o c ;Jl n 􀁾􀀠m 
J. FRANK POlMA. P.E. PRESIDENT June 14, 1996 • Texas Department of Transportation P. O. Box 3671 Dallas, Texas 75221 A'ITENTION: Mr. Ibrahim Musa, P.E. SUBJECf: DALLAS COUNTY FAU BRINSAP
INSPECTION BRIDGE NO. 8050-026, BELT LINE ROAD OVER WHITE ROCK CREEK, CITY OF DALLAS Gentlemen: The subject bridge has widespread fine cracks in prestressed beams at the bearing seat
areas. We strongly recommend that these be carefully monitored in subsequent BRINSAP inspections. Sincerely, R-DELTA ENGINEERS, INC. J. Frank Polma, P.E. President JFP:mfp 70S W. AVENUE
B • SUITE 606 • GAR!.AND. TEXAS 75040 • (214) 494-5031 FAX (214) 497·2270 
F••tur. X L ,&If Line.J;J, nee I/)/J:fc l?tX:/.: u, , BRIDGECOUNTY Dal/t 􀁾􀀭􀁆􀁁􀀨􀀩􀀠. ! r[ IS !,tiJb /i DATE CONDITlor, "A 7" [,OS MM DD yy COMMENTS 58 59 60 ! 8', 82 i 􀁾􀀮􀀠/II.
g-y 't/--&!3'olln 􀁾􀀬􀁥􀀬􀁪􀀠J;!L:I-<me;, Iilluncr; /!,::;t:£ ? 8' g t, ,f'i •i./'rv g-4 , I '7 "7 7 7 rl I . /03111 7 8' , !4 -Ie:;-: g; 􀁾􀀠􀁾-'5 n h ¥J J1-,q? f,􀁾􀀡􀁉􀁩􀀾I"!:.d
/n /IC-,i!!:.-tt" l2 􀁾􀀡􀀠S< 􀁾􀀠&-:7 1 X" 􀁾􀀠􀀭􀁾􀁴􀀮􀁉􀀭41J f . -; -; 7 7 AJ "b 􀀢􀁕􀀭􀁾􀀠7 '7 "7 􀁾􀀠,U. 􀁴􀀺􀀻􀁾􀀠-1lf i f: -; -J M 􀀯􀀻􀁻􀀬􀀴􀁾􀁩􀀠1 &, 7 -? iLl ! · I i . I !
i · ! I , , , ; · . ! · !,BRIDGE 􀁈􀁉􀁓􀁔􀁑􀁒􀁙􀁲􀁖􀁩􀁬􀁛􀀴􀁾􀀠\J 
􀁾􀀠1'__·'_ \..J 'J Form ,085·1-12-89 Bridge Inspection Record Structure oz.-vDi$trict_.II.l<fr>:....._ Description 􀁟􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁌􀀲􀀺􀀮􀀡􀀺􀁴􀁾􀁌􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂣􀀺􀀡􀁾􀁌􀁟􀁌􀀴􀀮􀀲􀁨􀀮􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀡􀀲􀁅�
�􀀼􀀦􀀧􀀽􀀡􀀭____________􀀭􀁲􀁾􀁲􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀁟􀀠Inlpector',Signature A. ,t:::>, 􀁾􀁉􀁃􀁾􀀠b N-Notapplicable 9 -Excellent condition 8 -Very good condition -no problem$ noted 7 -Good condttion
-some minor problems '6 -Satisfactory eondition-minor deterIoration of stru<:tural elements {limited) I5 -Fair condition -minor deterioration of structural elements (extensive) : 4 -Poor
condition ... deterioration significantly affe<:ts structural capacity , 3 -Serious condition -deterioration seriously affects structural capacity 2-Critical condition -bridge should
be closed until repaired 1 -Falling condition -bridge closed but repairable 0-Failed condition -bridge closed and beyond repal' Enter a rating for each elementaf each component. The
.atlng $hould equal Or exceed the minimum rating listed to the left of each element. Component Ratings should equal the lowest ,atmg af any element ofthe component. Fully supportive
comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for ali ratings of 7 or below, Min, I Deck (Item 58) I Rating Min. ISuper5tructure (Item 59) I Rating 1 Deck Rating CD [2J 0 Main Members
-Steel 'iJ'" (3) 0 Main Members-Concrete (I.J .<;: 6 Wearing Surface 􀁾􀀠0 Main Members -Timber N 6 JOints, Expansion, Open 􀁾􀀠0 Main Member Connections ,... I 6 Joints, Expansion,
Sealed i 1 Floor System Members t-i. 6 Joint., Other ... 1 Floor System Connections r./6 Drainage System 18 5 Secondary Member, e 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets C:q 􀁾􀁉􀀠5 Secondary
Member Connections <tJ 6 Median Barrier 􀁾􀀠6 Expansion Bearings B 6 Railings 􀁾􀀠6 Fixed Bearings .e; 7 Railing Protective Coating 6 Steel Protective Coating tJ 7 Delineation (curve
markers) Other N. Other 1t-J 􀁾Component Rating Comments! rId t<\lobe.. 􀀬􀁧􀁾􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀫􀁃􀀸􀁥􀀠Comments! to 􀁾􀀢􀀺􀁉􀁥􀀿􀀴􀀠􀀶􀁪􀀮􀀨􀁾􀀠(! EA7:t: 8i%u!,fC> 􀁾IH.0/2. 􀁾E'AeAel2'P 􀁾􀀠􀀤􀀱􀁲􀀺􀁥􀀢􀀢􀀴�
�􀁾􀀠HAve 5i+'Ei<U2. 􀁾􀁧􀀻􀀻􀀠AT 13E'A.e,144 􀁁􀀧􀀲􀁅􀁾􀀠® >r"Au.7 t 'fbfibJ:I 􀁾􀀠. -We'll 􀁁􀁥􀁵􀁲􀁾􀀶􀀧􀀯􀀼􀁉T 􀀱􀀱􀀲􀀧􀁾􀀠􀁉􀁾􀀧􀀡􀀺􀀠􀁯􀁾􀀠P.>SAtiJ' .5lri-lE PJIohl..E'M , Wt -􀀡􀀵􀀧􀁾􀀠c:r-􀁾�
�􀁉􀀢􀀧􀁩􀁲􀀠A.I e>E4,1-lS 􀀤􀁾􀁉􀀢􀁉􀁥􀀺􀀠-71',4.j, 􀁉􀁾􀀠fLACe M1 rJ!/J:f:t2<;.. PC 􀁾􀁲􀀮􀁣􀀺􀁈􀀠􀁥􀁾􀀭􀁲􀀠AP1yr· z."'!2 13etW f"U>..c Koall 5HE4n. 41.1\<",,) 􀁾􀀧􀀢􀀢􀀠-:;10",$.
$o..sn+ 5101:::' e.,.J;:> 􀁾􀀴􀁴􀀮􀁌􀁥􀀻􀁑􀀠tVIn" 􀁃􀀩􀁬􀀺􀀮􀁦􀁴􀀱􀁬􀁾􀁑􀀠&.\/2.. , i 􀁩􀀺􀁬􀁾􀀠5 !:IE IAfL 􀁃􀁾􀁾􀁤􀀺􀁩􀀠J tln;.h,.1l bE c,,\ iZf'l:-J.......::t f-\ OM-'jol2.c-Q A,7
􀁣􀁵􀀭􀁲􀁶􀁾􀁅􀀠!""''''t'G CT, a-J'> 
Distrkt_-.el_i>__ county 􀁏􀁾􀀠Cont-Sec 􀁟􀀭􀀢􀀧􀁢􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀁄􀀢􀀭􀁾􀀭􀀧􀀭􀀢􀀧􀀮􀁟􀀭􀀭􀀡􀀮􀀮􀁊􀁉􀂣􀀧􀀬􀀬􀀬􀀭􀀭􀀭___ Route f@l..I UN6Min, I Substructure (Item 60) I Rating Min. I Cu Iverts
(Item 62) i Raltng 0 Abutment caps IBl 0 Top Slab, .... T 0 Above Ground 􀁾􀁉􀀠0 Bottom Slab or Footings 0 Below Ground or foundation tJ! 0 Abutments & Intermediate Supports 5 SackwaHs
& Wingwalls 􀁾􀁉􀀠5 Headwalls & WingwaHs_ .... . "-0 Intermediate Supports RlCaps-Concrete Component Rating 􀁾Caps-Steei ,J , Caps -Timber N Comments: Above Ground -Con(rete B Above
Ground Steel tJ Above Ground Timber Above Ground Masonry Selow Ground or foundation i 5 Collision Protection System 6 Steel Protective Co.atin$j , Component Rating EJ Comments: DIA6.of,!AI.
CiAQ:::$ ItJ rut: Min. I Approaches (Item 65) I Rating C4j{fll.eJe.l P't:lZ-no.l oj:: I􀁾􀀰􀁻􀀲􀀮􀀠􀀧􀁃􀀾􀁥􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀁊􀀮􀁟􀁉􀀭􀀻􀀠l 1t0l211t 21 Qld 0 Embankments i £::. i;; oJ-4 Embankment
Retaining Walts 5 Slope Prote<:tlon t3 5 Roadway 11.J 1. 6 Relief JOints tf-z..) 11 6 Drainage,__ e. _ .... 6 Guardfence iI 7 Delineation oJ ._. 7 Sight Distance J3, Other ..J EJ: Component
Rating Min. I Channel (Item 61) : Rating comments:{Q1N 􀁥􀁾Aee. C!4A9;1 HQ T b.A'7\ *'" P.loQ>41:l Af'rteA.<:l:\ 􀁌􀁯􀀢􀀬􀀶􀀡􀁲􀀬􀁾􀁾􀀠0 Channel Banks r 0 Channel8ed e l...J'9PAIL.'EtJ
f,Jf'!J'!.J') r, 􀀢􀀢􀁁􀁾1fZ.fi5fliAJ.. 5 Rip Rap, Toe Wall' & Aprons £! . 5 Dikes 􀁾􀀠5 Jetties r-Other t-J 1 [2J Min. I Miscellaneous I Rating Component Rating Comments: M!T 􀁾􀁾\kn::A.1..
7 Signs r;:Ji .J:\a/Si: EA."";>( btt'El'4\Cllbe.lr: 7 Illumination 8 7 Warning Devices U 7 Utility Lines f;> Other I-.J Comments: N.Ot fd;rco <:.0*"£,,,-Npli:,TIi 􀀾􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀮􀀠Form
1085-U-S9 : 
I Texas Departmtm/of Tfans{Kll1atkm ' Fonn,381-1-1H, Bridge Appraisal Worksheet , District 􀁉􀁾􀀠County 057 COnt -Sec I Traffic Safety features (lte", 36) I /' Standard MBGF __Standard
Traffic or Comblnatlrm Rat! __None _NIA __Damag.d __Non-Std. __Other Bridge Railing (1st Digit) 􀁒􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀁂􀁇􀁆Transition __Standard Traffic or Combination RaU __None _NIA
__Damaged __􀁎􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁨􀁴􀁤􀀮􀀠_Other Transitions (2nd Digit) Rating-CD /Standard MBGF __Standard Traffic or Combination Rail __Non. _NlA __􀁄􀁡􀁭􀁡􀁧􀁥􀁾􀀠__Olher Approach Guardrail
(3rd Digit) 􀀭􀀮􀀮􀀡􀁾􀁂􀁃􀁬􀁆􀀠Terminal __Impact Attenuator __None _NlA __Damaged __Other Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit) __Non'Std. Rating-D __Non-Sid. Rating-[2J I Structural Evaluation
(Item 67) I IR= ./HS20 __Other Condition Rallngs ADT 15 310 YI. 1& <0 􀁾􀁵􀁰􀁥􀁲􀀮􀁴􀁲􀁵􀁣􀁴􀁵􀁲􀀮􀀠(Item 59) V'From TXOOT Trafflo Count lSubSlrUcture (Item 60) __From Field Estimates
􀁾􀁣􀁵􀁬􀁶􀁥􀁲􀁴􀀠(Ilem 62) Structural Rating (Table 1) .JL Rating -1G41 I Deck Geometry (Item 68) I I 􀁾􀀠No. 01 Lanes (Eech Way) __2 Lanes, 2-Way Traffic (Table 2A) -L2 or More Lane.
Each Way (Table 2C) __Limited Access Freeway __Multilane Faoilily __l-Wayramp (Table 2D) 10!r:,.".Bridge Roadway Widlh "'2Bridge Roadway Width Rating Overpassing Vertical Clearance __Posted
__M..sured 􀁾􀁳􀁴􀁬􀁭􀁡􀁴􀁥􀁤􀀠__Limited Acce .. __Arterial __Collector or Local Vertical Clearance Rating (Table 2E)_ Rating -I "2-1 Ro t BBt:L 1-1 iJf:'Structure D7.-J.. u e (p 110
lq&Date 0 /I. 􀁾􀀮􀁢􀁬􀁬􀀠UA. reSlfnat '''''''''\,\,􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁓􀀠...-;"(,\........... !' ".', 􀁾􀁏􀂷􀂷􀂷􀀧􀀠.....• 􀀢􀀧􀀧􀁶􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀀠..' .1, 􀁾􀀮􀀠.','􀁉􀁾􀀯􀀠􀀧􀁾􀀢􀀧􀁜􀁦􀀤􀀮􀀱􀀱'0: ....
.,' 􀁾􀁾􀁉􀀮,:. -':1:,+ ...' 􀁾􀀠'􀁯􀀺􀁺􀁾􀀠j • '. .... ..... ".<0 "'!<:u " .::.... 􀀩􀁾􀀮􀀯􀀠-"1>'1) A..􀁾􀁉􀀠t( ,,' G\?'" '-I.:'\ •... II" 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀁖􀀢􀀮',,; pij .... , ..'\C OFESS _,,,,,,......VI
Underclearances (Item 69) I .v: Stream Cro.slng (Item NlA) Vertical Undercl ••rance (Itam 54) __Posted __Meas. __Est. Route DescrietJQO __Umijed Access. Rural __Umfied Access. Urban
____Principal" Minor Arterials __Collector" Local Roads __Railroad Vertical Underclearance Rallng (Table 3A) _ Uiteral Clear Right (Item 55) Lateral Clear leI! (Item 56) __l-Way Traffic
__2-Way TraHIc __Acceleratloo " Deceleration Lane or Ramp under 2·way Traffic Lateral Clerance Rating (Table 3B) Rating-[2J I Bridge Posting (Item 70) I OR. 􀁾􀁈􀁓􀀲􀀷􀀠Postad Load Required
Posting __Other Rating 􀁾􀀠Waterway Adequacy (Item 71) II Clrade Separation (liem N/A) =ZNo Evidence of Flooding __Deck above Approaches __Evldenoe 01 Flooding Chance ot Qvertoplng TraHio
Delay 􀁾􀀠Flooded Deck Rdwy. -",,-Inslgnlfloant Remote (> 100 Yrs.) __SignKloant Slight (11-100 Vr•.) L L __Severe Occasional (3-10 Vrs) _ -Frequent (<3 Vrs.) --Rating-[fJ I Approach
Roadway Alignment (Item 72) I 􀁾􀁥􀁤BlSlymign DlliI!gge 02Qr9.Ichli _Not Required (8) _Slight Reduction (6) __Substanllal Reduction (=3) Sl2eed Reducl!Qn Regylred gy§ tQ __Vertical Allgnmenl
__Horizontal Alignment __Other Rating-[§J See reverse side for explanation of rating nu
mbers. Rating Code Descriptions Traffic, Safety Features (Item 36) The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. 1 -Feature meets currently
acceptable standards. o -Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or feature is required but not provided. N -Not applicable or feature is not required. General Features
(Items 67,68,69,71. and 72) Items 67, 68, 69, 71. and 72 are assigned a one-digit rating based on the following scale. N -Not applicable. 9 -Superior to present desirable criteria. 8
-Equal to present desirable criteria. 7 -Better than present minimum criteria. 6 -Equal to present minimum criteria. 5 -Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in
place as is. 4 -Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is. 3 Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of corrective action. 2 -Basically intolerable condition
requiring high priority of replacement. 1 -This value of rating code not used. o -Bridge closed. Bridge Posting (Item 70) Item 70 is aSSigned a one·diglt rating based on the following
scale. 5 -Operating rating equal to or above legal loading. 4 -Operating rating 0.1 to 9.9% below legal loading. 3 -Operating rating 10.0to 19.9 % below legal Joading. 2 -Operating rating
20.0 to 29.9% below legal loading. 1 Operating rating 30.0 to 39.9% below legal loading. o -Operating rating 39.9% or more below legal loading. Form naH-l1·" 
DISTRICT 18 COUNTY DALLAS CONT SEC 8050-18 STRUCTURE 026 ROUTE BELT LINE RD, DATE 6/6/96 r .I" I'I'bl Ie (\J r-I-Ih + I􀁾􀀠L() . • • • • • • • • • • I. . · l<I tJ NI n n II" I[JI", 􀁾􀀠-rf<")
􀁾􀀠· i" 1"::􀁉􀁾􀀠--. 􀁉􀁾􀀠.. k," • I f-O' IN 􀁉􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠I lO -r-NI " II' O"l iJl p. (J) Ih I'.I-f-l-􀁉􀁾􀀠􀀭􀀻􀁾􀀠f-+----+-!-. -􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠l-􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠-1-.. --I-T Of PE 􀁴􀁾􀀠o. ( ---l-E
-l-f-i-l-l-i-J --I10 lib -It. " I.Ib I􀁾􀀠/,t'l-f-I-I-50 EX CI 􀁁􀁎􀁾􀀠E PI 0 IL IA L . 1> • E D􀁾􀁅􀀠F E R DGE 10 --1-1II l-Iz --'" 􀁾􀀠-.: 􀁾􀁾I.<?I r􀁾10 f-11-l"': " WI ' .. '.r;:;;
If. : IP /',.. 􀁾􀀠r <t: A P, I)u A 􀁉􀁾􀀠· I 't􀁾􀁬􀀠􀁾􀁦􀀠1I.... I.... 􀁾􀁝􀀠. f 􀁾02 􀁉􀀭􀀻􀀻􀁾􀀠! I" b:. 1$ S A 􀁾􀁅􀀠1 !"' 0 􀀧􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀠􀁾􀀠I 􀁾.. 􀁾F'1 F1.( IJ.. --lf\' ii 􀀻􀁾􀀠Yj􀁬􀁾!:'
1\ ,\.J 17 it' 17 --I----II' -I f-W I.f-i<t: '-IJ.. I-f-i--I:'> IT 1'1' Ul R-DELTA ENGINEERS, INC. 50 1 0 1 _9 2 0 2 0 3 0 705 W.AVE B STE.G()(; 1GARLAND. TEXAS (2Hl49-1-5031 ---.--------_....
---_..... --_..... ---. . 􀀭􀁾􀀠􀁾􀀠....􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀭-. --... 􀀭􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀠. _. ... '" .. 
FORM 113,1 SCOUR VULNERABILITY EXAMINATION AND RANKING I DISTRICT I COUNTY I CSS LL I t221t 8tJ 5c) -tJ ZJ, SCOUR VULNERABILITY RANKING I ROUTE Be If /...1 ne. P1U VU-t-ERAB"ITY RANJ<INO!'EA
TURE CROSSED ttJh /te 'l!!:t?c:/:;; ere/!!. I::.. CATEGOfIY COOS oeSCRIP Tlor, 1 ANSWER AtL OVESIIONS BY CIRCL INO YES 5A NC B1 2 THEN USE THE >\ OW CHART TO RANK TrE BRIDGE IN TrE AP9ROP1'\IATE
CA TEGOfIY, 2 HIGH SUSCEPT,6'" ", , 3 CODE THE HIGHEST RANJ<ING IN CARD 8 CO\,I.MHO ISRINS"'P COOING ITEM 1\3,1) 􀁾􀀠, TO SC()U'I iID I> THE 􀁈􀁉􀁇􀁈􀁾􀁁􀁉􀀠(M8A"I;)«"T 􀁾􀀠IS TM( 8RIOGE
ON AN ALLUVIAL 83 3 weDIW SUSCEPTI81liTY IN TH( ,LOOOP\AI" CURRENTL1 fAN OR IN AN EROOl8LE SAND TO $OCU'\ QAHAGEO 61 SCOUR THAT HIGHT 6£0 CHAHH( 􀁾􀀠? YES 8 A A ,OWAISKTHREATEN TRAVELLEO
LANES OURING A nOOO? YES @J IS IKE BRIDG( CROSSING 􀁾􀁅􀁁􀁓IN DECISI'*' eoXES REFERLOCATEO 0' OR NCAR A SHARP TO YESINQ ou;STlONS '*' T1-£ SCOVl 􀁾􀀠HAS SCOUR OCCURREO 8ELOW 8ENO IN
TH( STREAM? YES @VU-t-ERABILITY EXAMINA ll'*'THE ORIGINAL GROUNO LINE AT A PIER OR A8VTMEHI. EITHER 􀁾􀀠IS THE 6RIOGE LOCATEO IN ISTARf QURING OR AfTER A fLOOO TO A SIREA" "ITHIN ON(
'IL( A OEP1H Of OF ACO"'UENCE OF ANOTHER "AJOR ITREAM' YES §) YES @;> cooe \ cooe 2 􀁾IS ANY (OHMERCIA, MATERIALS 􀁾􀀠1 fT ro I 'T ? "INI'G, IN'STREAM 80RROW AREAS, OR OREDGING fOR NAVIGATION
DR f\OOO CO,'ROL lDeATEO VII"INcu IS OloER ACTIVE EROIION OR DN( HllE Of 8RIOGE EITHERSCOUR EVIOEkT Ok STREAHBA.KS UPSIR(AH DR OOVNITREAMlOR IN THE CHA"NEl 6EO WllHIN SIGHT OISTANCE
Of THE aRIOGE 􀁾II ANY 8ENT OR A8UIM(NTEITHER UPSTREAM OR 􀁓􀁋􀁅􀁾􀁅􀁏􀀠AGAINST THE PRIMARY 􀁏􀁏􀁾􀁈􀁓TR(AH' YES DIRECTIO' OF Flev AT fLOOO \1 AGE' i i,i] OOES THE 6RIOG( HAvE ANY SPREAO
fOOTING fOUNOATIONS 􀁾IS SIGNifiCANT AGGRADATIONNOT SUPPORTEO ay PILES ANO (SILTING-UPI OCCURRING IN.OT ON SOLIO ROCK? YES ® IHE CHANNEL OR NEAR TH[ 8RIOGE?I!J OO(S THt 8RIOGC I(HO 10
􀁃􀁏􀁌􀁾􀁅􀀨􀁔􀀠lARGE AHOUNIS OJ '[f2'Aj IS ANY DAH lOCATEO WllHINORlfl OR OEBRIS OURlkG OkE MIL' Of BRIOGE EITHERyES NO r----------,UPSTREAM OR OOwNIIREAM?8 9. YES 􀁾􀀠 OO[S THE 8RIOGE
OR APPROACH 􀀨􀁈􀁂􀁁􀁎􀁾􀁅􀁈􀁔􀀠IN THE FLOOD i OA TE 01' EXAMINA TlON: PLAIN KAYE "'" HISTORY or fLOOO DAMAGE? YES 􀁎􀁁􀁍􀀵􀁾Of EXAMIt-ERe-------------.;' ... '.''􀀬􀁾􀀠.. 􀀬􀀮􀁦􀀱􀀢􀀬􀀱􀁬􀁲􀀻􀁴􀁾􀀠�
�􀁲􀀮􀁾􀀫􀁦􀁊􀁬􀀮􀀧􀁬􀁉􀀬􀀠,e .. ,rt,,, .. ,,, '''' t (214) 494-5031 TeXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I. ____________--'-_ i 
COUNTY: DALLAS FAU BRIDGE NO: 8050-18026 LOCATION: BELT UNERD. WHITE ROCK CREEK 
DALLAS FAUCOUNTY: 8050-18026BRlDGENO: BELT LINE RD.LOCATION: WPITE ROCK CREEK 
COUNTY: DALLAS FAU BRIDGE NO: 8050-18026 LOCATION: BELT LINE RD. WFITE ROCK CREEK 
COUNTY: DALLAS FAU BRIDGE NO: 8050-18026 LOCATION: BELT LINE RD. WPlTE ROCK CREEK 
COUNTY: DALLASFAU BRIDGE NO: 8050-18026 LOCATION: BELT UNERD. WPlTE ROCK CREEK ,