12 Temp. retaining wall Const. area, Plan Revisions and drawing for ED case. Keller at Midway.doc 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 214-653-715
1 ------BEGIN RETAINING WALL 9+900 ---------1------􀀭􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭9+842.-34 CKEUEif SPRINGS----------------􀁟􀀨􀁟􀁉􀁾􀁅􀁌􀁌􀁟􀁅􀁾􀀠_SPR:NGS_ -------------1---------------􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭13.87 RT = . . . .' . '. STA 1+000 Ii. RET. WALL "Au .. . . .' . .' . END RE TAINING WALL 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠9+920.49 ( KELLER SPRINGS\ PROPOSED R.O.W. ----.\ 16.59 RT =r-A ,Ii RET.
WALL "Au ST A 1+078.20 Ii. RET. WALL uA" I \ /\ /f f 􀁾􀁏􀁗􀀠__ _------..-. -----., --------------------__ \ _r=il-􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁔􀁬􀁎􀁇􀀠.... "'--... 􀁾􀀭-/.:,.--:::?'--􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭::.:Z::::c:
:.;::-:.? -/-""/" -,.. -.r--, -----' . L. , L ../_ 1. -f. _ .< _ _ _L =--.7... 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀷􀀺􀀠• '.z= :.-C7:. :..-'" _ '-, -, ----:---._ST A 9+900.17 \'----ST A 9+847.73 ( KELLER SPRINGS(
KELLER SPRINGS 16.82 RT14.93 RT '---RETAINING WALL '-'-"CONSTRUCTION AREA ±24.4 M2 STA 9+867.99 􀁾􀀠 ( KELLER SPRINGS 16.57 RT PLAN SCALE IN METERS Limits of •=...-.􀀻􀀲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁟􀂷􀁾􀀠Existi
ng Proposed Construction ROW ROW Area o 5 10 15m I I Varies 600 Varies Varies N mm -.93 m (max)1• I 􀀳􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀴􀁾􀁏􀁟􀀰􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁉􀁾􀀳􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠I. mm l mm (max) Elev ;---...---.-----.,189.38
􀁾􀀠Actual RETAINING WALL IIAIIH=I.73 m Elev 188.25 CONSTRUCTION AREA mm 300 300 mm KELLER SPRINGS ROAD SECTION A-A ! j AT MIDWAY ". ' TALLEST WALL HEIGHT AT Retaining wall dimensions
RET. WALL STA. 1+025.65 based on H=2.0 m(Not To Scole) 
--EXISTING EXlST1NG R.C.W. R.O.W. 15.240 12.392 .if ·1 EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING R.O.W. 􀁒􀀮􀁏􀀮􀁗􀁾􀀠LEGENDR.O.W. , I 0 200mm CONCRETE PAVEMENT-CPCO , 15.24 , , , IS2• 4 , , S 56 ,
RAISED MEDIAN12.2 .1 19.6 2.4 I ® , ,I .9 1.1 ' 1.910.2 3.3, 3.3 3.33.3 3.3 J , MONOLITHIC CURS {iYPE II}, I © , 􀁾􀁾􀁂􀁌􀁄􀁃􀁋􀀠SOD: @fUll DEPTH SAW CUTI !p C 'if !Q)ffIJ. I IJ. I IJ.
􀁾􀀠if􀁉􀁾VAIlIES I VARIES,, *1 , ® 10000m ACP TY B BASEI 􀀭􀁾I I IOOmm TOP SOil IQOrom CQNCRET£ SIDEWALK@-/(9-1 I ® PROPOSED ® RETAINING WAll SECTION A-A MIDWAY ROAD GENERAL NOTES EXISTING
I. SEE PAVING PLANS FOR EXISTING R.O.W. SECTION LOCAilONS.R.O.W. 30.840 , I I' 2. All O1MENS!ONS SHOWN ARE IN 15.240 15.240 ."E!ERS UNLESS OTHERWISE, I NOTED. VARIES I VARIES 12.542
12.047 12.5 16.2 24.589 3. TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE NOT DRAWN To SCALE. 4. MATCH EXISTINC CROSS SLOPE. EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED " I EXISTING􀁒􀁾􀁏􀀮􀁗􀀮􀀠 R.O.W. 􀁒􀀮􀁏􀁾􀁗􀀮􀀠I30,840
" , 15240 15240' . I II 'I ,2.' , , I , I VARIES IJ. 7•• I [l, 4.9 ,0.9 : ..L , I 3,0 􀁾􀀠PROPOSED 3.0 3.3 3.0 iJ:>􀁾􀀠11 100 3.0 .1 1.5 ""' I !pI r'l , 􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠, I:=I 􀀮􀁾􀀠f -:1
VARIES 􀁜􀀺􀀢􀁜􀁾􀁾􀁔VA!llES \ 􀁌􀁾􀁭􀀠TOP SOIL BLOCK SOD TYPICAL SECTIONS KELLER SPlUNGS ROAD AT MJDWAY SHE£T lor 2' SECTION B-B KELLER SPRINGS ROAD *MATC>! EXIST..G CROSS SLOPE .:aleO
eM.; 􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀠i5TJltt: 􀁾Qt& 6 TElW!. thlt 􀁾􀀮􀀠A-G' _._ <rlIITf (W lme?l Q;M.:"' 1(:: -:...... ,.. CS '"!!.'® 2003 r.OOT 
PROPOSED PROf'OSEO R.O.lI. R.o.w. 􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀵􀀱􀁭􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀲􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁭􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀺CW21-4D """"sro 'IrA!,\,.􀁩􀀺􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠§••"
P'IIITJ ------------rr SA1tCUT SAlfCuT PRCPOSEO PWT ITl'P) SECTION A-A (MIDWAY ROAD) SECTION 8-8 (KELLER SPRINGS ROAD> 􀁾􀀠, l 􀁾􀀠-N􀁾􀀮􀀠, SCAlE IN M£TERS 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀠! o 􀀵􀀱􀁏􀁾􀀵􀁭􀀠SCALE:
1:500 CW20-SDR 􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠{NOT TO SCAlE} (SEE SHEET 2 OF 3) (NOT TO SCAlE) (SEE SHEH 2 OF 3) ----􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠___ 􀁾􀀠􀁾_________􀂣􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁔􀁊􀁎􀁇􀀠ROW__________ _ 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭NOTES. I. ALL OIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN 'METERS UNLESS OTHERYI15E NOTED. 2. All SARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, LIGHTS ANI) DEVICES FOR TIlE GUIDANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN
MUST CONFORM TO THE INSTAllATION SHOWN IN THE 19ao TEXAS MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFfIC CONTROL DEVICES, AS CURRENT!.Y AMENDED. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION WARNlNG SIGNS,
aARRK:ADES.AND BARRELS SHALL BE FACED WITH HIGH ..TENSITY SIlEETING. 3. TIlE CONTRACTOR SHAll PLACE A 1:3 SLOPE BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE AND TRAVELED PAVEl.tENT AT THE END OF EACH
DAY IF THE DISTANCE FROM wORXING GRADE TO FINISH GRAIlE EXCEEDS 130mrn. • __ 􀁾􀁓􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁇􀀮􀁊􀀡􀁏􀁬􀁙_____ _ 91m 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REOUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY
AT ALL TIMES.ORlVEWAYS WILL BE PLACED ACCOROING TO THE ENGINEER. TEMPORARY DRIVEWAYS WlLL BE CONSTRuCTED IMMEOlATElY AFTER THE CONTRACTOR HAS DiSTURBED OR ALTERED TIlE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
5. DRUM SPACING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS' FOR 30_ . ON A TAPER: to METERS ON A TANDENT.20-25 METERS ON A DOWNSTREAM TAPER: £ METERS FOR 40 MPH: ON A TAPER: 13 METERS ON A TANDENT.Z6-32 METERS
6. HAIIDICAl' RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING OAII.Y LANE CLOSURE DURING OFF PEAK HOURS. 7. REMOVE DEVICES FROM TRAVEL LAIlES 6-9 AM AND 4-6,30 PM. PROPOSED R.O.W. •2.26m :: : 1.1590'_
• 1.068m I--I 4.306m 3.134m 3.29Bm 3.582m 3.235m 3.383m 3-.382m 2.aaZm 3.685m ,IJ, ,IJ, ¢;) 1J 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁅􀁬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁜􀁾􀀺􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀡􀂧􀁲􀁲􀀠SAWCUT "5AWCUTEXlST
!'VMT PROPOSED PVMT (TYI') EXISTING R.O.W. LEGEND • PLASTIC DRUMS _ BARRICADE TYPE W Carter .Burgess SECTION C-C (MIDWAY ROAD) (NOT TO SCAl£) (SEE SHEET 2 OF 3) ;; ,, LEGENO 􀁾PROPOSED
CONCRETE 􀁾PAVEMENT . I1iffl PROPOSED LANDSCAPEHl..IH PAVER MEOfAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾ORIVt:WAY m PROPOSED GRASS U MEDIAN LffiD PROPOSEO SIDEWALK 3.<435m : , • .. ;-.-..L"; . 1_ 􀁾􀀠Ir.xu.
DeparllOO(d of Tronsparlatlon TRAFFIC CONTROL KELLER SPRINGS ROAO -PHASE I AT MIDWAY 􀁾􀁾􀀠F'ttO.OI.. ..,,' FR>.a1" _ 􀀢􀀢􀁩􀁾􀀢􀁶􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮"',"'" tu< Ot9i"lS7J cs􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁦􀁯􀁾􀁴􀀠":,r:;,;,
• ..... ""'"_n --.. ,=---::.!l_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾
􀁾______􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁬􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁈􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁅􀁔􀁾􀁲􀀧􀁏􀁾􀁆􀁩􀀧􀁛􀁝 .,@2OO3 hOOT -. "" ""'-'S m. '"-'''' """'" ' " 
STAGE 2 CDN.W. QUADRANT =:> ..-..􀁾􀀠/?1/-.. 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠CW21-4D //AIlE ADDRESS an STATE CONTRACTOR G2Q-6 c d./1-' .􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁾􀁄􀀮􀁀􀀡􀁉􀀬􀀮􀀠_., -,. -'-----􀀭􀁐􀁍􀁬􀀧􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁯􀀠ri,;;
""-EXISTiNG LEGEND 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾PAvEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE I!Ql fA\lER MEOlAN 􀁾PROPOS£l) CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY 􀁾PROPOSED CRASS LI MEDIAN Bill PROPOSED SIIJEWALK STAGE I N.W.
QUADRANT 75m 15m I 􀀯􀀯􀁾􀀠75m ,/.,f'y.r,., . 1//' w.'I ....􀁾􀀠" , ! 15m fl\k' .# ,; //I 1/,'<I /..;..//: 1 /1 /1 , ( I '\t@''.' # I , . ,1/,4.' J ... 􀁾􀀠,. ,, . , , , •" ,,,, " /.!
..//'./../' /1" ;" 1 1 Ii , 17 !cs! /' 1 (j' .. I ,,' ,//I ..." " " ./1! !) 􀀧􀁾􀀯􀀯􀀠/1 .I 1.I I l /" ;" /'F /.. 1 1 1 1 STAGE I S.E. QUADRANT "''''':\; NfHES! /.ALL Ol>JENSlONS SHOWN
ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. , 2. ALL BARRiCADES. WARNING SIGN5.lIGHTS AND OEV1CES FOR THE GUIDANCE , AND PROTECTION OF TRAFfiC AND PEDESTRIAN MUST CCNFORIJ TO THE t 􀁾􀁊􀁴􀁫􀁾􀁴􀁔􀀶􀁾􀁬􀁦􀁅
􀁈􀁓􀁾􀁗􀁁􀁎􀁓􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁊􀁩􀁾􀀤􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁊􀁅􀀵􀀺􀁾􀁅􀁕􀁘􀁾􀁜􀂰􀁇􀁅􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁲􀁆􀁆􀁉􀁃􀀠........ TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION WARNING SIGNS. BARRICADES. AND BARRELS SHALL BE FACED Vi"H
HIGH INTENSiTY SHEETINC. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE A 1.3 SLOPE BETWEEN THE CONSTROCTION ZONE AND TRAVELED PAvEMENT AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THE DISTANCE FRO>J WORKING GRADE TO FINISH
GRADE EXCEEDS 130mm. . '. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WilL BE REOUlREO TO PROVi()[ ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY AT All TjMES.ORlVEWAYS 'NJll BE PLACEO ACCOROING TO THE ENGINEER. TEMPORARY ORIVEWAYS
WlLl BE CONSTRUCTED IMIJEDJATELY AFTER THE CONTRACTOR HAS DISTURBED OR ALTERED THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. 5. DRUM SPACING SHAll BE AS FOLLOWS• FOR 30 MPI!. ON A TAPER. 10 METERS ON A TANGENT:
20-25 METERS ON A DOWNSTREAM TAPER: 6 METERS FOR 40 MPH: ON A T APER:!3 METERS ON A TANGENT:26-32 METERS 6. HANOrcAP RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING DAII.. Y LANE CLOSURE DURING On: PEAK
HOURS. 1. REMOVE DEVICES FROM TRAVEL LANES 6-9 AM AND .(-6:30 PM. -_ _ PROPOSED ROw 􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭--􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭--_ .. ---􀁾􀀭--􀁾􀀠---EXISTiNG RoW---_.. --® END END ROAD WORK
RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT R3-7R STAGE 2 S.E. QUADRANT CW2Q-5DR 􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀪􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾...... -........ =-_...... ® 2003 T,DQT TRAFFIC FINES DOUBLE WHEN WORKERS ARE PRESENT ER20-5 G20-2A
LEGEND • I'I.ASTIC DRUMS _ BARRICAOE TYPE m -=*" ITexas DeparllllMlof Trons{XJrlq/{1JIl TRAFFIC CONTROL KELLER SPRINGS ROAO • PHASE I AT MIDYIAY SllEET 2 OF , 
----CONC nRIIIIEW"y ,",0••_' 29.1 1.42 R£TAlNING WALL CONSTRUCTION AREA MONO CURB (TYPE IIJ(!SOmmJ S.60 1.4 CONTROL POINT 12 E 13932.045 II E 13960.240 ---• -----1-'-BEGIN RET WALL "a'
STA 􀀹􀀫􀀹􀀳􀀹􀁾􀀴􀀶􀀺􀀠17.56 RT CONe DRiVEWAY (l50mm) 36.S 1.42 NOTE, SCALE IN METERS o 5 10 15m SCALE: 1:500 LE:GEND 􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠PROPOsED CONCRETE 􀁾PAVEMENT 􀁾PROPOSED LANDSCAPE 8l'8!
PAVER MEDIAN 􀁾PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEwAY nol PROPDSEO GRASS L:J MEDIANem PROPOSED SIDEWALK I. SEE SIGNAL ORAWING FOR DETAILS. _ Carter =Burgess2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES AND ElEVATIONS. 3.ALL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWJ$E
NOTED. 4. PAVER AND SUS-BASED TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY TOYIN OF ADDISON. 5. SEE MIS. DET AILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAILS. tESlCta> [J.H 􀁾-= .... PAVING PLAN KELLER SPRINGS ROAD
AT MIDWAY SHEET IOF :5 􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠FWO;IW. AIII-v:er "'" 􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮m«S 001 ..m81) ..• 􀀤􀁉􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠X"linT.... 􀁾.. 􀁾􀀮® 2003 hOOT rDOUM oou.<sow "'. '""""'" 
I I ----I INLET STA 09+851.416 13.'1 LT -"--.... .. 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭-----.. 􀁟􀁾... -/I Lun••n CURB HYPE U){lSOmm) 33,S I' CONe DRIVEWAY USOmm} 31.4 M2 CURVE DATA,CRV-E PC=9+90S.81
PTII9+954.fQ R=265.90 T=24.17 CONSTRUCT lAYDOWN SCALE IN METERS.os 106m SCALE: 1:500 ,--M(JNO CURS (TYPE. IIHrSOmm) 141.0 M STA.IO+OOO LECENO "'"" PROPOSED CONCRETE 􀁾PAVEMENT i8ll1I
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE tIi2;I PAVER MEDIAN 􀁾􀁐􀁒􀁏􀁐􀁏􀁓􀁅􀁾􀀠CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY rcl PROPOSED GRASS L:J MEDIAN [lliD PROPOSED SIDEWALK r-:I PROPOS EO CONCRETE 􀁾􀁍􀁭􀁉􀁁􀁎􀀠-"--.. . [PRe'POSED
JlJ!.l'l. ______ • _ _ " WOWAY ROAD '\ ---• -I----􀀮􀁕􀀻􀀺􀀬􀀼􀀻􀀻􀁓􀁩􀀺􀀧􀁐􀁩􀁴􀀱􀁜􀁾􀁶􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁓􀀠-COr¢:pAV ----􀁾􀀠'. -"\:CRV:t ------------_. --------lZd.'9-M2 (200mmHCPCO) 􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁟􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁃
􀀠PAY (200mmHCPCQ) RAMP TYPE. 22 54"n 1'2 MONO CURB • 􀁾􀀠-" _.. (150mmHTYP In CONSTRUCT LAyOQWN NOTE: I. SEE SIGNAL ORAWINO FOR DETAILS. 2. SEE INLET EXTENSION DETAILS FOR PIPE SIZES
AND ELEVATIONS. 3.AlL CALLOUTS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.4.PAVER AND SUB-BASE TYPES 10 BE APPROVEO BY lOWN OF ADOrSON. -42.5 M /I '-_0.:28 M OFFSET PAVING PLAN o
N o + o <i lV) S. SEE MISC. DETAILS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PAVER DETAILS. KELLER SPRINGS ROAD A.T MIDWAY SHE£t 2 OF J @200J hOOT !;l)ICU'J). DoH 􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀠sm£ r.t(M.,"IDI'I'Q.G1_ 􀁾a::s 6!EliAS
Oi 91t tm I u •• t R-61 1'11, .... .""" """" 
REMOVAL NOTES 1. SEE SICNING ANO PAVEt-tENT MARKING SHEETS FOR SIGN RELOCATIONS. 2. SEE SIGNAL PLANS fOR SIGNAL RELOCATIONS• .3. EXISTING LANDSCAPE PAVERS IN MEDIANS SHALL BE SALVAGED
AND USEO IN PROPOSED MEDIANS.' •• ALL RELOCATIONS. REMOVALS. AND ADJUSTMENTS BY OTHERS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO CON$TRUCTfQN BY THE' UTiliTY COMPANIES OR THE RESPECTIVE CITIES.
<By OTHERS) @2003 bOOT 􀁾􀀠 -N􀁾􀀮􀀠 ScALE IN METERS 􀁾0510J5m SCALElllSOO REMOVAL LECEND 􀁾EXiSTING CONCRETE 􀁾PAVEMENT n EXISTING CONCRETEU MEDIAN r:m:J EXISTIfle CONCRETE 􀁾DRIVEWAY
!EliI EXISTING SIDEWALK NOTEl EXISTING IRRIGATION IN CENTER MEDIANS SHALL BE CAPPED AND REMOVED AT THE MEDIAN REMOVAL lIMITS.IRRiGATION CAPPING SHALL BE SUBSIDIARY TO MEDIAN REMOVAL.
_ Carter=Burgess REMOVAL PLAN KEllER SPRINGS ROAD AT MIDWAY SHEET lOF J 'n,;.IQ RrIl'\OI.. ..,:)""'"-"Cf ....i:61C'C). .....1),i.4: (11' '''" 01 97187)􀁾_. "'. •Slott ""'"---lU';:...
􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾en ""-US ""-'" ..' •• -----.... 􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠RELoeA TE FIRE HYllR'NT.J (BY OTHERS) _____________ • ___􀁅􀀲􀀡􀂧􀁔􀁊􀁎􀀢􀁬􀁩􀀹􀁾􀀠_. ______ • ,,-•• __ _ -1<oLUL'''o
SICN REMOVE TREES REMOVE TREES TRANSMiSSION POLE WITH CONC BASE RELOCATE VAULT 
,, , , 􀂷􀁾􀁴􀀹􀀳􀀭􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀠____􀁾􀀠______ +______:______ .2 ______ , __ ; , I I ! --,-----::-----􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀧􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠---r􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾
􀀠􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀢􀁦􀁾􀀠--, I , ! I , , ' , , STA. 1+031.89 : Il .RE7: WALL : C ELEV, 192.420􀁾􀀠----:-+93-􀁾􀀠-----. ., ---+. ----􀁾􀀠----:------1--186"-􀁾􀀠----j "I ! i : ; , ; 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀪􀀪􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭l'I!! m --';--< 200l T.OO1' -NSTA 􀀹􀀫􀀸􀀴􀀷􀁾􀀷􀀳􀀠.. KELLER SPRINGS 14.93 RT 􀀹􀀫􀁡􀀶􀀷􀁾􀀹􀀹􀀠¢. KELLER SPRINGS 16.57 RT _______
􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁬􀀡􀁌􀁒􀁏􀀢􀀧􀁗􀀧􀁟_____ PROPOSEO R.O.W. 9+920.49 ¢. KELLER SPRINGS STA 9+900.17 .. KELLER SPRINGS 16.82 RT PLAN _ _____E"'X"."ISTlliiLROI'I 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁏􀀢􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀻􀀾􀁉􀁌􀀴􀀯􀀺􀀠(
KELLER SPRINGS 57A 9+955.50 It KELLER SPRiNGS leAS RT : STA 􀁊􀀴􀀭􀀰􀀱􀀶􀁾􀀱􀀳􀀠Ii 􀁒􀁅􀁔􀁾􀀠WALL "8" \ 􀁜􀁾􀀠'. 􀁾􀀠 SCALE: IN METERS.,.o 5 10 ISm HORZ. SCALE: 1:500 SCALE IN METERS
...-. i o I Z 3m VERT. SeAl£: hlOi) ,, • , • l .) I, ! • , , I i ,, NOTESI : . 10 !o I,.., it-10 I,... !", IN iN iN !", IN iN fN IN IN I : : lID . loqo j IN • I... THE WALL LAYOUT SHOWN
HAS BEEN DEVELOPED -; ---0--,---;q.' -,--(\1----0 --_. BASED ON CAST IN PLACE RETAINING WALLS. -􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾-􀂷􀀭􀁔􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁩􀁾􀀠---􀀭􀁾􀁧􀀭---􀀭􀀡􀁾---􀀭􀀱􀁾---􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾
􀀭---􀀭􀁪􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀡􀁾---􀀭􀁴􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠---􀀭􀁩􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾----􀀭􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁴􀁾􀀭--􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀠.. -􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁪􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀡􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁴􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠{_M 􀂥􀁟􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮-IT!. .,.,. ., ,,t-􀁎􀁪􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠CTXDOT RW 1{l}A(M). THE AREA OF PAYMENT FOR 􀁉􀁔􀁅􀁾􀀠4Z3,RETAINING 􀁗􀁁􀁌􀁬􀁾􀁉􀁓N N: 􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁬�
�􀀻􀁾􀀠;: :: ;: ;: :: ::! ;: 􀀻􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠m m MEASURED AT THE FACE OF THE WALL BETWEENI 􀀬􀁾􀀠,-;_ ;-.-,-.-,-,..... 􀁬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀠, ....-194-;---._"_;. _____ . ______ :____
... _ ...􀁾􀁟􀀮􀁟􀀠􀁾􀁟􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠.. 􀁟􀁾􀀠1 -;-------;. TOP Of WAlL/COPING AND ONE FOOT BELOW·194􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁢􀀭􀁷􀁾􀁌􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀭. FINISHED GRADE.:
: ' "',-....-.... "" .,; "'''''' "'" KElLER SPRlNGS ROAD SHEET IOF't 􀀽􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀧􀁄􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁴􀀠.... 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀠ro<AS , oV1 (Em co• 􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀠,bot 􀀽􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠""'."'"
􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠...""-L<S O>UA& -... ..., _ Carter=Burgess RETAINING WALL LAYOUT 
CMAQ PROGRAM 614103 Slide 1 UPDATE Project Status/Activities From May 7, 2003 Through June 4,2003 Transportation 
PROJECT STATUS/ACTIVITIES 614103 Slide 2 1. P02 -CP& Y -Construction 47.34% complete as of4/25/03. 2. P03-MK-PSE package sent to TxDOT, Dallas district approved and sent to Austin. 3.
P05 -PBS&J -Linfield at Illinois modifications on hold till issues resolved with County design ofthe Linfield widening project. Should receive revised design this Month as per Jim Smith.
Sent ROW Escrow request to the City ofDallas for "On-System" intersections. 4. P06A TC&B -Construction sill at 99.9% complete as of 5/31103. 5. P6B -TC&B -Looking into a design change
for the intersection ofBeckley @Twelfth Street due to potential high price for damages to the Exxon station on the SE comer, Parcel 2. See drawing. 6. P07A PBS&J -Construction 100% complete.
7. 7B -PBS&J -Pre-Austin corrections in progress. Reduced Fee proposal accepted and received partially executed Amendment from PBS&J. Fee proposal included updating new standards, temp.
signal designs for three intersections and the deletion ofwidening Improvements OfI-20 @Carrier. Successful meeting with Jim Sparks and new hire transportation Engineer Sholeh Karimi.
Utility relocations still in progress and waiting for approved RR agreement with TxDOT and UP Railroad. Waiting for Amendment Escrow from Grand Prairie. 8. 7C -PBS&J Received 80% ROW
escrow from Grand Prairie to complete acquisitions. 9. P08 -Huitt-Zollars -Waiting On FLA for ArapaholPlano from TxDOT and Escrow from City of Richardson. ROW corrections completed for
Plano @Arapaho and sent to County Property Division. 10. P10 -USA -Received all Pre-Austin review mylar revisions from consultant and sent to TxDOT to put on the letting calendar. RR
Agreement still in progress. II. PI1 Lee -Waiting on ROW requested corrections, Coit at Campbell, parcels 1,2,3 and 4. 12. P12 -C&B -Plan modification and ROW revisions received but
revisions were needed and sent request to consultant. County prepared and sent to our property division the legal descriptions and drawing for temp. construction easement at McEwen and
Midway. 
PROJECT STATUS/ACTIVITIES 6/4/03 Slide 3 13. P12A -C&B Received the ROW FLA contrltct from TxDOT for the intersection ofMidway at Trinity Mills. 14. ?13 -Walter P. Moore -Irv Griffin
is working on PS&E TxDOT/Austin submittal. Utility relocations mprogress. 15. PI4A -HNTB -Construction 40.09% complete as of4125/03. City ofDallas providing special Plaque signs for
four intersections for the service road left tum only signs. Change order escrow request sent to the City of Farmers Branch for excavation quantities that were not addressed in plan
set. 16. PI4B -HNTB -Mylar revision completed and sent to TxDOT for intersection ofI-635 at Centerville to avoid SS manhole relocation at ADA ramp location. . 17. PI4C -HNTB -Received
the ROW FLA contract from TxDOT. 18. PI5 -Halff-Waiting on requested ROW corrections. Revision due date later this month. 19. P16 -HDR -Received FLA contract from TxDOT for three intersections.
20. PI7 -Gojer-Utility relocations in progress for Oct. 2003 letting, Waiting on TxDOT's Pre-Austin plan review. 21. P18 Boyle -Received ROW escrow request from City ofDallas for Oncor
transmission pole relocation. 22. PI9 -Kellogg, Brown & Root-Received ROW corrections and sent to County property division. 23. P21 -LopezGarcia -Received Pre-Austin Mylar review comments
from TxDOT. Need to review and pass on to designer. 24. P23 MK Centennial (Washignton Infrastructure) -Waiting on TxDOT requested ROW corrections, new promised date by 6/14/03. 25. P24A
LopezGarcia Group -Construction 87.88% complete as of 511103. 
PROJECT STATUS/ACTIVITIES 614103 Slide 4 26. P24B -LopezGarcia Group -Sent TxDOT ROW map correction request to Consultant, Greenville at Lovers. 27. P25 -AZ&B -Received ROW corrections,
Greenville @Walnut Parcels 4, 4TA And 4ATE. County provided to County Temporary construction easement doc's. for ED case. 28. P26 -Carson -Received mylar revisions for Denton at Shorecrest
due to incorrect depicted RR existing ROW. ROW parcel not needed to acquire because existing RR agreement between Dart and City of Dallas gives the City usage. 29. P27 -APM -Waiting
on TxDOT requested ROW corrections to final documents, 3 Intersections on System, Preamble Corrections, past due but should have soon. 30. P28 Dikita -Waiting on County requested ROW
corrections, Spring Valley @DNT, Parcel 3. Sent ROW escrow request to the City ofDallas for "On System" intersections of Alpha at Preston and Spring Valley at Noel and Monfort. 31. P29
-EarthTech -Waiting on FLA contract approval at TxDOT. 32. P30 -Dal-Tech -Waiting on FLA contract contract approval at TxDOT. Waiting on TxDOT requested ROW corrections. Should be completed
by end ofthis week. 33. P32 Datum 95% resubmittal in progress, fee proposal reduced and accepted for Bridge and Street lighting design. Amendment in progress. 34. P71 C7 -Grand Prairie
Let project, 100% complete. OTHER INFORMATION 35. Exhibit H program and updates still in progress. 36. ROW 80% reimbursement submittal to TxDOT in progress. 37. TxDOT Dallas District
sent exception to Austin for approval ofprojects to be let in metric. 
i ·Proj... .. .. . 􀁟􀁾􀁐􀁲􀁥􀁶􀁾􀀠􀁃􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁳􀁴􀀮􀁴􀀺􀀺􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁨􀀻􀁴􀁥􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀠Engineering Progress 6/4/03 􀀡􀀺􀁥􀀡􀁬􀁥􀁾􀀠Slide 5 ! '-_.I n ....... 􀁟􀂷􀁟􀁾􀂷􀁟􀁾􀁌􀀠􀀮􀁟􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮
􀀠. MM' ---I 􀁾􀀠􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀠Is􀁲􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁊􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁥􀀭􀁾􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭---
Slide 6 Engineering Progress 6/4/03-:. [Legenc(----· ----􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁉􀀠I lPri!Vh)USIY Completed J _=--ICompleted--..---1 I . IP 􀁛􀁊􀀮􀁎􀀡􀁜􀁖􀁊􀁾􀁊􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀮􀁾􀀽􀀭􀁾􀁊􀀠... 􀀦􀁜􀁾􀁟􀀨􀁪􀁦􀁾􀁊�
�􀀬􀀭􀁬􀁣􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁴􀀧􀀻􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁮􀀠􀁐􀁨􀁡􀁾􀁝􀀠._........... 􀁾􀀠';;; c'l! c CI 􀁾􀀠􀁟􀀽􀂷􀀺􀁬􀁲􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁣􀀮􀀮􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀁊" I􀁟􀁾􀁝􀀿􀁾􀁶􀀬􀁾􀁯􀀮􀀡􀀡􀁓􀁴􀀭􀀮􀀺􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁩􀁥􀁴􀁥--
Engineering Progress 6/4/03 Slide 7 IPreviously Completed , 􀀮􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀽􀁾􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀠I IP I I New In Progress -􀀭􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁪􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁉􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀱􀁟􀀮􀀡􀀧􀁾􀁡􀁳􀁥=]
􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁾􀁦􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾----.--------------, , , _.._____,_1.,,_,___,____ 
Engineering Progress 614103 .Legend Slide 8 1,;;:<:)\:,: 􀁾􀁬􀁐􀁲􀁥􀁶􀁩􀁯􀁵􀁳􀁬􀁹􀀠Compi.eted _ 􀁾􀀭􀁬􀁃􀁯􀀡􀁬􀀡􀁐􀀧􀁉􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀭􀀺􀀽􀁟􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀠􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾...... 􀁾􀀠􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠'._--M_
----:i'-_._, -􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠.. -:_:..-. -,---_.----.--.--. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠c.c.c.E E E 888 C>I<Il1) 'i C. New In 􀁦􀀧􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠'conStruction' Phase-.. 􀁟􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀼􀁬􀀮􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁾􀁣􀀺􀁩􀀡􀀡
􀁬􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀀡􀀮􀀠_. Prevo 􀁃􀁯􀀮􀀮􀁬􀀱􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁯􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁐􀀬􀀡􀁴􀁥􀀠_ I 
Slicie 9 Right-of-Way 􀀱􀀧􀁾􀀻􀀡􀀬􀁲􀁉􀁐􀁲􀀦􀁖􀁩􀁯􀁵􀁳􀁬􀁹􀀠Completed ..J • , I i 􀁾􀀠!Prevlousfy In Progress : 6/4/03 . 􀀮􀀭􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀢􀁾􀂷􀀢􀀭􀁾􀂷􀁾􀀢􀂷􀀠---".,,' -'·-1 ..•􀁲􀀽􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁉􀀱􀁬􀁾􀁉􀀡􀀡
􀀢􀀮􀁤􀁌􀀢􀀬􀀻􀁳􀁴􀁍􀁯􀀮􀁮􀁬􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀬· .... -. -... D . Ll'lew In 􀁾􀀡􀁦􀀩􀀡􀀡􀁲􀁥􀁳􀁳.-_..---.......... ----..._.-.-..-. !No Right-of.Wa.y Required. 
Right-of-Way 􀀱􀀷􀀢􀁉􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁲􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀂷􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀀮􀂷􀂷􀀠,I.:lli.:.:J ,Previously Completed I , I ----i-----􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭-----····--1 􀁾.lPreviousl¥
In Prollr.ess 614103 •.... 􀂷􀂷􀁃􀁯􀀺􀁲􀁬􀁬􀀧􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁩􀁤􀁌􀁡􀁓􀁩􀀮􀁍􀁯􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁩􀂷􀀭􀀭.'...S.lideJQ 􀂷􀁬􀁪􀀺􀂷􀁎􀀻􀁷􀂷􀁩􀁾􀀧􀁰􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁊􀀱􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭..... Proj. # In Progress
I 3ED Cases '::"-''-::-'''=::-:. In Progress I 3ED Revised Final documents In NJA rcia Pre-Final documents sent to TxDOT 1 Arendondo 11 ED Case 26 27 28 29---+.. 31 Wilbur Smith 32 -33
Carson APM Dikita Dal-Tech .. in Progressl "On-System" Corrections Needed Preston Contract Sent To TxDOT 9/30/02 And In • 􀀭􀁾􀁯Righl-of-WayRequlreil' Comments In ISltlons In P -:--:::--=-----:-:=::,
---::􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠
614103 Summary Slide 11 • LOA Parcels Approved • Parcels 150 • Number of Parcels Closed (County Property Division) • Parcels 79 • Right ofWay Agreements -Contracts at TxDOT • Agreements
2 • Parcels 10 • Number of County Cases in ED (County) • Parcels 12 • CMAQ Projects Constructed 22 of 60 • CMAQ Projects Under Construction 4 of60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above
174 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 59 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At Mylar Development 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 100% Design 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of60 
CMAQ PROGRAM 517103 Slide 1 UPDATE Project Status/Activities From April 2, 2003 Through May 7,2003 Transportation 
PROJECT STATUS/ACTIVITIES 517103 Slide 2 1. P02 CP&Y Construction 34.57% complete as of3/26/03. Received sewer line escrow and sent to TxDOT. Reimbursed Duncanville their 80% ROW from
the County. Provided to TxDOT revised Typical for east leg ofCamp Wisdom at Cockrell. 2. P03-MK -PSE package sent to TxDOT for Dallas district review and then on to Austin. 3. P4B Paragon
-Sent City ofDallas notice for ED case Parcel 2, Illinois.@Westmoreland. 4. P05 -PBS&J -Linfield at Illinois modifications and standards update, on schedule. 5. P06A -TC&B Construction
99.9% complete as of3131103. 6. P6B TC&B -:-Sent City ofDallas notice for ED case Parcel 2, Beckley @Twelfth Street. 7. P07A -PBS&J -Construction about 50% complete. S. 7B -PBS&J -Pre-Austin
corrections in progress, possible deletion of widening Improvements OfI-20 @Carrier, video detection was requested and denied funding by NCTCOG. Jim Sparks was hired as Dir. OfTransportation.
Preparing meeting to get requested information from him. Jim is waiting for new hires (Traffic Engineer) in his division so that person will be involved with the Grand Prairie projects.
Utilities relocation in progress. Fee proposal in progress, waiting for TxDOT approval. 9. 7C -PBS&J -Waiting On 80% ROW escrow from Grand Prairie to complete acquisitions. 10. POS Huitt-Zollars
-Waiting On FLA for ArapaholPlano from TxDOT and escrow from City of Richardson. ROW corrections completed for Plano @Arapaho and sent to County Property Division. 1L. PIO -USA Sent
Mylar revisions to Don Penny for sign and seal signature for the deletion of Denton Tap @Bethel intersection and TxDOT standards update. Received Mylars from Scott Young. RR Agreement
still In progress. 12. PI1 Lee -Waiting on ROW requested corrections, Coit at Campbell, parcels 1,2 and 4. Received ROW corrections for Coit at Beltline and sent to County Property Division.

517103 PROJECTSTATUS/ACTIVITIES Slide 3 13. PI2 -C&B -Plan modification and ROW revisions promised 5/16/03. Rejected fee proposal for Temp. Easement preparations, intersection of McEwen
at Midway. County preparing Legal descriptions and drawing. . 14. P12A -C&B -FLA contract in progress, Gary Leuba with TxDOT said should.be soon. 15. P13 -Walter P. Moore -Pre Austin
Mylar revisions completed including added control points for County to stake for utility relocations. 16. P14A -HNTB -Construction 17.27% complete as of 3/26/03. TxDOT provided temporary
signal design. City of Dallas requested LED at all signals within the City. Passed info. to TxDOT Area Engineer. 17. P14B -HNTB -Mylar revision in progress for intersection ofI-635 at
Centerville to avoid SS manhole relocation at ADA ramp location. 18. P I4C -HNTB -FLA contract in progress, Gary Leuba with TxDOT said should be soon. 19. PIS -Halff-Waiting on requested
ROW corrections. Had successful meeting with Sub, (Dal-Tech) and TxDOT to resolve some issues from the ROW correction request. 20. P 16 -HDR -FLA contract In progress for three intersections,
Gary Leuba with TxDOT said should be soon. 21. P 17 Gojer -Utility relocations in progress for Oct. 2003 letting, TxDOT in progress for the Pre-Austin plan review. . 22. PI8 -Boyle -Waiting
on ROW escrow request from City of Dallas for Oncor transmission pole relocation. 23. P19 -Kellogg, Brown & Root-Just received requested ROW corrections, Parcels 3&4 Ross @Carroll and
Parcel 3, Henderson @Ross. Verifying all is correct. 24. P20 -Earth Tech -Sent City of Dallas notice for ED case parcel 8, Grand Ave. @Good-Latimer Expwy. 25 P23 -MK Centennial (Washignton
Infrastructure) -Waiting on TxDOT requested ROW corrections, promised by 5/16/03. . ?h 'PJdA _ T n"P'7(1",.t'i" (1,...""" _ ("n"<:trJ1t't;n" )1.7 C;7o/" ('nmnlptp ". nf1n(;/()1 
PROJECT STATUS/ACTIVITIES 5/1103 Slide 4 27. P24B -LopezGarcia Group -Sent final ROW documents to TxDOT, Greenville at Lovers. 28. P25 -AZ&B -Waiting on ROW corrections, Greenville @Walnut
Parcels 4, 4TA And 4ATE. Rejected fee proposal for providing temp. construction easement for Greenville @Walnut. County providing doc's. for ED case. . 29. P27 -APM -Waiting on TxDOT
requested ROW corrections to final documents, 3 Intersections on System, Preamble Corrections, past due but should have Soon, designer verifying centerline. 30. P28 -Dikita -Waiting
on County requested ROW corrections, Spring Valley @DNT, Parcel 3. 31. P29 -EarthTech -Waiting on FLA contract approval at TxDOT. 32. P30 -Dal-Tech -Waiting on FLA contract approval
at TxDOT. Waiting on TxDOT requested ROW corrections. 33. P32 -Datum -95% resubmittal in progress, fee proposal in progress for Bridge and Street lighting design, waiting on TxDOT approval.
RR agreement completed between TxDOT and Dart. 34. P71 S5 -Grand Prairie Let project 100% complete. 35. P71C2 -Grand Prairie Let project 100% complete. OTHER INFORMATION 36. Exhibit
H program and updates still in progress. 37. ROW 80% reimbursement submittal to TxDOT in progress. 38. CMAQ Projects Constructed 22 of 60. CMAQ Projects Under Construction 6 of 60. 
______ _ Slide 5 Engineering Progress ___􀁾__􀀭􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀤􀁥􀁧􀁴􀁩􀁊􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠__ ,=! , . 1 I I·e >Pd ___ 􀁗􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁏􀁕􀁓􀀱􀁾􀁾􀁯􀀡􀀢􀁊􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁥􀀡􀁥􀁾_1 _--Ic;,rnPlet.ed 􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀭�
�􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁝􀀠! .,IP__ '" 􀀡􀁎􀁥􀀭􀁷􀁟􀁲􀁮􀁰􀀮􀁲􀁯􀁧􀀭􀁲􀁾􀁩􀀻􀁓􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁌􀀠5/7103 Proj. 1,;",.-,'<,:,:;;·1'1, ,Construction Phase _Construction Complete :Prev. Const. Complete ' Comments
.,.. 
Engineering Progress 5fil03 􀀺􀁟􀁾􀀠•. 􀁔􀁊􀁩􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁾􀁃􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀠'-_.. , . ,Slide 6 ;, L __--' 􀀱􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀬􀀾􀀬􀀧􀀺􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀺􀀮􀁉􀁟􀁩􀁐􀀮􀁲􀁥􀁖􀁬􀁟􀁯􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁓􀀡􀁹􀀮􀂣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀀮􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀠_-􀁲
􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁩􀁾􀀽􀁣􀁉􀀺􀀢􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭, IP 1-;Newin-Progress """ •.,, _ ••••c.'· .,k;..:...; .. ..:.... ..:..::: ....􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁟􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀠.. 􀁟􀁾􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀠.. '0' I􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀬�
�1-[conStruCtionPhase····. -. i _ 'Construction Complete 'Prevo Const. Complete In As Of 3/26/03 19 20 
Engineering Progress 5/7103 I Slide 7 1"';1" 􀁜􀀺􀀢􀁉􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁢􀁥􀁖􀀡􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁙􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁬􀁰􀀡􀁥􀁴􀁥􀁾􀁾􀀠__􀁾􀁟􀁉􀁩􀀺􀀺􀁯􀁭􀁰􀀡􀁥􀀡􀁥􀁤􀀠1 IP 􀁌􀀬􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀧􀁮􀁆􀀧􀁾􀁧􀁲􀁥􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠:Constructio
n Phase ' 􀀬􀀬􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾..􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀬􀀭􀀭... --I II 􀁾􀁮􀀠 I --􀁟􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁦􀁣􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁭􀁰􀁴􀀻􀁴􀁥􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀧1ili1tl1 2£ -Tprev. CoriSt. 􀁃􀀻􀀻􀁭􀀭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁾􀀠In
•.,';, <,;, 
Slide 8 Engineering Progress 5/7/03---"􀁉􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀧􀀡􀁾􀀬􀀭-r--"---"";: l􀁉􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀧􀀬􀀻􀁾􀁲􀁲􀁬􀀠'IPreviously COmpieied 􀁟􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁫􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀧􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀠---."---ICompleted--,..-'-_.
-'"---... , -_._.'-----􀁾􀀠,p 1:!New In Progress '..... 􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀢􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀠:Construction Phase 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠11111 _ ,;C?nStruction 􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀀮􀁥􀁾􀁥􀀠,Prevo Const.
Complete 
Right-of-Way 􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁤􀁩􀁐􀁲􀁥􀁶􀁩􀁯􀁵􀁳􀁬􀁹􀀠Compleled·--·' liP 􀀱􀀭􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀺􀁧􀀡􀁥􀀤􀁓.._. 517103_:=. 􀀿􀀾􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀁤􀁌􀁡􀁓􀁴􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀮􀁩􀀡􀀾􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀂷􀀺􀀠n-'lNewii
l'progresS'" --. 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁩􀀠• •._____........_._...._._............ ___ 􀀮􀁟􀁊􀀡􀀡􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀮􀁨􀁴􀀺􀀼􀀧􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀹􀁕􀁉􀀬􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁊􀀮􀀠
"' L.-. Slide 9 􀁾􀁟􀀠L," L 
--Right-of-Way r;::n--'--""---"--"--------------" 􀁉􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀡􀀺􀁩􀁬􀀠iPreviously Completed i --------------------"---I rjpi iPreviously In Progress I 5nl03l!!:.L "__________ ___________1
"􀀭􀁾􀀻􀀭􀀽􀁩􀁬􀁩􀀺􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁾􀁾􀁧􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠.--NoRlght.of-WayRequired i Slide 10 I 􀁾􀀠􀁾c·s m & 􀁾c: :§ ,9 '1ii '1ii2! !!! c: c: r 10.. 0.. u:: u:: Comments --1-----1"------"
--------------.,"' ,-------,---""" 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀭-r 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀭􀀢􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀢􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭-----f----+---+----l 
Summary 5fl103 Slide 11 • LOA Parcels Approved • Parcels 150 .• Number of Parcels Closed (County Property Division) • Parcels 79 • Right of Way Agreements Contracts at TxDOT • Agreements
12 • Parcels 34 • Number of County Cases in ED (County) • Parcels 12 • CMAQ Projects Constructed 22 of 60 • CMAQ Projects Under Construction 6 of 60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above
174 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 59 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At Mylar Development 00f60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 100% Design 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of 60 
CMAQ PROGRAM 412/03UPDATE Slide 1 April 2, 2003 General Consultants -. Engineering Progress Right of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items Transportation 
412103 General Slide 2 • Design Review • None • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT In Progress • Construction • P02 Construction Still In Progress • P07A Construction
Still In Progress • P14A Construction Still In Progress • P24A Construction Still In Progress • P03 Construction Letting Estimated For July 2003 • P07B Construction Letting Estimated
For October 2003 • P13 Construction Letting Estimated For October 2003 • P17 Construction Letting Estimated For October 2003 
Consultants Slide 3 • Project 78 • Project.25 • Project 32 • None 412103 • Contract Amendments: Fee Proposal in Progress, Out OfScope Work, Update Standards And Possible Deletion Of
The Intersection Of Carrier At 1-20 And Adding Video Detection Executed: For 1 ED Case For The Intersection Of Greenville At Walnut Fee Proposal in Progress, Out OfScope Work, For Additional
Street Light Design . • Issues: 
CMAQOffice 4/2/03 Slide 4 • • •• Activities Currently Underway • P02 -Waiting On Construction Escrow, Sewer Une Construction • P03 -PSE Package To Be Completed ByApril 15, 2003 • P05
-Modifications In Progress And Going Well • P07A -Construction In Progress, Redesign Complete And Change Order Issued For Driveway Access, W/B Decel. Lane For Truck -, Access And EIB
Tum Lane OffJefferson • 7B -Pre-Austin Corrections In Progress, Possible Deletion Of Widening Improvements Of 1-20 @Carrier, Video Detection Is Requested And Waiting On Possible Funding
• 7C -Waiting On 80% ROW Escrow To Complete Acquisitions • P08 -Waiting On FLA for Arapaho/Plano, Escrow From City. ROW Corrections In Progress for Plano @Arapaho • P10 -Mylar Corrections
In Progress For The Deletion Of Denton Tap @Bethellntersection. RR Agreement In Progress • P11 -Waiting on ROW Requested Corrections, Coit at Campbell And BeltUne • P12 -Plan Modification
Update In Progress, Waiting On ROW Documents • P12A -FLA Contract In Progress 
CMAQOffice 412/03 Slide 5 •••• Activities Currently Underway • P13 -Pre-Austin Mylars Corrections In Progress, Should Be Completed By April 25th • P14C -Waiting On ROW FLA Contract For
Off System From TxDO T • P15 -Waiting On Requested ROW Corrections • P16 -Waiting On ROW FLA Contract For Off System From TxDOT • P1fJ -Waiting On Requested ROW Corrections • P20 -Waiting
On Requested ROW Corrections • P23 -Waiting On Requested ROW Corrections • P25 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Greenville @Walnut Parcels 4, 4TA And 4ATE • P27 -Waiting On ROW Corrections,
3 Intersections On System, Preamble Corrections, Past Due But Should Have Soon • P28 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Spring Valley @DNT, Parcel 3 • P29 -Waiting On FLA Contract Approval
At TxDOT • P30 -FLA Contract Waiting For TxDOT Approval, Waiting On ROW Corrections . • P32 -95% Resubmittalln Progress And Fee Proposal In Progress 
Engineering Progress 412103 Slide 6 c: c: iten 􀁾􀀠en 􀀧􀁾􀀠'iii􀀡􀁉􀁊􀁊􀁊􀁊􀀬􀁾􀀠'I ' -("..􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀠,-􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀻CI> 􀀧􀁾􀁉􀀠=I 􀁾􀀠a:: c &! 􀁾􀀠_ c
a:: 􀁾􀀡􀀠􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀭􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁓􀁴􀀬􀀠􀁃􀁯􀁩􀁮􀀮􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀀠i ... IConstruction Complete , 
Engineering Progress Slide 7 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠412/03 Prevo Const. Complete !________.______________1 
-. 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾> .. >., ., .,a::: c a::: 􀁟􀁉􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀭􀁴􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀠IPrev. Cons!. Complete . i' , ---__________ . l ___________ Comments
Slide 8 􀁾􀀠Engineering Progress 412103-., 􀁒􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁬􀀡􀁦􀀦􀀻􀁩􀀻􀁊􀀠Previously Completed ,..._--:=---. __ __􀀭􀁃􀀭􀁏􀀭􀁲􀁮􀀭􀁐􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠IP rltiiew In Progress
--, 􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁩􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀺􀁟􀀧􀀡􀀻􀁟􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀻􀁾􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁩􀀭􀁦􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁮􀀭􀁰􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁓􀁥􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀠-_􀀫􀁃􀁏􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁕􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠C;:;mplete -----.---
, I I I IiProj. : # iii 􀁟􀁟􀀢􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁶􀀮􀁟􀁃􀀼􀀾􀀮􀀬􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁲􀁮􀁰􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀮􀀠-. 1 ...0 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠fij 􀁾􀀠Comments "-:,,\[Slide 9 􀁩􀁾􀀭􀀭Engineering Progress 4/2103 􀀬􀀡􀀻􀀡􀀺􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾�
�􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀡􀀠􀁟􀀺􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽IP I INew In Progress 􀀮􀀱􀁟􀁊􀁬􀁦􀁾􀀱􀀠􀁉􀁃􀀹􀀮􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁴􀀡􀀼􀀿􀁮􀁐􀁨􀁡􀁾􀀠_ 􀀡􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁴􀁲􀁾􀁣􀁴􀁬􀁯􀁮􀀠C.ompfete 
Right-of-Way ----,-----_."_._--------,---iPreviously Completed 􀀧􀀢􀀭􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭412/03 Slide 10 '. i 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠Comments 
Slide 11 Right-of-Way 􀀱􀀧􀀺􀀻􀁲􀀺􀁩􀀱􀀡􀁾􀀽􀀱􀁰􀁲􀁥􀁖􀁩􀁏􀁕􀁳􀁬􀁙􀀠Completed 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁬􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁶􀁾􀀧􀀿􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁮􀁰􀀧􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀠412103 .=:::-ic::omPleted 􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁍􀁯􀁮􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠o
􀁾􀂷􀀮􀂷􀀡􀁾􀁥􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀭􀀢􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁳􀁳􀀠..􀁾___􀁾._+..._._-----_....._._--.• iNa Ri!lht-of.Way 􀁒􀁾􀁱􀁵􀁩􀁲􀁥􀁤􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠iii 0:: Comments 
412/03 Utility Coordination Slide 12 . • P7B -Utilities are being relocated And Verifications To Be Done, About 90% Complete • P 1 0 -Yerify Utilities • . P13 -Utilities Are Being Relocated
• P17 -Utilities Are Being Relocated 
412103 Summary Slide 13 • LOA Parcels Approved • Parcels 147 • Right of Way Agreements -Contracts At TxDOT • Agreements 12 • Parcels 34 -. • CMAQ Projects Constructed 20 of60 • CMAQ
Projects Under Construction 8 of60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above 174 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 59 of60 • CMAQ Design Sets At Mylar Development 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design
Sets At 100% Design 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of60 
Action Items 412103 Slide 14 Agency Target Dates • County • ROW Acquisitions On-going -. • TxDOT • Reviews Due On-going 
Action Items 412/03 Slide 15 Escrow • P08 -ROW, From City Of Richardson, Requested $211,870 On 217101 And Still Waiting • P14A -Construction, From City Farmers Branch, Requested $80,240.86
On 2120103 And Received On 3112103 • P02 -Congruction Brick Pavers, From City OfDallas, Requested $3,028.46 On 2120103 And Received On 3124103 • P14B -ROW, From City Of Garland, Requested
$16,541.56 On 2118103 And Received On 3111103 • P07C -ROW 80%, From City Of Grand Prairie, Requested $19,000 On 1127103 And Still Waiting • P02 -Construction Sewer Line, From City OfDuncanville,
Requested $7,208.43 On 412103 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS CMAQ.OFFICE 411 ElmSrretlt, 4th Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Transmittal 214'653-7151 Fax, 214'653-6445 E-mail: CGomJroad@DallasCcunty.crg To: Steve Chuthiari, P.E
􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠From . Jack W _ 􀁌􀀰􀀹􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁳􀁾􀁟􀂷_____'""'Date March 31. 2003 􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭CMAQProgmm􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁁􀀺􀀡􀀡􀁧􀁾􀁥􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁮􀁣􀁹􀀺􀀽􀀮___T.::o
...wn of Addison Project No.: 1.2 via:for your: the fonowing: o mall o Informatlonluse o shop drawings o change order o specifications o messenger o approval o copy of lener o plans !i!l other Ofedex o review/comment D prints
o samples See Below drawIng 􀁲􀁥􀁶􀁾􀀠no. !!!!ErIpllon copies date Sheets 56,57, 93,& 94 of planset 1 3-14-02 .._--II enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. colnments:
Steve, Here are two copies of the signal plans for Midway at Keller Springs and at Spring Valley due to your cities request. copies to: P12, Craig 􀁇􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁡􀁤􀀠'U: 􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮:\GEJnetaf\GQ4..0FAX\AODISON\2OO3\09 Signal Plans.doc 
General 3/05/03 Slide 2 • Design Review • None • CMAQ ILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT In Progress • Construction • P02 Construction Still In Progress • P07A Construction
Still In Progress • P14A Construction Still In Progress • P24A Construction Still In Progress • P03 Construction Letting Estimated For July 2003 • P07B Construction Letting Estimated
For September 2003 • P13 Construction Letting Estimated For August 2003 
CMAQ PROGRAM Fr:L 3105103UPDATE S7FV€'Slide 1 􀁊􀀨􀁾􀀠At/C€ s rrvGiFILe;March 5, 2003 General Consultants PZ&T€C7eD BI [) L-Eln'Vtj Engineering Progress ()ATE (S. M 4.--5?R ( '" 􀁾􀀠2,;;r:,4-,
􀀵􀁾􀀼􀀠.Right of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items 
Consultants 3105103 Slide 3 • Contract Amendments: • Project 05 Executed: To Delete Linfield Leg at Illinois, Update Standards • Project 25 Amendment For 1 ED Case In Progress • Issues:
• None 
CMAQO/fice 3105103 Slide 4 • Activities Currently Underway • P03 -Pre-Austin Mylars Corrections Completed, PSE Package • P05 -Amendment Executed, Modifications in Progress • P07A -Construction
In Progress, Redesign Almost Complete For Driveway Access, W/B Decel. Lane For Truck Access And ElB Tum Lane Off Jefferson • 7B -Pre-Austin Corrections In Progress, Possible Deletion
Of Widening Improvements Of 1-20 @Carrier, Video Detection Is Requested • P08 -Waiting -FLA for Arapaho/Plano, Escrow From City. ROW Corrections In Progress for Plano @Arapaho • P10
-Mylar Corrections and Red Line Plan Set For The Deletion of Denton Tap @Bethel Intersection. RR Agreement In Progress • P12 -Plan Modification Update In Progress • P12A -FLA Contract
In Progress 
CMAQOffice 3/05/03 Slide 5 • Activities Currently Underway • P13 -Pre-Austin Mylars Corrections In Progress, Should Be Completed On March 17th • P18 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Parcel
2 Live Oak @Texas And Parcels 2,3 And 4 Live Oak At Fitzhugh • P23 -Making Copies For TxDOT Of Complete ROW Final Doc's For Their Review • P25 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Greenville
@Walnut Parcels 4, 4TA And 4ATE • P27 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, 3 Intersections On System, Preamble Corrections, Past Due But Should Have Soon • P28 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Spring
Valley @DNT, Parcel 3 • P29 -FLA Contract In Progress • P30 -FLA Contract In Progress • P32 -95% Design Review Rejected But Did Provide Comments 
Engineering Progress 3/05/03 Slide 6 􀁐􀁲􀀺􀁯􀁧􀁾􀀤􀀤.. Iliilii!iliiU-_u ; ---•••••••iConstruction Phase c :: I I 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾'; C til C til til Q> £ 􀁾􀀠'; ]I 'S; 'gj 􀁾-" -" ££ c c 
Engineering Progress Slide 7 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠3105103 n Progress Complete -__••• 0 __.'._. __••• 
􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀠a::· c Engineering Progress 3105103 Slide 8 I IP r--iNewln Progress 􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁉􀁩􀁤􀁉􀁩􀁬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀀨􀀠􀁈􀀺􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁦􀁬􀁊􀁣􀁴􀁬􀁯􀁮􀀠Phase 􀂷􀂷􀁟􀁩􀁣􀁯􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁣􀁏􀁭􀁰􀀧�
�􀀡􀁥􀂷..---Iprev. Const:-C,implete--L . 􀀮􀁾____. .....: CI 
Engineering Progress c··... • ..._·······, ·1·..-................ 3/05103 , , .Legend , 􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀭􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀠􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭_.
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀢Slide 9 j 􀁾􀀠-.• '(Previously Completed .....1 IP r·!r.iew In 'prQgress__ , 􀁟􀀡􀀮􀁴􀁾􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁳􀁴􀁾􀁣􀁩􀁩􀀨􀀩􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁾t{tiittiiJ􀂧􀀸􀂧􀁊􀁊􀂧􀂧􀁊􀁉􀁾􀀠. s
􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I # DeSigner.... /Ii 􀁾􀀠'if ill il5 i::: ii!5 CI'i .... Kimley-Horn ...... """.. _....-
Slide 10 Right-of-Way :1!11m! ·iprevi-o-LiSiycom-pi"ted ---i 􀁲􀁭􀁩􀀽􀀽􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀺􀁉L.!!:! IPreviously In Progress : 3105/03 .--TcompietedLastMo
nth.. • o ..Newln 􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁲􀁥􀁓􀀵􀀠.-TNORigiit::Of.WaYReqiii"'rf; ••_-_..._-_. ", ._-., .",'.,'"'''' 􀁍􀀬􀀢􀀢􀁍􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀠,',,, ". ",' OJ i < Comments 
Right-of-Way JillUlll 􀁩􀁤􀁐􀁲􀁥􀁖􀁩􀁏􀁵􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁧􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁉􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁤􀀠􀁾􀀠!PrevioUslY In Progress 3/05/03 Slide 11 􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁊􀁣􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁩􀁐􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁌􀁡􀀼􀁩􀁴􀁍􀀢􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀱􀀬􀀠.. I
L,,!N"w In Progress ""'"'''''',."" ."".,--,----, _."."""-"."-,,.. iNo Right-of-Way Requiredi.-I « Comments 
Utility Coordination 3105103 Slide 12 • P7B -Utilities are being relocated And Verifications To Be Done • PI0 -Verify Utilities • P13 -Utilities Are Being Relocated • P 17 -Oncor has.
begun to look at conflicts, currently are clear at 2 intersections. Need To Verify Other Intersections 
Summary 3105103 Slide 13 • LOA Parcels Approved • Parcels 147 • Right of Way Agreements -Contracts At TxDOT • Agreements 12 • Parcels 34 • CMAQ Projects Constructed 20 of 60 • CMAQ Projects
Under Construction 8 of 60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above 174 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 59 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At Mylar Development 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At
100% Design 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of 60 
• • (V) 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠('<) ! C'O Q ".... Q) 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 O'J .S 0 O'J c::I 0 O'J.S 0 O'J I <5 
Action Items 3/05/03 Slide 15 Escrow • P08 -ROW, From City OfRichardson, Requested $211,870 On 2/7/01 • P14A -Construction, From City farmers Branch, Requested $80,240.86 On 2/20/03
• P02 -Construction Brick Pavers, From City OfDallas, Requested $3,028.46 On 2120/03 • P14B -ROW From City OfGarland, Requested $16,541.56 On 2/18/03 • P07C -ROW 80%, From City Of Grand
Prairie, Requested $19,000 On 1/27/03 
CMAQ PROGRAM 2105103UPDATE Slide 1 February 5, 2003 General Consultants . Engineering Progress Right of Way Utilities Escrow Action Items ATexas Department of Transportation 
. General 2105103 Slide 2 • Design Review • P32,95% • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT In Progress • Construction • P02 Construction In Progress • P07A Construction
In Progress • P14A Construction In Progress • P24A Construction In Progress • P03 Construction Letting Scheduled For June 2003 . • P07B Construction Letting Scheduled For Summer 2003
• P13 Construction Letting Scheduled For August2003 
Slide 3 • Project 05 • Project 10 • Project 12 • Project 25 • None Consultants 2105103 • Contract Amendments: Revised Fee Proposal Accepted -In Progress, Delete Linfield Leg at Illinois,
Update Standards Deleted Bethel/Denton Tap -No Amend Amendment Approved, 5 ED Cases, Update Standards And Right Turn Lane Modifications At Keller Springs And Midway Amendment For 1 ED
Case, Driveway Easements And Standards Update • Issues: 
CMAQ Office 2105103 Slide 4 • Activities Currently Underway • P03 -Pre-Austin Mylars Review And Corrections, PSE Package • P05 -Amendment In Progress • P06A -Lowering Ped Bridge Completed
At Combs Creek • P07A _.. Construction In Progress, Redesign For Driveway Access, W/B Decel. Lane For Truck Access And ElB Turn Lane Off Jefferson • P08 -Waiting -FLA for Arapaho/Plan,
Escrow From City .• • P10 -Dollar Analysis IP, Mylar Corrections and Red Line Plan Set For The Deletion of Denton Tap @Bethel Intersection • P12 -Plan Modification Update • P13 -Pre-Austin
Mylars Review And Corrections 
CMAQOffice 2105103 Slide 5 • Activities Currently Underway • P18 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Parcel 2 Live Oak @Texas • P19 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Ross @Henderson Parcel 3 and
@Carroll, Parcels 3 & 4 • P20 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Parcels 19 & 20 • P25 -Waiting On ROW Corrections, Greenville @Walnut Parcels 4, 4TA And 4ATE • P27 -Waiting On ROW Corrections,
3 Intersections On System, Preamble Corrections, Past Due • P29 -FLA Contract In Progress • P30 -FLA Contract In Progress • P32 -95% Design Review • 
Engineering Progress 2/05103 Slide 6 11JJJJ'i := c 􀁾􀀠c 􀁾C) C)'" 'iii 􀀮􀁾􀀠'iii 􀁾';;; '" '"'" c c:: cc c:: 
Engineering Progress 2/05103 Slide 7 Completed 􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭I I:: I I I II '!!!I 1:::5,::1:::ii ' tn f» .􀀮􀁾􀀠t:n Q) "I::: I: ::"&11:ll 􀁾􀀱􀁬􀀧􀁩􀀠ao>
ao>co::CO::c""a 'S;";"S:--"iUftia Q) (IJI CD nJ nJ C C " C 0:: .: .: u: u: 
Engineering Progress Slide 8 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠2105103 Comments 
2/05/03 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠J!! 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠111 'E.'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. 'E. EE E E E E E E E E 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ';#. 0 r 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉
􀀠Comments Slide 9 Engineering Progress 
Right-of-Way' · Proj. # 1 Leftwich 2 Patel 3 MK 4B 5 PBS&J Turner 7C PBS&J 8 Huitt-Zollars 9 GSW 10 USA 11 Lee 12 C&B 12A C&B 13 Moore 14B HNTB 14C HNTB 15 Halff 15A Halff .. ", uno
.....􀁾􀁬􀀮􀁰􀁲􀁥􀁶􀀻􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁬􀁯􀁵􀁳􀁬􀁹􀁾􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀀽􀁬􀁥􀁴􀁥􀁟􀁉􀀡􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁟I I . 2/05103Previously In Progress 􀁾􀀠& Comments funds needed in Process Revised Final
documents sent to TxDOT Received Revised Final documents 12103/02 ;n 
Right-of-Way ·2105103 Slide 11 Proj. # 19 20 248 25 Carson Salcedo 27 I APM Comments 
Utility Coordination 2/05103 Slide 12 • P7B -Utilities are being relocated And Verifications To Be_ Done • PI 0 -Verify Utilities . • P13 -Utilities Are Being Relocated • PI7 -Oncor
has begun to look at conflicts, currently are clear at 2 intersections. Need To Verify Other Intersections 
Summary 2/05103 Slide 13 • LOA Parcels Approved • Parcels 147 • Right of Way Agreements -Contracts At TxDOT • Agreements 12 • Parcels 34 • CMAQ Projects Constructed 18 of 60 • CMA Q
Projects Under Construction 10 of 60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above 174 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 59 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At Mylar Development 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design
Sets At 100% Design 0 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of 60 
Action Items Slide 14 Agency • County • ROW Acquisitions ,. • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • Office Closed 2/05103 Target Dates On-going On-going 12/31102 
.Action Items 2/05103 Slide 15 Escrow • P08 -ROW From City OfRichardson • pos -Amend 04 From City OfDallas, Requested $2,404.64 On 1131103 • P07C -ROW 80%, From City OfGrand Prairie,
Requested $19,000 On 1127103 
Right-of-Way Parcels 2105103 Slide 16 􀁾Completed Since 8/24/02 Din Progess @TxDOT I.:a Completed Since 8/24/02 • Incomplete 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Approved ROW
Acquisition Documents LOA Parcels Approved TxDOT Appraisal Approval 
Right-of-Way Parcels 2/05/03 Slide 17 Tota. Parcels::: 266 300, .. ','.".' 250 69':'. 200 +----1--_ 150 -1---1 100 -1----1 50 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁂􀁩􀁬􀀠o Prelim. f Final LOA Parcels Approl.ed Appraisals
Offers Made Number In E, D. Acquisition Production Approl.ed 
--CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE 9/"/02 September 11, 2002 General Consultants Engineering Progress RighfofWay Utilities Escrow Action /tems 􀁾􀀽􀁧􀀠􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀭General !S!e. SIido2 9/11/02• Design
Review • Process Continues • CMAQILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With rxOOT In Progress • Construction • P02 Construction Letting Scheduled For October • P07A LOA Approved, Let In
Sept. Award October • P24A Letting/Award In September • P14A Construction Letting Scheduled For November • P07B Construction Letting Scheduled For February 2003 
Consultants .. 􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠SlkJe :J!l1Se • Contract Amendments: 9/11102• • Project 03 Fee Approval In Progress • Project 12 Keller Springs At Midway -Will Shorten Right Turn Lane Need Fee
Proposal • Project 13 Fee Approval In Progress • Project 21 Driveway Changes And Update Per Ped-02(M) Standards In Progress • Issues: • Project 20 Need TxDOT Review OfQuantities 100
CMAQOjjice Slide 4"""''' • Activities Currently Underway'/()2 • POS -Fee Approval In Progress • POBA SBC Phone Duct Conflict -Solution IN Progress • P07A -LOA Received -Letting September
19'" • P07C -Plans And ROW Modifications Complete -Eriors Found • P08 -Waiting On TxDOT FLA for ArapaholPlan And Escrow From Richardson • P12 -Approval Of ROW Change -Keller Springs/Midway
• PIS -Fee Approval In Progress • P14A -Mylar Corrections In Progress • P14B -Verify Mylar Corrections • P14C -Verify Mylar Corrections • PI5 Waiting On ROW Final Documents 
===:::==, CMAQ Office = ==-􀀱􀁓􀁳􀁾􀀠SlideS 9111102• Activities Currently Underway • P19 -ROW Corrections Needed • P20 -Waiting On TxDOT -Verify Quantities • P21 -Waiting On Consultant
Revisions & ROW • P24B -Final Design In Progress • P25 -Corrections From Consultant Needed • P27 Need ROW Corrections • P28 -ESS Amend In Progress (Asbestos Inspection) at DNT and Spring
Valley • P32 -95% Design In Progress -Design Exception In Progress • P12A, P29, and P30 City of Dallas Right of Way Estimate Revision In Progress Engineering Progress 􀁾􀀮􀁧•.,d I, :co..
Viii -..r;'''hutiy 􀁃􀁯􀀢􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁉􀀢􀁢􀀭􀁤􀀠-. S/I1f()2 _ 􀀺􀁃􀁴􀀧􀀭􀁩􀁪􀁯􀁊􀀾􀁬􀀮􀀨􀀮􀁤􀁍􀁾􀁲􀀭􀁓􀁬􀁗􀀺􀁬􀀺􀀠(::JLJ. : Nil... 􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀡􀀢􀀬􀀹􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁯􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀢􀁾􀁟􀁷􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀠_
􀂷􀁩􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀢􀁴􀀺􀀡􀁬􀁬􀀾􀀡􀀧􀁩􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁾􀁉􀀮􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀠􀁾􀀺􀁐􀁾􀀮􀀬􀁩􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁰􀀢􀁉􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠
􀁾􀀢􀀠Slide 7 􀀬􀁾􀀠,, 100 Engineering Progress 9111102 Engineering Progress 􀁭􀁍􀁾􀀠Slice B li/.+.,..:*;.;:;I 􀀬􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀢􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁣􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁭􀁰􀁨􀀧􀁬􀀻􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀠9111/02 _ ...􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁴􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁤�
�􀀧􀀻􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁩􀂷􀂭c:::ILJ 􀀭􀁴􀀴􀀮􀁴􀁾􀁮􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁬􀁉􀀠---􀁾-􀁴􀁃􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-_ 􀀡􀁃􀁯􀁮􀀾􀁴􀀱􀁜􀁩􀁾􀁤􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀭􀁣􀀮􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀻􀁴􀁩􀀭􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁣􀁡􀀢􀁮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀡􀁾􀀡􀁌�
�􀀠____.i_.L. ________l 
Engineering Progress Right-of-Way o P",>;Io"IIily􀁾􀁃􀀨􀁊􀁾􀁰􀁬􀁥􀁦􀀼􀁬􀁤􀀠liE] 􀁾􀁟􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁧􀀮􀀧􀀢􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀠􀀮􀀭􀂷􀀧􀂷􀁾􀂷􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁰􀁩􀀢􀁩􀁥􀁤􀀠L.i.Si'Wl!ek P 􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀡􀁮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁲
􀁾􀁪􀁪􀁟􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀬􀀠, • 􀁟􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀭􀀬􀀬􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀻􀀼􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀡􀂷􀁾􀁾􀁵􀁬􀀬􀁡􀁾􀀠ProJ. 
I Right-of-Way ."-lpfIIO'IG<III'y 􀁃􀁑􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁦􀁬􀁾􀁤􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠If P,..,IGIUI!y In II'IGgm" i • j"Colupl''''d 􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁫􀀠,! 9/11102".,. r-r-r-r,------,--􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀁩􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁾􀂷􀁾�
�􀁾􀁩􀁲􀁯􀀴􀂷􀁩􀀠PI"j . Comments• Utility Coordination 100 .....e Slide 12 9/11/02 • P24A -Greenville @Milton utilities expected to be relocated by 911 5/02; no adjustments required
at the remaining intersections 
􀁒􀁩􀁧􀁨􀁴􀁾􀁯􀁦􀁾Way Parcels Total CMAQ ROW Parcels =266 300 250 I 200 150 100 50 o L .... .....cP-,ro_d_"'_tio_n__S_ur_'e,,-y_s__D_e_'"_Io..;p_ed__A.:..pp'-r_o'_ed___R_e'_ie_"______
Pr.liminary Approved Contracts Conl1acls Appraisal Acquisition Escrow Progress .. 􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀡􀀧􀀺􀁌.. __ .__ ._ I::E1 􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀧􀁾􀁬􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀼􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀠9111/02 _ 􀀺􀁾􀁩􀀩􀀮􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁎􀀼􀁾􀀠_
􀀬􀁱􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁜􀁹􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀮􀀠D N..!.\,.lk<f,)O,. _ t·_..􀁾. • I 
!B11. Escrow Progress Slide 15 100 􀁾􀀮􀀠Sljd.eJf3 Escrow Progress 
Summary roo,......, Slide 17 9/11/02• Right of Way Agreements Approved • Agreements 56 • Parcels 145 • Right of Way Agreements -Contracts At TxDOT • Agreements 7 (2 New) • Parcels 28
(7 new) • CMAQ Projects Constructed 14 of 60 • CMAQ Projects Under Construction 9 of 60 • CMAQ Intersections At 100% Or Above 173 of 175 • CMAQ Design Sets Complete 57 of 60 • CMAQ Design
Sets At Mylar Development 1 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 100% Design 1 of 60 • CMAQ Design Sets At 95% Design 1 of 60 Action Items 9111/02 Agenqy • CoWJ!¥ • ROW Aa;rJisiJ:it::ns • Count;yB2ff'1l:ainin
g On-gaing • I'MiE • Cl= Out 01' Yl6 8123102 • Clcse Out ci' F09, P31, YlO P72, Yl3, Yl5 9115102 
Letting-ROW Calendar· 9/11102 See Attachment 
CMAQ PROGRAM OFFICE 􀂷􀀮􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀧􀁶􀁬􀀠N. MARKffSTREffSUfTE410 DALLAS, IX 75202 214-747-6336. Fax; (214) 741-1937=-':::-100 􀀧􀀱􀁉􀀡􀁁􀁮􀁳􀁾􀀠September 4, 2002 Mr. Eric Starnater, P ,E,
Carter & Burgess, Inc, 7950 Elm Brook, Sle, 250 Dallas, TX 75247 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program PM/E Mylar Review • Project 12 Dear Mr. Starnater: Thank you
for your recent Mylar corrections that you sent us, Upon review of those corrections we found some same and additional items that need to be addressed, See attached review comments.
We will need revised signed and sealed Mylar's of any changes to the plan sheets. In addition, we have been advised at this time to keep the plans as is regarding the potential modification
of the Northbound Right Turn Lane on Midway just South of Keller Springs, We will contact you if any changes will be necessary, If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
this office at 214-747-8336 ext 28 or Craig Goodroad at ext. 25, 􀁳􀁩􀁮􀁣􀀺􀀺􀀴􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠ck W, Loggins, P,E, 􀁾rogram Manager Attachment: PM/E Review Comments cc: Don Cranford, P,E" Asst.
Director, Transportation and Planning, w/o attachment Suja Mathew, P,E" TxDOT Roadway Design, w/o attachment Fraydoon Nafissi, P,E, TxDOT Roadway Design, w/o attachment Nancy Cline,
P.E" City of Carrollton, w/o attachment 􀀴􀁉􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁩􀀡􀁩􀁲􀀮􀁪􀁬􀁪􀁦􀁩􀁩􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁗􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀡􀁅􀀾􀀠Jerry Murawski, PE,. City of Farmers Branch, w/o attachment Ray Purdy. P,E" City of Farmers
Branch, w/o attachment H:\P14CORRlP14-10U1\P12-C&bl2OO2\40_ P12 PME Mylar Review,doGOver a Century of Engineering Excellence 
CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE 9/19/01 September 19, 2001 General Consultants Engineering Progress RighI ofWay Utitities Escrow Action Items General 9119/01• Design Review • Process Continues -Timeliness
• CMAQ ILA's • Project 08, Richardson ILA With TxDOT In Progress • Project 08, ILA With Garland In Jeopardy • Construction • P03/P07/PI3, Dallas County Preparing "Letter of Authority"
Submittal 
Consultants 9119101 • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -Project 07A -Project 24 -Project 25 Fee Approved, Changes In Progress Fee Proposal In Progress At County Revised
Fee Proposal Received, Review In Progress • Issues -None Engineering Progress 9/19101• Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transp. Group -Grand Prairie Funded
& Let SS -Construct Start Aug. 2001 -Grand Prairie Funded & Let C2 Award 9112101, Start Oct. 2001 -Phase C3 To Be Let By City June 2002 Based On Funding -Phase C4 To Be Funded TIP 4160
Rebid Oct. or Nov. -Phase C5 To Be Funded TIP 4160 TxDOT Let Aug. 2001 -Phase C6 To Be Let By City March 2002 Based On Funding -C7 Funded TIP 4161 (Lone Star), Under Construction 65%
Reviews In Progress -Dallas None -TxDOT -None -Richardson None 
==􀁾􀀽􀀢􀀽􀀠Engineering Progress = 1SS4t SlideS 9/19/01• 95% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT None -Dallas None -Richardson None • 100% Reviews In Progress -TxDOT POll, POS -Farmers Branch
PI4B • Reviews Completed -TxDOT -None -Garland -None • Consolidated Comments -None """""Engineering Progress -TRSI$ Slide 6 9/19101 -Disposition Comments -None 'Design Underway -Schematic
None -Bridge Design P32 (Waiting on Approval From Austin) -65% -None -95% -None -I" Final -P11, P12A, PI5A -2'4 Final -14A, 148, 14C -3"' Final· None -Mylar Production -P10, P20, P25,
P30 -Plans Received/Returned -P06A 
100 􀁾􀁥􀀠SlkJo 7 Engineering Progress _·_ ..􀂷􀂷􀁩􀁬􀀮􀀡􀁩􀁾􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀠k-"'=otr-t,j 􀀱􀀧􀁾􀁯􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁩􀀡􀁾􀂧􀁪􀁏􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁤􀀮-" 􀁟􀁾􀁩􀂧􀁾􀁩􀁦􀁩􀀮􀀡􀀱􀀡􀁤􀁌􀁡􀀮􀁜􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀮􀂷􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀠0:0􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁊􀁾􀁾�
�􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁯􀁾􀀺􀁉􀁦􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀧􀁝CD 􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁦􀀮􀁩􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁩􀁡􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀠􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁪􀁾􀁮􀁡􀁲􀁾􀁬􀁬􀁯􀁊􀀧􀁬􀀠􀀡􀁲􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁬􀀮􀁴􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠....􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁰􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀺􀀠,
, 9119/Of !l1Be Engineering Progress 􀀮􀁌􀀮􀁧􀁾􀁍􀀠Slide 8 h--.it ->-1 -:Pnlvlou$t't 􀁾􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁾􀀨􀀬􀁤􀀠9/19101 _ -:Ct>!"PJ.tiKt l!u:l wU1! a:J PI'9'Ii<nl-.iy In i>mgr!lp. -;"';;'In 1'/0;'';---.
-􀁥􀁯􀁩􀀮􀁾..􀁾􀁮Im:amph"._ . 􀁟􀀺􀁣􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀬􀁃􀀮􀁬􀁴􀁏􀀢􀀠ComP't'!" 
Engineering Progress , 􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀺􀁉􀁴􀂷􀀢􀁮􀁾􀀽􀀭le-o-􀁜􀀭􀁾􀀧􀁔􀀢􀁾􀀢􀁉􀀭􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁜􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠__􀁾􀁟􀀽􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁬􀂷􀁬􀁩􀀻􀁲􀀨􀁩􀀢􀀮􀁴􀁷􀁪􀀡􀀬􀁾􀀭􀁟􀀠9/19/{)1 􀁾􀀭􀂷􀀭􀀺􀁐􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁌􀁪􀁮
􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁩􀀱􀀮􀀢􀀺􀂷c:JE:J 􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁮􀂷􀁾􀁾.. 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁲􀀺􀁾􀁲: C;.mm(H'lIS , Right-of-Way o ,P"''';''lIa1\',c<>mpIIII<:t @-,'"'.''' '" "." •• • 􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁤􀀠LUI W
...k o .H.q. In P".yt•• • lit> R.IgM..,I.Way U_",,11Gd Commenl$ 
-= 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁾􀀠 100 Slide 11 "'''''.. Right-of-Way 9119/()1 " Utility Coordination 9119/01 • Processing certification forms • Supplying 100% plans to utility companies • Monthly Utility
Meeting held • P13 -Alpha @Welch -relocation of3 SWBTpower poles • P24A -expected to be let March 20CJ2, few utility conflicts 
Preliminary Production $I19/V1 Right-of-Way Parcels Escrow Progress I"""mi o 1'f.,.I""'I)C,,"'I·..·d _ 􀁉􀁕􀁊􀁾􀁜􀀠􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀻􀁜􀂷􀀮􀂫􀁉􀀼􀁾􀀠_ 1.:'"'..,.k<lI ..... '\'i••􀁾􀀠=--==􀁰􀁾􀀽􀀠
100yU}!sc Sltde 14 91/9/01 D:-",t\jlAl,.". _ 􀁲􀁗􀀾􀁬􀁨􀁾••􀀢􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠il. 
----Escrow Progress 􀁉􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁮􀁤􀀠o 􀁲􀁦􀀮􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀬􀁉􀀩􀀭􀁬􀀧􀀢􀁮􀁾􀁨􀁬􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀠_ 􀀱􀁻􀁏􀁗􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀢􀁬􀁎􀀬􀂫􀁉􀀼􀁾􀀠_ L",,"'P •••dl ...... 'W••-" o M" 􀀧􀁉􀀱􀁁􀁫􀁾􀁬􀁏􀁾􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁉􀀠100
Y£IIRSIJII Slide 15 Escrow Progress 􀁾􀁾__-__􀁾􀁊􀀻􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁱􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀧􀁦􀀮􀀮􀁦􀀮􀀧􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁟􀁾􀀠􀁟􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀮􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀻􀁟􀁴􀁜􀁜􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀠o 􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁬􀀢􀁾􀁉􀀼􀀻􀁯􀀡􀀺􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀠_
􀁾􀀭􀁹􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀻􀀬􀁾􀀠􀁎􀀼􀁾􀁤􀀮􀁤􀂷􀀧􀀠111111101 S)!r9f01 
100 Action Items 􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀠Slide 17 Agency • County • Set Up Dallas Right Of Way Escrow Accounting System • TxDOT • Reviews Due • PMIE • New Office Lease 9/19/01 Target Dates In Progress
On-going Complete 
Steve Chutchian From: Jack Loggins [Jack.Loggins@DLSCMAQ.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11 :06 AM To: Steve Chutchian P. E. (E-mail) Cc: Jim Pierce (E-mail); Jon Engelke (E-mail);
Don Cranford (E-mail); Sam Wilson (E-mail); Craig Goodroad; Suja Mathew (E-mail); Jon Cox (E-mail); P. E. Mike Murphy (E-mail); Ivan Nicodem us; Ivan2 (E-mail) Subject: NW Corner Keller
Springs at DNT Steve, I understand that Jon Engelke has been visiting with Jim Pierce about a ROW matter at the NW corner of Keller Springs at DNT. The CMAQ program needs a corner clip
at this intersection for construction of a southbound right turn lane. But, Earthtech in its ROW study has determined that the north portion of Keller Springs is constructed past the
north ROW line. In other words, apparently the city street is encroaching onto private property. This Right Turn Lane may be in jeopardy unless your Town can either acquire this property
immediately or prove that the acquisition did in fact occur. I am sure your city will want to to investigate this further. Please keep us informed as to what you find. Jack W. Loggins,
Program Manager Dallas County CMAQ Office Parsons Brinckerhoff, 1701 N. Market Street Dallas, Texas, 75202, (214) 747-6336 x 28 FAX (214) 741-1937 1 
Steve Chutchian From: Jim Pierce Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:13 AM To: Steve Chutchian; Robin Jones Cc: Michael Murphy Subject: CMAQ Street Markings During our CMAQ presentation
to Council on 1/23/01 Councilman Barrett stated he liked the lane markings at Lindberg and Proton (I think those were the ones) and that we should re-mark as shown. We promised we would
review the situation. Steve, get the handouts, and lets discuss with Robin. Jim Pierce, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director PO Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 972-450-2879 1 
Frvm: FS1 To: P..E•• hhn lJaumVWKlr Pail" 1 vi 14 Memorandum To, Ale· Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Vf" Date: May 6, 1997 V SUbJect: CMAQ Progmm Update .110 Conducted April 23,
1997, 2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office Attendees: Sign·ln Sheet· AttaChment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Richard Peterson Dallas Co; Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBes Don Cranlord Dallas Co.
Jim Bernier' Proj. Controls pees Dave Davis Farmers Branch Tony Tramel, Traffic OTA Ali Malekouti Dallas James Allen, Civil ARS Don Ingram, Environmental ESS Ivan led the meeting with
the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment B. Information cIi.c .....d in addition to that which i. contained on the overflaads incilidecl. 1. General· Ivan Nicodemus Design
Review -James AliGn (ARS), Tony Tramel (OTA) and Don Ingram's (ESS) Gfforts continue on the design reviews. TIP Modifications -Grand Prairie, Mesqulte-No new news to report. City ofDallas
Invoice· Hazel Baker (County) is still reviewing the PM/E evaluation of invoices #2 and #3. Collin-Dallas Caunly ILA • No progress this week. t:scrow Requests· A Briefing Memo is being
reviewed by Dallas County for a County escrow payment 10 TxDOT for Projects 08 (Huitt-Zollars), 15 (Halff), 70 (Kirnley·Hom). and 71 (Parsons Transportation Group). The briefing was
expected on April 29, however, Richard Peterson (D<'IIIM County) indicated that the review 01 the TxDOT E&crow Payment Briefing Memo was still underway. In addition, the County needs
to verily athe County has received escrow payments from the sponsoring Cilles and that those funds have been deposited in the correct accounts. Richard requested a draft Court Order
be prepared considering the County Auditor'S schedule changes lor Court Order reviews. A discussion followed regarding the uncertainty 01 the TxDOT administration charges, and whether
or not to pursue the payment briefing until sUCh time that the administration charges are firmed up. Currently the escrow amounts are calculated based on the TxDOT leiter 01 August 1996.
Current issues which may change this direction InclUde: • Change to the overmatching approach on off-system improvements as discussed by Michael Morris at the recent Regional Transportation
CounCil meeting. • Differences between TxDOT Special Projects and ROW offices regarding ROW administration charges. • Uncertainty of TxDOT's intentions to collect indirect GOSIS Irom
FHWA lor off-system improvements. It was tentatively agreed thai the escrow payments would be held until the current issues can be resolved. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Nolic9 to
Proceed Meetings' D:IGENERALIG03MEET\UPDATE\1997\110.DOC 
Pilp' 20f 14 Brown & Root -Project 19 April 28. 1:30 p.m. (tentative) ICF Kaiser -Project 20 April 29. 1:30 p.m. Implemsnting (I Svbmittal Tracking System (STS) -Inputting submittal
history. Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 06 (TCB) -Currently, awaiting consultant response to PM/E evaluation of the fee proposal. o Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars) -Preparation of
the Bnefing Memo is underway lor the contract amendment for the additional survey now required dUe to construction. • Project 09 (GSW) -Court Order Will be May 6. o Project 72 (Bridge/armer)
-TIP modification from the City of Mesquite is required for a contract amendment. The PMIE has requested the County 10 assist in the survey on the ROW in the City of Balch Springs or
make a contract amendment to Bridge/armer. Richard Paterson (County) said the he assumed that the signals that are in place are on utility pOles with span wires. Tany said that was correct.
The City officials Brld the engineers disagree where the ROW is. o Project 76 (6W&R) -The Briefing Memo and draft Court Order for Contract Amendment 01 (add two signal locations) will
be ready for County review by the end of the week. Rt>gal Row Drawings -The draWings were forwarded to Wilbur Smith (Project 31), but the electronic file configuration needs to be checked
and then resent 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Klml..,·Hom • Garlandl -A Progress Meeting has been tentatively scheduled for late April with the final report presentation. Project
71 (PflI'$OIl$ Trall$porlation Group· Grand Pralrfe, -The first nine PS&E packages were submitted. The specs and estimates have not been reviewed by TxDOT, PM/E andlor the City. They
have been formally forwarded to the agencies for a shorten 5-day review cycle. The revised funding estimate Is expected by the end of this week. RIChard Peterson (County) asked about
the type of the central communication system being designed. Tony replied that the city has chosen a fiber optic system, with 9 to 12 cameras for surveillance purposes. At this point
the City will be purchasing the controllers; however, the type of equipment i$ not decided at this time. Tony noted that the PMIE will be writing a leiter on the extent of the global
management eHorts on the ultimate overmatched (100%) projects. Project n (andvefarmer •MesolteJBalcil SprtngsI8unnJYllie' . The request still stands for Dallas County aSSistance In identifying
ROW at the City of Balch Springs signal location\>. Sid Horner and Selas Camarillo (Dallas County) will be contacted. There are approximately 6-10 locations out of the 25 thet are at
75'% PS&E. AProgress Meeting will be held this Thursday. Project 73 (Hunhlr Assaciales • South Dallas County) • Ivan stated that the consultant is doing well after an Initial flurry
of misunderstandings and loss of personnel at the start. Tony said that Hal Jones (Hunter) was going to hire John Friebele (original project manager) on the weekends to assist. Project
75 (SVerdrup • Il'Vin9/Coppell, -Formal review of two Technical Memoshave been initiated. Project 78 (Bucher, WilliS" Ratliff. 1I!lUI Retlming • N. Dalru) -BW&FI's data collection is 90% complete. The PM/E Is recommending a cost proposal for two additional
locations. D:\GENERAL\OO3MEE'NJPOATE\1997\11O.00c 
Frqm: FS1 Tq: P.E .. Jqhn SiNmioutnVf CIlfAO "'ogram Updafe fl110 Page 3 of 5 Tony is working on consolidating the traffIC review comments into an electronic format. Tony stated that
the signal design on Project 02 has not been provided prior to the 95% submittal, resulting in II lot of review comments. 4. Civil James AHen James reported the follOwing project status:
Project 05 (PBS&J • Dallas) -ReView comments have been consolidated and James noted that he will be meeting with Cal Bostwick (PBS&J) tomorrow to review the list. One on one reviews
of the consotidated comments is II newly edopted PMJE practice to assist the consultant in tha 􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠'. proces.s. Project 10 (USA· CappellI -The consolldalion of
the review comments is being finalized: a meeting will be set up with Scott Young (USA) to review the list. Project 17 (Oojer • DaIIaS/Ga,'andl A meeting was held with Gojer last Thursday
to review the consolidated comments. Project 22 (Trans,.tems • Dallas) -A coordination Issue has come up on the Sylvan Avenue at Irving Boulevard intersection. Greiner (TranSyslems 􀁳􀁵􀁢􀁣􀁯􀁮􀀵􀁵􀁾
􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀩􀀠has had contact with HNTB who is performing Ihe design services for the Sylvan bridge improvements. There is some concern of overlapping/duplication of design efforts between
HNT8 and TranSystems which will have 10 be resolved. 5. Environmental· Don Ingram Projects 05 (PBS"") and 17 (Go;er • Dallas)· Consolidated review comments were senl out. ProJect 10
(USA· Coppell)-Don has completed the consolidated environmental review comments. Oyekan's (subconsultanl) staff member who prepared the draft environmental reports. has been assigned
to DART 00 a new person will be asSigned. Proiect 22ITran.,........ Dallas) . The 15% draft environmental reports are expected tomorrow. Project 23 (MIl Centennial (Dallas)-The 15% draft
environmental reports 􀁨􀁡􀁾been received. Don stated that sam Moghedassi (TxOOT) has backed off on the noise requests and on the Minute Order which was to be attached 10 the back of
the environmental reports. e. ProJect Control -Jim Bernier Development of Exhibit 'H' reports continues. Ten progress updates were completed this week. 7. Kef Issues -Ivan Nicodemus
TxDOT-CDllnty Agreement Modifications Gary Taylor (TxDOT) is currently reviewing Ihe PMIE evaluation of proposed revisions 10 thIS agreement. ExhibitA & B Content-Proposed listing being
reviewed by County and TxDOT. Continuation of PM!E Servioes -Ivan continues to work on 11 leiter requested by the County on alteroativesto carrying the PM/E services through the completion
of the program. 8. L_k Ah.... d -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on April 30, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones. D;\GENERAL\GQ3MEEliUPDATE\
1997\11 Q.DOC 
CMAO Program Update 1110 Page 4 tilII 9. Action Items .. Ivan NIcOdemus Collnty • Regal Row Drawings ..................................................................................................
...............ASAP • Balch Springs ROWAssistance ........................................................................................... April25 PM/II • Revised Pavement Survey
to TxDOr........................................................................................ASAP • 1998 Bond Input to tile City of0aiIas...........................................................
...................... On·Going • Grsnd Prairie's EiscrQW /0 TxDOT· COUlt Order................................................................... April 25 • 75% Notification Additionallnform;,tion
............................................................................ Apnl23 TxDOT., County t PM/II • TxOOT .. County Agreement Modifications...................................................
......... Aptil18 • Exhibit A & B Comments ................................................... .. ................................................ Apr/I 18 l'tfHquife • TIP Amendment.................
.............................................. . ...................................................... May 10. OlIIer Item. Richard asked about the ROW at Camp Wisdom and Cockrell Hill
(Denny's) Project 02. Ivan stated that very preliminary appraISal information has been used to make supposilions regarding the inadequacy of the budget. Ivan plans to contact Salas Camarillo
(County· ROW) to discuss several issues inclUding; • Schedule for developing ROW appraisals. It is important that appraisals be developed within 30 days of the mitial ROW drawings so
that if design changes are necessary, the changes can be made prtor to the 65% PS&E with little or no fe-design required. • Efforts should be focused on developing actual ROW cost estimates,
while TxDOT sorts out between the Special Projects and ROW divisions what the administrative costs are. • The issue of of whether or nOl Denny's has already received compensation for
the parking lot damages remains to be resolved. Ivan emphasized thai these ROW issues are on the projeCt's critical path. Ali Malekouti (City of Dallas) inquired jf the CMAQ Program
has been subject to any audits. Don Cranford (County) replied that the program has undergone three levels of audits: 1) one TxDOT·AUS!in audit (a second has been tequested by Bud Beene);
2) County audit of every PM/E Invoice; and 3) annual contract compliance audit performed by PBCS's corporate staff. Meeting Minutes by: Ivan F. Nicodemus. Project Manager AttaChments
D:\GENERAL\G03MEEnUPDATE\1991\11O.DOC 
eMAG Program U".... 1110Pagfl5 of 5 XC: Atlemlees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT. LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Fischer
(PBCS) J. Baumgartner (Town 01 Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City ot Carrollton) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas)
P Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) A. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (Cily of Irving)
A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Stewart (City of Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale)
D:\GENERAl\G03MEE1VJPDATE\1997\110.DOC 
Frvm: FS1 TO': P.E.. John BilllmviUtnvr ATTACHMENT A CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #110 SIGN-IN SHEET April 23, 1997 Dal/as Dallas Dallas Dallas Branch of Dallas of Dallas Helen Tran Everett Michael
Burbank 1 LaDonna Smith 695-9254 Mack FHWA 482-5988 " 
ATTACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • April23, 1997 • Gemwal • COIISultqnts • Trillflic • CMI • Envirunmlllltal • ProjectControl General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • Gflind Prairie
• Mesqulle • City ofDallas Invoice • Collin County. Da//as County ILA • Escrow Request Preparation 
-"II!!'_. a "Ii. Consultants • Accomplishments • Notice to Proceede Meetings -#19 B&R Aprll211, 1:30 (fentlttive) -#20 Kaiser April 29, 1 :30 • Implementing Submittal Tracking System
(STS) -InpuUng Schedule History, Opal'iltiollO/I • Pending Contract Amendments -1106 TeB: AWI/iling Con$uIlIlntResponse to Fee Revi"" -1106 H·Z, ,.,.",.rill9 BI1et1ng Memo -_ GSW: CC
Order. May 6 -11128-1': TIFIIIcdltiealion Newwary-Mesquite To Request Request forROWAfti..,ce to Baleh Springs -1I1.81m: Pnlparing Briefing IIIf1110 • Regal Row DraWings to W;lbuY-Smlrh
-RfH'IIqUflllf Djj Ei ;;:• --Traffic • Signa' Design Project Status • GAR (TO) • Status Quo -Compiling Data • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsona Trans. Group -First 1/PS&E Submitted • 5_&
ESIlIIIIIIII-l!xped1tfld RelllewPIVe,," -CfIIItrai COnt Communication Plans (15%) Anticipated -RfIViDdFunding Estimate Expected ThIs Wee/! • SE Dafl..Co.-MesIBSlSV(72) -SF -Requlllllt
ForCounty ROWAssistance In Salch Springs -Apprwcimately 8-10 Looations@75% Plans -ProgntSS Meetinl1lhls lhursday -Need To Amend Connet 
Frvm: FS1 Tv: P.E .. Jvhn BlIumviVtnvr DiII9: 517m Time: 08:Z8:46 PlIve 991 14 Traffic (Continued) • Signal Design Project Status (Continued) • Irving/Coppell (75) • Sverdrup -Forma/Review
2 Tech Memos/nlt/sted • N DIIII/IS Retiming (76) • BWR -Data Collection:!: 90% Complete '. -PME RecommendIng Cost ProPOSIl/For Two Additions/LocatiOns • Review OfFlatwork Projects. Consolidating
Comments Into Electronic Format Design Status muf//c) 10 m Perwnt CompIeIf! 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀠70. G;ri:tnd Kimlaj'-Horn ;1, Orend Pre... .,........ Trlll'Ml.Gp, n, E.
D8InCo. SooOofof."M ----.._, II 78, N. Dallal RI,"'WIg BWR -1EIIi!II!II_""'''' 
FI'Vm: FSl '('0: P.E.• John BillUTlVovtnVf PtI$V 11 vf 14 Design Status (G£O-mC' Ct1lllltuu!d) I'I<IJ«t 11 􀁄􀁡􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁩􀁉􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁤􀀠......,...13 UttQll! 11: Rm ... 2t fl.,w:ImOt """"'---.
22 􀁍􀀨􀁊􀀨􀁩􀀨􀁩􀁉􀁾􀁢􀁬􀁊􀁬􀀬􀀩􀀠lAlrwSrwam 2:1 􀁃􀁯􀁤􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀱􀀠Ml<C"" :4 Q<WlYIlIt ..... 􀁩􀁬􀁲􀀻􀁎􀁾􀀲􀀠.... 􀀲􀁑􀁾􀁰􀁲􀀬􀀠eo... 􀀱􀀷􀁾􀁴􀁶􀀮􀀠.... ::Z, 61Nk't1aV.tqy "'.....,2"
Chiln llllins .. """"'¢o 31 _tiRo-""."'"..."" 􀁮􀁾􀀮􀁴􀁊􀁉􀀧􀁖􀁙􀁏􀀧􀀽􀀭......, _ C<lmplMGd s.no.l..&fI' 􀁒􀁾􀁐􀁬􀀡􀁉􀁃􀁩􀁏􀁬􀁩....􀁡􀀮􀁉􀁨􀁴􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁬􀁬􀁭􀁬• Project Control • Accomplishments
• Developing Exhibit 'H' Reports, and Data Input • 10 Projects Updated • Issues • ProJect stIItus for DesIgn 
Environmental • Accomplishments • Review comments -Project 14'os -Project '15 to -Project 10' 11 ..,. tif.ejeef81• Ongoing coordination • Issues • None New Environmental Status DRAFTS
SCK£MATICS 
----------------PB Key Issues1IlI. • TxDOT -County Agreement • Exhibit A & B Content • Continuation ofPMIE Services • Design Review Procedures PI lSI• Look Ahead • Next Meeting • Wedn.$dty.
Ilprl130. 1_ .NextMilestones 􀁾􀀠􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠RI(,ftGl(Cll/llcqf ,. pl\l.... Utt'-l) 6 􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁦􀁯􀀮􀁕􀁾􀀠• ,....RtlMw!I 􀂷􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁕􀁾􀀠• ,...Ala. 11 (tIJdIfN ...... 􀁎􀀧􀁄􀀮􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀠•
􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀧􀁦􀁇􀁴􀁵􀁐􀁉􀀠• 􀁾􀁟􀁁􀁬􀁐􀁉􀁑􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁑􀀠• 􀀢􀀢􀀣􀁎􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠• 􀀢􀀬􀀮􀁫􀁲􀁴􀁾􀀠• flWd,.#IO./ti'N4' 􀂷􀁦􀀧􀁗􀁤􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀢􀁈􀁾􀀠· """...,-.'" • Pro/.Illcr.OI(II.¥J • Pro/.Ito. t4(1fK1B}
• 􀁐􀁴􀁯􀁊􀀮􀁾􀁮􀀨􀁬􀁬􀁯􀁴􀀱􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁬􀀠""",,..IlOW,,,-ToCDulrl>' ... -_ _....-... ,.,...􀀢􀁉􀀧􀁴􀀺􀀧􀁊􀁯􀁭􀁲􀁾......_......_-_.... 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁆􀁴􀁍􀁴􀀠8\o6IfIif """I'3&£ml'M'l: 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀡􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀠CMAQ
ConferenceRoom 􀁾􀀬􀀴􀂷TuMtCI'InJlpr.Il(1lltt...., "'.7(fmIt(/QfJ 􀁟􀁊􀁏􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀢􀁉􀁉􀁵􀀢.....tI.c.w..,.",.U •IIr. 􀁮􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁉􀁗􀀱􀁮􀁦􀁬􀀧􀁦􀀱􀁲􀁾fI. A(It. 􀀴􀁾􀁬􀀧􀁗􀁉􀁦􀁉􀁤􀁉􀁴􀁤􀁴􀁯􀁲􀀮􀀬􀁲􀁴􀀠􀁱�
�􀀬􀀮􀀮􀂷􀁾􀁦􀂫􀁟􀀱􀀠If...· "'IJWWF9I" t• 1i...... 􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀱􀀮􀀠C f ..... 􀂷􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀱􀀮􀀠C 􀁺􀀮􀁾'l"rrI#KMJltJTA(It. " "",,. •.. ........ ...... 􀀢􀀢􀀱􀁦􀁏􀁉􀀧􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁴􀁎􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁊􀀠..
.' ....' 
P.J<fV 14'0114 Action Items • County • Regal Row DraWings • Saleh Springa ROW Ani._ • • PMIE • Revlslld Pa""",.,..t SUMlY to TxOOT • 1998li1Ond Input to CIty orOailltS • GP Escrow to
Txdot -COUIt Onler • 76% NatificatJon Adrllt1onttllnrormatlon • TxDOTICountylFMIE • ncOOT-COIlnly AgtNment Modiflcalions • A&B Commen/!! • Mesqulle• TIP Amendment T!!JI!lIDaIe$ ASAP
April 25 ASAP On-Going Aptf/25 April 23 April 18 AprilfS May 
Initial Findings and Analysis of the Midway Road CMAQ Projects December 16.1996 
SUMMARY OF INn7AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAYROAD CMAQ Pf/OJECfli TRINITY MILLS ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection
with Trinity Mills Road shows operations at level of service (LOS) "F" for both the AM and PM peak hours. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The
eastbound and northbound approaches also have an exclusive right turn lane. At this location, Trinity Mills Road has three full lanes leading up to each approach with a lane drop at
the intersection for a five-lane section cross section east and west of the intersection. For the eastbound approach, the outside through lane currently becomes a right turn only lane
at the intersection, although the lane does carry through to the east side for a mandatory right tum at the first shopping center access driveway. At the westbound approach, the inside
through lane becomes a left turn only lane at the intersection. Midway Road has a six·lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 1. Proposed CMAQ Improvements
The proposed improvements are dual left turns at all four approaches and exclusive right tum lanes for the two approaches which do not currently have them: westbound and southbound.
The southbound approach would be widened to 2 left tum lanes. 3 through lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. For the northbound approach, the schematic of the recommended CMAQ improvements
show one of the existing through lanes being made into a forced left tum to accomplish the dual left tum through restriping only. However, the northbound through traffic volumes suggest
that this is more likely an error in the schematic. The highest traffic volume in the PM peak hour is the northbound through movement at 1,764 vehicles per hour, according to existing
traffic counts (October, 1996), shown in Figure 1. Therefore, the recommended geometrics for this approach would be widening to a total of 2 left tum lanes, 3 through lanes and an exclusive
exclusive right turn lane. The resultant geometries for the eastbound and westbound approaches would be 2 left turn lanes. 2 through lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The analysis
ofthese improvements show LOS "D" operations for the AM and PM peak hours, with room for a very limited amount of traffic growth. Additional Findings Some additional storage length is
recommended for most of the tum bay pockets, as shown in Table 1. JIlI1'FT/ID..WPD 1 C.t.BJob 1#95.2211-010 
------SUMMARY OF IN/TlAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MmWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECl'S t-r-t-,.... '" '" '" '" ":Co ... '" a:> ..-......􀁾􀁎􀀠'" 37/257 --646/1.505 T ·-2951205 Trinity Road
;. 162/331 1,370 11 ,227 • 445/139 t Figure 1 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic xxx .AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Trinity Mills Road 2 CA81ob,,95-2211-010

SUMMARY OF INlTlAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Table 1 Midway Road CMAQ Intersections Geometries and Storage Lengths : Inter-Approach Move-section menl Left
Eastbound Thllluah 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁬􀀠II!!! Westbound Thmuah Trinity Mitis Riah! Road Left Narlhbound Thllll/Oh I Riahl Left Soulhbound Throuah Rin.. left Eastbound Thllll/Oh 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁉􀀠left WestboUnd
Throuah Spong Riaht Valley LeftRoad Narlllbound Throuah Rinht Left Southbound Throuah Rfnht left easlbollnd Thmuah Riahl Left Westbound Thm..h Keller Riaht Springs leftRoad Norlllbound
ThrotJQh Riahl left SouIIlbound Th"'''''h Rlnhf Existing Proposed CMAQ Improvements #01 Storage Storage #of Storage Storage Lanes length 􀀨􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠Lanes Length Langlh(Feel) Meters)
IFeeU (Meters) 1 350 107 2 250 76 2 3 1 200 61 1 225 69 1 NlA lilA 2 250 76 1.5 2 0.5 NlA NIA 1 400 122 1 100 30 2 300 91 3 3 1 80 24 1 150 46 1 125 38 2 200 61 2.5 3 M NI. NI' , ,no
"' 1 200 61 2 150 45 2.5 3 0.5 NIA NIA 1 . 200 61 1 ! 115 35 2 200 61 2.5 3 0.5 NIA lilA 1 200 61 1 160 49 2 200 61 3 3 , "" " , 200 61 1 200 61 2 200 61 3 3 , NIA NI. , NI' NlA 1 150
45 2 150 46 1 2 1 NIA NIA 1 300 91 1 50 15 1 50 15 0.5 0.5 0.5 NIA NIA 0.5 NIA NIA 1 210 64 2 200 61 3 3 1 50 15 1 200 61 1 150 45 2 200 61 3 3 1 50 '" , .200 .. Final Recommended Improvements
#01 Storage Storage Lanes 􀁾􀀢􀁴􀀻􀁾􀀠LengthFeel (MeierS' : 2 150 46 1 2 100 :lO 1 100 30 0.5 0.5 NIA NIA 2 200 61 3 1 '00 61 2 150 46 3 1 ?50 76 3 CD1Gb II 95-2211.010 
SUMMARY OF INITIAL TlIAFFlC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Proposed CMAQ FinalRExisting Improvements ImprovementsInter-Approach Move-section men! #of Storage Storage
#01 Storage Storage #of Storage Storage Lanes 􀁾􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠Length Lanes Length Length Lanes 􀁾􀁾􀀠LengthFeet) (Meters) (Feel) (Meters) (MeterSl Left 1 75 23 1 150 46 eastbound Throoah
1 1 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁬􀀠1 75 23 1 150 46 Left 1 125 38 1 150 46 Westbound Throoah 0.5 0.5 Beltway Riohl 0.5 NIA NIA 0.5 N/A N/A Road Left 1 115 35 1 150 46 Nor1J1bound Throuoh 3 3 R"hl 1 75 23
1 150 46 Left 1 100 30 1 100 30 Southbound Throuoh 3 3 Olnh' 1 1no ,n 1 100 3D left 0,5 N/A NIA 1 NIA NtA 0.5 NIA NIA Eastbound Throuoh 0.5 0.5 0.5 Rjahl 1 NIA NIA 0.5 NIA NIA 1 NfA
MIA Left 0.5 NIA NIA 1 125 38 0.5 NlA NlA Westbound Throuoh 0.5 1 0.5 Undberg Rjohl 1 125 3B I 125 38 1 300 .1 Road left 1 160 49 1 160 49 1 200 61 Northbound Thmt..h 2.5 2.5 2.5 Rjah'
0.5 NIA NIA 0.5 NtA NIA Ofi NIA MIA Left 1 200 61 1 200 61 2 200 61 SouthbotJnd Thrnooh 2.5 2.5 2.5 Riaht 0,5 NIA NlA 0,5 NIA NIA "' NIA NIA Left 1 NIA NI" 0.5 100 30 Eastbound 'I"hm'''h
0.5 1.5 Riahl 0.5 NIA Nt" 1 NlA NIA Left 1 NI" NlA 1 100 30 Westbound Throuoh 0.5 1.5 Mcewen R"hI n< NIA . "fA n. NlA N/A Road left 1 125 38 1 200 61 Northbound Throuah 2.5 2.5 RiGht
0.5 NI" NI" 0.5 NlA NIA Left 1 100 30 1 100 30 ! SoulhbotJnd Throuoh 2.5 2.5 􀁾􀀢􀁨􀁴􀀠"' NlA MI. n. MIA NtA INITFltfl).WpfJ 4 
SUMMARY OF IN1TlAL TRAFFlC FlNDlNGS AND ANALYSlS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECI'S Existing Proposed CMAQ Final Recommended Imorovements Imorovements Inter-Approach Move-section ment #of Storage
Storage #of Storage Storage # of Storage Storage Lanes 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠Lanes 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠Lanes 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁾􀁜Feell Meters) Feell Meters)
Feet Meters Left 0.5 NfA NfA 0.5 NfA NfA 0.5 NIA NIA Eastbound Throuah 0.5 0.5 0.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠1 80 24 2 100 30 1 Inn 1n Left 0.5 NIA NfA 1 NfA NfA 0.5 NIA NIA Westbound Throuoh 1 0.5
0.5 Proton 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NfA NfA 0.5 NfA NfA 1 "',. "',. Dnve Left 1 85 26 1 150 46 1 175 53 Northbound Throuoh 2.5 2.5 2.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NfA NIA 0.5 NfA NfA 0.5 "'/A ""A Left 1 100
30 1 200 61 1 250 76 Southbound Throuah 2.5 2.5 2.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁴􀀠n< NIA WA n< NIA MI. n. ",. "'. Left 1 NfA NfA 1 NIA NIA 1 150 46 Eastbound Throuoh 0.5 1 1.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NfA NfA 1 100
30 0.5 "'fA NfA Left 1 NIA NIA 1 NIA N/A 1 250 76 Westbound Throuah 0.5 1 1.5 Belrneadel 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NfA NfA 1 100 30 0.5 "'. M,. Sojourn Left 1 100 30 1 100 30 1 150 46 Northbound
Throuah 2.5 3 3 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀀡􀀠0.5 NIA NIA 1 100 30 1 00< oa Left 1 100 30 1 100 30 1 300 91 Southbound Throuoh 2.5 2.5 2.5 R"ht n< NfA NIA n< NIA M" n< '''. '" Left 0.25 NIA NIA 0.5 N/A
NIA Eastbound Throuah 0.5 0.5 Riah! 0.25 NIA NIA 1 200 61 Left 0.25 NIA N/A 1 100 30 Westbound Throuah 0.5 0.5 Boyington! Rich! 0.25 NfA NIA 0.5 NfA NfA Dooley Left 1 100 30 1 150 46
Northbound Throuoh 2.5 2.5 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁴􀀠0.5 NIA NIA 0.5 NfA NIA Left 1 100 30 1 100 30 Southbound Throuah 2.5 2.5 Rklhl n< NIA NIA n< WA MI. INlTFTND.WPD 5 C4B Job 195-2211-010 
SUMMARY OF [NlI1AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALl'SIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJEClS SPRING VALLEY ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection
with Spring Valley Road shows operations at LOS "E" for the AM peak and LOS UF" for the PM peak hour. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The northbound
and southbound approaches also have an exclusive right tum lane. Both roadways have six·lane cross sections. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 2. proposed CMAO Improvements
The proposed CMAQ improvements would result in all four approaches having dual left tum lanes and an exclusive right tum lane. The analysis of these improvements show LOS "0" operations
for the AM and PM peak hours, with room for some growth in traffic. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1 . ... 01'"0 􀁾􀁾􀀠.-0::21 •is! ! ii 'I -II '_3291241 , -482/1,240
Spring Va,"'lle"'y___-_'.,..--+_,,--_3_'9_'369___ Road 261/165-' 9'1116'lS -3421100 Figure 2 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX • AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour
Traffic Spring Valley Road 6 
SUMMARY OF [NmAL TRAFFIc FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECfli KELLER SPRINGS ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection
with Keller Springs Road shows operations at LOS "En for the AM peak and LOS "0" for the PM peak hour. Each of the four approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The eastbound
approach has an exclusive right tum lane and the northbound and southbound approaches also have short right turn separations. Keller Springs Road is a two-lane roadway on the east side
and a four-lane roadway on the west side. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 3. Proposed CMAQ Improyements The proposed CMAQ
improvements include widening the northbound, eastbound and southbound approaches to include dual left turn lanes and an exclusive right turn lane. The eastbound approach would also
be widened to include two through lanes, which would narrow quickly to one lane on the east side. These improvements showed intersection operations would be at a LOS of "Fn in the AM
peak hour and LOS "Cnin the PM peak hour. Although the physical capacity increases with the proposed geometric improvements, the worsening of intersection operations in the AM peak is
due to the change in signal phasing as a result of the dual left turns and the heavy eastbound right tum movement. The dual left tum lanes prohibit the use of permissive left turns on
the green phase for the through and right turning traffic. Therefore, due to the fact that the 840 right-turning vehicles requires a significant portion of the green time, the left-turning
traffic actually has less opportunity per cycle, even though there would now be two lanes to move and store the traffic in. Additional Improvements The existing eastbound through volume
(less than 1 00 vehicles during the peak hours) does not currently warrant two lanes. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing lane balance be maintained by carrying only one eastbound
through lane across the intersection. It is also recommended that a dual right tum be installed for the eastbound approach. This would still result in recommending the widening of the
eastbound approach to five lanes but with the following geometrics: a dual left tum, one through lane and a dual right tum. These changes to the recommended improvements would result
in operations of LOS "0" in the AM peak and LOS "cnin the PM peak. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. Once the portion of Keller Springs under Addison Airport is opened,
a re-evaluation of the lane assignments will be necessary. lNm7ND.WPD 7 C&S lob" 95-2211-010 
SUMMARY OF INmAL TlIAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS N '" <> ... '" ..,. '" N <> Q> <> '" 􀁾􀁯'" N I, ; '" 162/331 _.--6/66 ... f --6/50Keller S.t;;en""·n".gs"--_____-:--___􀀬􀁾_
______ Road A .... A _347/419 ' 55144 II 840/228 ,i I : Figure 3 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX • AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Keller Springs Road
8 
SUMMARY OF INmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MiDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS BELTWAY ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway Road
and Beltway Road shows operations at LOS "D" for the AM peak and LOS "C· for the PM peak hour. Each ofthe four approaches currently have an exclusive left tum lane. The eastbound, northbound
and southbound approaches each have an exclusive right tum lane. Beltway Road is a twolane roadway. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown
in Figure 4. Proposed CMAO Improyements The proposed CMAQ improvements include lengthening the storage lengths for the northbound and westbound tum lanes. The proposed restriping/marking
for the eastbound approach is currently in place. These improvements would result in maintaining the intersection operations at the same LOS, but with slightly less average delay per
vehicle in the AM peak. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. 􀁾􀀠:::I:i!::i!::--􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠11 •-iili:s Beltwa,Yl-_____􀀧􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁉􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁩􀁾􀁟􀀳􀀳􀀰􀁟􀀱􀁟􀀱􀁡􀁳___
Road 􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀳􀀱􀀱􀀠'i ""I 'I (3161164 I Figure 4 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX -AM Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Beltway Road INlTFlND,WPD 9 C&B lob
19S-nl1-010 
SUMMARY OF lNITTAL TRAFFIC FINDIN(]S AND ANALYSIS MmWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS LINDBERG DRIVE Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway
Road and Lindberg Drive shows operations at LOS "0" for the AM peak and LOS "F" for the PM peak hour. The northbound and southbound approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane.
The eastbound and westbound approaches each have an exclusive right turn lane. Lindberg Drive is a two-lane roadway, east of the intersection and a three-lane roadway west of the intersection.
Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 5. Proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements are to widen the westbound
approach to include an exclusive left tum lane and to increase the right turning radius for the northbound approach. The eastbound approach is shown in the schematic as currently having
an exclusive left tum lane and a through right lane. However, a field survey showed the existing signing and markings for a through-left lane and an exclusive right tum lane. With the
addition of an exclusive left tum lane on the westbound approach, it would be advantageous to complement the left tum movement with an exclusive left tum lane on the eastbound approach.
The proposed CMAQ improvements, in combination with restriping the eastbound approach for an exclusive left tum lane and a through-right lane, would result in a LOS of "C" for the AM
peak and LOS "0" for the PM peak. Additional Improvements There is capacity available for some traffic growth with the proposed CMAQ improvements, but the eastbound and westbound approaches
would still be operating at LOS "F" and "E", respectively, in the PM peak. Alternatives were evlauated with the goal of providing a more balanced LOS for each of the approaches as well
as an acceptable LOS for the intersection itself. The first alternative consisted of adding a dual left tum at the southbound approach along with the proposed CMAQ improvements and increasing
the storage lengths for many of the tum bays. This resulted in approximately the same average delay for the overall intersection, but the LOS for each of the separate approaches was
more balanced, with the northbound, eastbound and westbound approaches at LOS "0" and the southbound approach at LOS "C" in the PM peak. The second alternative also added a dual left
tum to the southbound approach and increased some of the storage lengths. However, these improvements were added only to the existing conditions. The resultant evaluation showed the
same overall intersection LOS of "cn in the AM and "0" in the PM, but the eastbound and westbound approaches would be at LOS "E" and "0", respectively, in the PM peak. This represents
a better result than the proposed CMAQ improvements appear to promote, but not quite as good as the first alternative. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. 10 
SUMMARY OF iNmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS -\ 21/72 921169 • • 39172 "I, Figure 5 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic XXX -AM peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road
@XXX PM Peak: Hour Traffic Lindberg Drive IHlIFIND.WPD II C&B lebl 9S-2211-610 
SUMMARY OF INmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Me EWEN ROAD Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Midway Road
and McEwen Road shows operations at LOS "0" for the AM and PM peak hours. All four approaches currently have an exclusive left tum lane. McEwen Road is a four-lane roadway, with access
driveways within 100' of either side of the intersection. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 6. Proposed CMAQ Improvements
The eastbound and westbound approaches are currently signed and marked for an exclusive left tum lane and a through-right lane. The proposed CMAQ improvements are to widen the eastbound
and westbound approaches. The eastbound approach would be widened with an exclusive right tum lane, the through-right lane would become a through lane and the left tum lane would be
restriped for a through-left lane. The westbound approach would be widened to include an exclusive left tum lane, a through lane and a through-right lane. The proposed CMAQ improvements
would result in a LOS of "C" for the AM peak and LOS "0" for the PM peak. AdditionalImprovements Using the same amount of widening proposed for the CMAQ improvements, but striping the westbound approach to match the eastbound approach would allow the left turns to have
a separate phase. This alternative was analyzed to operate at LOS "C" for both the AM and PM peak hours. Recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. Figure 6 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour
Traffic for Midway Road @lQQS. -AM peak: HOllr Traffie XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic McEwen Road 12 
SUMMARY OF INmAL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECIS PROTON DRIVE Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing traffic conditions at the Midway Road intersection
with Proton Drive shows operations at LOS "C" for the AM peak and LOS "0" for the PM peak hour. The northbound and southbound approaches currently have an exclusive left turn lane. The
eastbound approach has an exclusive right turn lane. Proton Drive is a three-lane roadway. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure
7. Proposed CMAQ Improyements The proposed CMAQ improvements include widening the existing two lanes on the westbound approach and restriping these lanes to an exclusive left turn lane
and a throughright lane. The eastbound approach is proposed to be widened to include dual right turn lanes and a through-left lane. These improvements showed intersection operations
would improve slightly but the LOS would still be "c" in the AM peak hour and "0" in the PM peak hour. Additional Improyements Various phasing alternatives were tested for different
geometric alternatives. including the proposed CMAQ improvements. However, analysis showed that the existing laneage could be used along with restriping of the westbound approach, improved
signal phasing, and increased storage lengths. The westbound approach would be restriped to match the existing eastbound approach for an exlusive right tum lane and a through-left lane.
This altemative would provide operations at LOS "cn for the AM and PM peak hours. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. 1 '-431308 --211171Prolon ,'-16183Drive , 90/107
161/26 240177 Figure 7 1996 Peak Hour TrafficLEGEND for Midway Road @􀁾-&M Peak Hour Traffic Proton Drive'XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic INTTFIND.WPD 13 C&BJOO' 95-ll1 l.()tG 
SUMMARY OF 1Nl11AL TRAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECI'S BELMEADE/SOJOURN Existing Conditions Analysis of the Midway Road intersection with Belmeade and Sojourn shows
operations at LOS "En for the AM and PM peak hours, with traffic volumes higher than the capacity of the intersection. Each of the four approaches currently has an exclusive left turn
lane. There are no exclusive right turn lanes at this intersection. Sojourn and Belmeade Drives both have fourlane cross-sections. Midway Road has a six-lane cross section. Existing
peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 8. Proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements are to provide exclusive right turn lanes for the eastbound, westbound, and
northbound approaches. These improvements would bring the AM and PM peak hour operations up to a LOS of "0". However, the AM peak hour would still be operating near the capacity of the
intersection. Addjtjonallmprovements An alternative was tested which would add the same number of lanes lanes to the same approaches as proposed for the CMAQ improvements, but with different
lane usage. In other words, a restriping of the proposed improvements for the eastbound and westbound approaches. This would result in an exclusive left turn lane, a through lane and
a throughright lane for each ofthese approaches. The northbound exclusive right tum lane would also be needed. This alternative would still provide operations at LOS "0" for the AM and
PM peak hours, but would provide more efficient use ofthe intersection capacity. increasing the reserve capacity by over 5%. The recommended storage lengths are shown in Table 1. /•'-461181
• 831399Belrneade ,-179/194Olive Sojourn931100 •, Olive383/124 -_0 --i ; i 106128 -. i I t Figure 8 LEGEND 1996 Peak Hour Traffic xxx -AM peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @XXX PM Peak
Hour Traffic Belmeade/Sojou'rn lNm11Ib.WPD 14 C&9 Job j 9.5·1211-010 
SUMMARY OF [NmAL TIIAFFIC FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS MiDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJEcrs BOYINGTON I DOOLEY Existing Conditions Analysis of the Midway Road intersection with Boyington Drive and Dooley
Drive shows operations at LOS "F" for the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection is stop sign controlled for the eastbound and westbound approaches. The northbound and southbound traffic
is heavy enough to prevent adequate gaps in the traffic for the eastbound and westbound traffic to travel through the intersection. The northbound and southbound approaches (Midway Road)
each have an exclusive left tum lane. but again the gaps in traffic are not sufficient for all of the left turning traffic to make it through the intersection in a 􀁲􀁥􀁡􀁳􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁢􀁬􀁥􀀠amount
of time. The eastbound approach has an exclusive right tum lane. Boyington and Dooley Drives both have two-lane cross-sections outside of the intersection. Midway Road has a six-lane
cross section. Existing peak hour traffic counts are shown in Figure 9. proposed CMAQ Improvements The proposed CMAQ improvements are to signalize the intersection and to provide an
exclusive right turn lane for the eastbound approach and an exclusive left turn lane for the westbound approach. These improvements would involve some widening ofthe turning radii, but
the roadway widths will support an additional lane with new pavement markings and channelization markings. The AM peak hour LOS would be "N and the PM peak hour operations would be LOS
"B" with these improvements. 􀁾􀀭􀀴􀀱􀀲􀀰􀀠DIDBoyington -6132Drive • Dooley0117 􀀭􀁉􀁾􀀠Drive010 t81108 ,, i I I Figure 9 LEGENp 1996 Peak Hour Traffic for Midway Road @􀁾-AM p"ak Hour
Traffic XXX PM Peak Hour Traffic Boyington/Dooley lHlTFlND.WPD 15 C&.B IDb' 9s.2l11.o10 
APPENDIX 
Intersection Geometries ror Midway Road CMAQ Projects existing Proposed CMAQ Improvements Geometries Storage Storage Peak Hour Approach Geometries Storage Storage Approach #0/length
Length Traffic Volume. lOS Intersection HoI length length LOS Intersection IntersecHon Approach Movemefll Lanes (Feet) (Meiers) JW. PM (AMIPM) lOS Movement lanes (Feet) (Metersl (AMIPMI
LOS Comments Len 1 350 107 162 331 Left 2 250 76 There are currenUy 3 full lanes at Eastbound Through 2 1,370 1.227 FIF 􀁾􀀠Through 3 DIG AM Eea); Ihe weslbound approach. The RighI 1
200 61 445 139 lOSF, Right 1 225 69 LOSD. inside lane becomes a left tum Left 1 NlA NlA 295 205 􀁏􀁥􀁬􀁡􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠NiA. Left 2 250 76 Delay;:: 36.4 only lane. Therefore. the storage Trinity
Mills Westbound Through 1.5 646 1.505 FIF v/cr:; 1.01 Through 2 DID seclveh, needed for Ihls westbound' left Road Right 0.5 NIA NIA 37 257 Risht 1 400 122 vIC:::: 0.93 tum may be over
stated. Left 1 100 30 139 376 Left 2 300 91 Northbound Through 3 347 1.764 FIF EMeiilak Through 3 DID eM eeat!. RighI 1 80 24 117 97 LOSF, Right 1 150 46 LOSD. Left 1 125 38 2BB 127
Delay· wA. Left 2 200 61 Delay:::: 32.4 Southbound Through 2.5 2,122 577 FIF vIc;:: 1.13 Through 3 DID seclVeh. Right 0.5 NIA NlA 149 217 Righi 1 200 61 viet:: 0.94 Left 1 200 61 287
165 Left 2 150 46 Eastbound Through 2.5 937 625 ElF 􀁡􀁍􀁾􀁡􀁫􀀠Through 3 DID 􀁁􀁍􀁾􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀠Right 0.5 NlA NlA 342 160 LOSE, RIght 1 200 61 LOS 0, Left 1 115 35 319 369 Delay" 49.2 Left
2 200 61 Delay 21.S Spring Valley Weslbound ThroUGh 2.5 462 1,240 ElF secfveh. 'through 3 DID _h, Road Right 0.5 NIA NIA 329 247 vIce 1,02 RIght 1 200 61 vIc; 0.87 Left 1 150 49 174
418 Left 2 200 61 Norihbound ThlOll\lh 3 1,468 1,646 ElF f>JA 􀁦􀁩􀁉􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠ThlOll\lh 3 DID 􀁅􀁍􀁾􀁩􀁴􀀠RIght 1 110 34 361 311 lOSF. RIght 1 290 61 LOSD. Left 1 200 61 259 350 Delay
= 86.1 left 2 290 61 Delay 320 Southbound ThlOll\lh 3 1.796 1.564 ElF sedveh, Through 3 DIG _h, RIght 1 NIA NlA 115 357 vic = 1.OS RIght 1 NlA NlA vic =0.92 Left 1 150 46 347 419 Left
2 150 46 Although 'he ph!S1ea1 capaclty Eastbound Through 1 55 44 FID 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠T"IOIl\l" 2 FlO 􀁁􀁍􀁾􀀲􀁴􀀠increases with the proposed Righi 1 NIA NlA 840 228 LOSE, Righi 1 300 91
LOSF, Improvements. the dualletls Left 1 50 15 17 71 Delay::. SO.O Left 1 50 15 Delay·6Q.5 prohibit the pennissrve left lum Keller Westbound Through 0.5 6 66 DID se<iveh. Through 0.5
EID secfveh. durlng 1he green phase for tile Springs Righi 0.5 NlA NlA 6 50 vic =1.01 RIght 0.5 NlA NIA vie =1.11 Itrough movemertls. For Ihe Left 1 210 64 129 451 Left 2 200 61 eastbound
approach. it Is reearn-. Norlllbo1Jtld Through 3 653 2.046 DID EM 􀁅􀀳􀀺􀁩􀁉􀁾􀀠Through 3 DIG 􀁥􀁍􀁥􀁵􀁾􀀠mended that 2 left. 1 Ihrough and RIght 1 50 15 29 22 lOSD. Right 1 200 61 LOSC,
2 right 10m lanes be constructed Left 1 166 46 20 28 DeTay= 2S.9 Left 2 200 61 Delay:: 22.4 in (;Onsidera1ion o( the heavy Southbound Tlv1lugh 3 2.089 646 ElC -. Through 3 FIC -""",
right tumfng volumes and the light Righi 1 50 15 166 402 v/e=o.94 RIght 1 200 61 vie:;; 0.82 through movement volumes GEOMTRtC.xt.$ Page 1 12117196 
Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects Improvements In Addition to Proposed CMAQ Other Improvements Geometries Storage Slornge Approach Geometries Slornse Stor.ge Approach
1/01 Length Length LOS intersection 1/01 Length Length LOS Intersection Intersection Approach Movement Lanes (Fe.t) !Meters) (AM/PM) LOS Movemenl lanes (Feet) (Meters) (AMlPM) LOS Comments
left Left Eastbound through Through RighI RighI Left Left TJinily Mills Westbound Through Through Road Right Right i le. Left Northbound Through Through Right 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁬􀀠le. Left Southbound
Through Through RIght RIght Left left Eastbound Through Through RIghI RIght left left Spring Valley Westbound Through Through Road Right RIghI Left Left Northbound Through Through Right
RighI left Left Soulhbound Through Through RIght RIght Left 2 150 46 Left Eastbound Through 1 DID 􀁾􀁍􀁅􀁣􀁡􀁫􀀠Through Right 2 100 30 LOSe. RIght left 1 100 30 Delay. 26.6 left Keller
Westbound Through 0.5 DID _h. Through Springs Right 0.5 NlA NlA v/c=G.OO Right left 2 200 61 left Northbol.ll1d Through 3 CIC fMfnt Through Right 1 200 61 LOSe. RIght left 2 150 46 Oelay
2,2,3 loft Southbound Through 3 Ctc seeJwh. Through RighI 1 250 76 vIc; 0.77 Rig," ---------------GEOMTRIC)Q...S Page 2 12117/96 
Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects exIstIng 􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁲􀀢􀁊􀁬􀁏􀁳􀁥􀁤􀀠􀁃􀁍􀁉􀁜􀁾Improvements Geometries SfQfage Slorage Peak Hour Approach Geometries Storage Storage
Approach #ot 􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁧􀁴􀁨􀀠Traffic Volumes 􀁾􀁏􀁓􀀠Intersection /I of Length Length LOS Intersection Inte!Secllon Approach Movement Lanes (Feet) (Meters) AM PM (AM/PM)
LOS Movement Lanes (Feet) (Meters) (AM/PM) LOS Comments lllIt 1 75 23 129 68 Left 1 150 46 Easlbound Through 1 108 138 ElO 􀁾􀀠Through 1 ElO 􀀸􀁍􀁾􀁋􀀠Right 1 75 23 316 164 LOS 0, Right
1 150 46 LOS 0, Left 1 125 38 330 135 Delay::; 37.4 Left 1 150 46 Oelay =35,9 Beltway Westbound Through 0,5 71 145 ElC Seclveh, Through 0,5 E/C seclveh, Road RighI 0,5 N/A NJA 14 44
vIc =: 1.00 Righi D,S N/A N/A vIc:::: 0.96 Len 1 115 35 103 269 Left 1 Hill 46 Northbound Through 3 1,249 1,970 C/B 􀁾􀁍􀁅􀁬􀁩􀀡􀀱􀁳􀀠ThrOUgh 3 CIS 􀁾􀀠Right 1 75 23 83 283 􀁾􀁏􀁓􀁃􀀬􀀠Righi
1 150 46 LOSC, Left 1 100 30 27 68 Delay::; 18.2 Left 1 100 30 Delay: 18,2 SouthboUnd Through 3 2.465 1.495 O/C secJveh. Through 3 O/C -.Right 1 100 30 14 58 vIc =0.85 RighI 1 100 30
vic =o,as Loft 0,5 NJA NJA 21 72 Len 1 N/A N/A Eastbound Through 0,5 92 169 O/F 8M 􀁅􀁴􀁡􀁾􀀠Through D,S OIF 􀀸􀁍􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀠RighI 1 NJA NJA 39 72 LOSO. Righi 0,5 N/A NJA LOSC, Left D,S
NJA NJA 110 149 Delay =26.7 Left 1 125 38 0e1ay= 21.0 lindberg Weslbouna Through 0,5 125 110 OIF '-. Through 1 BlE """"'h.Drive RighI 1 125 38 309 453 we= 0,93 Righi 1 125 38 v/c=O.85
Left 1 160 49 87 60 Left 1 160 49 Norlhbot,md Through 2,5 1,019 1.980 OIF 􀁅􀁍􀁾􀁡􀁫􀀠Through 2,5 CID 􀁾􀀠RIght 0,5 NlA NJA 138 191 LOSF, Right 0.5 NJA N/A LOSO. loft 1 200 61 479 431
Delay I'< 70.4 Left 1 200 61 Delay: 35 7 Southbound Through 2.5 2,166 1.288 DIE seclveh, Through 2.5 C/D _h, Right D,S NJA NJA 33 40 vIc =1.12 Righi 0.5 N/A N/A v/e=O.91 loft 1 NlA NJA
62 179 Left 0,5 100 30 Easlbound Throug" D,S 135 73 DID 8M 􀁅􀁥􀁬􀀡􀁾􀀠Through 1.5 CIC .!IM.£l!l!I! RIgh1 0.5 NJA NJA 50 241 LOSO. RighI 1 NJA NJA 􀁾􀁏􀁓􀁃􀀬􀀠Left 1 NlA NJA 39 184 Delay:
26.6 Left 1 100 100 30 Delay: 23,3 McEwen WestboUnd Through 0.5 95 126 ClO sec/veil, Through 1,5 C/C sectveh. Road Right 0.5 NJA NJA 13 93 v/c_O.91 RIghi 0,5 NJA N/A vIC =0.86 Left 1
126 38 353 154 Left 1 200 61 NoMboUnd Through 2,5 2.027 1.616 DID 􀁥􀁍􀁅􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀠Through 2.5 Ctc 􀁾􀀠RIghI 0,5 NJA NJA 77 44 LOS 0. Right 0,5 NJA NJA 􀁾􀁏􀁓􀁃􀀮􀀠left 1 100 30 134
28 Delay .28.5 􀁾􀁦􀁴􀀠1 100 30 Delay = 21.4 SouthboUnd Through 2,5 1,637 1,929 0/0 _h. Through 2,5 C/C seclveh, Right 0,5 NJA NJA 49 24 vlc;o 0.96 RIghI 0,5 NJA N/A vIc =0.83 GEDMTRlc.xLS
Page 3 12117196 
Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects Improvements In Addition to Proposed CMAQ Other Improvements Geometries Storage Storage Approach Geometries Storage Storage Approach
#01 Length Length LOS Intersection #01 Length Length LOS Intersection Intersection Approach MOl/ement lanes (Feel) (Meiers) (AM/PM) LOS MOllemenl Lanes (Feel) (Meiers) (AM/PM) LOS Comments
Left Left Eastbound Through Through RighI Right Left Left Beltway Westbound Through Through Road Righi Righi Left Left Northbound Through Through Right Righi Left Left Southbound Through
Through Righi RighI Left 1 NlA NlA Left 0.5 N/A N/A Eastbound Through 0.5 DID 8M 􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁬􀁳􀀠Through 0.5 DIE 􀀸􀁍􀁅􀀡􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀱􀁳􀀠Right 0.5 N/A N/A LOSC, Right 1 N/A N/A LOSC, Left 1
150 46 Delay =20.2 Left 0.5 N/A N/A Delay =22.7 lindberg Westbound Through 1 BID secJveh. Through 0.5 DID secJlleh, Drive Right 1 300 91 II/e= 0.73 RighI 1 300 91 vIc = 0_84 Left 1 200
61 Left 1 200 61 Northbound Through 2.5 C/D EMElilals Through 2.5 C/D EM..Em Right 0.5 NlA N/N/A LOS 0, Righi 0.5 N/A N/A LOSD, Left 2 200 61 Delay =27.9 Left 2 200 61 Delay = 29.1 Southbound
Through 2.5 C/C sectveh, Through 2.5 C/C secJlleh, RighI 0.5 NlA N/A IIle =0.96 RighI 0.5 N/A N/A \lIe = 0.91 Left Left Eastbound Through Through RighI Right Left Left McEwen Westbound
Through Through Road Righi RIght Left Left Northbound Through Through RighI RighI Left Left Southbound Through Through Righi RighI GEOMTRICJ(lS Page 4 12117/96 
Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects exIsting Pro DIed CMAQ 􀁉􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁯􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁬􀁔􀁬􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠Geometries Storage SWage Peak Hour Approadl Geome!rics Siorage Siorage Approach
1101 LenQlh lenglll Traffic Volumes lOS lnterseClion 1101 Langill Lenglh LOS Intersection Intersection Approach Movement lanes (Feel) (Meiers) AM PM (AMlPM) LOS Movement lan.. (Feel)
(Meier.) (AM/PM) lOS Comments Left 0.5 NlA NlA 90 107 left 0.5 NlA NtA jCMAQ evaluation used different Eastbound -0.5 161 26 CIF AM Ef;lals Through 0.5 CIC I\M.eW east/west phasing (spJiUlng
Right 1 60 24 240 77 LOSC. Right 2 100 30 lOSC. movements). The PM peak hour left 0.5 NlA NlA 16 63 Delay::::. 19.6 Loft 1 NtA NlA Delay 17.1 would not achieve a beller level Proton
Westbound Through 1 21 171 CtC sedveh. Through 0.5 CIE seC/veti. of service than existing without Drive Right 0.5 NlA NlA 43 3Q8 vic = Q.77 RighI 0.5 N/A NlA vIc 0.77 the phasing changes.
Loft 1 85 26 43 126 Loft 1 150 46 Northbound Through 2.5 1.299 2.10S C/O EM 􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁢􀀠Through 2.5 C/C EM.&1Jils Right 0.5 NIA NlA 14 23 LOSD. Righi 0.5 NIA NlA LDSD. Left 1 100 30 272
86 Delay;;;; 31.8 Left 1 200 61 Delay 2:9.8 Soultlbound Through 2.5 2.272 1.692 CIO seclveh, Through 2.5 C/D seeJveh, RighI 0.5 N/A NlA 66 93 vJe::::.1.01 Right 0.5 NIA NlA IIIc=O,90
Left 1 NlA NlA 93 100 Left 1 NIA NlA Eastbound Through o.S 363 124 FIE 􀁡􀁍􀁥􀀮􀁥􀁡􀁾􀀠Through 1 FID 􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁡􀁬􀀡􀀻􀀠RighI 0.5 NlA NIA 106 26 LOSE. Right 1 100 30 LOSO. Left 1 NtA NlA
179 194 Delay·S8.S Left 1 NIA NlA Delay. 37.7 Belmeadel Westbound Through 0.5 63 399 FIF secl¥fth, Through 1 FID _h. SoJoum Right 0.5 N/A N/A 46 161 ¥ic; 1.18 Right 1 100 30 vlc;O.99
Loft 1 100 30 22 192 loft 1 100 30 Northbound Through 2.5 445 2.096 DID EMfHk Through 3 C/D 􀁅􀁍􀁬􀀳􀁡􀁾􀀠Right 0.5 NlA NlA 153 144 LOSE. Right 1 100 30 LOSD. left 1 100 30 299 143 Delay.
46.3 Left 1 100 30 Delay ;27.3 Soolhbound Through 2.5 2,504 557 EID seclveh, Through 2.5 OIC ,e<:Iveh. Rig" 0.5 NlA NlA 20 96 \/Ie; 1.05 Right 0.5 NlA NlA vic. 0,91 Left 0.25 NlA NIA
· 17 Left 0.5 NlA NIA Proposed Improvements lflCludo Eastbotmd Through 0.5 · . FIF 􀀮􀀡􀀡􀁍􀁦􀁈􀁾􀀠Through 0.5 ere 􀁁􀁍􀁐􀁥􀁾􀁾􀀠adding a signal It Is currently Right 0.25 NIA NlA 16
106 LOSF. Right 1 200 61 LOS A, Ftfoned by stop signs on the Left 0.25 NlA NlA 6 32 Delay)< 15 Left 1 100 30 Delay .. 3,7 Boyington and DooleyBoyington! Westbot.lOd Through O.S · -FIF
mlnlveh. Through 0.5 CIC Sec/veh, approaches.Dooley Right 0.25 NlA NIA 4 20 vic;;. 1,0 RighI 0.5 N/A NJA vIc"" 0.78 { 􀁾􀀠Left 1 100 30 132 63 left 1 150 46 Northbound Through 2.5 949
2.626 F/F EM 􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀠Through 2.5 MB 􀁅􀁍􀁾􀁡􀁾􀀠RIght 0.5 NIA NlA 35 7 LOSF, RighI 0.5 NIA NlA LOSe. left 1 100 30 5 7 Delay> 15 Left 1 100 30 Delay"" 11.6 Southbound ThlOUgh 2.S
3,Q42 1.276 FIF mlntveh. Through 2.S MB S8C:lveh, Right 0.5 NlA NlA 39 10 vIc> 1.0 Right O.S NlA NlA vIc"" 0.69 GEOMTRIC,XLS Page 5 12117196 
Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects Improvements In Addition to Proposed CMAQ other Improvements Geometries Storage Storage Approach Geometries Storage Storage Approach
#ot Length Length LOS IntersecUon #ot Length length LOS intersection Intersection Approach Movemenl lanes (Feet) (Meters) (AMIPM) lOS Movem.... lanes (Feet) (Meiers) (AMIPM) LOS Comments
Loft 1 NlA NlA Len 0.5 NlA NlA EJdsllng easUwest phase has all movrunenls Eastbound Through 1 C/O .eM 􀁾􀀡􀀺􀀦􀁬􀀱􀁳􀀠Through 0.5 C/C AM 􀁅􀁥􀁡􀁾􀀠running concurrentlv_ Phasltlg changes
RighI 1 100 30 LOSC. RighI 1 100 30 LOSC. were assumed toe all alternatives. The Loft 0.5 NlA NlA Oelay= 18.4 Left 0.5 NIA NIA Delay = 18.2 Other Improvemenls shows the reruns of Prolon
Westbound Throvgh 0.5 CIE secJveh. Through 0.5 CIC secJveh, malnlalnlng the exlstmg number or lanes Olive Righi 1 NIA NlA vic =0.85 Rght 1 NIA NIA vIc = 0.75 with reslriPlng of Ihe wesfbound
approach, Left 1 150 46 Lef. 1 175 53 increasing Ihe storage lengths, and signal Non_ Non_ Through 2.5 C/D EM Eeals Througll 2.5 CIG 􀁾timing and phasing changes. Righi 0.5 NlA NlA LOSO.
RIghI 0.5 NIA NlA lOSC. Loft 1 200 61 Delay;; 32.6 len 1 250 76 Delay =22.3 Southbound Througll 2.5 C/D sectveh. Through 2.5 CIG -.Righi 0.5 NlA NlA vic =0.94 Righi 0.5 NIA NIA vic =
0.15 Loft 1 150 46 Loft EaSibound Through 1.5 DiD 11M Peilk T_ Rignl 0.5 NlA NIA lOSO. Righi Left 1 250 76 Delay =28.8 Lett Belmeadel Weslbound Th",ugII 1.5 DID """""h. Through Sojourn
RighI 0.5 NlA NiA vIc =0.91 RIght Left 1 150 46 Left Northbound Througll 3 CID 􀁾􀁍􀀠􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀠Throogh Righi 1 225 69 LOSO. 􀁒􀁾􀁨􀁬􀀠Len 1 300 91 Delay = 25,9 Left Southbound T_ 2.5
DIC secl¥eh, Thn':lUgh Righi 0.5 NlA NlA vIc = 0,69 Right Loft Loft Eastbound '!'h«>lIgh Througll RIghI RighI Loft Loft Boyinglon! Weslbound Through '!'h«>lIgh Dooley RighI RIghi Left
Len Northbound Through T_ RighI RIghI LOft Len Southbound Through Through Right RighI GEOMTRlc.xt.S Page 6 12J"l1I9a 
---------AM Peak Hour Count for Midway Road@Trinity Mills PeMod Peak Totals 1 149 I2,1221 288 1 2,559 37 I 6<t6 1 295 1 918 􀁵􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀠1 341 1 139 1 603 445 11,370 1162 1 1,977 I 6,117
T= 0.8% T= 1.5% T= 1.3% T= 2.0% Average T= Ped = 0 Ped= 0 Ped = 0 Ped = 1 2.0% PM Peak Hour Count for Midway Road @Trlnlty Mills Period Peak ITotals 217 I 571 I 121 T = 1.5% Ped= 0 921
251 11•505 1205 1 T= 0.8% Ped= 0 1.96191 nLY64L316 LI--"-'-_--I._......I._-L__--L-__--'2.237 139 I 1,227 I 331 1,697 6,822 T = 0.5% Pod = 0 T= 0.9% Ped= 0 Average T = 0.8% TRNYMLCT.XLS
11/13196 
From: Panons BrinckerhoR To: P.E .• John Baumgartner Dale: 4125197 Tnne: 16:27:12 Page 1 011 CMAQ FACTS ;22 • ... F DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM April 1997 Issue 12 THE CMAQ
"REVIEW CYCLE" After hours of preparation, Project Manager reviews, Quality Con!rol checks and backchecks, a design product is finally deemed ready for submittal. However once delivered,
the submittal is subject to even further scrutiny, but this time with fresh sets of eyes and probably a few new perspectives from the multiple reviewing agencies. This process is an
important opportunity to improve the product by answering the tough questions, sharing Ideas, and at very least developing a better understanding of the reasoning behind the design decisions
made thus far. Both the fraffic signal projects and the geometric projects are subject to several review cycles. The 6 traffic signal projects undergo informal reviews at each monthly
Progress Meetings and formal reviews for: Various Technical Memorandums; Preliminary Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E); and Final PS&E orSignal Timing Report. The 32 geometric
design projects have informal reviews as necessary, and formal review cycles for five submittals: Dratt Environmental Reports; Initial Schematic Design/Environmental Reports; Preliminary
Rights-of-Way Documents; Preliminary PS&E; and Final PS&E. There are four stages of a review cycle, scheduled to take approximately 30 working days to complete: 1. CMAQ Program Manager
/Engineer (PM/EI Acceptance: The PM/E first reviews each deSign submittal for completeness, not correctness. The PM/E confirms that the dellverables have at least the minimum amount
of information suitable for the review process. In addition, drawings are checked for readability and that current design standards are met or exceeded. Once accepted by the PM/E, the
submittal is reproduced and distributed to the affected public agencies for review. 2. Public Agency Review: Each submittal is reviewed by the project's stakeholders including the Texas
Department Department of Transportation, Dallas County, host Clty{les), and the PM/E's Civil Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Environmental Specialist. The reviews are pertormed to verity
the technical adequacy of the submittals, adherence to applicable standards and criteria, and to ensure that interdisciplinary coordination has been adequately addressed. The reviewers
record their comments on a "Review Comment Form" provided by the PM/E. The "Review Comment Form" is key to the review in that it will eventually record the entire design review conducted
on each submittal by documenting not only the comments, but also the comment originators, designer responses and action agreements for each comment. 3. Compilation of Review Comments
The reviewers submit completed "Review Comments Form" to the PM/E for compilation. Duplicated comments are consolidated, and comments which are not pertinent, or which need clarification
are resolved before a complete set of comments are forwarded to the deSigner. This task is not an easy one with comments from at least four sources for each submittal. For record purposes,
each reviewer is given a compiled set of comments, as well as the PM/E responses to comments not forwarded to the designer. 4. Resolution of Review Comments: The complied set of review
comments are forwarded to the deSigner for dispositioning. Before any changes are made to the submittals, comments which the deSigner takes exception to are resolved via telephone and
faxes. However on occasion, a DeSign Review Committee comprised of all the stakeholders is convened to resolve the outstanding issues and provide the designer direction for the next
design stage. A review cycle is offiCially closed when the deSigner signs off on the set of review comments that has each comment marked either"Agreed" or "Deleted." The PM/E is implementing
a state of the art "Submittal Tracking System" fo !rack fhe vanous required submittals through the complex multl-Jurisdlctlonal review process. The software developed by Parsons Brinckerhoff
reports the current status approaching deadlines, outstanding reviews, submittal age, etc. -of all project submittals in great detail or in summary form. This tool will improve and simplity
the current tracking process into one compact network-based system. The review cycle is a complicated one due to the number of stakeholders, and it requires a significant effort from
all parties. But, this essential process is very effective when all parties remain focused on the responsibility to return the most effective design solution for mitigating !rafflc congestion
and improving the air quality in our community. BUD BEENE RECOVERY UPDATE As most of you know, Bud Beene (Dallas County Director of Public Works) was involved in a serious fraffic accident
last week. He is currently recovering from various injuries and related complications at Medical City. His doctors expect him to fully recover from his injuries. The outpouring of welf-.wishes
and prayers has been overwhelming and he is very thankful for the support he has received from his friends and colleagues. Bud has asked that in lieu of sending flowers, a contribution
be made to the memorial fund set up in Nathan Maier's memory, who, to the great sadness of our community, lost his life in the accident. Contributions can be made to: Nathan D. Maier
Memorial Foundation, Dallas Theological Seminary, Attn: Advancement Office, 3909 Swiss Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75204. • Addison. Balch Springs. Carrollton· Cedar Hill· Coppell· Danas •
Dallas Counly. DART· DeSoto· Duncanville· Formers Branch. FHWA • Garland· • Grand Prairie· Irving· Lancasler· Mesquile • NCTCOG • Richardson· Rowlell • Sachse· Sunnyvale· TxDOT • PM/E
Team -Parsons Brinckerhoff • ARS i Inc.• DeShazo, I 
, Memorandum Tm Rle -Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Date: April 15, 1997 􀁓􀁵􀁢􀁊􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁾􀀠CMAQ Program Update #108 Conducted April 9, 1997, 2:00 p.m.. CMAQ Program Office AHendees:
Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Richard Peterson Dallas Co. Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBCS Sid Horner Dallas Co. Jim Bernier, Proj. Controls PBCS Scarlett Tandy Dallas
Co. Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA Dave Davis Farmers Branch Don Ingram, Environmental ESS Ali Malekouti Dallas Moosa Saghian TxDOT Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are
included as Attachment B. Information discussed In addition to that which is contained on the overheads included: 1. General-Ivan Nicodemus Design Review-James Allen (ARS), Tony Tramel
(DTA) and Don Ingram's (ESS) efforts are concentrated on the design reviews that are In-house and they have made quite a bit of progress this past week. TIP Coordination • Grand Prairie
-Nothing new since last week as reinstatement of signal Improvements contin'ue to be considered: • Mesquite -The City 01 Mesquite is net expected to submit a TIP Modification request
until May. TxDOT indicated that the cost 01 this change should be paid for by City of Mesquite. City of Dallas Invoice -Karen Jones (PM/E) has been in contact with Hazel Baker (County)
on Invoices #02 and Il00. On #02, there was $3,200 questioned and Il00, $22,500 was questioned for a variety 01 reasons. There is also a concern of overtime charges Which was some 56%
(of controlier labor costs). Dave Davis (Farmers Branch) asked if these overtime costs threaten the budget, and Ivan said probably not. Moosa Saghian (TxDOT) questioned whether the review
of these invoices was reimbursable through CMAQ funds. It was noted by the PMIE staff that prOVisions for City Force Account work were included in both the TxDOT I County CMAQ Agreement
and the County I Cities ILAs. City Coordination • Bond Information -The PM/E office provided draft dala for the preparation 01 the '98 Bond Program to the City of Dallas, last week.
Also, prepared a plot of a typical Intersection improvement and working listing of shortfall dollars . • Garland at Gaston -A meeting was held last week wnh a planner from the City 01
Dallas. Ivan was . asked to attend a public meeting at the White Rock Pump Station with the Lakewood development steering committee. Ivan indicated that It was a productive meeting,
and it was agreed that the CMAQ program can be, to a certain extent, complimentary to the public desires in improving the Gaston Garland intersecUon as a gateway to the Lakewood area..
Dlstrict:3 ConOBms • The court orders for Projects 18, 19 and-20 are scheduled to be on the agenda April 15. Michael Morris (NCTCOG) has responded to the County's request for clarification
on the expiration and re-prograrnmlng 􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁳􀁩􀁢􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠of the CMAQ funds. Michael's main concern voiced was D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPDATE\l997\I08.DOC 
ClIfAQ Program Updat. ',08 Pag. 2 016 that the TIP budget will be depleted before ali the TIP scope can be completed. Projectsthat are not obligated in the near future, might not have a budget in the future. Moosa Saghian (TxDOT) asked for a copy of this letler and added that TxDOT may also write a letter urging
these projects to advance. Collin-Dallas County lLA -No progress this week. Escrow Requests -Karen Jones (PMIE) is working on the escrow request preparations. Briefing memo's will be
prepared next week for Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Group) and 08 (Huitt-Zollars). Moosa asked that Project 70 (Kimley-Horn) also be added to this escrow payment 2. Consultants-Ivan
Nicodemus Commissioners Court Order -ProJecls 18 (Boyle), 19 (Brown & Root) and 20 (Kaiser) are scheduled for April 15. Imp/emsnting a Submittal Tracking System (STS) -Ivan reported
that he is waiting for a call on a workaround for the tracking software. Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 06 (TCB) -TCB submitted a lee proposal and and it is being evaluated.
o Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars) -H-Z and the City of Richardson have Identified some new construction (Eckerds) that has laken place In the last month or two. so edditional survey will
be needed. Ivan noted that the design fee will be increased by about $3.000 for the survey, but is the most cost effective solution considering costs would be 2 to 3 times to fiX it
during construction. o Project 09 (GSW) -Briefing memo has been prepared. • Project 72 (Bridgefarmer) -TIP modification from the City of Mesquite is required. o Project 76 (BW&R) -Written
direction from the City of Dallas to add two signal loCalions was received. BWR will be asked to prepared a proposal to add this work to their scope, 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project
70 (Kimley.Hom • Garland) -The final data collection should be complete this week. Tony said that there are 12 sq. miles of Garland thai has interlocking east-west and north-south coordination,
which is a first. City of Garland staff members have received compliments from citizens. Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Group • Grand Prairie) -Parsons Transportation Group continues
to expect the final PS&E for the first 13 locations to be completed soon. The 75% plans for the 31 locations and communication plan will follOW in the next couple of weeks. Formal review
of sheets for CCTV Is underway. Richard Peterson (County) asked what will happen to the 4 -100% locally funded locations. Tony stated thai they will be submitted to the City of Grand
Prairie for construction letting. The City will most likely hold these designs, so they can be combined with a subsequent project and then let as a larger construction project. Moose
added that he would forward s sample letter for the lonmsl statement required from the County to clear ROWand environmental needed prior to construction letting. Project 72 (Brldgefarmer
• Me$qUlteJBalch Sprlll!J$/$wlnyvale' -A design review committee meeting was held as a part 01 last Thursday's progress meeting. The initial review comments for the test location were
resolved and Bridgefarmer will be submitting the dispositions of those comments soon. Project 73 (Hunter Associates • South Dallas County, -The design review comments for the test design
locations were submitted to the consultant for disposftloning. D:\GENERAL\G03MEE1'IIJPDATE\l997\l08.DOC 
CMAQ Program Update '1OB Page 3 of6 Project 75 (Sverdrup. Irving/Coppell) . The Progress Meeting is next Tuesday -the analysis and recommendations are expected at that time. Project
76 (Bucher, Willill & HaUm • S""Jgnal Retimlng • N. Dallas)· BW&R's data collection is 45% complete. A letter was sent to BW&R requesting a cost proposel to add two locations in response
to a City of Dallas request. Tony sialed that with the extra help, 13 schematic traffic reviews have been completed. Next week reviews will be completed for the 65% plans tor leftwich
(Project 01 • Farmers Branch) and 95% plans for Chiang, Patel (Project 02· DuncanvilleJDallas). Tony said that Gordon Alderman (TxDOT) had just received Chiang, Patel's 95% PS&E for
review.· Moosa noted that the 65% PS&E was not forwarded to Gordon because there ·was not enough signal information to warrant his time. 4. Civil· Ivan Nicodemus IVan reported the following
project status: ProJect 01 (Leftwich & All-. . Farmers Branchl . The 65% preliminary drawings are are under review. Dave Davis (Farmers Branch) asked if he could receive a set of review
comments when they are· finished. Ivan replied that all reviewers would receive their original comments, and the final consolidated review comment sent to the consultant for disposttioning.
Project 02 (Chiang, Patel & Yerby· DllllCllnvillelDallas) -Richard asked about the request from the City of Duncanville tor the sewer adjustments to be rolled into construction. Ivan
said that it is minor and that it can only be adjusted when tbe drop inlet is moved. Moose said that it is an easy thing to do but TxDOT will need a special specification for this work.
Project 05 (PBSIr.... • Dallas) . Moosa said that the intersection of Bonnie View at Ledbetter had been let for construction in January. Based on the Schematic Submittal, PBSIlJ did
not considered the design or ROW of the new construction just let and provided to the consuijant. Only the existing conditions are shown. TxDOT will provide a diskette. TxDOT's review
comments will be complete by the end of this week. Project 10 (USA • Coppell) -The QA/OC is being pertormed on the Initial Schematic Design Submittal which is expected to be submitted
in a couple of weeks. TxDOT's review comments will be done early next week. Project 12 (Car1er & Burgess • Midway) . The initial Schematic Design Submittf'l should be received In two
wesks. Staff turnover has delayed this submittal. ProJects 16 (HDR • N.. Dallas) and 17 (Geier. Dallas/Garland) -The initial Schematics are under review. Moosa turned in TxDOT's review
comments for Project 17's Schematic. Project ·13 (WP Moore • Farmers Branchl-The initial Schematic Design Submittal was received . and accepted for agency review. Reproduction Will be
completed next week and the submtttal will be . forwarded to each agency tor review. Dave· said Farmers Branch has had a request for escrow of $11,OO() tor months. In two weeks, the
City will have a minor budget adjustment, at which time they will have the money in the proper accounts, and will be able to make escrow payment to Dallas County. Projects 14 (HNTB •
LB ...) and 16 (HDR • N. Dallas) -The initial Schematic Designs were received and will be reproduced for reviewing. ProJect 15 (Halff • N. Dallas)· The final Schematic Design was received.
D:IGENERALIG03MEEl\UPDATE\1997\108.DOC 
CMAQ Prognun Update #108 Page 4 of6 5. Environmental -Don Ingram Project 14 {HNTB • LB",-The consultanl's Environmental Reports were not sent with the Schematic Submittal, but should
arrive lomorrow. Project 15 (Halff. N. Dallasl-The Final Schematic is currently being reviewed. Don reported that there are a few data errors that the consultant missed. Don said that
he will be sending the report to Sam Moghadassi (TxDOn to comment if there are any other clean-up remarks before he gets back with Half!. Projeet 16 (HDR • N. Dallas) -The inilial Schematic
with the Environmental Report has been sent ". out to be reproduced. Project 31 (WIlbur Smith • Dallas) -The draft environmental review comments were sent to the consultant last week.
The request for boiler plate noise text from Austin on Project 08 (Huilt-Zollars) was foIwarded to Donna Manhart (H-Z). H-Z expected to have the comments back to the PM/E office by tomorrow.
Don indicated that he has not received any direction from TxDOT regarding the extent of the MAPO process on Davis Street between Hampton and Westmoreland. Ivan reminded the group that
at the meeling with Scott Young and Stan Hall (TxDOn, TxDOT had wented MAPO letters sent to anybody in the zone 01 construction. Ivan stated that there would be hundreds of leiters that
would need to be sent at this Davis Street improvement. Moose said that those IimilS were too much: he would work on a relief of this requirement. 6. Project Control -Jim Bernier The
Monthly Schedule Update will use March SO as the data dale, and will be issued this Friday. Seventeen Design Progress Reports were submitted and entered Into the Program Schedule. Updates
were forwarded to each of the 17 consultants. Jim indicated that he aided the County in preparation of their Bond Quarterly Update schedule. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus Request of
Commissioner Jackson -The PMIE office was requested to provide a list of all 01 the firms and the principals associated with each firm for all of the qualified CMAQ primes and subconsultanlS.
The MM/BE status was provided for each prime and subconsultant firm. Bud Beene (County) forwarded this information to all of the Commissioners this morning. TxOOT-County Agreement Modiffcations
-Gary Taylor (TxDOn continues to work on the agreement. Exhibit A& B Content -Is still in review and awaiting comments. Continua.tion of PMIE Services -Ivan is working on a letter requested
by the County on alternatives to carrying the PMIE services through the completion 01 the program. Moose said that TxDOT and the County need to meet and revlew the PMlE services. 8.
Look Ahead -Illan Nicodemus· Next CMAQ Mealing will be held on April 16, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones. O;\GENERAL\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1997\I08.ooC

PageS 0.15'rom: SAN WUIS Ts; P.E., John BaumgartDer Dltt1I;4[15/91 lirne:09:11:tl CMAQ "''OfITSm Updaf. 'fOB Page 6 of 6 9. Action Hems .. Ivan Nicodamus County .• Regal Row Drawings
.................................................................................................................ASAP PM/E • Revised Pavement Survey to TxOOT .........................................
......................................... : .....ASAP . • 1998 Bond Input " • Grand prairie's Escrow to TxDOT..........................................................................................
April 11 TxDOT 􀁾􀀠Examples of Oversight lLAs.................................................................................................... April4 TxDOT., County I PM/Ii • TxOOT
-County Agreement Modifications............................................................................ April 10 • Exhibit A & B Comments ..................... : .................................
.................................................. April 4 Mesquite • TIP Amendment....................................................................................................................
......May City 01 Dallas • Addilionallnterseotions in Project 76 ................................................................... ...............Received • City ofDallas InvoIces
02 & OS.............................................................................................. April 10 10. Other Itama The City of Coppell has made Title 23 request for Project
10. The request is being reViewed. Sid Horner (County) passed out the preliminary ROW summary and cost estimate for Project 02 (Chiang, Patel). Sid noted that the property at Camp Wisdom
and Cockrell Hill (Denny's) was nO! conforming at this time. He added that Cocl<reil Hill was widened several years ago and calls for research because the property owner may have already
been compensated for damages for the parking. Meeting Minutes by: 􀁾􀂷􀁴􀀠> 􀁌􀁾􀀨􀁩􀁾􀀠Ivan F. Nicodemus, Project Manager Date: IS" APR') f f Date: I)Rffl9 7 Attachments D:\GENERAL\G03MEENJPDATE\l99
7\l08.DOC 
􀁐􀁡􀀡􀁬􀀡􀀮􀀧􀁬􀀶􀁾􀀱􀀱􀁓􀀠ClIfAQ fIrogI'am Update (1108 Page 6 at6 xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT. lBJ Project Office) LaDenna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett
Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Rscher (PBCS) J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) C. Syro (City of CarrolRon) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Patel (City
of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) D. DaviS (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of
Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. Johnson (City of lancaster) R. Berry (City 01 Mescuite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L Stewart (City of Rowlett) L. Henderson (City
of Sachse) R. J. Ewatt (City of Sunnyvale) O:\GENERAl\G03MEE1\I.JPDATE\1997\1OS.00c 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John B&umgartner Dale: 4n5(97 Time: 09;11:17 Page 7 0115 ATTACHMENT A .CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #108 SIGN-IN SHEET April 9, 1997 Dan Bud Beene Richard Peterson Don
Cranford Sid Horner Selas Camarillo Scarlett Helen Tran Everett Bacon Michael Burbank LaDonna Smith n Mack Parsons Brinckerhoff Parsons Brinckerhoff DeShazo ESS Farmers Branch of Dallas
of Dallas NCTCOG NCTCOG NCTCOG 214-747-6336 ext. 26 214-747-6336 ext. 25 214-747-6336 ext. 31 214-747-6336 ext. 28 214-747-6336 ext. 29 214-747-6336 ext. 30 21 214-653-7151 214-653-7151
214-653-7151 214-653-6354 214-653-6400 214-653-6018 214-653-7151 972-247-3131 214-670-7748 214-670-5662 214-320-4432 214-320-4435 214-319-6410 695-9253 695-9251 695-9254 482-5988 " 
From: SAM WUlS Til: P.E.. John BllamglUtUef 0et1t:4115/97 TIIIUt:09:11:17 Pagn eof 15 . , ATTACHMENT 8 1" CMAQ PROGRAM e. UPDATE • Apri/9, 1997 • General • Consultants • Traffic • Civil
• Environmental • Project Control General ,.-Design Review 􀀬􀁾􀀠<"iii TIP Coordination /, • GrandPtafrfa • Mesquite • CityofDallas Invoice • City Coordination • D./1ag Exl/mp/a Plan
II/ld Cost EsII_te. • GelfandatGaslOn Publh: Mealing • District3 Concerns • Court OrdentSchedu/ladforAplfl 15, 1997 • HerCOGI..ettlIr Recelvlld • CO/lin County 􀁾􀀠Dallas County ILA
, • Escrow Request Preparation 
From:: SAIofWUfS T.; 􀁐􀀮􀁅􀁾􀀠Joh. flaumgi&l11UIr Pagll9of15 , . PI Consultants1l!I • • Accomplishments • Commissioners Court Of!!er· April 15, 1997 -#18 Boyle, #19 B&R, #20 Kaiser
• Implementing Submittal Tracking System (STS) -Continues • Pending Contract Amendments -#106 TCS: ModifySeop... Fee PfOposa1ln Evalu.llen -#108 H·Z: Addillonal Survey forN_Ce_diel'!
-fIOS GSW: Briefing Mllmo PrepsTfld -#71 B-F: TIP Modlf/catf"" NIICfHI_ry. MlISqUfte To Request -'16 BWR: Letter RilClllved from City ofDaI/a$ •Regal Row Drawings to, Wilbur.SmIth 1"
1l!I. Traffic --..Slgnal Design Project Status : i '. GAR (70) -KHA Data Collection COmplete This Week • GP(71) Grand Prairie • Parsons Transportation Group , -Stili Anticipating First
13 Locations From Last Week -Expecting Central Co,. Communication Plans -FundlngIProjec:1slSchedule Being Reviewed • BE Dallas Co.-MeslBSlSV(12} • SF -Resolutmn OfInitialReview Commenls
AtProgress Meetfng Lest Week 
From: SAM WUIS 10: 􀁐􀀮􀁅􀁾.John Baumgllirtftet 0ah!:4,,5/91 TIme:09:tl;11 Pagfll0 of 15 PI Traffic e. (Contllluetl) • Signal Design Project Status • DaIIas-DunlCH/LanlDeS (73) -Hunter
• lIVing/Coppell (75) -Sverdrup -Aprll15 Progress Meeting In Coppell • N Dallas RetJmlng (76) -BWR -Data CollectIon 45% Comp/eta -Request Cost Proposal To Add1Wo LocatJolUI By City •
Review OfFlatwork Projects • Completed 13 Schematic PME T1aff1c Rev/ews • Expect To Complete 6S'Ki Plans OfLW&A & 9S'Ki CPA Next Week 1'8 Design Status e. (TrqJJ/c) 􀀷􀁴􀁉􀀬􀁇􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-----71.
GtnPnll'it PInonsTrana.Gp. .._-7$, __ I I I 
􀁆􀁉􀀧􀁏􀁉􀀧􀁊􀁉􀁾􀀠SAM WUlS To; P.E., John 8aumgartnor Pege 11 of15 1" e . Civil • Accomplishments • Proj 13 WP Moore Schematic Received • Pro] 14HNTB Schematic Received • Pro] 16 HDR
Schematic out for Review • Pro] 15 Halff Returned Dispositioned Comments RevisedSchematic • Issue • JuryDuty 'B Design Status fGeo-<iJe. r '4t F_BrJn:tt l.Ib!dI 􀀧􀁡􀀺􀁺􀁾􀀠f;P"t ,...........
....... ..""" .......""" "" fIf Gtwnd f'niIM, ESPYHZ..co _ __ .. _ USA 􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠ca 13 '_BrMch Won ,. I.t.I ""'" 1$ H. 'CNI H1fI 􀀧􀁕􀁬􀁈􀁾􀀠liDR 
Date;<C/15f.11 TIme!09:1'f:11 Page 120' 15 p, Design Status (GeqmtJric-CmrIiIllWl)1IlII. rr __ 11li UttOit BoJW 19 Roo e4R 2t e!ldl:lwr MtIelO "'-2'3 􀁃􀀧􀁯􀀴􀀦􀁲􀁾􀀠NKCttIl 􀁬􀀴􀁾􀀠kcia
"'-25I'tDaDu2 AM 􀀲􀀶􀁾􀁜􀀺􀀩􀀧􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀠atHMy...... »N 2b I!;d1gYdtJ I:ItiIa 211 0fIa 1'c&r&y fMt 30 DIItIMeo. o..T. 31 R!IpI Row WIM &1: 􀁾􀀮􀁆􀁍􀁉0IU'It 1'.11= ..... 1IlII• Environmental
.,;'.ii Accomplishments • RevlewcommentB -Project14 -Project 15 -Project 16 -Project31 • Ongoing coordination • Issues • NoneNew 
From: SAM WUlS To: P£., JDhQ Oumgurtner Oate:.lJ115/ltl TImo;09:11:11 P4go 13 of 15 Environmental Status " is'S. .IU.AHUMa.." " is'S. Project Control , . .' t' • Accomplishments • Aiding
County In PreparaUon of Bond Quarlerly Update Sc/ladUie • Mor/thly Update End ofWeek • Issues • Project StatwI for De$1gn 
Oatu: 4115/97 Tlma: 0:!i:11:17 Psgs 14 m15 1" e.· Key Issues • TxDOT .. County Agreement • Exhibit A & B Content • Continuation ofPN/IE Services • Design Review Procedures PI l1li. Look
Ahead -,. ._Next Meeting CMAQ ConfotBn•• _􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀠. • Wednesday, AptfI16, 1991 .. .NextMilestones 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀢􀁴􀁉􀁴􀁾􀀠mu.HIrII"",,__roc..,. 􀀱􀀢􀁾􀀠.• 􀁾􀀱􀁦􀁬􀁉􀀮􀀱􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠􀁈􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁗􀁁􀁰
􀁲􀀮􀀱􀁉• 􀁾􀀱􀁦􀁬􀁉􀀮􀀱􀀱___ ..............., 􀀮􀁑􀁍􀀮􀀷􀁗􀁍􀁤􀀧􀁬􀁉􀁴􀁍􀁬􀁲􀀻􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠 • 􀁐􀁮􀀺􀀯􀁉􀀮􀁬􀁦􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁵􀁢􀂫􀁲􀁬􀁬􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠􀁄􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀴􀀠C" • 􀁦􀁉􀁮􀁉􀁬􀀬􀁍􀁯􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮
􀀮􀀠􀀱􀀱􀀱􀁦􀁷􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁩􀁲􀁟􀀧􀀠C" • • 􀁾••jQIW} 􀁾􀁉􀁗􀁁􀁴􀁉􀀡􀀣􀁴􀁊􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁦􀁉􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀠• 􀁾􀀯􀁉􀁉􀁯􀀮􀁡􀁾􀀠""'jUE__􀁾􀀠• Pn:/I.If#."twN 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠• IIIrqI.NIt,_jJlU:&J}
􀁊􀁦􀁍􀁦􀁍􀁾􀁾 ·􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀪􀀢􀀢􀀠to.. ' , QIorIi.or.llr • 􀁊􀁬􀁮􀂥􀀬􀀱􀁦􀁬􀁉􀀮􀁴􀀣􀁾􀀠I:' ' c-t0llillr • Jln¥,No.H(/tldftIj CnT". CMtCM:flr • 
PIlge150t 15 Action ItemsAiII. • County " • Regal Flow Drawings . • FMIE • Flevlsed Pavement Survey to hDOT • 19118 Band Input • GP Escn)W to Txdot • TXDOr • Examples ofO!NSlght /LAs
• TxDOr/CountylFMIE • TxDOT· County Agteement McdlffcttlJol1ll ·A&BCommllllt9 • lItesqufte • TIP Amendment • City ofDallas • Addilionalln1erse.itJonsln #76 • City ofDallIIIIt Invoice
#2 & #3 < • ·. Ti!Il!!!t DAtu ASAP ASAP " April4 Apri/10 April 4 May 'F/ecelvad ApriJ10 
Pagel 0113 Memorandum TOI File -Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Date: April 11, 1997 Subjecb CMAQ Program Update #107 Conducted April 2, 1997,2:00 p.m., CMAO Program Office AHendees:
Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Richard Peterson Dallas Co. Karen Jones, Asst P.M. PBCS Don Cranford Dallas Co. Tony Tramel. Traffic DTA Sid Horner Dallas Co. Don
Ingram. Environmental ESS Scarlett Tandy Dallas Co. James Allen, Civil ARS Dave Davis Farmers Branch Ali Malekouti Dallas Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included
as Allachment B. Information discussed In addition to that which is contained on the overheads Included: 1. General-Ivan Nicodemus Design Review -James Allen (ARS), Tony Tramel (DTA)
and Don Ingram's (ESS) efforts are concentrated on the in-house design reviews. TIP Coordination • Grand Prairie -Reinstatement of signal improvements continue to be considered: it will
require a TIP modification. • Mesquite -Nothing new since receiving a leller directing the PM/PM/E 10 implement TIP modifications. The request also calls for an intersection that will
require an additional TIP modification. City Coordination -The City of Dallas has requested the PM/E 10 aid In the developing data for their '98 Bond Program and aid in preparation in
the City Council Transportation Commi!lee briefing. A plot of a typical intersection Improvament has been prepared along with current budget requirements. A meeting is scheduled for
2:00 p.m. tomorrow with the City of Dallas' planning department to discuss Gaston at Garland. The issues are about public input on a "gateway" entrance 10 the Lakewood area. Disltict
3 Concerns -The court orders for Projects 18-20 are scheduled to be on the agenda for April 15. The Commissioners Court requested infonmation regarding: 1) when and under what conditions
would funding lapse for CMAO improvements currently authorized, but not yet underway; 2) how long could these improvements be delayed before the funds would be jeopardized and what would
be the timeline associated with it. Another concern was If the CMAO improvements, in question. are not advanced how, and by whom. could or would the currently authorized CMAO funding
be reprogrammed? Don Cranford (County) IS working with Michael Morris (NCTCOG) to get authoritative answers on these issues. Don . agreed that the current answers given to the Commissioners
Court in January are still valid. but other options are possible. Collin-Dallas County ILA -No progress this weak. Escrow Requests -Karen Jones (PM/E) is working on the escrow request
preparations. Karen slated that she should have Project 71 done by the end of the week. OIffH' a Century of El'II/i'lIfHHiIIg Excellence D:\GENERAL\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1991\107.DOC 
Page 2 of13 CMAQ PI'ogram Update #107 Page:Z of 4 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Commissioners Court Order -Projects 18 (Boyle), 19 (Brown & Root) and 20 (Kaiser) are scheculed for April
15. Implementing a Submitta.l Tracking System (STS) -Database bugs are being resoivec. Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 06 (TCB) -TCB was given 􀁡􀁤􀁤􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁡􀁬􀀠direction to
prepared a cost proposal for changing the scope of Davis at Westmoreland. • Project 09 (GSW) -Still working on the added signal at Polk and Belt line. The City of DeSoto has. asked that
the signal, which is currently inefficient, be included as part of the geometric improvement. James stated that the downside is that additional right-of-way may be needec. .• Project
72 (Bridgefarmer) -Awaiting the TIP modification from the City of Mesquite. • Project 76 (BW&R) -Written direction needec from the City of Dallas to add two signal locations. Tony Tramel
reported that a draft letter was sent to Beth Ramirez (Dallas) to review. Regal Row Drawings -Design drawings for the Regal Row thoroughfare project 'are needec from the County for coordination
purposes on Project 31 (Wilbur Smith -Dallas). Don indicated he would follow up. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimley·Hom • Garland, -The status on the final travel time runs remain
the same. KH hopes to have the final report finished by the end of April or in early May. Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Group. Grand Prairie) -Parsons Transportation Group anticipates
having the first 13 locations completed this week. The next 31 locations and communication plan will follow in the next couple 01 weeks. Sheets for CCTV have been submittec for review.
Project 72 (Bridgefarmer • Mesquite}8alch Springs/Sunnyvale, -The formal review comments for the "sample design" location have been returned to the consultant. Progress Meeting will
held this Thursday. Project 73 (Hunter Associates • South Dallas County, -Have provided PM/E I TxDOT I DeSoto commenis on their revised set of drawings for the "sample design" location.
Project 75 (SVerdrup • Irving/CoppeJl) -The compilation of the data continues. Expect the analysis and recommendations at the next Progress Meeting on April 15. Project 76 (Bucher, Willis
& Ratliff· Signal Retimlng • N. Dallas' -BW&R's data collection Is about 50% complete. The turning movement counts are 90% complete and all that is left is Saturday collections and miscellaneous
locations. Twenty-four hour tube counts should be complete in the next two weeks. Tony stated that traffic is getting caught up on reviews for the flatwork projects. 4. Civil -James
Allen James reported the following project status: Project 01 (Leftwich & Assoc•• Farmers Branch, -The 65% preliminary drawings are under' review. Project 02 (Chiang, Patel & Yerby.
Duncanville/Dallas' -The 95% preliminary drawings are under review. Sid Horner (County) askec when the final ROW is expected. James said he did not know. Sid stated that alter the meeting
with TxDOT they felt comfortable with everything. Sid indicatec that D:IGENERALIG03MEET\lJPDATE\j9971107.DOC 
Date: 4f111ffT ,",me: 11:50:12 P*!)eSOf13 CAfAQ Program Update 11107 Page 3 ot 4 Harlan Moore (TxDOT) has staled that TxDOT administrative costs equal 11.78% of 20% of the appraised
value, or 5.5% for direct and 6.78% for indirect costs. Karen Jones noted that these markups differ from those directed by TxDOT in August 1996 and that she would contact Moosa Saghian
(TxDOT) to resolve the differences. Projects 05 (PBS&" • Dallas), 10 (USA· Coppell), 16 (HOR • H. Dallas) and 17 (Gojer • DallaS/Garland) -Schematics are under review. Projects 04 (Paragon.
Dallas), 06 ITCB • Dallas), 07 (Espey, Huston· Orand Prairil>, and 15 (Hallf. Dallas) -The SChamatic review comments are being dispositioned by the designers. " Prl>ject 09 (OSW • Cedar
HIII/DeSI>tO/Duncanvllle, -Currently. the project Is on hold until the amendment for the revised scope is resolved. Projects 03 (MK Engineers. Garland) and 08 (1IuItt"zollars • RlcbardsonlGarland)
-NTP's have been given for the PS&E. Project 13 (WP Moore. Farmers Branch) -The initial Schematic submittal is expected soon.. Project 14 (HHTB • L8.J) -Tha initial Schematic Design
submittal is expected today. S. Environmental -Don Ingram Projects 25 (ABA· Dallas) and Z7 (APM • Dallas) -The draft environmental review comments were sent to the designers for disposlUoning.
Proj&et 31 (Wilbur Smith. Dallas)-Their draft environmental review comments will be completed and sent to the designer tomorrow. Project 16 (HDR • H. Dallas) -Their environmental report
submitted with the initial Schematic Design was incomplete -awaiting a response as to when It can be expected. Don talked to TxDOT about the MApO requirements on the Davis Street notifications.
Mooes Seghian (TxDOT) will be responding. TxDOT will be taking the photographs lor Garland Ave. at Walnut St. (Project 03). The PMJE office still feels that it is not neceesary for pictures
to be taken at this particular location and it is out of scope work. e. Key IsSlies -Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-Coun/y Agreement ModifICationS -The PMJE's input has been summarized and submitted
to TxDOT and the County for review. Gary Taylor (TxDOT) is working on the agreement. Exhibit A & B Content -The A & B list is currently under TxDOT and County review. Continuation of
PMIE Sarvices -Ivan is working on a letter requested by the County on alternatives to carrying the PMIE services through the completion of the program. Design Review Procedures -All
revieWing agencies were urged to use the design review comment . forms. Providing the comments In the electronic format is preferred. Ali Malekouti (Dallas) requested that the PMIE provide
guidance for the review of 65%, 95%, etc. He suggested a checklist so lhey would know what level Is required at each phase. Ivan agreed and the PMJE would prepare some guidelines. 7.
Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on Apnl 9, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a IIsling 01 upcoming milestones. D:\GENERAlIG03MEEl\UPDATE\1997\107.DOC

CIIIAQ PrDgI\IIIm Update #107 Page 4 014 8. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus TametDates County • RegalRow Drawings ........................................................................................
........................,ASAP PUlE • Revised Pavem6n1 Survey to TxDOT "'....................................................................................ASAP • City 0'Dallas Invoice
#2 & 3 .................................................................................................. April 10 • 1998 Bond Input • Plan and CMAQ List for Council Brief " • Grand
Prairie's Escrow to TxDOT TxDOT • Examples ofOversight ILAs., ..... , ............................... " .................. " .................... " ...... " ......... April 4 TxOOT0{
County I PM/E • TxDOT -CountyAgreement Moditicatioos......" ........................................................."."".... April 10 • ExhibIY A & B Comments " ..........................
" .. "."......".................." ........................................ April 4 􀁍􀁎􀁾􀀮􀀠. • TIP Arnendment..............................,......................" ......." ......................,
....." ...........................ASAP CIty ofDallas • Add/tionallnterseotions in Projeot 76 .......................... , .............................................................
ASAP 9. Other Items Richard Peterson (County) commented that the County is reviewing HDR's (Project 16 N. Dallas) Schematic Design submittal and noted that tbe traffic engineering analysis
had good information. Tony agreed that their analysis has bsen more complete than others. ••􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀢... < 􀁾􀁬􀁾,,, _ t. Proj. MgT. Ivan F. Nicodemus, Project Manager Date: 􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁉􀁴􀁟􀁁􀁟􀁁􀁟
􀁾􀁟􀀡􀀿􀁟􀀱􀀧___ 􀁁􀁰􀁾􀁬Date: Attachments xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT, LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric
K. Fischer (PBCS)J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (City of Cedar HlII) A Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City 01 Dallas) P.
Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncarwille) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving)
A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Stewart (City of Rowiett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale)
D:IGENERAL\G03MEET\UPDATE\1997\107.DOC 
ATTACHMENT A . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #107 SIGN-IN SHEET April 2, 1997 4-653-7151 Richard Peterson 4-653-7151 Don Cranford 4-653-7151 Horner 4-653-6354 Salas Camarillo 4-653-6400 4-653-601
4-653-7151 131 14-320-4432 4-320-4435 TxDOT 14-319-6410 Everett Bacon NCTCOG 695-9253 Michael Burbank NCTCOG 695-9251 LaDonna Smith NCTCOG 695-9254 Mack FHWA 482-5988 
ATTACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • April 2, 1997 • General • COlI$ultants • Traffic • Civil • Environmental • Project Control General ". Design Review • TiP Coordination • Stand Prairie
• MesquIte • CityCoordJnation • Dallas Elmmpfe Plan and Cost EstImates • District 3 Concerns • CouTtOrdet$ScheduledforAprlI1S, 1997 • NCTCOG Leifer • Collin County· Dallas County ILA
• Escrow Request Preparation 
Ftom; SAN WUIS To: P.E., Jolln 8m,ung:iIftnet" DIIllt: 04/11/91 TIllie! 11:50:12 Page 1 of 13 ATtACHMENT B p,--e. Consultants • Accomplishments • CommissIoners Court Order -Aprll15,
1997 -#18 Boyle, #19 B&R, #20 Kaiser -Implementing Submittal Tracking System (STS) -Continues • Pending Contract Amendments -'/106 TeS: ModifyScope-PWEDIrection Given -_ GSW: RevIsions,
Add SIgnal. PMJE To Rftpond -#71 B-F: TIP ModlflcatJo" 􀁎􀀢􀁾􀁲􀁹􀀮Mesquite To Requm -#76 SWR: Add SIgnal Locations· N""d CoO's Wtltfen DIrection •Regal Row Drawings 10 Wilbur-Smith
PI iI!!8. Traffic ". Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) -KHA Data Collection Initiated • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transportation Group -Development of Communlcstlons Plan
& 3' Locations@30% -AntJcipamdRrst 13 Locations @100"" This Week -76% Centtal Core Communication Plans To Follow -Worlclng On SpreedsheefWlth FundlngIProjectslSchedule • SEDallas Co.-MeslBSISV(72)
• SF -Review Comments Forwarded To SF -Progress Meeting This ThuTS 
FlIllln:SMlWUIS To: P.£ .. 􀀢􀁗􀁬􀁮􀁂􀁡􀁵􀁾􀀨􀀠 1Jate;4/11/9111ma:11:50:12 PIl1fl'8of13 liS Traffic -Ii. (Continued) f • Signal Design Project Development (Continued) . • Dallas-DunlCHlLanlDeS
(73) -HunW • IrvingICoppeit (75) • Sverdrup -Data Compilation AndAnalysis -Recommendations AtAprll15 Progress Meeting In Coppell • N Dallas RetJming (76) -BWR -Deta Col/ectlon Continues
-Transmitted Draft ForC/ty To Add 1Wo Locations • Review OfJ=latwork Projects PI Design Status 1a2. rrrajJlc) _COmpIeIB 1t1020:IIl«!SG$l70MiD,13O 10,&10'" .....,...,., --71, G;n;: Pr.aIrio
PareansTrMt. Gp. '71. EDallQCo. 􀁾􀁲􀁉􀀧􀁊􀁜􀁬􀁬􀁴􀀠-----I .._-73, S. DzlIaI¢Q, 􀁾􀀠-.,..... 4' 1<-,.".1_ 
PI fSlI• Civil • Accomplishment:? • Sent Project 04 Consolidated Schematic Review Comments To Designer • Design Status (Oeometric) Pmenf 􀁣􀁡􀀯􀁬􀀱􀁰􀁾􀁴􀀦􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁏􀀧􀁇􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀹􀁊􀁏􀀤􀁑􀀱􀀰􀀦􀁬􀁬􀀠
tQQ: 􀀧􀁇􀀱􀁆􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠.. _ CP'f -􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾., ..... """ .-􀁾􀀮􀁟􀁉􀁟""""""-...... --...as Otiias Tea 111 G1itd PnIiIIG EVf .. _ HZ 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀁾..􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺..""""""'"
""" : 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀻􀁾"'''-..... ----􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀺􀁟􀁩􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁟􀁩􀁉􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁉􀁩􀁉􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀩􀀧􀀰􀀡􀁉􀁢􀀱􀁬􀀠··.iiiiiiiiiI____ 12_ C8 13 FMMrsQ;m;i\ No«e ._--------------r................... ''''AI
"""' Hal#'T$ K "*' 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾".'::::==􀀱􀁯􀁾􀀠HOlt -t::=J 
􀁭􀁭􀀺􀁓􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀮􀁊􀁬􀁓􀀠To: P.E •• .JofInBallmgenner 1late:."1(97 r_:11:50:12' Peg, 10 Ilf13 ..._...."""'..... Rl9<ltiiCQ FIIi6cd Design Status (G";'ntJ!!ric. C.ntlnutd) 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠1&
lhoI 0aII 8ayw 19 Aos!r S&R .,......., ""'-......􀀲􀀲􀁾􀁲􀁤􀀠􀁔􀁾􀀠2l 􀁣􀀮􀁷􀁾􀀠""Cenl. t .. Glftf'NffIt Gtrt:Ia 25 N.CaliU:Z NM 2ft Oen.IDrIOt. cnm 2?...."."HinN APM 28 StWqVtbt i»IitII
2& OduToe-.t lUI 30 IMIMCiI, [)oI,.Ttd\o 􀀳􀀧􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠Wlbur "-"""'" 􀁂􀁡􀁍􀁉􀁾hrcentCorr\pk!!Ie EnvironmentalI. Accomplishmentsf. • Review comments -Project25 -Project27 -ProJect31 •
Ongoing coordination • Issues • None New 
From: SAM wtnS TD: P.E.. Jolin BlllmIglUttil'!' Oam:4JllJ91 TIme:l1:50:12 Pag!lll11f1a p,1IIfl. EnvironmentClI Status DAAF1'S ."B'UTTID0'" -PB-. Project Control • Accomplishments • Sick
• Issues • Project status for Des/gn 
f'rom!SAJoIWUIS To; P.E ... JotmBllMmgartncf Date: 4nl191 lime: 11:50:12 '1eI. . Action Items • County • RegalRow Drawings • PMIE• RevisedPavementSUntey to TxDOT • CityofDallas Invoice
#2 & tI3 • 1998 BondInput • Plan and CMAQ Ustfor Council BrIef • GP Escrow to Txdot • TxDOT • Examples ofOversight /LAs • TXOOTlCountylPMIE • TxDOT-CountyAgreement Modlflcatlons • A&B
Comments • Mesquite • TIP Amendment • CIty ofDallas • Addltlo1l81'nteructions In #76 Tall/atDaleo ASAP ASAP April10 Aprll4 April 10 April4 ASAP 
Pqo 10'11 To: File· Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Date: April 1, 1997 Subject: CMAQ Program Update litH Conducted March 26, 1997,2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office Attendeesl Sign-In
Sheet· Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBes Sid Horner Dallas Co. <'Karen Jones, Ass!. P.M. PBCS Ali Malekoutl Dallas. Jim Bernier, Proj. Controls PBes Moosa Saghian TxDOT Tony Tramel,
Traffic DTA LaDonna Smith NCTCOG Don Ingram, Environmental ESB James Allen, Civil ARB Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are Included es Attachment B. Information discussed
in addition to that which is contained 011 the oVefllaads incilldedl 1. Genetal -Ivan Nicodemus Design Review -James Allen (ARS), Tony Tramel (OTA) and Don Ingram (ESS) continue to concentrate
on the design reviews that are in-house. TIP Coordination • Grand Prairie -Reinstatement of signal improvements are being considered: II will require a TIP modification. • Mesquite -Received
a letter directing the PMIE to implement TIP modifications. The request also calls for an intersection that will require an additional TIP modification. • The 1998 TIP update went away
after coordination with NCTCOG. • The 775C details regarding on/oH system status requested by NCTCOG is complete. City Coordination -The City of Dallas and the County have asked tor
a CMAQ data to aid In developing the City of Dallas '98 Bend Program. DistricI3 Conceins -Commissioner Jackscn has requested that the briefing memos for the remaining three projects
be put on the agenda for next Tuesday. The briefings have been submitted to the County, Collin-Dallas County ILA -This has received little attention, but is not on the critical path
at this time. Escrow Requests -Moosa said that TxDOT will need an escrow payment (design and construction) for Project 71 in order to proceed with construction. Karen Jones (PMIE) noted
that the County has the design escrow from the city and the PM/E will make" a priority to prepare the paperwork to TxDOT's share to TxDOT. CMAQ Facts -Will be faxed tonight. 2. Co/l6ultants
-Ivan Nicodemus CommiSSioners Court Briefing -Projects 18 (Beyle), 19 (Brown & Root) and 2.0 (Kaiser) are scheduled to be brieled next Tuesday. Moosa asked who was the project manager
of Project 19. Ivan said it is Robert Mardis, of Brown and Root. D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPDATE\1997\106.Doo 
Dtrte:.e1l191 limo: 1-4:41:24 Pqe2otl1 CMAQ Program Update #106 Page :z of5 Implementing a Submittal Tracking System (STS) -Ivan handed out (Attachment C) and briefly reviewed three
reports generated from the STS: 1) listing 01 entities 􀀨􀁣􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀠and people) involved in a project, 2) list 01 aJlthe submittals required tor the project, and 3) status of the submittals.
Ivan obtained this software from PB's Senior Project Seminar conducted in Allanla The tracking system data will be brought up to date and used 10 monitor the status of each designars
submittals. Pending ContractAmendments: • Project 06 (TCB) -County has given direction to TCB to delete the two locations at Clarendon Dr. at Tyler SI. and Reming Ave. at Jefferson Blvd.
Awaiting fee proposal from TCB. o Project 09 (GSW) -The PMIE office is preparing a response to GSW's proposal. o Project 24 (Garcia) -Court Order should be signed April 1. • Project
72 (Bridgefanner) -TIP modification is necessary. • Project 76 (SW&R) -Still have not received written direction from the City of Dallas to add two signal locations. Regal Row Drawings
-Drawings for the Regal Row thoroughfare project is needed from the County for coordination purposes on Project 31 (Wilbur Smith -Dallas). Moosa added that Dal-Tech (Project 30 􀁾􀀠Dalles)
should be given the QtylTxDOT design for Marsh Lane and Frankford for coordination purposes. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimley-Horn • Garland) -The final travel time runs have
been autihorized. There is one modification necessary due to a signal controller. Project 71 (Parsons TI'III'ISportation Group· Grand Prairie) -Tony and Moosa talked about some funding
issues. Karen Jones will be preparing a spreadsheet to show the total cost estlmate and timeline to help identify how much money is necessary for each phase ot the projects. Parsons
Transportation Group 􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁣􀁩􀁰􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀀠the first 13 locations will be complete by Friday or next Monday. The communication plan at 31 locations are potentially avallable next week.
The central core communication plans will be reviewed by Gordon Alderman (TxDOn. Project 72 (lIricIgefanner • Mesquite/BaJch Springs/SunnyvaJe) -The review of their test plan has basn
completed. The plan preparation Is at +30%. The request has been received from Rick Berry (Mesquite) to delete two locations and to add two locations. A TIP amendment Is needed. A copy
of the leiter from Mesquite will be given to LaDonna·Smith (NCTCOG). Project 73 (Hunter Auoclates • SoultI Dallas County) -A Progress Meeting was held last week. The review Comments
were provided for the 2nd draft of the test design location. The PMlE had 45 comments. Hunter presented peak hour and 24 hour volume data. Project 78 (SYerdrup • Irvlng/Coppell) -Sverdrup
has collected data and it is being 'compiled and analyzed. Project 76 (Btlcher, Willis & Ratliff • Signal Retiming • N. Dallas, -BW&R's data collection continues. Tony prepared a draft
letter for the City's consideration which formalized their verbal requests to add Iocalions. LaDonna will be given a copy of the draft The Town of Addison is no longer interested in
joining with the CilY of Dallas to add the four Bett Une Road locations to the proJecl. Moosa noted that he has been receiVing meeting minutes from Project 75 and 76, but has not received
any on Project 70, in a fong tima. Tony said that TxDOT will receive the final report with a oomplete set of meeting minutes and submittals. D:IGENERAlIG03MEET\UPDATB1997\100.DOC < .

fnmt:SIIMWUIS To: P.E...Jutrn8a1l1t1gartner Datu; 4n197 11mB: 14147::2:4 Pqv3CJfl1 CMAtll'rogram UpdBte #106 Page:' 015 Moosa said that TxOOT does not want to see Project 71's 100% submittal
until the 9 intersections in question are resolved. He also noted lhat Melanie Young (TxOO1) has $13OK City Force Account reserved lor Grand Prairie's CFA Ivan stated that Project 77
(NW Highway) is not going to happen. Beth Ramirez (Dallas) has talked about another 40 or 50 intersections south of LBJ and the freeway as a possible CMAQ Project. 4. Civil -James Allen
James reported the following project status: ProJect 01 ILeftwlch .. Assoc. • Farmers Branch) -ReView comments are needed on the 65%. preUminary PS&E from the County, City and PM/E traffiC.
ProJect 02 (Chiang, Patel" Yerby· Duncanville/Dallas, -Awaiting review comments on the 95% preliminary PS&E from the County and PM/E traffic. A meeting was held with Harlan Moore, Moosa
(TxOO1) and Sid Horner (County) last week to go over ROW issues. Once Chiang, Patel completes their changes in the ROW documents, the PM/E office will have a good "go-by" 10 give to
the other designers. ProJeet 04 (Paragon· Dallas) -The consolidated Schematic review comments will be sent to the designer shortly. The consolidated comments and the original list 01
comments will be forwarded to the reviewing agencies for their records. Projects OS (PBS." • Dallas), 10 (USA. Coppell, and n (Gejer • Dallas/Garland, -The initial Schematics are under
reView. Projects 06 (TCB. Dallas) and 07 (Espey, Huston. Grand Prairla) -The initial Schematic review comments have been consolidated for the designer's dispositioning. The consolidated
comments and the originalliSl of comments will be forwarded to the reviewing agencies for their records. . Project 18 (HDR • N. DaIIa8) -The revised initial SchemaUc submi1lal was received
two days ago -it will be sent out for review after reproduction. Project 15 (Hallf • Dallas) -Review comments addressing Belt Line at Hillcrest and Campbell at Hillcrest are being resolVed
with Half!. Prolect 21 (Mateo • Dallas) -The initial Schematic was received, but it has been rejected for incompleteness. MoOss asked if the final Schematic for Project 09 (GSW -Cedar
Hill!DeSoto/Duncanville) will be held until the scope Issues are resolved. Ivan said that a contract amendment is currently being worked out. Moosa suggested that the Schematic be advanced
to AusUn for approval so they can start the PS&E Ivan staled that 􀁾􀀠has to be a complete document prior to submittal to Austin. S. Environmental -Don Ingram Project 04 (Paragon • Dallas)
• TxDOT's comments were incorporated into the consolidated comments for the environmental reports. Projeet 16 (HDR • N. Dallas) -No environmental drawings were received with HDR's revised
Initial Schematic. After the drawings are received. it will be sent out for the agencies to review. Pro.leets 2t (Mateo • Dallas) and 24 (Garcia • Dallas) -The draft environmental review
comments were sent 10 the designers for dispositioning. Project 25 (ABA • Dallas, Dallas, -The draft environmental review comments will be sent to the designer tomorrow. D:\GENERAL'.G03MEE1\UPDATE\19
97\10S.DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., Jobn Baumgartner Data: 4/1/97 lime: 14:47:24 Page 4 or 17 CMAQ Program Update #106 Page 40'5 Projects 27 (APM • Dallas) and 31 (Wilbur Smith· DallasJ -Don will
be reviewing these draft reports next week. &. Project Control -Jim Bernier Jim continues to work on Exhibit "H". 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-County Agreement Modifications -The
PM/E's input is being summarized., Exhibit A& B Content -Is open to discussion. A copy was sent to TxDOT for review. ,,' Continuation of PM/E Services -75% notification letter was given
to the County. The County has asked some additional questions on alternatives to carrying the PM/E services through the completion of the program. Design Review Procedures -Please utilize
the design review comment forms. . 8. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on April 2, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones.
9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus Target Dates County • Regal Row Drawings ..................................-..............................................................................ASAP
PMJE • Revised Pavement Survey to TxDOT ........................................................................................ASAP • City ofDallas Invoice #2 & 3 ...................................
............................................................... April 10 TxDOT • Examples of Oversight ILAs ...........................................................................................
......... April 4 TxDOT" County I PMIE • TxDOT -County Agreement Modifications ............................................................................ April 10 • Exhibit A & B Comments
......................................................................................................... April 4 10. Otbel' Items Ivan requested that if TxDOT has any examples of federal
oversight agreements, they be sent to the PM/E for possible use for the City of Coppell. Moosa said that the City of Coppell needs to make a request from Jay Nelson (TxDOT). TxDOT has
never done this before in this district and only 1 or 2 times in the state. Ivan said that he informed the city that if they were going to perform the oversight, ' they needed to include
all of the intersections. Ivan also noted that the Title 23 book has been getting', compliments. It is an excellent, concise listing of the requirements, procedures and responsibilities
of a Title 23 project. D:\GENERAL\G03MEEnlJPDATE\I997\106.DOC 
CMAQ Program Update #106 Page 5 of 5 Meeting Minutes by: Date: {J I API?. 'J'f Attachments xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOn E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT. LBJ Project Office) LaDonna
Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Ascher (PBCS) 􀀬􀁁􀁐􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁜􀁾􀀾􀀠􀁾􀀠 Ivan F. Nicodemus. Project Manager Date: J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City
of Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville)
D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) < . R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. Johnson (City of Lancester) R. Berry (City of
Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L Stewart (City of Rowlett) L Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPOATE\1997\106.DOC 
Fmm:S...... WUIS fo: P.E...John HauIngllttn.ar ATTACHMENT A . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #106 SIGN-IN SHEET March 26, 1997 Helen Tran Everett Bacon Michael TxDOT TxDOT NCTCOG 214-747-6336 ext.
26 21 25 Brinckerhoff 214-747-6336 ext. 31 of Dallas of Dallas TxDOT FHWA 214-747-6336 ext. 28 214-747-6336 ext. 29 ext. 30 214-653-7603 214-653-7151 214-653-7151 214-653-6354 482-5988
... 
Frmn: SAN WUlS To: P.E.. ""1'10 Baump.rt.Mr Data: 4n1!11 TIme: 14:41:2<4 \ ! ATTACHMENTB CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • March 26, 1997 • General • Consultants .. ' • Traffic • CIvil • Environmental
• Project Control PB f/I. General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • GrandPrairie • MliIIlquH.e • City Coordination • Dallas • District 3 Concerns • Provided Bl'i6t1ng Memos toDirnclo/:
• Collin County. Dallas County ILA • Escrow Request Preparation • CMAQFacts 
OatJl!:ill1l9111me: 1iI:47:.24 Pasal uf17 Consultants • Accomplishments • Commissioners Court Brieffng -#18 Boyle, #19 B&R, #20 Kaiser • Implementing Submittal Tracking System (STS)
• Pending Contract Amendments -#68 TCS: Delete Two LoCUl/iOllS· Counly Direction Given -#09 GSW: Revisions, Add Signal-FMIE To Respond -#Z4 Garcia: Court OrderApril 01 -#1113-F: TIP
Modification 􀁎􀁾􀁲􀁹􀂷"'esquite To Request -m BWR: AddSignal Localions •Need CoD's Written OJ_lion • Regal Row Drawings to WilbUT-Smlth Submittal Tracking System 
D.Ucr. 4f2/f11 rune: 10:59:19 pag.a: lot11 To: File -Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Date: April 1, 1997 Subject: CMAQ Program Update ,ftOG Conducted March 26, 1997,2:00 p.m., CMAQ
Program Office Attendees: Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Sid Horner Dallas Ce. <'Karen Jones, Ass!. P.M. PBCS Ali Malekou!i Dallas. Jim Bernier, Proj. Centrals
PBCS Moasa Saghian TxDOT Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA LaDonna Smith NCTCOG Don Ingram, Environmental ESS James Allen, Civil ARS Ivan led the meeting with the aid ol overheads that are Included
as Attachment B. Information discussed in addition to that which is contained on the overheads included: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus Design Review -James Allen (ARS). Tony Tramel (DTA)
and Don Ingram (ESS) continue to concentrate on the design reviews that are in-house. . TIP Coordination • Grand Prairie -Reinstatement of signal improvements are being constdered: it
will require a TIP modification. • Mesquite -Received a letter directing the PM/E 10 implement TIP modifications. The request also calls for an intersection that will require an additional
TIP modification. • The 1998 TIP update went away atier coordination with NCTCCG. • The 775C details regarding on/off system status requested by NCTCCG is complete. city Coordination
-The City of Dallas and the County have asked for a CMAQ data 10 aid in developing the City of Dallas '98 Bond Program. District 3 Concerns -Commissioner JaCkson has requested that the
briefing memos for the remaining three projects be put on the agenda for next Tuesday. The briefings have been submitted to the Ceunty. Collin-Oallas Coun(y ILA -This has received little
attention, but Is not on the critical path at this time, Escrow Requests -Moose said that TxDOT will need an escrow payment (design and construction) for Project 71 in order to proceed
With construction. Karen Jones (PMJE) noted that the County has the design escrow from the city and the PMJE will make it a priority to prepare the paperwork to TxDOT's share to TxDOT,
. CMAQ Facts" Will be faxed tonight. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Commissioners Court Briefing -Projects 18 (Boyle), 19 (Brown & Root) and 20 (KaIser) are scheduled to be briefed next
Tuesday. Moose asked who was the project manager of Project 19. Ivan said It Is Robert Mardis. 'of Brown and Root. Over a C<mfu", 01 EngInsering Excel/tlMtI D:\GENERALIB03MEEl\UPDAID1997\106.DOC

Fnlm:SAMWtlIS Te: P.E.• J6bftlioumgaltJ'tet Date: 4!2J91 rmte: 10;59:19 CMAQ Program Update #106 Page Z of 5 Implementing 8 Submittal Tracking System (STS) -Ivan handed out (Attachment
C) and briefly reviewed three reports generated from the S15: 1) listing of entities (cities and people) involved in a project, 2) list of all the submittals required for the project,
and 3) status of the submittals. Ivan obtained this software from P8's Senior Project Seminar conducted in Allanta. The tracking system data will be brought up to date and used to monitor
the status of each designers submittals. Pending Contract I>mendments: • Project 06 (TCB) -County has given direction to TCB to delete the two locations at Clarendon Dr. at Tyler St.
and fleming Ave. at Jefferson Blvd. Awalling fee proposal from TCB. • Project 09 (GSW) -The PMJE office is preparing a response to GSW's proposal. ,. • Project 24 (Garcia) -Court Order
should be signed April 1. • Project 72 (Bridgefarmer) -TIP modification is necesSaly. • Project 76 (BW&R) -Stili have not received written direction from the City of Dallas to add two
signal locations. Regal Row Drawings -Drawings for the Regal Row thoroughfare project is needed from the County for coordination purposes on Project 31 (Wilbur Smith Dallas). Moosa added
that Dal-Tech (Project 30 -Dallas) should be given the City{TxOOT design for Marsh Lane and Frankford for coordinalion purposes. 3.. Traffic Tony Tramel Project 70 fKimley.Hom • Garland)
-The final travel time runs have been authorized. There is one modificalion necessary due to a signal controller. Proiect 71 fPar_ Transportation Group. Grand Prairie) -Tony and Moosa
talked about same funding issues. Karen Jones will be preparing a spreadsheet to show the lotal cost estimate and timeline 10 help identify how much· money Is necessary for each phase
of the projects. Parsons Transportalion Group anticipates the firsl 13 locations will be complete by Friday or nex! Monday. The . communication plan at 31 locations are potentially available
next week. The central core communication plans will be reviewed by Gordon Alderman (TxDOT). Project 72 (BI'ldgafarmar • Mesquite/Balch Sprlngll/Sunnyvale) The review of their test plan
has been completed. The plan preparation Is at +30%. The request has been received fr<im Rick Berry (Mesquite) to delete two locations and to add two localions. A TIP amendment is needed.
A copy of the letter from Mesquite will be given to LeDonna·Smith (NCTCOG). Project 73 (Hunter AssocIates • South Dallas County) -A Progress Meeting was held last week. The review Comments
were provided for the 2nd draft of the test design localion. The PM/E had 45 comments. Hunter presented peak hour and 24 hour volume data. Project 75 (Sverdrup. Irving,ICoppaIt) -Sverdrup
has collected data and it is being ·compiled and analyzed. Plojec1 76 (8ucher. Willis &. Ratliff· Signal Retiming. N. Dallasl-BW&R's data collection continues. Tony prepared a draft
leller for the City's consideration which formalized their verbal requests to add Iocatiors. LeDonna will be given a copy of the draft. The Town of Addison is no longer interested in
Joining with the City of Dallas to add the four Bett Una Road localions to the project. Moose noted ihat he has been receiving meeting minutes from Project 75 and 76, but has not received
any on Project 70, in a iong time. Tony said that TxDOT will receive the final report with a complete set of meeting minutes and submittals. D,\GENERAL\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1997\106.DOC 
CMAQ Program Update #106 Page 3 of5 Moosa said that TxDOT does not want to see Project 71's 100% submittal until the 9 Intersections in question are resolved. He also noted that Melanie
Young (TxDOT) has $130K City Force Account reserved for Grand Prairie's CFA. Ivan stated that Project 77 (NW Highway) is not going to happen. Beth Ramirez (Dallas) has talked about another
40 or 50 IntersecUons south of LBJ and the freeway as a possible CMAQ Project. 4. Civil -James Allen James reported the following project status: o·Project 01 (Leftwich a Assoc•• Farmers
Branch) -Review comments are needed on the 65%. preliminary PS&E from the County, City and PM/E traffic. Project 02 (Chiang, Patel a Yerby· Duncanville/Dallas) -Awaiting review comments
on the 95% preliminary PS&E from the County and PM/E traffic. A meeting was held with Harlan Moore, Moosa (TxDOT) and Sid Horner (County) last week to go over ROW issues. Once Chiang,
Patel completes their changes in the ROW documents, the PM/E office will have a good "go-by" to give to the O1her designers. Project 04 (Paragon. Dallas) -The consolidated Schematic
review comments will be sent to the designer shortly. The consolidated comments and the original list of comments will be forwarded to the reviewing agencies for their records. Projects
05 (PBSaJ • Dallas), 10 (USA. Coppell) and 17 (Gojer • Dallas/Garland) -The 􀁩􀁮􀁬􀁾􀁡􀁬􀀠Schematics are under review. Projects 06 (TCB • Dallas) and 07 (Espey, Huston. Grand Prairie)
-The initial Schematic review comments have been consolidated for the designer's dispositioning. The consolidated comments and the onginallist of comments will be forwarded to the reviewing
agencies for their records. . Project 16 (HDR • N. Dallas) -The revised initial Schematic submittal was received two days ago-it will be sent out for review after reproduction. Project
15 (Halff • Dallas) -Review comments addressing Belt Une at Hillcrest and Campbell at Hillcrest are being resolved with Halff. Project 21 (Mateo • Dallas) -The initial Schematic was
received, but it has been rejected for incompleteness. Moosa asked if the finai Schematic for Project 09 (GSW -Cedar Hili/DeSolo/Duncanville) will be held until the scope Issues are
resolved. Ivan said that a contract amendment is currently being worked out. Moosa suggested that the Schematic be advanced to Austin for approval so they can start the PS&E. Ivan stated
that it has to be a complete document prior to submittal to Austin. 5. Erivlronmental -Don Ingram Project. 04 (Paragon • Dallas) -TxDOrs comments were incorporated into the consolidated
comments for the environmental reports. Project 16 (HDR • N. Dallas) -No environmental drawings were received with HDR's revised initial Schematic. After the drawings are received, it
will be sent out for the agencies to review. Projects 21 (Mateo • Dallas) and 24 (Garcia • Dallas) -The draft environmental review comments were sent to the designers for dispositioning.
Project 25 (ABA· Dallas) -The draft environmental review comments will be sent to the designer tomorrow. D:IGENERALIG03MEEl\lJPDATE\19971106.DOC 
Pagt:l4nf17 DMAQ Program Update #106 Page 4 of S Projects 27 (APM • Dallasl and 31 (Wilbur Smith. Dallasl -Don will be reviewing these draft reports next week. &. Project Control-Jim
Bernier Jim continues to work on Exhibit "H". 7. Key Issues Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-County Agreement Modifications· The PM/E's input is being summarized. Exhibit A& B Content -Is open to
discussion. A copy was sent to TxDOT lor review. Continuation of PM/E Services -75% notification lettsr was given to the County. The County has asked some additional questions on ahernatives
to carrying the PM/E services through the completion of the program. Design Review Procedures -Please utilize the design review comment forms. . 8. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ
Meeting will be held on April 2, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overheadfor a listing 01 upcoming milestones. 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus Target Dates County • Regal Row Drawings .................................. , ...................................................
...........................ASAP PMJE • ReVised Pavement Survey /0 TxOOT ........................................................................................ASAP • City of Dallas
Invoice #2 & 3 .................................................................................................. April to TxDOT • Examples ofOversightILAs ...........................................
......................................................... April 4 TxDOTof County I PM/E • TxOOT -County Agreement Modifications........................................................................
.... April to • Exhibit A & B Comments ......................................................................................................... April 4 10. Other Items Ivan requested
that If TxDOT has any examples of federal oversight agreements, they be sent to the PM/E for possible use for the City of Coppell. Mcosa said that the City of Coppell needs to make a
request from Jay Nelson {TxDOn. TxDOT has never done this before In this district arid only 1 or 2 times in the state. Ivan said that he informed the city that if they were going to
perform the oversight, they needed to include all of the intersectiOns. Ivan also noted that the Title 23 book has been getting'compliments. It Is an excellent, concise listing of the
requirements. procedures and responsibilities of a Title 23 project. " . O:\GENEAAL\G03MEEruPDATE\1997\100.0OC 
ClIfAQ "'og''lIm Update If06 Page 5 of5 Meeting Minutes by: 􀁾􀁁􀁐􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀠. \. 􀁾􀀠Ivan F. Nicodemus, Project Manager . Date: {l/Aff. Y7 Attachments XC: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOn
E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT, LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K Rscher (PBes) Date: J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch
Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (CIty of DaSoro) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) D.
Davis (City of Farmers Branch) ,. R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. JohnsOn (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite)
W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L Stewart (City of Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D;\GENERAL\G03MEET\UPOATBl997\106.DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John Baumgartnor Dahl: 412/97 Timo: 10:59:19 Page 6 of 17 ATTACHMENT A CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #106 SIGN·IN SHEET March 26, 1997 214-747-6336 ext. 26 Parsons Brinckerhoff
214-747-6336 ext. 25 214-747-6336 31 Tan 214-747-6336 ext. 28 ESS 214-747-6336 ext. 29 Allen 21 47-6336 ext. 30 214-653-7603 Bud Beene 214-653-7151 Richard Peterson Don Cranford 214-653-7151
Horner 214-653-6354 Salas Camarillo 214-653-6400 214-653-6018 214-653-7151 Farmers Branch 972-247-3131 of Dallas 214-670-7748 214-670-5662 214-320-4432 214-320-4435 214-319-6410 Everett
Bacon NCTCOG 695-9253 Burbank NCTCOG 695-9251 NCTCOG 695-9254 482-5988 ". 
.. \ ! Dallt: Cf;l67 Timo: 10:59:19 Pagel Dt11 ATTACHMENTB CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • March 26,1997 • Genetal • Consultants ". • Traffic • Civil • EnvilOllmentaJ • Project Control General
• Design Review • TIP Coordination • Grand Prairie -Mesquite • City Coordination -Dallas • District3 Concems -ProvidlKl Briellng lIfemos to Directo{ • Collin County -Dallas County ILA
• Escrow Request Preparation • CMAQFacts 
Consultants • Accomplishments • Commissioners Court Briefing -#18 Boy/e, #19 SiR, #20 Kaiser • Implementing Submittal Tracking System (S18) • Pending Contract Amendments -1106 rCB: Delele
Two Locations -County DJrectlon GIven -tHJ9 GSW: Revisions, Add Signs/-PMIE To Respond -tIi24 Garcia: Court Order Aprl/01 -#71 e·p' TIP Modification Necessary. Mesquite To Request -fl.7fj
8WR: Add Signa/Locations -Need CoD's Written Direction • Regal Row Drawings to Wilbur-Smith Submittal Tracking -iii. System " 
From: SAM WUlS Til: p.E .. "DM BaLlmg.mu!r Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) -KHA Status Quo -TRlvei TIme RUM Authorized -ModifiC4tion Due To Signal Controller -Report
Remains <' • GP (71) Grand Prairie -SA -CommunicatioM Plan & 31 Locatlons@30% -First 13 LocatIoM@100% On FrilMon -75% Central Cora Comm Plans Next Week • SE Dallas Co.-MeslSSlSV(72}
-SF -Completed Formal Review OfInitial Plan -Plan PraparatJon At+30% -Request Scope/Cost Proposal Amendmant PI! E = Traffic /lIB. (Colllilllled) • Signal Design Project Development •
Dallas-DunlCHlLanIDeS (73) -Hunter -Progress Mealing Last Week -Review Comments Provided For 2nd Test Design Location -Peak Hour & 24 Hr. Volume Data PlVSooted • InringiCoppell (75)·
Svedrup Data Compilation -Data Being Comp/led & Analyzed, Expect Prasentatinn Next Meeting OfFindings and RecommendatfoM at Aprl115, 3n1 Tue at Coppell 
FroM: SAM WUIS 􀁔􀁯􀁾􀀠P.E.. JoJIn BlIW'D9!arf.tIol Oatil: 4I2l':11 Time: 10:59:19 PB Traffic = aii. (COllti1lUed) • Signal Design Project Development • N DaUas Retiming (76) -BWR Data
Collection -Developed Onlft For City's ReView To Add Locations -Belt Una Rd. Additions in Addison < . • CityScheduled Improvements • No Longsr Intsrsstad • Review OfFistwork Projects
,_ Design Status e. (Trtdfk) -.tComple;' o 10 20 30 40 $0 6? 70 00 to 100 , ._--15, __ I 􀁂􀁡􀁳􀁥􀁬􀁉􀁮􀁥􀁾􀁃􀁡􀁭􀁰􀁉􀁥􀁃􀁳􀀠_ COO'lplet6d5ifU1leat Repoctlflg Period ----
Fnnn:SAMWUIS To: P.E .• Joho8..􀁾􀁯􀁲􀀠Pagen 0117 Civil • Accomplishments • HDR Has Submitted Schematic. • Sending Project 04 Consolidated Schematic Review CommentS To Designer ,. •
Meet with TxDOT to go overRight otWayIssuas • Working with Halff on dispositioned review comments DR 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠iIIIlI. (;1 rn"l'n SnInth 02 C\mCInWIe ..'" """'" 􀁾􀀠'" """ ..""" rrt (htI:J
PtIi!fe 􀀰􀀸􀁾􀀠OIl """"""'",.11 Rk:h1V¢..lDll1lltf 􀀱􀀲􀁍􀁾􀀠13 FtI:I'I'rlIft9nn'.t1 14 LSJ 15 N. Deilu t6 HlII'YMtIFOI'l!II!I tJrI'lw!m CP"t "'" """"'""'" f!SP'f HZ """.... 􀁾􀀠cs
MIxInI tltr.8 Hdf HDR Design Status (Geometric) -"""""""',.......... I Rl'Ip(ItItIg Period BasIlhPeMI'tCompitle 
From:SAMWUIS To: P.E...JoImBawnglUtntlf 􀁐􀁡􀁧􀁾􀀠12 of17 Design Status (GeomelTfc-COltllnued) 19 Ran "''''''''''' ". "'􀀺􀁮􀁃􀀤􀁤􀁡􀁲􀁓􀁾􀀠"'-24 """".. 25 􀁾􀀮􀀠(l.aIlU:.l ABA 26 Ovnlm
ll'. Qmon V Hi!lflYli'llISl APtrII 28 SpMg: IJtlO1 oooc. .2'9 DlauTohW Rust 􀀳􀀨􀀩􀁾􀀨􀂻􀀮􀀠l)1li-"'" 31 􀁒􀁾􀁒􀁏􀀧􀀯􀁦􀀠'NIbs' a'2 PtartaI'llW.Qf'JVCI Dmum -...".............. ""-""""
SllIlGlhG 􀁐􀁾􀁃􀁣􀁭􀁰􀁴􀁯􀁴􀁯􀀠Environmental • Accomplishments • RIWf_commenla -Pro}ect4 -Pto}ect16 -Project 21 -Prn]ect24 -PtOject 25 • OngoIng coordination • Issues • Architecture
photo documentation 
Fmm:SA¥WUlS Ttl: P.E •• JQfmBeumg(Utn1l1' Dah!:4J2J91 Tim,,: 10::59:20 PAg013 ntH PI Project Control 1lIi• • Accomplishments • Exhibit "H" Worl! Continues • B&R Schedule ofVelues ...•
Issues • Project Status for Design Key Issues • TxDOT -County Agreement • Exhibit A & B Content • Continuation ofPMIE Services • Design Review Procedures 
----------------PI I!I!• Look Ahead • NextMeeting • Wednesday, AprIl 3. 1997 .NextMilestones "' 􀁾􀁎􀁡􀀮􀀢􀀨􀁈􀀴􀀧􀁊􀀠idWNTP,,,,..... .. 􀁐􀁦􀁴􀁩􀀮􀁬􀁊􀀨􀀷􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠• Ptq. 80. #am; 􀁾􀁐􀁲􀁦􀁬􀀮􀁦􀀧􀁓􀁤
􀁩􀁴􀀾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠.. Ptq.lfG. 11 fHDIf -• 􀁾􀁬􀁦􀁇􀀮􀁾􀀠• 􀁦􀁗􀀮􀁎􀁡􀀮􀀧􀁉􀁦􀁾􀀠• Ptqj. 􀁎􀁣􀀮􀁯􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠Ptoj.Ho. UfHNTD) -• f"n¥.JhIf(N$.L!l --__RMfROWIIIJfm 􀁉􀁢􀁾• Pn:f....􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠•
PttJJ.AIfb U{t:-3J 􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁡􀁾􀀠􀁒􀁉􀁍􀁬􀁐􀁓􀀦􀁅􀁉􀁭􀁬􀁉􀁬􀁲􀁲􀁾􀀠"' Ptq.1IO. 􀁦􀁏􀁾􀀠-.. P4JJ&. fTC!U 􀂷􀁾􀀯􀁦􀁥􀀬􀁴􀁴􀁲􀁾􀀠• 􀁾􀀣􀁉􀁑􀀬􀁉􀁊􀀹􀁦􀁇􀁓􀁗􀀩􀀠􀀧􀁾􀁉􀂫􀁾􀀧.. 􀁬􀀧􀁭􀀯􀀮􀀱􀁴􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀱􀀮􀁾􀀠C
ClxHt8t/tIfIt/(J .. 􀁾􀁎􀁯􀀮fff8llf ew: 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁉􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁐􀁮􀀺􀁪􀀮􀀮􀁉􀁦􀁯􀀬􀀡􀁉􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀠C 􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁲􀁃􀀡􀁵􀀮􀁶􀁴􀁾􀀠"Ii= ii. Action Items • Coullty • Regsl Row Drawings• PMIE • Re>rised
Pavement Survey to TxDDT • City ofDallas InvoIce #2 & #3 • TxDOT • Examples ofOversight ILAs • TxDOTlCountylPMIE • TxDOT· County AgreementModifications • A&B Comments CMAQCon_Room 􀁴􀁑􀁏􀁥􀁴􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁉�
�􀁉􀁴􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁉􀀧􀁃􀀠􀀮􀀬􀁎􀁴􀁨􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁏􀁉􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁈􀀠􀁖􀁊􀁎􀁴􀁷􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀨􀀩􀁲􀁟􀁴􀀠􀁈􀀢􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁊􀁦􀁃􀀠,," 􀀧􀁄􀁬􀁬􀁥􀀮􀀱􀁉􀁴􀁭􀁥􀁤􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀱􀀢􀁻􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁎􀁌􀁾􀀢􀀣􀀮􀁰􀁉􀀧􀀮􀁲􀁴􀀠􀁕􀁉􀀧􀁩􀁬􀁩
􀁩􀁢􀀮􀁾􀁾__1 􀁡􀁆􀁦􀁢􀀮􀁻􀁾􀁐􀀮􀁦􀁏􀁊􀁈􀁢􀁉􀁤􀀪􀀬􀁫􀁬􀁬􀀠􀀤􀀪􀀧􀁾􀁬􀁗􀁴􀀪􀁤􀁴􀁲􀁷􀀢􀁊􀀠􀁔􀀪􀁾􀀢􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀢􀀱􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁟•.1II uar,.."..􀁾􀁍􀁉􀁮􀀠􀀱􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀯􀁩􀁬􀁤􀁐􀁬􀀮􀀬􀀲􀀠􀀱􀁪􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁲􀀮􀁾..􀁾􀀻""".
'....CC/1lldJlttl1Ap/f1 OClWltngfAprIl CCBrlo/&tit t Apri' r"",.tDates ASAP ASAP Apr/I 10 Apr/I 4 April10 April4 
Submittal Tracking System i!'Submittal Listing 􀁾􀀠i Project: P-15 􀁾􀀠􀁾Albert Hall'f &Associates 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠100% 0 eon_Orawlng HaIff&Ass_ 100% Complete Design Drawings _ Tom Knicker
I 15%ErMROH ----0 --------oraifenViio;;.:;,ei;i.i1 R.iiiOii------Ham&-AioSoClBleS ----------------------i 15% EnvlronmenlaJ Submitlel E!nvironm<ln!aJ Tom KnIck6r 65%---------0 ----------ciOiil";':fo.
a.iliig-·· -----------------------------􀁈􀁡􀁭􀀦􀀭􀁁􀁓􀁓􀁯􀁾65% Design 50_I _ Tom Knicker eMRONMENTA --0 ----------eiWliOiim.;.'iai Report ---------Ham&-ASSodOtN --------------Environmental
RePQII Enllironm.nI11/Tom Knicl<er PVMT9URVEY----0 ---------------S-.;;,jjt;i ------------Hallf&A".;'iii.. ---------------------------------ExI.Yng condition. PaV&llJBl1/Survsy Genetal
Tom KnIck6r QAQC ---------0 ---------------QAiCic Plan -------------Haiji&ASSOCIBleS -----------------------------------------QualItY COntrol Quslity Ass""""", Plen Genetal Tom Knicker
􀁾􀀠ROW----------0------------􀀭􀀶􀁮􀁩􀁗􀁩􀀮􀀻􀁧􀀢􀀭􀁰􀁩􀀮􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁯􀀮􀀻􀀮􀁥􀁩􀁬􀁰􀁩􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁳􀀭-----H.iiI"&ASSOCiat'U---------------------------------------.---. ---------. --􀁾􀀠Right-of-Way
Documents Civil Tom KnlckerSCHEMATiC -----0---oniWi.;g-.ii.i"RePOrt -------. --liam&-AioSoClate. ------------. ---------------------• ----------􀁾􀀠Schematic Dlawingo snd Report Ganeml
Tom Knicker " i 1 <Ii 􀁾􀀠'" Printed:03l3111i17 .' Psge: 1 '9...:>*' 
Submittal Tracking System Submittal History by Number & Revision Project: P·15 Albert Halff & Associates ID NO. & Revision: TiUe: ExIstIng o Rev. ·DiSp.: CompleteJ1)letri_ 07112196 ,.
Haiff &. _.,.. CMAQ Proglll1!l Manager 0QI05I96 l0i1l5lge Complote/Ilislrlbule Tom _r Ivan NJeoc/omus InccmpJete ---ori12196 -􀀭􀁾􀀠􀂷􀁈􀀮􀁉􀁦􀁦􀀦􀁾􀀭-----------CMAQPr.,gmmMiiiia!ii>'
-------ooii"ii96 --10i11196 􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁰􀁾􀁩􀁩􀁵􀁩􀁩---Tom KnIoksr /van _us COmpleIl>tD/_uts (F/rnlJ) _______ mmm 􀁲􀀻􀀮􀀬􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁮􀁬􀁬􀀧􀀠􀀶􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁯􀁴􀁡􀁉􀁁􀁕􀁯􀁷􀁡􀁢􀁬􀀮􀁄􀀻􀀺􀀠--_;;
,__ 􀁵􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀭􀀻􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀠_m 31 f 􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠f{ALL . 􀁾. "' 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠, 􀁾􀀠i 􀁾􀀠55 MISSing one inl<>l$OO'!l.n ---------6" iiiitlic.nipiOiirOr----Distribution to TxOOTI-m--------QAQC
TiDe: Quality Control Quality Asauranc;e Plan Discipline: General Flna,l Disposition:Outstandlng o Rev. Dlsp.:Ou_dlng 07112196 .. Halff & Assoc;lot.. CMAQ Program Manager 06l11il16 For
approval NlA Tom Knick.Br IvSll lVicodemlJs i --------------􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭Total Day. Outstanding: 262 Total Allowable Days: 30 Day. OverdUe: 232 􀁾􀀠iSCHEMATIC
Title: Schematic Drawings and Report Discipline: General Final Disposition:CompleteJDistribute II o Rev. Disp.: CompletelDlslrtbule Ii 11/05Ige ,. Halff & _ales CMAQ Proglllm Manager
111U5Ige 111151ge CompleleJDisl1lbu\e 0 Sdlemotlc Complete on ill Tom Knlcker /van Nk>ldemus Comp/eI<1IDlslribute I'Irst Try. Di.tribllle to --------11iil8J9S ----CMAaProgmm Maiiagsr
--re:..iDipaii.iieOtOrTiiitipO.t.:----l2Tl'ii96--o1iii21iif--Fo,-"",1EiivlcOmme.ii ------------3Ef --SGaliOTiOOirOr-"i<.Vi"': 'van Nic<Jdem"" Gary l'lIyfor Comp/IlteIDf$Iribuf<> Review
Comments to be -------jiiil8f9i ----CMAa p;cg,;;m Manager --Ciiy-';Hliilia. ---------------------11i3&1ia -Fo,-riii!eWicOmme.ii -----------WA -----------Ivan_us Ssm_ -(iiil8l96 -CMAQ
ProgramManage," -------CMAQ program iiarnig8i --------.. ---.. -f1i30196 -'ForriivioWicOmmoni -----------WA --------------. Iwm Nicodemus Tony Tmmsl -(iiil8l96 -CrMa Program Manage,--CMAQPn,g1ll1!lM.
;;. -.. ------------(ii3&9i 'F«-riiViowicOmmoni -----------NiA ----.. -------... Ivan Nicodemus James Allen ----11iil8196 ----erMa pmijriiriiMSiiage..--Diiliim COuniY---------------------1'1130196
-'F«-riiViow;cOmmoni" ----------NIl\" ------------Ivan Moodemus ,Allen Bud8_ --------,2113iii6 ----eMAa pmgmmMaiiag"'--------Diili..6OuniY------. -' ------------01iiJ4/9f -Fo,,,,iiOW7commorlt-------N
it>: --------IVSJl NIwd.mus S/cJ Homer -----------􀀭􀁲􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁣􀁃􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁣􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀴􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠-􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁉􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁹􀀺􀀻􀀭--;----􀁾􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀠------􀀭􀀱􀁾i
􀁾􀀠.. 􀁾􀀠::􀁾􀀠., '-.).lPrinted: 03131197 Page; 1 
􀁐􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁒􀁙􀁄􀁾􀁇􀁎􀁒􀁅􀁐􀁏􀁒􀁔􀀠MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Table 22 Summary of Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects Eldstlng I 􀁉􀀧􀁉􀀧􀁣􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁥􀁤􀁃􀁍􀁁􀁑􀁉􀁾􀀠Final
Re<omnended 􀁉􀁭􀁰􀁲􀁾""""",, ...... ...... """..... -􀀮􀁾􀀠"'"'" ...... --...... ...... -lid ""'" ""'" T""'_ lOS ......... .d """" """" !.OS -'d ""'" """" lOS ......... ......... --"""
M -1M '" """" "E -...... M -"""" !.OS -"'" M _I """" LOS """"" "" , "" 107 '''' 311 "" , '" " "" 1bm.e!UT1!ltj3 iJI """'" ""'" , 1;!lU '.121 '" -""'" , 00 -""'" r-'''..... 1 "" .. ...
'" lOSF, ..... , '" " lOS 0, 􀁾.. 􀁾􀀧􀁉􀁉􀁬􀁉􀁉􀁊􀁉􀁓􀁩􀀤􀁾􀀠LeI 1 ... "" 2!!5 "" 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀠"" 2 '" " Delay=36.4 "" 􀁉􀁋􀁷􀀱􀁭􀁾􀁗􀁬􀁬􀁉􀁮􀀡􀀮􀀧􀁲􀁩􀁹􀀠TMIyMUs """""" ""'" 15 ...
I.'" FG v.t=1-01 ""'" 2 00 ""'" ""'" 1'--".... ... .. '" 􀁾􀁁􀀠J7 lSI .... 1 ... '" 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁇􀁩􀀳􀀠..... 􀁾􀁲􀁮􀁄􀁲􀁬􀀢􀀢􀁦􀁩􀀾􀁷􀀻􀁴􀀮􀀮􀀭"" 1 100 ,. ". 3lIl "" 2 "" " "" tmvlelUflJ1lI¥ilso.w""""'"
"""""" -J 341 1.161 hi' --, 00 --I"'.. "II' 1 Ii) " 111 " lllSF. ..... 1 '''' " lOSo. lOSo. "II' "" 1 \2S " '" '" """.,,, "" 2 "" .. t'dirt=32.4 "" '""""'" -as l'" 511 FG vA;=U3 ""'"
, 00 ""'" -..... OS If. I.. ,.. 211 .... , .. 61 \\t=1l94 ... "" , .. '" '" ,.. "" , '''' " "" 􀁾􀁐􀀴􀁴􀁤􀁲􀀮􀁃􀁉􀀮􀁊􀀡􀁾􀀠""""" ""'" as !ll1 '" 61' !!IE>;!; -J 00 --f--""'"..... M ""
􀁾􀁁􀀠,.; II1l lOO" ... , .. " ""D. ... i"m ...... "" , 115 35 '" "" Deli!)'=49.2 "" 2 '" 76 Dela:t=21i4 "" 􀁳􀁤􀀻􀁮􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁓􀁊􀁉􀀧􀁬􀂻􀀠stmiIVaJey -.. ""'" 2:5 '" ,)<0 61' --3 00 -""'"
1"'''-''"''.... "II' ,. IIA IfA Jl9 247 W;::f111.02 RII' 1 '" 76 ltC:tlBS ... 􀁩􀁨􀁬􀁾􀁢􀀭􀀮􀁢􀁯􀁥􀁮􀀠"" I '''' .. 17. "8 "" , '" ., "" 1-"....-, """"" ""'" 3 1.<" 1.646 61' --, 00 --r--'"F""",
.... I 110 34 '" 31' lCSF, .... I 􀁾􀁁􀀠"" lOSo. .... In---"..... lei I "" 51 ,., "" """'I!a , "" 2 '" " """,,.8 "" 􀁾􀀻􀁴􀁴􀁏􀀤􀁄􀁜􀁜􀁉􀁬􀁊􀁨􀁉􀀠"""""'" -, I."" '.... 61' ""'" -, 00
--f'w'-".... , "" "" 115 lSI *"H18 ..... , !fA II. 1It"'Ci.93 .... IlitoJblI'IIickOOJ lUI I "" .. '" 41' "" 2 ". " loft 2 '''' " 1"-"-........, -, " " F.Il --, F.Il --, 00 -􀁾􀁾􀁗􀁩􀁨􀁾􀁾...
I 􀁾􀁁􀀠"" '" ". lOO" -.. I ,., " lOSF. ... , 100 ,. lOSD. 1-"""""'''lei I .. 15 11 71 Delay'" 50.0 lei I 50 15 ();jay=oo.s "" 1 100 ,. DEl3'j:l2&6 """'-"'""". -.. -,.S • .. 00 ""'"
-M 61l ""'" ""'" " 00 ""'" 1'-.."".....-.... M 􀁾􀁁􀀠􀁾􀁁􀀠• ., \!til 1.01 .... 0.5 II'A "" \It =1.11 .... OS "" .... ""'=6.95 1""'...." ....... "" I '" .. '" 451 "" , ... " tat , ...
" r--.......-, """""" -, '" ltO<l 00 !'!!hit -J nc --3 oc !'!!hit 􀁾􀀭..'"' Cmi'" ""'. I 50 " '" " 􀁬􀁏􀁏􀁾􀀠􀁾.. I I "" " liE", .... 1 ,.. " ""'" -'""" 1 ,., .., ,. '" """2&. "" 2 ""
" \Ailt=224 lot , '''' .., Way=213 r->......,.t;t """""" -3 '-"" ... '-" --J '" ""'" -, oc ""'" 􀁕􀁲􀁩􀁲􀁱􀁾􀀻􀁮􀀱􀀧􀀱􀁴􀁩.... I .. " 1m ." ...... ..... I ,.. " \IJ::=Cl82 .... , ...
76 v};=o.n ----PREDSIGN.RPT 27 C&B Job # 95·2211.010 
Table 22 (Cont'd.) Summary of Iutersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects 􀁉􀁾􀁯􀁬􀀧􀁬􀀠,-p-Existing-Proposed CMAQ Improvements F[nal Recommended 􀁉􀁮􀀺􀀧􀁰􀁾􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁭􀀦􀁮􀁴􀁳-""""""
"""""" S1tI,,. Length 􀁾􀀢􀁱􀀠Ltl'l91h _"I PcakHour Tr;\l'OO \kJluroos Approach lOS {-I 􀁲􀁮􀁾􀁮􀀠LOS ""'"""" S_ Length (FeeQ Storage"_(Meters) Nlproacl1 LOS I-I ffllermon LOS ""'""""
Slllrage Lenglh lFeel) Length ilM""l -'-' cOS 1"""'1 fnterudiol'l LOS''',,''''. .", La... Movement '0' C"", -... #0' C"",AM PM ...." """ "'.." """"" "" , 1 , " 7S 2:l 2:l 12' '{)8 31.
.. '38 '" GO 􀁾􀀠1,0$0, Detay'" 37.4,vk.;o 1,00 􀁾􀀠lOSe. Delay: 1a2 """" Wt,,(t85 Le' , 1 , 150 150 " " GO 􀁾􀀠LOS 0, Delay'" 35.9 􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀠vic "" 0.95 􀁾􀀠LOse• OeIay= 1B.2 ....ft.
\1/(:=0,85 left ""ugh Thtougll Through flight RIght Right _... ""-1 O. '" 125 N/A ,. HlA 330 " 14 13' 14' 44 EJC 'd , OS 􀁾􀀬􀀠'" HlA " IlIA EJC left ThroughThrough "''' "''' rught -􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁕􀁦􀁴􀀧-
1 ,, 115 75 35 " '03 1.249 " '" 1,910 28' CiB Le' 1 3 I '" ,,, '9 " CI8 ", Througll Through """ ."., Rlght -""-1 3 , 100 100 " " 27 􀁾.... 14 .. .."" " 0iC La, 1 ,, 100 100 30 " DIC
L'" """"ft Through Rlg. .,'" ru,ht c-.-....... ,,,""" ""-0' 0.' 1 IlIA WA NIA IlIA 21 ",. 12 ,.. 12 IlJF 􀁾􀀠lOS I), 0eIay=2fi.1 ....'" We=W -lOSF. 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁬􀁕􀀠"""" vic =1,12 ""-,
M ••• HlA NIA NlA NlA IlJF 􀁾􀀠LOSe. Delay::: 211.1 ...... vk=O.as -LOSo. 0eiat=35.7 """"m"'0,.91 L" 1 , 1 100 HIA 30 NlA C/O 􀁾􀀠LOSe, 􀀰􀁥􀁉􀁾􀀽􀀠1'9.5 """,.. vJc'l'O.17 -I.OSC, 􀁄􀁥􀁉􀁾􀀽􀀠235
"""" 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀹􀀰􀀠Through 􀁾􀀠Rlg" RIg. w..""" ""-􀁾􀀮􀀠0.' 1 IlIA ". NlA 38 ".'25,.. '49". <Sl Il!F ....-1 , 1 125 ." ,. '" '" Left 1 1 , 100 ". " " .""""". 􀁾􀀠rug. Rigl!!. -""
"" •,., ,., •60 IlIA " WA " UWi 138 56 I.... ." IlJF ""-,.. ,.. 160 IlIA 4 • NlA 00 lei! • '.5.. 160 NIA " HlA CIC,..... ,..."., Righi rug", 􀁾􀀠So!Jlhtoond ....-1 2.5 •.S ,.. NlA "
HlA 4T9 2,168 " 431 1.28$ .. ",. lell ,.. 05 200 IlIA $1 NlA C/O ""-1 2.5 05 ". .... " HlA CIC""""rught """ Rlg• ""'''m Roo' ''''''''' er_ """"" cel! , 0.' 0.' NlA NlA HlA NlA " I" I"
50 119 73 '" on:> 􀁾􀀠LOS 0, 􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁉􀀩􀁉􀀧􀁉􀀧􀀲􀁓􀀮􀀶􀀠"""". fI/c-Q9' -lOSO. 􀁾􀁡􀁹􀀭􀀲􀀸􀀮􀀵-'. vic-age .... 05 U 1 IlIA 1" NlA ,. CIC 􀁾􀀠LOSe. 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾213 """"Yk=O.as PM ..... 􀁌􀁏􀁓􀁾􀀠Oday"'2t
4 """". m=O.83 "l!--"".... _,ft Rigid Right 􀁾􀀠We5!bound "" 1 0., ,., HlA NIA NlA NIA J9 " " 114 '26 .3 C/O "" 1 1. ,.. 101) NlA ,. HIA CIC ... Thn!ugh """'" """"ft Right ruoht Rlght
Northbound ce' 1 " ••• '" NlA 38 NlA 3" 2,027 17 1!' 1.611i., DID "" • >S "' ". NlA " NlA CIC left 􀁬􀀧􀁨􀁒􀁬􀁵􀁧􀁾􀀠"""'" """"Righi ro,ht Righl Soll1hlxH.Jnd Le' 1 I.' ,., 100 HlA ,.
HlA "4 1,637 " " 1,929 2' DID .... I " ••• 100 NlA " NlA CIC Leo """'" Th1>",. Through Righi ru,. Rlg. GEOMTRC3.xtS 28 C Job #95-2211.010 
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REpORT MIDWAY ROAD CMAQ PROJECTS Table 22 (Cont'd.) Summary of Intersection Geometries for Midway Road CMAQ Projects Existing I Proposed CMAQ Improvements I Final
Reconmended Improvements """"'" """ ..... """.... -""""'" ..... ..... -"""""" ..... ..... -'d ""'" ""'" Tr.&WI.Ire5 lOO """"'" 'd ""'" ""'" lOO ,'d ""'" ""'" lOO ""'""" ,--... """ iF<"!
-.1 .... '" 1""""1 lOO -... """ iF<"! -'1 I'oII!'I lOO -... """ iF<"! -'1 1""""1 lOO "'"""'" LOt 0.' "A WA '" 107 LOt 0.' WA WA WI 0' "A "A 􀁾􀁾􀁪􀀺􀁨􀁡􀁳􀁥--0.' '51 ,. Of --0.' cc --0.'
cc -􀁾ill rro.mut.s nrrO:l... , eo 24 240 n lOl" ... 2 ,,. '" lOl" ... • .,. '" lOl" 1=-.-LOt 0.' WA WA 16 63 Delay'=19.6 LOt • WA WA Delay'= 17.1 WI 05 WA WA Detar= 18.2 􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁉􀁓􀀡􀁕􀁉􀁅􀀡􀁤􀁢􀀢--
.. -, 21 171 CC """" -05 C< """" -05 cc """" 􀁡􀁉􀁾􀁔􀁨􀀳􀁆􀁭􀀠""" ... 05 WA WA 43 .. vJc=O.n ... 05 WA WA vJc=nn ... , WA WA v.l::=0-75 """""""'...... LOt , " 26 43 '26 LOt , ,.. 46
WI • 175 53 resUtsctrnm.nrqhl-, """"'" -,. 􀀮􀁾􀀠2.'(1; co --,. CC --,. cc -_""""d'"''''''' ... 0.' WA WA 14 23 LOSD, ... 0.' WA '" LOSD, ... 0.' WA WA lOl" ""'-""'" WI • ,,. '" m ..
OeIay=31.8 WI • 200 61 Detay=29.8 LOt • '" 76 Delay: 22.3 􀁾􀁾􀁨􀁉􀁾􀀠......... -" 2.m ',692 co """" -" co """" -,. cc """" 􀀱􀂣􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁉􀁉􀀻􀀮􀀦􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁄􀀻􀁬􀁡􀁬􀁤... os WA WA 66
9J vlc= 1.01 ... os WA WA v'\:=O.OO ... 0.' WA WA vic=O.75 􀁾􀁲􀁱􀁾􀀠WI • WA WA 9J .00 WI • WA WA LOt , ". 46--0' '" '24 􀀬􀁾􀀠--, ,.0 --1., '"' -... 0.' WA WA .IB 26 lOlE: ... , .00
30 lOSD, ... 0.' WA WA LOSD, LOt , WA WA '" '94 Delcr/" 58.5 WI • WA WA rm,=:f7.7 LOt , '" 76 Delay= 28.8 .."""'" """""" -0.' " ,.. FA' """" -• F.o """" -1.5 '"' """"S<jarn ... 0.' WA
WA 46 18. v,\:: 1.18 ... , '00 30 v.l::=O,99 ... 0.' WA WA vlc=0-91 LOt • '00 '" 22 .92 WI • .00 30 LOt • '50 46 """"'" """"'" -,. .... 2." 00 --, co PM""" -, co -... ., WA WA 15' .44
lOlE: ... • '00 30 LOSD, ... , '" " LOSO, LOt • .00 '" '" '43 Delay'= 46.3 WI , .00 30 Delay =21.3 LOt • 300 91 Del3)'=2i9 ......... -2.5 2.504 '" EO """" -2.5 IlC """" -,. IlC """"...
0.' "A WA 20 " vic =1.05 ... 05 WA WA vlc=O.91 ... 0.' WA WA vic =0.89 WI 0.25 WA WA " LOt 0.' WA '" WI 􀁾􀀭--0.' 􀀬􀁾􀀠....""" -0.' 􀁉􀁾􀀠CO --n:lda iDZ1g ilSg1a.... 025 WA WA 18 'IB
lOSF, ... , 61 􀁬􀁏􀁬􀁾􀀠... 􀁔􀁢􀁴􀁾􀁏􀁳􀁑􀁊􀁬􀀱􀁬􀀱􀁉􀁹􀀠LOt 015 WA WA 6 32 Delay'> 15 LOt , '00 30 Delay =3.7 WI famied IJt 􀁾Iigls en 0,;_ ......... -0.' 􀀬􀁾􀀠m""" -os cc """" -fIIIEb,\rqmIlldO:
:d!!y ""''' ... 0.25 "A WA 4 20 vic> 1.0 ... os '" WA v,\: =QJ8 ... ...-LOt , '00 30 '32 6J LOt • .50 46 LOt ,..",., """"'" -,. 949 2.626 FA' --2.5 NB --em", ... 0.' WA WA J5 7 lOSF.
... 0.' WA WA lOla ... LOt , '00 '" , 7 OeIay>IS LOt • '00 30 Delay= 11.6 LOt "'""""" -,. .042 .m FA' m""" -,. NB """" -... os WA WA J9 10 vic> 1.0 ... 0.' WA WA vlc=O.69 􀁾􀀠PREDSIGN.RPT
29 C&B Job # 95-2211"()10 
ADDISON AIRPORT " o !l '" "<C 􀁾􀀠REQUIRE. FURTHER ANALYSIS "-:i, 1, ..... ! o l-s:: 􀁾􀀠... o Z .. .! .. 1'1 􀁾􀀠I Not to Scald -ExIstIng -Proposed FIGURE 3 RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
. (6J 
From: P<:IfSORS Brinckerhoff TQ: P.E,. Jt:dm Baumgartner Date: 3128/97 Time: 20:07:35 Page 1 of1 • FACTS J J J J PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS & UPDATES: 􀁾􀁑􀁴􀁉􀀡􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁐􀀮􀀮􀀧􀁏􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀧􀀡􀀮􀁥􀀮􀀮􀁣
􀁦􀁣􀁊􀁾􀀢􀁾􀁊􀀧􀀡􀀮􀀢􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀡􀀡􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁟􀀮􀀯􀁊􀁦􀁯􀁉􀁯􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁅􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁾􀀡􀁟􀀯􀁨􀁥􀀠􀁾􀁊􀁜􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀮􀁦􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁤􀁵􀁲􀁩􀀧􀀡􀀮􀁉􀁬􀀡􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁆􀁦􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀺􀁦􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀿�
�􀀷􀀮􀀮􀀺___.. J Final Plans, Specification & Estimates (PS&E) for Project 02 (Duncanville, DeSoto, & Cedar Hili) was completed and Is now under final review. The Texas Department at
Transpartation (TxDOT) construction lelling is not expected until late 1998, due to the requirements for rights-at-way acquisition. J Preliminary PS&E [65%) was completed for Project
01 (Formers Branch). Leftwich & Assoc. is expected to complete the Final PS&E for these two intersection improvements along IH 35E (Valley View & Valwoodl by mid-summer. TxDOT construction
letting is anticipated for early 1998. J Final Schematic DeSign Submittals for Projects 03 and 08 were approved by TxDOTAustin --nolices to proceed to PS&E stages were issued. Project
03's design improves two Garland Intersections and Is prepared by MK Engineers. Nine Intersections in Duncanville and Dallas are included in Huitt-Zollars' Project 08. Schematic Submittals
received this quarter included: Project 04 -Paragon Project Resources Project 16 -HDR Englne\"flng Project 05 -Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan Project 17 -Charles Gojer & Assoc. Project
10 -USA Protessional Services Four draft Environmental. Reports were submitted for review: Project 21 -Mateo Consulting Project 25 -Arredondo, Brunz & Assoc. Project 24 -Garcia & Associates
ProJee! 27 -APM & Associates Notices To Proceed were issued lor ten design contracts. The design contracts listed below Include 49 City of Dallas improvements with Project Budgets totaling
$12.5 million: Project 22 -TranSystem Corp. Project 28 -Dlklta Engineering Project 23 -MK Centennial Project 29 -Rust Llchllter I Jameson Projee!25 -Arredondo, Brunz & Assoc. Projecl30
DaHech Engineering Project 26 -Carson-Salcedo-McWiliiams Projecf 31 -Wibur Smith Project 27 -APM & Associates Project 32 -Datum Engineering J Project 70's Signal Timing Plans lor 127
traffic signal locations in the City of Garland are in place. Final data collecfion efforts are underway -Kimley-Horn'j tinal report is expected in April . J Parsons Transportation's
Final PS&E for 13 traWc signals in the City of Grand Prairie will be completed the first week of April. TxDOT construction letting should be scheduled .u .Ii '" tU t tor late 1997 for
fhis phase of Project 71. Design at a central core communications"'" 'H" ( 111' , : plan for 31 traffic signallocatians is also underway. iii t .1.1 􀁾􀀠.= ;0.1 •.. i1;l J Draft preliminary
design submittals were received for Projects 72 and 73 for informal n,l·'" .':' :: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁉􀁯􀁾􀀭􀀮-"••-'-'r,::1"....,-r--I1 review. Bridgefarmer [Project 72) is preparing trattic
Signal designs tor 22 locations In '" •., , Mesquite, Balch Springs and Sunnyvale. Hunter Assoc. is designing signal 􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠• 􀁾􀀠•• , improvements for 26 locations Duncanville, DeSoto,
Cedar Hili & Lancaster. Notices To Proceed were Issued to Sverdrup (Project 75) and Bucher, Willis & Ratliff (project 76). Traffic Signal Timing Designs will begin on a total of 130
signals located in the Cities 01 Coppell, Dallas and Irving. II II 11 II I I I I II .􀁾...... -..... _, 􀀡􀀡􀁵􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠"' "1't ?1.. , .. 􀀮􀁬􀁾􀀠.... 􀁡􀁾􀀠t 􀁾􀀧􀁬􀀠?I.' J o I LI:ll
1;1.1 􀁾􀀠i:n:::::cc·· • Conlacl'he CMAQ PlOgrom Office if you-have any que.lions or commenls. (214) 747-6336 • FAX (214) 741-"37 • E-Mail cmaq@onramp.ne' • .. Addison· Bolch Sprirlgs"
Carrollton" Cedar Hill· Coppell· Dallas" Dallas County· DART· DeSo10 • Dunconv'l1e 􀀢􀁆􀁯􀁦􀀧􀁮􀀧􀁩􀁥􀁾􀀠• FHWA· Gor:on,oj • ., Grond Prairie· I .. loncostet. Mesqui!e 􀁾􀀠NOCOG ,. Rlchcrd$Ol1
􀁾􀀠􀁒􀂢􀁷􀁉􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀮􀁓􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁃􀁨􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁥􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀠
.2 􀁾􀁁􀀮􀁲􀁬􀀧􀁾􀀧-...􀁾􀀠p=-:7'ifl-IZU) ",-"A . "., .. 􀁾. ./(s 8€J ef'4 J C> tfC pJL-.JI) At CT. p /7P /-2-2}) Xc?!:J ;5i .fI . Jf 􀀩􀁐􀁾􀁉􀀧􀀱iJ -II 3 _.. -..---.---.,25/. 
To: File -Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones Date: May 27, 1997 Subject: CMAQ Program Update 1111 Conducted April 30, 1997, 2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office Attendees: Sign-In Sheet
-Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Don Cranford Dallas Co. '. Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBCS Sid Horner Dallas Co. Jim Bernier -Proj. Controls PBCS Dave Davis Farmers Branch Tony
Tramel, Traffic DTA Ali Malekouti Dallas James Allen, Civil ARS Walter Ragsdale Richardson Don Ingram, Environmental ESS Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included
as Attachment B. Infonnation discussed in addition to 􀁴􀁾which is contaIned on the overheads included: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus Design Review -Efforts continue. Meeting with the City
of Dallas -A meeting will be scheduled next week with the City of Dallas (Jack Antebi) to discuss budget status issues. TIP Coordination -The PMJE provided NCTCOG with the detail listing
of the County's CMAQ Program's 'Various Intersections" entries in the TIP. NCTCOG reported that now now all TIP entries are reconciled with the PMJE records. . City of Dallas Invoice
-The review of Invoices #2 and #3 is complete. Hazel Baker (Dallas) agreed with the PMJE's review comments. A Briefing Memo· and Court Order for payment has been prepared for the County's
review. Collin-Dallas County ILA -Jack Hatchell (Collin County Commissioner) was informally informed of the intention of Dallas County to agree to an ItA for participation in the CMAQ
Program. The ItA is not on the critical path; however, it is a bookkeeping and accounting task that needs to be done. Escrow Requests -All further progress on escrow payments to TxDOT
are on hold pending finalization of the administrative cost issues. An amendment to the TxDOT Sunset Bill dealing with recovery of administrallve charges has been brought to the legislative
arena. This issue will most likely not be resolved until the legislative session is over. Dave Davis (Farmers Branch) attended the snc meeting last Friday. He said that the meeting presented
even more uncertainty of the ultimate changes to TxDOT's administrative charges. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Notice to Proceed Meetings -This process is now complete for the current
CMAQ Program. Meetings completed this week include: Brown & Rqot -Project 19 April 30, 9:00 a.m. ICF Kaiser -Project 20 April 29, 1:30 p.m. Ove, " Century of Engi_rlng Excellence D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\U
PDATE\1997\111.DOC 
Dab!:5/2.8197 Tinte:16::10;S5 PagD 2 012:5 CMAQ Program Update 6111 Page Z ofS Pending ContractAmendments: • Project 06 (TGB) -The consultant's revised fee is under review: the PM/E
will be dise!lowing the environmental claim. The net result will be a credit to the contract amount for the two deleted intersections and the modified scope on another. There is a $4,000-6,000
difference to be resolved. • Project OS (Huitt-Zollars) -A Briefing Memo is being prepared for the additional survey request due to construction. • Project 09 (GSW) -The Court Order
will be presented May 6. • Project 72. (Brldgefarmer) • ARS is reviewing the apparent ROW data prepared by Dallas County. and will respond to Bridgefarmer and the City of Balch Springs.
Awaiting TIP modification from the Gity ofMesquite (May) to add an Intersection. '. Project 76 (BW&R) -A Briefing Memo is being prepared to add two signal locations. Regal Row Drawings -Drawings for the thoroughfare improvement
were sent to Wilbur Smith (Project 31). There is no electronic CADD file other than the raw COGO points file. Out ofScope Worn by the Consultanlll -The consultants have been cautioned
once again not to cut side deals and to not work beyond their scope without notifying the PMlE first. . 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Klmley·Horn • Garland) The City of Garland
has been approached to present the CMAQ Project for the summer TexlTE meeting. There is also a possibility that the project will be featured at the nationallTE session. Project 71 (Parsons
Transportation Group • Grand Prairie) -The nine TxDOT PS&E packages (Phase A1) were submitted. The specs and estimates are being reviewed by TxDOT, PMiE and the City. The PMIE Is awaiting
the Central Core Communication Plans (75%), expected this week. Review comments on the typical CCTV sheets, and the Phase A1 specs and estimates are being ccmpiJed. Project 72 (Brldgetarmer
• MesquitelBalch SprIngS/$unnyvale) -In addillon to the Mesquite request to modify the scope, the City of Balch Springs has requested to add 1 signal location to the scope. A formal
request is needed and a request for a TIP modification to NCTCOG is also needed. ARS is assisting in the ROW Issues in the City of Balch Springs. The monthly Progress Meeting was held
last Thursday •• Brldgefarmer is close to having a set of 75% plans ready to submit. Sid Horner (County) said thet he had some information on the three intersections In Balch Springs.
Ivan stated that the PM![ had received plat books from Richard Peterson (County). But Sid indicated that he had additional information on the current and previous ROW that was on microfiche,
and he will provide that information to James Allen. Project' 75 (Ivard"", • llving/Coppell) . Review comments on 2 tech memos are being compiled. Tony stated that In general the comments
requested thai more documentallon is needed. Project 76 (Bucher, Willis & RatliH • Signal Retiming • N. Dallas) -BW&R's data collectron is 90% connplete. The critical Intersections with
the max bend widths are In the NS/EW progression according to the HCM models. Two more intersections have been asked to be added to the scope. Tony staled Ilia! there are between ZJ
and 28 sheets of reView comments on the traffic aspects of Chiang, Patel's 95% PS&E for Project 02. He reported that his review Is about 95% connplete. D:\GENEAAL\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1997\11'.DOC

CMAQ Program Update 11111 Page 3 of5 4. Civil -James Allen James reported the following project status; Project 05 (PBS&J • Dallas) -A meeting was held with Cal Bostwick (PBS&J) last
Thursday to go over the consolidated review cornments. Review comments are expected to be disposltioned by the consultant by this Friday. Project oe (TeB • Dallas) -A meeting is SCheduled
tomorrow 􀁷􀁾􀁨􀀠TCB 10 review the dlspositloned Schematic review comments. Project 10 (USA· Coppell) -The initial Schematic review comments have been consolidated; , however. there
is an environmental and ROW issue that has cropped up. The environmentalist is' required to give a recommendation so that the City of Coppell can devise alternatives if possible. Pre,jects
13 (WP Mo_ • Farmers Branch) and 14 (HNTB • LBJ) -Awaiting agencies' review cornments lor the Schematic submittals. Pre,ject 21 (Mateo. Dallas) -The initial SChematic Design submittal
has been received, and after reproduction, will be edvanced for agency reviews. Project 'Z1 (APM APM • Dallas) -A meeting was held this morning to discuss traffic and ROW concerns. The
issues and recommendations will be summarized in a letter for resolution with the City of Dallas. The issues are at the intersection of Harry Hines and Southwell and include: 1. At the
NW corner where there is a shopping center, the road is built very close to the building. There is minimum setback, but to avoid ROW this setback could be reduced from 3M to 1.SM which
would leave the existing ROW as fi currently exists at the base of the railroad tie retaining wall. This minimum setback would still allow enough room for a curb and sidewalk. 2. A left
turn lane instead of a right turn lane is recommended based on the traffic analysis. 3. There is money left over in the TIP Budget which could be applied to an additional improvement
on another leg that would greatly enhance the operation of the intersection. APM will be writing a letter and sending some sketches addressing these issues. S. Envtronmental . Don Ingram
Project oe (TCB • Dallas) -Exceptions on the Schematic review comments were resolved. Project 10 (USA. Coppell) . Coordination continues with Oyekan 􀀨􀁳􀁵􀁢􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠to WP
Moore) at Sandy lake at Moore on the storage tanks. Project 13 (wp Moore • Farm.... Branch) -The Schematic Environmental Reports have been received. These reports were not included with
the Schematic Report and Drawings. Project 14 (HNTB • LBJ) -The Schematic Environmental Reports were not submitted with the original Schematic, and are overdue. Pre,jects 22 (TranSysterns
• Dallas) and 23 (MK Centennial • Dallas) -The 15% draft environmental submittals have been receilled. The ccmments for Project 23 are ready to be sent out. Don talked to Moose Saghlan
(TxDOT) in regard to the MAPO effort required on Davis Street between Westmoreland and Hampton. This effort was intended to be minimized; however, the letter writing appears to have
escalated to a public meeting. Don Cranford [County} asked if ROW will be taken. James replied· thai there is some head-on parking that Is going to be eliminated. The meeting, if necessary,
is to be run by TxDOT. Don noted thai 75% of the draft Environmental Reports are completed. D:\GENERAL\G03MEET\UPDATE\l997\111.DOC 
Page 4 of 25 CMAQ l'flJgram Update #111 Page 4 of 5 6. Project Control-Jim Bernier Ivan staled that Jim Bernier has accepted a position on DART's General Engineering Consultant team.
He will be performing the project scheduling and other project control related duties. Ivan thanked him for his work on this project and in the past and wished him well. Jlm's last day
Is this Friday, May 2. PBCS contract employees will flll in until a permanent replacement can be found. Jim has updated seven projects this week Also, has been writing procedures to
help the person taking over his duties. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus " TxDOT.countyAgreement Modifications -Gary Taylor (TxDOn continues to wor\( on the agreement. ExhibitA & B Content
-TxDOT and County are still revieWing the proposed listing. Continualion of PM/£. Services -Ivan continues to work on a letler requested by the County on alternatives to carrying the
PM/E services through the completion of the program. a. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on May 7, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of
upcoming milestones. 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus TargBf Dates County .• Regal Row Drawings ......................................................................... , .......................
, ........ Complete • Balch Springs ROWAssistance .......,... ,........,.....,..........,....., ................................................... May 8 PMJE • Revlsad Pavement Survey
to TxOOT ...........,',......................................,... ,... ,......,""",.,...........ASAP • 1998 Bond Input to the City of OaJla5...........................................................
.............. " ...... On-Going • Grand Prairie's Escrow to TxDOT· Court Order.................................................................. On Hold • 75% NotificatlonAdditionaJ
Information ........................................ " .." ...."" .. ,...,."""......",, ....,May 2 TlcooT􀁾County I PM/E • TxDOT -CountyAgreement ModlflCation5........................................
.................................... April 18 • Exhibit A & 8 Comments ....................................................................................................... April 18
Mesquite • TIP Amendment....................., .......................... , .......,............................................. , .................... May 10. 􀁯􀁴􀁨􀁥􀁲􀀧􀁾􀀠Dave
Davis (Farmers Branch) said that he had completed and sent back the comments for Project 13 and 14. In the comments he requested deleting an intersection. Ivan requested that Dave send
a separate letter requesting the deletion. Dave also wanted to know if all the proiects (38 consultants) were underway. Ivan replied yes. Dave congratulated.the County and the PMIE for
achieving this milestone. Ivan said that he would be writing a Memo to File on Camp Wisdom at Cockrell Hill indicating the status and the direction necessary to move this project into
ROWand Construction stages. TxOOT hes sent a letter to NCTCOG addressing their budget concerns for this intersection. D:\GENERAL\G03MEE1\UPDATB1997\lll.DOC 
rnm:SAMWUIS To: P.E,Jof!nBllIImglVtfter CMAQ Program Update #111 Page 5 of 5 A letter was sent to TxDOT on the 8 issues that were raised by Chiang, Patel (Project 2). Four were sent
back to the consultant to change and 4 were returned to TxDOT. Meeting Minutes by: Ivan F. Nicodemus, Project Manager Date: sibeft7 Attachments' xc: Attendeas Charles Tucker (TxDOT)
E. Kelsey Johnston (ixDOT, LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Fischer (PBCS) J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (Cily of Balch Springs)
C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (CiIY. of Cedar Hill) A. Palel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (CilyDf DeSoto) S. Miller (City 01 Duncanville) D. Davis (City
of Farmera Branch) R. Wunderlich (City 01 Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Beny (City of Mesquite) W. Ragsdale
(Cily of Richardson) N. L Stewart (City of Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of SUnnyvale) D:\GENERAl\G03MEET\UPDATE\1997\111.DOC 
ATTACHMENTA CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #111 SIGN-IN SHEET April 30, 1997 Allen 
from; SAM WUJS Tu: P.E.. Jo'hn BaumgertnOf 􀁐􀁱􀁥􀁬􀁡􀁦􀁾􀀠ATTACHMENTS CMAQ PROGRAM l1li. UPDATE " • April30, 1997 • General • Consultants • Trafflc • Civil • environmental • Project
Control l1li. General" • Design Review • TIP Coordination • GrandPraltle • Mesquite • City ofDallas Invoice • .Collin County -Dallas County lLA • Escrow Request Preparation 
1. ATTACHMENTB "4'-􀁃􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁵􀁕􀁡􀁮􀁾􀀠• Accomplishments o Notice to Proceed Meetings -Completed o Pending Contract Amendments -#06 TCB: Reviewing ConsultantsResponse -#08 H·Z: Preparing
Briefing Memo -#09 GSW: CC Order-May 6 -m B-F: TIP Modification N_ry-Muqul!e To Request ARSEvaluating Balch Springs ROW -#16 BWR: Preparing BrIefIng Memo o Regal Row Drawings to Wilbur-Bmith
-FofWarded, Hand Dmtlng, No Elactronlc FIles ExIst o Out ofScope Work by Consultants p,e. Traffic • Signal Design Project Status o GAR (70) • Status Quo . • GP (71) Grand Prairie • Parsons
Transportation Group -F//8t9 PS&E Submitted· S&E SUbject To 5 Day Review Proc_ -Awaiting CentnJI Core Communication Plans (15%) -CompHlng ReviewCommenls Typ Comm.1S&E • SfDallas Co.-MeslSSlSV(72)
-SF -Requut To Add1 Location Received -ROW Asslstance/n Salch Springs -Progress Meeting Lut ThU/8(/aY -Amending Contract Remains 
From:SAMWUIS To: P.E., JOJIII B.II.IIlhgartfmr Date:S/2W91 TIme: 16:10:55 P.9of25 Traffic (OIntinued) • Signal DesIgn Project Status (Continued) • Irving/Coppell (75) • Sverdrup -Compiling
Review Comments On 2 Tech Memos • N Dallss Retiming (76) • BWR -Data CollecUon & CompflMlon:l: 90% Complete -Critical Xsectlon 50% Complete -ModirlCation OfScope to CommlssfonerCourt
(For Two Additional Locations) • Review OfFlatworl< Projects. Consolidating Comments Into Electronic Format (Project 02, 95"") Design Status /,!!t. (Tuffic) " ----._-7,, __ II .... N.O".......
_ 
Dato:5/28191 TIme: 16:1655 Page. 100125 liB ISS• Civil • Accomplishments • Pro} 05 PBSJ • Consolidated Comments sent back to designer • Reviewing Pro} 21 • Meet with AMP to go over schematic
requirements • Meeting with TCB on disposition comments • Isslie • PI Design Status (Geo/1llll1'lc)ISS. _Complete -. 0; FIrI'Mr1 Br.mc:tI 􀁾􀀠"'.......-"'" ....... ""........... "'--I
.. "'"" "'" trI 􀁇􀁲􀁡􀁉􀀴􀁾􀀠ESPY .. _ HZ,,-11) (IOppIlI USA 􀀱􀁦􀁾0)W.a'I 12"""" C8 l' FtImMnI er.m 􀁾􀀠 14W NNTB 15 H. D** twII' 􀀢􀁾􀁯􀁭􀁴􀀠HOR 
Fnun: SAM WOJS To; P.E., John Baa.imgw1nef OeM:smi91 Tim,,:16:10:56 Page 11 of2S Design Status (O""mdrit!· Continueil) 􀀱􀀮􀀷􀁾􀀠oq. 1BUwOfik 􀁾􀀠1$ Rca SIR 􀁾DdpHn tan« It 8uc:tMr Wat.o
􀀲􀀱􀀺􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁭􀀠13 􀁃􀁥􀁃􀁉􀁲􀁾􀀠lI<c.nt. 􀁾GnlerMh GWa 􀁾N. 0IiIII2 ABA 2IS 0ttIII::in Dr. CIIwIn :z.r 􀁾􀁈􀁬􀁍􀁉􀀠-M'fI 28 $pring V..". DIdIit 2t Odu T..., IMt 􀁾􀀠0tnI0ttCQ. 􀁄􀁉􀁉􀁯􀁾􀀠3t
􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁉􀁉􀀠WIW U Ptu!MYI.p;I: Od.m _ <:,,,,,.,,,.,18'-"'"---" IBII• Environmental • Accomplishments • Consolidated Review Comments -Project 23 -Project 10 • Ongoing coordination • Issues
• Davis Street MAPO requirement 
•• S'AMWUIS To: P.E •• Juhll BIllIMgattfter Data: 5(28/91 Time: 16:10;58 PagtI!12of25 '1 Environmental Status ......... .-...• liB = ""lis• Project Control • Accomplishments • Writing
Procedures • T ProJGfs Updated • Issues • Projett Status for Design • Last Day on Project, May 2 
------------------------Date: 512&191 TIme: 16:10:56 Paaa 13 0'25 PI e. Key Issues • TxDOT -CountyAgreement • Exhibit A & B Content , • Continuation ofPMIEServices • Design Review Procedures
I'll. Look Ahead .NextMeeting • _Ndajl\ May 7. 1997 .NextMilestones 􀀧􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁟􀁾􀀠., ProJ..-_tcf*aJzt 􀁾􀀠'1ft/. JIo. n tcJ!IJ 􀂷􀁦􀀧􀁦􀁴􀀣􀁉􀀮􀁬􀁦􀁯􀀮􀁡􀁾􀀠􀂷􀁦􀀧􀁦􀁴􀀣􀁉􀀮􀁍􀁯􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠•
• 􀁾􀁫􀁴􀁴􀀨􀁄􀁦􀁗􀁡􀁴􀁉􀁊􀀠􀀮􀁦􀀧􀁦􀁴􀀣􀁉􀀮􀁈􀁯􀀮􀁦􀁴􀁾􀀠• 􀁐􀁲􀁦􀁉􀁉􀀮􀁉􀁬􀁢􀁏􀁦􀁾􀀠• • PrfII.lfo.ft,.CIV .. Ift/._to pc...., • ProJ..Ho._(G:M1 • AqI....sl""'J 􀂷􀁁􀁱􀁬􀀮􀁳􀀮􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠•
• f'ft#I.k_{H-IJ • I'tftI.Mo.UtMTUI 􀂷􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁟􀁮􀁾􀀠• AqI. ""IftWIIIurJ • JlWlj,No..n((kifIJ • 􀁦􀀧􀁦􀁴􀀣􀁉􀀮􀁎􀁯􀀮􀀮􀀢􀁾􀀠__IftUIROW-. 􀁨􀁉􀁾-_... 􀁾􀁐􀁎􀁉􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀠-"'"-"'"􀁾􀁦􀁴􀀺􀁉􀁴􀀢􀁁�
�􀁉􀁤􀀡􀁬􀁦􀁯􀁉􀁲􀁤􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀮ceo-_... .,..PhILN«.MII' _...... _........ 0&4.,..,....􀀬􀁦􀁴􀁦􀁬􀁸􀀺􀁃􀀮􀀬􀀬􀁾_.􀀱􀁩􀁉􀁉􀁴􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀮􀀠􀁉􀁢􀁔􀀻􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀢􀀧•." 􀀮􀀬􀀴􀀮􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁯􀁴􀀧􀁟􀀢􀀠􀁖􀁔􀀢􀀮�
�􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁦􀀠.tf .....􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁯􀁴􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁴􀀠􀁵􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀮..􀁴􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀠......,....."".....,.."". "". 14...􀀨􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁴􀀺􀁉􀁲􀁟􀀧""..'t'MnbIII"'" '"",''""," •• •• •• 
$AMWUIS To: P_E_•.,101m BaumgeltJler 0ahI: 512$191 Ttmlll! 16:1056 Pago14 0'25 p,9. Action Items • County• Regal RowDrawings • Balch Springs ROWAllSistanc« • PMIE• Revilk#1d PavmentSurvey
to hDOT • 1999 Bond Input to CIty ofDellas • GP Escrow to hdot· CourtOrder • 75% Notifir;at/on AddltlollallnfonmrtJon • TxDOT/CountyIPMlE • TXDOT. COunty AgrumentModIfications • A&S
COmrmlnts • Mesquite• TIP Amendment Tal!lMDatu COmplete MayS ASAP On-Golng On Hold May2 Aprfl1S April 18 May 
From: SAM MJlS Ta: P,E.. John BllIImgMtnGr Ode: 5/23N11ime: 16:10:56 Page 15ot25 Memorandum TOI File -Meeting 􀁍􀁩􀁾􀁲􀁓􀀠From: Karen M. Jones,,\) Date: May 27,1997 Subject: CMAQ Program
Update 1112 Conducted May 7, 1997,2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office Attendees; Sign-In Sheet· Attachment A . Karen Jones, Ass!. P.M. PBCS Sid Homer Dallas Co: . Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA
Scarlett Tandy Dallas Co. James Allen, Civil ARS Ali Malekouti Dallas Don Ingram, Environmental ESS Karen led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment B..
Information discussed in addition to l1Iat which is oontalnn on the overheads included: 1. General -Karen Jones Design Review -Efforts continue. Supplemental Information for 75% Notification
-The PMJE has provided Dallas County with supplemental information based on their earlier requests. Submittal Traaklng System -The tracking sollware is Installed and functional.. Lopez
Matthews and Sam Wuis are working on collecting the submittal history to be input. TIP Coordination -The TIP modifications involving the CHles of Grand Prairie, Mesquite and Balch Springs
are outstanding, City of Dallas Coordination -The '98 Bond Program support continues. Jack Antebi (Dallas) is currently determining what type of information and format will be needed
in addition to Information already submitted by the PMJE. A Briefing Memo has been prepared along with the draft Court Order for the City Force Account Invoices 2 and 3. The County staff
is reviewing them a.nd Karen Indicated that she was not sure when the briefing would make the Commissioners Court agenda. Co/lin-Dallas County ILA -No progress. Ivan Nicodemus will resume
work on his return next Thursday. Escrow Requests Preparation -On hold until TxDOT resolves the 􀁡􀁤􀁭􀁩􀁮􀁩􀁳􀁬􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀠costs. 2. Consultants -Karen Jones Pending Contract Amendments:
• Project 06 (TCB) -The PMIE has responded to TCB's second fee proposal. A final offer is expected soon. • Project 00 (Huitt-Zollars) -The Briefing Memo for additional surveying has
has been submitted to the County for review. It is a $3,000 Increase for survey work necessary because of construction. • Project 09 (GSW) • The Court Order passed on May 6 for Contract
Amendmant 01. They will receive an NTP for the additional signal work and revisions based on TxDOT ccmments thai came in after the Schematic review was complete. • Project· 72 (Bridgefarmer)
• TIP modnications are necessary before finalizing the contracl amendment Briefing and Court Order. The Cities of Mesquite and Balch Springs are going to be requesting these TIP mods.
D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPDATEl1997\112.DOC 
O.vc:${2JJrgl Time: 16:1U::56 Pag1l16.ot2:5 CMAQ Program Updaf. #112 Page 2 of 4 • Project 73 (Hunter) -An amencment is needed for the administrative clean-up documenting the reduction
of $1,800. The Brieftng memo Is aI the County for review and should be on the May 20 agenda. • Project 76 (BW&R) -Two additional signals were added to the contract for a total of +$4,000.
The Briefing Memo has been submitted lot County review. Design Consultant Invoice #15 -Five consultant invoices qualify for this invoice. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimley.Hom
• Garland) -Data is still outstanding from Hope Higginbotham (Metro Counts) and Unda Larkins (Quality Counts). Kimley-Horn is checking on the status and their schedule Impacts. K-H moved
their office this past weekenc which has also delayed the Final Report. Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Group • Grand Prairie) -Parsons Transportation finalized their specs and estimale
for the nine intersections (Phase AI). The PMIE will be submitting the consolidated spec spec and estimate review comments to PT tomorrow for their resolulion. 75% PS&E for 31 locations
and communication plans are expected any lime. The consolidated review comments for the CClV documents were returned to PT for resolution. Project 72 (Brldgefarmar • Mesquite/Balch SpringS/Sunnyvale)
-Progress continues. The target date is the end of May for the 75% PS&E submittal. Tony noted that he feels they are on track and when their product Is received there should be a minimal
amount of review comments. Project 73 (Hunter • Cedar HIlI/DeSotoJDuncanvlllB/Lancastar) -The consultant continues to struggle. The PMIE owes Hunter some review comments. Project 75
(SVerdrup. Irving/Coppell) -Two tech memos are being reviewed, Comments Will be consolidated and sent back to the consuttant this week. Project 76 (auchar, Willis a. Ratliff· Signal
Retiming • N. Dallas) -The monthly Progress Meeting is next week. The preliminary results will be identified anc discussed with the City of Dallas' staff before finalizing the first
technical memo. Tany reported that his review of Project 02's 95% PS&E is complete (submitted 28 pages of traffic comments). He staled that the level of effort was more signHicant than
expected. He will be reviewing Projects 13 (WF Moore -Farmers Branch), 14 (HNTB -LBJ) and 21 (Mateo -Dallas) next. 4. Civil -James Allen James reported the following project status:
Projects 08 (TCB • Dallas) and 17 (Go)er • DallaS/Garland) -Meetings were held to discuss the dlsposltloned review comments and to assign responsibilities to comments that require further
􀁲􀁥􀁳􀁯􀁴􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀯􀁣􀁬􀁡􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀮􀀠Gojer had two questions remaining and they will be working with the City of Dallas to resolve. Project 07 (Espey, Huston. Grand Prairie)
-A meeting is scheduled for tomorrow to review the ' dl!\positloned comments. Project 08 (HulHoZollars • Richardson/Garland) -Received H-Z's preliminary (65% PS&E) submittal for the
two projects that the City oi Richardson is funding. The PMIE is packaging them up and sending them to the City of Richardson for review. Donna Manhart (H-Z) was given some "go-by's"
for signals. D:\I3ENERAL\G03MEET\UPDATE.\1997\1i2.00C 
CNlAGAOfIranJ Update t/11flPage 3 0'4 Project 15 (Halff· Dallas) -The PMIE was given direction by the City of Dallas to resume design work on Spring Valley Road at Hillcrest Road. The
NTP for the PS&E package will be given to Half! next Wednesday. "'ojects 13 (WP Moore. Fanners Branch). 14 (HNTB. LB..) and 21 IMateo -Dallas) -The Initial Schematics remain under agency
review. James reported that he has informed Ali Malekoutl (Dalles) that HNTB is performing some work at Sylvan Avenue at Irving Boulevard that appears to overlap TranSystems' (Project
22 -Dallas) design services. HNTB has sent a sketch for coordination purposes. The sketch will be reviewed to see if the intersection needs to be dropped or nthere needs to be additional
Improvements. James said that the sketch showed there is a left turn lane coming off the bridge and it looks like TranSystems is proposing to add a right turn lane at this location.
This needs to be resolved in the next few days. 5. Environmental -Don Ingram Don reported that the the following Schematic Environmental Reports had been submitted and each had missing
or insufficient elements. Leners were sent to each consultant specifying the shortiaJls. ProJect 10 (USA. Coppell) -Drawings were incomplete. ProJect 11 (Oyeklin • RlchardsonJDallas)
. Drawings did not have enough environmental Information. Project 14 (HNTB • LB.J) . Drawings were incomplete. Project 21 (Mateo. Dallas) -Except tor the missing drawing, submittal is
acceptable. Draft Environmental Reports were submitted by the folloWing consultants and are under review: ProJect 22 (Tranaystems • Dallas) -Aboul 50% has been reviewed. Review comments
should be complete by the middle of next week. ProJect 25 (ABA. Dallas) -The review will. start on the next week. ProJects 06 (TeB • Dallas). 07 (Espey, Huston • Grand "'alrla) and 17
(Gojer • Dallas/Qarland) . All the envlronmental issues noled In the review comments have been resolved. MAPO letters are being prepared for Project 15 (HalH) and 09 (GSW). Project 06
(TCB) is on hold until resolution of the TxDOT's direction for a public meeting is clarified. 6. Project Centro. -Karen Jones Karen stated thaI the PM/E office has hired a temporary
part-time person for the Project Controls position until a full-time person is found. Tomorrow a candidate Is coming in for an interview. The monthly program schedule update will be
complete next week. 7. Key Issues -Karen Jones TxDOT-County Agreement Modifications -Gary Taylor (TxDOT) continues to work on the agreement. EXhibit A & B Content -PM/E awaits County
and TxOOT comments. Continuation of PMJE Services -Ivan prepared the supplemental Information and it will be given to the County today, 8. Look Ahead -Karen Jones -Next CMAQ Meeting
Will be held on May 14, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upooming milestones. O:\GENERAl.\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1997\112.DOC 
From; SAltf WUIS To: P.E., Jobn BUlllgartnor OQte:S/28I!Jl TIllle:16:l0:56 Page 180t25 CMAQ Program Update f11fR Page 4 of4 9. Action Items.. Karen Jones Tametpates County • Balch Springs
ROW Assistance (PM/E is assisting) ................................................................ May 8 PMJE • Revised Pavement Swvey to TxDOT.......................................................
.................................ASAP • 1998 Bond Input to the City ofDallas...............................................................................:. On-Going '.• Escrow to TxDOT.............
..................................................................................................... On Hold • 75% Notification Additional Information ...•.............................•.............
.............................. Complete TxDOTo{ County I PM/E • TxDOT -County Agreement Modlflcetlons............................................................................. May
30 • Exhibit A & B Comments ........................................................................................................May 30 Mesquite • nPAmendment .....................................
...................................................................................... May 10. Other Items James stated that the ROW for the City of Balch Springs (Project 72) has been
surveyed and the research has been completed by ARS. Meeting Minutes by: Approved by: Date: 2tl f'A-t" 7 Attachments xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT. LBJ
Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Rscher (PBCS) J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDoraid (City of Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton)
P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A Patel (City of Ccppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich
(City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City 01 Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Stewarl
(City 01 Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPDATE\1997\112.DOC 
ATT'ACHAfENT A CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #112 SIGN-IN SHEET May 7, 1997 Allen Peterson Cranford Horner I Camarillo Everett Bacon Farmers Branch of Dallas Michael Burbank NCTCOG LaDonna Smith
NCTCOG John Mack FHWA 4-653-6400 4-653-6018 . 4-653-7151 
Oarz:5/28191 Tmw: 16:t6,'S6 P8!l820ct25 A TTACHIrfENT B CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • May 7, 1997 • General • Consultants • TrafIlc • CMI • Environmental • Project Control General • Design Review
• Supplemental Information For 75% Notification • Submittal Tracking System • TIP Coordination GrandPralr1&&Mesqulte • City ofDallas Coordination • 98BondProgram Support • CFA Invoice
2 &3 • Collin County -Dallas County lLA • 􀁅􀁳􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁷Request Preparation -On Hold 
PI 􀁾. Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -flOG TCB: ( ) 2ndFoe Proposal!PMIE Responded -fI()8 H·%: (+3K) Briefing Memo Subm/ItGd For County Review -fI09 GSW:
(+9K) CC Order Passed May 6 -#72 B-F: ( ) TIP Mods (Muqu/te & Balell Springs) Necessaty -#73 Hunt (.2K) Briefing Memo· May 21Yn -#76 BWR: (+4K) Briefing Memo Submlttsd ForCountyReview
• Design Consultant Invoice #15·5 Consultant Invoice Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR(10) • Status Quo • GP (11) Grand Prairie • PTG -S&E Review Comments For 91.ocations
Returned ToPTG -Received Latest EstImatea -Central Core & Comm. Plans (75%) • BE Dallas Co.-MeslBSlSV(12) .8F -Response Needed To SS Request To Add f I.ocation -ROW AssistanCe In BliTch
Springs -AmendIng Contract Remains 
FllIm; SAM WlJIS To: P.E., Jahn SaumglU"tnel PIl!#Q22.af25 Traffic (Contlllue4) • Signal Design Project Status (Continued) • Irving/Coppell(75) -Sverdrup -Compiling Review Comments On
2 Tech Memos -Will Submit To Engineer This Week • N Dallas Retlmlng (76) • BWR -Data CollectIon & CompIlation :!: 99% Complete -Crlt/calXaectIon 90% Complete -PteftlltatlonJDlacusslon
OfInlt/al Findings For Tech Memo 1 • Review OfFlatwork Projects 1" eI• Civil • Accomplishments • Meetings With TeB, Go}er and EspeyHuston on Olsposltloned Comments • ReceIved Huitt Zollars'
Richardson Submittal • rxOOT Approval ofProject 16 Schematic • Issue • 
" 1llI • Environmental • Accomplishments • Submitted Environmental Reports -Project10 -Pmject11 -Project 14 -Project21 -Pro}ect22 -Project25 • Ongoing coordination • Issues • HaneHew
p,1llI. Environmental Status 
Fnun:SAMWUIS To: P.E,JofmBaumgartne:r OIl1B: 5128191 Time: 16:10:56 Project Control ISS• " • Accomplishments • Temporary, Part·TImo HIIU • Interview candldates • Monthly Program Schedule
Update· Next Week <, • Issues • No Project Updates 1" e. Key Jssues • TxDOT .. County Agreement • Exhibit A & B Content • Continuation ofPMlE Services • Design Review Procedures 
----------Fnnn:S.l\NWUIS Tp: P.E..Jpltn6aumgEUtnerDam: 5123191 Till'll:!: 16:'056 P4.g1l 25 at25 PI Look Ahead .Next Meeting • Wednesday, 􀁾􀁡􀁙􀁦􀁦1191 􀁾􀁥􀁸􀁴Milestones 􀁾􀀠PmJ..No.. t1 􀁾􀀠• PmJ..No.. 􀁏􀁦􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁐􀁉􀁯􀀻􀀺􀁯􀁊􀀮􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁊􀀠􀀢􀁐􀁭
􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁉􀁬􀁢􀀮􀁄􀁾􀀠• 􀁐􀁭􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁬􀁬􀁢􀀮􀁦􀀱􀁾􀀠• Ptcj, ..􀀨􀁉􀁴􀁾• 􀀱􀀱􀁮􀁉􀁊􀀮􀁟􀁕􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁉􀀱􀁮􀁉􀁊􀀮􀁎􀁯􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠• • 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁊􀀮􀁬􀁉􀁯􀀮􀁰􀁦􀁾􀀠• PrvJ.Mo. 􀁰􀀺􀁾􀀠• JW.... 􀁦􀁊􀁾􀀠•
hvJ,1IO.71(.!M41PV'• 􀁊􀁗􀀮􀁟􀁮􀁾􀀠I»S 􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀱􀁉􀀺􀁉􀁲􀁾􀀢􀁃􀁃􀁏....._.... ,...&ttIIIOft'f'lllllal'bcow., --....-_ -_.... auflmltFttJ. PSaBrol'ift! 􀁴􀁮􀁾􀁢􀁲􀁉􀁷􀁾􀀠-_ceo -Lti.
Action Items • County • ftIIlch Splfngs ROWAssistance • PMIE• Revised Pavement SUIVI!Y to 'IlrDOT • 1998 Sond Input to CIty01DBilas • Escrow to 'IlrDOT • 75",(, No1IfIcation AddTliona/lnfomutlfon
• TxDOTlCountylPMIE • 'IlrOOT. County AgRIfImflllt Modil1r:ationS • AU Comments • Mesquite • TIP Amendment .o.c.1!I 􀁾nmtd'...,. tpdaOIImI c: 􀁊􀀮􀁰􀁦􀀮􀀢􀁾􀁢􀀩􀁟􀀧􀀠C 􀁍􀀮􀁍􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁣􀁡􀀭􀁷􀁇􀁬􀀯􀁗􀁲�
�􀀧􀀯􀀠C c.... 􀀢􀀢􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀭􀀮-,,",.It ....' 􀁂􀁈􀁯􀁲􀀬􀀨􀁾􀁾􀁉􀁉􀀺􀁉􀁲􀁟􀁚􀀠%twr..,.,...,II:Ir..,., 􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁴􀁉􀁲􀁉􀀯􀁬􀁱􀀧􀀠..,....,.. ASAP On-Galng On Hold Camp/ate MIIy30 Nlt/ylO
May 
:FSl To: Page 1 011 1701 N. Market Street FAX Suile410 Dallas, TX 75202 214-747-6336 1'8<:214-741-1937 from Ivan Nicodemusto All Dallas Branch ASCE Members ASCE Dallas Branch Program
Cl1ainnan May 23,1997 Abstracts Needed for Octoner 1--4 ASCE Meeting in Fort Worth Abstracts are being accepted for papers to be presented at the October 1--4, 1997 ASCE Texas Seclion
meeting in Fort Worth. Pleasse send your abstracts or contact the technical chairperson for information. If you have a paper or an abstract. submit it to the appropriate chairman wtth
a copy of the abstract to the VP -Technical affairs. GROUP CHAIRS Construction & Indrustry Materials Water Resources Barry L. Richey Stephen R, Richards James P. Amick Utility Engineering
ETTL Engineers, Inc. HNTB Corporation P.O. Box 13033 1717 E. Erwin 512 Main St., Suite 717 Amarillo. Texas 79101 Tyler. Texas 75702-6398 Forth Worth. Texas 76102 (806) 359-2430 (903)
595 4421 Office (817) 870-1808 Office (806) 359-2499 (903) 595-6113 (817) 338--4159 FAX Structural Forensic En_mentel Joseph KaUaby Harayana L Sripadanna Steven M. Mendoza Offshore Structures,
Inc. CH&A Corporation Water Development Board 2550 Gray Falls Drive 2218 North Park Drive P.O. Box 13231 Suite 200 Kingwood, Texas 77339 Austin, Texas 78711-3231 Houston, Texas 77077
(281) 358-4441 Office (512) 463-0250 Oftice (281) 584-9300 Office (281) 358-2517 (512) 463-9980 (281) 584-9354 FAX Transportation Geotechnical Hydraulics Melinda Luna Sun-Chai Lee David
NB. Thompson 4411 Spring wood Springs Lamar 􀁕􀁮􀁩􀁶􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁾􀁹􀀠 Texas Tech University Rd. #308 P.O. Box 10024 P.O. Box 41203 Ausitn, Texas 78759 Beaumont. Texas 77710 Lubbock, Texas
79409 (512) 416-2324 Office (409) 880-2356 Office (806) 742-3485 Office (512)416-2292 (409) 880-8121 FAX (806) 742-3449 FAX Mark Your Calendar Abstract Deadline: June:z. 1997 Notification
Deadline: July 1,1997 Paper Deadline August 1, 1997 History & Hertlage Fred P. Wagner, Jr. 5230 18th Street Lubbock, Texas 79416 (806) 799-2413 Residence Professianal John A. Michaiel
P.O. Box 3099 Corpus ChrisH, Texas 76463 (512) 814-9900 Office (512)814-4401 FAX ..."'" w""P"'.,n••.. yo!u,,",,'.v,!!!.,•• ",y",.III,... "".Il!,.!llJ!IN,n!l!an!l!l'-V'VV'!!ILnot n':ceive
all oflhe pages, please cal1(214) T47-6336.O"., .. c.muriiif'-----------------------------Engineering Ex...",.. n .... EWANlEXCHANGE\PAPER\PAPER DOC 
CMAQ From: To: P.E.. John Baumgarlner Dale: 6/26197 Time: 17:14:55 Page 1 011 FACTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM May -June 1997 Issue 13 II, , ! II II ! II II ; ! II II II
of,. ;! I] PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS & UPDATES: 􀁟􀁟􀁟􀀡􀁴􀀺􀀢􀁟􀀧􀀡􀀧􀀡􀀧􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀢􀀭􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀡􀀬􀀺􀁬􀁦􀁸􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀧􀀡􀀮􀁰􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁟􀁲􀁴􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁟􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀢􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀢􀁾􀀬􀀡􀀬􀁉􀀡􀀡􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁉􀁩􀀮􀁾..
􀁦􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀧􀀡􀀮􀂣􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀿􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀬􀀡􀁥􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁉􀁪􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁽􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀮􀀢􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀡􀁉􀀬􀀺􀀡􀀬􀀺􀀡􀀺􀁊􀁾􀀿􀀡􀀧􀀭􀁟􀀠J Preliminary Plans, Specification & Esfimates (PS&E) for
fhe first phase (2 intersections) of Project 08 (Dallas, Richardson) were complefed by Huitt-Zollars. Preliminary Righf-of-Way and Bridge Layouf documents have also been submitted and
are under review. The second phase (4 Infersectlons) Is expected to be complete by the end of June. J The Final Schematic Design Submittal prepared by Halff tor Project 15 (Dallas) was
approved by TxDOT-Austin --the notice to proceed to PS&E stages was issued. J TxDOT-Austin also issued an Environmental Categorical Exclusion (environmental clearance) for MK Engineer's
Project 03 (Garland). J The Memorandum of Affected Property Owners (see Issue 9) process is underway for Projects 08 and 15. The public comment period is open for both projects. One
public meeting, called by Dallas Councllperson Sandy Greyson, will be held In July fo review fhe intersection improvemenf designed for Hillcrest at Spring Valley (Project 15). J Schematic
Submittals received this quarter included: Project 09 (Final) -Gutierrez, Smouse, Wilmut & Assoc. Project 14 -HNTB Project II -The Oyekan Group Project 15 (Final) -Halff Associates Project
13 -Walter P. Moore Project 21 -Mateo Consulting Engineers J Seven dratt Environmental Reports were submitted for review: Project 22 -TranSystem Corp. Project 29 -Rust Lichllter /Jameson.
Project 23 -MK Centennial Project 30 -Dal-Tech Engineering Project 26 -Carson-Salcedo-McWilliams Project 32 -Datum Engineering Project 28 -Dikita Engineering J Notices To Proceed were
issued for three design contracts which include a total of 22 City of Dallas improvements. The current Dallas County CMAQ Program is now entirely under design with the initiation of
these three final projects: Project 18 -Boyle Engineering Project 20 -ICF Kaiser Project 19 -Brown & Root 6 Traffic Signal Pro ecls J Parsons Transportation Group's Final PS&E for Phose
A of Project 71 (Grand Prairie) is complete and will be submitted for the TxDOT construction bid and letting process on June 30, 1997. The construction letting is scheduled for October
1997. Phase A Includes 13 traffic signals Improvemenfs. Prellmlnary PS&Es have been completed for Phase B (24 signals) and the Central Core Communications design. J The Traffic Confrol
Needs Assessment for Project 72 (Balch Springs, Mesquite, Sunnyvale) was finalized. The Preliminary PS&E is expected by the end of June. J Several technical submittals for Project 73
were made by Hunfer Associates and are currently under agency review. The submittals Include the Traffic Control Needs Assessment, Technology Review and Trade Off Analysis, Left Tum
Signal Analysis and the preliminary PS&E. design. The project includes 26 trallic signal improvements in the Cifies of Duncanville DeSoto Cedar Hill & Lancasfer. J Project 75's Technical
Memorandums for the Proposed Control Areas of traffic Signal operations along Belt Line Road in the Cifies of Coppell and Irving were completed by Sverdrup. Agency review of these documents
were also completed. 􀀡􀁮􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾"! ,,_.. :II.' 􀁾􀀠n .15 ... 􀁉􀀧􀀡􀁉􀀮􀁾􀀠t olf 1'1.' t .• " oS ll.' •'. .• oS 􀁾􀀮􀁉􀀠•'" n.' · D • .. 􀁾􀀠D.' ·.. . D 􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁉􀀮􀀱􀀠· ...
D.' · • • .. .• :D.l ·.. .u 􀁾􀁾•... 􀁾.·,--." .. "0." , Contact the CMAQ Program Offlce if you have any questions or comments, (214) 747-6336· fAX (214) 741-1937· E-Mail cmaq@onramp.net.
• Addison' Bolch Springs' Carrollton' Cedar Hill' Coppell. Dollas • Dollas Caunly. DART' DeSoto· Duncanville· Formers Branch· FHWA • Garland· • Grand Prairie' Irving' Lancaster' Mesquile
• NCTCOG • Richardson· Rowlelt • Sachse· Sumyvale • TxDOT • PMJE Team -Parsons Brinckerhoff' ARS Engineers, Inc.• DeShazo. Tong 8. Associates· Environmental Support Services, Inc. CMAQ
Program Office· 1701 North Market Street. Suite 410' Dallas. Texas 752U2.· (214) 747·6336 • FAX (214) 747·1937 
CMAQ From: To: Ron Whitehead Date: 6126191 Time: 􀀱􀀷􀀺􀀱􀁾􀀵􀀵􀀠 Page 1 01 t FACTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM May -June 1997 Issue J3 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS & UPDATES: If's
time for the 􀁑􀀡􀁘􀀡􀀬􀁾􀁟􀀢􀁹􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁉􀁾􀁅􀀧􀀿􀁴􀀡􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀢􀀡􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀧􀁩􀀡􀀺􀀡􀀡􀁴􀁨􀀡􀀵􀀺􀀧􀁍􀀧􀀭􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁩􀀡􀁩􀀧􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀼􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀡􀀡􀀮􀀧􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀡􀁉􀁊􀀡􀁟􀁾􀀡􀁟􀁣􀀺􀁴􀀺
􀀿􀁟􀀧􀀡􀀼􀀡􀁱􀁵􀀨􀁬􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁲􀀮􀀺􀀡􀀿􀀡􀀿􀁾􀀠___ _ ,f Preliminary Plans, Specification 8. Eslimates (PS8.E) lor Ihe first phase (2 intersections) of Project 08 [Dallas, Richardson) were
completed by Huitt-Zollars. Preliminary Right-of-Way and Bridge Layout documents have also been submitted and are under review. The second phase [4 Intersections) Is expecled to be complele
by the end of June . .f The Final Schematic Design Submittal prepared by Halff for Project 15 (Dallas) was approved by TxDOT-Auslin --the notice to proceed to PS8.E stages was issued.
.f TxDOT-Austln also Issued an Environmental Categorical Exclusion (environmental clearance) for MK Engineer's Project 03 (Garland). .f The Memorandum of Alfected Property Owners (see
Issue 9) process is underway tor Projects 08 and 15. The public commenl period Is open for both projects. One public meellng, called by Dallas Council person Sandy Greyson, will be held
In July to review Ihe intersection improvement designed for Hillcrest at Spring Valley (project IS). ,f Schematic Submittals received this quarter included: Project 09 (Final) -Gutierr""
Smouse, Wilmut 8. Assoc. Projecl 14 -HNTB Project 11 -The Oyekan Group Project 15 (Final) -Halll Associoies Project 13 -Walter P. Moore Project 21 -Maleo Consulting Engineers ,f Seven
draft Environmental Reports were submitted lor review: Pro)ect22 -TranSystem Corp. Project 29 -Rust lichllter I Jameson. Project 23 -MK Centennial Project 30 -Dol-Tech Engineering Project
26 -Carson-Salcedo-McWilliams Project 32 -Datum Engineering Project 28 -Dlkita Engineering .f Notices To Proceed were issued lor three design contracts which include a total at at 22
City at Dallas improvements. The current Dallas County CMAQ Program is now entirely under design with the initiation of these three final projecls: PrO/ecllS-Boyle Engineering Project
20 -ICF Kaiser CfOJ'=' 19 -Brown 8. Rool ,f Parsons Transportation Group's Final PS8.E tor Phase A 01 Project 71 (Grand Prairie) is complete and will be submitted for the TxDOT construction
bid and letting process on June 30, 1997. The construction letting is scheduled lor October 1997. Phase A includes 13 tramc signals Improvements. Preliminary PS&Es have been completed
for Phase B (24 signals) and the Central Core Communications design. .f The Traffic Control Needs Assessment tor Project 72 [Balch Springs, Mesquite, Sunnyvale) was Iinalized. The Preliminary
PS8.E is expected by the end of June . .f Several technical submittals tor Project 73 were made by Hunter Associates and are cUlTently under agency review. The submittals Include Ihe
Traffic Control Needs Assessment. Technology Review and Trade Off Analysis, Left Turn Signal Analysis and the preliminary PS&E. design. The project includes 26 traffic signal improvements
in " ; !:: (! :: ;;11 II ;: ji II II 6 Traffic Signal Prolects .." _"-'-'f !a 􀁾􀀡􀂣􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀠.=!.!!! n , ." ,'" ....' t " ,<!,; """ 􀀢􀀬􀁾􀀠I '" .,., f. • , • .s:u c " n .lI.
tu I; m ... ·, ." .3O.DA. C<. .• .1IIa., • ill 􀁾􀀢􀀠• , • •• nJ t ., ." 􀁾􀁾. ill 􀁾...􀁾􀀠.... A.l. lr'lt f. , -... , , -m 􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀠!:l : 􀁾􀀠t::=' F: 􀁾􀀭..--.ii' , \ ,r. : , 􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾.
􀀴􀀫􀀭􀁾􀁴􀁲􀁬􀀠,+ , the Cilies of Duncanville, Desoto, Cedar Hili 8. Lancaster . .f Project 7S's Technical Memorandums tor the Propased Control Areas of traffic signal operations along
Belt line Road in the Cities at Coppell and Irving were completed by Sverdrup. Agency review of these documents were also completed. Contact the CMAQ Program Offlce if you have any ques/iom
orcomments. (214) 747-6336 • FAX (214) 741-1937· E-Mail cmaq@onramp,nef, • Addison .. Bolch Springs" Carrollton .. Cedar Hill .. Coppell .. Dallos .. Dallas County.. DART" DART" DeSoto
.. DuncanvilLe t 􀁆􀁯􀀬􀁭􀁥􀁾􀀠Branch .. 􀁾􀁈􀁗􀁁􀀠.. Garland 􀁾􀀠 .. Grand Prairie' Irving' Lancosler w Mesquite" NCTCOG • Richardson. Rowlelt • Sachse· Sunnyvale"' TxDOT .. PMlE Team
-Parsons 􀁂􀁲􀁩􀁮􀁣􀁾􀀦􀀧􀁨􀁯􀁦􀁦􀀢􀀠ARS 􀁅􀁮􀀮􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁥􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁾􀀮􀀡􀀰􀁣... DeShazo, Tong 8. Associates· ErW!ronmentol Suppoli Services, Inc, CMAQ Program Office. 1701 North fI.<;lrkef
street, Suife 410· Dal!as, Texas 􀀷􀁾􀀮􀀠(::?(14) 7J7·6:t36" FAX (214) 747-19.37 
From: SAWWUtS fo: P.E.. Joltn Ilaumgllrtoet Pago1otH Memorandum TOI Rle -Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones'f\) Date: May 27,1997 Subject' CMAQ Program Update #113 Conducted May 14,
1997,2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office AHendees: Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Karen Jones, Ass!. P.M. P8CS salas Camarfllo Dallas Co.' Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA Dave Davis Farmers Branch
'. James Allen, Civil ARS Ali Malekoutl Dallas Don Ingram, Environmental EBB Moosa Saghian TxDOT Richard Peterson Dallas Co. Helen Tran T"DOT Don Cranford Dallas Co. LaDonna Smith NCTCOG
Sid Homer Dallas Co. Karen led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment B. Information discussed in addition to that which is contained on the overheeds
Included; 1. General-Karen Jones Design Review -Efforts continue. Submittal Tracking System -Karen anticipated that it will take about 3 or 4 more days to recreate Ihe submittal history
that has accumulated to date. The tracking system should be up to date in one to two weeks. TIP Coordination o The City of Balch Springs has requested that an intersection pe added to
Project 72 (Brldgefarmer -Mesquite/Balch Springs/Sunnyvale). LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) stated that COG will be econng that project and determining whether or not It can be tied in to Ihe
existing signal project. Karen noted that a letter has been prepared for the County to review asking Bridgefarmer to look at adding :3 locations and 􀁤􀁥􀁬􀁥􀁾􀁮􀁧􀀠2 locations according
to the Cities of Mesquite and Balch Springs wishes. o The City of Dallas has requested adding 2 locations to Project 76 (Bucher, Willis & Ratliff -Dallas). NCTCOG is verifying that these
two locations are included In the TIP. o TIP Modifications are stili needed from the Cities of Grand Pralrte (Project 71) and Meequite (Project 72). City of Dallas Coordinaffon -A meeting
is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon to discuss the bond preparation along with some project specific issues. The Briefing Memo for the City Force Account payments for Invoices 2 and
:3 remains under County review. Escrow Requests Prepwation -Moosa Saghian (fxDOT) stated that escrow preparation does not need to be on hold. He continued noting that the Program is
currently in violation of the original agreement and in Violation of what is going to be changed in the agreement. He directed that the escrow be prepared under the administrative guidelines
previously given to the County, end that the possible changes to the TxDOT edminlstratlve charges should be disragarded until further directed, TxDOT needs escrow payments for Projects
03 (MK Engineers -Garland). 08 (Huitt-Zollars Richardson/Garland) and 15 (Helff -Dallas). Oil",.II CeItfUl'lf of ElIf1/IIHrintl Excellence D:IGENERALI£l03MEEnUPDATEllee7\113.DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To; P.E., John Daumgartnar Oalt': 5m191 Time: 18:04::01 CMAQ Program Update #113 Page :I of5 Moosa said that the Right-ai-Way people at TXDOT were going to have a meeting
tomorrow morning on the indirect costs of ROW. If the ROW indirect costs are going to be different than the current Program direction, then another letter will be sent. A second issue
that is being discussed involves whether or not TxDOT is not charging FHWA (and the TIP Budget) 80% of the indirect costs. Inventory Value -The inventory and original cost of the office
equipment!fumishings at the CMAQ office has been prepared for the County as requested. A summary will be provided to the County alter the meeting. 2. Consultants -Karen Jones Pending
Contract Amendments: • Project 00 (TCB) -Awailing their final fee proposal. • Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars) -Briefing memo has been reviewed by the County and It requires some coordination
􀁷􀁾􀁨the City of Richardson. Efforts to contact Waller Ragsdale (Richardson) have not been successful to date. • Project 72 (Bridgefarmer) -TIP modification for the City of Mesquite
will be considered by NCTCOG this month. The City of Balch Springs will need some help to formulate a TIP Modification request. • Project 73 (Hunter) -Brtefing memo should be on the
May 20 agenda • Project 76 (BW&R) -Two additional signals were added to the contract for a total of +$4,000. Briefing memo remains under Counl;Y review. Design Consultant Invoice #15
-The invoice will be submitted to the County tcmorrow for review. Five consultant invoices qualify. Don Cranford (County) asked if PBS&J (Project 05 -Dallas) was one of the consuhants,.noting
that he received a call from them this morning. Karen said that they were still at less than 8% (not eligible), and that she relayed this to Cal Bostwick (PBS&J) this moming. 3. Traffic
-Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimlay-Horn -Garland) -Stili lacking 100% of the final travel runs. Wayne Kurtees (KH) Is checking on the status and the schedule impacts for their Final Report.
TexlTE's Interest In presenting this project to the summer session will press the completion of the Final Report. Project 71 (Parsons Transportntion Group -Grand Prairie) -The PMJE office
expects the 100% PS&E package this week for 9 locations (Phase A1). TxDOT expressed some concern about the funding. Tony talked to Gordon Alderman (TxDOT) who is trying to assemble the
necessary inlormation for the final submittal to TxDOT-Austin. Moosa said that TxDOT needs a listing of the intersections that need funding so they can apply lor a construction CSJ.
Project 72 (Bridgefanner • MasqulteJBalch SprlngsJ$unnyvala) -The ROW data completed by AAS will be provided to Bridgefarmer in about a week. The results indicated that there Is more
ROW available than what the preliminary Indications were. Target date remains at the end of May for 75% submittal plans. . Project 73 (Hunter -Cedar Hlll/DeSotoJDuncanvilia/Lancaster)
-The monthly Progress Meeting is scheduled lor this Thursdey at 1:30 p.m. The agenda Indicates a review of the signal progression analysis. Tony continues to be concerned about their
progress and he will conlinue to express his concerns at the meeting. Richard Peterson (Couni;Y) requested that the PM/E prepare a letter to the consultant noting these concerns. D:IGENERALIG03MEET\\
JPDATE\1997\113.00c 
Date: 5t29/91 Time: 16:0.41.)7 CMAQ Progtam Update #113 Page 3 of5 Project 75 (Sverdrup· Irving/Coppell' -The analysis and recommendations are being formulated. Comments are pending
on the two Technical Memorandums submitted. Project 76 (Bucher, Willis & Ratliff. Signal Retimlng • N. Dallas) -The monthly Progress Mooting was held yesterday. The preliminary analysis
of natural cycle. critical intersection and control areas were reviewed. BW&R will be meeting internally to review that product Some Saturday and road tube counts still remain. A meeting
was held with Halff (Project 15 -Dallas) this morning to assist in the preparation of the PS&E package. Tony stated that he still needs to review Projects 13 (WP Moore -Farmers Branch).
14 (HNTBLBJ) and 21 (Mateo -Dallas). 􀁾􀀠4. Civil-James Allen James reported the following project status; Project 02 (Chiang. Patel & Yerby • Duncanville) -The final ROW documents have
been submitted and are being reviewed. Mer initial PM/E review, the documents will be forwarded forwarded on to the County for a linal review. Project 04 (Parngon • Dallas) -Paragon
has responded to the dispositioned review comments. Some issues remain to be resolved. Projects 05 (pap... Dallas), 06 (TCa • DaUas) and 07 (Espey, Huston • Grand Pralrle)The PM/E has
responded to the dispositioned review comments. James reported that he has met with the 3 project managers and they have determined who will have the responsibility 01 resolving the
outstanding review comments which the designers feel require edditional information. Project 08 (HuItt.Zollars • 􀁒􀁩􀁣􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁲􀁤􀁾􀁡􀁲􀁬􀁡􀁮􀁤􀀩􀀠-The bridge layout which will nOOd
TxDOTAustin's approval was submitted by H-Z. James steted that the plans seemed to be more detailed than the normal TxOOT required brtdge layout. Projects 13 (WP Moore· Farmers Branch).
14 tHNTB. DallasjFarmers BranchlQarland) and 16 (HDR • Dallas)-Awaiting one to two reviews. which are due for these projects. Project 15 (Halfl • Dallas)-A meeting was held with Tom
Knlcker (Halff) to provide the NTP for PS&E preparation, to review PS&E requirements, and to provide examples of available PS&E packages. In addition. the Schematic for SpMng Valley
at Hillcrest was reviewed. A meeting is schedule tomorrow with Jack Antebi (Dallas) to go over some traffic concerns at this location. A flnal Schematic for this location (work recently
resumed) should be submitted within two weeks. Project 21 (Meteo· Danas) -The Schematic has been sent out to the reviewers for comments. Additional issues by TxOOT• Helen Tran (TxDOl)
stated thai Project 02's 95% PS&E review comments will be completed within the next 2 weeks. She said that there were several TxDOT preliminary review comments which were not taken care
of in the 95% drawings. • Moose indicated that a Cat-Ex has been issued for Project 03, • Moose hed concerns about the CI!y of Coppell's request for the CI!y to complete the construction
administration tasks for the Sandy Lake at Moore Intersection. He said that he would request a meeting with Ken Griffin (Coppell) to discuss this matter. He continued that he had submitted
a letter outlinlng the issues which the City of Coppell will heve to conform to. D:\GENERADLl03MEETlUPDATE\I997\113.DOC 
04te:5/29JBl Hme: 16:04;01 Page4of14 CAfAQ PI'ogmm Update 11113 ".9114 ofIS Sid Horner (County) stated that he had submitted preliminary ROW costs for the City of Coppell projects. This
is In response to questions submitted by TxDOT as to the validity of the ROW costs submitted by USA (Project 10). Karen pointed out thal in previous discussions it was the PMJE's understanding
that TxDOT was adding a 40% contingency to the ROW cOSIS to prevent having to go encumber more federal dollars after initial approval. II has now been determined that TxDOT is not adding
a 40% contingency, but thai issue was mls-communicetad between the parties. 5. Envlronmental-Don Ingram Submitted Environmental Reports: Project 21 (Mateo • Dallas) . Received the revised
environmental draWing making their EnVironmental Report acceptable for agency review. ProJect 28 (Dildta • Dallsa) • A meeting was held yesterday 10 review the draft Environmental Report.
Project 30 (Dal.Tech • Dallas)-The draft Environmental Report was received and Don noted that his is currently working on the review comments. Don reported that the MAPO letters for
Project 15 (Halff· Dallas) will be sent out today. Project 08 (HuittZollars -Richardson/Garland) letters have been written, but are waiting for Donna Manhart (H-Z) to fUrnish the PMiE
office with the parcels and proparty owners. Project 09 (GSW • Cedar HilVDeSoto/Duncanville) is being worked on and should be ready by next week. Ongoing Coordination· HNTB's (Project
14· LBJ) Reports came In and were rejected. Don anticipated that he would receive the revised enVIronmental reports next week. . Comments are being consolidated lor Project 16 (HDR •
Dallas) and they should be sent 10 the . consultant next week. 6. Project Control -Karen Jones A candidate for the project control position has bean interviewed and will be recommended
for hire. Richard Peterson asked how project control personnel were located, speculating that there were not many specializing In this Held. Karen replied thai PBCS has a pool of schedule/cost
control types used on proposals. This pool Is used as well as sources such as the PrimaVera (schedule software) distributors in the area The monthly program schedule update will be complete
by the end of this Week. 7. Ite, I_lIS' Karen Jones TxDOFCoun/y AgreementModifications· Gary Taylor (TxOOT) continues to work on the agreement. Continuation ofPM/E Services -The requested
supplemental infonnation was given to the County. 8. Look Ahead -Karen Jones· Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on May 21, 1997. Reference the "LOOK Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming
milestones. D;\GENERALIG03MEE1\UPDATE\19971113.DOC 
CMAO ProgI'am Update #113 Page S of S 9. Action Items· Karen Jones Target Dates County • Balch Springs ROWAssistance ....,............................,...............,,,.........Being
completed by PM/E. PMJE • Revised Pavement Survey to TxDOT......................... " .............................................................ASAP • 1998 Bond Input /0 the City
ofDaI/as...............................................................................:. On-Going '.• Escrow to TxOOT, ....... , ................................. , .., .............................
...................... , ................ On Hold • /nventay VaJue............,......." ........................ , .................... , ..... ,,,..................... " .. , .................
May 16 TxDOT<I County I PMJE • TxOOT· County AgreementModifjca/ions..........., ............. " ................................. " .........",,,.May 80 • Exhibit A & B Comments ................
" ...................................................................................... May SO Mell/quite • TIP Ameooment.,", .......................... ,;...........................................
..................,',..." ...........""...".May 1O. Other Items Helen expressed concern over the number 01 changes to the consuHant contracts which add/delete intersections, Karen Slated
that the County's clients are the Cities, and that as long as the adds requested by the cities are included in the TIP, they are eligible to be included in the Program, This discussion
also led to a discussion 01 what the contents of the exhibits A and B of the TxDOT I County agreement should be, No resolution for the A and B content was reached. Meeting Minutes by:
Attachments xc: Attendees J. Baumgartner (Town 01 Addison) R. Wundenlch (City 01 Garland) Charles Tucker (TxDOn W. McDonald (City 01 Balch Springs) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie)
E. Kelsey Johnston (TxDOT. C. Sylo (City of Carroltton) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) LBJ Project Office) p, Harts (City 01 Cadar Hill) A Johnson (City of of Lancaster) LaDonna Smith
(NCTCOG) A Patel (City 01 Coppell) R. Berry (City of Mesquite) ScarlettTandy (Dallas Co,) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) Eric K. Fischer (PBCS) P. Baugh
(City of DeSoto) N. L Slewart (City of Rowlett) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) L Henderson (City 01 Sachse) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERAL\G03MEET\UPDAT
El1997\113, DOC 
Frorn:$AMWU!S Til: 􀁐􀀮􀁅􀀢􀀮􀀬􀁉􀁯􀁨􀀢􀀸􀁡􀁜􀁬􀁾􀁲􀀠Pago61lf14 ATTACHMENT A . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #113 SIGN-IN SHEET May 14,1997 214-747-6336 ext. 28 21429 Allen 214-747-6336 ext. 30
Dan Bud 214-653-7151 214-653-7151 Sid Horner Camarillo 214-653-6400 " 
FIWI'I: SAW WUIS To: P £ .• John 8ewogaltllot Page lof14 ATTACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • May 14. 1997 • Genera' • Consultants • Trsfflc -CMI • Environmental • Project Control 11!11.
General" • Design Review • Submittal Tracking System • TIP Coordination • Salch Springs • C/(y atDallas· 715 • GrandPrairie & Mesquita • City ofDallas Coordination 􀁾􀀠• Meeting To DliscU$$Bond
PtrlplUatlon • CFA Payment (2 & 3) Briefing Memo UnderCo. RevllirW • Escrow Request Preparation -On Hold • Inventory Value • Collin County -Dallas County ILA 
Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -#06 res: ( ) Awaiting resFinal Fee PropOilel -#08 H-Z: (+31<} Coordlnalfon WfIh City ofRJehardson, Briefing Memo Reviewed
By County -#72 B-F: ( ) TIP Mods (AfOtl'lun. & Balch Sprlllg$) Nsce!!lSary -#73 Hunt (-21!) Briefing Memo· May 20 -#76 SWR: (+4K) Brieffng Memo Under County Review -17P Mod maybe necessary
• Des,fgn Consultant Invoice #15 • 5 Consultant Invoices PI IBSI. Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) • KHA Stili Lacking 100% OfRnal Travel Runs • GP (71j Grand Prairie·
Parsons Transportation Group -Expect 100% PS&E This 􀁗􀁥􀁾For 9 Locations -75% PS&E Expected ThIs Week For 81 Locations & CentnJI Core & Comm. Plens • SE Dallas Co.·Mes/BS/SV(72j • SF
-Response Needed To BS Request To Add 1 Location -Compiling Obtained ROW Information In Salch Springs -Amending Contfact Remelns • S Dallas Co•• Lanc.lDuncIDeSoiCedH 
-----f!"rom: SAM WU1S To: P,E., Jahn BaumgwtmlfPageS.,t14 1" Traffic i!IIi. (Con/blud) • Signal Design Project Status (Continued) • Irving/Coppell (75) • Sverdrup -Review Comments Pending On 2 Tech Memos • N Dallas Retimlng (76)
• BWR -Progress Meeting yesterday -RevIewed PrIlIlminary Analysis ofNatural Cycle, Crltfcsllntersectlon & Contrcl Areas, Review Meeting 11IIs Friday -Some Saturday And Road Tube Counts
Remain. • Review OfFlatwork Projects • Review Meeting With HaU • Initiated ReViews ForProjects 13,14 & 16 Design Status i!IIi. (TrqfJIc) " Po"",," Gomp/fII9 o to2d '" _ to 00 10 to 9O'fOQ
.._,..-Eel-
1" mliI• Civil • Accomplishments • Meeting with HaJffforNTPforPS&E. • Received Huitt Zollers' Bridge Layout sheet • Issue • Concurrence ofPS&E format with ncDOT • Spring Valley at Hillcrest
Design Status (G"'_J 01 􀁆􀁾􀀸􀁲􀁜􀀱􀁮􀁣􀁴􀁉􀀠􀁾􀀠 ,,_ CPr "'-..... ...... """ ....TOIl.. _ (f7 G:a'Id PniIIlt ISP't .. _ lIZ 􀀰􀀹􀁃􀁾􀀠tAN 􀀱􀁑􀁾􀀠USA , I RknI.tftJOalu QjIIkIWI 􀁴􀀲􀁾􀀠ce
1J 􀁆􀁾8tanctt Moen 14l&1 HNTB lS IlDdu HdI' 16 HlMfIIo'FInst HDR 
--Frain: SAW WUlS Tn: P.E., Jofm 8atllng4ltnOf Date: 5129/91 Ti"'I!: 16:04111 Pese 11 of14 Design Status (G.oltldrk-C.ntltmd) ""/COllI Complete • • • • • • 􀁾􀀠• • m 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀠Gc!« 18
LMO». Soy.19 Roll 8lR 􀀺􀁲􀁯􀁾􀀠KIIw 211kUn1r fIIfItiIf1 􀀲􀀲􀁾􀀠􀁔􀁲􀁷􀁴􀀤􀁓􀁾􀀠lI3 􀁣􀁥􀁵􀁾􀀠hCCenl 􀀲􀀴􀁾􀀠GI:fI:Sa 24 Jt. o.au 2 MiJA 2fI Denb:lnDr. c.wn 21 HMyHml APM 􀀲􀀸􀁾􀁖􀁤􀁉􀁹􀀠rma
2S DIIItITohIy IfI.#t SO lkInItnCo. 0IIf.TW! :11 AofIIRcM 'hR:uf ' 􀁾PnIC:IIVW.1iI/Vft Dnrn -_......... 􀁂􀁡􀁳􀁥􀁬􀁬􀀺􀁭􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀠Environmental • Accomplishments • Submitted Environmental
Reports -Project 21 -Mateo -Project 28 -Diklta -Project 30· DII/·Tech • MAPO Project 15, 8, 9 • Ongoing coordination • Issues • NoneNew 
Environmental Status Project Control • Accomplishments • Temporary, Pan·Tlme Hire • Interview candidate • Monthly Program Schedute Update • Issues 
-----------Key Issues • TxDOT» County Agreement • Continuation of PMIE Services PI look Ahead .Next Meeting , Wednesday, May 21, 1997 .NextMilestones ·""""'_(W,I• Jllt4M:L 􀁈􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁉􀀧􀁲􀁦􀀻􀁊􀀮􀁈􀁯�
�􀀮􀁾􀀠· "".12,",• Prf1J.No.U(D#ltt.llllf 􀀺􀁐􀁦􀁴􀀡􀁉􀀬􀁟􀁈􀁾􀀠• 􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁍􀁯􀀮􀁮􀁾·PJ!IC._u.... • 1'nIj.Ma. ullUltlll􀁾􀀠__1.lHQIO • hoJ.N4.H(ViOql • 1"tvI.1f&1(!:I(J • "",,,Ma.'cn:sJ
􀂷􀁾􀀱􀁴􀁲􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀴􀁾􀀠• 􀁾􀁈􀁯􀀮􀀧􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁎􀀢􀀢􀀠• f/WlI.llo.7ItlIWIV 􀁾􀁟􀁬􀁉􀁯􀀬􀁮􀁾􀀠.JIIlwIIIJ:nlnuJr)1Ifft .....􀀱􀁉􀁍􀀱􀁴􀁏􀁗􀀧􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁾_---_... ... 􀁟􀀢􀁍􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁉􀁩􀁩􀀺􀁴􀁬􀁷􀁋􀀮􀁒􀁉􀁉
􀁲􀁩􀁗􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁬􀁄􀁲􀁉􀁉􀁮􀁉􀁉􀁗􀁬􀁉􀀺􀁾􀀠....􀀱􀁉􀁉􀁍􀁴􀁗􀁣􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠_......_..........._... CMAQ contorenc.RO<Jf11 􀁊􀁉􀁴􀁾􀁉􀁍􀁁􀀮􀁴􀀮􀀮􀁣􀁉􀁣􀁉􀁤􀁄􀁍􀀤􀀱􀁉􀁦􀁈􀁉􀁉􀁬􀁉􀁃􀁉􀁴􀀼􀀱􀀠􀀢
􀁆􀁦􀁢􀀬􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀢---., ...._.. ."" ..... ..,"".. .. ......... ""..􀁉􀁊􀁲􀀮􀀺􀁵􀀬􀁈􀁬􀁦􀀱􀁗􀁃􀁩􀀡􀁮􀁨􀁣􀁴􀁾􀀠.""""...,....,.. 
fmm: SAW WUIS To: P ,f;,. JofIn D«umgartner Pego 14 (If 14 PI eI. Action Items • County TBlPGtDatu • Saleh Springs ROWAssfsfllnce • PMJE • Revised Pavement Survey to 'D:DOT ASAP • 1998
SondInPut to CIty ofOaHu CJn.Golng • Escrow to TxDOT On Hold '.• Inventory Value May 16 • TxDOTlCountylPMIE • 'D:DOT· C4unty Agreement ModlflCIIltons May30 • A&s Comments May30• Mesquite
• TIP Amendment May 
front:SAMWUIS To: P.E .. JoImBauntga1'lttr Oaw; 7fl3ffJ7 Time: 14:19:23 Pas!!! 1 uf12 Memorandum TOI Rle· Meeting Minutes Froml Karen M, Jones 'l Datel July 23. 1997 SubjeCtl CMAQ Program
Update 11119 Conducted June 25. 1997. 2:00 p.m.. CMAO Program Office Sign·ln Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Karen Jones. Asst, P.M. PBCS Tommy Mauer. Proi. Control PBCS
Tony Tramel. Trallic DTA James Allen, Civil ARS Dave Davis Farmers Branch Ali Malekouti City of Dallas Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment
B. Infomlation discussed in addition to that whlcb Is contained on the overheads includedl 1. Ge_al-Ivan Nicodemus TIP Coordination -A Ieller has been prepared for the consideration
of William McDonald (Balch Springs) for a TIP Modification pertaining to Project 72 -Bridgefarmer. It is hoped this request can be finalized this week. Escrow Requests Preparation· The
Briefing Manno to authorize payment to TxDOT Is under County review and includes design escrow payments for PrOjects 03 (MK Engineers· Garland), 08 (Huitt-Zollars -Rlchardson!Gal1and).
15 (Halff -Dallas). 70 (Kimley·Hom -Garland) and 71A (Parsons TransportatlonGrand Prairie). Ivan noted that the County Is very short on staff personnel and it is impacting gelling things
from Public Works to the Commissioners Court. Ivan said that there are 13 authorized positions, 6 are currentty unlilled. City of Dallas Council Person Meeting· Ivan indicated that the
meeting held with the PM/E. City of Dallas staff and Council person Ms. Sandy Grayson regarding CMAO improvement at Spring Valley and Hillcrest (Project 15 Halff) went very well; hoWever.
the Intersection is on hold again. Ivan told Ali Malekouti (Dallas) that the City needed to send the PM/E a letter to formalize this request. A public meeting has been scheduled for
July :1 at 7:30 pm at Fretz Pa!1< for the public to present oomments on this JocaUon. Collin County. Dallas County ILA -Has not been worked on. DWU Water Vault Relocation -Ivan reported
that in his his discussion with TxDOT utility relocation people yesterday, TxDOT stated that utility relocations are nol reimbursable. However, TxCOT agreed that the City of Duncanville
Can pay for the proposed water vautt relocation, Further discussion with Harlan Moore (TxDOT) did not discount the possibility of the cost being reimbursable. The relocation is at the
northwest comer of Camp Wiedom and Cockrell Hill (Project 02 -Chiang, Patel & Yerby). Ivan said that Ihere may be some state iaws that prohibits Texas from spending Texas money on utility
reiocaNons. This, however, is the City of Duncanville, Dallas County money and Federal reimbursable funds. More discussions will be necessary. D:\GENERAL\G03MEEnUPDATE\1997\119.00C 
o.te: 1rrJ!91 11_: 14:19:2'9 PIt!l62ef12 CMAQ Program Updafe 1119 Page 11 of4 2. Consulfents -Ivan Nicodemus Pending Controcl Amendments: • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) and Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars
-Richardson/Garland) -Briefing memos and Court Orders are under County review. • Project 07 (Espey, Huston -Grand Prairie) • The City wants to delete the improvements at the intersection
of Freetown and SW 3rd and increase the scope 01 work at IH 20 and Carrier Parkway. EH Is preparing a fee proposal. • Project 13 (WP Moore • Farmers Branch) -Stili awaiting WP Moore's
fee proposal. • Project 71 (Parsons Transportation -Grand Prairie) -COG 1527 (19 locations) added to the contract.. • Project 72 (Brldgefarrner • Mesquite!Balch Sprtngs/Sunnyvale) -Still
awaiting fee proposal from Bridgefarmer. Design Consultant Involoe #16 -Will be submitted to the County by the first of next week. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimley .... om
• Gerland) -Wayne Kurfees (KHA) has stated that he will have the draft Final Report on the initial and final traveillme runs data It will be submitted to the PM/E for final agency review.
Project 7'1 (Parsons Trel\llPlllt8tion Group • Grand PraIrie) -A Progress Meeting was held yesterday. TxOOT has not returned the final review of the 9 tooations -the deadline for the
TxDOTAustin submittal is July 8. The review of two 75% PS&E packages, S2 (24 locations); and C1 (Central Core & Communication), has been completed and should be sent to the ConsuHant
for 􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁩􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠today or tomorrow. There are between 200 and SOD comments. The PMIE traffic review of S21s the only missing comments. Project 72 (Brlclgefarmer • Mesqufte/8alch
SPI'ings/Sunnyvaie) -The 75% PS&E plans should be delivered tomorrow. Project 73 (Hunter • Cedar HillJDeSotoJDuncanville/Lancast8l') -Last Friday, Hunter submitted the Technioal Memos
and 75% PS&E package. All were advanoed for agency review. Tony noted that John Friebele (Hunter) had a very good presentation and lended credibility to the product which had been been
sent out for revlew. Project 75 {Sverdrup· IrvIngICoppelil . Sverdrup has completed a lot of work dealing with signal liming and some claan up work. It Is andclpated that the preUminary
drafts of liming Study documentation will be submitted by the next progress meOOng. PrOject 76 (Bucher, Willis & Retliff • SllInal Retiming • N. Dalles) -Technical Memos have been submitted
addressing various timing patterns, cycle links and control areas. The memos are under review. BW&R coiltlnues to work directly with Mark litus (City of Dallas) in developing solutions.
Review Efforts -Approxlmatety 75% complete for Project 11 (Oyekan • RichardsonlDallas). Pending reviews include Phases S2 and C1 for Project 71 (Parsons Transportalion • Grand Prairie),
Project 76 (Bucher Willis & Rafllff· Dallas) and Project 73 (Hunter -Cedar Hill/DeSotolDuncanvlllalLanoaster). 4. Civil -James flilan James reported the following project status: Project
03 (MK engineers. • Gerland) -The PMIE has received the preliminary right-of-way documents which will be sent out for agency review. D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPOATE\1997\119.00C 
From: SAW WUIS T,,: P.E., Jnhn &UJngartnt:lt' 0 .. 1:11: 7/2S197 Jinw: 14:19::23 CMAQ Progmm Updafe #119 Page aof4 Project 07 (Espey, Hllllton • Grand Prairie) -The Consultant has been
asked to prepare a lee proposal lor the deletion of one (Freetown /3rd) of the Intersections and some additional scope at another Carrier/IH-20 as requested by the City. Project 09 (OSW
• Cedar HlIIJDeSoIO/DIIIICafIville) -The Rna! Schematic Design Submillal for US 67 at Danleldale and Belt Une at Main has been submilled. These two locations were the only designs and
reports affected by the initial review. The PMIE will be sending this Inlormation to TxDOT lor submittal to Austin. Project 13 (WP Moore • F-nBranch, -WP Moore has resolved their Schematic
comments and are in the process 01 creating the Final Schematic drawings and reports. PrcIject 15 (HaI11. North Dallas) -Hall! has submitted the Rnal Schematic lor Spring Valley at Coit.
However, this Intersection has been put on hold by the City of Dallas. Project 16 {HOR • Dallas, -HDR has submitted dlsposiUonea review comments. Several issues still need to be resolved.
A Design Review Conference has been set for next Monday with Larry Hoffman (HDR). Larry is HDR's newly assigned Project Manager. Project 17 (Gojer • Dallas/Garland) -Gojer has submillec:l
the Final Schematic drewings ana report. The PMJE is stitl awaiting the EA.. Prejecl :n (APM • Dallas) -APM has submilled revised lee proposal for the additional work at Royal at 1-35.
The PMIE has agreed to the increase in fee and will be preparing a Briefing Mama for the County. Project 32 (DaIum • Dallas) -A meeting has been set up for this Friday to formally review
the Schematic at the CMAQ office. All pavement studies due from the Consultants, except for Carter and Burgess, have been submlttec:lto the PMIE and forwarded to TxDOT. S. Environmental
-Don Ingram Don Ingram Is attending ISO 14000 Training this week. The training addresses the category of international standards for EnVironmental Standards. Mel McFarland Is continuing
the enVironmental effor1 in Don's absence. The public meeting for comments to the Hillcrest I Spring Valley CMAQ improvement is schedulec:l for July 2, at Fretz ParI< Recreation Center,
at 7:30 pm. A plot or "dot map" of the entire GMAQ effor1 will be presented to emphasize that this improvement is on of many that the County is advancing. 6. Project Control -Tomrny
Mauer PrQJeet Updates -16 Projects were updated this week. 16 other Consultants were notifiec:l that the Progress Reports were overdue: 11 repUes were received, The draft of May's Monthly
Project Report was completed -the final will be submitted to the County this week. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-CQunty Agreement Modlfleatians & AmendedA & B List-Ameatlng will
be schedulec:llo address both related Issues. Continuatian of PMJE Services -The PMIE is preparing the Briefing Memo for the proposed extension based on the outline prepared by Don Cranlora
(County). D:IGENERALIG03MEEnUPDATE\19971119,DOC 
Page .. ot 12 CllfAQ Program Update 1119 Page 4 of4 Commissioners Court BrIefing Memos .. Contract Amendments for Projects 06 and 06, City of Dallas City Force Account reimbursements,
and the TxDOT Escrow Payments are anticipated to be briefed July 8, with Court Order action on July 15. Davis MAPa Leiter Review .. The County is currently reviewing the proposed letter.
8. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next. CMAO Meeting will be held on July 2, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones. 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus
Target Dates County • TxDOT Escrow Briefing Memo ............................, .....................................................................ASAP • City ofDallas Brief ........................
............................................................................................. ASAP • Contract Amendment Briefings (08, (6)...................................... , ....................
........................ .ASAP • Davis MAPa Leiter.. ..................................................................................................................ASAP • PMJE o Revised
Pavement Survey to TxDOT ............................................................................ , ...... Ongoing TxDOTof County I PM/! • TxDOT -County Agreement MocIiffcations..................
..........................................................June 30 • ExhlbitA & BComments ............................., .........................................................................June
30 • Project 71 Construotion Escrow Review... .............................................................................June 28 NCTCOG • Balch Springs TIP Amendment.....: .........................
....................................................... In Progress Meeting Minutes by: APProVij . 􀀭􀀯􀁾􀁾􀀠'p1A61 􀁾􀀠1\ uk Karen M. Jones.t-. ProJ. Mgr. Ivan F. Nicodemus. Proj. Mgr.
Date: Attachments xc: Attendees J. Baumgartner (Town 01 Addison) R. Wunderlich (City of 􀁇􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁤􀀩􀀠􀁃􀁨􀁡􀁾􀁥􀁳Tucker (TxOOT) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) R. larkins (City
of Grand Prairie) Matt MacGregor (TxOOT. C. Sylo (City of Carrolhon) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) LBJ Project Office) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) LaDonna
Smith (NCTCOG) A. Patel (CIty of Coppell) R. Berry (City 01 Mesquite) 􀁓􀁣􀁡􀁾Tandy (Dallas Co.) S. Wilson (CIty 01 Dallas) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) Eric K. Fischer (PBCS) P.
Baugh (City of DaSoto) N. L. Stewart (City of ROwiett) S. Miller (CIty 01 Duncanville) L Henderson (City of Sachse) D. Davis (CIty of Farmers Branch) R. J. 􀁅􀁷􀁡􀁾(City of Sunnyvale)
D:\GENERAl\G03MEElIUPDATE\1997\119.0OC 
Paglll5 Gf12 Dahl: 112'Jf91 Time: 14:19:20'3􀁆􀁭􀁭􀁾SAM wutS To: P.t::.. John BallA1gl'llUllllf ATrACHMENTA ··CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #119 SIGN-IN SHEET June 25, 1997 Karen Jones Parsons
Brinckemoff 214-747-6336 ext. 25 Ion lilly Mauer VI Parsons Bil; ',-,I\\::"'V" 1214-747-R;'\;'\R ext. 31 . Tony Tramel 214-747-6336 ext. 28 Don II 'Y'ttfl I U\::V"QLV, TangJ ESS 214-747-6336
ext 29 vall I\::<> Allen 214-747-6336 ext. 30 Dan c. ARS '-"\.jIl'CC' '" Dallas County 214-653-7603 Dallas County 214-653-7151Bud ""''''''\:: Richard Peterson Dallas County 214-653-7151
􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀭􀀶􀀵􀀳􀁾􀀷􀀱􀀵􀀱Dallas CountyDon L,a,"v,u Dallas County 214-653-6354 􀁑􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀠C!:u lIallllV Sid Horner Dallas County 214-653-6400 Scarlett Iandy 􀁮􀀺􀀽􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀽􀁬􀁾􀀠County
214-653-6018 Dave Davis 972-247-3131 Ali Malekouti a" , 'c' '" Branch City of Dallas 214-670-7748 Tim Starr ::;ity of Dallas liary Taylor TxDOT 214-320-4432 , A. 214-;.\?0-A A-:lC:TxDOT
Helen Tran vaY'"<::l1 TxDOT 214-319-6410 Everett Bacon NCTCOG (817) 695-9253 ,v1i0r.a"" Burbank INClljUli (817) <::nc: M"i1 LaDonna Smith NCTCOG (817) 695-9254 [John Mack FHWA (512)
482-5988 
Ftum:SAMWUlS Tv: P,E.,Jolln ATTACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • June 25, 1997 • General • ConsultantS • Traffic • Civil • environmental • Project Control 1 p,e. General • Design Review
• TIP Coordination • Balch Springs • Escrow Request Preparation • B.M. UnderCounty RsvlB",.03,I18, 15, rOand 71·A • ConstmctJon EscrowR9qu&St (11.A) Preparetl • C. ofDallas Council person
Meeting • Collin County -Dallas County ILA • HillcrestatSpring Valley on Hold • DWU Water Vault Relocation • Funding Issues (1130197 2 
From; SAM MIlS To: P.I: .. John DllIImglllftnef Page 7 0'12 "" = .....& • Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments . -1106 TCS: 􀀨􀁾􀁓􀀮􀁉􀁉􀁦􀀮& C.O. Undor County
Review -1106 H..z: (+219 B.M. & C.O. UndorCountyRIIlIi_ -#13 WPM ( J Dflle/1l Spring Velley IWfllch, Awaiting Fee Proposal -1172 B-1': ( ) TlF'Mod (Balch Sprinfll!l), Request.ed Fee
Proposal -#71 F'TG: ( ) COG 1527(19 IQCll/ion$) AddllJon to Conttact -fI07 Espy ( ) Delete F",_3rd, MOd /H2O Camer Awaillng FeePropossl • Design Consultant Invoice #18-10 Consultant
Invoices -Submitted To County By Rr.st OfNext Week 613007 3 = .....&. Traffle "" • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) • KHA • Progress Meeting Tomorrow Draft For Travel rtme Runs
Comparison • GP (71) Grand Prairie -Parsons Transportation Group -Ptogress Meeting yutentay. TxDOT Intemal Review Of9 t.DcatlOIIB, To Austin Sy July 8 -Two (2J 75% PS&EPacksgN;24 Locations:
& Centml Core & Comm. Review Comments BeIng Compiled • SE Dallas CtJ.·MesIBSISV(72) -SF -Antic/pBts 75% PS&E ForProgress Meeting Next Thursday 613007 • S DaJlu Co.(73)-Lanc./Dunc/DeSoICGdH
4 -Pressntatlon Lest Friday Requested Formal 
-----FrDm; SAW WWS To: P.E, John BaumgartJlln o.te:1f13f91 TIffHI: 14:19:23 Pag:e8I1f12 DB Traffic= i!EF e. (QIllIilrUed) • Signal DNlgn Project Status (Continued) • Irving/Coppell (75)
• Sverdrup -Anticipated Prellllllnary DraftOfStudy DocumenfilltIon By Next ProgI'QSS MeetIng • N Dallas RetJmlng (76) • BWR -Review COIIII!Ients Requested On Draft Technical MelllO And
Appendix Matwfal • Review Efforts -AppnlJdlllafill/y 75% Complete For Project 11 -Pending Reviews For GP 24 Locstlons and Comm, 76 N Dallas Tlllling. snd Project 73 S Dallas 6130/97
5 Design Status (froffu;) PwoonIGompIe" (I 10 :.co JII <4Q IiO III! 1'0: iIo) 110 1(11) 12. E. i)eJuCo. 􀁾􀀠.._73, S. DalIMI Co. IUder ._--I' __._....I.aot Rep«ll"gP&!fod -"""" , 8aaains
PamWII Compklte 6130/97 
Oall,,; llZS/91 Time: 14:19:23 Page 10 ot12 PI Design Status (Gen--"'-Co/I11"".d)e. w • a _ • • m _ • 􀁾􀀠11 􀁏􀁏􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀠Geier 1$ u..00; SciyD 19 R.ou Sa. R 20 "*'" KIa.. 􀀲􀀱􀁾􀀠Mao
􀀲􀀲􀁾􀀠􀁔􀁾􀀠 23 OwIiwSpti"l}l MKCoot. "' ........ ""'" 26 ft. Dt.IIU 2 A9A 􀀲􀁴􀁾􀁄􀁲􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠zr HanylihM /;PtA 2e 􀁾􀁖􀁴􀁩􀀯􀁉􀁓􀁴􀁲􀁊􀀠0II:Ib 29 DIII'IGlTctw.1I)' R\III 3O!M*InCo.
Dal-TOIII 􀀳􀁴􀁾􀁁􀁍􀀠YI1bK 􀁾PtemnMI.jjI"O\Ie Da&.m _ 􀁃􀁏􀁭􀁾􀁓􀁩􀁮􀁣􀁴􀁬􀀮􀁥􀁬􀁴􀀠􀁾􀁧􀁐􀁥􀁲􀁩􀁯􀁤􀀠􀀮􀁂􀁡􀁳􀁥􀁬􀀡􀀧􀁬􀁴􀁐􀁥􀁦􀀧􀁬􀁬􀀸􀁮􀁴􀁾􀀠9 Environmental • Don Ingram in ISO 14000
Training • Public Meeting • Hillcrest at Spring Valley • Fretz Parle Rec Center -WendNday, July 2, 7:30 • Project 09 • GSW EA Received 10 
D4h1: If'}:3fif1 TIme; 14:19:24 Project Control • Accomplishments • 16 Projects Updated This Wllllk. • 16 Projects notified for dollquont updates. • May's Monthly Report completed (Drtrft)
• Final Report will go outthis week. • Issues • De/lquont schedule updates. 6130/97 11 E! = e. Key Jssues "" • TxDOT -County Agreement • TxDOT SUmmllTY ofChanges Being Reviewed • Amended
A & BUst • Will Follow Amendedof Terms • Continuation ofPMlE Services • County Prepared OutlIne ForBriefing • Commissioners Court Briefing Memos • Huitt Zollars, TCB, City ofDallas Payment,
TxDOT Escrow Payment • Davis MAPO Letter Review 6130/97 12 
F.rom: SAW WUJS T,,; P.E., Joha BilUlnlJlI.l1.Iu!I¥ 08.bl: 7t23t!J7 Tiln": 14:19:24 88 IF'􀁾􀀮􀀠Look Ahead .Next Meeting • W<ldnosday, July 2, 1997 ClfAQ con,.",••• Room .NextMilestones
• Proj, No. 1S{SV'IUftnIp) 􀁔􀁥􀁣􀁨􀁬􀁦􀁦􀁬􀁭􀁯􀀣􀀱􀀦􀁾􀁒􀁯􀁍􀁷􀁃􀁯􀁭􀁭􀁴􀁷􀁦􀁬􀀺􀀠JorJ2Q C .. /1mj. No.. 'ItJ (BoyIs) EA DR/f$ubmIlbIl ./till Z3 • PmJ.No.utGardtJ 􀁾􀁓􀁶􀁢􀁮􀁴􀀯􀁦􀁴􀁴􀁬􀀠􀁊􀁴􀀮􀁭􀁐�
�􀁾􀁾􀀠• Pm}. No. Sf rNRbot1 SclJamd::iEA 5ubmltt!tI JIm :u ., • Pm}. No.. 25 (A&') Schamatb'EA 􀁾􀀠JorJ-2$ • ProJ. No. 􀁮􀁾􀁊􀀠􀁓􀁣􀁢􀁮􀁬􀁬􀁦􀁻􀀺􀂣􀁁􀁾􀀠JorJ1S • F'rOJ,No, 􀁄􀁾􀀠SCbamaticIEA
􀁾􀀠J1JIf 2f1 􀀨􀁾􀁉􀁗􀀠 .. Pro}. No. n (BWRJ Tech .Ifemo #f RmewComl2Jentl' JJm 2'1 • F'rOJ,tto.Z1(APfIJ Sell. 0 £A3a6milfaI Jwl'! • Pro/.No.3Z(DmImJ 􀁓􀁾􀁾􀀠,Ju/f 6/30/97 13 1'8 Action
Items 1IlII. • County TatRtl2!!"'" • rxDOT Escrow Briefing Memo ASAP • CIty ofDallas Brief ASAP • Contract Amendment Briefings (08, 08) ASAP • Davis MAPO Letter ASAP • PMIE • Revised
PavementSurvey to TxDOT OngoIng• 'TxDOTlCountylPMIE • TxOOT· County Agl'IIement Modifications June 3D • A&8 Commenls June 30 • Proj 71 Construclion Escrow Review Jund8 • NCTCOG • Balch
Springs TIP Amendment InProglW11 14 
From: SAM W'Uts TO': P.E.• JohnBaumgzutrnK 􀁯􀁾􀁯􀀺􀀠8111197 Time: 16:39'23: Pag& 1 of 13 Memorandum To: File -Meeting Minutes Froml Karen M. Jones Date: August 11, 1997 Subject: CMAQ
Program Update #t2O Conducted July 2. 1997, 2:00 p.m.• CMAQ Program Office Attendees: Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. . PBCS Karen Jones, Ass!. P,M. PBGS Don Cranford
Dallas Co. Sid Horner Da.llasCo, Dave Davis Farmers Branch Ali Malekouti Dallas Moosa Saghian TxDOT Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment B.
Information discussed In addition to tbat which Is contained on the ov&l'haadslncluded: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus TIP Coordination -There will be an administrative amendment to correct
the Mesquite TIP. The signal improvements were put in the TIP as intersection improvements. LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) has indicated thet this issue would be straightened out as soon as
possible. The PM/E office prepared the letter for the City 01 Balch Springs to request a TIP Modification to add two . Signal improvements. Balch Springs will heve to have some type
of council action to support the change. Escrow Requests Preparation -The construction escrow request for 71-S1 (Parsons Transportation Grand Prairie) is awaiting approvallrom TxDOT.
Collin County -Dal/as County lLA -Has not been worked on. Hi/lcrest at Spring Valley Public Meeting -Will be held tonight at 7:30 p.m. at Fritz Park with the City of Dallas. 11m Starr.
Jack Antebi (Dallas), Don Cranford (County). Moosa Saghian (TxDOT). Ivan Nicodemus and Don Ingram (PMIE) will be attending. . PM/E Contract Extension -A meeting Is scheduled with Dan
Savage. Don Cranford (County), Ivan and Karen Jones (PMIE) to discuss the scope of the PMIE extension. The extension brtefing Is scheduled lor July 22. Coordination batween Michael Morris
(NCTCOG) and Jay Nelson (TxDOT) is ongoing. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Pending ContractAmendments: • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) -Briefing memo is scheduled for July 15. • Project 07
(Espey. Huston -Grand Prairie) -Awaiting a fee proposal to delete Freetown at 3rd and the Modification 10 IH 20 at camero • Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars -RichardsoniGarland) -County has
completed the review of the briefing memo and will be scheduled for July 15. D:\GENERAL\G03MEffiUPDATE\1997\120,DOC 
From: SAMWUIS To: P.E.. John Baumgartner Dale: 8111191 Time: 16:39:23 Page 20f 13 CMAQ Program Update If1.l'age tl ofIi • Project 13 ((NP Moore -Farmers Branch) -Still awaiting WP Moore's
fee proposal 10 delete Spring Valley at Welch. • Project 71 (Parsons Transportation -Grand Prairie) -Letter is being prepared to add COG 1527 (19 locations) 10 the contract as requested
by the City. • ProjeCI 72 (Bridgelarmer -MesquiteJBalch Springs!Sunnyvale) -Still awaiting fee proposal from Bridgefarmer. • Projecl27 (APM -Dallas) -Amendment to change scope at IH35E
at Royal Lane. Design Consultant Invoice #16 -May and June will be combined with 19 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁴invoices. 3, TraffIc -Ivan Nicodemus ProJect 7t (Parsons Transportation Group •
Grand Prairie) -The TxOOT Internal review of the Phase Sl final PS&E is not complete. TxOOT is preparing additional review comments from Dan Turk, Melanie Young and Terry Sams (TxOOT):
they will be provided to the PMJE next Monday. Efforts by the PMlE, TxDOT and PTG will focus on incorporating comments without jeopardizing the scheduled October 1997 construction lelling
date. The 75% PS&E -Phase S3 has been SUbmitted (Great Southwest Parkway -14 locations, locally funded). Two 75% PS&E packages are under review. Review Efforts -Approximately 7!5% complete
with Schematic review of Project 11 (Oyekan -RichardsonJDallas). Pending reviews for Phases Cl and 52 for Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Grand Prairie), Technical Mamorandums for
Project 76 (Bucher WilDs & Ratliff -Dallas), and 75% PS&E for Project 73 (Hunter -Cedar HilI/DeSotolDuncanvilielLancaster). 4. Civil -Ivan Nicodemus Ivan reported the following project
status; Project 02 (CPAVI -95% PS&E formal will be reviewed with TxDOT on July 14th. Project OS (PD." . Dallasl-The PMJE has given PBS&J the City of Dallas comments on Ledbetter at Bonnie
View. Project 08 (HuiH.Zollars • Richardson/Oarland) -Moosa Saghlan (TxOOT) stated that TxOOT has not received the bridge layout. MAPO process will be concluded around mid..July • nothing
of consequence has been found. Project 09 (GSW • CedaP HlIIJDeSotoJDuncanville) -The Final Schematic for submittal to TxOOT-Auslin will be given to Moose alter the meeting. . Project
1 II (Halff • Dallas) -MAPO process will be complete after 􀁴􀁾􀁥􀀠public meeting on Spring Valley and Hillcrest. Don Ingram indicated that tile environmental comments from TxDOT have
not been received. . Project 18 (HDR • O8IIa$) -Schematic review comments were reviewed with Larry Hoffman (HDR). Project 25 (ABA. Dallas) -The initial Schematic Design was submitted
today. Project 32 (Datum. Dallas) -Gaylord O'Con (Datum) reviewed the preliminary Schematic Design with the PM/E staff-progress and design satisfactory. S. Environmental -Don Ingram
Pro;ect 11 (Oyekan • DallasIRichardson) -ConSOlidation of the Schematic Environmental Reports will be completa after receiving Information from the City of Richardson. . D:IGENERALIG03MEETIUPDATE\199
7\120.DOC 
Fram;SAMWUIS To: P.E..JohnBaumgorlner Ollie: 8111191 lime: 1&::39;23 PageSof13 CMAQ fIrogram Update 'f.Page a0'Ii Project 28CDlkita • Dallasl-The Draft Environmental comments have been
sent to the consultant Project 29 CRust LicIIlittH'/Jameson • Dallasl -The Draft review comments are complete and will be sent to the consultant. Consolidations are still pending for
Projects 14 (HNTB -LBJ), 15 (Half! -Dallas) and 21 (Mateo -Dallas). Don slated that TxDOT sent their comments in for Project 14, Moosa said that he would check but he fett that TxDOT
had submitted the remainder of the projects to the PM/E, MAPO Letters: • Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars -RichardsonlGarland) -Don has not received very many calls and is working with two
property owners. The procass will conclude mid-July, • Project 06 (TCB -Dallasj-PM/E is still reviewing the logistics of mailing 1,300 notices, • Project 15 (Half! -Dallas) -Ongoing
cocrdination with Mr. Knight (property owner), but will be closed out socn. Coordination with DesignelS -Continues, Don staled that he does not feel oomfortable with the TxOOT-Austin's
formal acceptance/rejectIon of locations with identified hazards. Moosa staled that it is up to the local level not Austin to make the! decision, Don Indicated that TxDOT's definilion
of high risk is inconsistent wIth the County's' pos!ton on high risk, TxDOT has reclassified their 􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁩􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀠on sites with underground storage tank issues and likely petroleum
related contamination from high to low based upon an ongoing contract with a hazard response company to handle these issues when they are encountered. The County has no such arrangement
and h,as been advised by TxDOT that the County can not tak!! advantag!! of TXDOT's arrangement in order to reduce this risk. Therefore, the County's position is that Leaking Underground
Storage Tanks, UST Issues, and other suspect petroleum contaminated sites must remain classified as high risk, Don expressed concern that project locations with less than obvious issues
are not getting addressed, A number of letters of recommendations on several of the intersections call for Phase" work be done. A review 01 the Issues and formal acceptance of the suspect
conditions as identified by the designer or rejdon of theS!! conditions as unacci!ptable by TxDOT is warranted. After this determination the city or sponsoring agency may elect to fund
the additional cost to carry oul the consultants recommendations or assume responsibility for encountered oontarnination, Project 11 (Oyekan -Richardllon/Dal/as)-Moosa talked to Waaer Ragsdale (Richardson) about replacing all the concrete. Moosa feels that it is a high prtce for the amount for concrel!!, but if the city wants to pay the extra
then TxDOTwill build it 8. Project Control-Ivan Nicodemus ProjilCt Updates-Twenty-three projects have been updated this week. May's Monthly Project Report is complete. Issues: Rve projects
curren!iy extend past the August, 1998 target date: • Project 16 (HDR) -August 7, 1998 • Project 20 (ICF Kaiser) -August 21,1998 • Project 28 (Dikiia) -August 24, 1998 • Project 18 (Boyle)
-September 18, 1998 • Project 12 (Carter & Burgess) -Nov. 4, 1998 D:\GENERAL\G03MEEI\UPDATE\1997\12D.DOC 
From: SAl..t WUlS To: P.E .. Jwn Baumgartner Oaie: 8111197 Time: 18:39:23 Page -40(13 CMAQ P70gram Update 11120 Page 4 of5 7. Key Issues· Ivan Nicodemus TxOOT-COUn/y Agreement Modifications·
Ivan suggested a meeting be set up during the week of July 14 to go over the modifications. Moose said that he WOuld check with Gary Taylor (TxDOT) on setting a date jor the meeting.
The A & B list will follow the amended terms of the TxDOT-County agreement Continuation ofPMIE Services· Draft Briefing I Fee proposal review continues. Commissioners Court Briefing
Memos 􀁾􀀠Several draft briefings were temporarily lost, all are now accounted for and are back in the Court process. Davis MAPO Letter Review· Ivan urged the County to review the draft
letter. Design Review Process· The review cycle for the Traffic Signal projects will be reViewed in detall with the TxDOT signal staff In order to avoid 􀁳􀁣􀁯􀁰􀁾􀁣􀁨􀁡􀁮􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠review
comments on the final PS&E. A meeting Is schedule next Monday. 8. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus Nicodemus Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on July 9, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead
for a listing of upcoming rnllestones. 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus TBIII'l!tt DliItes County • TxDOT Escrow Briefing Memo ....""....." ..." ......"."."•..........""." ......" .............
" .•.............. " .. July 15 • City of Dallas BrIefing ........................... " ....., .................................................... " ....""............ July 15 • Controot
Amendment Briefing (06)..." ........ "" .............. " ..." ..... " ................... ".. "." .. " ............ July 15 • Conlract Amendment Briefing (08). ..""................ "
.."."."...•...." ...." .............""""....,, ........... July 22 • Davis MAPO Letter ............... "."...." ..." .............. " ..................................... ".".......................
""ASAP PMJE • Revised Psvement Survey to TxDOT ...." ....."".................. " ........................................ " ...... Ongoing TxDOT., County I PMJE • TxDOT -County Agreement
Modifications ......... " ............................ " ......•.." ........... Week ofJuly 14 • Exhibit A & B Comments ...............................................................................
........... Week ofJuly 14 • Project 71 Construction Escrow RevlfJw........................................................................... Completed NCTOOG • Balch Springs np Amendment...........
............................................................................ In Progress to. Other 1_-Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT and PMIE to check status of EA reviews for Projects 15 (Half!
• DaUas) and 21 (Mateo .. Dallas).. Also TxDOT to check status oj Bridge Layout review for Project 08 (HZ • Richardson/Garland). PMIE will prepared the construction CSJ If request for
Phases C1 and S2 -Project 71 (Parsons Transportation -Grand Prairie). D:IGENERAl.IG03MEETlUPDATE\1997\120DOC 
From: SAM WUlS To; P.E .• John BawlgMtner Dal&: 8/11197 Time: 16:39:23 Page50113 CMAQ p,ogram Update fff:lD Page S ofS Meeting Minutes by; Attachments"'" _ndess Chari.. Tucker (TxDOT)
􀁍􀁡􀁾MacGrB(lOf (TxOOT, l.8J Project Offioo) LaDOnM Smnh (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. FISCher (PSCS) J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City at Balch 􀁓􀁰􀁾􀁮􀁧􀁳􀀩􀀠C.
Sylo (City 01 CIlrroll!oJ1) P. Harts (City of Cedar 1;;11) A. Patel (City ot Coppell) S. W,son (City of Oallao) P. Baugh (City 01 DeSoto) S. Millar (City of Duncanville) D. Davis (City
of Farmers Branch) IVlIn F. Nicod'7r:S' Proj. Mgr. Date: tl 􀁾qZ R. Wunderlich (Cily of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. 􀁄􀁾􀀮􀁣􀁯􀁉􀁬􀀠(City of Irving) A. Johnson (City
of Lancaster) A. Sorry (City 01 Mesquite) w. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L Stewart (City oI_ott) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewett (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERAL\GOSMEET'UPDATE\j997\j20.
DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To; P,E" John Baumgartner Dale; 8111If111ime: 16;39;23 Pag&8of 13 ATTACHMENf' A . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #120 SIGN-IN SHEET July 2,1997 Mauer 'om.:", Allen Everett Bacon
Michael Burbank LaDonna Smith NCTCOG Mack FHWA 
From: SAMWUlS To: P.E..John Baumo:utner Date; 81'1/97 Time: 16:3'9".23 Page 70113 ATTACHMENT B CMAQ PROGRAM e. UPDATE " • July 2, 1997 • General • ConsultantS • Trame • Civil-_:'-• Environmental
• Projet:tControl 7121W . 1 PI e. General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • AdmllIlstratlveAdmendlllfllf To ConecflrfMqulte T1P /lfodfflcalions (lNT'" SIG) • Baldi Spring:;. T1P lrfodmClllion
RequestFlnllliDd, CIty Counc" Acfton He_I')' • Escrow Request Preparation • T>lDOTApproval01Consll'Uclion Escrow Request (71-A) • Collin County· Dallas County ILA • Hillcrest atSpring
Valley Public Meeting • PMlE Contract Extension • Briefing ScheduledJuly 227/2197 
From:SAMWViS To: P.E .• 􀁊􀁯􀁨􀁮􀀸􀁾􀁡􀁴􀁬􀁮􀁥􀁲􀀠08: 8/11197 Tl!ne: 1&:39;23 Paget 0'"3 Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -tI06TCB: (:B!Si B.M.SchalfuledFQrJuly15
-tw8 H·Z: (+2K) C4un/y Review Completed -'#13 WPM ( ) Delete Spring Valleyl Wekh, AWIliting Fee Pn>posal -#12 B-F: ( ) TIP Mod ( Balch Springs), RequestedFee Proposal -f/71 FrG: ( )
COG 1527('I9loClfllollS) Addition to Contract -tI07 Espy ( ) De/ete Fl'Hfown 3rr1, Mod IH2IJ carrier 􀀭􀁾􀀠Awsltlng'FeeProposa/• Design Consultant Invoice #16 • May end June Combined,
19 Consulting Invoices 711197 3 PI e. Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GP (71) Grand Prairie • PTG -hDOT Internal Review Not Complete, July 8 Deadline In Jeopanly -75% PS&E •
Phase S3 Submitted (Great Southwest Parl<.way. 14 LOCatiOll$, Locally Funded) -Two (2) 75% PS&E Packages Under Ravlew • Review Efforts -Approximately 75% Complete For Project 11 -Pending
Reviews For GP 24 LocatIons snd C<lmm, 76 N Dallss Timing, and Project 'T3 S Dallas 711197 4 
From: SAM WUlS To: P.E .. John Baumgartner Date: 8/11197 Tnne: ltk89:.23 P&Q9 9 0113 Design Status " &I. (l'fI1/Jic) • 72. e. DallaICo. 81ktJel!allJ!Elll T.l, a DaiasCo. ttIn1er ,---'I
I-"""" 7121iJ7 p,&I• Civil • Accomplishments • Project 05 • Gave Cal Bostwick the City ofDallas Comments on LedbetteratBonnie View. • Project 16 • Met With Larry Hoffman to Go Over SchematicComments.
• Project 32· Met With Gaylord O'Con and Tom Knir:kerto PrelimInary Review Schematic. • Project 25· Schematic DesJgn Submitted • Issue • Concurrence ofPS&e format wIth TxDOT. 7121iJ7
6 5 
-------From:SAMWUIS To; P.E.• JohnBafJmJ,Jartner DalD; 8111197 TnnD: 16:39:..23 Page 100113 0'1 FImItf'IlIfnlnd't 􀁾􀀠"'_ <Ff OJ """" """ 04 DIftBs PWII;IIn 05 D.tlU POOJ 􀁏􀁓􀁾􀁗􀀠1C&
(J! GtancI Pn*it .., .. _ HZ ..""""""'" """ 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽11 IMfty C8 13 FatmIIt e..dJ UOOM 141&.1 HNi'9 1& ROdas HIm 􀀱􀀹􀁾􀁯􀁴􀁡􀁴􀀠HOO 7/2/97 Project ,,-1'tbtOU,.--.-... ..-..... .,2:J
C4d1tSptirlOt..---."",... .......as -H.0du2 """' 20 DltIItIIIDt. '*"""'--... .. _-.... 2t DdaTtIhIj :jO 0tntM eo. -...31 R'IgaI Row ...... 32: Pr'eItoMY.gmt fJtN\'!. 7/2/97 Design Status
(G."metric) Po","" CM7pIeIe It 10 lC M ao 􀁾􀀠IfQ ttl to to 100 ___1_<. __iiiiIIIII_􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽:_---􀁾􀀬􀀠__""'i_ . ___􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁲􀁴􀁉􀀡􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾...􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾...................
􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀻􀂧􀁾􀂧􀁾-.-___1__􀁾􀀠Design Status (G..""'trk· Conlinu.d) F'BI<ont Com_ 01020 JO om 51) IJD 10 f(I 80100 -""''' 
From;SAUWVlS To: P.E,.JohnBaumQmtner Paten 0/13 • _" • 712197 " Environmental Accomplishments • Project 9· to 1>rDOTI Auslln • Projact11. Pendln9 City Input • Project:lS -15'4 Revi_out
• ProJect29·15r.Rev1ewComplete • ConsolldatJon PendIng. 14, 15,21 'MAPO -Project S, OngOIng -Project 6, Log/slles ofMailing -Project 15, Ongoing • Ongoing coordination with designers
Issues • Femia'AcceptancsIRejacllon ofLocation.. WIth Identified 9Hazsrd6 Environmental Status. 􀁾􀀮􀀠-􀁾􀀮􀀠-AUSTIN SUBMITTAL stJeMITrED13" 􀀲􀀠ACCEPTED ~~&11> . REMAINING 8'" 10 
---mm:SAMwutS TO': P.E.• JohnBaumgamer Dale: 8111/97 Tune: 16:39':23 Page 12O'f 13 Project Control • Accomplishments • 23 Projects Updated ThIs Week. • May'S Monthly Report Completed
• • Issues • FIve (5) Projects Currently ExtendPasf the August 1, 1.998 Completion Date: -ProJ. 16(HdIj Aug. 7, 1998 ProJ. 12 (carte" No •• 4, 1m -Pro). 28 (Dlldta) Aug. 24, 1998 -Prof.
2Q (1(01..." Aug. 21, 1998 -Prof. 18 􀀨􀀯􀀳􀁑􀁾􀁥􀀩􀀠Sept 18, 1998 • One (1) Project RemaIns DeUquent In TheirSchedule Update: -I'ItIJ 19 (S&R)7/2/97 11 Key Issues • TxDOT-County Agreement
• TxDOTSummaI)'ofChanges Being Reviewed • Amended A & B List • WIll Follow Amended ofTermtl • Continuation ofPMlE Services • OmitBriefing I Fee ProponIRe"awMeeting • Commissioners Court
Briefing Memos • July 15· res, Dmlas Payment,TxDOTE.sctQw Payment • Co. Review Compleled. HulttZolIars • Davis MAPO Letter Review • Design Review Pmcess 7J2197 12 
F'rnrn: SAM WUIS To: P..E. John Baumgartner Dale: 91111&1 Time: 11k3tt.23 Pag6 13' of 13' Look Ahead .Next Meeting • _esdaY.July 9, 11197 .NextMilestones ,. 1'lrt1lo.f1(fJ¥IfJ 􀁾􀁒􀁷􀁶􀁬􀁨􀁤􀁓􀁴􀁲􀁨�
�􀁭􀀬􀁱􀁴􀀱􀁣􀁲􀁯􀁐􀁈􀂣􀀠Jtm23 C • 􀁐􀀱􀁴􀁬􀁪􀀮􀁎􀁧􀀮􀁾􀁉􀁄􀁡􀁊􀀮􀁲􀀮􀁭􀀩􀀠􀁾􀁳􀁾􀀠Jrm31)• IWJ. No.1fJ (HJmhty) SubmIf FInal Report. All Amu ..., I ,. Pto}.IIo.'(PMI1J . SrtbmIi.Prrtl.PSUmPI!IIE
.lUI7 • 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁊􀀮􀁎􀁯􀀮􀁊􀁦􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁓􀁕􀁢􀁭􀁬􀀯􀁴􀁡􀁬􀀠􀁊􀁵􀁬􀀷􀁾􀁅􀁁􀀩􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁐􀀱􀁱􀁊􀀮􀁉􀁉􀁯􀀮􀀲􀀴􀁾􀀠SdHtmadi:.'£ASufrml#tI 􀁊􀁵􀁬􀁲􀁾􀁅􀁁􀀩􀀠• Pta/. No.l1 (ItDut1 􀁾􀁾􀀠.1U17 • Pfo/.Ho..Z1{M'11t1O)
􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁯􀁐􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁩􀀮􀀮􀁍􀀱􀁏􀀠....-:-.... • 􀁐􀁦􀁯􀀯􀀮􀁊􀁲􀁯􀀮􀀢􀀨􀀱􀁴􀁡􀀱􀀡􀁾􀀠.14410 .. PlG}.N#.12(DMMtfiJ Scb 􀀮􀁌􀁉􀀺􀀺􀁉􀀧􀀱􀀡􀀺􀀴􀁾􀀠Jul10 712J97 13 1" Action Items Il!!lt.
• county . Tsme(DlItes • TxDOT Escrow BrIefIng Memo Jv1y15 • City of Dallas Bria' July 15 • Contract AmendmantBriefing (06) July 15 • Conllact AmendmentBriaflngs (08) July22 • Davis
MAI'O Letter ASAP • PMIE• Ravlsed PaIIamant Survey to TxDOT ango;ng • TxDOTICmmtylPMIE • T)llJOT. County Agreemant Mod/flcatlonl/July9 • A&B Comments July9 • Pro] 71 Construction Escrow
Review COmpJatad • NCTCOG • Ba/cll Springs TIP Amendment In ProgrQ!J 7/2/97 14 
From: SAM WUIS To: P£.. John Baumgartner Page 1 0114 Memorandum To: Rle -Meeting 􀁍􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀺􀁁􀀠From: Karen M. Jones 11 􀁾􀀠Date: August 14, 1997 Subjectl CMAQ Program Update 11123 Conducted
July 23, 1997, 2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office AHendees: Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBCS Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBCS Tommy Mauer, Proj. Control PBes Tony Tramel,
Traffic DTA James Allen, CMI ARS Dave Davis Farmers Branch Ali Malekouti Dallas Ivan led the meeting with the aid 01 overheads that are included as Attachment B. Information discussed
in addition to that which is contained on the overheads included: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus TIP Coordination -Balch Spring's TIP modification request will be acted upon by the ATC on
August 14. Working on a general TIP Modification to allOw right-of-way funding for projects that do not have an "RU associated to it within the TxDOT DCIS database. This matter was not
cleared up with NCTCO\3's letter to TxDOT last year. PMJE Contract ExlBnsion -Ivan said the brieling SCheduled for July 29 have been pushed back to August 5, so that Judge Jackson will
be In altendance at the briefing. TxDOT Fiscal Year End -Letters have been sent out to all the designers to submit their progress up to TxDOTs end of the year. The PMlE is also performing
this task for the global management of the project. 2. Consultants -ivan Nicodemus Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 07 (ESpey, Huston -Grand Prairie) -Awaiting a revised fee proposal.
first proposal was not satisfactory and without sufficient detail. • Project OS (Huitt-Zollars Richardson/Garland) -Court Order scheduled on July 29. • Project 13 (WP Moore -Farmers
Branch) -The consultant has committed to submit it by next week. • Project 71 (Parsons Transportation -Grand Prairie) -Briefing and Court Order on July 29 to revise COO #1527 locations
and to Incorporate scope changes to the 100% PS&E as directed by TxDOT. In response to a inquiry. Commissioner Mayfield was informed that the changes were requested after the 100% submittal.
• Project 72 (Blidgelarmer -Mesqulte/Balch Springs/Sunnyvale) -Bridgefarmer's fee proposal Is under reView. D;\GENERAL\G03MEET\UPDATE\19971123.DOC 
From:SAUWUIS To: P.E.. JabnBaumgartner Dale; 8112/97 Time: 11:12:32 PIt".2of14 CMAQ Program Update #123 Page 2 of 4 • Project 27 (APM -Dallas)-The Briefing Memo IS being prepared for
scope changes at Royal Lane at IH 35E for July 29. New Project -Ivan said that Bud Beene (County) had selected the firm of Wendy Lopez to design Project 33. Project 33 was a STP-MM project
that was changed into a CMAQ project. The City of Dallas has requested Ihalll be added to the program. The locations are at Alpha Road at Dallas North Tollway and Alpha at Noel Road.
3. Traffic· Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimler Hom -Garland) -Final Report is out for final review. ProjeCt close-out is expected by end of next month. Project 71 (Parsons Transpor1a1lon
Group. Grand Prairie) -Status of phases: S1 • scope change has been negotfated and Is ready for court action and delivery on July 29. The TxDOT intemal review concerns have been resolved.
C1 -awaiting TxDOT comments. once in hand it will be sent to the designer. 52 • consolidating review comments. S3 -awaiting for review comments. Project 72 (BridgelailliGl • Mesquite/Balch
Springs!SunnyY8le) -75% PS&E was delivered on July 18, as scheduled. Fee proposal was submitted on 2 intersections deleted and 3 Intersections added in the Cities of MesquHe and Balch
Springs and is cumently being reviewed. Project 73 (Hunter· Cedar HilI/DeSotO/DuncanvIIJa/Lancaster) -Review comments from the Cities of Duncanville and Cedar Hill were submitted. DeSoto,
Lancaster, TxOOT and the PMIE review are outstanding. Tony indicated thai had called the Cities and had left messages to remind them. Project 75 (SVerdrup -Irvlng/CoppeU) -AI the last
progress meeting the recommended timing plans were provided. The ClUes plan to implement plans August l3-16th. with fine tuning to follow. Project 76 (BWa.R • N. Dallas) -Review comments
for Technical Memo 1 have been requested and Technical Memo 2 has been circulated for comments. Next progress meeting is July 29. Tany slated that he would like to get the 􀁃􀁩􀁾􀁥􀁳􀀠concurrence
to the signal plans to be used in the flatwoi1< packages. . --4. Civil-James Allen The following project status was reported: Project 01 {Leftwich. Faill __ Branch}-Preliminary PS&E
expected by August 1. Project 02 {Chiang,. Pa1el a. Yelby • Duncanville/Dallall} • Awaiting Dallas Water Utilities to agree to the vautt relocation. Project 03(_Engineers -Garlandl·
Expected to have the preliminary PS&E submitted in two 10 three weeks. Project 07 (Espey, Huston • Orand Pro!rie) -The PMIE Is stili not In agreement with the fee submitted for the scope
change. The consultant Is currently revising the fee and providing more detail backup. ProJect 22 (TranSystems -Dallas) -Schematic submittal has been rejected. ProJects 24 (Oarcla •
Dallas), 25 (ABA • Dallas), 30 (Dal-Tech • Dallas) and 32 (Datum • DalIu)-The PM/E Civil reviews were completed. D:IGENERAlIG03MEE1\UPOATE\1997\123.DOC 
From: SAM WIllS To: fl£., John Bawng.vtn." Pat.,: SI12J97 limo: ":12;32 PageS Of 14 CMAG Program Update #tZl Page 3 014 5. Enviror.mental -Ivan Nicodemus Ivan stated that Don Ingram
was on vacation for two weeks. The enVironmental reViews are being performed by Mel McFarland and Lauren Ray from ESS. 6. Project Control -Tommy Mauer Project Updates -13 projects have
been updated this week. Rnal Monthly report for June will be turned in tomorrow. Issues: Nine projects currently extend past the August 1998 completion date: • Project 11 (Oyekan) -Aug.
4, 1998 • Project 25 (ABA)-Aug. 6, 1998 • Project 27 (APM) -Aug. 14, 1998 • Project 32 (Datum) -Aug. 20,1998 • Project 28 (Dikital -Aug. 24, 1998 • Projecl16 (HOR) -Sep\. 2, 1998 • Project
20 (ICF Kaiser) -Sept. 18, 1998 • Project 18 (Boyte) -Oct. 1, 1998 • ProJect 12 (Carter &. Burgess) -Nov. 3, 1998 Twelve design firms are delinquent with their schedule updates. Project
71's revised Project Schedule is due this Friday from Parsons Transportation. Tommy stated that 15 projects were more than 6 months behind schedule. James Allen pOinted out that not
all of the problems are with the designers. The reviewing agencies and the PM/E contribute to these delays when the review oycle is not completed as scheduled. The PM/E staff has compiled
a list of Issues delaying each of the projects. The Usting has been forwarded to Bud Beene, with recommendations to contact the most delinquent finns. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-County
Agreement Modifications -A meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July, 29 between TxDOT and the County to review proposed modifications. Amended A & B List -Will follow agreed upon amended
lenns. Continuation ofPM/E Services -A fee proposal meellng is set for July 28. The briefing has been pushed back to August 5. CommIssioners Court Briefing Memos -APM (Project 27 -Dallas)
and Barton-Aschman (Project 71 Grand Prairie) are on next week's briefing agenda e. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on July 30, 1997. Reference the "Look Look
Ahead" overhead tor a listing of upcoming milestones (two weak window). •• Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus Tam.t Dates. County • Contract Amendment CO (HZ-OS) ...........................................
.............................................. July 29 • Contract Amendment CO+Brlef(PTG-71) ............................................................................. July 29 D:\GENERAl\G03MEETlU
PDATE\1997\123.DOC 
From: SAM WUlS To: P.E .. John Baumgartner Da1e:8{12197 Time: 11:12:32 Page 40114 CMAQ PrDgram Update tlt23 Page 4 Df4 • Contract Amendment Brief (APM-27}.............................................
...........􀁾............................ July 29 • PM!E Amendment Brief.......................................................................................................August5
PMIE • Revised Pavement SUNey to TxDOT (CB) ...........................................................................Ongoing • Davis MAPO Letter.....................................................
...............................................................ASAP • Phase /I 54 recommendations Summary..................................................................................ASAP
• TIP ROW Lisfing........................................................................................................................ASAP TxOOT ICounty I PMIE • TxDOT -County Agreement
Modifications............................................................................. July 29 • Exhibit A & B Comments ...........................................................................
................................ASAP NCTCOG • Balch Springs TIP Amendment......................................................................................... August 14 Meeting Minutes
by: Approved by: Date: 􀀯􀁾􀀠#(J 91 Attachments xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) Matt MacGregor (TxDOT, LBJ Project Office) LaOonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric
K. Fischer (PSCS) J. Baumgerlner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hili) A. Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson
(City of Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll
(City of Irving) A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Stewart (City of Rowlett) Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R.
J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPOATE\1997\123.DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 􀀸􀀱􀀱􀁟􀁾􀀷􀀠Time: 11:12.-32 Page 5 of 14 ATTACHMENT A .CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #123 SIGN-IN SHEET July 23, 1997 214-747-6336 ext. 26Ivan
Nicodemus 1Parsons Brinckerhoff v Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-747-6336 ext. 25Karen Jones ./. Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-747-6336 ext. 31 .IVII lilly Mauer V DeShazo. Tanq 214-747-6336 ext.
28TonYI'd,"tll . Don Ingram 214-747-6336 ext. 29ESS 214-747-6336 ext. 30James Allen ARS 􀁅􀁩􀀧􀁵􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁴􀁉􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠214-653-7603Dallas County Dan Savage Dallas County 214-653-7151Bud
Beene Richard Peterson Inl'lUI'lR County 214-653-7151 214-653-7151 .Dallas County .Don Cranford Dallas County 214-653-6354Sid Horner 21 L1.-I';<;q-6400Dallas County Salas Camarillo Dallas
County 214-653-6018Scarlett I andy Farmers Branch 972-247-3131Dave Davis􀀮􀁾􀀠City of Dallas 214-670-7748lilt· Ali Malekouti Tim Starr City of Dallas 1214-670-5662 TxDOT 214-320-4432Gary
Taylor 21 􀁌􀀱􀀮􀁟􀁱􀁾􀁭􀁟􀁩􀁴􀀠it '21=;TxDOT.Saghian Helt:, , Tran 214-319-6410TxDOT (817) 695-9253NCTCOGEverett Bacon (817) 695-9251NCTCOGMichael Burbank LaDonna Smith NCTCOG 1(817)
695-9254 (512) 482-5988FHWAJohn Mack 
rrom:SAMWUlS To: P.E .• 􀁊􀁯􀁨􀁮􀁾􀀠Dale: 8112197 Time; 11:12:32 PetIe 6 0114 ATTACHMENT B 1'8 CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • July 23,1997 • General • Consultants • Tramc • Civil --". • Environmental
• Project Control 712J197 1 p,fBS. General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • Salch Springs. TIP Modif/catJon Request, RTe August 14 • G8IIfIfIJI TIP AmlltldmenttoIncludeROWFunding
• Collin County. Dallas County ILA • PMIE ContraCt Extension • Brleltng Scheduled August 6 Moved ftrJm July:119 • TxDOT Fiscal Year End 7123197 2 
From: SAM WUIS To: P E., John Baumgartner Dale: 8/12N1 Time: 11:12':32 Page 7of14 ,a4l!lt• Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -1f(J8 H-Z: CO July29 -#13 WPM
Delete Spring lIltney I Welch, Awaiting Fee Propoltal -#72 B":: TIP Mod (Balch springs), Requested Fee PropoNl -#71 PTe: COG 1527 (19 Jot:l1l1ons) Addition to COl/tract -#71 PTG: Chenge
oIDmwingstJfter100%SlIllmlltslto hOOT Court OrderBndBrleflngJuly29 -􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀠-1f(J7 Espy Reviewing Fes Proposlll -#27APM CC Bri&fing July 29 • New Project .,. Project 33 • Wendy Lopez
• Two fntersectfons In the CIIyofD<llfalt 7/23/97 3 Traffic • Signsl Design Project Status • GAR (70) • KHA • Draft Final Out For Final Review Comments • GP (71) Grand PraIrie· Parsons
Transportation Group -SI • NegotiMml Scope Chsnge For Court ActJon & DelIvery 29th -C1 • C8/1tra/Cote & Comm. (75% PS&E) D1sposltlon Revfew Comments Ext:ept MYoung Comm8/1ts -S2·:U Locations
Consolidating RevJew Comments -S3-14 Locations ForSP Revfllw Comments • SE Dallas Co.·MeslBS/SV(SV(72) • SF -75% PS&E Received July 18th, Fee ProPOSlI1 Submllted For AddsIDeietes Mesqu/tel&llch
Springs 7/23/97 -Distributing PS&ETo CJtIes ForComments 4 
-----Fmn:SAMWUIS To: P.E .• JohnSaumgarlner Date: 8112197 Thne: 11:12:32 Traffic (Continued) • Signal Design Project Status (Continued) • S Delles Co.(13J-Lelll:.lDum:/DeSo/CedH -PS&E.
Circulated To Cities, TxDOT, PME. For Review -Awaiting Llilrlcester & DeSoto's Comments • Irving/Coppell (16) • Sverdrup -Recommended Timings Provided --' -Cities To Implement Plans
August 13·16th • Gross & Fine Tuning • N Dei/as Ret/mlng (16) • BWR -Rsview Comments For Tech Mamo 1, Requested -Tech Memo 2 Circulated ForComments -Progress Meeting Scheduled ForJuly
29 7123197 PB Design Status ISS. (TrqjJlc) • • • • • w • • • _􀁾􀀠11),_ -., _1_1t. 􀁇􀁲􀁭􀀺􀁉􀁐􀁲􀁡􀁾􀀠a.A 12. e.o.a.ca. 􀁾􀁡􀁲􀀠 13,a_........ 11_'I-"""'............. --I 􀀱􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀪􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠7123197
5 6 
--------------------___ From; SAM WUI$ To: P.E.. John B,aumgarlntlr Dadfi12JQ7 Time: 11:12:33 PatJe 90114 pa Civil • Accomplishments • Reviewed schematics for Project 24, 25, 30 &32
• Rejected Transystems schematic submittal • Issue • Espey Huston fee proposalfor Project 07 7123197 7 p, Design Status (Geomdrlc)1fIl:II. 01 f"f:I'mi)t 􀁾􀁾.,_ CPY .. ""'" """'eo-"""
..... ... -. .... VI G(WId Prakkt esPY ..oa__lIZ 􀀭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀠-_ -= ..-........•!! "'....., USA 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀭__.iIiiir 􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠at __I 13 􀀧􀁦􀀺􀁉􀀧􀁭􀁩􀀩􀁴􀁾􀀠Iob:N
􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀂭14 UtI HHI1I .......,. N.DaIM IiIifI' 􀀱􀀸􀁾􀀠tlDR ........ 7123197 --------.... 8 
From:$AMWVIS To: P.E.• JohnBaumQMn9f Dale: 8/12191 Time: 11:12:83 Page 10 0114 PI Design Status (Geometric.CoNItlUl'lI). e. _CcmpJele 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠• 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠w 􀁾􀀠􀀱􀀷􀁾􀀠Gqtt 18
Umoalt $IlI)e URoM UR ..21_-..... ..... 􀀲􀀲􀁾􀀠􀁔􀁾􀀠 :tS 􀁣􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀠MKCMl\. 24 Gn.!errdIIIt Gl1ti:t. 2" N. Odes: ABA _􀁾􀀠a 0MilrtOr. CnoI:l zt HMJ' Hms AIM 􀁺􀁥􀀤􀁰􀁭􀁧􀁾􀀠DiIIhrII
􀁾􀁉􀀩􀁡􀁡􀁑􀁔􀁾􀀠RliII: 30 DtntanCo. o..Tad'! 31 Rep! R.cwrt WJt;ut 32 􀁾􀁐􀀧􀀸o.n.rn m -"""" 712:S1117 PI 9 • • Accomplishments • Mel apdLauren conllnulng WOIk • Issues • ncOOT Exhibit
c· ROWInform8llon • Formal IICctlPtant:ei'l'ejecllon atIoc,tkintt with ldentiflld ha2llrrls 10 
rfotn;SAMWUlS To: P.E .• JohnDaumgarfr/(!:r DaN: 8112191 Tune: 11:12:33 􀁐􀁡􀁧􀁾􀀠11 or 14 PB = Project Control-Il'li. • Accomplishments -13 Projects Updaled 1111. Week. • Inldal draft
ofMonlhly Repcrtcompleted (June), • Issues· •N/ne(9) ProJe"", CUI7IIII1ly_nd pasttheAU!/ust 1. 19981ar!/Ot compl.Uon dlllo: -Pro]. 14 fHDl!I sept, J, 1UIl -Pro}. 11 (Oyt/cIIn) AI9. 4,
_ -Pro}. 12 /QIrt<IIj No•• 􀁾ma -PtoPJI {IJJ>JIJI} AIIJ..u. 1m -ProJ. 20 (I<0I0''' Sept.11l. 11191l -ProJ. 18 (Boyle} 0<:t.1. 11191l -Pnl,. 2S {MAl Aug, 􀁾1998 -Pro}.:u (DltIIm) AUf.
20. 111N -Pro,/, Zt {A!WJ Aug. 14,_ • eontaol«l1:lDesIgn firm • ..,doIlqu...tll<lheduie upttates. •Rovlsed Proj. 7111<1hedule duefrom Barton IIIls FrIday.7123197 '_en(15) Projeobl"'"
more than 6monlM behindlI<Ihedlll•• 11 P8 Il'li. Key Issues • TxDOT-County Agreement • ScheduTed Meeting. MondayJuly 28· TxDOT& Dallas County • Amended A & B Usf • WI" Fo/IowAmended
olTenm • Continuation ofPMIE Services • DraftBrI&fIng ForAugustlSlFee Proposal ReviewMeeting Juty%8 • Commissioners Court Briefing Memos • APM and Berton Aschman 12 
From: SAM WUlS To; P.E.. Johh Baurnuwtn&f Dale: 8112J97 Time: 11:12:33 LookAhead· .Next Meeting • _"."day, July 3Q, 1997 .Next Milestones ...RlufItlpld.NI..... N.. 􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠.._.•••
􀁐􀁮􀀳􀀱􀁴􀁯􀀮􀀣􀁾􀀠._-..." 􀁾􀀠Pfr#. 􀁈􀁡􀀮􀁍􀁾􀀠...f1 •• PrftJ,Jfo..nfTfWW) ..."" ,... • f'lqJ.A'II.ZlUQ.w:t 􀁾􀀠IIWf,Mict.HIA/IIV 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾􀁄􀁷􀀠􀁾􀁦􀁬􀁷􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁷􀁾􀁄􀁮􀀠 􀂷􀁉􀁉􀁒􀀡􀁊􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁦􀁯􀀮�
�􀁴􀁦􀁾􀀠 􀀢􀁊􀁬􀁲􀁊􀁬􀁬􀀮􀁉􀁫􀁉􀀮􀀮􀁋􀁉􀁾􀁟􀀠----"" ....... ....... . -...,.·􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁉􀁢􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠-􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀧􀁦􀁉􀁉􀁯􀁊􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁬􀁦􀁾􀀠􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀱􀁍􀀠..... • fllqJ.lb..(HvIej 􀁐􀁲􀁦􀁉􀁉􀀴􀁴􀀢􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁉�
�􀁦􀁴􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁦􀁗􀁾PItt ..... 􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁵􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀁄􀁵􀁯􀁴􀀠....' 71231f}7 13 Action Items " e. • Counly T!!!l!!!f OItes • Contnrct Amendment CO (HU8) July29 • Contnoct
AmQlldmll11t CO+Brlef(PTG-T1) July29 • Contnrct Am"ndmll11t Brief(APIII-27) July29 • • P/IIIE Amendment Btief AugustS • PMIE • Davis MAPO LellW ASAP • Ravl!sedPavement SUlVey 10 7l<D01\CB)
OngoIng • Pilau II EA Recommendations SummaIY ASAP • TIP ROWUsUng ASAP • TxDOTfCounlylPMIE • TxDOT· County Agreemen! Mcd1fftlt{ons July!8 • A&B Comment>; ASAP • NCTCOG .' Bal,,/! Springs
TIPAmendment Augutit14 7123197 14 
Page 130114 ........... ...-.....,"",I." CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER 1\ CMAQ SCHEDULE , , ,, , , , , , , , ,, , ,, ,, ,, , , , , , 
...",DD .. .."''''-......."" CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE 
From:SAMWUJS To: P.E..JohnBaumgastner Dale: 81121911ime: 10;58;35 Page 1 oIlS Memorandum To: File· Meeting Minutes From: Karen M. Jones t6 Date: August 13, 1997 Subject: CMAQ Program
Updale 1122 Conducted July 16, 1997,2:00 p.rn.. CMAQ Program Office Attendees: Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nloodemus, P.M. PBCS Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBCS " Tommy Mauer, Proj.
Control PBCS Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA James Alien, Civil ARS Don Ingram, Environmental ESS Sid Horner Dallas Co. Ivan led the meeting With the aid of overheads that are included as Attachment
B. Infonnation discussed in addition to that which Is contained on the overheads Included: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus /design Review -The rate of reviews is increasing. TIP Coordination
-Administrative amendment 10 correct the Mesqulle TIP has been accomplished. -Balch Springs' TIP modification goes before the ATC for action on August 14, 1997. -Grand Prairie'S coordination
on duplicate listings has been resolved·the administrative amendment has been accomplished. Collin County -Dallas County lLA -PMJE must now also consider what needs to be done With the Interoections in Denton County. Neither
ILA is a high priority. PMJE Contract Extension -Ivan and Karen Jones (PM/E) will be meeting tomorrow with Bud Beene and Dan Savage (County) to go over the briefing memo schedule tor
Court on July 29, 1997. The revised briefing addresses the possible finish dates for the Program. The earliest finish date, which assumes all consultants remain on schedule for the remainder
of the Program, is November '98. The late finish, Which assumes all consultants will continue to lose schedule at the same rate, is November '99. The most probable completion date Is
Sprlng-Summer '99. 􀁉􀁾􀁡􀁮􀀠stated that Michael Morris (NCTCCG), Bud Beene end Jay Nelson (TxDOT) were in agreement that the program should be extended. TxDOT and NCTCOG will be included
In the review of the briefing. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) • Court Order was delayed and Is now scheduled for July 22. • Project
fJl (Espey, Huston. Grand Prairie) -Received fee proposal. It has been rejected based on overpricing and fautly assumptions. • Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars -Richardson/Garland) -Briefing
is scheduled for July 22. 0".,. a Century of I!Itg/IHHoring .1("88ence D:\GENERAl\G03MEET\IJPDATE\1997\122.DOC 􀁾􀀠, ." ... :.. , .. 
From: SAt.t WUIS To: P.E•• 􀁾􀁨􀁮􀀹􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁧􀁡􀁭􀁥􀁲􀀠Dale: &112197 Trme: 10:61;:3:5 Page20t 16 • Project 13 (WP Moore -Farmers Branch) Still awaiting WP Moore's fee proposal to delete
Spring Valley at Welch. Project 27 (APM -Dallas) -Agreed to fee proposal for modification to Royal at IH-35 and a Briefing Memo is being prepared. • Project 71 (Parsons Transportation·
Grand Prairie) -A briefing is being prepared adding the revised COO 1527 (19 locations) to the contract and incorporating TxDOT·requested changes to drawings after the 100% submittal.
Both are going to Brleffng and Court Order on July 29. • Project 72 (Bridgalanmer • Mesquitel8alch 8pringslSunnyvale) • Still awaiting fee proposal from 8ridgefarmer. . " Project 71
TxDOTMeeting -All parties have met and agreed on the review process. Design Consultant Invoice #16 & 17· Submitted to the County. 3. Traftlc-Tony Tramel PlOject 70 (Kimle, Hom • Garland)
-Designer has submitted the Final Report which Is being advancad to the agencies for final review. This will be the last deliverable in the contract. Tony also Slated that a benalitlcost
rallo based on I) year liming assumptions were mede and show a BIC of 80:1. Project 71 (Parsons Transportetlon Group • Grand Prairie, -The project has been divided Into several phases
and all signal Improvement projects will be signified with an'S" and communication phases with a "C'. The PMIE, Consultant and County met with TxDOT last Friday to go over Sl plans and
negotiate changes to the scope so thetthe October '97 bid letting date is maintained. Tony Is consolidating review comments for Phase C1 plans; however, Melanie Young's (TxDOT) comments
are needed to finish consolidation. The PM/E has provided TxDOT with detail project Inlonnation to enable TxDOT to initiate the procurement of construction CSJ #'s for 81 and C1. Tony
said that all comments are complete for Phase 82: comments are being consolidated. Comments are still outstanding for Phase 83. PlOject 72 (8r1dgefarmer • MesqulteJBalch Sprlngs,/SUnnyvale,
-The 75% P$&E Submittal's target dale is July 18. Tany stated thai he had reviewed the documents last week and tt appears 90% complete. A proposal for additions and deletions \0 be made
in Mesquite and Balch Springs Is still needed. Project 73 (Hunter. Cedar Hill/DeSotoJDuncanvillelLancasterJ -The 75% PS&E has been submitted to all the reviewing agencies. Cedar Hill's
comments are the only comments to be submitted to date. Project 75 (SVerdrup • IrvingfCoppell, -The 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠has submitted their 􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁥􀁤􀀠review comments.
Tony hopes to review them with the designer before next Tuesday's progress meeting. ProJect 76 (Bucher, WUIIIII ., Ratliff. Signal Timing. N Dallalll) -Progress meeting has been delayed
until July 29. The review comments for the Submittal (technical memorandums) are pending. Review Efforts -Pending reviews for 52 and S3, Project 71 (Parsons Transportation· Grand Prairie),
70 (Kimley-Hom -Garlend) and 73 (Hunter -Cedar Hill/DeSotolDuncBnvllleJ1.ancaster). Flat work reviews reviews are in progress lor Projects 24 (Garcia -Dallas), 25 (ABA -Dallas). 30 (DaHech
-Dallas) and 32 (Datum • Dallas). O,IGENERALIG03MEE1\UPOATE\1997\122.0OC 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E .. John Baumgartner Dale: 8/12/97 Time: 10:58:35 Page 30116 􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀠CMAQ Program Update #122 Page 3 of5 􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀠4. Civil-James Allen Project
03 (MK Engineer. Garland) -TxDOT comments on Preliminary Right-of-Way Drawings have been sent to the consuttant for dispositioning. Project 07 (Espey, Huston· Grand Prairie) -Received
fee proposal for changes in scope of work. PM/E disagrees wfth the cost and has sent the fee back to the designer for further consideration.• Project 08 (HuiH.zoliars • Richardson{Garland)
-Right-of-Way and Preliminary PS&E have been submitted to the reviewing agencies. Project 11 (Oyekan • Dallas/Rlchardson) -Consolidated review comments have been sent to the designer.
Project 16 (HDR • Dallas) -City of Dallas has dropped the right turn lane at Montfort and Harvest Hill. ThIs was the last issue that needed to be resolved -the Schematic will now be
finalized. Project 17 (Gojer .DaliastGariand) -Final Schematic submittal has been sent to TxDOT for for final approval of TxDOT-Austin. Project 23 (MK Centennial· Dallas) -A meeting
was held to review status of the Schematic and traffic issues. The designer agreed that they were three months behind, but has committed to losing no more schedule. Projects 25 (ABA.
Dallas), 30 (Dal.Tech • Dallas) and 32 (Datum. Dallas) -Schematics have been sent out to the reviewing agencies. Issues: The City of Dallas has added two intersections to the Progrann:
Alpha at Noel and Montfort. Bud Beene is selecting a consunant to design these two Intersections. Sid Horner (County) indicated that the review of Project 03's (MK Engineers) ROW documentation
was almost complete. Preliminary ROW review of Projects 25 and 30 are underway. 5. Environmental -Don Ingram Projects 22 (TranSystams • Dallas) and 25 (ABA. Dallas) -Resolving exceptions
to the draft review comments from the consultants. Project 28 (DikHa • Dallas) -The draft environmental comments have been sent to the designer. Projects 30 (Dal.Tech • Dallas) and 32
(Datum. Dallas) -The Environmental Repcrts have been sent to the reviewing agencies along with the Schematic Design Submittal. MAPO Letters: • Project 08 (Huitt-Zollars -Richardson/Garland)
-Comment period is closed. • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) -PMIE is still reviewing the logistics of mailing 1,300 notices. County is reviewing draft letter. • Project 15 (Halff -Dallas)
-Ccmment penod is closed. Still need a decision on Hillcrest at Spring Valley to finalize. • Project 09 (GSW -Cedar Hili/DeSoto!Duncanville) -Preparing MAPO notices to go out shortly.
Coordination with Designers -Continues.. • Project 18 (Boyle -Dallas) -Designer has committed to submit draft Environmental report (past due) tomorrow. • Project 20 (ICF Kaiser -Dallas)
-Environmental subcontract not executed as of last week.. D:\GENERAlIG03MEEnUPDATE\1997\122.DOC 
􀁆􀁲􀁯􀁭􀁾􀀠SAM WU1S To: P.E.. John Daurngatlner Dale: 8/12/97 Time: 10:58:35 Page 40t 18 CAfAQ ".""".m Update 1I1!l:l Page 4 01 5 • Project 24 (Garcia -Dallas) -Still awaiting preliminary
environmental report. Designer said they would hand deliver it today. • Project 25 (ABA -Dallas) • Still awaiting diskette from designer for draft EA. • Project 32 (Datum -Dallas) -May
be an issue of tree ordinance from the City of Dallas -the design calls for the removal of 17 trees of up to 3 feet in diameter. S. Project ContnII-Tommy Mauer Project Updates -Have
updated 13 projects this week and PM/E activities through the end,of June. The Monthly Project Report will be finished this week. Issues: Eight projects are currently extended past the
August 1, 1998, target date for completion. Three designers are delinquent with their project update. Late notices have been sent and will follow up with phone call. A revised Project
71 Project SChedule is due from Parsons Transportation next week. Deliverables are not currently shown as planned. 7. Kev 1_-Ivan Nicodemus TkDOT-County Agreement Modifications -A meeting
sho\lld be scheduled to go over the proposed modifications, as soon as possible. AmendedA & B Usl -Ivan staled that following the amended terms of the TxDOT-County agrearrent, the A
& B list should be acceptable to TxOOT, County. the Cities and their accounting systems. Continuation ofPMIE Services' Draft Sriefing for July 29; fee proposal review is set for July
16. Design Review Process -A meeting was held with TxDOT for coordination issues regarding the TxOOT review of Traffic proJects. a. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodarrus -Next CMAQ Meeting will
be herd on July 23, 1997. Reference the "l.ocI\ Ahaad" overhead for a listing 01 upcoming milestones, -􀀭􀁾9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodamus Target Dates County • Contract Amendment Briefings
(HZ-08)................................................................................. July 22 • Contract AmandmantCO+Brlaf (PTG-it) .................................................
: ........................... July 29 PM/E • Dewls MAPO Lerter....................................................................................................................ASAP
• Revised Pavement StiNey to TxDOT (CB) ........................................................... ; ............... Ongoing • Phase /I EA Recommendations Summery....................................
.............................................ASAP TIDOT leounlY I PM!E • TxDOT -CClunty Agreement ModificatJons...............................................................................ASAP
,. EXhibit A (I B Comments ...........................................................................................................ASAP D:\GENERALIG03MEET\UPDATE\1997\122.DOG 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 8112/97 Time: 10:58:35 Page 501 16 CMAQ Program Update Ifa Page 5 at 5 NCTCOG • Balch Springs TIP Amendment............................................
..........................................'" August 14 Meeting Minutes by: 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠<.. Ivad. Nicodemus. Proj. Mgr. Date: _f,_'02_4-,-I-to__ j t?,-_9_"1 Attachments xc: Attendees Charles
Tucker (TxDOT) Matt MacGregor (HOOT. LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric K. Rscher (PBCS) J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of
Balch Springs) C. Sylo (City of Carrollton) P. Harts (Cliy of Cedar Hill) A. Patel (City of Coppell) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of Duncanville)
D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite)
W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Stewart 􀀨􀁃􀁾􀁹􀀠of Rowlett) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) O:\GENERALIG03MEEnUPOATE\1997\122.0OC 
From: SAM WUJS To: P.E. John Baumgartner Dale: 8112197 Time: 10::59:35 Page Bot 16 ATTACHMENTA . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #122 SIGN-IN SHEET July 16, 1997 Allen II-\l<>r",tt Bacon Michael
Burbank 214-747-6336 ext. 30 214-653-7603 214-653-7151 214-653-7151 214-653-7151 214-653-6354 214-653-6018 Farmers Branch 972-247-3131 of Dallas 214-670-7748 214-670-5662 214-320-4432
214-320-4435 FHWA 695-9253 695-9251 695-9254 482-5988 " '-., ... -
From: SAM wutS To: P.E .. John 􀁾􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁧􀁡􀁲􀁴􀁮􀁥􀁲􀀠Dale: 81tV91 TuntJ; 10;;fi8;35 Page10J 18 "ATTACHMENT B PI CMAQ PROGRAM IllS. UPDATE • July 16,1997 • General • Consultants • Traffic
• Civil • Environmental • ProJect Control 7116197 1 General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • Admln15fra1lve Admendmont To CmnIctMesquita TIP Accompl1shed • Balch Bpdngs • TIP ModIflClltlon
Request, R1C August 14 • GrandFnllt1e CoordInation 011 DupUctlfe LIstings, AdmfnlstnltiVeAmendmentAccompllslled • Collin County -Dallas County ILA • PMIE Contract Extension • BrIefing
ScheduledJuly29 7116197 
From: SAM WUlS To: P.E .• John Baumgarlner Page 8ot1S Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -#08 Tea: CC OrderJuly 22 -jf(]IJ H-'Z: Briefing July22 -tf.13 WPM Delete
Spring VallayI Walch, Awaiting Faa Proposal -fl728-1': TIP Mod (Salch Springs), Requestad Fee Proposal -tl71 PTG: COG 1527(191ocations) Add/lion to Connet -tl71 PTG: Change ofClrnwlngs
􀁡􀁦􀁴􀁥􀁲􀀱􀀰􀀰􀁾submlltal to 'I1cOOT _._' ColJIt OrderllndBriefing July 29 -#07 Espy Reviewing Fee Proposal -#27 APM Preparing Briefing M4lJI!o • Project 71 TxDOTmeeting • Design Consultant
Invoice #16 -Submitted to County 7111W7 Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) • KHA • Draft FInal Report Provided, Need To Circulate For Final Review Comments • GP (71) Grand
Prairie • Parsons Transportation Group -51-Met Last Frlday@hDOT, Requested Changes To Plans, Negotiating Scope Changes To Meet October LettIng. -C1. CentralCore & Comm. (7ffK, PS&E)
Review Comments Consolidated & PlOviderIFor􀁄􀁬􀁳􀁰􀁾􀀱􀁴􀀱􀁯􀁮􀀬􀀠Need M Young Comments Comments -52.24 Locations Consolidating Review Comments -511-14 LocatIons ForGP Review Commants
. • SE Dallas Co.·MeslB$l$V(72) • SF -75% PS&E Tsrget Is July 18th, Need Fee Proposal For AddsIDe/etes·MesqultelBa1ch Springs 7111W7 4 ., . 
___ Fl'Om:$AMWUIS To: P.E .• JohnBaumgartner Dale: BJ12J9'1 Tune: 10$8;95 Page 901 18 Traffic (Continued) • Signal Design Project Status (COntinued) • S Dallas Co.(73)· Lanr:JDuncIDeSolCedH
-PS&'E Circulated To CftIet;, TxDOT, PME ForReview • Irvlng/Coppell (75) • Sverdrup -Disposition OfReview Comments WIth SVScheduled, Expect Draft OfStudy Documentation AI Next Tue Meeting
• N Dallas ReUmlng (76) • BWR --" -Review Comments For Submllled Material Pending -Progress M$etIng Delayed To July 29 • Review Efforts -Pending Reviews For GP (S2 &. $3), 76 N Dages
TimIng, and ProJecl73 S Daltas, FIne! Report ProJecl70 7116197 Design Status" eI. (1'1t1ffk) _1_-72. E.. DaIIt Co. St t t iN 1 'I ' _....... ............---..... 1--7116197 1/
From:SAMWUIS To; P.E •• JohnBaurngartner [)ate; 8112J91 Time: 10:5t:::36 Page 1Gof16 'Be • Civil • Accomplishments • Project 08· Submitted Bridge Layout to bOOT Recelvecl65% Drawings
• Project 12· Meeting with CityofCa"oHton and Soyle on Trinity Mills atMlclway. • Schematic Design Submitted -Project 17 (FInal) --" -Pto}ect25 -PlOject30 -P1OJect32 • Project 23 Review
Meeting • Issue 7116H! bOOT, CPY, PME July 14, 95% Review Meeting 7 Design Status1" (G••metric)e. _Complete 01 P'*,"*,BI'lIIiIdt l.tOI!ictt "'_ OFf.,-........,.. ""....... ..... """
G1 Qfard PtIIdI I$PY .. -..... _-tIM.1(1 Cof:iIlM 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾tl...., 13f.....ar.dI .... HIm! 15 H. Dales Htif 􀀱􀁂􀁾􀀠IfI:m ,H., C8 _.....-........ 71161!17 I """'--.._-8 
Fton'I: SALt WU:lS To; P..E.. John Baumgartner Dale: 8l121911"1mi!: 10:58:35 Design Status (GtomttJrk-C.nJiruulU)1tIt.'Ii 11 tlII!IIIIGWnd Gc;tr tS u.eo. BaI)e 1'Ra1 9t.R 2G DcipNn IQMer
21 Buc:krW UIhIo 22 􀁾􀀠Tl1I\tStdIWn ;13 ClduSprtngt WII;cn. ,,-..... 25 K. D*J .2 ABA _"__,,-20l:Itrn'6ontlt.. 􀁾􀀠rr HMyHIM. AN 2B 􀁾􀁖􀀮􀀬􀀠lIrlIa 29 IlIIIIlT*'r RtlIt ;)0 0entcnC4.
Da-T«h 􀀤􀁩􀁾􀀮􀁒􀁯􀁷􀀠'Nil:MIt 􀀤􀀲􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀪􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀠 7111V1i7 -P8 1tIt• Environmental • Accomplishments • PmJecf 22 & 25· Rasollllng exceplIo/lS • PtoJoct28·15%",vlowtoDIkHa
• Pto}eet 30 & 32 Preliminary reports distributed & Tn ",vI_ -MAPO -PtoJect 8 & 15 e/omng out -Prqfect 6, logistics ofmaliTng -Pmj&ct09, preparing noticfIII -ongoing coordination with
designers • Issues -TxlJOTExhibit C • Formalacceptance/"'jectiotl otlocal/ons with IdentJt1/idhazants . 7111V1i7 10 
--From:SNAWUlS To: P..E..JohnBaumgartnw 􀁥􀀮􀁬􀁾􀁯􀁊􀀱􀀶􀀠" e. Environmental Status ....... "" , . AUSTIIlIliUBMITTAL 7/16/97 11 Project Controle. " • Accomplishments • 13 Projects Updalad
This Week. • All PWEAOIIvltles updated. • Begin Monthly Rl!portthls week (June) • • Issues • Etght(B) Pr0jsct6 _Ify_puttheAugust 1, 1f1S Iarget comp/eI!on_' -Fro]." _ AIJV. 7. _ -FrDJ.11
(OyobnJ AIJV. ... 1m -Fro]. '2(CIImII Ney.!, 1m -ProJ. 28 (DlkII>I All!/-U. fNtl -I'ropotIWHttSep' 4, 1m -Fro]. 18 􀁪􀁬􀀡􀀴􀁾oct. '. , ... -FrDJ. 25 (ABA) All!/-􀁾,1/SIl -Fro]. JZ(Da1umJ
Aug. 􀁾,... • TIlreeIJ) Daslgn Flml&lIIOde/Iqumtwlth __klllPdale5: 7//6/97 • RevlSildPro/.71_lJ/tIdllitfrom __Frlday. 12 
--------From:SAMWU1$ To: P.E.,JohnBaumaamut Date: 8112197 lime: 10:58::35 Page 13 I)f 16 Key Jssues TxDOT -County Agreement • • NHd toSchedule Meeting • Amended A & B List • Will Follaw
Amended ofTIIIlIfUt Continuation ofPMIE Services• • Dtaft Brle"ng ForJuly291Fee Proposal Revfew MIKIIIng July 16 Commissioners Court Briefing Memos• _...,...'-• Huitt ZoI/am • Design
Review Process • Coord/nation with rxOOT 7116197 Look Ahead .NextMeeting • _esda1, July 23,1997 .NextMilestones tultMlfhltJl!Ulf,.1M ......JttrliMIfIdllldldtID ME ....􀁾__IPMV ......,......,to::llotm
d'4.1M-.t._ 􀁊􀁗􀁤􀁾􀁁􀁉􀁰􀁡􀁲􀁴􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭._7116197 13 CMAQCOIlfemrceRoom ..., o ..., •::: ./1411"""l1li}.......... ::""e ____e!...,. 14 
•• From: SAM WUIS To: P.E•• John Baumgartner Dale: Sll2J97 Time: 10;58-.35 Page 14-of16 p, Action Items • County• Con/rllct Amendment Briefing (HUB) • Con/rIIct Amendment CO+8tlsf (pTG-71)
• PMIE• Dallis MAPa Letter • RevIsed Pavement Survey to T"DOT(CB) • Ph""" 11 EA Recommen_Summary • TxDOTlCountylPMIE • '!)tOOT· County AgreementModifications ___-• A&BComments • NCTCOG
• Salch Springs TIP Amendment • Mesquite Admln/s/rlllfve Changes 7116197 T_'DafN July22 JuIy29 ASAP OngoIng '-, ASAP ASAP ASAP IR 􀁰􀀬􀀮􀀧􀁴􀁾􀀠MfJ 14 In I2II1gl'4n ('omp 1m 16 
From: SAM wutS TO': P.E., John Saumgariner _&1M--....... ""---, ,, , , , , , , , , ,, , , , , , , , , , ,, , CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER" CMAQ SCHEDULE _.5",.e , , ,,, , , , , , , , ,
,, , 
From:SAMwuas Tq: P,E .• JohnBaumgadner Dale: 8112197 Time: 10:'58:35 Page 16ql18 , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , ,, , , , , , , ,, , , , ,, , , , , , ,, , ,, , , , , , ,, , , , , , , ,
. , , , , ,, , , , CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE 
From: SAM WUIS To: p.e.. John Baumgartner Dale: 8112197 Time: 13:34-;(11 PaQ91 0114 Memorandum To: File -Meeting 􀁍􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁳I Froml Karen M. Jones V1 Date: August 15, 1997 SUbjectl
CMAQ Program Update 1/124 Conducted July 30, 1997, 2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office Attende8lll Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBGS Karen Jones, Asst. P.M. PBCS Tommy
Mauer, Proj. Control PBCS Tony Tramel, Traffic DTA James Allen, Civil ARS Don CranfOrd Dallas Co. Tim Starr Dallas Ivan led the meeting with the aid of overheads that are included as
Attachment B, Information discussed in adcrllion to that which is contained on the overheads includad: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus Design Review -Design review and coordination meetings
continue: The Oyeken Group (Project 11 -RichardsonJDallas) will be coming in this afternoon to introduce their new Project Menager, Ms. Reshma Chandnai, P.E,; Wilbur Smith (Project 32
-Dllllas) will be coming in tomorrow afternoon to review their Schematic report TIP Coordination -Balch Balch Spring's TIP modification request Is still scheduled for August 14. Coordination
continues with LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) in preparing the general TIP amendment to include ROW funding, This will allow righI-at-way funding for projects that do nOl have an "R" associated
10 il wilhin Ihe TxDOT database, Collin County -Dallas County ILA • Has not been worked on. PM/E Contract Extension -The briefing is n(JoN scheduled for August 12. Bud Beene (County)
and Charlie Tucker (TxDOT) have talked and agreed to move the bJiefing. The PMIE office is working on a "stop gap" extension for DTA to evoid interrupting the PMIE Services. The briefing
will be Augusl12 and Court Order on the 19th, 2. Censvltants -Ivan Nicodemus Pending Contract Amend/Tlfilnts: • Project 13 r:M' Moore -Farmers Branch) Continue to wait for WP Moore's
fee proposal to delete Spring Valley at Welch, • Project 72 (8ridgefarmer -MesquiteiBaJch Springs!Sunnyvale) • The consultant's fee Is under review. • Project 07 (Espey, HUsion • Grand
Prairie) -The PMIE does not agree with the revised proposal-a letter from the County will be prepared highlighting the points of exception. • Project P.7 (APM -Dallas) -Court Order will
be August 5. D:\GENERAL\G03MEET\lJPOATE\1997\124.DOC 
From:SAMWUIS To: P.E.• JohnBiWn\ilartn6f PalJ6 2of 14 CMAQ Program Update tll:l4 Page:Z of4 • Project 16 (HDA -Dallas) -Received a letter from HDA, did no! include a formal fee proposal.
The consukant proposed no fee adjustments, but did not include supporting documentation. New ProJeot -A Design Concept drawing and a "kick-off" negotiation package is being prepared
for Wendy Lopez to do Project 33. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimley Horn • Garland) -Draft firialls stili out for final review. Project 71 (Parsons Transportation Group. Grand
Prairie) S1 • The Briefing and Court Order for the contract amendment was approved, and the consultant is expected to deliver the Flnal 100% PS&E for Sl to the PM/E and a copy to TxDOT,
tomorrow. If necessary, there will be a meeting Friday. The final documents should be delivered to TxDOT on Monday to be sent to Austin. The October construction bid letting Is still
scheduled. C1 • Review comments have been dispositioned except for Melanie Young's (TxDOT) comments comments (yet to receive). Changes idenftfied in the amendment will also be incorporated.
S2 -Awamng the PMJE and TxDOT comments. S3 -Received the City's review comments, PM/E comments are being prepared. The City has requested a change in schedules and bid package arrangements.
There are 6 signal and 7 communication packages underway. Project 72 (Bridgefarmer • Mesquiter/Balcb 8prIngS/8unnyvaJe) -75% PS&E is under review. Negotiations continue on the fee proposal
for deleting 2 locations and adding 3 Improvements. Project 73 (Hunter • Cedar HiII/Dtt8OtOJDuncanvlllaJLancaster) -All lour clti",s have SUbmitted comments. Tha most extensive comments
were prepared by Gerry DeCamp for the City of Cedar Hill. TxDOT and the PM/E's review comments are needed to complete the review. Project 75 (Sverdrup· Irving/Coppell) -The Cities plan
to Implement plans August 13-16th. Project 76 (&w&R • N. Dallas) . Conclusion of the review comments to the two Technical Memorandums is expected by tha end of the week. During the Progress
Meeting held yesterday, the Cky of Dallas (Mark TItus) explained the diamond Interchange phasing for BW&R's consideration. One issue that has corne up is the TxDOT maintenance construction
along Preston Road. Pothole patching is underway which will make fine tuning the traffic signal timing difficuft, at best. There is a possibility of modifying the scope of services which
currently provides two weeks with two people performing fine tuning by BW&R. The consideration may be to have one person available during different periods of time. TIm Starr (Dallas)
asked ij Iha closed lanes were during peak hours. Tony said Ihat In the am, there are no southbound lanes closed; however, in the pm there are lanes closed at various times. It may also
be necessary to allow lime for the traffiC to normalize before fine tuning. 4. Civil -J'!JTl8S Allen Project status reported as follows: Projects 01 (Leftwich. Farmers Brancb) and 03
(MK Engln_s • Garland) -Scheduled to submit the 65% PS&E by the first week of August. Project 02 (Chiang, Patel & Yerby. DuncanVilleJDallas, -Still waiting on the Dallas Waler Utility
to advise on the possibility of the vault relocation and the cost.· Project 08 (HultI.Zollars • RicbardsonJGariand) -Received thalr specifications and cost estimate which has been sent
on to TxDOT. Preliminary PS&E plans is nOW under review. O:\GENERAL\G03MEEl\UPOATE\1997\124.DOC 
From: SAM WUl$ To: P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 8112/91 Trmo: 􀀱􀁾􀀺􀀰􀀷􀀠CMAIl p,ogram Update 111M Page 3 of 4 Project 09 (G/SW • Cedar Hill/DeSotoJDuncanvllle) -Meeling will be held
tomorrow for a Notice to Proceed on their PS&E. PlOject 11 (Oyekan. Rlchardson/Dalla&, -There will be a meeting this afternoon to meet their new Project Manager and go <:Ner two additional
comments concerning the rneeting that was held with !he developers on the soulhwesl and northwest corner of Arapaho Road at Coil Road. S. Environmental -No update this week' Don Ingram
is on vacation. 6. Project Control -Tommy Mauer Project Updates -14 projects have been updated this week. The Monthly Schedule Update report for June was issued last week. Issues: Ten
projects currently extend past the August 1, 1998 target completion date: • Project 11 (Oyekan) -Aug. 3, 1996 • Project 29 (Rust)· Aug. 4, 1998 • Project 25 (ABA) -Aug. 6, 1998. • Project
32 (Datum)-Aug. 7,1998 • Projecl27 (APM) -Aug. 14. 1996 • Project 28 (Dikita) • Aug. 24, 1996 • Project 16 (HDR)· Sept. 2, 1996 • Project20(ICF Kaiser)· Oct. 2, 1996 • Project 18 (Boyle)·
Oct. 15, 1996 • Project 12 (Carter & Burgess) -Nov. 3, 1996 Two design firms are delinquent with their schedule updates. Project 71's revised schedule was due last Friday from Parsons
Transportation, but should be here next week. Tommy stated that there are still 15 projects that are more than 6 months behind schedule. Tommy also has the engineering schedule which
shows the summary of all !he projects and where they are at in relallonship to what was originally negotiated. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus TxDOT-Counry Agreement Modifications -A meeting
was held today between TxOOT and Dallas County. There was general agreement on the financial iasues. ROW issues to follow -TxOOT and the County to propose language to add to the contract
concerning TxDOT procurement of on-system ROW, which is currently silent. TxDOT has suggested a sentence on how to allow global work on more than is listed in the MB Jist. Amended A
& B List· Will follow the amended terms. Continuation ofPM/E Services -Briefing is scheduled for August 12 and Court Order Augus!19. 8. Look Ahead . Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting
will be held on August 6, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" .<:Nerhead for a listing of uPcoming milestones. D:\GENEAAl.\G03MEETlUPOATE\1997\124.DOC 
From:SN.4WUIS To: P.E.. JohnBaumga.rtMr Dale: 8112191 Tim.: 13:34.:01 CMAQ Program Update #f124 Page 4 of4 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus Target Dates County • Contraot Amendment Brief(APM-27)......
............................................................................ August5 • PM/£Amendment Brief.............................................................................................
........ August 12 PM/E • Revised Pavement SUfiley 10 TxDOT (CB).........................................................................:. Ongoing • Davis MAPO Letter................................
....................................................................................ASAP • Phase /I EA recommendations Summlll}'........,...." ....., ..............................................
, ..............ASAP • TIP ROW Listing................................................................................................................... , .....ASAP • COG lJsting ofLetting
Dates.....................................................................................................ASAP TxDOT /County I PMJE • TxDOT -County AgrllllmentModifications...........................
.............................................. In Review • Exhibit A & B Comments ...................................................... : ....................................................ASAP
NCTCOQ • Baloh Springs TIP Amendment ......................................... , ........................................ , ... ,.. August 14 Meeting Minutes by: Date: Ie; 4tj 91 Dale:
------'\-..:.....,r-Attachmenls xc: Atlendees J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) Charles Tucker (TxDOT) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) R. Larldns (City
of Grand Prailie) Mati MacGregor (TxDOT, C. Sylo (City of CarrolRon) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) LBJ Project Office) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Johnson (City of Lencaster) LaOonna
Smith (NCTCOG) A. Patel (City of Coppell) R. Berry (City of Mesquita) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) S. Wilson Wilson (City of Dallas) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) Eric K. Rscher (PBCS)
P. Baugh (City of DeSolo) N. L. Stewart (City of Rowletl) S. Miller (City of Duncanville)L Henderson (City of Sachse) D. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENERALIG03MEET\UPDATE\1997\124.DOC 
From: SAMWUIS To: P.E.. John Baumg.mf)r D.: 8/12/97 Time: 13:34:07 Page 501 14 ATTACHMENTA . CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #124 SIGN-IN SHEET July 30, 1997 􀁾􀀠1Karen Jones .a'"V, '" Brinckerhoff
214-747-6336 ext. 25 , VII II IIY Mauer Parsons Brinckerhoff 214-747-6336 ext. 31 . YX/,any I,C1' , ''''' -'<::Iv' Ic::tLV, Tang 1214-747-6336 ext. 28 Don !I lid' 01 II ESS 214-747-6336
ext. 29 ... ..l.-' •AI/en ARS c. '\.llt ''''t ." 10 14-747-6336 ext. 30 Dan ". Dallas County 214-6537603 Bud Beene Dallas County 214-653-7151 􀁕􀁾􀀯Don Cranford Dallas County 214-653-7151
Sid Homer Dallas County 􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀭􀁒􀁆􀁩􀁾􀀮6354 <:"",,'" Camarillo Dallas County 214-653-6400 Scarlett I anay Dallas County 214-653-6018 Dave Davis Farmers Branch 972-247-3131 Ali Malekouti
City of Dallas 214-670-7748 -JZ:> <;"" Tim Starr City of Dallas 214-670-5662 1/'-' ,;"" y' Taylor TxDOT 214-320-4432 1􀁍􀀨􀀩􀀨􀀩􀁾􀁩􀀺􀁬􀀠vC1\.l.lIdn IXUUI 0-iA '20fl AA'21:: Helen Tran
IXUU' 214-319-6410 Everett Bacon NCTCOG (817) 695-9253 , Michael Burbank INCr L,;U\:;i ((817) 695-9251 LaDonna Smith NCTCOG (817) anI: 'l?l:;4 . IJohn 􀁾􀁁􀀬􀀠􀀮􀁾􀁉􀀬􀀠ICU\AJA (512)
482-5988 ", 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 􀀸􀁉􀁾􀀲􀀯􀀹􀀷􀀠Time: 13:34:08 Page 60114 ATTACHMENT S "s CMAQ PROGRAM -= -m. UPDATE • July 30, 1997 • General • Consultants • Traffic
• Civil • Project Control 7fJ0I97 1 General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • Balch Springs -TIP Modification Request, RTC August 14 • General TIP Amendment to Include ROW FundIng
• Collin County-Dallas County ILA • PMIE Contract Extension • SriefingScheduledAugust12 "7fJ0197 2 
Ffom:SAMWUlS To: P.E •• JotmBaurngartnur Oato: 8I12J97 Timo: 13:34:08 Page 10t 14 Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -#13 WPM Del..", Spring VBlley I Welch,
AWfl/Ong ""Proposal -#72 B-F: TIPMcd(Balch Springs), Reviewing FeeProposal -#01 Espy Reviewing,,"Proposal -#2T APIA CC Order August U5 • New Project -Project 33-Wendy Lopez • Two Intersecllons
in the CityofDallas • Prepet1ng Sketch and NegotialiOll Package 7130197 3 Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (TO) • KHA • Draft Rnal Out For Final Review Comments • GP (T1)
Grand Prairie • Parsons Transportation Group -S1-Plans To PMElTxDOT Thu, Meeting Frl, Delivery Monday -C1· Centtal Cora & Comm. (75% PS&E) RevlewComments DlsposltJoned, PT To Provide
To PME -$2-24 Loclltions -Awaiting PME & TxOOT Comments -S3-14 Locetions. PMS Comments Pending, Received City's Review Comments -Revisions To Schedule, Estimates,· & BId Packages • SE
Dallas Co.·MesiBS/SV(T2) • SF Tt:lfJl97 -15";{' PSIS RecefvedJuly 18th 4 
--From:SAMWUtS To: P.E..JoIv1Baumgadnef Ds: 8112197 Tune: 13:34:00 Page80114 Traffic (Continlle4j • SE Dallas Co.-MeslBs/sV(72) -SF (Continued) -15% PS&E Received July 18th -Negotiating
Fee Proposal Submftled For AddsIDeleles Mesquite/Balch Springs, VIsiting Site To Confinn Scope -Distributed PS&E To Cities & TxDOT For Review •S Dallas Co.(73)-LancJDunclDeSoICedH -Awaiting
PME & TxDOT Comments • Irving/Coppell (75) -Sverdrup -Recommended Timings ProvIded -Cities To Implement Plans August 13·16th -Gross & Fine TunIng • N Dallas Retiming (76) -BWR -ReView
Comments<For Tech Memo 1&2 Expected In 1 Week -Progrus Meeting Yestenfay, Most Comments Concern The 713f)1fJJ Diamond InterchBf1fle Phasing 5 p, Design Status e. <(TrqJJlc) 􀀬􀁾􀀭11,
􀁇􀁮􀁬􀁮􀁤􀁾Ih\ 72, E.Ollllteo. 􀁾􀁡􀁲􀀠 _1_-73, $. Ddall Cd tb!tw .1__'I' 7/3lJJ97 6 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E•• John Baumgartner Date: 8112197 Time; 13:34:08 Page90f 14 PlJ Civil • Accomplishments • Arapaho at Coit· Coordination with site development • Issue • Espey Huston
fee proposal for Project 07 7/30197 7 p, Design Status (GelJmettlcj1IlII. _CompJoto o tOte 􀁾􀀠40 '5G to 1'1:1l1li' 8G100 01F....􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁥􀁦􀁜􀁯􀁊􀁍􀁴􀀡􀀠,,-"'" ..csu03""""" "'" _ OS"""
.... 00 DIIU " tee (f1 OrW.I'nlIriI ESP'f ..-.......""..". 1Q CO$IPII USA 11 IUcNt t IDtIIat 0f4,In 􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠CB 13 FtfMf:t) 􀁾J,!oi;n WlB,) HNTB, ;5 N. DIIIU He 􀀱􀀮􀁾􀁲􀁷􀁡􀁴􀀠HCR 7/30197
--
__ From:$AMWUlS Tq; P.E.,JohnBaumgartner Page 1Dof14 􀀱􀁔􀁾􀀠18t.NtOM 1{; Rou ,.U __21_ 2.'l 􀁾􀁓􀁊􀁬􀁍􀁯􀁬􀀠􀀲􀀴􀁾􀀮􀀠29 It c.nu1 :M 􀁾􀁏􀁲􀀮􀀠-"%7 IiWI'J m. ze SpMg Vale)' a DeOuT....,.
􀁾􀁾Co. 31 Rei'I Row Q:iiw BoIye 8&R-_..... MKc.nt. GarCt ASA C!n:n APM 􀁾􀀠Ru.t Dll-TtIdl ...... 3;z Pn!Ib::HlIWfI'IM DItum: 7/3Q197 Design Status (Geometdc-Conlinued) ".' .. ,11 __--,
..lwi_--_ -.....-••11--J:.__.... iii..... --.: ••_IIiiiiii"-􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁾............. . -"""" ----,BMeliMPen:::ltltCcmpiete 9 Project Control • Accomplishments
'14 Projects Updated This Week. • Monlhly Report issued (June)• • Issues • Ten (fO) Pn>jo.Io CUrrotltly eJdondpIlst fII. Aug"" f, 11191)II1II/81 •2DesIgn IInns.,. dollnquentwtlh flleIr
selreduf. upclales.-Rev_Pn>j. 71 soh_'. /rom /3arlQn _dueIn!FrIday.7130197 •FIfIoen (1/i) Pn>j."tlUre 1110,. fIIan 6months behind sehe<iuf•• 10 """'PIeIfon dille; -FlO}. 15(11OR} Sopt.1.
1991 -Pro}. U (0yeItan) Aug. 3, 1998 -FIO}.IZ tcamorl No.. 3, 1998 -FlO}. 2B /fliId!II) AUf/. U. 1998 -Pro). 􀁾􀀨􀁋􀁊􀁲􀁬􀁳􀁷􀁪􀀠O<t" 1995 -1'nIJ. 18 (/Ioy/e) O<t If, 1m -ProJ. 211 (ABA)
AlJ9. II, _ -I'm]. 3% (Dalum) Aug. 7, 10911 -1'nIJ. tT(APM) Aug. 1<; 1998 Pn>j.1l9_Aug.",I998 
From:SAMWUiS To: P.E .• John9aumgartner Date: tJIlm7 lime: 13:34:08 Page 11 ol14 liB ,=, •• Key Issues • TxDOT· County Agreement • Meellng, July 30· 1l<DOT8. Dallas County • Amended
A & B List • Will Fo/low Amended ofTerm$ • Continuation ofPMIE Services • Briefing For August12;CoUlfOrder August19 • Continuation ofTraffic Speclaiist • PBCS to Amend DTA Subcontract
In Advance ofPMIE ContracfAmendment 7130197 11 1" I/!:e• Look Ahead • Next Meeting • Wednesday, Aug.st 6, 19117 CMAQ C...""""c:eRoom .Next Milestones 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁣􀂭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁄􀁵􀀮􀀠􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁾􀀠-􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁕􀁎􀁉􀁩
􀁉􀁉􀁡􀁉􀀠􀁾􀁢􀁲􀁊􀁴􀁴􀁷􀁾􀁟􀀠􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁐􀁎􀁉􀀡􀁾􀁃􀀭􀀪􀀢􀀬􀀢􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁏􀁉􀀮􀂭12 
Ftom:SAMWUlS To: Plt,Johnitaumgwtner DaIo; 8112197 Time: 13;34:08 Page 120114 Action Items • County • Contnlct Amendment CO (APM·21) • PHAmendmentBrief • PMIE • Davis MAPO Letter • RevisedPavement
Survey to TxOOT(CB) • Phase /I EA Recommendations Summary • TIP ROWLlsting • COG Usling of Letling Dates -' • TXDOTlCountylPMIE • TxOOT· County Agreement Modificalions • A&B Comments
• NCTCOG • Balch Springs TIP Amendment 7130197 T!!ll!1lt !?iItes AugustS AugulStf2 ASAP Ongoing ASAP ASAP ASAP In Rwiew ASAP AuguiSff4 13 
From: SAM WUlS To: P .E., John Baumgartner Dale: 8112197 Tune: 13:84:08 Vage 190114 ,---.......... Start. "'."" ., , , , , , , , , . , , CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE ,
,, , ,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 
--From: SAM W'UIS To: P.E •• John Baumgartner Dale: 9112197 Time: 13;84:08 Page 1401 14 Start. , , , , ,,, , , , , , , , , , 1 1 j I j I I I " ,t I j I , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , ,, , , , , , ,, , , , , , , ,,, , , ,, ,, • I , , , ,, , , , --...CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE 
From:SAMWUlS To; 􀁐􀀮􀁅􀀮􀀬􀁊􀁯􀁨􀁮􀁂􀁡􀁵􀁭􀁧􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁊􀀠Date: 914197 Trme: 08:01:0t PaGe 1 0115 Memorandum To: File -Meeting Minutes1􀁾􀀠A From: Ivan F. 􀁎􀁩􀁣􀁯􀁤􀁥􀁭􀁾􀀠Date: September
3, 19QJ ! Subject: CMAQ Program Update #128 Conducted August 13, 1997,2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office AHendaes: Sign-In Sheet -Attaqhment A Ivan Nicodemus, P.M. PBes Sid Homer Dallas
Counly Karen Jones, Ass!. 􀁾􀀮􀁍􀀮􀀠PBCS Salas Camarillo Dallas Counly Tommy Meuer. Pro]. Control PBCS Dave Davis Fanmers Branch Tony Tramel, Traffic DTS Ali Malekoutl Dallas Don Ingram,
Environmemal ESS Infonnatlon discussed In addition to that which is contained on the overheads included: 1. General-Ivan Nlcodamus Design Review-Civil and Trafflc will disc.uss in detail
TIP Coordination -Balch Spring's TIP modification request is scheduled for August 14. Collin County & Denton County ILA -Will progress following the PMJE contract extension. PM/E Contract
Extension -TxDOTINCTCOGJDallas Counly meeting was held AugUSIBIh. The major item to come out out of the meeting was the extension has been reduced from 18 months to 15 months. Ivan said
that the schedule was rerun using the new time frame and that this would leave 9 projects for Dallas Counly 10 ctose-out. Thase projects would be in the finel design stage. the main
issue was that the cost of the PMIE was just too high. As the cost projections are based on actual expenditures, the only way to realize savings is to reduce the 􀁾􀁭􀁥of services. .
Dave Davis asked whet date would the contract end? Ivan said February of 1999. Karen added that based on past history, the PMJE would have moneys left over to fund the office for a short
time after this date. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 07 (Espey, Huston -Grand Prairie) -Espey. Huston has provided another fee proposal. They are
giving e credit which is about a tenth of what It should be and adding a fee for additional work 􀁷􀁨􀁩􀁾􀀠is about three times what it should be. The County is forming up a resporise
to send to the designer. • Project 13 (WP Moore -Farmers Branch) -WP Moore's fee proposal to delete Spring Vailey at Welch was not acceptable, another response is due. • Project 16 (HOA
-Dellas) -Received a fee proposallrom HDA. The PMlE agrees the credit is . about the right amount but addffional fee is requested for-Items alreacJy in their scope of work. • Project
28 (Dikita -Dallas) -Fee proposal has been approved by the PMIE for additionsl work. • Project 72 (Bridgefarmer -Mesquite/8a1ch SpringS/Sunnyvale) Preparing briefing memo. • Project?5
(Sverdrup -Irving/Coppell) -Gerry DeCamp aided the City of Coppell in fOllTlatting timing data There will be an additional request from the City of Coppell to finalize the plans in a
format compatible to the Cily of Coppell. This was not in the designers original scope of services. D:\GENERAL\G03MEET\UPDATE\1997\126.DOC 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E.. John 9aumgarlner DB: 914191 Time: D8:01;Ol """dol 15 CJlfAQ PrDflram Update #1%6 Page:Z of4 New Project -Project 33 (Wendy Lopez -Dallas) -A positive meeting
was held yesterday to start fee negotiations, Ivan said thallhe PM/E office was directed by the County, that this contract project not be signed until the PM/E contract extension is
executed. 3. Tralf'lC' Tony Tramel Project 70 (Klmle,. Horn • Garland, -Garland 􀁾􀁮􀁡􀁬􀀠comments due Friday. ProJect 71 (Parsons Transportation Group • Grand Prairie' 51 October letting,
C1 Central Core & Communication (75% PS&E) comments dispositioned, S2 Waiting for the PM/E and TxDOT comments. S3 Consolidated review comment sent to the designer. Project 72 (BridgefArmer
• Mesqulte/8aICh SpringsJ$unnyvale) -The plans sent to public agencies, comments due this Friday. MesqUite goal is to deliver their comments on Monday. Project 73 (Hunter· Cedar HillJDeSotolDllncanvi
lleJLancaster) . Waiting for TxDOT's review comments. Project 75 (Sverdrup. Irving/Coppell, -The detailed controller liming plans were provided to the cities and they are implementing
these plans as we speak. A change order of about $1,200 is expected. Project 76 (&WBcR • N. Dallas' -Dallas review comments tor Tech Memo 1 & 2 are expected in 1 week. The city has requested
Gerry DeCamp to examine the diamond interchange interfaces with the timing plans, 4. Civll-Ivan Nicodemus Project 17 (Gofer. Dallas/Garland,-Austin schematic approval received, PS&E
NIP scheduled. Project 04 (Paragon. Dallas,-Rnal Schematic rejected tor incompleteness. Project 28 (Dildta • Dallas) -Agreed to their fee proposai for additional worl<. Project 07 (Espe,.,
Huston • Grand Pralrie,-County is writing a letter to the designer rejecting their fee proposel and hopefully get things moving again. Pro)ect 15 (HaIff • Dallas) . The PMJE has responded
to the request from the City of Dallas for a change to the 65% plans for Batt Une at Hillcrest. Other Project Comments: Project 01 (Leftwich· Farmers Branch) was going to have their
submittal In by Friday. Project 02 (Chiang, Patel -Duncanville/Dallas) -Still awaiting DWU decision on vauft relocation. Project 03 (MK Engineers -Garland) • StiR promising this week.
Project 07 (Espey, Huston· Grand Prairie) -Had a meeHng With the designer and City of Grand Prairie Ihls morning Grand Prairie has proposed adding the intersection of Roy Orr at Carrier
Parkway to construction of an upgrade of Roy Orr Rd. Project 11 (Oyekan -Dailas/Rlchardson) -PM/E Is iooklng for disposltioned review comments. Project 12 (Carter & Burgess -Dallas)
-They have said the schematic Is done, hOwever the hold up is !he environmental reports. Project 19 (Brown & Root -Dallas) -Ivan said that they have managed to get 61 days behind in
only 4 months. Talks are being held to lind how they are going to pick up that time. Ivan said that DaUas County has asked us to share the orthophotography with Needham Wright for Regal
Row. Ivan said that this has bsen accompllshad. 5. Environmental -Don Ingram Project 18 (Boyle· Dallas) -The draft review comments have been sent out today. D:\ClENERAL\G03MEEl\UPDATE\1997\126.00c

CMAQ Program Updale fl126 Page 30'4 MAPO Letter,,: • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) -PM/E is still reviewing the logistics of mailing 1,300 notices. • Project 09 (GSW -Cedar Hili/DeSoto!Duncanville)
-Notices sent, no responses as of yet. • Project 15 (Half! -Dallas) -Hillcrest at Spong Valley is slm on hold. • ProJect 17 (Gojer -Dallas/Garland) -obtaining addresses. anticipate mailing
neSI week. Coordlnatlan with Designers -Updated July '97 T)(DOT outline sent to all the effected designers. Phase /I Recommendations -Don said that we are getting close to having some
Phase II issues arising. We need to come to some agreement on the process since there is a difference between the T)(ooT and County processes. Also, need to have outlined the funding
of the possible Phase II environmental process. The sponsoring agency will need to make the final decision. . 6. Project Control-Tommy Mauer Project Updates -Nine projects have been
updated this week. The cost database is being updated. Issues: Fifteen projects currently extend past the August 1, 1998, target completion date: (Three more from last week) Five design
firms are delinquent with their schedule updates. They have all been contected. Project 71'S revised schedule from Persons Transportation still has not been received. Called the designer
and they indicated that it would happen this week. . /:;:':::"'''. Fifteen projects are more than 6 months behind schedule. 􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁦􀀢􀀠7. Key lu..ea -Ivan Nicodemus . . • TxDOT-County
Agreement ModificationS -T)(DOT is still prepaling the oposed wording and the amended A & B list will follow \he emended terms. . Continueffon of PM/E SelVices -Briefing is scheduled
for August 19 and Court Order August 26. Bud Beene (County) was going to sign \he briefing memo today. . 8. Look Abead -Ivan Nicodemus -Next CMAQ Meeting will be held on August 20, 1997.
Reference the 'Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones. 9. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus Tanref Dales county • PM/£Court Order .......................................................
....................................................... August 26 PMIE • Revised Pavement SutVey to TxDOT (eB)...........................................................................Ongoing
• DevisMAPOLetler.............., ..................................................................................................... ASAP O:\GENERALIG03MEET\UPOATE\l997\l2B.DOC 
From: SAMi WUlS To: P.E.• John Baumgartner Dale: 914197 Tvne: OB:Gl;Ol _40115 CIlfAQ Program Update 11126 Page 4 014liuiii_ -1iiB.. • Phase /I EA reccmmenciations SUmmllry............................
......................................................ASAP • TIP ROW Listing........................................................................................................................ASA
P • Project 28 Briefing Memo ................................................................................................. August22 • Project 72 ContractAmendment Brlef...........................
.................................................... August22 • Delinquent Sohedule Letters .............................................................................................
August22 bOOT /Caunty I PM/E • TxOOT-County Agreement Modificstiol1$.........................................................................In Review • Exhibit A& B Commenls ........................
...................................................................................ASAP 􀁄􀁾􀁥􀀺􀁾􀀫􀀫􀁾􀁾􀁦􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭__ Date: -1:+-'''-1--\;;;/---Attachments xc: Attendees J. Baumgartner
(Town of AddIson) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) Charles Tucker (TxDOT) W. McDonald (City of Balch Springs) R. Larkins (City of Grand Prairie) Matt MacGregor (TxDOT, C. Sylo (City of
Carrollton) J. Dnscoll (City of Irving) LBJ Project Office) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hili) A. Johnson (City of Lancaster) 􀁾􀁄􀁯􀁮􀁮􀁡Smith (NCTCOG) A. Patel (City of Coppell) R. Berry
(City of Mesquite) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) S. Wilson (City of Dallas) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) Eric K. Fischer (PBCS) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) N. L. Stewart (City of Rowlett)
S. Miller. (City of Duncanville) L. Henderson (City of Sachse) O. Davis (City of Farmers Branch) R. J. EwaK (City of Sunnyvale) D:\GENEAAL\G03MEEl\UPDATB1997\126.DOC 
From: SAM WUlS To: PE, John Baumgartner PageSol15 ATTACHMENT A .CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE #126 SIGN·IN SHEET August 13, 1997 Mauer Tramel 
From: SAM WUlS 􀁔􀁯􀁾􀀠P.C•• John BaurngarineJ Date: 914#87 Timo: 08:01:01 Page 6 of 15 CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • August 13, 1997 • General • Consultants • Traffic • Civil • Envfronmental
• Project Control 8113197 1 􀁾􀀮􀀠General" • DesIgn Review • TIP Coordination • SIl/ch Spdngs. 71P Modlflcatfon ReqUIl$!, RTC August14 • Oenen/TIP Amendmen!1O Include ROWFunding • Collin
County -Dallas County ILA • Denton County. Dallas County ILA . • PMlE Contract Extension • TxDOTINCTCOGIDaIlas CountyMig. Aug B • Coulllilne/ingAUgUst 19, Order August26 8ftMl7 2 
From: SAM WUlS To; P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 914197. Ttm&: 08:01:01 PB--Consultants1IlII• .• Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -t#J7 Espy 011"48 County Response Sent -1113
WPM Delete Spring VaHeyI WeIch, Relllewed Fee Proposal -1116 HDR CredItFee ProposalReceived -#28 Dlkifa Fee Proposal Approved -#'12 a.F: Preparing Briefing Memo -#75Sverdrup Request
from CIty ofCoppell • New Project -Project 38 -Woody Lopez • NegotIlltion Meeling Accomplished 8/13197 3 Traffic • Signal Design Project Status • GAR (70) • KHA -Expect Garland Comments
This Week 􀁾􀀠• GP (71) Grand PraIrie -Parsons Tnmsportation Group -81 -Plans To TxDOTForOct LetlIng -C1-Centtal COll) & Comm. /75"A. PS&E) Comments Dl:;positioned -S2· 24 Locations·
ConsoIfdating Comments -83-14 Locations (75"A. PS&E) Review Comments Submitted To PTS -S4 • 11 Locations 175% PS&S) Received, In RevIew Cycle • SE Dallas Co.-Mes/BS/SV(72)· SF -75" PS&E
Review Comments Due Aug. 8th 8113197 -Processing Change Orrler#1, AddlDeletes 4 
----From: SAM WUl$ To: P .E., John BlWntOariner Date: 914197 lime: 08;01;01 Page80f 15 p, Traffic 1lI!lI. (Continued) • S Dallas Co.(73}-LsncJDunc/DeSoICedH -PME & TxDOT Review Comments
Pending • Irving/Coppell (75) -SVerdrup -Cltles TolmplementPlsnsAugust13.16thGross & Fine Tuning -Need To Process CO For Scope Change ($1,200) • NDallss Retiming (76) • BWR -Awaltlng
Review Comments From City -DeKamp Reviewing Diamond Interchange Pheslng 8113197 5 Design Status. I7'r<!fJic) -Cornp/rItoo 1020 􀁾􀀠o1Q ItO Ib 70 III) totO!)' ..-\ I _""'-Sf....... ---p1--8113197
6 
--------------From:$AMWUIS To: P.E_.JohnBmmgartner Dale: 914197 Time: 􀀰􀀸􀀬􀀰􀀱􀁾􀀰􀀱􀀠Page90f 15 ,iJiIIi\e• Civil • Accomplishments . • Received Austin's APprovel for Project 17 •
Start Negotiations wfth Wendy Lopez for Project 33 • ReJeced Paragon's Rnal Schematic Submittal Project 04 . • Agreed to DlkltB tIIa Fea Proposal for Project 28 • Issue • Espey Huston
Fee PropOSlif for Project 07 • \flIP Moore Fee Proposal for Project 13 • Beftllne Road at Hilicrast Road -City ofDaNas Scope ofWork Request -Project 15 8113197 " iIIi\e. 01 F__Btanc:tJ
"'_"'...... ....... os -. .. _ or GtmdPtb,._eo -􀁾􀀠eM'"" P!III1'!til "'-iIFYHZ ,,-__ 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾􀂭....'" n FlmDn Brandl MoIn 14 LBJ HHrS 1.1 N.DaIal 1fIIIJ 􀀱􀁇􀁾􀀠HD!l 8113197 Design
Status 􀀨􀁾􀁣􀀩􀀠------􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀁾􀀠....._-------􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠-􀁾􀀮___il_ 􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀭􀂭.....___1_ 􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀽 .... ::::_:= _ __ ---..=' .Iiiiiii....i
........ -_-__-::.:;"' ---_.__810<0....--I Santini--PtfW'ltComp:iDte 7 8 
Design Status (6<.""",,,,· Continued) Feteel!l Comp/elll o 􀁾􀀠􀂻􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠w m 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀱􀁔􀁾􀀠Gcjet 1& Uw Oil !DtJe ,..... .0.,.tt_.. -2>O<W_ ..25 -H. 0aIIu 2. N!A :m """'Ot.
􀁾􀀠 􀀲􀀱􀁋􀁴􀁴􀁲􀁊􀁾􀀠A""' 2a 􀁾􀁙􀀡􀁉􀀶􀁹􀀠('Ala 􀀲􀁴􀀰􀁤􀁡􀁊􀁾􀀠FUt 30 􀀰􀁗􀁃􀀰􀁮􀁾􀀠􀁄􀁡􀁬􀀭􀁔􀁾􀀠 31 P.8;:iIRi/W Wb.r 32 PmWiNf.a-Dam ..8113197 '8 Environmental • Accomplishments·
• Project 18· 15% tIIvlew OliltO Soyle • MAPO -ProJlICt 6, log/sUcs ofmailing -Project 9, notices OIlt -ProjllCt 15, on hold -Project 17, Gojerbe/ngpraparlld -ongoing coordination with
designers • Issues • Phase It recommendaflons 8113197 10 
From: SAM W\JJS TO': P.E.• John Ba\Jl1lglll1ner 0.:914197 rtme: 08:01;01 Page 11 of 15 Environmental Issues • Locations with Phase II recommendations NO MAYBE. YES 8113197 11 p,l11li.
Environmental Status DRAft._.... '" -8113197 12 
Project Control • Accomplishments '9 Projects Upftted TIlls Week. • Updating ofcos! data base on-golng. • Issues ·1We/vo (1'1 ProjectseurrenByflJdendpasttheAUf/usf 1, f9981a1!/Of compr..lIon
_ (TIltH m"",>tomlHtweelr) -1'Ioj. 16(/IDRI Oct 2t!, 􀁾􀀠I'Ioj. ../RUSVAug. 4. -1'Ioj. 1110_ A"I/o:l, 1Sse I'Ioj. 24 {CanoloI AUf/. U, 1908 -Pro1· 12 (CtIdetj Nov. a,119B "'"J. 31 (WItbutJ
Aug. 11, 199B -Prot 26 (tlIldIa) Sap< 2t!, 111'i111 f>qf • .:t.I /WIIOdY) Sopt se ..... -Ptoj• ..(I{II/WJ S'I" 23, 1lI9S Ptoj. Z4 /G4tOIIJ) Aug. 1. 1f11lS -Ptr!j.1'lB4l1e} Oct:ZO, _
PrOJ. 1$ (lJ/'JMI} AlIg. 1, -""'1. n (ABAI AlIg. 2t!, 1$$6 -FlO/. $' (Da"'mI AlIg. 1, 1IN -1'10/. 21 (APII) '"""" 􀁾11191J .,Design IIm1slll8t!e11qUfll/lwIltJ thelrsch_ updalU, •Revised
Ptoj. 71 schedul. >tom Barton WIll dllG July 2$, 1m. 8If3l97 • Flftotll (1'1 PtoJ_1lI8mo....than 8mtHlth. behlndsdledule. 13 ,B«=. Key Jssues • rxDOT-County Agreement • TxDOTPrepsringProposed
Wotding • Amended A & BUst -Will Follow Amended ofTemr:r • Continuation ofPMIE Services • BtfellngForAugu:rt1S,CourtOtdluAugust26 • Ongoing CoordInat/QI'I Be1waan TiKDOTINCTCOatCounty
8113197 14 
-----Data: 9{4197 TlmG: 08'J)1:02 Pap 130f 15 e . Look Ahead" • Next Meeting • W.dnesday. Augus! 2D, 1997 .NextMilestoneS 􀁾􀁒􀁦􀁴􀁦􀁴􀁷􀁥􀁥􀀭􀁡􀁩􀀱􀁷􀀠􀁾􀁢􀁩􀀣􀁎􀁥􀁥􀀭􀁡􀁄􀁩􀁴􀁬􀀠􀀺􀁴􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀮�
�􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠􀁉􀀢􀁴􀁉􀁉􀁫􀁉􀁐􀁓􀁬􀁅􀁒􀁉􀁍􀁩􀁎􀁲􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠􀀢􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁦􀁴􀀨􀁟􀁾􀀬􀀮..._-...........8113197 PB e. Action Items • County • PMlEAmendm81ItBrief • PMIE • Davis MAPO Lellsr •
Revised Pavement Survey to TKDOT(CB} • Phase II E.II Recommendallons SummaI}' • TlPROWthlfng • Project 72 Contmcl Amend. Brief • Dellnqu81lt Schedule L.eIlsns • Prqfect 28 Briefing Memo•
TxDOTlCountylPMIE • TxooT -County Agreement Modifications • A&B Comments• NCTCOG • Balch Springs TIP Amendment 8113197 CMAQC.._ROiOm c 15 TlIrqeto.tes August19 ASAP OngoIng ASAP ASAP
Aug 15 Augost15 August 22 InReview ASAP August14 16 
Ffom:SAMWUIS To: P.E"JohnBaumgastner Oak!: 9/4/91 Tm1&: 08:01:02 Page 140115 CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE , ,, , 􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁩􀁇􀁾􀁜􀁉􀁾􀀠I. I I, ,, , , , ,, , , ,, , , , 
--From:SAUWUIS To: P.E"JohnBaumgartnor Dale: 914197 Time: 08:01:02 Page 1501'5 ....., 􀀢􀁊􀀷􀁖􀁍􀁾􀀠, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , , , , , , , , • , , , , ,, , , •
• ,, , • , , , , ,, , • • • ,, • , , • • • , • , , •, , , , ,, ,, , , ,, , , , CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE '., • , ,,, ,, , ,, , , , , , , ,, , _.... 
. ',. " , . ,"' " . _"! , -" .:' -. .. 􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠,., .' . j j j j j j j j , j : j! I ! /j j j j j j 
􀁯􀁭􀁾􀁓􀁁􀁍􀁗􀁕􀁉􀁓􀀠To: 􀁐􀁊􀁾... JohnBaumoartner Dale: BI12i97 􀁔􀁕􀁉􀀧􀁉􀁥􀁾􀀠08;14:59 Pago 1 of 16 􀁾􀂧􀁩􀁉􀀮􀀠 Memorandum 􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀠 TOI Rle -Meeting Minutes From: Tommy L. Mauer,
Jr. 􀁾􀁦􀁍􀁉􀀧􀀮􀀮􀀠Datel September 11, 1997 Subject: CMAQ Program Update 11128 Conducted August 'Z7, 1997, 2:00 p.m., CMAQ Program Office AHandeHI Sign-In Sheet -Attachment A Ivan Nicodemus,
P.M, PBCS Tommy Mauer, Proj. Control PBes Tony Tramel, Traffic DTS James Allen, Civil ARS Don Ingram. Environmental ESS Ali Malekouti Dallas Information discussed in addition to that
Which is cordained on the ovemeads included: 1. General -Ivan Nicodemus D&sign Review -Process continues. TIP Coordlnarlon -Ivan is preparing input for the general TIP amendment to include
ROW funding. The process will continue as the attention is reciirected off the PM/E contract extension issues. Collin County -Dallas County ILA & D&nton County -Dallas County ILA -After
the PMIE contract has passeci these Will be worked on. PM/E Contract Extension -The Commissioners Court order has been rescheduled for September 2 at the request of Commissioner Price.
The contract amendment Is being slightly modified. Project Conrrol -Access Training -Tommy Mauer has been attending Access dalabase training yesterday and again tomorrow. Access Programmer
-Have had a programmer add the administrative charges to the database. Don Cranford (County) said there has been talk that indirecl costs for off-system may be eliminated. Don Ingram
asked if the environmental Phase II costs were included in the database. Tommy Mauer (PB) said it did not. 2. Consultants -Ivan Nicodemus Pending Contract Amendments: • Project 07 (Espey,
Huston -Grand Prairie) -Have received a letter from Espey that attempts to show that the job was under estimated and a credit is not due. The letter is still under review. • Project
13 (WP Moore -Farmers Branch) -WP Moore's fee proposal for the scope chenge at Spring Valley and Welch was not acceptable. Still have not received a response beck. • ProJect 15 (Hallf
--Dallas) -A request was received and a fee proposal is necessary due to the change in scope by the City of Dallas following the approval of the Schematic. Awaiting a response. • Project
16 (HDR -Dallas) -Meeting with HDR tomorrow. • Project 28 (Dikita -Dallas) -Briefing memo is being prepared. OV., a Cent.",. of Engineering Ex"..llence D:\GENERAlIGOOMEET\UPDATE\1997\128.DOC

m: SAM WUIS To: P.E., John Baumgartner Dale: 9/12/97 Time: 08:14:59 Page 20t 18 CMAQ ProgrtJm Update 11128 Page 2 of5 • Project 72 (Bridgefarmer -Mesquite!Balch SpringslSunnyvale) -Briefing
memo has been prepared. • Project 75 (Sverdrup -Irving/Coppell) -Preparing a briefing memo. New Project -Project 33 (Wendy Lopez -Dallas) -Their fee proposal has been received and negotiations
continue. 3. Traffic -Tony Tramel Project 70 (Kimle, Horn. Garland) -Robert Wunderlich (Garland) will have the final comments on this project by next Tuesday. Project 71 (Parsons Transportation
Group· Grand Prairie) -S1 -The October bid date is still set. C1 -Central Core & Communication (75% PS&E) -PT is awaiting the S2, S3 and S4 packages completed before submitting. S2 -24
locations -Consolidated comments were sent last Friday and a meeting will be held next Thursday at Grand Prairie. S3 -14 locations (75% PS&E) -Awaiting the dispositioned review comments
from PT. S4 -11 locations (75% PS&E) -Next on list for PM/E review, awaiting Grand Prairie's review and have received TxDOT's comments. S5 -9 locations (75% PS&E) Received the plans
and will be transmitted for the review cycle. Tommy asked how many signals projects were in Project 71. Tony said there are seven communication packages and six signal projects. Project
72 (Bridgefarmer • Mesquite}Balch Springs/Sunnyvale) -The 75% PS&E review comments from TxDOT are anticipated next week. Mesquite, Balch Springs and Sunnyvale's comments are still pending.
Project 73 (Hunter • Cedar HllljDeSotoJDuncanville/Lancaster) -Have received TxDOT's review comments and these were the most extensive comments they have turned in. The PM/E is reviewing
them now. Project 7S (Sverdrup. Irving/Coppell) -Fine tuning for the City of Irving this week. The City of Coppell is to implement within the next 2 weeks. Gerry DeCamp will be in town
this weekend. There is a change order for $1 ,200 wihlch is being processed through the Commissioner's Court. Ivan said In order to transfer the money to the City of Coppell it has to
be taken from City of Irving. Project 76 (BW&R • N. Dallas) -The review comments havebeen transmitted to BW&R at a meeting yesterday. There was a base set of tasks and they are nearly completed. Ivan said that Beth Ramirez (Dallas) called and they are thinking about
adding a new signal timing project. It will be north of NW Highway and west of Central Expressway with about 95 int.ersections. If the city decides to go ahead with the project, then
a consultant will have to be selected. 4. Civil -James Allen Project 14 (HNTB • LB.!) -Received their markups of the Schematic. This is to help come to some agreement on what the final
alignment of those intersections will be. Project 17 (Gojer • Dallas/Garland) -Had an NTP meeting for the PS&E last Thursday. Project 18 (Bo,le • Dallas) -The Issues were resolved on
the 3 intersections on Live Oak. A letter has been sent to the designer giving them direction. Project 22 (TranS,stems • Dallas) -Received their revised Schematic today. Project 31 (Wilbur
Wilbur Smith· Dallas) -Received their Schematic yesterday and it was missing some items In the Environmental Reports. D:IGENERALIG03MEE1\UPDATE\19971128.DOC 
m: SAM WUIS To: P.E.• John Baumgartner Dale: 9l12l97 Time: 08:":;58 Pa9630116 CMAQ Program Update 1113 Page 3 ofS Project 33 (Wendy Lopez. Dal/as)-Received a new fee proposal and it
will be reviewed. Projects 07 (Espey, Huston· Grand Prairie, 13 (Walter P. Moore· Farmers Branch) and 16 (NDR • N. Dallas)-These projects are negotiating the amendments to their contracts.
Project 19 (Brown & Root • Dallas) -Still waiting lor some additional Information from the consultant on Haskell at Ross before going over it witll tile City of Dallas. Project 02 (Chiang
Palel • DuncanvillelDallas' -Wamng on the DWU vault Issue at Camp Wisdom and Cockrell Hill to be decided. Ivan stated that Project 03 (MK Engineers -Garland) -The consultant needs anotller
week for their ROW documents. Project 12 (Carter & Burgess -Dallas) -Met with Tom Simerly this morning and his hold up' is still GSW Othon. Tom said their Schematic should be complete
by September 12. Received a leiter from the City of Dallas stating that the Intersection at Sylvan Blvd. at Irving Blvd. (Project 22 -TranSystems) has been deleted. Awaiting a similar
leiter from the City on the deletion of Hillcrest Rd. at Spring Valley Rd. (Project 15 -Halff) and Gartand Rd. at Gaston Ave. (Project 21 -Mateo). 50 Environmental -Don Ingram Project
27 (APM • Dellas) -Their drawings were rejected and will have to be updated. The repcrts will need to match the Schematic changes. Project 19 (Brown & Root -Dallas'-Their preliminary
environmental reports were to be submitted last Friday but have not been received. MAPO Letters: • Project 06 (TCB -Dallas) -Davis Street letters are at the printer and should be mailed
this Friday. There will be 815 Non ROW leiters and 1ROW letter sent. • Projeot 09 (GSW -Cedar Hili/DeSoto/Duncanville) -Got an inquiry from the Southland Ccrporetion at Polk and Belt
Une. Don mailed them some information. • Project 17 (Galer -DailasiGarland) -Letters are being prepared for the Ccunty to sign. Coordination with Designers -USA (Project 10 -Coppell)
-They are still dealing with Oyekan. their sub, to get the respcnse on the draft environmental review comments. Don has talked to Jim Reiser (Boyle -Projeo! 18) and they should have
their schematic submitted by the end of next Friday. Phase II Recommendaffons -Don said that the updated database with cost tables and ROW cost estimates have been linked to the data
entry form. 6. Project Contral-Tommy Mauer Accomplishments -Eight projects have been updated this week. The projects that are due this week were moved to week ending August 31,1997,
to coincide with TxOOrs fiscal year end. The July Monthly Report was issued last week. Issues: Sixteen projects currently extend pastlhe August 1. 1998, target completion date: (No change
from last week) D:\GENERALIGOOME8\lJPDATE\1997\128.00c 
From;SAMWUIS To: P:E.. .kIlmBaumgartner Dale: 9112197 Ttme: 08':14:&9 Paga 4 of 16 ClIIAQ ProgMm Update #tflB Psg. 4 of5 Eight design firms are delinquent with their schedule updates.
Project 19 (Brown & Root -Dallas) is 69 days late after 4 months and they haven't started their schematic. Project 71's revised schedule from Parsons Transportation was due July 25.
1997. Tommy said that he will be doing it for them by this Friday. Seventeen projects are more then 6 months behind schedule. 7. Key Issues -Ivan Nicodemus 1XDOT-County Agreemant Modifications
-TxDOT continues to prepare too proposed wording and the amended A & B list will follow the amended terms. Continua/ion 01 PM/E ServiCl3s -Court Order has been rescheduled for September
2. Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs -The City 01 Dallas Is submitting $7-10 sq. ft. plus administrative cIlarges at $8,000-10,000 and the County is submitting $110-120 sq. ft. for ROW.
Don Cranford said that the City of Dallas may need to identify the intersections that are over-over-run due to ROW. 8. Look Ahead -Ivan Nicodemus· Next CMAQ Meeting will be held On September
3, 1997. Reference the "Look Ahead" overhead for a listing of upcoming milestones. 8. Action Items -Ivan Nicodemus TamefDate" County • PM/E Court Order ...............................................
......................................................... September 02 􀁾􀀠Project 72 Contract Amendment Brief. ............................. , .. ," ......., ..........................
, .. September 09 PMJE • Revised Pavemant Survey to TxDOT(CB).............""............................... " .................... " ... Ongoing • Davis MAPO Letter."."" .............................
... " ....................... " ...." ..." .......... " .. ""......... ". August 29 • Phase 1/£A recommendetions Summery........." ..................."'''"...........................,,...............
.ASAP • TIP ROW Listing.................................................................... , ....................................................ASAP • Project 28 8ri9fing Memo .....................
............................................................................ August 29 • Delinquent Schedule Letters ........................... ,'" ..................................................
.......... August 29 TxDOT /County I PMJE • TxDOT -County Agreement Modificeuons......................................................................... In ReView • Exhibit A & B Comments
..........................................................................................................ASAP O,\GENERAL\G03MEE1\UPDATE\1997\128.DOC 
From: SAM WUlS To: P.e.. JOhn Baumgartner 􀁏􀀼􀁴􀀡􀁥􀁾􀀠9112191 Tlmo: 00;14:59 Page50116 CMAQ I"rogmm Update #f2fl Pllge II ofII Meeting Minutes by: TomffiYCM'8Uer. Jr.• Proj. omls Ivan
F. Nicodemus, Proj. Mgr. Approved by: Attachments xc: Attendees Charles Tucker (TxDOT) Matt MacGregor (TxDOT, LBJ Project Office) LaDonna Smith (NCTCOG) Scarlett Tandy (Dallas Co.) Eric
K. FIscher (PBCS) Date: -.......I.-t-"+tq,....f---J. Baumgartner (Town of Addison) W. McDonald (City of Balch Spnngs) C. Sylo (City of Carrolkon) P. Harts (City of Cedar Hill) A. Patel
(Cily of Coppell) S. Wilson (City 01 Dallas) P. Baugh (City of DeSoto) S. Miller (City of DuncanVille) D. Davis (City 01 Fanners Branch) R. Wunderlich (City of Garland) R. Larkins (City
of Grand Prairie) J. Driscoll (City of Irving) A. Johhson (City of Lancaster) R. Berry (City of Mesquite) W. Ragsdale (City of Richardson) N. L. Slewart (City of Rowlett) L. Henderson
(City of Sachse) R. J. Ewalt (City of Sunnyvale) D,IGENEAALIG03MEET\UPDATE\19971128.DDC 
From:SAMWVIS To; P.E •• JohnBalJmgamer flag. So! 16 ATTACHMENTA CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE :#128 SIGN·IN SHEET August 27, 1997 Helen Tran Bacon Michael Burbank Mack 695-9253 695-9251 695-9254
482-5988 
From:SAMWVlS To: P.E.,JohnBaumgartner Dale: 911?J97 Time: OS:14:S9 Page 70116 CMAQ PROGRAM UPDATE • August 27, 1997 • General • Consultant3 • Traffic • CMI • EnvIronmental • Project
Control 8127197 1 PI fl!:II. General • Design Review • TIP Coordination • General T1P Amendmentto Include ROWFunding • Collin County -Dallas County ILA . • Denton County -Dallas County
ILA • PMIE Contract Extension • CC Order re-scheduled for September 2 • Project Control-Access Training • Access Programmer • Administrative Charges Addedto DataBase .8127197 2 
From:SAMWUIS TOo: P.E..JohnBavm;artner Dale: Sl12l97 Time: 08:14:59 Page80116 Consultants • Accomplishments • Pending Contract Amendments -fl()7 espy Response to Dallas County Leiter
Under RevIew -#13 WPM DeleteSpring IIIillleyt Welch, WPM Respnse Due -1#5 Hal" Fee Proposal Due, Hillcrest atSeWine -1#6 HDR HDR Response Due, Meellng AUgust 28 -#28 Dlldl1l Preparing
Briefing Memo -1176 Sverdrup Preparing Briefing Memo -tI1ll S·F; Briefing Prepellld • New Project -Project 33· Wendy Lopez • Fee ProposalReceived, Negot/aUons Continue 8127197 3 Traffic
• Signal Design Project Status 'GAR (10) • KHA • Gadand Comments by TlJe$Clay ·GP(11) Grand Prairie· Parsons Transportation Group -S1 • Oct Sid Date -C1 • Centlal Core & Comm. (15% PS&E)
AwaIting S2, S3,& S4 Comments Sefore Submitting 96% Packages -S2· 24 Locations· 75% Comments Sent Last FIldey. Resolution Meeting Next Thurs AtGRIndPmlrle .-S3· 14 LocllflonB (15% PS&E)
Awaiting Dtspositioned Review Comments From PTG -S4 ·11 Locations (15% PS&E) Next On LIst ForPME ForPME Reviaw. AwaIting GP Revlaw. Received TxDOT Comments -S5· 9 LocatIons (15% PS&E)
Received 8120197. Trensmitted For Rsvlaw Cycle 8127197 4 
Frnm:SAMVw'UiS To: P.E•• JohnBaumgat1ner Dale: 9I12J97 Time: 08:14:59 Page 901 18 Traffic (Continullld) • SE Dallas Co.·MestBSlSV(72) -BF -75% PS&E Ant/clpate rxDOT Comments By N'iXt
Week, Mesquite Balch Springs and Sunnyvale StlIf Pending • S Dallas 􀁃􀁯􀀮􀀨􀀷􀀳􀀩􀁾Lanc.lDuncIDeSoICedH -Received TxDOT RfW/ew Comments, PME Reviewing Now .Irving/Coppell(76) -SVerdrup
-Rne Tuning For Irving Th/$ Week. -Coppefl To Implement WIthin 2 Weeks, GDeKamp In Town This Weekend -Processing CO ($1,200) Through Commissioner's Court • N Dallas Retiming(76)· BWR
-TransmittedReview Comments To BWR 8127197 5 p, Design Status fl!:II. (TrqfJlc) -COmpIeIo • 􀁾􀀠» 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠• 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾_1-1_1t I I _ D,,,., _8127/97 
___ R'om:SAMWWS To: P.E•• JohnBaumgartnl!lr Page 100n6 Civil • Accomplishments • Project 17 GoJer • Notice to Proceed for PS&E • Project 33 W Lopez· RecJeve.d fee proposal • Project
18 Boyle· Resolved issues for three locations • Project31 W. Smith Received schematic submittal • Issue • Project 07 Espey Huston· Fee Proposal • Project 13 WP Moore· Fee Proposal •
Project 16 HDR· Fee Proposal • Project 19 Brown & Root· Haskell at Ross • Project 02 CPY· DWU Vault 8/27/97 7 Design Status·1" (60u_)1slI. PlJIWlI CompIe/o t) 1020 X 40'54 eo l'IJ to
to: 􀀰􀀱􀀱􀀢􀀱􀀺􀁉􀁉􀁉􀁜􀁉􀁉􀀴􀁑􀁾􀁾􀀠"'_ OFf.,"""'" .... CIf 0SIat P.9S1..-..-"'"(1f QrW PIt.\tt ISP'f .. _ l<I .. _iii-... 􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠1a JMfIIIj ca 13 Fnln8rwldl: IIII!co uw HNT'8 1$
N. o.IlI# twtI 􀀱􀀮􀁏􀀺􀁾􀁈􀁄􀁒􀀠8 .8/27/97 ----"'"-
Ftom:SAMWVlS To; P.E..John8aumgartner Dale: 911Zi97 Time: OS:14:i8 Page n of18 Design Status Pli (G_trio-􀁃􀁯􀁬􀁉􀁊􀁉􀁮􀁵􀁾= """""ISS. 􀀱􀀷􀁾􀁾􀀠18 t.MtOlk 􀁾􀀠111 Rou B&R ..-..... .
21 BudI:tIet ¥Me 􀁕􀁾􀀠􀁔􀁾􀀠23 CWlt8pmp MKe.nt. ......... ""'" 25 ItDllN.2 A'BI\ :M OMtDnDr. Coon 􀀺􀁲􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠Af'Mi 2S$pMsJVdIy Dildta 28 0cI1Iiu'1"clJwiQ' JUt 30 \?cII'!IQn
Co. DII-TtdI 􀀳􀀱􀁉􀁴􀁥􀀻􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠32 􀁾􀁑􀁉􀀧􀁉􀁗􀁴􀀠t::\a1$ 1!127197 -PB ISS• Environmental • Accomplishments -Project 27 • Review complete -MAPO -Proj&et 6, Dav/II Struton Its Way
-Project 9, R&eelvlng Inqultfes -Project 11, Goler Befng Prepared -OngoIng Coord1n8t1on WIth Dllllfgners • Issues -Hone Hew 10 
From; SAM W\)IS To: P .E•• John Baumga.rtner Oale: 9112197 lime: 08:14:69 Page 120116 DR g 􀁾􀀮􀀠Environmental Status D.............. .. _.8127197 11 Project Control • Accomplishments:
·81'rojects Upd8tod l'1li.$ _ (Pn>Je<ts du.thI....ek __.. WIE SI:I1mto...-wftIIll<DOI"afIK"yeo,end). • July MonJhJy lblpot! ....Issued. • Issues: 'S""""" (15) Pro}ects currently4IXtendpa$llhe
AugUlt 1, 19Ntarget ccmpIetion date: (No change from 1Bslweei<} 8127197 -Pnd. 16(IIDI1J Oc!. 211, _ -Pnd.l11O!fU1m) """'" Il1Q8 -PtoJ. 12(C4itIJt1 0& S, 1_ -ProJ. 21/{DIkIf1I} Sept.l/f,
_ -PtoJ. 'JIJ (Ka/HII-T, _ -PtoJ.16 /fIoyfw} Oc!.lO, _ -ProJ. B(ASA) Sept ;,m8 -PIOJ· 32j11atJ1m} A..,. 14, 1998 _.8 DoI1!/n IimIsate dO/fquerJt ___• updat... • PrqJeofI9/11&1lJ'..lIdqo/IrtIJalror4mo
Ljl/aanot_S_ • _/sed Pnlj. 71 _ from Ell.... _dUtJIIfy:lf, 1997. .-....1f7) 1'n>jiecfo ........thail6 ___.. 12 ProJ.:rt (N'III) sept. II. 1111 ProJ. 2t(RUlOA"II." 1_Pro/. B _ AI¥-􀁾llf/JPtoJ.
31 􀁾􀁁􀁵􀁧􀀮11, _ PrqJ.:n IWIIIIM SopI68 EA PrqJ. 24 (GMcIaJ AI¥-U. U. llf/J Pnd.19/11U1JAI¥-I4, 1119 ProJ. 23 (MK-ClAI¥-r. 
----------Key Issues • rxDOT -County Agreement • TxDOTPreparing Proposed Wording • AmendedA & BUst -WlIlFollowAmendedofTarms • Continuation ofPMIE Services • Court Order Rescheduled
September 02 • Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs 8127197 13 ,,, 1418. Look Ahead lJNext Meeting • W<ldneoday. Soptomber 3. 1997 .Next Milestones 􀁾􀀱􀁉􀁍􀁍􀁲􀁾􀁄􀁷􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁄􀁶􀀺􀁴􀀠􀁾􀁒􀁦􀂥􀁬􀁴�
�􀁾􀁄􀁶􀁴􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁣􀀭􀁍􀁬􀁊􀁄􀀱􀀱􀀸􀀠􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀱􀀺􀁕􀁦􀁒􀀢􀀪􀀭􀁾􀁍"--,8127197 14 
From: SAM WUIS To: P£., John Baumgartner Dale: 9/12197 Time: 08:14:59 Page 140116 Action Items • County • PMlE Court Onler • Project 72 ContractAmend. Brief • PMIE • Davis MAPO Lefler
• Revised Pavement Survey to TxDOT(CB) • Phase II EA Recommendations Summary • TIP ROWUstlng • Project28 Briefing Memo • Dennquenf Schedule Letters • TxDOTlCountylPMIE • rxDOT· Counly
Agraement Modifications • A&B Comments . 8127197 TawDates Sept 02 Sept OS Aug29 Ongoing ASAP ASAP Aug29 Aug 29 In Review ASAP 15 
From: SAM WUIS To: P.E•• John Baurngllilfner Dale: 9112191 Time: Qa14:59 Page 150116 -_.... ............ , , , ,, ,, , , ,, , , , ,, ,, , , ! , CMAQ DESIGN PROJECTS TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE
, ,, , , , , , 
----FfOm; SAM WUIS T(J; PE.. Joftn Baumgartner Oate: SlI2J97 Tune: 08:14:59 Page 16 of 16 , , • , , , i , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , • , • , , • • , , , , , , , I , , , , ,
, , ,, , , , , ,, , , , , " ,, " , ,, , , ,, ...... CMAQ DESIGN PRO,lECTS...,.. TIER II CMAQ SCHEDULE