0 " \ ... W 0:;' • " 0•g 0 :;: s 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠.g 􀁾􀀠" 􀁾􀀠g 􀁾􀀠􀁯􀁾... .... " " "''' ..... 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠!;i .... r ro til .... ! ifi .... .. 11:0 g ... g.. H '" 1Sl,,􀀡􀀱􀀺􀁾􀀠, , > '" F.atur. X m Q. 'C !t).,. BRIDGE '\0"-1 \. I '!. -0'\ DATE I CONDITION RATINGS I I MM DO yy COMMENTS 58 59 60 61 62 \ '.c.,s:.'Ql"\! 􀁺􀀮􀁾􀀠84f1e-/ullt:..re-fe. &x CuI,,--1' 't. q,. C& 4-'" 􀁾􀂷􀁉􀁴􀀮􀀮􀂷􀀴􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀡􀀠Ji.Ji · ... 􀁾􀁩􀀠IN '" 7 4-4. 7 4-14-"" 􀁾􀀠i 􀀧􀀬􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀠_4..1. \'>.1 􀁾􀀠.q <1 .q • J4. u:;. -+>.4-􀁴􀁦􀁾􀀠/2affe-i UnU-e--/e. 􀁩􀀳􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀮􀀮􀀠Cu 􀁉􀁶􀁾􀀠7 I 't. 4, I 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾\ -'tel l\..\ N. N C{.. I 􀀬􀁾􀀠􀀧􀁬􀁾􀀠-4.!./-N hl N 4-7 In 􀀭􀁾􀀠'lll, 'N. IN. N 4-17 · · ! · ! : --· , -· · · · · i · · · · I : : : · · -· · : , -· --· · --I I I r " BRIDGE HISTORY d;lrA4b I 􀁾􀀠TlI'xBIf Depttttmtmt of TrlUlllpat1ution Form 􀀱􀀰􀀸􀀵􀂷􀀱􀀭􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀸􀀹􀀠Bridge Inspection Record Di.trict 1'0 County D61 Cont-Sec i "D41 -I'h Structure 'l) I( De"riptlon 4 !;fttZ.M k e-. c, -􀁾􀁘􀀠c,kU-VGrz..,( In.peetor'. 􀁾􀁩􀁧􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁥􀀠A.B, l"iz:;;:i2IiIl.IC¥; ,,; ,">I, N􀁾87'65Not applicable Excellent condition Very good condition no problems noted Good condition some minor problems Satisfactory condition .. minor deterioration of structural elements (limited) Fair condition minor deterioration of structural elements (extensive) 􀀻􀀻􀁴􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁩􀁾 􀁜,.'􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀯􀀺􀀿􀁾􀀠..,,,,, 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁊􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀠43Poor condition .. deterioration s.ignificantly affects structural c.apacity Serious condition -deterioration seriously affects structu;al capacity '. ? 2Critical condition -bridge should be 􀁣􀁉􀁾􀁳􀁥􀁤􀀠until repaired 1 Failing c.ondition -bridge dosed but repairable 0Failed condition bridge dosed and beyond repair Enter a rating tor each element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum rating listed to the left of each element, CompOnent Ratings should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully supportive comments are to be made hereon Of on attachments for all ratings of 7 or below. Min. Deck (Item 58) P.ltingI I 1 Deck -Rating 0 6 Wearing Surface 6 Joints, Expansion, Open 6 Joints, Expansion, Sealed 6 Joints, Other 6 Drainage System 6 Curbs, Sidewalks Bo Parapets 6 Median Barrier 6 Railings 7 Railing Protective Coating 7 Delineation (curve markers) Other Comments: 'p;'" 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠tfJ. B ,oJ .!L!:S ,.l !::!..... Min. ISuperstructure (Item 59) i Rotlng 0 Main Members -Steel 7 0 Main Members -Concrete 0 Main Members -Timber 0 Main Member Connections 1 Floor System Members 1 Floor System Connections 5 Secondary Members 5 Secondary Member Connections 6 Expansion Searings 6 Fixed Bearings 6 Steel Protective Coating Other Component Rating 0 Comments: : Dis'';" 11(;, County /)151 Cant-Sec __f2lLJ!D.::!4-:..cI_--lIC1i>L-___ Structur. 0 II Route Mault kfVirj Min. TSubstructure (Item 60) T Rating Min. I Culverts (Item 62) Rating 􀁾􀀠6) 􀁾0 Abutment Caps ..1,,0 r"p Slab, 0 Above Ground 0 Bpttom Slab'of Footings lE-O Below Ground or foundation 0 Abutments: & Intermediate Supports B 5 Backwalls. & Wingwalls 5 Headwalls & Wingwalls r-a.) .., 0 Intermediate Supports rl􀁾􀀠Other tJ Caps -Concrete Component Rating . [!JCaps-St.el Caps Timber Comments:@"'l/40, 􀁾􀁾􀀪􀁛􀁃􀁁􀁍􀁾􀁓􀂷􀀠. Above Ground -Concrete {3 /0111 f.kd ctA4Ji,Above Ground -Steel Above Ground Timber Above Ground Masonry Below Gtounq or Foundation-5 Collision Prote Other rJ 􀁾Component Rating Min, I Chan nel (Item 61) I Rating Comments; 0 Channel8anks R 0 Channel Bed g _.... 5 Rip Rop, roeWall,&Apron, B 5 Dikes oJ 5 Jetties ""' Other jJ I I0 Min. Miscellaneous Rating Component Rating 􀁾Comments: 7 Slgns_ 7 illumination e. 7 Warning Devices ,.J 7 Utility Lines /J Other iJ .. 􀁬􀀡􀁾􀁾Comme(:lt.s: 􀀺􀁾􀀠i Form 1085-12-89 ------I Texas Department of Transportation fo"" tJaN -11·" Bridge Appraisal Worksheet District lib County 061 Cont Sec "b 041---Iq, T Traffic Safety Features (Item 36) 􀁾􀀠/Standa'd MBGf __Standard T raffie or Combination Ran __None _Nil< __Damaged __Non-Std. __Other Bridge Railing (1st Digit) Rating-0 __MBGF Transition ,,_Standard Traffic or Combination Rail _.__None __NIA _Damaged __Non·Std. __Other 􀁾􀀬􀀠 Transitions (2nd Digit) Rating-W __Standard MBGf _Standard TraffIc or Combination RalJ __None _NlA __Damaged __Non·Std, __Other Approach Guardrail (::Ird Digit) Rating -[IJ __MBGf Terminal __Impact Attenuater __None _NlA __Damagad __Non·Std, __Other Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit) Rating-w I Structural Evaluation (Item 67) I IR= /HS20 __Other Condition Ratings ADT 41 'I C> Yr, 18 ..tLSuperstructure (ltam 59) 􀁾􀁆􀁲􀁯􀁭TXDOT Traffic Count LSUbSIrUcture (Item 60) __From Field Estimates ...J...Culve" (Item 62) Structural Rating (Table 1) ..f2 [2JRating I Deck Geometry (Item 68) I No, of Lanes (Each Way) _3__ Overpass' 19 Vertical Clearance __2 Lane., 2·Way Traffic (Tabla 2A) __Pos1ed12or More Lanes Each Way (Table 2C) __Measured __Umlted Access Freeway __Estfmated __Umitej Access __Multilane Facility __Arterial __I-Way ramp (Tabla 20) __Collector or Local Vertical Clearance Rating (Table 2E) _ Bridge Roadway Width bC,(GfP 'Z-Bridge Roadway Width Rating Rati ng _\--z-\ 5t ctureru"'f 1q bDate (' :0. 0' II 􀀧􀀬􀀢􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀢􀁾􀀠"', 'j:. "?' ',« , :: .. /: ..........,....􀀬􀀮􀀺 􀀮􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀣􀁾􀀠􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀠...... fI.o,Nl< 􀁰􀁏􀁾.. ; ...􀁾􀀠I J.r ........... :0:;I ..... "7 .",,,,. .... ;.. "3246 Q :"1(;" 􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀠'<- 100 Yrs,) __Significant Slight (11-100 Yrs,) __Severe 0006slonal (3-10 Vrs) _ -frequent (<3 Yrs,) Rating-[IJ I Approach Roadway Alignment (Item 72) I Sneed 􀁾􀀮􀁤􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠at Brldae Accroaches INotRequired (8) __Srlght Reduction (6) __Substantial Reduction (",,3) §Qeed Beduction 􀁒􀁾uirgd due to __Vertical Alignment __Horizontal Alignment __Other 􀁒􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀭􀁾􀀠 See rellerse side 'or explanation of ratIng numbers, Rating Code Descriptions Traffic: Safety Features (Item 36) The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. 1 -Feature meets currently acceptable standards. o -Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or feature is required but not provided. N -Not applicable or feature is not required. General Features (items 67, 68, 69,71, and 72) Items 67, 68, 69, 71, and 72 are assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. N -Not applicable. 9 -Superior to present desirable criteria. 8 -Equal to present desirable criteria. 7 -Better than present minimum criteria. 6 -Equal to present minimum criteria. 5 -Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is. 4 -Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is. 3 -Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of correaive aalon. 2 -Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of replacement. 1 -This value of rating code not used. o -Bridge dosed. Bridge Posting (Item 70) Item 70 is assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. 5 -Operating rating equal to or above legal loading • . 4 -Operating rating 0.1 to 9.9% below legal loading. 3 -Operating rating 10.0 to 19.9 % below legal loading .. 2 -Operating rating 20.0 to 29.9% below legal loading. 1 -Operating rating 30.0 to 39.9% below legal loading. o -Operating rating 39.9% or more below legal loading. Form 1",,·2 -11-19 SCALE IN MittS j , o \1 it. .:;