i . • b I 
􀁔􀀯􀁊􀀮􀁾􀁋􀁾􀀠B. Pinner ROW Southwestern Sell ROW Auto One building ROW DART Transit Center Ublity relocation D. Snadon sidewalk issues 􀀷􀁾􀀱􀀮􀀠lJeSIgn-1>rocess Bid and construction
dates JULY .ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I 1996-97 (9 MONTH ACTIVITY CALENDAR) AUGUST I SEPTEMBER I OCTOBER .JA/\IUAKY RY I MARCH In Precess Expected RON .: .. :::::::::::-::::."􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁂􀀺�
�􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀳􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀸􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀸􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀠􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀿􀀭􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁭􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀳
􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀸􀀺􀁾􀀸􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀸􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀸􀁾􀀺􀀬􀁕􀀠􀁾􀀠Negotiations run concurrent with Pinnell ROW negotiations I:::::::: 􀂷􀀺􀀢􀂷􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀂷􀀮􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺�
�􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀤􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀱􀁀􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀿􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁻􀁈􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁍􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀤􀁍􀀺􀁂􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀸􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁧􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀿􀁩􀀺􀁾􀀺
􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀤􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁋􀀺􀀿􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀤􀁩􀀺􀀺􀁩􀁭􀀺􀀺􀁳􀁀􀀺􀀠􀁽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁬􀀠Negotiations run concurrent with
Pinnell ROW negotiationsI:: ..............:.:: t': 􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁍􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀨􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺
􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁮􀁥􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁥􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀦􀀺􀀺�
�􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀧􀀥􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁪􀀠. z+...v+"a)1-of Qv..or_ . 􀁾􀀠l __ 􀁌􀀮􀁾􀀠r;:-.::s---..."'-"'''" '--'" "'-S""
tlM\At'N ; w y(-Q7 i...( 􀁾􀀷􀀮􀀬􀀧􀀩􀀱􀀷􀀠Out to bid Award bid 􀁾􀀠1I-II>'9'r <; f.,.-.rCh..,rt-.. 􀁆􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀁗􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾�
�􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀿􀀺􀁾􀀿􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀿􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀰􀀿􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁭􀀠l􀁾..I-tv{r 􀁾􀁳􀁩􀀭6,(-fk.o n .... 􀁾􀀠Scheduled Actual Current Legend: 􀁴􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁎􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀥􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁥􀀤􀀺􀁷􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁤􀀠SPECIAL
NOTES I ISSUES Demolition of existing structures must be added to the schedule. 
􀁔􀁁􀀮􀀼􀀺􀀻􀁋􀁾􀀠Bulldtng align. agree. from Wellington and Princeton ROW agree. and ocq. from 3 property owners Secure boundary adjust. agree. from Farmers Branch Secure utility agree.
from Fanners Branch Complete Engineering To Bid Constructico Process Open for Use· April 2 SOUT-H QUORUM (North/South Phase) 1996-97 (9 MONTH ACTIVITY CALENDAR) JULY .tllr-:IIC.T ;;»t:1"'
j t:;.Mt;jt;.K I OCTOBER r: -·-·-·,·-:': ....t 􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀭􀂷􀀨􀀮􀁦􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀤􀀬􀁾􀁏􀀿􀁎􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁽􀀮􀀺􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀥􀀳􀀥􀁮􀀠7fZJ Council I(ljAtltct;:1ttM'lt c.ur_WX1 discUS$ion 􀀢􀁾􀀧􀀠􀁰􀁱􀀡􀁯􀁉􀀡􀁉􀁴�
�􀁡􀀮􀀺􀁥􀁤􀁬􀁄􀁾1 •....1 To 􀁃􀁯􀁵􀁮􀁣􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀨􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀁬􀁾􀀻􀀬􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀹􀀨􀀮􀁳􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁬􀀠􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀱􀁊􀀧􀀮􀁴􀁮􀀺􀀡􀀺..􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀻
􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀸􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁀􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁝􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁸􀁾􀀻􀀮􀀺􀀦􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁀􀁾􀀺􀁦􀁵􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀿􀀬􀀻􀀺􀁺􀀻􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁾􀀥􀁅􀁾􀁬􀀠􀁉􀀢􀁾􀁖􀀧􀁜􀀠Meet_ MI.lItIN!iki
again ::::::.::.:::. GetFSCC.􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀠-. 􀁾􀀠f:Z:=:= IJ":= 􀁾􀀠􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁨􀀿􀀭􀁾􀁍􀁾􀀺􀁨􀁴􀁾􀁷􀀣􀀪􀁾􀁴􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭::=: " ::::::::::3::; ::.
􀀬􀀼􀀼􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀼􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀾􀀧􀀼􀀼􀀧􀀿􀀼􀀢􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀿􀀱􀁾􀀻􀀧􀀻􀀿􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀂧􀁾􀀠-. :::::. -􀁾􀀠. \ 􀁾􀁴􀁩􀀺􀁉􀀠11115 _12110 􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁸􀁷􀁾􀀼􀀺􀂧􀁫􀀪􀀿􀁦􀀺􀀡􀀰􀀺􀁗􀁭􀀻􀁀􀀧􀀱􀁊􀀬􀂥􀀺􀀿􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀠AMIIA
DV CC'IU)I !.6CtV MARCH Begin ConsItuclloo 􀁂􀁥􀁧􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠90 day ecns.truetion SPECIAL NOTES I ISSUES Legend: 'fI'tf8e Pl property O'Mlers impacted with North/South phase:'5 Donald Carter
------------------1􀁢􀀬􀁽􀀫􀁲􀀧􀀪􀀧􀁾􀁭􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁬􀁴􀀺􀀮􀁩􀁾􀀠5000 QuorumScheduled Actual Cate!lus Inves. 
. DART TRANSIT CENTER 1996-97 (9 MONTH ACTIVITY CALENDAR) • TASKS JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER I OCTOBER NOVEMBER I DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH DARTs design process -compatible wi AddisonCircle
Land Acquisition Process 􀁲􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀺􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀺􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀺􀂷􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁊􀁩􀁩􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀺􀁽􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀽􀁦􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁲􀁦􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁽􀀺
􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁈􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁲􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁦􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁈􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁦􀀺􀀺􀁦􀀺􀁾􀁮􀀠r:::-:: '-"Ji:-:::%:::%MM::: 􀀯􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁷􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀻􀁷􀀺􀁲
􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁲􀁧􀁲􀁷􀀺􀀺􀂫􀁷􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀺􀀦􀀧􀀺􀁖􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀧􀁍􀁍􀀺􀁦􀀺􀀽􀀺􀁈􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁻􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁜􀀻􀀸􀀥􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀽􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁍􀁩􀀺􀁨􀂷􀀼􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁖􀁾􀀺􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻�
�􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀼􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀯􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠::U 1st meetingMeetings wI Ryden and DART staff every other month on 7f2J96 􀀱􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁈􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁭􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁪􀀠k, 􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺�
�􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁬􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁬􀀠􀁴􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀠􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀼􀀺􀁟􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀬􀀠􀀺􀀺􀂷􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁉􀀠􀁬􀀺􀁾􀂷􀁭􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾
􀀺􀁸􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁪􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀧􀀺􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁴􀀺􀀽􀀺􀀸􀀳􀀺􀁭􀀧􀁛􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀂷􀁲􀁾􀁉􀁔􀀺􀀤􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠To Bid construction Process Open for Use 12138 Out to Bid Award Bid
􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁭􀀺􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀱􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀱􀀠􀁈􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁾􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁮􀁮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺�
�􀀧􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀠Begin Construction 􀀺􀀡􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁷􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀥􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁲􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁀􀀺􀀺􀂥􀁦􀀡􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁭􀀦􀀿􀀪􀁀􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧�
�􀁦􀀡􀀺􀁭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀂥􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠SPECIAL NOTES I ISSUES Legend: 􀁴􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀥􀁾􀁶􀁗􀀸􀀺􀁾􀀸􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁰􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀱􀀠􀁾􀀠TOA does not fully control development process. DARTs ownership
in the project Scheduled Actual Current may drive the development schedule. B. Pinnel negotiations may take DART longer than expected. We estimate Pinnel negotiations to take roughly
4 months. 􀁾􀁜􀀠) 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit \ P.O. Box 660163 Dallas. Texas 75266-0163 214/749-3278 November 18, 1996 Dave Nighswonger, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Town of Addison P. D. Box 144 Addison,
TX 75001 Re; LAP and LAP/CMS Projects Dear Dave: In response to your September 19, 1996 and October 16, 1996 letters, attached is the DART Resolution approving the Addison RoadlExcel
Way LAP project. Also attached is a check in the amount of $134,000.00 for Technical Assistance ($34,000) and Surveyor Road railroad crossing ($100,000) projects. A copy ofthe signed
LAP/CMS applications are attached. In the future when referring to either of the above LAP/CMS projects, please use the project name and project number. This will help avoid confusion
when referring to projects. Ifyou need additional information, please call me at 749-2913. Sincerely yours, 􀁧􀀨􀁊􀁎􀁊􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠Tom K Ryden, P.E. Sr. Manager Project Development TKR:jr
Attachments 
960194: RESOLUTION RESOLUTION of theDallas Area Rapid Transit DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (Executive Committee) FY 1996 Local Assistance Program (LAP) Programming Request from the Town
of Addison WHEREAS, the Town Addison is eligibJe for participation in the DART LAP program; and WHEREAS, the activities requested are consistent with the intent of the LAP and LAP/CMS
program guidelines; and WHEREAS, funding for the activities requested is within current Budget and Financial Plan allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Dallas Area Rapid
Transit Board of Directors that the FY 1996 LAP programming request from Addison, as contained in Attachment 1, is approved. Sandy Greyson Secretary Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
􀁥􀁷􀁏􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠DART Counsel PresidentlExecutive Director October 22, 1996 Date 533.SAMlskh 1 10122196 ·8:24 AM 
DART FUNDING APPLICATION FOR DART's LAP/CMS PROGRAM RECEIVEC _enrol ocr 16 1996LAP/CMS Project No. (for DART use only) Q'"J -0,::1. \ city no. project type project no. PROJECT 􀁄􀁴􀀮􀁖􀁴􀀺􀁌􀁕􀁉􀀭􀀧�
�􀁖􀁉􀁴􀀺􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀠GENERAL INFORMATION Date Submitted Applicant City: Town of Addison City CIP No. N/A Technical Assistance Program 21 Pr6ject Eligibility Type: (see list, reverse side)
Technical Assistance Program Project Name: Boundaries/short description Appro)(. BeginlEnd Dates: from October 1996 to September 1997 'Ii I.t'UNUING. . .. .. > , .. ';/; 􀁾􀁾􀁑􀁊􀁅􀀼􀀺􀀻􀁔􀁅􀁛􀀩􀀠COS
T DISTRIBWION ',:-..,: ." . ;; ::'.Current LAP/CMS Request $ 34,000 Planning !Environmental Studies $ IPreviously Approved LAP/CMS $ 0 EngineeringlDesign $ Date(s) 􀁾􀁥􀁤􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁬􀀠(if
applicable) $ Right-of-Way $ State (ifapplicable) $ Construction $ Local (if applicable) $ Testing/Inspection $ Other (if applicable) $ OperationsIMaintenance $ TOTAL $ 34,000. TOTAL
$ DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (List/Explain bus routes affected, intersections to improve, project scope, phases, etc. Attach projectjustificalion as needed.) (List/explain fund transfers,
reprogramming requested ifapplicable.) Funding for salaries of engineering staff responsible for coordinating and supervising the Town's capital improvement projects funded with LAP/CMS
Funds. ! ! Public Works Director Title Date DART StaffConcurrencf Title Date 
DART FUNDING APPLICATION FOR DART's LAP/CMS PROGRAM RECEIVf::, OCT 161996􀁏􀁾􀁏􀀠_ enoolLAP/CMS Project No. (for DART use only) cPt city no. project type project no. PROJECT Dt:VI::LI..lr-IWt;.,
•. GENERAL INFORMATION Date Submitted Applicant City: Town of Addison City CIPNo. N/A Project Eligibility Type: (see list, reverse side) 20 Railroad crossing replacement on surveyor
RoadProject Name: Cottonbelt Railroad Crossing on Surveyor RoadBoundaries/short description Approl{. BeginlEnd Dates: from tl<-uNDING Current LAP/CMS Request !previously Approved LAP/CMS
Date{s) lFederai (if applicable) State (ifappJicable) Local (if applicable) Other (if applicable) TOTAL DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION to . PROJECTED COST DISTRlBU1JON· . $ 100,000. $Planning
!Environmental Studies EngineeringfDesign $$ O. ! $ $ .Right-of-Way $ Construction $ 100,000. $ $ ITesting/Inspection $ Operations/Maintenance $ i $ 100,000. TOTAL $ 100,000. j (ListlExplain
bus routes affected, intersections to improve, project scope, phases, etc. Attach projeCljustilication as needed.) (List/explain fund transfers, reprogramming requested ifapplicable.)
Replace wood railroad tie crossing with precast concrete panels. Public Works Director Title DART Staff Concurrence Title Date 
'960194 APPLI!)AMFOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM nr-, , ... r-ITYPE OF SUBMISSION (I) • 11..' Y 􀁉􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠-K Capil.1 Ie) _ TllchnJcal (T) r-Revillon (A) SEP 2 31996 PROJECT UI:Vt:L.lIrIYICI,
lPPIIr.4NT INFnRU EGAL HAilE (t) '1'own of Addison ADDRESS P.O. Box 144 Clly AMison (11) County Dallas (12) Slala tzpCcde Texas 75001 (13) (14 ). PROJECT TITLE PS). , . DATE SU8MIlTED
J2)Se2tember 1 ,1996 CATEGORY CODE ($611 leVe'$8) (3)....L (4)-L-(')(Ii) _ (7) __ (e) -ORGANIZATIONAL. UNIT (1O) Public Worka CONTACT PERSON Name: John Baumqartner, P.E. , . T8lephol\8:
( 932' 1 450-2871 . . Addison Road Excel Way (formerly Bent Tree Plaza Drive) Intersection Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTIOtl AND JUSTIFICATION (1&) 􀁩􀁾􀀠intersection vill be videned
to provide left turn lanes on Addison Road and install a traffic signal at the intersection. Bus Route: 341 • • PAOPQSED PROJECT Sian 01110 October, 1996 (17, Ending 0.1. March, 1997
(11) CONSTRUCTION COST DISTRI8UTIONESTIMATED FISCAL YEAR FUNDING • II 23,000S 1111 r'lIl R;nhl.,,'.nhl.,,'.Wov !It 23,000 lui IS,a,e s "HI CII.. S 1201 " 300,000 ',,,,, n,h., II . "11ft".1
S Inl Toll. A S 346AJOO t 􀁾􀀠II IlUIS .... ,..... US 346,000 ".1 􀁾􀁊􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠-. A_ ....II 346000 1251" SIGNATUJ\f OF A.ttrHORltED AEPRESENTATIVE (TriLE .£ DATE SIGNED 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁂􀁉􀁬􀁾􀀺􀁲􀁾􀁲􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁽�
�􀂣􀀧􀀠•FOR 􀁄􀁁􀁾􀁔􀀠USI; ONLY Dale Dale To DART Sial! To P&O Commillee ToTASC P&O Review TASCRov\ow Approved by P&D ------" 
_0ADDIsoN Public Works /Engineering 16801 Westgrove • P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 DATE 11//;2/9f.:, I JDBND. ATTENTION 􀁪􀁊􀁩􀀱􀁾􀀮􀀠$(" -Roj r 1''41" t":r RE: ...J LAp /C-VVl<;
Telephone: [214} 450-2871 • Fax: [214} 931-6643 GENTLEMAN: WE ARE SENDING YOU J¥Attached o Under separate cover via ______the following items: o Shop Drawings 0 Prints o Plans 0 Samples
0 Specifications 0 _______________o Copy of letter 0 Change order COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I .l1 ddl'<DVl c)rd /·V\liA"">r e-N II. () qfa -0'-/1.:, 1:Xly I h Iff>\ ( (Are yo I''''
'1 .I r &-\ 0 􀀢􀀧􀁻􀁾􀁉􀁉, D f I b;pci-rv THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: o For approval 0 Approved as submitted o Resubmit ____ copies for approval )(For your use 0 Approved
as noted o Submit copies for distribution Ji(As requested 0 Returned for corrections o Return corrected prints o For review and comment 0 __________________________ o FOR BIDS DUE __________
19__ o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS _____________________________________ COPY TO __________________ SIGNED: VOAFPI R;L,//,,= If enclosures are not as noted, please notify
us at once. 
TOWN OF ADDIsoN PuBLIC WORKS To: 'Ittlie. 'KDd(ljLte::c:From: David Nighswonger, P.E. Engineering Phone: 214/450-2879Company: 'nA1<T FAX: 214/450-2837 FAX: JIY -141-3(pfPZ16801 WestgroveDate:
_.l-!-II-t-/.:.,lJr---:/qc..::.l?---P.O. Box 144 II of pages (including cover): -->0",-__ Addison, Texas 75001 Koriginal in mail _Original not to follow FYI _Call me 􀁾􀁥􀁲your request
v----.... opportunity to be heard for or against any item or the amount of any item contained in , said budget, and all said persons were heard, after which said public hearing was closed;
and , WHEREAS, the City Council, upon full c(Jnsideration of the matter, is of the opinion that the budget hereinafter set forth is proper and should be approved and adopted: NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The sum of $49,509,310 is hereby appropriated for budget expenditures and that expenditures during the fiscal
year shall be made in accordance with the budget approved by this ordinance unless otherwise authorized by a duly enacted ordinance of the City. OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY ORDINANCE
NO. 096-046 
SECTION 2. The budget as adopted shall be deemed the official budget for the Town of Addison, Texas for the said fiscal year and a copy of the same marked "Exhibit A" shall be kept on
file with the City Secretary and shall be open to inspection by any interested persons. SECTION 3. That all ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same are hereby repealed and all other ordinances of the city not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The importance
of this ordinance creates an emergency and an imperative public necessity, and the ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its adoption. DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, on this the 24th day of September, 1996. ADEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY A DORNEY PUBLISHED IN THE METROCREST NEWS ON: ___________ OFFICE
OF THE CITY SECRETARY ORDINANCE NO. 096-046 
--------------------_ _ _ __ ______ _ __ ______ ___ TOWN OF ADDISON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY 0-:::=-....􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀬􀀭􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀧􀀠. ,.....􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀢􀀢􀁷􀀬􀁾􀁟􀀠.
_c 􀁟􀁾􀀽__􀁾􀀢􀁣􀁦􀀰􀀭􀀢􀀡􀀧􀁣􀁬􀁬Adoptec/,Budgel 􀀬􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀠".; 􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀻__-;;;.-.-􀂷􀁾􀀢􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀧􀀺􀀻􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀻􀀽􀁏􀁏􀀭__=:-:L.-;: __":._ ._w .. _.w __utiiitY-_J_QI"J:undsI
.. -General __ I-:-fiotei=L_Airport 􀁟􀁾􀀬􀁡􀁬􀀭􀀧􀁣􀀬􀀮􀀧􀁯􀁊􀁾􀀡􀀱􀀮􀁡􀁳􀁥􀁟􀁉􀁉___..... 􀁟􀁾􀁁􀀶􀀲􀀬􀁑􀁧􀁑􀁟------1 􀁟􀀮􀁁􀁲􀁡􀁰􀁡􀁨􀀮􀀹􀁔􀁾􀁩􀀻􀁥􀀮􀁥􀁊􀁉􀁊􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀵􀀹􀀱􀀬􀁑􀀨
􀀩􀁏______ -._ .. --------._-._-------􀀮􀁊􀀺􀀡􀁬􀁡􀁟􀁾􀁟􀁥􀁊􀀠-Ql,!o!!!.m 􀀸􀀮􀁑􀀡􀁾􀁟􀀡􀁙􀁊􀀺􀁡􀁲􀁾􀁟􀂷______􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁊􀀧􀁨􀁡􀁳􀀮􀁥􀁟􀁌􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁂􀁑􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁱􀁬􀁊􀁾􀀡􀀢􀀮􀁡􀁬􀀱􀀼􀁟􀂷_______
􀁾􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺{= 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁩􀀧􀀿􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭-f= Phase I -Street R-3 mPhase-I-Street R-4i!􀁟􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀂧􀁊􀁲􀀮􀁥􀁥􀁴􀀠M-1 _ ;;0 __􀁐􀁨􀁡􀁾􀁥J-=-St0.fllLS_ewer.lr:nprover:nents___
1_.. -< .Phase.1 :..UliIity_lrnprovemenls .. . . _. __􀁓􀁰􀁥􀁣􀀮􀁩􀀿􀁌􀁅􀀢􀁾􀁑􀁴􀁌􀀧􀀡􀁄􀀹􀀭􀀧􀁜􀁣􀁱􀁵􀁩􀁳􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁯􀁾􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟􀀠􀁾􀀠'11 Even! Landscaping 􀁾􀀠􀁰􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁾Point
Acquisition z 􀁐􀁵􀀡􀁾􀁥􀀠Point ParkinglPaving9-Total o <0 en 􀁾􀀠DEVELOPED:09119196 -----c-------_5.3MOO_________________535,000 -------􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀠ddl; nnn ____________ _
__C>C._==1 596000 _ __________----.lSQ,90_0_ ________. 2.87....0.0.0 .________ ._ . . .. _. _._. __ .. _ ... _ .. _____ ,__ ...69,000 _5,490,000 ____! .__ _______ --􀀴􀀬􀀳􀀶􀀰􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠--:-':::=-!:
.::-. -610,000 ----_.. 􀁮􀀽􀁴􀀮􀁾􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷I ====-----􀁾􀀶􀀿􀀦􀁑􀁏􀁟􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀧􀁄􀁁􀁾􀁬__r_.FIv.: :-]o!i;er]undiiigj:oeveioper i ... TOTAL . __ ._ i'_________._j-.:..::==:==---------1
-1-______ 􀁾􀀭􀀬􀁾􀀴􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀠'1 _______􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁪􀀠􀀱􀀡􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁧􀁾i ----------.---. _.___ 9C?5"QOO􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀺􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠dd, nnn ._..f.: •
__ •$596000 ______ __TI>!lAlOO1 _ _ ____ ____ ..._____281',00.0. .. ____ "'j ....69,000 ),.100,000. ___6,590,000 ! _􀀭􀀭􀀵􀀳􀀬􀀵􀀰􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠n 􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁮􀁴􀀭􀀱􀀮􀀳􀀴�
�􀁚􀁏􀁏􀂷􀀽􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁧􀁧􀀺􀀠.._--l-·-1()8,6()0 _410,600.1 , _110,400 348AOO' 38100 1.67]00I' '" 􀀭􀁐􀁨􀁡􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀭􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀻􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀱􀁅􀀿􀁛􀁉􀀼􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁮􀁾􀁬􀁾􀀺􀀠f=----1 :fi1'5;0001·········-i􀁐
􀁨􀁾􀀮􀁳􀁥􀁊􀁬􀁢􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀹􀀮􀁵􀀮􀁑􀀡􀁵􀁭􀀠I?riv_e 􀁾􀀽􀀬􀁟􀀿􀀦􀁱􀁑􀁟􀀠,_ -I I .i?-MO·' lib -Spectrum Drive ..________ 235 .._... .____ ___ __. ______ .. I I I 235,000235,000. .. 􀀻􀀻􀁏􀁬􀀺􀀧􀁊􀀺􀁬�
�􀁾􀀡􀀧􀁊􀀮􀁬􀁯􀀭",.[ee. K:" ____􀁾􀁬􀁑􀀬􀁑􀁉􀀩􀀮􀀮􀁑􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁮....-..-.------. -1-_.-270,000 o 􀀮􀀮􀁅􀁢􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀠lib -Street R-3 :tQ.!j,QQ0 ...... ___... ___205,0.00. 􀁾􀀽􀁩􀁾􀁭􀀽􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁩􀁬􀀭�
�􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀠􀁾􀁻􀁾􀀺􀂧􀁧􀁧􀀠-----:--==i=__􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀺􀀽􀀭􀀻􀁾􀁩􀀺􀁾􀁧􀁧􀀠1....442 000 ! 􀁲􀀭􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀱􀀱􀁩􀁾􀀹􀀺􀁯􀁯􀀺􀀠6.1!!..000 64_8,QO_O_1 ± I 22.A40 900 
-------------TOWN OF ADDISON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY __ Council1dopted Budgeto" :::0 __􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁟􀀽􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀽􀁾---=_-:-: ---_-I General_ --i---Hotel_ : >irport
􀁟􀁾􀀠__Utility _____􀁃􀁾􀀠Funds ... 􀁾􀁄􀁁􀁒􀁔_____JM_􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁏􀁴􀁾􀁥􀁲􀁟􀁆􀁾􀁮􀁤􀁩􀀻􀀧􀁧􀁔􀀠Develo-per-crOTAL ; 􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀡􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁳􀁥􀀠Intersection ---------I ----1----'
-----1----------1:000,000 ------------I ------\--,-:000:000 1 􀁾􀀺􀁑􀁵􀁯􀁲􀁵􀁾􀁩􀁂􀁥􀀭􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁥􀁪􀁲􀁬􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁴􀁯􀁑􀀭---􀀭􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁔􀀠---------":"L-:-":'=-=L-==-:= ::.-_-==--=
􀀽􀀭􀀭􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁏􀀺􀁯􀀺􀁯􀀠----.0 -􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭u-r _750,000 ; -/_Mid",ay/Lin_dbergJ'!tersec!io_Q_______ I _,__ 1 _ _1_5Q..0_0_0 ______________ 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭_ ___ .150,000' :n 􀁓􀁯􀁵􀁴􀁨􀁟􀁑􀁵􀁯􀁲􀁵􀁭􀁟􀀻􀁜
􀁾􀁣􀁥􀁳􀁳____􀁾􀁟􀀠_ n.! 2,25.0&00 ! -------1----. ______ -----c-------_________ .01 ________+__2,250,000Il\ 􀁋􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁥􀁲􀁟􀁓􀁐􀁑􀁑􀁧􀁳􀁌􀀻􀁜􀁤􀁤􀀬􀁳􀁯􀁮􀁊􀁾􀁴􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁣􀁳􀁥􀁣􀁨􀁯􀁮􀀮􀀠__
----I ___250&9.0_ , ____! ____ . ._. ______________ .______._ __1 __ . _ .. __250,000 rl Keller 􀁓􀁰􀀧􀁲􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀻􀀧􀀯􀁍􀁩􀁤􀀧􀁚􀀬􀁜􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁳􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠_ 125,.9£,0 __ 1__ -------1----_____
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀁩􀁟􀁟􀁊25,000 -/' I a 􀁒􀁩􀁬􀁗􀁾􀁉􀁬􀀧􀁨􀁴􀁡􀁜􀁉􀀶􀀡􀁜􀁦􀁐􀀮􀁲􀁯􀀠􀁲􀁡􀁭􀁾􀁱􀀩􀁾􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀻􀀱􀂣􀁩􀀮􀀪􀀬􀀱􀀰􀀨􀁪􀁲􀁯􀁏􀁏􀀠_ : _____I______ __ __ _ ._________400,000
I-------L--_500,000 􀀭􀀼􀁾􀁵􀁲􀁖􀁅􀁩􀁶􀁯􀁲􀁪􀁒􀁒􀁩􀀧􀁃􀁲􀁯􀁳􀁳􀁬􀁮􀁩􀁩􀁬􀁒􀁥􀁣􀀧􀀶􀀧􀁲􀁩􀁳􀁦􀁲􀀧􀁩􀁬􀁣􀁬􀁬􀀶􀁨􀀧􀀨􀁡􀀩􀁕􀀲􀀠􀀢􀀱􀀬􀁴􀀡􀀧􀀬􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁱􀀭􀀵􀀧􀀰􀀰􀀢􀀰􀀭!____!___.__ . ____
____􀁾______ I______ j__.___􀁾􀀵􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠􀀨􀁦􀀩􀀱􀁟􀀻􀁜􀁩􀁲􀁰􀁏􀁛􀁬􀁟􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁟􀁜..􀀧􀁌􀁉􀀳􀀰􀁡􀁓􀁉􀀮􀀮􀁂􀁥􀀮􀀡􀁬􀁡􀁢􀁩􀁬􀀡􀀡􀀿􀁊􀁩􀁏􀁾􀁀􀀠_ ___􀁾􀂧􀁣􀁱􀁑􀀮􀁏􀀠' -i 1------------t----=H-88,000
􀁾_BeJLLlDefToJI..B9.?Q£.e_d_e.§\!:ian__ Br[dges@_1_6co.og,9.9.o ---r'--_6,000,000 _ Belt Linerroll Rn;qrl l Jrh::m 􀁉􀁮􀁨􀁾􀁲􀁲􀀮􀁨􀀺􀀺􀁭􀁮􀁰􀁴􀀱􀁩􀁬􀀠I ? nnn nnn ? nnn nnn 􀁾􀀱􀀧􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀶􀁾�
�􀁾􀀺􀀨􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁯􀁾􀀻􀁜􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀀠􀀽􀀭􀁪􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀠J.--􀀭􀀭􀁊􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀽􀁾􀀭_ 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭--􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁟--_ -3---__ 􀁾􀁟􀀠􀁦􀁣􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠;:0' 􀁌􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁊􀁊􀀡􀀱􀁡􀁲􀁬􀀼�
�􀀧􀀡􀀧􀀮􀀧􀁥􀁾􀁩􀁑􀁧􀁜􀁯􀁾􀁅􀁸􀁴􀁥􀁾􀁳􀁩􀁯􀁮____I_ _,: ________ _ 1AOO,000 __ _ __ _ _ _____ 1,__ _ ___ ___ _---' ,400,000 -<I 􀁂􀁲􀁯􀁯􀁫􀁾􀁡􀀧􀁃􀁥􀁮􀁟􀁃􀁉􀁕􀁢􀁟􀁄􀀨􀁩􀁖􀁥􀁟􀁬􀀳􀁥􀁨􀁡􀁢􀀮􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁡�
�􀁩􀁏􀁮___ -2,500,0.00 ------_J -----1-.0 ---.-------------------::::0-::-= ------,-----1 ______ J-:___ 2,500,OOO "1 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀀬􀁳􀁯􀁮􀁟􀀸􀁤􀀭􀀧􀁂􀁥􀁾􀁴􀁊􀀺􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁟􀁴􀀺􀁕􀁮􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁳􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁀􀀠___25_
,000 _ ___ _ : _ _' _ ___ _____________225,000 _______ 1___' . __ 1 _ n_250,OOO; ____T:otal_________________________ _ _ _____ i--______ !__ __________ . ________________ ! _ !_ _ ___
j _20,838,000: Park Projects ' '1 􀀻􀁴􀀧􀁬􀁗􀁉􀁦􀁦􀁩􀀡􀁪􀁡􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀺􀀧􀁦􀁩􀁬􀁾􀁫􀀻􀁓􀁴􀀧􀂧􀁴􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁩􀁾􀀨􀁲􀁯􀁟􀀮􀁮􀂷􀁀􀁪􀀬􀁉􀁩􀀬􀁉􀁾􀁟􀀡􀀱􀁉􀁪􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀩􀁾􀁜􀀧􀀬􀁩􀀻􀁦􀁬􀀢􀀧􀁊􀀳􀀰􀀰􀀧􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠__"-____􀁾�
�􀀠-----__ H i____________300,000_________H !tli . 􀁩􀁩􀁗􀁗􀁯􀀨􀁪􀁬􀁐􀀮􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁬􀁛􀀻􀀡􀁥􀁳􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁬􀁩􀁬􀁱􀁴􀀧􀀼􀁩􀁬􀁾􀀬􀁪􀁩􀀠:-;\!; ... :&'125'000 1 __125,0.00􀀦.,0;'1<8. oflh'DrtiffifScreen'Wallra1;mr
::;I-J;j§ 􀀧􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀧􀁤􀀧􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀠-110,000 Pool 􀁦􀁡􀁣􀁩􀁾􀀠902,000 i ---------___ --9:O_2,ODOj • 􀁾􀁾.• '.. III 225000. 􀁾􀀹􀁟􀁾􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀮􀁅􀀺􀁾􀁓􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠Park Construction 􀀵􀀲􀁟􀁾􀀬􀁄􀁏􀁏􀀠I
􀀵􀁚􀀵􀁾􀀶􀀰􀀹􀁊􀀠_tl0!lh T91!B9?_dj,.and.s"a!<log:!'hase_1I" ! 1.5.0,0j}_0_ .____+__90,000 ___210,OOOJ _No(thJoll..Boad_La.!'dscapiog-tol1ase_lll:""" __10.0,0.00_ 1 I • _ __ __ ___
_ ___100,000 I -r:0tal __________ ___o -------------1 +_________________ _ ____________ T-2,527,OOOj ;:0 􀁁􀁩􀁲􀁰􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁾􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁬􀁳􀀠------------1 ----------------------t-------! 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀀺􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁾
􀂧􀁾􀀻􀁩􀁾􀁧􀁾􀁦􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁥􀁥􀁹􀁒􀁤􀀭􀁌􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁁􀁃􀁱􀀭􀁀􀁟􀀠. _ _II! __􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-.----:-= __ :_____ _ _______􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠-----200,000 ----------T 􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀠» West-side
Taxiway Rehabilitation 220,000 _ _1,980,000 I 2,200,000 I 􀁾􀀠_West:.side_T.axiway_ExteQsion 􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀲􀀲􀁾􀁏􀀮􀁯􀁏􀀠􀀱􀁾􀀹􀀸􀀰􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀠__ _ _________.0 ___ 2,200,000 m Tot?1 I 1
_ 􀁾􀀵􀀬􀀱􀁓􀀰􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀠Z o o CD OJ o -"" OJ DEVELOPED:09/14/9G 
TOWN OF ADDISON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY 00" 􀁾􀀽􀀢􀀭􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀽􀁾􀀢􀀠...... ' ." -... 􀀮􀂷􀀭􀀮􀁃􀀮􀁾􀀠.0. 􀁟􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀽􀁟􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀮􀀢..􀁟􀀮􀁟􀀭􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁟􀀽􀀮􀁾__ 􀀢􀁟􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁃􀁯􀀮􀀧􀁬􀁬􀀱�
�􀁩􀁬􀁁􀁤􀁬􀀿􀁊􀀡􀁬􀁬􀀧􀀡􀀡􀁊􀁽􀁬􀀧􀀼􀀡􀀮􀂥􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁟􀀽􀀢􀀭􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀮􀀽􀀽􀁟􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠 "TJ-------.. -----=----._-----------?__ _ ___.___􀁇􀁥􀀮􀁾􀁥􀁲􀁡􀁬__J:lotel___lIirport ___ UJilitL__GP_Eunds__􀁄􀁩􀁜􀁆
􀁾􀁌__FAi'...__ 􀁏􀁴􀁨􀁾􀁌􀁅􀁾􀁮􀀹􀁪􀁑􀁧􀀠_DeyelopeT___19IAL__ : n 􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁴􀀻􀁥􀀠􀁓􀁥􀁷􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀭􀁯􀁟􀁴􀁥􀁩􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀁰􀁴􀀹􀁲􀀠-------􀁾􀀲􀀮􀀮􀂧􀁬􀀰􀀰􀀬􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀠_ '-1--____2..§lOOcOOO-[!
􀁾􀀠􀁊􀀻􀁥􀁬􀁥􀂧􀁴􀀡􀀿􀁬􀂣􀀧􀁕􀁭􀁑􀀮􀁓􀁴􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁛􀁬􀁊􀁬􀀩􀁝􀁰􀁲􀀹􀀢􀁾􀁬􀀩􀀱􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀁴􀀱􀁩􀁬􀀠84§i0.Q.Q. _________845,000 ., 􀁾􀁥􀀱􀁎􀁥􀁌􀁌􀁪􀁮􀁥􀀠􀁒􀁟􀁾􀁰􀀧􀁉􀁾􀀬􀀬􀁟􀁥􀁭􀁬􀀧􀀮􀁮􀁴􀀠Pr.ogcamffil
.J.,.694,000_ __ 1 􀀶􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀰􀀰􀀰􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁥􀁲􀁟􀁌􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁐􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁑􀁴􀁟􀁛􀀧􀀮􀀺􀁯􀁧􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁀􀀭􀀽􀀭________ 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁟􀁾.. _􀀶􀀷􀀸􀀬􀁑􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀠_______..:-----::==_
􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁟􀀠6,e{::gggr 􀁾Miscellaneous ________r.-----_____._O! 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠rJ) m TOTAL 􀁟􀀤􀀮􀁮􀀮􀁉􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀳􀀬􀁑􀁑􀀮􀁑􀁟􀀤􀀹􀀬􀀸􀁾􀁑􀀮􀁑􀀮􀁑􀁌􀀤􀀴􀀹􀀵􀀮􀁑􀁄􀁄􀀠__$6,186.0QD_$.6.366,QQQJ9.;lI4
.QQQ_$<lA5S,QQQ_$6.0D.QQQJ_t6D5.9.00.J7J.684,9DO.o -----...-..---....-.-.-----.-..-.--.-..-.-.-.-..-------.... -------...-.---...-... -... ----....--.... -..... --. fgNOTES: -I »The
capital project summary identifies projects which may be included in a capital improvement plan over the next five years. The summary also identifies the likely sources of 􀁾􀁦􀁕􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠for
each project. Projects which are shown as being funded through the Capital Project (CP) funds have funding which is already in place. Projects renected in the other columns are likely
to be funded within the five year planning horizon. Projects renected in the General column have been Identified as being possible candidates for application . of General fund surpluses.
Although some of these projects may be funded, funding of all listed projects is beyond the General fund's capacity within the the five year planning horizon . • Items funded in whole,
or in part with General fund surpluses from prior fiscal years. @Items added to Capital Project List following FY1996 budget. Pro'ects In reverse t e are ro osed to be funded with FY1997
General fund sur luses. 􀀱􀁓􀀶􀂧􀀸􀁥􀀢􀁣􀀱􀁉􀁊􀁦􀁥􀁭􀁳􀀡􀁡􀁲􀁥􀁩􀁄􀀮􀁦􀁑􀁍􀁀􀁬􀀡􀀹􀀱􀁬􀁦􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀡􀁩􀁩􀁭􀀡􀁬􀁏􀁴􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁬􀁐􀁭􀁭􀁙􀁬􀁩􀁦􀁵􀀩􀁀􀁬􀁲􀁾􀁲􀁯􀀺􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀭• • 􀁩􀁩􀁩􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁜􀁲􀀬􀀬􀁬�
�􀁩􀀮􀁜􀀻􀀺􀁜􀀠o ::0 o Z » z o m z o o (0 en, o .j>. en DEVELOPED:D9f14f96 
________________________ _ Public Works I Engineering 16801 Westgrove 0 P,O, Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 Telephone: 12141450·2871 • Fax: [2141931-6643 DATE {o h/ql".; IJOB NO. ATTENTION
l.:.trOYL-I RE: I I GENTLEMAN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 􀁾􀁴􀁴􀁡􀁣􀁨􀁥􀁤􀀠D Under separate cover via ______the following items: D Shop Drawings D Prints D Plans D Samples D Specifications
D______________D Copy of letter D Change order I COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ! I £)CeC4+cd L.14P 􀀯􀁃􀁍􀁾􀀠T ... -I-er-lou:;, I A-&,,/'1""....... '"A 1/I , THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked
below: D For approval D Approved as submitted D Resubmit ____copies for approval :;;or your use D Approved as noted D Submit copies for distribution )(( As requested D Returned for corrections
D Return corrected prints D For review and comment D D FOR BIDS DUE __________ 19__ D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US I I COPVTO _________________ ••NED, ;241&/􀁾􀁾􀁥􀀭􀀬􀀠If enclosures
are not as noted, please notify us at once, ,;I 
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON, THE CITY OF CARROLLTON, THE CITY OF COCKRELL HILL, THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, THE CITY OF GARLAND, THE
CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS, THE CITY OF IRVING, THE CITY OF PLANO, THE CITY OF RICHARDSON and THE CITY OF ROWLETT ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING A LOCAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM/CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, on or about April 11, 1989 and June 27, 1939, DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ("DART") established a program for the return of a portion
of DARTs sales tax income to its member cities known and identified as the "Local Assistance Program" (''Lap Program"); and, WHEREAS, the Lap Program WaS continued in full force and
effect until November 14, 1995 at which time the DART Board, in Resolution No. 950260 adopted a new Transit System Plan pursuant to which the Lap Program would terminate on June 30,
1996; and, WHEREAS, on June 25, 1996, in Resolution No. 960117 the DART Board extended certain LAP ILA's to the end of Fiscal Year 1996, being September 30, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the DART
Board created a new program for returning a portion of DART sales tax income to certain member cities, the "Local Assistance Program/Congestion Management System" ("LAP/CMS Program")
effective on October I, 1996, the first day of the 1997 fiscal year; and, WHEREAS, on August 27, 1996, in Resolution No. 960153, the DART Board adopted a LAP/CMS Policy, including Guidelines
for the LAP/CMS Program; and, WHEREAS, eligibility for the LAP/CMS Program is limited to those member cities in which construction of light rail service has not yet commenced; and, WHEREAS
the parties desire to implement the LAP/CMS Program and to establish therefor guidelines and procedures for the creation, construction, completion, operation, maintenance and funding
of projects; NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH: In consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE Parties The
parties to this Agreement are: lAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20·96 Page I ofs 
1.01. Dallas Area Rapid Transit ("DART"). a regional transportation authority organized pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 452. Texas Transportation Code. 1.02. The Town of Addison;
The City of Carrollton; The City of Cockrell Hill; The City of Farmers Branch; The City of Garland; The City of Glenn Heights; The City of Irving; The City of Plano; The City of Richardson;
and The City of Rowlett: 􀁾􀀠ARTICLE TWO Definitions The following defmitions shall apply to the terms used in this ILA. including without limitation the Guidelines: 2.01. "Alloeations"
shall refer to LAP/CMS Program fund allocations as determined in accordance with Section C of the Guidelines. The Allocation for the City of Irving shall be one half (112) that of other
Eligible Member Cities Allocations because ofthe current work on Commuter Rail facilities in the City of Irving. 2.02. "Board" shall mean and refer to the Board of Directors of DART.
2.03. "City Council"shall mean and refer to the duly elected and acting City Council of each Eligible Member City. 2.04. "Comm utcr Rail" shall mean and refer to the self propelled diesel rail transit operations
planned to connect the City of DaUas, the City of Fort Worth and DFW International Airport to be operated by DART and the "T" pursuant to a separate Interlocal Agreement with Ralltran,
on right-of-way owned by Railtran. Commuter Rail service is to operate under Ihe assumed name of "Trinity Express." 2.05. "DART Enabling Legislation" means Chapter 452, Texas Transportation
Code as the same may from time to time be amended. 2.06. "Eligible Member City ( City/Cities) shall mean and refer to the Cilies enumerated in Article 1.02 oftnis ILA. 2.07. "Eligible
Projects" shall mean and include those listed in Section D of the Guidelines and any other project recommended by an Eligible Member City and specifically considered and approved by
the Board. 2.08. "FrA" shall mean and refer to the Federal Transit Administration. 2.09. "Guidelines" shall mean and refer to the Guidelines for the LAP/CMS CMS Program adopted by the
Board on August 27, 1996 in Resolution No. 960153. 2.10. "ILA" shall mean and refer to this !nterlocal Agreement. 2.11. "Light Rail" shall mean and refer to the DART electric powered
rail system as distinguished from Commuter Rail. 2.12 "Railtran" shall mean and refer to DFW RAILTRAN a common administrative agency established by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth.
2.13. The "T" shall mean and refer to the Fort Worth Transportation Authority. LAP..(;MS: Rev; 9-l0-96 Psg. l of 5 }.. 
ARTICLE THREE Incorporation of Guidelines The Guidelines are hereby incorporated into this ILA as if they were set out verbatim at this point. A set ofGuidelines is attached to each
􀁣􀁯􀁾􀁹􀀠of this ILA. ARTICLE FOUR Purposes oULA 4.01. The initial purpose of this ILA is to set forth the Eligible Member Cities' acceptance of and commitment to DART, and DART's commitment
to the Eligible Member Cities, to jointly participate in and work together for the satisfactory implementation of tbeLAP/CMS Program. 4.02. By .xecuting this ILA, each Eligible Member
City accepts and approves the Guidelines as the basis for implementing the LAP/CMS Program. 4.03. It is the further purpose and intent of DART and the Eligible Member Cities to continue
to explore other potential options which would permit continued and expanded revenue sharing with all of DART's member cities to meet their respective transportation requirements so
long as such options do not adversely impact the DART Transit System Plan or the DART Service Plan or the DART Financial Plan. ARTICLE FIVE Term The term of this ILA shall commence as
of the first day of October, 1996 and shall terminate for each Eligible Member City as provided in §C. ALLOCATIONS of the Guidelines. Though terminated as to a specific Eligible Member
City, the ILA shall remain in full force and effect until all Allocations for the affected Eligible Member City are finally funded and the activities of such Eligible Member City are
wound up. It is understood by all of the parties hereto that the Allocations and program duration'S shown in Table I of the Guidelines are projections only and that actual Allocations
will be based on actual sales tax collections and aClUal program duration will be determined by the schedule of rail construction. If a contract for rail construction in a Member City
is not awarded by the year shown in said Table I, Allocations will continue through the year in which a rail construction contract is awarded, or through 2004, when all program Allocations
shall end, end, ARTICLE SIX Administration and Procurement of Eligible Projects It shall be the obligation of each Eligible Member City receiving funds under the LAP/CMS Program to supervise
and administer the planning, design, land acquisition, construction, operation and maintenance of all Eligible Projects. Receipt of funds under the LAP/CMS Program shall not create an
agency, partnership or joint venture relationship between DART and the Eligible Member City. Each Eligible Member City shall be responsible for handling all procurements needed for each
Eligible Project in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental entity exercising jurisdiction over such
Eligible Project, and the resolution of any protest, dispute, claim or demand arising out of any such action by the Eligible Member City shan be the sole responsibility of the Eligible
Member City. ARTICLE SEVEN Indemnity LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20·96 Pogc 3 ofs 
To the extent permitted by applicable law, each Eligible Member City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold DART, its directors, officers and employees free and harmless against any claims,
demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees, resulting from the performance, or failure of the Eligible Member City to perform any obligation or duty in
connection with this ILA. Likewise, to the extent permitted by applicable law, DART hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold each Eligible Member City, its council, officers and employees
free and harmless against any claims, demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees reSUlting from the performance, or failure of DART to perform any obligation
or duty in connection with this ILA. ARTICLE EIGHT Confliet of Interest No City Council Member, officer, employee or agent ofany Eligible Member City, and no Board Member, officer, employee
or agent of DART shall have any flnancial interest, direct or indirect in this ILA or any Eligible Project. ARTICLE NINE Miscellaneous 10.0 I. Notices. Any notice, communication. invoice
or report required or permitted pursuant to this ILA and the Guidelines shall be in writing and shall be effeetive when personally delivered or three (3) days after being mailed by United
States Mail, certified, return receipt requested, to the respective parties at the address set forth for each party in the signature block of this ILA. Any party may change its address
by giving notice to all other parties. 10.02. Governing Law; Venue. This ILA is performable in Datlas, Denton, Collin, Ellis and Rockwall Counties, Texas and exclusive venue for any
legal action in connection with this ILA shall lie in Datlas County, Texas. This ILA shan be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Texas. 10.03. Construction.
In the event one or more ofthe provisions contained in this ILA shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability
shall not affect any other provision hereof and this ILA shall be considered as if such invalid. illegal or unenforceable provision(s) had never been contained herein. 10.04. Successors
and Assigns. This ILA shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and approved assigns. 10.05. Captions. The captions
of articles and sections within this ILA are for convenience and information and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of the ILA. 10.06. Entire Agreement. This ILA
embodies the entire agreement of the parties hereto relating to the matters covered herein and cannot be modified or amended except by a written addendum or agreement of the parties.
No interlocal agreement heretofore entered into between any Eligible Member City and DART shall be construed to apply to the subject matter(s) covered by this ILA and such other interlocal
agreements, if any, shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms. EXECUTED by the parties effective as ofO.tober 1, 1996. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
By: 􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁇􀀽􀁅􀁒􀁾􀁓􀁎􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁅􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭PresidentlExecutive Director P.O. Box 660 163 Dallas. Texas 75266-7201 LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20.1}6 Page 4 of 5 
TOWN OF ADDISON 􀁂􀀻􀁒􀁟􀁾􀁋􀁂􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀠 RONWHlTEH 0 City Manager P.O. Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 CITY OF COCKRELL HILL By:'ccL-=EO-=-=TRE=::-;V-=lN::OccL:-A::-;N-=D::::lN::-:--Mayor
4125 W. Clarendon Dallas, Texas 75211 CITY OF GARLAND By:'-=JE=f=f--:M-::U:::Z=Z:-:Y-City Manager P.O. Box 469002 Garland, Texas 75046 CITY OF IRVING 􀁂􀁹􀀺􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀽􀁣􀁣􀁣􀀽􀀭􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭STEVE
McCULLOUGH City Manager 825 W. Irving Boulevard Irving, Texas 75060 CITY OF RICHARDSON By:􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁉􀁌􀁾􀁌􀁾􀁋􀁅􀁾􀁦􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁦􀀷􀁌􀀽􀁅􀁒􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 830309 Richardson,
Texas 75083-0309 LAP.cMS: Rev: 9·20·96 CITY OF CARROLLTON By: 􀀧􀁍􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁇􀁾􀁕􀁾􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager 1945 Jackson Road Carrollton, Texas 75011-0535 CITY OF FARMERS
BRANCH By: 􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁈􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁄􀁾􀁅􀀭􀁓􀀭􀁃􀀭􀁁􀀭􀁌􀀭􀁁􀀭􀁎􀀭􀁔􀀭􀁅􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O, Box 819010 fanners Branch, Texas 75381-9010 CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS By:􀀧􀀭􀀽􀁅􀀭􀀭􀀺􀁁􀀭􀀽􀁒􀁌􀁾􀁋􀀽􀁅􀀭􀀭�
�􀁁􀁾􀁔􀁏􀀭􀀽􀁎􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager 1938 S, Hampton Road Glenn Heights, Texas 75154 CITY OF PLANO By:-=T::-:H-::CO""MA:-::S""MU-::C-::CE""H"'L-=E"-N=B'CCE'-::"CK:-:--City
Manager P.O. Box 860358 Plano, Texas 75086-0358 CITY OF ROWLETT By: 􀀢􀀢􀁍􀁡􀁾􀁋􀁅􀀭􀀢􀀢􀁇􀀭􀁉􀁂􀀭􀁓􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 99 Rowlett, Texas 75088-0099 Page 5 of 5

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (HI) 4S0·21l7 JADDisoN September 27, 1996 Mr. Tom Ryden Dallas Area Rapid Transit P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-0163 Re: DART/LAP Quarterly Report-July
-September 1996 Request for reimbursement This report is intended to update the status of the DART/LAP projects and serve as a request for reimbursement. 1) Midway/Lindberg Intersection·
Engineering for lhis project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 150,000.00 Reimbursemcnt by DART to date $
10,830.00 2) Midway/Beltway Intersection -Engineering for this projcct is 90% complete. We arc in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 45,000.00
Reimbursement by DART to datc $ 2,925.00 3) 􀁁􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁯􀁬􀁬􀀯􀁗􀁣􀀮􀁾􀁴􀁧􀁬􀀧􀁏􀁶􀁣􀀠Intersectioll -This project is complete. Tlte remaining $13,407.64 shall be rcprogramlncd. DA RT
Approved Project $ 125,000.00 l)l*cviolJs H.cq"csts: Engineering. EBA $ 8,500.00 Construction Jim Jim Bowman Canst. $ 96,208.23 Land Acquisition -AATI $ 3,180.18 Hall Financial $ 1,730.00
Reimbursement by DART to Date $ 109,618.41 New Invoices: Engineering -EHA $ 800.00 Engineering -EHA $ 233.95 P,1( Haggerty $ 595.00 Pat Haggerty $ 85.00 Cowles & Thompson $ 260.00 Reimbursement
this request $ 1,973.95 Total Project Costs $111,592.36 
Page Two September 27, 1996 Mr. Tom Ryden 4) Midway/Greenhill Intersection· This project is on hold. DART Approved Project $ 75,000.00 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 4,280.00 5) Delt
Linefl'vlarsh Intersection -This projecI is complete. The remaining $41,572.36 shall be reprogrammed. Previous Requests: DART Approved Project $ 800,000,00 Engineering -Espey Huston
$ 19,590,00 SMR Landscaping $ 4,358.09 Barton-Aschman $ 2,836.15 Land Acquisition -Mobil $ 58,501.00 Mobil $ 5,000.00 TCB Trust $ 70,977.71 Watson and Taylor Realty Company $ 5,184.00
Actna $ 15,855,00 P.ll Haggerty Co. $ 2,975.00 Cowks & Thompson $ 2,550,00 Construction -Ed Bell Construction $ 528,572,56 V"lmont Industries (67% or 􀀤􀀲􀀹􀀮􀀷􀀷􀁾􀀠(or" signa!s pOles
at ndl Linl! and Marsh) $ 19,951.00 TU Electric $ 8,161.00 Groves Electric $ 2,036,03 Venice Ltd. $ 184.03 Irallas Landscapc $. 755.50 Reimbursement by DART to dalC $ 747,487.07 New
Invoices: Land -Legal Svcs, Cowles & Thompson $ 100.00 Engi ncering -Espey Huston $ 2,939.01 Thomas Reprographics $ 48.58 Construction Banner Express $ 237.60 Groves Electric $ 800.00
Milltronics $ 180.00 SEC Marsh/Belt Line $ 319.34 Newman Signs $ 329.82 Consolidated Traffic $ 179.90 Groves Electric $ 956.34 B & M Construction $ 950.00 Tree Source $ 720.00 Equipment
Durable Specialties $ 3150.00 Administrative -Dallas Ft. Worth Suburban News $ 172.80 Daily Commeric<ti Re<:orti $ 69.68 Reimbursement this request $ 11,153.07 Total Project Costs $
758,427.64 
Page Three September 27, 1996 Mr. Tom Ryden 6) Keller Springs/Dallas North Tollway Interseetion -This project is complete. DART Approved Project $ 295,355.47 Engineering -LiehIighterllameson
$ 35,825.00 Dowdey, Anderson & Assoc $ 1,730.00 Contractor -Gibson & Associates $ 254,818.40 City of Dallas $ 1,453.22 Precision Landscape Management $ 700.00 Dallas County $ 200.32
Cobb Enterprises $ 759.00 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 267,868.44 Reimbursement this request $ 27,617.50Total Project Costs $ 295,485.94 -Exceeds budget. Adjusted reimburesement request
$27,487.03 7) nell LinelNortll Dallas Tollway Intersection -With the exception of restoration of the affected properly, this project is complete. Restoration will be completed in January.
DART Approved Project $ 262,000.00 I'.-evtou< Requests: Engincering ree EllA $ 13,770.00 SMR $ 1,932.29 Appraisal Fcc $ 4,300.00 Land acquisition -Cowles & Thompson $ 120.00 Mobil $
31,220.71 Trammel Crow $ 65,428.71 DISD Taxes $ 1,880.07 Dallas County TaKes $ 496.84 Construction M JlU $ 86,296.31 Williams Landscape S 11,674.75 Hencie Intcrnational $ 37,684.32 (90%
of $41,871.47) Precision Landscape $ 975.00 Dnnner Express $ 198.72 Reimbursement by DART to Date $ 255,977.72 New Invoices: Land -Legal Sves, Cowles & Thompson (4 invoices) $ 760.00
Consulting, Christon Co. $ 170.00 Pat Haggerty $ 127.50 Construction -Precision Landscape $ 56.52 Hencie InternaCI (10% on bal. on 1st request) $ 4,187.15 (8al. on final bill not requested)
$ 1,563.00 Reimbursement this request $ 6,864.17Total Project Costs $ 262,841.89 • Exceeds budget. Adjusted reimbursement request $6,022.28 
Page Four September 27, 1996 Mr. Tom Ryden 8) Delt Line/Midway Intersection -This projcct is a transit pass project. Engineering was started in late Spring 1994 by Barton-Aschman for
DART and the environment assessment was submitted to the State for approval. We have started right-of-way acquisition. 9) Delt Line/Quorum Intersection· This project is a transit pass
project. Engincering was started in late Spring 1994 by Barton Aschman for DART and the environment assessmcnt Was submitted to the State for approval. Wc have started right-of-way acquisition.
10) Wcstgrove/Sojourn Intersection Impro,·cment· This project is complete. be reprogrammed. The remaining $45,856.01 shall DART Approved Project Previous Request: Engineering Fee· Barton
Aschman Construction -Innovated Systems Inc. Reimbursement by DART to Date New Invoices: Outdoor Reflections Outdoor Reflections Suburban Newspapers, Jnc. Reimbursement Ibis rellue.,t
$ 175,000.00 $ 17,492.32 $ 108,528.45 S 126,020.77 $ 350.00 $ 2,540.42 $ 232.80 $ 3,123.22 3,123.22 Total Project Costs $ 129,143.99 II) Aml'aho Roa" RClllignmcntmxtcn,ioll-n,e Town
of Addison has authorized the engineer to proceed with the design of this project. Staff has started land acquisition. DART Approved Project $2,903,000.00 Engineering Fec -Huilt -Zo11ar
(90% of $199,239) Land Acquisition -Appraisal ConsultntioJl Group LR Denton MCM Tract $ 179,315.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 553,492.70 Total Project Costs Reimbursement by DART to Date
$ 747,707.70 $ 747,707.70 Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information regarding these projects. d: ,John R. Baumgar er, P.E. Director of Pub c Works JRB/amh
co: Randy Moravec 
Page Five September 27.1996 Mr. Tom Ryden Attachments: Addison/Westgrove Intersection: Belt Line Marsh Intersection: Espey-Huston. 2 invoices Pat Haggerty. 2 invoices Cowles & Thompson
Cowles & Thompson Espey-Huston Thomas Reprographics Banner Express Groves Electric Militronic SEC Marsh/Belt Line Newman Signs Consolidated Traffic Groves Electric B & M Construction
Tree Source Durable Spccialties DaUas Ft. Wonh Suburban News Daily Commercial Record Keller Springs/Dallns Nonh TollwllY Intersection: Lichliter/Jnmeson. 2 invoices Dowdey. Anderson
& Assoc Gibson & A>sociales City of D:III(l5 Precision Landscape Management Dallas County Cobb Enterprises Ilell Line/North Dallas Tollway Intersection: Cowles & Thompson. 4 invoices
Pat Haggerty, 2 invoices Precision Landscape Hencie lnternationlll 
DART/LAP REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST NUl";IDER 8 SEPTEMBER 27,1996 AddisonlWestgrove Intersection $ 1,973.95 Belt Line/Marsh Intersection $11,153.07 Keller Springs/North Dallas Tollway Intersection
$27,487.03 Belt LinclNorth Dalla, Tollway Intersection $ 6,022.28 Wcstgrovc/Sojourn Intersection $ 3,123.22 'I'otnl Reimbursement Requested $49,759.55 
Dallas Area Rapid Transil .'Of,_ PO 80x 660163 􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀠Dollas. Texas 75266-0163 􀁾􀀧􀀾􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀠214/749-3278 DATE: September 24, 1996 FROM: TomK Ryden TO: Larry Cervenka, City ofGarland;
Dave Davis, City of Fanners Branch; Jim Driscoll, City ofIrving; Marcos Fernandez, City of Plano; George Human, City ofRichardson; John Godwin, City ofRowlett; Earl Keaton, City ofGlenn
Heights; Sally McGlaun, City ofCockrell Hill; Dave Nighswonger, Town of Addison; Cissy Sylo, City ofCarrollton; SUBJECT: LAP/CMS Project Application Form Enclosed is a two-sided copy
of a proposed project application form for the LAP/CMS Program as well as a copy of the current LAP application. Until the old LAP funds are programmed, please use the old form to apply
for new or reprogrammed LAP projects. Once accepted, the new LAP/CMS form will be used for the new program. The LAP/CMS form is similar to the one prepared by Marcos during the LAP/CMS
meetings. We kept the Funding and Cost Distribution sections because they can provide useful details to the DART Board when considering projects. Also, the back side lists the eligible
uses of the funds as stated in the Guidelines. The Project Description section should be large enough to explain the project, fund transfers/reprogramming, etc. If you have suggestions
on the new form, please call me at (214) 749-2913 or Mike Morgan at 2141749-2841 by Thursday, October 3, 1996. Tom K Ryden, P.E. Sf. Manager Project Development c: Mike Morgan Attachment

Oollas Area Rapid TransH P,O Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266·0163 214/749-3278 DATE: September 20, 1996 FROM: TomKRyden TO: Larry Cervenka, City ofGarland; Dave Davis, City ofFanners
Branch; Jim Driscoll, City of Irving; Marcos Fernandez, City of Plano; George Human, City of Richardson; John Godwin, City of Rowlett; Earl Keaton, City of Glenn Heights; Sally McGlaun,
City of Cockrell Hill; Dave Nighswonger, Town of Addison; Cissy Sylo, City ofCarrollton; SUBJECT: LAP/CMS Interlocal Agreement Modification Since distribution of the Draft Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) for the LAP/CMS program in early September, a clarification to the document has been requested. Article Five has been expanded to explain that LAP/CMS allocations may
change from the future projections in Table 1 of the Guidelines, based on sales tax collections. Also, the new Article Five reinforces the point that program duration is a function of
the rail construction schedule. The City LAP/CMS allocation end dates shown in Table 1 of the Guidelines Guidelines are targets based on today's rail construction schedule. The last
year of program allocations remains 2004. This addition to the Interlocal Agreement is not a change in Board policy. It is being added for clarification purposes. The modified ILA document
is being provided along with a signature page to allow all eligible cities to execute the same agreement. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 Tom K Ryd;;n:P:E:' Sr. Manager Project Development c: Paul Jones 
INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON, THE CITY OF CARROLLTON, THE CITY OF COCKRELL HILL, THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, THE CITY OF GARLAND, THE
CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS, THE CITY OF IRVING, THE CITY OF PLANO, THE CITY OF RICHARDSON and THE CITY OF ROWLETT ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING A LOCAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM/CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, on Or about April 11, 1989 and June 21, 1989, DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ("DART") established a program for the return of a portion
of DART's sales tax income to its member cities known and identified as the "Local Assistance Program" ("Lap Program"); and, WHEREAS, the Lap Program was continued in full force and
effect until November 14, 1995 at which lime the DART Board, in Resolution No. 950260 adopted a new Transit System Plan pursuant to which the Lap Program would tenninate on June 30,
1996; and, WHEREAS, on June 25,1996, in Resolution No. 960111 the DART Board extended certain LAP ILA's to the end of Fiscal Year 1996, being September 30, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the DART
Board created a new program for returning a portion of DART' sales tax income to certain member cities, the "Local Assistance Program/Congestion Management System" ("LAPICMS Program")
effective on October I, 1996, the first day of the 1997 fiscal year; and, WHEREAS, on August 21, 1996, in Resolution No. 960153, the DART Board adopted a LAP/CMS Policy, including Guidelines
for the LAP/CMS Program; and, WHEREAS, eligibility for the LAP/CMS Program is limited to those member cities in which construction of light rail service has not yet commenced; and, WHEREAS
the parties desire to implement the LAPICMS Program and to establish therefor guidelines and procedures for the creation, construction, completion, operation, maintenance and funding
of projects; NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH: In consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE Parties The
parties to this Agreement are: LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20·96 Poge ! of S 
1.01. Dallas Area Rapid Transit ("DART"), a regional transportation authority organized pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 452, Texas Transportation Code. 1.02. The Town of Addison;
The City of Carrollton; The City of Cockrell Hill; The City of Farmers Branch; The City of Garland; The City of Glenn Heights; The City of Irving; The City of Plano; The City of Richardson;
and The City of Rowlett. ARTICLE TWO Definitions The following defmitions shall apply to the terms used in this ILA. including without limitation the Guidelines: 2.01. "Allocations"
shall refer to LAP/CMS Program fund allocations as determined in accordance with Section C of the Guidelines. The Allocation for the City of Irving shall be one half (112) that of other
Eligible Member Cities Allocations because of the current work on Commuter Rail facilities in the City oflrving. 2.02. "Board" shall mean and refer to the Board of Directors of DART.
2.03. "City Council" shall mean and refer to the duly elected and acting City Council of each Eligible Member City. 2.04. "Commuter Rail" shall mean and refer to the self propelled diesel
rail transit operations planned to connect the City of Dallas, the City of Fort Worth and DFW International Airport to be operated by DART and the "T" pursuant to a separate Interloeal
Agreement with Railtran, on right-of-way owned by Railtran. Commuter Rail service is to operate under the assumed name of "Trinity Express." 2.05. "DART Enabling Legislation" means Chapter
452, Texas Transportation Code as the same may from time to time be amended. 2.06. "Eligible Member City (City/Cities) shall mean and refer to the Cities enumerated in Article 1.02 of
this lLA. 2.07. "Eligible Projects" shall mean and include those listed in Section D of the Guidelines and any other project recommended by an Eligible Member City and specifically considered
and approved by the Board. 2.08. "FrA" shall mean and refer to the Federal Transit Administration. 2.09. "Guidelines" shall mean and refer to the Guidelines for the LAP/CMS Program adopted
by the Board on August 27,1996 in Resolution No. 960153. 2.10. "ILA" shall mean and refer to this interlocal Agreement. 2.11. "Light Rail" shall mean and refer to the DART electric powered
rail system as distinguished from Commuter Rail. 2.12 "Railtran" shall mean and refer to DFW RAIL !RAN a common administrative agency established by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth.
2.13. The "Til shall mean and refer to the Fort Worth Transportation Authority. LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·Z1l-96 Page 1 of S 
ARTICLE THREE Incorporation of Guidelines The Guidelines are hereby incorporated into this ILA as if they were set OUI verbatim at this point. A set ofGuidelines is attached to each
copy ofthis ILA. ARTICLE FOUR Purposes of ILA 4.01. The initial purpose of this !LA is to set forth the Eligible Member Cities' acceptance of and commitment to DART, and DARTs commitment
to the Eligible Member Cities, to jointly participate in and work together for the satisfactory implementation oftheLAPICMS Program. 4.02. By executing this !LA, each Eligible Member
City accepts and approves the Guidelines as the basis for implementing the LAP/CMS Program. 4.03. It is the further purpose and intent of DART and the Eligible Member Cities to continue
to explore other potential options which would permit continued and expanded revenue sharing with all of DARTs member cities to meet their respective transportation requirements so long
as such options do not adversely impact the DART Transit System Plan or the DART Service Plan or the DART Financial Plan. ARTICLE FIVE Term The term of this ILA shall commence as of
the first day of October, 1996 and shall terminate for each Eligible Member City as provided in §C. ALLOCATIONS of the Guidelines. Though terminated as to a specific Eligible Member
City, the ILA shall remain in full force and effect until all Allocations for the affected Eligible Member City are finally funded and the activities of such Eligible Member City are
wound up. It is understood by all of the parties hereto that the Allocations and program duration's shown in Table I of the Guidelines are projections only and that actual Allocations
will be based on actual sales tax collections and actual program duration will be determined by the schedule of rail construction. If a contract for rail construction in a Member City
is not awarded by the year shown in said Table J, Allocations will continue through the year in which a rail construction contract is awarded, or through 2004, when all program Allocations
shall end. ARTICLESlX Administration and Procurement ofEligible Projects It shall be the obligation of each Eligible Member City receiving funds under the LAP/CMS Program to supervise
and administer the planning, design, land acquisition, constraction, operation and maintenance of all Eligible Projects. Receipt of funds under the LAP/eMS Program sball not create an
agency, partnership or joint venture relationship between DART and the Eligible Member City. Each Eligible Member City shall be responsible for handling all procurements needed for each
Eligible Project in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental entity exercising jurisdiction over such
Eligible Project, and the resolution of any protest, dispute, claim or demand arising out of any such action by the Eligible Member City shall be the sole responsibility of the Eligible
Member City. ARTICLE SEVEN Indemnity LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20·% Pag<: 3 of S 
To the extent pennitted by applicable law, each Eligible Member City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold DART, its directors, officers and employees free and hannless against any claims,
demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees, resulting from the perfonnance, or failure of the Eligible Member City to perfonn any obligation or duty in
connection with this ILA. Likewise, to the extent pennitted by applicable law, DART hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold each Eligible Member City, its council, officers and employees
free and hannless against any claims, demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees resulting from the perfonnance, or failure of DART to perfonn any obligation
Or duty in connection with this ILA. ARTICLE EIGHT Conflict or Interest No City Council Member, officer, employee or agent ofany Eligible Member City, and no Board Member, officer, employee
or agent of DART shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect in this ILA or any Eligible Project. ARTICLE NINE Miscellaneous 10.01. Notices. Any notice, communication, invoice
Or report required or pennitted pursuant to this ILA and the Guidelines shall be in writing and shall be errective when personally delivered or three (3) days after being mailed by United
States Mail, certified, return receipt requested, to the respective parties at the address set forth for each party in the signature block ofthis ILA. Any party may change its address
by giving noticeto all other parties. 10.02. Governing Law; Venue. This ILA is perfonnable in Dallas, Denton, Collin, Ellis and Rockwall Counties, Texas and exclusive venue for any legal action in connection
with this !LA shall lie in Dallas County. Texas. This ILA shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State ofTexas. 10.03. Construction. In the event one or
more ofthe proviSions contained in this ILA shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforeeability shall not affect any
other provision hereof and this ILA shall be considered as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision(s) had never been contained herein. 10.04. Successors and Assigns. This
ILA shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and approved assigns. 10.05. Captions. The captions of articles and sections
within this [LA are for convenience and information and shall not alter the substance oCthe tenns and conditions of the !LA. 10.06. Entire Agreement. This ILA embodies the entire agreement
of the parties hereto relating to the matters covered herein and cannot be modified or amended except by a written addendum or agreement of the parties. No interlocal agreement heretofore
entered into between any Eligible Member City and DART shall be construed to apply to the subject matter(s) covered by this !LA and such other interlocal agreements, if any, shall continue
in full force and effect in accordance with their respective tenns. EXECUTED by the parties effective as of October 1,1996. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT By:􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁏􀁇􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁂􀁾􀁌􀁅􀁾􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭PresidentlExecutive Director P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-7201 LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·20·96 Page 4 of 5 
TOWN OF ADDISON By:􀀧􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁗􀁈􀁾􀀡􀀽􀁔􀀽􀁅􀁾􀁈􀁅􀀽􀁁􀁾􀁄􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 144 Addison. Texas 75001 CITY OF COCKRELL HILL By:·::-L=EOc:-=T=RE=V=lN-:cO,-,L=-A=ND-=lN=-=---M
ayor 4125 W. Clarendon Dallas, Texas 75211 CITY OF GARLAND By:􀀧􀁾􀁊􀁅􀀽􀁆􀀽􀁆􀁾􀁍􀁕􀁾􀁚􀀽􀁚􀀽􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 469002 Garland, Texas 75046 CITY OF IRVING By:
􀀽􀁓􀁔􀁅􀀽􀁖􀀺􀀭􀀻􀀺􀁅􀀽􀀭􀁍􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁣􀁃􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁕􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁌􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁌􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁕􀀽􀁇􀀽􀁈􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager 825 W. Irving Boulevard Irving, Texas 75060 CITY OF RICHARDSON By:􀁾􀁂􀀽􀁉􀁌􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁌􀀺􀀭􀀺􀁋
􀁅􀁾􀁆􀀽􀁆􀀽􀀭􀁌􀀽􀁅􀁒􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 830309 Richardson, Texas 75083·0309 LAP.cMS: Rev: 9·20·96 CITY OF CARROLLTON By: 􀁾􀁍􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁇􀀽􀁕􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭Ci
ty Manager 1945 Jackson Road Carrollton. Texas 75011-0535 CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH By:􀂷􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁈􀁁􀁾􀁒􀁄􀁾􀁅􀀽􀁓􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁁􀀷􀁌􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁔􀀽􀁅􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 819010
Farmers Branch, Texas 75381-9010 CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS By: 􀁾􀁅􀁁􀀷􀁒􀁌􀁾􀁾􀁋􀀽􀁅􀁁􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁎􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager 1938 S. Hampton Road Glenn Heights, Texas 75154 CITY OF
PLANO By: 􀀽􀁔􀁈􀁾􀁏􀀺􀀭􀁍􀁁􀁾􀁓􀀷􀁍􀁕􀁅􀁾􀀽􀁈􀁌􀁾􀁅􀀽􀀭􀁎􀀽􀁂􀀽􀁅􀀽􀁃􀁋􀁾􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 860358 Plano, Texas 75086-0358 CITY OF ROWLETT By: 􀁾􀁍􀁡􀁾􀁋􀁅􀁾􀀽􀁇􀀽􀁭􀀽􀁓􀀽􀁏􀀽􀀭􀁎􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭􀀭City Manager P.O. Box 99 Rowlett, Texas 75088·0099 Page 5 of 5 
ADDIsoN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450·287 t !!_t';.•􀀭􀀡􀁲􀁾􀂷􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀾􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁟􀁾􀀭􀁬􀀮􀁋􀂷􀂷􀀺􀁾􀀢..:.::-,;::;:n::>t"'::.'" Post Office Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 16801 Wc:stgrovc
September 16, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Whitehead, City Manager 'i2. FROM: John Baumgartner, Director of Public 􀁷􀁯􀁩􀁾0 SUBJECT: Interloeal Agreement for DART LAP/CMS Program Attached
is the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between DART and the suburban cities for the new Local Assistance Program/Congestion Management System (LAP/CMS) program. The program guidelines are
included with the ILA. The guidelines were 􀁮􀁥􀁧􀁯􀁴􀁩􀁡􀁴􀁾􀀧􀁬􀁬􀀠between the staffs of the suburban cities and DART. The guidelines were approved by tite DART board on August 27,
1996. Each suburban city must approve the ILA and guidelines for the program to begin. The new LAP/CMS program is basically a continuation of the current LAP program, which ends on September
30, 1996. Some of the key points of the LAP/CMS program are as follows: TIle program provides that each eligible suburban city will receive an allocation of 15 %of the DART sales taxes
collected in the eligible city from FY 1997 through FY 2004. Addison is projected to receive approximately $1,136,000 in FY 1997. The categories of eligible projects has been expanded
to include projects such as the Arapaho Road Extension; projects that may not have bus service on them, but are significant to mobility and also provide benefit to transit. Technical
Assistance funding remains at 3 %of the city's annual program allocation. All unused existing LAP funds will be administered under the new LAP/CMS program. Interest will accrue on the
unpaid LAP balance through September 30, 1997, at a fIxed rate of 4%. No interest will accrue on the new LAP/CMS program allocations. DART staff will approve projects $100,000 or Jess.
DART Board must approve all projects over $100,000. 
Ron Whitellead LAP/CMS Interlocal Agreement September 16, 1996 Page 2 DART staff is authorized, without further Board approval, to pay at project closeout an amount up to 10% higher
than the approved project amount. On projects of $250,000 or less, DART will pay the City 100% of the project cost upon approval of the project by the City COWlcil. On projects more
than $250,000, DART will pay the City 20% of the project cost upon approval of the project by the City Council and the remaining 80 % of the cost upon Notice to Proceed. Upon project
compledon, the City shall return to DART any unspent funds, which will be placed in the Cities' unprogrammed funds account. Overall, the new guidelines for the LAP/CMS should streamline
the process for project approval and the transfer of funds. An important aspect of the new program is that the Town will be able to use its allocation to fund the Arapaho Road Extension
project. Issues such as the percentage of the DART sales tax the cities would receive as their allocation and no accured interest on the new allocations were previously agreed to by
the DART Board and suburban Mayors and Councils. These items were not available for negotiation by the stafts. Staff recommends timt the City Council approve the Interlocal Agreement
and guidelines for tile J,.AP/CMS Program with DART. DCN 
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON, THE CITY OF CARRO LL TON, THE CITY OF COCKRELL HILL, THE CITY OF FARJI,1ERS BRANCH, THE CITY OF GARLAND,
THE CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS, THE CITY OF IRVING, THE CITY OF PLANO, THE CITY OF RICHARDSON and THE CITY OF ROWLETT ESTABLISHL'IG GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING A LOCAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM/CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM WHEREAS, on or about April II. 1989 and June 27, 1989, DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ("DART") established a program for the return of a portion
of DAR,!,s sales tax income to its member cities known and identified as the "Local Assistance Program" ("Lap Program"); and, WHEREAS, the Lap Program was continued in full force and
effect until November 14, 1995 at which time the DART Board, in Resolution No. 950260 adopted a new Transit System Plan pursuant to which the Lap Program would tennin.te on June 3D,
1996; and, WHEREAS, on June 25,1996, in Resolution No. 960117 the DART Board extended certain LAP ILA's to the end of Fiscal Year 1996, being September 30,1996; and, WHEREAS, the DART
Board created a new program for returning a portion of DAR'!' sales tax income to certain member eities, the "Local Assist.nce Program/Congestion Management System" ("LAP/CMS Program")
effective on October 1, 1996, the first day of the 1997 fiscal year; and, WHEREAS, on August 27, 1996, in Resolution No. 960153, the DART Board adopted a LAP/CMS Policy, including Guidelines
for the LAP/CMS Program; and, WHEREAS, eligibility for the LAP/CMS Program is limited to those member cities in which construction of light rail service has not yet commenced; and, WHEREAS
the parties desire to implement the LAP/CMS Program and to establish therefor guidelines and procedures for the creation, construction, completion, operation, maintenance and funding
of projects; NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH: In consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE Parties The
parties to this Agreement are: LAP'(;MS: Rev: 9·S·96 Page I of 4 
1.01. Dallas Area Rapid Transit ("DART"), a regional transportation authority organized pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 452, Texas Transportation Code. I .02. The Town of
Addison; The City of Carrollton; The City of Cockrell Hi!I; The City of Farmers Branch; The City of Garland; The City of Glenn Heights; The City of Irving; The City of Plano; The City
of Richardson; and The City of Rowlett. ARTICLE TWO Definitions The following dermitions shall apply to the terms used in this !LA, including without limitation the Guidelines: 2.01.
"Allocations" shaH refer to LAP/CMS Program fund allocations as determined in accordance with Section C of the Guidelines. The Allocation for the City of Irving shall be one half (112)
that of other Eligible Member Cities Allocations because of the current work on Commuter Rail facilities in the City of Irving. 2.02. "Board" shall mean and refer to the Board of Directors
of DART. 2.03. "City Council" shall mean and refer to the duly elected and acting City Council of each Eligible Member City. 2.04. "Commuter Rail" shall mean and refer to the self propelled
diesel rail transit operations planned to connect the City of Dallas, the City of Fort Worth and DFW lntemational Airport to be operated by DART and the "T" pursuant to a separate Inter
local Agreement with Raillran, on right-oC-way owned by Railtran. Commuter Rail service is to operate under the assumed name of "Trinity Express." 2.05. "DART Enabling Legislation" means
Chapter 452, Texas Transportation Code as the same may from time to time be amended. 2.06. "Eligible Member City (City/Cities) shall mean and refer to the Cities enumerated in Article
1.02 oflhis [LA. 2.07. "Eligible Projects" shall mean and include those listed in Section D of the Guidelines and any other project recommended by an Eligible Member City and specifically
considered and approved by the Board. 2.08. " ITA" shall mean and refer to the Federal Transit Administration. 2.09. "Guidelines" shall mean and refer to the Guidelines for the LAP/CMS
Program adopled by the Board on August 27, 1996 in Resolution No. 960153. 2.10. "ILA" shall mean and refer to this Inter local Agreement. 2.11. "Light RaU" shan mean and refer to the
DART electric powered rail system as distingUished from Commuter Rail. 2.12 "Railtran" shall mean and refer to DFW RA!L TRAN a common administrative agency established by the Cities
of Dallas and Fort Worth. 2.13. The "T" shall mean and refer to the Fort Worth Transportation Authority. LAP-CMS: Rev: 9·$·96 fage 2 of 4 
ARTICLE THREE Incorporation of Guidelines The Guidelines are hereby incorporated into this ILA as if they were set out verbatim at this point. A set ofGuidelines is attached to each
copy of this ILA. ARTICLE FOUR Purposes of ILA 4.01. The initial purpose of this ILA is to set forth the Eligible Member Cities' acceptance of and commitment to DART, and DART's commitment
to the Eligible Member Cities, to jointly participate in and work together for the satisfactory implementation oftheLAP/CMS Program. 4.02. By executing this ILA, each Eligible Member
City accepts and approves the Guidelines as the basis for implementing the LAP/CMS Program. 4.03. It is the further purpose and intent of DART and the Eligible Member Cities to continue
to explore other potential options which would permit continued and expanded revenue sharing with all of DART's member cities to meet their respective transportation requirements so
long as such options do no! adversely impact the DART Transit System Plan or the DART Service Plan or the DART Financial Plan. ARTICLE FIVE Term The term of this ILA shall commence as
of the first day of October, 1996 and shall terminate for each Eligible Member City as provided in §C. ALLOCA nONS of the Guidelines. Though terminated as to a specific Eligible Member
City, the ILA shaH remain in full force and effect until all Allocations for the affected Eligible Member City are finally funded and the activities of such Eligible Member City are
wound up . ARTICLE SIX Administration and Procurement of Eligible Projects It shall be the obligation of each Eligible Member City receiving funds under the LAP/CMS Program to supervise
and administer the planning, design, land acquisition, construction, operation and maintenance of all Eligible Projects. Receipt of funds under the LAP/CMS Program shall not create an
agency, partnership or joint venture relationship between DART and the Eligible Member City. Each Eligible Member City shall be responsible for handling all procurements needed for each
Eligible Project Project in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental entity exercising jurisdiction
over such Eligible Project, and the resolution of any protest, dispute, claim or demand arising out of any such action by the Eligible Member City shall be the sale responsibility of
the Eligible Member City. ARTICLE SEVEN Indemnity To the extent permitted by applicable law, each Eligible Member City agrees to defend, indemnil'y and hold DART, its directors, officers
and employees free and harmless against any claims, demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees, resulting from the performance, or failure of the Eligible
Member City to perform any obligation Or duty in connection with this ILA. Likewise, to the extent permitted by applicable law, DART hereby agrees to defend, indemnil'y and hold each
Eligible Member City, its council, officers and employees LAP-CMS: Rev: 9-5-96 Page 3 of 4 
free and harmless against any claims, demands, causes of action, costs and liabilities, including attorney fees resulting from the perfonnance, or failure of DART to perfonn any obligation
or duty in connection with this ILA. ARTICLE EIGHT Conflict of Interest No City Council Member, officer, employee or agent of any Eligible Member City, and no Board Member, officer,
employee or agent of DART shall have any fmancial interest, direct or indirect in this ILA or any Eligible Project ARTICLE NINE Miscellaneous 10m. Notices. Any notice, communication,
invoice or report required or pennitted pursuant to this ILA and the Guidelines shall be in writing and shaJl be effective when personally delivered or three (3) days after being mailed
by United States Mail, certified, return receipt requested, to the respective parties at the address set forth for each party in the signature block of this ILA. Any party may change
its address by giving notice to all other parties. 10.02. Governing Law; Venue. This ILA is perfonnable in Dallas, Denton, Collin, Ellis and Rockwall Counties, Texas and exclusive venue
for any legal action in connection with this ILA shall lie in Dallas County, Texas, This ILA shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State ofTexas, 10,03.
Construction. In the event one or more of the provisions contained in this ILA shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability
shall not affect any other provision hereof and this ILA shall be considered as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision(s) had never been contained herein. 10,04, Successors
and Assigns. This 'LA shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and approved assigns. 10.05. Captions. The captions
of articles and sections within this ILA are for convenience and infonnation and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of the ILA. 10,06, Entire Agreement. This ILA
embodies the entire agreement of the parties hereto relating to the matters covered herein and cannot be modi ned or amended except by a written addendum or agreement of the parties.
No interlocal agreement heretofore entered into between any Eligible Member City and DART shall be construed to apply to the subject matter(s) covered by this ILA and such other interlocal
agreements, if any, shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their respective tenns. EXECUTED by the parties effective as of October I, 1996. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
By:___________ ROGER SNOBLE PresidentlExecutive Director P,O, Box 660163 Dalias, Texas 75266-720 I signature block and address for each Eligible Member City LAP-CMS: Rev: 9-5-96 Page
4 of 4 
GUIDELINES FOR THE LAP/CMS PROGRAM August 27,1996 A. OBJECTIVE: Provide continued financial assistance for projects consistent with these guidelines and DART's enabling legislation that
enhance mobility in DART member cities that do not yet have rail construction in progress. B. ELIGmLE MEMBER CITlES: The following cities are eligible to receive LAP/CMS funds as ofOctober
1,1996: Addison, Carrollton, Cockrell Hill, Farmers Branch, Garland, Glenn Heights, Irving, Plano, Richardson, Rowlett. C. ALLOCATIONS: The LAP/CMS fund allocations will be made available
for use by an eligible member city annually from FY 1997 through FY 2004 when the program allocations end. The annual allocation will be calculated by multiplying by 15% (7.5% for Irving)
the DART sales taxes collected in an eligible member city for the previous twelve month period ending June 30. Each new annual allocation will be available for expenditure on October
1 (beginning in 1996). The FY 1996 Financial Plan includes approximately $87,000,000 for for this program. Table I shows the allocations by DART member city, based on the 1996 projections
and anticipated program duration. The time schedule in Table 1 is subject to change during DART's annual budget cycle. A city will no longer be eligible to receive program funds in the
fiscal year after the Board awards a contract to initiate rail construction within that member city. In no case shall the DART Board award such a contract more than six months prior
to construction. The budget for LAP/CMS will be revisited based on agency requirements to meet its obligations. D. PROJECT ELIGmILITY: Eligible types of projects are shown below. In
general, eligible projects are divided into two categories: 1) Transit related street improvements and 2) Transit supportive projects and programs. Typically, funds approved for capital
projects may be used for planning, environmental impact studies, engineering, final design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and testing/inspection/surveying. Maintenance and
operations may also be funded ifapproved by the DART Board in accordance with Section E ofthe guidelines. 1 
Any project not explicitly listed but considered allowable under DART's enabling legislation may be proposed for DART consideration. Additional eligible projects include: Transit related
street improvements (streets with current or planned/previous bus routes). 1. Roadway improvements that add capacity Road widening Adding storage to tum lanes Adding tum lanes Adding/deleting
access points Adding bus priority lanes HOVIanes 2. Grade separations . 3. Matching funds for federal/state programs 4. Intersection improvements New signals Computerization ofsignals
Traffic surveillance equipment Telecommunications 5. Cooperative funding of intercity capacity improvements Signal progression Bus only lanes Bus signal preemption Arterial street HOV
lanes Roadway and intersection improvements 6. Special design provisions along roadways and intersections with planned bus routes Shelters Sidewalks Bus stops Bus turnouts Bus priority
treatments 7. Roadway and intersection safety improvements Transit supportive projects and and programs 8. Additional service including non-productive service (previously eliminated
or not meeting warrants) 9. Transportation services for the elderly and/or disabled Emergency medical Shuttle services 2 : : 
10. ADA compliance items related to the provision of transit service II. Sidewalks related to providing access to transit facilities or services 12. Bus shelters 13. Bus benches 14.
Travel demand management Transportation Management Association operating funds User subsidies for transit service Van pool programs Rideshare promotion and incentives Alternate work
schedule subsidies Employer trip reduction support Emergency ride home funding taxiJloaner car 15. Vans for vanpool programs 16. Park and Ride lots 17. Mid-block bus turnouts 18. Incorporating
private transit services/facilities into DART 19. Transportation enhancements at existing and planned D ART transit centers, transfer centers and rail stations. 20. DART and Railtran
related railroad crossing and right of way improvements to include street closings or grade separations. 21. Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds may include, but are not limited
to: -Transit planning, feasibility, design and engineering studies -Salaries for new or existing city staff time specifically allocated for transportation planning andfor studies, or
interface with the DART staff on activities affecting the subject city -Technical Assistance seminars -Study and implementation oftransit-supportive land use planning policies and other
policies that benefit public transit -Minor capital support for technical staff 22. Other projects not meeting the test of past, present, or future bus service, but which are of significance
to mobility as long as benefits to transit can be demonstrated. For example: A project not located on a DART fixed transit route that relieves traffic congestion on a parallel or intersecting
DART route could be eligible for LAP/eMS funding. 3 
E. PROJECT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION: Project maintenance is the responsibility of the project owner. If shared maintenance responsibility for a project is desired, the cost sharing
arrangements must be approved by the DART Board and the eligible city as part of the project approval process. Operating costs of LAP/CMS projects may be eligible for LAP/CMS funding
subject to DART Board approval. F. PROJECT SUBMITTALS AND REPORTING: Cities will prepare LAP/CMS applications for consideration and approval by DART. DART staff will have 30 days to
review and respond to the applications. Once approved, the funding amount in the application becomes "programmed". Left over funding returned to DART after project closing becomes "unprogrammed".
A city may simultaneously return and "reprogram" left over funds by submitting a project application for approval along with the left over monies. DART will prepare, by September I of
each year, a projected LAP/CMS allocation for each city for budget purposes consistent with the the DART Financial Plan in effect at that time. DART will report quarterly (within 30
days after close of the quarter) on the status of the LAP/CMS fund including amounts allocated, amounts programmed, amounts expended, amounts available for reprogramming from completed
projects, and a total amount available for programming for each eligible city. Eligible cities will provide to DART notice of requests for LAP/CMS payment (at least 90 days in advance
of a request for LAP/CMS payment) for any amount exceeding $250,000. Eligible cities will maintain accurate books and records of all approved projects. Cities will maintain separate
records on each project including project budgets, budget amendments, revised budget balances, expenditures to date, estimated cost to complete, and DART payments to date. DART maintains
the right to audit a city's books to ensure that funds are spent in accordance with the approved workplan and DART's enabling legislation. Cities maintain the right to audit DART's books
to ensure that the fund allocations and disbursements are in accordance with these guidelines and other applicable laws. Eligible cities will provide an Annual Cash Flow Projection report
(See Table 2) for all approved projects by June 30 of each year beginning in 1997. DART may request updated cash flow projections from time to time to monitor its projected cash outflows.
G. CASH PAYMENTS: DART will prefund Technical Assistance Program (TAP) costs on an annual basis after submittal of an annual work plan by the eligible member city and approval by DART.
Technical Assistance funding will be 3% ofan eligible city's annual program allocation. DART will distribute LAP/CMS funds to the city for a City Council approved project according to
the following schedule: 4 
Project cost of$250,000 or less 100% ofthe cost upon approval by the City Council DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment with supporting documentation.
Project cost ofover $250,000 20% of the cost upon approval by the City Council. 80% of the cost upon Notice of Award by the city. Provided that written notice is received from the city
at least 90 days in advance, DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment over $250,000 with supporting documentation. Eligible cities will provide to DART
a completion report for each project documenting final acceptance of the project and fmal project cost. Project documentation will consist of a statement of project expenditures attested
by an authorized financial staff member, copies of paid invoices, or other similar documents. DART staff is authorized without further Board approval to pay at project closeout an amount
up to 10% higher than the approved project amount for properly documented eligible project costs. At project completion, cities will return any LAP/CMS funds distributed but unspent.
These funds will be available for reprogramming. Any unused funds allocated to an eligible city in any year will continue to be available to that city in succeeding years unless the
city withdraws from DART. Interest will not be paid on allocated, but unpaid LAP/CMS balances. H. OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since the LAP/CMS program allows for funding of operating
and capital transit projects, member cities will be eligible to apply for and receive FT A funds with prior approval by the DART Board. Plano will continue to be eligible to receive
funds for projects begun prior to FY 1989. Member cities may pool their LAP/eMS allocations for approval and implementation of eligible projects. Advanced (beyond I year) programming
of funds is allowed subject to Board approval; however, cities may not program, in any future year, more than the current year's LAP/CMS allocation. Board approval will be required for
projects over $100,000. DART staff will approve projects requiring LAP/CMS funding in amounts 0[$100,000 or less. A city may appeal to the Board any DART staff decision regarding project
approval. Starting October 1, 1997, all unused existing LAP funds will be administered as part of the new LAP/CMS program. Interest will accrue on the unpaid LAP balance through September
30, 1997, at a fixed rate of4%. 5 
All DART payments for LAP or LAP/eMS projects will be drawn from the eligible city's existing LAP fund balance until it is exhausted. After all LAP funds allocated are disbursed. further
payments will be drawn from that city's LAP/eMS allocation. I. EXPANDED REVENUE SHARING In accordance with Section 5 of DART Board Resolution No. 950260 of November 14. 1995. it is DART's
intent to continue to explore options for expanded revenue sharing with member cities to meet the region's transportation needs. These guidelines do not reflect the process to be used
to provide expanded revenue sharing. J. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER CITIES If a city withdraws from DART. no additional LAP/eMS funding will be allocated to that city. In the event of a withdrawal.
only individual projects for which construction contracts have been executed or for which formal funding agreements have been executed will be funded by DART and allowed to proceed to
completion. and the funds for completing these projects will be included as that city's specific obligation if that city withdraws from DART. All other funds revert to DART. Once a city
calls a withdrawal election, no new LAP/eMS projects will be considered for approval until after the election is canvassed. K. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Each construction project will display
at least one sign on each approach to the construction site indicating funding for that projectis provided through the DART LAP/eMS program. In addition, after implementation, if a project shaH have a visible permanent marker. it shan indicate that funding for the project was
provided through the DART LAP/eMS program. 6 
Table 1 LAP/CMS PROJECTIONS COMPARISON BY MEMBER CITY (1) (In Thousands of Dollars) 15% LAP TO CONSTRUCTION Projected CITY FY 1997 Allocation Total Program Cost Fiscal Year for Cities
Addison $ 1,136 $11,599 2004 Carrollton 1,908 17,313 2003 Cockrell Hill 6 83 2004 Dallas 0 0 na Farmers Branch 1,518 12,522 2003 Garland 1,975 4,127 1998 Glenn Heights 8 89 2004 Highland
Park 0 0 na Irving (2) 2,149 21,878 2004 Plano 4,167 12,908 1999 Richardson 2,768 4,971 1998 Rowlett 188 1,835 2004 University Park 0 0 na Total $15,823 $87,324 2004 1 Assumes program
allocations end in FY 2004 for all cities. Allocations based on sales tax collections from July I, 1995 through June 30, 1996. 2 Ining projected to receive 50% of tbe allocation of olber
cities for LAP/eMS. 7 
Table 2 ,--EXAMP[E-OF-ANNUAL CASH FLOW PROJECTION WORKSHEET CItY of Data (a) (b) (e) _J.d) 􀁾􀀨􀀵􀀡􀀩􀀠(f) (g) {hL_---.liL (f+o+I1+I) Approved Project Project Approved Budget Current
Payments Proiected payments from DART Total Description Number Budget Transfer BudQet Re<:'d to Date FY FY I FY Payments I I _..-----------------------------e----Total 8 04126196 02:25
PM LAPFORM1WK4 
ARTICLE FIVE Term The term of this !LA shall commence as of the first day of October, 1996 and shall terminate ror 􀁾􀁨Eligible Member City as plVvil.lw in C. ALLOCATIONS of the Guidelines.
Though terminated as to a specific Eligible Member City, the ILA shall remain in fuD force and efi.'ect until all Allocations for the alfected Eli8ible Member City are finally funded
3lId the activities ofsuch Eligible Member City are wound up. The allocation amounla andprogranr duratfollS incll«kd ill Table I of111ft Guirklinn anT projections. Actw:11 allocation:;
will be baKd 011 sak.s lax collection:;. ActualPTOgTQlll duration lVi/ibe rkrernuned by the sched#1e 0/rail fXJfIStruction. Ifa conJraCt for rail constrltctiem in a city is not awanled
by the year shown in Table 1. aJ/ocaticmsWili continue through the year in which a Tail construct/em contract is awarded or thr<Ngh 2004 when aii pmgram allocations end. TOTAL P.02 
Dallas Area Rapid 􀁔􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁳􀁾􀀠P.O. Box 660163 Dellas. Texas 75266-0163 214/749-3278 DATE: September 4, 1996 FROM: TomK. Ryden TO: Larry Cervenka, City ofGarland; Dave Davis, City ofFarmers
Branch; Jim Driscoll, City oflrving; Marcos Fernandez, City of Plano; George Human, City ofRichardson; John Godwin, City ofRowlett; Earl Keaton, City ofGlenn Heights; Sally McGlaun,
City ofCockrell Hill; Dave Nighswonger, Town of Addison; Cissy Sylo, City ofCarrollton SUBJECT: LAP/eMS Interlocal Agreement The DART Board of Directors approved guidelines for the new
LAP/CMS program on August 27, 1996. The guidelines are attached. For your convenience, the document changes resulting from the DART/City staff meeting held August 21, \996, are in bold
type. Changes made by the DART Board are either underlined or crossed out. To facilitate review and approval by each eligible member City Council, a draft Interloca1 Agreement (ILA)
is also enclosed. This ILA has, as an attachment, a 'clean' version of the guidelines. In other words, the guidelines attached to the ILA have no text bolding, underlining or cross out
sections. It is the same document as approved by the Board. Please review this ILA. Ifyou have any questions, please contact either Paul Jones of DART's Legal department at 749-3088
or myself. The next step to get the LAP/CMS program underway is for each eligible member City Council to approve the ILA. fdorn f){ 􀁩􀁬􀀮􀁾􀀠 Tom K. Ryden I c: Paul Jones 
GUIDELINES FOR THE LAP/CMS PROGRAM August 27,1996 A. OBJECTIVE: Provide continued financial assistance for projects consistent with these guidelines and DART's enabling legislation that
enhance mobility in DART member cities that do not yet have rail construction in progress. B. ELIGmLE MEMBER CITIES: The following cities are eligible to receive LAP/CMS funds as of
October 1, 1996: Addison, Carrollton, Cockrell Hill, Farmers Branch, Garland, Glenn Heights, Irving, Plano, Richardson, Rowlett. C. ALLOCATIONS: The LAP/CMS fund allocations will be
made available for use by an eligible member city annually from FY 1997 through FY 2004 when the program allocations end. The annual allocation will be calculated by multiplying by 15%
(7.5% for Irving) the DART sales taxes collected in an eligible member city for the previous twelve month period ending June 30. Each new annual allocation will be available for expenditure
on October 1 (beginning in 1996). The FY 1996 Financial Plan includes approximately $87,000,000 for this program. Table 1 shows the allocations by DART member city, based on the 1996
projections and anticipated program duration. The time schedule in Table 1 is subject to change during DART's annual budget cycle. A city will no longer be eligible to receive program
funds in the fiscal year after the Board awards a contract to initiate rail construction within that member city. In no case shall the DART Board award such a contract more than six
months prior to construction. The budget for LAP/CMS will be revisited based on agency requirements to meet its obligations. D. PROJECT ELIGmILITY: Eligible types of projects are shown
below. In general, eligible projects are divided into two categories: 1) Transit related street improvements and 2) Transit supportive projects and programs. Typically, funds approved
for capital projects may be used for planning, environmental impact studies, engineering, final design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and testing/inspection/surveying. Maintenance
and operations may also be funded if approved by the DART Board in accordance with Section E of the guidelines. 1 
Any project not explicitly listed but considered allowable under DART's enabling legislation may be proposed for DART consideration. Additional eligible projects include: Transit related
street improvements (streets with current or planned/previous bus routes). 1. Roadway improvements that add capacity Road widening Adding storage to turn lanes Adding turn lanes Adding/deleting
access points Adding bus priority lanes HOV lanes 2. Grade separations 3. Matching funds for federal/state programs 4. Intersection improvements New signals Computerization ofsignals
Traffic surveillance equipment Telecommunications 5. Cooperative funding ofintercity capacity improvements Signal progression Bus only lanes Bus signal preemption Arterial street HOV
lanes Roadway and intersection improvements 6. Special design provisions along roadways and intersections with planned bus routes Shelters Sidewalks Bus stops Bus turnouts Bus priority
treatments 7. Roadway and intersection safety improvements Transit supportive projects and and programs 8. Additional service including non-productive service (previously eliminated
or not meeting warrants) 9. Transportation services for the elderly and/or disabled Emergency medical Shuttle services 2 
10. ADA compliance items related to the provision oftransit service 11. Sidewalks related to providing access to transit facilities or services 12. Bus shelters 13. Bus benches 14. Travel
demand management Transportation Management Association operating funds User subsidies for transit service Vanpool programs Rideshare promotion and incentives Alternate work schedule
subsidies Employer trip reduction support Emergency ride home funding taxilloaner car 15. Vans for vanpool programs 16. Park and Ride lots 17. Mid-block bus turnouts 18. Incorporating
private transit services/facilities into DART 19. Transportation enhancements at existing and planned' DART transit centers, transfer centers and rail stations. 20. DART and Railtran
related railroad crossing and right of way improvements to include street closings or grade separations. 21. Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds may include, but are not limited
to: -Transit planning, feasibility, design and engineering studies -Salaries for new or existing city city staff time specifically allocated for transportation planning and/or studies,
or interface with the DART staff on activities affecting the subject city -Technical Assistance seminars -Study and implementation of transit-supportive land use planning policies and
other policies that benefit public transit -Minor capital support for technical staff 22. Other projects not meeting the test of past, present, or future bus service, but which are of
significance to mobility as long as benefits to transit can be demonstrated. For example: A project not located on a DART fixed transit route that relieves traffic congestion on a parallel
or intersecting DART route could be eligible for LAP/eMS funding. 3 
E. PROJECT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION: Project maintenance is the responsibility of the project owner. If shared maintenance responsibility for a project is desired, the cost sharing
arrangements must be approved by the DART Board and the eligible city as pa{t ofthe project approval process. Operating costs of LAP/CMS projects may be eligible for LAP/CMS funding
subject to DART Board approval. F. PROJECT SUBMITTALS AND REPORTING: Cities will prepare LAP/CMS applications for consideration and approval by DART. DART staff will have 30 days to
review and respond to the applications. Once approved, the funding amount in the application becomes "programmed". Left over funding returned to DART after project closing becomes "unprogrammed".
A city may simultaneously return and "reprogram" left over funds by submitting a project application for approval along with the left over monies. DART will prepare, by September 1 of
each year, a projected LAP/CMS allocation for each city for budget purposes consistent with the DART Financial Plan in effect at that time. D ART will report quarterly (within 30 days
after close of the quarter) on the status of the LAP/CMS fund including amounts allocated, amounts programmed, amounts expended, amounts available for reprogramming from completed projects,
and a total amount available for programming for each eligible city. Eligible cities will provide to DART notice ofrequests for LAP/CMS payment (at least 90 days in advance of a request
for LAP/CMS payment) for any amount exceeding $250,000. Eligible cities will maintain accurate books and records of all approved projects. Cities will maintain separate records on each
project including project budgets, budget amendments, revised budget balances, expenditures to date, estimated cost to complete, and DART payments to date. DART maintains the right to
audit a city's books to ensure that funds are spent in accordance with the approved workplan and DART's enabling legislation. Cities maintain the right to audit DART's books to ensure
that the fund allocations and disbursements are in accordance with these guidelines and other applicable laws. Eligible cities will provide an Annual Cash Flow Projection report (See
Table 2) for all approved projects by June 30 of each year beginning in 1997. DART may request updated cash flow projections from time to time to monitor its projected cash outflows.
G. CASH PAYMENTS: DART will prefund Technical Assistance Program (TAP) costs on an annual basis after submittal of an annual work plan by the eligible member city and approval by DART.
Technical Assistance funding will be 3% of an eligible city's annual program allocation. DART will distribute LAP/CMS funds to the city for a City Council approved project according
to the following schedule: 4 
Project cost of$250,000 or less 100% of the cost upon approval by the City Council DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment with supporting documentation.
Project cost of over $250,000 20"10 of the cost upon approval by the City Council. 80"10 of the cost upon Notice of Award by the city. Provided that written notice is received from the
city at least 90 days in advance, DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment over $250,000 with supporting documentation. Eligible cities will provide
to DART a completion report for each project documenting final acceptance of the project and final project cost. Project documentation will consist of a statement of project expenditures
attested by an authorized financial staff member, copies of paid invoices, or other similar documents. DART staff is authorized without further Board approval to pay at project closeout
an amount up to 10% higher than the approved project amount for properly documented eligible project costs. At project completion, cities will return any LAP/CMS funds distributed but
unspent. These funds will be available for reprogranuning. Any unused funds allocated to an eligible city in any year will continue to be available to that city in succeeding years unless
the city withdraws from DART. Interest will not be paid on allocated, but unpaid LAP/CMS balances. H. OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since the LAP/eMS program allows for funding of
operating and capital transit projects, member cities will be eligible to apply for and receive FTA funds with prior approval by the DART Board. Plano will continue to be eligible to
receive funds for projects begun prior to FY 1989. Member cities may pool their LAP/CMS allocations for approval and implementation of eligible projects. Advanced (beyond I year) programming
of funds is allowed subject to Board approval; however, cities may not program, in any future year, more than the current year's LAP/eMS allocation. Board approval will be required for
projects over $100,000. DART staff will approve projects requiring LAP/eMS funding in amounts of $100,000 or less. A city may appeal to the Board any DART staff decision regarding project
approval. Starting October I, 1997, all unused existing LAP funds will be administered as part of the new LAP/eMS program. Interest will accrue on the unpaid LAP balance through September
30, 1997, at a fixed rate of 4%. 5 
All DART payments for LAP or LAP/eMS projects will be drawn from the eligible city's existing LAP fund balance until it is exhausted, After all LAP funds allocated are disbursed, further
payments will be drawn from that city's LAP/eMS allocation, I. EXPANDED REVENUE SHARING In accordance with Section 5 of DART Board Resolution No, 950260 of November 14, 1995, it is DART's
intent to continue to explore options for expanded revenue sharing with member cities to meet the region's transportation needs, These guidelines do not reflect the process to be used
to provide expanded revenue sharing, •J. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER CITIES If a city withdraws from DART, no additional LAP/eMS funding will be allocated to that city. In the event of a withdrawal,
only individual projects for which construction contracts have been executed or for which formal funding agreements have been executed will be funded by DART and allowed to proceed to
completion, and the fundsfor completing these projects will be included as that city's specific obligation if that city withdraws from DART. All other funds revert to DART. Once a city
calls a withdrawal election, no new LAP/CMS projects earl ee stielRitlee or IIllpre¥eEI will be considered for approval until after the election is canvassed. K. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
Each construction project will display at least one sign on each approach to the construction site indicating funding for that project is provided through the DART LAP/CMS program. In
addition, after implementation aile ·;;here IIfIllrollrillte, ellen if a project shall have a visible permanent marker iIldieating it shall indicate that funding for the project was
provided through the DART LAP/CMS program. 
Table 1 LAP/CMS PROJECTIONS COMPARISON BY MEMBER CITY (1) (In Thousands of Dollars) 15% LAP TO CONSTRUCTION Projected CITY FY 1997 Allocation Total Program Cost Fiscal Year for Cities
Addison $ 1,136 $1l,599 2004 Carrollton 1,908 17,313 2003 Cockrell Hill 6 83 2004 Dallas 0 0 na Farmers Branch 1,518 12,522 2003 Garland 1,975 4,127 1998 Glenn Heights 8 89 2004 Highland
Park 0 0 na Irving (2) 2,149 21,878 2004 Plano 4,167 12,908 1999 Richardson 2,768 4,971 1998 Rowlett 188 1,835 2004 University Park 0 0 na Total $15,823 $87,324 2004 1 Assumes program
allocations end in FY 2004 (or all cities. Allocations bued on sales tax colleetions (rom July 1. 1995 through June 30. 1996. 2 Irving projected to receive 50% of the allocation of other
cities (or LAP/CMS. 7 
Table 2 ..................., EXAMPLE OFANNUAL CASH FLOW PROJECTION WORKSHEET City of Date (a) 􀀨􀁾􀀩􀀠(e) (d) (e) + Cd) (f) (g) (h) ..... (i) ..····cf.l.O+h+iT . Approve<! Project Project
Approved Budget Current Payments Projected Payments from DART Total Dasc:ripli()n Number Budget Transfer Budget Rec'd to Oat. FY FY FY Payments ------------_... r-... .. __ ._-----,􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭----
_._. _0 _____--. ! ------------------------_.i ! ------------------------------f----.Total 8 04126196 02:25 PM LAPFORM1.WK4 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit P<O< Box 660163 Dallas. Texas 75266-0163 214/749·3278 DATE: August 23, 1996 FROM: TomK. Ryden TO: Larry Cervenka, City ofGarland; Dave Davis, City ofFanners
Branch; Jim Driscoll, City ofIrving; Marcos Fernandez, City of Plano; George Human, City ofRichardson; 10hn Godwin, City ofRowlett; Earl Keaton, City ofGlenn Heights; Sally McGlaun,
City ofCockreU Hill; Dave Nighswonger, Town of Addison; Cissy Sylo, City ofCarrollton; SUBJECT: LAPfCMS Guidelines The DART Board ofDirectors is scheduled to collSider for approval the
LAPfCMS Guidelines on August 27, 1996. The attached LAPfCMS Guidelines are provided for your review and reflect comments received during the August 13, Board meeting and additional comments
from member city staff since that meeting. Given everyone's involvement and hard work on the document, I wanted to let each ofyou have a copy for review in advance ofthe Board meeting.
The attached guidelines reflect an attempt to address a vast majority of issues raised at the staff level over the past several months. I know there are issues some ofyou fuel are not
yet addressed or resolved< The substantive changes from the version reviewed on August 13 based on Board and member city input are in bold type. I will be happy to discuss the new document
at your convenience. Your participation and support during this effort is very much appreciated. 􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁊􀁖􀁋􀁾􀁾􀀠Tom K. Ryden, P.E. f TKR:jr Attachment !:-: 􀁾􀀠-c: Roger Snoble Doug
Allen 
GUIDELINES FOR THE LAP/CMS PROGRAM August 27, 1996 A. OBJECTIVE: Provide continued financial assistance for projects consistent with these guidelines and DARTs enabling legislation that
enhance mobility in DART member cities that do not yet have rail construction in progress. B. ELIGffiLE MEMBER CITIES: The following cities are eligible to receive LAP/CMS funds as ofOctober
1, 1996: Addison, Carrollton, Cockrell Hill, Farmers Branch, Garland, Glerm Heights, Irving, Plano, Richardson, Rowlett. C. ALLOCATIONS: The LAP/CMS fund allocations will be made available
for use by an eligible member city armually from FY 1997 through FY 2004 when the program allocations end. The armual allocation will be calculated by multiplying by 15% (7.5% for Irving)
the DART sales taxes collected in an eligible member city for the previous twelve month period ending June 30. Each newarmual allocation will be available for expenditure on October
1 (beginning in 1996). The FY 1996 Financial Plan includes approximately $87,000,000 for this program. Table 1 shows the allocations by DART member city, based on the 1996 projections
and anticipated program duration. The time schedule in Table 1 is subject to change during DART's annual budget cycle. A city will no longer be eligible to receive program funds in the
fiscal year after the Board awards a contract to initiate rail construction within that member city. The budget for LAP/CMS will be revisited based on agency requirements to meet its
obligations. D. PROJECT ELIGffiILITY: Eligible types of projects are shown below. In general, eligible projects are divided into two categories: 1) Transit related street improvements
and 2) Transit supportive projects and programs. Typically, funds approved for capital projects may be used for planning, environmental impact studies, engineering, final design, right-of-way
acquisition, construction, and testing/inspection/surveying. Maintenance and operations may also be funded if approved by the DART Board in accordance with Section E of the guidelines.
1 
Any project not explicitly listed but considered allowable under DART's enabling legislation may be proposed for DART consideration. Additional eligible projects include: Transit related
street improvements (streets witb current or planned/previous bus routes). 1. Roadway improvements that add capacity Road widening Adding storage to tum lanes Adding tum lanes Adding/deleting
access points Adding bus priority lanes HOVlanes 2. Grade separations 3. Matching funds for federal/state programs 4. Intersection improvements New signals Computerization ofsignals
Traffic surveillance equipment Telecommunications 5. Cooperative funding of intercity capacity improvements Signal progression Bus only lanes Bus signal preemption Arterial street HOV
lanes Roadway and intersection improvements 6. Special design provisions along roadways and intersections with planned bus routes Shelters Sidewa1ks Bus stops Bus turnouts Bus priority
treatments 7. Roadway and intersection safety improvements Transit supportive projects and programs 8. Additional service including non-productive service (previously eliminated or not
meeting warrants) 2 
9. Transportation services for the elderly and/or disabled Emergency medical Shuttle services 10. ADA compliance items related to the provision of transit service 11. Sidewalks related
to providing access to transit facilities or services 12. Bus shelters 13. Bus benches 14. Travel demand management Transportation Management Association operating funds User subsidies
for transit service Vanpool programs Rideshare promotion and incentives Alternate work schedule subsidies Employer trip reduction support Emergency ride home funding taxi/loaner car
15. Vans for vanpool programs 16. Park and Ride lots 17. Mid-block bus turnouts 18. Incorporating private transit services/facilities into DART 19. Transportation enhancements at existing
and planned DART transit centers, transfer centers and rail stations. 20. DART and Railtran related railroad crossing and right ofway improvements to include street closings or grade
separations. 21. Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds may include, but are not limited to: -Transit planning, feasibility, design and engineering studies -Salaries for new or existing
city staff time specifically allocated for transportation planning and/or studies, or interface with the DART staff on activities affecting the subject city -Technical Assistance seminars
-Study and implementation oftransit-supportive land use planning policies and other policies that benefit public transit -Minor capital support for technical staff 3 
22. Other projects not meeting the test ofpast, present, or future bus service, but which are ofsignificance to mobility as long as benefits to transit can be demonstrated. For example:
A project not located on a DART fued transit route that relieves traffic congestion on a parallel or intersecting DART route could be eligible for LAP/CMS funding. E. PROJECT MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATION: Project maintenance is the responsibility ofthe project owner. Ifshared maintenance responsibility for a project is desired, the cost sharing arrangements must be approved
by the DARTBoard and the eligible city as part ofthe project approval process. Operating costs of LAP/CMS projects may be eligible fur LAP/CMS funding subject to DART Board approval.
F. PROJECT SUBMITfALS AND REPORTING: Cities will prepare LAP/CMS applications ror consideration and approval by DART. DART stafTwill have 30 days to review and respond to the applications.
Once approved, the runding amount in the application becomes "programmed". Left over funding returned to DART after project closing becomes "unprogrammed". A city may simultaneously
return and "reprogram" left over funds by submitting a project application ror approval along with the left over monies. DART will prepare, by September I ofeach year, a projected LAP/CMS
allocation for each city for budget purposes consistent with the DART Financial Plan in effect at that time. DART will report quarterly (within 30 days after close ofthe quarter) on
the status of the LAP/CMS fund including amounts allocated, amounts programmed, amounts expended, amounts available for reprogramming from completed projects, and a total amount available
for programming for each eligible city. Eligible cities will provide to DART notice ofrequests for LAP/CMS payment (at least 90 days in advance ofa request for LAP/CMS payment) for any
amount exceeding $250,000. Eligible cities will maintain accurate books and records ofall approved projects. Cities will maintain separate records on each project including project budgets,
budget amendments, revised budget balances, expenditures to date, estimated cost to complete, and DART payments to date. DART maintains the right to audit a city's books to ensure that
funds are spent in accordance with the approved workplan and DART's enabling legislation. Cities maintain the right to audit DART's books to ensure that the fund allocations and disbursements
are in accordance with these guidelines and other applicable laws. Eligible cities will provide an Annual Cash Flow Projection report (See Table 2) for all approved projects by June
30 ofeach year beginning in 1997. DART may request updated cash flow projections from time to time to monitor its projected cash outflows, 4 
G. CASH PAYMENTS: DART will prefund Technical Assistance Program (TAP) costs on an annual basis after submittal ofan annual work plan by the eligible member city and approval by DART.
Technical Assistance funding will be 3% ofan eligible city's annual program allocation. DART will distribute LAP/CMS funds to the city for a City Council approved project according to
the following schedule: Project cost of$250,000 or less 100% ofthe cost upon approval by the City Council DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt ofa request for payment with
supporting documentation. Project cost ofover $250,000 20% ofthe cost upon approval by the City Council. 80% ofthe cost upon Notice of Award by the city. Provided that written notice
is received from the city at least 90 days in advance, DART will pay within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofa request for payment over $250,000 with supporting documentation. Eligible cities
will provide to DART a completion report for each project documenting final acceptance ofthe project and final project cost. Project documentation will consist ofa statement ofproject
expenditures attested by an authorized financial staff member, copies of paid invoices, or other similar documents. DART staffis authorized without further Board approval to pay at project
closeout an amount up to 10"/0 higher than the approved project amount for properly documented eligible project costs. At project completion, cities will return any LAP/CMS funds distributed
but unspent. These funds will be available fur reprogramming. Any unused funds allocated to an eligible city in any year will continue to be available to that city in succeeding years
unless the city withdraws from DART. Interest will not be paid on allocated, but unpaid LAP/CMS balances. H. OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since the LAP/CMS program allows for funding
ofoperating and capital transit projects, member cities will be eligible to apply for and receive FTA funds with prior approval by the DART Board. Plano will continue to be eligible
to receive funds for projects begun prior to FY 1989. Member cities may pool their LAP/CMS allocations for approval and implementation of eligible projects. 5 
Advanced (beyond 1 year) programming offunds is allowed subject to Board approval; however, cities may not program, in any future year, more than the current year's LAP/CMS allocation.
Board approval will be required for projects over $100,000. DART staffwill approve projects requiring LAP/CMS funding in amounts of$1 00,000 or less. A city may appeal to the Board any
DART staff decision regarding project approval. Starting October I, 1997, all unused existing LAP funds will be administered as part ofthe new LAP/eMSprogram. Interest will accrue on the unpaid LAP balance through September 30, 1997, at a fixed rate of4%. All DART payments for LAP or LAP/eMS projects will be drawn from the eligible
city's existing LAP fund balance until it is exhausted. After all LAP funds allocated are disbursed, further payments will be drawn from that city's LAP/eMS allocation. L EXPANDED REVENUE
SHARING In accordance with Section 5 ofDART Board Resolution No. 950260 ofNovember 14, 1995, it is DART's intent to continue to explore options for expanded revenue sharing with member
cities to meet the region's transportation needs. These guidelines do not reflect the process to be used to provide expanded revenue sharing. J. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER CITIES Ifa city
withdraws from DART, no additional LAP/eMS funding will be allocated to that city. In the event ofa withdrawal, only individual projects for which construction contracts have been executed
or for which formal funding agreements have been executed will be funded by DART and allowed to proceed to completion. All other funds revert to DART. Once a city calls a withdrawal
election, no new LAP/CMS projects can be submitted or approved until after the election is canvassed. K. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Each construction project will display at least one sign
on each approach to the construction site indicating funding for that project is provided through the DART LAP/CMS program. In addition, after implementation and where appropriate, each
project shall have a visible permanent marker indicating funding for the project was provided through the DART LAP/CMS program. 6 
Table 1 LAP/CMS PROJECTIONS COMPARISON BY MEMBER CITY (1) (In Thousands of DoUars) 15% LAP TO CONSTRUCTION Projected CITY FY 1997 Allocation Total Program Cost Fiscal Year for Cities
Addison $ 1,136 $1l,599 2004 Carrollton 1,908 17,313 2003 Cockrell Hill 6 83 2004 Dallas 0 0 na Farmers Branch 1,518 12,522 2003 Garland 1,975 4,127 1998 Glenn Heights 8 89 2004 Highland
Park 0 0 na Irving (2) 2,149 21,878 2004 Plano 4,167 12,908 1999 Richardson 2,768 4,971 1998 Rowlett 188 1,835 2004 University Park 0 0 na Total $15,823 $87,324 2004 1 Assumes program
allocations end in FY 2004 for all cities. Allocations based on sales tax collections from 􀁊􀁾􀁬􀁹􀀠1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. 2 Irving projected to receive 50% of the allocation
of other cities for LAP/eMS. 7 
T8bkt2 r--EXAMPUrOF-AtiiNUAL CASH FLOW PROJECTION WORKSHEET City of Date (a) (b) (eL (dI (e) + (d) (f) I (a) (h) (i) . (f+g+h+i) Approved Project Project Approved Budget Current Payments
Projected Payments from DART Total Description. Number Budget Transfer Budget Rec'd to Date FY FY FY Payments ------------------------------I . ----Tota, L--._---------------------------------------8
04126196 02:25 PM LAPFORM1.WJ(4 
Dallas Area Rapid Transn P.O. ilox 660 163 Dallas. Texas 75266·0163 214/749-3278 DATE: August 16, 1996 FROM: TomK. Ryden TO: George Human, City ofRichardson; Marcos Fernandez, City of
Plano; Brian Jahn, City ofCarrollton; Dave Davis, City ofFarmers Branch; Mike Gibson, City of Rowlett; Dave Nighswonger, Town of Addison; Larry Cervenka, City ofGarland; Tim Driscoll,
City ofIrving SUBJECT: LAP/CMS Guidelines The DART Board ofDirectors is scheduled to review and approve the LAP/CMS Guidelines on August 27, 1996. The attached LAP/CMS Guidelines are
provided for your review and represent the conJments received during the August 13 Board meeting. The unresolved issues from the last Board meeting were: -use ofFTA funds by eligible
member cities; • interest on the unused LAP balance at 4% for one year; • definition ofthe city commitment on a project before funds are disbursed; and -a moratorium on funds once a
city calls a withdrawal election. The attached guidelines reflect an attempt to address these issues. I suggest we meet as a group next Wednesday afternoon, August 22 or Thursday morning
August 23. Tom K Ryden, P.E. TKR:jr Attachments 
GUIDELINES FOR THE LAP/CMS PROGRAM August 14, 1996 A. OBJECTIVE: Provide continued financial assistance for projects consistent with these guidelines and DART's enabling legislation
that enhance mobility in DART member cities that do not yet have rail construction in progress. B. ELlGmLE MEMBER CITIES: The following cities are eligible to receive LAP/CMS funds as
ofOctober 1, 1996: Addison, Carrollton, Cockrell Hill, Farmers Branch, Garland, Glenn Heights, Irving, Plano, Richardson, Rowlett. C. ALLOCATIONS: The LAP/CMS fund allocations will be
made available for use by an eligible member city annually from FY 1997 through FY 2004 when the program allocations end. The annual aUocation will be calculated by multiplying by 15%
(7.5% for Irving) the DART sales taxes collected in a member city for the previous twelve month period ending June 30. Each new annual aUocation wiD be available for expenditure on October
1 (beginning in 1996). The FY 1996 Financial Plan includes approximately $87,000,000 for this program. Table 1 shows the allocations by city, based on the 1996 projections and anticipated
program duration. A city will no longer be eligible to receive program funds in the fiscal year after the Board awards a contract to initiate rail construction within that member city.
Ifin the future, DART's sales tax is reduced, the Board reserves the right to re-examine the LAP/eMS budget. D. PROJECT ELlGmILITY: . Eligible types ofprojects are shown on Table 2.
Any project not explicitly listed but considered allowable under DART's enabling legislation may be proposed for DART consideration. Additional eligible projects include: -Provisions
during design and construction ofstreet improvement projects for future shelters, sidewalks, bus stops, bus turnouts, and bus priority treatments on streets where bus service is planned
for the future. (Transit supportive category) LAPGUID2 1 
• Transportation enhancements at existing and planned DART transit centers, transfer locations and rail stations. (Transit supportive category) • Improvements including grade separations
and street closures at existing railroad crossings along DART and Railtran owned rail right ofway. (Transit supportive category) • Roadway and intersection safety improvements along
eligible streets. (Transit related category) • Other projects not meeting the test ofpast, present, or future bus service, but which are ofsignificance to mobility as long as benefits
to transit can be demonstrated. For example: A project not located on a DART route that relieves traffic congestion on a parallel or intersecting DART route would be eligible for LAP/CMS
funding. (Category to be determined) • Technical Assistance Program funds may include but are not limited to transit planning, feasibility and design studies; salaries for new or existing
city staff time specifically allocated for transportation planning andlor studies, or interface with the DART staffon activities affecting the subject city; technical assistance seminars;
study and implementation oftransit-supportive land use planning policies and other policies that benefit public transit; and minor capital support for technical staff D. PROJECT ELIGmILITY:
(proposed Replacement Section) Eligible types of projects are shown below. Any project not explicitly listed but considered allowable under DART's enabling legislation may be proposed
for DART consideration. Additional eligible projects include: Transit related street improvements (streets with current or planned/previous bus routes). 1. Roadway improvements that
add capacity Road widening Adding storage to tum lanes Adding tum lanes Adding/deleting access points Adding bus priority lanes HOV lanes Final engineering and design 2. Grade separations
3. Matching funds for federallstate programs LAPGUID2 2 
4. Intersection improvements New signals Computerization ofsignals Traffic surveillance equipment 5. Cooperative funding ofintercity capacity improvements Signal progression Bus only
lanes Bus signal preemption Arterial street HOV lanes Roadway and intersection improvements 6. Final engineering and design including special design provisions along roadways and intersections
with planned bus routes Shelters Sidewalks Bus stops Bus turnouts Bus priority treatments 7. Roadway and intersection safety improvements Transit supportive projects and programs 8.
Additional service including non-productive service (previously eliminated or not meeting warrants) 9. Transportation services for the elderly and/or disabled Emergency medical Shuttle
services 10. ADA compliance items related to the provision oftransit service II. Sidewalks related to providing access to transit facilities or services 12. Bus shelters 13. Bus benches
14. Travel demand management Transportation Management Association operating funds User subsidies for transit service Vanpool programs Rideshare promotion and incentives LAPGUID2 3 
Alternate work schedule subsidies Employer trip reduction support Emergency ride home funding taxilloaner car 15. Vans forvanpool programs 16. Park and Ride lots 17. Mid-block bus turnouts
18. Incorporating private transit services/facilities into DART 19. Transportation enhancements at existing and planned DART transit centers, transfer centers and rail stations. 20.
DART and Railtran related railroad crossing and right ofway improvements to include street closings or grade separations. 21. Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds may include, but
are not limited to: -Transit planning, feasibility and design studies -Salaries for new or existing city stafftime specifically allocated for transportation planning and/or studies,
or interface with the DART staff on activities affecting the subject city -Technical Assistance seminars -Study and implementation oftransit-supportive land use planning policies and
other policies that benefit public transit -Minor capital support for technical staff 22. Other projects not meeting the test ofpast, present, or future bus service, but which are of
significance to mobility as long as benefits to transit can be demonstrated. For example: A project IlDt located on a DART route that relieves traffic congestion on a parallel or intersecting
DART route would be eligible for LAP/CMS funding. E. PROJECT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION: Project maintenance is the responsibility ofthe project owner. Ifshared maintenance responsibility
fur a project is desired, the cost sharing arrangements must be approved by the DART Board and the eligible city as part ofthe project approval process. Operating costs of LAP/CMS projects
may be eligible for LAP/CMS funding subject to DART Board approval. F. REPORTING: DART will prepare, by September 1 ofeach year, a projected LAP/CMS allocation for each city for budget
purposes consistent with the DART Financial Plan in effect at that time. DART will report quarterly (within 30 days after close of the quarter) on the status of the LAPGUID2 4 
LAP/CMS fund including amounts allocated, amounts programmed, amounts expended, amounts available for reprogramming from completed projects, and a total amount available for programming
for each eligible city. Eligible cities will provide to DART notice ofrequests for LAP/CMS payment (at least 90 days in advance of a request for LAP/CMS payment) for any amount exceeding
$250,000. Eligible cities will maintain accurate books and records ofall approved projects. Cities will maintain separate records on each project including project budgets, budget amendments,
revised budget balances, expenditures to date, estimated cost to complete, and DART payments to date. DART maintains the right to audit a city's books to ensure that funds are spent
in accordance with the approved workplan and DART's enabling legislation. Eligible cities will provide an Annual Cash Flow Projection report (See Table 3) for all approved projects by
June 30 ofeach year. DART may request updated cash flow projections from time to time to monitor its projected cash outflows. G. CASH PAYMENTS: DART will prefund Technical Assistance
Program (TAP) costs on an annual basis after submittal ofan annual work plan by the eligible member city and approval by DART. Technical Assistance funding will be 3% ofan eligible city's
annual program allocation. DART will distribute LAP/CMS funds to the city for a City Council approved project according to the following schedule: Project cost of $250,000 or less 100%
ofthe cost upon approval by the City Council. DART will pay within thirty (30) days of receipt ofa request for payment with supporting documentation. Project cost ofover $250,000 2oolo
of the cost upon approval by the City Council. 80% ofthe cost upon Notice To Proceed by the city. Provided that written notice is received from the city at least 90 days in advance,
DART will pay within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofa request for payment over $250,000 with supporting documentation. Eligible cities will provide to DART a completion report for each
project documenting with final acceptance ofthe project and final project cost. Project documentation will consist of a statement ofproject expenditures attested by an authorized financial
staff member, copies ofpaid invoices, or other similar documents. DART staff is authorized without further Board approval to pay at project closeout an amount up to 10% higher than the
approved project amount for properly documented LAPGUID2 5 
eligible project costs, At project completion, cities will return any LAP/CMS funds distributed but unspent These funds will be available for reprogramming, Any unused funds allocated
to a city in any year will continue to be available to that city in succeeding years. Interest will not be paid on allocated, but unpaid LAP/CMS balances. G. CASH PAYMENTS: (Proposed
Replacement Section) DART will prefund Technical Assistance Program (TAP) costs on an annual basis after submittal ofan annual work plan by the eligible member city and approval by DART,
Technical Assistance funding will be 3% ofan eligible city's annual program allocation. DART will distribute LAP/CMS funds to the city for a City Council approved project according to
the following schedule: Project cost of$250,000 or less: 100"/0 of the cost upon approval by the City Council ofequipment purchases, right ofway acquisition, or notice to proceed for
project design, engineering, or construction DART will pay within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofa request for payment with supporting documentation. Project cost ofover $250,000: 20%
ofthe cost upon approval by the City Council for equipment purchases, right of way acquisition or notice to proceed for engineering and design. 80% ofthe cost upon notice to proceed
by the city for construction, Provided that written notice is received from the city at least 90 days in advance, DART will pay within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofa request for payment
over $250,000 with supporting documentation. (No change to remainder ofSection G, above) H. OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since the LAP/CMS fund allows for funding of operating and
capital transit projects, member cities will be eligible to apply for and receive FTA funds with prior approval by DART, Plano will continue to be eligible to receive funds for projects
begun prior to FY 1989. Member cities may pool funds to create projects. Advanced (beyond I year) programming offunds is allowed subject to Board approval; however, cities may not program,
in any future year, more than the current year's LAP/CMS allocation, LAPGUID2 6 
Board approval will be required fur projects over.$1 00,000. DART staffwill approve projects requiring LAP/eMS funding in amounts of.$1 00,000 or less. A city may appeal to the Board
any DART staffdecision regarding project approval. Starting October I, 1997, all unused existing LAP funds will be administered as part of the new LAP/eMS program. Interest will accrue
on the unpaid LAP balance through September 30, 1997, at a fixed rate of4%. All DART payments for LAP or LAP/eMS projects will be drawn from the eligible city's existing LAP fund balance
until it is exhausted. After all LAP funds allocated are disbursed, further payments will be drawn from that city's LAP/eMS allocation. L EXPANDED REVENUE SHARING In accordance with
Section 5 ofDART Board Resolution No. 950260 ofNovember 14, 1995, it is DART's intent to continue to explore options for expanded revenue sharing with member cities to meet the region's
transportation needs. These guidelines do not reflect the process to be used to provide expanded revenue sharing. J. WITHDRAWAL OF AND ADDmON OF MEMBER CmES: Ifa city withdraws from
DART, no additional LAP/eMS funding will be allocated to that city. In the event ofa withdrawal, individual projects for which construction contracts have been executed or for which
formal funding agreements have been executed will be funded by . ".fl DART and allowed to proceed to completion. All other funds revert to DART. Ifa city joins (' ,'1'... 10 DART, total
LAP/eMS funding will be increased by the joining city's annual LAP/eMS CI,,,t i􀁾􀀵􀁲􀀠allocation. The joining city's allocation will be calculated based on the allocation methodology.
11e, i described in these guidelines d􀁾􀀠t 􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀧􀀠?J. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER CITIES (proposed Replacement Section) Ifa city withdraws from DART, no additional LAP/eMS funding will
be allocated to that city. In the event ofa withdrawal, only individual projects for which construction contracts have been executed or for which formal funding agreements have been
executed will be funded funded by DART and allowed to proceed to completion. All other funds revert to DART. Once a city J ca' raw lectio no new LAP/eMS . can be submi ed for a-roval
an no ndin or existing LAP/eMS pro' ects will be ermi ed until after the election is ( LAPGUID2 7 
CITY Addison Carrollton Cockrell Hill Dallas Farmers Branch Garland Glenn Heights Highland Park Irving (2) Plano Richardson Rowlett University Park Total Table 1 LAP/CMS PROJECTIONS
COMPARISON BY MEMBER CITY (1) (In Thousands of Dollan) 15% LAP TO CONSTRUCTION Projected FY 1997 Allocation Total Program Cost Fiscal Year for Cities $ 1,136 $11,599 2004 1,908 17,313
2003 6 83 2004 0 0 na 1,518 12,522 2003 1,975 4,127 1998 8 89 2004 0 0 na 2,149 21,878 2004 4,167 12,908 1999 2,768 4,971 1998 188 1,835 2004 0 0 na $15,823 $87,324 2004 1 Assumes program
ends in FY 2004 for all cities. Allocations based on sales tax collections from Joly 1, 1995 tbrough June 30,1996. 2 Irving projected to receive 50% of tbe allocation of otber cities
for LAP/eMS. LAPGUID2 8 
....-------....... •f J I • rI 1t . i I 􀁾􀀠• t • I E 5 􀀡􀁾􀀠Itt I .'q f J. : 111 J 􀁾􀀠I t I 􀁾􀀠f a I 2 I I I' f fl. hJ )U In 􀁾􀀠-' } I ..lui 
I Q-l 
CAP TAP MEMBER UNPROGRAMMED UNPAID UNPROGRAMMED UNPAID CITY BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE ADDISON $ 334,555.00 $ 4,286,360 $0 $0 As ofJuly 31, 1996 
12119189 $18,712,40 $5,859,60 04111/9503/14196 􀀿􀁁􀀤􀀮􀀤􀁌􀀤􀀺􀁦􀁾􀁩􀁪􀁪􀁩􀁩􀁭􀁩􀁩􀁒􀁁􀀧􀁍􀁾􀀿􀁩􀀺􀀱􀁡􀁾􀁗􀁩􀁾􀀿􀀻􀁲􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀿􀀬􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁦􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁾􀂥􀁒􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀱􀀺􀁩􀀥􀁾􀁊􀁭􀁩􀁾􀁾􀀺􀂣􀁦􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁗
􀀺􀁬􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁗􀂣􀁆􀀧􀀠AMOUNT EXPENDITURES EXPEND1TURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES I TOTAl. DURING DURING DURING DURING DUR!NG AMOUNT PAIDDATE APPROVED TO BE 1124,572.00 $4,672,93
􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀻􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁁􀁾􀁴􀀠􀀧􀀻􀀺􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀿􀁾􀁾􀁭􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁴􀁾􀀪􀁑􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁀􀀻􀁾􀁩􀁦􀀧􀀬􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁲􀁁􀁾􀁀􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀬􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁻􀁻􀁀􀁫􀁴􀁇􀁽􀁦􀁾􀀧􀀠$12,605,00
$151,277,36 $170,00 $0,00 $19,926,00 $56,064.42 $S,12S,$5 $3,622,75 􀀷􀀼􀀢􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀭􀂷􀀿􀀺􀁽􀁭􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀰􀀱􀀺􀁳􀀺􀁥􀀬􀀺􀁱􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁩􀁘􀁀􀁾􀁩􀂷􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁭􀀠􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀻􀁀􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀥􀀻􀀺􀀿􀀺􀁾􀂣􀀱􀀻􀁂􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾�
�􀁩􀁾􀀯􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀾􀀧􀀠$20,400,00 $S,soo,oo $86,955,18 􀀧􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀮􀀿􀁾􀁾􀁍􀀻􀀺􀁾􀁴􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁻􀀠􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁦􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁴􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁩􀀧􀁩􀀮􀀺􀁾􀁀􀁜􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀮􀀠􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺
􀀻􀀬􀁭􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺􀁾􀀡􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁯􀀻􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁾􀀼􀀺􀀿􀀿􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀠􀀺􀂥􀁾􀀢􀀬􀀠$635,526,80 $5,525,00 6747,487,07 $52,512,93 AODS:N.WK4 00121100 
$7,114,943,89 1 􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁲􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁕􀀺􀀠$24,572.00 $13,770.00 $3,870.00 $15,570.00 $225,000.00 $120.00 $255,977,72 $35,825.00 $93,958.00 $184,715.00 $9,500.00 $4,672.93 $1,547,252.54
$435,890.93 $1,15(),755.131 $3.163,143.53 Projeet(s) Ciosed Funds Allocated thru FY 96 $6,163,569.94 lrrterest; Earned on. Unpaid Balance $1,285,934.25 T.I fonds Available $7,449,504.20
Funds Programmed $7,114,948J)9 Funds. unprogrammed $334,555.31 cash Paymenls Made $3,163,143,53 AOOSN.WK4 2 08121196 
PROJECT 11 PROJECT NAME TRANSFER TO TAP ACCOUNT FOR PAVEMENT MGMT. & THOROUGHFARE PLAN STAFF SALARIES DATE APPROVED 12/19/89 APPROVED AMOUNT S18,712.40 $5.659.60 ADDISON CAPITAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM AMOUNT IEXPENDITURES TO BE DURING REPROGRAMMED FY89-90 EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES DURING DURING DURING DURING FY91·92 FYSl-94 FY95 FY96 524.572.00 TOTAL
AMOUNT PAID PER PROJECT PROGRAMMEO FUNDS NOT YET PAID 􀁐􀀻􀁾􀀺􀁓􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁁􀁐􀀭􀁁􀁃􀁃􀁏􀁕􀁎􀁔􀁔􀁏􀀠: . ::1·:·: 􀁾􀀲􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀷􀀲􀂷􀂷􀁾􀁬􀀠... 􀂷􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁉􀀠HELP FUND SALARY FOR CITY
ENGINEER Project Completed 10/23190 >4.672.93 . ,. BELT LINEiOUOfl:UMINTERS'E"CTION 1􀀰􀀷􀀱􀁾􀁦􀀸􀁔􀀮􀁕􀁏􀀨􀁲􀁏􀁏􀂷􀀠....-'........-, .....-.... ". BELT ut,fEiMiDw!fYINTERS'ECTioN" ..
. , roii3i90" S/8,6061Xl Rigtil::OT-Wayp,'c'clulsilTcin U4ffl79S""OSOS:OOO. BEITUNEIATJDISON'"RD1NTERSEC.-----J0I2319<rODT,9601Xf ADDITIONAL FUNDS 11/26191 .$63,040.00 Payment 03/17/93
Payment 11/01/93 Payment 04111195 Project Completed Under Budget and funds transferred to the Keller SpringS/No Dallas Tollway Project 04/11/95 ($31,947.64 .. '···'·'L:""'" ."" ,"",.,',:,,,,',,.""'",
:",.:, ".','.', :""""","''",.,."'" ...,.,.",, .. ,..,IMONTFtlRT1BrrrDNrlNT'EO= I 􀁬􀁤􀁬􀀲􀁾􀁳􀀺􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀺􀁴􀁘􀁬􀀠Payment 03/17/93 Payment 02/10194 Payment 10104194 Payment 04/11195 Project
Completed Upder Budget and funds transferred to the Keller SprinQs/N. Dallas Tollv.'aV Project 04111/95 (S37,258.17) _'... 1 •• _" •••••••• ," ..__ • ,__ ...,_. , •• _,. __ ••• :'::::;.:::,:::':::"':
';::.;::,.,_::,-_._:._;_::,_;;_;.::.·..:'-:: •• -:: ••-.:".:.:.1,... TR=nTGNATIMPR:bvnrEN IS 10123190"""""'$:1O;-4OO1Xf Payment 10104194 Proiect Completed 10/4194 >4.672.93 I S12,605.00
S 151,277.36 519.926.00 556.064.42 $8.126.66 $20.400.00 >4.672.93 $0.00 $ = '. " ...-: :':': 􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠'. ;::-:-:::':..-:"::':-:':.....:-::'::::..._:--., :600'00·'··R·..··'·,·,·,,·
..0:00 􀁾􀀺􀁯􀁯􀀠$170.00 $164.052.361 $0.00 "'::;·.1::" 􀀢􀀺􀀭􀁾􀀠:······;·;·;·:=:·:::·::·::·d: 􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁹􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀠$3.622.75
$87.741.831 $0.00 .. ·N.'·. .'-":,,-:::::'::';"':::1 􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀻􀁟􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀬􀀺􀁟􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀻􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀮􀀬􀀭􀀬􀀭..,. -' 1 ;_":"::: 􀀻􀁟􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀭􀁟􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀭􀀺􀀺�
�􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀧􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀧􀀠$20.400.00 1 $0.00 ..·""·L'·"'....,··"··'"'·''':''''·:'·''''''''''''·''''''''''''''',,,.,,""􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁄􀁅􀁗􀁁􀁴􀁋􀀷􀁂􀁴􀁊􀁳􀀭􀁂􀁲􀁮􀁾􀁓􀂷􀂷􀀠.􀀻􀀧􀁩􀀯􀀲􀁾􀀠......
'·"","""""""""""""'::'·::·::,':,:'::t: ""':"':"::":"""'''1''''':'''::'::''' ",.•.,.... Project Completed Under BudClet 04/11/95 (S3,211.70· AooiSONmESTGROVElNTERSEC i: :, 􀀺􀀢􀁦􀁬􀁾􀀶􀁩􀀹􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁩􀁳
􀀺􀁯􀁯􀁤􀁗􀀠Payment 03117/93 Payment 04/11/95 Payment 03/14/96 MIDWAYlONDBERGlNTERSEC I. 􀀱􀀱􀁉􀀲􀀶􀀯􀀹􀁲􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁩􀁬􀁓􀁏􀀻􀁏􀁏􀁏􀀺􀁏􀁏􀀧􀀠Payment 03/17/93 $3,211.70 􀀾􀁾􀀠$3.364.30 $8.500.00
510.630.00 ' .. I·.··, .,........... .: ..: .... :. ::: .": ........., : .. ::'::.-... ::-........ ,.:::' .... ;. : .... : .. "I.' MlDWAYIBEt1WAY'ffiTER"S'EC 1 . 􀀱􀀱􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀯􀀹􀁾􀁳􀀺􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀺􀁏􀁏􀀢􀀠P
ayment 03117/93 S2.925.00 MTQWA"YlGREENHIITlNTERSEC'. "--􀀻􀀺􀀺􀁜􀁾􀀺􀁨􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭$75, Pa ment 03117/93 54.260.00 :!.. "1[BEITlJNElMARSHl]['1NTERSEC.· 11726J91OSSO:OOO:OO SI9;59!DXJ
Additional Funds 06114/94 .$250,000.00 Payment 09/30194 $635,526.60 Payment 04/11/95 Payment 03114/96 $37.788.30 1 $0.00 $86.955.16 $109.616.41 $15.381.59 514,163.23 $10.630.00 $139.170.00
$2.925.00 >42.075.00 $4.280.00 $70.720.00 55.525.00 $747.487.07 $52.512.93 $86.645.27 ADDSNWK4 08121196 
'ADDISON CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AMOUNT EXPENOITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES DATE APPROVED lOBe DURING DURING DURING PROJECTtt PROJECT NAME APPROVED AMOUNT REPROGRAMMED FY...'"
FY91-92 FY93-S4 ANSFERTOTAPl'OR Il'E';;GINEERIPlANNER 􀁐􀀶􀁾􀀬􀁾􀁔􀁯􀁎􀀠11/26191 $8,701,00 09/30/94 $.8,701.00,I!.HOROUGllFARE1'CAN 􀀲􀁉􀀲􀀵􀀱􀀹􀁾􀀷􀀻􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀺􀁯􀁯􀀠Payment 03117/93 $33,750.00
Payment 11/01/93 $3,750.00 , "EITUNEIDAITAS NORTRIOITWA 􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀺􀀠'lbl,WU,U(J 6122/93 Payment 11/01/93 $13,770.00 Payment 02110/94 $3,870.00 Payment 04111/95 PaYment 03114/96 􀁾􀁭􀀺􀁲􀁮􀀧􀁓􀁐􀁒􀁩
􀁎􀁇􀁳􀁩􀁄􀁬􀁜􀁲􀁮􀁩􀁎􀁢􀁒􀁬􀁩􀀭􀁦􀁲􀁢􀁩􀀺􀁩􀀺􀁗􀁁􀁟􀀿􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀢􀀠INTERSECTION 6122193 $226,150,00 Payment 04111/95 Addtional funds transferrred from Belt Line/Montfort and Belt Line!
Addison Rd. Projects 04/11/95 $69,205.47 Payment 03114196 .. , ,. ,." ,." .. , ... , . 􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀬􀁾􀀧􀁒􀁩􀀼􀀮􀁐􀁁􀁭􀁲􀁆􀁒􀁯􀁬􀁩􀁎􀀧􀁯􀁩􀁬􀁁􀁭􀁳􀀠􀀱􀁏􀁊􀀲􀁾􀀼􀁓􀀢􀀬􀁗􀁕􀀬􀁗􀀠ITOLLWAY TO
MARSH lANE PHASE I Payment 02110194 S255.000.OO , O'VE7S0JOURN IN IER. IMP 02l15!,';',". 'lfO,\MJ,W I Payment 09/30/94 $15,570,00 Payment 04111/95 PaYment 03114/96 􀁁􀁉􀀼􀁁􀁐􀁁􀁾􀁃􀁊􀁬􀁬􀁅􀁁􀁕􀁇􀁎􀁍�
�􀁎􀁲􀁲􀁏􀁏􀁾􀁳􀁩􀁯􀁾􀁭􀀵􀀷􀀹􀀢􀀿􀁩􀀸􀁕􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀠. Additional Funds 09/13194 $1,200,000.00 Additional Funds 10101194 $900,000,00 Payment 04111/95 Payment 03114196 Additional Funds
10101195 $620,559,00 Payment 05120/96 ., .. :..:; ........... .. ,....,,'-.'.....', .......... ,::',.'--:,.::-:::':::::::;;-::,'-::.,;':;'-,::;:;,:,:' S2OO:OOO1xl􀀢􀁾􀁈􀁅􀀱􀁉􀁄􀀺􀀷􀀱􀁬􀁕􀁓􀁔􀁎􀁅􀁓􀁓�
�􀁬􀁒􀀬􀀠Additional Funds Payment PaYment (and Project Complete) TOTAL TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ALL YEARS 02115/94 06114194 10104/94 04/12/95 $50,000.00 $7,114,948,89 I I $225,000.00 , $3,211.70
! $24,572.00 $4,672,93 $1,547,252.54 I I $3,163.143.53 EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES TOTAL PROGRAMMED DURING DURING AMOUNT PAID FUNDS NOT YET FY95 FY96 PER PROJECT PAID $8,701,00 $0,00 $37,500,00
$0,00 $120,00 $255,977.72 $8,022,28 $238,217,72 S,35,825.00 $267,868.44 $27,487.03 $232,043.44 .. ".' $255,000,00 $0,00 $93,958.00 $126,020,n n $48,979.23 $16,492.77 $184,715.00 $9,500,00
$553,492,70 $747,707.70 $2,n5,851 ,3O ......................... ",..".",.,:,,',::::' ",·,x·:"':·:;···· .......................,',.. . 􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀺􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀬􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀿􀀺􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀧􀀻􀀮􀀺.....
. $25,000.00 $250,000,00 $0,00 $435,890.93 $1,150,755.13 $3,163,143.53 $3,951,805,36 ProJec{{s) Closed Funds Allot;ated Ihru FY 96 Inlerest Eamed on Unpaid Balance Total Funds Available
Funds Programmed Funds Unprogrammed Cash Payments Made 56,163.569.94 51,285,934.26 S7,449,504.20 S7,114,948.89 5334,555.31 S3,163,143.53 
LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM BASED ON SALES TAX COLLECTIONS JULY 1995 THROUGH JUNE 1996 CITY DART ALLOCATION LAP AT 15% (Irving 7.5%) ADDISON 7,570,612 1,135,592 CARROLLTON 12,724,873 1,908,731
COCKRELL HILL 41,786 6,268 DALLAS 151,002,330 0 FARMERS BRANCH 10,122,734 1,518,410 GARLAND 13,165,488 1,974,823 GLENN HEIGHTS 55,495 8,324 HIGHLAND PARKS 995,436 0 IRVING 28,650,492
2,148,787 PLANO 27,780,189 4,167,028 RICHARDSON· 18,451,642 2,767,746 ROWLETT 1,256,044 188,407 UNIVERSITY PARK 1,667,149 0 TOTAL DART 273,484,269 15,824,116 ·Includlng allocation for
Buckingham SALESTAX.wK4 08114196 
ALLOCATION OF DART SALES TAX BASED ON COLLECTIONS FOR MEMBER CITIES (JULY 1995 THRU JUNE 1996) MEMBER CITY ADDISON BUCKINGHAM CARROLLTON COCKRELL HILL DALLAS FARMERS BRANCH GARLAND GLENN
HEIGHTS HIGHLAND PARKS IRVING PLANO RICHAROSON ROWLETT UNIVERSITY PARK TOTALS MONTH JULY 95 AUG 95 SEP95 OCT 95 NOV 95 DEC 95 JAN 96 FEB 96 MAR 96 APR 96 MAY 96 JUN96 TOTALS ACTUAL CITY
SALES TAX COLLECTION 8,056,403 335,994 13,563,256 44,380 161,092,651 10,776,205 14,013,954 59,710 1,063,938 30,592,472 29,649,132 19,262,574 1,342,206 1,789,593 291,642,469 ALLOCATION
OF DART COLLECTION 7,570,812 313,775 12,724,873 41,786 151,002,330 10,122,734 13,165,486 55,495 995,436 28,650,492 27,780,189 18,137,867 1,256,044 1,867,149 273,484,269 BASIS FOR MONTHLY
ALLOCATION JULY 1995 THROUGH JUNE 1996 TOTAL FOR DART 17,881,968 19,350,287 25,901,871 17,817,428 19,664,539 31,379,182 20,196,145 20,771,068 26,501,530 21,275,935 20,435,584 32,308,732
273,484,269 MONTHLY PERCENTAGE 94.78% 94.54% 86.20% 95.67% 96.99% 91.80% 94.29% 94.96% 88.68% 94.07% 93.35% 102.58% 93.77% TOTAL FOR MEMBER CITIES 18,866,446 20,486,224 30,049,237 18,623,764
20,274,596 34,182,157 21,418,461 21,872,614 29,883,850 22,615,962 21,891,920 31,495,219 291,642,469 SALESTAX.WK4 08114/96 
$/0-.DATE 12119189 APPROVED $18,712.40 $5,859.60 AMOUNT TO BE EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDlTURES EXPENDITURES EXPENctTURES I TOTAL DURING OURJNG DURING DURlNG DURING AMOUNT PAID
$24,572.00 $4,672.93 -':">:":' 􀀺􀀼􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀿􀁴􀀺􀁴􀁾􀀺􀁣􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠__􀁾􀁟􀀠$12,605.00 $151,277.36$19,926.00 $56,064.42 $8,128.66 $20,400.00 $8,500.00 $635,526.80 $170.00 $3,622.75 955,955.18 $5,525.00 "":,l: 􀀺􀀻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁩􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁻􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀠·-·....·'···-....·..·'·-·..·-·'-·'·..􀂷􀀧�
�􀂷􀀬􀀺􀂷􀀺􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀻􀁸􀀺􀀠􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁻􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁩􀀠:::':.: 􀀧􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀁸􀀺􀀺􀀥􀀡􀀥􀁦􀀪􀀺􀀿􀀬􀀺􀀮􀀺􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁶􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀥􀀺􀁳􀁲􀀡􀀻􀀺􀀮􀀺􀂷􀀻􀀠AODSN,WK4 1 05123198 
$13.770.00 $3.870.00 $120.00 $6.022.28 $35.825.00 $7,187,366.40 $72,417.51 $24,572.00 $225,000.00 $184,715.00 $9,500.00 􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀧􀁽􀀢􀀠􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀱􀀺􀀻􀁩􀀻􀀠, 'yV,,"􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀬􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀾􀀮􀀠(,;
􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁋􀁩􀀼􀀺􀀷􀀮􀁫􀀧􀀤􀀧􀀼􀀺􀁾􀁋􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀬􀀻􀂫􀀲􀁾􀀨􀁥􀁪􀁴􀁙􀁌􀀢􀀧􀁍􀀧􀁃􀀢􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁹􀀦􀀢􀀧􀁩􀀺􀀧􀁌􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀠$4,672.93 $1.547.252.54 $435.500.93 $1.150.755.131 $3,163.143.53
$15.570.00 $93,958.00 AClDSN.WK4 2 OS/23195 
March 13, 1995 Mr. Tom Ryden Assistant Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . (214) 450·2871 Post Oftu::c Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 16801 Westgro,:"c Bus Project Development 1401 Pacific
Ave. P.O. Box 66013 Dallas, Texas 75266·7212 Re: DARTILAP Quarterly Report -September 1994/December 1994 Request for reimbursement 'Ibis report is intended to update the status of the
DARTILAP projects and serve as a request for reimbursement. 1) MidwaylLindberg Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and
acquiring right-of·way. DART Approved Project $ 150,000.00 Reimbursement to date . $ 10,830.00 . 2) MidwaylBeltway Intersection· Engineeriog for this project is 90% complete. We are
in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 45,000.00 Reimbursement to date. $ 2,925.00 3) AddisonfWestgrove Intersection -'Ibis project is
substantially complete. DART Approved Project $ 125,000.00 Engineering -ERA $ 8,500.00 Construction Jim Bowmann Canst. (90% of $91,160.75) $ 82,045.00 Land Acquisition. AA11 $ 3,180.18
Hall Firiancial $ 1,730.00 Reimbursement to Date $ 8,500.00 ReinIbursement requested this report $ 86,955.18 . . 
-.:' ' Page Two March 13, 1995 Tom Ryden 4) Midway/Greenhill Intersection -'This project is on hold. DART Approved Project $ 75,000.00 Reimbursement By DART to date $ 4,280.00 5) Belt
Line/Addison Intersection -'This project is complete and all outstanding invoices have been paid. D Approved Project $ 196,000.00 Engineeriog ey Huston $ 12,605.00 Construction -Gi &
Assoc. $ 149,599.00 Cobb Ent rises $ 1,678.00 Land Acquisition -Pat Hag Co. $ 170.00 Total Project Costs $ 164,052.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 3,882.36 Reimbursement requested
this report $ This Idves approximately $ 31,948.64 for this project. Please transfer these funds e Keller SpringslNorth Dallas Tollway Intersection project. 6) Belt LinelMarsh Intersection
-'This project is substantially complete. DART Approved Project $ 800,000.00 Engioeeriog -Espey Huston $ 19,590.00 SMR Landscapiog $ 4,358.09 Land Acquisition -Mobil $ 58,501.00 TCB
Trust $ 70,977.71 Watson and Taylor Realty Company $ 5,184.00 Aetna $ 15,855.00 Pat Haggerty Co. $ 2,975.00 Cowles & Thompson $ 2,550.00 Construction -Ed Bell ConstrUction (90% of $511,889)
$ 460,700.00 Valmont Industries (67% of $29,778 for 4 signals poles at Belt Line and Marsh) $ 19,951.00 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 655,116.80 Reimbursement requested this report.
$ 5,525.00 
. . Page Three March 13, 1995 Mr. Tom Ryden 1) Belt LineMontfort hi eetlon -This project is complete. The remaining reimbursement consists of costs associated with land acq . ·tion.
DART Approved Projec $ 125,000.00 Engineering' Barton-Aschman $ 19,926.30 Contractors -Bowman Constrnction $ 60,409.97 Hoover Landscape $ 1,377.75 SMR Landscaping 2,405.06 Land Acquisition
-Bernie, Maynard & Parsons, Ltd. $ 2, .75 Pat Haggerty Co. Inc. $ 935. Total Project Costs $ 87,741.83 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 84,119.08 Reimbursements requested this report
$ 3,622.75 Please release the remaining $37,258.17 for use the Keller SpringslNorth Dallas Tollway pro t. 8) Keller SpringsIDallas North Tollway Intersection -We are currently negotiating
the engineering contract and discussing the right-of-way acquisition with the two affected property owners. Anticipate design starting' in September and constrnction in January. DART
Approved Project $ 226,ISO.00 Engineering -Lichlighter/Jameson $ 35,825.00 Reimbursement to Date $ $ 0.00 Reimbursement requested this report $ 35,825.00 Please increase the DART approved
project by the $31,948.64 remaining from the Belt Line/Addison Road Intersection and $37,258.17 from the Belt LineMontfort Intersection. 9) Belt LinelNorth Dallas. Tollway Intersectlnn
-Engineering is complete. We are in the process of acquiring the right-of-way and letting the project. DART Approved Project $ 262,000.00 Engineering Fee (90% of $ 15,300) $ 13,770.00
Appraisal Fee (90% of $ 4,3(0) $ 3,870.00 Land acquisition -Cowles & Thompson $ 120.00 Reimbursement to Date $ 17,640.00 Reimbursement Requested this report $ 120.00 
· . Page Four March 13, 1995 Mr. Tom Ryden 10) Belt Line/Midway Intersection -This project is a transit pass project. Engineering was started in late Spring 1994 by Barton-Ascllman for
DART and the environment assessment was submitted to the State for approvaL We hope to start right-of-way acquisition in the spring. 11) Belt Line/Quorum Intersection -This project is
a transit pass project. Engineering was started in late Spring 1994 by Barton Asclunan for DART and the environment assessment was submitted to the Slate for approval. We hope to start
right-of-way aquisition in the spring. 12) BusinessiBelt Line Intersec Improvements -This project is substantially complete. DART Approved Project $ 250,.1Jl.IIMI''''-Construction -Ed
Bell Construction 225,000.00 Reimbursement to date Reimbursement Requested tbis report $ -',',13) Westgrove/Sojoum Intersection Improvement -This project was awarded in January with
construction anticipated Ie start in February. DART Approved Project $ 175,000.00 Engineering Fee -Barton Asclunan $ 15,570.00 (90% of17,3OO) Construction -Innovated Systems Inc. (90%
of$103,819.60) $ 93,958.00 􀁒􀁥􀁩􀁭􀁢􀁾􀁮􀁴􀁴􀁣􀁄􀁡􀁴􀁥􀀠$ 15,570.00 Reimbursement Requested thls report $ 93,958.00 
· . PageS March 13, 1995 Mr. Tom Ryden 14) Arapaho Road RealignmentlExtenslon -The Town of Addison has authorized the engineer to proceed with the design of this project. DART Approved
Project $ 2,003,000.00 Engineering Fee -Huitt -Zollar (90% of $199,239) Land Acquisition Appraisal Consultation Group Reimbursement tri Date $ 179,315.00 $5,400.00 $ 0.00 Reimbursement
Requested this report $ 184,715.00 """""􀁾􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧..􀁾􀁝􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬__""""""re_""""_ Sincerel, . John R. Baumgartne P.E. Director of Public Works JRB/anth 
.. Attachments; Addison/Westgrove -Jim Bowman Contract -AATI Deed -Hall Financial Deed Belt Line! Addison -Pat Haggerty Co. invoice Belt LinelMarsh -EHA Agreement -SMR Invoice -Mobil
Deed -TCB Trust Deed/Closing statement -AETNA Deed -Watson and Taylor Deed -Ed Bell Construction contract with unit prices -Valmont Invoice -Cowles & Thompson Invoice -6 -Pat Haggerty
Company Invoice Belt Line!Montfort -Barton! Aschman Invoices -8 SMRInvoice -Bowman Construction Final Invoice -Hoover Landscape Invoice -Pat Haggerty Company Invoice -3 -Bernie, Maynard
& Parsons Ltd. Inv9ice Keller Springs/Dallas North Tollway -Lichlighter Jameson Agreements -2 Belt LinelNorth Dallas Tollway -Cowles & Thompson Invoice Belt LineIBusiness -Ed Bell Construction
Invoice fn WestgroveiSojoum -Barton Aschman Engineering Agreement -Innovated Systems Inc. Agreement ArapahQ Road Realignment -􀁈􀁵􀁩􀁴􀁴􀁾􀁚􀁯􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁲􀀠Contract -Appraisal Consultation
Group Invoice cc; Randy Moravec . . 
.. DARTILAP REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST NUMBER 5 MARCH 13, 1995 AddisonlWestgrove Intersection $ 86,955.18 Belt LinelAddison Intersection $ 170.00 Belt linelMarsh Intersection $ 5,525.00 Belt
LinelMontfort Intersection $ 3,622.75 Keller SpringslDallas North Tollway $ 35,825.00 Belt LinelNorth Dallas Tollway $ 120.00 Belt LinelBusiness Intersection $ 25,000.00 Westgrove/Sojoum
Intersection $ 93,958.00 Arapaho Road Reallgnment $ 184,715.00 Total Reimbursement Requested $ 435,890.93 .. 
/' A'N .n.uDISO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1'1"' .. '4" PO!!I Office Dox 􀀱􀂷􀀱􀀭􀁾􀀠Add"on,TeXllS 75001 February 13, 1995 Mr. Tom Ryden Assistant Director -Bus Project Development Dallas
Area Rapid Transit P.O. Box 660163 􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁾􀀬􀀠Texas 75266-0163 Re: 1993 -1994 DART -TAP Report Proposed 1994 --1995 DART -TAP Program Dear Tom: Attached for your review/approval
is a copy ofAddison's proposed Technical Assistance Program for the fiscal year 1994 -1995. The only progranmlCd expenditure of the 1993 -94 TAP funds was the support of the Town's transportation/eng
ineering staff. Both positions were utilized in planning and implementing the DART -LAP work program during the J993 -94 fiscal year. Please call me if you have any questions or need
additional information. hn R. Baumgartner, P.E. Djrector ofPublic Works JRB/amh Attachment 
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM capital (C)CATEGORY Technical (T) 􀁁􀁡􀁶􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠(R) , ( S) __ ( 7 ) ( 8) 􀁾􀁩􀁈􀁩􀀺􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁾􀁗􀁃􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁩􀀠...,""
NAME (il) L UNIT (10) Town of Addison i Town of Addison-Engineering Depart:meot P. O. Box 144 Addison pall as Texas 75001 ( 1 1 ) (1 2) ( 1 3 ) (1-4 ) CONTACT PERSON Name: John aaumgaLtoeL
Telephone: TITLE (15) 'fechnical Assistance PLO<JLilm City Engineer/PlanneL Position OJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION (16) c;;. ;Un leis . pilLtiill funding of the City EngineeL and
a :!±vii 􀁅􀀡􀁴􀁊􀁸􀁬􀁩􀁥􀁥􀁲􀁾􀁯􀁮􀀮􀀠ties of these positions include the following: 1.) Town of Addison DART-LAP cQOLdinatoL 2.) Plan, administel: ilnd implement DART-LAP pr:-ogr:-affi.
The 11 NO'l'E: !i'hese funds provide ilpPLoximately ia< of the funding of the sillary of th positions• . ' PROJECT Sian Dale (17 ) Ending Dale __________________ (18) TITLE . DATE SIGNED
Dil:ectoL·public l1or:-ks e 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀰􀀨􀀱􀂻􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽CODE (_I (3) __ ( 4 ) (5 ) Dale Date To DART Stan To P&D Committee ToTASC
P8.D Review :TASC Review Approved by P8.D i I 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450-2871 Post Office Box 144 Acldiron. Texos 75001 16801 Weflilgr(we August 17, 1994 Mr. Tom Ryden Assistant Director Bus Project Development Dallas Area
Rapid Transit P'.O. Box 66013 Dallas, Texas 75266-7212 Re: Arapaho Road DART-LAP Allocation . Dear Tom: As we have discussed, the town of Addison wishes to utilize its DART-LAP funds
on our Arapaho realignment/extension project. Addison's single most important mobility need is relief to the congestion on Belt Line Road. We have studied several alternatives for relieving
the congestion. The Arapaho Road realignment lextension is clearly the most cost effective based on the impact the improvements would have on adjacent properties, and on the benefits
realized by users of mass transit. Reducing the congestion on Belt Line Road can be accomplished through two approaches, increasing the capacity of the roadway or reducing the number
of vehicles using the roadway. The threc methods to increase the capacity are signallintersection improvements, grade separated intersections, and additional thrOUgh lanes. The Town
is in the process of initiating improvement projects at the major intersections on Belt Line Road. These improvements include new signals and additional right and left tum lanes. The
Town feels the improvements are the most that can be done to increase capacity given the constraints of the developed properties along Belt Une. Grade separated intersections and additional
through lanes on Belt Une Road are unacceptable options from a cost standpoint, and the impact the improvements would have on the adjacent properties. Both options would require the
acquisition of large amounts of rigbt-of-way. The construction of additional through lanes would eliminate parking and some of the landscape buffer areas along Belt Line Road. Parking
for most of the businesses and restaurants along Belt Line Road is already a precious commodity. The elimination of parking areas would likely cause the Town to pay damages in addition
to the cost of the land to many of the businesses. Addison bas high standards and prides itself on the landscaping that accents the streets and businesses. Grade separated intersections
would devastate the existing businesses and restaurants along Belt Une Road. Frontage roads would be required to provide for turning movements at the intersections. In some instances
the taking would rcquire the Town to acquire tbe entire parcel and improvements possibly causing that business to relocate to another community. The cost of the right-of-way would be
several times more than the cost of the roadway improvements. The goal of any project that Addison would support must be to enhance and benefit the adjacent properties and businesses,
not to negatively impact them. 
Page Two Tom Ryden August 17,1993 If the capacity of Belt Line Road cannot be further increased, then the other option is to reduce the number of vehicles using the roadway. This can
be a=mplisbed through the increased use ofmass transit and the collStruction of an alternate east-west route. The locations for additional east-west routes is limited by the Addison
Airport and the railroad spur lying 'parallel to Inwood Road, which divide the Town. Addison supports mass transit and hopes that collJlJluters will increasingly use the systems presently
available. Obviously, DART is attempting to improve the availability and access to mass transit in this area through its proposed DART Addison Transit Center, which will be located on
Quorum Drive just north of Arapaho Road. The commuters and buses travelling to and from the transit center will contribute to the need for an additional east-west route near Belt Line
Road. Arapaho Road when completed will provide an alternate east-west route immediately north of Belt Belt Line Road from Marsh Lane to east of Central E;l(pressway. It will provide
another route for those traveling to the Tollway and those circulating within Addison. Arapaho will directly benefit mass transit users living in Addison, Farmers Branch, Carrollton,
and north Dallas by providing another route to the proposed transit center and by reducing the congestion on Belt Line Road. Attached is a report prepared by Barton-Aschman & Associates
that supports the project and identifies the benefits realized by the transit vehicles. The Arapaho Road realignment/extension is planned in three phases: Phase I Dallas North Tollway
to Addison Road Phase II Addison Road to Midway Road Phase III Midway Road to Marsh Lane The realignment/extension of Arapaho Road is nol the construction of a complete new road. Approximately,
onethird of the road will occupy exisling rights-of-way for Arapaho Road, Centurion Way, and Realty Drive. We have retained Huitt-Zollars, Inc, 10 design phase I. DART has approved $1,058,000
in LAP funding for half of phase I, from the Dallas North Tollway to Quorum Drive. Attached is an application for $1,200,000 of DARTLAP funding for the remainder of phase I, from Quorum
Drive to Addison Road. It is our uuderstanding that the $1,200,000 is the uuprogrammed amount of our LAP allocation. We are also requesting DART agree that the funding of the second
and third phases of the Arapaho Road Project with our DART-LAP allocations for fiscal years 1995 & 1996 is an appropriate use for DART LAP funds. We understand that Addison will have
to submit separate LAP applications for the future pbases as the allocations become available. The estimated constructinn and right-of-way costs for phases two and three total approximately
$11,000,000. Assuming Addison's 1995 and 1996 LAP allocations total approximately $1,800,000, Addison will still be required to fund approximately $9,200,000, or 83% of the entire project,
through bonds, landowner dedications, and other grants. We are continuing to obtain right-of-way way dedications as property along'the route develops. 
Page Three Tom Ryden August 17, 1994 In summary, Addison feels the most cost effective solution to reducing congestion on Belt Line Road is the realignment/extension of Arapaho Road
from the Dallas North Tollway to Marsh Lane. Arapaho Road will reduce the congestion on Belt Line Road by providing an alternate east-west route. The reduced congestion will directly
benefit the DART bus routes by reducing the travel time on Belt Line Road. Arapaho will also provide better access to the proposed Addison Transit Center and provide routing flexibility
for existing or proposed bus routes. The use of DART -LAP funds for this project is justified by the benefits it provides those traveling on Belt Line Road and the commuters using DART.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call me. ohn Baumgartner, P.E. Director of Public Works DCN B:\Ryden.ltr 
APPUCATION fOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM , 􀁾􀁙􀁐􀁅􀀠OF SUSMISSION (1 ) DATE SUBMllTED (21 .:!lm!< 24, 1994 . r-1L Capital (CI CATEGORY CODE (see reversel 􀁾􀀠Technical (T) (3) ......L
( 41 ...lL (5) 􀁾􀀠_ Revision (AI (6) -(7) -(8) 􀁾􀀠lDPIIr:ANT II 􀁾􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀠LEGAL NAME (91 ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT (10) Town of Addison Town of Addison -Engineering Dept. -ADDRESS P.O.
Box 144 CONTACT PERSON OUy Addison (11 ) John Baumgartner • , County Dallas (12) Name: State Texas (13) q,Code 75001 (141 Telephone: ( 214 1 450-2886 PROJECT TITLE (15bArapaljoc)Roa
Extension, from Quorum Drive to Addison 'Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION (16) -.-This project is an extension of the Arapa!fo Road real'ignrnentproject. It is a continuatioD
of Phase I of the extension of Arapaho Road from the Dallas North Tollway to Marsh Lane. -See attached 'report from Barton: Aschman 􀁾􀀠Associates. -Funding 􀁲􀁥􀁱􀁾􀁥􀁳􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠for engineering,
and construction costs, and right-of-way. -DART Bus Routes: 400 & 333 􀀭􀁾􀀮􀁦􀁦􀁩􀁾􀁥􀁳􀁴􀀠DART agree that the use of Addison's '95 & '96 DART LAP allocations to fund phases II & III
offthe Arapaho 'Project is an acceptable use of DART LAP funds. -Future LAf..requests for phases II & III (estimated) 1995 -$900,000 1996 -$900,000 PROPOSED PROJECT Start Date Segtember,
1994 (171 Ending Data March, 1996 (1 a) 'EST/MATED FISCAL YEAR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION COST DISTRIBUTION Federal $ 11 !II 􀀬􀁾􀀠S [261 Gi1v I> 1"01 Pinh,.nf.Wov S 600,000 1271 IStale S
121\ 􀁾􀀠S; 600,000 .(281 􀁾􀀠I> 122\ n,h", S (291 Olh", $ /2S1 Tn,.1 S 1 .200.000 1301 DABT $ 1.?11I1.01111 /241 TOTAl $/1 1.200 000 .. /251 􀀧􀁶􀀬􀁾JljUTHORIZED,JiEPREsENTATIVE TITLE
DATE SIGNED /"4'.' 􀁾􀀠f./. Director of Public WorksJ 8/17/94 'OR DMiT USE oNLY. Dale Dale To DART Staff To P&D Committee To TASe P&D Review . Tlise Review Approved by P&D , 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾....
FINANCE DEPARTMENT (214) 450·";'051 Post Office Box 144 Addison, Texas 75001 5350 Belt Line Road August 2, 1994 Christopher A. Poinsalle Chief Financial Officer Dallas Area Rapid Transit
P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-0163 Dear Chris: Please find enclosed the diskclle "ith a completed cash flow schedule for Addison's Capital Assistance Program. The changes were
made to addenp.wk4. Also enclosed is a copy of the printed schedules. Please be advised the amounts reported on the schedule are estimates and subject to change. Any material changes
will be brought to your ollention on revised schedules. If you have any questions concerning this infornlotion. please contact mc. 􀁓􀁩􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀣􀁍􀁯􀁲􀁡􀁶􀁥􀁣􀀬CGFO Finance Director
RCM:nll Enclosure: Diskelle, Copies of Schedules Copics (schedules only): Ron Whitehead, City Manager John Baumgartner, Public Works Director ..:: Wl}51 \94\940802Jtr 
ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Repen thru March 81, 1994 SchGdule 1 􀁾􀀠Annual Cash Flow Summary Balance Forward Add: Future Allocations (Note 1) Future Interest Earnings at 5%
Less: Payments on Approved Projects (Seh 2) 3131194 9130194 9130195 9130196 9130197 9130198 9130199 Out Years 5,384,919 4,721,748 3,522,085 1,652,422 906,962 1 1 nl. nl. 862,400 646,800
nla nla nla nla nla 103,048 129,363 63,985 22,674 0 0 unknown (863,171) (1,057,711) (1,706,426) (56,245) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) Per DART Estimate of Allocation leHerdaled 05/19194 
2 ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Report thru March 31, 1994 Schedule 2 -Cash Ftow 01 ADJlroved Prolects Remainder 01 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 OUlYears Payments to Balance Projected
Projected Projecled Projected Projected Projected Projected Project Date Available 􀁅􀁸􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠Exeendlture 􀁅􀁸􀁰􀁥􀁮􀁤􀁾􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠Exeenditure Exeendilure 􀁅􀁸􀁾􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁬􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠E:-;eenditur
e Total BeltLine/Quorum Intersection $0 $0 $0 $187,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $187,000 BeltLinelMidway Inte!Seelion $0 SO $0 $78,606 SO $0 SO SO $0 $78,606 􀁍􀁯􀁮􀁬􀁦􀁯􀁲􀁴􀁦􀁂􀁥􀁾􀁌􀁩􀁮􀁥􀀠Intersection
$75,990 SO S49,010 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Traffic Signal Improvements $0 SO $0 $20,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,400 AddisoniWestgrove Intersection S8,500 SO $15,000 $101,500 SO $0 $0 $0
$0 S125,000 Midwayllindberg Inlersection $10,830 $0 SO $100,000 $39,170 SO $0 $0 $0 $150,000 MidwaylBeliway Intersection $2,925 SO SO $25,000 S17,075 SO SO $0 $0 $45,000 MidwaylGreenhilllnlersection
S4,280 $70.720 SO $0 SO $0 $0 SO $0 $75,000 BetiLineIMarsh Inlersection $19,590 $0 $480,000 $50,410 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 Transfer to TAP for City SO SO SO SO EngineerlPlanner Position
$0 $0 $8,701 $0 SO $0 SO SO SO $8,701 BeltLinelDalla. Pkwy Intersection $17,640 SO $75,000 $169,360 $0 $0 SO SO SO S262,000 Keller SpringslDalias Pkwy Intersect $0 SO $5,000 $221.150
$0 $0 $0 $0 SO S226,15O WestgrovelSojourn Inter.lmpv. $0 $0 $25,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Arapaho Realignment $0 SO $200,000 $603,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $803,000 BeltLine/Business
Dr. $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Completed Projects Balance '" /"'" 
3 ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Report thru March 31, 1994 ltqhedule 3 • Cash Flow of Future prolects Remainder of FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Out Year. Project Projected Projected
Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Future Projects Tot.1 Expendfture Expenditure Expenditure Expendlture.__􀁾􀁰􀁥􀁮􀁤􀁈􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠Expenditure Expendllu,e BellLine/Marsh Int.
Addtn. Funds $250,000 $200,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 BeltLineIBusines. Inl. Addtn. Funds $50,000 $45,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Arapaho Realignment Addtn. Funds $1,200,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$200,000 $0 $0 $0 BeltLinelMidway Addtn. Funds $500,000 $0 $300,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Arapaho Phasen $1,729,635 $0 $800,000 $200,000 $729,635 $0 $0 $0 $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $____ $0$ $ $
$ $ $ $____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $'--___ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $'--___ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0
$ $ $ $ $ $ $:____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $;____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $0 $ $0$ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $;____$:____$:____ $0$ $0 $ $! $ $ $! $
􀁾􀀠$ $ $:____!:____ Balance 
J8.A.1:):i)IsoN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450.2871 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""J!!'.mm _ ... Jt!' Post O£fice Box 144 Addis()n, Texas 75001 16001 Wcslgrove June 24, 1994 Mr.
Tom Ryden Assistant Director Bus Project Development Dallas Area Rapid Transit P.O. Box 66013 Dallas, Texas 75266-7212' Re: Arapaho Road DART-LAP Allocation Dear Tom: As we have discussed,
the town of Addison wishes to utilize its DART-LAP funds on our Arapaho realignment/extension project. Addison's single most important mobiJi!}' need is relief to the congestion on Belt
Line Roed which adversely affects the transit operations. We have studied several alternatives for relieving the congestion. The Arapaho Road realignment lexten.sion is clearly the most
advantageous from a cost standpoint and the impact the improvements would have on adjacent properties. . Reducing the congestion on Belt Line Road em he aecompUshed by one of two ways,
increasing the capaci!}' of the roadway or reducing the numher of vehicles using the roadway. The three methods to increase the capaci!}' are signal/intersection improvements, grade
separated intersections, and additional through lanes. The Town is in the process of initiating improvement projects at the major intersections on Belt Line Road. These improvements
include new signals and additional right and left tum lanes. The Town feels that capaci!}' of Belt Line Road will have been maximized with I:be completion of these intersection improvements.
Grade separated intersections and additional through lanes on Belt Line Road are unacceptable options from a cost standpoint, and the impact I:be improvements would have on the adjacent
properties. Both options would require the acquisition of large amounts of right-of-way. In almost aU cases, the needed right-of-way is presently used as a landscape buffer and for parking
areas. Unfortunately, the space does not exist between the existing buildings and the roadway to relocate the landscaping and parking areas. The Town has high standards and prides itself
on the landscaping that accents I:be streets and businesses. The elimination of the greenspace between the roadway and businesses is unacceptable, Parking for most of the businesses
and restaurants along Belt Line Road is already a precious commodi!}'. The elimination of parking areas would likely cause the Town to pay damages in addition to the cost of the land
to many of the businesses. In some instances the tailing would require the Town to acquire the entire parcel. and improvements. The cost of the right-of-way would be several times more
than the cost of the improvements. Belt Line Road is the center of the Town's commerce. The goal of any project that Addison would support must be to enhance and benefit the adjacent
properties and businesses, not to harm them. The addition of lanes or the construction of grade separated intersections would eliminate many businesses. The improvements would also destroy
the aesl:betic aspects of Belt Line Road that distinguishes it from the extensions of the road in the adjoining cities. 
Page Two Tom Ryden June 22, 1994 The Arapaho Road Project does present an option that will reduce the number of cars on Belt Line Road. Arapaho Road when completed to Marsh Lane will
provide an alternate east-west route north of Belt Line Road. It will provide another route for those traveling to the Tollway and those circulating within Addison. Arapaho will also
provide easy access to the proposed D ART Addison Transit Center for those living in Addison, Farmers Branch, and Carrollton. Attached is a report prepared by Barton-Aschman & Associates
that supports the project and identifies the benefits realize by the transit vehicles. The Arapaho Road realignment/extension is planned in three phases: Phase I Dallas North Tollway
to Addison Road Phase II Addison Road to Midway Road Phase 1lI Midway Road to Marsh Lane We have retained Huitt-Zollars, Inc. to design phase I. Design will start shortly. DART has approved
$1,058,000 in LAP funding for half of phase I, from the Dallas North Tollway to Quorum Drive. Attached is an application for $1,200,000 of DART-LAP funding for the remainder of phase
I, from Quorum Drive to Addison Road. It is our understanding that the $1,200,000 is the unprogrammed amount of our LAP allocation. We are also requesting DART to approve the use of
our DART-LAP allocations for fiscal years 1995 & 1996 to partially fund the second and third phases of the Arapaho Project. The estimated construction and right-of-way costs for phases
two and three total approximately $11.000,000. Assuming Addison's 1995 and 1996 LAP allocations total approximately $1.800.000, Addison will still be required to fund approximately $9,200,000,
or 83% of the entire project, through bonds, landowner dedications, and other grants. We are continuing to obtain right-ot-way dedications as propert)' along the route develops. In summary,
Addison feels the most cost efficient solution to reducing congestion on Belt Line Road is the realigrunent/extension of Arapaho Road to March Lane. Arapaho Road will reduce the number
of cars on Belt Line Road by providing an alternative east-west route. The reduced congestion will directly benefit the DART bus routes by reducing the travel time on Belt Line Road.
Arapaho will also provide better acCess to the proposed Addison Transit Center. The use of DART-LAP fonds for this project is justified by the benefits it provides those traveling on
Belt Line Road and the commuters using DART. If you have any questions or need additional information please call me. Sincerely, 􀁲􀀳􀁾􀀠 Director of Public Works DeN B:\RydenJu 
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, IrYPE OF SUBMISSION (1) DATE SUBMITTED (2) .Illile 􀁾􀀬􀀠199!1 cJL Capilal (C) CATEGORY CODE (&Be (everse) _ Technical IT) (3) -L (4) ....1L. (5) -_ Revision (A) (6) _ (7) __ (8) -lDDllCANT
LEGAL NAME (9) ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT (10) Town .of Mdison Town .of Addison -Engineering Dept. ADDRESS P.O. Box 144 CONTACT PERSON Cily Addis.on (11 ) County Dallas (12) Name: J.ohn Baumgartner
• Slate Texas (13 )tLpCode 75001 ( 14) Telephone: ( 214 I 450-2886 PROJECT TITLE (15)ArapatiboRoad ExtenSi.on, from Quorum Drive to AddisonRoao. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
(16) This pr.oject is an extensi.on .of the ArapaD.o Road realignment pr.oject. It is a continuati.oD .of Phase I .of the extensi.on .of Arapah.o Road fvom the Dallas N.orth Tollway
t.o Marsh Lane. See attached report from Bart.on =Aschman 􀁾􀀠Associates. FUnding requested f.or engineering, and constructi.on C.osts, and right-of-way. DART Bus R.oute: 83 , PROPOSED
PROJECT Start Data June, 1994 (17) Ending Data March, 1996 (18) ESTIMATED FISCAL YEAR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION COST DISTRIBUTION $ 11111 S 110,000 I? It , City S 12111 Ai.iht.of.W·av ! 500,000
I? 7' State ! 1?1\ ! 590,000 .r, 8\ .acal S 1221 nIh", .. 129\ Other S 1291 􀁔􀁮􀁬􀁾􀀱􀀠.. 1 200.000 1301 DART S 1 '00.000 1241 IOTAL S I/'􀁾􀁢􀁯􀀬􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀠II 1251 􀁓􀁉􀁇􀁎􀁁􀁔􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁲􀁈􀁏􀁒􀁉􀁚􀁅􀁏􀀠
􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁖􀁅􀀠TITLE DATE SIGNED 7 v.... ft-/'"J ...-/Direct.or .of Public Worksu 6/24/94 FOR OMIT USE ONLY /Dale Dale Te DART Staff To paD Committee TeTASC paD Review TASCReview
Approved by paD 
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: John Baumgartner From: Gary Jost 􀁾􀀠Karen George Date: May 27,1994 Subject: Analysis of the Extension of Arapaho Road This memorandum
presents the findings of an evaluation of the extension of Arapaho Road in Addison, Texas. This study evaluates the benefits of the extension of Arapaho Road to DART service in the area.
BACKGROUND The following sections provide information on existing travel demand, alternatives for enhancing east-west capacity, and existing transit routes. EXISTING TRAVEL DEMAND Presently,
the demand for east-west capacity is served predominantly by Belt line Road. Three factors have resulted in a heavily traveled arterial with significant conllestion during the peak hours:
(1) The combination of continuity from 1-35E on the west to US 75 on the east, (2) a conc:ntration of employment, retail, and residential centers along its route, and (3) an interchange
with the Dallas North Tollway (DNT). Recent traffic counts conducted along Belt line Road in November 1994 revealed 24-hour volumes in excess of 50,000 vehicles, well above the design
capacity of the roadway. Traffic volumes have increased along the roadway at annual rate of over three percent {3%1. ADDITIONAL EAST-WEST CAPACITY PROJECTS The existing roadway system
is shown in Figure 1. There have been severa! alternatives discussed for providing additional east-west capacity within the Town. These alternatives, as will as other transportation
needs, were analyzed in December 1992, as part of the develoPl11ent of a comprehensive transportation plan to meet the existing and future needs of the Town. This plan was adopted by
the Town's Council in January, 1993. In order to provide additional east-west capacity, the Thoroughfare Plan includes both the planned Keller Springs Toll Tunnel and the extension of
Arapaho Road from the DNT to Marsh Lane. Existing traffic volumes on Belt line Road within the Town limits have prompted the ' 􀀨􀁾􀁊􀁐􀁁􀁒􀁓􀁏􀁎􀁓• TRANSPORTATiON G;:::IOUP 
J !\ \ \ TriMy ..'" R4 . 􀁾􀀠U , ,..-J-.. 􀁾􀀠........ Not to Scale -V ,; I " t "• 􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁔􀁾􀁾.. ,,. JE 􀁾􀀬5 i tnt; I 􀁾􀀠:! t " _... 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁯􀀮􀁾􀀬V fJ'C 􀁁􀁉􀁒􀁐􀁾􀀠.. DALLAS
K"" $pM;I A4. 􀀮􀁾􀁜􀀭􀀭-/. "". \\ 􀁾􀀠.--:: ! i Aitpott'Pkwy. Proposed -J \ 􀁾􀀠J /'" TransIt Center =.?􀁾􀀠Wil<r_ 􀁎􀁾􀁁􀁤􀀮􀀠= I I I --. 􀁾􀁾􀁲􀁣'--.J ./B.n. Lltw Rd. &.Itu-.Ad. /'\
:\ 􀁾􀀠.' 􀀮􀁾􀀠􀁶􀀭􀁾􀁶􀁟􀁜􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠H if .-i 􀁾􀀠V 􀁾􀀠1 :.--􀁾􀀠z -...;=., 􀁾􀀠Ji \\. 􀀱􀁩􀁾i 􀁾􀀠-\ 5 􀁾􀀠y ..........Pr.aton 0'"ii • 􀁾􀀠• " 1:! '" i Spritlo VMIq Rd. r' " $3rinQ
v...., Ad. :I􀁾􀀬􀀣􀀠1'.\1 AI"", Rd. '\ -\ "' \ FARMERS BRANCH FIGURE 2 PLANNED ROADW A Y IMPROVEMENTS 􀁾􀀠
" 􀁾'" .,'" " 'J' 􀁾􀀠'" g /􀀢􀁾􀀠I /IiI, Ii....Z II 1-.... &! _􀁾􀁊􀀮􀁬􀀧􀁊􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁉􀀮􀀠R4. t["􀁾􀀺􀀠.1/􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀠J .1/􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠FIGURE 1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION AND BUS ROUTES
􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾Il ______L_J K.u,.,jls •􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀬􀀠J !i 􀁾􀀠·Il'd. 511Sl, 􀁾􀀠"
•! 􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀢􀁾􀁾􀀮􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁒􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀧􀁩􀀽􀀽􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁲􀀠++􀁾._. ') ._. '/' Pkwy. 􀁾􀀠Nol to Sula Ii i ! VIII_lIIV'a,.. In... CWb J<:l' -....,:. I I I".., ./􀁾􀀠l . I CIII\pb4;1J
Rd. Araplho Ad. ,;• ! 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠:. "' 􀁾􀀮􀀠􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁍􀂷􀀮􀀠l""'f Aloha Rd. lH. eu htl"O Vall• ., I "d.,. 
construction of additional turning lanes at several of Belt Line Road's major intersections. Projected traffic demand will necessitate improvements of Belt Line Road beyond the implementation
of additional turning lanes. The cost of improvements on Belt Line Road necessary to meet projected east-west demand would easily exceed the cost of Arapaho Road extension. Because of
this, as well as the impact to adjacent properties and aesthetic considerations, the Town elected not to proceed with the additional improvements of 8elt Line Road. Figure 2 illustrates
the planned improvements in the area which were approved by Town Council. Keller Springs Keller Springs Road currently extends to the east and west from Addison Airport. Keller Springs
Road extends from the Airport past Preston Road to Campbell Road on the east side of the Airport. On the west, the road continues through Carrollton to 1-35E. Tunnelling under the Airport
has been identified as the only feasible way to connect the eastern and western sections of Keller Springs while maintaining Airport operations. Because of the substantial cost of such
a project, funding is proposed through tolls. A two-lane (one lane in each direction) tunnel with a $.50 toll is planned. At this time, the bonds for design and construction of this
facility are being sold. The planned Keller Springs Toll Tunnel chiefly links areas west of the Airport to the DNT. Arapaho Road Arapaho Road is a continuous six-lane divided arterial
from the DNT to US 75. West of the DNT, Arapaho intersects with Spectrum at a four-way stop, right angle intersection. The planned Arapaho extension would extend Arapaho as a four-lane
divided arterial west from the DNT to Marsh Lane. The extension of Arapaho is scheduled to occur in three phases. The first phase, the realignment of Arapaho from DNT to Addison, was
recently let for design. The second phase, extending Arapaho from Addison to Midway is planned for letting within the next three to four years. The third phase, extending Arapaho from
Midway to Marsh is planned within the next five to ten years. The realignment and extension of Arapaho Road will serve as a relief facility for 8elt Line Road and will provide a continuous
circulation route for adjacent land uses. EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE Currently, several bus routes traverse the study area, including routes 83, 205, 333, 341, 363 and 400. Significant
transfer activity is made in the area of the existing Prestonwood Pulse Point on Prestonwood Boulevard. These transferring activities are scheduled to be relocated to a new Transfer
Center located north of the Cotton Belt Rail Line and west of Quorum Drive, just north of the proposed Arapaho Road alignment. The land acquisition process for the new transfer center
is currently underway. The existing bus routes in the study area and the proposed transfer center in are shown in Figure 1. BENEFITS OF EXTENDING ARAPAHO ROAD There are three primary
benefits to transit service resulting from the extension of Arapaho Road. These three benefits: level of service (LOS) improvement, decrease in delay, and increased continuity are discussed
below. 
lOS IMPROVEMENTS An important element of the Thoroughfare Plan Development process was to provide necessary roadway capacity to meet existing and future travel demand within the Town.
The effective capacity of any particular roadway is dependent on several factors, including horizontal and vertical curvature, signal spacing, signal operation, and level of access control
to adjacent properties. Considering these elements, the North Central Texas Council of Governments has developed capacities for various roadway classifications for use in their transportation
planning efforts throughout the region. These planning capacities were used in determining the Town's Thoroughfare Plan. For Belt Line Road, as a six-lane divided, a daily capacity of
43,500 vehicles per day was assumed. LOS is a qualitative measure of identifying how effectively traffic is managed along a roadway link and is defined by categories A through F. A comparison
of volumes and LOS under different scenarios are shown in Table 1. Count 54,199 F F 1.25 41,054 E .95 Yr 2010 No-Build 61,000 F 1.40 41,000 E .94 Yr 2010 w/Arapaho 50,000 F 1.15 41,000
E .94 to Midway Rd Yr 2010 w/Arapaho 49,000 F' .1.13 33,000 D .76 to Marsh Ln The Arapaho Road extension has a clear impact in reducing the projected growth of traffic on Belt Line Road.
This is important because the roadway is currently over capacity and additional growth will only increase the level of congestion. In the vicinity of Addison Road, the Arapaho project
will divert 11,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day from Belt Line Road resulting in a net improvement in LOS from the existing condition. Near Marsh Lane, the impact of the Arapaho Road extension
depends on whether the extension is completed to Marsh Lane. With a Marsh Lane connection, the model predicts a 20% net diversion of traffic from Belt Line Road of about 8,000 vehicles
per day with an expected improvement in the level of service. All of these reductions would have an appreciable positive impact on traffic congestion compared to conditions conditions
without the Arapaho Road project. 
DECREASE IN DELAY The existing travel time on Belt Line Road from the DNT to Marsh Lane was obtained from Town staff. The noon peak travel time by intersection is shown in Table 2. The
average travel time between DNT and Marsh is 5 minutes and 52 seconds. The average speed obtained during the Noon peak over the last year is 25 miles per hour. Dallas Parkway ·Quorum
48 sees Quorum -Addison 1 min 2 sees Addison • Beltway 33 sees Beltway -Midway 1 min 5 sees Midway· Runyon 31 sees Runyon -Surveyor 20 sees Surveyor -Commercial 17 sees Commercial -Marsh
55 sees TOTAL 5min31 sees * From one intersection through the next 1 min 18 sees . 43 sees 28 sees 55 sees 1 min 43 sees 17 sees 16 secs 32 secs 6 min 12 secs Without the extension of
Arapaho Road, the volume on Belt Line Road will increase by about 7,000 vehicles per day or 700 vehicles per hour near Addison Road as shown in Table 1. This increase in traffic volume
on Belt Line Road wnl increase tht! travel time on Belt Line Road. The current cycle length is 120 120 seconds (2 minutes) during all peaks. With the increase in volume, delay will also
increase. Buses and vehicles will likely have to wait more than one cycle before clearing major intersections. This would increase the delay by two minutes for each cycle missed and
also decrease the average travel speed. With Arapaho Road extended to Marsh Lane, the volume on Belt Line Road is substantially decreased (by approximately 10,000 vehicles per day),
thus allowing buses to travel on Belt Line Road with less delay and at higher speeds under projected conditions without the Arapaho Road project. ALTERNATE ROUTE The Arapaho Road extension
will provide additional opportunity for bus ridership as well as an alternative route for buses. Although there is currently not a large number of east-west bus routes servicing along
Belt Line Road, the new Transfer Center, future rail service along the corridor, future development, and increases in tran'sit usage all provide the ingredients for increased bus service
in the area. The Arapaho Road extension offers an additional or alternative route for this increased service. Also, the proximity of the proposed Transfer Genter to the Arapaho Road
extension will allow for a more direct and less congested route to the proposed Transfer Genter. 
CONCLUSIONS Based on this evaluation, the following conclusions can be drawn. • The extension of Arapaho Road diverts traffic from Belt Line Road with associated increases in LOS and
decreases in delay. This effect will be beneficial to all traffic. including DART transit vehicles using Belt Line Road. • With the extension of Arapaho Road, DART buses will have a
more convenient and less congested alternative for existing and future routes; including a more direct route to the new Transfer Center. 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit p,O, Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-0163 214/749-3278 March 7, 1994 Mr. John R. Baumgartner, P.E. Director ofPublic Works City ofAddison P.O. Box 144 Addison,
Texas 75001 Dear Mr. Baumgartner: On February 15, 1994, the DART Board authorized projects proposed by your city under the LAP Program. A copy of the signed resolution and "application"
form for each project are enclosed for your files. Ifyou need additional information, please call me at 749-2913. Sincerely, TomK. Ryden Manager, Project Development TKRItw Enclosure

940029 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION0aIas Alea RopIcI Transit orthe DAllAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (Executive Committee) FY 1994 Local Assistance Program Activities for Addison, CarroUtoa and Glenn
Beiahtl WHEREAS. Addison, CarroUton and Glenn Heights are eligible for participation in DART Local Assistance Program (LAP) projects; and WHEREAS. these projects are within current Budget
and Fmancial Plan aUocations. NOW, mEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Board of Directors that: Section 1. The FY 1994 Local Assistance Program requests by the
Town of Addison, as shown in Attachment 1. are approved for funding under the LAP. Section 2. The FY 1994 Local Assistance Program requests for the City of CarroUton, as shown in Attachment
2, are approved for funding under the LAP. Section 3: The FY 1994 Local Assistance project for the City of Glenn Heights, as shown in Attachment 3, is approved for funding under the
LAP. 􀀡􀁦􀁬􀁭􀁵􀁾􀁾􀀠Norma Stanton Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: 􀁌􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀼􀀠 􀁒􀁯􀁧􀁾4.,.,"bARfCount Executive Director February 15. 1994 Date 1\02·5! 4/0ib .,. 
940029 APPUCAnOH FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CIpuI ec, TICMIcaI en AIvielon(fI) .....-NAIll (I' C1, P.O. BOilAddi40n Dolla. (11, A4diaon (U) (11) CUt (14) 􀀢􀁈􀁩􀁧􀀮􀁮􀀺􀁾􀀠DESCRIPTION
AND .lUS1IflCATION C1', '''''''-1(a, 􀁾􀀠Cf,-1-") ____ (7' ____ 10RO,uIIZATlOINAL UIIT (10, CI, ..!LCI, _ 􀁾􀁯􀁶􀁮􀀠of Ad4iaon -Ingineeriag o.pt. Jpbn a'p'I.rtner « 2141 450-2886 􀁾􀁨􀀮􀀠Interaection
i.prove.enta entail installing a traffic aigna1. and restriping the interaectlon. Funding requested for ingin••ring and conatruction coata. DART Bus Route: 341 PROJECT Stan Dale "brwu,'y.
1994 (17) TITLE DAlE SIGNED Director of Public Worka 12/16/93 To 'AD CommitIet 'AOR", Approved br PAD 
• lan 0... (n, _________ (11, 940029 CIpiItI ee, TecMiCI' en ......ion ,., Addison oahas Tex.s 15001 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (U) C1I, tU) C14) (I'(I, --, ,.........,C4,
_ cn _ 􀁉􀁏􀁒􀁉􀁑􀁁􀁾􀁉􀁉􀁚􀁁􀀧􀁉􀀱􀁏􀁉􀀡􀁴􀁁􀁌􀀠UNIT (11, of Addi n••d "-: f 2141 4SO-2S8' ("CI, • TITLE in••r/Planner Positi DESCRIPTION AND JusnFICATION (1', Partial fundins of the
City Bngineer and. Civil Bngineer position. The duties of these poSitions include the following: 1. Town of Addison DART-LAP Coordinator. 2. Plan. administer and implement DART-LAP program.
NOTE: The 1993-94 DART-TAP fund includes $17.046 of 􀁵􀁮􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁧􀁲􀁡􀁾􀁥􀁤􀀠proceeds for 1992-93 and $27.485.64 from 1993-94 for a total uf $44.531.64. The.e funds provide approximately
45\ of the funding of the 􀁾􀁡􀁬􀁡􀁲􀁹􀀠of these positions • To paD CommilIft paD Review AQproyed by paD 
940029 APPLICAtiON FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM , 􀁾􀀧􀁉􀀠01 IU.MISSION (1) r!CII*II (C, 􀁾􀀠T_,(Iieal m r-fIIwh'on (AI ....-... 􀁾􀁑􀁁􀁌􀀠IWII (I, Town of AdeUson 􀁾􀁄􀁒􀁉􀀢􀀠P.O. Box
144",It, 􀀭􀀮􀁉􀁉􀀧􀁩􀁬􀀺􀁬􀀢􀁌􀁓􀁬􀀢􀁾􀁩􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁉􀁩􀁉􀁑􀀺􀁉􀁉􀁄______ QaU.. (11, (11,US, (14) IOATI SU.llmED (I) 􀁄􀁥􀁣􀁥􀁾􀁢􀁥􀁲􀀠16, 1993 CATEGORY CODE (1M ......, (S, -l.. (4)-L.(I,
___ (l' ____ OROANIZAnOHAL UtIT (10, (I) -J.I(" -Town of Addison -Ingin.ering Dept. CONTACT POIOH ,..,..: John a'YIQ,rtn,r IPROJECT lITLi (1" Belt Line Rd. /Busine.s Drive Intersection
I.orove.ents PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND .tUSTlflCAnoN (1', The intersection 􀁩􀁾􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠entail: 1. A traffic .ignal2. Belt Line we.tbound lanes -dual left turn lane., and
three thru lane•• 3. Belt Line ea.tbound lane. -.ingle left turn lane, three thru lane., and a right turn lane. The additional turn lane. and signal will provide for a 􀁾􀁯􀁲􀁥􀀠efficient
􀁾􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠of vehicle. at this inter.ection: thus redUCing the delay to thru traffic on Belt Line Rd. Punding requested for engine.ring, and con.truction cost•• All right-of-way
is being donated DART Bus Rout ••: 333, 400 PRQIIOSED -PROJECT IIIn Dale Dece.ber, 1993 (n, 1l'!1... • 200 • 000.00 "II' .. It" ....;..;... 'U) -II '''''111 -II 200.000. Ol "., !It A
400,000. Oel 'u, 􀁓􀁬􀁑􀁎􀁁􀁾􀁅􀀠01/AUTHORIZ£D RIiIRESEHTA11VI (Iff..... A 􀁾􀀠by the 'property owner•• 􀁾􀁾􀁎􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁕􀁃􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀀠CO,! 􀁄􀁬􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁉􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀧􀁉􀀮M ,,,., AIft"••ft(.Wn-1i
-,-,... i !I. 367,000.00 'u, Othe, .. ''II' T8Ial .' 4Ioo.onlLM lUI TITLI DATE SIGNED Director of Public Works 12/16/93 􀁾􀁾􀀡􀁦􀁴􀀦􀁁􀁔􀀠I 􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁎􀀮􀁾􀁌􀀴______________________________􀁾________...
.. " DaM Dale I!Cl DARTSIaI l10TASe To PID Commiaet PID Rmew ............_"......... """ ot.n 
940029 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM , . \ \ pYPI Of SU.MISSION (t' IOATI aU'MmED cat December 16, 1tt3 L CapiIaI (C) CATEGORY CODE ,... feY_I . _ Tectri:&I CTI (I' ...l..
(4) ...a..... (I' 3-􀁾􀀠..... (R) (') ..J..f. (7' _ (I' -...,.......... LlGAL NAIll Ct, QRGANlZAnONAL UNIT ,to) 'fOVII of &&thon 'fown of Addl.on -Bnglneerlng Dept. UDRISS S.O. 80S 14<!
CONTACT NRSON catr AdilDD (tt, Dall,. (U, Hula: MQhp BtulgArtner a.... (U, c. ;!!8! C14, T...-: « 2141450-2886 PROJECT TITLE ,t', Araoaho lealion.ent , fro. North Dalla. Tollroad to
Ouoru PROJICT DISCRIPnON AND JUSTIFICATION (t., 'fhi. project 11 the fir.t ph..e of Addi.on I •• plan to extend Arapaho Rd. from the North Dalla. Tollroad to "ar.h Lane. Funding requested
for engin.ering, 􀀮􀁮􀁾􀀠con.truction co.t•• DART Bu. Route: 83 PROPOSED PROJECT ...n 0... 􀁬􀀮􀁢􀁉􀀺􀁕􀁉􀀧􀁾􀀮􀀠􀁬􀁕􀁾􀀠(n, Ending DIll March, It" (,., UnMATED FISCAL YIAR fUtfDING•
Cltv '111 􀁾􀁏􀁎􀁓􀁔􀁒􀁵􀁣􀁮􀁯􀁎􀀠COlT DlSTRI8UT1ON .. . • 90,000.00 ItII• ,,,n .AlClht ... I.W.w • f2YI • 1'I1I • " ..􀀷􀀱􀁾􀀺􀁮􀁮􀁮􀀮􀁮􀁮􀀠[ ...... • I ••' ntlla, .. f'lll' • .....-Tata.
803,000.1:)0 􀁦􀁾􀁕􀁉• !III 803.000.00 I '''1.1 An'l.nnn.tIt'I •••t$1<:);1.OF AUTHORIZED REPJ 1mATJVE TITLI DATE SlGN£D ... 􀁾􀀠,.,.,,1.11(7 Director of Public Norks 12/16/93 FOAnAAT
us'; nNu( , , DIll 0lIl 􀁾􀀺􀁏􀁍􀁔􀁓􀀧􀀢􀀠To '&DComtniftH oTASe '&DRmtwtrASC Review Approved by PaD 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450·2871 Post Office Box 144 Addir;:on. Texas 15001 16801 Westgrove January 10, 1994 Mr. Tom Ryden Assistant Director Bus Project Development 1401 Pacific
Avenue P.O. Box 66013 Dallas, Texas 75266·7212 Re: DART/LAP Quarterly Report -December 1993 Request for reimbursement This report is intended to update Ibe status of Ibe DART/LAP projects
and serve as a request for reimbursement. 1) Midway!Lindberg Intersection • Engineering for Ibis project is 90% complete. We are in Ibe process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of·way.
DART Approved Project $ 150,000.00 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 10,830.00 2) Midway/Beltway Intersection -Engineering for Ibis project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing
plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 45,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 2,925.00 3) AddisonIWestgrove Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete.
We are in Ibe process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $125,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 8,500.00 4) MidwayIGreenhill School Intersection
-Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in !be process of reviewing plans and acquiring rigbt-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 75,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $
4,280.00 
Page 2 January 10, 1994 5) BeltIinel Addison Intersection -This project is complete and all outstanding invoices have been paid. DART Approved Project $ 196,000.00 Engineering -Epsey
Huston 12,605.00 Construction -Gibson & Associate 149,599.36 Cobb Enterprises 1,678.00 Total Project Costs $ 163,882.36 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 163,882.36 This leaves approximately
$ 32,117.64 for this project. Currently we owe the Southern Pacific Railroad approximately $ 20,000 for signal work associated with this project. We have not received the invoice. 6.
BeitlinelMarsb Intersection -Engineering fur this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 550,000.00 Reimbursements
by DART to date $ 19,590.00 7. BeitlinelMontfort Intersection -Eugineering for this project is complete. The bid was awarded in November of 1993 and construction is scheduled to start
January 11, 1994. DART Approved Project $ 125,000.00 Engineering -Barton-Aschman 19,926.00 (90% of $22,140.00) Contractor -Bowman Construction 56,064.42 (90% of $62,293.80) Reimbursements
by DART to date 19,926.00 Reimbursements requested this report $ 56,064.42 8. Keller Springs/DalJas North Tollway Intersection -Working through the proposal regarding a Keller Springs
toll tunnel under Addison Airport. No action regarding this project. DART Approved Project $ 226,150.00 Reimbursements to Date 0.00 
Page Three January 10, 1994 9. BeltlinelNorth Dallas Tollway Intersection -Engineering is nearing completion. We are in the process of acquiring the right-of-way . DART Approved Project
$ 262,000.00 Engineering Fee (90% of $15,300) 13,770,00 Appraisal Fee (90% of $4,300) 3,870.00 Reimbursements to Date 13,770.00 Reimbursement Requested this report $ 3,870.00 10. Arapaho
RealignmentlRight-of-Way -acquired in Deeember of 1993. DART Approved Project $ 255,000.00 Reimbursement to Date 0.00 Reimbursement Requested this report $ 255,000.00 11. BeltlinelMldway
Intersection -This project is a transit pass project. The engineering currently being negotiated between Barton-Asehman and DART. 12. Beltline/Quorum Intersection -This project is a
transit pass project. The engineering contract is currently being negotiated between Barton-Aschman and DART. 13. BusinesslBeltline Intersection Intprovements -Applied for approval of
partial funding from in December 1993. Began engineering with the Town's contribution, Request for DART-LAP Participation $ 200,000.00 14. Westgrove/Sojourn Intersection Intprovement
-Applied for approval of funding from DART-LAP Request for DART-LAP Participation $ 175,000.00 contract is DART-LAP 
Page Four January to, 1994 15. Ampabo Road Realignment· Applied for approval of funding from DART-LAP. Request for DART-LAP Participation $ 803,000.00 Please call me if you bave any
questions of need additional information regarding these projects. Sincerely, John R. Baumgartner, P.E. Director of Public Works JRB/gmk cc: Randy Moravac -Finance Director (No attachments)
Attachments: I. Agenda and minutes from the November 23, 1993 City Council Meeting· MontfortlBeltiine Intersection 2. Appraisal eontracts for two parcels on Beltline Road· Nottb Dallas
Tollway Intersection 3. Warranty deed and closing statement for 6.23 acres tract Arapaho Realignment· Rigbt·Of-Way Acquisition 
DARTILAP REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST NUMBER 3 January 7, 1994 Project Reimbursement Request BeItlinelMontfort Intersection $ 56,064.42 BeltlinelNorth Dallas Tollway 3,870.00 Arapaho Realignment
-R.O. W. Acquisition $ 255,000.00 Total Reimbursement Requested $ 314,934.42 
1 ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Report thru March 31, 1994 Schedule 􀀱􀁾􀁁􀁮􀁮􀁬􀀮􀁬􀁡􀁬􀀠Cash Flow Summary 3/31/94 9/30/94 9/30195 ·9/30/96 9/30/97 9/30/98 9/30/99 Out Years Balance
Forward 5,384,919 4,721,748 4,841,286 5,974,069 6,943,815 7,299,906 7,674,257 8,067,804 Add: Future Allocations (Note 1) nla nla 862,400 646,800 n/a n/a n/a n/a Future Interest Earnings
at 5% nla 119,538 270,384 322,947 356,093 374,354 393,552 unknown Less: Payments on Approved Projects (Sch 2) 1 (1) Per DART Estimate of Allocation letter dated 05/19/94 
2 ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Report thru March 31, 1994 Slmlllil.llll 2 • Gal1lb Elow of AJlJlroved Projects Remainder of FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Out Years Payments to
Balance Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Project Date Available Ex()enditure EXE!enditure EXE!enditure EXE!enditure Ex()enditure Ex()enditure EXE!enditure
Total BeltLine/Quorum Intersection $0 $187,000 $ a. $ LaZotlO $ $ $ $ $ $187,000 BeltLine/Midway Intersection $0 $78,606 $ a $ 􀀧􀀷􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁴􀀩􀁴􀀩􀀠$ $ $ $ $ $78,606 MontfortlBellLine
Intersection $75,990 $49,010 $ 􀁾􀁯􀂣􀁏􀀠$ $ $ $ $ $ $125,000 Traffic Signal Improvements AddisonlWestgrove Intersection $0 $8,500 $20,400 $ $116,500 $ $ 􀁾􀁑􀀮􀁏􀁏􀀠$ 􀁾􀀢􀀬􀁖􀀧􀀮􀁯􀁯􀀠$•􀁬􀁬􀁬􀀬􀁾�
�$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $20,400 $125,000 Midway/Lindberg Intersection $10,830 $139,170 $ $ l%Aao $ 􀁾􀁾􀀠$ $ $ $ $150,000 Midway/Beltway Intersection Midway/Greenhill Intersection BeltLine/Marsh
Intersection $2,925 $4,280 $19,590 $42,075 $ $70,720 $ $530,410 $ $ $ '¥8qtJtX)$ .. 􀀮􀀮􀀲􀀮􀁾􀀤􀀠qr:zab $ 􀁾􀁒􀁴􀀶􀀠$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $45,000 $75,000 $550,000 Transfer 10 TAP
for City Engineer/Planner Position BeltLine/Dalias Pkwy Intersection $0 $17,640 $8,701 $ tJ701 $244,360 $ Z'{;Oa::> $ $ $ Ihe300 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $8,701 $262,000 Keller Springs/Dallas Pkwy
Intersect Westgrove/Sojourn Inter. Impv. $0 $0 $226,150$ $175,000 $ s,(')OO 􀀤􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁦􀂥􀁘􀁬􀀠$ 􀁾􀀠$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $226,150 $175,000 Arapaho Realignment $0 $803,000 $ MI?-QOQ $ 0 $
$ $ $ $803,000 BeltLine/Business Dr. $0 $200,000 $ 20<?400 $ $ $ $ $ $200,000 Completed Projects 16 
3 i' ADDISON -CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Report thru March 31, 1994 Schedule 3 ..􀁾..cashFlow of Future PrQjects Remainder of FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Out Years Project Projected
Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Future Pro'ects Total Ex enditure Ex enditure Ex enditure Ex enditure Ex enditure Ex enditure Ex enditure 􀁾􀁟􀁾􀀠􀀮􀁡􀁤􀁬􀁩􀁊􀁾􀀠L
' 􀀮􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀴􀀠'"'::e $0 $ :a:-am $ :sq<:d\:X2 $ $ $ $,----􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁪􀁊􀀮􀁩􀁦􀁴􀀧􀀿􀁤􀀦􀁺􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁪􀀩􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀮__ r;"j':' $0 $ qs;pao $ -Gjl'X2C $ $ $ $ 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁟􀁾􀁤􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁟.􀀮􀁌􀁊􀁤􀁤􀁟􀁾
􀀫􀀠$0 $ :) $ 􀀤􀁾􀁡􀀻􀂢􀀠$ Zo4'()OO $ $ $:____ 􀁐􀁾􀁤􀁫􀁾7Y vl/c!;./Jp/-A;(l' 􀀬􀁾􀀠{; _ $0 $ $ '3&14"'22 $ VAear::> $ $ $ $._-tL-_D 􀁉􀁾􀁰􀁾􀀠􀁬􀀱􀀨􀀱􀀻􀁦􀁾􀀠Q$O $ $ S<:lq.QCtQ $ 􀁾􀁃􀁏􀀠$
Z$'4<'¢ $ $ 􀀤􀁾___ $0$ $ $ $ $ $ $ 􀀭􀀬􀀬􀀦􀀮􀁪􀀯􀁾􀂧􀁬􀀴􀁩􀁦􀀧􀁦􀁴􀁓􀀮􀀮􀀠􀀯􀀱􀀮􀁤􀀺􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀡􀁍􀁤􀀨􀀧􀁳􀁡􀀺􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀮􀁟􀀠$0 $ $ $ $6t:q;t;J(?C! $ $ $.---_􀁾􀀠(j /d 􀁾􀁧􀀠􀁾􀀠: 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀀦􀁾􀁇
􀀱􀁦􀁮􀁍􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭$0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $:____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭$0$ $ $ $ $ $:____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $:____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0$ $ $ $ $ $,__
$0$ $ $ $ $ $,____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $.____ $0 $ $ $ $ $ 􀀤􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭$0 $ $ $ $ $ $0 $ $ $ $ $ $:---$0 $ $ $ $ $,____ $0 $ $ $ $ ::$_____ $0 $ $ $ $...____ :::.____ 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (214) 450-2871 Post Office Box 144 Addi.son, Texas 75001 16801 Wesl'grove January 6, 1994 Mr. Tom Ryden Assistant Director Dallas Area Rapid Transit P.O. Box
660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-0163 Re: 1992-93 DART-TAP Report Proposed 1993-94 DART-TAP Program Dear Tom: Attached for your review/approval is a copy of Addison's proposed Technical Assistance
Program for the fiscal year 1993-94. The only programmed expenditure of the 1992-93 TAP funds was the Town of Addison's 1993 city wide traffic counts. Barton-Aschman completed the counts
in November of 1993 for a cost of $9,750. The remaining $17,046 of the 1992-93 allocation is included in the 1993-94 program. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional
􀁾information. y, oho R. 􀀬􀁾􀁥􀀢􀀠P.E. Director of ublic Works JRB/gmk Attachment 
--------APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ITYPE OF SUBMISSION (1 ) r-Capital (e) 􀁾􀀠Technical (T) r-Revioion (R) ll>DI II ..EGAL NAME (9) Town of Addison [ADDRESS P.O. Box 144
pity Addison (11 )pounty Dallas (12 ) 􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁴􀁥􀀠Texas ( 13)75001􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁤􀁥􀀠 ( 14) PROJECT TITLE (1S) DATE SUBMITTED (2) January 6, 1994 CATEGORY CODE (see reverse) (3) (4 ) (6) (6) _ (7) __ (8) ORGANIZATIONAL
UNIT (10) Town of Addison-Engineering De8t. CONTACT PERSON Nama: John Baumgartner Telephone: ( 214] 450-2886 Technical Assistance Program City En"gineer!Planner Positio! . PROJECT DESCRIPTION
AND JUSTIFICATION (16) Partial funding of the City Engineer and a Civil Engineer 8osition. The duties of these positions include the following: 1-Town of Addison DART-LAP Coordinator.
2. Plan, administer and implement DART-LAP 8rogram. NOTE: The 1993-94 DART-TAP fund includes $17,046 of unprogrammed 􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁣􀁥􀁥􀁤􀁳􀀠for 1992-93 and $27,485.64 from 1993-94 for a total
uf $44,531.64. These funds provide approximately 45% of the funding of the salary of these 8ositions. PROPOSED PROJECT Start Dale (17) ESTIMATED FISCAL YEAR FUNDING s fiAI Cilv S /201
ISlale S f21\ .ocal S SS 468.36 1221 Other S t2:l1 DART S 44,531.64 1241 'T $).00, 000 i 1251 􀁓􀁉􀁏􀀮􀀲􀁾 OF AUTHORIZED/REPRESENTATIVE .,0; 􀁲􀁾􀀠FDa DART USE AlNlY , Dale To DARTStaH
ToTASC TASCReview Ending Date (18) CONSTRUCTION COST DISTRIBUTION 􀁾􀀠Rinn'.nf.W.v !I: 􀁾􀀬􀀠." 􀁾􀀠OthAr !I: /., 􀁾􀀠\ I'} 7 \ " 81 129\ Tolal !I: (:l 0 I TITLE . DATE SIGNEDJ./c.v:",u-h!$/;/<;
aJ,,-?, c,'iy t5;j:.7:;LJ Dale To P&D Committee P&D Review Approved by P&D 
PUBLIC WORKS DEP;\RTl\IENT (214) 450-2971 ) Post Office Box 144 Addisont Texas 75001 16801 Wealgrove October 01, 1993 Mr. Tom K. Ryden Assistant Director Bus Project Development Dallas
Area Rapid Transit 1401 Pacific Avenue P.O. Box 66013 Dallas, Texas 75266-7212 Re: DART/LAP Quarterly Report -September 1993 Request for reimbursement This report is intended to update
the status of the DART/LAP projects and serve as a request for reimbursement. 1) Miscellaneous Sidewalk & Bench Pads -September 1992 -This project is complete with this report. DART
Approved Project $ 41,000.00 Contractor Nelson & Associates $ 33,368.05 Daniel's Dirt 750.00 Jim Bowman's Construction Co. 3,670.25 Total Construction $ 37,788.30 Reimbursement by DART
to date $ 34,404.00 Reimbursement requested this report $ 3,384.30 This leaves $ 3,211.70 remalnlng in this project that was used. Please free these monies for use on another project.
2) Midway/Lindberg Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. ) DART Approved Project $150,000.00
Reimbursement by DART to date $ 10,830.00 
Page Two Tom Ryden 3) Midway/Beltway Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project
$ 45,000.00 Reimbursement by DART to date $ 2,925.00 4) Addison/Westgrove Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of reviewing plans and acquiring
right-of-way. DART Approved Project $125,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 8,500.00 5) Midway/Greenhill School Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are
in the process of reviewing) plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 75,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 4,280.00 6) Beltline/Addison Intersection This project
is complete and all outstanding invoices have been paid. DART Approved Project $ 196,000.00 Engineering -Epsey Huston 12,605.00 Construction -Gibson & Associates 149,599.36 Cobb Enterprises
1,678.00 Total Project Costs $ 163,882.36 Reimbursements by DART to date 12,605.00 Reimbursements requested this report $ 151,277.36 This leaves approximately $ 32,117.64 for this project.
Currently we owe the Southern Pacific Railroad approximately $ 20,000 for signal work associated with this project. We have not received the invoice. 
Page Three Torn Ryden 7) Beltline/Marsh Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of a reviewing plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved
Project $ 550,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 19,590.00 8) Bel tline/Montfort Intersection -Engineering for this project is 90% complete. We are in the process of a reviewing
plans and acquiring right-of-way. DART Approved Project $ 125,000.00 Reimbursements by DART to date $ 19,926.00 Thoroughfare Plan Development -This project is complete and the council
accepted the plan. \ J DART Approved Project $ 37,500.00 Engineering Fee Reimbursements by DART to date 37,508.17 7£) 33,-5-00.00 Reimbursements requested this report $ 3,750.00 9) Keller
Springs/Dallas North Tollway Intersection -Working through the proposal regarding a Keller Springs toll tunnel under Addison Airport. No action regarding this project. DART Approved
Project $ 226,150.00 Reimbursement to Date $ 0 10) Belt Line/North Dallas Tollway Intersection -We have just hired an engineer to proceed with the design. DART Approved Project $ 262,000.00
"'. Engineering Fee (90% of $15,300) $ 13,770.00 ) Reimbursement Reimbursement to Date requested this report. $ 0 $ 13,770.00 
Page Four Tom Ryden 11) Arapaho Realignment Request from DART -LAP $ 255,000.00 Reimbursement to Date $ 0 12) Beltline/Midway Intersection -This project is a transit pass project. The
engineering contract is currently being negotiated between Barton-Aschman and DART. 13) Beltline/Quorum Intersection -This project is a transit pass project. The engineering contract
is currently being negotiated between Barton-Aschman and DART. me if you have any questions or need additional regarding these projects. JRB/gmk cc: Randy Moravec -Director of Finance
(No attachments) Attachments: 1) DART/LAP Reimbursement Request No. 2 2) 8 invoices for the sidewalk project 3) 3 invoices for the Addison Road project 4) 12 invoices for the thoroughfare
project 5) Agreement with Epsey, Huston & Associates for the Beltline/Tollway project. ) 
DART/LAP REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST NUMBER 2 OCTOBER 01, 1993 Project Reimbursement Request Miscellaneous Sidewalks -1992 $ 3,384.30 Beltline/Addison Intersection 151,277.36 Thoroughfare
Plan 3,750.00 Beltline/North Dallas Tollway Intersection 13,170.00 Total Reimbursement Requested $ 172,181. 66 
" C;; ew<'rtJ ;from the desk of... Tom K. Ryden, P.E. Assistant Director pZ.-Jy .fA Bus Project Development f' Ylq..f?B Attached is -the year end summary (FY 1993) for LAP expenditures.
If you have any questions, please call me. Tom. 
CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM September 30,1993 FY89-93 City Allocation Addison 4,399,665 . Buckingham 92,896 . Carrollton 6,648,818 , Cockrell Hill 61,103 Coppell 20,027 Dallas NlA Dallas
County N/A Fanners Branch 5,819,245 Garland 7,963,386 Glenn Heights 32,711 Highland Park N/A Irving 15,287,038 Plano 11,373,638 Richardson 8,751,791 Rowlett 528,616 University Park N/A
Total 60,978,934 Programmed 2,156,602 0 6,494,467 20,000 19,175 NlA N/A 4,046,043 6,315,341 0 N/A 12,448,655 11,055,377 8,292,091 100,868 N/A 50,948,619 Cash Payments Unprogrammed Made
2,243,063 176,055 92,896 0 154,351 2,945,911 41,103 18,000 852 17,257 NlA N/A NlA N/A 1,773,202 3,471,043 1,648,045 2,581,505 32,711 0 NlA N/A 2,838,383 4,892,397 318,261 5,489,090 459,700
5,152,123 427,748 100,868 N/A N/A 10,030,315 24,844,249 
TeCHNICAL ASSISTANce PROGRAM September 30, 1993 FY89-93 Cash Payments City ADocation Addison 109,822 Buckingham 2,729 Carrollton 172,272 Cockrell Hill 1,862 Coppell 528 Dallu 2,429,258
Dallas County 169,528 Fanners Branch 150,580 Garland 210,665 Glenn Heights 939 Highland Park 20,891 Irving 389,060 Plano 301,618 Wchardson 231,877 Rowlett 14,241 University Park 37,043
Total 4,242,913 Programmed 92,776 0 91,357 0 528 2,429,258 89,816 147,949 196,5SO 0 11,892 386,984 301,618 231,877 0 22,197 4,OOU02 Unprogrammed Made 17,046 109,822 2,729 0 80,915 172,272
1,862 0 0 528 0 2,429,258 79,712 169,528 2,631 lSO,580 14,115 210,665 939 0 8,999 20,891 2,076 389,060 0 301,618 0 231,877 14,241 3,805 14,846 37,043 240,111 4,226,947 
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM !TYPE OF SUBIlISSION (1) DATE SUBIlITTED (2) October 281 1991 l...x. Capilal IC) CATEGORY CODE (_ reverse) i--Tedlnical en (3) -(4) -(5 ) -r-Revi6ion
(A) (6) _ (7) __ (8) -􀁉􀁁􀁾􀁄􀁉􀁉􀁾􀀴􀁎􀁔􀀠..EGAL NAIIE (II) ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT (10) Town of Addison Town of Addison-Engineering Department ADDRESS P. o. Box 144 CONTACT PERSON City
Addison ( 11) !counly 􀁄􀀮􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁡􀁾􀀠(12) Name: John Bal.ll!lOartner 􀁾􀁉􀁡􀁴􀁥􀀠􀁬􀁥􀁸􀁧􀁾􀀠(13 ) 􀀬􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁣􀁉􀁥􀀠15001 (14 ) T81eph0/l8: ( 􀀲􀁊􀁾􀀠I :>I5lC2flflf! iPROJECT TITLE (15)
!PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION (16) PROPOSED PROJECT Start Dale (17) I£ndlng Dale (18 ) ESTlIlATED FISCAL YEAR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION COST DISTRIBUTION $ 119' !; t 2 S 1 City :
$ 1201 Riohl.nf.W,,' $ 1271 SIal.. S 1211 :£ r 2 81 n<:,,1 $ 1221 Olh", 􀀮􀁾􀀠1291 10th", S 1231 Tolal S 1301 S 1241 I...,......... $ 1251 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TITLE
DATE SIGNED ! City Engineer October 28, 1991 FOR DART USE nNIV Dale Dale To DART Staff To P&D Comminee ToTASC P&D Review TASCReview Approved by P&D •