,i ,,; (\ 􀁾􀀾􀀭􀁬􀀠., 0 􀁓􀁾􀀠0...., _.6: 0.. V> 0 ::I a 0 -. 􀁾􀀠 '" 􀁾􀀠 􀁾􀀠 '" El. I'!. //l IIR3-1 Council Agenda Item: IPR3 SUMMARY: The attached Industrial Waste Ordinance and attachments will replace Ord. #087-004 and relax sewer discharge restrictions on various industries due to the demonstrated efficiencies of the Trinity River Authority in removing certain industrial pollutants from the wastewater system. FlNANCIAL IMPACT: Budgeted Amount: -0Cost: -0If over budget or not budgeted, what is the budget impact? N/A BACKGROUND: Certain industries called Significant Industrial Users (Sills) discharge or have the potential to discharge pollutants that are incompatible or harmful to the sanitary sewer system, the publicly owned treatment works (pOTW) or the rivers and lakes (receiving waters) that receive treated sewage. Since 1987, these Sills have been regulated as if their waste streams were being discharged directly to the receiving waters without the benefit of treatment by a POTW. The Trinity River Authority, which operates the POTW that handles most of Addison's sewage, has demonstrated the ability to remove or at least reduce many industrial pollutants in the sewer system. After seven years of consideration, the EPA has finally decided to recognize these efficiencies demonstrated by TRA and allow this "credit" to be passed along to Sills in the form of relaxed restrictions on certain industrial pollutants. (see attached cover letter) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. January 20, 2003 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Neil Gayden, Environmental Services Official Re: Changes & Updates to Sewer Use Ordinance In accordance with an EPA mandate, the Town ofAddison adopted Ordinance No. 087·004 in 1987 to regulate businesses that have the potential to discharge certain toxic pollutants to the sanitary sewer. The required discharge limitations for these Significant Industrial Users (Sllis) is identical to similar businesses that could be permitted to discharge directly (without further treatment) to the receiving waters (Trinity River). Seven years ago, EPA began consideration of an objective that takes into account theefticacy of the Trinity River Authority Waste Treatment Facility (TRA) in removing or reducing the concentration of regulated pollutants from the sanitary sewer wastewater stream. This rationale would give "credit" to Sllis for TRA's sewage treatment efficiency by relaxing discharge concentration limits for most pollutants. In addition to an ordinance rewrite, an Enforcement Response Plan, a Funding Resolution and an Attorney's Statement are required to demonstrate an assurance that the Town of Addison has the intent, resolve, legal ability and resources to enforce a sewer use pretreatment program. To the best of my knowledge, these changes, updates and additions will have no additional impact on current and prospective Sllis or any other Addison business. No additional funding or personnel is needed to administrate this ordinance or any changes to the Industrial pretreatment program. IIR3-3 TOWN OF ADDISON ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN JANUARY 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONSmLE PERSONNEL 2 11. Control Authority -(CA) 2 La. Northern Region Manager -(NRM) 2 1.a. Staff Attorney -(SA) 2 La. Technical Services Manager -(TSM) 2 La. Contracting Party 2 II. INDUSTRIAL USER INVENTORY 3 D.l. Control Authority 3 III. COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROCEDURES 4 Dli. Compliance Data Collection 4 m.2. Inspections 4 IV. PROCEDURES TO SCREEN AND TRACK COMPLIANCE DATA 5 1V.1. Control Authority Responsibilities 6 1V.2. City Responsibilities 6 1V.3. Submission of Data 6 2 v. RESPONSE CRITERIA 7 VI. ENFORCEMENT RESPONSES 8 VI. I. Phone Call 8 VI.2. Notice of Violation 9 VI.3. Review Meeting 9 VI.4. Administrative Orders 9 VI.5. Civil Litigation 10 VI.6. Criminal Prosecution 11 VI.7. Termination of Sewer Service VI.8. Supplemental Enforcement Response 12 VII. ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE GUIDE 13 3 I. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONSmLE PERSONNEL 1.1. CONTROL AUTHORITY· (CA) The Control Authority is the Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) as the operator of a multijurisdictional regional wastewater facility that provides wastewater treatment, by contract, to the Town of Addison, Texas (hereafter "the City"). The Control Authority also implements an approved pretreatment program as part of it's existing TPDES permit requirements. TRA's enforcement capabilities originate from the contractual obligations of the City. Enforcement action to an IU must be initiated and pursued by the City. I.l.a. Northern Region Manager· (NRM) The NRM, or designated representative, is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the receiving wastewater treatment plant. The NRM is also responsible for meeting TPDES requirements. I.1.b. Staff Attorney. (SA) Is responsible for the review and commentary of any potential or ongoing judicial proceedings that the Control Authority may become involved in as pertains to the pretreatment program. The Staff Attorney also supplies legal counsel as needed on other issues, such as the Control Authorities legal obligations and rights. I.l.c. Technical Services Manager. (TSM) Is responsible for the overall staffing and funding of the pretreatment program. The TSM is responsible for the development and implementation of the Industrial Pretreatment Program, and appoints designated personnel for ongoing duties and tasks. 1.2. Contracting Party A Contracting Party (in this instance, The "Town of Addison" or "City") is an entity that contracts with TRA for services. Contracts range from wastewater treatment, to pretreatment services, andfor laboratory services. By contract, Town of Addison is responsible for the overall implementation of the pretreatment program within its jurisdiction. The City Manager has identified a designated representative that is responsible for ongoing implementation and monitoring of the pretreatment program. This designated representative will also serve as the contact for TRA. All IU enforcement must be initiated and followed through by the City. 4 The City is responsible for maintaining a City Ordinance containing current local limits which grant adequate legal authority to maintain, implement and enforce the pretreatment program. The City must also convey to the Control Authority in a timely manner, all relevant documents pertaining to the current IU's, as well as newly identified IU's. Current Permits, sample data and required reports, etc. will be forwarded to the Control Authority. II. INDUSTRIAL USER INVENTORY 11.1. Control Authority Customer cities shall maintain an Industrial User Master Inventory list for existing and potential Industrial Users. The Control Authority will perform ongoing updates as new industries are identified. This will be accomplished by setting up identification procedures with the designated representative within each of the City. The identification procedures will utilize the following: a) review of Contracting Party water use records b) review of building permits issued in commercial/industrial areas c) review of area phone books d) review of a Texas manufacturers guide e) on-site inspections of commercial/industrial areas to detect and define any new industries f) an Industrial User Survey, to be performed at a minimum of once every three (3) years. In order to form a close association with the customer cities and to receive the appropriate information required to maintain an up-to-date Master Inventory, it will be necessary to designate personnel responsible for the transfer of data. The TRA representative will coordinate with the designated City official to receive information concerning new IU's. It is the responsibility of the designated City official to transfer all applicable water use records andlor building permit information to the Control Authority. A complete Industrial User Inventory will be performed at least once every three (3) years. 5 III. COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROCEDURES Itis the intent and purpose ofCentral Regional Wastewater System's Industrial Pretreatment Program that compliance monitoring activities be established to detect and document violations. The Program must support the results obtained from compliance monitoring as admissible evidence in any judicial proceedings that may result due to non-compliance. Compliance data are collected in two ways: (1) self-monitoring by the permitted industrial user, the results ofwhich are forwarded to the Control Authority, and, (2) inspections and monitoring by the City, or their authorized representative. HI.!. The method of compliance data collection, time schedules for submission of data to the City and certification statements are established and set forth in the issued permits of Industrial Users. Regardless of the IU self monitoring, the City will have legal authority to conduct its' own monitoring events to evaluate and verify compliance. The City will assure that, at a minimum, one (1) sample per year will be collected for analysis ofall regulated pollutants for each of the permitted industrial users. Violations will result in increased sampling frequency. Within 30 days of becoming aware of a discharge limit violation, the IU will be resampled for the parameter in question. Sample collection and analysis shall be in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CPR 136 unless otherwise specified in an applicable categorical pretreatment standard. If40 CFR 136 does not contain sampling or analytical techniques for the pollutant in question sampling and analyses must be performed in accordance with procedures approved by EPA.. The IU is required to conduct self monitoring on a semi-annual basis. The City may opt to perform this sampling for the industry. In this case the City will sample a minimum oftwice per year (semiannually). City is responsible for reviewing City sampling data to determine it's validity. The designated City representative is responsible for reviewing industry self-monitoring data to determine validity. III. 2. The City, or an authorized representative of the City, will conduct inspections at each of the permitted industries at a minimum ofone per year, and more often should the City deem necessary. Inspections will be carried out in accordance with the procedures established by the Industrial 6 Pretreatment Program. The following are commonly noted during inspections: manufacturing processes chemical storage and amounts kept on hand comparison of water usage with semi -annual reports, permit applications, and/or water use records evaluate need for, or update of spill control plan evaluate the need for a slug control plan evaluate the need for a Total Toxic Organic (TIO) management plan or how well the current one is implemented Any deficiencies noted during inspections are addressed at this time. Depending on the magnitude, a target date for correction or an NOV can be issued, with a follow up report requested. Inspections can also, at the City's discretion, be performed during construction, and to investigate noncompliance issues. If the City, Control Authority, State and/or Federal agent is denied entry/access into an IU after displaying the proper credentials, or is denied copies of records, a warrant is obtained for entry. IV. PROCEDURES TO SCREEN AND TRACK COMPLIANCE DATA In order to effecti vely screen all compliance data recei ved from an Industrial User it is necessary to provide the method and designated personnel responsible for tracking compliance monitoring information. All data gathered, regardless if it is generated by self-monitoring reports or the City or Control Authority personnel, will be screened to identify violations. Violations identified will be addressed with an appropriate response. IV. 1. Control Authority Responsibilities The Control Authority is responsible for screening data received from City. Data received will be screened no later than ten (10) working days after receipt. IV.2. City Responsibilities The City is responsible for complying with the POTW's pretreatment program. This includes evaluating situations ofnoncompliance, conducting inspections, and recei ving required reports. The 7 Environmental Services Official, will screen data for violations and issue a notice of violation to the non-compliant industry, usually requiring a ten (10) day response, no later than ten (10 ) working days following receipt of the data. The Control Authority may provide pretreatment services on a contractual basis. In either case the City is responsible for forwarding all ru data (including water use records) to the Control Authority once received from an ru. Issuing permits is also a City responsibility. Parameters to be included in an ru permit are determined according to the USEPA Guidance Industrial User Pennitting Guidance Manual, September 1989. IV.3. Submission of Data The City is responsible for maintaining complete files on each industry and forwarding a copy ofthe data/correspondence submitted to the Control Authority. Correspondence received from the City and/or industry is stamped with the date. All data sent and received is kept in the industry and/or City file. Suspense date tracking for industrial notices and reports are accomplished through the use of a computer, the monthly update, and the files. Notices and reports that would require a suspense date could include a minimum of the following: a) Notices of Violation (NOV) b) Compliance schedule progress reports c) Baseline monitoring reports (categorical only) d) Ninety day compliance reports e) Self Monitoring reports f) Notification of changed discharge g) Permit renewal applications h) Notice of potential problems, including slug loading i) Notification of hazardous waste discharge j) Requested inspection follow up reports The Control Authority is responsible for reviewing incoming correspondence from the City and/or industries. Incomplete reports received from an ru are addressed according to severity and number of occurrences. 8 V. RESPONSE CRITERIA It is the duty of the City to establish a proper range of enforcement responses that identifies many common discharge and non-discharge violations. When detennining a proper response to Industrial User violations, the City will consider the following criteria: 1. Magnitude of the Violation 2. Doration of the Violation 3. Effect on the Receiving Water 4. Effect on the POTW 5. Compliance History of the User 6. Good Faith of the User "Good faith" shall be defined as the user's honest intention to remedy its noncompliance, combined with actions which give support to this intention. A users demonstrated willingness to comply may predispose the Control Authority andlor the City to select less stringent enforcement responses. Good faith will not eliminate the necessity for enforcement action. Compliance with any previous enforcement orders will not necessarily demonstrate good faith. VI. ENFORCEMENT RESPONSES When a violation is identified, the Control Authority andlor the City will detennine whether the violation should be considered significant or not significant. Significant violations will be responded to based on severity. The City may initially rely on informal actions such as telephone calls or Notices of Violation where violations are not significant, or do not result in immediate harm. However, when the violation is significant, or when the Industrial User does not promptly undertake corrective action, the City shall respond with more severe enforcement actions. In either case the enforcement response will promote a return to compliance in a timely manner. There are several initial and follow-up actions that the City may use in responding to noncompliance issues. Which response, orcombination of responses utilized will depend on the violation's severity, its doration, its effect on the environment and the treatment plant, the user's compliance history including its "good faith" in taking corrective action and the ill's economic benefit received from remaining in noncompliance. Industrial Industrial users committing significant violations can be assessed a 9 penalty based upon the economic benefit received. The amount of the penalty may be calculated using procedures outlined in the USEPA's Guidance Manual for POTW's to Calculate the Economic Benefit of Noncompliance (September, 1990). The Enforcement Response Guide will be utilized in determining the uses of each enforcement action. When the 1U fails to return to compliance following the initial enforcement response, the City shall escalate its enforcement response in a follow-up action. A description of the response actions follows: 1. Phone Call This is an informal communication between the City-and/or Control Authority to discuss situations that arise. This response could be used as the starting point for situations that are not significant in nature. 2. Notice of Violation The Notice of Violation (NOV) is an official communication from the City to the noncompliant industrial user that informs the user that a pretreatment violation has occurred. The purpose of the NOV is to notify the industrial user of the the violation(s) and to request a response within a given time period, usually within 10 working days. 3. Review meeting An informal meeting between the Industry and the Cioty and/or Control Authority to discuss a non compliance issue. This meeting can be at the request of the Industry and/or the City and is usually used as an avenue for discussion of the current situation and/or the sequence of events on impending action. 4. Administrative Orders An Administrative Order (AOs) are enforcement documents which direct industrial users to undertake and/or cease specified activities. The terms of AOs mayor may not be negotiated with industrial users. The AOs may incorporate compliance schedules, civil or criminal penalties, and termination of service orders. There are four types of AOs that the City may utilize alone or in combination. a. Cease and Desist Order A cease and desist order will direct a user to cease illegal unauthorized discharges 10 immediately or to terminate its discharge altogether. The order will be utilized in situations where the discharge could cause interference or pass-through at the treatment plant, or otherwise cause an emergency situation. The City may order immediate cessation of any discharge to its collection system, regardless ofa user's compliance status. If the user fails to comply with the order, the City may take independent action to halt the discharge, such as terminating water service or blocking the user's connection point. b. Consent Order The consent order is an agreement between the City and the industrial user nonnally containing three elements: 1) compliance schedules 2) stipulated fines or remedial actions 3) signatures of the City and industry representatives. c. Show Cause Order An order to show cause shall direct the user to appear before the City to explain its noncompliance, and show cause why more severe enforcement actions against the user should not be pursued. The show cause order/hearing may also also be used to investigate violations of previous orders. d. Compliance Order The compliance order shall direct the user to achieve or restore compliance by a date specified in the order. The tenns of the compliance order need not be discussed with the user prior to issuance. The order may be used to require a user to develop management practices, spill prevention programs, and any other related pretreatment program requirements. 5. Civil Litigation Civil litigation shall be the fonna] process offiling lawsuits against industrial users to secure court ordered actions to correct violations and to secure penalties for violations including the recovery of costs to the POTW of the noncompliance. Civil litigation shall also include enforcement measures which require involvement or approval by the courts, such as 11 injunctive relief and settlement agreements. It can be pursued when the corrective action required is costly and complex, orwhen the industrial user is considered to be unmanageable andlor unwilling to cooperate. Ci vii Litigation will be considered an appropriate enforcement response in three general si tuati ons: a. situations where injunctive relief is necessary to halt or prevent discharges which threaten human health or the environment, or interfere with the POTW; b. when efforts to restore compliance through cooperation with the industrial user have failed and a court supervised settlement (consent decree) is necessary to enforce program requirements; c. to impose civil penalties and or to recover losses incurred due to the noncompliance. The City will utilize three types ofcivil litigation either alone or in conjunction. They are as follows: a. Consent Decree An agreement between the City and the industrial user reached after a lawsuit has been filed. The decree will be signed by the judge assigned to the case. It will be used when the violator is willing to acknowledge and correct the noncompliance and the City and the violator agree on the penalty. The agreement can be formalized prior to a full hearing on the issues. b. Injunction A court order that will direct parties to follow an established procedure andlor to refrain from actions. An injunction can be utilized if the delays involved in filing a . suit would result in irreparable harm. A cease and desist order may be used in place of injunctive relief. c. Civil Penalties and Cost Recovery Reimbursement to the City andlor Control Authority by the industrial user to pay for all such expenses incurred in responding to the noncompliance, including restoration 12 of the physical treatment plant and collection system, payment for medical treatment of injured personnel, and indemnification for all fines assessed for TPDES permit violations. 6. Criminal Prosecution Criminal prosecution shall be the formal process of charging individuals andlor organizations with violations of ordinance provisions that are punishable, upon conviction, by fines andlor imprisonment. Its purpose is to punish noncompliance established through court proceedings and to deter future noncompliance. 7. Termination of Sewer Services Shall be the revocation of an industrial user's privilege to discharge industrial wastewater into the City's sewer system. Termination may be accomplished by physical severance of the industry's connection to the sewer system, by issuance of an administrative order which requires the user to terminate its discharge, or by a court ruling. Termination of sewer service can be considered an appropriate response to industries which have not responded adequately to previous previous enforcement remedies. A notice to the industrial user will be issued, when possible, to fulfill the due process requirements associated with service termination and enables the user to halt production in time to avoid backflows, spills, and other harm to its facility as well as time to look for alternative means of wastewater disposal. S. Supplemental Enforcement Responses These responses shall be designed to reinforce the compliance obligations ofindustrial users and shall be determined on an individual basis. The responses will be organized into two categories as follows: a. Public Notice As a requirement of 40 CFR 403.8(f){2){vii) an annual publication of a list of industrial users which were significantly violating applicable pretreatment standards or requirements during the calendar year will be employed. Publication of the list is intended to deter industrial users from committing pretreatment violations and to satisfy the public's right to know of violations affecting its immediate environment and causing additional expenditures of public funds to operate and maintain the 13 treatment system. b. Increased Monitoring and Reporting When an industrial user demonstrates a history of noncompliance they shall be subjected to increased surveillance (i.e., sampling and inspections) by the City. Additional self-monitoring and reporting may also be required of the industrial user until the problem is corrected and consistent compliance is demonstrated. The increased monitoring shall continue for a specific period of time or until continued compliance has been insured. VII. ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE GUIDE The enforcement response guide shall serve as a matrix describing violations and indicate a range of appropriate enforcement options. Itdefines the range ofenforcement actions based on the nature and severity of the violations and other relevant factors and is intended to promote consistent and timely use ofenforcement remedies. The guide allows the City to select from several altemati ve initial and follow-up actions. When an industrial user fails to return to compliance following enforcement response, the City shall "escalate" its enforcement response in a more stringent follow-up action. The City shall consider the following criteria when determining a proper response: -Magnitnde of the violation -Duration of the violation -Effect of the violation on the receiving water -Effect of the violation on the POTW -Compliance history of the industrial user -Good faith of the industrial user . Economic Benefit of Noncompliance The attached enforcement response guide identifies types ofcommon violations the City anticipates may be found, indicates what should be considered in determining which responses are appropriate for many of the common discharge and non-discharge violations, identifies initial and follow-up responses to the violations, and designates personnel responsible for administering each of these responses. 14 The following guidelines serves as a tool that is to be used as follows: 1. Locate the type of noncompliance in the first column and identify the most accurate description of the violation. 2. Assess the appropriateness of the recommended response(s) in column two. First offenders or users demonstrating "good faith" efforts may merit a more lenient response. Similarly, repeat offenders or those demonstrating negligence may require a more stringent response. 3. Apply the enforcement response to the industrial user. Specify corrective action or other responses required ofthe industrial user, if any. Column three indicates personnel by title to initiate each response. 4. Follow-up with escalated enforcement action if the industrial us.er's response is not received or violations continue. 15 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN SUMMARY OF ACTION I. MONITORING AND REPORTING lon-compliance . Reporting :. Self-Monitoring (if required) Nature of Non-compliance Report is improperly signed or certified If not corrected Report is late (more than 7 day Significantly late (30 days or more) Incomplete/Deficient reports Recurring Failure to report spill or changed discharge no harm Results in harm (no intent) (intent) Failure to monitor for all pollutants Second Occurrence Failure to monitor in correct location Enforcement Action Phone call or Letter -NOV -Review Meeting -possible AO -Phone call -Letter -NOV -SNC; published in newspaper -Possible AO -Phone Call or Letter -NOV -AO -Letter -NOV -Review Meeting -possible AO -Civil Action -Payment for costs/penalties -AO -Civil Action -Criminal Investigation -Retest -Increase monitoring -NOV -AO -NOV ·Retest in correct location ·Possible AO -Possible Civil Action P ' I . City City City City City City City City City City City : City 15 · MONITORING AND REPORTING (Continued) lon-compliance Nature of Non-compliance Enforcement Action Personnel : j. Compliance Report late -less than 7 days -Phone Call or Letter City Schedules Recurrence -Review meeting City -Possible AO Report late -more than 7 days, City less than 30 -NOV and/or Review Meetin -NOV30 or More days late City -Review Meeting -possible AO I Missed Final Milestone -Show Cause City (no reasonable cause for delay) -Civil Action -Terminate Service II. VIOLATIONS DETECTED DURING SITE VISITS L Entry Denied Entry denied and/or -Warrant obtained and City copies of records denie return to IU 2. Illegal Discharge No Harm -NOV City -Review Meeting -AO Recurring -Civil Action City -Criminal Action -Civil Action Causes Harm or evidence of City intent and/or neglect -Criminal Action 3. Improper Sampling Unintentional -NOV City Intentional -NOV 􀁾􀁁􀁏􀀠City I. Failure to Report Additional Monitoring Inspection finds additional City files -NOV -AORecurring City 16 II. DISCHARGE LIMIT VIOLATIONS lon-comOliance Nature of Non-comoliance Enforcement Action Personnel I. Violation of Permit Limit Isolated, Not Significant (parameter must be listed under Isolated, Significant, No Harm effluent limitations in the permit) Isolated, Cause Harm -NOV -Compliance Schedule -AO -Show Cause Order -Civil Action City City City Recurring, No Harm -AO -Civil Action City Recurring, Cause Harm -Show Cause Order -Civil Action -Terminate Service City 1. Slug anellor Unpermitted Discharge Unaware of Requirement No Harm -Phone Call -NOV with Application City Harm -AO -Civil Action City 3. Nonpermitted Discharge Unaware of Requirement No Harm -Phone Call -NOV -Resubmit permit application City Violation of Parameter not in permit iV. FALSIFICATION No Harm . -Notified of Violation of City Ordinance -Permit Amendment to include Parameter violated City 1. Suspected Commence investigation -Steps as necessary to obtain information City 2. Proven Depending on Severity -Review Meeting -Show Cause -Civil Action City 3. Good Faith Acted in good faith, no reason to believe intent -Phone Call -Review Meeting City 17 I. NON-EFFLUENT VIOLATIONS I. Permit Violations 2. Equipment 􀁾􀀮􀀠Failure to Mitigate Noncompliance t Inadequate Records Dilution in lieu of treatment Recurring Fail to maintain equipment in operable order Results in violation (first time) Second Time Further incidents Good Faith effort demonstratec Intent Good Faith effort demonstratec Intent -NOV with date to correct -AO with possible show cause -Depending on Magnitude NOV -Review Meeting -AO -Show Cause -Civil Action -Show Cause -AO -Civil Action -Review Meeting -AD -Civil Action City City City City City City City City \. All violations will be identified and documented within ten working days of receiving compliance information. I. Violations which threaten health, property or environmental quality are considered emergencies and will receive immediate responses such as halting the discharges or terminating service. 16 TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. __ AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 82, "UTILITIES," OF TIlE TOWN OF ADDISON CODE OF ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING REVISED STANDARDS FOR TIlE HANDLING OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER; MAKING CERTAIN SEMANTIC, GRAMMATICAL AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES; APPROVING TIlE ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF ADDISON, ATTACIlED IlERETO AS EXHIBIT A; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $2000.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE TOWN OF ADDISON, TEXAS: Section 1. That Division 7 of Article III, "Sewers," of Chapter 82, "Utilities," of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Addison is hereby amended to read as follows: "DIVISION 7. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER STANDARDS Sec. 82-172 GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec.82·172.1 Purpose and Policy This division sets forth unifonn requirements for users of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works for the Town of Addison and enables Addison to comply with all applicable State and Federal laws, including the Clean Water Act (33 United States Code § 1251 et seq.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter I, Subchapter N, Part 403). The objectives of this division are: A. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Publicly Owned Treatment Works that will interfere with its operation; B. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Publicly Owned Treatment Works that will pass through the Publicly Owned Treatment Works, inadequately treated, into receiving waters, or otherwise be incompatible with the Publicly Owned Treatment Works; C. To protect both Publicly Owned Treatment Works personnel who may be affected by wastewater and sludge in the course of their employment and the general public; -1 D. To promote reuse and recycling of industrial wastewater and sludge from the Publicly Owned Treatment Works; E. To provide for fees for the equitable distribution of the cost of operation, malntenance, and improvement of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works; and F. To enable the Control Authority to comply with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit conditions, sludge use and disposal requirements, and any other Federal or State laws to which the Publicly Owned Treatment Works is subject. This division shall apply to all users of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works. It authorizes the issuance of wastewater discharge permits; provides for monitoring, compliance, and enforcement activities; establishes administrative review procedures; requires user reporting; and provides for the setting of fees for the equitable distribution of costs resulting from the program established herein. Sec. 82-172.2 Administration Except as otherwise provided herein, the Environmental Services Official shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of this division. Any powers granted to or duties imposed upon the Environmental Services Official may be delegated by the Environmental Services Official to other Addison personnel. Sec. 82-172.3 Abbreviations The following abbreviations, when used in this di vision, shall have the designated meanings: BOD -Biochemical Oxygen Demand CFR -Code of Federal Regulations COD -Chemical Oxygen Demand EPA -U.S. Environmental Protection Agency gpd -gallons per day mgll -milligrams per liter NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System POTW -Publicly Owned Treatment Works, RCRA -Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SIC -Standard Industrial Classification Sill -Significant Industrial User TCEQ -Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TPDES -Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System TRA -Trinity River Authority TSS -Total Suspended Solids TIO -Total Toxic Organics U.S.C. -United States Code Sec. 82·172.4 Definitions Unless a provision explicitly states otherwise, the following terms and phrases, as used in this division, shall have the meanings hereinafter designated. A. Act or "the·Act." The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. B. Approval Authority. The Regional Administrator of EPA or the Director of a state agency delegated to act on EPA's behalf with an approved pretreatment program (e.g. Director of TCEQ). C. Authorized Representative of the User. (1) If the user is a corporation: (a) The president, secretary, treasurer, or a vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-maldng functions functions for the corporation; or (b) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operation facilities employing more than two hundred fifty (250) persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding twenty-five (25) million dollars (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. (2) If the user is a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or proprietor, respectively. -3 􀁾􀁮􀁴It; 1036S76 (3) If the user is a Federal, State, or local governmental facility: a director or highest official appointed or designated to oversee the pperation and performance of the activities of the government facility, or their designee. (4) The individuals described in paragraphs 1 through 3, above, may designate another authorized representative if the authorization is in writing, the authorization specifies the individual or position responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge originates or having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company, and the written authorization is submitted to the Town of Addison. D. Biochemical Oxygen Demand or BOD. The quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedures for five (5) days at 20° centigrade, usually expressed as a concentration (e.g., mgll). E. Categorical Pretreatment Standard or Categorical Standard. Any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. § 1317) which apply to a specific category of users and which appear in 40 CPR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405471. . F. Addison. The Town of Addison or the City Council of Addison, Contracting Party of the Trinity River Authority'S Central Regional Wastewater System. G. Composite Sample. A sample that is collected over time, formed either by continuous sampling or by mixing discrete samples. The sample may be composited either as a time composite sample: composed of discrete sample aliquots collected at . constant time intervals providing a sample irrespective of stream flow; or as a flow proportional composite sample: collected either as a constant sample volume at time intervals proportional to flow, or collected by increasing the volume of each aliquot as the flow increases while maintaining a constant time interval between the aliquots. H. Control Authority. Trinity River Authority of Texas as holder of the NPDES permit. I. Environmental Protection Agency or EPA. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or, where appropriate, the Regional Water Management Division Director, or other duly authorized official of said agency. J. Environmental Services Official. The person designated by the City who is charged with certain duties and responsibilities by this ordinance, or a duly authorized representative. K. Existing Source. Any source of discharge, the construction or operation of which commenced prior to the publication by EPA of proposed categorical pretreatment standards, which will be applicable to such source if the standard is thereafter promulgated in accordance with Section 307 of the Act. 4 L. Grab Sample. A sample which is taken from a waste stream without regard to the flow in the wastestream and over a period of time not to exceed fifteen (15) minutes. M. Indirect Discharge or Discharge. The introduction of pollutants into the POTW from any nondomestic source regulated under Section 307(b), (c), or (d) of the Act. N. Industrial User. An industry that discharges wastewater into the wastewater system. O. Instantaneous Maximum Allowable Discharge Limit. The maximum concentration of a pollutant allowed to be discharged at any time, determined from the analysis of any discrete or composited sample collected, independent of the industrial flow rate and the duration of the sampling event. P. Interference. A discharge, which alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations or its sludge processes, use or disposal; and therefore, is a cause of a violation of the Control Authority's NPDES permit or of the prevention of sewage sludge use or disposal in compliance with any of the following statutory/regulatory provisions or permits issued thereunder, or any more stringent State or local regulations: Section 405 of the Act; the Solid Waste Disposal Act, including Title II commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); 40 CFR 503 sludge regulations; any State regulations contained in any State sludge management plan prepared pursuant to Subtitle D of the Solid Waste Disposal Act and 30 TAC 312; the Clean Air Act; the Toxic Substances Control Act; and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. Q. Medical Waste. Isolation wastes, infectious agents, human blood and blood products, pathological wastes, sharps, body parts, contaminated bedding, surgical wastes, potentially contaminated laboratory wastes, and dialysis wastes. R. NPDES