_ Operating Rating (HS Truck) 6 H5/C Selected Comoonent DescriDtion BRIDGE SUMMARY SHEET P60/o0-oo3 District: 18 County: 057 Bridge # 80'fZ-/a -003 Inspection Date: <Ii -I 7-78 Location:
" In,· Ju 􀁬􀁳􀀱􀀡􀁪􀁲􀁬􀀼􀀮􀁾􀁊􀁬􀁬􀀺􀀮􀀬􀀻􀁉􀁾􀀮􀀺􀀺􀀺􀁄􀀺􀀻􀀢􀀢􀀮􀀺􀁌􀀺􀁬􀁏􀁩􀁩􀁥􀀮􀀮􀀬􀀮􀁲􀁾􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀮􀁊􀁬􀁵􀀯􀁾􀀮􀁉.<..1..JL...LO/)t.f:n'.L-.s..B::!.,;r,!..."􀀮􀁣􀁡􀁵􀁬􀀯􀁬􀁾􀁃􀀮􀁥􀀬􀁪􀀱􀁨􀁾􀀢􀁬􀀮
􀀭 _ Description: """"..3.."---􀀭􀀧􀁉􀀱􀀱􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀻􀀮􀀮􀁴􀀻􀁂􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀬􀁵􀀬􀀮􀀬J",Ct!...L... 1 _ SUMMARY OF INSPECTION /ANALYSIS Inspection Inventory Rating Rating (108S) (HS Truck) RECOMMENDATIONS
We recommend the following aaions to be taken: __-"",'\: 􀁾 􀁾􀁍􀁾 __ No action or Load Posting required 􀀻􀀻􀀬􀀬􀀭􀁜􀁾􀀮􀁾􀀪􀁟􀀮􀁾􀀺􀁴􀀢􀁦'. _ _ (0􀁾 !J Repair, 0 Remove) current Load
Posting , l"'" '. 􀁾 􀁴􀁾 i! * ". 􀀪􀁾􀀢 __ Load Post according to the recommendations listed below 􀁦􀁾.._ ........._....􀀺􀀮􀁾􀀮􀁾 . __ Pezfonn additional ( 0 Inspection., 0 􀁁􀁄􀁡􀁬􀁾􀀩
(See comments below) 1o-.,r'!;l9.·􀂣􀁾􀁾􀁾 ...J -':::::. Rehabilitate or repair bridge (See commaus below) \-:0\. 41368 114J __ Close bridge pending further ( 0 Inspection., 0 RdJabilitatian.
or GRepair) ;: 􀀬􀁾􀂷􀁴􀁾 􀁉􀁓􀁬􀁦􀀬􀀢􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁙 _ Pes fUlM special inspection ( 0 Underwater, 0 Fraaure c:riticai. 0 Scour. _/"\ ••-. 􀁾 a 12-mmtb lDspection. a Special aa::ess) I 􀁾
􀁾 7 COMMENTS AND/OR MATERIALS REQUIRED TO UPGRADE BRinGE 􀁾􀀷􀀺􀀮􀀺􀁾 􀀺􀀻􀀥􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀺􀁾􀀺􀁉􀁬􀀽􀀧􀁾􀀺􀁾􀁊􀀬 ozr Al, laT..􀁫􀁾􀀬 EXISTING LOAD POSTING PROPOSED LOAD POSTING FOR PRESENT
CONDmON (IfApplic:ablc) ___ Lbs Axle'or TanciaD ___ LbsTandem Axle ___ Lbs Gross ___ Lbs Axie:orTandein ___ Lbs Tandem-Axle ___ Lbs Gross ___ L.bs Axle or Tandem ---Lbs Tandem Axle ___
Lbs Gross Nmc --R12-2'Th R12-2Tc --R12-4Th R12-4Tc Other (Desaiption) (District to decide Load Posting accorciing to either Inventory or Opcnaing rating) Proposed Sign (I-(nventory,
Q-Operating) WE!GHT" WEiGHT Sign Max. Load Limit WEIGHT WEIGHT 0 Type Span UMIT LIMIT LIMIT' UMIT R12·21b < 40 tt ::: 20.000 # I AXLE-OR TANCEM GROSS GROSS I R12-2Tc -::: ..0 It ::-:0.000#
ITANOE.\rt AXI.E 􀁾􀁳􀁳 .3S1 R124Th 􀁾 40 ft ::: 20.000;# I AXLE OR 􀁔􀁁􀁎􀁏􀀮􀁅􀀮􀁾 -Rl:·4Tc :.:. ..0 It :0.000 = 􀁾􀁳􀁳􀁬 '.3.5 I TANCeJl AXLE I 􀁾􀁳􀁳 􀀮􀁾 􀀮􀀽􀁩􀁾􀀺􀀮􀁾 􀁾􀀱􀀲􀂷􀀺􀀢􀀺􀀧􀀢􀁣
􀁾􀁬􀁚􀁾􀁔􀁢 􀀻􀁈􀀺􀁾􀀧􀁪􀁣
Texas Deplll1ment of Transportation Form 1085-1 -12-89 ) --, Bridge Inspection Record District 18 County 057 Cont-Sec P001-00 Structure _--=0;..:0;;..:3:;..,.-_Route__...;.M;...;.;.;;.id...;.w;.;;a""
Yr.....;..;R;.;;.o.;;.;a.;;.;d__ Description 3-9W x 6'H M.B.C. over Hutton Branch ______________Inspector's Signature __71-:r1 􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁾􀀽􀀮􀀺􀀮􀀼􀀻􀀺􀀻􀀮􀁾􀁟􀁟􀀧􀁟􀂢􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀮􀁟􀀼􀀲􀀮􀁾􀀺􀀭􀀮􀀢􀀢
􀀧􀁝􀀧􀀭􀀧􀀱􀀢􀀢􀀧􀀮􀀭􀀢􀀢􀀢.􀂷....,...._Date__---::;0...;:6;..;../..:.;17;..;..i.=..9.=..8 _ /I 1') . Not applicable Excellent condition Very good condition Good condition -some minor
problems Satisfactory condition -minor deterioration of structural elements (limited) Fair condition -minor deterioration of structural elements (extensive) Poor condition -deterioration
significantly affects structural capacity Serious condition -deterioration seriously affects structural capacity N987654321 0-􀁙􀁟􀁾􀁾􀀺_􀁡􀁓􀁊 .....,. ....". " 􀀭􀀭􀀱􀁾 C;: i€ ", 􀁾􀀮􀀢􀀮􀀮􀀺
•••••••••. .-t.• 􀁾􀁾 , ...."l., ....." • 􀀮􀁾.. 􀀭􀀢􀁦􀀧􀁜􀀮􀁾􀁾 􀁾 ., ,.. ilL_ ......)0 .• --,iIi'*. 􀁾􀀣􀀷 ."" it l 􀁾􀁾􀁾 \!') 􀀨􀁻􀀭􀁦􀁴􀀮􀁾 • . ,.-.' .. ' .. -􀀭􀁾 !y-_·..··jOSEPH
E. BANKI 􀀬􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀁥􀁟􀀮􀁾 ..􀀢􀂷􀁾􀀭􀂷 0; _ ' ;"J. Critical condition -bridge should be closed until repaired 􀀮􀁾􀀮 􀁐􀀱􀁾􀁜 44729:y 􀀯􀁾􀀻􀀺􀀱 􀁆􀁡􀁾􀁬􀁩􀁮􀁧 􀁣􀁯􀁮􀁾􀁩􀁾􀁩􀁯􀁮 -􀁢􀁾􀁩􀁤􀁧􀁥
closed but 􀁲􀁥􀁰􀁡􀁩􀁲􀁾􀁢􀁬􀁥 . 􀁖􀁴􀁁􀁩􀀺􀀮􀀺􀂷􀂷􀀺􀀿􀁾􀁇􀁬 􀁩􀁦􀀻􀁾􀀺􀀼􀀣􀁶􀁦 Failed condition -bndge closed but beyond repair 􀀧􀁩􀁜􀁲􀁾􀀺􀁓􀂷􀂷􀂷􀂧􀀡􀂷􀂷􀂷􀁾􀀮􀁦􀀧􀀮􀀧􀀺􀀺􀀮􀀮􀁦
􀁜􀁜􀀮􀁾 IOMA\:-_-Enter a rating for each element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum rating 􀁲􀁴􀁾􀁎􀁬􀁨􀁥 left of each element. Component Ratings should
equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully supportive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for all ratings of 7 or below. Min. I Deck (Item 58) I Rating
Min. I Superstructure (Item 59) I Rating 1 Deck-Rating 􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁾􀁛􀀳 6 Wearing Surface 􀁾􀁲􀀮􀀻􀀮􀀮􀁡􀁊􀀬􀁉􀀱􀀢􀁉􀁾􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁬􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁴􀁌􀁪􀁎 6 Joints, Expansion,
Open .,...--l-_..LN;:L.j 6 Joints, Expansion, Sealed _----------1-....1.>..N1 6 Joints, Other -------------t--.l.:I.Nl 6 Drainage System 􀁾􀀭􀀭􀀺􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀀭􀁟􀀫􀁟􀀧􀁐􀁊􀀢􀀢􀀭􀁟􀁟􀁬
6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets 8 6 Median Barrier N 6 Railings 6 1 7 Railing Protective Coating 􀀮􀁊􀁾􀀲􀁡􀀭􀁾􀁮􀀮􀁬􀀲􀁾 􀁟􀀫􀁡􀀮􀀮􀀮􀀸􀁾 Delineation (curve markers) 􀀭􀀫􀀭􀁟N􀁾 Other
N Comments: 1. NW 6ection of pede6trian railina j6 􀁬􀁥􀀻􀁡􀁮􀁩􀁮􀁾 due to impact at intake end. o Main Members· Steel 􀁾 o Main Members -concre-t:"""e----------+-..I.N;I.j o Main Members
-Timber N o Main Member Connection-s----------+---'l\I"'-I 1 Floor System Members l\I ----------+----'o;I.j 1 Floor System Connections _________+-...../,;N1.1 5 Secondary Members __-:-:-+-_..Ll:\II.j
5 Secondary Member Connections N 6 Expansion Beari-ng=s -------------I---1.:LNi Fixed Bearings N Steel Protective '::C:"""o-at:-:-in-g----------I--Ll..ll\l other l\I Component Rating
Comments:-------------------
District 18, county 057 cont-Sec --,P..:.0..::0;..;1--,-0::...:..C_' Structure _--=O..::Q:..:::::-'·__Ro ute iv...;.i.;.:.iCl-􀁷-,􀀮' 􀀮􀀮􀀻􀀮􀁡􀁾􀁜􀁟􀀧_K.;.:.o.:..a;.:..I/_'__ Min.
I Substructure litem 60) I Rating Min. I Culvertslitem 62\ i Rating , 0 Abutment Caps 􀁾 0 Top Slabs 􀁾􀀲 0 Above Ground N 0 Bottom Slab or Footing 7 2 0 Below Ground or Foundation N
0 Abutments & Intermediate Supports 7 2 0 Ba,ckwalls & Wingwalls N 5 Headwalls & Wingwalls V3 1 0 Intermediate Supports Other N Caps -Concrete 􀁾 Component Rating Caps -steel N 􀁾 Caps
-Timber N Above Ground -Concrete N Comments: 1. Minor 6pa!! intake headwall due to rail Above Ground -Steel N impact Above Ground -Timber N Above Ground..; Masonry N 2 Minor leachjng
crack6 in ceiling & abutment wall6 Below Ground or Foundation N Approximatel)l12" of 6i1t & rubble in east upertream 5 Collision Protection System N barrel 6 steel Protective Coating
N Component Rating [3 Comments: Min. I ADDroaches f1tem65) I Rating -0 Embankments 􀁾 4 Embankment Retaining Walls N 5 Slope Protection PJ 5 Roadway -'-7 1 6 Relief Joints 7 1 6 Drainage
PJ 6 Guardfence 8 7 Delineation 1\1 -7 Sight Distance 8 Other 1\1 Component'Rating [] Min. I Channel (Item 61) I Rating Comments: 1 Minor spa!!6. 0 Channel Banks e;;-, 0 Channel Bed
I=j 2 5 Rip Rap, Toe Walls & Aprons V3 2 5 Dikes N 5 Jetties N Other N Component Rating 􀁾 Min. I Miscellaneous I Rating 7 Signs ----r:J Comments: 1 Vegetation & silt downstream end.
7 Illumination 1\1 7 Warning Devices N 2 Approximatel)l6" of 6cQlJr at lJp6tream apron edge. 7 Utility Lines 1\1 Other N 1. Water ponding downertream end. Comments: No load pOGtine!.
--Fonn 1085 ·12.a9 ! ' \
i 􀁔􀁥􀁾􀁳 Department of Transportation·· ) . _ Form 1387-' -11·89 Bridge Appraisal Worksheet \ \i Bridge Railing (1st Digit) Rating-G Non-standard Steel Rail MIDWAY ROAD 􀁟􀁄􀀺􀁩􀁳􀀺􀀺􀁴􀁲􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁴􀀺
􀀮􀀺􀁲􀀺􀁬􀀽􀁁􀁾􀁾􀁣􀀻􀁯􀀻􀁵􀀻􀁮􀁾􀁴􀁙􀁾􀀰􀀺􀀻􀀻􀀵􀁾􀀷􀁾􀁾􀁃􀁯􀁾􀁮􀀻􀁴􀀺􀀮􀀮􀀺􀀭 􀁳􀀺􀁥􀁾􀁣􀀽􀀽􀀽􀁰􀁾􀁏􀁾􀁏􀀽􀁬􀀽􀁏􀀺􀀺􀁏􀀺􀀺􀀺􀀻􀀭􀁟􀁟􀁟Structure 003 Route HUTTON BR. r I Traffic Safety
Features (Item 36) I --'"""'" Date Jun. 25 , 1998 "􀁁".􀁾,.􀁾.􀁾*􀂷􀂷􀁴􀁾.􀁾􀀢􀁴 '-*L :.,.\.$•'.t.. JBV 􀁾􀀪 􀁜􀀪􀁾 􀁾•• 􀁙􀁩􀁎􀁇􀁾􀂷􀁃􀁈􀁕􀁎􀁾􀂷􀁐􀁁􀁎􀀭􀂷􀂷􀁾 V 7. 7 􀀧􀀢􀁩􀁲􀀴􀁩􀀳􀀶􀀸􀀢􀂷􀀭􀀷􀀬􀁾􀁩
􀁰􀀮 􀀭􀁾􀀮 􀁾 􀁾 􀀮􀁾􀁩􀀧 X' ;-/4 /' '. 0. 􀂷􀂷􀀮􀁾􀁇􀀧􀀯􀁳􀁴􀁅􀀮􀁾􀁾􀂷􀁾􀁩􀀢 ( J. L..--t-"'v .;' -----,.'---'-'---=:L£;4Z------..1--􀀢􀀮􀁴􀀺􀁾􀁾􀀭 Signatur({ I Transitions (2nd Digit)
Rating-G T Underclearances (Item 69) I No Guardfence provided Stream or waterway crossing Approach Guardrail (3rd Digit) Rating-G Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit) Rating -G Rating-G I
StrueturalEvaluation (Item 67) I I Bridge Posting (Item 70) I ADT > 5000 Inventory Rating = HS-15.0 ==> 6 Culvert RatingTable 1 = 6 Operating Rating = HS-20.0 ==> 5 Rating-G T WatelWay
Adequacy (Item 71) I [ Rating-Q Deck Geometry (Item 68) I Arterials or major collectors. Deck-and approach overflooding frequency> 100 􀁹􀁥􀁡􀁲􀁳􀁾 ==> 9 -----------Table 2C ----------Open
Access Facility 3 Lanes, 1-Way ---------------------------------Rating-G Roadway Width = 35.8 FT ==> 2 I Approach Roadway Alignment (Item 72) I Approach alignments are good. No speed
reduction required ==> 8 -----------Table 2E ----------Collector or Local Route or Frontage Road Vertical Clearance = 99 FT 99 IN ==> 9 Regulatory speed = 40 MPH 􀁒􀁡􀁴􀁩􀁮􀁧􀁾 Q --------------------
-------------Rating-G 􀀮􀁾 ..
I'lANI(F P.D 37 38 1...!.9 􀁾􀁲 -::.\ 36 􀁓􀁃􀁁􀁾􀁅 I... MILES v. DETAIL MAP SEC,ION SO;.:oRTS ON INDEX PAGE :?C2 􀂷􀁾􀀬􀀩------, 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀬 􀁏􀁾􀂭 • 􀁯􀁾 􀁾􀁴􀀮􀀢􀀢 ;."\ c 􀁾􀁾--􀁾 􀁾...
I .. 􀁾 <􀁾Zc i:z 0v 􀁾 􀁾􀁾􀁾 􀁾􀁾I,i 􀁾􀁾Ij IZZ=J j cl:= 􀁾􀁾􀁾I m-1: 􀁾 ; 􀁭􀁶􀀺􀁾􀀬
PSD12 '0/9' ROLLS _---'-1__ FQa/OD-oo..3 COUNTY 18 -057-804-2. -/8 PHOTOGRAPH SUMMARY SHEET BRIDGE 003 NEGATIVE NUMBER VIEW NUMBER CAPTION NOTES :]'1., I ROADWAY OVER BRIDGI"" (L k'
5 , . c 00 mg I VIEW FROM BRIDGE (Looking I ;:) tt 2 Up Stream) i /'l I VIEW FROM BRIDGE (Looking , :<'"( 3 [J<:1Uj"", Stream) I S 􀁾􀀨􀀮􀁾􀀮 ott/) 4 ELEVATION (Looking Nt=". ) 􀀮􀁾􀁬
5 SUPERSTRUCTURE (Looking 5 ) 􀁾􀁾 C+:> STREAM (Looking .sW ) ROADWAY UNDER (Looking ) I M;d wClq n I I"'.d ...,) /"-U VIEW LOCATION
Date: 06/17/98 County: Dallas (057) ID No.: POOl-00-003 Route: Midway Road Roadway Over Bridge Looking South Neg. 23 View 1 Upstream View Looking North Neg. 24 View 2 jOb Pan, Banki
& Associates, Inc.
Date: 06/17/98 County: Dallas (057) ill No.: POOl-00-003 Route: Midway Road Downstream View Looking South Neg. 25 View 3 Elevation Looking Northeast Neg.26 View 4 !=Jb Pan, Banki & Associates,
Inc.
Date: 06/17/98 County: Dallas (057) ill No.: POOl-00-003 Route: Midway Road Superstrucrure Looking South Neg. 27 View 5 Stream Looking Southwest Neg. 28 View 6 jOb Pan, Banki & Associates,
Inc.