I \" " en ri , 􀁯􀁾... "," ..... IX>, o o w 
Foatur. X _ M...:..<...J"d..... ....􀁕􀁊􀁾􀁌􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀱􀂫􀀭􀀭􀁊􀁋􀁾􀀬􀀬􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁡􀀧􀀭􀀢􀁤􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠COUNTY_--'""[Ja=-"-I.....􀀨􀁻􀀻􀁷􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀢􀂣􀀭􀀭􀁷􀁦􀁨􀀺􀀢􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀺􀁊􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀬,,,",",,_
OATE ! RATINGS MM 00 yy COMMENTS '58 ! 69 r 80 81 62 ! t. .'to. g--c '0 -1""Jl'ufe-i 􀁌􀁾􀁲􀀻􀁣􀀮􀀮􀁲􀀺􀁥􀁦􀁥􀀠8/);( c.u/r/er-t '1 􀁾􀀠r.J 7 g 􀁾􀀠.1ft:,· 8'1.--/J &' R -; 􀁾􀀠",. -c:;
.K{., tV q-f: "2 􀁾􀀠, 􀀱􀁊􀂷􀁾􀀨􀀩􀀴􀀰􀀠A/;J tJ ! -J' g 􀁾􀀳􀂷􀀴􀀭􀁌􀀠IJ Ai AJ & C, ;5 ·1'5· qt{,,,..J N tV t., -; t.f .'2-/. q /,., '2;';t "'Jil/-' E. har/'e//"],,/:1: "'./.An-l,nc􀀬􀁊􀀯􀀱􀀮􀁴􀁾􀀠L
J A'£L/.t:<o. "p AJ V >:? C, I , I /· · " " · , . · , · · , · · , , · !· · · , I· · · · · · , , · ! · · · · · I · · ! • ! · · ' ' · , · :I · · · · · BRIDGE HISTORY 􀁈􀁉􀁾􀀯􀁱b 
STATE OEPAATMENTOF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTAnON Form 1085·' -12-89 Bridge Inspection Record DIRrlct lib county 061 Cont-S.c 􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁬􀀼􀂣􀀻􀀾􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀰􀀴􀀺􀀽􀁷􀀱􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁉􀀦
􀁾___ 􀁓􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵􀁲􀀮􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁉􀁑􀀢􀀧􀁑􀀢􀀢􀀺􀀸􀁾􀁟􀀠N Notappli<able 􀁾􀀠-Excellent condition 8Very good condition -no problem. noted 7 Good condition -some minor problems 6 -Satisfactory
condition -minor deterioration of structural elemenU (limited) , , . ,:.'\;1,8 4.,5 Fair condition -minor deterioration of structur.1 elements (extensive) 􀁾􀀺􀀢􀀠.. ,,,,, "', .',\ 4Poorcondltlon
-deterioration slgnlflc.ntly affects structural <aPllclty :' 'V.i:, " • .< 3 -Serlouscondltion -deterioration seriously affectsstructural caPllclty ".:" ez....., ""<4''J '/V-" eY'i .'
I2-C,ltlcal condition -bridge should be dosed Until repaired , , i ..... 􀀢􀁾􀀬􀁓􀁏􀀠':/, Ja: I 0failed condition -bridge closed and beyond repair " ): .... , 􀀬􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁑􀀠􀀨􀁾􀁦􀀠1Falhng
condition-bridge closed but ,epalrable "􀀬􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀬􀀠􀀢􀀢􀁹􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀢􀀬􀀠􀁾􀀱􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠! ,.,,:. 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀱'l'.?tEnter a r.tlng for each element of each component, The ratms should equal or
exceed the 􀁭􀁬􀁮􀁬􀁭􀁕􀀢􀀧􀁻􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁬􀁬􀁩􀁦􀀼􀀡􀀡􀁬􀀧􀁾􀁯􀀺􀀠'. 􀁾􀀬􀁯􀁦each element. Component Ratings should equal the lowe.t rating of any element of the component. fully 􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁾􀀬􀁴􀀮􀁾􀀧􀀠nt,
a'e to be made hereon 0' on attachment' for all rating. of 7 0, below, Min, I Deck (Item 58) I RatI", Min, ISuperstruc:ture (Item 59) Ratl", 1 Deck -Rating 􀁾􀀠0 Main Members -Steel
0 Main Members -Concrete 6 Wearing Surface ;::;;= 0 Main Members -Timber -;;;; 6 JOints, Expansion, Open N 0 Main Member Connections 6 Jolnu, Expansion, Sealed A/1 Floor System Members
6 Joints, Other ".",.;;;;:? j1 1 Floor System Connections 6 Drainage System 􀁉􀁾􀀠5 Secondary Members 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets 1ft'> 5 Secondary Member Connections 6 Median Barrier
AI 6 expansion Bearings 6 flailing. --pff 􀁾􀀠6 Fixed Bearing' 7 flailing Protective Coatin" /'"74'///6 Steel Protective Coating 7 Delineation (curve markers) Other v Other A/rb Component
Ratir'l9 /. --:;,k/>:-/'R"'''􀁣􀁯􀁭􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁨􀀠-Comments; 􀁾􀀠//.".-,.6 ,P'.(::?/7 1J'/7 􀀥􀀣􀀧􀁾􀀯􀁣􀀡􀀧􀁰􀀮􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁣􀀮􀀠􀀬􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀠" 􀀷􀀺􀀻􀀿􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀮􀁶􀀿􀁾􀀠1---------
----------------------------------i 
District-Li.>:fi,--_ county r:J61 Cont-Sec "bO+z. -I€:> Structure bel:!> RouteM I DlAJl'ry !eDA-,D Min. I Substructure (Item 60) I Rating Min. I Culverts (Item 62) I Rating 0 Abutment
Caps '7 0 Top Slab, '""7i 0 Above Ground /0 80ttom Slab or Footing. 7 • 0 Below Ground or foundation I, 0 Abutment. & Intermediate Supports "/5 Bat:kwall. & Wingwall. v 5 Headwall, &
Wlngwall. t1G 0 Intermediate Support. A7! Other ,v Cap' -Concrete Component Rating 􀀢􀁾/.Caps-Ste.1 Caps -Timber 􀁣􀁯􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀬􀁾􀀠/;l1M/.r ?y,;?/,f"'c" /.-7".{;,k Above Glound -Concrete
h w·" 􀁾􀀮􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀬􀀠Y.?'///;:r.?..lA'?r. Above Ground -Steel } 􀀯􀀮􀀿􀀣􀁾􀀬􀀮􀀠/;.-..,; 􀁾􀁲􀀺􀀢􀀠..,Above Ground -Timber ....􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀯􀀯􀀬􀀯􀁾􀀠.".... 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠di:7R'#!;" Above
Ground -Mawnl}' I" Below Ground"or Foundation -. 5 Collision Protection System 6 St.el Protectl"e Coating Component Rating [!JComment!: Min. I Approaches (Item 65) I Rating 0 Embankments
Igl 4 Embankment Retaining Wall. A./5 Slope Protection B 5 Roadway '1 i 6 Relief Joints 7 i 6 Drainage S 6 Guardfence 0. 1 Delineation IV 7 Sight Distance f:f Other 'V Component Rating
􀁾􀀠I IMin. Channel (Item 61) Rating Comments: 􀀮􀁸􀁦􀀿􀁀􀁡􀀻􀀺􀁅􀀻􀀮􀁴􀀻􀀻􀀺􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀮􀀠&!:"/ff t::.dr.:.,<::.-;?l L-t. 􀁾􀁈􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀠􀁾t!?H'P4"t:!.7. 0 Channel Banks ' /" 0
Channel8ed 5" . 5 Rip Rap. Toe Walls & Apron. 6 5 Dikes AI'" 5 Jerlies .v Other -U Component Rating i-5'1 Min. I Miscellaneous I Rating 7 Signs -;:J• Comments; 'w/h!ff/t!'C'P;;;ey(,
/y;(/r; c? //?/J?/;7r-/,.... C////-r?r 1 Illumination • /"//. /-J//A/;/" 􀁾􀀯􀀯􀀯􀀠7 Warning Devices 􀁾􀁤􀀧􀀢<!Y/;>?u/.A-J /.//G 􀁾􀁁􀀧􀀺􀁾􀁷􀀧􀀧􀀭7 Utility Lines hAJl"/--:{/"Q 􀀯􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀯􀁲􀀼􀀯􀀭)
7/"'</_ Other II..,...,.... 􀁾e/d///-'2. <CtZ 􀁾􀀯......_/;P;rYr/! Lt2.tld' 1Jd''Zfi7("" 􀀯􀀯􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀻􀀮􀁤􀀯􀁾􀀯􀀮􀀬􀀼􀀢􀀠/􀀮􀁣􀀭􀀴􀀣􀀢􀀬􀀬􀀻􀁾􀀱􀀢􀀢􀀠􀀦􀀧􀁢􀁡􀀻􀁾􀀠Comments: 􀁾􀁦􀀲-;;ICved"/n
.,../􀀢􀁴􀀮􀁐􀀭􀀭􀀯􀁾􀀢􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀀴􀁥􀀺􀀾􀁤􀀧􀀢􀀯􀀬􀀬􀀻􀀻􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀠I /c.:n""d'd:-d ytJ 􀁣􀀧􀁾􀀣􀀧..."""" 􀁾( ..Pt. /-.form 1085-12-89 i ". 
I T6"88 Department of Tran$portatlon fonn 1187·' ... 11·1t Bridge Appraisal Worksheet District 1'0 County 067 Cont Sec Structure r:;p;;, I Traffic Safety Features (Item 36) I __Standard
MBGF __Standard Traffic or ComblnaUon Rai! __None __N/A __Damaged __Non-Std . ..LO'tler HoN srI? 0 Bridge Railing (1st Digit) Rating -lQJ __MBGF TransWon __Standard Traffic or Combination
Rail /None __N/A __Damaged __Non-Std. __Olher --.::--;-:::-;-=-------: 0 Transitions (2nd Digit) Rating -L£J __Standard MBGF __Standard Traffic or Combination Rail ..,;None __N/A __Damagad
--..Non-Std. __Other r:l Approach Guardrail (3rd Digit) Rating 􀁾􀀠__MBGF Terminal __Impact Attenuatar ./None __NfA __Damaged __Non-Std_ __Other r:;:)l Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit)
Rating 􀁾􀀠I Underciearances (Item 69) I 􀁾􀁓􀁴􀁲􀁥􀁡􀁭􀀠Crossing (Item N/A) Vertical Underclearance (Item 54) __Posted __Meas. __Est. Route Description __Umlted Access, Rura! __Umited
Access, Urban _Principal & Mtnor ArterialS _Collector & Local Roads __Railroad Vertical Underciear8J'lC$ Rating (Table 3A) __ Lateral Clear Right (Item 55) Lateral Clear Len (Item 55)
__1-Way Traffic __2-Way Traffic __Acceleration & Deceleration lane or Ramp under 2·way Traffic Lateral Clarance Rating (Table 3B) ___ Rating -0 I Structural Evaluation (Item 67) I __Olher___________=
-------Condition Aatlngs ADT?700 Yr._4.,Lo:::...._ .-t.superstructure (Item 59) 􀁾􀁆􀁲􀁯􀁭TXDOT Traffic Count I Bridge Posting (Item 70) I OR= ./HS27 Posted Load ______ Aequired 􀁐􀁯􀁳􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀁾...__
_ __Other __􀁾_____ Rating-ra􀁾􀀠-tLsubstructura (Item SO) __From Field Estimates 􀁾􀁣􀁵􀁬􀁶􀁥􀁲􀁴􀀠(Item 62) Structural Rating (Table 1) £.. 􀁒􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀭􀁾􀀠I Deck Geometry (lterl)
68) I No. ot Lanes (Each Way) ... 3",,-_ __2 lones, 2-Way Traffic (Table 2A) 12or More lanes Each Way (Table 20) Overpassing Venlcal Clearance __Posted __Measured I Waterway Adequacy
(Item 71) I ---->lrade Separation (Hem N/A) _VNNo Evidence of Flooding __Deck above Approaches __Evidence 01 Flooding Chance of Ovenoping Deck AdY/Y. Remote (> 100 Yr•. ) 􀁾􀀠_"",,_.
Slight (11-100 Yr•.) __ Occa.lonal (3-10 Yrs) _ _ Frequent (<,J Yrs.) __ Traffic Deloy if Ftooded __Insignificant 􀁾􀁬􀁧􀁮􀁾􀁬􀁣􀁡􀁮􀁴􀀠__Severe Rating-w I Approach Roadway Alignment
(Item 72) I __limited Access Freeway __Multilane Facilily __I-Way ramp (Table 20) 8rldge Roadway Width ; if: 7$ !;'to "l-Bridge Roadway Width Rating ____ __Estimated __LJm"ed Access
__Merlat __Collector or local Vertical Clearance Aatlng (Table 2E) __ Rating-[3 SoeJid Reduction at Bridge Approaches -LNot Required (8) _Slight Reduction (6) __Substantial Reduction
«=3) Speed ReductIon Required due to __Vertical Alignment __Horilontal Alignment __Other ___________ Rating-0 See reverse side for explanation of rating numbers. 
Rating Code Descriptions L...____T;.;r,;;aff;;.;.;;ic. Safety Features (Item 36) The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one..cJigit rating based on the following scale. 1 -Feature
meets currently acceptable standards. o -Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or feature Is required but not provided. .. ' N -Not applicable or feature is not required.
General Features (Items 61. 68. 69. 71, and 72) Items 61, 68, 69, 11. and 12 are assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. N -Not applicable. 9 -Superior to present desirable
criteria. 8 -Equal to present desirable criteria. 1 -Better than present minimum criteria. 6 -Equal to present minimum .riteria. 5 ... Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate
beir,g left in place as is. 4 •. Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is. 3 -Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of ccrrective action. 2 -Basically
intolerable condition requiring high priority of replacement. 1 -This value of rating code not used. o -Bridge closed. 8ridge Posting (Item 10) Item 10 Is assigned a one-digit rating
based on the following scale. 5 -Operating rating equal to or above legal loading. 4 -Operating rating 0.1 to 9.9% below legal loading. 3 -Operating rating 10.0 to 19.9 % below legal
loading. 2 -Operating rating 20.0 to 29.9% below legal loading. 1 -Operating rating 30.0 to 39.9% below legal loading. o -Operating rating 39.9% or more below legal loading. Form n.7-2
·11·.. 
4 i " I'. _ DETAIL MAP SEcnON STARTS ON tNDEX PAGE 202 • • i r 􀁬􀁾􀀠: _/1 ,_. .. )l(u•• 􀁊􀀧􀁾􀁬􀀼􀁬􀁯􀁮􀀠.....pur..-..... ' I'" i 􀀦􀁴􀀽􀁾􀀠J, II ,==:l 
COUNTY : DALLAS FAU BRIDGE NO.: 8042-18003 LOCATION : MIDWAY ROAD OVER HUTON BRANCH 
COUNTY DALLASFAU BRIDGE NO.: 8042-18003 LOCATION : MIDWAY ROAD OVER HUTON BRANCH 
COUNTY DALLASFAU BRIDGE NO.: 8042-18003 LOCATION: MIDWAY ROAD OVER HUIDNBRANCH 
COUNTY DALLASFAU BRIDGE NO.: 8042-18003 LOCATION: MIDWAY ROAD OVER HUTON BRANCH