􀁾􀁉􀁥􀀡􀁦􀁲􀁾􀁢􀀴􀀧􀀰􀀠􀁒􀁅􀁑􀁕􀁅􀁾􀁩􀁆􀁏􀁒􀁓􀁔􀁁􀁔􀁅􀁍􀁅􀁎􀁔􀁓􀁏􀁆􀁑􀁕􀁁􀁌􀁉􀁆􀁬􀁾􀁁􀁔􀁉􀁏􀁎􀁓􀀠(jG,,: IZ':;-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES TOWN OF ADDISON The Town of Addison is seeking
Statements of Qualifications from experienced engineering firms to provide traffic engineering services related to the development and implementation of coordinated signal timing plans
for Belt Line and Midway Roads. The scope of the project includes all Belt Line Road signals between Dallas Parkway and Marsh Lane and all Midway Road signals between Spring Valley Road
and Lindbergh Drive. Also included is all necessary coordination with adjacent municipalities (Dallas, Carrollton and Farmers Branch) to insure optimum vehicle progression across city
boundaries. Addison will accept written Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) from engineering consultants through January 5, 2001. Four (4) copies of the SOQ shall be submitted. The SOQ
should contain a maximum number of thirty (30) single sided pages on 8-1/2" x 1J" paper. The engineering firm should provide enough information to demonstrate the firm's ability to design
the project. The SOQ shall designate the individuals who will be assigned to the project (principal-in-Charge, Project Manager, Project Engineer, etc.) and resumes for each individual.
A list of similar projects in scope and size to those listed which the firm has completed in the last five (5) years shaH be provided. For each project, a description shall be provided
along with project cost, completion date, names of design team members involved in the project, name of the client, contact person and phone number for contact person. All written Statements
of Qualifications submitted will be evaluated by the Selection Committee, which will be made up of Mike Murphy, P.E., Director of Public Works; James C. Pierce, Jr., P .E., Assistant
Public Works Direetor; Steve Chutchian, P .E., Assistant City Engineer; and Robin Jones, Street Superintendent. The review of the SOQ's will be based on the selection criteria shown
on the attached page. The SOQ should specifically address each criterion for evaluation. If it is deemed necessary, the top ranking firms will be asked to meet with thc Town and make
oral presentations. The firm the Town deems most qualified will then present a proposal to perform the work and a fee will be negotiated. The design contract will go to thc City Council
for approval. Interested consultants should direct questions to Robin Jones at (972)-450-2849. Submit Statements of Qualifications to: Mailing: James C. Pierce, Jr., P.E. Assistant Public
Works Director P.O. Box 9010 Addison, TX 75001·9010 Street: 16801 Westgrove Addison, TX 75001 Phone: (972)-450-2879 Fax: (972)-450-2837 
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER 1. The finn's experience in successfully perfonning 0-10 4 similar assignments, scope, and size for others within the last five
(5) years, by personnel still on the fmn's staff. PYI'JeJ-􀁾􀁾􀁾􀀮􀀮􀁦􀀭􀁥􀀮􀀭2. Professional background 􀁯􀁦􀁾p9l'iQAAei 0-10 4 and experience in engineering, 􀀢􀀧􀁟􀀧􀀸􀁾􀀧􀁩􀁡􀁧􀀠II'llei,
project administration, and resident project I -AA 􀁾􀀮􀀠representation. The finn's current staff, 0.$ W-e./t ...$ 􀁳􀀢􀁢􀀬􀁾􀀢􀁴􀀮􀁊􀀬􀀱􀀢􀀤􀀠􀁾􀁔􀁌􀀠􀁾􀁾􀁜􀁩􀁺􀁥and related experience,e
qualified 􀁾􀁴􀁯provide the desired service. 􀁾􀁈􀀮􀁬􀀠3. Location of main office and/or branch 0-10 I office that will provide services and experience in the local area. 􀁉􀁾􀁴􀁬􀁴􀀠􀀬􀀬􀁾􀀠4.
.-AManagement 􀁡􀁰􀁰􀁲􀁯􀁡􀁾􀁲􀁯􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁴􀁊􀁁􀁾􀀠0-10 􀀧􀁾􀁴􀁴􀀻􀁥􀁴􀀧􀁵􀁦􀀢􀀻􀁽􀁾􀀻􀀻􀀧􀀧􀀧􀁾􀁾􀀠 5. Technical approach 􀁴􀁯􀁾􀁪􀁥􀁣􀁾􀀠0-10 I t!nclttde compUl\:n capacity.' Previous
clien or similar projects x ress 0-10 2l' satisfaction with th s wo s ort listed finns only, if necessary). Oral presentation (short listed finns only 0-10 4 if necessary). 0-10 \ 
HUITT-ZOLLARS, INC. AUBREY C. ADCOCK, P.E. 3131 MCKlNNEY,#600 DALLAS, TX 75204 PARSON TRANS. GROUP DAVE CARTER, P.E. 5485 BELT LINE RD., #199 DALLAS, TX 75240 DESHAZO, TANG & ASSO.,
INC. JOHN 1. DESHAZO, JR.,P.E. 330 UNION STA nON DALLAS, TX 75202 KlMLEY-HORN & ASSO. BRIAN K. SHEWSKl 12700 PARK CENTRAL DR. #1800 DALLAS, TX 75251 JACK HATCHELL & ASSO. JACK HATCHELL,
P.E. P.O. BOX 260119 PLANO, TX 75026-0119 HNTBCORP. JERRY HOLDER, P.E. 14114 DALLAS PKWY., #630] DALLAS, TX 75240 CARTER & BURGESS JOHN N. LINDNER, P.E. 7950 ELMBROOK DR., #250 DALLAS,
TX 75247 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 􀁾􀀺􀀻􀀮􀀻􀀻􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂮􀀠Post Office Box 9010 Addison. Te:x.as 􀀷􀀵􀀰􀀰􀀱􀁾􀀹􀀨􀁮􀁏􀀠(972) 450-2871 16801 Westgrove January 24,2001 Mr. Dave.N. Carter, P.E.,
P.T.D.E. Parsons Transportation Group Inc. 5485 Belt Line Road, Suite 199 Dallas, TX 75240 Re: Traffic Engineering Services Dear Mr. Carter: This is to advise that Kimley-Horn and Associates
has been selected to provide traffic .engineering services for our Belt LinelMidway signal timfug project. This is to also thank you for your response to the request for qualifications.
We appreciate the time and effort you took to respond and hope that you will continue to seek work with the Town ofAddison in the future. Very truly yours, Town of Addison 􀁾􀁩􀁥􀁲􀁣􀁥􀀬Jr.,
P.E. Assistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Works 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀁾􀂮􀀠Post Office 􀁾9010 Addison. Texas 75001-9010 (972) 450-2871 16801 Westgrove January 24,2001 Mr. Benjamin J. Biller, P.E. HNTB 14114 Dallas
Parkway, Suite 630 DaUas, TX 75240-4381 Re: Traffic Engineering Services Dear Mr. Biller: This is to advise that Kimley-Horn and Associates has been selected to provide traffic engineering
services for our Belt LinelMidway signal timing project. This is to also thank you for your response to the request for qualifications. We appreciate the time and effort you took to
respond and hope that you will continue to seek work with the Town of Addison in the future. Very truly yours, Town ofAddison 􀁊􀁾􀀧􀁾􀁫􀀮􀁐􀀮􀁅􀀮􀀠 Assistant Public Works Director cc:
Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Works 
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT (972) 450-2871 Poat Office Box 9010 Addison. Texas 15001-9010 }6801 Westgrove '. January 24,2001 Mr. Brian K. Shewski, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates 12700
Park Central Drive, Suite 1800 Dallas, TX 75251 Re: Traffic Engineering Services Dear Mr. Shewski: I am pleased to announce that your firm has been selected to provide to provide traffic
engineering services for our Belt LinelMidway signal timing project. I will be in contact with you in the near future for a meeting to discuss a scope and fee proposal for the project.
Very truly yours, Town ofAddison 􀀢􀁣􀁰􀁾􀁾sistant Public Works Director cc: Chris Terry, Assistant City Manager Michael E. Murphy, P.E., Director ofPublic Works 
BELT LINE/MIDWAY SIGNAL TIM.;:.;.;..IN:..;:G'-----l Evaluation Scores -Criteria Nos. 1 thru 5 Kimley Name Hom Robin (1) 92 Jim m 101 I,;;M::.::ik:::,e_-+_ (I) 108 Totals 301 Ranking
First Parsons HNTB {:ill 83 (1;) 84 (iJ 87 :n 51 ('S) 􀀸􀀰􀁾93.5 250 228.5 Second Third 
" ." EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER l. The fInn's experience in successfully performing 0-10 􀀧􀀵􀁾􀀴􀀠l'1similar assignments, scope, and size for others within
the last fIve (5) years, by personnel still on the fIrm's staff. 2. Professional background of key personnel 0-10 q'f-A )..C!Jand experience in engineering, surveying and project administration,
and resident project representation. The fIrm's current staff, both size and related experience, is qualifIed to provide the desired service. 3. Location ofmain office and/or branch
0-10 101'1 10 office that will provide services and experience in the local area. 4. Management approach to projects. 0-10 6'A 1 5(Include schedule and budget programs.) 5. Technical
approach to projects. 0-10 1'rt... 1 Y.(Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express 0-10 2 -satisfaction with the fIrm's work (short listed fIrms only,
if necessary). 7. Oral presentation (short listed firmS only 0-10 4 if necessary). 5' l 
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER 1. The furn' s experience in successfully performing 0-10 41 rS similar assignments, scope, and size for others within the last
five (5) years, by personnel still on the finn's staff. 2. Professional background ofkey personnel 0-10 1 .4 􀁉􀀩􀀭􀁾􀀠 and'experience in engineering, surveying and project administration,
and resident project representation. The furn's current staff, , both size and related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 3. Location ofmain office andlor branch
0-10 g 1 , office that will provide services and experience in the local area. 4. Management approach to projects. 0-10 1􀁾􀀠(Include schedule and budget programs.) 5. Technical approach
to projects. 0-10 1 CO􀁾􀀠(Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express 0-10 I 2 satisfaction with the finn's work (short listed fmns only, ifnecessary).
*1</. 7. Oral presentation (short listed finns only 0-10 4 ifnecessary). ,4􀁾gu 
. 􀀮􀀮􀁾􀀮􀀠---, --.; -.'C, EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER I. The firm's experience in successfully performing 0-10 q 4 􀁾􀁦􀁰􀀠similar assignments, scope, and
size for others within the last five (5) years, by personnel still on the firm's staff. 2. Professional background ofkey personnel 0-10 4 "7-ZBand experience in engineering, surveying
and project administration, and resident project representation. The firm's current staff, both size and related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. g.<j3. Location
ofmain office and/or branch 0-10 office that will provide services and 6·'6 1 experience in the local area. 4. Management approach to projects. 0-10 1:"" IOJ?(Include schedule and budget
programs.) /'5. Technical approach to projects. 0-10 1􀁾􀀮􀀧􀀷(Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express 0-10 If) cr .":1 ,./satisfaction with the
firm's work (short listed firms only, ifnecessary). 7. Oral presentation (short listed firms only 0-0-10 4 . r3 15 if necessary). 􀁾􀀠
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING I. The fIml's experience in successfully perfonning similar assignments, scope, and size for others within the last five (5) years, by personnel still
on the finn's staff. 2. Professional background ofkey personnel and experience in engineering, surveying and project administration, and resident project representation. The finn's current
staff, both size and related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 3. Location ofmain office and/or branch . office that will provide services and . experience in
the local area. 4. Management approach to projects. (Include schedule and budget programs.) 5. Technical approach to projects. (Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar
projects express satisfaction with the finn's work (short listed flmls only, if necessary). 7. Oral presentation (short listed flmls only if necessary). POINTS MULTIPLIER 0-10 411l 10
40 0-10 ,f) 4 0-10 1q 1 /" 0-10 􀁣􀁴􀀬􀁾􀀠qh /"" 0-10 q,t;; 1 􀁱􀀮􀁾􀀠 0-10 {O 􀀱􀁾􀀧􀀶􀀠0-10 4 􀁾IDf{ 
􀁾􀀧􀀮􀀠 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIERJ 1. The finn's experience in successfully perfonning 0-10 q{-4 􀁪􀁾similar assignments, scope, and size for others within
the last five (5) years, by personnel still on the fum's staff. 2. . Professional background ofkey personnel 0-10 C(K"4 􀀳􀁾and experience in engineering, surveying and project administration,
and resident project representation. The fum's current staff, both size arid related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 3. Location ofmain office and/or branch
0-10 Cj'f-.l office that will provide services and experience in the. local area. 4. Management approach to projects. 0-10 }eH-I /0 (Include schedule and budget programs.) 5. Technical
approach to projects. 0-10 ItO;"1 /0(Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express 0-10 2 satisfaction with the fInn'S work (short listed fums only, ifnecessary).
7. Oral presentation (short listed fums only 0-10 4 if necessary). [D '/
· .-,"" 􀀢􀀧􀁾􀀧􀀠: "" EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING 
􀀬􀀮􀀺􀀧􀁾􀀠, 􀁾􀀮􀀠", EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER 1. The fum's experience in successfully performing 0-10 4 ;.c7similar assignments, scope, and size for others
within the last five (5) years, by personnel still on the fum's staff. 2. . Professional background ofkey personnel 0-10 7 4 􀀻􀁺􀀮􀁾􀀠 and experience in engineering, surveying and project
administration, and resident project representation. The fum's current staff, . both size and related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 3. Location ofmain office
andlor branch 0-10 fo I , office that will provide services and experience in the local area. 4. Management approach to projects. 0-10 'K 1 (Include schedule and budget programs.) 5.
Technical approach to projects. 0-10 r 1 (Include computer capacity.) 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express 0-10 '} 2 11 􀁾􀀠satisfaction with the firm's work (short listed
fums only, ifnecessary). ()·7. Oral presentation (short listed fums only 0-10 4 'f. ifnecessary). 't,? -l't '"'" t3 10 
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER 1. The firm's experience in successfully performing similar assignments, scope, and size for others within the last five (5) years,
by personnel still on the firm's staff. 0-10 7 4 ;l.g" 2. Professional background ofkey personnel and experience in engineering, surveying and project administration, and resident project
representation. The firm's current staff, both size and related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 0-10 3 4 3.2.. 3. Location of main office andlor branch office
that will provide services and experience in the local area. 0-10 i 1 i 4. Management approach to projects. (Include schedule and budget programs.) 0-10 C (;, 5. Technical approach to
projects. (Include computer capacity.) 0-10 'f 1 r 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express satisfaction with the firm's work (short listed firms only, if necessary). 0-10 3
2 If, 'f.. 7. Oral presentation (short listed firms only if necessary). 0-10 4 0 -J(J{/.--IV.-8''1
j(.. ,,,:,.:... EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ENGINEERING POINTS MULTIPLIER I. The finn's experience in successfully perfonning similar assignments, scope, and size for others within the last
five (5) years, by personnel still on the finn's staff. 0-10 g 4 2. . Professional background of key personnel and experience in engineering, surveying and project administration, and
resident project representation. The finn's current staff, both size arid related experience, is qualified to provide the desired service. 0-10 'I 3. Location ofmain office and/or branch
. office that will provide services and . experience in the local area. 0-10., . I 4. Management ap£lroach to projects. (Include schedule and budget programs.) 0·10 I(J I 5. Technical
approach to projects. (Include computer capacity.) 0-10 f I r 6. Previous clients. For similar projects express satisfaction with the finn's work (short listed firms only, if necessary).
0·10 'g 2 7. Oral presentation (short listed fl1'lDS only if necessary). 0-10 IP