--C") 􀁾􀁦􀀠 􀁾􀀠 N 10 I'􀁾􀁾􀀠 ci 􀁜􀁊􀁾􀀠 z 􀁾􀁨􀀭 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀤􀀠 ® 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 . \J t C )..j 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 -Ja:; a 􀁾􀀢\J 
I Steve Chutchian From: Jim Pierce Sent: Monday, November 20, 20004:20 PM To: Steve Chutchian Cc: Michael Murphy; Chris Terry Subject: FW: Approved Master ILA for County CIP CIP lLA,
VOffiion 13 NOV. APPRO..• Steve: Please add this to your project list. We had two projects approved by Dallas County as a result of their call for projects. 1. Arapaho Rd. Phase III
-$1.4 million in FY2007 2. Midway Rd. Signal Re-timing -$196K in Fy 2005 We need to get the agreement in Ken Dippel's hands for review. At the same time, we should review. will give
you some more info about this. Jim. -----Origina1 Message----From: Donald Holzwarth [mailto:DHolzwarth@dallascounty.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:14 PM To: jcosby@airmail.net;
Jim.Sparks@cedarhilltx.com; Jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us; mmurphy@ci.addison.tx.us; 􀁎􀁣􀁬􀁩􀁮􀁥􀁀􀁣􀁩􀁾􀁣􀁡􀁲􀁲􀁯􀁬􀁬􀁴􀁯􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁸􀀮􀁵􀁳􀀻􀀠 􀁒􀁷􀁡􀁬􀁨􀁯􀁯􀁤􀁀􀁣􀁩􀁾􀁣􀁡􀁲􀁲􀁯􀁬􀀱􀁴􀁯􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁸􀀮􀁵􀁳􀀻􀀠
Sjenkins@ci.carrollton.tx.us; Kgriffin@ci.coppell.tx.us; ddybala@ci.dallas.tx.us; pbaugh@ci.desoto.tx.us; tjohnson@ci.ciesoto.tx.us; dschwartz@ci.duncanville.tx.us; Davisd@ci.farmers-branch.tx.us;
MURAWSKJ@ci.farmers-pranch.tx.us; Jbaker@ci.garland.tx.us; Rwunderlich@ci.garland.tx.us; Jmcmeans@ci.qrand-prairie.tx.usl rlarkins@ci.grand-prairie.tx.us; tturnulty@ci.mesquite.tx.us;
Jgodwin@ci.rowlett.tx.us; George hurnan@cor.gov; henry.drexel@cor.gov; Walter ragsdale@cor.gov; jangel@irving.lib.tx.us; Jeline@irving.lib.tx.us; Publicworksinspector@townofsunnyvale.org;
townmanager@townofsunnyvale.org Cc: discodad@aol.com; ABacchus@dallascounty.org; ARobinson@dallascounty.org; BWeems@dallascounty.org; CMarek@dallascounty.org; Dcranford@dallascounty.org;
DDavidson@dallascounty.org; ENgwa@dallascounty.org; IHicks@dallascounty.org; JCantwell@dallascounty.org; JHedge@dallascounty.org; JMears@dallascounty.org; JNorrnan@dallascounty.org;
LFisher@dallascounty.org; MAIN.SWilson@dallascounty.org; NNew@dallascounty.org; SCamarillo@dallascounty.org; SHorner@dallascounty.org; CON INSP@HOTMAIL.com Subject: Approved Master ILA
for County ClP Dear Dallas County Parters: Attached is the version of the Master lLA that was approved by the Commissioners Court on Tuesday, 14 November. We will also send it to you
with cover letter by regUlar mail also. PIs go ahead and start coordination for approval by your City, since this approval is the first step in our getting off to a fast start. We have
Kick-off meetings already scheduled (or conducted) with all of you, and the Project Specific Agreements will flow out of that meeting and the Predesign Charrette. 1 
As you will see, we used your input from the Partnering Meeting on 13 October, and have tried really hard to compose an agreement that reflects partnering principles in a 50%--50% cost
sharing environment. The document is intended to reflect sound Project Management principles throughout. PIs let me know if you have any questions or there is anything we can do to help
you get it signed from your side. Don Holzwarth 2 
TOWN OF ADDIsoN To: Ms. Angela Washington Company:Cowles & Thompson FAX #: 214-672-2344 Date: 11/21100 # of pages (including cover): 17 PUBLIC WORKS From: Steven Z. Chutchian, P.E. Assistant
City Engineer Phone: 972/450-2886 FAX: 972/450-2837 scb utcb ian@ci.addison.tx.us 16801 Westgrove P.O.Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 Re: Dallas County Capital Improvement Projects D
Original in mail [J Per your request DFYI D CaUme Proposed Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects 
STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Tms MASTER AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of , Texas, hereinafter
calJed "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials, which desire to enter into an Interlocal Agreement,
hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on roads inside Dallas County that are on the North Central Texas Council of Government's Reginnal
. Thoroughfare Plan. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursua:qt to Court Order 2000-2117, dated October 17, 2000, County Commissioners Court approved participation in Transportation Major Capital
Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004, 2005, and a portion of2006 within the cities inside Dallas County; and WHEREAS, the approved project lists may be modified, updated or
approved by the Commissioners Court on a periodic, as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, provides authorization for local governments to
enter into interldcal agreements; and , '. , NOW THEREFORE, TmS AGREEMENT, is hereby rriade and entered into by CITY and COUNTY fur the mutual consideration stated herein: • .AGREEMENT
Article 1. DEFINITIONS: The fullowing definitions are incorporated into this agreement fur all purposes. a) AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed by all parties detailing
changes, additions or deletions in the MASTER AGREEMENT. b) CITY shall mean the City of , CoUnty ofDa:Das, State ofTexas. c) COUNTY shall mean the County ofDallas, State ofTexas. d)
DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM COSTS shalI mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or program cost objective. These costs generally include MASTER AGREEMENT
-11110/00 1 
compensation of employees for the time devoted and identified specifically to the performance of the project or program, cost of materials acquired, consumed or expended specifically
for the purpose of the project or program; equipment changes; damage claims and other approved capital expenditures; change orders; damage claims; travel expenses incurred specifically
to carry out the project including, but not limited to, design, right-of-way, road or street drainage, utility relocation and adjustment and construction. Direct Cost does not include
either CITY or COUNTY general overhead. e) EFFECTIVE DATE sball mean the date of the signature of the last person necessary for this MASTER AGREEMENT to become el:lective. f) INDIRECT
COSTS shall mean those costs which have been incurred for common or joint purposes. These costs benefit more than one cost 􀁯􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁩􀁶􀁥􀀠and cannot be readily identified with a particular
final project or program cost objective without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. g) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS sball mean contracts or agreements entered into between CITY
and COUNTY in accordance with Texas Goveroment Code Chapter 791 . h) LEAD AGENCY shall mean that entity responsible fur project management, including, but not limited to planning, design,
right-of-way acquisition, approved utility relocation or adjnstrnent and constroction. i) MASTER AGREEMENT sball mean this document including all incorporated documents, attachments,
and exhibits. j) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) sball mean a written document which incorporates the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETI'E. Said MOA shall at a minimum identifY the overall
funding scheme, and basic scope ofthe PROJECT. k) PARCEL OR PARCELS shaD mean those tracts ofland and improvements located either wholly or partially thereon, identified by COUNTY, CITY
or other STAKEHOLDER as required for right-of-way requirements of the PROJECT. Such Right-of-way sball include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property
ownership and all additional real property to be utilized. fo r the PROJECT. . I) PREDESIGN CIIARRETTE shaD mean a meeting of decision making STAKEHOLDERS and other members of the PROJECT
TEAM for the purpose ofentering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT fur the overall funding, alignment and scope ofthe PROJECT. m) PROJECT MANAGER shall mean the person appointed by the Lead
Agency who is assigned the primary duty for assuring Project Te!I:\D. coordination and timely project delivery. There will be only one PROJECT MANAGER assigned to a PROJECT. n) PROJECT
TEAM shaD mean representatives . from COUNTY, CITY, and other STAKEHOLDERS as may be mntua11y agreed upon by COUNTY, CITY and STAKEHOLDER or otherwise with responsibility for delivering
the completed PROJECT. 0) PROJECT(S) shaD mean the road improvements approved by the COUNTY for inclusion in the Transportation Major Capital Improvements Program approved by the Commissioners
Court and approved by the CITY anl:IIor other applicable STAKEHOLDERS. p) ROAD or STREET AMENITY shall mean PROJECT features not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN including
but not limited to street pavers, colored cdncrete, planters, irrigation, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature above and beyond the MASTER AGREEMENT -11/10/00 2

STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN or any increase in capacity in excess of COUNTY determined requirements based on anticipated future traffic flow. q) RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that
real property, (either existing, or required in ree and! or easement) identified by COUNTY, CITY, or other project STAKEHOLDER as necessary for the constroction of the PROJECT. Such
Right-of-way shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY orCOUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. .
(r) STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN shall mean the standard COUNTY-approved CITY criteria for paving, bridges, drainage and appurtenances, traffic control items including pavement marking,
warranted unifurm signals, street light fuundations, pull boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/tum lanes, access, required structural retaining walls and standard driveways excluding
ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, or such design criteria as may be mUtually agreed upon in a project specific SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. (s)(s) SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent
to this document which is entered into to establish the contractual rights and responsibilities of the CITY and COUNTY as it relates to the PROJECT. (tXt) STAKEHOLDER shall mean any
governmental or quasi-governmental entity making a financial contnbution to the PROJECT. fu} (u) TxDOT shall mean the Texas Department ofTransportation. (v) UTILITIES shall mean each
City Utility, public utility, common carrier, governmental or quasigovernmental facility, fiber optic fucility, or other tacility located within the limits of the Project by virtue of
Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY, COUNTY, or STATE OF TEXAS. (w)CITY UTILITY shall mean those owned or operated by CITY which require relocation or 􀁡􀁤􀁪􀁵􀁾􀁮􀁴
fur the purpose ofthe constroction ofthe PROJECT as identified by PROJECT plans. (x) UTlLITYlN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES located within the limits of the 􀁾􀁒􀁏􀁊􀁅􀁃􀁔􀀠by
virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY. 􀁾􀀠 i . 0') UTILITY IN PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES, excluding CITY UTILITIES,
whose fucilities are located within the limits of the PROJECT by virtue ofsatjsfuctorily documented pre-existing real property ownership. (z) UTILITY BETTERMENT shall mean any increase
in the capacity of any UTILITY'S Facility adjusted or relocated as a part of the PROJECT as compared to the existing Facility, or any upgradingofthe UTILITY'S Facility above the standard
practices, devices or materials, specified by the UTILITY and customarily used by CITY or UTILITY on projects solely financed by CITY or UTILITY. Provided, however, that any upgrading
necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Betterment, and further, that any increase in the capacity of the Utility Facility resulting solely from the
replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly inanufuctured, processed or installed shall not be considered a Betterment, provided that such replacement shall be only to the
standard devices or materials currently nsed on other projects financed solely by CITY or UTILITY. This mea:ning shall apply to utilities that are part of the project as well as the
standard basic street components ·(See "STANDARD BASIC PRO.iECT DESIGN").' MASTER AGREEMENT -11110100 3 
Article II. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the respective agreement fully executed (The "Effi:ctive
Date"). This MASTER AGREEMENT shall be an annual agreement and shall automatically renew without further action by either party unless or until terminated as provided in Article IV (Termination)
or the expiration often (10) years, whichever shall first occur. Article m. AMENDMENTS This Master Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of the CITY and COUNTY. Any amendment
must be in writing and approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. Article IV. TERMINATION. DEFAULT. TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE 1. TERMINATION A. This MASTER AGREEMENT
may be terminated by any ofthe following conditions: 􀁾􀀨􀁬􀀩􀀠By expiration ofterm ofthe agreement. 131(2) By mutual written consent and agreement of COUNTY and CITY. ej(3) By either
party, by notice in writing establishing the effective date of termination to the other party as consequence of the party being in defuult of the provisions of this Agreement or any
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT or fuilure to timely provide funding, with proper allowances being made for circumstances beyond the control of the defuulting party. dj(4) By either party with
ninety days written notice to the other party. B. Should either party terminate this MASTER AGREEMENT as herein provided, all existing, fully executed SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made under
this MASTER AGREEMENT shall not be terminated and shall automatically incorporate all the · provisions ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT. C. In the event that any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is terminated
prior to · completion of the PROJECT, no additional Costs shall be incurred other than Costs due · and payable atthe time of termination for services actually performed or that shall
become · due imd payable due to such termination. The LEAD AGENCY, to the extent permitted, may terminate all project contracts, unless written notice is given by either party to the
other of its intent to complete the PROJECT, and prepare a final accounting for the PROJECT. D. If the PROJECT is terminated by the CITY prior to the award ofany construction contract
and the PROJECT is located within the CITY limits, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the full amount expended by COUNTY on the project and COUNTY shall transfer to CITY its rights and all deliverables
that it may be entitie,d to receive under the existing professional services or other project contracts or agreements. Such amount shall be included in the MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00
4 
final accounting for the PROJECT. Such amount shall be due and payable in full ninety (90) days subsequent to the termination, or thirty days subsequent to delivery of final accounting.
E. Once the construction contract has been let, with the approval of the other party, the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for that PROJECT cannot be terminated until completion ofthe construction.
F. In the event that a PROJECT is terminated either party may, upon written notice, take over the project and prosecute the work to completion by contract or otherwise at their sole
cost and expense. In the event that the party completing the work is not the LEAD AGENCY, it is agreed that the PROJECT MANAGER will furnish to the completing party a listing of current
records pertaining to any outstanding obligations or other records or information required by any project contract, including any Work Order, or requested in writing by completing party
in either printed or electronic furmat or both. The LEAD AGENCY agrees to cooperate with the completing party. The LEAD AGENCY will use its best efforts to transfer to the completing
party all contracts. Obligations under such contracts shall become the sole obligation of the completing party upon transfer. Completing party agrees to timely pay all future obligations
under such contract as they become due and payable. Completing party hereby releases the LEAD AGENCY from any and aU liability under such assigned contracts subsequent to date of transfer,
effective upon the transfer date. LEAD AGENCY shall exercise its best efforts to insure a transition of services without interruption G. Either party shall have the right to retain copies
of all data, information, engineering, studies, or other items produced to the date oftermination. H. Provisions B through G will survive the termination of this MASTER AGREEMEJ.'IT
and any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and shall be a continuing obligation until(the transition of services, all payments made and the PROJECTS are complete. All itrns listed or required in
this provision shall be furnished by LEAD AGENCY to completing party without additional cost or expense to completing party. • r ,\ 2. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be
deemed in violation of this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through strikes, stopPage of labor, riot, fire, flood, invasion,
insurrection, accident, order of court, judge or (civil authority, an act of God, or any cause reasonably beyond the party's control and: not attnbutable to its neglect. In the event
of such an occurrence the time for performance of:SUch obligations or duty shall be suspended until such time that such inability to perform, shlin be removed. The party claiming the
suspension shall give notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days ofthe knowledge ofsuch occurrence: Each party shall make all reasonable
efforts to mitigate the effects ofany suspension. Article V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTYand CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall each be responsible fur their own negligent acts or
omissions or other tortious conduct in the course ofperformance of¢is .. MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental immunity . available to either COUNTY or CITY
under Texas law and without waiving any available MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 .5 !' 1 ! 
defenses under Texas law. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. Article VI. NOTIFICATION
A. When notice is permitted or required by this MASTER AGREEMENT, it shall be in writing and shall be presumed delivered when delivered in person or three (3) days subsequent to the
date placed, postage prepaid, in the U. S. Mail. Certified or Registered, Return Receipt Requested and addressed to the parties at the fullowing address. B. All notices and correspondence
to County by City shall be mailed or delivered by hand as fullows: Dallas County Public Works Donald R. Holzwarth, P .E., Director 411 Elm Street, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202-3389
C. All notices and correspondence from County to City shall be mailed or delivered by hand as follows: [Title ofAppropriate City Official] City, Texas . i 􀁾􀀠 _! i D. Either party hereto
may from time to time designate another and different 􀁉􀁴􀁤􀁾 􀁦􀁾􀁲􀀠 receipt ofnotice by giving written notice ofsuch change ofaddress to the' other party. ; j Article VII. CITY COVENANTS
AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A. To execute the necessary agreements fur the implementation ofdesign and construction of the PROJECTS mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT.'I B. Provide City Council Resolution adopting approved preferred alignment, proposed estimated budget, and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for;each milestone as specified
herein or in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. . C. CITY agrees to share the funding of each PROJECT with COUNTY; on an equal share basis (50"/0/50%), or as otherwise agreed upon cost sharing
arrangelll!lnt as specified in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT with the fullowing exclusions: . CITY shaD bear the entire cost of: 1. CITY owned utilities relocation or adjustment such as wateriand
sanitary sewer :fil.cilities, except utility adjustments directly attributable to storm:seWer improvement conflicts; . MASTER AGREEMENT-11/10/00 6 
2. ROAD or STREET AMENITIES including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the STANDARD BASIC
PROJECT DESIGN; 3. UTILITY BETTERMENTS and ROAD or STREET 􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁉􀁔􀁉􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀠 4. CITY PROJECT TEAM participation or project management (if the CITY bas LEAD AGENCY Responsibility)
Direct Costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly accounting system; 5. CITY Indirect Costs. When mutual written agreement bas been reached as to PROJECT limits by COUNTY and
CITY at the Predesign Charrette, City agrees to acquire right-of-way required for designated projects by voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process and/or other legal means,
to the maximum extent possible, and to ensure through the building permitting process that setback requirements are imposed to limit encroachment upon the required right of way. CITY
agrees to fund ROW not acquired but reasonably expected to be. CITY also agrees to fund the removal of improvements that are encroachments within existing or proposed right ofway areas.
In the event of any proposed use of the PROJECT right-of-way that will conflict with the proposed PROJECT and CITY is unable to obtain such right-of-way as descnbed above, CITY shall
notifY COUNTY of such conflict. COUNTY and CITY shall determine if the acquisition of the conflicting parcel would be in the best interest of the PROJECT. In the event that agreement
is reached and the parcel is acquired such cost shall be included in the pro rated cost ofthe project in the agreed upon proportions.; , CITY hereby grants the COUNTY authority to enter
􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁯􀀮􀀠􀁥􀁾􀁰􀁴􀀠domain proceedings within the city limits on each specific right of way alignmellt as; apwoved by the CITY and COUNTY. i . . D, ;Q,-To require all Utilities located
within or using the 􀁰􀁾􀁥􀁳􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠􀁰􀁵􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁣􀀠right of way on all designated transportation projects within CITY's 􀁭􀁵􀁮􀁩􀁣􀁾􀀠limits tp adjust and/or relocate said Utilities as
required by the proposed improvement of the designated transportation Project. CITY Utilities shall be relocated or adjusted at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth
in this MASTER AGREEMENT. E. CITY agrees to be cooperative on issues relating to billboards, advertising signs, nonconforming uses, zoning and similar restrictions and to eirercise its
best effurts to provide variances when possible to minimi7.e cost and delay of PROJECT. Additional PROJECT cost caused or contributed to by CITY 􀁯􀁲􀁤􀁩􀁮􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁾􀀬􀀠 zoning, non-confonning
use determination or other requirement shall be paid in full by CITY. F. .CITY shall require the adjustment and/or relocation ofUTILITIES to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously
as possible after approval of final plans to prevent PROJECT schedule delays. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, ali UTILITIES shall be adjusted or relocated
and the right-of-way clear fur construction not later than thirty (30) days prior to the award ofthe construction contract. CITY will notifY the 90UNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS when utilitY
coirllicts would impact progress of the project completion. COUNTY and CITY agree to WOrk in partnership and with all STAKEHOLDERS to solve the problem to include helping to engage elected
officials in , MASTERAGREEMENT-IIIlO/OO ! ' 7 
the problem resolution with the goal to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the PROJECT. G. Where new storm drainage fucilities are in conflict with CITY
owned water and sanitary sewer systems, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, after submission of an acceptable schedule ofwork and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY and
COUNTY approvill, the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of CITY water and sewer utilities shall be pro rated at the overall percentage agreed to by CITY and COUNTY for cost sharing.
CITY shall be responsible for funding one hundred percent (100";(,) of any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment and/or relocation of utilities in the public
right of way shall be the responsibility of the Utility Owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay or other damages caused by CITY UTILITY'S fiIilure to timely relocate or adjust
the facility shall be at the entire cost ofCITY. H. To provide fur continuing surveillance and control of right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment
of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances in the right ofway. In the event that the aforementioned features are allowed by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration
ofthe project, CITY shall bear the entire cost ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. L To provide to COUNTY for COUNTY'S or COUNTY'S designee use, at no cost, adequate copies
of all construction standards, codes, (specifically including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications, guidelines, 􀁳􀁴􀁡􀁮􀁾􀁤􀁾􀀠or any other pertinent information as
determined by COUNTY to be required for the completion of the PROJECT. Additionally, CITY shall furnish COUNTY, at no cost, subh 􀁤􀁰􀁣􀁾􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁳􀀠as necessary to keep all items previously
furnished to County current. 􀁩􀁾􀀧􀀺􀀠 J. Actively participate and provide authorized 􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁳􀁥􀁮􀁴􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀀠with decision miking power at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, preconstruction meeting,
parmering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completion and fiduciary relationships. K. CITY agrees to provide timely review of (interim submittals.
"Timely ieview" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN 􀁃􀁾􀁔􀁔􀁅 as a part of the PROJECT schedule. City further agrees that ifno review notes are submitted by CITY in writirig to
<;:OUNTY on a timely basis, plans are approved as subnl.l it ed. . L. City agrees that it will pay all additional project cost fur any CITY requested discretionary change, including,
but not lirnited to' STREET AMENITIES AND UTILITY BETTERMENTS, in or addition to the design or constructinn ofthe project subsequent to the City opportunity to review the sixty five
percent (65%) design plans. M. Provide at CITY's cost for the continuing lmaintenance of all PROJECT ROW, such as mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period between acquisition
and construction. . MASlER AGREEMENT-ll1l0/00 8 
N. SUbsequent to the completion of a PROJECf, that the CITY will be responsible fur all future maintenance, operation and control of the PROJECf, without cost or contn'bution from the
COUNTY. O. Bear the entire. cost of design, construction and administration fur landscaping, streetscaping, streetlighting, as such items are not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT
DESIGN and other ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES specified or requested by CITY in excess ofSTANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN. P. It is the intent of this MASTER AGREEMENT that the COUNTY will
be the LEAD AGENCY. In the event that the CITY and COUNTY agree in writing that CITY will manage and administer one or more PROJECTS, CITY and COUNTY will enter into a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
as to that project(s). In such instance, CITY agrees to assume all LEAD AGENCY responsibilities except as may be set forth in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as determined by mutual consent.
Article vm. UTILITY IMPACTS. A. In cases where a UTILITY IS LOCATED IN A PRIVATELY OWNED RlGHT-RlGHT-OFWAY, and it is necessary to relocate the facility or make adjustments by reason
of the widening or improvement of the designated project, the COUNTY (or CITY if acting as the LEAD AGENCy) will,. after submission by utility company of right of way documentation and
cost estimates acceptable to the CITY, COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS, assign the .actual costs fur the relocation and/or adjustment of said utility to the PROJECf. . f , B. In cases
where a UTILITY IN 􀁦􀁾􀁌􀁉􀁃􀁒􀁉􀁇􀁈􀁔􀀭􀁏􀁆􀀭􀁗􀁁􀁙􀀬􀀠excluding CITY UTILITIES, occupies any portion of the PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY by Texas or Federal Law or by agreement with the CITY
that auows or permits the CITY to cause the relocation of the !, . utility for the construction of the project, the CITY sball timely require and enforce the relocation or adjnstment
requirement at no cost to the project. In the event that the CITY has no legal or contractual right to cause therelocation, the relocation or adjustment sball be relocated or adjusted and all cost sball be a Project Cost. CITY sball take all steps necessary to insure that such rt:location or adjustment
sball not conflict with or delay the PROJECf schedule. ' Artide IX. COUNTY AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A. To provide as a PROJECT C6st preliminary engineering which will define project details,
e.g., location, scope of work and specific right of way alignment fur each improvement. Such preliminary engineering; sruin be submitted to the CITY for approval, prior to proceeding
with the finaJ design and any right ofway 􀁡􀁣􀁱􀁵􀁩􀁳􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁮􀀮􀀠 , i : . B. To provide as a PROJECT CoSt fur the construction of transportation improvements based upon design criteria
conforming to STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN in confurmity with applicable: <jITY ordinances and standards, to the extent of MASTER AGREEMENT-llllO/OO ;, 9 
Commissioners Court approved program funding. Scope of work shall include the agreed upon design standards as the basis for improvement criteria. Deviations from mutually agreed upon
application of CITY standards and/or design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY. Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOT standards as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this MASTER
AGREEMENT shall be utilized unless otherwise mutually agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. &C. To actively participate and provide authorized representation at PREDESIGN CHARRETfE , preconstruction
meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development and completion and fiduciary relationships. D. To provide project management of each
Project where County is LEAD AGENCY from commencement to completion of construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redefine project management roles as beneficial
to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA and SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. E. Upon receipt of written request detailing the information requested, to provide information related to the PROJECT
to CITY or CITY'S designee at no cost to the CITY. F. COUNTY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review notes are submitted by COUNTY (if
CITY is filling the role as PROJECT MANAGER) in writing to CITY, plans are approved as submitted. ''Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, as part ofthe project
schedule. G. To submit final engineering plans for review and written approval by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to jtdveJ..1ising for construction. H. To provide for 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠acquisit;ion,
including acquisition by Eminent Domain, of the necessary additional right o,'f way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard ..' requirements and 'utilizing 'existing
public right of way to the maximum extent possible as a PROJECT cost.; j" i ,f 1 I. To require all contractorS to secure all necessary pennits required by CITY on Said construction projects.
. . J. To furnish record, drawings of construction plans for the permanent records of CITY within twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance of the transportation improvement
' PROJECT. ; K. In and for Ten Db11ars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, including the' future obligation! of maintenance, operation, control and acceptance of liability
therefor to transfer, by Quit' Claim Deed, all PROJECT related easements acquired by COUNTY to CITY. L. In the event COUNTY and CITY agree in writing that CITY will be the LEAD AGENCY
for the agreed upon PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs as. detailed in Artidle XI (FUNDING) in an amoimt not to exceed the PROJECT cost' 􀁾􀀠 approved by ,Dallas County
Commissioners Court and incorporated in' the SUPPLEMENTAL ' AGREEMENT. All COUNTY payments shall be in accordance with COUNTY Policies ,and Procedures or as may be mutually agreed between
the parties aDd incorporated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. MASTER AGREEMENT0 11110/00 10 
Article X. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE A. CITY and COUNTY, as specified in Articles VII and IX, respectively, will designate officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette
to be conducted on a mutually agreeable date and location. At least part of this meeting will be conducted on the PROJECT site. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identifY the
general project scope and the general· preferred alignment of the project, and project administration and management roles, to include the PROJECT MANAGER. Additionally, key project
team participants shall be identified at the Predesign Charrette . C. At the conclusion of the Predesign Charrette a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall be produced which outlines the identified
roles and scope for the Project. Artic:le XI. FUNDING A. CITY and COUNTY mutually agree to proportionately fund the DIRECT PROJECT &; PROGRAM costs as agreed by the parties in a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, COUNTY shall bear fifty percent (50%) of the total DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs excluding the ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES,
relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accounting system and other items as specified in this MASTER
AGREEMENT or any SUPPLE;MENTAL AGREEMENT. COUNTY shall not be responsible for any amount of funding .iin ex;cess of the PROJECT not-to-exceed amount as shown in the PROJECT SUPPLl;tMENTi\L
AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, 􀁾􀁉􀁔􀁙􀀠shall bear fifty percentage (50"/0) of all DIRECT PROJECT AND . PROGRAM'cosis. In addition City agrees
to fund all other City cost as·provided herein, including, but nQt limited to, ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, 􀁲􀁥􀁬􀁯􀁣􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁯􀁲􀀠adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BEITERMENT,
INDIRECT COST, DIRECT cost not \ . -. supported by detailed hourly accountmg system and other items as specifiedm this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. . B. Unless otherwise
stated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the milestones for each project shall be (1) preliminary and primary design (2) right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation or adjt&ment and (3)
construction. The LEAD AGENCY shall prepare an estimated cost for each milestone. Upon approval ofthe cost by the other party, each party shall fund its share of the respective milestones
by placing that amount of money in an escrow account or otherwise encumber the funds to insure that the LEAD AGENCY will have sufficient funding available from current revenue fur the
timely payment of PROJECT milestone costs. The LEAD AGENCY may bill the other party for periodic payments for the actual amount of work completed-toward the completion ofthe milestone.
Upon completion of the milestone, the nOnmanagement party will be furnished a notice that such work has been comPleted and allthe amount of funding that may be: utilized to pay subsequent
milestone i Project cost. Notwithstanding any other term or condition contained herein or or in any SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT, neither party will be required to award any contract until j.vritten
certification has been received that funding fer the flrojeet has been eeRifiea in vlrifing te luwe eeen placed MASJER AGREEMENT-11110/00 11 
in eSCrow or encumbered for the payment ofthe non-awarding party's portion ofthe PROJECT cost. C. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT sball exceed the not-to-exceed amount, CITY
and COUNTY agree to either reduce the scope of construction or seek additional funding to complete the PROJECT at the agreed upon cost share percentages. At the termination of the PROJECT,
the LEAD AGENCY will do a final cost accounting ofthe PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by either party exceeds its portion ofthe actual cost, the difference will be remitted
to such party. In the event that additional funds are due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such funds within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofsuch billing. D.
If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY based on invoices fur actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. E. Upon execution of a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, CITY sball escrow an amount adequate for initial project costs which COUNTY may use to to pay for initial professional services required fur scoping, preliminary, and primary
design. Article xu. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT. It is expressly understood and agreed that enfurcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all right of action
relating to such enfurcement sball be strictly reserved to CITY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement sball give or allow any claim or right ofaction whatsoever by any other
person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services or benefits under this agreement sball be
deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement 􀁾 intended only to set furth the contractual right and responsibilities, ofthe agreement parties. Article XII. 'RIGHT OF ENTRY
!. \ { . The CITY agrees that COUNTY sball have the right to enter upon the PROJECT area fur the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. CITY agrees to furnish such
police or other CITY personnel as requested BY COUNTY fur traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. , ' 􀁁􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁣􀁬􀁥􀀠XIV. LIST OF PROJECTS
, CITY agrees that it has been furnished with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, subject to the agreement between the parties of
a , SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. CITY stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and descnbes the type 'of project
in sufficient detiill that the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects heing considered. ' MAS1ER AGREEMENT-11110/00 12 
Article XV. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all matters pertinent thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with tbe laws ofthe State
ofTexas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity,
Title 5 ofTexas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable State of Texas and Federal laws. B. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties hereto as herein provided. C. Severability. Ifany provision ofthis Agreement shall be
held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall not be affilcted or impaired, and such remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. D. DeCaultlWaiverlMitigat
ion. It is not a waiver ofdefiwIt ifthe non-defaulting party fails to declare immedistely a defauh or delays in taking any action. Pursuit ofany remedies set forth in this Agreement
does not preclude pursuit ofother remedies in this Agreement or provided by law. E. Federal or State ofTens Funding. In the event that any work or part thereofis funded by State ofTexas
or U. S. Government funding and any statute, rule, regulation, grant, contract provision or other State ofTexas or U. S. Government law, rule, regulation or other provision imposes additional
or greater requirement(s) than stated herein, City agrees to timely comply therewith without additional cost or expense to County. F. Headings. The titles which are used following the
number ofeach paragraph are only for convenience in locating various provisions ofthis AGREEMENT and shall not be deemed to affect the interpretation or construction ofsuch provisioa
G. Number and Gender. Words ofany gender used in this AGREEMENT shall be held and construed to include any other gender; and words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa,
unless the text clearly requires otherwise. . -;" : ; H. Counternarts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in multiple counterparts, (;lach ofwhich shall be deemed an original, but all ofwhich
shall conStitute one and the same instrument. MASTERAGREEMENT-ll/l0/OO 13 
The City of_____.;>. State ofTexas, has executed the AgRement pursuant to duly authorized City Council Resolution ____--', Minutes'--_______Dated the __day of__--", 200_. The County
of DaUas, State ofTexas, has executed this agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number _____and passed on the __day of___----', CITyOF _________ COUNTY OF DALLAS By__====______________
􀁂􀁹􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽 TITLE LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM: CI=-TY:-:-S:'::E-:"C"'"RE"""T=-AR-"""y"--A\ -T....T....O.. --RNE="'""y John Dahill, Advisory
Chief, Civil Section DaUas County District Attorney MASTERAGREEMENT-ll/10/00 14 
2000 Dallas County Call For Projects APPLICATION INFORMATION Submitting Agency: Town ofAddison Contact Person: Jim Pierce. P.E •• Assistant City Engineer Address: P.O. Box 9010 Addison
TX 75001-9010 Telephone: 9721450-2879 Facsimile: 972/450-2834 e-mail address: jpierq@ci.addison.tx.us PROJECT INFORMATION Location: Arapaho Rd. MAPSCO: 14 A, B, C Beginning: Addison
Rd. Project Length: 1.02 Ending: Su rveyor Blvd. Avg. Posted Speed: 40 mph, Avg. Operating Speed: N/A Functional Classification: R Traffic Volume: N/A # of Correctable Accidents: 64
(on Belt Line Rd.) Traffic Volume Source: N/A (over past 3 years) Existing Proposed Through lanes o 4 Left turn lanes o 1 Right turn lanes o o Sidcwalks o o Bicycle lanes o o Description
of Proposed Improvement(s): This is Phase mof a three phase project. Phase I was realignment and improvement of Arapaho Road from Dallas Parkway to Addison Road. Phase II will be construction
of Arapaho Road from Marsh Lane to Surveyor Blvd., which will take place prior to 2004. This project (Phase D1) will construct a new section of Arapaho Road from Surveyor Blvd. to Addison
Road (see attached plan). The roadway will be 2 lanes in each direction, undivided, except at the intersections with Addison Road and Surveyor Blvd., which will have left turn lanes.
The intersection with Midway Road will consist of an overpass with no entrance or exit ramps. The purpose of this project is to reduce traffic congestion on Belt line Road (reliever
road or Belt Line by-pass). This projcct will benefit the bus routes on Belt Line Road by reducing congestion. This is our number 3 priority project for this program. While we would
like a 10% match from Dallas County, we realize this would put pressure on available funds. If it would help secure funding, the Town would be willing to contribute 95% to the project.
We believe this project will reduce traffic on Belt Line Road and will therefore reduce accidents 00 Belt Line Road by 15%. PROJECT COST INFORMATION Total Project Cost: $14,328,120 Right-of-way
Cost: $ 3,180,000 EngineeringlDesign 􀁃􀁯􀁾􀀱􀀺􀀠 $ 1,230,000 Utility Cost: $ 289,200 Construction Cost: $ 9,628,920 Local Cost Contribution: S In percent of total cost 90 % 
2000 Dallas County Call For Projects APPliCATION INFORMATION Submitting Agency: Contact Person: Address: Town of Addison Jim Pierce, P.E., Assistant City Engineer P.O. Box 9010 Addison
TX 75001-9010 Telephone: 972/450-2879 Facsimile: 972/450-2834 e-mail address: 􀁩􀁰􀁩􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁾􀁣􀁩􀀮􀁡􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁳􀁯􀁮􀀮􀁴􀁸􀀮􀁵􀁳􀀠 PROJECT INFORMATION Location: Midway Road MAPSCO: 14K,
F & B; 4X Beginning: Spring Valley Road Project Length: 1.75 miles Ending: Dooley Road Avg. Posted Speed: 40 mpb Avg. Operating Speed: 16.8 mpb Functional Classification: R Traffic Volume:
51,074 # of Correctable Accidents: 21 Traffic Volume Source: Count 8199 (over past 3 years) Existing Proposed Through lanes 3 3 Left turn lanes 1 1 Right turn lanes 1 1 Sidewalks o Bicycle
lanes o °o Deseri tion of Proposed Improvernent(.): This project provides for retiDling 􀁴􀁃􀁨􀁏􀀢􀀧􀁥􀀢􀀧􀁥􀀺􀀢􀁘􀀱􀀷􀀢􀂷􀁳􀀢􀀢􀁴􀁩􀀺􀀭􀁮􀀭􀁧􀀢􀀧􀀺􀀱􀀢􀀧􀀴􀀧􀀭􀁹􀀭􀁥􀀭􀁡􀀭􀁲􀀭􀁯􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁤􀀭􀀽􀀭􀁣􀁯􀁯�
�􀁲􀀭􀁤􀀺􀀻􀁩􀁮􀀭􀀮􀀭􀀺􀁴􀀭􀁥􀁤􀀢􀀭􀁳􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁧􀁮􀀭􀁡􀁬􀀧􀀭􀁳􀁹􀀭􀁳􀁴􀀢􀀧􀁥􀀭􀁭􀀭􀀭􀁡􀀱􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁮􀀧􀁾􀁧􀀭􀁍􀀽􀁩􀀢􀀢􀁤􀁷􀀭􀁡􀁹􀀭􀀻􀀻􀁒􀀺􀀺􀀭􀁯􀀭􀁡􀀭􀀺􀁤􀀭􀀺􀁦􀀺􀀭􀁲􀁯􀀭􀁭􀀭􀀭 Spring Valley
Road to Dooley Road (see attached plllJl). Timing plans for the AM, PM, Off-Peak, lIJId Friday PM Peak periods will be prepared for each intersection. The signal bardware at eacb intersection
will be upgraded to include video detection, TS-2 cabincts, and TS-2 controllers. Additional pbooe drops will also be installed to provide a communicatioos link to the traffic service
ceoter. Existing bardwire interconnect cables will be used to maintain communication between the signal controllers. Associated work wiD include installation of new conduit and wiring
at each intersection. Tbe existing power source for each location will be used. For this section of road, we bave bad a total of 141 accidents in the last 3 years. We believe retiming
will improve traffic now, and we estimate accidents will be rednced by 15%. This is our number 5 priority project for tbis program. ______________-' PROJECT COST INFORMATION Total Project
Cost: $392,000 Right-of-way Cost: $ 0 EngineeringIDesign Cost: $ 52,000 Utility Cost: $ ° Construction Cost: $340,000 Local Cost Contribution: $ in percent of total cost 50 % 
Zq COURT ORDER ORDBR-NO: 2000 2111 DATE: 0CT 1 7 2000 STATEOFlEXAS § COUNTY Of'DALLAS § BE IT REMEMBERED. at II resular meeting of the Corn:mlssioners Court of Dallas County. Texas,
held on 􀁾􀀠 _____!Lth ____day of____ . __Qs:.to.!:!E.____• 2000, on motion made by Mike 􀁴􀁴􀁴􀀢􀁥􀁬􀀱􀁾􀁥􀀽 ::; ;;f . and secondod · by Ii.eiili A. MaSllt. 114 • the following Order
was adopted: WHEREAS•. Commissioners COurt was brieCed on October 10, 2000 regarding recommended Transportation Improvemen\ Proj eels to be considered for fUnding from the: Major Capital
Development Fund for conslnlction in fiscal · years 2004 tIw 2007; and WHEREAS, 'continued lind forecast population and employment growth in Dallas County places increasing demands on
· the COunty'S:surface tranIlportation system; and WHEREAS. Dallas County has II 􀁬􀁯􀁮􀁾􀀠slan<ling role in providing transponatic;m system improvements for the benefit of ill citizenS
and the public travelina In Dallas County; and WHEREAS, Dallas County desires to implement needed transpor1ation system improvements in partnership with the cities and otlj,er tnlllSportation
agencies in Dallas County; and . WHEREAS,: the specific Transportation System Improvement 􀁐􀁾􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁳􀀠included in the attached listing have been · identified thtough an extensive
data gathering and evaluation process and in conjunction with the DaUas County cities for funding 􀁾􀁤 Implementation in the FY 2001· 2007 timoperiod; WHl!R.EAS.it is the intent oltho
Commiseioners Court that the pro)ecta included in the attached listing be implemented with joint fi\ndini 'by the County and the cities and other agencies, and that County participation
be limited to the percenlaiCi 􀁾􀁨􀁯􀁷􀁮 in the listings, not to ell!:eed the total COunty amounts shown for eaoh project without prior approval ofthe Comnjiss\oners Court. IT IS UlER13FORE
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Dallas County Commissioners Com he!eby approves 􀁴􀁨􀁾􀀠spccifi(l projects Identified in the attached listing for fUnding from the. Dallas County
County Major Capital Development Fund in the percentages and mllltimum amounts shown in the listing for County fUnding. _--"1""7th,,,,,-_(!ay Of.____-:-.-"O.C...t.Q...􀁾.. 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀮􀀭􀀻.
􀁏2000. 􀁌􀀭􀀭􀁁􀁾􀁡􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠 Mike Cantrell Commissioner,, DiBble! #2 c , Disble! #3 􀁄􀁾􀀡􀁬􀁩􀁗􀁾􀀮􀀠 Director of Publio Works 
,iI ,,I I ! 'I l j 1 i 1 I '1, I i I II 
• 
\ \, " I \ \ ". \ \ 9B"d 
..... 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁲􀀮􀁲􀁾􀁔􀁔􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 \ \ \ \ \ 1 I 
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: __􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁪􀁾􀁏􀁾􀀨___________ SENT BY: 􀀦􀀺􀁬􀀼􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀠 c.......I' .. ')"-DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 411 ELM STREET, 4TH FLOOR
DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 Phone: 214-653-7151 Fax: 214-653-6445 COj\lJ'PANY: c..;."'1 •./" 4.u..'a_ FAXNUMBER: :z. ,./, II 1-'L., 1... Ift PHQNENO.: NO, OF PAGES (lnc. Cover Sheet): 􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁊􀀮􀀱􀀭􀀽􀀭􀀭�
�􀁾__ \ \ \ \ \ Plea.,s e call 214-653-7151 ifthere are any difliculties or problems in the transmission ofthis fax. , .. ... .. --" ...-" .. \ \ \ \ , \ \, COMMENTS: 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS ANGELA K. WASHINGTON 214.672.2144 AWASHINGTON@COWLESTHOMPSON.COM May 3, 2002 Mr. Steve Chutchian Assistant City Engineer
Town ofAddison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 RE: Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects Dear Steve: Enclosed please find the finalized Master
Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects, which I obtained today from Dallas County. I have reviewed it as requested by the County to ensure that no substantive
changes were made between the final and the previous draft Ifyou have any questions, please give me a call. AKW/yjr Enclosure c: Mr. Ken C. Dippel, City Attorney (w/o Enclosure) 901
MAIN STREET sunE 4000 DALLAS, TEXAS 􀀷􀁓􀀲􀀰􀀲􀂷􀀳􀀷􀁾􀀳􀀠 o ALL A S T Y L E R TEL 214.072.2000 FAX 214.672.2020 Do.:llmclll"lf 999860 WWW.COWLESTHOMPSON.COM 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELORS ANGELA K. WASHINGTON 214.67221« AWASHINGTON@COWLESTHOMPSON.COM May 3, 2002 Mr. W. Bowen Weems Assistant District
Attorney Criminal District Attorney's Office Administration Building, 5th Floor 411 Elm Street, Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75202 RE: Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital
Improvement Projects Dear Mr. Weems: ., I obtained the Master Capital Improvement Agreement from your office today. As yoy requested, I have reviewed the document to ensure that there
was no change to the content. I am forwarding it to the Town to be placed on the next available council agenda. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. AKW/yjr c: Mr. Steve Chutchian,
wlTown Mr. Ken C. Dippel, City Attorney 901 MAjN STREET SUUE 4000 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202<37'1) OAlLAS T Y L E R TEL 214.612.2000 FAX 214,1)72.2020 WWW.COWl.ESTliOMPSON.COM 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS ANGELA K. WASHINGTON 214Ji72..2144 A.WA.SHINGTON@CaWlESTHOMPSON.CQM May 2, 2002 Mr, W, Bowen Weems Assistant District
Attorney Criminal District Attorney's Office Administration Building, 5th Floor 411 Elm Street, Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75202 RE: Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation
Major Capital Improvement Projects Dear Mr, Weems Enclosed for your review is the Town of Addison's proposed Supplemental Agreement to the Master Agreement Governing Transportation Improvements,
As you will note, this Agreement is intended to govern the Arapaho Road Project, which was approved by Dallas County Commissioner's Court Order No, 2000 2117, Please let me know whether
this Agreement is satisfactory to the County, As we discussed, I am ready to pick up the Master Agreement as soon as your supervisor has completed her review, It is our desire to schedule
both agreements for council approval as soon as possible, Thank you for for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you, Sincerely, 􀀯􀁾􀀡􀁮􀁲􀁱􀁾􀀠 AKW/yjr Enclosure
c: Mr, Mike Murphy, Town of Addison (w/Enc.) Mr, Jim Pierce, Town of Addison (w/Enc.) Mr, Steve Chutchian, Town of Addison (w /Ene. ) Mr. Donald Holzwarth, Dallas County Director of
Public Works (w/Ene.) Mr. Ken Dippel, City Attorney (w/Ene.) <tOl MAIl<{ STREET SUITE 4000 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 JIG} o ALL A S T Y L E R TEL 214,672,2000 FAX 214,6722020 www.COWLE STH
(} M? SO III.C 0 M 
DRAFT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT to the MASTER
AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ("MASTER AGREEMENT") is made by and between the Town of Addison, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and the County
of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY," acting by and through its duly authorized officials, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on ARAPAHO ROAD FROM ADDISON ROAD TO
SURVEYOR BOULEVARD inside Dallas County, which is on the North Central Texas Council of Government's Regional Thoroughfare Plan. Article l. INCORPORA TED DOCUMENTS This SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT incorporates the MASTER AGREEMENT authorized by Court Order No. dated , 2002, and A TT ACHMENT A, Design and Construction Criteria, as if each was reproduced herein word for
word. These documents together define the scope of the project with an agreed upon preliminary ., alignment. The MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT was waived by the parties at the 􀁐􀁲􀁥􀁾􀀠 design
Charrette held for this project on October 3, 200 I. As agreed by the parities at said Charrette, the Design and Construction Criteria (ATTACHMENT A) was prepared in lieu of the MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT and said Criteria is hereby approved by COUNTY and agreed upon by the parties. Article II. EFFECTIVE DATE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE WHEN SIGNED BY THE
LAST PARTY WHOSE SIGNING MAKES THE RESPECTIVE AGREEMENT FULLY EXECUTED (THE "EFFECTIVE DATE"). Article III. THE PARTIES COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. CITY shall provide project management
of the Project as designated LEAD AGENCY from commencement of planning to completion of construction. B. CITY shall execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design
and construction of the ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY shall, and does hereby provide City COWlciI Resolution
No. No. R99-039 (ATTACHMENT B), adopting the approved preferred alignment for the project. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-} Oo!:\PTlCflt.l 94J76: 
D. CfTY shall pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary and primary design, such funds to be reimbursed pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT. As City is funding
such initial project costs, Paragraph E of Article XI of the MASTER AGREEMENT, requiring City to escrow an amount adequate for such costs, shall not apply to this project. The Town of
Addison, State of Texas, has executed this Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Council Resolution , Minutes dated the __day of ___ 2002. The County of Dallas, State of Texas,
has executed this Agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed on the __day 2002. TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS BY CfTY MANAGER 􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁎􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁲􀁵􀁄􀁾􀁇􀀽􀀽􀁅􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 ATTEST 􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁲􀁔􀀽􀁙􀁾􀁓􀀽􀁅􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁁􀁒􀁾􀁙􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District Attorney SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-2 Documc:nl' 9Qj162 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III Date: April 2002 PAVEMENT AND ALIGNMENT TOPICS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVING DESIGN CRITERIA NCTCOG Standard Specifications (or Public Works Construction & Town o(Addison Standard Consm,ction
Specifications ROW WIDTH: Existing: _...!..M'-"IA""--___ Proposed: _8!1.l0L'_. 􀁲.􀀢. 􀀡􀀨􀁪􀀼􀁰􀁾􀀮􀁟􀀠 PAVEMENT WIDTH: ., Existing: 􀁐􀁲􀁯􀁰􀁯􀁳􀁥􀁤􀁾􀀠 No. oflanes proposed: PARKWAY:
Proposed Width varies Proposed Sidewalk Width 4' Minimum Parkway cross fall slope maximum 2.08% GRADE REQUIREMENTS: Is TC 6" below adjacent ground criteria to be followed? NO Any deep
cuts, high fills? YES -BRIDGE APPROACHES PAVEMENT CROSS FALL PROPOSED 114 in/O MINIMUM Jl8 in/O MAXIMUM 114 infO 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III VERTICAL GRADE: MINIMUM 0.5% MAXIMUM 6% CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT POSITION: IN CENTER OF EXISTING ROW? NIA OFFSET FROM CENTER NIA ON BRAND NEW ALIGNMENT? YES CRASH CUSHIONS! ATTENTUATORS
INVOLVED YES ___ NO X RAILROAD CROSSINGS INVOLVED YES.---",X,--_ NO ___ NOTE: IF CURRENT CROSSING IS NOT USED, [S ABANDONMENT AN OPTION? YES ___ NO X 2 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental A.:reement to Master Agreement Governin.: Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN WHEEL LOAD 2,700,000 Equivalent 18 000 Ib sini/le axle loads BUS AND HEAVY TRUCK TRAFFIC YES _..LX'--__ NO ROADWAYCLASSIFICA nON MINIMUM PAVEMENT STRUCTURE THICKNESS: 8" MINIMUM PAVEMENT BASE OR SUBGRADE THICKNESS: 6" DESIGN SPEED 45 MPH POSTED SPEED 40 MPH MEDIANS MEDIAN WIDTH 15' iF-FI ANY MID
BLOCK OPENINGS TO CONSIDER? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠 NO ANY SIDE STREETS TOO CLOSE FOR OPENING? YES__ NO_X_ STANDARD TURN LANE WIDTH II' STANDARD NOSE WIDTH 5' " J 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III DRIVEWAYS: MAXIMIMUM RESIDENTIAL GRADE N/A MAXIMIMUM COMMERCIAL GRADE "-,5%,,,-0_ MINIMUM COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WIDTH 26' B-B SIDE STREET CONSIDERATIONS: TURNING RADIUS, MINIMUM 20'
PAVEMENT THICKNESS 6" -8 " -, COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY THICKNESS _-",-6'_'___ DRAINAGE TOPICS STORM SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA: TxDOT CITY X HYDRO-35 TP-40 INLET DEPTHS (APPROPRIATE FOR PAVEMENT
THICKNESS) 4' MINIMUM COVER LATERALS 2 ' , BRIDGESIBOX CULVERTS INVOLVED YES X NO ___ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CONSIDERA nON __",-1_'_ FT FREEBOARD 4 OoeWYlO'lI' 998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III PERMITS COE 404 PERMITS NEEDED YES NO X TNRCC 401 PERMIT YES NO CDC PERMIT YES NO X EIS YES NO ADA PERMIT YES NO X ([(> $50.000 o(pedestrian facilities) ANY OTHER PERMITS FROM OTHER
AGENCIES SUCH AS TXDOT, DFW AIRPORT, DART ETC.? YES 􀀭􀁌􀀡􀁘􀁾___ NO ___ UTILITIES LIST OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES . TXUgas and electric AT&T Southwestern Bell DOCUMENT KNOWN RISKS (TRA
lines, Transmission Towers, Lone Star Gas Valve Stations) FOR OUR UTILITY PARTNERS: ARE UTILITIES ON EXISTING STREET R.O.W.? NIA DO UTILITIES OWN THEIR R.O.W. OR HAVE PREVIOUS EASEMENTS?
YES HAS WORK ORDER BEEN ISSUED FOR SUE (Subsurface Utility Engineering)? No 5 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III ANY UNUSUAL CONSIDERATIONS? _-'N.!.>O"'----___􀁾􀀠 R-O-W ACQUISITION RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS, IF ANY, PROVIDE A LIST AND DESCRIPTION ALONG WITH DATA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: ANY NON-ROUTINE,
i.e., CEMETARY, JUNK YARD, OLD CHURCHES, SERVICE STATIONS, CONTAMINATED SOILS, LANDFILLS, NOISE WALL CONSIDERATIONS, TRAILER PARKS, TREE ORDINANCES? YES X NO ___ ANY NON-CONFORMING ISSUES?
YES ___ NO X R-O-W MAP NEEDED YES -,,-,-X__ NO ___ FIELD NOTES NEEDED YES --""X__ NO ___ R-O-W PLATS NEEDED YES ...d2..__ NO ___ RELOCATION ASSIST ANCE INVOLVED YES ___ NO X PARKINGILOSS
OF PARKING CONSIDERATIONS YES --,,-,-X__ NO ___ HISTORICAL SITE CONSIDERATION YES ___ NO --'--'--_ 6 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III USUAL CITY TOPICS OF CONCERN DESIGN STANDARDS TO BE USED? ORDER OF PRECEDENCE OF STANDARDS. NCTCOG Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction & Town ofAddison Standard
Construction Specifications: Addison. AUXILIARY LANES? NO PROVISIONS FOR FUTURE WIDENING? NO LANDSCAPING? ---",r.E..",-S___ EXPOSED AGGREGATE DRIVEWA YS, SIDEWALKS? . NO ST AMPED!COLORED
CONCRETE? YES IRRIGATION? YES. BRICK PAVERS? YES STREET LIGHTING? YES TRAFFIC SIGNALS? Yes PAVEMENT MARKINGS? Yes. BIKE LANES (EXTRA WIDTH)? No NEW SIDEWALKS? Yes BUS TURNOUTS? No. BUS
STOPS OR BUS SHELTERS? No. WATER UTILITY BETTERMENTS? Minor water line extension. 7 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental A&reement to Master A&reement Governin2 Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III WATER UTILITY REWC.? Yes SAN. SEWER BETTERMENTS? NO SAN. SEWER RELOC.? NO RETAINING WALLS? Yes (STONE, BLOCKS, GABIONS, PROPRlETARY TYPES) SOD, SEEDING, TOPSOIL? __􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀡􀀮􀁂􀁷􀁬􀁯􀀸􀁣􀁾􀁫􀁊􀁊�
�􀁓􀁯􀁾􀁤􀁌􀁬􀁯􀁾􀁮􀁵􀁡􀁷􀁬􀁬􀀢􀀢􀁩􀁭􀁗􀀻􀁰􀁬􀀡􀀭􀀧􀁲􀀮􀀻􀁴􀀮􀁯􀁶􀀮􀀡􀀺􀀡􀁥􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁡􀀡􀀮􀀡􀁲􀁥􀀼􀁦􀀡􀁡􀁾􀁳􀀮􀀠 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS? Install one storm sewer trunk with laterals crossing
under (rom O[2J!osite side inlets. Also. utilize velocity dissipaters at outfall end ofthe two cross-drain 9' x 5 'structures. RR CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS? Yes GRADE SEPARATIONS? Yes RAMPS
OR CONNECTORS TO TXDOT FACILITIES? NO SPECIAL SCHOOL OR EMERGENCY VEHICLE CONSIDERATIONS ANY NEARBY OR ADJACENT SCHOOLS, CITY HALL, FIRE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIRING SPECIAL CONSIDERATION?
NO DOCUMENT POTENTIAL SITES FOR PUBLIC AND OR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. The Stone Cottage 4901 Addison Circle Road PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ALIGNMENT, REQUIRED? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀡􀁬􀀮􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠
NO __ HAVE ALL NEIGHBOR GROUPS PROVIDED EARLY INPUT? YES NIA NO __ 8 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, REQUIRED YES NIA NO ___ IF REQUIRED WHO CONDUCTS, CITY OR COUNTY? City lead with County participation CONSTRUCTIBILITY REPORT FROM INSPECTION STAFF, DOCUMENT
ANY AND ALL ISSUES THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCOPE, BUDGET, CONSTRUCTIBIL TY, THE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND/OR THE SAFETY OF PROJECT? N/A 9 
ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. R99-039 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON. TEXAS, APPROVING THE TECHNICALLY PREFERRED ALIGNMENT FOR ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE 111111. WHEREAS,
the Town desires to further extend Arapaho Road from Addison Road west to Marsh Lane; and WHEREAS, an engineering report entitled Alignment Study for Proposed Al8paho Road ExtenSion,
dated January 1999, was prepared for the Town; and WHEREAS, the Study proposes a Technically Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 111111; and WHEREAS, a depiction of the Technically
Proposed Alignment is attached to this Resolution; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the City Council does hereby approve the Technically
Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 11/111. OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R9S-0SS
ATTACHMENT B DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS. this the 27th day of April, 1999. Mayor ArrEST: 􀁃􀁉􀁖􀁢􀁾􀁜􀁻 City Secretary OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY
R99-039
-----ATTACHMENT B 1-. .,. )5 􀀯􀁾o \:1 U r I PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ( UNDER CONSTRUCTION , ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION )FFIeE OF THE CITY SECRETARY
R99-039 
DRAFT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TIllS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT to the MASTER
AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ("MASTER AGREEMENT") is made by and between the Town of Addison, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and the County
of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY," acting by and through its duly authorized officials, for the purpose of Transportation hnprovements on ARAPAHO ROAD FROM ADDISON ROAD TO
SURVEYOR BOULEVARD inside Dallas County, which is on the North Central Texas Council of Govermnent's Regional Thoroughfare Plan. Article I. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS This SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
incorporates the MASTER AGREEMENT authorized by Court Order No. dated 2002, and ATTACHMENT A, Design and Construction Criteria, as if each was reproduced herein word for word. These
documents together define the scope of the project with an agreed upon preliminary alignment. alignment. The MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT was waived by the parties at the Predesign Charrette
held for this project on October 3, 200 I. As agreed by the parities at said Charrette, the Design and Construction Criteria (ATTACHMENT A) was prepared in lieu of the MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT and said Criteria is hereby approved by COUNTY and agreed upon by the parties. Article II. EFFECTIVE DATE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE WHEN SIGNED BY THE LAST
PARTY WHOSE SIGNING MAKES THE RESPECTIVE AGREEMENT FULLY EXECUTED (THE "EFFECTIVE DATE"). Article III. THE PARTIES COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. CITY shall provide project management
of the Project as designated LEAD AGENCY from commencement ofplanning to completion ofconstruction. B. CITY shall execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and
construction of the ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY shall, and does hereby provide City Council Resolution No.
R99-039 (ATTACHMENT B), adopting the approved preferred alignment for the project. \ SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-l Document #: 9937(11 
· ,. D. CITY shall pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary ".; . and primary design, such funds to be reimbursed pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT. As
City is funding such initial project costs, Paragraph E of Article XI of the MASTER AGREEMENT, requiring City to escrow an amount adequate for such costs, shall not apply to this project.
The Town of Addison, State of Texas, has executed this Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Council Resolution , Minutes dated the __day of ___ 2002. The County of Dallas, State
of Texas, has executed this Agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed on the __day 2002. TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS BY 􀁃􀁾􀁉􀀽􀁔􀁙􀁾􀁍􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁇􀀭􀁅􀀭􀁒􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀀭􀀭 COUNTY JUDGE ATTEST 􀁾􀁃􀁉􀁾􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁓􀀽􀁅􀀽􀁃􀀽􀁒􀁅􀁾􀁔􀁁􀁒􀁾􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District
Attorney \ SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-2 Document #1: 993761 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS ANGELA K WASHINGTON 􀀲􀀱􀀴􀁟􀁾􀀱􀀲􀀮􀀲􀀱􀀴􀀴􀀠 AWASHlNGTON@COWlESTHOMPSON,COM April 25, 2002 Mr. Steve Chutchian
Assistant City Engineer Town of Addison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 RE: Arapaho Road from Addison Road to Surveyor Boulevard Dear Steve: Enclosed for your review is the draft
Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects for the Arapaho Road project. Please give me a call regarding the design and construction
criteria, as there is an issue that we must address prior to forwarding the agreement to the county. Also, if you have any questions or changes to the agreement, p lease let me know.
Sincerely, AKW/yjr Enclosure c: Mr. Jim Pierce (w/Enclosure) Mr. Ken Dippel, City Attorney (w/o Enclosure) 901 MAIN STREET SUITE 40(}O DALLAS, TEXAS 1S2(}2·3793 DALLAS T Y L E R TEL
214.672.200G FAX 214.672.2(}20 WWW.COWLE S THO M PS 0 N .C(}M 
DRAFT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT to the MASTER
AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRAt"lSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ("MASTER AGREEMENT") is made by and between the Town of Addison, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and the County
of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY," acting by and through its duly authorized officials, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on ARAPAHO ROAD FROM ADDISON ROAD TO
SURVEYOR BOULEVARD inside Dallas County, which is on the North Central Texas Council of Government's Regional Thoroughfare Plan. Article I. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS This SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
incorporates the MASTER AGREEMENT authorized by Court Order No. dated , 2002, and ATTACHMENT A, Design and Construction Criteria, as if each was reproduced herein word for word. These
documents together define the scope of the project with an agreed upon preliminary alignment. The MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT was waived by the parties at the Predesign Charrette held for
this project on October 3, 200 I. As agreed by the parities at said Charrette, the Design and Construction Criteria (A TT ACHMENT A) was prepared in lieu of the MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
and said Criteria is hereby approved by COUNTY and agreed upon by the parties. Article II. EFFECTIVE DATE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE WHEN SIGNED BY THE LAST PARTY
WHOSE SIGNING MAKES THE RESPECTIVE AGREEMENT FULLY EXECUTED (THE "EFFECTIVE DATE"). Article III. THE PARTIES COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. CITY shall provide project management of
the Project as designated LEAD AGENCY from commencement of planning to completion ofconstruction. B. CITY shall execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and
construction of the ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY shall, and does hereby provide City Council Resolution No.
R99-039 (ATTACHMENT B), adopting the approved preferred alignment for the project. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-l OccW'lWlli Q9J162 
D. CITY shall pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary and primary design, such funds to be reimbursed pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT. As City is funding
such initial project costs, Paragraph E of Article XI of the MASTER AGREEMENT, requiring City to escrow an amount adequate for such costs, shall not apply to this project. The Town of
Addison, State of Texas, has executed this Agreement pursuant to duly autnorized City Council Resolution , Minutes dated the __day of ___' 2002, The County of Dallas, State of Texas,
nas executed this Agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed on the __day of ,2002. TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS BY BY 􀁃􀀽􀁉􀀽􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁇􀁾􀁅􀁒􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭 􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁎􀁔􀁙􀁾􀁾􀁮􀁊􀁄􀁾􀁇􀀽􀁅􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 ATTEST 􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁉􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁅􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁒􀁅􀀽􀀽􀁔􀁾􀁁􀁒􀁾􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Advisory
Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District Attorney SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-2 [)o(urtWrtl. qlH7o! 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III Date: September 2001 PAVEMENT AND ALIGNMENT TOPICS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVING DESIGN CRITERIA NCTCOG Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction & Town o[Addison Standard
Construction Specifications ROW WIDTH: Existing: _ ...􀁎.􀀮􀀢􀀭􀁉􀁁􀁾_____ Proposed: 􀁟􀁾􀀸􀀰􀁌􀀧􀁟.T.J.(y'o{2",-._ PAVEMENT WIDTH: Existing: __...!.N!.!.,'!aA____ Proposed: 2 -22' No.
oflanes proposed: 4 lane divided PARKWAY: Proposed Width varies Proposed Sidewalk Width 4' Minimum Parkway cross fall slope maximum 2.08% GRADE REQUIREMENTS: Is TC 6" below adjacent
ground criteria to be followed? NO Any deep cuts, high fills? YES-BRIDGE APPROACHES PAVEMENT CROSS FALL PROPOSED 114 in/O MINIMUM 118 in/O MAXIMUM 114 in/O 􀁾􀁴􀁬􀁊􀀠998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III VERTICAL GRADE: MINIMUM 0.5% MAXIMUM 6% CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT POSITION: IN CENTER OF EXISTING ROW? NIA OFFSET FROM CENTER NIA ON BRAND NEW ALIGNMENT? YES CRASH CUSHIONS I A TTENTUATORS
INVOLVED YES ___ NO X RAILROAD CROSSINGS INVOLVED YES--<.X,,--_ NO ___ NOTE: IF CURRENT CROSSING IS NOT USED, IS ABANDONMENT AN OPTION? YES ___ NO ---<J,X__ 2 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN WHEEL LOAD 2,700,000 Equivalent 18,000 Ib single axle loads BUS AND HEAVY TRUCK TRAFFIC YES _--'-X"--__ NO ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION MINIMUM PAVEMENT STRUCTURE
THICKNESS: 8" MINIMUM PAVEMENT BASE OR SUBGRADE TIDCKNESS: 6" DESIGN SPEED 45 MPH POSTED SPEED 40 MPH MEDIANS MEDIAN WIDTH 15' (F-FI , ANY MID BLOCK OPENINGS TO CONSIDER? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠
NO ___ ANY SIDE STREETS TOO CLOSE FOR OPENING? YES,__ NO ". STANDARD TURN LANE WIDTH 11 ' STANDARD NOSE WIDTH 5 ' 3 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III DRIVEWAYS: MAXIMIMUM RESIDENTIAL GRADE N/A MAXIMIMUM COMMERCIAL GRADE ·",-,5'X:.I/..0_ MINIMUM COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WIDTH 26' B-B SIDE STREET CONSIDERATIONS: TURNING RADIUS, MINIMUM
20 ' PAVEMENT THICKNESS 6" -8 " COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY THICKNESS _--1L____ DRAINAGE TOPICS STORM SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA: TxDOT CITY __.<>.X____ HYDRO-35 TP-40 INLET DEPTHS (APPROPRIATE FOR
PAVEMENT THICKNESS) 4 ' MINIMUM COVER LATERALS 2 '. BRIDGESIBOX CULVERTS INVOLVED YES----"'X__ NO ___ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CONSIDERATION __.1....'_ _ FT FREEBOARD 4 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III PERMITS COE 404 PERMITS NEEDED YES __ NO --"'''--_ TNRCC 401 PERMIT YES ___ NO ---""'--_ CDC PERMIT NO X EIS YES,--:-::-NO X ADA PERMIT YES -"'X'-----'G""lf...:;>....;$""5""O"",O""'OO"-""o..f.V."
"ed""'e""'St"'n""a'-'.n""fa""cI""'li""tieos"",,,1 NO __ ANY OTHER PERMITS FROM OTHER AGENCIES SUCH AS TXDOT, DFW AIRPORT, DART ETC.? YES X (DART) NO ___ UTILITIES LIST OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES
, TXU gas and electric AT&T Southwestern Bell DOCUMENT KNOWN RISKS (TRA lines, Transmission Towers, Lone Star Gas Valve Stations) FOR OUR UTILITY PARTNERS; ARE UTILITIES ON EXISTING
STREET R.O.W.? NIA DO UTILITIES OWN THEIR R.O.W. OR HAVE PREVIOUS EASEMENTS? YES HAS WORK ORDER BEEN ISSUED FOR SUE (Subsurface Utility Engineering) ? No 5 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Alreement to Master Alreement Governinl Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III ANY UNUSUAL CONSIDERATIONS? _-'N.uO"--___􀁾􀀠 R-O-W ACQUISITION RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS, IF ANY, PROVIDE A LIST AND DESCRIPTION ALONG WITH DATA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: ANY NON-ROUTINE,
i.e" CEMETARY, JUNK YARD, OLD CHURCHES, SERVICE STATIONS, CONTAMINATED SOILS, LANDFILLS, NOISE WALL CONSIDERATIONS, TRAILER PARKS, TREE ORDINANCES? YES X NO ___ ANY NON-CONFORMING ISSUES?
YES ___ NO X R-O-W MAP NEEDED YES--",__ NO ___ FIELD NOTES NEEDED YES --"",-X__ NO ___ R-O-W PLATS NEEDED YES 􀁾􀁘􀀮􀀺􀁌􀀭􀁟􀀠 NO ___ RELOCATION ASSISTANCE INVOLVED YES ___ NO --''''--_
P ARKINGILOSS OF PARKING CONSIDERATIONS YES --",-X__ NO ___ HISTORICAL SITE CONSIDERATION YES ___ NO ----£."--_ 6 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Aareement to Master Aareement Governina Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapabo Road, Phase
III USUAL CITY TOPICS OF CONCERN DESIGN STANDARDS TO BE USED? ORDER OF PRECEDENCE OF STANDARDS. NCTCOG Standard Specifications fOr Public Works Construction & Town o[Addison Standard
Construction Specifications: Addison. AUXILIARY LANES? NO PROVISIONS FOR FUTURE WIDENING? NO LANDSCAPING? ---'YL£E"",S___ EXPOSED AGGREGATE DRIVEWA YS, SIDEWALKS? . NO STAMPED/COLORED
CONCRETE? YES IRRIGATION? YES. BRICK PAVERS? YES STREET LIGHTING? YES TRAFFIC SIGNALS? Yes PAVEMENT MARKINGS? Yes. BIKE LANES (EXTRA WIDTH)? No NEW SIDEWALKS? Yes BUS TURNOUTS'? No.
BUS STOPS OR BUS SHELTERS? No. WATER UTILITY BETTERMENTS? Minor water line extension. WATER UTILITY RELOC.? Yes 1 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III SAN. SEWER BETTERMENTS? NO SAN. SEWER RELOC.? NO RETAINING WALLS? Yes (STONE, BLOCKS, GAB IONS, PROPRIETARY TYPES) SOD, SEEDING, TOP SOIL? __-",B'-'.\lo",c,,-k􀀢􀀢􀁓􀁯􀀢􀀢􀁤􀀬􀀭􀀬􀁯􀀢􀀬􀁮􀀬􀀭􀀢􀁡
􀁾􀁬􀁬􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀬..􀁩.􀁭..􀀠pi<!.r.!<.ov""e.d.-.", ar,-"e"",as,,,-. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS? Install only one storm sewer trunk with laterals crossing under from oPJlOsite side inlets. Also.
utilize velocity dissipaters at outtall end oCthe two crossdrain structures. RR CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS? Yes GRADE SEPARATIONS? RAMPS OR CONNECTORS TO TXDOT FACILITIES? NO SPECIAL SCHOOL
OR EMERGENCY VEHICLE CONSIDERATIONS ANY NEARBY OR ADJACENT SCHOOLS, CITY HALL, FIRE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUlRlNG SPECIAL CONSIDERATION? NO . DOCUMENT POTENTIAL SITES FOR PUBLIC AND
OR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. The Stone Cottage 4901 Addison Circle Road PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ALIGNMENT, REQUIRED? YES -!.b..__ NO __ HAVE ALL NEIGHBOR GROUPS PROVIDED
EARLY INPUT? YES NIA NO __ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, REQUIRED YES NIA NO ___ 8 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III IF REQUIRED WHO CONDUCTS, CITY OR COUNTY? City lead with County participation CONSTRUCTIBILITY REPORT FROM INSPECTION STAFF, DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL ISSUES THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCOPE,
BUDGET, CONSTRUCTIBIL TY, THE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND/OR THE SAFETY OF PROJECT? 9 
ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. R99-039 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TECHNICALLY PREFERRED ALIGNMENT FOR ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE 111111. WHEREAS,
the Town desires to further extend Arapaho Road from Addison Road west to Marsh Lane; and WHEREAS, an engineering report entitled Alignment Study for Proposed Atepaho Road Extension,
dated January 1999, was prepared for the Town; and WHEREAS, the Study proposes a Technically Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 1/1111; and WHEREAS, a depiction of the Technically
Proposed Alignment is attached to this Resolution; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the City Council does hereby approve the Technically
Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 111111. OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R99-039
ATTACHMENT B DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON. TEXAS. this the 27th day of April. 1999. Mayor ATIEST: CI'/bRel\{ City Secretary OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R99-039
-----ATTACHMENT B '-IT ).5 􀁊􀁾􀀠 8 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮-􀀺􀁾􀀠. .'&t I ( \ \ i,, I PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION ( UNOER CONSTRUCTION
) OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R99-039 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Prohsslonal Corporation ATTORN"YS AND COUNS"lORS ANGELA K. WASHINGTON 21ol612.2144 AWASliING'tON@COWLESTHOMPSON.COM April 25, 2002 Mr. Steve Chutchian Assistant City
Engineer Town of Addison P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001-9010 RE: Arapaho Road from Addison Road to Surveyor Boulevard Dear Steve: Enclosed for your review is the draft Supplemental
Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projeets for the Arapaho Road project. Please give me a call regarding the design and construetion criteria,
as there is an issue that we must address prior to forwarding the agreement to the county. Also, if you have any questions or changes to the agreement, please let me know. Sincerely,
AKW/yjr Enclosure c: Mr. Jim Pierce (w/Enciosure) Mr. Ken Dippel, City Attorney (w/o Enclosure) 901 MAIN STREET SUITE 40{)0 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202-3793 D ALL A S T Y L " R TEL 214.672.2000
FAX 214.672.2020 WWW,COWLESTHOMPSON COM Document 11' 99872g 
DRAFT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT to the MASTER
AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ("MASTER AGREEMENT") is made by and between the Town of Addison, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and the COlUlty
of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY," acting by and through its duly authorized officials, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on ARAPAHO ROAD FROM ADDISON ROAD TO
SURVEYOR BOULEVARD inside Dallas COlUlty, which is on the North Central Texas Council of Government's Regional Thoroughfare Plan. Article I. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS This SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT incorporates the MASTER AGREEMENT authorized by Court Order No. dated , 2002, and ATTACHMENT A, Design and Construction Criteria, as if each was reproduced herein word for
word. These documents together define the scope of the project with an agreed upon preliminary alignment. The MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT was waived by the parties at the Predesign Charrette
held for this project on October 3, 2001. As agreed by the parities at said Charrette, the Design and Construction Criteria (ATTACHMENT A) was prepared in lieu of the MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
and said Criteria is hereby approved by COUNTY and agreed upon by the parties. Article II. EFFECTIVE DATE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE WHEN SIGNED BY THE LAST PARTY
WHOSE SIGNING MAKES THE RESPECTIVE AGREEMENT FULLY EXECUTED (THE "EFFECTIVE DATE"). Article III. THE PARTIES COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. CITY shall provide project management of
the Project as designated LEAD AGENCY from commencement of planning to completion of construction. B. CITY shall execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and
construction of the ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY shall, and does hereby provide City Council Resolution No.
R99-039 (ATTACHMENT B), adopting the approved preferred alignment for the project. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-I !)o(:wnCf\1 If: 993162 
D. CITY shall pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary and primary design, such funds to be reimbursed pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT. As City is funding
such initial project costs, Paragraph E of Article XI of the MASTER AGREEMENT, requiring City to escrow an amount adequate for such costs, shall not apply to this project. The Town of
Addison, State of Texas, has executed this Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Couneil Resolution , Minutes dated the __day of ___ 2002. The County of Dallas, State of Texas,
has executed this Agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed on the __day 2002. TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS BY BY 􀁃􀀽􀁉􀀽􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁇􀀽􀁅􀁒􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
􀁾􀁃􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁕􀁎􀀽􀀽􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁊􀁕􀁄􀁾􀁇􀀽􀁅􀀽􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 ATTEST 􀁾􀁃􀁉􀀽􀁔􀁃􀁃􀁃􀁹􀀭􀁃􀁓􀀽􀁅􀁃􀁒􀁅􀁔ARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas
County District Attorney SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT-ARAPAHO ROAD PROJECT PAGE-l i)o;::umcmlt 9931
62 ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III Date: September 2001 PAVEMENT AND ALIGNMENT TOPICS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVING DESIGN CRITERIA NCTCOG Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction & Town ofAddisqn Standard
Construction SpeCifications ROW WIDTH: Existing: _.1JN'-""IA»-___ Proposed: 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀬􀁂􀁾􀁏􀀬􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁔􀁷􀁾􀀢􀀢􀁶􀁾􀀮_ PAVEMENT WIDTH: Existing: __LN""i'A»-___ Proposed: 2 -22' No. oflanes
proposed: 4Ian€!.,.,dl"'·VI""d""ed'--__ PARKWAY: Proposed Width varies Proposed Sidewalk Width 4 • Minimum Parkway cross fall slope maximum 2.0B% GRADE REQUIREMENTS: Is TC 6" below adjacent
ground criteria to be followed? NO Any deep cuts, high fills? YES -BRIDGE APPROACHES PAVEMENT CROSS FALL PROPOSED 114 inlft MINIMUM liB inlft MAXIMUM 114 inlft Docml1tnt fI: 998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental 􀁁􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴 to Master 􀁁􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁭􀁥􀁮􀁴􀀠􀁇􀁯􀁶􀁥􀁲􀁮􀁩􀁮􀁾􀀠 Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT
NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase III VERTICAL GRADE: MINIMUM 0,5% MAXIMUM CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT POSITION: IN CENTER OF EXISTING ROW? NIA OFFSET FROM CENTER NIA ON BRAND NEW ALIGNMENT? YES CRASH
CUSHIONS I ATTENTUATORS INVOLVED YES __ RAILROAD CROSSINGS INVOL VED 􀁙􀁅􀁓􀀭􀀭􀁯􀂣􀀡􀁘􀁾􀁟􀀠 NO ___ NOTE: IF CURRENT CROSSING IS NOT USED, IS ABANDONMENT AN OPTION? YES ___ NO --"'__
2 Docurn<!nt If: 9985110 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN WHEEL LOAD 2,700.000 Equivalent 18.000 Ib sinfl/e axle loads BUS AND HEAVY TRUCK TRAFFIC YES _""""-___ NO _____ ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION MINIMUM PAVEMENT
STRUCTURE THICKNESS: 8" MINIMUMPAVEMENTBASEORSUBGRADETHICKNESS: 6" DESIGN SPEED 45 MPH POSTED SPEED 40 MPH MEDIANS MEDIAN WIDTH /5' (F-FI ANY MID BLOCK OPENINGS TO CONSIDER? YES -"'-__
NO ANY SIDE STREETS TOO CLOSE FOR OPENING? YES__ NO ........ " STANDARD TURN LANE WIDTH STANDARD NOSE WIDTH 3 Dooumrnl Ii: 99'8580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to MasterAgreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase III DRIVEWAYS: MAXIMIMUM RESIDENTIAL GRADE N/A
MAXIMIMUM COMMERCIAL GRADE ·.5.'Y. c'-\!..o_ MINIMUM COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WIDTH 26' B-B SIDE STREET CONSIDERATIONS: TURNING RADIUS, MINIM1.JM 20 ' PAVEMENT THICKNESS 6" -8 " COMMERCIAL
DRIVEWAY THICKNESS _----"-6'_'___ DRAINAGE TOPICS STORM SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA: TxDOT CITY HYDRO-35 TP-40 INLET DEPTHS (APPROPRIATE FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESS) _:L-_ MINIM1.JM COVER LATERALS
2 '. BRIDGESIBOX CULVERTS INVOL VED 􀁙􀁅􀁓􀀭􀀭􀀢􀀢􀁘􀁾􀁟􀀠 NO ___ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CONSIDERATION FTFREEBOARD 4 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III PERMITS COE 404 PERMITS NEEDED YES NO X TNRCC 401 PERMIT YES NO CDC PERMIT YES NO X EIS YES NO ADA PERMIT YES X (If> $50,000 ofpedestrian facilities) NO ANY OTHER PERMITS FROM OTHER
AGENCIES SUCH AS TXDOT, DFW AIRPORT, DART ETC,? YES X (DART) NO ___ UTILITIES LIST OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES TXU gas and electric AT&T Southwestern Bell DOCUMENT KNOWN RISKS (TRA lines,
Transmission Towers, Lone Star Gas Valve Stations) FOR OUR UTILITY PARTNERS: ARE UTILITIES ON EXISTING STREET R.O.W.? NIA DO UTILITIES OWN THEIR R.O.W. OR HAVE PREVIOUS EASEMENTS? HAS
WORK ORDER BEEN ISSUED FOR SUE (Subsurface Utility Engineering) ? No 5 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Al:reement to Master Al:reement Governinl: Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III ANY UNUSUAL CONSIDERATIONS ? _---'-N-'-'O"-----___􀁾􀀠 R-O-W ACQUISITION RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS, IF ANY, PROVIDE A LIST AND DESCRIPTION ALONG WITH DATA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: ANY
NON-ROUTINE, i.e., CEMETARY, JUNK YARD, OLD CHURCHES, SERVICE STATIONS, CONTAMINATED SOILS, LANDFILLS, NOISE WALL CONSIDERATIONS, TRAILER PARKS, TREE ORDINANCES? YES X NO ___ ANY NON-CONFORMING
ISSUES? YES ___ NO X R-O-W MAP NEEDED YES X NO FIELD NOTES NEEDED YES X NO R-O-W PLATS NEEDED YES X NO RELOCATION ASSISTANCE INVOLVED YES NO X PARKINGILOSS OF PARKING CONSIDERATIONS
YES X NO HISTORICAL SITE CONSIDERATION YES NO X 6 Document II: 998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Al:reement to Master Al:reement Governinl: Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III USUAL CITY TOPICS OF CONCERN DESIGN STANDARDS TO BE USED? ORDER OF PRECEDENCE OF STANDARDS. NCTCOG Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction & Town ofAddison Standard
Construction Specifications; Addison. AUXILIARY LANES? NO PROVISIONS FOR FUTURE WIDENING? NO LANDSCAPING? ----'Y"'=E""S___ EXPOSED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS? . NO STAMPED/COLORED
CONCRETE? YES IRRIGATION? YES. BRICK PAVERS? YES STREET LIGHTING? YES TRAFFIC SIGNALS? Yes PAVEMENT MARKINGS? Yes. BIKE LANES (EXTRA WIDTH)? No NEW SIDEWALKS? Yes BUS TURNOUTS? No. BUS
STOPS OR BUS SHELTERS? No. WATER UTILITY BETTERMENTS? Minor water line extension. WATER UTILITYRELOC.? Yes 7 Document #; 998!iKO 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III SAN. SEWER BETTERMENTS? NO SAN. SEWER RELOC.? NO RETAINING WALLS? Yes (STONE, BLOCKS, GABIONS, PROPRIETARY TYPES) SOD, SEED ING, TOPSOIL? __-"B"'lo""c"'k-"S""od"-"'!on"-a"'I!....lz"'·m!,#p:!Jro"-
'v""ed.....,.,ar"'e""'-'.as. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS? Install onlv one storm sewer trunk with laterals crossing under trom opposite side inlets. Also. utilize velocitv dissipaters at outfall
end ofthe two crossdrain structures. RR CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS? Yes GRADE SEPARATIONS? Yes RAMPS OR CONNECTORS TO TXDOT FACILITIES? NO SPECIAL SCHOOL OR EMERGENCY VEHICLE CONSIDERATIONS
ANY NEARBY OR ADJACENT SCHOOLS, CITY HALL, FIRE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIRING SPECIAL CONSIDERATION? NO DOCUMENT POTENTIAL SITES FOR PUBLIC AND OR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. The Stone Cottage
4901 Addison Circle Road PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ALIGNMENT, REQUIRED? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠 NO __ HAVE ALL NEIGHBOR GROUPS PROVIDED EARLY INPUT? YES NIA NO __ NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING, REQUIRED YES NIA NO ___ 8 Documenlll: 998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Aereement to Master Aereement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
III IF REQUIRED WHO CONDUCTS, CITY OR COUNTY? City lead with County participation CONSTRUCTIBILITY REPORT FROM INSPECTION STAFF, DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL ISSUES THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCOPE,
BUDGET, CONSTRUCTIBILTY, TIlE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND/OR THE SAFETY OF PROJECT? 9 Docvmwt 11: 9985&0 
ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. R99..Q39 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TECHNICALLY PREFERRED ALIGNMENT FOR ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE 11/111. WHEREAS,
the Town desires to further extend Arapaho Road from Addison Road west to Marsh Lane; and WHEREAS, an engineering report entitled Alignment study for Proposed Arapaho Road Extension,
dated January 1999, was prepared for the Town; and WHEREAS, the Study proposes a Technically Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 111111; and WHEREAS, a depiction ofthe Technically
Proposed Alignment is attached to this Resolution; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: THAT, the City Council does hereby approve the Technically
Preferred Alignment for Arapaho Road Phase 11/111. OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R99-039 
ATTACHMENT B DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS, this the 27th day of April, 1999. Mayor ATIEST:C 1'/kP!:i\{ City Secretary OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY R99-039

ATTACHMENT B Keller Spr;nqs V"O VoI.yVI ------PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION PROPOSED ARAPAHO ROAD PHASE I ARAPAHO ROAD EXTENSION ( UNDER CONSTRUCTION ) OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY
R99-039 I 
4/26/02 Jim -Angela Washington is ready to forward our Supplemental Agreement to Dallas COWlty, regarding the Arapaho Rd., Phase ill project. However, she asked that we look it over
one more time and see if it needs any updating, because the original date of preparation is September 2001. I will be reporting for Jury Duty on Monday, the 29th. Could you and Luke
look the attached document over and make any revisions to the agreement that are applicable. I can take any changes that you and Luke make and forward them to Angela later in the week.
Thanks. Steve C. 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
III Date: September 2001 PAVEMENT AND ALIGNMENT TOPICS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVING DESIGN CRITERIA NCTCOG Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction & Town ofAddison Standard
Construction Specifications ROW WIDTH: 􀁅􀁾􀁭􀁧􀀺􀀠__􀁾􀁎􀁾􀁕􀁾_____ Proposed: ---,8",,0,-'--..:T.J:lyp",-,_ PAVEMENT WIDTH: 􀁅􀁾􀁭􀁧􀀺􀀠 NIA Proposed: 2-22' No. oflanes proposed: 4"till
W'yis;PARKWAY: Proposed Width varies Proposed Sidewalk Width 4' Minimum Parkway cross fiill slope maximum 2.08% GRADE REQUIREMENTS: Is TC 6" below adjacent ground criteria to be followed?
NO Aoy deep cuts, high fills ? YES -BRIDGE APPROACHES PAVEMENT CROSS FALL PROPOSED MINIMUM MAXIMUM 114 infft 118 infO 114 infft Documenl#:99SstO 1 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
m VERTICAL GRADE: MINIMUM MAXIMUM 6% CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT POSITION: IN CENTER OF EXISTING ROW? NIA OFFSET FROM CENTER NIA ON BRAND NEW ALIGNMENT? YES CRASH CUSHIONS I ATTENTUATORS INVOLVED
YES __ NO ---"-''--_ RAILROAD CROSSINGS INVOLVED 􀁙􀁅􀁓􀀮􀁾􀁘􀁾􀁟􀀠 NO ___ NOTE: IF CURRENT CROSSING IS NOT USED, IS ABANDONMENT AN OPTION? YES ___ NO ---"",X__ 2 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
m PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN WHEEL LOAD 2.700.000 Equivalent 18.000 Ib single axle loads BUS AND HEAVY TRUCK TRAFFIC YES _-"'X'--__ NO _____ ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION MINIMUM PAVEMENT STRUCTURE
TIllCKNESS: 8" MINIMUM PAVEMENT BASE OR SUBGRADE TIllCKNESS: 6" DESIGN SPEED 45 MPH POSTED SPEED 40 MPH MEDIANS MEDIAN WIDTH 15' (F-Fi ANY MID BLOCK OPENINGS TO CONSIDER? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀢􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠
NO ANY SIDE STREETS TOO CLOSE FOR OPENING? YES__ NO X STANDARD TURN LANE WIDTH STANDARD NOSE WIDTH 3 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
m DRIVEWAYS: MAXIMIMUM RESIDENTIAL GRADE N/A MAXIMIMUM COMMERCIAL GRADE =5%",-0_ MINIMUM COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WIDTH 26' B-B SIDE STREET CONSIDERATIONS: TURNING RADIUS, MINIMUM 20' PAVEMENTTIDCKNESS
6"-8" COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY THICKNESS __"-____ DRAINAGE TOPICS STORM SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA: TxDOT CITY X HYDRO-35 􀀭􀁾􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭 TP-40 INLET DEPTHS (APPROPRIATE FOR PAVEMENT TIDCKNESS)
4 ' MINIMUM COVER LATERALS 2 '. BRIDGESIBOX CULVERTS INVOLVED 􀁙􀁅􀁓􀁾􀁘􀁾􀁟􀀠 NO ___ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CONSIDERATION IT FREEBOARD 4 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
m PERMITS COE404PERNUTS NEEDED YES NO X lNRCC 401 PERNUT YES NO X CDCPERNUT YES NO X EIS YES NO X ADAPERNUT YES X (If> $50,000 ofpedestrian facilities) NO ANY OTHER PERNUTS FROM OTHER
AGENCIES SUCH AS TXDOT, DFW AIRPORT, DART ETC,? 􀁾􀁓􀀠X 􀁜􀁾􀁒􀁖􀀠 'uu--_' UTILITIES /' V.p 􀁾􀁜 IrnJ ? . l)G-UO: 'II LIST OF ALL KNOWN UTILITIES , \ 1 U;"l dli'S TXU gas and electric
D0,,,,( lM I.VM U AT&T Southwestern Bell DOCUMENT KNOWN RISKS (TRA lines, Transmission Towers, Lone Star Gas Valve Stations) FOR OUR UTILITY PARTNERS: ARE UTILITIES ON EXISTING STREET
RO,W,? NIA DO UTILITIES OWN THEIR RO.W. OR HAVE PREVIOUS EASEMENTS? YES HAS WORK ORDER BEEN ISSUED FOR SUE (Subsurface Utility Engineering) ? No 5 Document #: 993580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
m ANY UNUSUAL CONSIDERATIONS? _---"M-'-'O"------___--'R-O-W ACQUISITION RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS, IF ANY, PROVIDE A LIST AND DESCRIPTION ALONG WITH DATA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT: ANY NON-ROUTINE,
i.e., CEMET ARY, JUNK YARD, OLD CHURCHES, SERVICE STATIONS, CONTAMINATED SOILS, LANDFILLS, NOISE WAIL CONSIDERATIONS, TRAILER PARKS, TREE ORDINANCES? YES X NO ___ ANY NON-CONFORMING
ISSUES? YES --::-::--_ NO X R-O-W MAP NEEDED YES X NO FIELD NOTES NEEDED YES X NO R-O-W PLATS NEEDED YES X NO RELOCATION ASSISTANCE INVOLVED YES NO X PARKINGILOSS OF PARKING CONSIDERATIONS
YES X NO HISTORICAL SITE CONSIDERATION YES NO X 6 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road, Phase
ill USUAL CITY TOPICS OF CONCERN DESIGN STANDARDS TO BE USED? ORDER OF PRECEDENCE OF STANDARDS. NCTCOG Standard Specifications (or Public Works Construction & Town ofAddison Standard
Construction Specifications: Addison, AUXILIARY LANES? NO PROVISIONS FOR FUTURE WIDENING? NO LANDSCAPING? --"YE.""",-S___ EXPOSED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS? NO STAMPED/COLORED CONCRETE?
YES IRRIGATION? YES. BRICK PAVERS? YES STREET LIGHTING? XES. TRAFFIC SIGNALS? Yes PAVEMENT MARKINGS? Yes. BIKE LANES (EXTRA WIDTH)? No NEW SIDEWALKS ? Yes BUS TURNOUTS? No. BUS STOPS
OR BUS SHELTERS? No. WATER UTILITY BETTERMENTS? Minor water line extension. WATER UTILITY RELOC.? Yes 7 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road. Phase
m SAN. SEWER BETTERMENTS? NO SAN. SEWERRELOC.? NO RET AINING WALLS? Yes (STONE, BLOCKS, GABIONS, PROPRIETARY TYPES) SOD, SEEDING, TOPSOIL? Block Sod on all improved areas. ri 􀁾􀀠{2
-' u.J Ii􀁾􀁲􀁉􀀭􀁓􀀠 'I1.)1r"l "'IX'::> 􀁾􀀧􀁪􀀭 ? DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS? Install only one storm sewer trunk with laterals crossing under trom opposite side inlets. Also. utilize velocity
dissipaters at outfall end ofthe two cross-, drain structures. RR CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS? Yes GRADE SEPARATIONS? RAMPS OR CONNECTORS TO TXDOT FACILITIES? NO SPECIAL SCHOOL OR EMERGENCY
VEHICLE CONSIDERATIONS ANY NEARBY OR ADJACENT SCHOOLS, CITY HALL, FIRE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIRING SPECIAL CONSIDERATION? NO DOCUMENT POTENTIAL SITES FOR PUBLIC AND OR NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETINGS. The Stone Cottage 4901 Addison Circle Road PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ALIGNMENT, REQUIRED? YES 􀁾􀁘􀀢􀀧􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀠 NO __ HAVE ALL NEIGHBOR GROUPS PROVIDED EARLY
INPUT? YES NIA NO __ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, REQUIRED YES NIA NO ___ 8 Dorumenl #; 998580 
ATTACHMENT A Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROJECT NAME: Arapaho Road;, Phase
m IF REQUIRED WHO CONDUCTS, CITY OR COUNTY? City lead with County participation CONSTRUCTIBILITY REPORT FROM INSPECTION STAFF, DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL ISSUES THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCOPE,
BUDGET, CONSTRUCTIBILTY, THE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND/OR THE SAFETY OF PROJECT? ) 9 
Steve Chutchian From: Washington, Angela [awashington@cowlesthompson.coml Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:08 AM To: 'schutchian@cLaddison.lx.us' Cc: jpierce@cLaddison.lx.us; DIPPEL,
KEN Subject: FW: Master Agreement Goveming Transportation Improvements Steve: We are ready, but I am not sure the County is. I received a letter from Bowen Weems on April 2, 2002 (just
after Jim sent his e-mail to Don Holzwarth)enclosing a final draft. The letter asked that I call or e-mail him if the document was satisfactory and he would furnish me a final document.
Below is my e-mail sent the next day, April 3, 2002, approving the draft and requesting the final document. I have not yet received that document. I have called Mr. Weems and I have
left a message this morning. I plan to keep calling today until I get him. I do not know or understand what the hold up is. I will keep you posted. -----Original Message----From: Washington,
Angela Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:08 PM To: 'Bowen Weems' Cc: 'jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us'; us'; Steve Chutchian (E-mail); DIPPEL, KEN; dholzwarth@dallascounty.org; SCamarillo@dallascounty.org;
'JFerguson@dallascounty.org' Subject: Master Agreement Governing Transportation Improvements Dear Mr. Weems: Yesterday, April 2, 2002, I received the draft document for the above-referenced
agreement. I have reviewed it and it is satisfactory to the Town of Addison. Please forward the final document at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule it on the council's
agenda. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Angela K. Washington 1 
CJr7Vf!.sT 􀁖􀁾􀁓􀀦􀀢􀁮􀀮􀀮􀀭􀀭 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS § § § 2-(2-S-/c?L MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS MASTER AGREEMENT is
made by and between the Town of Addison, TexaS, hereinafter called "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials,
which desire to enter into an InterJocal Agreement, hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, for the purpose ofTransportation Improvements on roads inside Dallas County that are on the North
Central Texas Council of Government's Regional Thoroughfure Plan. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Court Order 2000-2117, dated October 17, 2000, County Commissioners Court approved participation
in Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004, 2005, and a portion of2006 within the cities inside Dallas County; and WHEREAS, the approved project
lists may be modified, updated or approved by the Commissioners Court on a periodic, periodic, as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, provides
authorization for local governments to enter into interlocal agreements; NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, is hereby made and entered into by CITY and COUNTY for the mutual consideration
stated herein: AGREEMENT ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS; THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS ARE INCORPORATED INTO THIS AGREEMENT FOR ALL PURPOSES. a) AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed
by all parties detailing changes, additions or deletions in the MASTER AGREEMENT. b) CITY shan mean the Town ofAddison, County ofDallas, State ofTexas. e) COUNTY shall mean the County
ofDallas, State ofTexas. d) DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM COSTS shall mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or program cost objective. These costs
generally include compensation of employees for the time devoted and identified specifically to the performance ofthe project or program, cost ofmaterials acquired, consumed or expended
specifically for the purpose of the project or program; equipment changes; damage claims and other approved capital expenditures; change orders; damage claims; travel expenses incurred
specifically to DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-I4-02 -Page I 
cany out the project including, but not limited to, design, right-of-way, road or street drainage, utility relocation and adjustment and . coustruction. Direct Cost does not include
either CITY or COUNTY general overhead. e) EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean the date of the signature of the last person necessary for this MASTER AGREEMENT to become effective. 1) INDIRECT
COSTS shall mean those costs which have been incurred fur common or joint pwposes. These costs benefit more than one cost objective and cannot be readily identified with a particular
final project or program cost objective without efibrt disproportionate to the resuhs achieved. g) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS shall mean contracts or agreements entered into between CITY
and COUNTY in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 791. b) LEAD AGENCY shall mean that entity responsible for project management, including, but not limited to planning, design,
right-of-way acquisition, approved utility relocation or adjustment and construction. i) MASTER AGREEMENT AGREEMENT shall mean this document including all incorporated documents, attachments,
and exhibits. j) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) shall mean a written document which incorporates the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE. Said MOA shall at a minimum identifY the overall
funding scheme, and basic scope ofthe PROJECT. k} PARCEL OR PARCELS shall mean those tracts of land and improvements located either wholly or partially thereon, identified by COUNTY,
CITY or other STAKEHOLDER as required for right-of-way requirements ofthe PROJECT. Such Right-of-way shall include hoth the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real
property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. I) PREDESIGN CBARRETTE shall mean a meeting of decision-making ST AKEHOWERS and other members of the
PROJECT TEAM for the purpose of entering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the overall funding, alignment and scope of the PROJECT. m) PROJECT MANAGER shall mean the person appointed
by the Lead Agency who is assigned the primary duty fur assuring Project Team coordination and timely project delivery. There will be only one PROJECT MANAGER assigned to a PROJECT.
0) PROJECT TEAM shall mean representatives from COUNTY, CITY, and other STAKEHOLDERS as may be mutna1ly agreed upon by COUNTY, CITY and STAKEHOLDER or otherwise with responsibility for
delivering the completed PROJECT. 0) PROJECT(S) shall mean the road improvements approved by the COUNTY fur inclusion in the Transportation Major Capital Improvements Program approved
by the Commissioners Court and approved by the CITYand/or other applicable STAKEHOLDERS. DISCUSSION DRAFT· MASTER AGREEMENT-2·14·02 -Page 2 
p) ROAD or STREET AMENITY shall mean PRomCT features not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROmCT DESIGN including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, irrigation,
decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature above and beyond the STANDARD BASIC PROmCT DESIGN or any increase in capacity in excess ofCOUNTY detennined requirements based
on anticipated future traffic flow. q) RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that real property; (either existing, or required in fee and! or easement) identified by COUNTY. CITY, or other project
STAKEHOlDER as necessary for the construction of the PROmCT. Such Right-of-way shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership
and aU additional real property to be utilized for the PROmCT. r) STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN shall mean the standard COUNTY-approved CITY criteria for paving, bridges. drainage and
appurtenances, traffic control items including pavement marking. warranted uniform signals, street light foundations, puU boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/turn lanes, acceSS,
required structural retaining waDs and standard driveways excluding ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, or such design criteria as may be mutually agreed upon in a project specific SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. s) SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent to this document which is entered into to establish the contractual rights and responsihilities of the CITY and
COUNTY as it relates to the PROJECT. t) STAKEHOLDER shall mean any governmental or quasi-governmental entity making a financial contribution to the PROmCT. u) TxDOT shall mean the Texas
Department ofTransportation. v) UTILITIES shall mean each City Utility, public utility, common carrier, governmental or quasi-governmental faCility, fiber optic facility, or other facility
located within the limits of the Project by virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY, COUNTY, or STATE OF TEXAS. w) CITY UTILITY shall mean those owned
or or operated by CITY which require relocation or adjustment for the purpose of the construction of the PROmCT as identified by PROJECT plans. x) UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY shaH
mean all UTILITIES located within the limits of the PROmCT by virtue ofTexas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY. y) UTILITY IN PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY shall
mean aU UTILITIES, excluding CITY UTILITIES, whose facilities are located within the limits of the PROmCT by virtue ofsatisfactorily documented pre-existing real property ownership.
z) UTILITY BETTERMENT shall mean any increase in the capacity of any UTILITY'S Facility adjusted or relocated as a part ofthe PROJECT as compared to the existing Facility, or DISCUSSION
DRAFf -MASTER AOREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 3 
any upgrading of the UTILITY'S Facility above the standard practices, devices or materials, specified by the UTILITY and customarily used by CITY or UTILITY on projects solely financed
by CITY or UTILITY. Provided, however, that any upgrading necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Betterment, and further, that any increase in the
capacity of the Utility Facility resulting solely from the replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly manufactured, processed or installed shall not be considered a Betterment,
provided that suCh replacement shall be only to the standard devices or materials currently used on other projeCts financed solely by CITY or UTILITY. 1his meaning shall apply to utilities
that are part of the project as well as the standard basic street components (See "STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN',). ARTICLE II. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes
effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the respective agreement fully executed (The "Effective Date''). 1his MASTER AGREEMENT shall be an annual agreement and shall
automatically renew without further action by either party unless or until terminated as provided in Article IV (Termination) or the expiration often (10) years, whichever shall first
occur. ARTICLE m. AMENDMENTS This Master Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent ofthe CITY and COUNTY. Any amendment must be in writing and approved by the parties' respective
governing bodies. ARTICLE IV. TERMINATION, DEFAULT, TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE 1. TERMINAnON A. This MASTER AGREEMENT may be terminated by any ofthe following conditions:
(1) By expiration ofterm ofthe agreement. (2) By mutual written consent and agreement ofCOUNTY and CITY. (3) By either party, by notice in writing establishing the effective date oftermination
to the other party as consequence of the party being in default ofthe provisions of this Agreement or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT ortailure to timely provide.funding,.with proper allowances
being made for circumstances beyond the control ofthe defaulting party .. (4) By either party with ninety days written notice to the other party. B. Should either party terminate this
MASTER AGREEMENT as herein provided, all existing, fully executed SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS made under this MASTER AGREEMENT shall not be terminated and shall automatically incorporate
all the provisions ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT. C. In the event that any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is terminated prior to completion of the PROJECT, no additional Costs shall be incurred other
than Costs due and payable at the time of termination for services actually perfurmed or that shall become due and payable due to such termination. The LEAD AGENCY, to the extent permitted,
DISCUSSION DRAFT • MASTER AGREEMENT-2·14·02 -Page 4 
may termiilllte all project contracts, unless written notice is given by either party to the other of its intent to complete the PROJECT, and prepare a final accounting Jor the PROJECT.
D. Ifthe PROJECT is terminated by the CITY prior to the award ofany construction contract and the PROJECT is located within the CITY limits, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the full amount
expended by COUNTY on the PROJECT and COUNTY shall transfer to CITY its rights and all deliverables that it maybe entitled to receive under the existing professional . services or other
project contracts or agreements. . Sucli amount shall be included in the final accounting fur the PROJECT. Such amount shall be due and payable in full ninety (90) days subsequent to
the termination, or thirty days subsequent to delivery of final accounting. E. Once the construction contract has been let, with the approval of the other party, the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
for that PROJECT cannot be terminated until completion ofthe construction. F. In the event that a PROJECT is terminated either party may, upon written notice, take over the project and
prosecute the work to completion by contract or otherwise at their sole cost and expense. In the event that the party completing the work is not the LEAD AGENCY, it is agreed that the
PROJECT MANAGER will furnish to the completing party a listing of current records pertaining to any outstanding obligations or other records or information required by any project contract,
including any Work Order, or requested in writing by completing party in either printed or electronic format or both. The LEAD AGENCY agrees to cooperate with the completing party. The
LEAD AGENCY will use its best efforts to transrer to the completing party all contracts. Obligations under such contracts shall become the sole obligation of the completing party upon
transfer. Completing party agrees to timely pay aU future obligations under such contract as they become due and payable. Completing party hereby releases the LEAD AGENCY from any and
all liability under such assigned contracts subsequent to date of transfer, effective upon the transfer date. LEAD AGENCY shall exercise its best efforts to insure a transition of services
without interruption G. Either party shall have the right to retain copies of all data, information, engineering, studies, or other items produced to the date oftermination. H. Provisions
B through G will survive the termination of this MASTER AGREEMENT and any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and shall be a continning obligation until the transition of services, aU payments made
and the PROJECTS are complete. All items listed or'required in this provision shall be, furnished by LEAD AGENCY to completing party without additional cost or expense to completing
party.' ' 2. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be deemed in violationof this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, fire, flood, invasion, insurrection,
accident, order of court, judge or civil authority, an act of God, or any cause reasonably beyond the party's control and not attributable to its neglect. In the event ofsuch an occurrence
the time for performance ofsuch obligations or duty shall be suspended until such time that such inability to perform, shall be DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 5 
removed. The party claiming the suspension shall give notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days ofthe knowledge ofsuch occurrence. Each
party shall make all reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects ofany suspeusion. ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTY and CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall each be responsible
fur their oWn negligent acts or omissions or other tortious conduct in the course ofperformance.oftbis MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental immunity available
to either COUNTY or CITY under Texas law and without waiving any available defunses under Texas Jaw. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to create or grant any rights, contractual
or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. ARTICLE VI. NOTIFICATION A. WHEN NOTICE IS PERMITTED OR REQUIRED BY THIS MASlER AGREEMENT, IT SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL BE PRESUMED
DELIVERED WHEN DELIVERED IN PERSON OR THREE (3) DAYS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE PLACED, POSTAGE PREPAID, IN THE U. S. MAIL, CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND ADDRESSED
TO THE PARTIES AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS. B. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE TO COUNTY BY CITY SHALL BE .. MAILED OR DELIVERED BY HAND AS FOLWWS: DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Donald R. Holzwarth,
P.E., Director 411 Elm Street, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202·3389 C. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNTY TO CITY SHALL BE MAILED OR DELIVERED BY HAND AS FOLLOWS: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TOWN OF ADDISON P.O. BOX 9010 ADDISON. TX 75001-9010 D. EITHER PARTY HERETO MAY FROM TIME TO TIME DESIGNATE ANOTHER AND DIFFERENT ADDRESS FOR RECEIPT OF NOTICE BY GIVING WRITTEN
NOTICE OF SUCH CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO THE OTHER PARTY. ARTICLE VII. CITY COVENANTS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 6 
A. To execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and construction of the PROJECTS mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Provide
City Council Resolution adopting approved prererred alignment, proposed estimated budget, and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for each milestone as . specified herein or in a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. C •. CITY agrees to share the funding· of each PROJECT with COUNTY on an equal share basis (500/0/50%), or as otherwise agreed upon cost sharing arrangement as specified in
a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT with the following exclusions: CITY shaD bear the entire cost of: l. CITY owned utilities relocation or adjustment such as water and sanitary sewer :fucilities,
except utility adjustments directly attributable to storm sewer improvement contlicts; 2. ROAD or STREET AMENITIES including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters,
􀁤􀁥􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁶􀁾􀀠lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN; 3. UTIUTY BETTERMENTS and ROAD or STREET AMENITIES, 4. CITY PROJECT TEAM
participation or project management (if the CITY has LEAD AGENCY Responsibility) Direct Costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly accounting system; 5. CITY Indirect Costs.
When mutual written agreement has been reached as to PROJECT limits by COUNTY and CITY at the Predesign Charrette, City agrees to acquire right-of-way required for designated projects
by voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process andlor other legal means, to the maximum extent possible, and to ensure through the building permitting process that legally
required setbacks are adhered to in order to limit encroachment upon the required right of way. CITY agrees to fund ROW not acquired but reasonably expected to be. CITY also agrees to
fund the removal of improvements that are encroachments within existing or proposed right ofway areas. In the event of any proposed use of the PROJECT right-of-way that will conflict
with the proposed PROJECT and CITY is unable to obtain such right-of-way as described above, CITY shall notifY COUNTY of such contlict. COUNTY and CITY shall determine if the . acquisition
of the conflicting parcel would be in the best interest of the PROJECT. In the event that agreement is reached and the parcel is acquired such cost shall be included in the pro rated
cost ofthe project in the agreed upon proportions. CITY hereby grants COUNTY authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within the city limits on specific right-of-way aligrunents
approved by both the CITY and COUNTY where COUNTY is LEAD AGENCY or where COUNTY by mutual agreement between the parties has the responsibility to acquire the right-of way for the PROJECT.
D. To require all Utilities located within or using the present public right of way on all designated transportation projects within CITY's municipal limits to adjust andlor relocate
said Utilities as required by the proposed improvement of the designated transportation DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 7 
Project. CITY Utilities shall be relocated or adjusted at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. L CITY agrees
to fully cooperate on issues relating to billboards, advertising signs, nonconforming uses, zoning and similar restrictions and to exercise its best efforts to provide variances when
possible to minimize cost and delay of PROJECT. AddiIiefial PROJECT eest. saused er eeatril:ltlted Ie by CITY enlifl'aa6e, zeniBg, nell eenffil'miag. lise detel'miootiell er ether reEjliiremeat
shall be paid in fu.II by CITY. Additional PROJECT costs caused or contributed to by non-conforming use determinations, or adoption of or changes to ordinances. er-laws or other requirements
made by either party subsequent to execution of the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for the PROJECT shall be borne in full by the party making such determination, adoption or change. Nothing
in this paragraph shall be construed to restrict the CI1Y's zoning or other police power authority, or to restrict the CI1Y's Board ofAdjustment in the exercise ofits authority. F. To
the extent allowed by law, including, but not limited to, all contracts, franchise agreements, or other legal means, CITY shall require the adjustment andlor relocation of UTILITIES
to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible after approval of final plans to prevent PROJECT schedule delays. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary,
all UTILITIES shall be adjnsted or relocated and the right-or-way clear for construction not later than thirty (30) days prior to the award of the construction contract. CITY will notifY
the COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS when utility conflicts would impact progress of the project completion. COUNTY and CITY agree to work in partnership and with all STAKEHOLDERS to solve
the problem to include helping to engage elected officials in the problem resolution With the goal to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the PROJECT.
PROJECT. G. Where new storm drainage mcilities are in conllict with CITY owned water and sanitary sewer systems, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, after submission of an
acceptable schedule ofwork and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY and COUNTY approval, the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of CITY water and sewer utilities shall be· pro
rated at the overall percentage agreed to by CITY and COUNTY for cost sharing. CITY shall be responsible for funding one hoodred percent (100%) of any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided
herein, all costs for adjustment andIor relocation of utilities in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the Utility Owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay
or other damages caused by CITY UTILITY'S failure to timely relocate or adjust the mcility shall be at the entire cost ofCITY. H. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of
right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances in the right of way. In the event that the aforementioned
features are allowed by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration ofthe project, CITY shall bear the entire cost ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. I. To provide
to COUNTY for COUNTY'S or COUNTY'S designee use, at no cost, adequate copies of all construction standards, codes, (specifically including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications,
guidelines, standards or any other pertinent information as determined by COUNTY to be required for the completion of the PROJECT. Additionally, DISCUSSION DRAFT. MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02
-Page 8 
CITY shall furnish COUNTY, at no cost, such documents as necessary to keep all items previously furnished to County current. J. Actively participate and provide authorized representation
with decision making power at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completion and fiduciary
relationships. K. CITY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE as apart of the PROJECT schedule. City
further agrees that if no review notes are submitted by CITY in writing to COUNTY on a timely basis, plans are approved as submitted. L. City agrees that it will pay all additional project
cost fur any CITY requested discretionary change, including, but not limited to STREET AMENITIES AND UTILITY BETTERMENTS, in or addition to the design or construction ofthe project subsequent
to the City opportunity to review the sixty five percent (65%) design plans. M. Provide at CITY's cost fur the continuing maintenance of all PROJECT ROW, such as mowing, drainage, trash
removal, etc., during the period between acquisition and construction. N. Subsequent to the completion of a PROJECT, that the CITY will be responsible for all future maintenance, operation
and control of the PROJECT, without cost or contribution from the COUNTY. O. Bear the entire cost of design, construction and administration fur landscaping, streetscaping, streetlighting,
as such items are not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN and other ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES specified or requested by CITY in excess ofSTANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN. P. It
is the intent of this MASTER AGREEMENT that the COUNTY will be the LEAD AGENCY. In the event that the CITY and COUNTY agree in writing that CITY will manage and administer one or more
PROJECTS, CITY and COUNTY will enter into a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as to that project(s). In such instance, CITY agrees to assume all LEAD AGENCY responsibilities except as as may be
set forth in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as determined by mutual consent. . ARTICLEvrn. UTILITY IMPACTS A. In cases where a UTILITY IS LOCATED IN A PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OFWAY, and it
is necessary to relocate the fucility or make adjustments by reason of the widening or improvement of the designated project, the COUNTY (or CITY if acting as the LEAD AGENCy) will,
after submission by utility company of right of way documentation and cost estimates acceptable to the CITY, COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS, assign the actual costs for the relocation
andlor adjustment of said utility to the PROJECT. DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 9 
B. In cases where a UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, excluding CITY UTILITIES, occupies any portion of the PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY by TeXllS or Federal Law or by agreement with the CITY
that allows or permits the CITY to cause the relocation of the utility for the construction of the project, the CITY shall timely require and enforce the relocation or adjustment requirement
at no cost to the project. In the event that the CITY has no legal or contractual right to cause the relocation, the relocation or adjustment shall be relocated or adjusted and all cost
shall be a Project Cost. CITY and COUNTY shall use their best efforts and take aU steps necessary to insure, that such relocation or adjustment shall not conflict with or delay the PROJECT
schedule. ARTICLE IX. COUNTY AGREES AS FOLLOWS A. To provide as a PROJECT Cost prelhninary engineering which will define project details, e.g., location, scope of work and specific right
of way alignment for each improvement. Such preliminary engineering shall be submitted to the CITY for approval, prior to proceeding with the final design and any right ofway acquisition.
B. To provide as a PROJECT Cost for the construction oftransportation improvements based upon design criteria conforming to STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN in conformity with applicable
CITY ordinances and standards, to the extent of Commissioners Court approved program funding. Scope of work shall include the agreed upon design standards as the basis for improvement
criteria. Deviations from mutually agreed upon application of CITY standards· and/or design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY. Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOTstandards
as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this MASTER AGREEMENT shall be utilized unless otherwise mutually agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. To actively participate and provide authorized representation
at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development and completion and fiduciary relationships.
D. To provide project management of each Project where County is LEAD AGENCY from commencement to completion of construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redefine
project management roles as beneficial to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA and SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. E. Upon receipt of written request detailing the information requested, to provide
information related to the PROJECT to CITY or CITY'S designee at no cost to the CITY. F. COUNTY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review
notes are submitted by COUNTY (if CITY is filling the role as PROJECT MANAGER) in writing to CITY, plans are approved as submitted. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN
CHARRETTE, as part ofthe project schedule. G. To submit final engineering plans for review and written approval by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to advertising for construction.
H. To provide for the acquisition, including acquisition by Eminent Domain, Domain, of the necessary additional right of way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard
DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 10 
requirements and utilizing existing public right of way to the maximum extent possible as a PROJECT cost. 1. To require all contractors to secure all necessary permits required by CITY
on said construction projects. 1. To furnish record drawings ofconstruction plans fur the permanent records ofCITY within twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance of the transportation
improvement PROJECT. . K. In and fur Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, including the future obligation of maintenance, operation, control and acceptance
of liability therefur to transfer, by QuitClaim Deed, all PROJECT related easements acquired by COUNTY to CITY. L. In the event COUNTY and CITY agree in writing that CITY will be the
LEAD AGENCY fur the agreed upon PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs as detailed in Article XI (FUNDING) in an amount not to exceed the PROJECT cost as approved by Dallas
County Commissioners Court and incorporated in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. All COUNTY payments shall be in accordance with COUNTY Policies and Procedures or as may be mutuaIly agreed
between the parties and incorporated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. ARTICLEX. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE . A. CITY and COUNTY, as specified in Articles VII and IX, respectively, will designate
officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette to be conducted on a mutually agreeable date and location. At least part of this meeting will be conducted on the
PROJECT site. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identitY the general project scope and the general preferred alignment of the project, and project administration and management
roles, to include the PROJECT MANAGER. Additionally, key project team participants shall be identified at the Predesign Charrette. C. At the conclusion of the Predesign Charrette a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT shall be produced wlUch outlin!lS the identified roles and scope for the Project. ARTICLE XI. FUNDING A. CITY and COUNTY mutuaIly agree to proportionately fund the DIRECT PROJECT
& PROGRAM costs as agreed by the parties in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, COUNTY shall bear fifty percent (50"/0) oftile total DIRECT
PROJECT & PROGRAM costs excluding the ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly
accounting system and other items as specified in this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. COUNTY shall not be responsible for any amount of DISCUSSION DRAFT· MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02
-Page 11 
funding in excess of the PROJECT not-to-exceed amount as shown in the PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall bear fifty
percentage (50"/0) of all DIRECT PROJECT AND PROGRAM costs. In addition City agrees to fund all other City cost as provided herein, including, but not limited to, ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES,
relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not . supported by detailed hourly accounting system and other items as specified in this MASTER
AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Unless otherwise stated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the milestones for each project shall be (I) preliminary and primary design (2) right-of-way
acquisition and uti1ity relocation or adjustment and (3) construction. The LEAD AGENCY shall prepare an estimated cost for each milestone. Upon approval of the cost by the other party,
each party shall fund its share of the respective milestones by placing that amount of money in an escrow account or otherwise encumber the funds to insure that the LEAD AGENCY will
have sufficient funding available from current revenue for the timely payment of PROJECT milestone costs. The LEAD AGENCY may bill the other party for periodic payments for the actual
amount of work completed toward the completion ofthe milestone. Upon coinpletion of the milestone, the nonmanagement party will be furnished a notice that such work has been completed
and the amount of funding that may be utilized to pay subsequent milestone Project cost. Notwithstanding any other term or condition contained herein or in any SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT,
neither party will be required to award any contract until written certification has been received that funding has been placed in escrow or encumbered for the payment of the non-awarding
party's portion ofthe PROJECT cost. C. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT shall exceed the not-to-exceed amount, CITY and COUNTY agree to either reduce the scope of construction
or seek additional funding to complete the PROJECT at the agreed upon cost share percentages. At the termination of the PROJECT, the LEAD AGENCY will do a final cost accounting ofthe
PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by either party exceeds its portion of the actual cost, the difference will be remitted to such party. In the event that additional funds are
due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such funds within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofsuch billing. D. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse
CITY based on invoices for actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. E. Upon execution of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall escrow an amount adequate for initial
project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary, and primary design. ARTICLE xn. NO TBIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT
It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all right of action relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to
OTY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right ofaction whatsoever by any other person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of
CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services or DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 12 
benefits under this agreement sball be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement is intended only to set forth the contractual right and responsibilities ofthe agreement
parties. ARTICLExm. RIGHT OF ENTRY The CITY agrees that COUNTY shallhave the right to enter upon the PROJECT area for the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. CITY
agrees to furnish such police or other CITY personnel as iequestedBY COUNTY for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. Article XIV. LIST
OF PROJECTS CITY agrees that it has been furnished with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, subject to the agreement between the parties
of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. CITY stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and describes the type of
project in sufficient detail that the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects being considered. ARTICLE XV. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable Law. This
Agreement and all matters pertinent thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas. Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Inunuoity, Title 5 of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable State
ofTexas and Federal laws. B. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing executed
by the parties hereto as herein provided. C. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall not
be affected or impaired, and such remaining provisions sball remain in full force and effect. D. DefaultlWaiyerlMitigation.It is not a waiver of demultif the non-demulting ,party fails
to declare innnediately a defu.uIt or delays in taking any action. Pursuit ofany remedies set forth in this Agreement does not preclude pursuit ofother remedies in this Agreement or
provided by law. E. Federal or State of Texas Funding. In the event that any work or part thereof is funded by State of Texas or U. S. Government funding and any statute, rule, reguIation,
grant, contract provision or other State ofTexas or U. S. Government law, rule, regulation or other provision imposes additional or greater requirement(s) than stated herein, City agrees
to timely comply therewith without additional cost or expense to County. DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTERAGREEMENT-2-14-02 -Page 13 
F. Headings. The titles which are used following the number of each paragraph are only for convenience in locating various proVisions of this AGREEMENT and shall not be deemed to affect
the interpretation or construction ofsuch proVision. G. Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this AGREEMENT shall be held and construed to include any other gender; and words
in the singular shall include the plural and vice verS/!, unless the text clearly requires otherwiSe. . H. Countemarts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all ofwhich shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Town of Addison. State of Texas, has executed the Agreement pursuant to duly authorized
City Council Resolution , Minutes Dated the __day of ,200_. The County of Dallas, State of Texas, has executed this agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed
on the __day of _____ 200_, TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS BY: BY: BY: RON WHITEHEAD, CITY MANAGER LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE DATE: DATE: ________ ATTEST:
BY: 􀁡􀁔􀁾􀁙􀁾􀁓􀀽􀁅􀁾􀁃􀀽􀁒􀁅􀀽􀀽􀁔􀀷􀁁􀁒􀁾􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: BY:--::___--:::--__-:=--:---=-:-__ 􀁃􀁉􀁔􀁙􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁔􀀽􀁔􀀽􀁏􀀽􀁒􀁎􀁅􀁾􀁙􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭
Janet Ferguson, Deputy Chief, Civil Section DaUas County District Attorney's Office DISCUSSION DRAFT -MASTER AGREEMENT-2-I4"{)2 -Page 14 
Steve Chutchian From: Sent: To: Subject: Washington, Angela [awashington@cowlesthompson.comJ Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:09 PM Steve Chutchian (E-mail};.jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us.;
'dholzwarth@daUascounty.org'; 'arobinson@dallascounty.org'; 'bweems@dallascounty.org'; 'SCamarillo@dallascounty.org' Master Agreement Governing Transportation Improvements Master Agreement
Enclosed is a red-lined draft showing the changes made at our meeting this morning. The language regarding the City granting eminent domain authority to the County is a little different
from what we hammered out. Basically, I placed the language we came up with at the end of the sentence instead of at the beginning. If you have any questions or disagreements with the
way I phrased the changes, please let me know. Angela Washington <<Master Agreement» 1 
STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALLAS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS MASTER AGREEMENT is made by and between the Town of Addison, Texas,
hereinafter called "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials, which desire to enter into an Interlocal
Agreement, hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, fur the purpose ofTransportation Improvements on roads inside Dallas County that are on the North Central Texas Council of Government's
Regional Thoroughfure Plan. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Court Order 2000-2117, dated October 17, 2000, County Commissioners Court approved participation in Transportation Major Capital
Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004, 2005, and a portion of2006 within the cities inside Dallas County; and WHEREAS, the approved project lists may be modified, updated or
approved by the Commissioners Court on a periodic, as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, provides authorization for local govermnents to
enter into interlocal agreements; NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, is hereby made and entered into by CITY and COUNTY fur the mutual consideration stated herein: AGREEMENT ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS:
THE .FOLWWING DEFINITIONS ARE INCORPORATED INTO TillS AGREEMENT FOR ALL PURPOSES. a) AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed by all parties detailing changes, additions or deletions
in the MASTER AGREEMENT. b) CITY shall mean the Town ofAddison, County ofDallas, State ofTexas. c) COUNTY shall mean the County ofDallas, State ofTexas. d) DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM COSTS
shall mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or program cost objective. These costs generally include compensation of employees for the time devoted
and identified specifically to the performance ofthe project or program, cost of materials acquired, consumed or expended specifically fur the purpose of the project or program; equipment
changes; damage claims and other approved MASTER AGREEMENT-II/IO/OO Page I 
capital expenditures; change orders; damage claims; travel expenses incurred specifically to carry out the project including, but not limited to, design, right-of-way, road or street
drainage, utility relocation and adjustment and construction. Direct Cost does not include either CITY or COUNTY general overhead. e) EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean the date ofthe signature of the last person necessary for this MASTER AGREEMENT to become effective. f} INDIRECT COSTS shall mean those costs which have been incurred for common or joint purposes.
These costs benefit more than one cost objective and cannot be readily identified with a particular final project or program cost objective without effort disproportionate to the results
achieved. g) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS shall mean contracts or agreements entered into between CITY and COUNTY in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 791. b) LEAD AGENCY shall
mean that entity responsible fur project management, including, but not limited to planning, design, right-of-way acquisition., approved utility relocation or adjustment and construction.
i) MASTER AGREEMENT shall mean this document including all incorporated documents, attachments, and exluoits. j) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) shall mean a written document which incorporates
the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE. Said MOA shall at a minimum identifY the overall funding scheme, and basic scope ofthe PROJECT. k) PARCEL OR PARCELS shall mean those tracts of
land and improvements located either wholly or partially thereon, identified by COUNTY, CITY or other STAKEHOLDER as required for right-of-way requirements of the PROJECT. Such Right-of-way
shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. I) PREDESIGN CHARRETTE
shall mean a meeting of decision-making STAKEHOLDERS and other members of the PROJECT TEAM fur the purpose of entering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT fur the overall funding, alignment
and scope of the PROJECT. m) PROJECT MANAGER shall mean the person appointed by the Lead Agency who is assigned the primary duty for assuring Project Team coordination and timely project
delivery. There will be only one PROJECT MANAGER assigned to a PROJECT. n) PROJECT TEAM shall mean representatives from COUNTY, CITY, and other STAKEHOLDERS as may be mutually agreed
upon by COUNTY, CITY and STAKEHOLDER or otherwise with responsibility for delivering the completed PROJECT. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 1 
0) PROJECT(S) shall mean the road improvements approved by the COUNTY for inclusion in the Transportation Major Capital Improvements Program approved by the Commissioners Court and approved
by the CITY and/or other applicable STAKEHOLDERS. p) ROAD or STREET AMENITY shall mean PROJECT features not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN including but not limited to
street pavers, colored concrete, planters, irrigation, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other reature above and beyond the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN or any increase in
capacity in excess ofCOUNTY determined requirements based on anticipated future traffic flow. q) RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that real property, (either existing, or required in fee
and/or easement) identified by COUNTY, CITY, or other project STAKEHOLDER as necessary for the construction of the PROJECT. Such Right-of-way shall include both the existing street,
road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized fOr the PROJECT. r) STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN shall mean the standard
COUNTY-approved CITY criteria for paving, bridges, drainage and appurtenances, traffic control items including pavement marking, warranted u.nifOrm signals, street light foundations,
pull boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/turn lanes, access, required structural retaining walls and standard driveways excluding ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, or such design criteria
as may be mutually agreed upon in a project specific SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. s) SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent to this document which is entered into to establish
the contractual rights and responsibilities of the CITY and COUNTY as it relates to the PROJECT. t) STAKEHOLDER shall mean any governmental or quasi-govermnental entity making a financial
contribution to the PROJECT. u) TxDOT shall mean the Texas Department ofTransportation. v) UTILITIES shall mean each City Utility, public utility, common carrier, govermnental or quasi-govermnental
facility, fiber optic facility, or other fucility located within the limits of the Project by virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY, COUNTY, or
STATE OF TEXAS. w) CITY UTILITY shall mean those owned or operated by CITY which require relocation or adjustment for the purpose of the construction of the PROJECT as identified by
PROJECT plans. x) UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY sball mean all UTILITIES located within the limits of the PROJECT by virtue ofTexas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and
the CITY. MASTERAGREEMENT-IIIlO/OO -Page 3 
y) UTILITY IN PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES, excluding CITY UTILITIES, whose facilities are located within the limits of the PROJECT by virtue ofsatisfuctorily
documented pre-existing real property ownership. z) UTILITY BETTERMENT shall mean any increase in the capacity of any UTILITY'S Facility adjusted or relocated as a part of the PROJECT
as compared to the existing Facility, or any upgrading of the UTILITY'S Facility above the standard practices, devices or materials, specified by the UTILITY and customarily used by
CITY or UTILITY on projects solely financed by CITY or UTILITY. Provided, however, that any upgrading necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Bettennent,
and further, that any increase in the capacity of the Utility Facility resulting solely from the replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly manufactured, processed or installed
shall not be considered a Bettennent, provided that such replacement shall be only to the standard devices or materials currently used on other projects financed solely by CITY or UTILITY.
This meaning shall apply to utilities that are part of the project as well as the standard basic street components (See "STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN"). ARTICLE n. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT
This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the respective agreement fully executed (The "Effective Date"). This MASTER AGREEMENT shall
be an annual agreement and shall automatically renew without further action by either party unless or until terminated as provided in Article IV (Termination) or the expiration often
(l0) years, whichever shall first occur. ARTICLE m. AMENDMENTS This Master Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of the CITY and COUNTY. Any amendment must be in writing and
approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. ARTICLE IV. TERMINATION. DEFAULT. TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE 1. TERMINATION A. This MASTER AGREEMENT may be terminated
by any ofthe following conditions: (1) By expiration ofterm ofthe agreement. (2) By mutual written consent and agreement ofCOUNTY and CITY. (3) By either party, by notice in writing
establishing the effective date of termination to the other party as consequence ofthe party being in defuult ofthe provisions of this Agreement or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT or failure
to timely provide funding, with proper allowances being made fur circumstances beyond the control ofthe defuulting party. (4) By either party with ninety days written notice to the other
party. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 4 
B. Should either party tenninate this MASTER AGREEMENT as herein provided, all existing, fully executed SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS made under this MASTER AGREEMENT shall not be tenninated
and shall automatically incorporate all the provisions ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT. C. In the event that any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is tenninated prior to completion of the PROJECT, no additional
Costs shall be incurred other than Costs due and payable at the time of tennination fur services actually performed or that shall become due and payable due to such tennination. The
LEAD AGENCY, to the extent pennitted, may tenninate all project contracts, uuless written notice is given by either party to the other of its intent to complete the PROJECT, and prepare
a fina1 accounting for the PROJECT. D. Ifthe PROJECT is terminated by the CITY prior to the award of any construction contract and the PROJECT is located within the CITY limits, CITY
shall pay to COUNTY the full amount expended by COUNTY on the PROJECT and COUNTY shall transfer to CITY its rights and all deliverables that it may be entitled to receive under the existing
professional services or other project contracts or agreements. Such amount shall be included in the fina1 accounting fur the PROJECT. Such amount shall be due and payable in full ninety
(90) days subsequent to the tennination, or thirty days subsequent to delivery of final accounting. E. Once the construction contract has been let, with the approval of the other party,
the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for that PROJECT cannot be tenninated until completion ofthe construction. F. In the event that a PROJECT is tenninated either party may, upon written notice,
take over the project and prosecute the work to completion by contract or otherwise at their sole cost and expense. In the event that the party completing the work is not the LEAD AGENCY,
it is agreed that the PROJECT MANAGER will furnish to the completing party a listing of current records pertaining to any outstanding obligations or other records or information required
by any project contract, including any Work Order, or requested in writing by completing party in either printed or electronic format or both. The LEAD AGENCY agrees to cooperate with
the completing party. The LEAD AGENCY will use its best efforts to transrer to the completing party all contracts. Obligations under such contracts shall become the sole obligation of
the completing party upon transfer. Completing party agrees to timely pay all future obligations under such contract as they become due and payable. Completing party bereby releases
tbe LEAD AGENCY from any and an IiabiHty under sucb assigned contracts subsequent to date of transfer, effective upon the transfer date. LEAD AGENCY shall exercise its best efforts to
insure a transition of services without interruption G. Either party shall have the right to retain copies of all data, information, engineering, studies, or other items produced to
the date oftenninatinn. H. Provisions B through G will survive the tennination of this MASTER AGREEMENT and any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and shall be a continuing obligation until the
transition of services, all payments made and the PROJECTS are complete. All items listed or required in this provision shall be furnished by LEAD AGENCY to completing party without
additional cost or expense to completing party. MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00 -Page 5 DOfiuttertt-#.: 9J07SO 
2. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be deemed in violation of this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through
strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, frre, flood, invasion, insurrection, accident, order of court, judge or civil authority, an act of God, or any cause reasonably beyond the party's control
and not attributable to its neglect. In the event of such an occurrence the time for performance of such obligations or duty shall be snspended until such time that such inability to
perform, shall be removed. The party claiming the suspension shall give notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days ofthe knowledge ofsuch
occurrence. Each party shall make all reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects ofany suspension. ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTY and CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall each
be responsible for their own negligent acts or omissions or other tortious conduct in the course of performance of this MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental
immunity available to either COUNTY or CITY under Texas law and without waiving any available defenses under Texas law. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to create or grant
any rights, contractual or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. ARTICLE VI. NOTIFICATION A. WHEN NOTICE IS PERMITTED OR REQUIRED BY TIDS MASTER AGREEMENT, IT SHALL BE IN
WRITING AND SHALL BE PRESUMED DELIVERED WHEN DELIVERED IN PERSON OR THREE (3) DAYS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE PLACED, POSTAGE PREPAID, IN THE U. S. MAIL, CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED, RETURN
RECEIPT REQUESTED AND ADDRESSED TO THE PARTIES AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS. B. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE TO COUNTY BY CITY SHALL BE MAILED OR DELIVERED BY HAND AS FOLLOWS: DALLAS COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DODald R. Holzwarth, P.E., Director 411 Elm Street, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202-3389 C. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNTY TO CITY SHALL BE MAILED OR DELIVERED
BY HAND AS FOLLOWS: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN OF ADDISON P.O. BOX 9010 ADDISON, TX 75001-9010 MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 6 
D. EITHER PARTY HERETO MAY FROM TIME TO TIME DESIGNATE ANOTHER AND DIFFERENT ADDRESS FOR RECEIPT OF NOTICE BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO THE OTHER PARTY. ARTICLE
VII. CITY COVENANTS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A. To execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and construction of the PROJECTS mutually agreed upon and incorporated
herein by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Provide City Council Resolution adopting approved preferred aligmnent, proposed estimated budget, and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for each
milestone as specified herein or in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY agrees to share the funding of each PROJECT with COUNTY on an equal share basis (50%/50"Al), or as otherwise agreed
upon cost sharing arrangement as specified in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT with the following exclusions: CITY shall bear the entire cost of: 1. CITY owned utilities relocation or adjustment
such as water and sanitary sewer fucilities, except utility adjustments directly attributable to storm sewer improvement conllicts; 2. ROAD or STREET AMENITIES including but not limited
to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN; 3. UTILITY BETTERMENTS and ROAD or STREET
􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁉􀁔􀁉􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀠 4. CITY PROJECT TEAM participation or project management (if the CITY has LEAD AGENCY Responsibility) Direct Costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly
accounting sYstem; 5. CITY Indirect Costs. When mutual written agreement bas been reached as to PROJECT limits by COUNTY and CITY at the Predesign Cbarrette, City agrees to acquire right-of-way
required for designated projects by vohmtary dedication, the subdivision platting process and/or other legal means, to the maximum extent possible, and to ensure through the building
permitting process that legally required setbacks are adhered to in order to limit encroachment upon the required right of way. CITY agrees to fund ROW not acquired but reasonably expected
to be. CITY also agrees to fund the removal of improvements that are encroachments within existing or proposed right ofway areas. In the event of any proposed use of the PROJECT right-of-way
that will conllict with the proposed PROJECT and CITY is unable to obtain such right-of-way as described above, CITY shall notifY COUNTY of such conllict. COUNTY and CITY shall determine
ifthe acquisition of the conllicting parcel would be in the best interest of the PROJECT. In the event that agreement is reached and the parcel is acquired such cost sha1l be included
in the pro rated cost ofthe project in the agreed upon proportions. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 7 Dorumt1l1 iJ; 9JO'lSO 
CITY hereby grants the COUNTY authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within the city limits on eaeh specific right::of::way alignmentl1 as approved by both the CITY and COUNTY
where COUNTY is LEAD AGENCY or where COUNTY by mutual agreement between the parties has the responsibility to acquire the right-of-way for the PROJECT. D. To require all Utilities located
within or using the present public right of way on all designated transportation projects within CITY's municipal limits to adjust and/or relocate sald Utilities as required by the proposed
improvement of the designated transportation Project. CITY Utilities shall be relocated or adjusted at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT
or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. E. CITY agrees to timely schedule and fairly consider issues relating to billboards, advertising signs, non-confurming uses, and zoning and similar restrictions
that require action by the governmental body or any administrative body of CITY to avoid delay of PROJECT or increase in PROJECT cost. Additional PROJECT cost caused or contributed to
by CITY's fuilure to timely schedule and consider such matters shall be paid in full by CITY. Additional PROJECT costs caused or contributed to by adoption of or changes to ordinances
or laws made by either party subsequent to execution ofthe SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for the PROJECT shall be borne in full by the party making such adoption or change. F. To the extent
allowed by law, CITY shall require the adjustment and/or relocation of UTILITIES to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible after approval of final plans to prevent
PROJECT schedule delays. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, all UTILITIES shall be adjusted or relocated and the right-of-way clear for construction not later
than thirty (30) days prior to the award of the construction contract. CITY will notifY the COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS when utility conflicts would impact progress of the project
completion. COUNTY and CITY agree to work in partnership and with all STAKEHOLDERS to solve the problem to include helping to engage elected officials in the problem resolution with
the goal to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the PROJECT. G. Where new storm drainage fucilities are in conflict with CITY owned water and sanitary
sewer systems, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, after submission of an acceptable schedule ofwork and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY and COUNTY approval, the actual
costs of the necessary adjustment of CITY water and sewer utilities shall be pro rated at the overall percentage agreed to by OTY and COUNTY for cost sharing. CITY shall he responsible
for funding one hundred percent (100%) of any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment and/or relocation of utilities in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the Utility Owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay or other damages caused by CITY UTILITY'S fuilure to timely relocate or adjust the fucility shall be at
the entire cost ofCITY. H. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property
or other appurtenances in the right of way. In the event that the aforementioned reatures are allowed MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00 -Page 8 
by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration ofthe project, CITY shall bear the entire cost ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. I. To provide to COUNTY for COUNTY'S
or COUNTY'S designee use, at no cost, adequate copies of all construction standards, codes, (specifically including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications, guidelines,
standards or any other pertinent information as determined by COUNTY to be required for the completion of the PROJECT. Additionally, CITY shall furnish COUNTY, at no cost, such documents
as necessary to keep all items previously furnished to County current. J. Actively participate and provide authorized representation with decision making power at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE,
preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completion and fiduciary relationships. K. CITY agrees to provide timely
review of interim submittals. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE CHARRETTE as a part of the PROJECT schedule. City further agrees that ifno review notes
are submitted by CITY in writing to COUNTY on a timely basis, plans are approved as submitted. L. City agrees that it will pay all additional project cost for any CITY requested discretionary
change, including, but not limited to STREET AMENITIES AND UTILITY BETTERMENTS, in or addition to the design or construction ofthe project subsequent to the City opportunity to review
the sixty five percent (65%) design plans. M. Provide at CITY's cost fur the continuing maintenance of all PROJECT ROW, such as mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period
between acquisition and construction. N. Subsequent to the completion of a PROJECT, that the CITY will be responsible for all future maintenance, operation and control of the PROJECT,
without cost or contribution from the COUNTY. O. Bear the entire cost of design, construction and administration fur landscaping, streetscaping, streetlighting, as such items are not
included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN and other ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES specified or requested by CITY in excess ofSTANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN. P. It is the intent of this
MASTER AGREEMENT that the COUNTY will be the LEAD AGENCY. In the event that the CITY and COUNTY agree in writing that CITY will manage and administer one or more PROJECTS, CITY and COUNTY
will enter into a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as to that project(s). In such instance, CITY agrees to assume all LEAD AGENCY responsibilities except as may be set forth in the SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT as determined by mutual consent. ARTICLEvm. UTILITY IMPACTS MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 9 DOo.l.Illenl#; 930780 
A. In cases where a UTILITY IS LOCATED IN A PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OFWAY, and it is necessary to relocate the facility or make adjustments by reason of the widening or improvement of
the designated project, the COUNTY (or CITY if acting as the LEAD AGENCy) will, after submission by utility company of right of way documentation and cost estimates acceptable to the
CITY, COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS, assign the actual costs fur the relocation and/or adjustment of said utility to the PROJECT. B. In cases where a UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
excluding CITY UTILITIES, occupies any portion of the PROJECT RIGHT -OF-WAY by Texas or Federal Law or by agreement 'With the CITY that allows or permits the CITY to cause the relocation
of the utility fur the construction of the project, the CITY shall timely require and enforce the relocation or adjustment requirement at no cost to the project. In the event that the
CITY has no legal or contractual right to cause the relocation, the relocation or adjustment shall be relocated or adjusted and all cost shall be a Project Cost. CITY and COUNTY shall
take all steps necessary to insure to the extent practicable, that such relocation or adjustment shall not conflict with or delay the PROJECT schedule. ARTICLE IX. COUNTY AGREES AS FOLLOWS
A. To provide as a PROJECT Cost preliminary engineering which will define project details, e.g., location, scope of work and specific right of way alignment for each improvement. Such
pre1iminary engineering shall be submitted to the CITY fur approval, prior to proceeding with the final design and any right ofway acquisition. B. To provide as a PROJECT Cost for the
construction of transportation improvements based upon design criteria conforming to STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN in conformity with applicable CITY ordinances and standards, to the
extent of Commissioners Court approved program funding. Scope of work shall include the agreed upon design standards as the basis for improvement criteria. Deviations from mutually agreed
upon application of CITY standards and/or design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY. Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOT standards as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this MASTER
AGREEMENT shall be utilized unless otherwise mutually agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. To actively participate and provide authorized representation at PREDESIGN CHARREITE, preconstruction
meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development and completion and fiduciary relationships. D. To provide project management of each
Project where County is LEAD AGENCY from commencement to completion of construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redefine project management roles as beneficial
to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA and SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. E. Upon receipt of written request detai1ing the information requested, to provide information related to the PROJECT
to CITY or CITY'S designee at no cost to the CITY. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 10 I>ooJment tI: 9J07l:IO 
F. COUNTY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review notes are submitted by COUNTY (if CITY is filling the role as PROJECT MANAGER) in
writing to CITY, plans are approved as submitted. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, as part ofthe project schedule. G. To submit final engineering plans
for review and written approval by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to advertising fur construction. H. To provide fur the acquisition, including acquisition by Eminent Domain, of
the necessary additional right of way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard reqwrements and utilizing existing public right of way to the maximum extent possible
as a PROJECT cost. L To require all contractors to secure all necessary pennits required by CITY on said construction projects. J. To furnish record drawings of construction plans for
the permanent records ofCITY within twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance of the transportation improvement PROJECT. K. In and for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration, including the future obligation of maintenance, operation, control and acceptance of liability therefor to transfur, by QuitClaim Deed, all PROJECT related easements
acquired by COUNTY to CITY. L. In the event COUNTY and CITY agree in writing that CITY will be the LEAD AGENCY fur the agreed upon PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs
as detailed in Article XI (FUNDING) in an amount not to exceed the PROJECT cost as approved by Dallas County Commissioners Court and incorporated in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. All COUNTY
payments shall be in accordance with COUNTY Policies and Procedures or as may be mutually agreed between the parties and incorporated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. ARTICLEX. PREDESIGN
CHARRETTE A. CITY and COUNTY, as specified in Articles VII and IX, respectively, will designate officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette to be conducted on
a mutually agreeable date and location. At least part of this meeting will be conducted on the PROJECT site. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identifY the general project scope
and the general preferred alignment of the project, and project administration and management roles, to include the PROJECT MANAGER.. Additionally, key project team participants shall
be identified at the Predesign Charrette. C. At the conclusion of the Predesign Charrette a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall be produced which outlines the identified roles and scope for
the Project. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 11 Doanur:ut{J;930780 
ARTICLE XL FUNDING A. CITY and COUNTY mutually agree to proportionately fund the DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs as agreed by the parties in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise
specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, COUNTY shall bear fifty percent (50%) of the total DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs excluding the ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, relocation or adjustment
of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accountiog system and other items as specified in this MASTER 'AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. COUNTY shall not be responsible for any amount of funding in excess of the PROJECT not-to-exceed amount as shown in the PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified
in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall bear fifty percentage (50"10) of all DIRECT PROJECT AND PROGRAM costs. In addition City agrees to fund all other City cost as provided herein,
including, but not limited to, ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES,relocation or adjustment of of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accountiog system and other items as specified in this
MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Unless otherwise stated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the milestones for each project shall be (1) preliminary and primary design (2)
right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation or adjustment and (3) construction. The LEAD AGENCY shall prepare an estimated cost for each milestone. Upon approval ofthe cost by the
other party, each party shall fund its share of the respective milestones by placing that amount of money in an escrow account or otherwise encumber the funds to insure that the LEAD
AGENCY will have sufficient funding available from current revenue for the timely payment of PROJECT milestone costs. The LEAD AGENCY may bill the other party fur periodic payments for
the actual amount of work completed toward the completion ofthe milestone. Upon completion of the milestone, the nonmanagement party party will be furnished a notice that such work has
been completed and the amount of funding that may be utilized to pay subsequent milestone Project cost. Notwithstanding any other term or condition contained herein or in any SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT, neither party will be required to award any contract until written certification has been received that funding has been placed in escrow or encumbered for the payment ofthe
non-awarding party's portion ofthe PROJECT cost C. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT shall exceed the not-to-exceed amount, CITY and COUNTY agree to either reduce the scope of
construction or seek additional funding to complete the PROJECT at the agreed upon cost share percentages. At the termination of the PROJECT, the LEAD AGENCY will do a final cost accountiog
ofthe PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by eitber party exceeds its portion ofthe actual cost, the difference will be remitted to such party. In the event that additional funds
are due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such funds witbin thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofsuch billing. D. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse
CITY based on invoices fur actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. MASTER AGREEMENT-llIIO/OO -Page U 
E. Upon execution of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall escrow an amount adequate fur initial project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional services required for
scoping, preliminary, and primary design. ARTICLEXD. NO TBIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY .ENFORCEMENT It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement and all right of action relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to CITY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or
right of action whatsoever by any other person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services
or benefits under this agreement shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement is intended only to set forth the contractual right and responsibilities ofthe agreement
parties. ARTICLEXllI. RIGHT OF ENTRY The CITY agrees that COUNTY shall have the right to enter upon the PROJECT area fur the time period necessary fur the completion of the Project.
CITY agrees to furnish such police or other CITY personnel as requested BY COUNTY for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. Article XIV.
LIST OF PROJECTS CITY agrees that it has been furnisbed with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, 􀁳􀁵􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁴􀀠to the agreement between
the parties of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. CITY stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and describes
the type of project in sufficient detail that the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects being considered. ARTICLE XV. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable
Law. This Agreement and all matters pertinent thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County,
Texas. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity, Title 5 of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and
all applicable State ofTexas and Federal laws. B. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and may not be modified except by an instrmnent
in writing executed by the parties hereto as herein provided. C. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions
hereof shall not be affucted or impaired, and such remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 13 
D. DefaultlWaiverlMitigation. It is not a waiver of default if the non-defaulting party fails to declare immediately a default or delays in taking any action. Pursuit of any remedies
set furth in this Agreement does not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this Agreement or provided by law. E. Federal or State of Texas Funding. In the event that any work or part
thereof is funded by State of Texas or U. S. Government funding and any statute, rule, regulation, grant, contract provision or other State ofTexas or U. S. Government law, rule, regulation
or other provision imposes additional or greater requirement( s) than stated herein, City agrees to timely comply therewith without additional cost or expense to County. F. Headings.
The titles which are used following the number of each paragraph are only for convenience in locating various provisions of this AGREEMENT and shall not be deemed to affect the inteIpretation
or construction ofsuch provision. G. Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this AGREEMENT shall be held and construed to include any other gender; and words in the singnlar
shall include the plural and vice versa, unless the text clearly requires otherwise. H. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in multiple counteIparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Town of Addison, State of Texas, has executed the Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Council
Resolution , Minutes Dated the __day of , 200_ • The County of Dallas, State of Texas, has executed this agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed on the __day
of _____, 200_. BY: BY; RON WmTEHEAD, CITY MANAGER LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE DATE: DATE: ______________ MASTERAGREEMENT-lI/\O/OO -Page 14 
TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY John Dahill, Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District Attorney MASTER AGREEMENT-11110100
-Page 15 
W. BOWEN WEEMS ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATIORNEY'S OFFICE DALlAS couNTY, TEXAS (214) 653·7358 ADMINISTRATlON BUILDING FAX: (214) 653-6134 411 ELM SmEET EMAil: bweems@dallascounty
.org DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 411 ELM STREET. 3AD FLOOR DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 SELAS CAMARillO, P.E., A.P.l.S. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR·PROPERTY DIVISION PHONE: (214)653-6400
EMAIL: SCamarlllo@dallascounty.org FAX: (214) 653-6517 
COWLES &THOMPSON A Professional Co'rporation ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS ANGELA K. WASHINGTON 214.672.2144 AWASHfNGTONOCOWLESTHOMPSON.COM August 31, 2001 Mr. John ahill Dallas ounty District
Attorney's Office Civil ivision 43 . Industrial Blvd. L ckBox 19 allas, Texas 75207 RE: Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects Town of Addison Dear
Mr. Dahill: As we discussed, I have prepared a redlined draft of suggested changes to the Master Agreement Governing Transportation Major Capital Improvement Projects. It is enclosed
along with a clean copy of same. Please let me know if the changes are acceptable to you. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 􀁾􀁽􀀨􀀮􀁯􀁃􀁪􀁾􀀠 Angela K. Washington
AKW/yjr Enclosures c: jMr. Steve Chutchian, wlTown Mr. Ken C. Dippel, City Attorney w/firm 901 MAIN STREET SUITE 4000 DALLAS. TEXAS 75:<'02·}793 DALLAS T Y L E R TEL 214.bi2.2000 FAX
214.612,202:0 
STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALLAS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TIllS MASTER AGREEMENT is made by and between the Town of Addison,
Texas, hereinafter called "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials, which desire to enter into an Interlocal
Agreement, hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on roads inside Dallas County that are on the North Central Texas Council of Government's
Regional Thoroughfare Plan. WITNESSETII WHEREAS, pursuant to Court Order 2000-2117, dated October 17, 2000, County Commissioners Court approved participation in Transportation Major
Capital Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004, 200S, and a portion of 2006 within the cities inside Dallas County; and WHEREAS, the approved project lists may be modified,
updated or approved by the Commissioners Court on a periodic, as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Govemment Code, as amended, provides authorization for local governments
to enter into interlocal agreements; NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, is hereby made and entered into by CITY and COUNTY for the mutual consideration stated herein: AGREEMENT ARTICLE I.
DEFINITIONS: THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS ARE INCORPORATED INTO THIS AGREEMENT FOR ALL PURPOSES. a) AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed by all parties detailing changes, additions
or deletions in the MASTER AGREEMENT. b) CITY shall mean the Town of Addison, County of Dallas, State of Texas. c) COUNTY shall mean the County ofDallas, State of Texas. d) DIRECT PROJECT
& PROGRAM COSTS shall mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or program cost objective. These costs generally include compensation of employees
for the time devoted and identified specifically to the performance of the project or program, cost of materials acquired, consumed or expended specifically for the purpose of the project
or program; equipment changes; damage claims and other approved MASTERAGREEMENT-Il/l0/00 Page 1 
capital expenditures; change orders; damage claims; travel expenses incurred specifically to carry out the project including, but not limited to, design, right-of-way, road or street
drainage, utility relocation and adjustment and construction. Direct Cost does not include either CITY or COUNTY general overhead. e) EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean the date of the signature
ofthe last person necessary for this MASTER AGREEMENT to become effective. f) INDIRECT COSTS shall mean those costs which have been incurred for common or joint purposes. These costs
benefit more than one cost objective and cannot be readily identified with a particular final project or program cost objective without effort disproportionate to the results achieved.
g) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS shall mean contracts or agreements entered into between CITY and COUNTY in accordance with Texas Govermnent Code Chapter 791 . h) LEAD AGENCY shall mean that
entity responsible for project management, including, but not limited to planning, design, right-of-way acquisition, approved utility relocation or adjustment and construction. i) MASTER
AGREEMENT shall mean this document including all incorporated documents, attachments, and exhibits. j) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) shall mean a written document which incorporates
the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE. Said MOA shall at a minimum identify the overall funding scheme, and basic scope of the PROJECT. k) PARCEL OR PARCELS shall mean those tracts
of land and improvements located either wholly or partially thereon, identified by COUNTY, CITY or other STAKEHOLDER as required for right-of-way requirements ofthe PROJECT. Such Right-of-way
shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. I) PREDESIGN CHARRETTE
shall mean a meeting of decision making STAKEHOLDERS and other members of the PROJECT TEAM for the purpose of entering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the overall funding, alignment
and scope of the PROJECT. m) PROJECT MANAGER shall mean the person appointed by the Lead Agency who is assigned the primary duty for assuring Project Team coordination and timely project
delivery. There will be only one PROJECT MANAGER assigned to a PROJECT. n) PROJECT TEAM shall mean representatives from COUNTY, CITY, and other STAKEHOLDERS as may be mutually agreed
upon by COUNTY, CITY and STAKEHOLDER or otherwise with responsibility for delivering the completed PROJECT. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110100 -Page 2 Oixumenl #: 930780 
0) PROJECT(S) shall mean the road improvements approved by the COUNTY for inclusion in the Transportation Major Capital Improvements Program approved by the Commissioners Court and approved
by the CITY and!or other applicable STAKEHOLDERS. p) ROAD or STREET AMENITY shall mean PROJECT features not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN including but not limitea to
street pavers, colored concrete, planters, irrigation, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature above and beyond the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN or any increase in
capacity in excess of COUNTY determined requirements based on anticipated future traffic flow. q) RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that real property, (either existing, or required in fee
and! or easement) identified by COUNTY, CITY, or other project STAKEHOLDER as necessary for the construction of the PROJECT. Such Right-of-way shall include both the existing street,
road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. r) STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN shall mean the standard
COUNTY-approved CITY criteria for paving, bridges, drainage and appurtenances, traffic control items including pavement marking, warranted uniform signals, street light foundations,
pull boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/tum lanes, access, required structural retaining walls and standard driveways excluding ROAD OR STREET AMENITmS, or such design criteria
as may be mutually agreed upon in a project specific SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. s) SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent to this document which is entered into to establish
the contractual rights and responsibilities of the CITY and COUNTY as it relates to the PROJECT. t) STAKEHOLDER shall mean any govermnental or quasi-govermnental entity making a financial
contribution to the PROJECT. n) TxDOT shall mean the Texas Department ofTransportation. v) UTILITIES shall mean each City Utility, public utility, common carrier, govermnental or quasi-govermnental
facility, fiber optic facility, or other facility located within the limits of the Project by virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY, COUNTY, or
STATE OF TEXAS. w) CITY UTILITY shall mean those owned or operated by CITY which require relocation or adjustment for the purpose of the construction of the PROJECT as identified by
PROJECT plans. x) UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean ail UTILITIES located within the limits ofthe PROJECT by virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and
the CITY. MASTER AGREEMENT -11/10/00 -Page 3 
y) UTILITY IN PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES, excluding CITY UTILITIES, whose facilities are located within the limits of the PROJECT by virtue of satisfactorily
documented pre-existing real property ownership. z) UTILITY BETTERMENT shall mean any increase in the capacity of any UTILITY'S Facility adjusted or relocated as a part of the PROJECT
as compared to the existing Facility, or any upgrading of the UTILITY'S Facility above the standard practices, devices or materials, specified by the UTILITY and customarily used by
CITY or UTILITY on projects solely financed by CITY or UTILITY. Provided, however, that any upgrading necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Betterment,
and further, that any increase in the capacity of the Utility Facility resulting solely from the replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly manufactured, processed or installed
shall not be considered a Betterment, provided that such replacement shall be only to the standard devices or materials currently used on other projects financed solely by CITY or UTILITY.
This meaning shall apply to utilities that are part of the project as well as the standard basic street components (See "STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN"). ARTICLE II. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT
This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the respective agreement fully executed (The "Effective Date"). This MASTER AGREEMENT shall
be an annual agreement and shall automatically renew without further action by either party unless or until tenninated as provided in Article IV (Termination) or the expiration often
(J 0) years, whichever shall first occur. ARTICLE III. AMENDMENTS This Master Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of the CITY and COUNTY. Any amendment must be in writing
and approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. ARTICLE IV. TERMINATION, DEFAULT. TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE 1. TERMINATION A This MASTER AGREEMENT may be tenninated
by any ofthe following conditions: (1) By expiration ofterm ofthe agreement. (2) By mutual written consent and agreement of COUNTY and CITY. (3) By either party, by notice in writing
establishing the effective date of termination to the other party as consequence ofthe party being in defuult ofthe provisions of this Agreement or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT or fuilure
to timely provide funding, with proper allowances being made for circumstances beyond the control ofthe defaulting party. (4) By either party with ninety days written notice to the other
party. MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 4 
B. Should either party terminate this MASTER AGREEMENT as herein provided, all existing, fully executed SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS made under this MASTER AGREEMENT shall not be terminated
and shall automatically incorporate all the provisions of this MASTER AGREEMENT. C. In the event that any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is terminated prior to completion of the PROmCT, no additional
Costs shall be incurred other than Costs due and payable at the time oftermination for services actually performed or that shall become due and payable due to such termination. The LEAD
AGENCY, to the extent permitted, may terminate all project contracts, unless written notice is given by either party to the other of its intent to complete the PROmCT, and prepare a
final accounting for the PROmCT. D. Ifthe PROmCT is terminated by the CITY prior to the award of any construction contract and the PRomCT is located within the CITY limits, CITY shall
pay to COUNTY the full amount expended by COUNTY on the PROmCT and COUNTY shall transfer to CITY its rights and all deliverables that it may be entitled to receive under the existing
professional services or other project contracts or agreements. Such amount shall be included in the final accounting for the PROmCT. Such amount shall be due and payable in full ninety
(90) days subsequent to the termination, or thirty days subsequent to delivery of final accounting. E. Once the construction contract has been let, with the approval of the other party,
the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for that PROmCT cannot be terminated until completion of the construction. F. In the event that a PRomCT is terminated either party may, upon written notice,
take over the project and prosecute the work to completion by contract or otherwise at their sole cost and expense. In the event that the party completing the work is not the LEAD AGENCY,
it is agreed that the PROmCT MANAGER will furnish to the completing party a listing of current records pertaining to any outstanding obligations or other records or information required
by by any project contract, including any Work Order, or requested in writing by completing party in either printed or electronic format or both. The LEAD AGENCY agrees to cooperate
with the completing party. The LEAD AGENCY will use its best efforts to transfer to the completing party all contracts. Obligations under such contracts shall become the sole obligation
of the completing party upon transfer. Completing party agrees to timely pay all future obligations under such contract as they become due and payable. Completing party hereby releases
the LEAD AGENCY from any and all liability under such assigned contracts subsequent to date of transfer, effective upon the transfer date. LEAD AGENCY shall exercise its best efforts
to insure a transition of services without interruption G. Either party shall have the right to retain copies of all data, information, engineering, studies, or other items produced
to the date oftermination. H. Provisions B through G will survive the termination of this MASTER AGREEMENT and any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and shall be a continuing obligation until the
transition of services, all payments made and the PROmCTS are complete. All items listed or required in this provision shall be furnished by LEAD AGENCY to completing party without additional
cost or expense to completing party. MASTERAGREEMENT-Il/IOl00 PageS 
2. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be deemed in violation of this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through
strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, fire, flood, invasion, insurrection, accident, order of court, judge or civil authority, an act of God, or any cause reasonably beyond the party's control
and not attributable to its neglect. In the event of such an occurrence the time for performance of such obligations or duty shall be suspended until such time that such inability to
perform, shall be removed. The party claiming the suspension shall give notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days of the knowledge of
such occurrence. Each party shall make all reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects of any suspension. ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTY and CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall
each be responsible for their own negligent acts or omissions or other tortious conduct in the course of performance of this MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental
immunity available to either COUNTY or CITY under Texas law and without waiving any available defenses under Texas law. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to create or grant
any rights, contractual or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. ARTICLE VI. NOTIFICATION A. WHEN NOTICE IS PERMITTED OR REQUIRED BY THIS MASTER AGREEMENT, IT SHALL BE IN
WRITING AND SHALL BE PRESUMED DELIVERED WHEN DELIVERED IN PERSON OR THREE (3) DAYS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE PLACED, POSTAGE PREPAID, IN THE U. S. MAIL, CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED, RETURN
RECEIPT REQUESTED AND ADDRESSED TO THE PARTIES AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS. B. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE TO COUNTY BY CITY SHALL BE MAILED OR DELIVERED BY HAND AS FOLLOWS: DALLAS COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS Donald R. Holzwarth, P.E., Director 411 Elm Street, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202-3389 MASTER AGREEMENT -1111 0/00 -Page 6 Docwnent #: 9307BO 
C. ALL NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNTY TO CITY SHALL BE MAILED OR DELIVERED BY HAND AS FOLLOWS: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN OF ADDISON P.O. BOX 9010 ADDISON. TX 75001-9010 D.
EITHER PARTY HERETO MAY FROM TIME TO TIME DESIGNATE ANOTHER AND DIFFERENT ADDRESS FOR RECEIPT OF NOTICE BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO THE OTHER PARTY. ARTICLE
VII. CITY COVENANTS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A. To execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and construction of the PROJECTS mutually agreed upon and incorporated
herein by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Provide City Council Resolution adopting approved preferred alignment, proposed estimated budget, and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for each
milestone as specified herein or in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY agrees to share the funding of each PROJECT with COUNTY on an equal share basis (50%/50%), or as otherwise agreed
upon cost sharing arrangement as specified in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT with the following exclusions: CITY shall bear the entire cost of: 1. CITY owned utilities relocation or adjustment
such as water and sanitary sewer facilities, except utility adjustments directly attributable to storm sewer improvement conflicts; 2. ROAD or STREET AMENITIES including but not limited
to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN; 3. UTILITY BETTERMENTS and ROAD or STREET
􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁉􀁔􀁉􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀠 4. CITY PROJECT TEAM participation or project management (if the CITY has LEAD AGENCY Responsibility) Direct Costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly
accounting system; 5. CITY Indirect Costs. When mutual written agreement has been reached as to PROJECT limits by COUNTY and CITY at the Predesign Charrette, City agrees to acquire right-of-way
required for designated projects by voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process and/or other legal means, to the maximum extent possible, and to ensure through the building
permitting process that legally required setbacks are adhered to in order to limit encroachment upon the required right of way. CITY agrees to fund ROW not acquired but reasonably expected
MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00 -Page 7 Documen! II: 930780 
to be. CITY also agrees to fund the removal of improvements that are encroachments within existing or proposed right ofway areas. In the event of any proposed use of the PROJECT right-of-way
that will conflict with the proposed PROJECT and CITY is unable to obtain such right-of-way as described above, CITY shall notify COUNTY of such conflict. COUNTY and CITY shall determine
if the acquisition of the conflicting parcel would be in the best interest of the PROJECT. In the event that agreement is reached and the parcel is acquired such cost shall be included
in the pro rated cost of the project in the agreed upon proportions. CITY hereby agrees that it will consider granting the COUNTY authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within
the city limits on each specific right of way alignment as approved by the CITY and COUNTY. D. To require all Utilities located within or using the present public right of way on all
designated transportation projects within CITY's municipal limits to adjust and/or relocate said Utilities as required by the proposed improvement of the designated transportation Project.
CITY Utilities shall be relocated or adjusted at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. E. CITY agrees to timely
schedule and consider issues relating to billboards, advertising signs, non-conforming uses, and zoning and similar restrictions that require action by the governmental body or any administrative
body of CITY to avoid delay of PROJECT or increase in PROJECT cost. Additional PROJECT cost caused or contributed to by CITY's failure to timely schedule and consider such matters shall
be paid in full by CITY. F. To the extent allowed by law, CITY shall require the adjustment and/or relocation of UTILITIES to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible
after approval of final plans to prevent PROJECT schedule delays. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, all UTILITIES shall be adjusted or relocated and the right-of-way
clear for construction not later than thirty (30) days prior to the award of the construction contract. CITY will notify the COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS when utility conflicts would
impact progress of the project completion. COUNTY and CITY agree to work in partnership and with all STAKEHOLDERS to solve the problem to include helping to engage elected officials
in the problem resolution with the goal to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution of construction on the PROJECT.G. Where new stonn drainage facilities are in conflict with CITY owned water and sanitary sewer systems, and the stonn sewer design carmot be modified, after submission of an acceptable
schedule ofwork and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY and COUNTY approval, the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of CITY water and sewer utilities shall be pro rated at
the overall percentage agreed to by CITY and COUNTY for cost sharing. CITY shall be responsible for funding one hundred percent (100%) of any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided herein,
all costs for adjustment and/or relocation of utilities in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the Utility Owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay or other
damages caused by CITY UTILITY'S failure to timely relocate or adjust the facility shall be at the entire cost ofCITY. MASTER AGREEMENT -11110100 -Page 8 
H. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances
in the right of way. In the event that the aforementioned features are allowed by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration of the project, CITY shall bear the entire cost
ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. I. To provide to COUNTY for COUNTY'S or COUNTY'S designee use, at no cost, adequate copies of all construction standards, codes, (specifically
including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications, gnidelines, standards or any other pertinent information as determined by COUNTY to be required for the completion of
the PROJECT. Additionally, CITY shall furnish COUNTY, at no cost, such documents as necessary to keep all items previously furnished to County current. J. Actively participate and provide
authorized representation with decision making power at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completi
on and fiduciary relationships. K. CITY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE as a part of the PROJECT
schedule. City finther agrees that if no review notes are submitted by CITY in writing to COUNTY on a timely basis, plans are approved as submitted. L. City agrees that it will pay all
additional project cost for any CITY requested discretionary change, including, but not limited to STREET AMENITIES AND UTILITY BETTERMENTS, in or addition to the design or construction
of the project subsequent to the City opportunity to review the sixty five percent (65%) design plans. M. Provide at CITY's cost for the continuing maintenance of all PROJECT ROW, such
as mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period between acquisition and construction. N. Subsequent to the completion of a PROJECT, that the CITY will be responsible for
all future maintenance, operation and control of the PROJECT, without cost or contribution from the COUNTY. O. Bear the entire cost of design, construction and administration for landscaping,
streetscaping, streetlighting, as such items are not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN and other ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES specified or requested by CITY in excess of STANDARD
BASIC PROJECT DESIGN. P. It is the intent of this MASTER AGREEMENT that the COUNTY will be the LEAD AGENCY. In the event that the CITY and COUNTY agree in writing that CITY will manage
and administer one or more PROJECTS, CITY and COUNTY will enter into a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as to that project(s). In such instance, CITY agrees to assume all LEAD AGENCY responsibilities
except as may be set forth in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as determined by mutual consent. MASTER AGREEMENT -11/10/00 -Page 9 Documem II: 930780 
ARTICLE VIII. UTILITY IMPACTS A. In cases where a UTILITY IS LOCATED IN A PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OFWAY, and it is necessary to relocate the facility or make adjustments by reason of the
widening or improvement of the designated project, the COUNTY (or CITY if acting as the LEAD AGENCy) will, after submission by utility company of right of way documentation and cost
estimates acceptable to the CITY, COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS, assign the actual costs for the relocation and/or adjustment of said utility to the PROJECT. B. In cases where a UTILITY
IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, excluding CITY UTILITIES, occupies any portion of the PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY by Texas or Federal Law or by agreement with the CITY that allows or permits the CITY
to cause the relocation of the utility for the construction of the project, the CITY shall timely require and enforce the relocation or adjustment requirement at no cost to the project.
In the event that the CITY has no legal or contractual right to cause the relocation, the relocation or adjustment shall be relocated or adjusted and all cost shall be a Project Cost.
CITY shall take all steps necessary to insure to the extent practicable, that such relocation or adjustment shall not conflict with or delay the PROJECT schedule. ARTICLE IX. COUNTY
AGREES AS FOLLOWS A. To provide as a PROJECT Cost preliminary engineering which will define project details, e.g., location, scope of work and specific right of way alignment for each
improvement. Such preliminary engineering shall be submitted to the CITY fur approval, prior to proceeding with the final design and any right ofway acquisition. B. To provide as a PROJECT
Cost for the construction of transportation improvements based upon design criteria confurming to STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN in conformity with applicable CITY ordinances and standards,
to the extent of Commissioners Court approved program funding. Scope of work shall include the agreed upon design standards as the basis for improvement criteria. Deviations from mutually
agreed upon application of CITY standards andlor design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY. Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOT standards as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of
this MASTER AGREEMENT shall be utilized unless otherwise mutually agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. To actively participate and provide authorized representation at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE
, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development and completion and fiduciary relationships. D. To provide project
management of each Project where County is LEAD AGENCY from commencement to completion of construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redefine project management
roles as beneficial to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA and SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. MASTERAGREEMENf-ll/10/OO-Page 10 
E. Upon receipt ofwritten request detailing the information requested, to provide information related to 'the PROJECT to CITY or CITY'S designee at no cost to the CITY. F. COUNTY agrees
to provide timely review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review notes are submitted by COUNTY (if CITY is filling the role as PROJECT MANAGER) in writing to CITY,
plans are approved as submitted. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, as part of the project schedule. G. To submit final engineering plans fur review
and written approval by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to advertising for construction. H. To provide for the acquisition, including acquisition by Eminent Domain, of the necessary
additional right of way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard requirements and utilizing existing public right of way to the maximum extent possible as a PROJECT
cost. I. To require all contractors to secure all necessary permits required by CITY on said construction projects. J. To furnish record drawings ofconstruction plans for the permanent
records ofCITY within twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance of the transportation improvement PROJECT. K. In and for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration,
including the future obligation of maintenance, operation, control and acceptance of liability therefor to transfer, by Quit Claim Deed, all PROJECT related easements acquired by COUNTY
to CITY. L. In the event COUNTY and CITY agree in writing that CITY will be the LEAD AGENCY for the agreed upon PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs as detailed in Article
XI (FUNDING) in an amount not to exceed the PROJECT cost as approved by Dallas County Commissioners Court and incorporated in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. All COUNTY payments shall be
in accordance with COUNTY Policies and Procedures or as may be mutually agreed between the parties and incorporated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. ARTICLEX. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE A. CITY
and COUNTY, as specified in Articles VII and IX, respectively, will designate officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette to be conducted on a mutually agreeable
date and location. At least part of this meeting will be conducted on the PROJECT site. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identify the general project scope and the general preferred
alignment of the project, and project administration and management roles, to include the PROJECT MANAGER. Additionally, key project team participants shall be identified at the Predesign
Charrette . MASTERAGREEMENT-ll/lO/OO-Page 11 Document 1/; 9J{)780 
C. At the conclusion of the Predesign Charrette a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall be produced which outlines the identified roles and scope for the Project. ARTICLE XI. FUNDING A. CITY
and COUNTY mutually agree to proportionately fimd the DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs as agreed by the parties in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, COUNTY shall bear fifty percent (50%) of the total DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs excluding the ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY
BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accounting system and other items as specified in this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. COUNTY
shall not be responsible for any amount of fimding in excess of the PROJECT not-Io-exceed amount as shown in the PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, CITY shall bear fifty percentage (50%) of all DIRECT PROJECT AND PROGRAM costs. In addition City agrees to fimd all other City cost as provided herein, including, but not
limited to, ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accounting system and
other items as specified in this MASTER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Unless otherwise slated in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the milestones for each project shall be (1)
preliminary and primary design (2) right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation or adjustment and (3) construction. The LEAD AGENCY shall prepare an estimated cost for each milestone.
Upon approval of the cost by the other party, each party shall fimd its share of the respective milestones by placing that amount of money in an escrow account or otherwise encmuber
the fimds to insure that the LEAD AGENCY will have sufficient fimding available from current revenue for the timely payment of PROJECT milestone costs. The LEAD AGENCY may bill the other
party for periodic payments for the actual amount of work completed toward the completion of the milestone. Upon completion of the milestone, the nonmanagement party will be fumished
a notice that such work has been completed and the amount of fimding that may be utilized to pay subsequent milestone Project cost. Notwithstanding any other term or condition contained
herein or in any SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT, neither party will be required to award any contract until written certification has been received that fimding has been placed in escrow or encmubered
for the payment of the non-awarding party's portion of the PROJECT cost. C. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT shall exceed the not-to-exceed amount, CITY and COUNTY agree to
either reduce the scope of construction or seek additional fimding to complete the PROJECT at the agreed upon cost share percentages. At the termination of the PROJECT, the LEAD AGENCY
will do a final cost accounting of the PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by either party exceeds its portion of the actual cost, the difference will be remitted to such party.
In the event that additional fimds are due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such fimds within thirty (30) days ofreceipt of such billing. MASTER AGREEMENT
-11110/00 Page 12 
D. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY based on invoices for actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. E. Upon execution of a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, CITY shall escrow an amount adequate for initial project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary, and primary
design. ARTICLE XII. NO TruRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the tenns and conditions of this Agreement and all right of action
relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to CITY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any
other person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services or benefits under this agreement shall
be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement is intended only to set forth the contractusl right and responsibilities ofthe agreement parties. ARTICLE XIII. RIGHT OF ENTRY
The CITY agrees that COUNTY shall have the right to enter upon the PROJECT area for the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. CITY agrees to furnish such police or
other CITY persormel as requested BY COUNTY for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. Article XIV. LIST OF PROJECTS CITY agrees that it
has been furnished with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, subject to the agreement between the parties of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT.
CITY stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and describes the type of project in sufficient detail
that the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects being considered. ARTICLE xv. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all matters pertinent
thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity, Title 5 of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable State ofTexas and Federal laws.
B. Entire Aveement. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties hereto
as herein provided. MASTERAGREEMENT-Il/IO/00-Page 13 DoeunteJlt II: 9l(781) 
C. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected or impaired, and such remaining
provisions shall remain in full force and effect. D. DefaultlWaiverlMitigation. It is not a waiver of default if the non-defaulting party fails to declare immediately a default or delays
in taking any action. Pursuit of any remedies set forth in this Agreement does not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this Agreement or provided by law. E. Federal or State of Texas
Funding. In the event that any work or part thereof is funded by State of Texas or U. S. Govemment funding and any statute, rule, regulation, grant, contract provision or other State
of Texas or U. S. Govemment law, rule, regulation or other provision imposes additional or greater requirement(s) than stated herein, City agrees to timely comply therewith without additional
cost or expense to County. F. Headings. The titles which are used following the number of each paragraph are only for convenience in locating various provisions of this AGREEMENT and
shall not be deemed to affect the interpretation or construction ofsuch provision. G. Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this AGREEMENT shall be held and construed to include
any other gender; and words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, unless the text clearly requires otherwise. H. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in mUltiple
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Article XVI. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY With
the COUNTY'S adoption of Court Order No. 2000-2117 (the "County Order"), the COUNTY has approved certain PROJECTS located within the CITY (the "City Projects"). It is anticipated by
this Agreement, that the CITY will proceed with the funding, design, and construction of the City Projects, and that the COUNTY will reimburse the City a percentage of the design and
construction costs as set forth in the County Order, not to exceed the maximum amounts shown therein, unless otherwise agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT between the parties. Any SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT shall reflect such reimbursement and such other terms and conditions as the parties may agree upon. The Town of Addison, State of Texas, has executed the Agreement pursuant
to duly authorized City Council Resolution Minutes Dated the __day of , 200_ • The County of Dallas, State of Texas, bas executed this agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order
Number and passed on the __day of _____, 200 . MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00 -Page 14 Oocwnent #: 9301110 
TOWN OF ADDISON COUNTY OF DALLAS BY: BY: RON WHITEHEAD, CITY MANAGER LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE DATE: _______________ DATE: ________________ ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY Jobn Dabill, Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District Attorney MASTER AGREEMENT-II/I0/00 Page 15 Dao;;umcnt #: 9J(J780 
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 411 ELM STREET. 3RD FLOOR DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 SELAS CAMARILLO. P.E•• R.P.L.S. ASSISTANT DIRECTOfl·PROPEATY DIVISION PHONE: (214) 653-&400 EMAIL: SCamarilloOd.Rascounty.mg
FAX: (214) 653-11517 I I I W. BOWEN WEEMS I ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DALlAS COUNTY. TEXAS 1 AOMINISTRATlON aUILDING 411 ELM STREET (214) 553-7358
DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 i FAX; (214) 653.6134 EMAIL: bw<lems@daUaSCOtJnty.org I,, 
GOAL #4 PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: Objooiive 4.1: Develop candidate project recommendations willl our partner cilies and agencies for lIle 1999 TEA-21 Call for Projects by NCTCOG as Phase
1 of our Capital Improvement Program. (Don Cranford) AM Obiective 4.2: Develop recommended transportation . elements for lIle Dallas County Major Capital Development Funding Plan. (Don
Cranford) Obiectjve 4.3: Reengineer our design, RON, and construction programming and project management processes for future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projoois. (Don Holzwarth,
AD's, and Jack Hedge) GOAL #5 INVEST IN PEOPLE: Objeciive 5.1: Establish a professional developmenl system lIlal provides for more systematic career progression, training programs, and
incentives for high performance tied to our Departmental Goals and Olr jectives. (Don Holzwarth, AD's, Toni Bacchus and Irv Griffin) Objective 5.2: Improve Public Works facilities and
fumishings in order to increase personal productivity. (Don Holzwarth and AD's)AAR Obiective 5.3: 5.3: Assure all Public Works Tearn Mem· bers have Personal Performance Objectives in
place, linked to !he Department strategy, and are held accountable for achievement (Don Holzwarth, AD's, and all Supervisors) Objective 5.4: Develop Safety manual for County personnel.
(Dan Middlelon and James Walsh) Issue 2, Number I Revised S/30roo PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 1999 to 2001 Mission Statement: Our mission is to improve the quality of life
of our customen; -the ciUzens, taxpayers, transportation users, communities, and intemal County partnerS :... by effeclive/y planning, developing, implementing andadministering approved
regional public works transportation projects, supporting maintenance of county-wide roads and bridges, and providing real property management selVices. irIS/on Statement: Dallas County
Public Worlm DeparlmenL..... .A recognized leader in .regional transportation planning and coordination. • An effective agent and valued partner for planning, design, right-of-way acquisition,
and construction of high value-added regionaitransporlation projects. • Avital part ofDallas County government • A values based organization; -Respected, Responsive, Reliable; -demonstrating
extraordinaTY caring..... caring leadership of our County people; caring partnerships focused on our customers; caring stewardship of the fIScal and na/ural resources we manage. DALLAS
COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Dallas County experienced asilrge of economic growth and population expansion in the late nineties. Critical to the success of sustainable growth is the transportation
infrastructure in the County. With over 2million poople and 32 cities, Dallas County is preparing for the 21st Centmy with.a renewed sense of energy and excitement. The men and women
of the Public Wolks Department enthusiastically accept the challenge to be proactive leaders in de/ivering /rensportation projects· in a manner thet truly delights our customers. Our
Strategic Plan consists of our Mission, Vision, Goals and Objectives. srRA rEGIC GOALS While our vision is abeacon, /he Goals guide us to more specilic action. They become the major
categories ofeffort in which we need to progress. We expect the Goals to change only infrequently as we proceed up the path of change. As opportunities arise, we may discover other major
categories of walk that we need to accomplish to achieve our vision. Our five Goals guide us to achieve revolu1ionary progress for the beneftl of our customers and partnen;. I our project
delivery capability. 3 R's of Restructuring, Reengineering. and Reinvention to assure we are optimally organized, have the most efficient processes and have the right core competencies
to meet future needs. GOAL #2 LEVERAGE TECHNOLOGY: Use the new information management, design and project management tools to help revolutionize ourproductivity. GOAL #3 Improve the
. partnerships and internal County teamwork. GOAL #4 PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: Prepare for Ihe next capital investment program through extensive coordination and assuring we leam from
insights gained in execu1ing the 1991 Bond Program. GOAL #5 INVESTIN PEOPLE: Show extraol'dlnary care lor our people, assuring that we recruit, develop and retain the best possible team
members for Public 􀁗􀁯􀁲􀁫􀁾􀀮􀀠
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES Our Vision and Goals are. ultimately achieved through specific acHons -our Objectives. These are concrete plans of action with process and product improvement as
the targeted results. They are aimed at the heart of our business -delivering projects to customers in concert with our partners. We initially tackled a finite number of Objectives in
order to stTetch but not overwhelm our people. As Objectives are successfully completed, an Aller Action Review (AM) is written to explain "What Happened' and "Lessons Leamed'. Often
these reveal the need for new or modified Objectives. As a result we have almost doubled the number of Objectives. By continuing to select .t)le right Objectives, achieving the milestones,
and incorporating measures of progress into our regular processes, we can achieve the kind of lasting and beneficial change to achieve our. VIsion. . GOAL #1 REVOLUTIONIZE EFFECTIVENESS:
Objective 1. 1: Achieve effective and efficient financial program management capability in. Public Works. (Don Holzwarth) AM • Objective 1.2: Achieve FY 00 and FY01 targets for encumbering
funds in each of the 3 Program areas of Publit; Works (TranspOrtation & Planning, Property, and Engineering & Construction). (Don Holzwarth) Objective 12.1: Achieve FY 00 & FY 01 design
completion and construction award targets.(A1berta Blair'Robinson) Objective 12.2: Achieve FY 00 and FY01 targets for encumbering funds in property acquisition ectivifies.(SeIes Camarillo)
Objective 1.2.3: Achieve FY 00 and FY01 Targets for encumbering planning, transportation and CMAQ funds. (Don Cranford) Objective 1.3; Reengineer our utility coordination process in
design and construction. (Janet Norman) AM Obiec/ive t3. 1: Increase capability through Indefinite Delivery Quality Coniract for Subsurface Utility Engineering. (Janet Norman) Objective
t3.2: Increase capability through Slrategic Utility Partnering. (Janet Norman) Objective 1.4: Institute evaluation systems for design consultants and construction contractorn.(Dale Davidson)
AM Objective 1.5: Revise and improve contracts with consultants and cities. (John Mears) AM Objective 1.5.1: Revise ILA contract documents with cities and other agencies that will be
utilized for the new MCIP.(Alberta BlairRobinson) Objective 1.5.2: Develop new conlrec/and systems for bringing consultants on-board for new MCIP. (Alberta Blair-Robinson) Obiective
1.6: Assign designern to work as construction project engineern. (Alberta Blair-Robinson) AM Objective 1.7: Increase capability to do lab, survey, design, and subsurface utilities engineering
(SUE) services through Indefinile Delivery Conlrac1s. (Jack Hedge and Alberta Blair-Robinson) Objective 1.8: Increase capability within the Design Branch by filling vacant designer positions.
(Jack Hedge, Alberta Blair-Robinson and Don Holzwarth) Objective 1.9: Increase Right of Way acquiSition capability to assure Bond Program and future Capital Improvement Progrann (CIP)
projects stay on traclc (Salas Camarillo) AM Obieclive 1.10: Revise the Dallas County overall .' ROW policy. (Salas Camerillo) Objective 1.11: Develop a formally structured and documented
constructibility review process. (Irv Griffin) AM Objective 1.12: Develop new change order policy and procedures. (James Walsh) MR Objective 1. 13: Establish a Pavement Quality Team
to evaluate Dallas County procedures, specifications, and processes related to concrete pavements. (Larry Ansley) AM Objec1ive 1.14: Dramatically Improve Public Works Financial Management
Processes{Noah New) Objec!ive 1.1S: EstabHsh and maintain a Public Works Department Technical Ubrary (Jack Hedge and Sid Homer) Obieclive 1.16: Continue to train and develop a mabix
team process to eJfectively incorporate the 5Phase Gapital Improvement Program utilizing the individual strengths of the team members.{lrv Griffin) Objective 1.17: Develop New Public
Works Design Guidelines and 􀁍􀁡􀁮􀁵􀁡􀁬􀁾􀁊􀁡􀁣􀁫􀀠Hedge) Objective 1.18: Revise/update subdivision policy. (Jack Hedge, David McSwain and Doug Keesey) Objeptive 1.19: Develop a Manufactured
Home Rental Community Policy!Jack Hedge) AM Objective 1.20: Fill senior inspector and current vacant inspector positions. (Alberta Blair-Robinson) Objec1ive 1.21: Establish Construction
Utility Coordinator. (Alberta Blair-Robinson) GOAL 112 LEVERAGE TECHNOLOGY, ObjectiVe 2.1: Upgrade Public Works computer resources and tools in order to dramatically improve our effilctiveness.
(Don Holzwarth) MR Db/ee/ive 2.2: Obtain Cell phones for appropriate peopie in Public Works. (Sid Homer) AM Objective 2.3: Revise and Implement New Project Management Tools (Microsoft
Projects 98 and New PSR)JAlberta Blair-Robinson) Objective 2A: Dramatically improve our project delivery capability by planning, developing and acquiring technology to move Public Works
Transportation projects to web-based or other computer linked solutions for project management.(lrv Goffin} Objective 2.5: Provide computern and training for inspectors. (Bud Snodgrass)
Objective 2.6: Establish Construction Senior Technical Coordlnator.(A1berta Blair-Blair-Robinson) Objective 2.7: Ublize a streamlined process of 0btaining property tax maps and related
data using GIS technology.(Craig Marek) Objeptive 2.8: Improve service to our public customers and partners through planning, design and implementing a PW home page as' part of Dallas
County web-based service. (Edith Ngwa) Obieclive 2.9: Prepare to exectlte the first phase of the Public Works CIP by ensuring thatall deSigners, technicians and drafters are trained in Microstation J. (Jack Hedge and Toni Bacchus) GOAL #3 REVITAUZE PARTNERSHIPS; Objective 3. 1: Plan and execute general partnering
workshops with key private sector and public works organization.s during FY 00. (Don Holzwarth) MR Objec1ive 3.2: Assure effective contract partnering for construction projects initiated
in FY 99 and FY 00. (Project Managers) Objective 3. 3: Reestablish and recharge strong -:,., . ties with internal partners within Public Works and DaUas County. (Don Holzwarth) Objective
3.4: Improve the Property Division information distribution process.(Pam Easterling) AM Objective 3. 5: Work to help streamline the mUIlijurisdictional review process.(Don Holzwarth)
(CeTltimted on oppruile page) 
CITY OF ADDISON KICKOFF MEETING DECEMBER 11,2000 NAME 􀂣􀁑􀁾 I Ac.J::.. 2J, HL,􀀷􀁬􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀠 􀁣􀁾􀀠 RW. A,.h17 􀁾􀀠.IVrkt ) " 1/, I Sf· -'. co vc; Utv(C/fIA/I/roWIV pF /I.PJrJPIV
A .l u,.,. MUI? 'f')tJ...J ,. /I k I VII_ , I t )\vlA fie 'U;:J I 1 • I' ! 􀁌􀀱􀁊􀁨􀁾􀁊􀁡􀀮􀀠D· 􀁾􀀱􀀱 i15111 mBas u,,_tJk , I E-MAIL Ann""",,,, ./,Jr.,. .-.. _j qt:' f" /1/􀁾􀀠 -0/.
or? A/A//-uN;). dct/b, Qocv"ty Dre, ...J 􀁓􀁃􀀻􀀻􀁦􀀨􀀻􀁦􀁣􀂣􀀯􀁾􀂷􀀠-cj. "./...//.s()'l fx. vc. vunll I. .. _ A. .......,. h. 􀁾􀀠 10 I' .( ., .. ..,.. Lob.h-"i'· ,/.JdafkJf!.Ah.L r1Y4
'-' v '" i 􀁾􀁍􀁉􀁉􀀠 􀀮􀁆􀁁􀁘􀁎􀁾􀀠 z 14. 6.S!!s.(f.4ec> 2./4.""$ 3."445 ;)14 c;:,S:S 7/5/::)/cj 6s-., to 7"'«')-, 172-t{fl?-2SS'6 '172-4-9-2,F3? 412.· 􀀩􀁾􀀠 zg1l> ! I. i #/'1 JI I.:Jt
'l 4)') 715/I.C3 -{PWsi ' I II I I i ,: , , 
PROJECT, the LEAD AGENCY will do a fmal cost accounting of the PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by either party exceeds its portion of the actual cost, the difference will
be remitted to such party. In the event that additional funds are due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such funds within thirty (30) days of receipt of such
billing. D. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY based on invoices for actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. E. Upon execution of
a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall escrow an amount adequate for initial project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary,
and primary design. ARTiCLEXll. NO THlRD-P ARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all right
of action relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to CITY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right ofaction whatsoever
by any other person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services or benefits under this agreement
shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement is intended only to set forth the contractual right and responsibilities ofthe agreement parties. ARTICLE XllI. RIGHT OF
ENTRY The CITY agrees that COUNTY shall have the right to enter upon the PROJECT area for the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. CITY agrees to furnish such police
or other CITY personnel as requested BY COUNTY for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. Article XIV. LIST OF PROJECTS CITY agrees that
it has been furnished with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, subject to the agreement between the parties of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT.
CITY stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and describes the type of project in sufficient detail
that the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects being considered. ARTICLE XV. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all matters pertinent
thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity, Title 5 of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable State of Texas and Federal laws.
MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00 -Page 13 
,..-, Zq COURT ORDER ORDBRNO: 2000 2117 DATE: 0CT 1 7 2000 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNlY OF DALLAS § BE IT 􀁾􀁬􀁜􀁩􀀮􀁬􀁂􀁅􀁒􀁅􀁄􀀬􀀠at 11 resu1ar meetin,s of'the Commissioners Court of Dallas
County, Texas, held on the ____ 􀀱􀀷􀁾_____d!lY o'C____..:____􀁏􀀻􀀺􀁴􀀮􀁣􀁉􀁾􀀮􀀡􀀮􀀮􀀮______• 2000, On motion made by Mike ttx'ell 􀁾􀁳􀀽 􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀀠 , and seoonded . by;nne A. 􀁍􀁡􀁾􀁌􀀿􀁳􀁴􀀮
114 •the following Order was adopted: WHEREAS" Commissioners Court was briefed on Ootoher 10, 2000 resarding ,ecommended TnmsportatiOll Improvemen\ Projects to be considered for funding
from the Major Capital Development Fund for construction in fiscal , years 2004 tI\I'\l ;io07; and WHEREAS, 'continued and forecast popl.IJation and employment growth in Dallas COl.Inty
places increasing demands on . the County's:surface transportation system; and WHEREAS, Dallas County has a long standing role in providing transportation system improvements for the
benefit orits oitizw and the publio travelins in Dallas County; and WHEREAS, Dallas County desires to implement needed transportation system improvements in partnership with tho cities
and other transportallOn agencies in Dallas County; and . WHEREAS.: the specific Transportation System Improvement Projects inoluded in the attached listing have been , identified thtough
an extensive data gathering and evaluation process and in conjunotion with the Dallas County cities for flmding 􀁾􀁊􀁬􀁤.implementation in the IT 2001 -2007 time pcrlod; WHEREAS, it
is thc intent ofthe Commissioners Court that the pro)eets included in the attached listinS be implemented with joint !\\ndin, by the County and the cities and other agenCIes, and that
County participation be liImted to the percentJllcs 􀁾􀁨􀁯􀁷􀁮 in the listings, not to exceed the total County amounts shown for each project without prlOT approval of the Comnjiss\oners
Court. IT IS tHEREFORE ORDERED. ADJUDGED, AND PECREED that the Dallas COllnty Comm!sllioners Court hereby approves tM specific projects identified in the attsohed listing for funding
from the. Dallas County Major CapItal Development Fund in the peroentages and maximum amounts shown in the listing fOT County funding • 17th .. 􀁾􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠 􀀮􀁌􀀭􀀭􀁁􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀡􀀮􀀠
Mikii Cantrell Commissioner, District #'1. 􀁾􀀠 Ie c , District #3 R.ecommended 􀁄􀁾􀀡􀁾􀀮􀀠 Director of'l'ublio Works 
i I I ! " J I J I 1, 1 I I i i I I 'I i 
• sa-d 
." I, i ! 90-d 􀁓􀀾􀁬􀁾􀁏􀁍􀀠 OI.and
<"-< r;;n,,-,.. r.I""rTTT.,...,..."""""""" 
.'. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING TRANSPORTATION MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS MASTER AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of , Texas,
hereinafter called "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials, which desire to enter into an Intedocal
Agreement, hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, for the purpose of Transportation Improvements on roads inside Dallas County that are on the North Central Texas Council of Government's
Regional Thoroughfare Plan. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Court Order 2000-2117, dated October 17, 2000, County Commissioners Court approved participation in Transportation Major Capital
Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004, 2005, and a portion of2006 within the cities inside Dallas County; and WHEREAS, the approved project lists may be modified, updated or
approved by the Commissioners Court on a periodic, as-needed basis; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the the Texas Government Code, as amended, provides authorization for local governments
to enter into interlocal agreements; and NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, is hereby made and entered into by CITY and COUNTY for the mutual consideration stated herein: AGREEMENT Article
I. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions are incorporated into this agreement for all purposes. a) AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed by all parties detailing changes,
additions or deletions in the MASTER AGREEMENT. b) CITY shall mean the City of_____-', County ofDallas, State of Texas. c) COUNTY shall mean the County ofDallas, State ofTexas. d) DIRECT
PROJECT & PROGRAM COSTS shall mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or program cost objective. These costs generally include MASTER AGREEMENT-11110/00
1 
compensation of employees for the time devoted and identified specifically to the performance of the project or program, cost of materials acquired, consumed or expended specifically
for the purpose of the project or program; equipment changes; damage claims and other approved capital expenditures; change orders; damage claims; travel expenses incurred specifically
to carry out the project including, but not limited to, design, right-of-way, road or street drainage, utility relocation and adjustment and construction. Direct Cost does not include
either CITY or COUNTY general overhead. e) EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean the date of the signature of the last person necessary for this MASTER AGREEMENT to become effective. 1) INDIRECT
COSTS shall mean those costs which have been incurred for common or joint purposes. These costs benefit more than one cost objective and cannot be readily identified with a particular
final project or program cost objective without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. g) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS shall mean contracts or agreements entered into between CITY
and COUNTY in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 791. b) LEAD AGENCY shall mean that entity responsible for project management, including, but not limited to planning, design,
right-of-way acquisition, approved utility relocation or adjustment and construction. i) MASTER AGREEMENT shall mean this document including all incorporated documents, attachments,
and exhibits. j) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) shall mean a written document which incorporates the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE. Said MOA shall at a minimum identify the overall
funding scheme, and basic scope ofthe PROJECT. k) PARCEL OR PARCELS shall mean those tracts ofland and improvements located either wholly or partially thereon, identified by COUNTY,
CITY or other STAKEHOLDER as required for right-of-way requirements of the PROJECT. Such Right-of-way shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real
property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized fur the PROJECT. I) PREDESIGN CHARRETTE shall mean a meeting of decision making STAKEHOLDERS and other members of the
PROJECT TEAM for the purpose of entering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the overall funding, alignment and scope ofthe PROJECT. m) PROJECT MANAGER shall mean the person appointed
by the Lead Agency who is assigned the primary duty for assuring Project Team coordination and timely project delivery. There will be only one PROJECT MANAGER assigned to a PROJECT.
n) PROJECT TEAM shall mean representatives from COUNTY, CITY, and other STAKEHOLDERS as may be mutually agreed upon by COUNTY, CITY and STAKEHOLDER or otherwise with responsibility for
delivering the completed PROJECT. 0) PROJECT(S) shall mean the road improvements approved by the COUNTY for inclusion in the Transportation Major Capital Improvements Program approved
by the Commissioners Court and approved by the CITY andlor other applicable STAKEHOLDERS. p) ROAD or STREET AMENITY shall mean PROJECT features not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT
DESIGN including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, irrigation, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature above and beyond the MASTER AGREEMENT
-1111 0100 2 
STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN or any increase in capacity in excess of COUNTY determined requirements based on anticipated future traffic flow. q) RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that
real property, (either existing, or required in fee and! or easement) identified by COUNTY, CITY, or other project STAKEHOLDER as necessary for the construction of the PROJECT. Such
Right-of-way shall include both the existing street, road, drainage or other CITY or COUNTY real property ownership and all additional real property to be utilized for the PROJECT. (r)
STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN shall mean the standard COUNTY-approved CITY criteria for paving, bridges, drainage and appurtenances, traffic control items including pavement marlcing,
warranted uniform signals, street light foundations, pull boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/turn lanes, access, required structural retaining walls and standard driveways excluding
ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, or such design criteria as may be mutually agreed upon in a project specific SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. (5)(S) SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent
to this document which is entered into to establish the contractual rights and responsibilities of the CITY and COUNTY as it relates to the PROJECT. (t)(t) STAKEHOLDER shall mean any
governmental or quasi-governmental entity making a financial contribution to the PROJECT. {u) (u) TxDOT shall mean the Texas Department ofTransportation. (v) UTILITIES shall mean each
City Utility, public utility, common carrier, governmental or quasigovernmental facility, fiber optic facility, or other facility located within the limits ofthe Project by virtue of
Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY, COUNTY, or STATE OF TEXAS. (w)CITY UTILITY shall mean those owned or operated by CITY which require relocation or adjustment
for the purpose ofthe construction of the PROJECT as identified by PROJECT plans. (x) UTILITY IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES located within the limits of the PROJECT
by virtue of Texas or Federal Law or agreement between the entity and the CITY. (y) UTILITY IN PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY shall mean all UTILITIES, excluding CITY UTILITIES, whose
facilities are located within the limits of the PROJECT by virtue of satisfactorily documented pre-existing real property ownership . .!i} UTILITY BETTERMENT shall mean any increase
in the capacity of any UTILITY'S Facility adjusted or relocated as a part of the PROJECT as compared to the existing Facility, or any upgrading of the UTILITY'S Facility above the standard
practices, devices or materials, specified by the UTILITY and customarily used by CITY or UTILITY on projects solely financed by CITY or UTILITY. Provided, however, that any upgrading
necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Betterment, and further, that any increase in the capacity of the Utility Facility resulting solely from the
replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly manufactured, processed or installed shall not be considered a Betterment, provided that such replacement shall be only to the
standard devices or materials currently used on other projects financed solely by CITY or UTILITY. This meaning shaH apply to utilities that are part of the project as well as the standard
basic street components (See "STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN"). MASTERAGREEMENT-III10/00 3 
Article II. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the respective agreement fully executed (The "Effective
Date"). This MASTER AGREEMENT shall be an annual agreement and shall automatically renew without further action by either party unless or until terminated as provided in Article IV (Termination)
or the expiration often (10) years, whichever shall first occur. Article m. AMENDMENTS This Master Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of the CITY and COUNTY. Any amendment
must be in writing and approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. Article IV. TERMINATION, DEFAULT, TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE 1. TERMINATION A. This MASTER AGREEMENT
may be terminated by any of the following conditions: 􀁡􀁾􀀨􀁬􀀩􀀠By expiration of term of the agreement. 􀁾􀀲􀀩􀀠By mutual written consent and agreement of COUNTY and CITY. ej(3) By
either party, by notice in writing establishing the effective date of termination to the other party as consequence of the party being in default of the provisions of this Agreement
or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT or failure to timely provide funding, with proper allowances being made for circumstances beyond the control of the defaulting party. d)(4) By either party
with ninety days written notice to the other party. B. Should either party terminate this MASTER AGREEMENT as herein provided, all existing, fully executed SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made
under this MASTER AGREEMENT shall not be terminated and shall automatically incorporate all the provisions ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT. C. In the event that any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is
terminated prior to completion of the PROJECT, no additional Costs shall be incurred other than Costs due and payable at the time oftermination for services actually performed or that
shall become due and payable due to such termination. The LEAD AGENCY, to the extent permitted, may terminate all project contracts, unless written notice is given by either party to
the other of its intent to complete the PROJECT, and prepare a final accounting for the PROJECT. D. Ifthe PROJECT is terminated by the CITY prior to the award of any construction contract
and the PROJECT is located within the CITY limits, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the full amount expended by COUNTY on the project and COUNTY shall transfer to CITY its rights and all deliverables
that it may be entitled to receive under the existing professional services or other project contracts or agreements. Such amount shall be included in the MAS1ER AGREEMENT-11110/00 4

final accounting for the PROJECT. Such amount shall be due and payable in full ninety (90) days subsequent to the termination, or thirty days subsequent to delivery of final accounting.
E. Once the construction contract has been let, with the approval of the other party, the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for that PROJECT cannot be tenninated until completion ofthe construction.
F. In the event that a PROJECT is tenninated either party may, upon written notice, take over the project and prosecute the work to completion by contract or otherwise at their sole
cost and expense. In the event that the party completing the work is not the LEAD AGENCY, it is agreed that the PROJECT MANAGER will furnish to the completing party a listing of current
records pertaining to any outstanding obligations or other records or information required by any project contract, including any Work Order, or requested in writing by completing party
in either printed or electronic fonnat or both. The LEAD AGENCY agrees to cooperate with the completing party. The LEAD AGENCY will use its best efforts to transfer to the completing
party all contracts. Obligations under such contracts shall become the sole obligation of the completing party upon transfer. Completing party agrees to timely pay all future. obligations
under such contract as they become due and payable. Completing party hereby releases the LEAD AGENCY from any and all liability under sucb assigned contracts subsequent to date of transfer,
effective upon the transfer date. LEAD AGENCY shall exercise its best effurts to insure a transition of services without interruption G. Either party shall have the right to retain copies
of all data, information, engineering, studies, or other items produced to the date oftermination. H. Provisions B through G wit! survive the tennination of this MASTER AGREEMENT and
any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and shall be a continuing obligation until the transition of services, all payments made and the PROJECTS are complete. All items listed or required in this
provision shall be furnished by LEAD AGENCY to completing party without additional cost or expense to completing party. 2. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be deemed in violation
of this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, fife, flood, invasion, insurrection,
accident, order of court, judge or civil authority, an act of God, or any cause reasonably beyond the party's control and not attributable to its neglect. In the event of such an occurrence
the time for performance of such obligations or duty shall be suspended until such time that such inability to perform, shall be removed. The party claiming the suspension shall give
notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days of the knowledge of such occurrence. Each party shall make all reasonable efforts to mitigate
the effects of any suspension. Article V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTY and CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall each be responsible for their own negligent acts or omissions or other
tortious conduct in the course ofperfonnance ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental immunity MASTERAGREEMENT-III10/00 5 
available to either COUNTY or CITY under Texas law and without waiving any available defenses under Texas law. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to create or grant any rights,
contractual or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. Article VI. NOTIFICATION A. When notice is permitted or required by this MASTER AGREEMENT, it shall be in writing and
shall be presumed delivered when delivered in person or three (3) days subsequent to the date placed, postage prepaid, in the U. S. Mail, Certified or Registered, Return Receipt Requested
and addressed to the parties at the following address. B. All notices and correspondence to County by City shall be mailed or delivered by hand as follows: Dallas County Public Works
Donald R. Holzwarth, P.E., Director 411 Elm Street, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202-3389 C. All notices and correspondence from County to City shaH be mailed or delivered by hand as follows:
[Title of Appropriate City Official] City, Texas D. Either party hereto may from time to time designate another and different address for receipt of notice by giving written notice ofsuch
change of address to the other party. Article VII. CITY COVENANTS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A. To execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and construction of the
PROJECTS mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Provide City Council Resolution adopting approved preferred alignment, proposed estimated budget,
and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for each milestone as specified herein or in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. C. CITY agrees to share the funding of each PROJECT with COUNTY on an equal
share basis (50".10150%), or as otherwise agreed upon cost sharing arrangement as specified in a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT with the following exclusions: CITY shall bear the entire cost
of: 1. CITY owned utilities relocation or adjustment such as water and sanitary sewer facilities, except utility adjustments directly attributable to storm sewer improvement conflicts;
MASTER AGREEMENT-11/10/00 6 
2. ROAD or STREET AMENITIES including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the STANDARD BASIC
PROJECT DESIGN; 3. UTILITY BETTERMENTS and ROAD or STREET 􀁁􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁉􀁔􀁉􀁅􀁓􀁾􀀠 4. CITY PROJECT TEAM participation or project management (if the CITY bas LEAD AGENCY Responsibility)
Direct Costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly accounting system; S. CITY Indirect Costs. When mutual written agreement has been reached as to PROJECT limits by COUNTY and
CITY at the Predesign Charrette, City agrees to acquire right-of-way required for designated projects by voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process andlor other legal means,
to the maximum extent possible, and to ensure through the building permitting process that setback requirements are imposed to limit encroachment upon the required right ofway. CITY
agrees to fund ROW not acquired but reasonably expected to be. CITY also agrees to fund the removal of improvements that are encroachments within existing or proposed right ofway areas.
In the event of any proposed use of the PROJECT right-of-way that will conflict with the proposed PROJECT and CITY is unable to obtain such right-of-way as described above, CITY shall
notify COUNTY of such conflict. COUNTY and CITY shall determine if the acquisition of the conflicting parcel would be in the best interest of the PROJECT. In the event that agreement
is reached and the parcel is acquired such cost shall be included in the pro rated cost ofthe project in the agreed upon proportions. CITY hereby grants the COUNTY authority to enter
into eminent domain proceedings within the city limits on each specific right ofway alignment as approved by the CITY and COUNTY. D. D,····To require all Utilities located within or
using the present public right of way on all designated transportation projects within CITY's municipal limits to adjust andlor relocate said Utilities as required by the proposed improvement
of the designated transportation Project. CITY Utilities shall be relocated or adjusted at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT. E. CITY
agrees to be cooperative on issues relating to billboards, advertising signs, nonconforming uses, zoning and similar restrictions and to exercise its best efforts to provide variances
when possible to minimize cost and delay of PROJECT. Additional PROJECT cost caused or contributed to by CITY. ordinance, zoning, non-conforming use determination or other requirement
shall be paid in full by CITY. F. _CITY shall require the adjustment andlor relocation ofUTILITIES to be accomplished and finalized, as expeditiously as possible after approval of final
plans to prevent PROJECT schedule delays. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, all UTILITIES shall be adjusted or relocated and the right-of-way clear for construction
not later than thirty (30) days prior to the award of the construction contract. CITY will notify the COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS when utility conflicts would impact progress ofthe
project completion. COUNTY and CITY agree to work in partnership and with all STAKEHOLDERS to solve the problem to include helping to engage elected officials in MASTER AGREEMENT-1111
0/00 7 
the problem resolution with the goal to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution ofconstruction on the PROJECT. G. Where new storm drainage facilities are in conflict with CITY
owned water and sanitary sewer systems, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, after submission of an acceptable schedule ofwork and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY and
COUNTY approval, the actual costs of the necessary adjustment of CITY water and sewer utilities shall be pro rated at the overall percentage agreed to by CITY and COUNTY for cost sharing.
CITY shall be responsible for funding one hundred percent (100"/0) of any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment and/or relocation of utilities in the public
right of way shall be the responsibility of the Utility Owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay or other damages caused by CITY UTILITY'S failure to timely relocate or adjust
the facility shall be at the entire cost ofCITY. H. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment
of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances in the right ofway. In the event that the aforementioned features are allowed by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration
ofthe project, CITY shall bear the entire cost ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. 1. To provide to COUNTY for COUNTY'S or COUNTY'S designee use, at no cost, adequate copies
of all construction standards, codes, (specifically including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications, guidelines, standards or any other pertinent information as determined
by COUNTY to be required for the completion of the PROJECT. Additionally, CITY shall fumish COUNTY, at no cost, such documents as necessary to keep all items previously furnished to
County current. J. Actively participate and provide authorized representation with decision making powerat PREDESIGN CHARRETTE, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completion and fiduciary relationships. K. CITY
agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE as a part of the PROJECT schedule. City further agrees that
if no review notes are submitted by CITY in writing to COUNTY on a timely basis, plans are approved as submitted. L. City agrees that it will pay all additional project cost for any
CITY requested discretionary change, including, but not limited to STREET AMENITIES AND UTILITY BETTERMENTS, in or addition to the design or construction of the project subsequent to
the City opportunity to review the sixty five percent (65%) design plans. M. Provide at CITY's cost for the continuing maintenance of all PROJECT ROW, such as mowing, drainage, trash
removal, etc., during the period between acquisition and construction. MASTER AGREEMENT -1111 0/00 8 
N. Subsequent to the completion of a PROJECT, that the CITY will be responsible for all future maintenance, operation and control of the PROJECT, without cost or contribution from the
COUNTY. O. Bear the entire cost of design, construction and administration for landscaping, streetscaping, streetlighting, as such items are not included in the STANDARD BASIC PROJECT
DESIGN and other ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES specified or requested by CITY in excess of STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN. P. It is the intent of this MASTER AGREEMENT that the COUNTY will
be the LEAD AGENCY. In the event that the CITY and COUNTY agree in writing that CITY will manage and administer one or more PROJECTS, CITY and COUNTY will enter into a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
as to that project(s). In such instance, CITY agrees to assume all LEAD AGENCY responsibilities except as may be set forth in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as determined by mutual consent.
Article VDI. UTILITY IMPACTS. A. In cases where a lITILITY IS LOCATED IN A PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT-OFWAY, and it is necessary to relocate the facility or make adjustments by reason of
the widening or improvement of the designated project, the COUNTY (or CITY if acting as the LEAD AGENCy) will, after submission by utility company of right of way documentation and cost
estimates acceptable to the CITY, COUNTY and other STAKEHOLDERS, assign the actual costs for the relocation andlor adjustment of said utility to the PROJECT. B. In cases where a lITILITY
IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, excluding CITY UTILITIES, occupies any portion of the PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY by Texas or Federal Law or by agreement with the CITY that allows or permits the CITY
to cause the relocation of the utility for the construction of the project, the CITY shall timely require and enforce the relocation or adjustment requirement at no cost to the project.
In the event that the CITY has no legal or contractual right to cause the relocation, the relocation or adjustment shall be relocated or adjusted and all cost shall be a Project Cost.
CITY shall take all steps necessary to insure that such relocation or adjustment shall not conflict with or delay the PROJECT schedule. Article IX. COUNTY AGREES AS FOLLOWS: A To provide
as a PROJECT Cost preliminary engineering which will define project details, e.g., location, scope of work and specific right of way alignment for each improvement. Such preliminary
engineering shall be submitted to the CITY for approval, prior to proceeding with the final design and any right ofway acquisition. B. To provide as a PROJECT Cost for the construction
of transportation improvements based upon design criteria conforming to STANDARD BASIC PROJECT DESIGN in conformity with applicable CITY ordinances and standards, to the extent of MASTER
AGREEMENT -11/10/00 9 
Commissioners Court approved program funding. Scope of work shall include the agreed upon design standards as the basis for improvement criteria, Deviations from mutually agreed upon
application of CITY standards and/or design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY. Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOT standards as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this MASTER
AGREEMENT shall be utilized unless otherwise mutually agreed by SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, A,C, To actively participate and provide authorized representation at PREDESIGN CHARRETTE , preconstruction
meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development and completion and fiduciary relationships. D. To provide project management of each
Project where County is LEAD AGENCY from commencement to completion of construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redefine project management roles as beneficial
to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA and SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS, E. Upon receipt of written request detailing the information requested, to provide information related to the PROJECT
to CITY or CITY'S designee at no cost to the CITY. F. COUNTY agrees to provide timely review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review notes are submitted by COUNTY (if
CITY is filling the role as PROJECT MANAGER) in writing to CITY, plans are approved as submitted. "Timely review" will be agreed upon during thePREDESIGN CHARRETTE, as part ofthe project
schedule. G. To submit final engineering plans for review and written approval by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to advertising for construction. H. To provide for the acquisition,
including acquisition by Eminent Domain, of the necessary additional right of way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard requirements and utilizing existing public
right of way to the maximum extent possible as a PROJECT cost. 1. To require all contractors to secure all necessary permits required by CITY on said construction projects. J. To furnish
record drawings of construction plans for the permanent records of CITY within twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance of the transportation improvement PROJECT. K. In and
for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, including the future obligation of maintenance, operation, control and acceptance of liability therefor to transfer,
by Quit Claim Deed, all PROJECT related easements acquired by COUNTY to CITY. L. In the event COUNTY and CITY agree in writing that CITY will be the LEAD AGENCY for the agreed upon PROJECT,
COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs as detailed in Article XI (FUNDING) in an amount not to exceed the PROJECT cost as approved by Dallas County Commissioners Court and incorporated
in the SUPPLEI\1ENTAL AGREEMENT. All COUNTY payments shall be in accordance with COUNTY Policies and Procedures or as may be mutually agreed between the parties and incorporated in a
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. MASTERAGREEMENT-11110100 10 
Article X. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE A. CITY and COUNTY, as specified in Articles vn and IX, respectively, will designate officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette
to be conducted on a mutually agreeable date and location. At least part of this meeting will be conducted on the PROJECT site. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identify the
general project scope and the general preferred alignment of the project, and project administration and management roles, to include the PROJECT MANAGER Additionally, key project team
participants shall be identified at the Predesign Charrette . C. At the conclusion of the Predesign Charrette a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall be produced which outlines the identified
roles and scope for the Project. Article XI. FUNDING A CITY and COUNTY mutually agree to proportionately fund the DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs as agreed by the parties in a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, COUNTY shall bear fifty percent (50%) of the total DIRECT PROJECT & PROGRAM costs excluding the ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES,
relocation or adjustment of CITY urILITIES, urILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT COST not supported by detailed hourly accounting system and other items as specified in this MASTER
AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. COUNTY shall not be responsible for any amount of funding in excess of the PROJECT not-to-exceed amount as shown in the PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise specified in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY shall bear fifty percentage (50"/0) of all DIRECT PROJECT AND PROGRAM costs. In addition City agrees to fund
all other City cost as provided herein, including, but not limited to, ROAD OR STREET AMENITIES, relocation or adjustment of CITY UTILITIES, UTILITY BETTERMENT, INDIRECT COST, DIRECT
COST not supported by detailed hourly accounting system and other items as specified in this MAS1ER AGREEMENT or any SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. B. Unless otherwise stated in a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, the milestones for each project shall be (1) preliminary and primary design (2) right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation or adjustment and (3) construction. The LEAD
AGENCY shall prepare an estimated cost for each milestone. Upon approval ofthe cost by the other party, each party shall fund its share of the respective milestones by placing that amount
of money in an escrow account or otherwise encumber the funds to insure that the LEAD AGENCY will have sufficient funding available from current revenue for the timely payment of PROJECT
milestone costs. The LEAD AGENCY may bill the other party for periodic payments for the actual amount of work completed toward the completion of the milestone. Upon completion ofthe
milestone, the nonmanagement party will be furnished a notice that such work has been completed and aHthe amount of funding that may be utilized to pay subsequent milestone Project cost.
Notwithstanding any other term or condition contained herein or in any SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT, neither party party will be required to award any contract until written certification has
been received that funding ft:lr-tne-pr-aject··has been eertifie(l·in·wr-iting ..te'have·been placed MASTER AGREEMENT -11110/00 11 
in escrow or encumbered for the payment ofthe non-awarding party's portion ofthe PROJECT cost. C. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT shall exceed the not-ta-exceed amount, CITY
and COUNTY agree to either reduce the scope of construction or seek additional funding to complete the PROJECT at the agreed upon cost share percentages. At the termination of the PROJECT,
the LEAD AGENCY will do a final cost accounting of the PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by either party exceeds its portion of the actual cost, the difference will be remitted
to such party. In the event that additional funds are due, the LEAD AGENCY will bill the other party who agrees to pay such funds within thirty (30) days of receipt of such billing.
D. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY based on invoices for actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. E. Upon execution of a SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT, CITY shall escrow an amount adequate for initial project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional services required for scoping, preliminary, and primary
design. Article XII. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT. It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all right of action
relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to CITY and COUNTY and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right ofaction whatsoever by any other
person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of CITY and the COUNTY that any entity other than CITY or the COUNTY receiving services or benefits under this agreement shall be
deemed an incidental beneficiary only. This Agreement is intended only to set forth the contractual right and responsibilities of the agreement parties. Article XII. RIGHT OF ENTRY The
CITY agrees that COUNTY shall have the right to enter upon the PROJECT area for the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. CITY agrees to furnish such police or other
CITY personnel as requested BY COUNTY for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to the PROJECT or COUNTY. Article XIV. LIST OF PROJECTS CITY agrees that it has been
furnished with a list of the potential PROJECTS as approved by the Dallas County Commissioners Courts, subject to the agreement between the parties of a SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. CITY
stipulates and agrees that the Commissioners Court Order approving the projects identifies the potential PROJECT location and describes the type of project in sufficient detail that
the CITY is fully aware of the location and type of projects being considered. MASTER AGREEMENT-lIllO/DO 12 
Article XV. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all matters pertinent thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws ofthe State
ofTexas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas, Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity,
Title 5 ofTexas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable State ofTexas and Federal laws, B. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties hereto as herein provided. C. Severability. If any provision ofthis Agreement shall
be held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected or impaired, and such remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. D. DefaultlWaiverJM:iti
gation. It is not a waiver of default ifthe non-defaulting party fails to declare immediately a default or delays in taking any action. Pursuit ofany remedies set forth in this Agreement
does not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this Agreement or provided by law. . E. Federal or State of Texas Funding. In the event that any work or part thereof is funded by State
ofTexas or U S. Government funding and any statute, rule, regulation, grant, contract provision or other State ofTexas or U. S. Government law, rule, regulation or other provision imposes
additional or greater requirement(s) than stated herein, City agrees to timely comply therewith without additional cost or expense to County. F. Headings. The titles which are used following
the number ofeach paragraph are only for convenience in locating various provisions ofthis AGREEMENT and shall not be deemed to affect the interpretation or construction ofsuch provision.
G. Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this AGREEMENT shall be held and construed to include any other gender; and words in the singular shall include the plural and vice
versa, unless the text clearly requires otherwise. H. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in multiple counterparts, each ofwhich shall be deemed an original, but all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument. MASTERAGREEMENT-ll/lOIOO 13 
The City of______" State of Texas, has executed the Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Council Resolution _____" Minutes, _____􀁾􀁄􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁤 the __day of___....;, 200_. The County
of Dallas, State of Texas, has executed this agreement pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number _____and passed on the __day of____...J, CITY OF _________ COUNTY OF DALLAS 􀁂􀁙􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭 􀁂􀁙􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽 TIlLE LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE ATTEST_. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY =SEC-:C=RE=TARY \ ATTORNEY John Dahill, Advisory Chief, Civil Section
Dallas County District Attorney MASTER AGREEMENT-11/10/00 14 
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT 􀁾􀀡􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀡􀀡􀀡􀁩􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁌􀂮􀀠Post Office Box 9010 Addison, Texas 75001-9010 April 25, 2001 (972) 450-2871 16801 Westgrove Mr. Donald L Holzwarth,
P.E. Dallas County Director ofPublic Works 411 Elm Street, 4th Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Re: 200 I Call For Projects Dear Mr. Holzwarth: The Town of Addison is pleased to submit the following
Application Information for five projects, in response to your 200 I Call For Projects. Belt Line RoadlDallas Parkway Single Point Urban Interchange Southbound to Northbound U-turn on
Dallas Parkway at Arapaho Road Keller Springs! Addison Road Intersection Signals Upgrade and Re-timing, Belt Line Rd. from Quorum Dr. to Marsh Lane The Town Council passed a resolution
authorizing filing the applications at their meeting on April 25, 200 I. A copy ofthe resolution will be forwarded as soon as it is signed by the Mayor. We appreciate the opportunity
to submit these applications. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Pierce, P.R, Assistant City Engineer at 972-450·2879. Very truly yours, Michael E. Murphy, P.E. Acting Director
ofPublic Works Cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Jim Pierce, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Attachments 
Submitting Agency: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: e-mail address: Location: Beginning: Ending: Functional Classification: Av. # of Accidents: (over past 3 years) Through
lanes Left turn lanes Right turn lanes Sidewalks Bicycle Lanes Bridges 2001 Dallas County Call For Projects APPLICATION INFORMA TION Town of Addison Jim Pierce, P.E.-Assistant Director
of Public Works P.O. Box 9010 /' Addison, 972-450-2879 Facsimile Number: ipierce@ci.addison.lx.us PROJECT INFORMATION Keller Springs Road At Addison Road 900Ft. E. of Addison Road Principal
Arterial 3 per year Existing Two One One Yes None None MAPSCO: Project Length: Avg Posted Speed: Avg Operating Speed: Traffic Volume: Traffic Volume Source: Proposed Three One One Yes
None None TX 75001 972-450-2837 4U 900 Feet 40 mph 40 mph 16,554/day 1999 traffic count by Town of Addison Description of Proposed Improvement(s): !The purpose of this project is to
relieve traffic back-up conditions for those vehicles traveling eastbound hrough the Addison Airport Tunnel. Presently, there is only one through lane for eastbound vehicles. During
peak periods, vehicles back up almost to the Tunnel and it takes at least two traffic light cycles o pass the intersection with Addison Road. This project will provide two through lanes
for traffic 􀁾􀁸􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠the Tunnel and proceeding east on Keller Springs Road. The proposed improvements include 􀁾􀁤􀁤􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀠an eastbound lane for traffic approximately 900 feet
long. The project includes extension of a 􀁾􀁴􀁯􀁲􀁭􀀠 drain culvert, and new pavement markings. The engineering for this project has been completed. The traffic signals at the intersection
have already been adjusted for this project. 
PROJECT COST INFORMATION Total Project Cost: $ 248,000 Right-of-way Cost: $ 72,000 EngineeringlDesign Cost: $ 3,000 Utility Cost: $ Construction Cost: $ 173,000 Local Cost Contribution:
in percent of total cost: 80% Supporting Comments Regarding Cost: his project was bid in late 1999 but was never awarded because of lack of right-of-way. The tota mount bid was $147,560.
The bid price has been adjusted upward by 6% for inflation, and 5% ha een added to that for contingencies. Engineering costs are for re-bidding the project and bid phas ervices. Right-of-way
cost figured at $B.OO/square foot for 9000 square feet. 
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ----------NOTES: I 1. RENOV£ EJaSliNG PA'IDIENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO INSTAWNG TENPORARY PA'IDIENT MARKINGS (TABS). 2. PLA$llC DRUMS
ARE TO HAVe: T.oOT TYPE A 􀀰􀁁􀁉􀁬􀀠 WARNING UGlliS ATTACHEa TO EACH DRUM. . 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAlNTAJN SIGNS. DRUMS 􀁾 AND MARKINGS THROUGHOUT THE OURAliON Of CW2<HD· CONSnRUCTION.
􀁾<48. X 48I INSTAlL TENPORARY Fl£XlBLE-REFLECTlV£. ROADWAY MARKIER TABS (YELLOW) 􀁉􀀧􀀩􀁾􀀧􀀠('I o S'-O· CENTERS INSTAlL TEMPORARY Fl£XlBLE-REfl.ECTlV£ II ROADWAY MAAKER TABS (VMITE)
R3-BLTR o S'-O" CENTERS TO Sf REMOVED :? II II PROPOSEO PA'IDIENT v.lOENING 􀁾􀁾􀀠 R3-7R 30",30" INSTAlL TEMPORARY Fl£XlBLE-REI'l.ECTlV£ 􀁾 ROADWAY MARKIER TABS (Vol-lITE) .. o S'-O"
CENTERS 􀁾􀀠 CW20-tD 􀁾􀀠 • • MI" X MI" 􀁾􀀠INSTAlL TENPORARY Fl£XlBLE-REI'l.ECTlV£ 􀁾􀀠 ROADWAY MARKIER TABS (YELLOW) l:! o S'-O· CENTERS i:! 0 PLASTIC DRUMS v.lTH Tld)QT TYPE A 􀁾􀀠
WARNING UIlHiS 0 30' -O' ON CENTER I I 'i' PLASTIC DRUMS v.lTH TxOOT TYPE A rr WARNING UGHiS C 30' -O· · ON CENTER Ii ElOST. NORTH CURB .. .. ... 0 0 EJaST. SOUTH CURB WORK ZONE PAVEMENT
MARKINGS 
PROJECT RISK ANALYSIS IASSESSMENT SHEET 􀁐􀁲􀁾􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁎􀁭􀁮􀁥􀀺􀀬__________􀁾􀁋􀁾􀁥􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁉􀁾􀁾􀁓􀁾􀁰􀁾􀁲􀁩􀁮􀁾􀁧􀁾􀁍􀁾􀁁􀁾􀁤􀁤􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁳􀁯􀁾􀁮􀁾􀁒􀁾􀁯􀁡􀁤􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁲􀁥􀁾􀁲􀁾􀁳􀁥􀁾􀁣􀁾􀁴􀁩􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁾_________
_______ Project Location (Beginning): Keller Springs Road at Addison Road Project Location (Ending): 900 Feet East ofAddison Road City: Addison, TX 1. Right ofWay Is ROW available? a)
Yes Utility 􀁾􀁴 Utility easements present? a) Yes 􀁾􀀠 Any Comments on ROW availability? The Town has been waiting for development ofthe south east 􀁣􀁯􀁲􀁮􀁾 (where right-of-way is
needed) so that ROW could be obtained by dedication. However, traffic is building up through the Tunnel and the need for this project has become much more pressing. 2. Utilities I RaiJroad
Check Utilities present: o Water lines, o Gas lines o TRAlines o Transmission Lines o Cable o Electricity lines o Railroad lines Underground vaults 􀁾 Other underground utilities,_ _____􀀭􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁳􀁴�
�􀀧􀁯􀁲􀁲􀁮􀁾􀁟􀀢􀁳􀁥􀀢􀀧􀁷􀀢􀀧.􀁥.r___________ o Any historical designations, __________________ 3. Safety What safety issues exist? o Gas lines o Transit (Dart line) o School oo Church
􀁏􀁴􀁨􀁾_________________ 
4. Environmental What environmental issues exist? o Parks o Floodplains o Lakes o Cemeteries o Oilier___________________________________ 5. Traffic a) Posted Speed 40 mph b) Peak hour
operational speed.____-=3-"'0___,mph c) Off-peak operational speed 40 mph 6. Structural Conditions a) Pavement 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁤􀁩􀁴􀁩􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁟􀀭􀀢􀁎􀁟􀀢􀁥􀀢􀀧􀁥􀀢􀀧􀁤􀀢􀀧􀁳􀁟􀀢􀁩􀁭􀀢􀀢􀀢􀁰􀀢􀀢􀁲􀁯􀁾􀁶􀀧􀁟􀀢􀁥
􀁾􀁭􀁾􀁥􀁥􀀽􀁮􀀢􀀧􀁴􀀮􀀧􀁟􀁟􀁟􀁟__________ b) Drainage condition i) Any undersized bridges Yes ii) Culverts present? 􀁖􀀧􀁙􀁾􀁳􀀠 c) Bridges present? Yes d) Any road sections under 100
year BFE? ____yes 7. Opposition Possibility of Individual or neighborhood group opposition? _Yes 􀁾􀀧􀀠 If yes, explain: ___________________________ 8. Other Comments:_________________________

2001 Dallas County Call For Projects APPLICATION INFORMATION Submitting Agency: Town of Addison Contact Person: Jim Pierce, P.E., Assistant Director-Public Works Address: P.O. Box 9010
Addison TX 75001-9010 Telephone: 972/450-2879 Facsimile Number: 972/450-2834 e-mail address: ipierce@ci.addison.tx.us PROJECT INFORMATION Location: Belt Line Road MAPSCO: 14D Beginning:
Dallas Parkway(Dallas N. Tollway) Project Length: 0.00 Ending: N/A (Intarsection) Avg. Posted Speed: N/A Avg. Operating Speed: N/A Functional Classification: F Traffic Volume: 58,103
Belt Line Rd. 31,801 DallasPkwy Av. # of Accidents: • 37 per year Traffic Volume Source: Count 8199 (over past 3 years) Existing Proposed Through lanes Belt Line -3, Dallas Pkwy -3 Belt
Line -3, Dallas Pkwy -3 Left turn lanes Belt Line -1, Dallas Pkwy-1 Belt Line -2, Dallas Pkwy -2 Right turn lanes Belt Line -1, Dallas Pkwy -1 Belt Line -1, Dallas Pkwy -1 Sidewalks
Belt Line -S, Dallas Pkwy -0 Belt Line -Y, Dallas Pkwy -Y Bicycle lanes Belt Line -0, Dallas Pkwy -0 0 Belt Line -0, Dallas Pkwy -0 Description ofPropoSed Improvement(s): The project
will allow the simultaneous operation of left turn lanes for easUwest traffic and for north/south traffic. Efficiency of the intersection will be improved by 15 to 20%. The project consists
of the removal of existing pavement, medians and bridge parapet walls, installation of concrete drifl shafts and cantilever bridge bents, reconstruction of existing retaining walls,
construction of additional bridge deck and parapet walls, construction of right-turn lanes, construction of dual left-turn lanes and installation of new traffic signals. Traffic signals
will be timed with other Signals on Belt line Road which are covered by another project. Associated work includes traffic control during construction, pavement markings and signing.
Even though this project is located in the City of Daflas, Addison is willing to fund the project as it will improve traffic flow on Belt line Road within the Town. It will also benefit
the Daflas North Tollway by improving traffic flow on Dallas Parkway. DART busses will benefit from this project as wefl. This project is an example of regional cooperation where one
Town is willing 10 fund a project of regional Significance (see attached drawing). The two projects that were approved for funding under TEA-21 , on Belt Line Road west of Dallas Parkway,
underscore the need for this project. For this intersection, we have had 112 accidents over the past 3 years. We estimate with this project, accidents will be . reduced by 20%. This
is our nurnber 1 priority project for this program. 
PROJECT COST INFORMATION Total Project Cost: Right-oC-way Cost: EngineeringfDesign Cost: Utility Cost: Construction Cost: $2,500,000 $ 170,000 $ 240,000 $ 30,000 $2,060,000 Local Cost
Contribution: in percent oC total cost $ 80 % Supporting Comments Regarding Cost: A project cost estimate was prepared by Barton Aschman, based upon schematic design, in October 1997.
The cost estimate was revised to present day as shown above. 
.,' 1_--: w '-' j:;;: '" --􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 I 
PROJECT RISK ANALYSIS IASSESSMENT SHEET Project Name: ______􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁂􀀢􀀢􀁥􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁴􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁌􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁾􀁮􀀢􀀢􀁥􀁬􀁄􀀢􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀢􀁡􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁬􀀢􀀧􀁡􀁳􀀢􀁟􀀢􀁟􀁐􀀢􀀧􀁡􀁲􀀢􀀧􀁫􀁷􀀽􀁡􀀢􀁟􀁹􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁓􀀢􀀢􀁩􀁮􀁾�
�􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁥􀀢􀀭􀀢􀀭􀁐􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀬􀁯􀁩􀁾􀁮􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁴-",U""rb",an""-,In""t""e""rc""h,,,an=ge Project Location (Beginning): __---'=B"'e..,lt..L.""in"'e"-'R""""oa..,.d...A'-"'-tD"'-'Oal",la""s,-,.P...a..r.kw=.a.
y. ,-,-,________ Project Location (Ending): __----"S"'am...."e'-----__________________ Ciry:·___________􀁌􀁁􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁩􀁳􀁾􀁯􀁾􀁮___________________ 1. Right of Way Is ROW available?
􀁡􀀩􀁾􀀠 􀁢􀀡􀁾􀀠 Utiliry Easement Utiliry easements present? a) Yes 􀁢􀁾􀀠 Any Comments on ROW availability? ROW will be acquired by negotiation. It all negotiations fail. ROW will
be acquired by eminent domain. 2. Utilities /Railrol!JY Check Utilities present: 􀁾/Water lines, ,1J<t' Gas lines Cl llRJ\lines 9../' Transmission Lines 􀁾􀀯􀀠Cable Ill" Electriciry
lines Cl Railroad lines Underground vaults 􀁾􀀠Other underground 􀁵􀁴􀁩􀁬􀁩􀁴􀁴􀁩􀁥􀁳􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁳􀀢􀀧􀁥􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁷􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁥􀀢􀀢􀁲􀀬􀀧􀀭􀀧􀁳􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁯􀀢􀀧􀁲􀁲􀁮􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁳􀁥􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁷􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁥􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁲______
Cl Any historical designations, ___________ 3. Safery What safery issues exist? I!f' Gas lines Cl Transit (Dart line) Cl School Cl Church Cl Oilier__________________ 
4. Environmental What environmental issues exist? None o Parks o Floodplains o Lakes o Cemeteries o Other____􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾_______ 5. Traffic a) Posted Speed _..;.;N"'IA'-"-_____mph b)
Peak hour operational speed N/A mph c) Off-peak operational speed N/A mph 6. Structural Conditions a) Pavement condition, ___---'OO""'o".d'--__________ b) Drainage condition i) Any undersized
bridges Yes ii) Culverts present? Yes c) Bridges present? V""" Yes d) Any road sections under 100 year BFE? ___Yes 7. Opposition Possibility of Individual or neighborhood group opposition?
VY;s _No If yes, explain: Property Owner on S.E. comer may offer some opposition because ofloss of parking. However, this loss will most likely be compensated. 8. Other Comments:_________􀁾􀀠
2001 Dallas County Call For Projects APPLICATIONINFORMATION Submitting Agency: Contact Person: Address: Town of Addison Jim Pierce, P.E., Assistant Director-Public Works P.O. Box 9010
Addison TX 75001-9010 Telephone: Facsimile Number: 972/450-2834 e-mail address: jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us PROJECTINFORMATION Location: Beginning: Ending: Functional Classification: Average
# of Accidents: (over past 3 years) Tbrough lanes Left turn lanes Rigbt turn lanes Sidewalks Bicycle lanes Belt Line Road Marsh Lane Dallas Parkway Principal Arterial 143/Yr. Existing
3 1 1 Y o MAPSCO: Project Length: Avg. Posted Speed: Avg. Operating Speed: Traffic Volume: Traffic Volume Source: Proposed 3 1 1 Y o 13D,14A, B, C 1.7 miles 40 mph 12 mph 59,380 Count
8/99 Description of Proposed lmprovement(s): This project provides for retiming the existing 17 year old coordinated signal system along Belt Line Road from Marsh Lane to Quorum Drive
(see attached plan). Timing plans for the AM, PM, Off-Peak, and Friday PM Peak periods will be prepared for each intersection. The signal hardware at each intersection will be upgraded
to include video detection, TS-2 cabinets, and TS-2 controllers.Additional phone drops will also be installed to provide a communications link to the traffic service center. Existing hardwire interconnect cables will be used to maintain communication
between the signal controllers. Associated work will include installation of new conduit and wiring at each intersection. The existing power source foe each location will be used. For
this section of road, we have had a total of 429 accidents in the last 3 years. We believe retiming will improve traffic flow, and this project will work hand-in-hand with the Belt Line/Dallas
Parkway Single POint Urban Interchange project. 
PROJECT COSTINFORMATION Total Project Cost: S700,OOO Right-of-way Cost: S 0 EngineeringlDesign Cost: $ 90,000 Utility Cost: $ 0 Construction Cost: $610,000 Local Cost Contribution: S
in percent of total cost 80 % Supporting Comments Regarding Cost: Use this section to justify project cost estimate.} This cost estimate was prepared by Parsons Transportation: roup
in January 2000. 
" 􀁾􀁵􀀮􀀮􀁄􀁉􀀠QOUHn' -... -... -... -.··-.· .􀀮􀀢􀀬􀀮􀀢􀀮􀁾􀁾􀁆􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀽􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀭􀀻􀀭􀁉􀀭􀁔􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀸􀁾􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀭 LEGEND £\ SIGNAL TIMING AND 1; i..
.......%-=-'-""'f-----+i ; \Jf HARDWARE UPGRADE LOCATION BEL T LINE ROAD SIGNAL TIMING AND HARDWARE UPGRADE; 
PROJECT RISK ANALYSIS IASSESSMENT SHEET Project Name: _______----'B"'e..it...,L""in"""'e-"R""o""ad"'--"S"'ign..."a""ls'-'U"'p"--bgr"'a"'d""e_________ Project Location (Beginning): _----"'M"'ar"""'sh"
-'L"'an"""'e'----_______-------Project Location (Ending): ___----=D"'a"'U"'a"-s"-P"'ar"'kw"'-"a'-'-v_______________ Ciry:___________􀁁􀁾􀁤􀁾􀁤􀁩􀁾􀁳􀁾􀁯􀁮􀁾_______________ 1. Right of
Way Is ROW available? None Required a) Yes b) No Utility Easement Utiliry easements present? None Required a) Yes b) No Any Comments on ROW availabiliry? _________________ 2. Utilities
/Railro!}t'Y Check Utilities present: Iff/, Water lines, IJf Gas lines o . TRAlines 􀁾􀀠Transmission Lines 1Jr/Cable 􀁾􀀠Electriciry lines I.I:r Railroad lines o Underground vaults o
Other underground utilities ___________ o Any historical designations __________ 3. Safety What 􀁳􀁾􀁲􀁹 issues exist? Ilf Gas lines o Transit (Dart line) o School o Church o Other__________________

4. Environmental What environmental issues exist? None o Parks o Floodplains o Lakes o Cemeteries o 5. Traffic a) Posted Speed 40 mph b) Peak hour operational speed,____-'-12"----'mph
c) Off-peak operational speed 40 mph 6. Structural Conditions a) Pavement condition, ___􀀭􀀢􀁇􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁯􀀢􀀧􀁯􀀢􀀢􀁤􀁾_______ b) Drainage condition i) Any undersized bridges Yes 􀁾􀁎􀁯􀀠
ii) Culverts present? v" Yes _-::7"",,,,,No c) Bridges present? Yes 􀁾􀁯􀀠 d) Any road sections under 100 year BFE? ___Yes 􀁾􀁎􀁯􀀠 7. Opposition Possibility oflndividual or neighborhood
group opposition? _Yes 􀁾􀀠 Ifyes, explain: ________________________ 8. Other Comments:,________________________ --... ---------...--------END
2000 Dallas County Call For Projects APPLICA110N INFORMATION Submitting Agency: Town of Addison Contact Person: Jim Pierce, P£., Assistant Director-Public Works Address: P.O. Box 9010
Addison TX 75001-9010 Telephone: 9721450-2879 Facsimile Number: 9721450-2834 e-mail address: jpierce@ci.addison.tx.us PROJECT INFORMATION Location: Dallas Parkway (Dallas N. Tollway)
MAPSCO: 4Z Beginning: Arapaho Road Project Length: NIA Ending: NIA (Intersection) Avg. Posted Speed: NIA Avg. Operating Speed: N/A Functional Classification: F Traffic Volume: Arapaho
Rd. 15,477 Dallas Pkwy. 35,221 Average # of Accidents: 4 per year Traffic Volume Source: '99 traffic count (over past 3 years) Existing Proposed Through lanes Arapaho -3 Dallas Parkway
-3 Arapaho -3 Dallas Parkway -3 Left tum lanes Arapaho -1 Dallas Parkway -1 Arapaho -1 Dallas Parkway -2 (u-turn, functions like a left turn lane) Right turn lanes Arapaho -1 Dallas
Parkway -1 Arapaho -1 Dallas Parkway -1 Sidewalks 1 1 Bicycle lanes o o Dallas Parkway SB t6 NB u-turn 0 0 1 Description of Proposed Improvement(s): The widening and realignment of Arapaho
Road required the elimination of the southbound to northbound u-turn lane to accommodate 6 through lanes and 2 left turn lanes across the bridge. The SB to NB u-turn lane must be re-established
when SB to NB turning movements reach 90 per hour. The project consists of the removal of a portion of existing concrete mono curb along inside curb lines of southbound and northbound
Dallas Parkway, removal of a portion of the east and west retaining walls, installation of concrete drill shafts and concrete abutments on the east and west sides of Dallas North Tollway,
installation of AASHTO Type IV beams to span' Dallas North Tollway, and construction of reinforced bridge deck and parapet walls with associated retaining wall construction. Associated
items of work include traffic control during construction, pavement markings and signage, This is another example of interlocal cooperation where Addison is willing to modify facilities
in another : city (Dallas) to improve traffic flow for the region. The project will benefit DART busses that use Dallas Parkway . . The City of Dallas has also submitted a project to
widen Arapaho Road from Knoll Trail to Dallas Parkway, including widening the bridge over the Dallas North Tollway, If both projects are selected, they could be joined into one ro'ect.

Total Project Cost: Right-or-way Cost: Engineering/Design Cost: Utility Cost: Construction Cost: Local Cost Contribution: in percent oftotnl cost PROJECT COST INFORMATION $750,000 $
0 $ 90,000 $ 0 $660,000 $ 80 % Supporting Comments Regarding Cost: A cost estimate, based upon schematic design, was prepared by Parsons Transportation Group in April 1999. 
-. .. 􀁾􀀠 • 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀻􀁭􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁎􀀭􀀭􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠 i .--" TOu.WAY_ I DALLAS PARKWAY .-􀁾. 􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀻􀀠 .. " 􀁾􀀠 -. . '-.,.:".'. 
PROJECT RISK ANALYSIS IASSESSMENT SHEET Project Name: __􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀢􀁄􀀢􀀭􀀧􀁡􀀢􀀢􀁬􀁾􀁬􀁡􀀢􀀧􀁟􀁳􀁟􀀢􀁟􀁐􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁡􀁲􀀬􀀮􀀮􀁫􀁷􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁡􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁹􀁟􀁟􀀢􀁓􀀧􀀢􀀢􀁂􀀢􀁟􀀢􀀧􀁴􀁯􀀧􀁟􀀧􀁎􀁂􀀧􀁟􀀧􀀽􀀧􀁟�
�􀀧􀁕􀀢􀁟􀀭􀁟􀀢􀁴􀁵􀁲􀁮􀀽􀁾_____________ Project Location (Beginning):Dallas Parkway at Arapaho Road Project Location (Ending):_-"S"'am"-""'e'----__________________ City: Addison 1.
Right of Way Is ROW available? N/A a) Yes b) No Utility Easement Utility easements present? a) Yes b);@Any Comments on ROW availability?_ ___---'R"'O"'--'-W....n..o. "--"re.,q'-"u""ir"'e"'d.'----____
__ 2. Utilities I Railroad o o o o o o o o o o Check Utilities present:NIA Water lines, Gas lines TRA lines Transmission Lines Cable Electricity lines Railroad lines Underground vaults
Other underground utilities, __________ Any historical designations, __________ 3. Safety What safety issues exist? NIA o Gas lines o Transit (Dart line) o School o Church o Other____________________
_____________ 
4.· Environmental What environmental issues exist?NIA o Parks o Floodplains o Lakes o Cemeteries o Oilier_______􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾____________ 5. Traffic N/A -Inspection a) Posted Speed
_-,---:-__--:-____________􀁾􀁭􀁰􀁨􀀠 b) Peak hour operational speed.____________________mph c) Off-peak operational speed mph 6. Structural Conditions a) Pavement condition __ Oood....
__________ b) Drainage condition i) Any undersized bridges Yes c) ii) Culverts present? Bridges present? Yes 7Yes d) Any road sections under 100 year BFE? _____yes 7. Opposition Possibility
ofIndividual or neighborhood group opposition? _Yes 􀁾􀁾􀀠 Ifyes, expJain: _________________________ 8. Other Comments:_________________________ 
Steve Chutchian From: Michael Murphy Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 3:10 PM To: Jim Pierce; Sieve Chulchian Subject: FW: Participation in CIP AlE Consultant Selection Process 3 I:mns
to matrix team, EXHIBIT 0, Rf"Qfor 26 Fob", consurt Fe.., GuyS. FYI Mike Michael E. Murphy, P.E. Director of Public Works Town of Addison (972)450-2878 ---Original Message--From: Donald
Holzwarth [maillo:DHolzwarth@daliascounty.org) Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:26 PM To: jcosby@airmail.net; Jlm.Sparks@cedarhUltx.com; Jpierce@cl.addison.tx.us; mmurphy@cI.addison.tx.us;
Ncline@cI.carrollton.tx.us; Rwalhood@cl.carrollton.tx.us; SjenkinS@ci.carrollton.tx.us; Kgrlflin@cl.coppell.tx.us; ddybala@cI.dallas.tx.us; pbaugh@cl.desoto.tx.us; ljohnson@cLdesoto.tx.us;
dschwar1z@cl.duncanville.tx.us; Davlsd@ciJarmers-branch.tx.us; MURAWSKJ@ci.farmers-branch.tx.us; Jbaker@cl.garland.tx.us; Rwunderllch@ci.garland.tx.us; rlarkinS@ci.grand-prairie.tx.us;
ttumulty@ci.mesquite.tx,us; Jgodwin@ci.rowJett.tx.us; George_human@cor.gov; henry.drexel@cor.gov; WalterJagsdale@cor.gov; jangel@irving.lib.tx.us; Jcllne@lrving.lib.tx,us; Publlcworkslnspector@townof
sunnyvale.org; townmanager@townofsunnyvale.org Cc: discodad@aol.com; ABacchus@daliascounty.org; ARoblnson@dallascounty.org; BWeems@daliascounty.org; CMarek@dalJascounty.org; DCranford@daliascounty.or
g; DDavldson@daliascounty.org; DKeesey@dallascounly.org; DMcswain@dallascounty.org; ENgwa@dallascounty.org; IHicks@daliascounty.org; IRodriguez@dallascounty.org; JHedge@dallascounty.org;
JMears@dallascounty.org; JNorman@dallascounty.org; JSmith@daliascounty.org; LFisher@daliascounty.org; MAIN.SWilson@daliascounly.org; NNew@daliascounty.org; SCamarillo@daliascounty.org;
SHomer@daliascounty.org; CON_INSP@HOTMAIL.com Subject: Participation in CIP AlE Consultant Selection Process Dear Partners, Attached is the schedule for our selection process to assure
a fast start on our joint County-City CIP projects. These are the projects which we all agreed that the County would provide PM services for and thus we are taking the first important
step of getting the consultants on-board. As we promised in our Partnering Session and at other times, you are invited and welcome to be a part of the Selection Committee. It will involve
a commitment of a member of your staWs time, if you chose to participate at that level. 1 
The first meeting will be at 1:00 P.M. on 1 March, one hour before our pre-submittal meeting with the consultants. At this meeting, we will cover the process with our city partners and
our County Selection Team members. The next commitment would be the to work as a member of the selection committee to prequalify the top -30 firms as the best of the potentially best
qualified firms. This will involve scoring the SOQ's (number unknown, could be -50), then meeting to finalize list. This will happen between 12 -26 March. Then in April. from the 9th
to the 17th, we will schedule interview with the top -30 firms (45 min each), and the committee member needs to be in attendance for those sessions. They become the basis for the "best
qualified" determination for each of the 15 projects. The final selection meetings will be 20 April. to come up with a recommended "best qualified" firm for each project. We will certainly
understand if you think this is too large a time commitment, and will pledge to keep you informed informed of the status at every milestone. Pis respond to this e-mail or to Janet Norman
with your desires in this selection process. Don Holzwarth 2 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS February 28, 2001 MEMORANDUM: TO: Public Works Directors, Matrix Team Members FROM: Alberta Blair-Robinson, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works SUBJECT:
MCIP Matrix Team Meeting Thursday, March 1,2001,1:30 PM Please mark your calendar with the subject date and time (1 pm) for an e!;Isential team meeting for the purpose of preparing for
the pre-submission meeting with the Consultants interested in the Request for Qualifications for Engineering Services in connection with the Major Capital Improvement Program (MClP).
The Consultants ioterested in proposiog for these contracts will be meeting at 2:30 pm on the same day. We would like to address pertinent issues with the person you will have on the
selection team at the 1:30 pm meeting. Ifyou have any questions, you may contact our Contracts Administrator, Janet Norman at 214-653-7232 (jnorman@dal!ascoU!!!;y.org) or me at the phone
and address listed below. jen Dallas, Texas 75202(214)653s7151 
EXHIBIT "D" CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES Schedule for AlE Consultant Selection for MCIP 2000 -2001 Consultant Selection Process Brief FRQ Advertisement of Request for SOQ Consultant
Selection Overview Meeting Consultants submit SOQ Selection Committee submit Initial Rankings Brief Individual Commissioners Letters to Consultants on Shortlisted Firms Scheduling of
Interviews and Confirmation Letters Interviews of Shortlisted Firms Committee Review Final Ranking Meetings Briefing to Commissioner Court to Negotiate with Best Qualified and Approval
of Modified AlE Contract Negotiation of Contracts with Consultants Award Consultant Contracts Schedules 13-Feb 19-Feb to 5-Mar 1-Mar 12-Mar 260Mar Zlto 29 Mar 3lJ.Mar 3O-Mar to Apr 6
09-to 17-Apr 2lJ.Apr 1-May 01 to 09-May 22 May to 26 Jun EXHffilT "D" 1 
2001 Major Capital Improvement Program Kick-Off Meeting January 31, 2001, 2-5pm AGENDA • 2:00--2:20pm Gather, Network, Coffee • 2:20-3:OOpm Welcome, Overview ofMeeting and Introductions
• 3:00-4:00pm Short Presentations: • Candidate Impact Projects • Review of2000 MCIP Application, Evaluation and Selection Process • Recommended Changes for 2001 • 2001 MCIP Evaluation
Methodology • Project Cost Estimation Guidelines • Sample Application Forms and Demonstration of 2001 Application Process • 4:00-5:00pm Discussion, Question and Answer Session • 5:00pm
Break! 
1 -􀀮􀁾􀀠 MCIP ajar Impact I Total t Costs Valley View Ln , \0 IH 535 IRd-Jaz. 􀁾􀁤􀁴􀁯􀁕􀁓􀀷􀀵􀀠 . Spring i DOOley 1,Rdta )Id , : 10 Trinity MillS , -Belt Line 10 Trinity Mills , 􀁾􀁡􀁮􀁤􀁹􀀠Lake
-Denlon Tap 10 SH 121 IIH 35E-Spur: , Hwy to: : I t -Royal to Loop 121NW Hwy : Las , 81vd -Colwell to Lake' ISh 121 ;-, 'Line to ;@PlanoRd ISpring Valley @􀁾􀀠 :8ell Line -Plano Rd .Rd
City I Dallas I Dallas I DaUas Dallas Dallas , Pkwy Irving TapRd ,Main StlS",11 Line I Rd to US 75 i ITotal Notes: 􀁾􀀠i Costs Per Year I ma!Cl1lS , BIV<l I Road Grade' i TEA-21 Project,
IFor on 􀀧􀀱􀀰􀁾􀀠 ..tJ Only 2004 20051 2006 􀁾􀁕􀁕􀁉􀀠 2008 2009 2010 '" M ... ' ....-'''. Mv'....-"'" •Sep. 1. 1. 5, ,500 1,917 1 􀁾􀀬􀁥􀀷􀀰􀀠 ,713 􀁩􀀬􀀲􀀵􀀰􀀬􀁾􀀠 ',91 444,778 520,001
􀁾􀀠 .. "V" 􀁾􀁾􀀠 <,/K, r.;0' 􀁁􀁾1J"" /'V' """ 􀀺􀀺􀁅􀀺􀀽􀀽􀀭􀀫􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀫􀀭􀁾􀀧􀀼􀀮􀁪􀀻􀀻􀀨􀁅􀀺􀀡􀀠 I 􀁾􀀠 •nu, 􀁉􀁎􀁥􀁷􀁾􀀠 "'1 Ii􀁾􀁾􀀠: .Ra: I ,nor Inor ITum Lanes New New lph"h
I Tum Lanes All , listed meet, 1, , and , 􀁾 1$1.0 mHrlOl1ln I ,50% 􀀳􀀰􀀰􀀮􀀰􀁾􀀠 􀀠 175,000 277,721 475,000 1 Ii ',916,500 ',915,500 7,916,500 ((.,V /i '/,,I'> 􀀮􀁾􀀯􀀬􀀩􀁾􀀠 Oil'
1?I'::,/,v'l \' 􀁾􀀠 I ..,vael' . J """ , 'fJ/flM v' A<fr . 􀀨􀁬􀀧􀁓􀀨􀁴􀀼􀁾􀀠 /'c", "j) A .-/' IZP. fIh. " ,. ... 11,432.81£ f'.-'5NFHe. I 􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁜􀁦􀁦􀀧􀁾􀀠 (.fJ(I" Nfl <e o I I :
)<.,. .r.N a/4""" 􀁜􀁉􀀺􀀻􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀠 {flY'l' o r to develop !han estimaled acove' , In lIle earlY years. c a o IOIalS 51,917 75,713 520,001 700 737.500 By ""..."... 2,189,787 􀀱􀀲􀁾􀀠
2,201,000 737,500 65.176.871 Total Cost , 2,737,235 􀁾􀁯􀁯􀁯􀀠 R 8275.000 3 1 1 I ftA.n• ;-' 􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀠 1.0 m.o' 50.0% 16.7% 162 (23.0% :1 
D t? 􀁾􀁆􀀧􀀠 City IMCIP 'EA-21 laJor Total T I Lanerto" &'I-IWV 􀁾􀀠 !rR ._, 􀀬􀁴􀁯􀀭􀁾􀀠 1tto Adlela [otal iCCiStS per Year I f21 rhor InC mor •Ear ! Inor ITi ,on !Rds rdg are, are
• I ,10 2004 , ??7-:1j 1,522JU I 􀁾􀁁􀁉􀁬􀀠 rio.OOO 1, 1 3.750.000 l,I I i I Year. cnr-.... 2008 2007 unly 200B 1.181.857 i,OOO,Oon I ""'" 7 • 4.10C ,0001 1.1. 1,661,843 2.634, I 1 5.01
1 7. 7. o -:r, 5.000 JV 7.916.5OQ 2009 o 2010 1 o I I 710. 1 " 1.1)()( 4,100 2.112.500 o 12,787.357 o 29,711.843 I 7. O.OC 722, 4!'i: 1, 277,50C 4.100 :> 112.5( I rot,,1 Cost 116 3.
1.180.000' 8 􀁾􀀧􀀠 1, 1.000, 
.3 IFUI IMCIP ITEA-21 IMajOr Impact Funding TotalT ,@r@tCosts :amp ,@'@I@I@IRed Bird @I & Polk (GR 6) IIH 30{ RL 11 I I Carroll IRd-l ItoHines Loop . Lake June 10 US 175 Hines ) Oak
Lawn Oak Lawn @IH 35E 􀁗􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 I IH 635 , Rd -Lake June to Quail Rd I Hill Rd-, ItolH30 Fair Park Unk -,10 Hall 1-SH 310 10 Illinois Routh -Ross to US 75 SB , Rd Jim Miller -Elam
to Loop 12 ,Pkwy,10 ,Rd rotal I Costs City ! Source Dallas 􀁩􀁾􀀠 II I Dallas !Balch !Dallas Dallas IDallas IDallas IDallas IDallas ""'" II lUI "'" I I '" I 1"1 i nor nor or ! Noles:
TEA·21 """,. '" , are lIle latest adiusted !'or I"""" A Imatcllis I fCr all Fnr nn 1 ,Rd 2004 161 59.469 31.651 4S ,673 54 ,061 56,407 10.2000 2005 o 3,7 􀁾􀀠 1,666 5,416 1, 1 Year•
I Only 2006 2007 2008 2009 1, 7, 2010 7 o I I 59,489 31,651 59,489: • 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠 . 1. DO 1,050,000, o o o o 7.916.500 0
I I 40.9: 26.1: 42.163 I 1,1' 1, 147!i nnn 1, 1, 1, 1, By 211817 173055 flnn Total Cost ',788 ,182 016 I Public Works nA1>. II;! !.O% !.O% 13.0% 13 
:4 For 􀁾􀀠. ICity • 􀁾 ..􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀠 . T;pe Source IMCIP ITEA-21 IM aior ImTpoatcatl I Costs I@ZangBld. IIH30 ,Rds-IDallas ,Mv....-';.cl TRA RR Spur ,Grand Prairie ,Mv'...·';.cl
I .• • 􀁾􀀠 0' oucPart Dallas ,nor .• • 􀁾􀀠 0' oucPart 'nor ,Rd. .• ;00'oucPart :eda: liII ,nor;.:.: 1 WB I :0 Bell Line lram 'rairie ,nor , Rd on '10.2000 2004 !27,1S0 'R40 : !'iIln
1 116,500 48,673 Year , .............l;! Only 2005 2006 2007 2008 o 1. 1 1. 1, 7 j!009 I 2010 o "'.n . By lOla• IOUUS Cost 7 48,673 194,687 20.0% 6.6% 1EB I· Belt L Ie 0 lram 'rairie
,nor 􀁾􀁩􀁣􀁥 Rd 20.0' It ill Rd-' 0 IRun ,nor 􀁾􀀠 50.0% Rd @Bear 􀁃􀁲􀁥􀁥􀁾􀀠R, lIenn ,nor lint : 50.0% IRd -' Ito Belt Line 1:;:;; I : nonl a, i,OllO 382% I I 􀁾􀁔􀁯􀁾􀁴􀁡􀁬􀁬􀁾􀁾􀁬􀁣􀁾􀁯􀁭􀁬􀁾􀁾�
�􀁮􀁾􀁡􀁲􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁴􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁴􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀰􀁴􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀰􀁴􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀰􀁴􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀰􀁴􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁭􀀽􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀽􀀽􀁾􀀲􀀸􀁁􀀥􀀠 I o 77 Notes: TEA-21
A 50% I for: 􀀧􀁏􀁏􀁭􀁎􀁾􀁑􀁾􀁾______________________________________________􀁾____-L______􀁾____􀁾_______􀁾􀁉__ ......􀁾􀀠 I 
E I .2000 I I I · I I I 􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁲􀀧􀀠 Ionly By Total , Type 20114 􀀲􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀠 2007 2008 2009 110 Totals Others Costl Share I􀁾TEA·2􀀠1 Fundlns 1 .E§II 􀁾 I:m '.000 T, tal • 0 1 U '.000
II It 2 I 1.000 3 . 1.000 • e 4 􀁾􀀮􀀠 , 1.000; I , .091.358 i 􀁾􀁾􀁅􀁕 I i 2 I 3 4 Total 31, 0 B liFt 964.71' 0 0 0 I 􀀱􀀮􀀱􀁾􀀠 1. 0 2.. I 1>42i 0 , Tolal 0 8.: I PrIlIe<:IS Q Q 0
0 0 0 0 Talal 􀁾􀀻􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁏􀁬􀀠 -􀁾􀁧􀁧􀁾􀀠 􀀬􀁾􀀭􀁾􀁉 ' Prill""'" .0001 hRI 0 I ..."'''1 Annual' IlIalanca , I 1,709 0 1 , ..cst Ranges • Aom.n, .'" Annu • 0 􀁾􀀠 ,50<50Y, ..ost Sharing
50% 􀁾􀀠 IMmln , ![Annual 􀁾􀀠 Q 100% ,50-50% ' ' 50% 
--..e..n. = == u .= a=. e= = U = ecna .c.a .=.... CD e CD .==.. -e= --.e-=a,.... =m ==... .E... Iii' e Em ,... ... == N=ea
2001 MelP Timeline 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠 Cities submit applications [4/21] {!: Complete preliminarv evaluation [6/29] {!: Cities review preliminarv resullS [1/29] {;} Consultant completes final ranking
[8/111 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠Recommend projects to Commissioners {!: Commissioners make final selection [10/30] 
Summary of Changes to Evaluation Methodology 􀁻􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠 Functional classification rating 􀁻􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠 Speed delav rating for intersection projects 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 Dllll/uedestrian projects 􀁻􀀬􀀮􀁾􀀠
Inter-modal I Multi-modal rating {,.: Accident rate rating 􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀠 Project cost estimation 
=1:1 = -== .== I 7 e E .==.., I " ftI = = nnn -=u ==CD .i= .ea. ._.._.. ..... u -= CD 1:11 '= CD CD =en -ea ·=eenn :ulea =u a: 
-== a. = .C.D. I=W ..=.=... U .===.. 1'. -1-.== m .... mm -= .... .... .... f"I .... en en 1-= = ..... ..... =aU = I ca " C'-' c .=.... =.=.... =CD m CD -ca , uen = == IC --= = = ! ca
ca IC I-a-= = • 7 = N CD = u -;: I: -aa. = == = iCsD a-CD = 1-= is == ICD = CD .= ..... In = -= CD ..... -CD en 1:1: .a..-= :=z 1:1: III= • • • • iC , • • ...•...:.. 􀀮􀁾􀀠
2. Speed Delav Rating [10 points] 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠To determine anticipated improvement to travel times and speed {;} DOC = Degree of congestion= • (Posted Speed -Operational speed] -0.41 length
of project {;} The greater the DOC the greater the score 
3. Traftic Volume Raling [10PIS] 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠To determine magnitude of traffic flow improvement 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠Year 2025 "Build" condition {;} Year 2025 "No Build" condition 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠 Difference
between the two 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠The areater the traffic improvement, the greater the score 
4. Tranic Volume Growth Raling 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠To determine magnitude Of growth in traffic volume btw existing and future condition {;} Year 1995 "Existing condition" {;} Year 2025 "Build" conDlllon
􀁾􀀺􀀡􀁾􀀠 Difference between the two {!; The greater the difference [% growth), the greater the score 
5. Travel Desire Rating [10Pts] 􀁾􀁾􀁽􀀠To determine the project's inherent attractiveness and desirabilitv 􀁾􀁾􀁽􀀠Year 2025 "capacitv-constrained" run 􀁾􀁾􀁽􀀠Year 2025 "all-or-nothing"
model run {!.: The greater the %difference, the greater the score 
6. Benefit-Cost Ratio [10Pts) 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠 Benefits based on: • reduction in travel-time delav (increase in ave dailv loaded speeds after the improvemenU {!: Cost based on approved estimated
project cost {!: The greater the ratio, the greater the score 
1. Accident Rate Rating 110pts) (+} lastvear rating was based on correctable accidents 􀁾􀀺􀀫􀁽􀀠 This vear, rating based on raw accident rate per million vehicle miles 􀁾􀀺􀀫􀀺􀁾􀀠
Three vears' wonh of accident data will be provided bv cities {!: The greater the rate, the greater the score 
8. Air QualitY Raling 􀁾􀁩􀁾􀀠 Project's impact toward improving air Qua 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠Nitrous oxide emission before and after improvement [vear 2025 'build'&'no-build'J 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠Difference
between the two {;} Factor-in volume, project length and cost {;} The lesser the cost [S/lbJ of nitrogen oxide reduction, the greater the score 
9. Sustainable Development I Redevelopment I Sman Growth {;} Project's potential to encourage regional sustainable development/sman growth 􀁻􀀡􀀮􀁾􀀠 projects receive lull 10 points
or no p at all {!} Points will be awarded il project is located: • distressed area* • under-utilized area* • *Based on Dallas County tax abatement policy. Check map! 
10. Intermodall Multimodall Social MobilitY Rating 􀁻􀁾􀁾􀀠1. Inter-modal I Multi-modal (abililV 10 involve more Ihan asingle model • Transit [bus/rail] lUpoints • School Bus lpoints
• Bicvcle paths 5points • Pedestrian paths 3points 􀁻􀁾􀁾􀀠 2. Social Mobilitv [services to elderlv or disabled] 􀁻􀁾􀁾􀀠 3. Infrastructure Investment Project [long-term economic development
potentialJ 
Special Cases {!.: Special case # 1 • lor new roadways, multiplv traffic volume ratingbv3 􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀠 Special case # 2 • il BIC ratio is 0because resulting congestion is > alter improvement
multiplv volume bv 2 􀁾􀀡􀀮􀀺􀀠 Special case # 3 • il absolute value 01 traffic volume is < 5000, divide TVG and TOR bv 2 
local Cost Participation Multiolier [lePM] {+} Rewards projects with strong commitment {!: Aggregate project score multiplied bv lCPM =Final Project Score 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠lCPM= 1+ratio of city
match 􀁻􀀡􀁾􀀠Bonus multiplier points [,3] awarded to projects in disadvantaged areas {!: Partnering cities must commit to a minimum of 500/0 of total project cost 
􀁾􀀱􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀢􀁮􀁣􀀠 :[ ",;,,""w....! . ! 􀁔􀁾􀂷􀂷􀀠 􀀲􀀰􀀰􀀵􀀱􀁾􀁥􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 Bv Total 2004 2009 -COstl 􀁾􀀮 IMCIP Fun"'na . lCA-21 '.161 • all 7. .161 '.1601 .1601 .161 ,161
.160 Tolal 1.000 􀀲􀁾􀁾􀀱 Total E_._ 'I 􀁾􀀮􀀠 II , I§I§-Tolal 6.666.' i.666.---, • Funding ¢ 􀀲􀁾􀁑􀁑􀁏􀁩􀀠 31 0 1COots TFA:?1 p"'[.ets 􀁾􀀠 􀁾2. 􀁅"1 􀁾􀀠 I T< tal I 􀁾􀀶􀁯􀀮􀀱􀀠 4
. ,. lM.i", 1 , , ,. , D t D t , -:, 􀀵􀀰􀀰􀁾􀀠 􀁾 T, 'lal , s:Jj[jjf ., , : .lId : ill I a c 0 􀁾􀁯􀁴􀁡􀁉􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ! 0 C 􀁾􀀮􀀠 IAnnua' I Balance 0 , .CostRana... " I I , I Annual -;
0 􀀱􀀰􀁄􀁾􀀠 lsa... 􀁾􀀠. 􀀱􀀲􀀮􀁾􀀠 50% -;􀁾􀀮􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀠 -, . 3, 􀀳􀁾􀀠 or fOO%1 I . tSharlng 1.565, 10j 􀁾 50%1 
IMCIP ITEA-21 IThnrnllnhfare I Major Impact I Total' ICity I Costs i=or Sourc􀁉e􀁉􀁾 􀀠 􀁔􀀻􀁾􀁥 .". .nor . on 2004 iZ i6E ,4' . 2005 20Q.6 ,""UUI o 3,750 noc 1 )00 7,916,500 500 only
2008 2009 1 7,916,50C /"!nllnru By Total /"!nllnt" 2010 IOIal5 Ulner" '" 2 c 'ViewLnItolH635 􀁾􀁂􀁲􀁡􀁮􀁣􀁨􀀠IMv....-I"·, . 2,079, 20.0% I Rd-Jay Ell Rd to US 75 IMvlr--I""I !Sep. 3,5
1! 15.0% 􀁛􀁾􀁯 Loop 121NW Hwy Las I las Blvd I to Lake Sh121 ;'Uneto ; @Plano Rd Ie IValley@'Rd . lallas )allas . I Pkwy rvlng, TapRd 􀁾􀀠 I Belt Line -Plano Rd to Main St/Belt Line
I Rd to US 75 ,Total I Costs t'er Tear . ., Inor Signal • nor New Facility_ .nor .nor .nor .nor !Rd • nor Tum Lanes • nor New Facility • nor New Facility Inor .nor Inor I nor Tum Lanes
Notes: TEA·21 "eject cost ; are the 􀁬􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀁾􀀠, I for Innation, , !rom I .50%, IInatell Is , 3,750,000 11e Las I lUnas """'I I mUlion I • and ; an 1$1.) mnlion In I 1, 737,50C 175.00C
􀀲􀀷􀀷􀀬􀀷􀁾􀀠 ne II Rca' 􀁣􀀻􀁲􀁡􀁯􀁾􀀠: Ifor City of, I projects. Allother 􀁾􀁭􀁥􀁥􀁴􀀧􀀠 I the 50% 1 I I Project may lake Ionoer to develop than, 1would i , the funding 1. 419, i21
􀁉􀁮􀁮􀁾􀀠 􀀮􀁮􀁮􀁾􀀠 55,479 . . 2,1 : . , In the earlY years. ,, i i ! , o o 7, 132, 971 20 737,500 73' ? nnnnnn R 30C ,000 1, 175,001 475 o 19,513,291 65,176,871 o . .. . .. . 1.0'
);0' 16:7' 􀀵􀀰􀁾􀀰􀀥􀀠 50.0% 49.0% 50.0% 23.0% 11 o , , . ; , I' i '. 
STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2004 AND 2005 TIDS MASTER AGREEMENT is made by and between the City
of , Texas, hereinafter called "CITY", and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "COUNTY", acting by and through its duly authorized officials, desire to enter into an Interlocal
Agreement, hereinafter called MASTER AGREEMENT, for the purpose ofRoadway Improvements on XXXX Road from XXXX to XXXX; and, WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Court Order 2000-:xxxx, dated
XXXXXXXX, Commissioners Court approved participation in Major Capital Improvement Projects for the Program Years 2004 and 2005, in the City ofXXXXX, on the aforementioned roads; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, provides authorization for local governments to enter into interlocal agreements; and NOW THEREFORE, TmS AGREEMENT, is
hereby made and entered into by CITY and COUNTY for the mutual consideration stated herein: AGREEMENT Article I. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions are incorporated into this agreement
for all purposes. 1. CITY shall mean the City 0(_____-', County o(DaDas, State of Tens. 2. COUNTY shaD mean the County of Dallas, State ofTexas. 3. TxDOT shaD mean the Texas Department
of Transportation, State of Texas. 4. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS shall mean contracts or agreements entered into for the mutual benefit of the travelling public. 5. MASTER AGREEMENT shall
mean this document including aD incorporated documents, attachments, and exhibits. 6. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall mean an agreement subsequent to this document which is entered into
to establish the contractual rights and responsibilities of the CITY and COUNTY of Dallas as it relates to the PROJECT. DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP -MASTER ILA -9/28/00 for discussion only
Pg. 1 
7. PROJECT(S) shall mean the below listed road improvements: Road with limits 8. PARCEL OR PARCELS shall mean those tracts of land and improvements located either wholly or partially
thereon, identified by COUNTY as required for right of way requirements of COUNTY 9. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE shall mean a meeting of decision making stakeholders and other members of the
PROJECT TEAM for the purpose of entering into a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the overall funding, alignment and scope of the PROJECT. 10. CITY UTILITY shall mean those utilities owned
by City which require relocation or adjustment for the purpose of the construction of the PROJECT as identified by PROJECT plans. 11. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) shall mean a written
document whieh incorporates the results of the PREDESIGN CHARRETTE. Said MOA shall at a minimum identify the overall funding scheme, horizontal alignment and basic scope of the PROJECT.
12. AMENDMENT shall mean a written document executed by all parties detailing significant changes in the MASTER AGREEMENT. 13. RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) shall mean that real property identified
by COUNTY as necessary for the construction of the PROJECT. 14. PROJECT TEAM shall mean representatives from COUNTY and CITY with responsibility for delivering the completed PROJECT.
15. EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean the date of the signature of the last person to sign the document. 16. STANDARD BASIC STREET DESIGN shall mean the paving, drainage and appurtenances, traffic
control items including pavement marking, warranted uniform signals, street light foundations, pull boxes, conduit, sidewalks, medians, storage/turn lanes, access, and standard driveways.
17. BETTERMENT shall mean any increase in the capacity of the PROJECT as compared to the existing Facility, or any upgrading of the Facility above the standard practices, devices or
materials, specified in this MASTER AGREEMENT and customarily used by COUNTY on projects solely fmanced by COUNTY. Provided, however, that anyupgrading necessary to successfully accomplish the PROJECT shall not be considered a Betterment, and further, that any increase in the capacity of the PROJECT resulting solely from the
replacement of devices or materials no longer regularly manufuctured, processed or installed shall not be considered a Betterment, provided that such replacement shall be only to the
standard devices or materials currently used on other projects financed solely by COUNTY. 18. AMENITY shall mean PROJECT fcatures not included in the STANDARD BASIC STREET DESIGN including
but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, irrigation, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other filature above and beyond the STANDARD BASIC STREET DESIGN.
19. DIRECT ·PROJECT & PROGRAM COSTS shall mean those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular cost objective. These costs generally include compensation of DRAFT VERSION
OF MCIP -MASTER ILA -9/28/00 for discussion only Pg. 2 
employees for the time devoted and identified specifically to the performance of the project or program; cost of materials acquired, consumed or expended specifically for the purpose
of the project or program; equipment and other approved capital expenditures; travel expenses incurred specifically to carry out the project. 20. INDIRECT COSTS shall mean those which
have been incurred for common or joint purposes. These cost benefit more than one cost objective and cannot be readily identified with a particular fmal cost objective without effort
disproportionate to the results achieved. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OFMeIP -MASTER ILA -9128100 for discussion only Pg. 3 
" Article n. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT This MASTER AGREEMENT becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing make the respective agreement fully executed. This MASTER AGREEMENT
shall remain in effect until terminated as provided in Article IV or the expiration of ten (10) years which ever shall first occur. Article m. AMENDMENTS Amendment ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT
by Notice with Mutual Consent: COUNTY may notifY CITY of changes in this MASTER AGREEMENT resulting from changes in federal or state laws or rules or regulations and these changes in
the MASTER AGREEMENT shall be incorporated into this agreement unless COUNTY is notified by CITY within 60 days. This MASTER AGREEMENT may be amended by mutual agreed written amendment
that is executed by the all parties. Article IV. TERMINATION, DEFAULT. TIME OF THE ESSENCE AND FORCE MAJEURE This MASTER AGREEMENT may be terminated by any ofthe following conditions:
A. By mutual written consent and agreement ofaU parties. B. By either party with ninety days written notice. If this MASTER AGREEMENT is terminated under this clause, ail existing, fully
executed advance funding agreements made under this MASTER AGREEMENT shall automatically incorporate all the provisions of this MASTER AGREEMENT. C. By either party, upon the failure
of the other party to fulfill the obligations as set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT and any supplement thereto. D. Neither COUNTY nor CITY shall be deemed in violation of this Contract
if it is prevented from performing any of its obligations hereunder by reason of, for or through strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, fire, flood, invasion, insurrection, accident, order
of court, judge or civil authority, an act of God, or any canse reasonably beyond the party's control and not attributable to its neglect. In the event of such an occurrence the time
for performance of such obligations or duty shaH be suspended until such time that such disability to perform, for which the party is not responsible or circumstances beyond its control,
shall be removed. The party claiming the suspension shall give notice of such impediment or delay in performance to the other party within ten (10) days ofthe knowledge of such occurrence.
Each party shall make ail reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects ofany suspension. Article V. INDEMNIFICATION COUNTY and CITY agree that both COUNTY and CITY shall each be responsible
for their own negligent acts or omissions or other tortuous conduct in the course ofperformance ofthis MASTER AGREEMENT, without waiving any sovereign or governmental immunity available
defenses under Texas law. Nothing in this paragraph shaH be construed to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise, in or to any third persons or entities. DRAFT VERSION OFMClP-MASTER
ILA -9128100 for discussion only Pg. 4 
Article VI. NOTIFICATION A. When notice is pennitted or required by this MASTER AGREEMENT, it shall be in writing and shall be presumed delivered when delivered in person or three (3)
days subsequent to the date placed, postage prepaid, in the U. S. Mail, Certified or Registered, Retum Receipt Requested and addressed to the parties at the following address. B. All
notices and correspondence to County by City shall be mailed or delivered by hand as follows: Dallas County Public Works Donald R. Holzwarth, P.E., Director 411 Elm Street, 4th Door
Dallas, Texas 75202 C. All notices and correspondence from County to City shall be mailed or delivered by hand as follows: City Director ofPublic Works City, Texas D. Either party hereto
may from time to time designate another and different address for receipt ofnotice by giving written notice ofsuch change ofaddress to the other party. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE
DRAFT VERSION OF MCIP -MASTER ILA -9128/00 for discussion only Pg. 5 
" . Article VII. CITY agrees as follows; A. To execute the necessary agreements for the implementation of design and construction of the above described project(s). Provide City Council
Resolution adopting approved alignment, proposed estimated budget, and commitment to meet PROJECT funding for each milestone as specified in SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. B. CITY agrees to
share the funding of PROJECT with COUNTY on an equal share basis (50%/50%) with the following exclusions: CITY shall bear the entire cost of• CITY owned utilities such as water and sanitary
sewer facilities; • PROJECT AMENITIES including but not limited to street pavers, colored concrete, planters, decorative lighting, special signage, or any other feature over the basic
street design; • Project management direct costs which are not supported by a detailed hourly accounting; • Indirect costs. C. When in mutual agreement by COUNTY and CITY at the time
ofPredesign Charrette, to acquire right of way required for designated projects by voluntary dedication, the subdivision platting process andlor other legal means to the maximum extent
possible and to ensure through the building permitting process that setback requirements are imposed to limit encroachment upon the required right of way. CITY hereby grants the COUNTY
authority to enter into eminent domain proceedings within the city limits on specific right of way alignment as approved by the CITY and COUNTY. CITY agrees to fund ROW it failed to
acquire through its platting and permitting ordinances and for the removal of improvements (encroachments) within existing or proposed right ofway areas. D. To require all utilities
located within or using the present public right of way on all designated transportation projects within CITY's municipal limits to adjust andlor relocate said utilities as required
by the proposed improvement of the designated transportation project for CITY Utilities at no cost to COUNTY except as may be specifically set forth in this MASTER AGREEMENT. E. CITY
agrees to be cooperative on issues relating to bill boards, advertising signs, nonconforming uses, zoning and similar restrictions and to provide variances when possible to minimize
cost and delay ofPROJECT. F. CITY shall require the adjustment andlor relocation of utilities to be accomplished and fmalized, as expeditiously as possible, after approval of fmal plans,
but in no event later than six (6) months after receiving notification in writing from COUNTY that acquisition of additional right of way for the designated project has been completed.
CITY shall initiate legal action to compel the adjustment or relocation of the utilities by the utility owner or, if necessary to prevent delays in the commencement or prosecution of
DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP-MASTER ILA -9/28100 for discussion only Pg. 6 
construction on the project, CITY will itself adjust and relocate said utilities. Any additional cost due to CITY requirements shall be borne by CITY . G. In cases where a franchised
utility has a private right ofway easement for its utility and it is necessary to make adjustments by reason of the widening or improvement of the designated project, the COUNTY will,
after submission of satisfactory right of way documentation and cost estimates acceptable to the COUNTY by the utility company, bear the actual costs for the relocation and/or adjustment
of said utility. H. Where new storm drainage fucilities are in conflict with CITY owned water and sanitary sewer systems, and the storm sewer design cannot be modified, after submission
of an acceptable schedule of work and cost estimate by the CITY to the COUNTY, the actual costs ofthe necessary adjustment ofCITY water and sewer utilities shall be pro rated at the
overall percentage agreed to by CITY and COUNTY for cost sharing. CITY shall be responsible for funding any BETTERMENTS. Except as provided herein, all costs for adjustment and/or relocation
ofutilities in the public right ofway shall be the responsibility of the utility owner or of the CITY UTILITY. Any PROJECT delay or other damages caused by CITY UTILITY's failure to
timely adjust at the entire cost ofCITY. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP-MASTER /LA -9128100 for discussion only Pg. 7 
I. To provide for continuing surveillance and control of right of way to prevent the construction, placement, storage or encroachment of any signs, personal property or other appurtenances
in the right of way. In the event that the aforementioned features are allowed by CITY to encroach on necessary ROW during the duration of the project, CITY shall bear the entire cost
ofremoval or relocation ofsaid encroachment. J. To provide adequate copies of all codes, (specifically including zoning and development codes), plats, specifications, guidelines, standards
or any other pertinent information as determined by COUNTY required for the completion of the PROJECT to COUNTY or COUNTY's designee at no cost. Additionally, CITY shall furnish COUNTY
such documents as necessary to keep previously furnished information current. K. Actively participate and provide authorized representation with decision making power at predesign charrette,
preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings which are necessary to project development/completion and fiduciary relationships. L. CITY agrees to provide timely
review of interim submittals and hereby agrees that if no review notes are submitted by CITY in writing to COUNTY within twenty (20) days plans are approved as submitted. M. Provide
for the continuing maintenance of all existing ROW, such as mowing, drainage, trash removal, etc., during the period between acquisition and construction N. Bear the entire cost of design,
construction and administration for landscaping, street scaping, street lighting, and other amenities specified or requested by CITY in excess of basic design. In addition, CITY shall
bear the entire costs related to any change in criteria or features requested by CITY after prior approval, vocal or tacit. O. In the event CITY elects to manage and administer PROJECT,
CITY agrees to assume all applicable roles previonsly identified as COUNTY to be determined by mutual consent in MOA. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OF MCIP -MASTER ILA
-9/28100 for discussion only Pg. 8 
Article VllI. COUNTY agrees as follows: A. To provide preliminary engineering which will deflne project details, e.g., location, scope of work and speciflc right of way alignment for
each improvement for approval by CITY, prior to proceeding with the flnal design and any right ofway acquisition. B. To provide for the construction of transportation improvements based
upon design criteria conforming to CITY ordinances and standards, to the extent of funding. Deviations from CITY standards and/or design criteria shall require prior approval of CITY.
Where CITY standards do not exist, TxDOT standards as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this MASTER AGREEMENT shall be utilized. C. To actively participate and provide authorized representation
at predesign charrete, preconstruction meeting, partnering meetings and project team meetings, which are necessary to project development and completion and flduciary relationships D.
To provide administration and management of project from commencement to completion of construction. construction. CITY and COUNTY may further agree by mutual consent to redeflne administrative
and management roles as beneflcial to the PROJECT as defined in the MOA E. To provide information related to the PROJECT to CITY or CITY's designee at no cost to CITY. PLEASE NOTE YOUR
COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OF MCIP -MASTER lLA -9118100 lor discussion only Pg. 9 
F. To submit final engineering plans for review and approval by CITY, at least thirty (30) days prior to advertising for construction. G. To provide for the acquisition of the necessary
additional right of way, on designated projects, in accordance with minimum standard requirements and utilizing existing public right of way to the maximum extent possible. H. To require
all contractors to secure all necessary permits required by CITY on said construction projects. I. To furnish record drawings of construction plans for the permanent records ofCITY within
twelve (12) months upon completion and acceptance ofthe transportation improvement project. J. To transfer, by Quit Claim Deed, all roadway related easements acquired by COUNTY to CITY.
K. In the event COUNTY elects for CITY to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY for agreed costs as detailed in Article X and retain only responsibilities for reimbursement and
reimbursement certification. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE . DRAFT VERSION OF MCIP -MASTER lLA -9128100 for discussion only Pg. 10 
Article IX. PREDESIGN CHARRETTE A. CITY and COUNTY, as specified in Article VI and VII, will designate officials or representatives to participate in a Predesign Charrette to be conducted
on a mutually agreeable date and location. B. Results from Predesign Charrette will identify the general project scope and the general alignment of the project, project administration
and management roles. Additionally, the Predesign Cbarrette shall identify key project team participants. C. At the conclusion ofthe Predesign Charrette a MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT shall
be produced which outlines the identified roles and scope for the Project. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OFMeIP -MASTER ILA -9/28100 for discussion only Pg. 11 
ArticleX. FUNDING A. CITY and COUNTY mutually agree to assess proportionately fimd the direct project costs as more fully described in Court Order XXXXXXXXX dated the XX SS of XXXXXXXXX,
200X attached as Attachment A and incorporated herein as if reproduced word for word for all purposes. COUNTY shall bear XXXX percentage of the total project costs excluding the amenities,
CITY utility items. CITY shall bear XXX percentage of all project costs in addition to any amenities. B. In the event that the cost of the PROJECT shall exceed the Not to Exceed Amount,
CITY and COUNTY agree to either reduce the scope of construction or seek additional fimding to complete the project. At the termination of the PROJECT, COUNTY will do a fmal cost accounting
of the PROJECT. In the event that the amount paid by CITY exceeds its portion of the actual cost, the difference will be remitted to CITY. In the event that additional fimds are due,
COUNTY will bill CITY who agrees to pay such fimds within thirty (30) days ofreceipt ofsuch billing. C. If CITY elects to manage PROJECT, COUNTY will reimburse CITY based on invoice
for actual costs expended in accordance with COUNTY invoicing policy. D. CITY shall escrow an amount of $XXXX for initial project costs which COUNTY may use to pay for initial professional
services required for scoping and preliminary design. PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP -MASTER ILA -9128100 for disclIssion only Pg. 12 
Article XI. RIGHT OF ENTRY The CITY agrees that COUNTY shall have the right to enter upon the Project area for the time period necessary for the completion of the Project. City agrees
to furnish such police personnel as requested by Connty for traffic control or other public safety matters at no cost to County. Article XII•. MISCEI.IJANEQUS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Applicable
Law. This Contract and all matters pertinent thereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State ofTexas and exclusive venue shall be in Dallas County, Texas.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Contract is expressly made subject to County's Sovereign Immunity, Title 5 ofTexas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and all applicable
State ofTexas and Federal laws. B. Entire Agreement. This Contract, including all Work Orders, all exhibits and addendum, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto
and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties hereto as herein provided. C. Severability. If any provision of this Contract shall be held invalid,
void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected or impaired, and such remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. D. DefaultIWaiverlMitigation.
It is not a waiver of default ifthe non-defaulting party fails to declare immediately a default or delays in taking any action. Pursuit of any remedies set forth in this Contract does
not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this Contract or provided by law. Consultant shall have a duty to mitigate damages. E. Federal or State of Texas Funding. In the event that
any work or part thereof is funded by State ofTexas or U. S. Government federal funding and any statute, rule, regulation, grant, contract provision or other State ofTexas or U. S. Government
law, rule, regulation or other provision imposes additional or greater requirement(s) than stated herein, City agrees to timely comply therewith without additional cost or expense to
County. F. Headings. The titles which are used following the number ofeach paragraph are only for convenience in locating various provisions ofthis Contract and shall not be deemed to
affect the interpretation or construction of such provision. G. Number and Gender. Words ofany gender used in this Contract shall be held and construed to include any other gender; and
words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, unless the text clearly requires otherwise. H. Counter:parts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all ofwhich shall constitute one and the same instrument. I. Funding. Notwithstanding any provisions contained herein, this Contract is
expressly contingent upon the availability offunding for each item and obligation contained DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP -MASTER ILA -9118100 for discussion only Pg. 13 
herein for the tenn ofthe agreement and any extension thereto. CITY shal1 have no right of action against the COUNTY ofDallas in the event that the COUNTY of Dal1as is unable to fulfil1
its obligations under this MASTER AGREEMENT as a result of lack of sufficient funding for any item or obligation from any source utilized to fund this MASTER AGREEMENT or failure to
budget or authorize funding for this MASTER AGREEMENT during the current or future fiscal years. In the event that County ofDallas is unable to fulfill its obligations under this MASTER
AGREEMENT as a result oflack of sufficient funding or iffunds become unavailable, County of Dallas, at its sole discretion, may, subsequent to execution by County, provide funds from
a separate source or tenninate this MASTER AGREEMENT. J. Remedies This agreement shall not be considered as specifYing the exclusive remedy for any agreement default, but all remedies
existing at law and in equity may be availed ofby either party to this agreement and shall be cumulative. The City of , State of Texas, has executed the Agreement pursuant to duly authorized
City Council Resolution , Minutes Dated the __day of ,200_. The County of Dallas, State of Texas, has executed this agreemeut pursuant to Commissioners Court Order Number and passed
on the __day of____-' 200_. CITY OF _________ COUNTY OF DALLAS BY BY TITLE LEE JACKSON, COUNTY JUDGE 􀁁􀁔􀁔􀁅􀁓􀁔􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀂭 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY SECRETARY \ ATTORNEY John
Dahill, Advisory Chief, Civil Section Dallas County District Attorney DRAFT VERSION OFMCIP -MASTER ILA -9128100 for discussion only Pg. 14 
PLEASE NOTE YOUR COMMENTS HERE Ctl/Selas 2000·031ClPMLA DRAFT VERSION OF MCIP -MASTER lLA -9/28100 for discussion only Pg. 15 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS • GUIDING COALTION --Finished 7 Habits • Salary Increases for Technical People, Re-look by Personnel for some other specialties • Successful CIP Planning Cycle
and Transition to PM Two Outstanding Call for Projects -Great Perfonnance by consultant and County Team -Superb Teamwork between PW and Commissioners to build project lists -Acceptance
by Court without controversy for first PY projects • Sticking together during tough times --opportunities, not unsolvable problems 
PUBLIC WORKS • FY 2001 BUDGET SUBMISSION APPROVALS 3 Additional People -Training for Designers and GIS folks -Confinnation from Court that we are on right azimuth • P ARTNERING SUCCESSES
-Joe Wilson and Beltline --Coppell, highly successful starts -City-County Partnering Session 13 October • Successful Bids on 3 Key Projects -Joe Wilson -Beltline -Haskell 
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
FIVE PHASE PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM PHASE COUNTY CITY(lES) CONSULTANT • CaU for projects ILA• Liaison Contract • Risk analysis • Est. cost share • Attends charrette I • Coordinate ILA,
other stakeholders • Define project management and • Project Walk• Define Project Management Team team responsibilities thru • Predesign charrette • Provides Survey including Commissioners,
etc. • Conduct Predesign Charrette • Project Walk-thru • Alignment Study • Conduct Project Walk-thru i. Commit to maintain current zoning • EA, Permits, etc. • Determine level of SUE
and row • Prelim Schematic • Fund 50% of design and SUE? (STPIMM) » In-house • Initiate design thru • Commit to alignment » City • Provide preliminary surveying » Consultant • Input
in consultant selection/and/or! • Negotiate Liaison contract extension of consultant contract? • Determine centerline • Approve alignment study • Constructability Review • Consultant
Evaluation • Negotiate contract with consultant !. Provides accurate data at no cost • N cgotlates contract • Defines delivery dates • Well define scope of work • Coordinates with stakeholders
• Coordinates with all stakeholders under County Project i. Determine definite delivery dates • Input in constructability review II • Project Management in partnering Management mode
• Completes EA • Constructability review • Conducts public meetings • Produces traffic studies?? • Approve EA and Neighborhood • Provides final ROW Meetings documents within schedul.
• Check traffic/utility data • Identify early ROW issues/resolve \ ---_._.
·, 
III IV V • Final approval of ROW documents • Project Manager (PM) monitors and tracks progress. • PM resolves issues • PM communicates to all stakeholders • ROW acquisition begins •
Package for construction bidding • Evaluate consultant • Acquire ROW-complete • Require utility adjustments • Resolve issues/track schedules • Prepare to Advertise for construction •
Advertise for construction bids • Final ILA with City(Supplemental) • Approve partnering, preconstruction meeting • Construction Management • Partnering with all stakeholders • As-builts
created/approved • Close out project report (AAR) );> ConsultantlContractor Evaluations • Tum over to City for maintenance '. Conduct 1 yr maintenance review );> Inspection );> Punch
list > Approval • Input on packaging for construction • Evaluation • Expedites utility relocations • Provides plans for City requested joint venture work • Attends Preconstruction and
Partnering Meetings i. Final I1A (Supplemental) • Final Payment • Close out contract );> ConsultantlContractor Evaluations • Project turned over for maintenance • 1 yr maintenance review
• Minor changes per property owner requests • Expert testimony for ED '. Evaluation • Engineering during construction • Review shop drawings • Attends Preconstruction and Partnering
Meetings • Close out contract );> ConsultantlContr actor Evaluations 2 
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j 
'. DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 00 OCT -4 PM 3:"5 October 4, 2000 ,MEMORANDUM To: Commissioners Court From: Donald R. Holzwarth, P. E., Director ofPublic Works Subject: Major Capita! Development
Program Selection ofTransportation Projects for Funding Background In Spring of 1999 the Commissioners Court began the process of identifying, evaluating and selecting transportation
improvements to be funded through the Major Capital Development Fund with a "Call for Projects" issued to the cities for participation funding in TEA-21 projects, Selection ofthe TEA-2l
projects was finalized in November 1999. The Attachment includes listings ofthe selected TEA-21 projects by District. In December 1999 the Court issued a Call for Projects to the cities
to identify candidate Thorougbfare improvement projects for potential County funding. In this Call the cities were asked to commit to cost participation with the County on a 500/.-50%
basis. Candidate projects were accepted for consideration until March 2000. Between March and July 2000 County staff and the consulting firm ofKirnley-Hom together with NCTCOG performed
extensive data validation and technical evaluation of the 86 candidate projects submitted by 1 g cities. The fmal results ofthe evaluations were presented to the Court on July 11, 2000.
Since July 2000 the Court and County staff have been reviewing the evaluation results with the cities, confirming city and District priorities, resolving scope and cost participation
with the cities, and assessing risk, schedule and constructability to firm up fmal recommendations for funding. The Attachment includes projects recommended for Thoroughfare funding
in each District. ' Throughout this process the Commissioners and staff have worked with our partoers to identify candidate "Major Impact" projects. A number ofpotential Major Impact
projects have been identified and are currently under review for future consideration. At this time, only Commissioner Mayfield has confirmed his recommendation for one project to be
funded in Major Impact category: Mountain Creek Parkway. This project is shown under District 4 in the Attachment. Parallel to the project selection process the Commissioners Court and
the Office ofBudget and Evaluation have worked to develop and approve funding forecasts for the Major Capital Development Fund. The current funding forecasts for the Transportation elements
(TEA-21, Thoroughfare and Major Impact) are shown by District in the Attachment. The first page ofthe Attachment summarizes the funding forecasts and the recommended project. totals
for the entire Program. The Summary also includes four estimates providing a range ofpotential Administrative costs which must be funded in addition to the project costs. 411 Elm Street,
4th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 653-7151
Commissioners Court October 4, 2000 Page 2 of2 Financial Impact The total project and administrative costs recommended in the Attachment are within the total Transportation funding forecast
for the Major Capital Development Fund. Funding distribution is held equal among the four Districts. The Major Impact funding in each District is left unallocated to projects except
in District 4. The project funding shown in the Attachment will obligate approximately 77% ofthe available funds for FY 2004 and FY2005, excluding administrative costs. The percentage
of available funds obligated drops to approximately 53% in FY 2006 and approximately 18% in FY 2007. No funding would be obligated beyond FY 2007. Final selection ofthe recommended projects
as listed in the Attachment is in accordance with Major Capital Development Fund Policy. Schedule Approval ofthe recommended projectsidentified in the Attachment will permit staffand our partner cities to initiate development ofnecessary Interlocal Agreements and begin the implementation ofthese projects. A "partnering"
workshop hosted by Dallas County Public Works is scheduled for Friday, October 13<11 to discuss the project development process and the initial joint development stages. Projects listed
in the Attachment are shown in the target Program Year (planned construction start year). Recommendation The project selection process is near completion for the Thoroughfare portion
of the Major Capital Development Program. While minor adjustments in these recommended projects can be expected and additional projects will be selected in the future for all three categories
offunding (TEA-21, Thoroughfare and Major Impact) staff recommends that the Commissioners Court approve the projects identified in the Attachment for funding in the Major Capital Development
Fund. Ifthe Court concurs a Court Order to approve the recommended projects will be prepared for the Court's consideration on it's next scheduled formal agenda. Approved By: Donald R.
Holzwarth, P. E. Director ofPublic Works Works Attachment 
• 
I Fundin, iMalor t Fundirnl ' Total ItEA-21 • Projects IToIaI j Costs . Yea, , ""'ance ,COSt Tota' Telal 2004 2005 􀁾􀁾􀁡􀁲􀀭􀁾􀀠 i I I i IOnlv 2008 2009 3' o o o Z010 , : o 169. 1.000
0, 542,i 8.891 5. '.Qll 5; 1.00 By 􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠 25.0% 􀀲􀁓􀁝􀁪􀁾􀀱􀀠 192. m 29.2'!! 􀁬􀁾􀁭􀀧􀀵􀀥􀀠 􀀱􀁾􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱 2. ,AMua' 􀁾􀁏􀁏􀁏􀁉􀀠 3.131 3. 2.000: I ".. , ; 1, 􀀬􀁾􀀠
City EA-21 Total 􀁾􀁥􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁬􀁮􀁥􀀠􀁒􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀠 I to Dallas PkWY D as as I Rd @Lovers Lane as lalley View Ln ',/Ii!@.g I to IH 635 􀁾􀁤􀁴􀁯􀁕􀀵􀀷􀀵􀀠 IOld , • Spring Valley to I 1
Rdto , • t to Trinity Mills , • Be t Line to TMnily Mills landy Lake· Tap to SH 121 H315E • Spur l IHwy to Spur t· Royal to Loop 12JNW Hwy Las' .Blvd·! Ito Lake' ICollins <i!t IBelt
'Rd ,Dallas I Dallas 1PkWY Ilrving Tap Rei Shllii t,·' 'Unelo IMain Une· , Rei to US 75 ITotal: ICosts Per Year , INotes: TEA·21 , are the 􀁬􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀁾􀀠• I lor InllaHon. A W% I mall:llis
• 'lOr "It)' 0" I The Las COlfnas I:JIVtI projeCt 􀀧􀁾􀀲􀀬􀁕􀁉􀀠 I Tho , I RoaO "",00 I 'EA·21 project may I IV '" , lI,ur ,'", ,'", ,'", ,'", MI 􀁾􀀮􀀠 nor MI.i't'· nor IMI.i.... •
nor IMl.iIt'· nor 􀁉􀁍􀁃􀁉􀁐􀁾􀀠hor MI IMI 1M' ,from IFor Ion 􀁵􀁲􀁮􀁌􀁾 ewFac WlFa 1 .an! , ••􀁴􀁥􀁤􀁾􀀠 I.bove' 􀀱􀀰􀀬􀀲􀁾􀁮􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧�
�􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁢􀁉􀁬􀁃􀀭􀀧􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬􀀠 . 2004 11 j lIle 50r. , lin, 2005 o 444.778 1.001 RQQ nnn 737,500 300,000: 175,000 277.721 ?nn nnn • the IiJndinQ
• • fori 􀁙􀁥􀁡􀁲􀁾􀀠 Only 2006 ;tUUI 2008 2009 1 '.916.501 '.916,600 7916,500 7.916. , 419.521 1, 1, I 'In IIle, 1, o o 2,11 7.916,500 7,916,500 2010 o o o I 7.227161 51.917: 547.448
􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀰􀀰􀀱􀀠 700 737,500 1: 47<; nnn By Total Cost 207.667 2.737.2315: 􀁾􀀬􀀠 , 21).0% 15.0% 50,0% " I ". 􀀬􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁾􀀠 1.0%1 737.50C i,OOa ),0 i.OOO 4 i,OOO v.... " v,'" 162
).0 i.7 150.0% 50,0% 49.0% 50.0'i'o 23.0% 11 
IMCIP ITEA-21 IMajor Impact Total . : Costs ILane-W ·toE IHwyI,to 1 rRd.-' 1 ,to I Cily Um i 'Pkwv-IH 635 to Tripp Rd at Collins Rd ,Rd,toUSeo i .d -Bruton to Belt Line :Iub I to , I
: to Adleta Tolal : Costs per Year Notes: TEA·21·"""""" N .. , , are the tate$!, For on City Dallas Dallas Irtom j to th••• Bmits. 􀁾􀀬􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀠 1,000 10.2000 􀁩􀀧􀀴􀀱􀀶􀀬􀁊􀁾􀀠 1, 1,661,643
: I I 1 1 7 o I 1 1 7,91 1, o I 1,250,01 !'i 1, 7,916,5C o I 9 I.OOC c 1,000 o o o . 29,711,643 I 4,7: 2r7,500 4,1000no 2,1 o I 1,1ftn nor R ?nnnnr .t??!'inoc 1,770,000 I Public Works
20.0% ;0.0 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 12 
:3 IMaior IFundi IMCIP EA -21 Funding lajor Impact Total II 1Costs '@1&( I (COG Gr22) City )allas 􀁒􀀬􀀬􀁾􀁫􀁮􀀢􀁲􀀠@)allas Camp ,Iii) I School & Polk (Gr 5) )allas @Illas I Gaston as
I Gaston as IRed Bire @,& Polk {GR 6} as IIH 301 RL I -I I Carroll Dallas linwood Rd -• I to Hines Dallas For Fllncling 􀁲􀁾􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀮􀀠 Source 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 Inor 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠
􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉􀀠 , ,Rd , I􀀱!􀀱;j􀁾in􀀬e􀀬s􀁾 􀁏-􀁐M􀁾􀁾o􀁾t􀀧o􀀭r􀁾 􀁌a􀁌 􀁡O􀁾a􀁫􀁥k􀁊 L􀀽a􀀭􀁵w􀁮n􀁥 􀁟􀀬􀁲􀁯􀁟􀀧_􀁕S_I1_75_ ____􀁦􀀮􀁟􀁾􀁾􀁾.􀁾.􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀠􀀺
􀀺􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁉􀀠 􀁉􀁾􀁉 IOak La @; 35E IOlive(1'i I , IPearl (1'i I Dallas IH 635 , Rd -Lake June to Quail Rd 1 􀁾􀀠 Rd , to IH 30 IFair Park :-lItoHall Linfield 310 to Illinois
I ' -Ross to US 75 SB " Rd , r -Elam to Loop 12 'Pkwy'toRd ITotal I Costs INoles: TEA-21 Project' , are the 􀁬􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀁾􀀠 A 50% I 1 match Is I for all I Balch I Dallas I Dallas I Dallas
I Dallas I Dallas I Dallas '-" hor hor hor hor '10_ 2000 2004 2005 2,227,161 0 1 1 5,416,500 5.416,500 59,489 31,651 59,489 43,265 48,673 54,081 58,407 Year -county 2006 2007 ',50C 120,000
1 nnn nnn 1, 1, 1 3,775,216 3,7, o 1, lunly 2008 2009 1.250.0nn ',916, o o 7,916,500 . I r.nllntv 2010! , UL<I'" 7,227,161 25,272,839 Q QQQ nnn o 4?4QQ nnn 59,489 31,651 59,489 43,265
48,673 54,081 58,407 1,321,648 1: 1 120,000 1 By 237,951 211,817 237,951 173055 19 􀁾􀀠 1,063 ,198 1 471 :,000 1 475 1 1 1 1 o n. n. Total Cou_ntY Cost 297,440 􀀿􀀴􀁾􀀴􀁒􀁒􀀠 ?Q744n
216,320 270,400 000 000 ,100 ,800 om I 2( 20.0' 20.0% 20.0% 13.0% 20.0% 13.0% :.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 13 
:4 MCIP TEA-21 ... TI I Maior Impact Total :Costs I@ZangBld. ICity ,.<, I Dallas I ILl IIH30' 􀁾􀁒􀁤􀁳􀀭􀀺􀀠 TRA RR Spur !Grand Prairie ILl I Creek , IH 20 to Spur 409 Clark . -: 0 .
to Coucll par lar • -;0 to CoucllPart . -: 0 to Couch Pari 􀁾􀀠 :d 􀂷􀁴􀁯􀁂􀁥􀁾􀀠line , Rei -Belt Line to It 1-' Ito :Run t Bear Creek Rei hoc: Rei I to tiel! Une Total I ICosts per
I ear Notes: TEA-21 Project' ,a... lIle 􀁬􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁳􀁾􀀠 A 50% • I match • II Cl\Y IDallas IDallas ;edal liII iran< 'raine 'raine G'enn I'Vlv,r ., nor IlV,v,r . II,or I'Vlv,r . II,or IlV,v,r
. II,or IlV,v,r . II,or 1!V,v,r ',"or 1!V,v,r 'lIIor 'ITom' For Ion •Rd. TI 10.2000 • 1 2004 2005 o 500 -62,173 I Year· r.nllntv Fum""y only 2006 2007 2008 1 7.91 I o o 2009 2010 1,
o o o o County By Total IOtalS Cost ;g--+---,􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁩􀀠 1: 1. ;S t.ooe 2. i.55C 'II 20.0% 6.8% 􀁾􀀠 l.O% 8. 31.1001 50.0% 1 I I 50.0% 38.2% 28.4% 
DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5 PHASE PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM October 13, 2000 
PHASE 1 --PLANNING & PRELIMINARY DESIGN STEP ONE, PROJECT DEFINITION • A start with analysis that precedes selection ofprojects for County's CIP for a given Program Year. Analysis will
include risk assessments from various perspectives-political, Right ofWay, utilities, technical, funding, safety, environmental, and traffic factors. • After PY selections are made,
Initial Interlocal Agreement (ILA) is coordinated and signed between Cities, County and any other stakeholders. The goal will be to include city partners who are totally committed to
the projects they submit, and are willing and able to be cost sharing partners in all phases, to include design, whenever feasible. We will also explore roles for each stakeholder all
focused on assuring timely project delivery. We will clearly define Project Management and total team responsibilities. We intend to use Partnering Principles ofTrust, Commitment, and
Shared Vision throughout the life of the project. • A Pre-design Charrette may be planned and executed with all stakeholders (Cities, utilities, County, any private parties or other
decision-makers), dependent upon project complexity and number ofunknowns. This will include an orientation walk-thru ofthe project site, which includes right ofway assessment. We will
bighlight specific City zoning and other ROW requirements. • An initial contract will be signed with the best qualified consultant to either perfonn the entire preliminary design, or
participate in Phase 1 as a liaison etc. Ifsigned before the Charrette, the consultant will participate in that event. 
PHASE 1 --PLANNING & PRELIMINARY DESIGN STEP TWO, PRELIMINARY DESIGN • Decision on use of Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) will be made after the Charrette, before initiating design.
SUE determination should take funding sources into account. Hopefully our partners, including utilities, will be willing to participate. This information will be critical for designers
to use as they launch the design. • County, city, or joint team of in-house designers or selected AlE firm begins initial design. Objective is to resolve all alignment issues, in close
partnership with all stakeholders. Preliminary surveying requires estimating centerline and ascertaining existing ROW. County PM and Inspectors will assure an effective Constructibility
Review is completed. In most projects a consultant will be brought in as early as possible in Phase I with the possibility for an amendment to the contract after concept design is complete.
City partners will be involved in the selection process. The decision to amend the contract for completion of the Primary Design will be made after an interim evaluation is completed
using the County's consultant evaluation system. • Phase 1 ends with approved preliminary alignment and profile and preliminary sizing of bridges and drainage structures along with SUE
determination. Preliminary environmental or permitting investigations will have begun. Basically the level of effort will approximate that required of the Preliminary Schematic and Environmental
Assessment Phase that currently is required on the STP/MM projects. 
PHASE 2 --PRIMARY DESIGN • Negotiation ofamendment to contract with consultant for Primary Design is the initial task. with Scope ofWork now well defined by all Phase 1 effort and includes
geo tech, utility analysis or SUE early in the process. Part of negotiations includes defmitive delivery dates for various phases and reviews. • Consultant works closely with all stakeholders
--under the guidance and direction ofthe County PM, in a partnering mode. Any available internet-based Project Management tools, including extranets, will be used to optimal effect during
the life ofthe proj ect. • Constructibility reviews will be incorporated at key points during design. • Environmental analyses and neighborhood public workshops are to be included during
this phase. • Traffic and Utilities data will be considered in design, with data from partner city, County, NCTCOG, or consultant. Agreed upon level ofS.U.E. will be key input into design
details. • Any required environmental impact analysis will be included in this this phase. Common sense will be used to address significant issues without wasting time on clearly unimportant
areas. The goal is to execute environmentally sustainable development that improves the ovemll quality of life ofour joint customers, the transportation users and citizens of Dallas
County and the partner city. • Early involvement on ROW issues will be important, and early provision of ROW documents will be a critical milestone ofthe design contract. • PM completes
interim evaluation of consultant 
PHASE 3 -DESIGN COMPLETION & RIGHT-OF-WAY INITIATION • Begins with the delivery of the R-O-W documents to the County by the consultant. Standards and scheduling will be clearly spelled
out in writing within Consultant's contract. County or City ROW functional manager works to assure efficient execution of ROW planning and execution services, as part of the Project
Matrix Team. This includes management of ROW Services IDIQ contract, if this delivery tool is used. • County or City Project Manager monitors and tracks progress. Resolves issues as
they develop, keeping all stakeholders in the net, using e-tools and networking. Any available intemet-based Project Management tools, including extranets, will be used to optimal effect
during the life of the project. • ROW acquisition begins, using in-house or ROW consultant on IDQ contract. PM works closely with ROW functional people to assure all acquisition activities
stay on track, issues are brought to conclusion, logical design changes are made, etc. PM uses Matrix Team and assures appropriate leadership required to assure project delivery dates
are met. • County decides, in consultation with other stakeholders, the packaging ofthe construction contract (early enough to preclude re-work by consultant). • Consultant to make minor
changes resulting from property owner requests. • Design consultant completes work on provided schedule, however, in rare . instances may be asked for expert testimony at Eminent Domain
hearings. • County and Partners evaluate Consultant using standard evaluation system. Consultant is given opportunity to evaluate Countys project management process, also. 
PHASE 4 -ROW & Utility Adjustment • ROW acquisition is carried to completion. • We will use parmering principles as well as results ofS.U .E. to assure utility adjustments are accomplished
in time to keep scheduled project advertisement and contract award dates. • County or City Project Manager tracks and resolves issues and work and schedules, using Matrix Team. • All
work is done to prepare project for letting (Ready to Advertise). • City works as part of Matrix Team to expedite utility relocations. • Consultant may be kept on call for unique projects
or if required to complete requested Engineering During Construction (EDC) services, such as shop drawing submittal review. 
PHASE 5 --CONSTRUCTION • Project is advertised and bids opened. • Final Supplemental City County Agreement is completed with each Partner giving approval of final funding on a timely
basis. • Construction contract is awarded and notice to proceed is given. • Partnering & pre-construction meeting scheduled, planned, and executed with key stakeholders in attendance.
• Construction proceeds on schedule with Construction Management services provided by County or city partner. Partnering principles and spirit of Partnering (Trust, Commitment, and Shared
Vision) are maintained throughout the project construction phase. • As-builts are provided for ultimate owner from marked-up construction plans. • Project is formally turned over to
the City for maintenance. • Evaluations are completed in fmal form on consultant, using interim evaluation results. • Oose out project report including lessons learned. These will be
captured by using an After Action Review (AAR) session with the entire Project Matrix Team. • Conduct one year follow up inspection in conjunction with all applicable stakeholders 
􀁾􀀠 􀀮􀁾􀀠 'N 􀀮􀁾􀀠 U I I 0 􀁾􀀠 ;::s a 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 ::::: Q 􀁾􀀠 􀁾 ... c· .... · 􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 CIS C/J 􀁾􀀠 􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 S 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 \..J 􀀮􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 'N 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 0 0 0
N 􀁾􀀠 Q) 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 U 0 ("f') 'l""-I 
Dallas County --Cities Strategic Partnering AGENDA . • 0930 -1000 Registration • 1000 -1015 Introductions • 1015 -1100 Dallas County, Strategic Vision, New 5 Phase Project Delivery System,
CIP Results to date • 1100 --1200 Breakout Group Brainstorming • 1200 --1230 Working Lunch in Breakout Groups • 1230 --1330 Breakout Reports from Group • 1330 --1400 Consensus Building
Conclusion " 􀁾􀀠
Dallas County --Cities Strategic P artnering Breakout Groups • Group 1. Master and Project InterLocal Ag(l3l31'Y\ (ILAs) & Project Delivery Responsibilities (Don H, Sid, Noah, Bowen
Weems ..........) • Group 2. Consultant Selection Process and Contract (Alberta, Ivan N., John M, John C, Irvin Hicks, Janet,) • Group 3. Transition from Planning to Project Management·
& The Project Matrix 􀁔􀁥􀁡􀁭􀁾􀀠Public Involvement Issues (Don C, Edith, Irv, Jack, Toni, David McSwain ......) • Group 4. ROW & Utility Considerations and Roles, Construction Issues
(Selas, Craig, LaVaughn, Dale, Pam, Sam, Doug Keesey .....) 
Dallas County Public Works DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC VISIGIA' , "1.. • Recognized leader in regional planning & coordination • Effective agent for total transportation project delivery services
• Valued partner • Vital part of Dallas County Government • Values based organization 
Dallas County Public Works ELEMENTS OF SUCCESSFUL PARTNERING • VOLUNTARILY SETTING UP WORKING RELA TIONSHIPS WITH A "TEAM" APPROACH TO CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND SOLVING PROBLEMS. • ESSENSE
OF PARTNERING: Establishing and Maintaining: -Trust -Commitment -Shared Vision 
Dallas County Public Works ELEMENTS OF SUCCESSFUL PARTNERING • Using Partnering DOES NOT: • Assure there won't be tough challenges • Mean one party can "roll over" the other • Mean we
can achieve success without a lot ofhard work • Effective Partnering will: • Improve Team problem solving and mutual respect • Assure open communications and prompt issue resolution
• Avoid wasting time in adversarial pursuits • Provide pride and satisfaction in accomplishment 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECTDELIVERYSYSTEM • Reengineer total project delivery process • Program Year concept • Annual Call for
Projects • Total partner involvement focused on timely project delivery • Striving for new paradigm in effective PM • Involves Thoroughfare Program (non-federal) projects 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECTDELIVERY SYSTEM • Incorporate risk assessment in extensive project screening process. Initial ILA
nails total project responsibilities and commitment Incorporate pre-design charrette as key part of project definition and preliminary design stages. -Use Subsurface Utility Engineering
(SUE) to ascertain existing utility conditions before designing the project -Execute preliminary design using in-house design forces, with Consultant liaison early on. Use geotech investigations
to influence design -Phase 1 ends with solid preliminary schematic using GEO-PACK design tools 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM • Insights Applied --Phase 2 --Primary Design -Negotiate final consultant contract
with well-defined scope ofwork based on SUE, geo-tech, and use of GEO-PACK Consultant works with all stakeholders in Partnering mode -PM launches full management efforts using Project
Matrix Team -PM tracks using PM software and reports to Project Review Board monthly, include all partner in PRE -PM used enhanced constructibility review process during design -Effective
public involvement with full participation by all partners -Early involvement on ROW issues by ROW staff -Early delivery ofROW documents is key goal 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECTDELIVERYSYSTEM • Initiation -Begins with delivery on-time ofROW documents that meet standards specified
in contract PM tracks using PM software and reports to Project Review Board monthly, include all partners in PRB -ROW acquisition begins using County workforce, city partner acquisition
or ROW contractor Stakeholders decide packaging ofconstruction documents Stakeholders evaluate consultant using new County evaluation system 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECTDELIVERYSYSTEM • Adjustment ROW is completed on schedule -Use partnering principles and SUE to assure
utility adjustments are accomplished on schedule for letting -Optimum bidding package is put together with input from all stakeholders. -Consultant finishes up design, may be retained
for Engineering During Construction (EDC) services -PM continues to manage and track progress, reporting to PRB 
Dallas County Public Works Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program 5 PHASE PROJECTDELIVERYSYSTEM • Insights Applied --Phase 5 --Construction -Final ILA signed with all stakeholders
providing for final funding and PM responsibilities -Construction project awarded on streamlined basis Partnering/precon meeting planned and conducted with all key stakeholders present
-PM continues to manage and track progress, reporting to PRB -Project is closed out with After Action Review (AAR) session with all key stakeholders -Apply lessons learned from AAR to
other projects 
Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program Thoroughfare Program PY2004 thru 2006 Approved Projects • District 1: 􀀭􀁾 • District 2: • District 3: (See Spreadsheets) • District 4: .....
Note: These Projects are subject to final Court Approval, scheduled for 17 Oct, and will have a few additions 
Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program Impact Projects Program PY2004 --2008 Approved Projects • District 1: • District 2: • District 3: (See Spreadsheets) • District 4: Note: Additional
projects will be added in the future and all projects are still subject to Court Approval 
Pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement Program TEA -21 Endorsement Program ,:;, ,0. PY2004 --2008 Approved Projects • District 1: • District 2: • District 3: (See Spreadsheets) • District
4: Note these Projects are subject to final Court Approval, scheduled for 17 Oct. 
Dallas County --Cities Strategic Partnering Breakout Groups • Group 1. Master and Project InterLocal 􀁁􀁧􀁲􀁰􀁰􀀱􀀧􀁬􀀧􀀢􀀧􀁬􀁾􀁲􀁴􀀮􀁦􀁅􀁜􀀺􀀠 (ILAs) & Project Delivery Responsibilities
(Don H, Irv G Sid, Noah, Bowen Weems ..........) -Cover ILA concepts, receive comments from stakeholders, forge consensus on win-win solutions -Discuss Methodology for Determining Roles
in Project Delivery -Scheduling project kickoff meetings Scheduling Predesign Charrette Dates and Agendas 
Dallas County --Cities Strategic Partnering Breakout Groups • Group 2. V\..H ....:,........ t.,U..........................."" .....v ...... .I. ... v ........ ..,.., ................
'-"v....................... · (Alberta, John Cantwell, Ivan N., John M, Irvin Hicks, Janet, ............) -Time frame for getting consultants on-board -Roles for consultants -PW Policy
and Procedures -Consultant Selection methodology and City Participation -MWBE Considerations 
Dallas County --Cities Strategic Partnering Breakout Groups • Group 3. 􀁾􀀠!.UU;:'UJ.VU .LJ.VJ.U 􀁾􀀠J.UJ.llUU,e, !.-v 􀁾􀀠J.V)\.I\.I!'-l.V:J:unue:\.IrJ.J.\.IJ.U & The Project Matrix
􀁔􀁥􀁡􀁭􀁾􀀠Public Involvement Issues (Don C, Edith, Irv, Jack, Toni, David McSwain ......) Gantt Chart Schedule of Critical Events Next Call for Projects Schedules The Project Matrix
Team • Fonnation of the Team • Operation and Training the Team • Web-based PM & Extranets Public Involvement, history and future needs 
Dallas County --Cities Strategic Partnering Breakout Groups • Group 4 . .J."-'-'!! !,& U 1",l.l,HY VyugH..lvJ.aL.lV.l.l., au" .J."-v.lv.". Construction Issues (Seias, Craig, LaVaughn,
Dale, Sam, Doug Keesey, ..... ) -Determining ROW roles for Stakeholders -Dallas County ROW Process -How to achieve "Early" ROW acquisition How to avoid EDs -How to determine need for
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) -How to partner with Utilities and use SUE Discuss Construction/Safety Issues 
GROUP 4 ROW & UTILITY CONSIDERATIONS AND ROLES. CONSTRUCTION ISSUES I. Determining ROW roles for Stakeholders Stakeholders: The Traveling Public, Property Owners, City, County, our Bosses
Types of Roles: Active and Supportive A. Active Role -is the Acquisition Agency Role B. Supportive Role Activities 1. Provide existing data in a timely manner (zoning, subdivision, sign,
relocation policy), 2. Condemnation Authority, 3. Public Involvement, Facilitate City facilities or coordinate with schools, 4. Be receptive to exceptions and waivers to strict City
Ordinances or Policies, 5. Disclose any known Envirorunental concerns in vicinity ofproject alignment, 6. Disclose and coordinate ongoing or proposed City Project in vicinity of CIP,
7. Assist in locating hard to find property owners by facilitating utility service records, 8. Stay involved and be responsive to citizens. II. Dallas County ROW Process 1. ROW Plan
Review, 2. At 65% ofDesign -Receive Final ROW Documents, 3. Appraisal Section prepares or updates ROW Summary, 4. Preliminary Abstracting and Property Owner's List, 5. Prepare Title
Reports and/or Title Commitments, 6. Mail first Letter of Permission -to enter property to inspect, measure & appraise; solicit donation, 7. Review Board approves Appraised Value and
ensures fair and adequate compensation, 8. Property Acquisition Agent initiates negotiations, 9. Prepares closing documents, clear title, execute deed, 10. Administrative Settlement,
II. Process Court Order to authorize Condemnation and assemble E.D. package to submit to District Attorney's Office, 12. Monitor Condemnation Process, 13. Process Payment. m. How to
Achieve "Early" ROW Acquisition 1. Maintain up to date Master Thoroughfare Plans and ensure that the CIP projects are in concert with said plans, 
2. City should acquire by Subdivision Plat Dedication and other development avenues the necessary ROW for the CIP project involved, 3. Know the locations and parameters ofall CIP projects
in your City and aggressively pursue dedication and/or donations, 4. Protect known CIP project alignments from encroachments by "Advance Acquisition to Protect ROW", 5. Do not forget
that ROW can also be acquired or protected during permitting process, 6. Access infrastructure model and revise it to parallel development trends, e.g. major subdivision or commercial
development construction, sport tracks, sport complexes, etc. IV. How to Avoid E.D.s I. Study CIP project alignments and develop alternative based on impacts to private property, impacts
to existing improvements, major utility structures, drainage features, cemeteries, wrecking yards, 2. Consider using absolute minimum standard design rather than desirable standards,
i.e. 3: I slopes verses 6: 1 slopes, II foot travel lanes verses 12 foot lanes, lower design speed, undergoumd drainage verses open ditches, 3. Protect existing ROW from encroachments.
Police all your ROW'S and remove unintended encroachments prior to advent ofa CIP project, 4. Establish and maintain close communication between all stakeholders, 5. Be receptive to
recommending exceptions or waivers to strict City Policies that affect cost ofROW Acquisitions, 6. Be smart about assessments. V. How to Determine Need for SUE 1. History of Utility
conflicts, 2. Lack of"As Built" information, 3. Extensive excavation expected on CIP projects. VI. How to Partner with Utilities and Use SUE VII. Construction Safety Issues c..t4Je (IFF
􀁁􀁾􀀠0'-""'-1'" 'i CO"-5 r!?<--<-T7°""'" <v! 􀀯􀁬􀁓􀁓􀁬􀁊􀁻􀁉􀀴􀁾􀀠 v'&'"" 􀀧􀁊􀀷􀀺􀀾􀀰􀁾􀀠 SELAS1000·03IGROUP 4