O1RROILTON STORMWATER AND : i , .. , ; FLOOD PROTECTION ORDINANCE FEBRUARY 1994 NATHAN D. MAIER CONSUl..TING ENGINEERS. INC, DaHas. Tella& (214:) 139-4141 RH'D APR 1 81997 QlRROI&TON April 17, 1997 Mr. John Baumgartner, City Engineer Town ofAddison P.O. Box 144 Addison, TX 75001 Re: Addison Drainage Contribution Dear Mr. Baumgartner: The City of Carrollton has experienced considerable erosion and flooding problems within our city in the past. Due to these problems, the City of Carrollton has requested that neighboring cities and towns require developments, within drainage basins that discharge to and pass through the City of Carrollton, comply with the City of Carrollton Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance. We are enclosing a copy of this ordinance for your files. Presently, both the City ofDallas and the City ofPlano require that any development, whose drainage flows through the City of Carrollton, submit drainage plans to the City of Carrollton and obtain a letter stating that the development appears to conform to this ordinance. We are requesting your assistance in this area by asking that the City of Addison join with the cities ofDallas and Plano in requiring the same type ofreview and approval of drainage plans on sites contributing to the drainage flow through Carrollton. Please respond in writing as to your consent to this request. Ifyou should have any questions concerning the ordinance, or our request, feel free to contact us. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁾􀀠/Joe Evans Division ManagerlDesign cc: File Tim Tumulty, City Engineer ENGINEERING • 1945 E. Jackson Road· P.O. Box 110535 • Carrollton, Texas 75011·0535.972/466· 3200. Fax: 972/466·3193 I ORDINANCE NO. ....;2",,2,-,-1:=..8___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS AMENDING THE REVISED STORMW ATER AND FLOOD PROTECTION ORDINANCE REGULATING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY TO PROVIDE FOR ELEVATION CERTIFICATES, DETENTION AND RETENTION FACILITIES AND NON-RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE; SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the original Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance No. 1375 for the City of Carrollton was adopted by the City Council on May 12, 1987; and revised on February 15, 1994 (Ordinance 1964); and WHEREAS, certain revisions of the Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance are necessary to promote orderly development ofthe city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARROLLTON,TEXAS: Section 1. That the "Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance", Article 4, Section C (permits), Subsection 4 (Elevation Certificate) is hereby amended and shall read in its entirety as follows: Developers, owners or builders shall complete an elevation certificate prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City whenever a development and/or building is constructed in a designated floodplain area. Section 2. That the "Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance", Article 7, Section D (Detention and Retention Facilities), Subsection 2 is hereby amended and shall read in its entirety as follows: Detention areas in parking lots shall not be: In required parking spaces except as provided in Section D(7). Behind speed bumps unless the speed bumps are made with reinforced concrete. Deeper than six inched unless warning signs are posted. ! i I I Ordinance No. 2218 Page 2 Section 3. That the "Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance," Article 7, Section D (Detention and Retention Facilities) is hereby amended to add subsection 7 which shall read in its entirety as follows: 7. Detention facilities will be allowed in the parking areas of commercial and/or industrial uses. Section 4. That the "Stormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance", Article 8, Section B (General Floodplain Regulations), Subsection 3 (Non-residential Construction) is hereby amended and shall read in its entirety as follows: New construction in reclaimed floodplain areas and "substantial improvement" of any existing commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure in floodplain areas shall either have the lowest floor, including basements ofany new or "substantial improvement" construction, elevated to at least two feet above the design flood elevation; or, together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall: Be floodproofed so that below two feet above the design flood elevation, the structure is watertight, with walls, substantially impermeable to the passage ofwater; Have structural components capable ofresisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buo yancy; and Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certifications shall be provided to the official set forth in Article 4, Section AI. Incremental improvements, either at one time or over a period of time, the cumulative cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value at the time of the first improvement, shall be considered as a "substantial improvement." Improvements to an existing commercial, industrial or other non-residential structure that increase the outside dimensions, but do not result in a "substantial improvement," must meet the requirements of Article S.C. Parking lot pavement for the truck loading docks may be constructed below the design flood elevation. Table 10 presents a synopsis ofthe requirements for nomesidential structures in floodplain areas. Ordinance No. 2218 Page 3 Section S. That save and except as amended by this ordinance, Ordinance No. 1964 adopting the Storm water and Flood Protection Ordinance, shall remain ill full force and effect. Section 6. That conviction of a violation of the S tormwater and Flood Protection Ordinance is punishable in accordance with Section 10.99 of the Carrollton City Code. Section 7. That the provisions oftrus ordinance are severable in accordance with Section 10.07 of the Carrollton City Code. Section 8. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ISm DAY OF OCTOBER 1996. Pamela Schmidt City Secretary Q V) 7A 􀁾􀀠;PO '\" 1f2 1.486 '>n 1/2Q '" _ (A) (R),,",J (S) or V = (R)""IJ (S) n n Where: Q '" Row in cubic feet per second. V = Velocity of flow in conduit in feet per second. A = Cross-sectional area of the conduit in square teel. R '" Hydraulic radius of tile conduit, which is the area of flow divided by the wetted perimeter (R =AlP). S = Slope of the hydraulic gradient. n '" Roughness coefficient of the conduit. P = Wetted perimeter. Figure 22 is a graphical solution of Manning's Equation, which allows sizing of concrete pipe, assuming an "n° value of 0.013. 2. Minimum and Maximum Velocities in Pipes The minimum velocities in conduit shall be 2 . .5 feet per second. The minimum slopes for various pipe sizes that will maintain this minimum velocity are given in Table 3. The recommended maximum velocities offlow in the conduit and channels are given in Table 4. The maximum discharge velocities in the pipe shall also not exceed the permitted velocity of the receiving channel or conduit at the outfall to prevent erosive conditions, as shown in Table 4. The maximum outfall velocity of a conduit in partial flow shall be computed for partial deptb and shall not exceed the maximum permissible velocity of the receiving channel unless controlled by an appropriate energy diSSipater (e.g. stilling basins, impact basins, riprap protection). 3. Roughness Coefficients for Conduits In general, stormwater shall be carried in concrete pipe conduit, but other types of conduit can be used to carry stormwater. However, prior permission to use metal conduit must be obtained from the City Engineer. Table.5 shows recommended roughness coefficients for various types of conduits. If, in the opinion of tbe design engineer, other values for the roughness coefficient should be used, the different value can be used with the permission of tbe City Engineer. Appropriate notes of the approved roughness coefficient shall then be shown on the engineering plans. 32 4. Hydraulic Gradient of Conduits Conduits must be sized and slopes must be set such that runoff flows smoothly down the drainage system. To insure this smooth passage, the hydraulic gradient must be at the proper elevations. The proper starting elevation of the hydraulic gradient shall be set according to the applicable criteria listed below: 1. When a proposed conduit is to connect to an existing storm sewer, the hydraulic gradient of the proposed storm sewer should start at the elevation of the hydraulic gradient of the existing storm sewer based on an evaluation of the existing storm sewer with respect to the requirements found in this ordinance. This criterion will be used for existing systems whether or not they are designed in accordance with this ordinance. 2. When a proposed conduit enters an open channel, creek, or flood control sumps, the hydraulic gradient of the proposed conduit should start at the 10-year water surface elevation of the channel or creek when the ratio of the drainage area of the receiving creek (at the development) to the development area is 15 or greater. For ratios of less than 15, the l00-year water surface will be used on the receiving creek. Not only is it important to use the proper starting elevation for the hydraulic gradient, but proper hydraulic gradient elevations must be maintained for the length of the conduit. The inside top of the conduit should be at or below the hydraulic gradient. However, effort should be made to keep the top of the pipe as close to the hydraulic gradient as possible so that deep excavations to lay pipe are not required. When the conduit is flowing partially full, the hydraulic gradient shall be shown at the inside crown of the conduit. The hydraulic gradient shall be kept two feet below the top of curb. If this cannot be obtained, the hydraulic gradient shall be at least 1.5 V12f2g feet below the gutter line, where V 1 is the velocity in the lateral. 5. Minor Head Losses When establishing the hydraulic gradient of a storm sewer, minor head losses at points of turbulence shall be calculated and included in the computation of the hydraulic gradient. Entrance Losses Entrance losses to a closed storm sewer system from an open channel or lake shall be calculated using Equation 4. 33 I (Equation 4) Where: HL = Head loss in feet. VI = Velocity in the downstream pipe in feet per second. Ke = Head loss coefficient (see Table 6). The resulting hydraulic gradeline shall be compared to inlet control conditiOns for the storm sewer as described in Section F. The higher of the two values will be used as the controlling upstream hydraulic grade line. Expansion Losses For pipe size expanSions, head loss shall be calculated using the following equations: (Equation 5) Where: HL = Head loss in feet. VI = Upstream velocity in feet per second. 01 = Upstream pipe diameter. 02 = Downstream pipe diameter. Manhole and Bend Losses Head losses associated with manholes for pipe direction changes and bends in pipes of equal diameter shall be calcula ted using: (Equation 6) Where: H L = Head loss in feet. V2 = Velocity in the downstream pipe in feet per second. Kb = Head loss coefficient from Table 7. 34 Junction Losses Head losses associated with wye connections or manholes with branch laterals entering the main line can be calculated by using Equation 7. (Equation 7) Where: HL = Head loss in feet. VI = Velocity in the upstream pipe in feet per second. V2 = Velocity in the downstream pipe in feet per second. Kj = Head loss coefficient from Table 7. 6. Storm Sewer Laterals Laterals for storm sewer systems shall be sized to control the flooding depth at the inlets. The depth shall not exceed the limits previously established for storm sewer systems. Calculation of the flooding depth shall be determined based on the addition of the velocity head of the lateral to the computed HGL: ELEV =HGL + VL2 2g This calculated elevation shall be compared to the elevation determined based on inlet control nomographs as developed by the Department of Transportation. The highest of the twO elevations shall be used to establish the capacity of laterals and the corresponding depth offlooding. 7. Outfalls to Open Channels and Lakes The flow lines ofstorm sewer conduits that discharge into open channels shall match the flow line of the channel. One exception to this requirement of matching the flow line is when a storm sewer discharges into a concrete-lined channel. or when the outfall is submerged below the normal water surface of a lake. In the case of a pipe discharging to a lined channel, the outlet must be below the top of the channel lining. The second exception pertains to storm sewer discharge that must cross wide floodplain areas. Under this condition, the storm sewer could discharge into a lined ditch which would convey runoff to the flow line of the channel without creating an erosive condition. Permissible velocities within the ditch will be based on the type of lining used and the velocities provided in Table 4. Flumes to bring the disCharge down to the flow line of earthen creeks shall not be permitted. Drop structures shall be allowed upon written approval of the City Engineer. The velocity at the discharge end of the conduit shall be computed based on partial flow depth and shall be sufficiently low so as to not cause downstream erosion problems. Table 4 shows the maximum velocities allowed in various types of channels. which are then the maximum discharge velocities at storm sewer outfalls. 35 In some circumstances. the configuration of the storm sewer in relation to the flow line of the creek may cause excessive velocities to be reached unless provisions are made to slow tbe velocity. One recommended metbod of slowing the velocity is to have the last length of pipe (a length of at least ten times the diameter) be on a slope that will reduce the partial flow outlet velocity to the values shown in Table 4 for the receiving stream. Stilling basins shall also be allOWed to reduce discharge velocities. The discbarge pipe shall also intersect minor creeks at an angle not to exceed 60 degrees. Minor creeks are defined as those creeks. cbannels. or drainageways where the distance from the pipe outlet to the opposite creek bank at the bottom of the channel is twenty (20) feet or less. Pipes may intersect major creeks (greater than 20 feet to opposite bank) at a9Q.degree angle. The City Engineer may require that pipes intersect major creeks at an angle not to exceed 60 degrees, when a 9Q.degree angle would result in an erosive condition. Figure 23 shows how a storm sewer sbould be configured to discharge into a creek. 7. Easements for Enclosed Storm Sewers and Positive OverQow Areas All storm sewer conduits to be dedicated to the City of Carrollton shall be located in an easement dedicated to the City of Carrollton at the time of final platting of the property. The easement shall be at least 15 feet wide for storm sewers or wider if the City Engineer reqUires it for maintenance or Other purposes. Special drainage easements on private property sball be a minimum of 10 feet wide or wider if the City Engineer reqUires it for maintenance or other purposes. No fences, buildings or other structures and improvements shaH be placed within these dedicated easements. SECTION F. Culvert Design Standards Culverts shall be designed in accordance with the Texas Highway Department Hydraulic Manual. Cbapter 4· Culverts. The calculation of hydraulic grade lines will consider botb inlet and outlet control for the culvert. Starting water surface elevations for gradeline calculation will be the same as required for storm sewers; see Section E. 36 ARTICLE 7 Sl'E.CIAL DRAINAGE FACILITIES SECTION A. Channels L Channel Design Open channels may be used instead of enclosed systems when the drainage area of contributing flow to the channel is greater than 160 acres. Open channels shall not be permitted when the drainage area is less than 160 acres. Table 4 shows the maximum velocities allowed for certain types of channels. Roughness coefficients for the design of open channels are provided in Table 8. The following criteria shall be used in determining the nature of the open channel. 􀀮􀁆􀁑􀁌􀁾with a contributing drainae-e area QJ 160 acres Of greater: a. Channels may be left in their natural state provided that the channel velocities are 6.0 feet per second or less. b. If the natural channel is to be replaced by an improved channel, the flow from the IOD·year design flood must be contained within the improved channel while allowing for one foot of freeboard. An improved channel shall meet the floodplain alteration regulations presented in Article 8. c. Improved channels shall include a lined section if the design velocity is greater than six feet per second. Lining types such as concrete, rock walls and gabions, may be used upon approval of the City Engineer. Improved channels with design velocities of less than the permissible velocities shown in Table I I may be earthen if the channels are revegetated properly. d. For lined channels, all of the channel bottom and at least the first three feet (vertical height) of the side slopes up from the channel bonom shall be lined, unless approved by the City Engineer. e. Earthen sides above the lined section or totally earthen channels shall be on at least a four horizontal to one vertical slopes and shall have approved ground cover to prevent erosion. f. Unless shown to be feasible in a soils report sealed by a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas, and approved by the City Engineer. improved channels shall have minimum side slopes of: 4 feet horizontal to I foot vertical for earthen grassed side slopes. 1.5 feet horizontal to I foot vertical for side slopes in rock. g. The developer or owner shan use low maintenance vegetation for vegetative cover, as approved by the City Engineer prior to planting. The selection of materials shall comply with either the current ground cover listing for North Central Texas furnished through the Texas Agricultural Extension Service or Table 9 in this ordinance. 37 h, The developerlowner shall provide a drainage easement and a required maintenance easement (see paragraph 4 below) which shall be dedicated to the City of Carrollton as a penn anent drainage right-of-way and open space corridor. i. Channel improvement shall not include concrete pilot channels which do nOI meet the requirements of item A, I,d" unless approved by the City Engineer. 2. Erosion Prevention All channel sections must consider and account for channel stabilization in their design, This requirement pertains to all sections whether they are left in their natural condition or are modified in any manner. Three sets of requirements are provided depending upon the relationship of the existing channel to the limits of the developerlowner's property boundaries. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to require the implementation of the portion of these requirements as deemed necessary, depending on the specifics of the property being developed or improved, a, In cases where the entire channel section is contained within the limits of the developer/owner property boundaries, The developerlowner shall: I. Provide for an improved stabilized channel cross-section which reduces all velocities to 6,0 fps or below for vegetated channels. The channel improvements must meet all requirements of this oroinance, 2. For vegetated channel sections with channel velocities ranging from 6 to 8 fps, construct grade control structures within the channel and overbank areas to prevent erosion, Grade control structures shall have a minimum effective depth of 3,0 feet below existing or proposed grades with an adequate number of structures to prevent less than I foot of degradation. b, In cases where the property boundary follows the centerline of the channel or incorporales only a portion of the channel cross-section, the developer/owner shall: 1, Detennine the design section required to provide for an improved stabilized channel cross-section which reduces all velocities to 6.0 fps or below for vegetated channels, The design channel section must meet all requirements of this oroinance, 2, The design section may include vegetated channel sections with channel velocities ranging from 6 to 8 fps, provided that grade control structures are included within the channel and overbank areas to prevent erosion, Grade control structures shall have a minimum effective depth of 3.0 feet below existing or proposed grades with .n adequate number of structures to prevent less than I foot of degradation, 3, The developer/owner shall construct the portion of lhe design improvements required on their property for the ultimate channel design. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to detennine the portion of the design improvements to be constructed by the developerlowner, In most instances, the developerlowner shall construct one-half of the improvements on their property, 4, If grade control structures are incorporated into the design, the developerlowner shall coordinate with adjacent owners in order to construct 38 these features in their entirety at the time of the initial portion of the channel improvements. 5. The developer/owner shall provide for a drainage easement and accesslmaintenance easement consistent with the portion of the improvements provided. c. In cases where the developer/owner owns property adjacent to channel or floodplain areas but does not Own a portion of the channel or floodplain area, the developer/owner shall (at the discretion of the City Engineer): I. Determine the channel improvement configuration necessary to meet the requirements of item (2a) above and 2. ShaH provide a dedicated easement to the city for the portion of this future improvement configuration, including necessary maintenance and access easement, which will include the developer/owner property. 3. 􀁓􀁴􀁡􀁲􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠Water Surface Condition When performing hydraulic analyses for channel or drainage way design, the starting water surface shall be based on the following criteria. a. When the ratio of the drainage area of the receiving creek (at the confluence location) to the drainage area of the channel or drainageway being designed is 15 or greater, the lO-year water surface of the receiving creek shall be used as the starting water surface for hydraulic design calculations. For creeks where the lO-year water surface is not available, the slope-area method will be used for starting design calculations. b. When the ratio of the drainage area is less than 15, the I()()..year elevation On the receiving creek shall be used as the starting water surface for design calculations. 4. Easements Required for Open Channels Drainage andlor flood way easements for all open channels, creeks and flumes shall be dedicated to the City of Carrollton. Easements shall encompass all areas having a ground elevation below the higher of One foot above the water surface elevation associated with the design flood or the top of the high bank or channel edge. No fences, buildings, or other structures which could impede flow shall be placed within this dedicated drainage easement. In all cases, the easement shall also include at least a 15-foot wide maintenance strip along bOlh sides of the channel or, if the City Engineer so a!lows, at least a 20-foot wide maintenance strip along one side of the channel. Streets, alleys, bike paths, etc., alongside the channel can serve as all or part of the maintenance easement. Drainage easements for flumes shall be located with sufficient width to permit future maintenance accessibility, and in no case shall be less than 15 reet wide. SECTION B. Lakes and Dams In the event that a property Owner or developer desires to modify an existing pond or lake or desires to impound slorrowater by filling or constructing an above-ground dam, thereby creating a lake, pond, lagoon or basin as part of the planned development of that property, the criteria listed below shall be met before City 39 approval of the impoundment can be given. Ponds or lakes. created by excavation of a channel area without erecting a dam above natural ground elevation or instream, low water checkdams are also subject to the criteria listed below, with the exception of spillway capacity requirements. The City Engineer has the final authority to detennine the design criteria for a proposed dam, checkdam or excavated lake. The requirements of the State of Texas must also be met for the construction of dams, lakes, and other impoundments. The design criteria for a dam is dependent on the size and hazard classification of the dam. The size and hazard classification will be based on Chapter 12 of the Texas Water Code and will be detellIlined by the City Engineer based on infollIlation furnished by the owner. The following criteria will be used to classify a dam: L 􀁾􀀠The classification for size is based on the height of the dam and storage capacity. whichever gives the larger size category. Height is defined as the distance between the top of the dam (minus the freeboard) and the existing streambed at the downstream toe. Storage is defined as the maximum water volume impounded at the top of the dam (minus the freeboard). Size Classification Impoundment Category Storage (acre-feet) Height (feet) Minor <100 <10 Small 􀁾􀁬00 and < 1,000 ;,,10 and < 40 IntellIlediate 􀁾􀁉􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠and < 50,000 ;;,40 and < 100 Large 10 4 Buffalo grass, Kentucky bluegrass 0-5 5 smooth brome, blue grama 4 >10 5-10 3 Grass mixture 0-5 4 5-10 3 Do nat use on slopes steeper than 10% Lespedeza sericea, weeping love grass, 0-5 2.5 grass, ischaemum (yellow blue-stern), Do not use on slopes steeper than 5% kudzu, alfalfa, crabgrass except for side slopes in a combination channel. Annuals -used on mild slopes or as 0-5 2.5 temporary protection until permanent Use an slopes steeper than 5% is nat recommended. coverS are established, common lespedeza, Sudan grass Remarks: The values apply to average, uniform stands of each rype ofcover. Use velocities exceeding 5 fps only where good covers and proper maintenance can be obtained. Based on past experience, all sails within the City of Carrollton have been found to be easily eroded soils . • Longitudinal bed slape of the channel bottom. 76 -CITY OF CARROLLTON RAINFALL INTENSITY VALUES 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 STORM 1 ENCY STORM DURATION (MINUTES 1 (YEARS) 􀁾􀀠:::> 0 ::t: 􀁾􀀠W 0.. (J) w ::t: <.) Z-Z >!: (J) z OJ ..Z-...l ...l -ii: 8 6 Ho.4''. 5 4 '00 o 1010.8 , r --_.....-------3 2 1HO.8.0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 H 1.0' 0.3 0.2 0.1 􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀬􀀡􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀼􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾.."..;:;, :;',: 0;.. .. •􀁾􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀢􀁬􀀮􀂷􀀠••􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀢􀁪􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀠..􀁾􀀺􀁦􀀠DIFFERENCE 10.0 9.0 8.0EXAMPLE: 7.0 KNOWN, 6.0 COLLECTOR STREET, PAVEMENT WIDTH: 40' I-r-5.0 o ... z GUTTER SLOPE: 2.m!> ... o II. \-4.0 U.___ GUTTER DIFFERENCE: 0.6' '"(/) -FIND:,_......... '" '" 􀁾􀀠II: II: 3.0GUTTER CAPACITY OF HIGH CURB '" "" GUTTER CAPACITY OF LOW CURB_ '" "" I-...-....--..... w'" SOLUTION: -........... III '" -------FROM 0.6' ON THE HIGH CURB PROJECT ___"'::I.wIi-2.0 u Z HORIZONALL Y TO THE PIVOT LINE. FROM THE -::;) '" PIVOT LINE DRAW A STRAIGHT LINE TO '" U 0 "" ... -Z GUTTER SLOPE: 2.0" READ Q: 2.4 c.l••. FOR HIGH CURB "' i: 1.0u FftOMO.6'ON THE LOW CURB PROJECT "" 0.9 HORIZONALLY TO THE PIVOT LINE. FROM THE r., I'" ...'" i-'" >-..... '" 􀁾􀀠...... ...... ...... . < ......... ..... 􀁾􀁴􀀾􀀼􀀠'" ..... ..... '"c:'" '" i,..10V I< I--. V ""::> 1>""'"V I--'V r<:; t:>-C L..l..V P f"r., I􀁾>-V 􀁾􀁾􀀠f'; /t:-.-.􀁾􀁾􀀠/....􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁇􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀺􀁴􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀠t ,..0 􀁩􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀠i-' 0'" ... ... I"'" 15 20 30 40 50 602 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 10 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.s. 91 1 FOUR GRATE COMBINATION INLET FIGURE 15 CAPACITY CURVES ON GRADE EXAMPLE KNOWN' QUANTITY Of FLOW: 12 c.I••• GUTTER SLOPE: 2.0 S FIND: CAPACITY OF FOOR GRATE COMBINATION INLET SOLUTION: ENTER GRAPH AT 12 c.I••• INTERSECT SLOPE: 2.0 S READ PERCENT OF FLOW INTERCEPTED: 68 S 68 S OF 12 c.t•••: 1.2 c.I••. AS CAPACITY OF .. GRATE COMBINATION INLET REMAINING' GUTTER FLOW, 12 c.I•••·8.2 c.I••• : 3.8 c.I.8. 􀁾􀀠􀁾'> 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾•. >'>..t: ,.,. ,.,. 􀁾􀁾􀀠...... .... .... >,.,. ...... -... >< .... ........ ,.,.I'DI <. I.....,.,. .... 􀁉􀁾􀀠........ P'" .... i.-' V i.-'k I->V i--" 1-01-"'> i.-' r'-I P? k:: ... "'" V i< ........ "" .... r"" ...r􀁾􀀠1-0 >.... .... 1-0 I-􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁾􀀠\1 11V I---' 􀁾􀁾,. ..-' I---' 􀁩􀁥􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠V I---' ..-' " 􀁾􀁉􀀭􀁯􀁲􀀭I---' ,.,. .,.."'(' . ..., 􀁾􀀠,.,. ..-' "" ........ 􀁾􀀠􀁾,.,. 􀀮􀀭􀀺􀁾􀀠.... C' 􀁾􀀠,.,. .... (, 1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. COMBINATION INLET CAPACITY CURVES AT LOW POINT FIGURE 16 EXAMPLE KNOWN: SOLUTION: QUANTITY OF FLOW: 20.0 c.I.•• ENlER GRAPH AT 20.0 c.f••• MAXIMUM DEPTH OF FLOW DESIRED INTERSECT 􀁾􀁯􀀠: 0.5' AT,LOW POINT (yo) : 0.5' READ LI : 8.4 FIND: USEIO'INLET LENGTH Of INLET REQUIRED ILl) 25 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 nllllll III I 1 o o 40 50 I 20 5 4 1l1l1lUi i.L.. I JJ.IIIIII ..1. ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT." .0115 CROWN TYPE I II V 􀁾􀀴􀀫􀀫􀁈􀁾􀀫􀁈􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀭􀀪􀀭􀀫􀁁􀀭􀁾􀁩􀁪􀀴􀀴􀁾􀁾􀀲􀀰j 1/STREET WIDTH ALL STRAIGHT AND PARABOLIC lHH-l+ll++lcH-lKMt---lV(.......J1-c1/i+-1H/-t-J1-I---H I I //il l""l 1/7 :j 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 SO 40 50 60 70 802 4 Q-QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S." 93 TWO GRATE INLET CAPACITY FIGURE 17CURVES ON GRADE EXAMPLE KNOWN' SOLUTION, QUANTITY OF FLOW, 5.0 d .•. ENTER GRAPH AT 5.0 c.I.•. GUTTER SLOPE, 0.6" INTERSECT SLOPE: 0.6 " FIND, READ PERCENT OF FLOW CAPACITY OF TWO GRATE INLET INTERCEPTED: 63" 63 "OF 5.0 c.I••• : 3.2 c.I••• AS CAPACITY OF TWO GRATE INLET REMAINING GUTTER FLOW, 5.0 c.I... '3.2 c.t.•• , 1.8 c.I••• 􀁾􀀠1\.01 L--􀁾􀀠('\t'> V 􀁾....... 10' 􀁾􀀠" V ,,'􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁾􀀠!IoV 􀁾.1 􀁾􀁾􀀠..... 􀀡􀀭􀀭􀁾I'! ,..........􀁾􀀠.... .....􀁾􀀠...... 􀁾.... ""\ ..... ....... K !-,....... ..... ...... 􀁾􀁌􀀮......V 1\ ....􀁾􀀠I....􀁾􀁶􀀢􀀢􀁋􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠. ts:v V v 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁶􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀱􀁜􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠...... 􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀡􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀭􀀧v.........V 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀠.........-v 􀁾􀀠 .........􀁾􀀠• i , .... l 􀁾􀀠.... fl< ')..... ..... \ ...... 􀁾􀀺..... 􀁾􀀢􀀢􀀠, 􀁾􀁾􀀠...... ............. ............... 􀁾􀀠􀁾).......... ...... ..... l..1\ I1 3 4 5 iii 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. 94 FOUR GRATE INLET CAPACITY CURVES ON GRADE FIGURE 18 EXAMPLE KNOWN: QUANTITY OF FLOW, 20 c.f••. GUTTER SLOPE: 1.0 􀁾􀀠FINO: CAPACITY OF FOUR GRATE INLET SOLUTION, ENTER GRAPH AT 20 c.I .•• INTERSECT SLOPE: 1.0 􀁾􀀠 READ PERCENT OF FLOW INTERCEPTED: 63 iii 611 iii OF 20 c.I•••: 12.6 c.I .•• AS CAPACITY OF FOUR GRATE INLET REMAINING GUTTER FLOW: 20.0 c.f••• -12.6 c.f••• = 7.4 c.r••• II< :;; II<􀁾􀁾􀀠H II>'" '" V .....􀁩􀁾􀀠fu 6 V VI-' V 1I <:'>!:, ""􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠V :...-2􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀭V Ii: ..... I-' V V 􀁾...... 􀁾􀀠i-' 􀁾􀀠..... 􀁉􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁬􀁾􀀠􀁾!! :,... I-'i-' 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1;:"'-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠G 􀁾􀁔􀀠􀁾􀁅iI'''' """"""f' S ,-0 Ek ........... 􀁾􀀠f'l-' ...... I-'f' V V I......... .}􀁾􀀠""f'""f'"" ........... V I................ 􀁾􀀠 v 􀁾􀀠........... .......... ................. -V ;:;V v ............ 0'1 .......... v V.t ...... I ............ .......... ....... ............ .......... 􀁾􀀠 V -1 ..........." ...... 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. 95 SIX GRATE INLET CAPACITY FIGURE 19CURVES ON GRADE EXAMPLE KNOWN; QUANTITY OF FLOW. 4.0 c.I••• GUTTER SLOPE: 3.0" FIND: CAPACITY OF SIX GRATE INLET SOLUTION. ENTER GRAPH AT 4.0 .:.f ••. INTERSECT SLOPE: 3.0" READ PERCENT OF FLOW INTERCEPTED. U" 85"OF 4.0 <:.f..... 3.4 c.f••• AS CAPACITY OF SIX GRATE INLET REMAINING GUTTER FLOW. 4.0 c.I... • 3.4 c.f••• : 0.6 c.f••• 1 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠1 􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀢􀁬,"ii I .... 't/#􀁾....... /lIU ....... 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠""" ....... /) ...., v 􀁾v vi.; ..... 􀁾􀀠.... 􀁾􀀠i.-i.-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠K: l,.; v -􀁾􀁲􀀬􀀠..... ......􀁾􀁉􀁜􀀠I--􀁾􀁉􀀭􀀧􀀠""...... i-" ...i-" "" '" i-"i-" ",,'" ",,'" "".... 􀁾􀀠'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀨􀀠'10 rtJ 􀁖􀁾􀀠f.&,V V i-" /l,' vi-"..s i-" -"" V 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀧􀀭􀀢􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀁾􀀠Is . ... 1-I-",'" ",'" ... 5 6 7 8 11 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. 96 :2 3 4 1 .. Uol Uol ... Z-i!J 0 􀁾􀀠... ... 0 :c..... 11.1 Q 2 0.7 i 0.6 i 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 , 1.1 GRATE INLET CAPACITY CURVES AT LOW POINT EXAMPLE KNOWN: SOLUTION: QUANTITY OF FLOW: 4.8 c./.•• ENTER GRAPH AT 4.8 MAXIMUM DEPTH Of FLOW DESIRED INTERSECT 3 • GRATE AT LOW POINT: 0.4' INTERSECT 2 • GRATE FIND: USE 3 • GRATE INLET REQUIRED :I 4 5 Ii 7 8 9 10 I.-----r ----//1/I I V I I te!, . 􀁾􀀠I r/I I I '( I /II I II , I /I II //, /II /:I 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. 97 0.7 J 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 : I 0.1 15 FIGURE 20 c.I••• AT (1.28' AT G.63' 15 DROP INLET CAPACITY CURVES AT LOW POINT FIGURE 21 EXAMPLE . KNOWN: SOLUTION: QUANTITY OF FLOW: 12 c.! ••• ENTER GRAPH AT 12 c.!.•. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF FLOW INTERSECT yo: O.S' DESIRED (yol: 0.5' READ L I : 12.3 FIND: USE 12.3 OF INLET 4x4 LENGTH OF INLET OPENING REQUIRED (LI) 1 s 4 5 6 7 8 910 15 20 30 U rrl I "rt 1/'Y II 1/. //'. II I. 􀁾􀀠.j I II .r f 1/-f . ----r---I yt /II V I; 􀁾􀀠1I II I j II /I V I I /II I I II j II /V I I f /f II II imI I /f III 2020 4,,4IIII 1515III ... ;z:-I:) ;z: :lx3-;z: III ... 0 10I-10 III ... ;z: 9-• ... 0 8 2><28 = l-I:) ;z: 7 7 III ... 6 55 44 1 2 :I 4 5 6 7 8 910 15 20 30 40 QUANTITY OF FLOW IN C.F.S. STANDARD DROP INLET SIZES: 2'x 2" Li:S' 3'x 3', LI:12' 4'x. 4', LI:16' 98 •• .. .. .. .. ..t_,... .. Oi ... ."".00 .oo 700 700 600 600 5005"" .00 400 300 300 200 200 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾100 10. u. 9090 " 80 80 " 70 60 5. •0 3. 20 10 9 8 7' 60 SO 3. 20 ••10 􀁾􀀠a 􀁾􀀠0 a " u 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠UJ '" :: ::; '" u 􀁾􀀠3 0 ... u. 7 7 6 6 S 4 • 3 3 2 2 SLOPE. OF piPE IN FEET PER 100 FEET CAPACITY OF CIRCULAR PIPES FLOWING FULL FIGURE 22 A GRAPHICAL SOLUTION OF MANNING'S EQUATION V '. 1.486-n-nn 213 S112 n : 0.013 99 OUTFALL OF A STORM SEWER INTO A CHANNEL FIGURE 23 DESIGN TAILWATER ... NORMAL TAILWATER (NOT ALLOWED) DESIGN TAILWATER 20' OR GREATER FOR 90· INTERSECTION ANGLE NORMAL TAllWATER RIPRAP PROTECTION MIN.:IO·x DIA. (ALLOWED) • OUTFALL SLOPE SUCH THAT NONEROSIVE EXIT VELOCITIES WILL OCCUR. 100 FIGURE 24 Approximate Routing Method for Watersheds < 160 Acres E(!) a:: « J: () (1) Cl I To + Tep Qp (1) u.. STORAGE VOLUME (V.l w Q() 􀀱􀁉􀀺􀀢􀁲􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀧� �􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀭Q 0 = Q E TIME (MINUTES) y,,( 60) [(QD[(TD -TCp)+(TD+TCp)]12) -(QE[TCp+TD]I2)] in cubic feet. Or y" 60 (<4lt2) (TD -TCp) Where: Qp = Peak discharge in cfs for developed watershed using storm duration equal to TCp. Qe = Peak discharge in cfs for existing watershed, assuming full residential development and corresponding TC . QD = Peak discharge in efs for developed watershed, based on a storm duration that yields the existing discharge for Cp and A. TCp = Time of concentration in minutes for proposed development. TD = Storm duration in minutes corresponding to ID' In = Rainfall intensity (incheslhour) for a storm duration that produces QD and is calculated using the following formula: QD ID= (CpA) Cf Where: Cp = Rational "c" for developed condition. A = Drainage area in acres. Cf = Frequency factor coefficient of 1.25 101 FIGURE 24, continued Detention Basi n Example: Development Oata: Orainage Area = 160 acres Residential C '" 0.55 Residential T CR '" 15 minutes Developed Cp = 0.70 Oeveloped TCp = 10 minutes Cf '" 1.25 Forthe 100"year storm: IRES = 7.52 inJhour (from Figure 1) Ip = 8.82 inJhour. QE Qo'" (1.25) (0.55) (7.52) (160) = 827 cfs '" Qp (1.25) (0.70) (8.82) (160) '" 1235 cfs '" Qo 827 10 = = 5.91 inJhour'" (Cp A) Cf (.7)(160)(1.25) From Figure 1, for 10 = 5.91 inlhour. TO = 28 minutes v = = 24,810 (18) =446,580 cubicfeet 102 " -----􀁾􀀧􀀬􀀠-------------------1""'-+-v ' I , t" I /" FLOW I 􀁾􀀫􀁾􀀠" II 􀁾􀀠" /􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠, I Q , 􀁟􀀮􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁜􀀮􀀠J;r---II I II I IT t fI t -r..... :", 􀁾􀁒􀁟􀁉􀁟􀁄􀁟􀁇􀀢􀀽􀁅􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭 􀀯􀁀􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁖􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁬􀁾􀁉􀁛􀀭II I II II I I II ".............. CONSTR I cnON \ 11 1 1 1 1 11 .. I I I II ------./1 \ '------I \ I \ 1 \ I NEFFECTI VEI \I \ FLOW AREA1 􀁾􀀠I \ \ (;; /\ \i /""\. "NATURAL FLOODWAY" FLOODPLAIN\::.( 1 o I (EFFECTIVE FLOW 􀁁􀁐􀀮􀁅􀁁􀁾􀀠.... I os LIMITS). I ,.. I \ \I \I \I \I FLOW 􀀨􀁾􀀠\1 I \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ -----r-'--------------------.-: ...'+----FIGURE 25. "NATURAL FLOODWAY" EXAMPLE 103